Electronic Discovery. Dan Bishop Bishop London Brophy & Dodds, P.C.



Similar documents
COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York

E-Discovery: New to California 1

THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS

Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5

E-DISCOVERY GUIDELINES. Former Reference: Practice Directive #6 issued September 1, 2009

The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

grouped into five different subject areas relating to: 1) planning for discovery and initial disclosures; 2)

Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP

ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL ******************************************************************************

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

Archiving and The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Understanding the Issues

Developing an Integrated e-discovery and Corporate Records Management Program. Presented by: Janeine Charpiat Information Security Professional

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

Preservation and Production of Electronic Records

E-Discovery for Paralegals: Definition, Application and FRCP Changes. April 27, 2007 IPE Seminar

THE PURSUIT OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. co-authored by. Andy D. Birchfield, Jr. 1 & Keith Altman 2

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

Understanding ediscovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI)

2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery?

Records Retention & E-Discovery. Preserving Electronically Stored Information for Litigation

E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.

Computer-Based Discovery in Federal Civil Litigation * I. Potential Advantages of Computer-Based Discovery

New Amendments to Rule 26 Dictate Use of Electronic Discovery Technology by Larry Johnson, Esq. Director, Electronic Discovery Services

Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery

Agenda 1) Applicable Disclosure Requirements 2) Records Retention for 3) Confidentiality Obligations 4) Management Strategies 2

E-Discovery Perils: The AutoArchive Function Not Gone, But Forgotten?

Electronic Discovery and Disclosure:

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery

Data Preservation Duties and Protocols

Acknowledgments Introduction: Welcome to the Labyrinth. CHAPTER 1 Gathering the Evidence 1. CHAPTER 2 Third-Party Experts 25

Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES

PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

B. Preservation is not limited to simply avoiding affirmative acts of destruction because day-to-day operations routinely alter or destroy evidence.

How to Win the Battle Over Electronic Discovery in Employment Cases. By Philip L. Gordon, Esq.

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DATA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

The E-Discovery Process

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents

Document Retention & Destruction Policies for Digital Data What You Don't Know Can Hurt You

REED COLLEGE. ediscovery GUIDELINES FOR PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents?

A PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS. MDLA TTS August 23, 2013

University of Louisiana System

Protecting Electronic Data From Court Design

Friday 31st October, 2008.

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry

Electronic Evidence and Discovery: The Changes in the Federal Rules. April 25, 2007 Bill Belt

Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions in Electronic Discovery. Discovering What There Is to Discover

STRATEGIES FOR ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

Case 6:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Electronic Data Retention and Preservation Policy 1

Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys

The e-discovery edge: Expertise and preparation can save millions *

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK

California Enacts New E-Discovery Rules that Mirror Federal Court E-Discovery Rules - with One Exception

In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum

ediscovery: The New Information Management Battleground Developments in the Law and Best Practices

SOMEONE S WATCHING: PROTECTING PRIVILEGE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE TABLE DURING ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

Supreme Court of Florida

Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions

Electronic Discovery in Civil Litigation. Stanley D. Ference III Ference & Associates

Electronic Data What Does it Include, its Retention and Disclosure

Measures Regarding Litigation Holds and Preservation of Electronically Stored Information (ESI)

E-Discovery Quagmires An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CISA, CISM, FLMI Final Draft for February 2007 CSI Alert


WHOSE NEEDLE? WHOSE HAYSTACK?: COST ALLOCATION IN ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Stephen F. McKinney, Esq. Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.

Any and all documents Meets Electronically Stored Information: Discovery in the Electronic Age

Archiving: Common Myths and Misconceptions

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production

State of Michigan Records Management Services. Frequently Asked Questions About E mail Retention

Article originally appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of The Professional Engineer

Electronic Discovery Reference Model and Metadata October 7, Peter S. Vogel, Adjunct. Copyright, Peter S. Vogel,

E-Discovery in Practice: A Roadmap for Financial Institutions

and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance

Civil Antitrust Litigation in the United States: Implications for Ireland and the European Community

COMING: NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-DISCOVERY

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT ( ) Fall 2014

Case 2:14-cv KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Electronic Discovery

STATE OF WYOMING Electronic Mail Policy

E-Discovery Best Practices

Proactive Data Management for ediscovery

CIVIL DISCOVERY STANDARDS* AUGUST 1999 [NOVEMBER 2003 DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY STANDARDS]

Legal Developments in ediscovery: Implications for Security Management

Elements of a Good Document Retention Policy. Discovery Services WHITE PAPER

RESPONDING TO SUBPOENAS AND REQUESTS FOR EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES. I. Purpose 1. II. Scope

WHITE PAPER Archiving: The Facts Behind The Myths

ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE THE TEXT MESSAGE

Best Practices in Electronic Record Retention

How To Write A Hit Report On A Lawsuit Against A Company

E-discovery: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and their Implications for Public Sector Corrections Departments

Transcription:

Electronic Discovery Dan Bishop Bishop London Brophy & Dodds, P.C.

Computers... 93% of the world s information is now generated and stored in digital form 3.4 trillion e-mail messages were sent in 1998, including 343 billion in the U.S The average office worker in the U.S. sends and receives an average of 60 e-mails a day

... and the law The number of law firms using computers for legal research increased from 5% in 1992 to 72% in 1995 The number of attorneys who had computers at their desks rose from 7% in 1986 to 88% in 1995

Types of Computer Materials Client: databases, records, e-mail, reports, memos, software, hardware inspection Attorney: case management databases, memos, e-mails, software Experts: databases, memos, models, software

Issues -E-mail: the new smoking gun -Siemens Solar Indus. v. Argo - As it appears that (Argo s solar technology) is a pipe dream, let Siemens have the pipe -Sexual Discrimination Case - Get rid of that tight-assed bitch -Deleted is not shredded until it is overwritten

Discovery What do you request? How do you request? Do you need an expert? Daubert issues

Inspection/Access Does the party producing discovery have to allow inspection? Who pays? Irony of cost advantages Who reviews? Privileges?

Privileges Attorney Client Work product Inadvertent disclosure How do you waive?

Federal Rules Rule 34 1970 other data compilations from which information can be obtained Rule 26 discovery can be limited if unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or it is obtained from some other source that is more convenient... Rule 26 discovery may be limited if burden or expense outweighs likely benefit

Texas Rules Rule 192.3 electronic recordings, data and data compilations Rule 196.4-- Party must specifically request production and specify form Responding party must produce electronic or magnetic data that is responsive and is reasonably available in its ordinary course of business If cannot comply through reasonable efforts, object Extraordinary steps required to retrieve must be paid by requesting party if required to comply

Requesting Discovery Request for Production, Interrogatories Define documents in your request to include every type of material needed State it is a request under R. 196.4 Specify form, e,g. request for disks, CD, inspection, printout Deposition? Preservation letter?

Specific Requests Which computers? Desktop, home, laptop, fileserver, palm pilot? Operating system? How is system backed up? How does email system work? Local machine, file server, Internet

Experts Experts to review system? Testify? Daubert issues-kumho Tire Court appointed expert Joint expert

Inspection Early cases: Fennell v. First Step Design ; Strasser v. Yalamanchi Newer cases: Playboy v. Welles ; Simon Property Group v. mysimon, Inc. Procedure for inspection

Shifting costs Barbara Caulfield article, fn. 21 Cases that have shifted or refused to compel Zonoras v. General Motors proportionality test Anti-Monopoly v. Hasbro pay for special programming Sattar v. Motorola 1/2 shift

Cases with no shift of costs Bills v. Kennecott information should be available, defendant set up system In re Brand Name Pres. Drugs Antitrust Litigation required responding party to pay for 30 million pages of email data stored on backup tapes

Privilege Issues Federal Work product: opinion v. ordinary or fact Texas Work product: core work product Database management systems more than just facts? Attorney client privilege Waiver issues

Sanctions Permanent deletion of email-spoliation? Cabinetware v. Sullivan deleted earlier version of source code American Bankers v. Caruth-death penalty sanctions for failing to produce information

Practical Guidelines Implement specific e-document retention policy, with litigation provisions Educate on e-mail Organize e-mail