MOBILE DEVICES, TRAVEL AND CYBER-SECURITY ISSUES FOR



Similar documents
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Michael H. TARKOFF, Defendant-Appellant. No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Export Controls. How to Comply with Export Controls. By Kimberly Marshall

STATE OF MAINE WADE R. HOOVER. [ 1] Wade R. Hoover appeals from an order of the trial court (Murphy, J.)

Case 1:03-cr LEK Document 24 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 7. Petitioner, Respondent. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER 1

Case 1:09-cr PLF Document 30 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Harvard Export Control Compliance Policy Statement

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO IA SCT

Case 2:03-cr JES Document 60 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 7 PageID 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

APPENDIX B ABOUT U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION: MISSION AND CORE VALUES

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 307 WDA 2014

CHAPTER. What is Criminal Justice? Criminal Justice: Criminal Justice: Criminal Justice: What is the Definition of Crime?

General District Courts

CRIMINAL DEFENSE FAQ. QUESTION: Am I required to allow law enforcement be allowed to search my house or my car?

Case 2:04-cv LSC-JEO Document 5 Filed 03/18/05 Page 1 of 7

. ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE NO Shelby County

Chapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures

C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

A PRIMER: WHAT STATE DEFENDERS MUST KNOW ABOUT FEDERAL LAW. Wendy Holton Attorney, Helena, Montana

SUMMARY OF KEY SECTIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001 By Richard Horowitz, Esq.

SPECIAL RECOMMENDATION IX: CASH COURIERS DETECTING AND PREVENTING THE CROSS-BORDER TRANSPORTATION OF CASH BY TERRORISTS AND OTHER CRIMINALS

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0675n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Edward Lowery III. Special Agent in Charge Criminal Investigative Division, U.S. Secret Service. Prepared Testimony

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

ITAR Export Control Laws

Key Elements of International Trade Compliance. Presented by:

System Overview ~~~~~ Presented by: Darcie McElwee

BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY

C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C

Criminal Justice Curriculum Maps. Unit 1: Introduction to Government and Law Unit 2: Crime Unit 3: Due Process

A Federal Criminal Case Timeline

Overview. Chapter 1: 1.1 Purpose of Manual 2

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

THE FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT -INFORMER- MONTHLY LEGAL RESOURCE AND COMMENTARY FOR FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND AGENTS

Police Interaction: On and Off Campus. Last Updated January 2010

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. KAREN BATTLE, Appellant

Criminal appeals. Page 1 of 19 Criminal appeals version 3.0 Published for Home Office staff on 08 July 2015

Defendant brought a Motion to Suppress the DNA Testing Results or in the alternative,

People v Bakntiyar 2014 NY Slip Op 32137(U) June 27, 2014 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 10521/2012 Judge: Danny K.

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX

United States v. Jones: The Government s Use of a GPS Tracking Device Constitutes a Search within the Meaning of the Fourth Amendment

Export Controls: What are they? Why do we care?

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

CONDUCT A NEBRASKA SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF YOUR HOME?

Department, Board, Or Commission Author Bill Number

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

State v. XXXXXX XXXXX County Case No. XX-CF-XXXX

I. WHAT IF THE POLICE, FBI OR DHS AGENTS CONTACT ME?

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. v. CASE NO.: 1D

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Immigration Consequences of Criminal Conduct

Attorney General Balderas Criminal Affairs Update to Courts, Corrections & Justice Interim Committee

F I L E D February 1, 2013

A Primer on U.S. Export Controls

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 49th DISTRICT COURT ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS

CHALLENGING CRIMINAL HISTORY CALCULATIONS

State Laws Legalizing Marijuana Do Not Make Marijuana Legal Under

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATEMENT OF JOSEPH S. CAMPBELL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BEFORE THE

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Committee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference Thursday, January 15, 2015

Posting Bail. First Court Appearance

Restoration of Civil Rights. Helping People regain their Civil Liberties

Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia Transition Into Prosecution Program

Case 1:13-cr SS Document 79 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

THE MCCRUM LAW OFFICE,

Case 1:05-cr GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO.

Case 1:07-cv PGC Document 12 Filed 07/20/07 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

STATE OF TENNESSEE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 24, Opinion No QUESTIONS

Chapter 13 Procedure (Last Updated: May 13, 2013) Chapter 13.A Speedy Trial Chapter 13.B Recorded Interrogations

MASSACHUSETTS WARRANTLESS CELL PHONE SEARCHES CASE HEADS TO THE SUPREME COURT

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Federal Criminal Court

MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT REGIONAL COUNSEL (CRIMINAL TAX) SUBJECT: Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Jeremy Johnson was convicted of making false statements to a bank in

WILLIAM C. SNYDER Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall, Room 268 Syracuse, NY

Glossary of Court-related Terms

United States Court of Appeals

DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS

United States District Court Southern District of Florida MIAMI DIVISION

xtra redit A Classroom Study of a Supreme Court of Ohio Case

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. LUIS ANTONIO RIQUIAC QUEUNAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. No. 383, Submitted: October 23, 2014 Decided: December 3, 2014

N.5 Immigration Holds and Immigration Detention; When to Obtain Release from Criminal Incarceration, and When Not To

LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller

Transcription:

MOBILE DEVICES, TRAVEL AND CYBER-SECURITY ISSUES FOR DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA Nelson G. Dong Dorsey & Whitney LLP Seattle, WA Orange County Aerospace & Defense Forum Costa Mesa, CA August 1, 2013 2 1

2013 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WHITE PAPER ON CHINESE MILITARY China utilizes a large, well organized network of enterprises, defense factories, affiliated research institutes, and computer network operations to facilitate the collection of sensitive information and export-controlled technology, as well as basic research and science that supports U.S. defense system modernization. Many of the organizations comprising China s military industrial complex have both military and civilian research and development functions. This network of government-affiliated companies and research institutes often enables the PLA to access sensitive and dual use technologies or knowledgeable experts under the guise of civilian research and development. The enterprises and institutes accomplish this through technology conferences and symposia, legitimate contracts and joint commercial ventures, partnerships with foreign firms, and joint development of specific technologies. As in previous years, China utilized its intelligence services and employed other illicit approaches that involve violations of U.S. laws and export controls to obtain key national security technologies, controlled equipment, and other materials not readily obtainable through commercial means or academia. 3 A SMALL AEROSPACE COMPANY Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc. (AGT) founded by Univ. of Tennessee (UT) alumni Had won U.S. Air Force Small Business Innovative Research (SIBR) contracts t Established to commercialize plasma technologies 4 2

JOHN REECE ROTH, Ph.D. Physics professor at the University of Tennessee (UT) Highly respected scholar, leading researcher in plasma physics with many publications Held several U.S. patents based on plasma research Had been involved in academic exchanges with foreign scholars, including those in China Scientific consultant to AGT 5 AGT S SBIR RESEARCH U.S. Air Force theory: plasma applied to an airfoil will also affect movement of air over that airfoil and thus aircraft motion In theory, plasma could be manipulated by actuators t to control small aircraft or even munitions traveling at subsonic speeds. However, application of theory technically complex and existing plasma actuators were insufficient to control small munitions AGT won SBIR award to develop this technology for Air Force, utilizing its unique patents, personnel and materials AGT s proposals, reports in Phase I and II contracts confirm technology development was unique to Air Force weapons requirements under those contracts 6 3

2006 EVENTS Dr. Roth invited to lecture in China at Fudan University in Shanghai and at Tsinghua University (Shenzhen campus) 7 2006-08 EVENTS May 26, 2006: Upon reentry into United States from China at Detroit International Airport, Dr. Roth s laptop computer is seized and inspected by Customs and Border Protection officers Had several AGT weekly reports and documents which contained AGT export controlled technical data Had laptop computer which also contained AGT export controlled technical data 2006-2008: Detailed investigation launched by Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) 8 4

2008-2011 CASE HISTORY April 2008: AGT s lead physicist pleads guilty to 1-count criminal information charging Arms Export Control Act (AECA) violation May 2008: AGT and Dr. Roth indicted by Grand Jury in E.D. Tenn. 1 count of conspiracy 16 counts of AECA violations 1 count of wire fraud [against UT] August 2008: AGT itself enters into plea agreement and pleads guilty to 10 counts of AECA violations August-September 2008: 7-day jury trial of Dr. Roth alone as remaining defendant Convicted on all 17 counts of indictment t against him July 2009: Dr. Roth sentenced to 48 months in prison, fined January 2011: 6 th Circuit Court of Appeals affirms conviction October 2011: U.S. Supreme Court declines to review conviction 9 CASE ELEMENTS: THE LAPTOP Government inspection of laptop at time of search, seizure at Detroit showed it contained export controlled technical data from AGT research program Government computer forensics indicate laptop was connected to Fudan University network in May 2006 E-mails also indicated a Fudan University computer technician examined the laptop when Dr. Roth had technical problems during his China trip Government case suggested reasonable inference that non-u.s. persons had direct access to AGT s export controlled technical data on laptop because Dr. Roth took it to China on his trip 10 5

SEARCH & SEIZURE AT THE BORDER U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 823 (1982): luggage carried by a traveler entering the country may be searched at random by a customs officer no matter how great the traveler s desire to conceal the contents may be. Torres v. Puerto Rico, 442 U.S. 465, 472-73 (1979): The authority of the United States to search the luggage of arriving international travelers is based on its inherent sovereign authority to protect its territorial integrity. By reason of that authority, it is entitled to require that whoever seeks entry must establish the right to enter and to bring into the country whatever he may carry. 9 th CIRCUIT RULING IN ARNOLD CASE U.S. v. Arnold, 533 F.3d 1003 (9 th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1176 (2009) U.S. traveler returned from the Philippines and interrogated at LAX, including CBP inspection of his laptop containing images of nude women and children Arnold detained and questioned several hours by CBP, resulting in seizure of his laptop as evidence of possession, transportation of child pornography Arnold sought to apply 4 th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure to his laptop p and moved to suppress the evidence found on it 9 th Circuit ruled against Arnold: [only] reasonable suspicion is needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage devices at the border (emphasis supplied) 6

OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND THE BORDER SEARCH DOCTRINE No 4 th Amendment protection against CBP border searches of: Separate hard drive, flash drive, thumb drive, memory stick: U.S. v. Arnold, 533 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9 th Cir. 2008) Videotape: U.S. v. Linarez-Delgado, 259 F. Appx. 506, 508 (3 rd Cir. 2007) Cell phone: Cancel-Rios v. U.S., 2010 WL 3420805, at *3 (D.P.R. Aug. 30, 2010) Other computer equipment: U.S. v. Bunty, 617 F.Supp.2d 359, 364-65 (E.D. Pa. 2008) CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION INSPECTION, SEIZURES OF DEVICES American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) s August 2010 report on CBP activities: Between October 2008 - June 2010, > 6,500 people (almost half of whom were U.S. citizens) traveling to or from U.S. had their electronic devices searched at border Devices searched included laptops, cell phones, cameras, hard drives, flash drives and even DVDs Between October 2008 - June 2009, cell phones were most commonly searched devices, followed by laptops, digital cameras Between July 2008 - June 2009, CBP agents transferred data found on searched devices to other unnamed federal agencies over 280 times 7

CBP S AUGUST 2009 POLICY CBP Directive No. 3340-049 (Aug. 20, 2009): Searches of electronic devices help detect evidence relating to terrorism and other national security matters, human and bulk cash smuggling, contraband, and child pornography. They can also reveal information about financial and commercial crimes, such as those relating to copyright, trademark and export control violations. (emphasis supplied) CBP policy applies to searches, seizures of any computers, disks, drives, tapes, mobile phones and other communication devices, cameras, music and other media players, and any other electronic or digital devices (whether inbound or outbound) COMPLIANCE TIPS FOR TRAVELERS If feasible, carry only clean devices containing only needed materials that have been subject to export control clearance by compliance staff For any technical materials, carry hard copies of: DDTC commodity jurisdiction (CJ), BIS commodity classification request (CCR) papers for export control status Appropriate export licenses from those agencies Consider level, type of materials are now being carried on smart phones, tablets (e.g., ipads) Consider what is being carried on thumb or flash drives, especially those not regularly used but tucked inside small compartments in briefcases and often forgotten or overlooked 8

Nelson G. Dong Dorsey & Whitney LLP Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100 Seattle, WA 98104-7043 phone: (206) 903-8871 fax: (206) 903-8820 email: dong.nelson@dorsey.com 17 9