EMPLOYEE INVENTOR COMPENSATION PRACTICES SURVEY



Similar documents
ipperformance ipperformance Group Benchmark2006 Inventor Reward and Recognition Programs Best Practices Benchmark Report Summary

University of the West of England, Bristol. Intellectual Property Policy

Intellectual Property

Jerry Haynes Law registered patent attorney

Intellectual Property How to Protect Your Discovery. Technology Transfer Office

Intellectual Property at The University of Melbourne. Dr Lachlan Wilson Intellectual Property Manager

The Role of Research Institutions in the Formation of the Biotech Cluster in Massachusetts

Business Models of Innovation Closed Innovation and Open Innovation (Topic 7 (c))

Remuneration Report by the Compensation Committee

Intellectual Property Management of Biotechnology Start-ups and Companies in Japan

3361: Patents and copyrights: policy on inventions and discoveries.

How To Plan A Patent Portfolio

PATENT LITIGATION IN US AND GERMANY SEMINAR THOMSON REUTERS, LEGAL CORDIALLY INVITES YOU TO

Coeliac UK funded Intellectual property: Exploitation consent and standard revenue/equity sharing agreement

The Biotech Business Life Cycle. The Lawyer s Role as Counselor and Advisor

GUIDELINES FOR THE CUSTOMIZATION OF THE PATENT GUIDE INVENTING THE FUTURE - AN INTRODUCTION TO PATENTS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

Douglas M. DePeppe Cyberlaw Attorney

How Tsinghua Manages its Companies

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING JAPANESE PATENT PRACTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Intellectual Property (IP), Revenue Sharing & Equity Policy

Contents of Online Data Room

Efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for intellectual property disputes

Intellectual Property. Policy and Procedures

Revenue from contracts with customers

IP Valuation. WIPO Workshop on Innovation, Intellectual Asset Management and Successful Technology Licensing: Wealth Creation in the Arab Region

R&D Tax Relief. Helping businesses make the most of their R&D. investni.com

DELAWARE INCORPORATION QUESTIONNAIRE. In order to prepare the incorporation documents, we will need the following information:

VC - Sample Term Sheet

Q&A Intellectual Property Policy

Patent Box Tax Relief. Pay tax at just 10%

Due diligence report for :

Business from Research Innovation at VTT

BFB-G-42: Gifts Presented to Non- Employees on Behalf of the University

Entrepreneurship Education at Universities

Intellectual Property Rights in the USA

Ryerson Digital Media Zone Online Resources Patent Essentials

BIOMARK DIAGNOSTICS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. June 30, (Stated in Canadian Dollars)

Intellectual Property & Technology Commercialization Basics

Who holds the most cloud computing patents now? A preliminary analysis

Patent data mining and effective patent portfolio management

Inventions & Patents: Marketing a New Idea

Fact Sheet Inventorship, Authorship and Ownership

Intellectual Property

The Technology Transfer Process

Reputation Impact of a Data Breach U.S. Study of Executives & Managers

Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program (NOL)

Private Company Incentive Pay Practices. research. A Research Report by WorldatWork and Vivient Consulting October 2007

Opportunities, Challenges and Strategies for the China Market

Innovation Incentives: How Companies Foster Innovation By Susan Malanowski September 2007

萬 全 科 技 藥 業 有 限 公 司 * (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability)

Profile of Biomedical Research and Biotechnology Commercialization. Boston-Worcester-Lawrence Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. 403(b) Retirement Plan Investment Analysis and Consulting. July 2012

MODEL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY FOR UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS

WTAS Valuation Services Group


Mywish Maredia, Frederic Erbisch, Anwar Naseem, Amie Hightower, James Oehmke, Dave Weatherspoon, & Christopher Wolf 1

trainer course on IPR support for the internationalization of innovative biotech SMEs.

BUSINESS ASPECTS OF PATENTS: A PRIMER FOR THE NON-PATENT LAWYER

Managing Innovation & Intellectual Property Rights. Document author Assured by Review cycle. Executive Team. 1. Introduction Purpose...

Negotiating Intellectual Property (IP) Clauses

Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation and Start-Up Fund

Providing High-Quality Innovation and Technology Support Services University Experience and Best Practices. Professor Stanley Kowalski

Eric F. Wagner Associate Director - Legal. Duke University Office of Licensing & Ventures eric.f.wagner@duke.edu

INVENTIONS, PATENTS AND LICENSING POLICY

T-Account Approach to Preparing a Statement of Cash Flows Indirect Method

Policy for the Exploitation of University Intellectual property - Formation of New Companies

NASA DESK GUIDE ON THE EMPLOYMENT OF NONCITIZENS

The Challenge Faced by Argentinean Leaders Today: To Buy or to Develop Technology

INFOBRIEF SRS. Athree-decades-long trend of increasingly strong WHERE HAS THE MONEY GONE? DECLINING INDUSTRIAL SUPPORT OF ACADEMIC R&D

Policy for the Management of Intellectual Property

INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT

Business Plan Template

Venture Development Fund Request for Proposals

THE MANAGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL

Articles of Incorporation

TNS UK PRIVACY & COOKIE POLICY FOR SURVEYS ( Policy )

Transcription:

EMPLOYEE INVENTOR COMPENSATION PRACTICES SURVEY Report of the IPO Asian Practice Committee February 2004 Intellectual Property Owners Association 1255 23 rd Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20037 P: 202/455-2396 F: 202/466-2893 www.ipo.org

Table of Contents Introduction 1 Amount company pays for an employee invention disclosure.. 1 Amount company pays an employee for a filed patent application..2 Amount company pays an employee for issuance of patent. 3 Amount company pays an employee for a highly valuable patent...3 Type and amount paid for other patent-related awards 3 Type of non-cash incentive to inventors other than the above awards.4 Total annual amount paid by company for awards to inventors..4 Appendix A: Employee Invention Compensation Practices Questionnaire...A1 Appendix B: Summary of responses to six-part question from the 2003 Intellectual Property Owners Association Survey on Strategic Management of Intellectual Property...B1 i

Introduction The questionnaire was sent to IPO s 89 corporate members in July 2003. Thirty-eight companies responded. Fifteen were in the computers and electronics field; thirteen were in chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and biotech; and ten were in consumer products, machinery, and general manufacturing. The annual revenue of the 38 companies ranged from $400 million to $177 billion; average annual revenue was $30.8 billion. The number of US patent applications filed annually average 623. The number of foreign patent applications filed annually average 867. Each company was asked to answer seven questions regarding its employee invention compensation practices. The responses are summarized below. 1 Two appendices have been added for reference. Appendix A contains the Employee Invention Compensation Practice Questionnaire, the results of which are summarized in this report. Appendix B summarizes responses to a six-part question from a separate, recent survey, the 2003 Intellectual Property Owners Association Survey on Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. 2 Question 1: Amount your company pays for an employee invention disclosure Responses: 84% of all respondents reported they make no payments for employee invention disclosures. Those who make such payments pay $200 or less per disclosure. $101-$200 11% $100 5% All Respondents (38) 84% Computers and Electronics $101- $200 27% Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotechnology 100% Consumer Products, Machinery, and General Manufacturing 100% $100 13% 60% 1 Questions have been renumbered from those in original questionnaire. 2 For an earlier report on employee invention compensation practices, including analysis of governing law, see Thomas R. Savitsky, Management of Employee Inventions, October 1990. Copy available on IPO website at www.ipo.org/savitsky. 1

Question 2: Amount your company pays an employee for a filed patent application Responses: 61% of all respondents make such payments. The most common range for the amount of such payments is $501 to $1500. All Respondents (38) $1,501-$3,000 11% $1,500 29% 39% 21% Computers and Electronics $1,501- $3,000 27% 20% $1,500 20% Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotechnology 40% 8% Consumer Products, Machinery, and General Manufacturing $1,500 8% $1,500 53% 40% 84% 2

Question 3: Amount your company pays an employee for issuance of a patent Responses: 37% of all respondents report making such payments. Of those who do make such payments, the most common amount is in the range of $1 to. $2,000 11% All Respondents (38) 26% 63% Computers and Electronics $2,000 13% 60% Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotechnology 15% $2,000 20% Consumer Products, Machinery, and General Manufacturing 40% 27% 85% 40% Question 4: Amount your company pays an employee for a highly valuable patent Responses: Twenty-nine of the 38 respondents indicated that their companies do not pay for highly valuable patents. Of the nine remaining, four companies indicated that inventors of highly valuable patents become eligible for achievement awards with varying cash prizes; one company pays a flat fee of $200; and the last four respondents paid inventors for their highly valuable patents, the values ranging from $300 to $37,500. Question 5: Type and amount paid for other patent-related awards Responses: Nineteen respondents indicated no payment for other patent-related awards. One company reported a payment of. Four companies reported payments from to $750 for trade secrets or other non-patented intellectual property. One company paid $2,000 for patent usage. Another reported a $5,000 payment for identifying infringement activities. One company paid $5,000 annually to the inventor with the most patents. Three companies reported cash awards for milestones (e.g., $10,000 for an inventor s 10 th patent.) One respondent reported payment of a $15,000 award. Another gave an annual $25,000 award for an invention, patented or not, that contributed significantly to the success of the company. 3

Question 6: Type of non-cash incentive to inventors other than the above awards Responses: Twenty-five of the companies present plaques to their inventors. Fifteen host recognition banquets, luncheons, and dinners where inventors are recognized. Three of the companies have some means of promotional consideration, notification to management, or fellow appointments for inventors. One company rewards inventors of highly valuable inventions with stock options. Seven companies reported no non-cash incentives to inventors. Question 7: Total annual amount paid by your company for awards to inventors Responses: Average annual amount per company is shown on the graph below. Annual Amount Paid for Inventor Awards $2.6 million $1.2 million.5 million.1 million All Respondents (38) Computers and Electronics Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotechnology Consumer Products, Machinery, and General Manufacturing 4

Appendix A 7/8/2003 EMPLOYEE INVENTION COMPENSATION PRACTICES QUESTIONNAIRE GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR COMPANY 1. Business field(s) of your company (i.e., chemical, biotech, electronics, etc): 2. Approximate annual revenue of your company: 3. Annual number of US patent applications filed by your company: 4. Annual number of foreign patent applications filed by your company: QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR COMPANY S EMPLOYEE INVENTOR COMPENSATION PRACTICES (If answer is none, state none. ) 5. Amount your company pays for an employee invention disclosure: 6. Amount your company pays an employee for a filed patent application: 7. Amount your company pays an employee for issuance of patent: 8. Amount your company pays an employee for a highly valuable patent: 9. Type and amount paid for other patent-related awards: 10. Type of non-cash incentive to inventors other than the above awards: 11. Total annual amount paid by your company for awards to inventors: INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES WILL BE ACCESIBLE ONLY TO THE IPO STAFF AND WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. Results will be reported in consolidated form only. No individual companies will be identified. Send completed questionnaire to herb2@ipo.org or fax to 202/466-2893 no later than July 22, 2003. -A1-

Appendix B This appendix summarizes responses to a six-part question from a separate IPO survey, the 2003 Intellectual Property Owners Association Survey on Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. The survey was conducted for IPO by Professor Rebecca Henderson of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Professor Ian Cockburn of Boston University. This survey was sent out in the late summer of 2002 to the IPO member companies, as well as to a list of senior corporate IP managers maintained by Delphion Inc; 66 usable questionnaires were returned. Results were presented at an IPOsponsored conference in Washington, DC on November 10, 2003. 3 Note: For each question below, respondents were asked to respond that they strongly disagree (SD), disagree (D), agree (A), or strongly agree (SA). At my company, scientific and technical personnel are: (i) recognized for invention disclosures 44% Typical reward: plaque, dinner, t-shirt 29% 17% 6% 5% (ii) recognized for initial patent filing 29% 35% 30% Typical reward: -$1000. Maximum was $3000 5% 2% 3 Copies of the report on the complete survey, which contains more than 100 questions, may be obtained from Intellectual Property Owners Association by purchasing conference materials from 2003 s Managing Corporate IP Today Conference. Ian M. Cockburn and Rebecca Henderson, Survey Results From The 2003 Intellectual Property Owners Association Survey on Strategic Management of Intellectual Property, October 2003. Go to www.ipo.org or call 202-466-2396. -B1-

(iii) recognized for patent grants 55% Typical reward $1000 plus dinner and plaque. 14% 32% Maximum was $10million! (iv) recognized for generating other IP If reward is given, it is typically for trade secret and is a token amount of money. Part of the job was a common comment from respondents. 47% 39% 3% 6% 5% (v) promoted, at least in part, on their record of generating patents. The majority of companies do take inventors records of generating patents into account in promotion decisions, though very few registered strong agreement and 40% of companies do not appear to use this practice. 59% 32% 8% 2% (vi) given significant monetary rewards for generating patents. 41% 30% Significant appears to have been an important modifier for this question. The majority of companies do reward inventors, but rarely with substantial amounts of money. 14% 14% 2% -B2-