Student-centred funding model. Linking school funding with student need

Similar documents
Evaluation Case Study. Kimberley Region Support Centre

ENGLISH as an ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE or DIALECT (EAL/D)

NATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR RURAL AND REMOTE EDUCATION

Local Schools, Local Decisions

2015 / 2016 STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS AND OPERATIONAL PLAN

Mapping Funding and Regulatory Arrangements Across The Commonwealth and States and Territories Jack Keating Peter Annett Gerald Burke Clare O Hanlon

Every Student, Every School. Learning and Support

Towards a New School Funding Model

Leadership in public education

SCHOOL AUTHORITIES FUNDING MANUAL FOR SCHOOL AUTHORITIES

Inquiry into educational opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students Submission 18

Local Schools, Local Decisions

Essential Programs & Services State Calculation for Funding Public Education (ED279):

THE HON JULIA GILLARD MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER Minister for Education Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations Minister for Social Inclusion

COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS

Evaluation Case Study. Developing a regional Special Education Network Centre

The Boston Consulting Group Report EXPENDITURE REVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING (DET)

Position paper on the Federal Budget 2015

NSW SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE

Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into Child Care and Early Childhood Learning 2014

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Action Plan

Improving Access for Indigenous Australians to Medicare and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme

Education and Early Childhood Development Legislation Reform

New Child Development Legislation, Legislation reform Discussion Paper No. 5 Submission from the AISSA

Manager Research and Planning. 7 August 2015

AUSTRALIAN CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING AUTHORITY

National Plan for School Improvement

The submission begins with some general comments before addressing a number of the Inquiry s terms of reference.

Section 6. Strategic & Service Planning

Frequently asked questions

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR INDEPENDENT PUBLIC SCHOOLS INITIATIVE

Productivity Commission Study on Early Childhood Development Workforce. Submission by the Western Australian Department of Education

ENGLISH. Second Language. as a GUIDELINES FOR SCHOOLS

CALIFORNIA S NEW EDUCATION FUNDING FORMULA:

Submission The Health Workforce Productivity Commission Issues Paper

Smarter Schools National Partnership Interim Evaluation Summary

Teaching Qualifications - Full, Provisional and Non-Practising Registration

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): EDUCATION 1

The National Health Plan for Young Australians An action plan to protect and promote the health of children and young people

SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE NSW DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING POSITION DESCRIPTION. Deputy Director-General TAFE and Community Education

Inquiry into the Provision of Education to Students with a Disability or Special Needs

Overview of State Funding for Public Education in Idaho

Key Priority Area 1: Key Direction for Change

Primary Health Networks Life After Medicare Locals

COUNCIL MEETING Meeting: 26 February Education Funding Settlement and Local Formula for 2015/16

EARLY CHILDHOOD POLICY AND ACTION PLAN (Adopted at AEU Federal Conference 2003 and endorsed by Branch Council June 2003.)

VU would like to highlight two areas which we suggest were overlooked in the panel s report:

Submission to the NSW Ministry of Health on the discussion paper: Towards an Aboriginal Health Plan for NSW

Funding of Schools The Way Ahead. A Discussion Paper. Irish National Teachers` Organisation (INTO)

Improving ACT Public High Schools and Colleges

Primary Health Care Reform in Australia National Health and Hospital Reform Commission Professor Justin Beilby University of Adelaide

ACN Federal Budget Submission Funding priorities. 1. A National Transition Framework for nurses

NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

Council of Social Service of NSW (NCOSS) Submission to IPART Pricing VET under Smart and Skilled (Draft Report)

Foreword. Closing the Gap in Indigenous Health Outcomes. Indigenous Early Childhood Development. Indigenous Economic Participation.

RI s Education Funding Formula. Introduction and Its Impact on Cumberland Students 02/04/2014

QUEENSLAND TEACHERS UNION RESPONSE TO THE MASTERS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

Website:

Government Response to Recommendations

Early Childhood Development Workforce Productivity Commission Issues Paper

Supporting Education Quality through Public Finance Planning in Central Asia Education Financing and Management Reforms in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

Commentary on The Status and Quality of Teaching and Learning of Science in Australian Schools 1

School Finance 101. MASA / MASE Spring Conference Joel Sutter Ehlers Greg Crowe - Ehlers

Supporting Australia s Live Music Industry: Suggested principles for best practice

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Nancy C. Rhodes and Ingrid Pufahl. Amount of Language Instruction

NSW GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Briefing Paper. THE CHRONIC UNDERFUNDING OF DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS IN AUSTRALIA S NON- GOVERNMENT SCHOOL SECTOR.

THE NATIONAL QUALITY FRAMEWORK FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE: INFORMATION FOR FAMILIES

Submission to the. National Commission of Audit

Principles and protocols for reporting on schooling in Australia

EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT PUBLIC SCHOOLS INITIATIVE

Proposed post-2015 education goals: Emphasizing equity, measurability and finance

Assessing existing funding models for schooling in Australia. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations

An evaluation of the Victorian Secondary School Nursing Program Executive summary

Expenditure on education and training in Australia Update and analysis

NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

KANSAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS 1420 SW Arrowhead Road, Topeka, Kan

Equity programs for government schools in New South Wales: a review

Summary of Significant Spending and Fiscal Rules in the Every Student Succeeds Act

Management Initiatives in Ontario School Boards: Supporting Student Achievement by Minimizing Distractors

Report on Evaluation of School Based Management

BILATERAL AGREEMENT ON ACHIEVING UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

A Vision for 2020: Achieve Equity in Education

Full-time Special Education Sponsorship Program 2015

Senate Standing Committee on Education and Employment - Education. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Supplementary Budget Estimates

PAPER 1 THE SCHOOL COUNSELLING WORKFORCE IN NSW GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS

Fairer schools funding. Arrangements for 2015 to 2016

Early childhood education and care

Senate Standing Committee on Education and Employment - Education. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Supplementary Budget Estimates

Australian Catholic Schools 2012

Bachelor of Bachelor of Education (Honours)

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): EDUCATION. 1. Sector Performance, Problems, and Opportunities

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

PK-12 Public Educational Facilities Master Plan Evaluation Guide

Regulatory Burdens Social & Economic Infrastructure Services

DEPARTMENT OF TRAINING AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Trade Training Centres in Schools Programme

REPORT NO. 4, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE. TO: The Board DATE: 01 November 2011

Private Health Insurance: What Consumers Want. Anna Greenwood. Deputy Chief Executive Officer. Presentation to the 2012 PHIO Industry Seminar

Submission by SDN Children s Services Early Childhood Development Workforce Productivity Commission Issues Paper

Transcription:

Student-centred funding model Linking school funding with student need

From the Minister The next step in the Government s reform of public education is through the establishment of a new funding model driven by the learning needs of students and delivered to schools through one line budgets. This is quite different from the current mechanism that funds school types and programs through numerous funding lines using complex multipliers and formulas. Establishing a model that is based on equity of funding for individual students will help ensure that every child in Western Australian public schools receives the opportunity for a high quality education. The case for a new funding model is both clear and compelling. A comprehensive review by The University of Melbourne found that the current way of distributing and allocating resources is out-dated and inflexible. Importantly, the review also found that funding could be used more effectively to improve students learning outcomes. Our new student-centred funding model has been informed by the findings of this review. It complements other education reforms including school autonomy driven by the highly successful Independent Public Schools initiative and the increasing number of flexibilities extended to all schools so they can better respond to the needs of their students. There is no doubt that changes to funding models are challenging. Next year the groundwork will be laid to implement the model. This will see alterations to some aspects of funding and distribution processes that will ensure a more effective and sustainable use of resources. Further alterations will be made in 2015 which will then lead into the new model. In 2015 all schools will have one line budgets. The State Government will be working closely with educators and key stakeholders ahead of 2015 to ensure that implementation of the new model is as seamless as possible. An effective and contemporary funding model is vital to meet the educational needs of students today and into the future. Peter Collier MLC Minister for Education August 2013 2

The case for change The case for changing the way resources are distributed and allocated to public schools in Western Australia is compelling. The Department of Education identified the need to review the current mechanism in 2008 and undertook initial scoping at that time. This work confirmed the need for a major review. Over the last two decades, there have been considerable changes to how schools operate; the ages of students attending various stages of schooling; the curriculum that is delivered; and the learning needs of students. More recently, the degree of autonomy in which schools operate has changed significantly. From 2015, the type of schools that Year 7 students attend will also change. First comprehensive review in 20 years The first comprehensive review in more than 20 years was undertaken in 2010 and 2011 by The University of Melbourne s Centre for Research on Education Systems under the leadership of Professor Richard Teese. The review examined the enrolment and performance profiles of schools to determine a sample of schools for review that reflected the diverse nature of the WA public school system. In a sample of 82 mainstream and education support schools analysis of data, an interview with each principal and a site visit to each school was undertaken to see how schools use their current resources. An online survey of leaders in these schools covered areas such as teaching and learning challenges, funding issues, factors affecting student learning and school performance, current funding arrangements, staffing, and community relations. An online survey was extended to all principals and provided a rich array of information on school performance and school resourcing. Consultations were undertaken with professional associations and small groups of principals to inform the writing of the report entitled Development of a school funding model for Western Australian public schools: Report on funding and options. Key findings from the review The review found that governments in Western Australia have sought to deliver equitable resourcing across a large and very diverse jurisdiction. Adjustments to staffing formulae and many special purpose lines of funding have tried to tackle problems of educational disadvantage. With many piecemeal changes made over the years, the review found that the funding mechanism is now excessively complex. Inefficiencies are compounded by complicated staffing formulae, multitudes of funding lines, numerous multiplier effects and many bolt-ons over two decades. Professor Teese concluded that the mechanism could not cope with any more adaptations or additions. The review also found that funding could be used more effectively to improve student outcomes, and that principals want more flexibility in using available funds so they can better target student needs. It also proposed that any new funding model should consider each student according to their educational needs, rather than just where they live or what school they go to. It should also provide schools with more flexibility in planning and using resources. The review concluded that a new model is needed to set schools on the continuing path to ensure success for students in the future. Discover more An executive summary and the full review are available. W: det.wa.edu.au 3

The new model and one line budgets The new student-centred model will start in 2015 with funding distributed to schools through one line budgets. Two categories of funding for students The model, which has two funding categories, will deliver all resources as funds on a per student basis. The majority of funding will be provided for each student enrolled. This is the per student funding. For primary school aged students there will be three levels of funding: Kindergarten, Pre-primary to Year 3, and Years 4 to 6. For secondary school aged students there will be one level of funding for Years 7 to 12. The second category of funding will address specific student and school characteristics. It will be provided for eligible Aboriginal students, students facing social disadvantage, students with English as an additional language/dialect and students with disability; as well as for students in small schools and schools in isolated and remote parts of the State. This category will take into account the huge diversity of the student population in Western Australian public schools and the critical influence of these identified student and school characteristics on education outcomes. Where funding will be provided for particular students (for example, students with disability), principals will need to ensure that the total value of the funding for those identified students in their schools will be directed to their needs. Increased flexibility through one line budgets Funding for all schools will be delivered though one line budgets. Each school s one line budget will consist of a salaries component and a cash component, with capacity for resources to be moved between these two components. Salaries will be charged at a set salary rate determined by the system average plus on-costs. Schools will have the flexibility to determine staffing profiles to match the circumstances and profiles of their students, within industrial parameters and Government and Department policies. The new model and one line budgets will further support the move away from a highly centralised system. They will provide principals with more control over available resources so they can make the best educational decisions for their students and be more accountable for the performance of their schools. All schools will be provided with support to implement the new model and move to one line budgets. There will be new software and tools so schools can plan and monitor expenditure effectively. The new model will also streamline processes and further extend the flexibility of one line budgets for Independent Public Schools. Other funding Items such as capital works, maintenance and security services will continue to be paid for and managed centrally. Schools will continue to receive separate funding lines for staff and services provided centrally and across regions (eg school psychologists). Only specific Commonwealth programs (eg national partnership funding) and key State Government election commitments (eg Independent Public Schools administration funding) will remain as separate funding lines. 4

Student-centred funding model Per student funding Funding for all students in all schools This will be how the majority of funding is distributed for students. Funding will be provided for each enrolled student. For primary school aged students there will be three levels of funding for Kindergarten, Pre-primary to Year 3 and Years 4 to 6. For secondary school aged students there will be one level of funding for Years 7 to 12. Student and school characteristics funding 1. Aboriginality The will be provided for eligible students to help schools address the learning needs of Aboriginal students and close the education achievement gap between Aboriginal and non-aboriginal students. A per student for eligible students will be provided through a weighting based on the number of Aboriginal students in a school. 2. Social disadvantage The will be provided for eligible students to help schools address the higher and additional learning needs of students in disadvantaged communities. The will be based on a new socioeconomic status (SES) scale of relative disadvantage for individual students that replaces current whole-school SEI measures. A per student will be provided for eligible students reaching the low SES threshold. Funding for eligible students and schools 3. English as an additional language/dialect (EAL/D) The will be provided for eligible students to help schools address the learning needs of all EAL/D students. A per student will be based on categories of educational need and teaching and learning adjustments required. The ESL/D Progress Map will be the basis for determining needs. The will replace the current teacher, ethnic assistant, social worker and other FTE s and special purpose funding s for EAL/D students. The will be calculated as the number of EAL/D students x assessed need x per student amount. 5. Small school The will be provided to eligible small schools where the per student funding is insufficient to meet basic school operating costs. A per student will be provided, with primary and secondary schools receiving different s that reflect differences in size and complexity. Once a school reaches a certain enrolment size, the will be phased out through a tapering mechanism. Kindergarten to Year 12 schools and district high schools will receive the same as secondary schools as they need to provide secondary school classes. 4. Disability The will be provided for eligible students to help schools address the learning needs of students with disability. A per student will be provided based on categories of educational need and teaching and learning adjustments required. The will replace the current teacher, education assistant and other staffing and funding for students with disability. Student eligibility categories considered under Schools Plus will continue. 6. Locality The will be provided to eligible schools in isolated and remote areas to help them meet additional costs unique to their localities. Locality will be considered separately from school size. Constraints of size will be dealt with through the small school. Isolation and remoteness will be defined by distance from key services as measured by the Accessibility/ Remoteness Index of Australia and local contextual factors (eg utility costs). 5

Implementing the new model The new student-centred funding model and one line budgets for all schools will be in place for the beginning of the 2015 school year. In 2014 and 2015 a number of funding areas and processes will change in readiness for the new model. 2014 2015 Per student funding Aboriginality Social disadvantage English as an additional language/dialect (EAL/D) Disability School characteristic: Small school School characteristic: Locality Other Per student FTE s will be implemented for Kindergarten to Year 2 education assistants Schools will receive AIEO s relative to the number of Aboriginal students and not influenced by their year levels. No changes. Schools will receive teacher FTE s for students accessing EAL/D support and IECs on a per student basis. This will not be influenced by year levels of students. Schools will receive teacher FTE s relative to student educational need and not influenced by year levels of students. A tapered base will be implemented for the teacher FTE. This will be different for primary and secondary schools. No changes. Other funding lines will be devolved to schools (eg postage). All current funding lines (FTE and cash) apart from funding lines related to student and school characteristics as below will be consolidated into a single for each student enrolled. The amount will depend on the year level of each student. All current Aboriginal education funding lines (FTE and cash) will be consolidated into a single per Aboriginal student for eligible schools. All current SES funding lines (FTE and cash) will be consolidated into a single per eligible student for eligible schools. A new SES measure will replace the current SEI measure. All current EAL/D funding lines (FTE and cash) will be consolidated into a single per eligible EAL/D student determined by English language proficiency using the ESL/D Progress Map. All disability funding lines (FTE and cash) will be consolidated into a single per eligible student with disability. All current base resourcing will be consolidated into a single and redistributed to small schools. The amount will differ for primary and secondary schools and gradually phase out as school size increases in line with the increasing level of funding that will come with per student funding. All rural and remote resourcing will be consolidated into a single and redistributed to eligible schools. A remoteness index and contextual factors will be used to determine eligibility. Funding through the School Support Program Resource Allocation will be replaced by the student and school characteristics s for Aboriginality, social disadvantage, disability and locality. 6

Student-centred funding model Key principles Per student funding For primary school aged students there will be three levels of funding for Kindergarten, Pre-primary to Year 3 and Years 4 to 6. For secondary school aged students there will be one level of funding for Years 7 to 12. Fairness The model is a fair and equitable means of allocating funding so schools can make the best choices for students to achieve their standards of learning. Responsiveness The model responds to differences and changes in the circumstances of individual schools and their student populations. Student and school characteristics funding This funding will be provided to eligible students and schools through six s: Aboriginality Social disadvantage English as an additional language/dialect (EAL/D) Disability Small school Locality Flexibility Transparency The model enables resources to be used flexibly to best meet the learning needs of students. The model is straightforward to follow and clearly shows what is being funded and how it is being funded. 7