EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2011



Similar documents
Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

Licensure Resources by State

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

State Tax Information

PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION

State Tax Information

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

American C.E. Requirements

********************

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

$7.5 appropriation $ Preschool Development Grants

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

COMPARE NEBRASKA S BUSINESS CLIMATE TO OTHER STATES. Selected Business Costs for Each State. Workers Compensation Rates

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1

Overview of School Choice Policies

Current State Regulations

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

Education Program Beneficiaries

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

When the workers compensation system in New York was reformed in 2007, the system worked poorly for both employers and employees.

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.

2014 Tax Changes. This document currently reflects only tax changes of which ADP was notified by tax agencies as of January 2, 2014.

What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL

U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workforce Security Division of Fiscal and Actuarial Services

States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon)

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013]

GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011

Significant Measures of State Unemployment Insurance Tax Systems

Changes in the Cost of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans,

State Corporate Income Tax Rates As of July 1, 2009

Sample/Excerpts ONLY Not Full Report

THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY

State Corporate Income Tax Rates As of December 31, 2006 (2006's noteworthy changes in bold italics)

IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010

THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY

Acceptable Certificates from States other than New York

#1: Unemployment benefits provide an important boost to the economy.

Model Regulation Service January 2006 DISCLOSURE FOR SMALL FACE AMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES MODEL ACT

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014

Financial State of the States. September 2015

Medicare Advantage Cuts in the Affordable Care Act: March 2013 Update Robert A. Book l March 2013

REPORT OF FINDINGS NURSING FACILITY STAFFING SURVEY 2010

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009

Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA (619)

State Government Subsidies for Retirement Plans Sponsored by Local Governments. National Conference of State Legislatures, January 2010

Please contact if you have any questions regarding this survey.

Economic Impact and Variation in Costs to Provide Community Pharmacy Services

State and Federal Individual Capital Gains Tax Rates: How High Could They Go?

Healthcare. State Report. Anthony P. Carnevale Nicole Smith Artem Gulish Bennett H. Beach. June 2012

REPORT OF FINDINGS 2008 NURSING FACILITY STAFF VACANCY, RETENTION AND TURNOVER SURVEY

Understanding Socioeconomic and Health Care System Drivers to Increase Vaccination Coverage

Question by: Karon Beyer. Date: March 28, [LLC Question] [ ]

TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT $119,067, State and Territory Base Awards for Policy and Environmental Change $44,602,383

STATE MOTORCYCLE LEMON LAW SUMMARIES

Full Medical Benefits**

FELONY DUI SYNOPSIS. 46 states have felony DUI. Charts 1 and 2 detail the felony threshold for each of the 46 states analyzed.

I have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans

NCSL Capitol Security Survey ( )

State Estate Taxes BECAUSE YOU ASKED ADVANCED MARKETS

Use of "Mail Box" service. Date: April 6, [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015]

Impact of the House Full-Year Continuing Resolution for FY 2011 (H.R. 1)

Transcription:

A State-by-State Look at the President s Payroll Tax Cuts for Middle-Class Families An Analysis by the U.S. Department of the Treasury s Office of Tax Policy The President signed into law a 2 percentage point payroll tax cut for 2011 that is providing: A tax cut of about $1,000 for the typical American working family in 2011. A total of $109 billion in tax relief to support economic growth and job creation in 2011. Expanding this to a 3.1 percentage point tax cut for 2012, as President Obama has proposed, would provide: A tax cut of about $1,550 for the typical American working family in 2012. A total of $179 billion in tax relief to support economic growth and job creation in 2012. A boost of around 2 percent or more to the after-tax income of workers who are most likely to spend their additional after-tax income leading to greater demand, stronger growth, and job creation. The current 2 percentage point payroll tax cut is providing a significant benefit to workers in every state in 2011, and this report shows the substantial tax relief expected to go to workers in each state if the payroll tax cut is extended and expanded to 3.1 percentage points in 2012. The bipartisan Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 included several specific tax cuts and initiatives designed to spur economic growth and job creation. One important component of the Act was a reduction in the employee Social Security tax rate from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent of the first $106,800 of taxable wages received in 2011. On December 17, 2010, President Obama signed this Act into law. The payroll tax cut is providing substantial benefits to working families and the economy throughout 2011. Some of the highlights are: $109 billion in overall tax relief: The payroll tax cut is providing an estimated $108.6 billion in tax relief throughout 2011 to working Americans. Tax cut for 159 million workers: The payroll tax rate cut has resulted in an estimated 158.9 million working Americans receiving larger paychecks in 2011. A tax cut of about $1,000 for a typical family: For a family with wages or salaries of $50,000 per year, about the median household income, the payroll tax cut equals $1,000. No effect on Social Security solvency: The legislation provided that the Social Security Trust Fund be made whole by transfers from the General Fund. Thus, the reduction in Social Security taxes paid by employees had no effect on the Social Security Trust Fund and no effect on individuals current or future Social Security benefits. Table 1, below, shows the number of beneficiaries from the payroll tax cut and the total increase in after-tax income received by the residents of each state.

Table 1. State-by-State Estimates of the Tax Relief Provided by The 2.0 Percentage Point Cut in the Employee Payroll Tax in 2011 (Millions of People/Billions of Dollars) United States 158.9 108.6 Alabama 2.3 1.4 Massachusetts 3.5 2.7 South Dakota 0.5 0.3 Alaska 0.4 0.3 Michigan 5.1 3.3 Tennessee 3.2 2.0 Arizona 2.9 2.0 Minnesota 3.1 2.2 Texas 11.4 7.7 Arkansas 1.5 0.8 Mississippi 1.4 0.8 Utah 1.3 0.8 California 16.7 12.6 Missouri 3.1 1.9 Vermont 0.4 0.3 Colorado 2.5 1.7 Montana 0.6 0.3 Virginia 4.3 3.3 Connecticut 2.0 1.6 Nebraska 1.1 0.7 Washington 3.5 2.7 Delaware 0.5 0.4 Nevada 1.2 0.8 West Virginia 0.9 0.5 Florida 9.0 5.6 New Hampshire 0.8 0.6 Wisconsin 3.2 2.1 Georgia 4.6 3.0 New Jersey 4.7 4.1 Wyoming 0.3 0.2 Hawaii 0.7 0.5 New Mexico 0.9 0.6 DC 0.4 0.3 Idaho 0.8 0.5 New York 10.1 7.8 Puerto Rico 1.2 0.5 Illinois 6.5 4.6 North Carolina 4.7 3.0 Other Areas 3.0 1.4 Indiana 3.6 2.3 North Dakota 0.4 0.2 Iowa 1.7 1.1 Ohio 5.8 3.5 Kansas 1.6 1.0 Oklahoma 1.9 1.1 Kentucky 2.2 1.3 Oregon 1.9 1.3 Louisiana 2.1 1.3 Pennsylvania 6.7 4.7 Maine 0.8 0.4 Rhode Island 0.6 0.4 Maryland 3.2 2.6 South Carolina 2.2 1.3 11-29-2011 The figures in the table are based on tabulations from the 2008 Social Security Administration, Continuous Work History Sample, 1 percent sample and the Department of Treasury's Office of Tax Analysis estimate of the number of people benefitting in 2011. State designation is based on employee residence. Without Congressional action by the end of the 2011 calendar year, the 2 percentage point payroll tax cut the President signed into law will expire. If the payroll tax cut is allowed to expire, taxes will increase substantially for nearly every middle-class working American family, and economic growth and job creation will be significantly slower in 2012 as a result. On September 8, 2011, President Obama proposed the American Jobs Act (AJA) of 2011, a fully paid-for initiative to boost economic growth and create jobs. One provision in the AJA extends and expands the 2011 payroll tax provision, cutting the employee Social Security payroll tax rate in half from 6.2 percent to 3.1 percent of the first $110,100 of taxable wages received in 2012. Some of the highlights are: $179 billion in tax relief: The payroll tax rate cut proposed in the American Jobs Act is expected to provide $178.8 billion in tax relief to working Americans throughout 2012. Tax cut for 161 million workers: The payroll tax cut would result in an estimated 161.2 million working Americans receiving larger paychecks in 2012. 2

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2011 A tax cut of more than $1,500 for a typical family: For a family with wages or salaries of $50,000 per year, about the median household income, the proposed 3.1 percentage point payroll tax cut equals $1,550. No effect on Social Security solvency: Similar to the payroll tax rate cut enacted in 2010, under the American Jobs Act, the Social Security Trust Fund would be made whole by transfers from the General Fund. Thus, the reduction in Social Security taxes paid by employees would have no effect on the Social Security Trust Fund and no effect on individuals current or future Social Security benefits. Table 2, below, shows that workers all across America would benefit from the payroll tax rate cut contained in the American Jobs Act. The table also shows the total increase in after-tax income that will accrue to residents of each state. Table 2. State-by-State Estimates of the Tax Relief Provided by The 3.1 Percentage Point Cut in the Employee Payroll Tax in 2012 (Millions of People/Billions of Dollars) United States 161.2 178.8 Alabama 2.4 2.3 Massachusetts 3.5 4.5 South Dakota 0.5 0.4 Alaska 0.4 0.4 Michigan 5.2 5.5 Tennessee 3.3 3.2 Arizona 3.0 3.2 Minnesota 3.2 3.7 Texas 11.6 12.8 Arkansas 1.5 1.3 Mississippi 1.4 1.3 Utah 1.4 1.4 California 17.0 20.7 Missouri 3.1 3.1 Vermont 0.4 0.4 Colorado 2.5 2.9 Montana 0.6 0.5 Virginia 4.4 5.4 Connecticut 2.0 2.6 Nebraska 1.1 1.1 Washington 3.5 4.4 Delaware 0.5 0.6 Nevada 1.2 1.2 West Virginia 0.9 0.9 Florida 9.1 9.3 New Hampshire 0.8 1.0 Wisconsin 3.2 3.5 Georgia 4.7 5.0 New Jersey 4.8 6.7 Wyoming 0.3 0.4 Hawaii 0.7 0.8 New Mexico 0.9 0.9 DC 0.4 0.6 Idaho 0.8 0.7 New York 10.3 12.8 Puerto Rico 1.2 0.8 Illinois 6.6 7.6 North Carolina 4.8 5.0 Other Areas 3.0 2.3 Indiana 3.7 3.7 North Dakota 0.4 0.4 Iowa 1.8 1.8 Ohio 5.8 5.8 Kansas 1.6 1.7 Oklahoma 1.9 1.9 Kentucky 2.2 2.1 Oregon 2.0 2.1 Louisiana 2.2 2.2 Pennsylvania 6.8 7.8 Maine 0.8 0.7 Rhode Island 0.6 0.7 Maryland 3.2 4.3 South Carolina 2.3 2.2 11-29-2011 The figures in the table are based on tabulations from the 2008 Social Security Administration, Continuous Work History Sample, 1 percent sample and the Department of Treasury's Office of Tax Analysis estimate of the number of people benefitting in 2012. State designation is based on employee residence. 3

Payroll tax rate cuts tend to provide the largest proportional benefits to middle-class families who are at or below the Social Security tax wage cap of $110,100 for 2012. The payroll tax cut proposed in the American Jobs Act for 2012 provides relatively large benefits to workers who are most likely to spend their additional after-tax income. Increasing middle-class families disposable incomes leads to greater demand, stronger growth, and job creation. Payroll taxes are capped at $110,100 of wages in 2012: Because of the cap on wages and salaries subject to the Social Security payroll tax, cutting the payroll tax rate provides tax relief that is concentrated on low- and middle-income working families. According to analysis by Treasury s Office of Tax Policy: o The President s proposed payroll tax cut is expected to reduce total Federal taxes paid by families in the lowest quintile by 32.3 percent, while those paid by families in the highest quintile are reduced by 5.1 percent and those paid by families in the top 1 percent of the income distribution by just 0.9 percent. o Lower and middle income families will receive a boost to their after-tax income of around 2 percent or more, which will translate directly into greater demand for goods and services by these households. Low- and middle-income families have a higher propensity to spend additions to their aftertax income: The Congressional Budget Office and other independent, nonpartisan economists have found that tax cuts targeted toward low- and middle-income families will generate stronger near-term growth more effectively than tax cuts for high-income taxpayers who tend to save rather than spend additions to their after-tax income. ### 4