Number 11-02 October 2002 BALLOT MEASURE 23 HEALTH CARE FINANCE PLAN



Similar documents
Changes in Oregon's Additional Medical Deduction for Seniors Incorporated in the 2003 Revenue Package. Overview

THE GRADUATED PERSONAL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How Would Expanding Oregon s Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid Affect Elderly Oregonians? A Distributional Analysis of Ballot Measures 88 and 91

The Consequences of Increasing Oregon s Income Tax Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid

(Rev. 6-09)

SCHOOL LOCAL PROPERTY TAX OPTION 1999 Legislation

SCHOOL LOCAL OPTION PROPERTY TAX

School & Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012 Governor's Initiative. Our Children, Our Future 2012: The Education Initiative Molly Munger / PTA

Prescription Drugs. Inside this Brief. Background Brief on. Spending for Prescription Drugs. Medicare and. Prescription Drugs. State Discount Programs

Tax Reform in Texas: Was it the Perfect Storm? Karey Barton Principal

LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE H-197 State Capitol Building Salem, Oregon

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590)

The Consequences of Increasing Oregon s Income Tax Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid

INCOME TAX REFORM. What Does It Mean for Taxpayers?

2005 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

Frequently Asked Questions about Question 3, the Margin Tax Initiative

TAX EXEMPTION FACT SHEETS. Office of Financial Management January 2014

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) Why is the change being made and why does the employee care?

CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE CITY HALL, 435 RYMAN MISSOULA, MT Phone: (406) Fax: (406) LEGAL OPINION

Executive Summary. 204 N. First St., Suite C PO Box 7 Silverton, OR fax

Health Reform Employer Impact Analysis. Sample Employer. Prepared for. Date

Health-Related Revenue Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L )

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE FISCAL NOTE

Oregon Property Tax Statistics Fiscal Year

TEMPORARY TAXES TO FUND EDUCATION. GUARANTEED LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

President Bush s Health Care Tax Deduction Proposal: Coverage, Cost and Distributional Impacts. John Sheils and Randy Haught

Q UANTITATIVE E CONOMICS & S TATISTICS AUGUST 25, Virginia Taxes Paid by Manufacturers

Health Care Reform How it Will Affect Employers and their Group Health Plans. Benecon Comments and Observations

2015 OREGON PUBLIC FINANCE: BASIC FACTS

Impact of the Health Insurance Annual Fee Tax

Effective Federal Income Tax Rates Faced By Small Businesses in the United States

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE

What the federal tax system is costing you besides your taxes! Tax Compliance Facts

Chapter 6: Value Added Tax A Major Replacement Alternative

How To Pass The Health Care Bill

How do the 2016 Presidential Tax Plans Compare So Far?

Legislative Changes For PY2015. Melodye Mitchell, Branch Chief EFS Development Services

Health Care Access Fund Overview and Forecast Changes December 2015

JOINT OVERSIGHT HEARING. Senate Committee on Business, Finance, and Insurance Assembly Committee on Insurance. March 24, 2010

California - Voters approve San Francisco business tax reform

Governor Walker's Tax Reform Initiative. Wisconsin Department of Revenue February 2013

Initiative Measure No filed January 5, 2015

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) and Your Facility

Staying Healthy, Wealthy & Wise: The Aftermath of the Fiscal Cliff. Heather Kovalsky, CPA

Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments

MUNICIPAL BUSINESS TAXES Chapter RCW

Tax Reform & Tax Relief Package

Small Business Tax Credit for Employee Health Expenses

Advisory. The Health Care Reform Bill: How Will Its Tax Provisions Impact You and Your Business? April Impact on Employers

March 13, Hon. Daniel E. Lungren Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California Initiative Coordinator

TAX CHANGES IN THE HEALTHCARE REFORM ACT

26 CFR : Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of correct tax liability.

Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments

Federal Income Tax Information January 29, 2016 Page Federal Income Tax Withholding Information - PERCENTAGE METHOD

Implementation and Effectiveness of the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit

What if Indiana Eliminated Personal Property Taxes? Larry DeBoer Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University. June 2014

Local Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in California

The Civic Federation

Health Insurance Exchange Study

Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI (608) Fax: (608)

Taken from Guide to Ohio s School District Income Tax 2009 Ohio Dept. of Taxation

An Overview of Florida s Insurance Premium Tax

Tax subsidies for private health insurance: who currently benefits and what are the implications for new policies?

Annual Report FY Courtney M. Kay-Decker Director

Tax Subsidies for Private Health Insurance

Cut here and give this certificate to your employer. Keep the top portion for your records. North Carolina Department of Revenue

Leasing Taxes in Illinois and Chicago. Stan Cichowski Director Multistate Tax 111 S. Wacker Dr. Chicago, IL

Missouri Budget and Tax Issues. James R. Moody & Associates January 2013

CHAPTER VIII CONSUMPTION TAX. General

2009 SCHOOL FINANCE LEGISLATION Funding and Distribution

State Ballot Question Issue Brief # 4 SQ 713: Tobacco Tax Increase + Tax Relief + Health Care Initiative

A BILL. To provide a single, universal, comprehensive health insurance benefit for all residents of Illinois, and for other purposes.

Tax Implications of Health Care Reform

Insurance Premium Tax

A GUIDE TO NONPROFIT BOARD SERVICE IN OREGON. Office of the Attorney General

THE Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) annually

Christy Tinnes, Brigen Winters and Christine Keller, Groom Law Group, Chartered

TAX AND REVENUE ISSUES IN THE FY 2010 BUDGET

Comparison of California Health Coverage Expansion Proposals

Highlights of the 2007 Legislative Session

IRS Tax Gap: 2001 and 2006 (Billions)

Oregon Housing and Community Services Administrative Overview August 2003

ANSWERS TO THE MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT CORPORATE TAX REFORM

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL TO EXTEND TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND THE HEALTH COVERAGE TAX CREDIT

The FairTax treatment of insurance

OPTIONS FOR TAX RELIEF FOR FAMILIES. BLUE RIBBON TAX REFORM COMMISSION September 11-12, 2003

Oregon's Senior Population Growth and Property Tax Relief Programs

HEALTHY PA 101. Help for Your Health Care is Here!! Pennsylvania Health Access Network HELPLINE:

Health Care in Rural America

PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING

GROSS RECEIPTS TAX AND BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES ORDINANCE 2014

Summary of the Major Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act

How To Determine Income For Medicaid And Chip

State and Local Taxes. An Overview and Comparative Guide

SCHOOL FINANCE IN COLORADO

Corporation Excise, Retaliatory, and Transition Taxes

The primary purpose of a tax system is to support public goods and services. State and local taxes

InSight. A Littler Mendelson Report. Health Care Reform: Are You Prepared? A Timeline for Employers to Follow

July 2, Honorable Edward M. Kennedy Chairman Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions United States Senate Washington, DC 20510

How To Tax Virginia

Transcription:

LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE State Capitol Building 900 Court St. NE, Room H-197 Salem, Oregon 97301 Research Brief (503) 986-1266 FAX (503) 986-1770 http://www.leg.state.or.us/comm/lro/home.htm Number 11-02 October 2002 BALLOT MEASURE 23 HEALTH CARE FINANCE PLAN Brief Description of the Ballot Measure Ballot Measure 23 has been referred by initiative petition to Oregon voters in the 2002 November general election. This statutory measure finances a state health care program that would be administered by a new public non-profit corporation called the Oregon Health Care Finance Board. If this measure receives voter approval, all Oregonians who choose to participate in the state health care plan could receive health care coverage. This new health care plan would be financed by a personal income and a new payroll tax. Full implementation of the financing of the health care plan would begin in 2005. This report on Ballot Measure 23 only analyzes the potential tax revenue authority the Oregon Health Care Finance Board could impose. It does not address the health care costs of providing the covered services outlined in the measure. The Health Care Finance Board has the authority to annually set progressive personal income and payroll tax rates up to maximum limits outlined in the measure. In addition, the board would only have authority to impose taxes up to the maximum amount of the health care costs provided to Oregonians. The new personal income tax would be paid by individuals and businesses would pay the payroll tax. Table 1 below outlines the maximum tax authority limits that Measure 23 establishes if passed by voters. The start-up costs for the health care plan would be paid through a payroll tax and assessed for 2 years beginning tax year 2003 at a rate of 1% of total payroll. The maximum tax authority for the start-up costs would be approximately $600 million per year. Beginning tax year 2005, the maximum amount of personal income taxes which can be imposed is 3.9% of total personal income annually. In 2005, the maximum personal income tax limit would be $4.6 billion and rise to $5.9 billion by 2009. The payroll tax is limited each year to 9.5% of total payroll. Beginning tax year 2005, the maximum limit on payroll taxes would be $6 billion and by 2009 the maximum payroll tax would be $7.5 billion. The Oregon Health Care Finance Board would have TABLE 1: MAXIMUM TAX AUTHORITY LIMITS UNDER MEASURE 23 (billions) MAXIMUM TAX AUTHORITY Tax Year Personal Income TOTAL 2003 $0.6 $0.6 2004 $0.6 $0.6 2005 $4.6 $6.0 $10.6 2006 $4.9 $6.3 $11.2 2007 $5.2 $6.7 $11.9 2008 $5.6 $7.1 $12.7 2009 $5.9 $7.5 $13.4 Based on the Sept. 2002 DAS Economic and Revenue Forecast Page 1 of 5

tax authority for a total of $10.6 billion when the measure would first be implemented in tax year 2005 and that tax authority would rise to $13.4 billion by 2009. These estimates are based on the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis - September 2002 Economic and Revenue forecast. Measure 23 sets maximum tax and rate limits but allows the Oregon Health Care Finance Board the flexibility to determine the tax rate structure for both the personal income and payroll taxes. The next two sections of this research brief outline a personal income and payroll tax proposal which is estimated to generate the annual maximum tax authority allowed for each tax. These proposals, in Tables 2 and 4, are examples of tax structures suitable to achieve that maximum tax limit. Personal Income Tax The Oregon Health Care Finance Board would be charged with setting the tax rates annually which generate tax revenues which do not exceed the maximum personal income tax limit of 3.9% of Oregon s total personal income. The tax rate structure is to be progressive and the new personal income tax rates for health care services can not exceed 8%. Oregonians, with adjusted gross income below 150% of the poverty level, would be exempt from paying the new income tax. In tax year 2005, it is estimated that 412,837 income tax filers, or 25% of all income tax filers, would not pay any of the increase in taxes for financing the state health care services. If the proposed progressive tax rate structure specified in Table 2 was put in place beginning 2005, it would generate close to the maximum limit for personal income tax revenue. This new proposed personal income tax for health care represents a 89% increase in personal income taxes from current law. In 2005, it is estimated that Oregonians will pay $5.1 billion in personal income tax and if Measure 23 passes, Oregonians will pay an additional $4.6 billion for a total of $9.7 billion in personal income taxes. In tax years 2006-2009, the proposed Oregon tax increase would generate $4.9, $5.2, $5.6 and $5.9 billion respectively. TABLE 2: PROPOSED TAX RATES FOR FINANCING HEALTH CARE SERVICES Single Filers Taxable Joint and Head of Household Proposed Tax Income Filers Taxable Income Rate 0 - $1,500 0 - $3,000 5.5% $1,500 - $3,000 $3,000 - $6,000 6.5% $3,000 - $5,000 $6,000 - $10,000 7.5% Above $5,000 Above $10,000 8.0% Annually, the majority of the income tax returns filed in Oregon, (56%), are from individuals with gross income less than $40,000. A large number of the low income returns are single income tax filers, like students and seniors. The joint income tax filers make up a larger portion of the higher income groups. In 2005, it is estimated that 67% of Oregon s personal income tax will be paid by individuals with total income above $75,000. The overall tax burden of this new personal income tax for health care in Oregon is illustrated in Table 3. If Oregon has higher income taxes from the passage of Measure 23, Oregonians will also have a larger state income tax deduction on their federal income taxes which will lower federal income taxes. The average tax increase and tax burden estimates take into consideration not only the increase in Oregon personal income taxes but also the reduction in future federal income taxes. The total tax increase on average for all tax returns in Oregon would be 4.6% of gross income. Since the majority of the low-income tax filers are exempt from paying this tax, the total tax increase as a percent of gross income for low-income tax filers is less than the total tax burden for all returns. In 2005, all tax returns on average would have an increase of $2,415 if Page 2 of 5

Measure 23 passes. On average single income tax filers would have an increase of $1,323. Families, filing joint tax returns, would have an increase of $3,336 on average in 2005. These personal income tax estimates for Measure 23 do not take into consideration the credit allowed, under certain conditions, for existing health insurance premiums. TABLE 3: BREAKDOWN BY GROSS INCOME OF A PROPOSED M23 PERSONAL INCOME TAX TAX YEAR 2005 GROSS INCOME TOTAL TAX RETURNS OREGON TAX INCREASE (millions) TOTAL OREGON + FEDERAL TAX INCREASE AS % OF GROSS INCOME AVERAGE INCREASE IN OREGON + FEDERAL TAX PER RETURN ALL ALL ALL RETURNS ALL SINGLE FAMILY RETURNS RETURNS RETURNS LESS THAN 10,000 257,751 9.7 1.7% 37.5 45.6 0 10,000 TO 20,000 266,911 95.7 2.4% 355.6 551.5 45.1 20,000 TO 30,000 215,707 261.8 4.8% 1,180.6 1,406.2 865.8 30,000 TO 40,000 167,304 326.4 5.3% 1,843.5 1,897.3 1,780.3 40,000 TO 50,000 137,076 350.3 5.1% 2,304.0 2,167.3 2,389.5 50,000 TO 75,000 219,448 758.5 5.0% 2,999.7 2,660.6 3,118.2 75,000 TO 100,000 202,872 1,009.4 5.0% 4,139.8 4,007.7 4,159.2 100,000 TO 200,000 118,890 983.5 5.2% 6,796.9 7,159.0 6,754.5 200,000 AND OVER 38,815 764.3 3.4% 16,317.5 16,848.2 16,245.7 STATE 1,624,774 4,559.6 4.6% 2,414.5 1,323.0 3,335.6 Tax Annually, the Oregon Health Care Finance Board would determine a payroll tax structure which does not exceed the maximum payroll tax revenue limit of 9.5% of Oregon s total payroll. This payroll tax will be paid by private businesses, schools as well as state and local governments. Like the personal income tax, the payroll tax structure must also be progressive based on total payroll and the tax rates must be between 3% and 11.5%. Table 4 illustrates a proposed TABLE 4: PROPOSED PAYROLL TAX RATES FOR MEASURE 23 Progressive Total Tax Structure 0 - $100,000 3.0% $100,000 - $500,000 6.0% $500,000 - $1 million 7.0% $1 million - $2 million 8.0% $2 million - $3 million 9.0% $3 million - $5 million 10.0% $5 million - $10 million 11.0% Above $10 million 11.5% progressive payroll tax structure which would generate payroll tax revenues close to the maximum payroll tax limit as specified in Table 1. Page 3 of 5

The estimates for the payroll tax are based on the Oregon Employment Department total payroll data for 2001. Table 5 provides some background statistics on the private industry total payroll in Oregon and the amount of payroll tax which would be assessed given a proposed tax structure as outlined in Table 4. In 2005, it is estimated that 16% of Oregon businesses will have no payroll. In addition, 49% of Oregon businesses will be small with an average of 2 employees per company and total payrolls of less than $100,000. 89% of all Oregon companies had total payrolls of $500,000 or less and 94% of all businesses had payrolls less than $1 million. Any new payroll tax will be paid primarily by the large businesses in Oregon because these companies have the largest portion of the total payroll in the state. In 2005, it is estimated that a progressive payroll tax would generate $5.5 billion from private businesses with $3.5 billion (64%) being paid by businesses with $10 million or more in annual total payroll. 790 companies statewide (.7% of all businesses) are estimated to have total payrolls above $10 million in 2005. Small businesses, with total payrolls of less than $100,000, would be paying an additional $1,068 per year on average if Measure 23 passes. As the business s total payroll rises, so does the average payroll tax per company. For those businesses with total payroll between $5 million and $10 million, the average payroll tax per business would be $647,136. For large companies with payrolls above $10 million, the average payroll tax is biased upward due to a few companies paying a large payroll tax so the average payroll tax per business is significantly higher at $4.4 million. Statewide, the average payroll tax per business would be $46,155. TABLE 5: BREAKDOWN OF PRIVATE INDUSTRY PAYROLL TAX BY TOTAL PAYROLL Tax Year 2005 Average Number Of Total Total Average Tax Private Industry Total Number of Employees (billions) Tax per company Companies (billions) 0 19,526 0 0.000 0.000 0 0 - $100,000 58,663 2 2.089 0.063 1,068 $100,000 - $500,000 28,091 8 6.271 0.292 10,394 $500,000 - $1 million 5,732 20 4.005 0.235 40,914 $1 million - $2 million 3,498 39 4.881 0.328 93,627 $2 million - $3 million 1,277 65 3.122 0.232 182,058 $3 million - $5 million 1,134 101 4.367 0.360 317,084 $5 million - $10 million 810 173 5.634 0.524 647,136 Above $10 million 790 840 31.446 3.484 4,410,127 Private Industry STATEWIDE 119,521 139 61.815 5.516 46,155 Estimates based on Oregon Employment Department Data for 2001 Figure 1 graphically illustrates the differences in the average payroll tax per private industry group for 2005. The average payroll tax per business ranges from $19,275 for the construction industry to $163,813 for manufacturing companies. The reason why the construction industry has the lowest average payroll tax per company is because there are a lot of small businesses in this industry. In contrast, some of the largest companies with largest payrolls per company in Oregon are in the manufacturing sector. Therefore, this industry s average payroll tax would be significantly higher than any other sectors in the state. The services industry pays the largest portion of the total payroll tax at 32%. The manufacturing industry pays 24%, the second largest portion of the total payroll tax. Together, these two industry groups, services and manufacturing, pay 56% of the total payroll tax. Page 4 of 5

Figure 1: 2005 Average Tax Increase By Industry 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 26,645 19,275 41,221 Natural Resources Construction Finance+ Insurance 163,813 Manufacturing Retail Trade 40,621 30,265 Services 109,729 Transp.+Utilties 39,880 Wholesale Trade Table 6 below provides private industry as well as public agencies payroll tax estimates for tax years 2005-2009. It is estimated that a proposed payroll tax, like that specified in Table 4, would generate a total of $5.9 and $6.3 billion in 2005 and 2006 respectively. These total payroll tax estimates are close to the maximum payroll tax amount allowed for tax years, 2005-2007. Beginning tax year 2008, this proposed progressive payroll tax structure would exceed the maximum payroll tax allowed. Consequently, adjustments in the payroll tax rates would need to be made by the Oregon Health Care Finance Board. Private industry is annually paying 94% of the estimated payroll tax for health care services and 6% of the tax would be paid by state and local governments. TABLE 6: TOTAL PAYROLL TAX ESTIMATES FOR TAX YEARS 2005-2009 Tax Estimates (billions) Tax Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL Private Industry STATEWIDE 5.52 5.91 6.35 6.74 7.15 TOTAL Public Agencies STATEWIDE 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.43 0.46 TOTAL PUBLIC + PRIVATE STATEWIDE 5.86 6.28 6.75 7.17 7.61 Estimates based on Oregon Employment Department Data for 2001 Page 5 of 5