TAX ABATEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE



Similar documents
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAMS in New York City

Tax Increment Financing in Polk County

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOOLS AND TRENDS BRIDGING THE FINANCING GAP APRIL 2, 2015

Historic Tax Incentive For

Debt Service/ Excluded Tax Rates. Combined. Rate

Commercial Rehabilitation Tax Abatement (PA 210) Application Guidelines October 21, 2008

6. Utilities and Communications

Olmsted County Regional Housing Needs Forum. Stacie Kvilvang Ehlers

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Development Services Department

DRAFT Enterprise Community Partners CITY OF DURHAM. Date GOALS. Karen Lado, Consultant March 10, 2016

Adaptive Reuse/Building Rehabilitation Program

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

WHEREAS, Santa Monica is a coastal city in a prime location, being bordered by the City of Los Angeles to the north, east and south; and

City of Houston Economic Development Programs. Presented by: Andy Icken Chief Development Officer

Stabilizing Rural Communities Through Housing Partnerships

REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS FOR. Compostable Kraft Yard Waste Bags. October 14, Issued by METRO WASTE AUTHORITY. 300 East Locust Street, Suite 100

Buncombe County Project Development Financing Policy

CITY OF LEHI, UTAH GENERAL PLAN MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ELEMENT

TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 130--NATIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUBCHAPTER II--INVESTMENT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING

City of Orlando Economic Development Tools for Job Growth and Economic Prosperity

Request for City Council Committee Action from the Department of Community Planning & Economic Development - CPED

First-Time Homebuyer Programs in Portland

Government of the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Planning & Development Department City of Marion, Iowa Phone: Fax:

Attachment 3 DCHA Response to FY2016 Budget Oversight Pre-hearing Questions. DC Housing Authority Capital Needs and Maintenance Review

Gustav/Ike Hurricane Recovery

THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2004 C ROBERT R. OVROM, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ARTICLE 345. Tax Incremental Financing Plan

METROPOLITAN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN II OLD ALBUQUERQUE HIGH SCHOOL

State Tax Credits for Historic Preservation A State-by-State Summary. States with income tax incentives States that do not tax income

Reviewed and Approved


URA / Bridgeway Capital Workshop for Mainstreets Managers. Tom Link, Manager, Business Development Center. May 15, 2009

Washtenaw County Economic Development Incentives & Programs

HB What does it mean to me?

7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Redevelopment. Resource Guide

H.R Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008

Historic Designation and Financial Incentives for Building Rehabilitation

Fiscal impact analysis of three development scenarios in Nashville-Davidson County, TN

III. Focused Issues. 1. Economic Development C I T Y OF P E T E R S B U R G, V I R G I N I A - C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N 2 011

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title )

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Frederick. Frederick. Maryland. Smart Growth Successes. Frederick. Maryland Department of Planning

ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOARD FOR CAMDEN

Village of Cambridge. Tax Incremental Financing Policy & Application

MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION of COUNTY TREASURERS. Tax Increment Financing Programs: An Interactive Overview

KALAMAZOO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUILDING REHABILITATION PROGRAM

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations. Table of Contents

RAD Implementation - Development Team RFQ. SF Housing Authority Commission. January 30, 2014

Green Development Profile: Greater Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky LISC Complete Profile

OBSOLETE PROPERTY REHABILITATION ACT Act 146 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:

Request for Information

How To Build A Home In A Neighborhood Of A Large Size

Submittal Requirements for Development Projects

Tashman Johnson LLC Consultants in Policy, Planning & Project Management

J-51 Property Tax Exemptions and Abatements June 4, 2003

CITY OF NORMANDY PARK MANHATTAN VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA STRATEGY AND CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN

A LETTER FROM THE CEO

Borough of Glassboro, New Jersey May Redevelopment Plan for Rehabilitation In the Borough of Glassboro May 2010

Creating More Affordable Housing in Chicago

Market Summary. prepared by FXM Associates 6.1. North River Canal Corridor

Multi-family Affordable. Becky Christoffersen, Midwest Housing Development Fund, Inc.

Understanding the tax base consequences of local economic development programs

Land Banks and Affordable Housing

City of Elkhart Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Plan

Revitalizing. Tulsa.

Economic Development Funding Matrix. Page 1 of 5

Tax Allocation District Redevelopment Plan for the Stadium Neighborhoods Tax Allocation District Atlanta, Georgia

COMMUNITY ACQUISITION REHABILITATION LOAN CARL CARL TERM SHEET AND GUIDELINES

MACOMB COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE FOR VACANT FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

NCLB. Development Resource Directory. Newburgh Community Land Bank

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY Recommended July 23, 2013

SECTION 2 CORRIDOR A

Transcription:

TAX ABATEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE Public Presentation, August 19, 2015

Process for Amendment Program expires December 31 st, 2015 Staff research and analysis Summer 2015 Public meeting held August 2015 Gather feedback to present to City Council Amended staff recommendations City Council decision on how to proceed Fall 2015 Implementation January 1, 2016

Goal Statements for Program Stabilize, improve, and raise value of existing housing stock Support high quality, sustainable new construction Reduce blight in neighborhoods and along corridors Encourage housing product options in targeted areas that market may currently lack Target development in areas where existing infrastructure is already in place

Considerations for Recommendations Multi-family property tax rollback by State Current real estate market momentum Future municipal budget considerations Abatement has not increased single-family housing starts Continued emphasis on housing rehabilitation

Considerations for Recommendations Target abatement to coincide with development & housing plan initiatives: PlanDSM Capital Crossroads Tomorrow Plan Polk County Housing Trust Fund Des Moines Strategic Plan

Current Abatement Schedules Residential Rehabilitation Schedule 1: 10-year, 115%, capped at $20,000 in abated value Commercial & Industrial (outside the downtown) Schedule 2: 10-year declining Schedule 3: 3-year, 100% Residential & Multi-Family Schedule 4A: 10-year, 100% (targeted area only) Schedule 4B: 5-year, 100% (Citywide)

Residential Tax Abatement is NOT AVAILABLE in most of Ankeny, Clive, Grimes, Johnston, Urbandale, Waukee, West Des Moines, or Windsor Heights. Residential Tax Abatement: Other Metro Cities Municipality Abatement Type Maximum Amount Abated (Capped Value) Percentage of Value Abated Des Moines-10 yr. Full 10 year None 100% Des Moines-5 yr. Full 5 year None 100% Des Moines Rehab Full 10 year $20,000 115% Des Moines (Graduated) Graduated 10 year None 80%-20% Altoona Full 5 year $75,000 100% Ankeny (Uptown Area Only) Graduated 10 year None 80%-20% Bondurant Graduated 5 year None 80%-20% Carlisle Graduated 5 year None 90%-20% Pleasant Hill #1 Graduated 5 year None 75%-15% Pleasant Hill #2 (rehab) Full 10 year None 90%

Number of Applications by Schedule 4,000 3,976 2008 2012 2014 3,500 3,000 2,688 3,010 2,500 2,000 1,964 2,181 2,046 1,868 1,500 1,204 1,000 724 500 0 224178 200 10 Schedule yr. 115% 1under Schedule 10 yr. Declining 2 - $20,000 10 yr. 115% - Sched 1 Sched 2 Rehab 10 yr. Declining Residential/ Commercial 40 47 10 Schedule 3yr /100% 3-3 yr. Sched 100% 3 Commercial Schedule Dtown 4A 10 yr./100% 100% - Sched Targeted 4a Area City Schedule 5yr./100% 4B - 5 yr. Sched 100% 4b Citywide

Residential Applications by Tax District- Rehabilitation ABATEMENT APPLICATIONS - REHABILTIATION District 100 361 District 090 242 District 080 102 District 070 153 District 030 48 District 020 26 District 110 147 District 040 34 District 060 300 District 050 79 Tax District # Apps $Amt. $Avg. 010 258 $3,503,110 $13,578 020 26 $360,600 $13,869 030 48 $640,450 $13,343 040 34 $453,500 $13,338 050 79 $988,780 $12,516 060 300 $3,440,950 $12,516 070 153 $1,945,880 $12,718 080 102 $1,335,660 $13,095 090 242 $3,214,490 $13,283 100 361 $4,364,800 $12,091 110 147 $1,944,390 $13,227 120 194 $3,043,560 $15,688 District 010 258 District 120 194 Consistently used across the city Average value is similar city-wide

Residential Applications by Tax District- New Construction/Major Rehabilitation ABATEMENT APPLICATIONS NEW CONSTRUCTION (4A & 4B) District 100 75 District 090 228 District 080 356 District 070 24 District 110 District 030 410 District 020 917 3 District 040 284 District 060 137 District 050 86 Tax District # Apps $Amt. $Avg. 010 131 $20,673,960 $157,816 020 917 $135,475,510 $147,738 030 410 $71,211,970 $173,688 040 284 $33,083,190 $116,490 050 86 $7,689,730 $89,415 060 137 $25,620,680 $187,012 070 24 $1,539,270 $64,136 080 356 $17,594,960 $49,424 090 228 $32,089,520 $140,743 100 75 $7,277,260 $97,030 110 3 $185,260 $61,753 120 311 $37,155,230 $119,470 District 010 131 District 120 311 Highly utilized in areas with significant new construction

Tax Abatement Data Number of projects receiving abatement have decreased by 50% since 2008 DM Register article: 3.5% of new homes in DSM area cost less than $200,000, the market for first time homebuyers. The average price of a newly constructed home is $316,000. Average 2014 Schedule 4B new construction application value: $165,000 Total taxable value abated in 2014: $482 million Represents about $3.9 million in city property tax revenues in 2014

Metro Residential Permit Data: Single-Family/Townhome 3500 3000 3042 Single-Family Building Permit Totals 2008-2014 2500 2000 1500 1000 903 1238 1224 2118 Single-Family Building Permit Totals 500 0 Ankeny Des Moines Urbandale Waukee West Des Moines Source: DSM Homebuilders Association & DSM Permit Data

Metro Residential Permit Data: Multi- Family Dwelling Units 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1613 1661 Multi-Family Units Permitted 2008-2014 150 575 1624 Ankeny Des Moines Urbandale Waukee West Des Moines Multi-Family Units Permitted Source: DSM Homebuilders Association & DSM Permit Data

Multi-Family Rollback Year Assessment Rollback Reduction in Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation Property taxes paid 2014 $1,500,000 0 0 $ 1,500,000 $69,000 2015 $1,500,000 86.25% 13.75% $ 1,293,750 $59,513 2016 $1,500,000 82.50% 17.50% $ 1,237,500 $56,925 2017 $1,500,000 78.50% 21.50% $ 1,177,500 $54,165 2018 $1,500,000 75.00% 25.00% $ 1,125,000 $51,750 2019 $1,500,000 71.25% 28.75% $ 1,068,750 $49,163 2020 $1,500,000 67.50% 32.50% $ 1,012,500 $46,575 2021 $1,500,000 63.75% 36.25% $ 956,250 $43,988 Same as 2022 Single Family

Recommended Tax Abatement City of Des Moines Tax Abatement Staff Recommendations

Single-Family Residential: New Construction/Rehab Current: 5-year, 100% citywide Proposed: Reduce to 5-year declining schedule, Keep 5-year, 100% for rehab/additions Effective 1/1/16

Single-Family Residential: New Construction in Targeted Area Current: 10-year, 100% in targeted area Proposed: Reduce to 5- year 100%, then 5-year declining schedule Keep 10-year, 100% for rehab/additions Extend full eligibility for one additional year Effective 1/1/17

Single-Family Rollback Year Assess ment Rollback Assessed Valuation After RB Tax Rate % Abated Property Taxes Abated* Property Taxes Paid* 2014 $175,000 0.557335 $97,533.63.04767311 100 $4,649.73-2015 $175,000 0.557335 $97,533.63.04767311 80 $3,719.78 929.95 2016 $175,000 0.557335 $97,533.63.04767311 60 $2,789.84 1,859.89 2017 $175,000 0.557335 $97,533.63.04767311 40 $1,859.89 2,789.84 2018 $175,000 0.557335 $97,533.63.04767311 20 $929.95 $3,719.78 *After 5 Years of No Tax Abatement Property taxes paid would be $23,248.66 **After a 5 Year 100 % Tax Abatement Schedule property taxes abated would be $23,248.66 ***After using a 5-Year Graduated Tax Abatement Schedule property taxes abated would be $13,949.19 and taxes paid would be $9,299.46

Single-Family Residential: New Construction Basis for Recommendations: Brings abatement more in line with what other metro communities offer Abatement not shown to increase single-family housing starts over multiple years Recommend modifying targeted areas with future land use plan update (PlanDSM)

Single-Family Residential: Rehabilitation Current: 10-year, 115% Citywide, (capped at $20,000 project value)* Proposed: No Change Seek increase in maximum value allowed from State *Currently at the maximum benefit allowed by law

Single-Family Residential: Rehabilitation Basis for Recommendations: Schedule 1 is a popular choice for small housing rehabilitation projects and most frequently used citywide Maintains emphasis on rehabbing existing housing stock Seek increase in maximum value allowed from State to give more incentive to make housing renovations

Multi-Family Residential: Rehabilitation Current: 5-year, 100% Citywide. 10-year, 100% in targeted area. Proposed: No Change Effective 1/1/16 Citywide

Multi-Family Residential: Rehabilitation Basis for Recommendations: Maintains incentive to rehab existing properties Bring existing properties into conformance with current design guidelines for significant rehabilitation (for projects with construction value 50% or more of current assessed building value)

Multi-Family Residential: New Construction Outside the Targeted Area Current: 5-year, 100% citywide Proposed: Eliminate tax abatement for all multi-family new construction outside of Targeted Area Effective 1/1/16

Multi-Family Residential: New Construction Outside the Targeted Area Basis for Recommendations: Property tax reduction already provided by state rollback (phased in from 2014-2021) Recommend amending multi-family design guidelines for site plan approval to leverage higher construction standards

Multi-Family Residential: New Construction Inside the Targeted Area Current: 10-year, 100% Proposed: 5-year, 100%, then 5-year declining Keep 10-year, 100% schedule in place for one additional year for projects currently in process Includes residential conversion of commercial buildings Effective 1/1/17

Multi-Family Residential: Inside the Targeted Area Basis for Recommendations: Numerous phased or large-scale projects currently in planning phases (Riverpoint West/Gray s Landing, The Bridge District, East Village, Wilkins Building, Two Rivers District) Developers need certainty of tax abatement for project pro formas on current projects Keep reduced abatement schedule as a tool to help offset higher redevelopment costs in urban core

Commercial Tax Abatement Current: 3-year 100% abatement or 10-year declining schedule (outside of Downtown Overlay District) Proposed: No change Minor amendments to design guidelines for Industrial projects Effective 1/1/16

Commercial Tax Abatement Basis for Recommendations: Current design guidelines need minor adjustment, but standards are working to incent higher quality development

Schedule Existing Proposed Schedule 1 (rehabilitation) Residential 10-year, 115% - Citywide No changes Summary of Recommendations Seek increase in maximum value allowed from State Schedule 2 Residential, Commercial 10-year, declining - Commercial outside the Downtown Overlay Eliminate for residential, Keep for commercial outside Downtown Overlay District Schedule 3 Commercial 3-year, 100% - Commercial outside the Downtown Overlay No changes, amend design guidelines for industrial Schedule 4A (new construction/significant rehabilitation) Residential 10-year, 100% - Targeted Area Reduce to 5-year, 100% then 5-year declining for new construction Keep 10-year, 100% for rehabilitation Keep current schedule in place for 1 additional year in Targeted Area Schedule 4B (new construction/significant rehabilitation) Residential 5-year, 100% - Citywide Reduce to 5-year declining for new construction of single-family & townhomes Keep 5-year, 100% for rehabilitation Eliminate multi-family eligibility for new construction only (keep for rehabilitation)

Schedule/Type of Project *See accompanying handout High Priority Medium Priority Low Priority Multi-Family New Citywide X Multi-Family New Targeted Area Multi-Family Rehab Citywide X X Multi-Family Rehab Targeted Area X Single-Family New Citywide X Single-Family New Targeted Single-Family Rehab Citywide Single-Family Rehab Targeted Area X X X Commercial/Industrial X

Implementation Considerations Any new construction or rehabilitation commenced under a building permit by December 31 st, 2015 and diligently pursued to completion may receive abatement under current schedules One year extension for projects in targeted area would allow abatement under current schedule for building permits obtained by December 31 st, 2016 Suggest 3-year program extension (2016 through 2018)

Tax Abatement Final Considerations Suggest follow up once PlanDSM is completed Consideration may be given to future redevelopment needs in select neighborhoods and corridors LIHTC applications given bonus points for local funding contribution, tax abatement counts as contribution Monitor effects of reduced abatement on development projects, new housing starts, market conditions Next step: Present feedback received to City Council, with Staff recommendations on how to proceed

Questions?? City of Des Moines Community Development Department