Transportation Assessment TracAnalysis

Transcription

1 Transportation Assessment TracAnalysis Final Report Prepared for: Boulder Valley School District March 213

2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 COMPARATIVE DATA... 3 ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING... 8 ROUTE PLANNING DISPATCH... 2 MAINTENANCE DRIVER RECRUITING AND RETENTION SAFETY AND TRAINING FACILITIES FLEET PLANNING BUDGET AND COST CONTROLS ROUTEYIELD ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF KEY INITIATIVES Appendices A. T.E.A.M.S. B. Safety Climate Analysis C. Bus Inspection Worksheets D. Principal Evaluations E. Transportation Cost Allocation F. Comparable Financial Data G. Recaps of Routes by Program Type AM H. Recaps of Routes by Program Type PM I. Time & Capacity Utilization by School AM J. Time & Capacity Utilization by School PM K. Current Bell Time Tiers AM L. Current Bell Time Tiers PM M. Resource Utilization Timeline - AM N. Resource Utilization Timeline - PM

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Management Partnership Solutions, Inc. was engaged to perform a comprehensive review of the Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) student transportation system. Over a period of two months the following functions were analyzed for performance and compared to common industry standards and best practices: Organization and Staffing Dispatch Maintenance Driver Recruitment Safety and Training Facilities Fleet Planning Route Planning Time and Capacity Utilization (RouteYield ) Budget and Cost Control Building Principal Satisfaction Operationally we found the management team to be very well organized with documented processes and procedures in place that meet or exceed industry standards. In particular, the driver recruiting, screening, and training was exceptional. Overall effectiveness was further demonstrated by a relatively high level of satisfaction among the building principals. The analysis revealed that BVSD operating costs are high when compared to other districts. In particular the cost per student and bus were high while the cost per mile was in the mid-to-high range of peers. The broad geographical area served in BVSD certainly lifts the per bus and per student costs yet the impact of this operating environment is further evidenced in the relatively satisfactory per mile cost. It is our judgment that two factors contribute to the high costs borne by the system: School opening and closing bell times Fleet related costs Bell Times The chart below depicts the wide variety of bell times employed by the district. The impact of such an array is that buses cannot be scheduled to serve multiple schools. We have taken the liberty of summarizing the various bell times as the buildings actually employ in excess of 5 unique times. Throughout the United States and Colorado commonly districts target buses to serve three schools in the morning and a corresponding three in the afternoon or triple-routed. This results in an overall rate achieved in many districts of 2.5 to 2.8 runs per bus. The runs per bus rate for BVSD is 1.76 per bus some 33% less efficient than most districts. Page 1

4 With the adoption of three distinct bell times for the district and properly balancing the number schools throughout the schedule it is estimated that about forty buses could be reduced resulting in operating cost reductions approaching $2,5, per year. Fleet Related Costs Our analysis of the fleet and its maintenance revealed relatively high costs. This is primarily the result of: Too many buses being maintained and insured Average fleet age of approximately 1 years An industry target for spare buses is 15% in excess of regularly routed buses and the average fleet age target is 7-8 years. The 15% allows for bus maintenance scheduling and school activity trips. The BVSD fleet exceeds the spare ratio target by 54 buses and the average age of the fleet is about ten years. Both factors create additional costs. Should BVSD adopt a lower number of spares the fleet costs would be reduced. Organization and Staffing The level of organization and the documentation of policies and procedures meet or exceed that which we find in other districts. In particular, we found the driver recruiting, screening and training to be very well organized. Recommendations will be found to help the team become more data-driven in its management and decision processes. Page 2

5 COMPARATIVE DATA The direct comparison of school district transportation systems can be very difficult. Rider eligibility polices, geographic challenges, nature of the community(s), labor market competiveness, etc., have significant cost impacts and can account for uncontrollable differences. However, some broad judgment may be made and therefore general comparative analysis provides for more informed decision making. Boulder Valley School District Operational Summary Transportation is provided to a service area of approximately 5 square miles serving the communities of Boulder, Gold Hill, Jamestown, Lafayette, Louisville, Nederland, Superior, Ward, and section of Broomfield, and Erie. Total enrollment is 27,387 students making the Boulder Valley School District the eighth largest district in the state. Over 1, students are scheduled to be transported daily to the District s 66 schools and programs. However only about 5,2 regular education and 41 special needs students were transported on the school day the bus system activity was measured. Service is provided on 182 route buses, 99 regular education and 83 special needs buses. A fleet of 264 school buses and Chevrolet Suburbans are available to serve the daily needs. Transportation services are self-managed with all managerial, operational, support, and fleet maintenance staff employed by the district. The department is managed by an administrative organization structure consisting of a Director, three terminal managers, four dispatchers, one payroll clerk, one extra trip clerk, one administrative clerk, and one Transportation Coordinator. Routing is managed by three full time employees with one each for regular education planning, one for special needs planning, and a specialist for the maintenance of the map. Safety training and oversight is provided one manager supported by three part-time trainers who also serve as route drivers. Buses are dispatched from the district s three terminals which are also responsible for the maintenance of the fleet assigned to their area. The fleet maintenance function staffed by a one Fleet and Service Manager, three lead mechanics, eleven mechanics, and five mechanics helpers or trainees. The department is supported by a one administrative clerk and two parts clerks. Regulatory and Policy Framework: Eligibility is determined by locally approved policies within the guidelines established by state law. Transportation is provided for students who meet the following criteria: Elementary students who live beyond a 1.5 mile distance from school; Middle school students who live beyond a 2. mile distance from school; High school students who live beyond a 2.5 miles distance from school; Students who would be exposed to hazardous condition conditions; Students whose school of attendance has been changed as a result of a change in boundaries; Elementary ESL/ELL students assigned to schools other than their neighborhood school; All special needs students as determined by their IEP. Pay Range for Bus Drivers: The 212/213 pay scale for bus drivers 1 ranged from a beginning wage of $14.96 to a high of $18.23 per hour. 1 Agreement: Boulder Valley Classified Employees Association 212/213 Salary Schedule Page 3

6 Cost of Services: Total expenditures as compiled by TransPar from information provided by the District found transportation services for the fiscal year to be $16,85,773 which included $3,471,424 of vehicle, buildings and grounds capital outlays. We utilized the pupil transportation cost and scheduled rider information from the Colorado Department of Education reports in order to make apples-to-apples comparisons with other school districts. Transportation service expenditures (excluding capital costs) for were $12,589, Transportation represents 7% of the District s FY 212 operating budget of $175,495, The number of pupils scheduled to be transported was 9,474. A cost recap is as follows: Measure Boulder Valley School District (212) Annual cost per route bus $ 69,173 Annual cost per student $ 1,329 Cost as percent of total district costs 7.2% 2 Colorado Department of Education Public School Finance/Transportation Operation Analysis 3 BVSD Revised and Adopted Budget 211/212 Page 4

7 Douglas County School District Operational Summary The Douglas County School District is Colorado s fourth largest district serving an area of approximately 926 square miles with a population of approximately 292,. District enrollment is over 63, students with transportation provided to over 31, out of 33, eligible students on approximately 225 active route buses to the district s 68 educational facilities. Transportation services are self-managed with all managerial, operational, support, and staff employed by the district. The department is managed by an administrative organization structure consisting of a Director, a Fleet Manager, three Terminal Managers, three Assistant Terminal Managers, six secretaries, a Field Trip Manager, a Scheduling/Project Manager, a Special Needs Manager, and a ZPass Coordinator. Buses are dispatched from the district s three terminals which are also responsible for the maintenance of the fleet assigned to their area. Regulatory and Policy Framework: Eligibility is determined by locally approved policies within the guidelines established by state law. Transportation is provided for students who meet the following criteria: Elementary students who live beyond a 1. mile radius from school; Secondary students who live beyond a 2. mile radius from school; Students who live in areas absent of safe walking routes; and All special needs students as determined by their IEP. Pay Range for Bus Drivers: The 212/213 pay scale for bus drivers 4 ranged from a beginning wage of $14.28 to a high of $22.49 per hour. Cost of Services: Total expenditures on transportation services for the fiscal year were $18,359,14. Transportation represents three percent of the District s FY 212 expenditures of $574,762, The number of pupils scheduled to be transported was 31,159. A cost recap is as follows: Measure Douglas County School District (212) Annual cost per route bus $81,596 Annual cost per student $589 Costs as percent of total district costs 3.2% Amalgamated Transit Union Agreement 5 Douglas County School District FY Financial Plan and Budget Page 5

8 Poudre School District Operational Summary Transportation is provided to a service area of approximately 1,85 sq. miles. Total enrollment is approximately 27, students making it one of the largest districts in the state. Nearly 12, regular education and special needs students are transported to the District s 5 elementary and secondary schools on approximately 15 buses. NOTE: The administrative and organizational structure has been requested. This section will be updated pending receipt of information from the district. Regulatory and Policy Framework: Eligibility is determined by locally approved policies within the guidelines established by state law. Transportation is provided for students who meet the following criteria: Elementary students who live beyond a 1. mile distance from school; Junior High students living beyond a 1.5 mile distance from school; Senior High students living beyond a 2. distance from school; Students who would be exposed to hazardous condition conditions; and All special needs students as determined by their ITP. Pay Range for Bus Drivers: The 212/213 pay scale for bus drivers 6 ranged from a beginning wage of $13.8 to a high of $19.31 per hour. Cost of Services: Total expenditures on transportation services for the fiscal year were $6,85,371. This represents two percent of the District s FY 212 expenditures of $32,536,343. The number of students scheduled to be transported was 11,81. A cost recap is as follows: Measure Poudre School District (212) Annual cost per route bus $4,569 Annual cost per student $515 Costs as percent of total district costs 2.% 6 Classified Hourly Salary Schedule H Page 6

9 St. Vrain Valley School District Operational Summary Transportation is provided to a service area of over 411 sq. miles serving all or portions of 13 different communities including parts of Boulder County and the community of Broomfield. Total enrollment is approximately 27, students making the district the ninth largest in the state. Approximately 11, regular education and special needs students are transported to the District s 51 elementary, secondary, and charter schools on approximately 118 buses 7. Transportation services are self-managed with all managerial, operational, support, and staff employed by the district. The department is managed by an administrative organization structure consisting of a Director, dispatch and scheduling personnel, lead drivers, and fleet maintenance mechanics 8. NOTE: This information is based on information available on the district s website. More specific and definitive information has been requested. Regulatory and Policy Framework: Eligibility is determined by locally approved policies within the guidelines established by state law. Transportation is provided for students who meet the following criteria: Half-day kindergarten students are eligible to either a ride to school or home providing they live beyond 1.5 miles from school; Full-day kindergarten to grade 8 students who live beyond a 1.5 mile distance from school; Senior High students living beyond a 2.5 distance from school; Students living in exception areas based on safety considerations; and Special needs students as determined by their IEP. In addition to distance based eligibility criteria, students who live within the walk zone may apply for space-available transportation from an established stop providing there is space on the bus. Pay Range for Bus Drivers: The 212/213 pay scale for bus drivers ranges from a beginning wage of $14.26 to a high of $2.52 per hour. Cost of Services: Total expenditures on transportation services for the fiscal year were $6,249,739. Transportation represents four percent of the District s FY 212 expenditures 9 of $164,173,637. The number of students scheduled to be transported was 1,938. A cost recap is as follows: Measure St. Vrain Valley School District (212) Annual cost per route bus $52,964 Annual cost per student $572 Costs as percent of total district costs 3.8% 7 Based on FY 29-1 District Information District Website Salary Schedule Classified Staff 9 St. Vrain Comprehensive Annual Report FY 212 Page 7

10 ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING Customer Service, Policies and Procedures Management of student transportation does not differ from any other department in that it is incumbent upon management to select, organize, maintain, and adjust staff to meet all demands. Establishing and reviewing action plans, developing people, adopting new methods and technologies are part of the ongoing efforts required to be efficient and successful. All pupil transportation systems are unique. This section reviews issues of quantity, use of staff assets, training of staff, demands, and overall productivity. The figure below briefly describes the functional responsibilities prevalent in all student transportation operations, regardless of size, scope, or relative complexity: Student Transportation Functional Responsibilities Capital / replacement planning Maintenance & repair Fueling Bus route development Operational analysis Technology support Fleet Management Routing & Analysis Administrative Support Operations Payroll Human resources Procurement & accounting Special trip admin Dispatch Bus operations On-road supervision Training & safety Page 8

11 The District provided the following organization chart dated 7/31/12: In working with more than one hundred school districts in over twenty states TransPar has developed a staffing guideline based upon the number of buses operated. Using the ratios for 182 route buses the staff members are forecasted and compared to the Boulder Valley staffing levels: Page 9

12 Transportation Department Staffing Guidelines* Staff: Route Bus Ratio Model (182 Buses) BVSD Function Position Operations Director 1:3 1 1 Terminal Manager 1: Dispatcher 1:5 4 4 Payroll Clerk 1: Extra Trip Clerk 1: Admin 1: Trans Coordinator 1.5 Bud/Ops Analyst 1:1-5 1 Subtotal Maintenance (add spares to ratios) Service Manager 1:3 1 1 Shop Foreman 1: Lead Mechanic 1: Mechanic 1: Mechanic Helper 4 Parts Clerk 1: Shop Clerk 1: Subtotal Safety/Training/Recruiting Manager/Supervisor 1: Lead Trainer 1:25 1 Trainers 1:5 4 2 Trainers 4 PT Drivers 2 Subtotal Routing/Planning Regular Ed Trans Router 1: Special Ed Trans Router 1: Tech Specialist/Supervisor 1: Subtotal 4 4 Total Staffing *(Source: TransPar Group, Inc. 213) The difference between the model and BVSD staffing is maintenance. The staffing model contemplates maintenance staffing for school buses only. As analyzed within the maintenance section of the report BVSD is properly staffed once the white fleet demands are taken into account. The organizational framework is established in three documents: The Transportation Operating Procedure Manual Operator s Vehicle Reference Operator s Handbook Page 1

13 FINDING: The above mentioned documents are comprehensive and appear to be continually updated. The material provides an easy to understand reference with meaningful information for new and veteran drivers alike. COMMENDATION: In our review of over 2 school districts nationwide, Boulder Valley School District s transportation manuals are the most functional we have seen. FINDING: Comprehensive job descriptions were found for all employees. COMMENDATION: Boulder Valley School District s job descriptions are professionally written, appear to be updated and are provided for all transportation employees. Data Driven Decision Making BVSD transportation has successfully developed and implemented operations policies and procedures. This solid management organizational framework readily lends itself to supporting a more robust data driven decision making environment. FINDING: While team meetings are held every two weeks, staff does not routinely gather and disseminate data in support of the organization s decision making process. The transportation department, having identified a challenge or concern, will embark on a process to objectively assess the situation and develop alternatives. However, as a matter of routine practice little operational data is formally assembled. Defining, implementing and measuring success within a pupil transportation system occurs within the following hierarchy of information: Page 11

14 RECOMMENDATION: Implement a formal data driven accountability system for the various functions/staff. By establishing measurements of success and tracking progress toward the goals action plans can be evaluated for effectiveness and performance evaluations become more objective. Increased communications between staff along with brainstorming sessions will help all concerned do their job more efficiently and allow management to get a full view of what needs are yet unfulfilled. A proven management system, T.E.A.M.S (Appendix A), is included to provide management a framework for performance measurement and service assessment. Alternative Transportation Unique to BVSD is its staff of two that facilitates finding students alternative means for getting to school. Focused primarily on students ineligible to ride, the team educates parents and students on transportation resources other than a school bus available in the community. A robust program encouraging the use of bicycles (BLAST) and the Federal program Safe Routes to School is being Page 12

15 maintained. The highly innovative Trip Tracker program utilizes contributions from local merchants to reward children who find a way to school other than their parents car. COMMENDATION: The alternative transportation function is a unique concept worthy of the pursuit of the grants to support it. Customer Service Principal Surveys (Appendix D) BVSD principals were surveyed to measure their perceptions of the various aspects of the transportation service. The results serve to establish benchmarks and guide the transportation department to improving customer service where opportunities are identified. This survey was conducted online beginning January 16 through January 23, 213. The Principal Survey was presented to 46 school principals at 46 school sites. We received 28 responses; 4 high schools, 6 middle schools, 14 elementary schools and 4 other. In general, the responses received were above average and provide ample information to draw conclusions. Moreover, studies show the no responses represent no related issues exist. We found the following results to be extremely favorable. Highlights of the survey show principals to be: Overall 75% of participants are satisfied to very satisfied with student management techniques and following of procedures. In general, 89% of participants are satisfied to very satisfied with the Transportation Department s responsiveness to complaints/issues. Overall the respondents were satisfied to very satisfied with the AM and PM routes being on time. Principals were for the most part satisfied to very satisfied with the customer service delivered by the drivers. Customer service received from the transportation staff was rated at 86% satisfied to very satisfied. Appearance of vehicles and drivers were viewed as positive. All respondents indicated that they have safe bus loading/unloading areas. (Industry safety results show that fatalities are most likely to occur in loading and unloading areas.) The written comment section shows a desire for additional student behavior training for the drivers. The results as to service satisfaction exceed the results we typically find. There was no definitive problem or weakness noted. Cameras on Buses The District is not utilizing video cameras on it vehicles. Video and audio systems are now widely accepted as an effective tool for maintaining student management and creating a safer environment within the buses. Page 13

16 FINDING: The District is not utilizing video cameras on it vehicles which has become standard operating procedure for most school districts and pupil transportation contractors. RECOMMENDATION: To the degree the investment can be made, the District should place a camera system on every daily bus. Drivers In the graph below may be found the distribution of drivers by seniority: It is quite common for districts to have, on balance, drivers with relatively few years experience. The nature of the job and its lack of hours are not attractive to career seekers. The distribution of BVSD fits the profile for the districts we review. The turnover rate for BVSD is in the range of 3-35% which, again, is typical for larger districts. Therefore, we conclude that the wage benefit package for BVSD is appropriate for the marketplace. Page 14

17 ROUTE PLANNING Systems generally rely on computerized routing software to aid in the process. Often these systems do not produce accurate and efficient routes unless they are constantly monitored and updated. This section speaks to the overall routing process. Continued training and monitoring is a must. Effectiveness of routing is measured by time and capacity utilization. The routing and scheduling function is second only to the safety area in determining the effectiveness of a transportation system. Routing determines the total number of routes, which in combination with scheduling of bell times for the various schools, dictates the total number of buses required. This total route bus count drives nearly every expense associated with transportation. The better the district routes the system, the more efficient it becomes. BVSD encompasses approximately 5 square miles covering 66 school sites. Over 1, students are eligible for and scheduled for daily transportation. The routing department is led by a Route Supervisor and assisted by a regular education Router, a special needs education Router and a Special Needs Liaison. The Routing Supervisor s main responsibility is maintaining the Edulog routing system and its associated functions of mapping and census management. The Routers provide for stop creation, student assignment to stops, timing of routes, stop order and the pairing of routes to buses. The Special Needs Liaison works closely with IEP teams, parents and special needs staff to assure appropriate accommodations of special equipment and vehicles are provided for students with special needs. The routing department currently routes 323 AM routes of which 129 routes are special needs and 194 are all others. In the PM there are 38 runs of which 127 are special needs and 181 are all others. Special needs routes represent approximately 4% of all routes. Routing parameters and eligibility requirements District policy establishes the eligibility criteria for students who will be transported aboard BVSD buses. The criteria are: Elementary students who live beyond a 1.5 mile distance from school; Middle school students who live beyond a 2. mile distance from school; High school students who live beyond a 2.5 miles distance from school; Students who would be exposed to hazardous condition conditions; Students whose school of attendance has been changed as a result of a change in boundaries; Students assigned to schools or programs as schools other than their neighborhood school; All special needs students as determined by their IEP. Bus stops are created along public roadways and public areas such as parks and school sites. Bus stops are created minimally 8 feet, or two blocks apart, where practical. Students may be required to walk the same distance to a bus stop as walkers must walk to school. Any hazardous areas along the paths to stops or schools are determined by the transportation department. The district does have a process in place where parents may appeal a determination by the department. Appeals are directed to the Director of Transportation with final appeal to the Superintendent. There are no written policies regarding length of ride times or number of students per seat on a bus. The ride time practice is to maintain a 3 minute ride time for regular education students and 6 minute ride time for students with special needs. The times are longer for special needs students as they are often transported to programs outside of their normal attendance areas. For seating on buses, the practice is to Page 15

18 load 2 students per seat. The seating can increase to 3 students per seat as needed with the exception of high school students when possible. Students who choose to attend a school other than the school of attendance based on residence may be provided transportation on a limited basis. Students may apply to ride a bus that services the chosen school of attendance but the student must access an existing stop on an existing route within the chosen attendance area and there must be room on the bus. Additional stops, routes or buses will not be added to accommodate these situations. FINDING: BVSD provides transportation to certain groups of walkers to several schools including Angevine MS, Casey MS, and Louisville MS. BVSD currently transports students to Angevine MS who live within two miles of the school that are not in or required to walk through an area that is deemed hazardous. These students originally walked to school and were provided transportation for a period of time due to a road construction project. That project has since been completed and there exists safe paths for the students to access the school as determined by transportation department personnel. The district has two buses dedicated to transport these otherwise ineligible students. Additionally, the high school feeder for Angevine MS, Centaurus HS, has requested transportation of these students continue once they reach high school. The area is also within walking distance to Centaurus HS. RECOMMENDATION: Board policy establishes that transportation personnel determine hazardous areas within the walk zone of schools. There is no known appeal to the Director of Transportation or the Superintendent that reversed this determination. The district should adhere to Board policy and return the students to a walker status and in turn remove two routes from the system. FINDING: BVSD provides transportation for two different high schools from the same areas. BVSD provides transportation from the Heatherwood, Gun Barrel and Boulder Country Club areas to students attending two different high schools, Boulder HS and Fairview HS. The school of attendance by residence is Boulder HS. Fairview HS, under Board policy, should be a school of choice and transportation offered from an existing stop and route within Fairview s attendance area, as with all other schools. Currently, students are allowed to choose which high school they wish to attend and are provided transportation to either. Transportation has two buses dedicated to transport students for this accommodation. RECOMMENDATION: Board policy is established with regard to transportation of students in a choice situation. The transportation of these students is from an unknown arrangement that dates back approximately 3 years. In absence of policy that provides for this accommodation and, in the interest of equality, the district should treat the students attending Fairview HS as choice students. Transportation should then be based on current policy for students attending schools outside of the area of attendance by residence. This action removes an additional two routes from the system. Page 16

19 FINDING: The attendance boundaries for some schools are separated. This may lead to transporting more students and transporting them more inefficiently than if they were consolidated and contiguous. RECOMMENDATION: Attendance boundary maps should be reviewed for irregularities and solutions discussed that could result in more straightforward student assignment and reduced transportation challenges. FINDING: BVSD assigns students to schools (or programs) other than their neighborhood schools such as choice, magnet, or special education programs. This creates incremental transportation demand and generally reduces transportation efficiency. RECOMMENDATION: Each school and program assignment practice that disrupts the neighborhood school transportation concept should be reviewed from the standpoint of its impact upon transportation cost and efficiency. Alternative assignments may be available that would mitigate such. FINDING: The Transportation Department reported that some special education students are transported to (or from) multiple or various destinations on different days. This creates transportation scheduling and service inefficiencies. RECOMMENDATION: Special education IEPs and education programs can cause for transportation schedules to vary for certain days of the week, and these must be accommodated by Transportation. However, if irregular pick-up and drop-off addresses are being mandated by IEP or otherwise, a policy should be established to define how exceptions will be addressed and approved, or disapproved. Software Assessment Transportation personnel facilitate their routing requirements using Edulog routing software that provides student transportation information to parents and district bus drivers. The Routing Supervisor maintains the system and associated maps. The original mapping from Edulog has been enhanced with the use of current county provided GIS mapping sources which has provided a map with higher functioning and more precise routing capabilities. Transportation also utilizes Google map overlays to provide better definition to street outlays to the core of the Edulog map. As with any routing software, route timing is often the most varied outcome due to varying traffic patterns during the day. In BSVD, route timing becomes even more difficult due to the mountainous region and the varying speeds in which vehicles can actually travel versus posted speeds. Transportation responded to these variances by creating different speeds within the map that vary depending on the area of travel as well as the direction of travel (ex., up or down mountains). Routing personnel work with dispatchers and drivers to manually refine the timing of the routes when conditions exist that cannot be Page 17

20 effectively corrected within the map for all applications. All users of the system are comfortable and knowledgeable with its use. FINDING: Census downloads present the most problems in the use of Edulog. Infinite Campus is the student information system (SIS) in place. The SIS does not provide for address matching at the time of student address entries at the school level. Many streets have different ways they may be spelled as well as local names for streets versus approved USPS spellings. Due to a combination of a lack of address ranges associated with street names within the SIS and misspelling of streets at the school level, transportation regularly experiences a 1% rate of error in geocoding students to the map. A student s eligibility for transportation is not determined by the SIS. Edulog determines the eligibility of the students within the software after a full census download. A 1% rate of error represents over 3 students that do not match the map. Students who do not match the map must be manually assigned. However, the mismatching replicates itself if the address coming out of the SIS is never rectified to match Edulog addressing. Any students who have been manually geocoded within Edulog become mismatched on the next download if a student record is changed for any reason as the system looks for all changes within the record in the SIS against what is within the Edulog record. For these reasons transportation only performs quarterly, full census downloads. Between the full downloads only new students are downloaded. However, this schedule does not provide for deletion of students who have moved out of the district or changes in student information in an automatic format. This results in the retention of records that no longer exist or may be incorrect. Transportation then provides an excel file every week back to IT personnel to populate the student record with bus stop location and time. IT personnel provide a file back to transportation that contains those students no longer attending or other reasons a student may not have loaded into the SIS. This process is only completed for regular education students due to the frequency of changes for special needs students. Students with special needs bus information is relayed directly to parents via bus drivers to coordinate changing schedules. RECOMMENDATION: Evaluate the addition of an address matching program within the student information system; create a process for automatic downloads/uploads between Edulog and Infinite Campus. District IT personnel should work cooperatively with the software vendors and the Routing Supervisor to establish a process whereby staff at the school level, when entering student address information, are provided with a method of verifying street address matching in the SIS using a uniform address database that meets the system requirements of Edulog. This allows for Edulog to perform an evaluation of additions, deletions and changes between its database and the SIS database in the background versus the partially manual process currently used. Once this process is in place a regular daily or other incremental download process can be established to provide the most up-to-date information to transportation and other users of the information. A report of new students can be generated within Edulog and assignments made by staff. FINDING: Special needs transportation information for routing is not performed timely. Transportation of special needs students is a time consuming process that requires multiple decisions regarding equipment and personnel in order to provide appropriate scheduling of transportation for students. Staff interviews indicate that their ability to effectively route this population is hampered by not receiving information in a timely fashion, particularly in the summer. The cause of late and/or poor information varies; Page 18

21 Late teacher input Outdated by the time school starts Approximately 5% of required information not received at all until teaching staff return to work the week prior to school starting Erroneous teacher input (sent the same form from the prior year) Pre-K students often not enrolled until the beginning of school Late homeless input RECOMMENDATION: The district should develop timely processes to provide special needs information to transportation. The routing of the special needs population necessitates significant resources in time and personnel. Board policy dictates that student information is to be delivered to the transportation department 2 working days in advance of the start of school. The district should work with special needs personnel to provide the information within the required time frame. FINDING: Breakfast program timing causes double runs to school from the same areas. There are numerous schools that have breakfast programs that start 1-15 minutes prior to bell time. The buses are scheduled to arrive early to accommodate the breakfast programs. However, for schools that also have pre-k and special needs programs, these students cannot be released from the bus as the staff (paraprofessionals) that accept these students are not on duty until 5 minutes prior to bell time. Consequently, transportation is providing separate rides for the pre-k and special needs students from many of the same areas so that these students do not have to sit on buses for the 1-15 minutes during the breakfast program. RECOMMENDATION: The district should evaluate revising the schedule by adjusting time or extending the workday for the paraprofessionals. This would allow for transportation to schedule pickups for the pre-k and special needs population at the same time as regular education students and reduce costs to transportation to cover the same areas twice. Page 19

22 DISPATCH Few functions within a pupil transportation operation are as important to asset utilization and customer service as the dispatch team. Superior communications, planning, and route knowledge are keys to success. Dispatch is in the position to track and quantify overall service performance. Effective dispatching is measured by on-time service. The process and procedures for attendance, absences, and call-offs are documented in the department s Transportation Operating Procedure Manual G-13. Drivers are instructed to call off 3 minutes prior to departure time or 6: AM whichever is earlier. Check-in time is 15 minutes prior to the AM route and 1 minutes for subsequent runs. Beginning the prior day the dispatchers build a spread sheet identifying open runs and scheduled absences. Early morning call-offs are taken from an answering machine. The substitutes are assigned from a list of relief drivers with scheduled show times. The absentee spreadsheet and the relief driver list are reconciled to assure all runs are covered. The absentee spreadsheet is copied to payroll as a record of absences. COMMENDATION: The department assigns relief driving to their most experienced drivers that wish to perform this duty. The practice of utilizing experienced staff and compensating accordingly is consistently recommended by TransPar as a best practice. The benefit is the mitigation of service shortfalls by utilizing drivers whose seniority and experience helps overcome their unfamiliarity with the route assigned. The Garage end of Shift Report keeps the dispatchers informed of buses that are being serviced. This report is complemented by the Spare Bus Log that is utilized to make bus assignments. A Daily Check-In Sheet is produced from the routing system. The sheet is organized in dispatch time order and includes the driver name, bus assigned, route number, and any variance in departure time based upon the day of the week. COMMENDATION: Drivers must receive their keys from the dispatcher in a face-to-face interaction. Again, this is best practice that TransPar recommends. The face-to-face process enables the dispatcher to judge the driver s fitness for duty in a non-threatening but consistent manner. For safety and liability reasons this practice should be maintained. FINDING: The dispatch office maintains descriptions and maps for every route. At the beginning of the year each driver is required to draw on a paper map the route he or she has been assigned. RECOMMENDATION: The routing system should be used to produce maps of the routes. While the exercise at the beginning of the year of drawing a map likely serves to familiarize a driver with the route it is difficult to maintain current and accurate maps as changes occur throughout the year. Page 2

23 Field Trips. Requests for field trips are received and recorded in an automated system known as TOMS. Drivers are required to submit and maintain their trip availability on a department form. Trips are assigned to drivers according to their seniority and their availability. Trips are not assigned that conflict with regularly scheduled routes. Failure to accept a trip could result in the drivers being removed from the trip eligibility list. The driver must complete a trip ticket to include the signature of the sponsor in order to be paid for the trip. The trip ticket becomes the source document for allocating the cost of the trip to the user. The Transportation Department contends that many field trips are scheduled during prime time morning and afternoon service periods and that to serve this demand many additional buses and bus drivers are assigned for daily service. Although school buildings are charged for all activity trips performed, the Department represented that the fees charged are well below the actual cost of performing these services. FINDING: The cost related controls over the quantity and extent of prime time activity and field trips may be ineffective and/or not leading to fiscally responsible decision making. RECOMMENDATION: The transfer pricing for school activity and field trip pricing should be set at the incremental cost per hour and per mile for the services performed. This would include a driver cost per hour (to include benefit and payroll tax load) and a bus cost per mile (to include fuel and parts). These rates should be increased by 25% during prime time service to thwart any unnecessary bus demands during those periods. Accordingly the base trip charge should be $3 per hour and 1. per mile; increased to $37.5 per hour $1.25 per mile for prime time trips. FINDING: No operational data is being recorded to determine the effectiveness of dispatch or the performance of the system in meeting the needs of principals, parents, and pupils. RECOMMENDATION: Dispatch should gather data to determine the system s performance. The data should be compiled daily and include: Total number of dispatches Late buses as reported by principals Accidents Breakdowns Driver absences Extra trips performed during route time This data becomes the basis for objectively determining the following key rates: On-Time Performance Rate (total dispatches-lates/total dispatches) Accident Rate (per 1, miles operated basis) Breakdown rate (per 1, miles operated basis) Page 21

24 Absentee rate (drivers absent/total drivers) determines total drivers required to meet regular routes Extra trip rate (total dispatches-trips/# of regular routes); along with the breakdown rate determines the number of buses and drivers required. Page 22

25 MAINTENANCE The Fleet Maintenance Department is charged with maintaining safe reliable vehicles in a cost effective and service efficient manner. Breakdown frequency, mechanically related accidents, maintenance cost per vehicle, parts inventory levels, state inspection pass rate, and fuel economy can measure performance. Systems and processes that routinely monitor for these activities must be utilized. Key and essential elements that are common to an effective and efficient fleet maintenance operation include: Technically trained and motivated fleet maintenance technicians and staff; An emphasis on safety; Adequate working facilities including dedicated work stations for each technician; Accessibility to equipment and tools; Efficient vendor support and a parts inventory system that ensures parts and supplies are readily available; An assigned workload that is consistent with industry standards; A methodology for tracking of services performed and scheduled; and A process for self-evaluation including key performance measurements. OPERATIONAL SUMMARY The Boulder Valley Fleet Maintenance Department is responsible for the maintenance and repair of all active route and spare school buses, and transportation support vehicles. In addition to the transportation department s vehicles, the department maintains over 23 of the district s white fleet vehicles and miscellaneous types of small equipment for other departments and programs. Examples of these include vehicles used by the Food Service, Maintenance, and Grounds Departments. The district operates three separate dispatch terminals with a maintenance facility co-located at each of the sites. The department is staffed by a one full time equivalent (FTE) Fleet and Service Manager, three lead mechanics, eleven mechanics, and five mechanics helpers or trainees. The department is supported by a one FTE administrative clerk and two FTE parts clerks. Fleet management as a functional responsibility has many interrelated components all of which must be well coordinated to support the effective and efficient maintenance of the fleet. This includes the use of systems or software to effectively schedule work, procure and supply parts, and track repairs. Equally important are systems that track maintenance expenditures to enable managers to better control costs, manage budgets, and to project replacement costs. The interrelation of these components is best illustrated in the following graphic: Page 23

26 Fleet Management Program Components Parts & Vendor Management Inventory management Parts & feul procurement Warranty administration Outsourced repair management Replacement scheduling Funding and financing Fuel data management Surplus property Fueling infrastructure Fleet Management & Fueling Preventive maintenance Scheduling and work order management Mechanic training Work quality assurance Safety inspections Maintenance & Repair FINDING: Fleet maintenance scheduling and tracking: For a fleet maintenance operation to be both cost effective and service efficient a system for the scheduling of maintenance and repairs and the tracking of completed work must be utilized. The data from a fleet management system is invaluable as it provides managers with necessary information to effectively schedule preventative and reactive maintenance, track employee productivity, track excessive costs by bus or model type, and to develop key performance indicators. The fleet maintenance function of the BVSD is aided by the use of FleetVision school bus management and maintenance software. All preventative and reactive maintenance work is scheduled and tracked with the use of the software. The software is also used to coordinate the procurement of parts and supplies to ensure that parts are available as buses are brought in for service. The system is effectively used to help manage annual inspections, preventive maintenance, work orders, driver identified defects, and quick fixes as described below: Annual inspections: The Fleet Manager forecasts and posts all buses due for their annual inspection for each of the next two months. This allows for the coordination of the ordering of parts based on past work and information stored in the system. As an example, tire tread depth is measured and recorded each time a bus is brought in for service. If it appears that a tire replacement will be necessary, the parts process ensures that tire replacements are inventoried or that they are readily available. This is true of other vehicle components such as braking or suspension systems. This process also promotes the effective use of the mechanic s time as they can proactively perform bus inspections as time in their schedules permit. Preventative maintenance: The district has implemented a 4, mile preventive maintenance standard which is well within the required 6, mile inspection standard required by the state. To ensure compliance with the schedule a calendar is created and updated as inspections are Page 24

27 becoming due. This process again supports the coordination of the procurement of parts and ensures that Dispatch and the drivers are appropriately notified. Work orders: As repairs are identified as a result of a mechanical failure or during an annual or preventative inspection, a work order is created to ensure that all services are being tracked. As work orders are being performed, reports are pulled to ensure the mechanic has all the work requested for that vehicle including driver identified defects. This helps to ensure that all repairs are completed at the time that a vehicle is brought into service improving the efficiency of the mechanic and reducing the inconvenience to the drivers. Vehicle defects: Drivers are provided with a Defect book for the recording of defects or mechanical issues during their pre-trip inspections or throughout the course of their day. A copy of the defect report is given the Dispatch Office. The dispatchers are responsible for entering the work request into FleetVision using a Low, Medium, High and Red Tag system of priority identification. While this process has required a commitment of training on how to accurately classify repair requests, the result of this is that all stakeholders have input and ownership of the maintenance process. The result of this is a more accurate description of the problem being provided which reduces the investigative time required during the repair process. Quick fixes: A process has also been established for the quick fix of minor issues such as lamp replacements or switches to ensure safety and eliminate the need to pull a bus from service. Performance measurement: The use of the system allows the Fleet Manager to effectively track the cost of maintenance per bus and other key performance indicators. These include cost per mile, miles per gallon by vehicle, and emissions tracking. The tracking of these measures helps to support the data driven decisions on which buses should be replaced and on what schedule. COMMENDATION: In a relatively short period of time, the Fleet Manager and the department have made a concerted effort in the re-implementation of the maintenance software to assist in both the scheduling of work and the tracking of performance. This benefits the entire operation as it supports the effective and timely repair of the fleet assets and also promotes effective communication between the maintenance and dispatch/driving functions. FINDING: Parts Inventory and Vendor Accessibility: Under the direction of the Fleet Manager, two FTE parts clerks are responsible for the procurement and inventory management of the parts for the department. A secure parts room is located at the Boulder Valley Terminal and serves as the primary location for the procurement and storage of parts and supplies. Limited parts storage is also maintained at the Lafayette and Nederland terminals under the control of the parts clerks. As the remote terminals require parts, drivers are used to transport parts reducing the impact to the mechanics in obtaining necessary parts and supplies. The process is supported by the efficient use of FleetVision and it parts management and inventory capabilities. As a work order or defect report is submitted the parts clerks coordinate the procurement and supply of parts to proactively have parts available as a bus becomes due for service. As an example, as a bus is due for either preventive maintenance or it annual inspection, a review of all current defects or deferred repairs is conducted to ensure that all necessary parts are available when the bus is brought in for service. This process reduces the potential down time of the bus and increases the efficiency of the process and the mechanic. An annual inventory process has also been implanted to better control what is Page 25

28 being ordered and what parts actually need to be stored. Interviews with staff did not indicate that vendor support and the availability of parts is a constraint to the maintenance function COMMENDATION: The use of software and the coordination of parts procurement help to ensure the effectiveness of the maintenance process by reducing the wait time for parts and the impact on productivity of the mechanic. FINDING: Workload of mechanics: For a maintenance operation to be both effective and efficient, it is important that the ratio of fleet maintenance personnel to the number of vehicles is appropriate and reasonable. A methodology has been developed to assist managers in determining the correct number of mechanics in ratio to the number of vehicles and equipment that is maintained. Each vehicle or piece of equipment is converted into a vehicle equivalent units or VEU. A VEU is a measurement that allows all fleet work to be measured against a common comparison basis. A standard automobile is 1. VEU while a school bus typically measures 3.5 to 4.5 depending on type and equipment. Industry standards suggest a ratio of 1. FTE technician to 1 to 125 VEUs as a guideline for staffing. These standards are inclusive of typical state vehicle inspection requirements. The department is responsible for the maintenance of 264 buses with a VEU of approximately 942. Added to this responsibility is the maintenance of 22 vehicles for the transportation staff with 38 VEUs and a white fleet with a VEU of approximately 5. In total, this results in combined responsibility of approximately 1,48 VEUs. The department is currently staffed with a total of 2 FTE for the maintenance of the combined fleet including the Fleet Manager. Factoring in absences for vacations, sick leave, holidays, meetings, reduces the effective FTE by at least 12 percent resulting in the equivalent of 17.5 FTE for vehicle maintenance. The ratio of fleet maintenance personnel to VEU is best illustrated in the following table: Table 1: Ratio of Vehicles Maintained to FTE Ratio of VEU to FTE Number of Staff Estimated VEU Ratio of VEU to FTE Current Maintenance Staff With No 2 1,48 74 Adjustment for Time Off Available FTE Adjusted for Time Off ,48 84 Available FTE Adjusted for Time Off ,48 89 and net of the Fleet Manager Guideline: 1 to 125 VEU per FTE As the table illustrates, staffing appears to be slightly below the guideline with a range of approximately 84 to 88 VEU one FTE maintenance staff. RECOMMENDATION: While considering the measure alone it may appear that there may be an opportunity for a reduction in fleet maintenance staff; the immediate reduction of staff should be considered with caution. Specifically, the average model year age of the fleet is approximately 1 years of age which is above the desired average of 8 years. Older vehicles typically require additional time for both preventive and reactive Page 26

29 maintenance requiring additional maintenance staff. A decision in achieving an optimal level of staffing should be made in conjunction with the other recommendations in the report including a potential realignment of bell times. The change in bells often results in a reduction in both active and spare buses which has a direct impact on the number of maintenance staff that is required. COMMENDATION: While it is understood that during times of a severe driver shortage that all members of the transportation department may need to be used in a driving capacity; interviews indicate that this practice is limited and has not had a negative impact on the department s ability to provide effective services. FINDING: Staff Training and Education: All bus mechanics are required to have a minimum of two years experience in automotive and or heavy equipment repair including the completion of a recognized apprenticeship program (or equivalent). Additionally all mechanics must obtain a Colorado Department of Education School Bus Inspector s Certification and possess or obtain a Colorado School Bus Operator s license. Lead mechanics are required to have an additional three years of direct maintenance and supervisory experience and are able to demonstrate a masters level of skill and knowledge. Interviews indicates that additional and ongoing training is supported and encouraged by the district including the payment of additional hourly stipend to employees that achieves the Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) and the National Association of Pupil Transportation masters certification. Interviews indicate that all mechanics have obtained some level of ASC certification and that five of the mechanics and the Fleet Manager hold master level certifications. Ongoing training is supported by dedicated training budget. Mechanic s helpers are also provided training opportunities to increase their skill levels and to apply for mechanics positions as they become available. COMMENDATION: The encouragement and support of both routine and advanced training ensures that mechanics have the necessary skills and knowledge to ensure that buses are maintained in a safe and efficient manner. FINDING: Facilities and Equipment: Work is performed in facilities co-located at each of the three terminals. Combined, there are 2 work bays available for 14 mechanics and 5 mechanic s helper/trainees. Industry standards suggest a ratio of 1.5 bays per technician or 29 bays. The fractional bay per technician is necessary to enable technicians to perform both major and quick repairs simultaneously. In the absence of the additional work space, the department must be efficient in how it schedules and completes its work. As in the case of BVSD this includes having staggered work shifts and performing some repairs outside of the facility. An additional impact to the efficient use of staff is the width of the bays themselves. The bays at the Boulder Valley Terminal in particular were designed with minimal space between the bays. This requires that the mechanics coordinate the work on the side of the buses to minimize the interference as work is being performed. While Technicians are required to provide their own service tools, a reimbursement program provides for replacement in the event that a tool is broken in the course of service. The department provides all shop equipment and supplies. Interviews indicate that there is sufficient funding to provide the necessary equipment and supplies that support effective and efficient bus maintenance. Additional comments regarding the overall facilities for the Transportation Department are contained in Facilities section of the report and within the Safety Climate Analysis forms found in (Appendix B). Page 27

30 RECOMMENDATION: In the event that funding for a new facility or renovations becomes available, the consideration of an increase in the number of work bays should be considered. As discussed earlier in this section, this recommendation should be considered in conjunction with the other recommendations in this report and in particular after the results of a comprehensive bell time study. FINDING: Material Safety Data Sheets: Interviews and cursory review of the maintenance department s Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Book may not be routinely updated as required. RECOMMENDATION: Working in conjunction with the BVSD s risk management provider, a more structured process for the maintenance of the MSDS information books should be implemented. This program would ensure that the safety of employees is of paramount importance and that the workplace is fully compliant. FINDING: General shop housekeeping and personal protective equipment: In general, while the condition of the equipment and the housekeeping in the shop areas were observed to be acceptable, the establishment of shop standards would be beneficial to ensure a clean and safe working environment. Additionally, interviews and observations found that the use of personnel protective equipment including vision and hearing protection were not fully established or enforced. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. A Safety Committee should be formed to help establish and support safe work practices and to identify areas for improvement. This program would ensure that the safety of employees is of paramount importance and that the workplace is fully compliant. 2. The monitoring of the use of personnel protective equipment should be considered and implemented. Guidelines for the use of personnel protection equipment should include at a minimum, vision and hearing protection, safety footwear, respiration, and lifting devices. Page 28

31 DRIVER RECRUITING AND RETENTION The pursuit and retention of high quality bus drivers has been a nationwide challenge over the past decade. More recently the economy s general performance has created a wider pool for part-time labor. However, for many districts, maintaining a competitive market position along with continual aggressive recruiting is imperative to be successful. Reliance on non-driver staff to cover required routes is a common phenomenon that, left unattended, will eventually affect the performance level of the entire transportation team. Safe reliable transportation is a team effort. Drivers, trainers, mechanics, dispatchers and managers are all indispensable. When a shortage of drivers exists the team adjusts to meet the demands of the day. Should a mechanic have to drive then maintenance is delayed. If a trainer drives then training new drivers is delayed. Managers become dispatchers as everyone scrambles to cover open routes. The immediate impact is on service. Substitute drivers or staff members that usually are less familiar with the route are transporting children. More critically, the sub driver is less familiar with the passenger. The distinguishing characteristic of school transportation is the care and concern the driver must have for the passenger. Familiarity with every passenger is an important element of an effective system. As members of the staff are called upon to drive, the office can no longer operate properly. Response to patrons and principals is slowed. Route adjustments wait for weekend or night attention. All this has a cost. Maintenance becomes more expensive as overtime makes up for a mechanic s driving time. Or worse, maintenance is deferred which leads to major, expensive problems. First year drivers are most likely to have accidents; chronic driver shortages mean a less experienced driver force. Service degradation, maintenance expense, accidents, new driver recruiting and training combine to make a tough situation expensive. Money, time, and attention that could make a system great are consumed to meet daily demand. Reducing buses must be a priority. This is the quickest way to achieve a full driver force. Analysis of capacity and time utilization must be on going and thorough. In the RouteYield section of this report, the opportunities for run consolidations and bus reductions are identified. Starting wages and benefits will attract driver applicants. An enviable workplace retains them. The environment worked in everyday must be one about which one can brag. It must be clean, organized, respectful, and even fun. Today s workforce will not long abide oppressive conditions. COMMENDATION: The recruiting, interviewing, and screening process for BVSD was found to be well organized and managed. In particular the use of tools such SUPPORTINSIGHT indicates that management team is taking a very proactive approach to the recruitment of drivers. FINDING: The screening process can be slowed by the requirement for an interview committee of two people. Page 29

32 Scheduling conflicts makes its difficult at times for the interview process to be completed due to a requirement that two people perform the interview. RECOMMENDATION: Allow the manager to perform and pass interviewees. A stumbling block for recruiting drivers is the time from a candidates first response until all qualifications have been met. A constrictive pipeline contributes to driver shortages. The interview process for BVSD is well organized with a set of questions asked of every applicant. Given the demonstrated experience and success of the manager we judge the risk of solo interviews, when scheduling does not allow the use of second person, to be minimal. Page 3

33 SAFETY AND TRAINING Pupil transportation and safety go hand in hand. Pupil transportation is regulated by numerous agencies that place certain requirements and standards upon the industry. Management must ensure that all applicable rules, regulations, laws, and standards are adhered to. A sound safety climate is fostered by rigorously screening applicants, thorough training, diligent documentation, scheduled inspections and continuous observations. Initial training offers the first opportunity to mold and develop positive attitudes. Selection of training personnel and the sequencing of training curriculum are highly important. Training departments should possess positive attitudes, energetic staff, sequential curriculums, and excellent tracking methods. Preventable accidents per 1, miles are the accepted industry measurement for determining the effectiveness of the safety and training effort. OPERATIONAL SUMMARY Upon completion of the hiring process approved applicants are scheduled for training. New drivers receive about 1 hours of classroom and behind-the-wheel instruction. Special mountain driving training is made available to drivers desiring the qualification and deemed skilled enough. The trainees are targeted for specific open routes. Once assigned the new driver receives a formal performance review with 6 days of assignment. COMMENDATION: The training of new drivers is well organized, thorough and meets or exceeds regulatory requirements. SAFETY PERFORMANCE The industry standard for a school bus accident rate is one preventable accident per 1, miles. The total accident rate standard is 2 per 1, miles. However, operating conditions vary widely making direct comparisons inaccurate. Moreover, there is no consistent recording standard for accidents. For example, some districts only record accidents that result in second party damages above a certain monetary threshold. FINDING: The accident rate for BVSD for the past four years is as follows: Year Accidents Preventable Miles Total Rate Preventable Rate ,412, ,35, ,272, ,175, For the time period selected miles have increased annually while the total number of accidents has declined. Given the various methods of recording accidents trend analysis within the operation may be the most reliable barometer to measure effectiveness of the safety program. The following chart depicts BVSD s positive trend: Page 31

34 Accident Rate Detailed review of the accident reporting revealed that BVSD records every accident regardless of severity (no cost) or location (on lot). This is a high standard of reporting and not commonly used by other schools. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the nature of the reporting by BVSD contributes to a higher rate than one might expect. RECOMMENDATION: Establish the performance as the benchmark and target to improve the 1.2 preventable accidents per 1, miles. Rather than be concerned with the variances in nation-wide reporting, the BVSD operation is sufficiently large and diverse to use the system s trends and past performance to judge the effectiveness of its safety efforts. To facilitate analysis adopt the practice of monthly recording accidents and miles to maintain a moving 12 month accident rate. In this fashion management can recognize trends in order to develop plans and revise in-service training. The Safety Climate established and maintained by management contributes to safety performance as well as training. A Safety Climate Analysis was performed and can be found in (Appendix B). Page 32

35 FACILITIES The ability to adequately serve the patrons can be affected by the type and amenities of the facilities utilized as well as where the facilities are located. When analyzing facilities the size and scope of the transportation operation as well as the overall size of the District must be considered. This review also considers items contained within the Safety Climate Analysis forms found within (Appendix B). The core function of providing safe and on-time student transportation is supported by multiple supporting services or functions within the organization. These include administration and operations (e.g., management, route planning, dispatch and administrative support), on-board personnel (drivers and attendants), and fleet maintenance personal. Each of these supporting functions benefits from properly designed facilities and site amenities. Transportation services are dispatched from three regional terminals with each providing space for the administrative, on-board staff, and for fleet maintenance. The following provides a brief summary and the resulting findings and recommendations for each of the facilities. Boulder Valley Terminal: Centrally located and the largest of the three terminals, the site is shared with other district support services including facility maintenance and grounds. The departmental administrative offices, dispatch, training, and the driver and attendant lounge share a building which is located across the lot from the maintenance facility. The maintenance facility has 14 working bays that have been assembled into a single facility over a period of time. Buses are parked and fueled on-site which facilitates the maintenance and fueling for approximately 14 buses. The facility is secured by a full perimeter fence and is lighted. Ample parking is provided for drivers in an adjacent lot. The traffic lanes and bus parking lots are not fully paved or are covered in sand or gravel which presents the potential for slips and falls of staff and in particular drivers, aides, and mechanics as they board buses for driving or maintenance duties. One such area is between the bus garage and the covered parking bay; while this area is paved, the elevation difference between the two structures has resulted in buses losing traction and slipping into the garage facility. Lafayette Terminal: Serving the eastern area of the district; the Lafayette Terminal dispatches approximately 95 route buses per day. The facility is modern and is of adequate size for the number of buses served. The driver lounge and the safety and training functions have been augmented by the installation of portable buildings to provide an increase in available space. The maintenance facility has four working bays. Two of the bays were added to accommodate an additional FTE mechanic and to enable the use of a vehicle lift. The lot service is similar to the noted conditions of the Boulder Valley Terminal. Driver parking is somewhat limited and cars are typically parked in the street. Nederland Terminal: The Nederland terminal serves the western area of the district accommodating approximately 25 buses. Services are provided in a two bay garage staffed by two FTE mechanics. FINDING: Administrative offices: Boulder offices are functional but provide very limited space for support staff; and training. (Route planning space is provided in separate building and cannot be returned). They are segregated from but connected to the dispatch office and the driver and attendant lounges providing easy access for interaction between administrative and on-board staff. Visitor parking is adjacent to the building providing easy access to transportation staff. RECOMMENDATION: The transportation administrative offices should be included in the district s long term plan for facility upgrades and expansion. Page 33

36 FINDING: Driver lounge and restrooms (Boulder Valley): While a lounge area is provided for drivers and attendants to report to dispatch at the start of their day and to take breaks between runs; the size of the space is adequate at best. The room is outfitted with standard school tables that provide a working surface for completing paperwork and eating. Staff has access to a small preparation kitchen for light meals. While the housekeeping appeared to be acceptable, the finishes in the room are dated. The restrooms appear to be well maintained but are small in capacity compared to the number of staff assigned to the location. RECOMMENDATION: When funding becomes available, the renovation of the lounge/break-room and restrooms should be considered. This might include enclosing a roofed area adjacent to the break-room to increase the amount of available space or the use of a portable facility. Additionally, the upgrading and reconfiguration of the type of furniture to the size of the room may increase the usable space. FINDING: Covered bus parking area (Boulder Valley Terminal): The insulation in the exposed ceiling has become dilapidated and presents a potential safety issue from either falling on staff or buses and also for other environmental concerns. RECOMMENDATION: Remove and investigate the need for the replacement of the insulation material. FINDING: Capacity of the fleet maintenance facilities (All Terminals): An analysis of the fleet maintenance buildings was performed to determine if the space available was sufficient based on the size of the fleet. Having a facility that is in size ratio to the number of vehicles maintained is necessary to support an effective maintenance program. Approximately 1.5 working bays per fleet maintenance staff is recommended or 29 bays for the current staff of 19 mechanics and mechanics/helpers. Between the 3 maintenance buildings, there are 2 working bays plus a single wash bay located at the Boulder Valley Terminal. While precise scheduling can mitigate some of inefficiencies that this causes, additional bays support an efficient maintenance program providing ample space for both major and quick repairs. This analysis is described in greater detail in the Maintenance section of this report. Ample space is available for the storage of parts and supplies and each of the facilities. A cursory walkthru of the facilities found that in general parts and supplies are stored in a safe manner. RECOMMENDATION: As discussed in the Maintenance section of the report; in the event that funding for a new facility or renovations becomes available, the consideration of an increase in the number of work bays should be considered. FINDING: Bus lot and driver pavement (All Terminals): The lack of full pavement is both a potential employee safety issue and can also have an impact on bus maintenance. Page 34

37 RECOMMENDATION: As renovations are considered the paving or improvement of the lot surfaces and drives should be accomplished. FINDING: Fueling stations (All Terminals): The on-site fueling stations support the efficient fueling and dispatching of buses. Interviews indicate the while leak detection equipment is installed and maintained and that the fuel is tested monthly for water infiltration; the tanks are 199 s vintage. RECOMMENDATION: A thorough review of the fueling system and storage tanks should be conducted. This includes tank type (single or double wall), supply piping, pumps, fire suppression equipment, soil type, and fuel tracking and environmental monitoring equipment. This evaluation should also include the review of results and recommendation of any previous inspections. This process will help to ensure that risks are understood and that risk management and budgetary plans are developed. Page 35

38 FLEET PLANNING Fleet planning provides for the orderly replacement of buses, minimizing capital investments, maintaining reliability and providing for growth in demand. Deferred capital spending can result in severe service degradation. Selection of equipment size based on capacity utilization must be considered to ensure capital is conserved. FINDINGS: Total fleet count: 264 ; Regularly routed buses 182 ; Spare Buses 82 Spare buses 31% of the fleet (Industry standard is 15%); Spares exceed standard by 54 units Average model year of vehicles is 23.2; the median model year is 25. The average model year age of the fleet is 9.88 years; industry target is 7.5 years Oldest bus is a 1988 model (25 years old); Industry practice to retire after 15 model years Newest bus is a 213 model. Fleet appearance and condition meets industry norms (Appendix C). On the following page may be found the fleet distribution by age and mileage. The columnar totals represent the count of vehicles for that model year. Where odometer readings were not consistent with other vehicles within the model year (likely the result of an odometer being replaced during the vehicle s life) the mileage was adjusted to an amount representative of the age group. Ideally each model year would have about the same number of vehicles reflecting a consistent replacement process; however, steady student population growth would result in growth of buses within a model year to accommodate the additional demand beyond replacement. It appears that beginning in the late 9 s fleet replacement slowed particularly in relationship to student growth. Beginning in 25 bus purchases picked up for a period of three years, dropped in 9 and 11 with large spikes of 19 and 5 in 1 and 12 respectively. Overall in the 2 s the fleet replacement cycle has been uneven. Page 36

39 Number of Spares. While operating environments and demands vary, in general a 15% spare ratio is accepted as the standard for school operated systems. Contractors will attempt to reduce their investment even further and target 1%. Assuming the present fleet requirement of 182 buses necessary to operate the morning routes a 15% spare factor would result in a total fleet of 21 buses. FINDING: The BVSD fleet exceeds the industry standards by 54 units. As noted in the cost analysis section of the report BVSD has high maintenance costs. While the relatively old fleet contributes to these costs; additionally, maintaining an excess number of buses does as well. RECOMMENDATION: Dispose of all buses (54) 1994 model year and older. The average age of the fleet would drop to 7 years placing BVSD at or better than the industry target. The oldest bus in the fleet would drop from 25 years to 2. Parts costs would reduce and two mechanics could be re-assigned as the mechanic manning standard is 1:25 buses. Finally, liability insurance would be reduced at an estimated rate of $3, per bus for an approximate annual savings of about $15,. Fleet Replacement Plan. On the following page may be found a five year fleet replacement plan. The columnar totals represent the number of buses to be purchased in that year. With a reduced total number vehicles of 21 and a target of replacing buses after 15 years of service BVSD should replace 14 buses per year. Following this approach in 218 the district would find itself operating no bus older than 15 years and an average age of 7 years. Page 37

40 Page 38

41 BUDGET AND COST CONTROLS Budgeting for safe, timely and quality service requires planning and consistent vigilance. Operational costs primarily involve payroll, parts and fuel. Each of these is influenced by program service demands, i.e. number of required buses, number of routes, overtime hour, driver shortages, and district transportation policies. Primary measures of effectiveness are driver wage and benefit costs per bus operated, overtime as a percent of regular wages, benefits as a percent of wages, maintenance cost per mile; and miles per gallon. Measurement tools must be developed, implemented, and monitored regularly to maintain efficiencies and contain costs. BVSD s Costs The district s finance team provided us historical budget and cost reports, and assisted in compiling certain costs to aide in cost analysis. The team appeared to be knowledgeable and aware of pupil transportation costs. We were also provided copies of the transportation data submitted annually to the Colorado Department of Education. We did not audit, or recompile, any of this information such that we could attest to its accuracy or integrity. We were provided budget/expenditure data for the past three school years. We focused on the previous year s actual expenditures. We compiled the following from three different sources of data: Net Operating Costs Risk Related Expenditures Operating Costs Capital Expenditures Total $12.2 million $.4 million $12.6 million $ 3.5 million $16.1 million Thus, the total operating costs were $12.6 million, and the total costs including capital were $16.1 million. (Appendix E) recaps those costs. The $3.5 million of capital outlays included approximately $3.2 million for vehicles and $.3 million for building and site improvements. The $3.2 million is inordinately high for a 264 bus fleet, possibly about double that of an average year. According, we examined the costs including capital outlays and without the capital outlays to provide perspective. Costs were allocated across the regular education and special needs transportation service based upon bus runs, student counts, and reported system times. These factors as determined in our RouteYield analysis were: AM PM Number of Daily Buses (AM) Number of Daily Bus Runs (AM) Number of Pupils Transported (AM) 5,68 5,297 Riders on Bus Live Time Minutes 1,519 8,817 Page 39

42 The wages and benefit for all bus monitors were assigned to special needs. The cost allocation result was: With Capital Without Capital Regular Education Programs $ 8.5 million $ 6.4 million Special Needs Programs $ 7.6 million $ 6.2 million Total $ 16.1 million $ 12.6 million The cost per bus per program was: With Capital Without Capital Regular Education Programs $86,2 $ 65,2 Special Needs Programs $91, $ 74,3 Combined $88,4 $ 69,39 The cost per student transported was: With Capital Without Capital Regular Education Programs $ 1,643 $ 1,242 Special Needs Programs $ 18,281 $ 14,924 Combined $ 2,868* $ 2,249 *This per student cost is based upon the actual number of students transported per the survey conducted in December. This will be markedly higher than the per student cost reported by districts in Colorado as the planned number of students transported is utilized as the denominator. Definitively accurate benchmarks for these costs are not readily available in the industry, although we find looking at some broad ranges helps frame BVSD s costs. Regular Education versus Special Needs The data we collected in November revealed that about 6% of BVSD s bus runs and 93% of the pupils transported pertain to regular education programs. Thus some 4% of the bus runs transport only 8% of the riders. This is a typical distribution. Special needs runs transport only a few pupils make door stops that may require several minutes to complete, and are often smaller buses. Theses buses run out of time well before they run out of seats. We believe it critical to monitor transportation activities and costs for each type of transportation, and explore means of improving efficiency and lowering costs for each. Cost per Bus Annual costs per bus including capital range nationally from $5, to $8,, but vary widely depending upon many factors. Costs over $8, are unusual, but can occur in county-wide schools where numerous district-wide or choice programs create considerable transportation challenges. In addition, schools that have successfully implemented three distinct starting and ending bell times such that its buses can perform three runs (or tiers) each morning and afternoon can create very high costs per bus, but very low costs per pupil transported. BVSD s high cost does not appear to be caused by these anomalies. Cost per Pupil Transported Annual costs to transport a regular education student range nationally from $4 to $1,. Special needs transportation can be five to ten times those amounts, in the range of $2, to $1,. These averages become lower when fewer buses carry more pupils, and higher when the reverse is true. BVSD s costs are very elevated as compared what we see in a typical school district. Page 4

43 Vehicle Maintenance Costs Utilizing reported mechanic wage and benefit costs, parts expenditures, bus count, and miles per the state report we calculated the following maintenance costs for : Parts Cost per Mile $.28 Vehicle Maintenance Cost per Mile $.85 Parts Cost per Bus $ 3,794 Vehicle Maintenance Cost per Bus $11,228 These costs include services and parts incurred in the repair of non-yellow service vehicles and the number of service vehicles or miles are not included in the denominator. Thus, these metrics are inflated; we estimate a 5-1% inflation. Regardless, these metrics well exceed the ranges we typically see for vehicular repairs. Colorado Comparable Costs We accessed Colorado school district comparables from the Colorado Department of Education Public School Finance/Transportation section of its website. Therein, a limited amount of transportation information from every district in the state is provided. We extracted that pupil transportation information for every district for reported transporting 5, to 3, pupils. These comparables represented 17 districts, plus BVSD. Five of these counties had larger enrollments than Boulder. This group represented approximately 5% of the state s enrollment and transportation costs. Our contention is that this comparable grouping of districts should be a reasonably useful peer group for Boulder to be compared to. The pupil transportation information in the state report varies from the information we gathered in our analysis, and the reader should be aware that our cost analysis approach differs from that use by the state. The operating expenditures in the state report were $12.9 million; the expenditures we were provided were $12.2 million, or $12.6 including risk expenditures. The number of pupils scheduled to be transported per the state report was 9,474; we tallied only 5,68 actual riders. It is common that the number of eligible or scheduled riders exceeds the number of pupils that regularly ride to school. The data from for those districts can be found in (Appendix F). A recap of the comparisons is as follows: Page 41

44 BVSD did not compare favorably to this peer group as to most efficiency standards. Operating expenditures per pupil and per mile well exceeded the state s average costs. Additionally BVSD was the only district among a peer group of seventeen we listed with a cost per pupil in excess of $1,; yet, the per vehicle and mileage costs more nearly approached the average. This would verify that the bell time structure contributes to the lack of efficiency when compared to other districts. Additionally, we calculated the average number of pupils transported per 1 miles, and found BVSD at 3.9, the peer group at 7.2 and the state at 6.4, indicating that most other districts enjoy greater student density thus transportation can be more efficient. BVSD s reimbursement recovery rate is comparable to the peer group and the state results. Space Available Riders Management estimated that about 8-9 students, otherwise ineligible for transportation, are afforded a ride to school because capacity is available on a bus near their home. This practice is not uncommon but is difficult to administer. For example, as the year progresses and buses become full, how and in what order are the space available students displaced? It is our experience that when the space available option is eliminated costs are reduced indicating that the service is not free. Some districts charge for this service. Equitable development of a price can be difficult. Using a base cost of a run as $3, per year on a 65 passenger bus we estimate the cost to be $2.6 per day. However, this cannot be a demand service; therefore, we recommend that for a discount the parents must reserve the seat for at least a semester. A reasonable charge to consider would be $22 per semester or $4 per year. Page 42

45 ROUTEYIELD ASSESSMENT This section contains the results of the RouteYield assessment for all Regular and Special Education school bus routes operated by the District. Route information (actual riders and times) was collected via Route Survey sheets filled out by the District drivers. Data collection took place December 11, 212. TransPar entered the data received, returned same for verification and predicated its findings upon this information. Information is believed to be valid for the period researched. Minor changes may have occurred since research was completed. Purpose: The purpose of a RouteYield assessment is to determine if the current system is being routed efficiently, and to make recommendations for any possible improvements based on the findings. The assessment measures the two limiting factors involved in routing of school buses Time and Capacity. Time: Districts establish a ride time policy that targets the maximum amount of time for their students to ride. If properly administered, as a route approaches policy minutes it must conclude its route and deliver students to school. This occurs regardless of any remaining unfilled seats. If this does happen the route becomes Time restricted. For school districts that have tiered routing (buses running more than one route to different schools on different bell schedules) the time between bells acts as a restriction to reaching capacity and this operating time often is less than the official ride time policy. This assessment used the maximum ride time available; 5 minutes or tier time available, whichever was less. Available ride times can vary for each route. Capacity: Districts establish policy concerning the number of students they desire to ride on a bus, i.e. maximum riders by grade levels. Generally this is two per seat for Secondary students and three per seat for Elementary. As routes are developed the maximum number of riders may be reached prior to using all of the available Time. When a bus fills to capacity but still has Time remaining the route becomes Capacity restricted. In order for a system to be perfectly efficient every route would fill all available seats and reach school at or under the allotted time limit. This never occurs. On a school by school basis eighty percent (8%) or better efficiency ratios are considered to be acceptable requiring no further analysis. Within the assessment an efficiency percentage for both Time and Capacity are calculated. If ratings are shown to be below 6% on any one route this triggers the need to analyze that route. Efficiency ratings are also calculated for each building served and is comprised of the sum of all buses serving it. These same percentages are calculated for the entire system. This assessment is designed to be a tool to direct action and help create solutions. It does not yield specific answers to individual route issues but highlights all opportunities for analysis. It is a road map to increase efficiency. FINDING: On the day of the survey every driver participated in gathering information that was developed to depict the actual operation versus that which is planned for in the routing system. Specifically they reported: The time of terminal departure The time of the first pick-up The time of arrival to the first school The number of children that disembarked The process was repeated for every school served in the morning and afternoon. Page 43

46 Summary of system performance on the day the survey was performed: Current Situation: Prime Time Sessions AM PM Total buses operated Total runs operated Total runs per bus Total pupils transported 5,543 4,858 Average run length 32 minutes 28 minutes Average riders per run Time utilization 69% 62% Capacity utilization 35% 43% Time & Capacity Utilization Reports In order to interpret the information the Time & Capacity Utilization reports provide recaps that list and calculate various information by school, then further sorted by program type for the morning and afternoon service (Appendix G and H). The first section of the recaps contain a school by school listing of current routes, and a forecasted number of routes that the RouteYield system determines should ideally be needed. This is based upon the amount of time and number of seats available for each bus/school; this is a mathematical forecast of how many buses/routes are required at each school served based upon 8% of available time and/or capacity - this is the theoretical number that establishes a threshold for evaluation. As stated the time utilization figure (time available) uses either the 5 minute ride time policy as its base or the amount of available time between tiers whichever is less. The actual amount of available time to operate routes will generally be less in the PM sessions due to the time consumed in loading the buses at the schools; this time erosion averages between 8-1 minutes which reduces the available route time to 5-8 minutes. All of these figures can be found within the AM and PM graphs within this report. In addition to the recaps, RouteYield generates a Time & Utilization chart for each school building (Appendix I and J). These reports help identify schools where more buses are serving that school than the time and seat availability would indicate are needed. When reviewing the graphs the red line or dot at the top of graph is the ride time policy or tier time available and the blue line or dot indicates the actual amount of time being utilized by each bus. The closer these two lines are to one another the more efficient they become. If the actual amount of time (blue) is above the red line this means the route is not adhering to the allotted ride time policy. The blue area of the graphs represents the empty seats while the yellow area represents the number of seats filled. At a glance you can quickly determine the efficiency of each bus relative to Capacity and the Time remaining. The manufacturer rated capacity of the bus has been altered within the formulas to reflect the required capacity parameters (students per seat). This analysis is a tool that management should utilize in planning for route consolidations. It offers a road map for the pursuit of efficiencies. It is quite common to have bus routes appear to be inefficient and upon review find there are valid reasons for them to remain unchanged. Page 44

47 RECOMMENDATION: Review schools where more than two buses utilize less than 6% of their time and seating capacity. The specific schools that should be reviewed: Angevine MS Aspen Creek K8 Boulder HS Casey MS Centaurus HS Centennial MS Columbine ES Eisenhower ES Fireside ES Foothill ES Heatherwood ES Louisville ES Monarch HS Monarch K8 Ryan ES Run Distribution by Time Tier The most powerful cost reduction aspect to review while looking for route efficiencies and possible consolidations is the school building bell schedule. RouteYield provides a report that depicts how the school bell times and current bus runs stack up by school bell time; we refer to these as bus time tiers (Appendix K and L). Not having enough tiers or short gap times between tiers is the biggest cause of inefficiencies in most systems. In the PM the gap time between tiers is shortened even more due to time consumed in loading of buses. It is best to create enough time between bells to allow buses to be properly routed as well as paired. If accomplished this reduces the total number of buses required since each bus and driver will be performing more work and being fully utilized. The time utilization indicates that some routes will have time remaining to do more work. The larger geographical size of the district creates longer routes while the makeup of the district also shows pockets of high student density both of which can influence the amount of time needed as well as utilized. FINDING: BVSD utilizes a large number of school opening and closing times resulting in a runs per bus of Most districts target 3 runs per bus. The bell time schedule for BVSD makes this impossible to achieve. While operating 182 buses the peak number of buses operating in the afternoon with a child on board is only 155 indicating that the bell schedules creates the need for 27 more uses than the theoretical minimum. Page 45

48 Page 46

49 In the afternoon 174 buses are operated but the peak usage is only 18: The distribution of buses in the morning and afternoon clearly demonstrate that BVSD operates essentially a two tier system. RECOMMENDATION: Establish three distinct bell times district-wide and schedule school to balance the tiers accordingly. On the day of the survey the system required 323 runs. The theoretical minimum number of triplerouted buses for such a system is 323 divided by three or 18 buses. While the theoretical minimum is almost always impossible to achieve it is our judgment that the district could conserve upwards of 4 buses by proper scheduling of school opening and closing times. A forty bus reduction would reduce costs by about $2.5 million annually. Bus Resource Utilization Timeline Reports Another RouteYield output is the Bus Resource Utilization Timeline reports (Appendix M and N) which depict a timeline for each morning and afternoon bus. This report displays horizontal bars when Page 47

50 each bus is transporting riders, and colorizes that bar by school program type. This reports not only indicates how many bus runs each bus is performing and its approximate run time length, it demonstrates how the service is occurring within the school building bell schedule. The reader can envision a vertical line that aligns with the high, junior and elementary school start or end time groupings and see the challenge a bus has in serving each of those time tiers. Page 48

51 IMPLEMENTATION OF KEY INITIATIVES In order to effectively implement the major recommendations herein it is recommended the district pursue these objectives according to the following general timetable: February 213 o o o March 213 o o o o o o o April 213 o o o o o o o May 213 o o The routing team reviews the run consolidation opportunities identified in RouteYield and plans new routes. Conduct dry runs of the new routes. Communicate new routes to parents and principals. Commence planning for the adjustment of bell times to achieve a balanced three tier system. Develop and establish the means for assembling operations information in dispatch for weekly dissemination. MSDS Books updated in Maintenance. Shop safety committee formed and facility inspection routine developed. Identify the excess buses to be disposed. Seek board approval for returning Angevine riders to walking status. Commence monthly compilation of miles and accidents to establish the moving twelve month accident rate. Seek board approval of the new bell time schedule. Develop communication plan for principals and parents to facilitate the implementation of new bell times. Collaborate with the Special Education Department on the automation of student data dissemination. Identify the order in which excess busses will be disposed. Commence weekly operations meetings to review operation information (terminal based). Develop bargaining rationale for extending para-professionals days at schools utilizing breakfast clubs and submit to HR. Begin collaboration with IT to achieve daily downloads for Infinite Campus. Complete route initial planning for and determine number of buses. Commence dry runs to confirm planning assumptions. Page 49

52 o Begin collaboration with Special Needs to improve information process. o Begin community communication of new bell times and walkers. o Dispose of excess buses targeting a 15% spare factor. June 213 o Complete community outreach process. o Complete Infinite Campus download enhancement. o Prepare bus order rationale for 14 units and forecast cost for capital planning. o Maintenance staffing adjustments to reflect reduced number of buses owned. o Prepare capital expenditure forecast for facility and lot improvements. July 213 o Report on driver recruitment and retention progress. o Complete enhancement of Special Needs information process. o Complete dry runs of new system and begin final planning for the new year. Page 5

53

54 T.E.A.M.S Transportation Efficiency and Accountability Management System Users Guide Revised: January 3, 26

55 T.E.A.M.S Transportation Efficiency and Accountability Management System INTRODUCTION TEAMS is designed to allow management and staff the opportunity to manage the overall system by assembling its various components into distinct reporting groups and track the needed information to make sound, timely, and accurate decisions. The premise is to be informed, have accurate data, meet and discuss, and thus implement actions plans that allow for the elimination of weak areas. Staff and management work hand in hand allowing all to participate and implement all corrective actions. Unity of effort is the key element of the system. This is accomplished by establishing clear and concise lines of responsibility, accountability, communications, reporting, and problem solving. These activities are managed by the location manager and the success of the program can be measured by the ease in which the location functions while accomplishing its goals. In December, 25 TransPar began using an electronic version. This will enable users to log into the companies server and post required information. This information will be maintained in the home office. Another benefit for gathering the information in a single location will enable the company personnel to review information with out being at the local terminal. MISSION STATEMENT The Transportation Efficiency and Accountability Management System shall provide the location manager with the tools required to enable them to fulfill the department s mission - to efficiently transport passengers safely, on time, and in a courteous manner. PROGRAM BENEFITS 1. Professionalizes management at all levels. 2. Stimulates more business thinking, values and goal orientation. 3. Reduces the risk of surprise. 4. Raises location manager focus and activity to correspond with upper management s expectations. 5. Establishes an organized method for translating manager s vision to operational reality. 6. Standardizes facility management so as to facilitate internal career growth and cross training. 7. Encourages team building, communication, and mutual respect among team members.

56 ARCI Technique I. PURPOSE One of the leading causes or excuses for inefficiency or failure is that not everyone knows exactly what is expected of them by the employer. As the transportation manager, for all practical purposes, you operate your own business and are viewed as the employer by all those subordinate to you. While you may assume that everyone knows his or her roles and responsibilities that is not normally the case. Related to this is the fact that many employees are not good at setting priorities among all the roles and responsibilities that they have. The ARCI technique picks out the most important responsibilities to be carried out, determines all key people having a role to play and specifically defines and assigns each role to a person. Done in a group setting, confusion and misunderstanding among staff members should be reduced. If a new problem arises, ARCI becomes a tool for helping decide how to tackle it as efficiently as possible. This helps insure that you are using available people resources so as to take advantage of individual talents and overcome weaknesses. The ARCI chart is designed to be used as a graphic expression of the roles and responsibilities of key members of your staff. It provides a definition of terms in regard to key tasks. II. III. DEFINITIONS A - Those who are held ACCOUNTABLE for the success of the organization and have the right to assign people. R - Those who are RESPONSIBLE for getting it done. C - Those who need to be CONSULTED before an action can take place. I - Those who need to be INFORMED after an action takes place. Department Reports A R C I Action Plan Dispatch Summary Maintenance Report Staffing Safety Routing Payroll Score sheet Contractor Readiness

57 ORGANIZATION CHART The department shall make a chart showing the relationships between the key employees at the department. This should be done neatly and shall be displayed in a prominent location. This chart will include the corporate level management, and all supervisors that are in the chain of command that help to supervise the department. Locally, include all management, staff, and associated personnel. Listings shall be by title and name. The chart should be reviewed and updated as necessary. WEEKLY MANAGEMENT MEETING The Weekly Management Meeting is the key to making TEAMS work. It is the driving force that moves actions smoothly through the management cycle. It is the formal communication link between the facility manager and local staff. Without this meeting being held regularly there can be no fully effective management system. The following elements are critical to the meeting s success. 1. A day is set and maintained for each week s meeting. It should be after all report information is gathered, but no later than Tuesday. 2. A specific time is set-aside on the meeting day. The time must be set to allow key employees to be present. All possible events should be scheduled around that specific time. If the facility manager is gone, the meeting should be held anyway. 3. The meetings must be formal and business-like, with minutes recorded. 4. An agenda must be prepared and strictly followed. 5. Materials and reports must be done neatly and be easy to read so as to command the necessary respect and to get proper use. AGENDA I. Read minutes of last meeting. II. Review and update previous Action Plans III. Review reports, update current action plans, and create new action plans. IV. Review Discussion Pages from various department personnel. V. Management Report VI. Other Business VII. Review new added action items TECHNICAL INFORMATION (THINGS TO KNOW) When installing and using TEAMS there are a few important points to know: 1. Follow instructions for proper installations. Please call Lee s Summit for support. 2. Install and create users for anyone that will need access. In some locations it may be necessary to install multiple locations.

58 3. Due to license limitations, only 1 individuals may be connected at any one time. Therefore, please limit your time to data entry and review. Once complete disconnect immediately. 4. Disconnect properly. You must disconnect and not simply close out. Otherwise you risk staying connected and limiting other individual s access. MANAGEMENT BOOK The department will place a copy of every report, minutes, and action log in a three-ring binder after the weekly meeting is held. These notes plus the Organization Chart, ARCI Chart, on going graphs and logs will form the Management Book. This book becomes the history of the facility. It can be used to compare one year s performance with the past, prepare budgets, predict driver shortages, etc. Once the year is completed the book can be filed and another started. The format for the book should be as follows: The Organization Chart, ARCI Chart and Weekly Meeting Agenda should be placed inside the front cover. Place Tabs in the book for each of the weekly reporting periods for the week ending (Saturday s date). Place all reports for that week in that section in the order they appear on the agenda. Cumulative logs or graphs, which are on going, can be placed in the back of the book under their appropriate tabs. INFORMATION REPORTS This is a group of reports that measures key information indices that are critical to the success of the local operation. The reports collect local information to be turned into local action plans to prevent or solve local problems. The most successful manager s keep track, one way or another, of these key indices and use them as a basis for making decisions. Some managers do not and they often make decisions based on poor information or upon intuition. Such practices often lead to error. This system provides an efficient way to involve the facility staff in the information gathering process and makes them a part of the decision making process. It also helps to train them to really understand the business better and encourages them to contribute ideas for improvement. It further strengthens their responsibility/accountability in their area of expertise, i.e. they are in charge of their area and must insure satisfactory levels of operation. ACTION PLAN ASSIGNMENTS DISPATCH SUMMARY (DRIVER & ATTENDANT) MAINTENANCE REPORT STAFFING REPORT (DRIVER & ATTENDANT) SAFETY REPORT ROUTING REPORT OPERATIONS DISCUSSION PAYROLL SCORE SHEET (DRIVER & ATTENDANT) CONTRACTOR READINESS REPORT

59 ACTION PLAN ASSIGNMENTS I. PURPOSE This form provides direction in determining ACTION NEEDED after the local management team reviews and analyzes the data compiled the previous week. II. HOW TO USE The details of form execution are as follows: A. CONTROLS - Enter the area of concern for the problem i.e. safety, dispatch, maint., misc., etc. B. DISTRICT - Choose the district. C. TERMINALS - Choose the Terminal. D. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION - In this field, identify the problem or action needed to be addressed the following week(s). For example, if the Dispatch Summary Report shows an unusual number of absentees, this would be an item listed as a problem area and action would be needed to try to lessen absenteeism. E. ASSIGNED TO - Enter the individual responsible for taking action to resolve the identified problem. Enter the date the individual should have the problem resolved by. F. ASSIGNED DATE - Enter the date the individual was assigned the task G. DATE DUE - Enter the date the individual should have the problem resolved by. E. ORIGINAL WK END - Enter the date of the original week ending for tracking purposes. F. ACTION TECHNIQUES - The section is to list ideas or techniques utilized to correct the problem(s) identified. The Team can add to the list of ideas any brainstorming techniques offered by staff members or other managers. G. DATE COMPLETED - Enter the date the problem was resolved. Until a date is entered it will continue to appear as an Action Plan. All completed and resolved issues drop off. All action plans not resolved will continue to appear. This is a color-coded form and changes colors as the deadline approaches and when it is past due.

60 DISPATCH SUMMARY (Driver & Attendant) I. Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide the manager with the necessary data to match the workload requirements against available personnel and equipment. II. Instructions This document has been designed to record three dispatches per day (shifts) for all days of the week on which work is performed. The person in charge of each dispatch must record the results. Those results will be used as the basis for creating action plans to either overcome shortages or dispose of surpluses. It is critical that each dispatch be summarized prior to the start of the next dispatch. A. REGULAR DRIVERS - Enter the number of regular assigned route drivers. D. SUB DRIVERS Enter the number of regular assigned sub drivers or P/T drivers that can be counted on driving. E. REGULAR ROUTES - Enter the number of regular assigned routes for that given dispatch. D. ABSENCES Enter the number of absences for that given shift. Don t forget LOA s or W/C personnel. E. EXTRA TRIPS Enter the number of trips that must leave during a dispatch time (conflicting or primetime trips) that require a driver during your normal dispatch. F. LATE BUSES - Enter the number of late buses or dispatches that occurred during the given dispatch. MAINTENANCE REPORT I. Purpose This control document provides local management with information essential in the monitoring of the critical aspects of the maintenance program. II. Instructions A. VEHICLE TYPE Enter the various types of vehicles that are maintained. B. MAINTENANCE STAFFING Enter the Maintenance Staffing needs such as mechanics, fuelers, part-time staff, including drivers used for maintenance, to have their hours reflected in the maintenance program. The vehicles/mechanic ratio is total FTE s divided into total vehicles.

61 C. BREAKDOWNS & SERVICE CALLS - Enter the number of vehicles that break down on the street for which a spare vehicle must be dispatched to replace it and finish the assigned work and Service Calls require a staff member to go to the vehicle, make minor repairs and allow that same vehicle to complete its assigned work. D. DAILY DOWNS Daily Downs refer to broken or otherwise defective vehicles that are not available for a particular dispatch that day. E. PM s AND 45 DAY INSPECTIONS Preventative Maintenance section records the number of units planned for P.M. service for the week (weekly plan #) plus the recording by day of actual P.M. s completed. F. DAILY REPAIR ORDERS (WORKLOAD) Item 7 & 8 could be similar. Each location should determine which one applies to them. G. DRIVER REPAIR REQUEST - Item 7 & 8 could be similar. Each location should determine which one applies to them. Maintenance should enter each day the number of repair request received as well as the number of completed request. No report may be considered complete until the driver receives the copy showing the results. STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS (Driver & Attendant) I. Purpose This control is used to track key factors that control driver/attendant supply. The information collected here should provide a basis for the creation of action plans, which direct the use of company resources and management effort in the hiring, training, and retaining of drivers. II. Instructions A. APPLICATION SOURCE The Application Source section is used to track information as to what motivated the applicants (newspaper, signs, referral; etc B. INTERVIEWS The Interview section is used to track interviews. C. TRAINING PROGRAM - The Training Program section requires the preparer to keep a running total of exactly the number of drivers in training at all times. The carryover number is used to start the next report. This also records number completing/hired as well as those dropped from training D. TURNOVER CAUSES The Turnover Causes section allows local management to know why drivers/attendants leave. When patterns are observed, action plans should be developed to counteract them. Reviewing applicant flow, successful training, and turnover as represented on form should guide management in controlling staffing levels.

62 SAFETY & TRAINING SUMMARY (Driver & Attendant) I. Purpose This control is used to track key factors concerning the safety climate. The information collected here should provide a basis for the creation of action plans, which direct the use of company resources and management effort in programs to improve safety awareness. II. Instructions E. DEVELOPMENT The Development section is used to track information regarding develop of drivers/attendants such s additional training, safety meetings, specialized training. F. CHECK RIDES AND ROAD OPS. Enter the number of check rides and road ops. Conducted the past week. G. ACCIDENTS - Enter the number of accidents that occurred the past week. H. UNSAFE ACTS AND INCIDENTS Enter the number of unsafe acts and incidents that occurred the past week. ROUTING SUMMARY I. Purpose The purpose of this control form is to provide a quick synopsis of routing for the past week. II. Instructions A. TRANSPORTATION REQUEST Enter number of Adds, Deletes, Changes, etc. (otherwise known as the downloads) B. # OF ROUTE UPDATES Enter the number of route updates that resulted from the changes received. C. # OF ROUTE/SCHOOL REVIEWS - Enter the number of reviews conducted that is separate from the normal route changes. Such as taking a school and reviewing for efficiencies, etc. D. # OF BUS INCREASES Enter the number of bus increases made over the past week. E. # OF BUS DECREASES Enter the number of bus decreases made over the past week.

63 F. OTHER This section is allowed for any individual location that may be doing tracking of another sort. G. SUMMER SCHOOL REQUEST Enter the number of Add s, Deletes, Changes, etc specifically for summer school. These requests should not be counting in Item #1. OPERATIONS DISCUSSION I. Purpose To keep up-to-date on various issues that may need attention. This form is designed to spark discussion about all aspects of the location. This form is to be used by all TEAM Members. II. Instructions A. FACILITY CONCERNS Enter any concerns related to the facility such as A/C not working, Bathrooms need attention, Roof leaking, etc. B. DRIVER CONCERNS Enter any concerns being shared by drivers and attendants about any topic. C. STAFF CONCERNS - Enter any concerns being shared by staff about any topic. D. SAFETY CONCERNS Enter any concerns being shared relating to Safety & Training E. MAINTENANCE CONCERNS Enter any concerns being shared relating to Maintenance. F. ROUTING CONCERNS Enter any concerns being shared relating to Routing. G. OTHER CONCERNS Enter any concerns being shared by anyone about any topic (catchall) Helpful hint; please put your initials behind the concern so we know who shared the concern. Such as: The bathroom tile is in need of repair. SA PAYROLL SCORE SHEET I. Purpose This control document provides local management with information essential in the monitoring of the critical aspects of payroll cost. Tracking is done by hours and not dollars. The score sheet is divided into five sections, Driver, Attendant, Maintenance, Safety & Training, and Staff.

64 II. Instructions I. PLAN Enter the average daily planned hours. J. DAYS Enter the days planned as paid days. K. ACTUAL REGULAR HOURS - Enter the actual number of regular hours for that period. L. ACTUAL OVERTIME HOURS Enter the actual number of overtime hours for that period. It is at the discretion of each location as to the period of tracking. For instance some locations can only get actual payroll information by pay period of two weeks other may be twice a month. Yet the TransPar employee s payroll tracking will be done weekly. Adopt this form to you individual needs. CONTRACTORS READINESS REPORT I. Purpose This control document provides local management with information essential in the monitoring of the critical aspects of contracted service from an outside vendor. The local contractor should gather this information. II. Instructions A. OPERATIONS Tracks various operations needs and should be entered on a daily basis. B. DEVELOPMENT Tracks various Training needs. C. SAFETY- Tracks various Safety Training needs.

65

66 SAFETY CLIMATE ANALYSIS The goal of a loss control program, to effectively manage risk at the least possible cost, cannot be achieved without a reduction in the number of incidents that lead to losses. Prevention is the most positive and rewarding cost control activity, and prevention is accomplished by a program aimed at detecting and eliminating unsafe conditions and acts. About five percent of all accidents involve an unsafe condition, so it is important that an ongoing analysis of the work environment take place to minimize this from occurring. The following Safety Climate Analysis provides a detailed checklist for evaluating the work environment and initiating an action plan to correct any problems that are found. The analysis includes a review of the Physical Plant (Lot, Drivers Room, and Shop) and Administrative Procedures (Files, Drug Free Workplace Program, HAZCOM, etc.). It also includes a Perception Survey for both drivers and mechanics, an interview format that gives an indication of the employees familiarity with company policy and programs affecting the facility s safety climate. COMPLETING AN ANALYSIS An analysis will be conducted quarterly by the Safety Director to monitor changes in the department building and its operation. The analysis form is primarily intended for department use and should be kept on file at the bus garage. If an action plan is established and unsafe conditions identified, follow-up action must occur to ensure safe working conditions for the employees. Each item or operational aspect on the analysis form is analyzed monthly. Place a check mark in the appropriate column indicating whether the item is found to be in Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory condition. If the item or operational aspect is not applicable at the facility, us N/A in the column. If an item on the analysis is deemed unsatisfactory, the manager must explain the current situation in the Comment analysis form, corrective action must be taken to ensure safe working conditions for the employees. The following procedure should be followed when an unsatisfactory condition is found: 1. Identify the unsafe or unsatisfactory condition in the Comment column of the Safety Climate Analysis form. If it poses an immediate hazard, take immediate action to protect the employees from danger (i.e., grinder has exposed cord, take grinder out of service until repaired ). 2. Consider the options available to correct the unsatisfactory condition, then determine the action plan that will be implemented. 3. Establish who has been assigned the responsibility to assure that corrective action is taken. 4. Establish a completion date for the corrective action. 5. Indicate on the analysis form (far right column) which weekly Action Plan to refer to that will document corrective action or progress made. 6. Document that corrective action has been completed and the date it was completed on the Action Plan. (See Exhibit IV-G.) mcarroll/transpar/forms/safety climate

67 FACILITY: Boulder Valley School District DATE: 1/18/13 SAFETY CLIMATE ANALYSIS SIGNED: Phil McConnell OPERATION ASPECT UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY COMMENTS: IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION I. PHYSICAL PLANT A. Lot A majority of the lots are unimproved making it difficult to provide a uniform walking surface and Increase paved areas or improve gravel surface 1. Lot surface X causing the potential for trip hazards especially 2. Parking pattern for school vehicles X in the winter months. With the exception of the 3. Parking pattern for employee vehicles X shop entry issues at the Boulder Valley Terminal, traffic patterns appear to be 4. Traffic pattern for fueling X acceptable. The facility is secured by a fence 5. Traffic pattern for entry and egress X (Boulder Valley) X and is lighted although the effectiveness of the 6. Perimeter security (fence) X lighting was not reviewed. The Boulder Valley 7. Fuel storage and island maintenance X Terminal is shared with other support services. 8. Shop entry and egress of vehicles X Exterior cleanliness could be improved 9. Cleanliness of building exterior/lot X B. Drivers Room 1. Rest room cleanliness X 2. Drivers room cleanliness X 3. Drivers room entry/egress X 4. W/C postings X 5. Discrimination postings X 6. Safety program evidence X 7. Furniture quality/adequacy X 8. Vending machine condition X 9. General atmosphere X 1. Accessibility to management X 11. Proper driver footwear/clothing X The drivers lounge and restrooms are attached to the transportation administrative offices providing ready access to management and support staff. The driver s lounges are minimally adequate in size and are furnished with standard school furniture. The lounges and restrooms were generally clean but furniture could use improvement. Several bulletin boards provide an area to post information for drivers including required postings, however, the posted material should be reviewed to ensure full compliance A review of the Mandatory Postings should be conducted. C. Hazard Communication Program The Hazard Communication program was 1. Responsible employee for MSDS X discussed during the inspection of the shop 2. MSDS book established, location X areas. While the MSDS book is readily available 3. List of chemicals X on a shelf in the shop area, the updating occurs 4. MSDS for each chemical X primarily when the shop adds a new chemical. It 5. Containers properly labeled X X does appear that there is a regular process for the updating of the material data sheets. 6. MSDS/containers correspond X 7. Employee training scheduled and X conducted 8. Training documented? 9. Attendance rosters/dates in MSDS? 1. Posted hazard communication? standard 11. Chemicals properly stored/marked X X The labeling on secondary containers should include the product s name and manufacture. Flammable liquids should be stored in a flammable materials storage cabinet. The management of the MSDS program for Transportation should be reviewed to ensure that chemical information is updated and current. A review of the training program should also be conducted to ensure that all new employees have been properly trained and that all training is documented. Secondary containers were labeled; however, the information is not fully descriptive. A review of the flammable liquid storage parameters should also be conducted. mcarroll/transpar/forms/safety climate

68 FACILITY: DATE: SAFETY CLIMATE ANALYSIS SIGNED: UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY COMMENTS: OPERATION ASPECT I. PHYSICAL PLANT (cont d) D. Shop 1. Condition/use of tire res. div./inflation dev. X 2 Physical capability of those changing tires? 3. Posting of tire change posters X 4. Condition of electrical cords X 5. Personal protective equipment available a. condition and use of safety glasses While the equipment b. condition and use of safety masks was available, it was c. condition and use of gloves not always in use. d. condition and use of hearing protection e. condition and use of welding hood 6 Door condition and open/close system X 7. Floor cleanliness/slickness Some improvement required 8. Lighting, electrical, cleanliness, entry X 9 Parts cleaning area, safety equipment X 1. Battery, eye wash station X 11. Fire extinguishers, condition X 12. First aid kit X 13. No smoking signs/smoking evidence X 14. Equipment guards/use Not observed but in place 15. Jack stands/use Not observed 16. Lighting X 17. Oil waste handling X 18. Flammables storage Some improvement required 19. Rest room conditions X 2. Break area condition X 21. Hazardous material postings SEE SECTION C 22. Work area cleanliness 23. Observed safety practices Some improvement required 24. Vehicle condition reports status X 25. Staff cleanliness X 26. Noise level X 27. Non-mechanic shop access X 28. Other unsafe work areas/conditions As noted Safety Observations: -Several potential concerns were observed including worn or damaged extension cords, the use of a non-self-ejecting drill press chuck key, and face shields in need of cleaning. -While the general housekeeping and cleanliness in the shop areas was satisfactory, observations and interviews indicate that that departmental management must be diligent in requiring that work place standards are maintained. -Examples of potential areas for concerns include trip hazardous, general storage of supplies in the technicians areas. -First Aid materials are maintained by a vendor and appeared to be well stocked and current. The eye-wash station was found to be functional. Missing spark guard: IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION: A regular inspection of the shop areas should be implemented including cleanliness, the condition of personal and shop safety equipment, and work practices... -Specific recommendations include: Replace all non-grounded or repaired extension cords: Replace non-safety rated equipment or tools: Non-Safety Chuck Key Eliminate trip hazards and monitor general housekeeping: mcarroll/transpar/forms/safety climate

69 FACILITY: DATE: SAFETY CLIMATE ANALYSIS SIGNED: UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY COMMENTS: SEE ACTION OPERATION ASPECT PLAN, WEEK OF: II. ADMINISTRATION A. Personnel File of Person Who Had Accident Not Reviewed 1. Training record 2. License 3. Drug screen 4. Physical exam 5. Check ride/road observation results 6. Retraining notes 7. MVR 8. CRC B. Alcohol-Drug Education Materials C. Safety Meeting File D. Safety Inspection File E. D.O.T. Certification Status F. Daily Recognition of Safe Acts G. ASSET Program 1. Employees screening process explained 2. Driver Trainer time usage 3. Retraining after accidents 4. Accident log complete/timely 5. OSHA log complete/timely 6. Action plans to improve safety 7. Driver supply/turnover 8. Vehicle breakdowns/service calls 9. Vehicle condition report status H. Accident Investigation Process I. Injury Investigation Process J. Contract Labor Certificate of Insurance K. Underground Storage Tank Status 1. Visible leaks or spills 2. Tank information in MSDS book 3. Tightness testing verification 4. State/local registration mcarroll/transpar/forms/safety climate

70 FACILITY: DATE: SAFETY CLIMATE ANALYSIS SIGNED: OPERATION ASPECT III. DRIVER INTERVIEW NAME: HIRE DATE DETERMINE FAMILIARITY WITH: A. Driver Instruction Statement B. Driver Training Card C. Vehicle Condition Report D. Check Rides E. Road Observations F. Drug Testing Program G. Drug/Alcohol Treatment Program H. Workers Compensation 1. What to do if injured 2. Who pays W.C. costs 3. W/C effect on district I. Recognition of Safe Acts J. Knowledge of MSDS UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY COMMENTS: SEE ACTION PLAN, WEEK OF: Not Reviewed DRIVER SIGNATURE mcarroll/transpar/forms/safety climate

71 FACILITY: DATE: SAFETY CLIMATE ANALYSIS SIGNED: UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY COMMENTS: SEE ACTION OPERATION ASPECT PLAN, WEEK OF: IV. MECHANIC INTERVIEW: A large percentage of the mechanics NAME: were interviewed in both groups and HIRE DATE: as individuals. Interviews indicate a DETERMINE FAMILIARITY WITH: high level of work-place satisfaction A. Mechanic Instruction Statement X and in particular with the changes that have been implemented under B. Shop Safety Rules Needs improvement the new management of the C. Vehicle Condition Report X department. D. Drug Testing E. Drug/Alcohol Program X F. Workers Compensation X 1. What to do if injured X 2. Who pays W.C. costs 3. W/C effect on district G. Recognition of Safe Acts H. HAZCOM Program See comments in I C 1. MSDS Book 2. Labeling requirements 3. Proper handling/storage/disposal of Hazardous materials. 4. Training provided MECHANIC SIGNATURE

72

73

74

75

76

77 Principal's Evaluation Boulder Valley School District (Boulder Terminal) Responded % Unresponded % Surveys Delivered 24 1.% 1. Name of your school. Arapahoe Campus BCSIS Elementary Boulder High Casey Middle Centennial Middle Columbine Elementary Community Montessori Elem Creekside at Martin Park Elem Crest View Elementary Douglass Elementary Eisenhower Elementary Fairview High Flarirons Elementary Foothill Elementary Halcyon Middle-Senior Halcyon Middle-Senior Heatherwood Elementary High Peaks Elementary Manhattan Arts and Academics Mesa Elementary Nevin Platt Middle New Vista High Platt CHOICE Middle Southern Hills Middle University Hill Elementary Whittier Elementary Other (please specify) Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % % 1 7% Satisfactory Rating % Not Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied 1 7% 1 7% 1 7% 1 7% % % 1 7% 1 7% Very Satisfied 5 36% % Satisfied 68 49% Satisfactory % Somewhat Satisfied 15 11% Rating % Not At All Satisfied 5 4% 25.4 % 138 1% 1 7% 1 7% Very Satisfied - Satisfied % % Somewhat Satisfied -Not at All Satisfied 2 14% % 1 7% % 1 7% % 1 7% 4% Overall Satisfaction Rating % 11% 1 7% % 36% Very Satisfied % % Satisfied % % Somewhat Satisfied % Not At All Satisfied % % 49% % % % % % 2. What level does your school serve? Preschool % Elementary 8 57% Middle 3 21% High 1 7% Tech % Charter % Non-Public % Other 2 14% Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % % % % 7% 22% 14% % 57% Who Responded? Preschool Elementary Middle High Tech Charter Non-Public Other 1 of 2

78 3. How many regular buses serve your school? Buses 1 7% 1-2 Buses 2 14% 3-5 Buses 6 43% 6-1 Buses 5 36% Buses % 16-2 Buses % Buses % 26-3 Buses % Buses % 36-4 Buses % Buses % 46-5 Buses % 51- Greater Buses % Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % 51- Greater Buses 46-5 Buses Buses 36-4 Buses Buses 26-3 Buses Buses 16-2 Buses Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 4. How many special needs buses serve your school? Buses 4 29% 1-2 Buses 9 64% 3-5 Buses 1 7% 6-1 Buses % 11- Greater Buses % Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % 11- Greater Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 5. How many mid-day buses serve your school? Buses 5 36% 1-5 Buses 9 64% 6- Greater Buses % Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % 6- Greater Buses 1-5 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% The following questions grade transportation performance from the building administrator's point of view. Point Assignment: Very Satisfied=4 points, Satisfied=2 points, Somewhat Satisfied=1 points, Not at all Satisfied= points 6. Factor: Drivers' student management techniques and following of procedures. Points Very Satisfied 2 14% 8 Satisfied 8 57% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 4 29% 4 2. Not At All Satisfied % Total 14 1% 28 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 7. Factor: Drivers' responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 3 21% 12 Satisfied 1 71% 2 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 7% Not At All Satisfied % Total 14 1% 33 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 2 of 2

79 8. Factor: Transportation Department responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 6 43% 24 Satisfied 6 43% 12 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 7% Not At All Satisfied 1 7% Total 14 1% 37 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 9. Factor: AM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 5 38% 2 Satisfied 5 38% 1 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 3 23% Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 33 answered question 13 1% skipped question 1 8% Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 1. Factor: PM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 8 57% 32 Satisfied 4 29% 8 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 7% Not At All Satisfied 1 7% Total 14 1% 41 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 11. Factor: Customer service delivered by drivers. Points Very Satisfied 5 38% 2 Satisfied 6 46% 12 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 2 15% Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 34 answered question 13 1% skipped question 1 8% Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 12. Factor: Customer service delivered by transportation staff Points Very Satisfied 7 5% 28 Satisfied 5 36% 1 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 7% Not At All Satisfied 1 7% Total 14 1% 39 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 13. Factor: Appearance of vehicles. Points Very Satisfied 5 36% 2 Satisfied 8 57% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 7% Not At All Satisfied % Total 14 1% 37 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 3 of 2

80 14. Factor: Appearance of drivers. Points Very Satisfied 5 36% 2 Satisfied 8 57% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 7% Not At All Satisfied % Total 14 1% 37 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 15. Does your school have safe bus loading/unloading areas? Yes 14 1% No % Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 16. Does your school have personnel watching the buses load and unload? Yes 13 93% No 1 7% Total 14 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 17. Would you like a representative from transportation to contact you regarding concerns? No Yes 2 14% Yes No 12 86% Total 14 1% % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% answered question 14 1% skipped question % Yes, would like someone to contact me Kirk Quitter Guillermo Medina [email protected] Overall, how satisfied are you with transportation at your building? 18. Points Very Satisfied 4 29% 16 Satisfied 8 57% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 22.9 Not At All Satisfied 2 14% Total 14 1% 32 answered question 14 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 4 of 2

81 19. In your opinion, what three changes most need to be made to improve transportation for your school? Respondents that answered question 9 64% Respondents that skipped question 5 36% Direct comments from participants are listed below 1 Behavior management of kids 2 Behavior management on buses/ monitors 3 Camera on bus 4 Charges of transportation cost expensive and inequitable 5 Consistent process for student management 6 Field trip hours flexibility currently hours are limited 7 I would love for New Vista to have transportation. 8 Knowing students' names 9 Monitor overcrowding 1 More flexibility with special education pick up times 11 Scheduling adjustments on delivery to match school budget cuts for supervision 12 Split problematic routes 13 Sport team pick up after school hours 14 Support bus drivers with difficult routes 15 Timeliness of arrival 16 Very satisfied across the board 17 I am concerned about turn over of bus drivers with difficult routes. They need support as it is very unsafe to drive a bus with large numbers of young kids. Many of the students at our school have multiple at risk factors and need to be supported differently... even during the bus rides home. Many of the discipline issues that I deal with happen in the bus and it is difficult to piece "what happened" during the rides. A camera in the buses, particularly with all the current safety issues would be ideal I would also like to say thank you to the Transportation Department, they are very responsive and professional! 5 of 2

82 Principal's Evaluation Boulder Valley School District (Lafayette Terminal) Responded % Unresponded 7 35.% Surveys Delivered 2 1.% 1. Name of your school. Angevine Middle Aspen Creek K-8 School Birch Elementary Broomfield Heights Middle Broomfield High Centaurus High Coal Creek Elementary Eldorado K-8 Emerald Elementary Fireside Elementary Kohl Elementary Lafayette Elementary Louisville Elementary Louisville Middle Monarch High Monarch K-8 Pioneer Bilingual Ryan Elementary Sanchez Elementary Superior Elementary Other (please specify) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % 1 8% % Satisfactory Rating % Not Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1 8% 1 8% % 1 8% % % 1 8% Very Satisfied 48 37% 1 8% Satisfied 61 47% Satisfactory 1 8% Somewhat Satisfied 18 14% Rating 1 8% Not At All Satisfied 2 2% 25.7 % 129 1% 1 8% 1 8% Very Satisfied - Satisfied 19 84% 1 8% Somewhat Satisfied -Not at All Satisfied 2 16% % 1 8% % 47% 14% 2% 37% Overall Satisfaction Rating Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Not At All Satisfied 2. What level does your school serve? Preschool % Elementary 6 46% Middle 3 23% High 2 15% Tech % Charter % Non-Public % Other 2 15% Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % % % % 16% 15% 23% % 46% Who Responded? Preschool Elementary Middle High Tech Charter Non-Public Other 6 of 2

83 3. How many regular buses serve your school? Buses % 1-2 Buses 3 23% 3-5 Buses 5 38% 6-1 Buses 3 23% Buses 2 15% 16-2 Buses % Buses % 26-3 Buses % Buses % 36-4 Buses % Buses % 46-5 Buses % 51- Greater Buses % Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % 51- Greater Buses 46-5 Buses Buses 36-4 Buses Buses 26-3 Buses Buses 16-2 Buses Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 4. How many special needs buses serve your school? Buses 2 15% 1-2 Buses 8 62% 3-5 Buses 3 23% 6-1 Buses % 11- Greater Buses % Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % 11- Greater Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 5. How many mid-day buses serve your school? Buses 6 46% 1-5 Buses 7 54% 6- Greater Buses % Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % 6- Greater Buses 1-5 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% The following questions grade transportation performance from the building administrator's point of view. Point Assignment: Very Satisfied=4 points, Satisfied=2 points, Somewhat Satisfied=1 points, Not at all Satisfied= points 6. Factor: Drivers' student management techniques and following of procedures. Points Very Satisfied 5 38% 2 Satisfied 6 46% 12 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 2 15% Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 34 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 7. Factor: Drivers' responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 5 38% 2 Satisfied 6 46% 12 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 2 15% Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 34 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 7 of 2

84 8. Factor: Transportation Department responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 6 5% 24 Satisfied 4 33% 8 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 2 17% Not At All Satisfied % Total 12 1% 34 answered question 12 1% skipped question 1 8% Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 9. Factor: AM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 5 38% 2 Satisfied 8 62% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 27.7 Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 36 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 1. Factor: PM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 7 54% 28 Satisfied 6 46% 12 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 3.8 Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 4 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 11. Factor: Customer service delivered by drivers. Points Very Satisfied 7 54% 28 Satisfied 5 38% 1 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 8% 1 3. Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 39 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 12. Factor: Customer service delivered by transportation staff Points Very Satisfied 4 31% 16 Satisfied 7 54% 14 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 2 15% Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 32 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 13. Factor: Appearance of vehicles. Points Very Satisfied 5 38% 2 Satisfied 8 62% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 27.7 Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 36 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 8 of 2

85 14. Factor: Appearance of drivers. Points Very Satisfied % Satisfied 3 23% 6 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 8 62% Not At All Satisfied 2 15% Total 13 1% 14 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 15. Does your school have safe bus loading/unloading areas? Yes 13 1% No % Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 16. Does your school have personnel watching the buses load and unload? Yes 12 92% No 1 8% Total 13 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 17. Would you like a representative from transportation to contact you regarding concerns? No Yes 1 8% Yes No 12 92% Total 13 1% % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% answered question 13 1% skipped question % Yes, would like someone to contact me Mike Medina [email protected] Overall, how satisfied are you with transportation at your building? 18. Points Very Satisfied 4 31% 16 Satisfied 8 62% 16 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 8% Not At All Satisfied % Total 13 1% 33 answered question 13 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 9 of 2

86 18. In your opinion, what three changes most need to be made to improve transportation for your school? 19. Respondents that answered question 9 69% Respondents that skipped question 4 31% Direct comments from participants are listed below 1 After school routing for programs seems very expensive and the kids are on the bus a long time 2 Buses arriving in time for students to eat breakfast at school 3 Consistent management of student behavior on bus 4 Continue to celebrate the bus drivers for their hard work and positive focus 5 Continued communication with parents to make them feel safer about who gets on and off the bus 6 Continued training with bus drivers on how to respond to situations that may arise when driving 7 cost has become prohibitive for some field trips 8 direct communication between drivers and parents for first and maybe second offenses similar to a teacher. 9 Follow through on management of student behavior on bus 1 Holding students accountability for bullying behavior 11 I have no suggestions. When I do need help with an issue Steve Schuster is VERY helpful and supportive. 12 I really appreciate the drivers at Emerald, but your question about appearance made me think that it would be great if the bus drivers had some BVSD Transportation work shirts or polos to wear 13 increased flex-time for activities to and from Knowing student rides and being able to track them 15 Larger bus loop area 16 Larger parking area 17 relationship building skills for drivers to actually build relationships with students. Some are naturally wonderful, others are just doing the job. 18 The level of PBS Training required for drivers 19 They are very responsive when we call them 2 training for dealing with behavior on the bus including bullying 21 Transportation for students who can't afford to participate in athletics due to lack of personal transportation issues 1 of 2

87 Principal's Evaluation Boulder Valley School District (Nederland Terminal) Responded 1 5.% Unresponded 1 5.% Surveys Delivered 2 1.% 1. Name of your school. Nederland Elementary Nederland Middle/High Other (please specify) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % % 1 1% Satisfactory Rating % Not Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % % % % % % % % Very Satisfied 6 6% % Satisfied 3 3% Satisfactory % Somewhat Satisfied 1 1% Rating % Not At All Satisfied % 31. % 1 1% % % Very Satisfied - Satisfied 9 9% % Somewhat Satisfied -Not at All Satisfied 1 1% % % % 3% 1% % 6% Overall Satisfaction Rating Very Satisfied Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Not At All Satisfied 2. What level does your school serve? % % % Who Responded? Preschool % Elementary % Middle % High 1 1% Tech % Charter % Non-Public % Other % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % 1% Preschool Elementary Middle High Tech Charter Non-Public Other 11 of 2

88 3. How many regular buses serve your school? Buses % 1-2 Buses % 3-5 Buses % 6-1 Buses 1 1% Buses % 16-2 Buses % Buses % 26-3 Buses % Buses % 36-4 Buses % Buses % 46-5 Buses % 51- Greater Buses % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % 51- Greater Buses 46-5 Buses Buses 36-4 Buses Buses 26-3 Buses Buses 16-2 Buses Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 4. How many special needs buses serve your school? Buses % 1-2 Buses 1 1% 3-5 Buses % 6-1 Buses % 11- Greater Buses % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % 11- Greater Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 5. How many mid-day buses serve your school? Buses % 1-5 Buses 1 1% 6- Greater Buses % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % 6- Greater Buses 1-5 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% The following questions grade transportation performance from the building administrator's point of view. Point Assignment: Very Satisfied=4 points, Satisfied=2 points, Somewhat Satisfied=1 points, Not at all Satisfied= points 6. Factor: Drivers' student management techniques and following of procedures. Points Very Satisfied % Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 1% 1 1. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 1 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 7. Factor: Drivers' responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied % Satisfied 1 1% 2 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 2. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 2 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 12 of 2

89 8. Factor: Transportation Department responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 1 1% 4 Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 4. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 4 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 9. Factor: AM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 1 1% 4 Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 4. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 4 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 1. Factor: PM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 1 1% 4 Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 4. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 4 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 11. Factor: Customer service delivered by drivers. Points Very Satisfied 1 1% 4 Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 4. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 4 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 12. Factor: Customer service delivered by transportation staff Points Very Satisfied 1 1% 4 Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 4. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 4 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 13. Factor: Appearance of vehicles. Points Very Satisfied 1 1% 4 Satisfied % Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 4. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 4 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 13 of 2

90 14. Factor: Appearance of drivers. Points Very Satisfied % Satisfied 1 1% 2 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 2. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 2 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 15. Does your school have safe bus loading/unloading areas? Yes 1 1% No % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 16. Does your school have personnel watching the buses load and unload? Yes 1 1% No % Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % No Yes % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% 17. Would you like a representative from transportation to contact you regarding concerns? Yes % No 1 1% Total 1 1% answered question 1 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% Overall, how satisfied are you with transportation at your building? 18. Points Very Satisfied % Satisfied 1 1% 2 Rating Somewhat Satisfied % 2. Not At All Satisfied % Total 1 1% 2 answered question 1 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 14 of 2

91 In your opinion, what three changes most need to be made to improve transportation for your school? Respondents that answered question % Respondents that skipped question 1 1% Direct comments from participants are listed below Late buses so students could stay after school some 15 of 2

92 Principal's Evaluation Boulder Valley School District (Combined Terminals) Responded % Unresponded % Surveys Delivered 46 1.% 1. Name of your school. Angevine Middle 1 4% Arapahoe Campus % Satisfactory Rating Aspen Creek K-8 School % Not Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied BCSIS Elementary 1 4% Birch Elementary % Boulder High % Broomfield Heights Middle % Broomfield High 1 4% Casey Middle 1 4% Centaurus High 1 4% Centennial Middle 1 4% Very Satisfied 14 38% Coal Creek Elementary % Satisfied % Satisfactory Columbine Elementary 1 4% Somewhat Satisfied 34 12% Rating Community Montessori Elem 1 4% Not At All Satisfied 7 3% 25.8 Creekside at Martin Park Elem % 277 1% Crest View Elementary 1 4% Douglass Elementary 1 4% Very Satisfied - Satisfied % Eisenhower Elementary 1 4% Somewhat Satisfied -Not at All Satisfied 41 15% Eldorado K-8 1 4% Emerald Elementary 1 4% Fairview High % Fireside Elementary % Flarirons Elementary % 2% Overall Satisfaction Rating Foothill Elementary % 12% Halcyon Middle-Senior % Halcyon Middle-Senior High Peaks Elementary 1 4% % Heatherwood Elementary Kohl Elementary 1 1 4% 4% 38% Very Satisfied Satisfied Lafayette Elementary 1 4% Somewhat Satisfied Louisville Elementary 1 4% Louisville Middle 1 4% Not At All Satisfied Manhattan Arts and Academics % Mesa Elementary 1 4% 48% Monarch High % Monarch K-8 1 4% Nederland Elementary % Nederland Middle/High 1 4% Nevin Platt Middle % New Vista High 1 4% Other (please specify) % Pioneer Bilingual 1 4% Platt CHOICE Middle % Ryan Elementary 1 4% Sanchez Elementary % Southern Hills Middle 1 4% Superior Elementary 1 4% University Hill Elementary % Whittier Elementary 1 4% % % % Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % 16 of 2

93 2. What level does your school serve? Preschool % Elementary 14 5% Middle 6 21% High 4 14% Tech % Charter % Non-Public % Other 4 14% Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % % % % 14% 22% 14% % 5% Who Responded? Preschool Elementary Middle High Tech Charter Non-Public Other 3. How many regular buses serve your school? Buses 1 4% 1-2 Buses 5 18% 3-5 Buses 11 39% 6-1 Buses 9 32% Buses 2 7% 16-2 Buses % Buses % 26-3 Buses % Buses % 36-4 Buses % Buses % 46-5 Buses % 51- Greater Buses % Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % 51- Greater Buses 46-5 Buses Buses 36-4 Buses Buses 26-3 Buses Buses 16-2 Buses Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 4. How many special needs buses serve your school? Buses 6 21% 1-2 Buses 18 64% 3-5 Buses 4 14% 6-1 Buses % 11- Greater Buses % Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % 11- Greater Buses 6-1 Buses 3-5 Buses 1-2 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 5. How many mid-day buses serve your school? Buses 11 39% 1-5 Buses 17 61% 6- Greater Buses % Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % 6- Greater Buses 1-5 Buses Buses % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% The following questions grade transportation performance from the building administrator's point of view. Point Assignment: Very Satisfied=4 points, Satisfied=2 points, Somewhat Satisfied=1 points, Not at all Satisfied= points 6. Factor: Drivers' student management techniques and following of procedures. Points Very Satisfied 7 25% 28 Satisfied 14 5% 28 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 7 25% Not At All Satisfied % Total 28 1% 63 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 17 of 2

94 7. Factor: Drivers' responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 8 29% 32 Satisfied 17 61% 34 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 3 11% Not At All Satisfied % Total 28 1% 69 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 8. Factor: Transportation Department responsiveness to complaints/issues. Points Very Satisfied 13 48% 52 Satisfied 1 37% 2 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 3 11% Not At All Satisfied 1 4% Total 27 1% 75 answered question 27 1% skipped question 1 4% Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 9. Factor: AM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 11 41% 44 Satisfied 13 48% 26 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 3 11% Not At All Satisfied % Total 27 1% 73 answered question 27 1% skipped question 1 4% Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 1. Factor: PM bus routes are timely. Points Very Satisfied 16 57% 64 Satisfied 1 36% 2 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 4% Not At All Satisfied 1 4% Total 28 1% 85 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 11. Factor: Customer service delivered by drivers. Points Very Satisfied 13 48% 52 Satisfied 11 41% 22 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 3 11% Not At All Satisfied % Total 27 1% 77 answered question 27 1% skipped question 1 4% Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 12. Factor: Customer service delivered by transportation staff Points Very Satisfied 12 43% 48 Satisfied 12 43% 24 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 3 11% Not At All Satisfied 1 4% Total 28 1% 75 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 18 of 2

95 13. Factor: Appearance of vehicles. Points Very Satisfied 11 39% 44 Satisfied 16 57% 32 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 4% Not At All Satisfied % Total 28 1% 77 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 14. Factor: Appearance of drivers. Points Very Satisfied 5 18% 2 Satisfied 12 43% 24 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 9 32% Not At All Satisfied 2 7% Total 28 1% 53 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 15. Does your school have safe bus loading/unloading areas? Yes 28 1% No % Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 16. Does your school have personnel watching the buses load and unload? Yes 26 93% No 2 7% Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 17. Would you like a representative from transportation to contact you regarding concerns? Yes 3 11% No 25 89% Total 28 1% answered question 28 1% skipped question % No Yes % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% Overall, how satisfied are you with transportation at your building? 19. Points Very Satisfied 8 29% 32 Satisfied 17 61% 34 Rating Somewhat Satisfied 1 4% Not At All Satisfied 2 7% Total 28 1% 67 answered question 28 1% skipped question % Not At All Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% 19 of 2

96 18. In your opinion, what three changes most need to be made to improve transportation for your school? Respondents that answered question 13 46% Respondents that skipped question 15 54% Direct comments from participants are listed below 1 After school routing for programs seems very expensive and the kids are on the bus a long time 2 Behavior management of kids 3 Behavior management on buses/ monitors 4 Buses arriving in time for students to eat breakfast at school 5 Camera on bus 6 Charges of transportation cost expensive and inequitable 7 Consistent management of student behavior on bus 8 Consistent process for student management 9 Continue to celebrate the bus drivers for their hard work and positive focus 1 Continued communication with parents to make them feel safer about who gets on and off the bus 11 Continued training with bus drivers on how to respond to situations that may arise when driving 12 cost has become prohibitive for some field trips 13 direct communication between drivers and parents for first and maybe second offenses similar to a teacher. 14 Field trip hours flexibility currently hours are limited 15 Follow through on management of student behavior on bus 16 Holding students accountability for bullying behavior 17 I have no suggestions. When I do need help with an issue Steve Schuster is VERY helpful and supportive. 18 I really appreciate the drivers at Emerald, but your question about appearance made me think that it would be great if the bus drivers had some BVSD Transportation work shirts or polos to 19 I would love for New Vista to have transportation. 2 increased flex-time for activities to and from Knowing student rides and being able to track them 22 Knowing students' names 23 Larger bus loop area 24 Larger parking area 25 Late buses so students could stay after school some 26 Monitor overcrowding 27 More flexibility with special education pick up times 28 relationship building skills for drivers to actually build relationships with students. Some are naturally wonderful, others are just doing the job. 29 Scheduling adjustments on delivery to match school budget cuts for supervision 3 Split problematic routes 31 Sport team pick up after school hours 32 Support bus drivers with difficult routes 33 The level of PBS Training required for drivers 34 They are very responsive when we call them 35 Timeliness of arrival 36 training for dealing with behavior on the bus including bullying 37 Transportation for students who can't afford to participate in athletics due to lack of personal transportation issues 38 Very satisfied across the board 39 I am concerned about turn over of bus drivers with difficult routes. They need support as it is very unsafe to drive a bus with large numbers of young kids. Many of the students at our school have multiple at risk factors and need to be supported differently... even during the bus rides home. Many of the discipline issues that I deal with happen in the bus and it is difficult to piece "what happened" during the rides. A camera in the buses, particularly with all the current safety issues would be ideal I would also like to say thank you to the Transportation Department, they are very responsive and professional! 2 of 2

97

98 Boulder Valley School District Allocation Regular Ed Special Ed Transportation Cost Allocation Students 1.% 92.6% 7.4% Based on FY Expenditures Buses 1.% 54.4% 45.6% Runs 1.% 6.1% 39.9% version Miles (or Time) 1.% 53.1% 46.9% Account Description Comments Category Actual Adjustments Allocated Total Allocation Type Regular Ed Special Ed 13.1 Director/Manager-support Salaries 95,241 95,241 RUNS 57,23 38, Director/Manager-support Benefits 21,64 21,64 RUNS 12,998 8, Non-instructional Program Consultant Salaries 44,673 44,673 RUNS 26,831 17, Non-instructional Program Consultant Benefits 7,568 7,568 RUNS 4,545 3, Payroll Supervisor Salaries 33,83 33,83 RUNS 182,47 121, Payroll Supervisor Benefits 75,991 75,991 RUNS 45,642 3, Computer Technician Salaries 62,413 62,413 RUNS 37,487 24, Computer Technician Benefits 16,17 16,17 RUNS 9,674 6, Monitors Salaries 754, ,353 DIRECT-SPED - 754, Monitors Benefits 371, ,383 DIRECT-SPED - 371, Dispatcher Salaries 369, ,965 RUNS 222,28 147, Dispatcher Benefits 115, ,651 RUNS 69,462 46, General Office Assistant Salaries 56,267 56,267 RUNS 33,795 22, General Office Assistant Benefits 17,167 17,167 RUNS 1,311 6, Head/Admin Secretary Salaries 48,69 48,69 RUNS 29,195 19, Head/Admin Secretary Benefits 13,785 13,785 RUNS 8,28 5, Bus Driver Salaries 4,896,697 4,896,697 MILES 2,6,337 2,296, Bus Driver Benefits 2,115,441 2,115,441 MILES 1,123, , Warehouse Wrkr/Parts Clerk Salaries 14,75 14,75 RUNS 62,59 41, Warehouse Wrkr/Parts Clerk Benefits 28,691 28,691 RUNS 17,232 11, Auto Mechanic Helper Salaries 199, ,487 RUNS 119,815 79, Auto Mechanic Helper Benefits 54,448 54,448 RUNS 32,73 21, Vehicle Mechanic Salaries 768, ,226 RUNS 461,412 36, Vehicle Mechanic Benefits 198,85 198,85 RUNS 118,974 79,111 3 Purchased Prof & Tech Svcs 11,764 11,764 RUNS 7,65 4, Water/Sewage 1,797 1,797 RUNS 1, Repairs/Maintenance Srvcs 54,417 54,417 RUNS 32,684 21, Rentals 17,887 17,887 RUNS 1,743 7, Rental Of Equipment 8,623 8,623 RUNS 5,179 3, Tran Prch From Contractor 38,815 38,815 RUNS 23,313 15, Telephone/Facsimile 5,674 5,674 RUNS 3,48 2, Postage 1,983 1,983 RUNS 1, Advertising RUNS Mileage Reimbursement 5,153 5,153 RUNS 3,95 2, Other Transportation Svcs 1,46 1,46 RUNS 6,25 4, Inservice Travel 7,821 7,821 RUNS 4,698 3, Purch Gps Svcs 42,449 42,449 RUNS 25,496 16,953 Page 1 of 3

99 Boulder Valley School District Allocation Regular Ed Special Ed Transportation Cost Allocation Students 1.% 92.6% 7.4% Based on FY Expenditures Buses 1.% 54.4% 45.6% Runs 1.% 6.1% 39.9% version Miles (or Time) 1.% 53.1% 46.9% Account Description Comments Category Actual Adjustments Allocated Total Allocation Type Regular Ed Special Ed 61 General Supplies 18,73 18,73 RUNS 11,233 7, Food RUNS Natural Gas 7,917 7,917 RUNS 4,755 3, Electricity 17,41 17,41 RUNS 1,457 6, Motor Vehicle Fuels 1,34,12 1,34,12 RUNS 84, , Vehicle Parts - Purchased 69,494 69,494 RUNS 414, ,77 65 Computer Software 12,166 12,166 RUNS 7,37 4, Wo Materials & Supplies (15,273) (15,273) RUNS (9,173) (6,1) 69 Other Supplies 15,28 15,28 RUNS 9,134 6,74 73 Equipment 41,765 41,765 RUNS 25,85 16, Non-capital Equipment 4,213 4,213 RUNS 2,53 1, Dues And Fees 3,96 3,96 RUNS 2,378 1, Transportation/Field Trip (549,269) (549,269) MILES (291,683) (257,586) 852 Maintenance Work Orders RUNS Printing/Bind In-district 4,514 4,514 RUNS 2,711 1, Vehicle Parts - In Distr (128,66) (128,66) RUNS (77,243) (51,363) 856 Vehicle Fuel - In District (2,716) (2,716) RUNS (12,554) (8,162) Insurance Premiums from CDE-4 Risk - 117, ,922 RUNS 7,826 47,96 Property Damage Repairs from CDE-4 Risk - 17,785 17,785 RUNS 1,682 7,13 Workers Compensation from CDE-4 Risk - 23,434 23,434 RUNS 138,43 92,31 Utilities from CDE-4 Risk - 37,747 37,747 RUNS 22,672 15,75 Replacement Buses from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 585, 585, RUNS 351, ,638 Preschool Buses from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 1,32, 1,32, RUNS 792, ,183 Non Capital Equipment from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 1,754 1,754 RUNS 6,459 4,295 Building Improvements from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 4,635 4,635 RUNS 2,784 1,851 Supplemental Vehicles from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 1,243,668 1,243,668 RUNS 746, ,697 Site Improvements from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 14,178 14,178 RUNS 8,516 5,662 Building Improvements from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 64,955 64,955 RUNS 39,13 25,942 New Building Instruction from Cap Exp Report Cap Exp - 228, ,234 RUNS 137,82 91, ,21,361 3,875,312 16,85,673 8,535,538 7,55,135 Page 2 of 3

100 Boulder Valley School District Allocation Regular Ed Special Ed Transportation Cost Allocation Students 1.% 92.6% 7.4% Based on FY Expenditures Buses 1.% 54.4% 45.6% Runs 1.% 6.1% 39.9% version Miles (or Time) 1.% 53.1% 46.9% Account Description Comments Category Actual Adjustments Allocated Total Allocation Type Regular Ed Special Ed Unit Totals TOTAL Regular Ed Special Ed Transp. Students 5,68 5, Total Buses Bus Runs Time from RY 1,519 5,586 4,933 Miles from DOE 14,17 7,66 7,41 Unit Costs School Days Regular Ed Special Ed Cost per Student $ 2,868 $ 1,643 $ 18,281 Cost per Bus $ 88,383 $ 86,218 $ 9,965 Cost per Run $ 49,81 $ 43,998 $ 58,528 Cost per Minute $ 1,529 $ 1,528 $ 1,531 Cost per Mile $ 6.67 $ 7.6 $ 6.27 Daily per Bus $ 491 $ 54 $ 532 Daily per Run $ 277 $ 257 $ 342 Page 3 of 3

101

102 FY CDE PUPIL TRANSPORTATION DATA DISTRICTS > 5, & < 3, TRANSPORTED >5, & <3, TRANS WESTMINST ADAMS ADAMS ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR BOULDER STATE TOTALS SCHOOLS ER THOMPSON ARAPAHOE COUNTY GREELEY WIDEFIELD BRIGHTON SCHOOLS Number of Pupils Transported 9, ,79 175,659 5,78 5,149 6,287 6,299 6,618 7,17 7,129 7,414 Total Miles 2,412,297 53,365,36 24,235, ,364 1,3,284 1,131, ,42 99,93 566,912 1,27, ,554 Current Operating Expenditures (C.O.E.) 12,859,564 29,71,42 116,614,258 2,133,98 3,975,82 5,581,58 2,67,143 3,647,669 2,51,411 4,697,498 7,115,528 Entitlement 4,959,656 85,14,863 46,361,5 875,358 1,64,629 2,499, ,849 1,483, ,787 1,962,198 2,789,936 Reimbursement Payment 3,66,525 52,259,643 28,44,81 536, ,354 1,531, ,71 98,5 515,274 1,22,556 1,692,128 Current Operating Expenditures Per Pupil $ 1,357 $ 69 $ 664 $ 42 $ 772 $ 888 $ 328 $ 551 $ 292 $ 659 $ 96 Current Operating Expenditures Per Mile $ 5.33 $ 3.93 $ 4.81 $ 6.11 $ 3.86 $ 4.93 $ 8.39 $ 3.68 $ 3.62 $ 4.57 $ 7.18 Percentage of Current Operating Expenditures to which District is Entitled 39% 41% 4% 41% 4% 45% 37% 41% 41% 42% 39% Percentage of Entitlement Reimbursed 62% 61% 64% 61% 62% 61% 62% 61% 62% 61% 61% Percentage of Current Operating Expenditures Reimbursed 24% 25% 24% 25% 25% 27% 23% 25% 25% 26% 24% Pupils Transported per 1 Miles (calculated) of 2

103 FY CDE PUPIL TRANSPORTATION DATA DISTRICTS > 5, & < 3, TRANSPORTED COLORADO SPRINGS LITTLETON PUEBLO BOULDER MESA COUNTY VALLEY ACADEMY ST VRAIN VALLEY POUDRE CHERRY CREEK JEFFERSON COUNTY Number of Pupils Transported Total Miles Current Operating Expenditures (C.O.E.) Entitlement Reimbursement Payment Current Operating Expenditures Per Pupil 7,45 7,789 8,291 9,474 9,71 1,559 1,938 11,81 21,64 27,52 1,45,699 67, ,932 2,412,297 1,716,362 1,64,61 1,375,523 2,,343 2,43,456 3,759,89 3,978,519 3,838,675 2,997,626 12,859,564 5,734,337 5,929,672 6,249,739 6,85,372 17,872,94 19,798,626 1,69,43 1,468,21 1,235,312 4,959,656 2,222,734 2,65,658 2,528,448 2,562,7 6,655,46 7,655, ,537 98, ,561 3,66,525 1,362,229 1,612,454 1,549,589 1,562,878 4,18,794 4,676,66 $ 534 $ 493 $ 362 $ 1,357 $ 591 $ 562 $ 571 $ 515 $ 827 $ 732 Current Operating Expenditures Per Mile Percentage of Current Operating Expenditures to which District is Entitled $ 3.8 $ 5.73 $ 3.42 $ 5.33 $ 3.34 $ 3.62 $ 4.54 $ 3.4 $ 7.44 $ % 38% 41% 39% 39% 45% 4% 42% 37% 39% Percentage of Entitlement Reimbursed Percentage of Current Operating Expenditures Reimbursed Pupils Transported per 1 Miles (calculated) 61% 62% 61% 62% 61% 61% 61% 61% 62% 61% 25% 24% 25% 24% 24% 27% 25% 26% 23% 24% of 2

104

105 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes School School Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS % % ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS % % ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K % % BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES ES % % BCSIS ELEMENTARY ES % % BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES % % BOULDER HIGH HS % % BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS % % BROOMFIELD HGT MS+ASPEN COM % % BROOMFIELD HIGH HS % % CASEY MIDDLE MS % % CASEY MIDDLE LATE MS % % CENTAURUS HIGH HS % % CENTAURUS HIGH LATE HS % % CENTENNIAL MIDDLE MS % % CHILDRENS HOUSE PS ES % % COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES % % COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES % % COLUMBINE ES+CASEY MS COM % % COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM ES % % CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES SE % % CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES % % CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES % % DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES % % EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES % % ELDORADO K8 K % % EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES % % FAIRVIEW HIGH HS % % FIREFLY SE % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

106 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes School School Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz FIREFLY+JOSHUA SE % % FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES % % FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES % % FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY LATE ES % % FLATIRONS ES+CASEY MS COM % % FLATIRONS ES+MANHATTAN MS COM % % FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES % % FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS COM % % FOOTHILL ES+CENTENNIAL MS COM % % HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR HS % % HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES % % HIGH PEAKS ELEM LATE ES % % HIGH PEAKS+MESA ES ES % % HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 ALT % % JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY ES % % JOSHUA SCHOOL SE % % KOHL ELEMENTARY ES % % KOHL ES+BROOMFIELD HGT MS COM % % LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES % % LARADON SE % % LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES % % LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS % % MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS % % MESA ELEMENTARY ES % % MESA ES+SOUTHERN HILLS MS COM % % MONARCH HIGH HS % % MONARCH K8 K % % MT ST VINCENTS SE % % NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY ES % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

107 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes School School Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz NEDERLAND ES LATE ES % % NEDERLAND ES+MSHS COM % % NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS % % PIONEER BILINGUAL ES % % PLATT MIDDLE MS % % ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF SE % % RYAN ELEMENTARY ES % % SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES % % SERENITY SE % % SOUTHERN HILLS LATE MS % 2 4 5% SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE MS % % SUMMIT+PLATT+MANHAT MS MS % % SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY ES % % TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS VOT % % TRANSITIONS CENTER ALT % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM LATE ES % % WHITTIER ELEMENTARY ES % % WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES ES % % Grand Totals % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

108 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Pivot Table By School School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS % % ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS % % ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K % % BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES % % BOULDER HIGH HS % % BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS % % BROOMFIELD HGT MS+ASPEN COM % % BROOMFIELD HIGH HS % % CASEY MIDDLE MS % % CASEY MIDDLE LATE MS % % CENTAURUS HIGH HS % % CENTENNIAL MIDDLE MS % % COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES % % COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES % % COLUMBINE ES+CASEY MS COM % % COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM ES % % CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES % % CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES % % DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES % % EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES % % ELDORADO K8 K % % EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES % % FAIRVIEW HIGH HS % % FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES % % FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES % % FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY LATE ES % % FLATIRONS ES+CASEY MS COM % % FLATIRONS ES+MANHATTAN MS COM % % FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

109 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Pivot Table By School School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz FOOTHILL ES+CENTENNIAL MS COM % % HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES % % HIGH PEAKS ELEM LATE ES % % JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY ES % % LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES % % LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES % % LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS % % MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS % % MESA ES+SOUTHERN HILLS MS COM % % MONARCH HIGH HS % % MONARCH K8 K % % NEDERLAND ES LATE ES % % NEDERLAND ES+MSHS COM % % NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS % % PIONEER BILINGUAL ES % % PLATT MIDDLE MS % % RYAN ELEMENTARY ES % % SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES % % SUMMIT+PLATT+MANHAT MS MS % % SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY ES % % TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS VOT % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM LATE ES % % WHITTIER ELEMENTARY ES % % Grand Totals % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

110 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Pivot Bus Type School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS - SE % % ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS - SE % % ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K-8 - SE % % BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES ES - SE % % BCSIS ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % BOULDER HIGH HS - SE % % BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS - SE % % BROOMFIELD HIGH HS - SE % % CASEY MIDDLE MS - SE % 3 4 8% CENTAURUS HIGH HS - SE % % CENTAURUS HIGH LATE HS - SE % % CHILDRENS HOUSE PS ES - SE % % COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES SE - SE % % CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES - SE % % CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % ELDORADO K8 K-8 - SE % % EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % FAIRVIEW HIGH HS - SE % % FIREFLY SE - SE % % FIREFLY+JOSHUA SE - SE % % FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS COM - SE % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

111 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Pivot Bus Type School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR HS - SE % % HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % HIGH PEAKS+MESA ES ES - SE % % HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 ALT - SE % % JOSHUA SCHOOL SE - SE % % KOHL ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % KOHL ES+BROOMFIELD HGT MS COM - SE % % LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % LARADON SE - SE % % LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS - SE % % MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS - SE % % MESA ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % MONARCH HIGH HS - SE % % MONARCH K8 K-8 - SE % % MT ST VINCENTS SE - SE % % NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS - SE % % PIONEER BILINGUAL ES - SE % % PLATT MIDDLE MS - SE % % ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF SE - SE % % RYAN ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % SERENITY SE - SE % % SOUTHERN HILLS LATE MS - SE % 2 4 5% SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE MS - SE % % TRANSITIONS CENTER ALT - SE % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES - SE % % WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES ES - SE % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

112 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Pivot Bus Type School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz Grand Totals % % /23/213 TandC AM xlsm

113 % 9% 19% Run Type % of Runs % 8% 43% 2% Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Recap - Regular Schools ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT Ride Time Available % Actual Riders 16% 2% Time Utilization % 6% % 17% Seating Capacity Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % ES % 6% 42% MS % 53% 38% HS % 62% 43% SE % % % COM % 84% 54% K % 48% 48% ALT % 74% 29% Totals % 1% 1% 41% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT % 1% 16% Seat Utilization % 9% 18% % 47% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 1/23/213 TandC AM xlsm

114 2% 9% 6% 22% Run Type % of Runs 6% 4% 15% Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Recap - Special Needs ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT Ride Time Available 3% 8% 8% 12% Actual Riders Time Utilization % 2% Seating Capacity 12% Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % ES % 75% 12% MS % 7% 7% HS % 68% 15% SE % 128% 16% COM % 18% 21% K % 75% 1% ALT % 116% 7% Totals % 1% 1% 37% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 4% 3% 9% 23% Seat Utilization % 5% 1% 46% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 1/23/213 TandC AM xlsm

115 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Recap - All Schools 3% 6% % of Runs 3% 9% 42% 2% Run Type 18% Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT Ride Time Available 6% Actual Riders 1% 2% Time Utilization % 7% 4% Seating Capacity 15% Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % ES % 66% 35% MS % 59% 32% HS % 65% 36% SE % 128% 16% COM % 87% 52% K % 6% 38% ALT % 116% 7% Totals % 1% 1% Total Buses 182 Runs/Bus 1.76 Minutes/Runs 32 Riders/Runs 17 39% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT % 1% 16% Seat Utilization % 9% 17% % 47% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 1/23/213 TandC AM xlsm

116 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - AM Routes Recap - Special Needs Impact 6% % of Runs 4% 53% Time Utilization % 47% Seat Utilization % 7% Run Type Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time Ride Time Available Actual Riders Seating Capacity Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % SE % 8% 11% OTHER % 61% 43% Totals % 1% 1% Total Buses 182 SE OTHER SE OTHER 93% SE OTHER 1/23/213 TandC AM xlsm

117

118 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes School School Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS % % ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS % % ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K % % BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES ES % % BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES % % BOULDER HIGH HS % % BOULDER HS+CASEY MS COM % % BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS % % BROOMFIELD HIGH HS % % CASEY MIDDLE MS % % CENTAURUS HIGH HS % % CENTENNIAL MIDDLE MS % % CENTENNIAL MS+BOULDER HS COM % % CHILDRENS H+COLUMBINE ES COM % % CHILDRENS+FLATIRONS ES COM % % COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES % % COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES % % COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM ES % % CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES SE % % CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES % % CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES % % DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES % % EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES % % EISENHOWER ES+BOULDER HS COM % % ELDORADO K8 K % % EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES % % FAIRVIEW HIGH HS % % FIREFLY+JOSHUA SE % % FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

119 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes School School Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES % % FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES % % FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS COM % % HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR HS % % HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES % % HIGH PEAKS ELEMENTARY ES % % HORIZONS K8 SCHOOL K % 1 4 3% HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 ALT % % JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY ES % % JOSHUA SCHOOL SE % % KOHL ELEMENTARY ES % % LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES % % LARADON SE % % LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES % % LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS % % LOUISVILLE PRESCHOOL ES % % MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS % % MESA ELEMENTARY ES % % MONARCH HIGH HS % % MONARCH K8 K % % MT ST VINCENTS SE % % NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY ES % % NEDERLAND ES+MSHS COM % % NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS % % PIONEER BILINGUAL ES % % PLATT MIDDLE MS % % ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF SE % % RYAN ELEMENTARY ES % % SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

120 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes School School Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz SANCHEZ ES LATE ES % % SERENITY SE % % SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE MS % % SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY ES % % TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS VOT % % TRANSITIONS CENTER ALT % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES % % WHITTIER ELEMENTARY ES % % WHITTIER ELEMENTARY LATE ES % % WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES ES % % Grand Totals % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

121 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Pivot Table By School School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS % % ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K % % BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES % % BOULDER HIGH HS % % BOULDER HS+CASEY MS COM % % BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS % % BROOMFIELD HIGH HS % % CASEY MIDDLE MS % % CENTAURUS HIGH HS % % CENTENNIAL MIDDLE MS % % CENTENNIAL MS+BOULDER HS COM % % CHILDRENS+FLATIRONS ES COM % % COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES % % COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES % % COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM ES % % CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES % % CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES % % DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES % % EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES % % ELDORADO K8 K % % EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES % % FAIRVIEW HIGH HS % % FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES % % FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES % % FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES % % HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES % % JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY ES % % LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES % % LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

122 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Pivot Table By School School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS % % MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS % % MESA ELEMENTARY ES % % MONARCH HIGH HS % % MONARCH K8 K % % NEDERLAND ES+MSHS COM % % PIONEER BILINGUAL ES % % PLATT MIDDLE MS % % RYAN ELEMENTARY ES % % SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES % % SANCHEZ ES LATE ES % % SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY ES % % TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS VOT % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES % % WHITTIER ELEMENTARY ES % % WHITTIER ELEMENTARY LATE ES % % Grand Totals % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

123 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Pivot Bus Type School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS - SE % % ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS - SE % % ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K-8 - SE % % BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES ES - SE % % BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % BOULDER HIGH HS - SE % % BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS - SE % % BROOMFIELD HIGH HS - SE % % CASEY MIDDLE MS - SE % 3 4 8% CENTAURUS HIGH HS - SE % % CHILDRENS H+COLUMBINE ES COM - SE % % COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES SE - SE % % CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES - SE % % CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % EISENHOWER ES+BOULDER HS COM - SE % % ELDORADO K8 K-8 - SE % % EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % FAIRVIEW HIGH HS - SE % % FIREFLY+JOSHUA SE - SE % % FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % 4 7 8% FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES - SE % 4 2 2% FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS COM - SE % % HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR HS - SE % % HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

124 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Pivot Bus Type School School Type Bus Type Ride Time Policy Actual Ride Time Ride Time Avail Time Utiliz% Actual Riders Seating Capacity Seat Utiliz% Actual Bus Runs Average Ride Time Average Riders 8% Time or Capacity Forecast Runs in Excess of Forecast Runs <6% Time & Seat Utiliz HIGH PEAKS ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % HORIZONS K8 SCHOOL K-8 - SE % 1 4 3% HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 ALT - SE % % JOSHUA SCHOOL SE - SE % % KOHL ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % LARADON SE - SE % % LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS - SE % % LOUISVILLE PRESCHOOL ES - SE % % MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS - SE % % MESA ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % MONARCH HIGH HS - SE % % MONARCH K8 K-8 - SE % % MT ST VINCENTS SE - SE % % NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS - SE % % PIONEER BILINGUAL ES - SE % % PLATT MIDDLE MS - SE % % ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF SE - SE % % RYAN ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES - SE % % SERENITY SE - SE % % SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE MS - SE % % TRANSITIONS CENTER ALT - SE % % UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES - SE % % WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES ES - SE % % Grand Totals % % /23/213 TandC PM xlsm

125 % 1% 17% % of Runs % 8% 47% 18% Run Type Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Recap - Regular Schools ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT Ride Time Available % Actual Riders 16% 16% Time Utilization % 6% 17% % Seating Capacity Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % ES % 64% 39% MS % 55% 43% HS % 66% 5% SE % % % COM % 76% 43% K % 39% 54% ALT % 74% 29% Totals % 1% 1% 44% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT % 8% 17% 17% Seat Utilization % 11% % 48% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 1/23/213 TandC PM xlsm

126 % of Runs 6% 2% 7% 6% 43% 23% Run Type 13% Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Recap - Special Needs ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT Ride Time Available Actual Riders 5% 11% 7% 2% Time Utilization % 7% Seating Capacity 1% Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % ES % 66% 12% MS % 47% 7% HS % 58% 12% SE % 13% 16% COM % 13% 14% K % 61% 11% ALT % 66% 5% Totals % 1% 1% 4% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 4% 5% 22% 7% Seat Utilization % 4% 9% 5% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 1/23/213 TandC PM xlsm

127 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Recap - All Schools 2% 7% % of Runs 3% 8% 45% 19% Run Type 16% Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT Ride Time Available 5% Actual Riders 11% 18% Time Utilization % 6% 3% 14% Seating Capacity Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % ES % 65% 34% MS % 52% 36% HS % 62% 39% SE % 13% 16% COM % 8% 39% K % 47% 45% ALT % 66% 5% Totals % 1% 1% Total Buses 174 Runs/Bus 1.75 Minutes/Runs 28 Riders/Runs 17 42% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT % 8% 17% 1% 16% Seat Utilization % % 48% ES MS HS SE COM K-8 ALT 1/23/213 TandC PM xlsm

128 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT - PM Routes Recap - Special Needs Impact 59% % of Runs 41% 56% Time Utilization % 44% Seat Utilization % 7% Run Type Actual Bus Runs Actual Ride Time Ride Time Available Actual Riders Seating Capacity Average Minutes/Run Average Riders/Run Average Empty Seats % of Runs Time Utilization % Seat Utilization % SE % 65% 11% OTHER % 62% 43% Totals % 1% 1% Total Buses 174 SE OTHER SE OTHER 93% SE OTHER 1/23/213 TandC PM xlsm

129

130 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ANGEVINE MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 97 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 97 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 7% 78% 55% 42% 7% 4% 7% 62% 4% 89% 92% 57% Time Utilization 7% 3% 5% 42% 62% 4% 7% 62% 4% 89% 92% 57% Capacity Utilization 63% 78% 55% 4% 7% 3% 37% 8% 24% 3% 4% 38% 1/23/213 Page 1 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

131 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ARAPAHOE CAMPUS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE 49 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE 49 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 24% 44% 7% 82% 114% 67% Time Utilization 24% 44% 7% 82% 114% 67% Capacity Utilization 19% 22% 25% 6% 17% 17% 1/23/213 Page 2 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

132 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE SE 84 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE SE 84 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 57% 84% 49% 1% 116% 18% 32% 83% 6% 76% Time Utilization 57% 84% 44% 1% 116% 18% 32% 83% 6% 76% Capacity Utilization 4% 1% 49% 43% 28% 17% 32% 9% 57% 38% 1/23/213 Page 3 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

133 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 641 Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats 9 9 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time 6 6 Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 12% 12% Time Utilization 12% 12% Capacity Utilization 36% 36% 1/23/213 Page 4 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

134 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BCSIS ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 78 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 78 - SE Grand Total Run # 637 Seats Occupied 2 2 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time 1 1 Ride Time Available 3 3 Current Utilization 33% 33% Time Utilization 33% 33% Capacity Utilization 4% 4% 1/23/213 Page 5 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

135 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BIRCH ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 8 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 8 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 94% 5% 4% 61% Time Utilization 94% 5% 4% 61% Capacity Utilization 15% 5% 21% 13% 1/23/213 Page 6 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

136 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BOULDER HIGH AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE SE SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE SE SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 44% 83% 7% 8% 6% 1% 2% 56% 54% 9% 96% 88% 82% 74% 56% 7% Time Utilization 44% 83% 7% 8% 6% 1% 2% 56% 54% 9% 96% 88% 78% 74% 56% 7% Capacity Utilization 8% 28% 9% 25% 6% 11% 2% 8% 17% 54% 44% 53% 82% 55% 25% 31% 1/23/213 Page 7 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

137 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 44 - SE 79 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 44 - SE 79 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 66% 2% 26% 84% 4% 46% Time Utilization 54% 2% 26% 84% 4% 46% Capacity Utilization 66% 3% 4% 9% 7% 25% 1/23/213 Page 8 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

138 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BROOMFIELD HGT MS+ASPEN AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 171 Bus Numbers Bus # 171 Grand Total Run # 315 Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 55% 55% Time Utilization 55% 55% Capacity Utilization 32% 32% 1/23/213 Page 9 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

139 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BROOMFIELD HIGH AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 62% 12% 8% 81% Time Utilization 62% 12% 8% 81% Capacity Utilization 1% 25% 8% 16% 1/23/213 Page 1 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

140 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CASEY MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 4% 76% 4% 66% 28% 57% 52% Time Utilization 4% 76% 4% 66% 28% 53% 52% Capacity Utilization 37% 3% 8% 37% 11% 57% 31% 1/23/213 Page 11 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

141 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CASEY MIDDLE LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 33% 2% 24% Time Utilization 33% 2% 24% Capacity Utilization 2% 18% 1% 1/23/213 Page 12 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

142 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CENTAURUS HIGH AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 44 - SE 85 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 44 - SE 85 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 64% 129% 82% 62% 64% 54% 6% 2% 48% 3% 57% Time Utilization 64% 129% 82% 62% 64% 54% 6% 2% 48% 3% 57% Capacity Utilization 32% 29% 29% 9% 22% 39% 41% 1% 1% 19% 26% 1/23/213 Page 13 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

143 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CENTAURUS HIGH LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 81 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 81 - SE Grand Total Run # 44 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats 9 9 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 28% 28% Time Utilization 28% 28% Capacity Utilization 26% 26% 1/23/213 Page 14 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

144 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CENTENNIAL MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 61% 54% 4% 51% 32% 4% Time Utilization 22% 3% 4% 5% 32% 35% Capacity Utilization 61% 54% 24% 51% 14% 4% 1/23/213 Page 15 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

145 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CHILDRENS HOUSE PS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 48 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 48 - SE Grand Total Run # 428 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 98% 98% Time Utilization 98% 98% Capacity Utilization 2% 2% 1/23/213 Page 16 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

146 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 55% 54% 29% 52% Time Utilization 33% 46% 16% 31% Capacity Utilization 55% 54% 29% 52% 1/23/213 Page 17 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

147 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 14 - SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 14 - SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 46% 96% 1% 4% 63% 1% 41% 49% 6% 65% Time Utilization 46% 96% 1% 38% 63% 1% 41% 49% 44% 65% Capacity Utilization 9% 13% 62% 4% 48% 2% 27% 26% 6% 34% 1/23/213 Page 18 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

148 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COLUMBINE ES+CASEY MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 268 Bus Numbers Bus # 268 Grand Total Run # 51 Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 1 1 Current Utilization 11% 11% Time Utilization 11% 11% Capacity Utilization 8% 8% 1/23/213 Page 19 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

149 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 116% 158% 1% 136% 128% Time Utilization 116% 158% 1% 136% 128% Capacity Utilization 49% 42% 38% 26% 39% 1/23/213 Page 2 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

150 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 18 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 18 - SE Grand Total Run # 642 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 5 5 Total Seat Capacity 6 6 Ride Time 4 4 Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 67% 67% Time Utilization 67% 67% Capacity Utilization 17% 17% 1/23/213 Page 21 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

151 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CREEKSIDE ES M PARK AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 13 - SE SE SE 78 - SE 91 Bus Numbers Bus # 13 - SE SE SE 78 - SE 91 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 64% 14% 52% 42% 6% 74% 5% 3% 59% Time Utilization 64% 14% 46% 42% 6% 74% 5% 3% 59% Capacity Utilization 17% 23% 52% 28% 57% 21% 2% 17% 29% 1/23/213 Page 22 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

152 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 54% 92% 74% 72% 14% 18% 52% 89% 7% Time Utilization 54% 92% 74% 72% 9% 18% 3% 4% 7% Capacity Utilization 12% 38% 6% 25% 14% 21% 52% 89% 48% 1/23/213 Page 23 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

153 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 74% 58% 76% 54% 8% 94% 72% 5% 94% 67% Time Utilization 28% 58% 76% 54% 8% 94% 72% 5% 94% 67% Capacity Utilization 74% 56% 11% 45% 34% 66% 4% 24% 36% 44% 1/23/213 Page 24 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

154 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE SE SE SE 87 Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE SE SE SE 87 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 77% 41% 87% 56% 33% 4% 8% 35% 54% Time Utilization 77% 38% 87% 56% 33% 4% 8% 24% 54% Capacity Utilization 8% 41% 3% 28% 1% 38% 14% 35% 27% 1/23/213 Page 25 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

155 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ELDORADO K8 AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 71% 12% 52% 47% 68% Time Utilization 71% 12% 52% 47% 68% Capacity Utilization 28% 38% 36% 6% 29% 1/23/213 Page 26 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

156 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School EMERALD ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 5% 84% 84% 73% Time Utilization 5% 84% 84% 73% Capacity Utilization 4% 32% 23% 22% 1/23/213 Page 27 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

157 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FAIRVIEW HIGH AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 46 - SE 87 Bus Numbers Bus # SE 46 - SE 87 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 26% 14% 86% 112% 11% 118% 78% 91% Time Utilization 26% 14% 86% 112% 11% 118% 78% 91% Capacity Utilization 15% 72% 51% 6% 48% 6% 7% 53% 1/23/213 Page 28 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

158 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FIREFLY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 25 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 25 - SE Grand Total Run # 61 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 5 5 Total Seat Capacity 6 6 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 145% 145% Time Utilization 145% 145% Capacity Utilization 17% 17% 1/23/213 Page 29 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

159 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FIREFLY+JOSHUA AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 42 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 215% 215% Time Utilization 215% 215% Capacity Utilization 9% 9% 1/23/213 Page 3 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

160 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 85 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 85 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 41% 94% 56% 26% 26% 5% Time Utilization 41% 94% 56% 26% 26% 5% Capacity Utilization 13% 19% 22% 7% 7% 17% 1/23/213 Page 31 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

161 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 259 Bus Numbers Bus # SE 259 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 92% 16% 99% Time Utilization 92% 16% 99% Capacity Utilization 25% 35% 33% 1/23/213 Page 32 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

162 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 52 Bus Numbers Bus # 52 Grand Total Run # 517 Seats Occupied 7 7 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 24% 24% Time Utilization 24% 24% Capacity Utilization 9% 9% 1/23/213 Page 33 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

163 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FLATIRONS ES+CASEY MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 63% 95% 79% Time Utilization 63% 95% 79% Capacity Utilization 33% 76% 54% 1/23/213 Page 34 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

164 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FLATIRONS ES+MANHATTAN MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 227 Bus Numbers Bus # 227 Grand Total Run # 51 Seats Occupied Empty Seats 1 1 Total Seat Capacity 4 4 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 115% 115% Time Utilization 115% 115% Capacity Utilization 98% 98% 1/23/213 Page 35 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

165 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 46% 144% 39% 69% 46% 51% 61% Time Utilization 46% 144% 24% 33% 46% 51% 61% Capacity Utilization 2% 17% 39% 69% 21% 49% 34% 1/23/213 Page 36 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

166 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 628 Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 4 4 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 113% 113% Time Utilization 113% 113% Capacity Utilization 13% 13% 1/23/213 Page 37 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

167 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FOOTHILL ES+CENTENNIAL MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 15% 1% 88% 98% Time Utilization 15% 1% 88% 98% Capacity Utilization 83% 79% 68% 77% 1/23/213 Page 38 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

168 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE SE 25 - SE 3 - SE 55 - SE 8 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE SE 25 - SE 3 - SE 55 - SE 8 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 6% 118% 64% 9% 124% 12% 96% Time Utilization 6% 118% 64% 9% 124% 12% 96% Capacity Utilization 6% 15% 8% 29% 48% 29% 15% 1/23/213 Page 39 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

169 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 53 - SE 62 - SE 94 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 53 - SE 62 - SE 94 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 28% 6% 38% 49% 64% 3% 118% 64% 57% 61% Time Utilization 28% 6% 38% 34% 64% 3% 118% 64% 56% 61% Capacity Utilization 11% 1% 34% 49% 55% 7% 21% 14% 57% 41% 1/23/213 Page 4 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

170 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HIGH PEAKS ELEM LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 34 Bus Numbers Bus # 34 Grand Total Run # 52 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 24% 24% Time Utilization 24% 24% Capacity Utilization 5% 5% 1/23/213 Page 41 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

171 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HIGH PEAKS+MESA ES AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 63 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 63 - SE Grand Total Run # 64 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 92% 92% Time Utilization 92% 92% Capacity Utilization 21% 21% 1/23/213 Page 42 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

172 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 17 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 17 - SE Grand Total Run # 63 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 7 7 Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 134% 134% Time Utilization 134% 134% Capacity Utilization 13% 13% 1/23/213 Page 43 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

173 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 16 Bus Numbers Bus # 16 Grand Total Run # 55 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 8 8 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 22% 22% Time Utilization 22% 22% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 44 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

174 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School JOSHUA SCHOOL AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 65 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 65 - SE Grand Total Run # 43 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 125% 125% Time Utilization 125% 125% Capacity Utilization 32% 32% 1/23/213 Page 45 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

175 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School KOHL ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 414 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 34% 34% Time Utilization 34% 34% Capacity Utilization 8% 8% 1/23/213 Page 46 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

176 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School KOHL ES+BROOMFIELD HGT MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 73 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 73 - SE Grand Total Run # 48 Seats Occupied 6 6 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 12% 12% Time Utilization 12% 12% Capacity Utilization 51% 51% 1/23/213 Page 47 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

177 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 79 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 79 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 83% 116% 13% 49% 52% 76% 33% 13% 38% 79% Time Utilization 76% 116% 13% 43% 52% 76% 33% 13% 38% 79% Capacity Utilization 83% 5% 26% 49% 5% 44% 28% 26% 6% 46% 1/23/213 Page 48 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

178 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LARADON AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 41 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 2 2 Ride Time 6 6 Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 1% 1% Time Utilization 1% 1% Capacity Utilization 15% 15% 1/23/213 Page 49 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

179 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 73% 28% 3% 19% 5% 39% Time Utilization 68% 28% 3% 18% 5% 39% Capacity Utilization 73% 2% 7% 19% 36% 33% 1/23/213 Page 5 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

180 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LOUISVILLE MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 53 - SE 74 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 53 - SE 74 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 48% 63% 25% 7% 65% 14% 139% 56% 79% Time Utilization 48% 63% 25% 7% 36% 14% 139% 56% 79% Capacity Utilization 46% 25% 3% 26% 65% 8% 17% 17% 3% 1/23/213 Page 51 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

181 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 62 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 62 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 43% 71% 66% 57% 9% 1% 69% Time Utilization 43% 71% 66% 44% 9% 1% 69% Capacity Utilization 9% 37% 31% 57% 9% 17% 34% 1/23/213 Page 52 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

182 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MESA ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 65 Seats Occupied 4 4 Empty Seats 1 1 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 9% 9% Time Utilization 9% 9% Capacity Utilization 29% 29% 1/23/213 Page 53 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

183 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MESA ES+SOUTHERN HILLS MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 211 Bus Numbers Bus # 211 Grand Total Run # 543 Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 75% 75% Time Utilization 75% 75% Capacity Utilization 57% 57% 1/23/213 Page 54 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

184 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MONARCH HIGH AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE 55 - SE 79 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE 55 - SE 79 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 94% 56% 34% 5% 46% 66% 44% 16% 48% 53% 64% 34% 51% 44% 32% 32% 48% Time Utilization 94% 42% 34% 5% 16% 66% 14% 44% 48% 36% 2% 34% 46% 44% 32% 32% 41% Capacity Utilization 82% 56% 17% 44% 46% 48% 44% 16% 34% 53% 64% 6% 51% 6% % % 48% 1/23/213 Page 55 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

185 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MONARCH K8 AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 13 - SE SE SE 43 - SE 47 - SE 49 - SE 96 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 13 - SE SE SE 43 - SE 47 - SE 49 - SE 96 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 63% 5% 71% 5% 54% 48% 77% 66% 59% 59% 58% 6% 6% 8% 92% 51% Time Utilization 63% 5% 71% 5% 16% 28% 32% 48% 33% 26% 58% 6% 6% 8% 92% 51% Capacity Utilization 1% 1% 45% 38% 54% 48% 77% 66% 59% 59% 9% 3% 11% 8% 17% 41% 1/23/213 Page 56 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

186 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MT ST VINCENTS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 81 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 81 - SE Grand Total Run # 44 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 8 8 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 13% 13% Time Utilization 13% 13% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 57 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

187 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 15 - SE 21 - SE 42 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 15 - SE 21 - SE 42 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 4% 6% 9% 63% Time Utilization 4% 6% 9% 63% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 58 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

188 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND ES LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 237 Bus Numbers Bus # 237 Grand Total Run # 74 Seats Occupied 9 9 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 24% 24% Time Utilization 24% 24% Capacity Utilization 14% 14% 1/23/213 Page 59 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

189 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND ES+MSHS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 76% 67% 112% 67% 85% 75% 65% 72% 117% 81% Time Utilization 73% 67% 112% 67% 85% 75% 65% 72% 117% 81% Capacity Utilization 76% 39% 41% 41% 33% 63% 48% 61% 52% 5% 1/23/213 Page 6 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

190 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 72% 64% 65% Time Utilization 62% 64% 63% Capacity Utilization 72% 15% 65% 1/23/213 Page 61 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

191 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School PIONEER BILINGUAL AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 97 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 97 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 13% 64% 64% 117% 12% 98% Time Utilization 13% 64% 64% 117% 12% 98% Capacity Utilization 31% 22% 57% 6% 12% 27% 1/23/213 Page 62 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

192 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School PLATT MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 65% 46% 8% 52% 12% 8% 4% 28% 56% 28% 8% 59% Time Utilization 64% 4% 8% 52% 12% 8% 4% 28% 56% 28% 8% 59% Capacity Utilization 65% 46% 31% 41% 42% 25% 3% 9% 42% 2% 55% 34% 1/23/213 Page 63 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

193 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 21 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 21 - SE Grand Total Run # 62 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 165% 165% Time Utilization 165% 165% Capacity Utilization 32% 32% 1/23/213 Page 64 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

194 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School RYAN ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 39 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 39 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 46% 74% 96% 36% 38% 6% 46% 5% Time Utilization 42% 38% 96% 36% 31% 6% 46% 5% Capacity Utilization 46% 74% 55% 1% 38% 14% 13% 43% 1/23/213 Page 65 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

195 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE 84 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE 84 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 14% 64% 212% 66% 113% Time Utilization 14% 64% 212% 66% 113% Capacity Utilization 21% 8% 17% 4% 22% 1/23/213 Page 66 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

196 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SERENITY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 45 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 8 8 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time 6 6 Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 1% 1% Time Utilization 1% 1% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 67 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

197 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SOUTHERN HILLS LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 25 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 25 - SE Grand Total Run # 61 Seats Occupied 2 2 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 4 4 Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 29% 29% Time Utilization 29% 29% Capacity Utilization 5% 5% 1/23/213 Page 68 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

198 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 27 - SE 82 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 27 - SE 82 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 1% 11% 15% Time Utilization 1% 11% 15% Capacity Utilization 14% 27% 16% 1/23/213 Page 69 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

199 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SUMMIT+PLATT+MANHAT MS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 211 Bus Numbers Bus # 211 Grand Total Run # 543 Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 86% 86% Time Utilization 86% 86% Capacity Utilization 2% 2% 1/23/213 Page 7 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

200 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 39% 42% 36% Time Utilization 39% 33% 36% Capacity Utilization 25% 42% 34% 1/23/213 Page 71 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

201 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 7% 22% 56% 45% Time Utilization 6% 17% 56% 45% Capacity Utilization 7% 22% 34% 4% 1/23/213 Page 72 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

202 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School TRANSITIONS CENTER AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE SE 13 - SE SE SE 24 - SE 46 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE SE 13 - SE SE SE 24 - SE 46 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 136% 1% 13% 1% 16% 64% 25% 113% Time Utilization 136% 1% 13% 1% 16% 64% 25% 113% Capacity Utilization 17% 2% 4% 3% 5% 7% 5% 7% 1/23/213 Page 73 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

203 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 9 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 9 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 66% 72% 8% 9% 7% 72% 75% Time Utilization 66% 72% 8% 9% 7% 72% 75% Capacity Utilization 6% 26% 76% 83% 4% 31% 41% 1/23/213 Page 74 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

204 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM LATE AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 34 Bus Numbers Bus # 34 Grand Total Run # 52 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time 8 8 Ride Time Available 4 4 Current Utilization 2% 2% Time Utilization 2% 2% Capacity Utilization 5% 5% 1/23/213 Page 75 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

205 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School WHITTIER ELEMENTARY AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 95% 52% 58% 67% Time Utilization 76% 43% 58% 61% Capacity Utilization 95% 52% 54% 67% 1/23/213 Page 76 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

206 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES AM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 636 Seats Occupied 2 2 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time 3 3 Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 6% 6% Time Utilization 6% 6% Capacity Utilization 4% 4% 1/23/213 Page 77 of 77 TandC AM xlsm

207

208 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ANGEVINE MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 97 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 97 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 75% 65% 45% 54% 77% 32% 46% 7% 24% 36% 46% Time Utilization 54% 4% 32% 54% 77% 32% 46% 7% 24% 36% 46% Capacity Utilization 75% 65% 45% 32% 76% 3% 37% 36% 3% 2% 4% 1/23/213 Page 1 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

209 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ARAPAHOE CAMPUS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE SE 49 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE SE 49 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 34% 8% 64% 55% 7% 62% Time Utilization 34% 8% 64% 55% 7% 62% Capacity Utilization 17% 28% 11% 5% 17% 14% 1/23/213 Page 2 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

210 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE SE 84 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE SE 84 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 51% 52% 51% 6% 18% 12% 35% 52% 76% 61% Time Utilization 3% 52% 4% 6% 18% 12% 3% 52% 76% 61% Capacity Utilization 51% 5% 51% 49% 32% 26% 35% 9% 59% 42% 1/23/213 Page 3 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

211 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 641 Seats Occupied 4 4 Empty Seats 1 1 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 43% 43% Time Utilization 43% 43% Capacity Utilization 29% 29% 1/23/213 Page 4 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

212 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BIRCH ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 8 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 8 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 78% 46% 3% 51% Time Utilization 78% 46% 3% 51% Capacity Utilization 13% 2% 14% 1% 1/23/213 Page 5 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

213 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BOULDER HIGH PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 32 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 32 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 4% 126% 8% 6% 46% 9% 82% 46% 32% 54% 61% Time Utilization 4% 126% 8% 6% 46% 9% 4% 46% 32% 54% 61% Capacity Utilization 3% 47% % 9% 7% 43% 82% 33% 25% 21% 34% 1/23/213 Page 6 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

214 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BOULDER HS+CASEY MS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 32% 87% 57% 58% Time Utilization 32% 87% 57% 58% Capacity Utilization 6% 37% 8% 17% 1/23/213 Page 7 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

215 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 44 - SE 73 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 44 - SE 73 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 54% 42% 72% 62% 18% 47% Time Utilization 4% 42% 72% 62% 18% 47% Capacity Utilization 54% 15% 6% 9% 9% 23% 1/23/213 Page 8 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

216 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School BROOMFIELD HIGH PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 27 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 27 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 52% 16% 18% 14% 49% Time Utilization 52% 16% 18% 14% 49% Capacity Utilization 3% 31% 13% 3% 15% 1/23/213 Page 9 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

217 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CASEY MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 52 9 Bus Numbers Bus # SE 52 9 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 54% 42% 46% 46% 45% Time Utilization 54% 42% 36% 46% 45% Capacity Utilization 49% 8% 46% 43% 4% 1/23/213 Page 1 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

218 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CENTAURUS HIGH PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 44 - SE 85 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 44 - SE 85 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 7% 5% 5% 22% 64% 46% 69% 74% 7% 48% 52% Time Utilization 7% 5% 5% 22% 64% 46% 61% 74% 7% 48% 52% Capacity Utilization 31% 9% 29% 12% 17% 38% 69% 19% 6% 29% 27% 1/23/213 Page 11 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

219 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CENTENNIAL MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 65% 52% 56% 3% 41% Time Utilization 34% 52% 56% 22% 41% Capacity Utilization 65% 2% 44% 3% 39% 1/23/213 Page 12 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

220 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CENTENNIAL MS+BOULDER HS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 42% 28% 58% 43% Time Utilization 42% 28% 58% 43% Capacity Utilization 23% 28% 5% 34% 1/23/213 Page 13 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

221 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CHILDRENS H+COLUMBINE ES PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 625 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 112% 112% Time Utilization 112% 112% Capacity Utilization 15% 15% 1/23/213 Page 14 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

222 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CHILDRENS+FLATIRONS ES PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 239 Bus Numbers Bus # 239 Grand Total Run # 56 Seats Occupied Empty Seats 5 5 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 72% 72% Time Utilization 72% 72% Capacity Utilization 23% 23% 1/23/213 Page 15 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

223 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 61% 6% 29% 48% Time Utilization 61% 6% 21% 48% Capacity Utilization 38% 53% 29% 44% 1/23/213 Page 16 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

224 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 14 - SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # 14 - SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 9% 64% 8% 74% 11% 48% 7% 83% 7% Time Utilization 9% 2% 8% 74% 11% 48% 7% 57% 7% Capacity Utilization 13% 64% 49% 49% 1% 23% 26% 83% 42% 1/23/213 Page 17 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

225 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 86% 112% 98% 86% 96% Time Utilization 86% 112% 98% 86% 96% Capacity Utilization 37% 18% 6% 25% 35% 1/23/213 Page 18 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

226 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 18 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 18 - SE Grand Total Run # 642 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 5 5 Total Seat Capacity 6 6 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 55% 55% Time Utilization 55% 55% Capacity Utilization 17% 17% 1/23/213 Page 19 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

227 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CREEKSIDE ES M PARK PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 13 - SE SE SE 78 - SE 82 - SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # 13 - SE SE SE 78 - SE 82 - SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 49% 7% 62% 46% 73% 9% 86% 6% 41% 56% 64% Time Utilization 49% 7% 57% 46% 73% 9% 86% 6% 41% 56% 64% Capacity Utilization 8% 21% 62% 31% 48% 25% 4% 33% 15% 14% 28% 1/23/213 Page 2 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

228 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 4% 74% 48% 68% 92% 14% 43% 74% 67% Time Utilization 4% 74% 48% 68% 88% 14% 39% 65% 67% Capacity Utilization 18% 24% 6% 24% 92% 36% 43% 74% 41% 1/23/213 Page 21 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

229 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 68% 49% 82% 78% 84% 72% 66% 47% 22% 54% Time Utilization 36% 22% 82% 42% 84% 72% 66% 47% 22% 54% Capacity Utilization 68% 49% 9% 78% 34% 58% 44% 24% 7% 45% 1/23/213 Page 22 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

230 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE 87 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE 87 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 64% 56% 58% 92% 56% 64% 7% 62% Time Utilization 64% 56% 58% 92% 56% 64% 7% 62% Capacity Utilization 42% 3% 31% 7% 31% 14% 46% 31% 1/23/213 Page 23 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

231 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School EISENHOWER ES+BOULDER HS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE Grand Total Run # 632 Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 4 4 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 72% 72% Time Utilization 72% 72% Capacity Utilization 13% 13% 1/23/213 Page 24 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

232 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ELDORADO K8 PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 58% 42% 5% 5% Time Utilization 58% 42% 5% 5% Capacity Utilization 34% 39% 6% 3% 1/23/213 Page 25 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

233 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School EMERALD ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 8% 72% 36% 63% Time Utilization 8% 72% 36% 63% Capacity Utilization 8% 38% 8% 2% 1/23/213 Page 26 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

234 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FAIRVIEW HIGH PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 91 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 91 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 68% 68% 94% 1% 14% 114% 82% 9% Time Utilization 68% 68% 94% 1% 14% 114% 82% 9% Capacity Utilization 33% 45% 55% 48% 63% 1% 57% 47% 1/23/213 Page 27 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

235 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FIREFLY+JOSHUA PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 42 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 175% 175% Time Utilization 175% 175% Capacity Utilization 9% 9% 1/23/213 Page 28 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

236 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 85 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 85 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 91% 77% 44% 45% 4% 46% 54% Time Utilization 91% 77% 44% 45% 4% 46% 54% Capacity Utilization 21% 19% 15% 14% 2% 7% 15% 1/23/213 Page 29 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

237 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 88% 56% 66% 96% 77% Time Utilization 88% 56% 66% 96% 77% Capacity Utilization 2% 21% 2% 2% 2% 1/23/213 Page 3 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

238 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 152% 54% 59% 46% 86% 62% 46% 64% 75% Time Utilization 152% 54% 59% 46% 86% 62% 46% 64% 75% Capacity Utilization 17% 31% 56% 3% 51% 35% 18% 4% 36% 1/23/213 Page 31 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

239 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 628 Seats Occupied 6 6 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 4 4 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 127% 127% Time Utilization 127% 127% Capacity Utilization 15% 15% 1/23/213 Page 32 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

240 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 12 - SE SE 25 - SE 3 - SE 55 - SE 8 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 12 - SE SE 25 - SE 3 - SE 55 - SE 8 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 38% 12% 58% 3% 112% 7% 71% Time Utilization 38% 12% 58% 3% 112% 7% 71% Capacity Utilization 6% 15% 8% 19% 38% 29% 14% 1/23/213 Page 33 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

241 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 53 - SE 62 - SE 94 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 53 - SE 62 - SE 94 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 24% 29% 55% 66% 78% 6% 56% 5% 5% Time Utilization 24% 18% 4% 66% 78% 6% 56% 5% 5% Capacity Utilization 3% 29% 55% 54% 21% 7% 21% 42% 38% 1/23/213 Page 34 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

242 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HIGH PEAKS ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 33 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 33 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 113% 42% 6% Time Utilization 113% 42% 6% Capacity Utilization 1% 1% 1/23/213 Page 35 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

243 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HORIZONS K8 SCHOOL PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 3 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 3 - SE Grand Total Run # 623 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 4 4 Ride Time 7 7 Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 14% 14% Time Utilization 14% 14% Capacity Utilization 3% 3% 1/23/213 Page 36 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

244 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 17 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 17 - SE Grand Total Run # 63 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 7 7 Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 14% 14% Time Utilization 14% 14% Capacity Utilization 13% 13% 1/23/213 Page 37 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

245 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 16 Bus Numbers Bus # 16 Grand Total Run # 55 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 8 8 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time 1 1 Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 2% 2% Time Utilization 2% 2% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 38 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

246 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School JOSHUA SCHOOL PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 65 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 65 - SE Grand Total Run # 43 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time 9 9 Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 15% 15% Time Utilization 15% 15% Capacity Utilization 32% 32% 1/23/213 Page 39 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

247 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School KOHL ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 32 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 32 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 1% 7% 79% Time Utilization 1% 7% 79% Capacity Utilization 5% 8% 6% 1/23/213 Page 4 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

248 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 79 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 79 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 8% 68% 98% 157% 113% 56% 73% 116% 3% 84% Time Utilization 8% 68% 98% 157% 113% 56% 73% 116% 3% 84% Capacity Utilization 65% 44% 15% 4% 46% 44% 31% 24% 6% 4% 1/23/213 Page 41 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

249 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LARADON PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 41 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity 2 2 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 63% 63% Time Utilization 63% 63% Capacity Utilization 15% 15% 1/23/213 Page 42 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

250 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 74 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 74 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 56% 52% 5% 39% 32% 26% 42% Time Utilization 5% 52% 5% 39% 32% 26% 42% Capacity Utilization 56% 14% 24% 19% 2% 7% 25% 1/23/213 Page 43 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

251 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LOUISVILLE MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 53 - SE 74 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 53 - SE 74 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 6% 62% 72% 96% 5% 46% 64% Time Utilization 6% 62% 72% 96% 5% 46% 64% Capacity Utilization 4% 26% 66% 5% 9% 17% 38% 1/23/213 Page 44 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

252 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School LOUISVILLE PRESCHOOL PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 45 Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats 9 9 Total Seat Capacity Ride Time 2 2 Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 4% 4% Time Utilization 4% 4% Capacity Utilization 36% 36% 1/23/213 Page 45 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

253 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 62 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 62 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 4% 54% 34% 114% 58% 28% 48% 54% Time Utilization 4% 54% 34% 114% 58% 28% 48% 54% Capacity Utilization 9% 38% 17% 6% 52% 9% 17% 34% 1/23/213 Page 46 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

254 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MESA ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 63 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 63 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 9% 46% 41% 6% Time Utilization 9% 46% 41% 6% Capacity Utilization 37% 21% 7% 3% 1/23/213 Page 47 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

255 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MONARCH HIGH PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE 55 - SE 79 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE 55 - SE 79 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 86% 8% 52% 41% 58% 58% 62% 116% 48% 73% 1% 16% 87% 48% 54% 28% 6% Time Utilization 86% 65% 52% 38% 5% 58% 5% 48% 48% 7% 45% 16% 87% 48% 54% 28% 51% Capacity Utilization 79% 8% 26% 41% 58% 48% 62% 116% 47% 73% 1% 3% 6% 6% 19% % 6% 1/23/213 Page 48 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

256 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MONARCH K8 PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 13 - SE SE 96 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 13 - SE SE 96 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 6% 48% 66% 65% 52% 77% 52% 69% 69% 42% 68% 54% Time Utilization 6% 22% 34% 18% 52% 2% 52% 22% 26% 42% 68% 38% Capacity Utilization 18% 48% 66% 65% 48% 77% 52% 69% 69% 6% 9% 54% 1/23/213 Page 49 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

257 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School MT ST VINCENTS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 81 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 81 - SE Grand Total Run # 44 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 8 8 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 55% 55% Time Utilization 55% 55% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 5 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

258 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 21 - SE 42 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 21 - SE 42 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 8% 92% 86% Time Utilization 8% 92% 86% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 51 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

259 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND ES+MSHS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 98% 13% 13% 8% 97% 97% 93% 72% 62% 18% 91% Time Utilization 98% 13% 13% 8% 97% 97% 93% 72% 62% 18% 91% Capacity Utilization 79% 68% 44% 59% 72% 3% 61% 33% 57% 52% 56% 1/23/213 Page 52 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

260 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 25 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 25 - SE Grand Total Run # 84 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 7 7 Ride Time 3 3 Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 6% 6% Time Utilization 6% 6% Capacity Utilization 15% 15% 1/23/213 Page 53 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

261 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School PIONEER BILINGUAL PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 97 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 97 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 66% 54% 6% 312% 68% 9% Time Utilization 66% 54% 6% 312% 68% 9% Capacity Utilization 21% 13% 52% 2% 22% 22% 1/23/213 Page 54 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

262 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School PLATT MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 66% 52% 86% 46% 66% 96% 46% 56% 4% 6% 6% Time Utilization 66% 42% 86% 46% 66% 96% 46% 56% 4% 6% 6% Capacity Utilization 66% 52% 31% 28% 42% 24% 11% 17% 39% 5% 37% 1/23/213 Page 55 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

263 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 21 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 21 - SE Grand Total Run # 62 Seats Occupied 3 3 Empty Seats 6 6 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time 8 8 Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 133% 133% Time Utilization 133% 133% Capacity Utilization 32% 32% 1/23/213 Page 56 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

264 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School RYAN ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE 3 - SE 39 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE 3 - SE 39 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 89% 94% 56% 34% 67% 31% 4% 48% 49% Time Utilization 89% 94% 56% 34% 67% 31% 4% 48% 49% Capacity Utilization 4% 5% 5% 6% 41% 7% 14% 19% 36% 1/23/213 Page 57 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

265 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE SE SE 84 Bus Numbers Bus # SE SE SE 84 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 47% 6% 5% 47% 52% Time Utilization 47% 6% 5% 47% 52% Capacity Utilization 7% 6% 4% 4% 17% 1/23/213 Page 58 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

266 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SANCHEZ ES LATE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 194 Bus Numbers Bus # 194 Grand Total Run # 37 Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 9% 9% Time Utilization 9% 9% Capacity Utilization 49% 49% 1/23/213 Page 59 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

267 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SERENITY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 45 Seats Occupied 1 1 Empty Seats 8 8 Total Seat Capacity 9 9 Ride Time Ride Time Available 6 6 Current Utilization 92% 92% Time Utilization 92% 92% Capacity Utilization 11% 11% 1/23/213 Page 6 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

268 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 27 - SE 82 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # 27 - SE 82 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 7% 22% 46% Time Utilization 7% 22% 46% Capacity Utilization 9% 13% 9% 1/23/213 Page 61 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

269 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 43% 55% 48% Time Utilization 43% 52% 48% Capacity Utilization 24% 55% 39% 1/23/213 Page 62 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

270 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 185% 154% 1% 49% 95% Time Utilization 185% 154% 1% 49% 95% Capacity Utilization 29% 7% 38% 31% 25% 1/23/213 Page 63 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

271 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School TRANSITIONS CENTER PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 13 - SE SE 24 - SE 24B - SE 27 - SE 46 - SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE 13 - SE SE 24 - SE 24B - SE 27 - SE 46 - SE Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 9% 78% 16% 2% 6% 3% 33% 6% Time Utilization 9% 78% 16% 2% 6% 3% 33% 6% Capacity Utilization 15% 4% % 7% 1% 2% 2% 5% 1/23/213 Page 64 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

272 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE 9 Bus Numbers Bus # SE 9 Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 68% 14% 48% 88% 77% Time Utilization 68% 14% 48% 88% 77% Capacity Utilization 33% 82% 17% 4% 44% 1/23/213 Page 65 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

273 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School WHITTIER ELEMENTARY PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) Bus Numbers Bus # Grand Total Run # Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available Current Utilization 56% 65% 83% 72% 63% Time Utilization 56% 37% 83% 72% 63% Capacity Utilization 35% 65% 51% 46% 49% 1/23/213 Page 66 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

274 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School WHITTIER ELEMENTARY LATE PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) 23 Bus Numbers Bus # 23 Grand Total Run # 518 Seats Occupied Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 72% 72% Time Utilization 72% 72% Capacity Utilization 18% 18% 1/23/213 Page 67 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

275 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pivot Table By School WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES PM Bus Routes Run Numbers Seat Occupancy & Capacity Ride Time & Available Time (Minutes) SE Bus Numbers Bus # SE Grand Total Run # 636 Seats Occupied 5 5 Empty Seats Total Seat Capacity Ride Time Ride Time Available 5 5 Current Utilization 12% 12% Time Utilization 12% 12% Capacity Utilization 1% 1% 1/23/213 Page 68 of 68 TandC PM xlsm

276

277 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT LAFAYETTE District BOULDER First VALLEY Tier Second SCHOOL TierDISTRICT Third Tier Fourth Tier Runs Current AM Run Distribution of Time Tiers Number of Runs School Type ALT-Alternative School COM-Combo School ES-Elementary School HS-High School K-8-K-8 School MS-Middle School SE-Special Education School #N/A 4 2 First Tier Second Tier Third Tier First Tier Second Tier Third Tier 7:3 / 7:3 7:45 / 8:3 8:35 / 1: School Type TIME # of Runs School Type TIME # of Runs School Type TIME # of Runs BROOMFIELD HIGH HS 7:3 3 ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS 7:55 5 ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS 8:4 11 CENTAURUS HIGH HS 7:3 1 BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES ES 8:5 1 ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K-8 8:35 9 MONARCH HIGH HS 7:3 16 BCSIS ELEMENTARY ES 8:2 1 BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS 8:4 5 BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES 8: 3 BROOMFIELD HGT MS+ASPEN COM 8:4 1 BOULDER HIGH HS 8: 15 CASEY MIDDLE MS 8:35 6 COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES 7:5 3 CASEY MIDDLE LATE MS 1: 2 COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES 8:15 9 CENTAURUS HIGH LATE HS 9:3 1 COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEM ES 8: 4 CENTENNIAL MIDDLE MS 8:4 5 CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES 7:55 8 CHILDRENS HOUSE PS ES 9: 1 CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES 8: 8 COLUMBINE ES+CASEY MS COM 8:35 1 DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES 8: 9 CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES SE 8:45 1 ELDORADO K8 K-8 8:27 4 EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES 8:4 8 EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES 7:45 3 FIREFLY SE 9: 1 FAIRVIEW HIGH HS 8:5 7 FIREFLY+JOSHUA SE 9:3 1 FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES 8: 5 FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY LATE ES 9:45 1 FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES 8:15 2 FLATIRONS ES+CASEY MS COM 8:35 2 FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES 8:15 6 FLATIRONS ES+MANHATTAN MS COM 8:4 1 HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES 8: 9 FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS COM 8:35 1 HIGH PEAKS+MESA ES ES 8:15 1 FOOTHILL ES+CENTENNIAL MS COM 8:4 3 JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY ES 8: 1 HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR HS 9: 6 KOHL ELEMENTARY ES 8: 1 HIGH PEAKS ELEM LATE ES 9:1 1 LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES 7:55 9 HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 ALT 8:45 1 LARADON SE 8:3 1 JOSHUA SCHOOL SE 9:3 1 LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES 8: 5 KOHL ES+BROOMFIELD HGT MS COM 8:4 1 MESA ELEMENTARY ES 8:25 1 LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS 8:4 8 MT ST VINCENTS SE 8:3 1 MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS 8:4 6 NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY ES 8:1 3 MESA ES+SOUTHERN HILLS MS COM 8:4 1 NEDERLAND ES+MSHS COM 8:1 9 MONARCH K8 K-8 8:4 15 NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS 8: 2 NEDERLAND ES LATE ES 9:1 1 PIONEER BILINGUAL ES 8: 5 PLATT MIDDLE MS 8:4 11 RYAN ELEMENTARY ES 8: 7 ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF SE 8:4 1 SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES 8: 4 SOUTHERN HILLS LATE MS 9:45 1 SERENITY SE 8:15 1 SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE MS 8:4 2 SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY ES 7:54 2 SUMMIT+PLATT+MANHAT MS MS 9:45 1 TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS VOT 7:55 3 UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM LATE ES 9:45 1 TRANSITIONS CENTER ALT 8:3 7 UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES 8: 6 WHITTIER ELEMENTARY ES 8:5 3 WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES ES 8:5 1 First Second Third Total Runs # of buses # of Runs /2/213 PairCur AM xlsm

278

279 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT LAFAYETTE District BOULDER First VALLEY Tier Second SCHOOL TierDISTRICT Third Tier Fourth Tier Runs Current PM Run Distribution of Time Tiers Number of Runs School Type ALT-Alternative School COM-Combo School ES-Elementary School HS-High School K-8-K-8 School MS-Middle School SE-Special Education School #N/A 4 2 First Tier Second Tier Third Tier First Tier Second Tier Third Tier 1:45 / 2:55 3: / 3:45 4: / 4:3 School Type TIME # of Runs School Type TIME # of Runs School Type TIME # of Runs ARAPAHOE CAMPUS HS 2:4 5 ANGEVINE MIDDLE MS 3:4 1 HALCYON MIDDLE+SENIOR HS 4: 6 BCIS+HIGH PEAKS ES ES 2:4 1 ASPEN CREEK K8 SCHOOL K-8 3:35 9 SANCHEZ ES LATE ES 4:3 1 BIRCH ELEMENTARY ES 2:35 3 BOULDER HIGH HS 3:3 1 CHILDRENS H+COLUMBINE ESCOM 2:5 1 BOULDER HS+CASEY MS COM 3:3 3 CHILDRENS+FLATIRONS ES COM 2:5 1 BROOMFIELD HEIGHTS MIDDLE MS 3:4 5 COAL CREEK ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 3 BROOMFIELD HIGH HS 3: 4 COMMUNITY MONTESSORI ELEMES 2:3 4 CASEY MIDDLE MS 3:35 4 CREATIVE PERSPECTIVES SE 2:25 1 CENTAURUS HIGH HS 3: 1 CREEKSIDE ES M PARK ES 2:4 1 CENTENNIAL MIDDLE MS 3:3 4 CREST VIEW ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 8 CENTENNIAL MS+BOULDER HS COM 3:3 3 DOUGLASS ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 9 COLUMBINE ELEMENTARY ES 3: 8 EMERALD ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 3 EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ES 3:1 7 FIRESIDE ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 6 EISENHOWER ES+BOULDER HS COM 3:1 1 FLATIRONS ELEMENTARY ES 2:5 4 ELDORADO K8 K-8 3:3 3 FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY ES 2:55 8 FAIRVIEW HIGH HS 3:2 7 FOOTHILL ES+CASEY MS COM 2:55 1 FIREFLY+JOSHUA SE 3: 1 HEATHERWOOD ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 8 HORIZONS K8 SCHOOL K-8 3:45 1 HIGH PEAKS ELEMENTARY ES 2:4 2 JOSHUA SCHOOL SE 3: 1 HUMANEX ACADEMY 6-12 ALT 2:45 1 LARADON SE 3: 1 JAMESTOWN ELEMENTARY ES 2:25 1 LOUISVILLE MIDDLE MS 3:3 6 KOHL ELEMENTARY ES 2:35 2 LOUISVILLE PRESCHOOL ES 3:15 1 LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 9 MANHATTAN ARTS ACAD MS 3:44 7 LOUISVILLE ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 6 MESA ELEMENTARY ES 3: 3 MT ST VINCENTS SE 2:5 1 MONARCH HIGH HS 3: 16 PIONEER BILINGUAL ES 2:35 5 MONARCH K8 K-8 3:3 11 RYAN ELEMENTARY ES 2:35 8 NEDERLAND ELEMENTARY ES 3:5 2 SANCHEZ ELEMENTARY ES 2:4 4 NEDERLAND ES+MSHS COM 3:5 1 SERENITY SE 1:45 1 NEDERLAND MIDDLE+HIGH HS 3:15 1 SUPERIOR ELEMENTARY ES 2:3 2 PLATT MIDDLE MS 3:4 1 TEC ARAPAHOE CAMPUS VOT 2:4 4 ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEAF SE 3:4 1 TRANSITIONS CENTER ALT 2:15 7 SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE MS 3:3 2 UNIVERSITY HILL ELEM ES 2:45 4 WHITTIER ELEMENTARY LATE ES 3:45 1 WHITTIER ELEMENTARY ES 2:45 4 WHITTIER+HIGH PEAKS ES ES 2:4 1 First Second Third Total Runs # of buses # of Runs /2/213 PairCur PM xlsm

280

281 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1:3 1 3 HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS 2 2 ES ES ES MS MS 3 2 ES ES ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS 4 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 5 2 ES ES ES ES ES MS MS 8 2 ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 9 2 ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS 12 2 ES ES ES HS HS HS HS 13 1 ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT 14 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES 15 1 ES ES ES 16 1 ES 17 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES 21 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 22 3 HS VOT K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 25 3 ES ES ES ES ES HS HS HS HS MS MS 26 1 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES 3 1 ES ES ES ES ES 31 3 HS HS HS ES MS MS 32 2 HS HS HS HS MS MS MS 33 1 MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS 34 5 ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS 35 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES MS MS 39 2 ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS 4 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS 42 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 43 2 HS HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS MS MS MS MS MS MS 45 2 HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES 46 2 HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ALT ALT ALT ALT 47 2 ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 49 2 HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES 52 3 ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES 53 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS 55 2 HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 56 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS HS HS HS MS MS 59 3 HS HS HS HS HS ES ES MS 62 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS MS 1/23/213 1 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

282 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: ES ES ES ES ES ES 65 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 66 3 HS HS HS HS HS MS MS MS 67 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 68 2 ES ES ES ES 73 1 COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM 74 2 ES ES ES MS MS MS 78 2 ES ES ES ES 79 3 HS HS ES ES MS MS MS 81 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE HS HS 82 1 MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS 84 2 ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS ES ES 87 2 HS HS HS HS HS ES ES 88 2 HS HS HS HS ES ES 91 1 ES ES 94 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS 96 1 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS 1 1 HS HS 12 2 HS HS HS ES ES ES ES 13 2 ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT 18 1 SE SE SE SE SE 19 1 COM COM COM COM COM COM 11 2 HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM HS HS HS HS 12 1 ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT HS HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 14 2 ES ES ES MS MS 1/23/213 2 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

283 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES MS MS MS MS 15 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS HS HS HS HS HS HS MS MS MS HS HS HS ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS HS HS HS HS ES MS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT HS HS HS HS ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 MS MS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES HS K ES ES ES ES K-8 K HS HS HS HS ES SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 18 1 COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES MS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS VOT VOT VOT VOT ES ES MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS 21 1 ES ES ES ES 25 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 28 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 29 1 ES ES ES 21 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM MS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES MS MS MS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS MS 1/23/213 3 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

284 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS HS HS HS HS ES ES MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES 23 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM 24 1 ALT ALT ALT ALT HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 25 1 HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS VOT VOT VOT VOT MS MS MS HS HS HS HS ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS MS MS MS MS MS HS HS ES ES MS MS ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 26 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS HS HS HS HS ES ES K-8 K HS HS HS ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM HS ES ES K-8 K COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K MS MS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 1/23/213 4 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

285 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: ES ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES 1/23/213 5 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

286 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 1 Special Ed 83 Bus Count Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1:3 1 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 2 2 SE SE SE SE SE 3 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 4 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 5 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 8 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 9 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 12 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 13 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 14 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE 15 1 SE SE SE 16 1 RG 17 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 18 1 RG RG RG RG RG 21 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 22 3 RG RG RG RG 23 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 25 3 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 26 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 27 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 3 1 SE SE SE SE SE 31 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG 32 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 33 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 34 5 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 35 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 36 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 39 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 4 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 42 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 43 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 44 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 45 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 46 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 47 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 48 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 49 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 51 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 52 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 53 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 55 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 56 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 58 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 59 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 62 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 1/23/213 6 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

287 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 1 Special Ed 83 Bus Count Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: SE SE SE SE SE SE 65 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 66 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 67 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 68 2 RG RG RG RG 73 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 74 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE 78 2 SE SE SE SE 79 3 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 81 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 82 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 84 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 85 2 SE SE SE SE 87 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 88 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG 91 1 RG RG 94 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 96 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 97 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 1 1 RG RG 12 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 13 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 17 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 18 1 SE SE SE SE SE 19 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG 11 2 RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 12 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 13 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE 14 2 RG RG RG RG RG 1/23/213 7 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

288 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 1 Special Ed 83 Bus Count Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 15 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 17 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 18 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 21 1 SE SE SE SE 25 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 28 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 29 1 RG RG RG 21 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 1/23/213 8 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

289 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 1 Special Ed 83 Bus Count Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 23 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 24 1 SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 25 1 SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 26 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE 27 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 1/23/213 9 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

290 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 1 Special Ed 83 Bus Count Bus # Runs 6:26 6:33 6:4 6:47 6:54 7:1 7:8 7:15 7:22 7:29 7:36 7:43 7:5 7:57 8:4 8:11 8:18 8:25 8:32 8:39 8:46 8:53 9: 9:7 9:14 9:21 9:28 9:35 9:42 9:56 1: SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 1/23/213 1 of 1 Timeline AM xlsm

291

292 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: ES ES HS HS HS MS MS MS MS 2 2 ES ES MS MS 3 2 ES ES HS HS 4 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 5 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS 8 2 ES ES HS HS HS HS HS 9 2 ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS 12 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES HS HS HS 13 1 ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT 14 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 16 2 ES HS HS HS HS HS HS 17 2 ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 22 3 VOT VOT VOT HS K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 25 2 ES ES ES HS HS HS HS 26 2 HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 3 2 ES ES ES ES 31 3 ES HS HS HS MS MS MS MS MS 32 2 ES ES ES ES ES HS HS HS 33 2 ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS MS 34 3 ES ES ES MS 35 2 ES ES K-8 K ES ES ES ES MS MS MS 39 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS 4 2 ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 42 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES 43 2 ES HS HS HS HS 44 2 HS HS HS MS MS MS MS 45 2 ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS 46 2 ALT ALT HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 47 2 ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 49 1 HS HS HS HS HS 51 2 ES ES COM COM COM COM COM 52 2 ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS 53 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS 55 2 HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 56 2 ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES 1/23/213 1 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

293 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: ES ES HS HS 62 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS 63 2 ES ES MS MS MS 65 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 66 2 VOT VOT VOT HS HS HS HS 67 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES 68 3 ES ES ES ES HS HS 73 1 MS 74 2 ES ES MS MS MS MS 78 1 ES ES ES ES ES ES 79 2 ES HS 81 1 SE SE SE SE 82 2 ES ES ES ES MS MS 84 2 ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES HS HS HS 87 2 ES ES MS MS MS 88 2 ES ES ES HS HS HS HS 91 2 ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS 94 2 ES ES ES MS MS MS MS 96 2 ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES MS MS 12 1 COM COM COM COM COM COM 13 2 ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT 18 1 SE SE SE SE SE 19 1 COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS SE SE SE SE SE ES ES ES ES K-8 K HS HS HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM 1/23/213 2 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

294 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: ES ES ES ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES HS HS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES MS MS MS MS 15 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS HS HS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES HS HS K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES MS MS ES HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS ES ES ES HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ALT ES ES ES HS HS ES ES ES K-8 K ES ES ES HS HS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES HS HS HS HS K ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES HS HS HS HS SE SE SE SE SE SE SE ES ES ES 18 1 COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS VOT VOT VOT VOT HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES MS MS MS ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES ES 21 1 ES ES ES ES ES 28 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES 29 2 ES ES ES HS HS HS HS HS 21 2 ES ES HS HS HS HS HS 1/23/213 3 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

295 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES MS MS MS ES HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES MS MS MS ES ES ES HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS 23 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES COM COM COM ES ES ES COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM COM 24 1 ALT 24B 1 ALT ALT ALT ALT HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES HS HS HS ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS HS HS HS HS HS HS 25 1 HS HS HS HS VOT VOT HS HS HS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES COM COM COM COM ES ES COM COM ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES COM COM COM COM ES ES ES ES ES ES 26 2 ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS MS MS ES HS HS K-8 K ES HS HS K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES 1/23/213 4 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

296 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline Bus Count SCHOOL TYPES ALT K-8 COM MS ES SE HS SHT Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: ES HS HS K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES HS 27 2 ALT ALT MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES ES MS MS ES ES HS HS HS HS HS HS HS ES ES ES ES ES ES ES K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K-8 K HS HS MS MS MS MS MS ES ES ES ES ES 1/23/213 5 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

297 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 94.5 Special Ed 81.5 Bus Count Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 2 2 SE SE SE SE 3 2 SE SE SE SE 4 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 5 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 8 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 9 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 12 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 13 1 SE SE SE SE SE 14 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 16 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 17 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 21 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 22 3 RG RG RG RG RG 23 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 25 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 26 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 27 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 3 2 SE SE SE SE 31 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 32 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 33 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 34 3 RG RG RG RG 35 2 RG RG RG RG 36 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 39 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE 4 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 42 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE 43 2 SE SE SE SE SE 44 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 45 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 46 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 47 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE 48 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 49 1 SE SE SE SE SE 51 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 52 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 53 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 55 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 56 2 SE SE SE SE SE 58 1 RG RG RG RG RG 1/23/213 6 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

298 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 94.5 Special Ed 81.5 Bus Count Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: RG RG RG RG 62 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 63 2 SE SE SE SE SE 65 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 66 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 67 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG 68 3 RG RG RG RG RG RG 73 1 SE 74 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE 78 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE 79 2 SE SE 81 1 SE SE SE SE 82 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE 84 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 85 2 SE SE SE SE SE 87 2 RG RG RG RG RG 88 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 91 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 94 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 96 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 97 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE 12 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE 13 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 17 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 18 1 SE SE SE SE SE 19 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 13 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 1/23/213 7 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

299 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 94.5 Special Ed 81.5 Bus Count Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 15 2 RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 17 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 18 1 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 21 1 SE SE SE SE SE 28 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG 29 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 21 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 1/23/213 8 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

300 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 94.5 Special Ed 81.5 Bus Count Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 23 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 24 1 SE 24B 1 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 25 1 SE SE SE SE RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 26 2 RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG 1/23/213 9 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm

301 BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PM Resource Utilization Timeline SCHOOL TYPES Regular 94.5 Special Ed 81.5 Bus Count Bus # Runs 2:7 2:14 2:21 2:28 2:35 2:42 2:49 2:56 3:3 3:1 3:17 3:24 3:31 3:38 3:45 3:52 3:59 4:6 4:13 4:2 4:27 4:34 4:41 4:48 4:55 5:2 5:9 5:16 5: RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG RG SE SE 27 2 SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 1/23/213 1 of 1 Timeline PM xlsm