New Teacher Survey Results

Transcription

1 Kentucky s Education Professional Standards Board New Survey Results Kentucky Christian College Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov.

2 New Survey Results 1. Satisfaction with preparation to design units of instruction that focus on Kentucky's student learning goals and academic expectations. Excellent 45.5% 100.0% 75.0% 50.0% 61.8% Good 50.0% 17.9% 50.0% 32.7% Fair 4.5% 3.6% 3.6% Poor 3.6% 1.8% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to use information about the community and backgrounds of students to design learning tasks. Excellent 13.6% 100.0% 28.6% 50.0% 25.5% Good 40.9% 64.3% 50.0% 52.7% Fair 36.4% 7.1% 18.2% Poor 9.1% 3.6% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 2 of 16

3 New Survey Results 3. Satisfaction with preparation to design classroom assessments that are aligned with Kentucky core content standards and CATS. Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 67.9% 50.0% 54.5% Good 45.5% 25.0% 50.0% 34.5% Fair 18.2% 3.6% 9.1% Poor 3.6% 1.8% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to design and use classroom assessments that reliably measure learning. Excellent 22.7% 100.0% 57.1% 75.0% 45.5% Good 63.6% 39.3% 25.0% 47.3% Fair 13.6% 3.6% 7.3% Poor Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 3 of 16

4 New Survey Results 5. Satisfaction with preparation to design and use formative assessments to provide feedback to students and guide their learning. Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 46.4% 75.0% 45.5% Good 40.9% 46.4% 25.0% 41.8% Fair 22.7% 3.6% 10.9% Poor 3.6% 1.8% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to design instruction and learning tasks that connect core content to real-life experiences for students. Excellent 28.6% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 46.3% Good 52.4% 42.9% 42.6% Fair 19.0% 3.6% 9.3% Poor 3.6% 1.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 4 of 16

5 New Survey Results 7. Satisfaction with preparation to design instruction and assessments for students with special needs. Excellent 4.5% 100.0% 25.9% 16.7% Good 72.7% 48.1% 100.0% 61.1% Fair 4.5% 18.5% 11.1% Poor 18.2% 7.4% 11.1% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to use technology to enhance and extend learning tasks related to core concepts and/or content standards. Excellent 18.2% 100.0% 42.9% 75.0% 36.4% Good 68.2% 42.9% 25.0% 50.9% Fair 13.6% 10.7% 10.9% Poor 3.6% 1.8% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 5 of 16

6 New Survey Results 9. Satisfaction with preparation to design and use a variety of instructional strategies that address the learning needs of different types of students. Excellent 31.8% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 43.6% Good 45.5% 46.4% 50.0% 45.5% Fair 13.6% 5.5% Poor 9.1% 3.6% 5.5% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to use methods of inquiry to create meaningful learning experiences for students. Excellent 31.8% 100.0% 46.4% 75.0% 43.6% Good 50.0% 42.9% 25.0% 43.6% Fair 13.6% 7.1% 9.1% Poor 4.5% 3.6% 3.6% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 6 of 16

7 New Survey Results 11. Satisfaction with preparation to use multiple assessments and data sources to interpret learning results for individuals and groups of students. Excellent 27.3% 100.0% 42.9% 25.0% 36.4% Good 50.0% 46.4% 75.0% 49.1% Fair 22.7% 10.7% 14.5% Poor Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to design a personal professional development plan that facilitates student learning. Excellent 22.7% 100.0% 34.6% 33.3% 30.8% Good 36.4% 61.5% 66.7% 50.0% Fair 40.9% 3.8% 19.2% Poor N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 7 of 16

8 New Survey Results 13. Satisfaction with preparation to reflect on the effectiveness of instruction for the purpose of improving student learning. Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 60.7% 50.0% 50.9% Good 45.5% 32.1% 50.0% 38.2% Fair 18.2% 7.1% 10.9% Poor Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to develop graphic and/or written presentations to show evidence of student learning resulting from instruction. Excellent 13.6% 100.0% 32.0% 25.0% 25.0% Good 40.9% 64.0% 75.0% 53.8% Fair 45.5% 19.2% Poor 4.0% 1.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 8 of 16

9 New Survey Results 15. Satisfaction with preparation to use classroom management techniques that foster selfcontrol and self-discipline among students. Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 46.4% 50.0% 43.6% Good 50.0% 39.3% 25.0% 41.8% Fair 13.6% 10.7% 25.0% 12.7% Poor 3.6% 1.8% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to plan and provide instruction that stimulates critical thinking and the application of knowledge. Excellent 27.3% 100.0% 53.6% 33.3% 42.6% Good 63.6% 39.3% 66.7% 50.0% Fair 9.1% 3.7% Poor 7.1% 3.7% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 9 of 16

10 New Survey Results 17. Satisfaction with preparation to collaborate with other teachers, administrators, parents, and service agencies to provide the best possible instruction for students. Excellent 22.7% 100.0% 57.1% 50.0% 43.6% Good 40.9% 39.3% 50.0% 40.0% Fair 27.3% 3.6% 12.7% Poor 9.1% 3.6% Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to use a multimedia computer to support and extend student learning. Excellent 22.7% 100.0% 46.4% 25.0% 36.4% Good 50.0% 35.7% 75.0% 43.6% Fair 27.3% 17.9% 20.0% Poor Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 10 of 16

11 New Survey Results 19. Satisfaction with preparation to assess own professional growth needs and plan meaningful professional development activities. Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 40.0% 50.0% 40.4% Good 31.8% 60.0% 50.0% 46.2% Fair 27.3% 11.5% Poor 4.5% 1.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to exhibit and promote ethical and professional behavior as a teacher. Excellent 81.8% 100.0% 82.1% 75.0% 81.8% Good 18.2% 14.3% 25.0% 16.4% Fair 3.6% 1.8% Poor Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 11 of 16

12 New Survey Results 21. Satisfaction with preparation to understand the core concepts and skills related to certified content area(s). Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 66.7% 50.0% 53.7% Good 50.0% 22.2% 50.0% 35.2% Fair 9.1% 7.4% 7.4% Poor 4.5% 3.7% 3.7% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to identify and properly refer students with social or emotional problems, e.g., those who may become a threat to themselves or others. Excellent 22.7% 100.0% 28.0% 75.0% 30.8% Good 45.5% 60.0% 48.1% Fair 27.3% 8.0% 25.0% 17.3% Poor 4.5% 4.0% 3.8% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 12 of 16

13 New Survey Results 23. Satisfaction with preparation to understand the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Excellent 36.4% 100.0% 43.5% 25.0% 40.0% Good 45.5% 43.5% 75.0% 46.0% Fair 9.1% 4.3% 6.0% Poor 9.1% 8.7% 8.0% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to develop useful strategies to address the behavioral issues of special needs children included in the regular classroom. Excellent 19.0% 100.0% 32.0% 25.5% Good 57.1% 56.0% 75.0% 56.9% Fair 14.3% 8.0% 25.0% 11.8% Poor 9.5% 4.0% 5.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 13 of 16

14 New Survey Results 25. Satisfaction with preparation to teach in Kentucky s schools, overall. Excellent 31.8% 100.0% 71.4% 50.0% 54.5% Good 59.1% 14.3% 50.0% 34.5% Fair 9.1% 14.3% 10.9% Poor Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 14 of 16

15 New Survey Results The following items were not included in the calculation of the institution s Quality Performance Index (QPI). 26. Satisfaction with preparation to integrate the latest research in analyzing student reading problems. Excellent 27.3% 26.9% 25.0% 26.4% Good 50.0% 100.0% 57.7% 75.0% 56.6% Fair 22.7% 15.4% 17.0% Poor N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to integrate best practices for health education into overall instruction. Excellent 4.5% 16.7% 50.0% 13.7% Good 45.5% 100.0% 66.7% 50.0% 56.9% Fair 36.4% 16.7% 23.5% Poor 13.6% 5.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 15 of 16

16 New Survey Results 28. Satisfaction with preparation to integrate environmental education into overall instruction. Excellent 100.0% 29.2% 25.0% 17.6% Good 45.5% 41.7% 75.0% 45.1% Fair 45.5% 29.2% 33.3% Poor 9.1% 3.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Satisfaction with preparation to teach students basic economic principles and the economic concepts students use in everyday decision making. Excellent 4.5% 100.0% 25.0% 25.0% 17.6% Good 50.0% 58.3% 75.0% 54.9% Fair 40.9% 12.5% 23.5% Poor 4.5% 4.2% 3.9% N Mean Score Standard Deviation Standard Error of Mean Page 16 of 16