Punishing Student Internet Posts Good School Policy or Violation of Rights?
|
|
- Elmer Frederick Jordan
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Punishing Student Internet Posts Good School Policy or Violation of Rights? Activity 1: Voting with Your Feet Materials Needed: Post the following on the board, or make signs to post along one wall (a set of signs is provided in the curriculum notebook): Should definitely be subject to school punishments Should probably be subject to school punishments Don t know/no opinion Should probably not be subject to school punishments Should definitely not be subject to school punishments The signs should be positioned on the board or wall so there is room for students to stand between and in front of them. Procedure: 1. Tell students that they are going to begin studying the Colorado Youth Summit focus question: Should students be subject to school punishments for material posted off-campus on their personal websites or social networking sites when that material does not violate the First Amendment? 2. Explain that students are going to have an opportunity to vote with their feet on this issue, but rather than dealing with the general issue, they are going to look at some specific cases. Point out the five signs and explain that students will stand in front of the sign that best describes their response to each case. You may pick a few students to stand on the line and let the remainder of the students comment on/interpret the graph created by the voters. Alternatively, you may have all students stand on the line and allow them to discuss why they have chosen to stand where they are. Point out that, if they hear a good argument, students can switch their positions at any time. 3. Read the following real-life cases, all involving off-campus posting, one at a time, allowing them to vote on and discuss each case: Angry that his biology teacher assigned three times the regular amount of homework, a tenth-grader in Sacramento, California, went home and posted a status update on Facebook, calling his teacher two obscene names and saying the fat teacher should could stop eating fast food. (2010) A junior at Littleton High School in Colorado posted satirical comments about the school on MySpace. He commented on his perception of the physical condition of the students, the behavior of students, racist attitudes on the part of teachers and administrators, and the lack of resources available to students. (2006) Center for Education in Law and Democracy 3
2 Six middle school students in Carson City, Nevada, created a Facebook event called Attack a Teacher Day, inviting other students to take part on Friday, January 7. (2011) During summer vacation, several girls who were going to be sophomores at Indiana s Churubusco High School in the fall had a slumber party. At the party, they took some suggestive photographs of themselves. Two girls posted the pictures on their MySpace pages. Several parents called the school to complain. (2009) A seventh-grade student at Roxboro Road Middle School in North Syracuse, New York, created a Facebook group for the purpose of posting insulting remarks about a teacher at the school; 25 students became fans of the group. (2010) Note: In this case, you may want to ask students opinion regarding the student who started the page and those who became fans. A student at Beverly Vista High School in California posted a crude and insulting video on YouTube. It showed the student and some of her friends cruelly mocking another girl at the school. When the girl who was targeted found out about the video, she broke down and had to leave class. (2008) 4. After students have discussed all the cases, debrief the activity by asking such questions as: Did you differentiate among the cases? If so, how did you draw the line between cases where punishment was appropriate and those where it was not? Would you feel differently about general punishments, such as suspension or expulsion, versus more targeted punishments, such as being banned from extra-curricular activities? For example, the Indiana high school mentioned has a policy that students can be banned from extra-curricular activities if their conduct in or out of school reflects discredit upon Churubusco High School or the IHSAA or creates a disruptive influence on the discipline, good order, moral or educational environment at Churubusco High School. Would you feel differently knowing that? What was the best reason you heard for allowing punishment? For not allowing punishment? Were there any cases in which you felt that the police, rather than the school, should be involved? Explain your answer. 5. You may want to share with students that all of the students in these cases were punished in one form or other (the students in the Nevada case were actually arrested). Some had the punishments rescinded. Others are suing for damages. 6. Tell students that the next step in examining the issue will be looking at the constitutional questions that it raises. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 4
3 Activity 2: Jigsaw on the First Amendment in the Schools Materials: Copies of the Limits on Freedom of Speech handout for all students (if you have not previously covered this material on the First Amendment). Enough copies of the Case Cards for one-fifth of the class to have each. Optional: Copies for all students of your school or school district s policy regarding offcampus Internet postings and/or cyberbullying. Procedure: 1. Ask students: When people make the case that punishing students Internet postings violates their rights, what rights are they talking about? (First Amendment free speech rights) Review the wording of the First Amendment with students: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. 2. Remind students that rights do have limits. If students have not previously studied the limits on freedom of expression, distribute the Limits on Freedom of Speech handout and go over the limits with students. Ask: Do any of these limits apply to the cases we discussed in the Voting with Your Feet activity? If the examples describe speech that is not protected by the First Amendment, does that change your thinking about whether schools should be able to punish it if it occurs off-campus? (Accept all student answers.) 3. Tell students that they are now going to look more closely at limits on free speech by examining some of the cases involving students free speech rights that the Supreme Court has ruled on plus two it may rule on in the future. 4. Organize the students into five groups and give each group one of the Case Cards (numbered 1-5). Go over the task with students: Each group is to read and discuss their card with the aim of deciding what they should teach their classmates about the case. 5. After students have had time to read and discuss their cases, create five-person jigsaw groups comprised of one student from each of the case groups. Allow time for students to share the information about their cases. 6. When groups have completed their discussions, ask students why the Supreme Court might take one or both of the Third Circuit cases. Is this issue important in terms of First Amendment law? Is a definitive answer important to school districts? (Yes, because they want to be able to maintain the learning environment and the safety of students without violating students rights and opening themselves to lawsuits.) Center for Education in Law and Democracy 5
4 7. Tell students that the next phase of the unit will be thinking more deeply about what schools and school districts should do about this issue. Optional: Share with students your district/school s policy regarding off-campus Internet postings by students. Ask: What goals is the policy designed to achieve? Are these worthwhile goals? Is this a good way to meet those goals? Why or why not? This exercise could be completed as homework. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 6
5 Handout Limits on Freedom of Speech The First Amendment has strong language protecting freedom of speech. But the Supreme Court has allowed some limits to be placed on that freedom. Here are some general guidelines for when limits are allowed: Clear and Present Danger Will this speech create danger? The First Amendment does not protect statements that are intended to provoke violence or panic. Fighting Words Was something said to deliberately injure someone or start a fight? Language that provokes a fight can be punished. Libel and Slander Did the speech defame someone falsely? The First Amendment does not protect you if you are telling lies about someone. Obscenity Would the average person in the community find a work to be obscene? Does the work depict or describe sexual content in an offensive way? Does the work lack any serious value? Such material is not protected. The Supreme Court has also said that higher standards can be established to protect children from obscenity. Conflict with Other Legitimate Social or Governmental Interests Does the speech conflict with other compelling interests? For example, protecting young people from pro-drug messages might be seen as a compelling interest. Time, Place, and Manner Did the speech occur at a time or place that is inappropriate or illegal? Did the speaker use an inappropriate method of communicating the idea? For example, driving through the neighborhood of a public official at midnight, broadcasting information about an issue before that official, would likely not be protected. Source: Adapted from Education for Freedom (Denver, CO: First Amendment Congress, 1997). Center for Education in Law and Democracy 7
6 Case Cards Case 1: Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969) John Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt, and Mary Beth Tinker were students in Des Moines during the early years of the Vietnam War. The students and their parents decided to protest the war. The students planned to wear black armbands between December 16 and December 31, The principals at the schools the students attended found out about the planned protest. They immediately adopted a new policy: the school would ask any student wearing an armband to remove it. If the student refused, the school would suspend him/her until the student would return without the armband. The students wore their armbands to school. While many of their classmates noticed the armbands, no fights or disruptions occurred. Nonetheless, John, Christopher, and Mary Beth were sent home and suspended. The students sued in federal court, claiming their First Amendment rights had been violated. Voting 8-1 in favor of the students, the Supreme Court said that wearing an armband was symbolic speech and was not actually or potentially disruptive conduct. The Court further held that First Amendment rights, applied in light of the special characteristics of the school environment, are available to teachers and students. The Court did not, however, say students rights were unlimited. If a student s conduct, in or out of class, materially disrupts class work, involves substantial disorder or invades the rights of others, there is no Constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 8
7 Case 2: Bethel School District v. Fraser (1986) Mathew Fraser was a top student in his class at Bethel High School in Bethel, Washington. A senior, Mathew gave a speech at an assembly, nominating a friend for an office in student government. About 600 students attended the assembly; many in attendance were ninthgraders. Before giving the speech, Mathew discussed it with two teachers. Both said that the speech was inappropriate because he used a graphic sexual metaphor to refer to his friend throughout the speech. They advised him not to give the speech and warned him that there could be serious consequences if he did. Mathew gave the speech anyway. Students reacted in a variety of ways. Some shouted and laughed. Others mimed the sexual activities Mathew referred to. Others were clearly embarrassed. Mathew was suspended. The administration also informed him he would not be able to speak at graduation, even though he ranked second in his class. He brought suit in federal court, claiming his First Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district. The Court made a distinction between political speech, such as wearing armbands to protest a war, and lewd speech. The Court said, Surely it is a highly appropriate function of public school education to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive terms in public discourse.... Nothing in the Constitution prohibits the states from insisting that certain modes of expression are inappropriate and subject to sanctions. The inculcation of these values is truly the work of the schools. The school board has the authority to designate what type of speech is inappropriate in classrooms or assemblies. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 9
8 Case 3: Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) In May 1983, the journalism class at Hazelwood East High School near St. Louis was preparing an issue of the school paper for publication. The issue had two very serious articles. One dealt with how pregnant students coped during their pregnancies. Another looked at how divorce affected students. As usual, the journalism teacher ran the final proofs of the paper by the principal. That s when business as usual ended. The principal objected to the pregnancy and divorce stories. The principal believed that the pregnant students, although their names were not given, could be identified from information in the story. He also thought that references to sex and birth control in the article were inappropriate for younger students. The divorce story actually named a student, who made negative comments about her father. The principal felt the parents should have been asked to comment or at least to give their consent to the article. The principal ordered that the pages on which these two articles appeared be pulled from the newspaper even though there were other articles on the pages. Four journalism students sued in federal court, claiming their First Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court ruled against the students. In its ruling, the Court said Educators do not offend the First Amendment by exercising editorial control over the style and content of student speech in school-sponsored expressive activities so long as their actions are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns. The Court said only if the school s decision to censor a school-sponsored publication had no valid educational purpose would a student s constitutional rights be violated. In response to this case, several states, including Colorado, passed laws protecting the rights of student journalists. (See for the text of the law.) Center for Education in Law and Democracy 10
9 Case 4: Morse v. Frederick (2007) In 2002, the Olympic torch relay was traveling toward the Winter Olympic site in Utah. When it went through Juneau, Alaska, the route went right by the high school. Students at the high school were released from class so they could go outside and watch the torch pass. Student John Frederick and nine classmates had a plan to try to get on television. They made a huge banner and rolled it out across the street from the school. The banner said Bong Hits 4 Jesus. The banner could be seen by almost all the school s student. When the principal saw the banner, she immediately decided it violated the school s policy banning pro-drug messages. She walked across the street and asked the students to take the banner down. John Frederick refused, saying the First Amendment protected his right to show the banner. The principal seized the banner and suspended John. He sued, saying his First Amendment rights had been violated. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school. The Court held that the school could ban drug-related messages at school events, even if the events took place off school grounds. The Court said that keeping students from using drugs was an important enough goal to justify the limits on students rights. In a concurring opinion, Justice Alito clarified that the decision did not restrict speech that had a political or social purpose. In other words, this was a narrow ruling. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 11
10 Case 5: J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District (2010) and Layshock ex rel. Layshock v. Hermitage School District (2010) These two Pennsylvania cases involve very similar fact patterns. J.S. was a middle school girl, while Justin Layshock was a high school senior. But both students created fake profiles of their school principals on a social-networking site. In both cases, the students were using computers off campus. Both profiles were derogatory and created a reaction at the schools, although the reaction at the middle school was more serious, since two teachers reported having trouble getting their classes to stop talking about the site and get down to business. In both cases, the principals suspended the students involved. And, in both cases, the students sued, saying their First Amendment Rights were violated. When the cases were heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the similarities ended. Each case was heard by a panel of three judges. The two cases were heard by different panels. And the panels reached different decisions, both announced on February 4, In the case of J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District, the Court of Appeals held that the student s suspension was proper. In the Layshock case, the court said the school did not prove that the phony profile created a significant disruption to the school environment. Thus, the suspension violated Justin s First Amendment rights. After the two conflicting rulings were issued, both were vacated, and the cases were heard again by the full Court of Appeals. The ruling is expected any day. Many observers believe that, no matter what the decision, this issue will be appealed to the Supreme Court. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 12
11 Activity 3: Structured Academic Controversy on What Policy Schools Should Adopt Regarding Punishing Student Internet Posts Materials: Copies of the Structured Academic Controversy: Student Directions handout for all students. List of steps on in the SAC on the board or projected for student reference throughout the lesson. Deliberation question on the board: Should students be subject to school punishments for material posted off-campus on their personal websites or social networking sites when that material does not violate the First Amendment? What should be school policy about this issue? Enough copies of SAC Reading A and SAC Reading B for half the students to have each. Procedure: 1. Tell students that they are going to be taking part in a Structured Academic Controversy on the issue of school punishments for off-campus student Internet postings, thinking in particular about what school policy should be. Point out the discussion question that you have posted on the board: Should students be subject to school punishments for material posted off-campus on their personal websites or social networking sites when that material does not violate the First Amendment? What should be school policy about this issue? 2. Explain that a Structured Academic Controversy is a discussion that occurs in groups of four. Point out the list of steps in the SAC that you have posted and distribute the Structured Academic Controversy: Student Directions handout. Go over the steps with students. 3. Organize the class into groups of four (some groups could have five or six members if your class total doesn t divide evenly by four). Within each group, create pairs A and B, with pair A assigned to support a school policy that allows for punishments if students make inappropriate postings on the Internet and pair B assigned to oppose such a policy. Give the appropriate pairs the SAC Reading A and SAC Reading B handouts. Ask pairs to read their handout and identify the strongest points supporting their position. 4. When students have completed the reading, they should work in their pairs to complete step 2 of the SAC; that is, preparing to advocate their position. Tell students how long they will have to present their arguments (two or three minutes is generally adequate). 5. Before beginning step 3 of the SAC, remind students that (a) those who are listening need to take notes and ask clarifying questions that will help them better understand the opposition s views; this is not the time for them to argue, (b) pairs will be reversing positions in a few minutes and will need to understand the arguments of the opposition so listening is important, (c) they will have two (or three, depending on how much time you wish to allot) minutes to present their case. Tell students arguing in support of the school policy allowing for Center for Education in Law and Democracy 13
12 punishments for student Internet postings to begin; after the allotted time has passed, announce a one-minute period for clarifying questions. Following the questions, students arguing against the policy should present their arguments; another one-minute period should be allowed for clarifying questions. 6. Move to step 4 of the SAC, in which pairs identify the most powerful argument for the opposing position. Allow a minute or two for pairs to put their heads together and decide which argument was most persuasive. Then have the pairs present to each other, beginning with the pair that formerly opposed the policy (B). Allow no more than two minutes for each pair to present its argument in this phase; one minute is probably adequate. 7. Move to step 5 of the SAC. Remind students that in this phase they leave their assigned roles and discuss the question from their own perspectives. The goal of the discussion is to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and to see whether the group can agree on something. If they can agree on a policy, that would be great. If they cannot agree on a policy, they can try to agree on a more limited aspect of the problem/solution. Allow 10 to 15 minutes for this step. 8. Debrief the discussion using such questions as the following: How many groups reached agreement on an answer to the overall question: Should students be subject to school punishments for material posted off-campus on their personal websites or social networking sites when that material does not violate the First Amendment? What should be school policy about this issue? Why were you able to reach agreement? Was it something about the nature of your group or the process you used? What other agreements did groups reach? What does this illustrate about the issue of what policy should be regarding punishment of student Internet postings? What were the most compelling arguments for each side? What questions do you still have? How might you find answers to these questions? What do you like/dislike about this process? How might a process like this help us discuss divisive issues in our school and community? Why is it important to discuss controversial issues in a democracy? 9. Following the debrief, ask each student to write a one-page position statement on the issue. The statement should clearly identify the student s position on the focus issue and provide arguments and evidence to support that position. Have the delegates to the Colorado Youth Summit prepare a summary of the class members positions on the issue to post on the project wiki. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 14
13 Structured Academic Controversy: Student Directions Handout 1. Organizing Groups. You will be working in a group of four. Two students will be Side A, two Side B. Side A will begin by arguing for a policy that provides punishments for students who post disruptive or obnoxious comments on social networking sites during out-of-school time. Side B will argue against such a policy. 2. Preparing Arguments. With your partner, reread the background materials or review your notes and identify facts and arguments that support your assigned position. Prepare to advocate the position. 3. Presenting Arguments. Take turns advocating your positions, starting with Side A. When the other side is presenting, make notes and ask clarifying questions questions about information you don t understand. This is not the time for argument! 4. Reversing Positions. Put your head together with your partner. Decide what you think is the best argument you heard for the opposing point of view. Make a short presentation demonstrating your understanding of that argument. 5. Discussing the Issue. Leave your assigned positions and discuss the issue in your group, trying to find points of agreement and disagreement among group members. Try to reach consensus on something. If you cannot reach consensus on any substantive aspect of the issue, try to reach consensus on a process you could use to resolve disagreements. 6. Debriefing the Activity. Participate in a class discussion of the activity. The discussion will focus on how the groups worked and how use of the process contributed to your understanding of the issue. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 15
14 Handout SAC Reading A Should students be subject to school punishments for material posted off-site on their personal websites or social networking sites when that material does not violate the First Amendment? What should be school policy about this issue? From school shootings to suicides prompted by cyberbullying, the safety of today s students seems harder than ever to ensure. If any proof is needed, just consider a recent Florida case in which four middle-schoolers were plotting to kill a classmate on Facebook! School administrators cannot sit idly by while their students are taking part in this kind of activity. Research shows that more than 90 percent of students ages use the Internet (Parent and Teen Internet Use, 2007). Some of this use occurs at school, but much of it occurs at home. A third of online teens create their own content via personal web pages, blogs, or social networking sites. Many teens have harmless fun on the Internet, create wonderful expressive products, and even use the Web to advance worthy causes. But teens also sometimes post hurtful, embarrassing, or even threatening comments. These kinds of comments when directed to other members of the school community have an effect on the learning environment. Some student posts create such buzz around the school that class is disrupted. Others may affect one or two targeted individuals so much that they cannot focus on learning. And verbal attacks on teachers can make it more difficult for them to do their jobs. Certainly, the Constitution protects free speech. However, free speech rights do have limits. In the case of Frederick v. Morse, the Supreme Court upheld a school punishment for speech that took place off school grounds, saying such limitations were allowable if the school s interest in suppressing the speech was important enough. The chief attorney for the National School Boards Association, Francisco Negron, has said that the case allows schools to regulate student speech when the student welfare is at stake. That same thinking could well apply to Internet postings that occur off campus. Furthermore, schools have long had policies that punished students for such off-campus activities as drinking or using drugs. Students have been subject to school discipline especially being barred from extracurricular activities, such as sports for these actions, even when criminal charges were not pressed. The U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights has recently sent a letter to school districts reminding them that bullying including cyberbullying can actually become discriminatory harassment. The Department has stressed the school s responsibility to deal with this kind of behavior. If schools do not respond adequately, they could be subject to civil rights lawsuits. In the letter, Department officials specifically mentioned cases when name-calling occurred on social networking sites, suggesting that schools are responsible for knowing about and taking action in such cases. This puts a heavy burden on schools and school administrators. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 16
15 Handout SAC Reading B Should students be subject to school punishments for material posted off-campus on their personal websites or social networking sites when that material does not violate the First Amendment? What should be school policy about this issue? The First Amendment to the Constitution clearly states, Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech. The Supreme Court has held that, through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, this protection applies to the public schools as governmentfunded organizations. The Supreme Court has also said that students do have freedom of speech in school. In the Tinker case, the Court famously said that students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate. In addition, the Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment applies to speech on the Internet. In the case of Reno v. ACLU (1997), the Court said that we presume that government regulation of the content of speech is more likely to interfere with the free exchange of ideas than to encourage it. The interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship. Lower courts have ruled in Internet cases involving students that disliking or being upset by the content of a student s speech is not an acceptable justification for limiting student speech (Killion v. Franklin Regional School District, 2001) and that ordinary personality conflicts among middle school students that may leave one student feeling insecure do not qualify as substantially disrupting the school s educational environment (J.C. v. Beverly Hills Unified School District, 2010). Of course, other Supreme Court cases have put some limits on students right to free expression, but these cases have involved speech at school or at school-sponsored functions. Speech that occurs outside of school using students own computers should not be punished by school officials. If the speech strays into criminal behavior, such as making actual threats against someone, then it is a matter for the police, not the school. If the speech defames a person, that person can sue for defamation in the courts. Drawing attention to websites where students have criticized school officials may actually cause more disruption than the websites themselves. Punishing students for calling a teacher a nasty name will make students feel that the administration is out to get them in other words, rather than everyone working together to promote learning, everyone will be angry and fighting. Certainly, given the problems with school budgets, schools should not be wasting money to pay lawyers to defend them in free speech lawsuits. Spending the money to educate young people about cybercitizenship and bullying would be a better use of the funds. There s no question that cyberbullying and harassing people online or in person, for that matter are bad things. But off-campus behavior is simply outside the school s jurisdiction. In addition, it s obvious from many of the cases that have made the news lately that school administrators have difficulty distinguishing between bullying, satire, and blowing off steam. They also seem to have a very low threshold for deciding when something affects the learning environment. Those are things that would need to be defined if a policy were ever to gain wider support. Center for Education in Law and Democracy 17
16 References Sources: Abbott, Karen, Suspension Called Off: Littleton Student Back in Class after ACLU Steps In, Rocky Mountain News (February 22, 2006). Adams, John, A Student s Right to Be Cyber-Mean, NBC Los Angeles (December 14, 2009), html. Ali, Russlynn, Dear Colleague Letter: Harassment and Bullying (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights, October 26, 2010), Egelko, Bob, Student Off Hook for Facebook Insult of Teacher, San Francisco Chronicle (January 29, 2011), Florida Teens Charged with Facebook Death Threat, WPTV.com (February 3, 2011), Griffith, Martin, 6 Girls Arrested in Facebook Teacher Attack Invite, ABC News Technology (January 7, 2011), Johnson, David D., Layshock and J.S.: The 3 rd Circuit Attempts to Define the Circumstances under Which a School Can Punish a Student for Creating a Defamatory MySpace Profile, Internet and E-commerce Law Blog (San Francisco, CA; EpsteinBeckerGreen, February 9, 2010), Legal Tips to Know before You Post, Student Press Law Center White Paper (Arlington, VA: Student Press Law Center, 2008). Lenhart, Amanda, and Mary Madden, Teen Content Creators and Consumers, Pew Internet & American Life Project (Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2005), Macgill, Alexandra Rankin, Parent and Teenager Internet Use (Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2007), Negron, Francisco M., Jr., A Foot in the Door? The Unwitting Move Towards a New Student Welfare Standard in Student Speech after Morse v. Frederick, American University Law Review ( 2009), Netter, Sarah, Suspension over Sexy Slumber Party Photos Leads to ACLU Lawsuit, ABC News (November 2, 2009), O Toole, Catie, Seventh-Grade North Syracuse Student Suspended, 25 Others Disciplined, Syracuse Post-Standard (January 24, 2010), Court Cases: Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986). Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1989). J.C. v. Beverly Hills Unified School District, 2010 WL (C.D. Cal.). Center for Education in Law and Democracy 18
17 J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District, 3rd Cir.., No , Opinion (2010). Killion v. Franklin Regional School District, 136 F. Supp. 2d 446, 448 (W.D. Pa. 2001). Layshock v. Hermitage School District, 3d Circuit, No , Opinion (2010). Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997). For More Information: American Civil Liberties Union, Student Speech/Internet Censorship, American Library Association, Office of Intellectual Freedom, Blumner, Robyn, Schools Reach Must Have Limits, Columbus Dispatch (February 23, 2010), Davis, Michelle R., Schools Tackle Legal Twists and Turns of Cyberbullying, Digital Directions (Washington, DC: Education Week), February 4, 2011), Electronic Frontier Foundation, Bloggers FAQ Student Blogging, First Amendment Center, K-12 Public School Student Expression: Cyberspeech, Hudson, David L., Student Online Expression: What Do the Internet and MySpace Mean for Students First Amendment Rights? (Washington, DC: First Amendment Center (2007), National School Boards Association, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Center for Education in Law and Democracy 19
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969)
Journalism 1 Review Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969) Issue: Freedom of Speech at School Bottom Line: You Have the Right To Express Yourself Up to a Point Background In December 1965,
More informationTop Ten Rules That Govern School Authority Over Student Cyber Expressions
11 Top Ten Rules That Govern School Authority Over Student Cyber Expressions Although conflicting court decisions have surfaced and jurisdictional variations exist, the following general principles guiding
More informationBETHEL SCHOOL DIST. NO. 403 v. FRASER, 478 U.S. 675 (1986)
BETHEL SCHOOL DIST. NO. 403 v. FRASER, 478 U.S. 675 (1986) Argued March 3, 1986 Decided July 7, 1986 CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to decide whether the
More informationfirstamendmentcenter.org Your First Freedoms A Basic Guide to the First Amendment
firstamendmentcenter.org Your First Freedoms A Basic Guide to the First Amendment Q: What is the First Amendment and where does it come from? A: The First Amendment consists of 45 words added to the Constitution
More informationTraining for Dialogue on America Leaders. Student Rights to Free Speech: How Free?
Training for Dialogue on America Leaders Student Rights to Free Speech: How Free? I. Introduction: A. Concept of Dialogue on America Not A Lecture or A Law School Class B. Informal, Engaging, Challenging
More informationStudents: Know Your Rights
Students: Know Your Rights "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right
More informationBackground on the First Amendment
Background on the First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the
More informationThe Fight for Equality in Education in the United States
The Fight for Equality in Education in the United States Lesson #3: Chicano! Taking Back the Schools Learning Objectives Students will understand the motivation for and outcomes of the 1968 walkouts in
More informationPublic Schools Ability to Discipline Students for Off-Campus Online Speech By Gabriela Traxler-Romin
Public Schools Ability to Discipline Students for Off-Campus Online Speech By Gabriela Traxler-Romin For the past forty years, the courts have addressed whether students attending public schools shed their
More information2015 STATE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT SURVEY A Project Sponsored by the Newseum Institute
2015 STATE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT SURVEY A Project Sponsored by the Newseum Institute The Newseum Institute has supported an annual national survey of American attitudes about the First Amendment since
More informationSTUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE
STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE A Guide for Public School Students in Washington State . STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE A Guide for Public School Students
More informationMinors First Amendment Rights:
FEATURE All materials in this journal subject to copyright by the American Library Association Minors First Amendment Rights: CIPA ANd School libraries 16 Knowledge Quest Intellectual Freedom Online Volume
More informationFranklin Technology Center s Code of Conduct
Franklin Technology Center s Code of Conduct Franklin Technology Center is comprised of students, faculty, staff and administrators. This community recognizes the need to establish a code of conduct that
More informationColorado Youth Summit: Introductory Lesson
Colorado Youth Summit: Introductory Lesson Lesson Components Student pre-survey (required): Return surveys to CELD, P.O. Box 18490, Denver, CO 80218-0490. CELD will reimburse you for the cost of postage.
More informatione-rate toolkit Cyberbullying: Crossing the Line
e-rate toolkit Cyberbullying: Crossing the Line Lesson Plan Essential Question: When does inappropriate online behavior cross the line to cyberbullying, and what can you do about it? Learning Overview
More informationWalking Through a Trial
Lesson Overview Overview: This lesson will teach students how the legal system works and how a case progresses through the state courts. Objectives: Students will be able to Define key terms related to
More informationCyberbullying in Schools: Chapter 157 Updates the Law on Suspension for Online Conduct
McGeorge Law Review Volume 44 Issue 3 Article 7 1-1-2013 Cyberbullying in Schools: Chapter 157 Updates the Law on Suspension for Online Conduct Sydney Smith Pacific McGeorge School of Law Follow this and
More informationInformation Brief. Cyberbullying and School Policy. Introduction. Examples and Impact
Information Brief AU GU ST 2 0 0 8 Cyberbullying and School Policy Introduction The Commonwealth of Virginia has been concerned with student Internet safety since the General Assembly first enacted legislation
More informationJune 2008. Canadian Teachers Federation Fédération canadienne des enseignantes et des enseignants
Addressing Cyberconduct A Brief to the Department of Justice Canada June 2008 Canadian Teachers Federation Fédération canadienne des enseignantes et des enseignants Brief to the Canadian Ministry of Justice:
More informationThe Silencing of Student Voices preserving free speech in america s schools. David L. Hudson Jr.
The Silencing of Student Voices preserving free speech in america s schools David L. Hudson Jr. The Silencing of Student Voices the challenge to free speech in america s schools 2003 First Amendment Center
More informationD.C., A MINOR V. HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCH., 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300. Plaintiff D.C., a student, appealed a Los Angeles Superior Court decision in favor of
D.C., A MINOR V. HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCH., 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300 Raquel Rivera Rutgers Conflict Resolution Law Journal November 22, 2010 Brief Summary: Plaintiff D.C., a student, appealed a Los Angeles Superior
More informationVIDEO SCRIPT. Bullying, Harassment, & Civil Rights: An Overview of School Districts Federal Obligation to Respond to Harassment
SCRIPT TITLE: PREPARED BY: LEGEND: Bullying, Harassment, & Civil Rights: An Overview of School Districts Federal Obligation to Respond to Harassment National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments,
More informationSCHOOL LAW STUDY GUIDE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE MICHAEL D. EISNER COLLEGE OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY STUDIES
SCHOOL LAW STUDY GUIDE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE MICHAEL D. EISNER COLLEGE OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY STUDIES US CONSTITUTION General Welfare Clause is found in the preamble
More informationSCHOOL LAW STUDY GUIDE
SCHOOL LAW STUDY GUIDE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE MICHAEL D. EISNER COLLEGE OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY STUDIES US CONSTITUTION General Welfare Clause is found in the preamble
More informationYou Can t Say That in School?!
Class Summary: Students discover how the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment apply in everyday life and in school. When are there limits and why? The landmark Supreme Court case of Tinker v.
More informationBullying 101: Guide for Middle and High School Students
Bullying 101: Guide for Middle and High School Students A guide to the basics of bullying, what it is and isn t, the role of students, and tips on what you can do. 952.838.9000 PACERTeensAgainstBullying.org
More informationNewspaper Literacy Unit (Grades 6-9)
Newspaper Literacy Unit (Grades 6-9) TAMELA MCCARTNEY / SPRING 2004 Overall During this unit, students should be able to: Identify the parts of today s standard newspaper (Day 1) Identify the differences
More informationSarah Smythe Youth Community Developer Western Ottawa Community Resource Centre. Genevieve Hupe School Resource Officer Ottawa Police Service
Sarah Smythe Youth Community Developer Western Ottawa Community Resource Centre Genevieve Hupe School Resource Officer Ottawa Police Service From the choices below, which screen name is the worst for
More informationParticipation on University of California Employment Practices Liability Program Defense Panel for UC Davis and UC Davis Health Systems Application
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL BERKELEY * DAVIS * IRVINE * LOS ANGELES * MERCED * RIVERSIDE * SAN DIEGO * SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA * SANTA CRUZ 1111 Franklin
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
2006 AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM OUTCOMES As a result of this lesson, students will be able to: Summarize juvenile court process and procedures Define legal terms used in the juvenile justice
More informationKNOW YOUR RIGHTS KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. A Guide for Trans and Gender Nonconforming Students
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS KNOW YOUR RIGHTS A Guide for Trans and Gender Nonconforming Students KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: A GUIDE FOR TRANS AND GENDER NONCONFORMING STUDENTS Whether you re a girl who doesn t act like one,
More informationA Guide to the Human Rights Act
A Guide to the Human Rights Act A booklet for People with Learning Disabilities Human Rights Human Rights Illustrations by CHANGE Picture Bank What s inside This booklet,..................................1
More informationLABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE. Timothy L. Davis. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw.
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE Timothy L. Davis Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw.com OVERVIEW FOR 2016 UPDATE Labor Law Court Decisions Employment
More informationSocial Studies Lesson Plan Evaluating the importance of civic responsibilities in American democracy.
Teacher s Name: Employee Number: School: Social Studies Lesson Plan Evaluating the importance of civic responsibilities in American democracy. 1. Title: The Importance of Civic Responsibilities in American
More informationHow Do People Settle Disputes? How a Civil Trial Works in California
Article brought to you by the Administrative Office of the California Courts and California Council for the Social Studies in partnership for Civic Education How Do People Settle Disputes? How a Civil
More informationAppropriate Use of Social Media and Cell Phones. Karen Haase. karen@ksbschoollaw.com KSB School Law @KarenHaase
Appropriate Use of Social Media and Cell Phones Karen Haase karen@ksbschoollaw.com KSB School Law @KarenHaase Raise your hand if You have a cell phone You use text messaging You ve taken photos with a
More informationA Parent s. Guide to. Religion. in the. Public. Schools. National PTA
A Parent s Guide to Religion in the Public Schools National PTA Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
More informationWHAT IS SEXUAL HARASSMENT?
WHAT IS SEXUAL HARASSMENT? Sexual harassment is a serious problem for students at all educational levels. Students in elementary and secondary schools, as well as vocational schools, apprenticeship programs,
More informationLegal Update: Effectively Navigating Student Issues in the Era of Social Media
Legal Update: Effectively Navigating Student Issues in the Era of Social Media U C S A S S I S T A N T P R I N C I P A L S M E E T I N G W E D N E S D A Y, F E B R U A R Y 4, 2 0 1 5 Presenter: Kevin T.
More informationHow To Protect Free Speech At A College
Student Press Law Center Model Guidelines for College Student Media Copyright 2009 Student Press Law Center, Inc. I. STATEMENT OF POLICY [Name of institution] recognizes the educational and societal value
More informationKnow your rights. Q: What If police, FBI, or immigration agents contact me? Do I have to answer questions?
Know your rights What rights do I have as a non-immigrant, F-1/J-1 visa holder? Whether or not you re a citizen, you have rights under the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment gives every person
More informationAppropriate Use of Social Media and Cell Phones
Appropriate Use of Social Media and Cell Phones Karen Haase Harding & Shultz (402) 434-3000 khaase@hslegalfirm.com H & S School Law @KarenHaase Raise your hand if You have a cell phone You use text messaging
More informationa threat made in school
a threat made in school ADAM S BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE CRIME Adam, 15, is the youngest of four children. His parents are divorced. He lives with his mother, has regular contact with his father, and
More informationAnti Harassment and Bullying Policy
Anti Harassment and Bullying Policy Document Control Title : Anti Harassment and Bullying Policy Applicable to : All Staff and Executive Officers Date last reviewed : February 2014 Procedure Owner : People
More informationThe Legal Side of Blogging: How Not to get Sued, Fired, Arrested or Killed
The Legal Side of Blogging: How Not to get Sued, Fired, Arrested or Killed By: Ruth Carter ISBN: 978-1-938574-02-3 Copyright: Ruth Carter 2013 89 pages Kindle Price: $3.99, pp: 89. Reviewed by Bridget
More informationJournal of College Teaching & Learning May 2010 Volume 7, Number 5
A Court Case Analysis Of Administrative Versus Faculty Grading Rights Homer L. Bates, University of North Florida, USA Bobby E. Waldrup, University of North Florida, USA ABSTRACT Since 1940, when the AAUP
More informationYES, LAWS APPLY ONLINE, TOO. Dom Caristi, Ph.D Professor of Telecommunications Digital Policy Institute Ball State University
YES, LAWS APPLY ONLINE, TOO Dom Caristi, Ph.D Professor of Telecommunications Digital Policy Institute Ball State University University of Tulsa: Student Suspended for Husband s Facebook Posts In October
More informationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN FLORIDA
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN FLORIDA The Petitioner may go to court on his/her own (without an attorney) to petition for an injunction to protect him/her against domestic violence (assault or battery by your spouse
More informationAcalanes Union HSD Board Policy Sexual Harassment
Acalanes Union HSD Board Policy Sexual Harassment BP 5145.7 Students The Governing Board is committed to maintaining a safe school environment that is free from harassment and discrimination. The Board
More informationPlease Step Out of The Car
Urban Survival Guide: Please Step Out of The Car A Step by Step Guide Through The Los Angeles DUI & DMV Process MR DUI LA Attorney Mark Rosenfeld The Law Office of Mark Rosenfeld 800-9700-DUI (384) MRDUILA.com
More informationAppropriate Uses of Modern Technology
Appropriate Uses of Modern Technology Each new school year brings high hopes, great expectations and challenges for both new and seasoned educators. Th e American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has developed
More informationVentura Charter School of Arts & Global Education Board Policy for Acceptable Use and Internet Safety
Ventura Charter School of Arts & Global Education Board Policy for Acceptable Use and Internet Safety Student Policy--SP004 Ventura Charter School of Arts and Global Education ("School") recognizes the
More informationTEXAS SAFE SCHOOLS ACT
TEXAS SAFE SCHOOLS ACT Your Rights and Responsibilities 2007-2009 UPDATE Texas AFT www.texasaft.org July 2009 Dear Colleague, Seventeen years ago, Texas AFT launched its campaign for a Safe Schools Act
More informationMassachusetts. Rights of LGBT Public School Students
Massachusetts Rights of LGBT Public School Students January 2015 This document is intended to provide general information only and cannot provide guidance or legal advice as to one s specific situation.
More informationHOT TOPICS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW. E-Mail, Voicemail, and Employees Right To Privacy: Monitoring Employees Electronic Communications. by Andrew M.
HOT TOPICS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW E-Mail, Voicemail, and Employees Right To Privacy: Monitoring Employees Electronic Communications by Andrew M. Low Employers have plenty of legitimate reasons for wanting to
More informationCyberbullying Policy Considerations for Boards
July 2007 Cyberbullying Policy Considerations for Boards Schools have long had to deal with bullying among students, including hitting, teasing, name-calling, intimidation, harassment and social exclusion.
More informationUniversity Schools Social Media Guidelines for Employees
University Schools Social Media Guidelines for Employees Purpose of Social Media Guidelines All University Schools Laboratory Employees are subject to the Ball State University Social Media Policy available
More informationVirginia Commonwealth University Police Department
Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department NUMBER SECTION CHIEF OF POLICE EFFECTIVE REVIEW DATE 2 9 1/2013 2/2013 SUBJECT SOCIAL MEDIA GENERAL The department endorses the secure use of social media
More informationDomestic Violence Case Management Plan
Domestic Violence Case Management Plan From the commencement of litigation to its resolution, whether by trial or settlement, it is the goal of this Court to reduce delay and enable just and efficient
More informationMental Health Role Plays
Mental Health Role Plays Goals: To discuss various mental health issues and mental illnesses. To discuss stigma, support and treatment options surrounding mental health issues and mental illnesses. Requirements:
More informationYouth Faces the Law. A Juvenile Rights Handbook
Youth Faces the Law A Juvenile Rights Handbook YOUTH FACES THE LAW: A Juvenile Rights Handbook The Pro Bono Committee of the Multnomah Bar Association Young Lawyers Section is pleased to present the 11th
More informationWisconsin Anti-Bullying Center
Patrick Evans, M.S. CESA 7 - Project Management Consultant Green Bay, Wisconsin Certified Trainer Wisconsin Emergency Management Multi-Hazard Emergency Planning for Schools Writer, Editor, Contributor,
More informationONA Position Statement
ONA Position Statement Photography, Video and Audio Taping of ONA Members Providing Care Need for Employer Policy The Ontario Nurses Association (ONA) takes the position that all employers should have
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA. Record No. 091535 DWIGHT KEITH SMITH, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA Record No. 091535 DWIGHT KEITH SMITH, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Appellee. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF VIRGINIA, INC. IN SUPPORT
More informationStatutory Rape: What You Should Know
Statutory Rape: What You Should Know 2013 Why Do You Need To Read This? Many teens are concerned about the laws regarding something commonly called statutory rape. This brochure will explain what statutory
More informationSection 1. 2. Should school authorities have the right to censor student speeches or newspapers? Why or why not?
Study Guide 13.1 Supreme Court Cases Section 1 DIRECTIONS As you read the Case Study, use the graphic organizer below to take notes. In the space below to record your answers to the What Do You Think?
More information7. MY RIGHTS IN DEALING WITH CRIMINAL LAW AND THE GARDAÍ
7. MY RIGHTS IN DEALING WITH CRIMINAL LAW AND THE GARDAÍ 7.1 Victim of a crime What are my rights if I have been the victim of a crime? As a victim of crime, you have the right to report that crime to
More informationLESSON PLAN Privacy, the Internet and that Phone in your Pocket
LESSON PLAN Privacy, the Internet and that Phone in your Pocket Subject(s): History, Civics, Social Science, Law, Politics Grade Levels: 9-12 Specific Student Learning Objectives: Students will develop
More informationMINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Policy #470: Employee Use of Social Media I. PURPOSE As a national leader in using technology as an accelerator of learning, the Minnetonka School District recognizes the value
More informationPreparing a Federal Case
Last Updated: October 2010 Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Preparing a Federal Case If you are reading this, you are probably proceeding on your own in court without the help of an
More informationJUVENILES AND THE LAW
JUVENILES AND THE LAW When Are You a Juvenile and When Are You an Adult? The answer to this question is complicated because, under Missouri law, when you are considered an adult and when you are considered
More informationSocial Networking Policy
Social Networking Policy Policy Date June 2013 Review Date June 2015 Section 1: Introduction 1.1 Objectives 1.1.1 This policy sets out West Row Primary School s policy on social networking. New technologies
More informationON THE JOB. Employment
ON THE JOB Employment In order to work in the United States, you must have a social security number, as required by the federal Social Security Act. If you do not have a social security number, you have
More informationWhen the Classroom Is Not in the Schoolhouse: Applying Tinker to Student Speech at Online Schools
When the Classroom Is Not in the Schoolhouse: Applying Tinker to Student Speech at Online Schools Brett T. MacIntyre * I. INTRODUCTION The Internet has changed how public school students communicate and
More informationPrinciples in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights
Principles in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights Barry Winograd Arbitrator and mediator in Oakland, California Member of the National Academy of Arbitrators Adjunct faculty of the law
More informationMAXIMIZING STRIKES FOR CAUSE IN CRIMINAL CASES BY ROBERT R. SWAFFORD
Maximizing Strikes for Cause MAXIMIZING STRIKES FOR CAUSE IN CRIMINAL CASES BY ROBERT R. SWAFFORD I. INTRODUCTION This paper will introduce an approach to jury selection that is radically different from
More informationTAXI and TLC-Licensee CASES
TAXI and TLC-Licensee CASES A Guide to Your Hearing at the OATH Tribunal 40 Rector Street, 6th Floor New York, NY TABLE OF CONTENTS Taxi and TLC-Licensee Cases Heard at OATH.......3 Should I Get a Lawyer?.
More informationDISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE ARRANGEMENTS. the disciplinary process: how councils can deal with concerns about employee
Legal Topic Note LTN 22 January 2013 DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE ARRANGEMENTS 1. This LTN provides guidance on: the disciplinary process: how councils can deal with concerns about employee misconduct or
More informationHarmful digital communications, cyber bullying and digital harassment can take a variety of forms.
FAQs - Harmful Digital Communications Bill What are harmful digital communications? Harmful digital communications, cyber bullying and digital harassment can take a variety of forms. Examples include sending
More informationDallas Police Department Computer Crimes Unit Cyber-Bullying Sexting And Criminal Consequences
Dallas Police Department Computer Crimes Unit Cyber-Bullying Sexting And Criminal Consequences Prepared by Detective Russell Stephens Computer Crimes Unit Dallas Police Department 214-671-3545 Cyber-bullying
More informationLiterature Review and Analysis: Internet Filters and Intellectual Freedom. Danielle Cunniff Plumer. The University of Texas at Austin
Literature Review and Analysis: Internet Filters and Intellectual Freedom Danielle Cunniff Plumer The University of Texas at Austin Graduate School of Library and Information Science LIS 384K.16: Creation
More informationDraft Resolution. Submitted for revision by the delegations to the Model United Nation, College of Charleston, Spring 2011
Committee A: Net Neutrality and Internet Access Draft Resolution Submitted for revision by the delegations to the Model United Nation, College of Charleston, Spring 2011 The General Assembly Reaffirming
More informationKNOW YOUR RIGHTS A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS IN WASHINGTON
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS IN WASHINGTON Know Your Rights A Guide for Public School Students in Washington This guide provides general information on students rights in Washington
More informationYes. There are two types of nuisances, a private nuisance and a public nuisance.
What is a nuisance? An activity which arises from unreasonable, unwarranted or unlawful use by a person of his/her own property, working obstruction or injury to the right of another, or to the public,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Portland Division. V. CRYSTAL COX, Pro Se Defendant
Crystal L. Cox Attorney Pro Se UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Portland Division OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK, Plaintiffs, V. CRYSTAL COX, Pro Se Defendant Objection
More informationVocabulary Builder Activity. netw rks. A. Content Vocabulary. The Bill of Rights
A. Content Vocabulary Directions: Fill in the Crossword Puzzle with content vocabulary words from Chapter 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 18 1 A. Content Vocabulary, Cont. Across 5.
More informationHAZING AND BULLYING (Harassment, Intimidation and Dating Violence)
HAZING AND BULLYING (Harassment, Intimidation and Dating Violence) The prohibition against hazing, dating violence, harassment, intimidation or bullying is publicized in student handbooks and in the publications
More informationRocky Mountain News (Denver, CO)
Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO) March 7, 2005 Monday Final Edition Police Response Faces Challenge; Castle Rock Lawsuit Could Alter Handling of Restraining Orders By Gabrielle Johnston, Rocky Mountain
More informationPreparing a Federal Case
Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Preparing a Federal Case If you are reading this, you are probably proceeding on your own in court without the help of an attorney. This is often called
More informationPracticing Interventions: Role Playing
Practicing Interventions: Role Playing You cannot simply explain an intervention technique to students and expect them to use it. They need practice these skills using multiple scenarios, before we can
More informationschool resource CREATE DEBATE THE
school resource CREATE THE DEBATE welcome The Create the Debate pack has been produced by Parliament s Education Service with help from the UK Youth Parliament and BBC Three s Free Speech. This easy-to-use,
More informationElectronic Devices Non Negotiables Policy (Laptops, Mobile Phones, etc)
Electronic Devices Non Negotiables Policy (Laptops, Mobile Phones, etc) The non negotiables listed below direct your use of electronic devices for educational purposes at Holy Cross College. You need to
More informationLabor & Employment Law Update
, California 90071, California 92260-4305 Wrongful Termination/Retaliation for First Quarter 2007 WRONGFUL TERMINATION Catherine Coble, Esq. Public employer has immunity against direct liability for wrongful
More informationNetworking and Social Media Policy
Networking and Social Media Policy 1 Objectives This policy sets out the Millfields Community School policy on social networking. New technologies are an integral part of our lives and are powerful tools
More informationIowa-Grant School District Acceptable Use and Internet Safety Policy For Students, Staff and Guests
Iowa-Grant School District Acceptable Use and Internet Safety Policy For Students, Staff and Guests The Iowa-Grant School District has invested significantly in technology that offers vast, diverse, and
More informationThe Basics of Sexual Harassment
The Basics of Sexual Harassment Sexual Harassment is a violation both of Federal Law and the laws of most states. For employers, it is fairly easy to take steps to prevent sexual harassment and to defeat
More informationPrivate Today, Public Tomorrow
LESSON PLAN Private Today, Public Tomorrow UNIT 4 Essential Question How can you respect the privacy of others online? Lesson Overview Students reflect on their responsibility to protect the privacy of
More informationA Guide for the Non-Professional Provider of Supervised Visitation
A Guide for the Non-Professional Provider of Supervised Visitation Superior Court of California County of Orange Answers To Your Questions A Guide for the Non-Professional Provider of Supervised Visitation
More informationNYC Department of Education Social Media Guidelines
Spring 2012 NYC Department of Education Social Media Guidelines A. Introduction/Purpose 1. Social media technology can serve as a powerful tool to enhance education, communication, and learning. This technology
More informationEASTNOR PAROCHIAL PRIMARY SCHOOL STAFF SOCIAL NETWORKING POLICY. Inspire and Achieve
EASTNOR PAROCHIAL PRIMARY SCHOOL STAFF SOCIAL NETWORKING POLICY Inspire and Achieve Introduction This document sets out the guidance on social networking and aims to: Set clear expectations of behaviour
More information