4-column document Net neutrality provisions (including recitals)
|
|
|
- Barnaby Stevenson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 4-column document Net neutrality provisions (including recitals) [Text for technical discussions. It does not express any position of the Commission or its services] Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down measures concerning the European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent, and amending Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1211/2009 and (EU) No 531/2012 COMMISSION EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COUNCIL POSSIBLE COMPROMISE Article 2 Definitions [no changes] [no change] (14) "internet access service" means a publicly available electronic communications service that provides connectivity to the internet, (12a) "net neutrality" means the principle according to which all internet traffic is treated equally, without discrimination, restriction or interference, independently of its sender, recipient, type, content, device, service or application; [Ams 234 and 241] (14) internet access service means a publicly available electronic communications service that provides connectivity to the internet (1) internet access service means a publicly available electronic communications service that provides access to the internet, and (14) internet access service means a publicly available electronic communications service that provides connectivity to the internet. 1
2 and thereby connectivity between virtually all end points connected to the internet, irrespective of the network technology used; in accordance with the principle of net neutrality, and thereby connectivity between virtually all end points of the internet, irrespective of the network technology or terminal equipment used; [Am. 96] (15) specialised service means an electronic communications service optimised for specific content, applications or services, or a combination thereof, provided over logically distinct capacity, relying on strict admission control, offering functionality requiring enhanced quality from end to end and that is not marketed or usable as a substitute for internet access service; [Ams 235 and 242] thereby connectivity to substantially all end points of the internet, irrespective of the network technology and terminal equipment used; (15) "specialised service" means an electronic communications service or any other service that provides the capability to access specific content, applications or services, or a combination thereof, and whose technical characteristics are controlled from end-to-end or provides the capability to send or receive data to or from a determined number of parties or endpoints; and that is not marketed or widely used as a substitute for internet access service; deleted deleted Article 23 - Freedom to provide and avail of open internet access, and reasonable traffic management Article 23 - Freedom to provide and avail of open internet access, and traffic management [Am. 148] Article 3 - Safeguarding of open internet access 1. End-users shall be free to access 1. End-Users shall have the right to 1. End-users shall have the right to 1. End-users shall have the right to access 2
3 and distribute information and content, run applications and use services of their choice via their internet access service. End-users shall be free to enter into agreements on data volumes and speeds with providers of internet access services and, in accordance with any such agreements relative to data volumes, to avail of any offers by providers of internet content, applications and services. access and distribute information and content, run and provide applications and services and use terminals of their choice, irrespective of the enduser s or provider s location or the location, origin or destination of the service, information or content, via their internet access service. access and distribute information and contentuse and provide applications and services and use terminal equipment of their choice irrespective of the end-user s or provider s location or the location, origin or destination of the service, information or content, via their internet access service in accordance with this Article. and distribute information and content, [run/use] and provide applications and services and use terminal equipment of their choice irrespective of the end-user s or provider s location or the location, origin or destination of the service, information or content, via their internet access service in accordance with this Article. This paragraph is without prejudice to Union law or national law, in compliance with Union law, related to the lawfulness of the information, content, application or services. Recital for open internet reason for action: The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation with low access barriers for end-users, content and application providers and internet service providers. The internet's open character has been a key driver of competitiveness, economic growth, social development and innovation - which has led to spectacular levels of development in online applications, content and services - and thus of growth in the offer of, and demand for, content and services, and has (45) The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation with low access barriers for end -users, content and application providers and internet service providers. The existing regulatory framework aims at promoting the ability of end-users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice. Recently, however, the report of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on traffic management (45) The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation with low access barriers for users, content and application providers and internet service providers. The principle of net neutrality in the open internet means that traffic should be treated equally, without discrimination, restriction or interference, independent of the sender, receiver, type, content, device, service or application. As stated by the European Parliament resolution of (3) The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation with low access barriers for end-users, content and application providers and internet service providers. The existing regulatory framework aims at promoting the ability of end-users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice. However, a significant number of end-users are affected by traffic management practices which block or slow down specific 3
4 practices published in May 2012 and a study, commissioned by the Executive Agency for Consumers and Health and published in December 2012, on the functioning of the market of internet access and provision from a consumer perspective, showed that a significant number of end-users are affected by traffic management practices which block or slow down specific applications. These tendencies require clear rules at the Union level to maintain the open internet and to avoid fragmentation of the single market resulting from individual Member States' measures. 17 November 2011 on the open internet and net neutrality in Europe 1, the internet's open character has been a key driver of competitiveness, economic growth, social development and innovation which has led to spectacular levels of development in online applications, content and services and thus of growth in the offer of, and demand for, content and services, and has made it a vitally important accelerator in the free circulation of knowledge, ideas and information, including in countries where access to independent media is limited. The existing regulatory framework aims at promoting the ability of users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice. Recently, however, the report of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on traffic management practices published in May 2012 and a study, commissioned by the applications. These tendencies require common rules at the Union level to maintain the open internet and to avoid fragmentation of the single market resulting from individual Member States measures. made it a vitally important accelerator in the free circulation of knowledge, ideas and information, including in countries where access to independent media is limited. The existing regulatory framework aims at promoting the ability of end-users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice. However, a significant number of end-users are affected by traffic management practices which block or slow down specific applications. These tendencies require common rules at the Union level to maintain the open internet and to avoid fragmentation of the single market resulting from individual Member States measures. 4
5 Executive Agency for Consumers and Health and published in December 2012, on the functioning of the market of internet access and provision from a consumer perspective, showed that a significant number of users are affected by traffic management practices which block or slow down specific applications. These tendencies require clear rules at the Union level to maintain the open internet and to avoid fragmentation of the single market resulting from individual Member States' measures. (4) End-users should be free to choose between various types of terminal equipment (defined in Directive 2008/63/EC on competition in the markets in telecommunications terminal equipment) to access the internet. Providers of internet access service should not impose restrictions on the use of terminal equipment connecting to the network, in addition to those imposed by Recital for terminal equipment: (in Article 23(1) and (2): End-users should be free to choose between various types of terminal equipment (defined in Directive 2008/63/EC on competition in the markets in telecommunications terminal equipment) to access the internet. Providers of internet access service should not impose restrictions on the use of terminal equipment connecting to the network, [in addition to those imposed by terminal equipment s manufacturers or distributors 5
6 terminal equipment s manufacturers or distributors in compliance with Union law. (5) Internet access service is any service that provides connectivity to the internet, irrespective of the network technology and terminal equipment used by end-user. However, for reasons outside the control of internet access service providers, some end points of the internet may not always be accessible, for instance due to measures taken by public authorities. Therefore, a provider is deemed to comply with its obligation related to the offering an internet access service within the meaning of this Regulation when that service provides connectivity to substantially all end points of the internet. (6) In order to exercise their right set out in Article 3(1), end-users should be free to agree with providers of in compliance with Union law]. Recital (related to connectivity to endpoints of the Internet): Internet access service is any service that provides connectivity to the internet, and in principle to all its end-points, irrespective of the network technology and terminal equipment used by the end-user. Subject to legal obligations under Union or national law, providers of internet access services should therefore not restrict connectivity to any end-points of the internet. However, for reasons outside the control of internet access service providers, some end points of the internet may not always be accessible, for instance due to measures taken by public authorities. Therefore, a provider is deemed to comply with its obligation related to the offering an internet access service within the meaning of this Regulation when that service provides connectivity to essentially all end points of the internet. Recital (related to contractual freedom, subject to control of circumvention / abuses): In order to exercise their right set 6
7 internet access services on tariffs with specific data volumes and speeds or on other technical or commercial characteristics of the internet access service. Such agreements, as well as commercial practices conducted by providers of internet access service, should not limit the exercise of the right set out in Article 3(1) and thus circumvent provisions of this Regulation on safeguarding internet access. Commercial practices should not, given their scale, lead to situations where end-users choice is significantly reduced in practice. Since the right to open internet is based on end-user s choice to access preferred content and information, such practices would therefore result in undermining the essence of this right. 2. Providers of internet access services and end-users may agree on commercial and technical conditions and characteristics of internet access services, such as out in Article 3(1), end-users should be free to agree with providers of internet access services on tariffs with specific data volumes and speeds or on other technical or commercial characteristics of the internet access service. Such agreements, as well as commercial practices conducted by providers of internet access service, should not limit the exercise of the right set out in Article 3(1) and thus circumvent provisions of this Regulation on safeguarding internet access. Commercial practices should not, given their scale, lead to situations where end-users choice is significantly reduced in practice. Since the right to open internet is based on end-user s choice to access preferred content and information, such practices would therefore result in undermining the essence of this right. [para 2 moved down, for easier comparison with Pres para 3] [para 2 moved down, for easier comparison with Pres para 3] EP para 5: Providers of internet access services and end-users may agree to set limits on data volumes 2. Providers of internet access services shall provide connectivity between essentially all end points of the internet, irrespective of the network technology or terminal equipment used. 7
8 [Paragraphs 2-4 moved down to reflect new proposed order of paragraphs] or speeds for internet access services, [ ] price, volume and speed. Such agreements, and any commercial practices conducted by providers of internet access services, shall not limit the exercise of the right of end-users set out in paragraph 1. (8)[ ] Reasonable traffic management contributes to an efficient use of network resources and thus also protects the freedom of internet access service providers to conduct a business. Innovation by content service and application providers should be fostered. In order to be considered reasonable, traffic management measures applied by providers of internet access services should be transparent, proportionate, non- Providers of internet access services and end-users may agree on commercial conditions for internet access services such as price, data volumes or speeds. Such agreements, and any commercial practices conducted by providers of internet access services, shall not limit the exercise of the right of end-users set out in paragraph 1 or the obligations of internet access providers set out in the first sub-paragraph. Recital (related to traffic management): The underlying objective of rules relative to the open internet is that end-users should have right to access and distribute information or use applications and services of their choice, as well as terminal equipment. Reasonable traffic management contributes to an efficient use of network resources and to an optimisation of the overall transmission quality responding to the technical requirements of the content, services and applications transmitted. In order to be considered reasonable, traffic 8
9 discriminatory and should not constitute anti-competitive behaviour. The requirement for traffic management measures to be non-discriminatory does not preclude providers of internet access services to implement traffic management measures which take into account objectively different quality of service requirements of certain traffic (for example, latency or high bandwidth). Blocking, slowing down, altering, degrading or discriminating against specific content, applications or services should be prohibited, subject to justified and defined exceptions laid down in this Regulation. Content, services and applications should be protected because of the negative impact of blocking or other restrictive measures on enduser choice and innovation.[ ] management measures applied by providers of internet access services should be transparent, proportionate, nondiscriminatory and should not constitute anti-competitive behaviour. The requirement for traffic management measures to be non-discriminatory does not preclude providers of internet access services to implement, in order to optimise the overall transmission quality, traffic management measures which differentiate between different types of traffic, i.e. categories of content, services or applications. Any such differentiation should be permitted only on the basis of objective technical quality [of service] requirements (for example in terms of latency, jitter, packet loss, bandwidth), of the different types of traffic, but not on the basis of commercial considerations. Such differentiating traffic management measures should be proportionate in relation to the purpose of overall quality optimisation and should treat equivalent traffic equally. Any traffic management practice which goes beyond such reasonable measures, including reasonable differentiation, by blocking, 9
10 5. Within the limits of any contractually agreed data volumes or speeds for internet access services, providers of internet access services shall not restrict the freedoms provided for in paragraph 1 by blocking, slowing down, degrading or discriminating against specific content, applications or services, or specific classes thereof, except in cases where it is necessary to apply reasonable traffic management measures. Reasonable traffic management measures shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and necessary to: 5. Providers of internet access services and end-users may agree to set limits on data volumes or speeds for internet access services, providers of internet access services shall not restrict the freedoms provided for in paragraph 1 by blocking, slowing down, altering degrading or discriminating against specific content, applications or services, or specific classes thereof, except in cases where it is necessary to apply traffic management measures. Traffic management measures shall be transparent, nondiscriminatory, proportionate and necessary to: 4. Subject to this paragraph, providers of internet access services shall equally treat equivalent types of traffic when providing internet access services. Providers of internet access services may implement traffic management measures. Such measures shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and shall not constitute anticompetitive behaviour. When implementing these measures, providers of internet access services shall not block, slow down, alter, degrade or discriminate against specific content, applications or services except as necessary, and only for as long as necessary, to: slowing down, altering, degrading or discriminating against specific content, applications or services, or categories thereof, should be prohibited, subject to justified and defined exceptions laid down in this Regulation. 3. Subject to this paragraph, providers of internet access services shall treat traffic in accordance with the principle of equal treatment when providing internet access services. Providers of internet access services may implement reasonable traffic management measures. In order to be deemed reasonable and compliant with the principle of equal treatment, such measures shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and shall not constitute anticompetitive behaviour, account being taken of objectively different technical quality of service requirements of specific categories of traffic. Providers of internet access services shall not engage in traffic management measures going beyond the reasonable measures set 10
11 a) implement a legislative provision or a court order, or prevent or impede serious crimes; a) implement a a court order; a) comply with legal obligations to which the internet access service provider is subject; out in sub-paragraph 2, and in particular shall not block, slow down, alter, degrade or discriminate against specific content, applications or services, or specific categories thereof, except as necessary, and only for as long as necessary, to: a) comply with legal obligations to which the internet access service provider is subject; b) preserve the integrity and security of the network, services provided via this network, and the end-users' terminals; [no change] [no change] b) preserve the integrity and security of the network, services provided via this network, and the end-users' terminal [equipment]; c) prevent the transmission of unsolicited communications to endusers who have given their prior consent to such restrictive measures; deleted c)[compare with (d) in EP position] prevent pending network congestion and mitigate the effects of exceptional or temporary network congestion, provided that equivalent types of traffic are treated equally; c) subject to a prior explicit request by the end-users concerned, (i) prevent the transmission of unsolicited communications within the meaning of Article 13 of Directive 2002/58/EC, or (ii) implement parental control measures, [in accordance with national rules which define parental rights and obligations], with respect to content, services or applications which might seriously impair the physical, mental or moral development of minors, in particular pornography or gratuitous 11
12 violence. The end-user shall be given the possibility to withdraw this request at any time. d) minimise the effects of temporary or exceptional network congestion provided that equivalent types of traffic are treated equally. d) prevent or mitigate the effects of temporary and exceptional network congestion provided that equivalent types of traffic are treated equally. d) [compare with (c) in COM proposal] comply with an explicit request from the end-user, in order to prevent transmission of unsolicited communication within the meaning of Article 13 of Directive 2002/58/EC 1 or to implement parental control measures. The legal obligations referred to in point (a) shall be laid down in Union legislation or national legislation, in compliance with Union law, or in measures giving effect to such Union or national legislation, including orders by courts or public authorities vested with relevant powers. d) prevent impending network congestion and mitigate the effects of exceptional or temporary and non-recurring network congestion, provided that equivalent types of traffic are treated equally. The legal obligations referred to in point (a) shall be laid down in Union legislation or national legislation, in compliance with Union law, or in measures giving effect to such Union or national legislation, including orders by courts or public authorities vested with relevant powers. 1 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ L 201, , p. 37). 12
13 (46) The freedom of end- users to access and distribute information and lawful content, run applications and use services of their choice is subject to the respect of Union and compatible national law. This Regulation defines the limits for any restrictions to this freedom by providers of electronic communications to the public but is without prejudice to other Union legislation, including copyright rules and Directive 2000/31/EC. (46) The freedom of users to access and distribute information and content, run applications and use services of their choice is subject to the respect of Union and compatible national law. This Regulation defines the limits for any restrictions to this freedom by providers of electronic communications to the public but is without prejudice to other Union legislation. Traffic management measures shall not be maintained longer than necessary. (10) This Regulation does not seek to regulate the lawfulness of the information, content, application or services, nor the procedures, requirements and safeguards related thereto. These matters remain thus subject to Union legislation or national legislation in compliance with Union law, including measures giving effect to such Union or national legislation (for example, court orders, administrative decisions or other measures implementing, applying or ensuring compliance with such legislation). If those measures prohibit end-users to access unlawful content (such as, for example, child pornography), endusers should abide by those obligations by virtue of and in accordance with that Union or national law. [compare with chapeau before points a-d] Recital (related to measures referred to in the above paragraph): This Regulation does not seek to regulate the lawfulness of the information, content, application or services, nor the procedures, requirements and safeguards related thereto. These matters remain thus subject to Union legislation or national legislation in compliance with Union law, including measures giving effect to such Union or national legislation (for example, court orders, administrative decisions or other measures implementing, applying or ensuring compliance with such legislation). Measures implementing Union or national law cannot relate to mere contractual agreements between private economic operators. If those measures prohibit endusers to access unlawful content (such as, for example, child pornography), end-users should abide by those obligations by virtue of and in accordance with that Union or national law. 13
14 Reasonable traffic management shall only entail processing of data that is necessary and proportionate to achieve the purposes set out in this paragraph. Without prejudice to Directive 95/46/EC, traffic management measures shall only entail such processing of personal data that is necessary and proportionate to achieve the purposes set out in this paragraph, and shall also be subject to Directive 2002/58/EC, in particular with respect to confidentiality of communications. 5. Traffic management measures may only entail processing of personal data that is necessary and proportionate to achieve the objectives of paragraph 4 (a d). Such processing shall be carried out in accordance with Directive 95/46. Traffic management measures shall also comply with Directive 2002/ Traffic management measures may only entail processing of personal data that is necessary and proportionate to achieve the objectives of paragraph 3 (a d). Such processing shall be carried out in accordance with Directive 95/46. Traffic management measures shall also comply with Directive 2002/ This Article is without prejudice to Union or national legislation related to the lawfulness of the information, content, application or services transmitted. 6. Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to Union law or national law, in compliance with Union law, related to the lawfulness of the information, content, application or services. 3. Providers of electronic communications to the public, including providers of internet access services, shall be free to enter into agreements with endusers, including providers of content, applications and services to deliver a service other than. 2. End-users shall also be free to agree with either providers of electronic communications to the public or with providers of content, applications and services on the provision of specialised services with an enhanced quality of service. In order to enable the provision of 2. Providers of internet access, of electronic communications to the public and providers of content, applications and services shall be free to offer specialised services to end-users. Such services shall only be offered if the network capacity is sufficient to provide them in 5. Providers of electronic communications to the public, including providers of internet access services, and providers of content, applications and services shall be free to offer individual services which are distinct from internet access services and which are optimised for specific content, applications or services, or a combination thereof, in 14
15 specialised services to end-users, providers of content, applications and services and providers of electronic communications to the public shall be free to enter into agreements with each other to transmit the related data volumes or traffic as specialised services with a defined quality of service or dedicated capacity. The provision of specialised services shall not impair in a recurring or continuous manner the general quality of internet access services. addition to internet access services and they are not to the detriment of the availability or quality of internet access services. Providers of internet access to end-users shall not discriminate between functionally equivalent services and applications. Providers of internet access services shall put in place appropriate, clear, open and efficient procedures aimed at addressing complaints alleging breaches of this Article. Such procedures shall be without prejudice to the end-users right to refer the matter to the national regulatory authority. [Ams 236 and 243] [deleted] internet access services, which requires a specific level of quality. Providers of electronic communications to the public, including providers of internet access services, shall ensure that sufficient network capacity is available so that the availability and quality of internet access services for other end-users are not impaired in a material manner. order to meet their requirements for a specific level of quality. Such services shall only be offered if the network capacity made available by providers of electronic communications services to the public, including providers of internet access services, is sufficient to provide them in addition to internet access services, they are not marketed or usable as substitute for internet access services and are not to the appreciable detriment of the availability or quality of internet access services for other end users. 8. Providers of internet access services shall put in place appropriate, clear, open and efficient procedures aimed at addressing complaints alleging breaches of this Article. Such procedures shall be without prejudice to the end-users right to refer the matter to the national regulatory authority. deleted [see para 6 in this column] 4. The exercise of the freedoms 4. End-users shall be provided with deleted [To be determined in light of discussion on 15
16 provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be facilitated by the provision of complete information in accordance with Article 25(1), Article 26 (2), and Article 27 (1) and (2). complete information in accordance with Article 20(2), Article 21(3) and Article 21a of Directive 2002/22/EC, including information on any traffic management measures applied that might affect access to and distribution of information, content, applications and services as specified in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article. end-user provisions, to include a specific provision on transparency of the types of content, applications and services that would be affected by parental control measures offered by an ISP.] 16
EN United in diversity EN 21.10.2015 A8-0300/2. Amendment
21.10.2015 A8-0300/2 2 Matt Carthy, Sofia Sakorafa, Kostas Chrysogonos, Luke Ming Flanagan, Barbara Spinelli Recital 3 (3) The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation
Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 April 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 April 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) 8337/15 LIMITE TELECOM 97 COMPET 169 MI 268 CONSOM 68 CODEC 603 NOTE From: Presidency To: Delegations
6482/15 GB/ek 1 DG E2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 25 February 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) 6482/15 NOTE From: To: Presidency Delegations TELECOM 48 COMPET 57 MI 106 CONSOM 36 CODEC 239
10788/15 AD/FC/vm DGE 2
Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 September 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) 10788/15 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: TELECOM 161 COMPET 361 MI 481 CONSOM 126
5439/15 PT/ek 1 DG E
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 January 2015 5439/15 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) TELECOM 17 COMPET 12 MI 28 CONSOM 13 CODEC 70 NOTE from: Presidency to: Delegations No. Cion prop.:
Council of the European Union Brussels, 7 April 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 7 April 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) 7741/15 LIMITE TELECOM 84 COMPET 142 MI 210 CONSOM 59 CODEC 458 NOTE From: Presidency To: Delegations
10409/1/15 REV 1 KS/ek 1 DG E 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 8 July 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) 10409/1/15 REV 1 TELECOM 157 COMPET 324 MI 430 CONSOM 119 CODEC 963 NOTE From: To: No. Cion doc.: Subject:
BoR (16) 94. BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules
BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules June 2016 Contents Background and general aspects... 3 Article 1 Subject matter and scope... 4 Article 2 Definitions...
EDRi's Position Paper on Council text regarding net neutrality
EDRi's Position Paper on Council text regarding net neutrality The purpose of this document is to provide an analysis of the Council text, in order to show its limits, contradictions and problems. Loopholes
Declaration of Internet Rights Preamble
Declaration of Internet Rights Preamble The Internet has played a decisive role in redefining public and private space, structuring relationships between people and between people and institutions. It
DOC NO: INFOSOC 52/14 DATE ISSUED: June 2014. Resolution on the open and neutral Internet
DOC NO: INFOSOC 52/14 DATE ISSUED: June 2014 Resolution on the open and neutral Internet Introduction This resolution builds on the TACD net neutrality resolution of April 2010 1, which called for policies
BUREAU EUROPÉEN DES UNIONS DE CONSOMMATEURS AISBL
BEREC report on IPinterconnection in the context of Net Neutrality BEUC statement Contact: Guillermo Beltra [email protected] Ref.: X/2012/062-09/08/2012 BUREAU EUROPÉEN DES UNIONS DE CONSOMMATEURS AISBL
Delegations will find attached a set of Presidency drafting suggestions concerning Articles 1-3 of the above proposal, as well as the Recitals.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 11 February 2010 6092/10 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0140 (CNS) SOC 75 JAI 108 MI 39 NOTE from : The Presidency to : The Working Party on Social Questions on :
Net Neutrality The importance of measuring QoS
Net Neutrality The importance of measuring QoS Frode Sorensen NPT and BEREC Net Neutrality Expert Working Group Bits seminar - Net Neutrality vs. the right to discriminate 28 November 2013, Brussels Net
(DRAFT)( 2 ) MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
05 Motions for resolutions, and other B8 documents 05_09. Motions to wind up debate on statements by other institutions: Rule 123(2) Cover page EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2014 2019 Plenary sitting [.2014] B[8-/2014](
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party 00451/06/EN WP 118 Working Party 29 Opinion 2/2006 on privacy issues related to the provision of email screening services Adopted on 21 February 2006 This Working
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 336 of 2011
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 336 of 2011 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND SERVICES) (PRIVACY AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS) REGULATIONS 2011 (Prn. A11/1165) 2 [336] S.I.
Ref. Ares(2014)1520151-13/05/2014. l(5)vodafone.com>
Ref. Ares(2014)1520151-13/05/2014 From: Vodafone Group" < Date: 25 Jul 2013 17:51:32 GMT+02:00 To: "Wolf-Dietrich.Grussmann(g)ec.europa.eu l(5)vodafone.com> Subject: virtual access products Dear Dieter,
Binding Corporate Rules ( BCR ) Summary of Third Party Rights
Binding Corporate Rules ( BCR ) Summary of Third Party Rights This document contains in its Sections 3 9 all provision of the Binding Corporate Rules (BCR) for Siemens Group Companies and Other Adopting
BEREC Guidelines for Quality of Service in the scope of Net Neutrality
BEREC Guidelines for Quality of Service in the scope of Net Neutrality BEUC response to the public consultation Contact: Guillermo Beltrà [email protected] Ref.: X/2012/060-27/07/2012 BUREAU EUROPÉEN DES
EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 July 2002 (OR. en) PE-CONS 3636/02 2000/0189 (COD) LEX 365 ECO 217 CODEC 778
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 12 July 2002 (OR. en) 2000/0189 (COD) LEX 365 PE-CONS 3636/02 ECO 217 CODEC 778 DIRECTIVE 2002/58/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL
CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION DIRECTIVE
Représentant les avocats d Europe Representing Europe s lawyers CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION DIRECTIVE CCBE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA RETENTION
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor. on net neutrality, traffic management and the protection of privacy and personal data
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on net neutrality, traffic management and the protection of privacy and personal data THE EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR, Having regard to the Treaty
Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 March 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 March 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0027 (COD) 6788/15 LIMITE TELECOM 59 DATAPROTECT 23 CYBER 13 MI 139 CSC 55 CODEC 279 NOTE From: Presidency To:
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 April 2010. 8173/10 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0140 (CNS) SOC 240 JAI 270 MI 94
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 15 April 2010 8173/10 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0140 (CNS) SOC 240 JAI 270 MI 94 NOTE from : The Presidency to : The Working Party on Social Questions No. prev.
Proposal of regulation Com 2012 11/4 Directive 95/46/EC Conclusion
Page 1 sur 155 Proposal of regulation Com 2012 11/4 Directive 95/46/EC Conclusion Legal nature of the instrument Règlement Directive Directly applicable act in internal law 91 articles 34 articles Art.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.12.2015 COM(2015) 627 final 2015/0284 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content
BEREC Monitoring quality of Internet access services in the context of Net Neutrality
BEREC Monitoring quality of Internet access services in the context of Net Neutrality BEUC statement Contact: Guillermo Beltrà - [email protected] Ref.: BEUC-X-2014-029 28/04/2014 BUREAU EUROPÉEN DES UNIONS
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
Proposal for a 2012/0180 (COD) DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. on the existing EU legal framework applicable to lifestyle and wellbeing apps. Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.4.2014 SWD(2014) 135 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT on the existing EU legal framework applicable to lifestyle and wellbeing apps Accompanying the document GREEN
AMENDMENTS TO THE DRAFT DATA PROTECTION REGULATION PROPOSED BY BITS OF FREEDOM
AMENDMENTS TO THE DRAFT DATA PROTECTION REGULATION PROPOSED BY BITS OF FREEDOM On 25 January 2012, the European Commission published a proposal to reform the European data protection legal regime. One
This letter is to provide you with our views on the minimum criteria for the impact assessment and subsequent legislative proposal.
Dear Commissioner Malmström, As you know, we have been closely involved in consultations with the European Commission with regard to the impact assessment on, and probable review of, the Data Retention
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE OF THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE OF THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT 2300 Pursuant to its authority from Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament, the Legislation Committee determined the revised text
LIMITE EN 13383/14 1. Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 September 2014 13383/14. Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) LIMITE NOTE
Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 September 2014 13383/14 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) LIMITE NOTE from: to: No. Cion prop.: Subject: Presidency Delegations Proposal for a Regulation
ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA ON THE AMENDMENT OF THE ORDER NO. 1V-1013 ON THE APPROVAL OF THE RULES ON THE ENSURANCE OF SECURITY AND INTEGRITY
EDRi s. January 2015. European Digital Rights Rue Belliard 20, 1040 Brussels www.edri.org @EDRi tel. +32 (0) 2 274 25 70
EDRi s Red lines on TTIP January 2015 European Digital Rights Rue Belliard 20, 1040 Brussels www.edri.org @EDRi tel. +32 (0) 2 274 25 70 ABOUT EDRI European Digital Rights is a network of 34 privacy and
Official Journal of the European Communities DIRECTIVE 98/10/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 26 February 1998
L 101/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 1.4.98 DIRECTIVE 98/10/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 February 1998 on the application of open network provision (ONP) to
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party 11601/EN WP 90 Opinion 5/2004 on unsolicited communications for marketing purposes under Article 13 of Directive 2002/58/EC Adopted on 27 February 2004 This Working
Online Security, Traffic Data and IP Addresses. Review of the Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications
Brussels, October 8 th 2008 Online Security, Traffic Data and IP Addresses Review of the Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Francisco Mingorance Senior Director Government Affairs [email protected]
Guidelines on data protection in EU financial services regulation
Guidelines on data protection in EU financial services regulation 1 Contents Table of Contents 10-point checklist for analysing data protection and privacy...4 1. Data protection and financial services
PRINCIPLES OF THE TRANSFER OF PERSONAL DATA TO A THIRD COUNTRY. Introduction
PRINCIPLES OF THE TRANSFER OF PERSONAL DATA TO A THIRD COUNTRY Introduction The continuous globalization of the world economy influences the international transfer of personal data. The transfer of personal
DIRECTIVES. DIRECTIVE 2009/24/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs
L 111/16 Official Journal of the European Union 5.5.2009 DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2009/24/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs (Codified
Factsheet on the Right to be
101010 100101 1010 101 Factsheet on the Right to be 100 Forgotten ruling (C-131/12) 101 101 1) What is the case about and what did 100 the Court rule? 10 In 2010 a Spanish citizen lodged a complaint against
Charter of Consumer Rights in the Digital World
DOC No: INFOSOC 37 08 DATE ISSUED: MARCH 2008 Charter of Consumer Rights in the Digital World Digital technologies contribute to an improvement in the quality of people s lives in many ways. They create
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 May 2012. 9441/12 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0090 (COD) LIMITE INF 75 API 56 JUR 253 CODEC 1153
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 4 May 2012 9441/12 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0090 (COD) LIMITE INF 75 API 56 JUR 253 CODEC 1153 NOTE from: Presidency to Permanent Representatives Committee
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. on a common framework for electronic signatures
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 29.04.1999 COM(1999) 195 fmal 98/0191(COD) Amended proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on a common framework for electronic signatures
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a European network of Employment Services, workers' access
Response of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission on the Health and Social Care (Control of Data Processing) NIA Bill 52/11-16
Response of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission on the Health and Social Care (Control of Data Processing) NIA Bill 52/11-16 Summary The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission (the Commission):
DRAFT BILL PROPOSITION
DRAFT BILL PROPOSITION Establishes principles, guarantees, rights and obligations related to the use of the Internet in Brazil. THE NATIONAL CONGRESS decrees: CHAPTER I PRELIMINAR PROVISIONS Article 1.
Processor Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), for intra-group transfers of personal data to non EEA countries
Processor Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), for intra-group transfers of personal data to non EEA countries Sopra HR Software as a Data Processor Sopra HR Software, 2014 / Ref. : 20141120-101114-m 1/32 1.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 June 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 June 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2012/0011 (COD) 9985/1/15 REV 1 LIMITE DATAPROTECT 103 JAI 465 MI 402 DIGIT 52 DAPIX 100 FREMP 138 COMIX 281 CODEC
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.4.2011 COM(2011) 222 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
How To Respect The Agreement On Trade In Cyberspace
CHAPTER 14 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE Article 14.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: computing facilities means computer servers and storage devices for processing or storing information for commercial
Acceptable Use Policy
Acceptable Use Policy 1. General Interoute reserves the right to modify the Acceptable Use Policy ( AUP ) from time to time. Changes to this Acceptable Use Policy will be notified to Customer in accordance
Europe s Video Game Industry and the Telecom Single Market
Executive Summary The internet is a key driver of growth in the video game industry and facilitates distribution of content, engagement with customers, multiplayer gameplay and provision of crucial software
Virgin Media Business Acceptable Use Policy (Internet)
Virgin Media Business Acceptable Use Policy (Internet) 1 Introduction 1.1 This Acceptable Use Policy ( AUP ) specifies actions prohibited by Virgin Media Business to users of the Internet Services (in
European Union Law and Online Gambling by Marcos Charif
With infringement proceedings, rulings by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the ongoing lack of online gambling regulation at EU level, it is important to understand the extent to which member states
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of 9.10.2014. (Text with EEA relevance)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2014 C(2014) 7174 final COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 9.10.2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante
Network neutrality. Guidelines for Internet neutrality. Version 1.0 24 February 2009
Network neutrality Guidelines for Internet neutrality Version 1.0 24 February 2009 The guidelines in general These network neutrality guidelines have been drawn up by the Norwegian Post and Telecommunications
5626/15 PT/ek 1 DG E
Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 January 2015 5626/15 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) TELECOM 21 COMPET 15 MI 38 CONSOM 20 CODEC 103 NOTE from: Presidency to: Delegations No. Cion prop.:
Information Services. Regulations for the Use of Information Technology (IT) Facilities at the University of Kent
Scope Information Services Regulations for the Use of Information Technology (IT) Facilities at the University of Kent 1. These regulations apply to The Law All students registered at the University, all
on the transfer of personal data from the European Union
on the transfer of personal data from the European Union BCRsseptembre 2008.doc 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY REMARKS 3 II. DEFINITIONS 3 III. DELEGATED DATA PROTECTION MANAGER 4 IV. MICHELIN GROUP
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 21.9.2005 COM(2005) 438 final 2005/0182 (COD) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the retention of data processed
RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION
16.5.2009 Official Journal of the European Union L 122/47 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 12 May 2009 on the implementation of privacy and data protection principles in applications
Corporate Guidelines for Subsidiaries (in Third Countries ) *) for the Protection of Personal Data
Corporate Guidelines for Subsidiaries (in Third Countries ) *) for the Protection of Personal Data *) For the purposes of these Corporate Guidelines, Third Countries are all those countries, which do not
Public Consultation Paper: Payment Accounts Directive. Department of Finance. July 2015
DIRECTIVE ON PAYMENT ACCOUNTS Public Consultation July 2015 Public Consultation Paper: Payment Accounts Directive Department of Finance July 2015 Department of Finance Government Buildings, Upper Merrion
Comments and proposals on the Chapter III of the General Data Protection Regulation
Comments and proposals on the Chapter III of the General Data Protection Regulation Ahead of the trialogue negotiations in September, EDRi, Access, Panoptykon, Bits of Freedom, FIPR and Privacy International
CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individual with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data
Insurance Europe key messages on the European Commission's proposed General Data Protection Regulation
Position Paper Insurance Europe key messages on the European Commission's proposed General Data Protection Regulation Our reference: SMC-DAT-12-064 Date: 3 September 2012 Related documents: Proposal for
T H E G O V E R N M E N T
[Symbol of the State of Israel] RESHUMOT (Official Gazette) BILLS T H E G O V E R N M E N T Shvat 7, 5768 356 January 14, 2008 Page Electronic Commerce Bill, 5768 2008..................................
DIRECTIVE 2014/32/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
29.3.2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 96/149 DIRECTIVE 2014/32/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS Recommendation Rec(2006)8 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on assistance to crime victims (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 June 2006 at
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development (National Assembly) after consideration of proposed National
Crimes (Computer Hacking)
2009-44 CRIMES (COMPUTER HACKING) ACT 2009 by Act 2011-23 as from 23.11.2012 Principal Act Act. No. 2009-44 Commencement except ss. 15-24 14.1.2010 (LN. 2010/003) Assent 3.12.2009 Amending enactments Relevant
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE. REPORT on E-Commerce and EEA legislation
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA 30 November 2000 Brussels JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE REPORT on E-Commerce and EEA legislation Co-rapporteurs: Ms. Marjo Matikainen-Kallstöm (EPP-ED, Finland) Mr. Vilhjálmur Egilsson
Option Table - Directive on Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts
Option Table - Directive on Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidated Accounts The purpose of this document is to highlight the changes in the options available to Member States and Competent Authorities
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE DATA RETENTION (EC DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS 2007. 2007 No. 2199
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE DATA RETENTION (EC DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS 2007 2007 No. 2199 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Home Office and is laid before Parliament by Command of
