FCC s Amendments to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA )
|
|
|
- Samantha Fitzgerald
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 { ;v1}{ ;v7}{ ;v6} FCC s Amendments to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) Mitchell N. Roth, Esquire Roth Doner Jackson, PLC 8200 Greensboro Drive, Suite 820 McLean, Virginia Phone: (703) Fax: (703) [email protected] Earlier this year, the Federal Communications Commission finalized amendments to its regulations implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Once fully effective, these amendments will further restrict the manner in which forprofit schools can initiate recruitment calls to the cell phones of past, current, and prospective students using both live operators and prerecorded messages, transmitting prerecorded recruitment messages to landlines, and provide further limitations on the practice of abandoning outbound calls. For-profit schools and marketing partners that do not implement new internal practices to ensure compliance with these amended regulations could be exposed to governmental fines and class action lawsuits. Although the ability of schools to initiate recruitment calls to cell phones has been restricted since 1991, the FCC cited mounting evidence of continued consumer frustration with unwanted calls to cell phones as the impetus in finalizing many of these amendments. Note that these new restrictions apply only to calls initiated with automated telephone dialing systems which, for the most part, include any calls that are not dialed manually regardless of whether the call will be connected to a live operator or a prerecorded message will be transmitted. Schools should be aware that the definition of automated telephone dialing system includes dialing equipment which has the capacity to store numbers and dial them randomly or sequentially. This definition is so broad that it even applies to predictive dialers even those that will immediately connect calls to live telephone agents since they generally have such capacity as well as any other dialing equipment with this capacity regardless of whether the capacity is utilized. Therefore, schools and their
2 vendors will not be permitted to call phones using predictive dialers without the recipient s prior express written consent, regardless of whether the calls are made using VoIP or traditional telephone service.. Although calls that are truly dialed manually with no automation are not affected by these regulations, courts and the FCC have interpreted automated telephone dialing systems broadly to include dialing equipment where a telephone number is manually entered or otherwise dialed. Additionally, many schools use internal/external call centers to contact potential students who requested information via the Internet -- most of these call centers use automated telephone dialing systems and schools could be liable for the violations that these call centers commit. The new regulations also require for-profit schools and their lead generators to obtain specific consenting language from students to be able to call them on their cell phones. More particularly, it must be prior express written consent by which the potential student, in writing, has affirmatively consented in a clear manner to be contacted on his/her cell phone. The regulatory amendments do not affect nonprofit schools which continue to be governed by the existing regulations which require that they obtain prior express consent before calling a potential student s cell phone. For-profit schools that do not implement changes are at risk of enforcement actions and lawsuits since most prospective students only provide schools and lead generators with their cellular phone numbers and do not provide the requisite consent to be called. These amendments significantly affect the marketing and recruitment practices of for-profit schools and their lead generators, as well as their compliance obligations. Below is a summary of the new requirements: { ;v1}{ ;v7}{ ;v6} Calls to Cell Phones Recruiting Calls to Cell Phones with a Live Agent or Pre-Recorded Message: The new regulations require that by October 16, 2013, schools must have prior express written consent of past, current and prospective students to initiate recruitment calls to their cell phones. This is different from the current standard which only requires prior express consent which may be oral or even implied when the student provides a cell phone number to a school as a point of contact. When a prerecorded message is transmitted, the messaging platform must contain an automated feature that permits the student to interrupt the message by voice or key-press and
3 automatically be placed on the school s internal do-not-call list. This latter requirement goes into effect on January 14, Non-Recruiting Calls to Cell Phones with a Live Agent or Pre-Recorded Message: The new regulations do not affect these calls. Instead, the current standards apply which require schools to have the prior express consent of past, current and prospective students for non-recruitment calls to cell phones. Calls to Residential Landlines Recruiting Calls to Residential Landlines with a Live Agent: The new regulations do not restrict recruitment calls to residential numbers when a live agent will be used (note that do-not-call restrictions apply). Non-Recruiting Calls to Residential Landlines with a Live Agent: The regulations do not restrict these calls. Recruiting Calls to Residential Landlines with Pre-Recorded Messages: The new regulations require that by October 16, 2013, schools must have prior express written consent of past, current and prospective students to initiate prerecorded recruitment calls to their landlines. Although these calls have been restricted since 1991, the new regulations eliminate the exception which permits the transmission of prerecorded recruitment calls to many past and present students as well as those students who inquired into the school s programs. The messaging platform must contain an automated feature that permits the student to interrupt the message by voice or key-press and automatically be placed on the school s internal do-not-call list. Non-Recruiting Calls to Home Telephone Lines with Pre-recorded Messages: The regulations do not restrict these calls. Call Abandonment A call is considered abandoned if it is not connected to a live agent within two seconds of the completion of the called party s greeting. This subject arises when schools or their vendors initiate calls using predictive dialers. The FCC s amended
4 regulations implement new restrictions on abandoned calls. { ;v1}{ ;v7}{ ;v6} Call Abandonment Calculation: Schools may not abandon more than 3% of outbound recruiting calls, measured per 30 days per campaign. The term campaign is now defined as the sale of the same service (i.e. educational program) for the same school. This modification went into effect on November 15, Abandoned Call Recording: When a call is abandoned, the school or its vendor must transmit a non-solicitous message that identifies the school, provides a telephone number, and indicates that the call was initiated for telemarketing purposes. The messaging platform must contain an automated feature that permits the student to interrupt the message by voice or key-press and automatically be placed on the school s internal do-not-call list. This requirement went into effect on January 14, What Do these Amendments Mean for You? Effective immediately, calculate abandoned call percentages on a per day, per campaign basis. No later than January 14, 2013, when a recruiting call is abandoned, the abandoned call message must contain an automated feature that permits the student to interrupt the message by voice or key-press and automatically be placed on the school s internal do-not-call list. Between now and October 16, 2013, formulate and implement strategies to obtain prior express written consent from former, current and prospective students to initiate recruiting calls to their cell phones. Between now and October 16, 2013, formulate and implement strategies to obtain prior express written consent from former, current and prospective students to transmit prerecorded recruiting calls to their landlines.. Cease all recruiting calls to cell phones without prior express written consent no later than October 16, Cease all prerecorded recruiting calls to landlines without prior express written consent no later than October 16, 2013.
5 What Requirements are Unaffected by these Amendments? Must have prior express consent from former, current and prospective students to initiate non-recruiting calls to their cell phones. Must comply with all applicable do-not-call laws for recruiting calls. Mitchell N. Roth, Esquire Roth Doner Jackson, PLC 8200 Greensboro Drive, Suite 820 McLean, Virginia Phone: (703) Fax: (703)
On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA
Ifrah Law Whitepaper On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA IfrahLaw Hands-on Counsel, Gloves-off Litigation PREPARED BY: Rachel Hirsch 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Suite
How To Get A Phone Call From A Telemarketing Company
CLIENT MEMORANDUM From: West Corporation Re: New Federal Communication Commission Rule for Autodialed and Prerecorded Message Telemarketing Calls and Abandoned Call Provisions Date: February 17, 2012 Federal
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company About AnswerNet AnswerNet is the largest privately held telemessaging company in the world and a fullservice provider
DISCLAIMER. Two important things to note: Thanks for your Cooperation!
DISCLAIMER Two important things to note: The materials in this Presentation are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. These materials are intended, but not promised
Consent to Call? Internet Leads and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Whitepaper
Consent to Call? Internet Leads and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Whitepaper Consent to Call? Internet Leads and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Introduction On October 16, 2013, new FCC
Telephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA)
Telephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA) Guideline for Aspect customers on the latest FCC Report and Order Serge Hyppolite, VP, Sales Development October 8, 2013 Disclaimer The purpose of this document
Can I Text My Customer? Recent FCC Rulings Under the TCPA. Jonathan Thessin, Senior Counsel American Bankers Association
Can I Text My Customer? Recent FCC Rulings Under the TCPA Jonathan Thessin, Senior Counsel American Bankers Association aba.com 1-800-BANKERS Background The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) CITATION AND ORDER PRERECORDED MESSAGE VIOLATIONS
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Dialing Services, LLC File No.: EB-TCD-12-00001812 CITATION AND ORDER PRERECORDED MESSAGE VIOLATIONS Adopted: March 15,
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. You may address any questions to [email protected]
October 11, 2013 Thank you again for being a valued Vocalcom customer. We are pleased to provide this letter to discuss changes in the Federal Communications Commission s (FCC s) Telephone Consumer Protection
Wrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation
Wrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation Yaron Dori Covington & Burling LLP Nancy Thomas Morrison & Foerster LLP Julie O Neill Morrison & Foerster LLP International Association of Privacy
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act Recent Developments in Litigation, Regulation and Insurance Coverage June 13, 2013 Presenters Henry Pietrkowski Partner Chicago +1 312 207 3904 [email protected]
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Request of ACA International for Clarification
Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits
Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) was enacted in 1991 and codified in Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934. The FCC adopted updated
Recent Developments in TCPA Litigation. April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman
Recent Developments in TCPA Litigation April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman Why Pay Attention To The TCPA? 2 TCPA Arithmetic: Banks More Debtors + More Cell Phones + $500-$1500 Statutory
The Telephone Consumer Protection (TCPA): Consumer Protection Controlled Business Mayhem
The Telephone Consumer Protection (TCPA): Consumer Protection Controlled Business Mayhem The Telephone Consumer Protection Act is surrounded by a plethora of fear, loathing, confusion and a seemingly never
FCC PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CLARITY ABOUT RULES UNDER THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
August 3, 2015 FCC PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CLARITY ABOUT RULES UNDER THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT The Issue: On July 10, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released an order addressing a
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Guide for Contact Centers
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Guide for Contact Centers September 2013 Sponsored By: - 1 - DMG Consulting LLC 2013 DMG Consulting LLC. All rights reserved. This Report is protected by United
TCPA. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR 64.1200. Jackson Lewis P.C. www.jacksonlewis.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR 64.1200 TCPA www.jacksonlewis.com ABOUT JACKSON LEWIS Founded in 1958, Jackson Lewis is dedicated to representing
Do-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules
Do-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules The Pennsylvania Telemarketer Registration Act, ( Pennsylvania Act ), as amended, applies to telephone solicitation and marketing activities performed by
13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act."
13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act." Enacted by Chapter 26, 1996 General Session 13-25a-102. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Advertisement"
Federal Regulations on Advertising:
Federal Regulations on Advertising: Phone, Fax, or E-mail By Jordan B. Hansell 700 Walnut, Suite 1600 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Telephone: 515-283-8166 Facsimile: 515-283-8018 [email protected] Disclaimer
Best practices for improving consumer data quality
Best practices for improving consumer data quality Experian and the marks used herein are service marks or registered trademarks of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Other product and company names
Case 1:14-cv-10006-WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 114-cv-10006-WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Anthony Clark, v. Plaintiff, Living Scriptures, Inc.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
NCHER Winter Legal Meeting TCPA Litigation Update. Robert G. Cameron [email protected]
NCHER Winter Legal Meeting TCPA Litigation Update Robert G. Cameron [email protected] Overall Litigation Trend Do not do indirectly what is prohibited directly. Consumer protection statutes are being
White Paper. FTC TCPA Regulation Revisions Calling Wireless Devices after Written Prior Express Consent is Required
White Paper FTC TCPA Regulation Revisions Calling Wireless Devices after Written Prior Express Consent is Required Mick Bennett VP, Corporate Compliance 135 Chestnut Ridge Road Montvale, NJ 07645 Phone
Telemarketing, E-mail, and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits
Telemarketing, E-mail, and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits LeadsCouncil December 11, 2012 2 pm 3 pm ET Webinar Ari N. Rothman, Esq., Co-Presenter Molly T. Cusson, Esq., Co-Presenter Jonathan
MEMORANDUM. Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages
MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 2008 RE: Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages The following sets forth the individual state and federal requirements regarding express consent for the
Suggested National Do-Not-Call Registry Policy
Purpose: The federal regulations issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulate telephone solicitation activities performed by REALTORS. The State and Federal laws apply to all telephones,
FEDERAL TELEMARKETING AND OUTBOUND CALLING COMPLIANCE GUIDE. October 2013
FEDERAL TELEMARKETING AND OUTBOUND CALLING COMPLIANCE GUIDE October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 3 II. TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT REQUIREMENTS... 4 III. TELEMARKETING SALES RULE REQUIREMENTS...
The Ninth Circuit Holds That Text Messages Are Subject to a Telemarketing Law
The Ninth Circuit Holds That Text Messages Are Subject to a Telemarketing Law By Gonzalo E. Mon Gonzalo E. Mon is an attorney in Kelley Drye & Warren s advertising and marketing law practice. He can be
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015 November 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner Overview Overview of the TCPA Recent Developments Issues to Watch What You
About Talkdesk. // Everything you need to know about do not call lists
About Talkdesk Talkdesk is easy-to-use, cloud-based call center software that helps growing businesses provide excellent customer service with phone support. Talkdesk makes it possible to have real time,
Glossary of Click-to-Call Terms. Definitions and descriptions of the terms used in the Click-to-Call industry.
Glossary of Click-to-Call Terms Definitions and descriptions of the terms used in the Click-to-Call industry. Abandoned Call - A call that is ended before any conversation is able to occur. Most inbound
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE TEXT MESSAGING YOUR CUSTOMERS. Business Considerations for Implementing Mobile Communications
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE TEXT MESSAGING YOUR CUSTOMERS Business Considerations for Implementing Mobile Communications S mall, medium, and enterprise business entities are all using SMS to improve workflow
Ready, Set, Text! Best Practices for. Texting Compliantly. Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Riverwalk South
Ready, Set, Text! Best Practices for Texting Compliantly Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Riverwalk South John F. Possumato, Esq Automotive Mobile Solutions LLC [email protected] Call or Text 856 577 2763 Text
Email and Text Message Campaigns. Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup
2012 Email and Text Message Campaigns Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup What s the Risk? Effective and active marketing area This makes it a target for litigation and enforcement action Consumer
Biennial Report to Congress
Biennial Report to Congress Under the Do Not Call Registry Fee Extension Act of 2007 FY 2014 and 2015 Federal Trade Commission December 2015 I. Report Overview Do-Not-Call Registry Fee Extension Act of
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Rules and Regulations Implementing the ) CG Docket No. 02-278 Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) ) REPLY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) [email protected] ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) [email protected] KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) [email protected]
ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE APPLICATION COLLECTION AGENTS ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE APPLICATION COLLECTION AGENTS ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 1. Applicant Name: Address: 2. a. What type(s) of collections are handled? b. What is the average dollar value of each
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) Rules and Regulations Implementing ) CG Docket No. 02-278 the Telephone Consumer Protection ) Act of 1991 ) Comments
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Plaintiff 2:14-cv-2081-RMG. Case No. vs. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
2:14-cv-02081-RMG Date Filed 05/29/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARK FITZHENRY, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: February 15, 2012 Released: February 15, 2012
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) ) ) ) CG Docket No. 02-278 REPORT
2nd Annual Venable Advertising Law Symposium. Minding Your TCPAs. Ellen Traupman Berge, Venable LLP. 2015 Venable LLP
2nd Annual Venable Advertising Law Symposium Minding Your TCPAs Ellen Traupman Berge, Venable LLP Agenda TCPA Overview Focus on Calls/Texts to Cell Phones Non-Marketing Calls: The Prior Express Consent
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on
Calling All Cell Phones With Express Permission. June 24 th, 2014
Calling All Cell Phones With Express Permission June 24 th, 2014 Kenlyn T. Gretz President and CEO of Law360, New York (May07, 2014, 8:55PM ET Tenet Healthcare Corp. and its debt collection subsidiary
Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9
Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf
Case: 1:16-cv-02787 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02787 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CARY WOLOVICK, individually and on behalf
(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity
Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. 227 SEC. 227. [47 U.S.C. 227] RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT (a) DEFINITIONS. As used in this section (1) The term automatic telephone dialing
Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document34 Filed07/28/11 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 Sean Reis (SBN 00 [email protected] EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 00 Tomas Street, Suite 00 Rancho Santa Margarita, California Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Michael
Authenticated Caller ID Plus Regulatory Changes
Authenticated Caller ID Plus Regulatory Changes By Vincent A. Lucas, Ph.D. Presented to the FTC Robocall Challenge This paper provides solutions to two problems faced in the enforcement of the Telephone
Telephone Consumer Protection Act - Current Issues
Recent Developments and New Challenges Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act COHEAO Mid-Year Conference Mark W. Brennan July 29, 2013 Overview Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Choose your Price per Seat (no contract): $79 per month Pay $237 for 3 months Save $30 quarterly
Make More Money in Less Time Move Instantly from Call to Call! Choose your Price per Seat (no contract): $89 per month Pay month to month Truly Unlimited Calls to USA & Canada from virtually anywhere in
Cell Manager Solution
RADIUS SOLUTIONS, INC. Cell Manager Solution TCPA Compliance Project Mark S. Love and Wade Kapsak 9/1/2011 9550 Regency Square Boulevard, Suite 500, Jacksonville, Florida 32225 (800) 577-2869 www.radiusarm.com
Update on TCPA Requirements for Text Messages and Best Practices
Update on TCPA Requirements for Text Messages and Best Practices ESPC Annual Meeting September 9, 2015 Heather Zachary Agenda Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Past TCPA Orders by the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION PAUL BARRETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. : CLASS ACTION
Case: 1:10-cv-02697 Document #: 65 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:659
Case: 1:10-cv-02697 Document #: 65 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:659 10-2697.111-RSK August 16, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROSLYN
Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GARY HANLEY on behalf of himself and
2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22
2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION LINDA KENZIK, individually and on behalf of others
Case 1:13-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 113-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Robert Pegg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Collecto,
Predictive Dialer. and most important of all to control costs( one way to do this is to employ fewer live agents to handle routine calls)
Predictive Dialer Introduction Ever thought how a call center functions? How it handles so many outbound calls and incoming calls? Call centers of business companies, like mail order catalogue firms, customer
MEMORANDUM. Re: Federal and State Restrictions on the Delivery of Recorded Messages
MEMORANDUM Date: October 29, 2008 Re: Federal and State Restrictions on the Delivery of Recorded Messages The following requirements are imposed on the delivery of recorded messages by automated dialing
Instructions for Application for a Texas Permit to Operate an Automatic Dial Announcing Device (ADAD)
Permit Required Pursuant to PUC SUBSTANTIVE RULE 26.125 Instructions for Application for a Texas Permit to Operate an Automatic Dial Announcing Device (ADAD) General Instructions A person may not use an
CASL Compliance: A Primer on Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation. Whitepaper by David O. Klein, Esq.
CASL Compliance: A Primer on Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation Whitepaper by David O. Klein, Esq. Part 1 Will Your Marketing Campaign Be the Target of a Class Action Lawsuit or Regulatory Investigation for
Health Care Entities Get Clarity from FCC on Telephone Communications
10 August 2015 Practice Group(s): Health Care Telecom, Media and Technology Health Care Entities Get Clarity from FCC on Telephone Communications By Martin L. Stern, Samuel R. Castic, Ryan J. Severson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant.
CASE 0:14-cv-00062-PAM-JSM Document 26 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Caleb Trainor and Isaac Trainor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
HIPAA and TCPA Intersection: Navigating Healthcare Call Exemption, Landline/Cell Phone Distinction, Scope of Consent
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A HIPAA and TCPA Intersection: Navigating Healthcare Call Exemption, Landline/Cell Phone Distinction, Scope of Consent THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2015
Case 4:14-cv-00248-A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Case 414-cv-00248-A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Katrina Hilliard, v. Plaintiff, GTC Auto Sales, Inc. d/b/a
