BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
|
- Susanna Roberts
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 0 WILLIAM A. MUNDELL Chairman JIM IRVIN Commissioner MARC SPITZER Commissioner In the matter of: BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION SCOTTSDALE FINANCIAL FUNDING GROUP, LLC 000 North Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, AZ MARTIN & GRIFFIN, LLC 000 North Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, AZ GREGORY B. GILL aka GREGORY P. GILL, 0 N. th St. # Scottsdale, AZ HAYDEN KEITH HOLLAND E. Montecito Phoenix, AZ 0- TAD L. ULRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC North th Place Scottsdale, AZ 0 TAD LYN ULRICH North th Place Scottsdale, AZ 0 SENIOR ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC 0 Kimdale Street Lehigh Acres, Florida WALLACE BUTTERWORTH East Orangewood Avenue # Phoenix, AZ 00 NOTICE: Respondents. DOCKET NO. S-0A NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST, ORDER FOR RESTITUTION, ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES, AND FOR OTHER AFFIRMATIVE ACTION RESPONDENTS HAVE DAYS TO REQUEST A HEARING
2 Docket No. S-0A The Securities Division ( Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission ( Commission alleges that respondents have engaged in acts, practices and transactions, which constitute violations of the Securities Act of Arizona, A.R.S. -0 et seq., ( Securities Act. I. JURISDICTION. The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Article XV of the Arizona Constitution and the Securities Act. II. RESPONDENTS. SCOTTSDALE FINANCIAL FUNDING GROUP, LLC ( SFF is an Arizona limited liability company organized on December,, and was doing business in Arizona at all pertinent times. Its last known address is 000 North Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, Arizona. It was formerly located at E. Shoeman Lane, Suite, Scottsdale, Arizona.. MARTIN & GRIFFIN, LLC ( M&G is an Arizona limited liability company organized on August,, and was doing business in Arizona at all pertinent times. Its last known address is 000 North Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, Arizona. It was formerly located at E. Shoeman Lane, Suite, Scottsdale, Arizona.. GREGORY B. GILL aka GREGORY P. GILL ( GILL is an individual whose last known address is 0 N. th St. #, Scottsdale, Arizona. GILL was a principal, owner, officer, director, or shareholder of SFF and M&G at all pertinent times, and a purported principal, owner, officer, director, or shareholder of Credit Investors, LLCs. On July 0,, a federal grand jury indicted GILL and another co-founder of a company in Newport Beach, California called First Capital Corporation, alleging various instances of mail and wire fraud. A jury convicted GILL on one count of conspiracy and two counts of wire fraud relating to charges of preparing a phony financial statement and guaranty used to defraud investors. GILL was sentenced to five years imprisonment, five years probation, and an order to pay $,00 in restitution. GILL appealed the conviction, and the
3 Docket No. S-0A judgment was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Opinion No. -, United States of America v. Gregory B. Gill, decided on August,.. HAYDEN KEITH HOLLAND ( HOLLAND is an individual whose last known address is E. Montecito, Phoenix, Arizona 0-. At all pertinent times, HOLLAND was a principal, owner, officer, director, or shareholder of SFF and M&G, and a purported principal, owner, officer, director, or shareholder of Credit Investors, LLCs.. TAD L. ULRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC is an Arizona limited liability company organized on March,. It is and was at all pertinent times located at N. th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona, 0.. TAD LYN ULRICH ( TAD ULRICH is an individual whose last known address is N. th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona, 0. TAD ULRICH was at all pertinent times managing member of TAD L. ULRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC. TAD ULRICH and TAD L. ULRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC may be collectively referred to as ULRICH. At all pertinent times, ULRICH was a sales agent for M&G and/or SFF. ULRICH is a licensed insurance salesman in Arizona.. SENIOR ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC ( SAS is a limited liability company organized in the State of Florida on May,. Its principal office was identified in corporate filings as 0 Kimdale Street, Lehigh Acres, Florida. WALLACE BUTTERWORTH ( BUTTERWORTH was identified as a managing member. BUTTERWORTH and Roger Lancette applied as owners to use SAS as a trade name in Arizona on or about July,. SAS s last known location in Arizona was E. Orangewood Ave. #, Phoenix, Arizona 00.. BUTTERWORTH is an individual whose last known address is E. Orangewood Ave. #, Phoenix, Arizona 00. During the pertinent time period, BUTTERWORTH was registered as a securities salesman in Arizona. On October 0, 00, BUTTERWORTH consented to Decision No., ordering, inter alia, revocation of his securities salesman registration for alleged violations of the Securities Act involving the offer and sale of investments that are not the subject of this proceeding. According to the consent order, one of the grounds for BUTTERWORTH s revocation
4 Docket No. S-0A was that he allegedly engaged in dishonest or unethical practices within the meaning of A.R.S. - (A( as defined by A.A.C. R--0(A(, by effecting securities transactions that were not recorded on the records of the dealer with whom he was registered at the time of the transactions from August to December. SAS and BUTTERWORTH may be collectively referred to as BUTTERWORTH. At all pertinent times, BUTTERWORTH was a sales agent for M&G and/or SFF. BUTTERWORTH is a licensed insurance salesman in Arizona.. The respondents may be collectively referred to as RESPONDENTS. III. FACTS. Beginning in or around, RESPONDENTS solicited investors in two or more investment programs, in which investors were told that they would receive profits from the management efforts of others.. RESPONDENTS solicited private investors through public media advertisements and publicly advertised investment seminars primarily targeted to retired persons and senior citizens, within or from Arizona.. RESPONDENTS distributed written materials to investors representing that SFF is a finance company that specializes in analyzing and acquiring select investment alternatives for the discriminating investor demanding better than average returns without taking undue risk. SFF promises to provide investors with alternatives to the traditional market place, with returns that are competitive with stocks and bonds, and that will allow them to diversify their portfolio so that they are not dependent on the volatility that usually accompanies the traditional market place. Investors are assured that only quality investments will be made available for their benefit, and that SFF is committed to provide them profitable investment alternatives, minimize risk, and provide high growth yield.. Beginning around December through at least November 00, RESPONDENTS solicited passive investments in a program involving the sale of membership interests in a series of companies called Credit Investors, LLCs, RESPONDENTS distributed marketing materials to
5 Docket No. S-0A investors describing this investment program as a Purchase of Non-Performing and Consumer Debt, with management services to be provided by SFF.. Beginning around June through at least December 00, RESPONDENTS solicited passive investments in another program involving factored receivables allegedly purchased from a Phoenix-based company, American Business Funding Group, Inc. ( ABF. RESPONDENTS 0 distributed marketing materials that represented that ABF s professional credit management team with over 0 years of experience would perform all credit, accounting and other technical and servicing functions, and that ABF proposed to expand its business by selling commercial accounts receivable to various independent third-party buyers. For this servicing and marketing function, ABF will receive a fee comprised of a portion of the gross fees earned by the buyer. Marketing materials referred to this program as Factoring and Accounts Receivable Management (the M&G factoring program. M&G was to purchase the accounts receivable, and the investors were to share in the profits of those investments.. Since around, ULRICH placed monthly ads in the Senior World monthly newspaper promising CD Alternatives earning up to.%. When prospective investors called ULRICH about CD investments in response to his ad, ULRICH placed them in SFF s and/or M&G s investment programs.. Since around, BUTTERWORTH placed ads in the Arizona Republic newspaper offering free information workshops for seniors; BUTTERWORTH held an average of one to two workshops per month in churches, clubs and various retirement communities in Arizona, including Sun City, Sun Lakes, Coyote Lakes, and Mesa. After obtaining leads from these publicly advertised workshops, BUTTERWORTH scheduled meetings with individual investors in the investors homes, and solicited them to invest in the SFF and/or M&G investment programs.. Some offerees and investors in the SFF investment programs are unsophisticated and inexperienced in investments. As a result of the solicitations, some investors believed that they were investing in certificates of deposit (CDs.
6 Docket No. S-0A Some investors were instructed to sign blank signature pages at the time of their investments; they were given only promotional materials and receipts or IRA custodial applications. Purchase of Non-Performing and Consumer Debt Program 0. Investor contracts for the Purchase of Non-Performing and Consumer Debt program include an Operating Agreement whereby the investor is to become a member of a limited liability company called Credit Investors, LLCs, and a Member Representation Agreement. The Operating Agreement represents that the nature of the business and of the purposes to be conducted and promoted by the Company shall be to engage the acquisition, collection and disposition of nonperforming receivables. Salesmen describe the investment as involving non-collected consumer credit card-type paper.. RESPONDENTS represented to investors in written promotional materials that their investments in the Purchase of Non-Performing and Consumer Debt program involve certain risks but that SFF has taken steps to reduce the risks to investors. SFF represents that those steps include a strategic partnership between SFF and Intervention & Recovery Specialist Corp. (IRSC, a collections company that purportedly engages in the management and collection of consumer and commercial paper for profit. SFF represents that IRSC has been successfully collecting on non-performing commercial and consumer debt for over years. SFF further represents that because IRSC scrutinizes the debt first hand, we know exactly what we are purchasing, thereby minimizing the risk to our investors. RESPONDENTS do not disclose the address or telephone number for IRSC or the identity of any of its principals, or its financial condition. IRSC has made no filing with the Arizona Corporation Commission for authorization to operate in Arizona as a domestic or foreign corporation.. Credit Investors, LLCs have made no filings with the Arizona Corporation Commission for authorization to operate in Arizona as limited liability companies.. Approximately 0 investors, most of them Arizona residents, have invested approximately $,00, in SFF s Non-Performing and Consumer Debt Credit Investors, LLC program.
7 Docket No. S-0A At the time of the filing of this Notice, investors have not received any distributions since October 00. Factoring and Accounts Receivable Management Program. SFF promoted its Commercial Factoring investment program as a business opportunity in which a participant can project returns of %+ per annum in a fully secured AND INSURED environment and Returns with safety a promise from Scottsdale Financial Funding Group, LLC.. Respondents told investors that ABF and third parties manage and monitor the investment and do everything to service the investors; that SFF and M&G and their principals have a procuring agreement with ABF and perhaps other suppliers of factored paper, under which SFF and/or M&G own the receivables and that investors will share the profits from administration of the factored paper; that investors can get a distribution quarterly or reinvest the dividends, accrued quarterly, for a one-year, two-year, or three-year term; that at the end of the investment term, investors will get a return of their investment capital plus interest if any has accrued, or they have an opportunity to reinvest if they choose.. The amount of the interest or profit varies in accordance with the amount invested and the term of the investment. Although marketing materials represent the minimum investment as $0,000, investments of $,000 have been accepted in the program RESPONDENTS gave investors promotional materials that described the commercial factoring program as a Factoring and Accounts Receivable Management program. Investor contracts included an Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement and a Purchaser Representation Agreement.. The Purchaser Representation Agreement represents that M&G is in the business of acquiring the receivables from Clients, and describes a sharing of interests in the receivables as follows: M&G agrees to sell and assign to Purchaser all of its rights, title, and interest in and to each
8 Docket No. S-0A Receivable or pro rata portion thereof that Purchaser agrees to purchase. M&G shall not be obligated to sell any specific Receivables to Purchaser and nothing provided herein shall be construed to obligate M&G to provide any minimum or maximum amount of Receivables for sale to Purchaser. 0. The Purchaser Representation Agreement represents that the profits to be obtained by the investor are dependent on the efforts and expertise of third parties: Since one of the most critical aspects of the Factoring business is proper due diligence with respect to the Clients, the Account Debtors, and monitoring of payments, the role of the servicers of these activities will be important in determining whether Purchasers receive a return of, or any return on, their investment.... [T]hird parties will provide these services.. The Purchaser Representation Agreement provides that profits to investors ( Purchasers will be paid from fees paid to M&G and other third parties: Clients will receive a discounted purchase price for Receivables they sell directly or indirectly to M&G. Upon payment of the Receivables by the Account Debtor, the Client will receive its remaining funds. Until such repayment, these Clients will pay monthly fees to M&G and the servicers of the Receivables, Purchasers will receive a portion of those fees. This compensation may vary depending upon the amount invested by Purchasers and the terms of their investment.. Investors were given no disclosure documents relating to the financial condition of SFF or M&G, or their principals.. Investors were provided no background or financial information concerning any of the third parties or principals of these third parties who will purportedly provide the services that would produce a profit for investors.. Investors were provided no background or financial information concerning any companies whose receivables SFF and/or M&G were allegedly buying or selling.. The contracts include statements that the investors are all accredited, as that term is defined under securities laws. RESPONDENTS directed unaccredited investors to sign the documents.
9 Docket No. S-0A SFF represented in written promotional materials provided to investors prior to their investments that SFF receivables, in most cases, are insured to their full-face amount by insurance provided by nationally-known insurance companies and that debtors are financially sound. However, contrary to the representations contained in the promotional materials, the Purchaser Representation Agreements state: Certain of the Receivables purchased from M&G are or will be insured to a limited extent by certain insurance policies. However, not all of the Receivables will be covered by insurance, and thus no Purchaser should acquire Receivables in reliance on insurance.. Investors were given no specific information concerning the alleged insurance.. Investors were given no background or financial information concerning the debtors who were allegedly obligated to pay the receivables.. SFF promotional materials provided to investors through sales agents prior to their investments represent that You are secured by an assignment of our security to you plus we pass title to the purchased invoices to your entity. SFF manages the entire process on your behalf. However, contrary to these representations, there is no provision in the investor contracts for assigning security or passing title to purchased invoices to the investor, or for providing any security for the investments. 0. Investors funds were paid to M&G. Although the records of ABF reflect some investment by M&G, there is no record on the books of ABF reflecting any investment by or on behalf of any of M&G s investors.. On February, 000, ABF filed a petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona, for protection under Chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code.. Sometime prior to December, according to ABF s bankruptcy filings, ABF allegedly discovered that its controlling principal, Angelo Tullo, had been engaging in fraudulent activities including forging signatures to create phony receivables and companies; destroying documents and altering bank statements, client statements, buyer accounts, and other records; and misappropriating ABF investor funds to support his lavish lifestyle and to further his ponzi scheme. As a result of the alleged fraudulent activities of former management, ABF estimated that investors lost about $ million.
10 Docket No. S-0A After ABF filed for bankruptcy protection, RESPONDENTS continued to offer and sell the M&G factoring program to investors without disclosing any of the background or financial information about ABF, or its bankruptcy.. Individual private investors solicited by RESPONDENTS, whose funds were used to invest in ABF, were not identified as creditors in the ABF bankruptcy.. After February 000, ABF was reorganized under new management and continued operations as New Horizon Capital, Inc. ( New Horizon. New Horizon solicited no new private investors.. Although RESPONDENTS continued to solicit new investors and new funds after ABF s bankruptcy, SFF and M&G invested no new funds in New Horizon and purchased no receivable paper from New Horizon or ABF since February Approximately investors, most of them Arizona residents, have invested approximately $,,00 in M&G s Factoring and Accounts Receivable Management program.. At the time of the filing of this Notice, investors have not received any distributions since October 00. IV. VIOLATION OF A.R.S. - (Offer or Sale of Unregistered Securities. From or, RESPONDENTS offered or sold securities in the form of investment contracts, notes, evidences of indebtedness, and/or certificates of interest in profit-sharing agreements within or from Arizona. 0. The securities referred to above were not registered pursuant to Articles or of the Securities Act.. This conduct violates A.R.S. -. V. VIOLATION OF A.R.S. -
11 Docket No. S-0A (Transactions by Unregistered Dealers or Salesmen. RESPONDENTS offered or sold securities within or from Arizona while not registered as dealers or salesmen pursuant to Article of the Securities Act.. This conduct violates A.R.S. -. VI. VIOLATION OF A.R.S. - (Fraud in Connection with the Offer or Sale of Securities. In connection with the offer or sale of securities within or from Arizona, RESPONDENTS directly or indirectly: (i employed a device, scheme or artifice to defraud; (ii made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts which were necessary in order to make the statements made not misleading in light of the circumstances under which they were made; and/or (iii engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon offerees and investors. RESPONDENTS' conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following: a Misrepresenting and/or failing to disclose the nature of the investment; b Misrepresenting the safety of the investment and/or minimizing the risks; c Failing to provide investors with disclosure statements, prospectuses or financial statements including but not limited to past operations, balance sheets, statements of income, retained earnings, cash flows and uses of proceeds that would reflect the financial position of these entities; d Failing to disclose financial and background information about third parties that are supposed to provide management services and technical expertise necessary to produce profits for the investors; e Failing to disclose the identities, the principals, or the financial condition of the clients from whom the receivables were purchased or the debtors that are obligated to pay the receivables;
12 Docket No. S-0A f Misrepresenting or failing to fully disclose the use of investors funds; g Misrepresenting that Credit Investors, LLCs were limited liability companies or failing to disclose that Credit Investors, LLCs were not authorized to do business as limited liability companies in Arizona; h Failing to disclose that IRSC, the company responsible for providing management services and producing a profit for investors in the Credit Investors, LLCs, is not authorized to conduct business as a domestic or foreign corporation in Arizona. i Failing to disclose, after February, 000, that ABF filed a petition for bankruptcy protection under Chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code; j Failing to disclose, after February 000, the alleged fraudulent conduct of the former controlling principal of ABF that resulted in the alleged loss of approximately $ million of investor funds; k Misrepresenting after February 000 that M&G was using investor funds to purchase factoring paper from ABF; l Misrepresenting that all the investors are accredited, as that term is defined under the securities laws; and m Failing to disclose GILL s prior felony conviction for fraud involving misrepresentations in soliciting an investment and misuse of investor funds.. This conduct violates A.R.S. -.. RESPONDENT GILL directly or indirectly controlled M&G within the meaning of A.R.S. -. Therefore, RESPONDENT GILL is liable to the same extent as M&G for their violations of A.R.S. -.. RESPONDENT GILL directly or indirectly controlled SFF within the meaning of A.R.S. -. Therefore, RESPONDENT GILL is liable to the same extent as SFF for their violations of A.R.S. -.
13 Docket No. S-0A RESPONDENT HOLLAND directly or indirectly controlled M&G within the meaning of A.R.S. -. Therefore, RESPONDENT HOLLAND is liable to the same extent as M&G for their violations of A.R.S. -.. RESPONDENT HOLLAND directly or indirectly controlled SFF within the meaning of A.R.S. -. Therefore, RESPONDENT HOLLAND is liable to the same extent as SFF for their violations of A.R.S RESPONDENT TAD ULRICH directly or indirectly controlled TAD L. ULRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC within the meaning of A.R.S. -. Therefore, TAD ULRICH is liable to the same extent as TAD L. ULRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC for its violations of A.R.S. -.. RESPONDENT BUTTERWORTH directly or indirectly controlled SAS within the meaning of A.R.S. -. Therefore, BUTTERWORTH is liable to the same extent as SAS for its violations of A.R.S. -.. RESPONDENTS made, participated in or induced the sale of a security within the meaning of A.R.S. -00(A. Therefore, RESPONDENTS are liable for the above violations of A.R.S. -. XIII. REQUESTED RELIEF The Division requests that the Commission grant the following relief against RESPONDENTS:. Order RESPONDENTS to permanently cease and desist from violating the Securities Act, pursuant to A.R.S. -0;. Order RESPONDENTS to take affirmative action to correct the conditions resulting from their acts, practices or transactions, including a requirement to make restitution pursuant to A.R.S. -0;. Order RESPONDENTS to pay the state of Arizona administrative penalties of up to five thousand dollars ($,000 for each violation of the Securities Act, pursuant to A.R.S. -0; and
14 Docket No. S-0A Order any other relief that the Commission deems appropriate. XIV. HEARING OPPORTUNITY RESPONDENTS may request a hearing pursuant to A.R.S. - and A.A.C. R-- 0. A request must be in writing and received by the Commission within business days after service of this Notice of Opportunity for Hearing. Each RESPONDENT must deliver or mail the request to Docket Control, Arizona Corporation Commission, 00 W. Washington, Phoenix, Arizona 00. A Docket Control cover sheet must accompany the request. A cover sheet form and instructions may be obtained from Docket Control by calling (0 - or on the Commission's Internet web site at If a request for a hearing is timely made, the Commission shall schedule the hearing to begin 0 to 0 days from the receipt of the request unless otherwise provided by law, stipulated by the parties, or ordered by the Commission. If a request for a hearing is not timely made, the Commission may, without a hearing, enter an order against each RESPONDENT granting the relief requested by the Division in this Notice of Opportunity for Hearing. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation such as a sign language interpreter, as well as request this document in an alternative format, by contacting Shelly M. Hood, Executive Assistant to the Executive Secretary, voice phone number 0/-, [email protected]. Requests should be made as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation. Dated this day of, 00. Mark Sendrow
15 Docket No. S-0A Director of Securities 0
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. S-03424A-00-0000 THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION CARL J. KUNASEK Chairman JIM IRVIN Commissioner WILLIAM A. MUNDELL Commissioner In the matter of: GLOBAL HARVEST CORP. An Arizona corporation 00 N. Scottsdale
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORP. :;it1 A ~ G
I 0 0 BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORP COMMISSIONERS GARY PIERCE, Chairman BOB STUMP SANDRA D. KENNEDY PAUL NEWMAN BRENDA BURNS :;it A ~ G Aizona Corporation Comml! t A : 0 DOCKET [ [n the matter of: ) DOCKET NO.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * The Greatest Virtual Office, LLC, * and * Sandra Kay Johnson, a.k.a. * Sandra Johnson Adaralegbe, * Respondents,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Louis H. Rivas ) ) and ) File No. 08008 ) The FOREX Project, ) ) Respondents.
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION
STATE OF WASHINGTON SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: Sarah Rose Sorensen; Sigh of Relief, Life and Financial,
State of New Hampshire Banking Department ) ) ) ) ) Cease and Desist Order Department, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 08-228 NOTICE OF ORDER
1 State of New Hampshire Banking Department Case No.: 0- In re the Matter of: State of New Hampshire Banking Cease and Desist Order Department, Petitioner, and Magnum Cash Advance (d/b/a International
Case 2:13-cv-00753-DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00753-DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 Thomas M. Melton ( 4999) [email protected] Daniel J. Wadley (10358) [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities & Exchange Commission 15
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
Case 2:13-cv-14048-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2013 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 2:13-cv-14048-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2013 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. -Civ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * BES ENTERPRISES, LLC, * d.b.a. FRANKLIN FINANCIAL, a.k.a. FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, * a.k.a. FRANKLIN FINANCIAL
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT ORDER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * Cash Flow Capital, LLC * and * Brendan Gallagher, * Case No. 2012-0311 and * Elliott Clark, * Respondents, *
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * SOLID AD SOLUTIONS, LLC, * and * Case No. 2010-0376 CHRISTOPHER LEWALLEN, * Respondents. * * * * * * * * * *
CONSENT ORDER (As to Respondents North America Marketing, LLC and TM Multimedia Marketing, LLC)
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: North America Marketing and Associates, LLC, and Case No. 2010-0279 TM Multimedia Marketing, LLC, and Kimberly
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * MARK A. FULLER * CASE NO. 2008-0001 and * WEALTH MANAGEMENT AND * MARKETING LLC * Respondents. * * * * ORDER
Case 1:16-cv-00437-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00437-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. ANDREW K. PROCTOR, and
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST Ronald E. Satterfield, and Graham Street FOREX Group, LLC, File No. 09044 Respondents.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 2003-0264 VIATICAL CAPITAL, INC. and VIATICAL FUNDING, INC. and VIATICAL FUNDING, L.L.C.: ##01, 02, 03,
and Cease and Desist Order ( Order ), and makes the
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES P.O. Box 47029 Newark, New Jersey 07101 Telephone (973) 504-3600 IN THE MATTER OF: Alcibiades Cifuentes (CRD# 5738792), individually, and d/b/a Cifuentes Fund Management,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 8:15-cr-00244-SDM-AEP Document 3 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
ROBERT L. MITCHELL (Admitted in California) [email protected] LLOYD A. FARNHAM (Admitted in California) [email protected] HELANE L. MORRISON (Admitted in California) 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 San
SUMMARY ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * No. 2011-0128 BEATE M. BRANDL * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SUMMARY ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
FINAL ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * BES ENTERPRISES, LLC, * d.b.a. FRANKLIN FINANCIAL, a.k.a. FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, * a.k.a. FRANKLIN FINANCIAL
Receivership Entities (collectively, ANMP ) were comprised of 112 interrelated entities.
00 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 000 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 0 0 Michael Carmel, Esq. #00 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL W. CARMEL, LTD 0 East Columbus Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 0- (0) - e-mail [email protected] Attorney
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * MATTHEW A. KRIMM * Case No. 2015-0120 and * KRIMM FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC * and * ADAM DUSO * and * KAIROS CAPITAL
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION. Respondents STATEMENT OF CHARGES
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: David Lyn Lenihan; AllianceCapital
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 8750 / November 8, 2006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 54720 / November 8, 2006 INVESTMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Defendants.
Case 1:13-cv-01817-WSD Document 1 Filed 05/30/13 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND In the Matter of: * REDRHINO, INC., * a.k.a. REDRHINO: The Epoxy Flooring Company * MICHAEL KENEALY, and Case Number 2015-0382 *
How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho
ALAN G. LANCE ATIORNEY GENERAL STATE OF IDAHO MARY E. HUGHES Deputy Attorney General State of Idaho Department of Finance P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0031 Telephone: (208) 332-8092 Facsimile: (208)
STATE OF MAINE BUREAU OF BANKING SECURITIES DIVISION. SUMMARY ORDER TO Michael L. Hancock ALLEGATIONS, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
STATE OF MAINE BUREAU OF BANKING SECURITIES DIVISION In Re: SUMMARY ORDER TO Michael L. Hancock CEASE AND DESIST Case? 00-013 ALLEGATIONS, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Michael L. Hancock,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 9581 / May 1, 2014 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 72073 / May 1, 2014 INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 3828 / May 1, 2014 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT
Mike Watson Investments was purportedly formed to conduct real estate seminars. Its principal
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: Mike Watson Investments,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv-01151. Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv-01151 MICHAEL R. ENEA, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Securities
Nebraska Loan Broker Act Chapter 45, Article 1, Section f 45-189 to 45-193
45-189 Loan brokers; legislative findings. The Legislature finds that: Nebraska Loan Broker Act Chapter 45, Article 1, Section f 45-189 to 45-193 (1) Many professional groups are presently licensed or
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT ORDER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE MARYLAND SECURITIES COMMISSIONER IN THE MATTER OF: * ROBERT BRUCE SANDO, * File No. 2000-0140 Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSENT ORDER WHEREAS, the Maryland
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C. 1679 et. seq.
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C. 1679 et. seq. Please note that the information contained herein should not be construed as legal advice and is intended for informational purposes only. In addition,
Case 0:11-cv-60673-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2011 Page 1 of 13
Case 0:11-cv-60673-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2011 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ~ JAMES
Case 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Case
in the bankruptcy proceeding; and that on July 9, 2012, Johnson s bankruptcy proceeding was
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * The Greatest Virtual Office, LLC, * and * Sandra Kay Johnson, a.k.a. * Sandra Johnson Adaralegbe, * Respondents,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No. 10-75(JMR) The United States of America, by and through its attorneys,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No. 10-75(JMR) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) PLEA AGREEMENT ) TREVOR GILSON COOK, ) ) Defendant. ) The United States of America,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * FCE INVESTMENTS.COM, * FIRST CASH EXPRESS, INC. * (dba FIRSTCASHEXPRESS.com), * Securities Division No. 2007-0337
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: Joel L. Gillespie, Thomas G. Carls, Carls Financial Group, Bridgewater, Inc. Respondents. ORDER TO CEASE
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0000 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 James H. Holl, III,, CA Bar # [email protected] Thomas J. Kelly, pro hac vice pending [email protected] U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION st Street,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 10051 / March 8, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 77318 / March 8, 2016 INVESTMENT
TITLE III CROWDFUNDING
H. R. 3606 10 have any person associated with that person subject to such a statutory disqualification. (3) For the purposes of this subsection, the term ancillary services means (A) the provision of due
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
In the matter of: STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of the Office of Financial and Insurance Services Management
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND FINAL ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * * FAMILY TREE DIGITAL VIDEO CORP., * Case No. 2008-0350 and * ROBBIE DON FRITZER, * Respondents. * * * * * *
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Bart Sweazea Ray Valdez STATEMENT OF CHARGES
1 1 1 1 1 IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: Pangean Energy, LLC; Bart Sweazea; Ray Valdez, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 4:10-cv-00706 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/04/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff,
FORM MLOE-1. State of Maryland Office of the Attorney General Securities Division
FORM MLOE-1 State of Maryland Office of the Attorney General Securities Division NOTICE CLAIMING MARYLAND LIMITED OFFERING EXEMPTION (MLOE) Under The Maryland Securities Act Section 11-602(9) and Regulations
BEFORE THE ARIZONA Cb & %k
P? y. % a BEFORE THE ARZONA Cb & %k COMMSSON BOB STUMP SANDRA D. KENNEDY PAUL NEWMAN BRENDA BURNS ) DOCKET NO. S-A--0 n the matter of: ROGER D. WOODS, an individual, ) AMENDED TEMPORARY ORDER TO ) CEASE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * Dream Marketing and SEO, Inc. * and Case No. 2013-0331 * Michael Dies * Respondents. * * * * * * * * * * * *
PURSUANT TO GBL 684(1), EXEMPTION REQUEST FOR AN UNREGISTERED U.S
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL INVESTOR PROTECTION BUREAU 120 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10271 PHONE (212) 416-8236 WWW.AG.NY.GOV DIVISION OF ECONOMIC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA
ALAN G. LANCE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF IDAHO Scott B. Muir Deputy Attorney General State ofidaho Department of Finance P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ID83720-003 l Telephone: (208 332-8091 Facsimile: (208 332-8099
Case 2:15-cv-01429 Document 1 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 SEATTLE DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Case No. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT v. SUMMIT ASSET STRATEGIES
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION Registration of Crowdfunding Intermediary Application (Form FL-INT) Pursuant to Section 517.12, Florida Statutes GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS An intermediary of
Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures
Case 2:06-cv-00132-KJD-LRL Document 1 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 1 of 10 Louis V. Traeger California State Bar No. 38714 [email protected] William P. Janulis IL ARDC No. 1326449 Rosemary Hollinger IL ARDC No.
Miller Financial Services, LLC Advisory Services Agreement
Miller Financial Services, LLC Advisory Services Agreement This Agreement (the Agreement ) is made and entered into, by and between, Miller Financial Services, LLC (the Advisor ) and xx (the Client ),
Case 2:09-cv-01560-SRB Document 1 Filed 07/28/2009 Page 1 of 18
Case :0-cv-00-SRB Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 JOHN M. McCOY III (Cal. Bar No. ) Email: [email protected] DAVID S. BROWN (Cal. Bar No. ) Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange
Case 3:11-cv-01252-P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 3:11-cv-01252-P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
GENERAL AGENT AGREEMENT
Complete Wellness Solutions, Inc. 6338 Constitution Drive Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804 GENERAL AGENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is made by and between Complete Wellness Solutions, Inc. (the Company ) and (the
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT. Horizon Investments, LLC Lifetime Income Strategy
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT Horizon Investments, LLC Lifetime Income Strategy This agreement (the Agreement ) for investment management services is entered into by and between HORIZON INVESTMENTS, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GUY POTTER, JERONE BROWN, MATTHEW GIOVENCO, and CHERONNE MAYES aka Sherone
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * * Ralph Edward Thomas, Jr. * Securities Docket No. 2011-0427 * Respondent * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER
ILLINOIS CREDIT REPAIR LAWS
ILLINOIS CREDIT REPAIR LAWS This page contains information about starting a credit repair business in Illinois as well as legal information and Credit Repair laws for the State of Illinois. IL ST Ch. 815,
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: IRA Resource Associates
1. This case involves widespread fraudulent conduct orchestrated by Shkreli from at
Andrew M. Calamari Sanjay Wadhwa Gerald A. Gross Paul G. Gizzi Eric M. Schmidt Attorneys for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION New York Regional Office 200 Vesey Street, Suite 400 New York,
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES P.O. Box 47029 153 Halsey St.. 6t1 Floor Newark, New Jersey 071 01 (973) 504-3600 IN THE MATTER OF:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES P.O. Box 47029 153 Halsey St.. 6t1 Floor Newark, New Jersey 071 01 (973) 504-3600 IN THE MATTER OF: RONALD CHARLES HEIDEL, FRANK RICHARD HENDRICKS, MICHAEL JOSEPH
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * Arnold M. Hecht * Case No. 2009-0304 Respondent. * * * * CONSENT ORDER WHEREAS, the Securities Division of the
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Franchise Investment Protection Act of Washington by: Silvino Patulot III; Petelo David Tuiasosopo; Insource Jobs, Inc.; Strategic
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No.: 3:10-cv-840 TIERONE CONVERGED NETWORKS, INC.,
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATEMENT OF CHARGES
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING Whether there has been a violation of the Securities Act of Washington by: SEATTLE CAPITAL GROUP
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * No. 2011-0106 KENNETH R. OGAN, JR. * and * OGAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. * D/B/A TRUE WEALTH MANAGEMENT * and *
NC General Statutes - Chapter 78C Article 3 1
Article 3. Registration and Notice Filing Procedures of Investment Advisers and Investment Adviser Representatives. 78C-16. Registration and notice filing requirement. (a) It is unlawful for any person
Charles Carroll Financial Partners, LLC INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTRACT
Charles Carroll Financial Partners, LLC INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTRACT Charles Carroll Financial Partners Investment Advisory Contract 03-13 1 INVESTMENT AGREEMENT The undersigned ( Client ), being duly
Case 4:11-cv-00592 Document 1 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1
Case 4:11-cv-00592 Document 1 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. ) ) In the matter of: ) CFTC Docket No. 01-09 )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ) ) In the matter of: ) CFTC Docket No. 01-09 ) MADISON FINANCIAL GROUP LLC; ) COMPLAINT AND RICHARD A. COHEN; and RONALD G. SCOTT
----------------------------------~'
Case 1:12-cv-24326-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2012 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, INNOVIDA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) DEFERRED PROSECUTION ) AGREEMENT v. ) ) BIXBY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) The United
-------------------------------)
Case 1:11-cv-11538 Document 1 Filed 09/01/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ALEXANDER GRANT, BENJAMIN LEE GRANT
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
In the matter of: STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of the Office of Financial and Insurance Services Matthews Consultants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR E. CILLI Honorable Madeline Cox Arleo Case No. 11-8072 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I, Derek E. Altieri, being duly sworn, state
Frequently Asked Questions for Professional Solicitors and Professional Fundraising Counsels
Who needs to register? Frequently Asked Questions for Professional Solicitors and Professional Fundraising Counsels Professional Solicitors and Professional Fundraising Counsels must register. A Professional
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. v. ) ) Violation: Title 18, United States DAVID GODWIN and ) Code, Section 1343 JOHN COLETTI
