US Regulatory Stress Testing Implications for Large Banks
|
|
- Bertram Reed
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 US Regulatory Stress Testing Implications for Large Banks Michael Jacobs, Ph.D., CFA Senior Manager Deloitte & Touche LLP Audit & Enterprise Risk Services Government, Risk and Regulatory Services November 2013 Pace University GARP Chapter Meeting
2 Agenda Executive Summary Regulatory Expectations & Timelines Implications for Banks Stress Testing Methodology and Processes Guidance and Key Considerations Industry Observations and Emerging Practices
3 Executive Summary Regulators setting higher standards on Banks's internal capabilities for assessing and stress testing capital adequacy as integral part of their overall risk management and capital planning framework Regulations Capital planning has become the key tool of US supervisors for monitoring and managing financial system and bank level soundness and stability Stress testing and CCAR has gone through multiple iterations and evolved significantly over time Recent rulemaking and guidance have set high expectation on the Bank s framework for stress testing and capital planning processes, system and governance Implications to Banks Large scale effort, which spans across the enterprise, with significant data sourcing, aggregation and processing needs to meet CCAR annual reporting and other business/regulatory needs Iterative validation and reconciliation efforts requiring intense manual intervention, to provide consistency across various regulatory requirements Integrating CCAR into the overall risk management and capital planning process Institutions need to significantly upgrade their capabilities to conduct periodic stress testing Road Ahead Establish effective governance mechanism, board approval, internal management review, accountability and transparency Implement systems, processes and controls to help provide the availability of consistent, highquality risk data that can easily be aggregated across their organization.
4 Evolving US banking regulatory landscape Stress testing and capital planning have become the key tool of US supervisors, especially Fed, for monitoring and managing financial system and bank level soundness and stability. These requirements have significantly evolved over time Basel III 1 5 CCAR / CapPR (Capital Plan) CCAR 2013 Guidance RESOLUTION PLANS 5 6 ENHANCED PRUDENTIAL STANDARDS 6 Basel II introduced Pillar II Supervisory 1 Guidance on Capital Adequacy, which I continued and enhanced in Basel III Requirements of Pillar II were detailed in the 2 ICAAP guidance and include in the use of stress testing 3 SCAP put forward the prescriptive requirements for 19 banks during 2009 which are in turn leveraged in later stress testing requirements CCAR ICCAP Basel II Model Validation SCAP Stress Testing Validation 3 CCAR formalizes regulatory expectations and provided fairly prescriptive guidance 4 Identifying, measuring, monitoring and managing model risk is a critical component of effective stress testing framework 5 The five stress testing principles established whereby banks should sensitivity analysis, reverse stress testing, scenario analysis 6 Enhanced prudential standards enshrines stress testing as regulatory tool for capital adequacy US Capital Regulations
5 Linkages amongst various regulations Given the overlapping nature of regulations, institutions need to take a broad and integrated view of regulatory capital Projected capital ratios are a key component of stress test results Capital plan approval is based on projected capital ratios Capital amount / ratios are a key input to resolution and contingency planning processes Stress Testing CCAR Living Wills Contingency plans Regulatory Capital Basel II / II.5 / III ICAAP Economic Capital Collins Amendment (floor) Enhanced Prudential Supervision Governance Early Remediation Counterparty limits Early remediation framework is based on capital ratio thresholds Oversight and governance of ICAAP is aligned with requirements under Enhanced Prudential Supervision Credit exposure calculation for counterparty limit is aligned with EAD calculation
6 CCAR Mission Forward-looking supervisory assessments to ensure determine that banking organizations are adequately capitalized From a micro prudential perspective, the CCAR provides a structured means for supervisors to assess not only whether banks hold enough capital, but also whether banks are able to rapidly and accurately determine their risk exposures, an essential element of effective risk management. The cross-firm nature of the stress tests also helps supervisors identify outliers--both in terms of results and practices-- that can provide a basis for further, more targeted reviews By Chairman Ben S Bernanke, April 8,
7 CCAR Overview Supervisory assessment based on a combination of quantitative results from stress tests and qualitative assessment of the capital planning processes used by banks In February 2009, the Fed mandated 19 BHCs to participate in its Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP) that involved stress testing under two scenarios. Background This exercise contributed to gaining in-depth assessment of the financial system and provided lessons that were included in the Stress Test Rule of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act Deficient BHCs were subjected to specific actions to raise capital, including through the U.S. Treasury s Capital Purchase Program or Capital Assistance Program Federal Reserve (Fed) Rulings In November 2010, the Fed issued guidelines requiring 19 large BHCs with total assets of $50B and above to participate in the CCAR 2011 process In December 2011, the Fed issued the Capital Plan rule formalizing the evaluation of capital adequacy on an annual basis CCAR 2011, has been followed with CCAR 2012 and CCAR 2013 in alignment with the Dodd Frank Act s requirements for annual capital adequacy assessment and stress testing requirements Ensure that institutions develop and demonstrate robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for their unique risks Objectives of CCAR Ensure that institutions establish sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial stress. Evaluate and approve/object to capital distribution plans proposed by institutions, based on the supervisory assessment of capital sufficiency and strength for each institution 7
8 Application of Rules and Timelines Multiple rules and/or additional guidance by Fed embeds stress testing as a cornerstone of the U.S. supervisory regime. Below is a summary of the capital planning and stress testing rules and timelines for their application by type of US banking institution. BHC Type Key Requirements Timing of Rules Application US BHC with global assets $500B or more (6 banks with large trading activities) Other Original SCAP Banks (12 banks with assets $100B or more) Other US BHCs $50B or more (12 banks) US BHCs $10B-$50B FBOs with $50B or more in US assets (excl. branches) FBOs with $10B-$50B in US assets (excl. branches) Submission of annual capital plans, with stress tests using supervisory Baseline, Adverse, and Severely Adverse and company scenarios (as at Sept 30, due Jan 5 each year) Required to run additional market risk shock scenarios Subject to supervisory stress tests on annual capital plans Submit FR Y-14 reports (including trading & counterparty schedules) Mid-year company-run stress tests (as at Mar 31, due July 5 each year) Publication of annual capital plans and mid -year stress tests within 90 days Same as above, except: o Not required to run additional market risk shock scenarios o Not required to submit detailed FR Y-14 trading & counterparty schedules Same as other original SCAPs Completion of annual stress tests using supervisory Baseline, Adverse, and severely Adverse scenarios (as at Sept 30, due Mar 31 each year) Publication of company run stress test results for Severely Adverse scenarios within 90 days of submission Required to establish US Intermediate Holding Company for US assets Same as US BHCs $50B or more Required to establish US Intermediate Holding Company for US assets Same as US BHCs $10B-$50B Already fully in effect, including publication of results Already fully in effect, including publication of results Were required to submit full 2013 capital plans Supervisory stress tests and publication of results starts from 2014 plans (fall 2013) Starts from fall 2013, including publication of results Starts from July 2015 Starts from July 2015
9 2013 Stress Test: Stress Test & Capital Plan Results Brief recap of CCAR 2013 Stress Testing Results and key highlights Quantitative: Minimum regulatory ratios Tier 1 Common ratio 5% Tier 1 Leverage ratio 3% or 4% Tier 1 risk-based Capital ratio 4% Total risk-based capital ratio 8% FRB Assessment Criteria Qualitative Considerations Robustness of BHC s capital adequacy assessment process, including corporate governance, controls and risk-measurement & management practices Reasonableness of assumptions and analyses underlying the BHC s capital plan Review of proposed capital distributions for sound practices Determine that no outstanding material, unresolved supervisory issues 2013 CCAR Assessment Results 2013 CCAR Observations 17 of 18 BHCs maintained capital above regulatory minimums in severely adverse scenarios Objections to capital plan of 2 banks: One on qualitative grounds (BB&T Corp) and the other on both quantitative & qualitative grounds (Ally Financials Inc.) Conditional non-objection to capital plan for 2 BHCs (JP Morgan Chase &Co. and The Goldman Sachs Groups, Inc.), owing to weaknesses in their capital plan or capital planning process 2 BHCs required to submit adjusted cap actions as they had at least one minimum post-stress capital ratio fall below regulatory minimum levels based on the original planned capital actions (American Express Company and Ally Financial Inc.) Minimum level of all four capital ratios significantly below the third-quarter 2012 value, with declines ranging between 2.7 and 5.0 percentage point. There is considerable variation across BHCs in the extent of the decline. Aggregate Tier 1 Common ratio fell 458 basis points post stress Aggregate Tier 1 leverage ratio fell 273 basis points post stress All 18 BHCs are on a path to successfully meet the Basel III requirements
10 Regulatory Expectations Regulatory expectations continue to evolve from initial SCAP to more prescriptive CCAR and SR (i.e. BHC > $10 B) Institutions are expected to establish sound risk measurement and infrastructure supporting identification, measurement, assessment, and controls Translate risk measures into estimates of potential losses over a range of stressful scenarios and environments Use defined capital resources and estimation over the same range of stressful scenarios and environments used for estimating losses Capital planning and composition should be integrated with estimates of losses and capital adequacy Establish a comprehensive capital policy and robust capital planning practices for establishing capital goals Develop robust internal controls governing capital adequacy components, including policies and procedures; change control; model validation and independent review Effective Board and senior management oversight on Capital Adequacy Process (CAP), periodic reviews of risk infrastructure, methodologies
11 Supervisory Guidance Rules & Guidance Key areas of focus SR U.S. Basel II Pillar II and ICAAP SR SR put forward the notion of assessing own internal capital adequacy, including the use of economic capital and stress testing Basel II introduced Pillar 2- Supervisory Guidance on Capital Adequacy Requirements of Pillar 2 introduced in Basel II were detailed in the ICAAP guidance and included the use of stress testing SR linked dividend payment with elements of capital planning process such as identification of risks e.g. capital shortfall due to losses in a stress scenario SCAP SCAP put forward the prescriptive requirements for 19 banks during 2009, which are in turn leveraged in later stress requirements Model Validation (SR 11-7, OCC ) CCAR / CapPR for 2012 (published in 2011) Supervisory Guidance on Stress Testing (SR12-7), May 2012 CCAR/ CapPR 2013 guidance (published in 2012) FRY-14 Guidance Identifying, measuring, monitoring and managing model risk. This letter is guidance applicable to models used as part of stress testing framework CCAR formalized regulatory expectations and provided fairly prescriptive guidance associated with the role of stress testing and capital management, capital adequacy processes, and planning The five stress testing principles are broadly consistent with the principles outlined for CCAR/CapPR institutions. They are applicable to financial institutions that are $10 billion and above and also require banks to calculate sensitivities, complete reverse stress tests and complete scenario analysis The CCAR/ CapPR 2013 guidance (published in 2012) reinforces the 2012 guidance (published in 2011) and provides additional clarifications based on regulatory findings during the 2012 stress testing process on the principles and requirements previously outlined FRY-14 mandates reporting of quantitative projections of balance sheet, income, losses, and capital across a range of macroeconomic scenarios
12 Typical CCAR Processes Bank holding companies (BHCs) need continuous program to undertake Federal Reserve requirement towards submission of Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. BHCs need coordinated and cross functional effort, given below is generic functional view for understanding Risk Identification and Extraction Analysis, Review and Processing Reporting Schedules (for Submission) Product / Portfolios Information - Retail Exposures (Revolving/ Instalment) - Commercial Exposure - Other Risk Information (Ratings, Collateral, Segments) - Retail Risk Parameters (Internal and External) - Commercial Involved Party - Other Macro Variables (Per Economic Scenarios) Banks uses Fed. scenarios & develops proprietary macro variables Balance Forecasting - Balances are forecasted for 9 Quarters - Baseline is taken from Finance Information - Line Items / Segmentation for Loan Balances is defined Reconciliation - Y9C - Spreadsheets - Population, etc. Loss / Provisions (Projections) - Credit Loss Models are developed and validated per methodology - Portfolio specific Models are executed for Loss Projections ICCAP Documentation - Statement of Risk Appetite - Capital Adequacy - Capital Forecast - Liquidity Planning - Aggregation and Diversification - Model Validation Report - Governance FR Y 14 M (Retail Schedules) Credit Card Address Matching First Mortgage Home Equity FR Y 14 Q Schedules Basel III and DFA Retail Trading Wholesale Securities Operational Risk Pre Provision Net Revenue Regulatory Capital Instruments Historical Information - Delinquency - Payments - Charge off and Recovery Finance Information - IMPR Hierarchy - Balance Sheet Information Schedule Preparation - Loan and Summary Level Information - Calculate PPNR - Calculate Net Income - Capital Rations, RWA etc. Capital Planning Process - Planned Capital actions - Assumptions Review & Approve - Internal Reviews - Board Reviews - Challenge Process - Approval Process FR Y-14A Summary Macro Scenario Counterparty Credit Risk (CCR) Basel III and Dodd Frank Regulatory Capital Banks Capital Plan
13 Elements of Effective Stress-Test Modeling Frameworks Integration with Scenarios Specificity to the Bank Conservatism & Challenge - PPNR, Credit, Op Risk, and all models should integrate with the same inputs - Models should demonstrate ability to differentiate gains/losses well in Base and Adverse scenarios, showing sensitivity to different conditions - Chosen macro-factors should drive bank s losses/ppnr - Models and data inputs (e.g. housing prices) should reflect the footprint of the bank and the portfolio composition - Banks should demonstrate a forward-looking approach and justify that past data is still relevant - Idiosyncratic Scenario should reflect bank s specific risks - Banks should recognize model risk and the need to buffer their capital estimates - Banks should show a plan for continuous improvement for models and awareness of model limits - Banks should challenge and validate their models regularly Governance Right Team, Strong Process - Model monitoring & controls should be in place - Data quality checks and governance required - Clear integration with ICAAP process - Banks need to show ownership of models and results by the right people - Well-understood, clear process for stress-testing: Becomes part of Business As Usual
14 Sample Credit Loss Modeling Framework for CCAR Stress Testing Portfolio Segment Loan / Pool Data Modeling Approach Key Dependencies C&I - Major Industries - Oil & Gas - Agriculture - etc. Loan Level - Ratings - EAD / Balances - Vintage - NAIC Code Time Series Analysis - Predict quarterly changes in PD, LGD using footprint-specific state-level macro-factors (e.g. state-level Unemployment) and prior-period levels, for each industry segment - Valid PDs, LGDs, or charge-offs by Rating and by risk factor or industry segment - Rating history or reference data CRE - Construction - Income- Producing - Land Loan Level - Ratings / LTV / DSCR - EAD / Balances - Collateral Type (Retail, Industrial, etc) Time Series Analysis - Predict quarterly changes in LTV and DSCR using state-level macro-factors and vended property price data - Defaults trigger charge-offs Accurate LTVs and vintage Reference property price data histories by region and for CLTV Retail - Mortgage - HELOC - Credit Cards - Small Business - Other Portfolio Level - Historical charge-offs - Further segmentation - Vintage/maturity - Legacy acquisition Time Series and Static Regression - Predict Charge-offs as function of macro factors, deposits, prior-period balances, FICO, OLTV, Vintage, Status - Choice of method depends on data quality and history length Balance projections Charge-off reference data across credit cycle by risk factor Geography Loan Type Footprint Macroeconomic and External Data States - New York - Connecticut - New Jersey - etc. - National - State-level - MSA-level - Unemployment - GDP Growth - HPI - T-Bill Rates - etc. - Property Prices - Land Prices - BBB Bond Spread - Stock Price Volatility
15 Key Success Factors for Stress-Test Modeling Engagements Full ownership by the bank is the goal, with engagement in the business lines and process going forward Model validation, documentation, model use, and the bank team, must be prepared for reviews Driving ROI into Process, Concentration Management and Changing Risk Profile Knowledge and Tools Transfer Preparing for Challenges Alignment with Business What s Appropriate for the Bank Getting Results Together Do the proposed models fit your business? What loss and risk data do you have? Knowing the Bank s Story Using Intuitive Key Risk Drivers The Models and the narrative in the Capital Methodologies should be consistent and integrated Internal and external parties should see a model result and be able to understand how it was derived Modeling can be complex. Constant and ongoing communication with all interested parties is key (credit, liquidity, rate risk, market risk, operations risks)
16 Submission Timeline With consolidated assets between $10B and $50B Companies pull financial data to run stress test models. Overview of Annual Stress Testing Timeline FRB/OCC/FDIC publishes scenarios for upcoming annual cycle Companies complete stress tests and submit regulatory report to the Board Sept 30 Nov 15 Mar 31 Jun 15 Companies disclose summary of the results of the annual tests Key Differences: Delayed deadline to Mar 31 (against Jan 5), plus one additional year No requirements on mid-cycle stress test Less detailed disclosure of results for <$50 billion Significantly more limited reporting forms (to be devised) Management charged with responsibility of controls, oversight and documentation Slightly diminished Board responsibilities; however Board is still charged with reviewing and approving policies, procedures and stress test results Question on formal Capital Plan submission With consolidated assets greater than $50B Covered companies pull financial data to run stress test models. Companies to submit FR Y-14 data Covered companies submit regulatory report to board on stress tests Covered companies submit required regulatory report to the Board on mid-cycle stress test Sept 30 Nov 15 Jan 5 Mar 31 Jul 5 Sep FRB publishes scenarios for upcoming annual cycle FRB communicates and publishes results of supervisory stress tests Companies disclose the summary results Companies make required public disclosures on their mid-cycle stress test
17 CCAR Reporting Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Primary Worksheets FR Y-14Q/M FR Y-14Q / M submissions required on quarterly or monthly basis (exposure data such as loan level details) Basel III & DFA Wholesale * Retail * Securities * Trading ** Operational Risk * Pre Provision Net Revenue Regulatory Capital Instruments FR Y-14A Income Statement Retail Counterparty Credit Risk Balance Sheet Wholesale Operational Risk FR Y-14A submissions required on an annual basis (Projected balances for scenarios) Capital Basel III & DFA AFS/HTM Securities Trading Pre Provision Net Revenue Regulatory Capital Instruments Supporting Documentation Model Risk Management Policy Documentation of Risk Measurement Practices Documentation of Internal Stress Testing methodology Documentation of assumptions and approaches Validation and Independent Review *Quarterly/Monthly reports subject to materiality threshold ** Quarterly/Monthly worksheets for trading required only for the 6 BHCs subject to trading shock in CCAR
18 18 Typical Challenges Going forward, CCAR is likely to be a core planning element for Finance, Risk and IT functions in BHCs with a focus on achieving business integration and common data infrastructure Theme Methodology Data and IT Infrastructure Governance Implementation Challenges Ad-hoc execution of CCAR reporting and stress testing with limited focus on sustainment Credit risk modeling, loss modeling, finance and regulatory reporting (including Basel) are separately documented and not linked Alignment of CCAR requirements with a structured and flexible capital-planning framework Inconsistencies in business rules, definitions and assumptions related to key data fields such as PD and Lien information Multiple or duplicative data sourcing for key components such as Balance Forecasting, Loan loss modeling and credit risk modeling Significant effort for data sourcing, processing and manipulation to meet CCAR annual reporting and other business/regulatory needs Lack of a single platform to integrate the components of capital planning/ CCAR Lack of data availability (historical data, data pertaining to acquired businesses) Iterative validation and reconciliation effort requiring intense manual intervention Lack of active involvement by the Board and senior management in CCAR review and submission Capital planning/ CCAR is still not an integral part of strategy conversations and is thought of primarily as a regulatory exercise Identification and definition of roles and interactions specific to capital planning components
19 Emerging practices for effective stress testing Effective Stress test modeling frameworks include the following elements: Scenarios and integrated Infrastructure PPNR, Credit, Op Risk, and all models should integrate with the same inputs Chosen macro-factors should drive bank s losses/ppnr Creation of a single data platform to source, transform, aggregate and report data for CCAR and capital planning requirements Dedicated focus Governance Specificity to the Bank Other long term initiatives Identify key skill and experiences across business, risk, technology and finance required Banks need to show ownership of models and results by the right people Well-understood, clear process for stress-testing: becomes part of Business As Usual Model monitoring & controls should be in place based on functional awareness of model limits Adoption of a prioritization framework to allow focus on models/ issues that are critical in the capital planning process and communicate issues transparently Driving consistency in adoption of definitions, business rules and assumptions related to data, especially used for stress testing and projections Models and data inputs (e.g. housing prices) should reflect the footprint of the bank and the portfolio composition Idiosyncratic Scenario should reflect bank s specific risks Banks should demonstrate a forward-looking approach and justify that the past data pertaining to Bank is still relevant Integrating CCAR into longer term initiatives ( e.g. semi-annual stress testing, impact on ICAAP processes etc.) and aligning regulatory and internal definitions, and timelines Integrating CCAR processes into strategy, annual budgeting and planning cycle, performance reporting and internal audit Banks should challenge and validate their models regularly and show a plan for continuous improvement for models
20 Industry Observations Infrastructure supporting CCAR requirements at Banks are becoming more automated and sustainable, driven in part by regulatory feedback (MRA / MRIAs) Ad-hoc processes and manual adjustments persist, given rule ambiguity / interpretations and evolving regulatory expectations (i.e. Enhanced Prudential Guidelines, Basel III etc.) Differences exist in the underlying data and IT systems, processes and governance framework, with varying degrees of centralization (i.e. the extent to which guidance / specificity is provided centrally) o o o Scenario projections, capital actions, non-interest expense projections, policy and governance aspects are typically centralized Stress test loss projections, data and reconciliation are decentralized to LOB / LOB level credit risk teams Basel III RWA projections, loan balance and income projections may follow a mix of centralized and decentralized approaches Focus is primarily on BHC (enterprise) level planning o Increasing focus on standalone DI level planning (i.e. limit structure, risk appetite etc.) Identify and achieve easier action steps o Defining centralized governance frameworks (policies, committee charters) and use of centralized version control software Integrate CCAR process with longer term initiatives (internal budgeting, capital planning)
21 Q&A
22 Thanks Michael Jacobs, Jr., Ph.D., CFA Deloitte & Touche LLP Audit & Enterprise Risk Services / Government, Risk and Regulatory Services / Business Risk / Financial Services 1633 Broadway, 35 th Floor New York, N.Y Office: (212) Home: (212) Cellular: (917) mikjacobs@deloitte.com SSRN Author Page: er_id=97517 LinkedIn: k=tab_pro
23 Creating a culture of risk awareness TM Global Association of Risk Professionals 111 Town Square Place Suite 1215 Jersey City, New Jersey USA nd Floor Bengal Wing 9A Devonshire Square London, EC2M 4YN UK + 44 (0) About GARP The Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP) is a not-for-profit global membership organization dedicated to preparing professionals and organizations to make better informed risk decisions. Membership represents over 150,000 risk management practitioners and researchers from banks, investment management firms, government agencies, academic institutions, and corporations from more than 195 countries and territories. GARP administers the Financial Risk Manager (FRM ) and the Energy Risk Professional (ERP ) exams; certifications recognized by risk professionals worldwide. GARP also helps advance the role of risk management via comprehensive professional education and training for professionals of all levels Global Association of Risk Professionals. All rights reserved.
BB&T Corporation. Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Stress Test Disclosure March 5, 2015
BB&T Corporation Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Stress Test Disclosure March 5, 2015 1 Introduction BB&T Corporation (BB&T) is one of the largest financial services holding companies in the U.S. with $186.8
More informationHSBC North America Holdings Inc. 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Annual Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results
2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Annual Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results Date: March 5, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Overview of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and
More information2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
BMO Financial Corp. and BMO Harris Bank N.A. 206 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review Dodd-Frank Act Company-Run Stress Test Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario Results Disclosure June 23, 206 Overview
More informationStress testing: Midterm results improved, but it s all about the final
Regulatory September 2013 brief A publication of PwC s financial services regulatory practice Stress testing: Midterm results improved, but it s all about the final Overview Before the stress test results
More information2013 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Stress Tests
2013 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Stress Tests Comprehensive Capital Plan submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank on January 7, 2013 SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Background
More informationState Farm Bank, F.S.B.
State Farm Bank, F.S.B. 2015 Annual Stress Test Disclosure Dodd-Frank Act Company Run Stress Test Results Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario June 25, 2015 1 Regulatory Requirement The 2015 Annual Stress
More informationDFAST & CCAR: One size does not fit all
AD-127 DFAST & CCAR: One size does not fit all Charyn Faenza, F.N.B. Corporation ABSTRACT In 2014, for the first time, mid-market banks (consisting of banks and bank holding companies with 10-50 bn in
More informationSupporting Statement for the Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Associated with Regulation Y (Capital Plans) (Reg Y-13; OMB No.
Summary Supporting Statement for the Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Associated with Regulation Y (Capital Plans) (Reg Y-3; OMB No. 700-0342) (Docket No. R-425) (RIN 700-AD77) The Board of Governors
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA. 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure March 2015 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
More informationManagement. Model Risk. Nav Vaidhyanathan Director, Head of Model Risk Management Wintrust Financial Corporation
Model Risk Management Nav Vaidhyanathan Director, Head of Model Risk Management Wintrust Financial Corporation Global Association of Risk Professionals August 2014 These materials reflect the views and
More informationSummary. Background and Justification
Supporting Statement for the Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation YY (Enhanced Prudential Standards) (Reg YY; OMB No. 7100-0350) Annual Company-Run Stress Test
More informationCharles Schwab Bank. 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
Charles Schwab Bank 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure June 2015 I. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results A. About Charles Schwab Bank Charles Schwab Bank (the Bank) is a wholly-owned subsidiary
More informationComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2015 Summary Instructions and Guidance
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2015 Summary Instructions and Guidance October 2014 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2015 Summary Instructions
More informationRisk Management. Trends for Insurance Companies. Jeffrey Lovern Genworth Financial VP, Enterprise Risk Management Global Mortgage Insurance
Risk Management Trends for Insurance Companies Jeffrey Lovern Genworth Financial VP, Enterprise Risk Management Global Mortgage Insurance Global Association of Risk Professionals March, 2014 Agenda Global
More informationOneWest Bank N. A. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
OneWest Bank N. A. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure Capital Stress Testing Results Covering the Time Period October 1, through December 31, for OneWest Bank N.A. under a Hypothetical Severely Adverse
More informationDilip Krishna Director, Governance, Regulatory & Risk Strategies, Deloitte & Touche
Track 3: Risk Management in a Data Rich Environment Standardized Information for Increased Transparency 2:20pm 3:10pm Presenter: Dilip Krishna Director, Governance, Regulatory & Risk Strategies, Deloitte
More informationComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2012: Methodology and Results for Stress Scenario Projections
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 2012: Methodology and Results for Stress Scenario Projections March 13, 2012 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Note: The Federal Reserve revised
More information2015 DFAST Annual Stress Test Disclosure For Synchrony Bank, a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Synchrony Financial. June 26, 2015
2015 DFAST Annual Stress Test Disclosure For Synchrony Bank, a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Synchrony Financial June 26, 2015 Disclaimers Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation
More informationCiti 2016. 2016 Annual Stress Test Disclosure. Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. June 23, 2016
Citi 2016 2016 Annual Stress Test Disclosure Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act June 23, 2016 Overview 2016 Annual Stress Test In February 2016, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) launched
More informationHuntington Bancshares Incorporated & Huntington National Bank Company Run Capital Stress Test Results Disclosure
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated & Huntington National Bank Company Run Capital Stress Test Results Disclosure Capital Stress Testing Results Covering the Time Period October 1, 2014 through December
More informationSUMMARY: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "Corporation" or "FDIC") is
DRAFT 6714-01-P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION 12 CFR Part 325, Subpart C RIN 3064-AD91 ANNUAL STRESS TEST AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Federal
More information2014 Annual Stress Testing Disclosure. Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. March 20, 2014
2014 Annual Stress Testing Disclosure Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act March 20, 2014 Overview 2014 Annual Stress Test In November 2013, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) launched
More informationStress Testing for Mid-Sized Banks
Paper 3478-2015 Stress Testing for Mid-Sized Banks Charyn Faenza, F.N.B. Corporation ABSTRACT In 2014, for the first time, mid-market banks (consisting of banks and bank holding companies with $10 $50
More informationThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation The Bank of New York Mellon. Company-Run Stress Test Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results.
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation The Bank of New York Mellon Company-Run Stress Test Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results June 24, 2016 Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario Dodd-Frank Capital Actions
More informationAnnual Company-Run Stress Test Results
Wells Fargo & Company Annual Company-Run Stress Test Results Under the Federal Reserve s Assumed Severely Adverse Scenario March 5, 2015 Contents Overview...3 Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario...5
More informationBOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551 DIVISION OF BANKING SUPERVISION AND REGULATION DIVISION OF CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS SR 12-17 CA 12-14 December 17, 2012 TO
More informationU.S. Bancorp. 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure. March 2015
U.S. Bancorp 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure March 2015 Page 1 Quantitative Disclosure U.S. Bancorp (the Company ) administers its capital adequacy
More informationFinal look. A practical guide to the Federal Reserve s enhanced prudential standards for foreign banks
Final look A practical guide to the Federal Reserve s enhanced prudential standards for foreign banks Produced by the Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategies 1 Foreword 3 At a glance: scope, timeline,
More information2014 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure Citi Severely Adverse Scenario
Citi 2014 2014 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure Citi Severely Adverse Scenario September 15, 2014 2014 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Overview Under the stress testing requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
More informationDodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST) Reporting Instructions
Dodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST) Reporting Instructions OCC Reporting Form DFAST-14A February 2016 1 Table of Contents GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 4 1. Who Must Report 4 2. Where to Submit the Reports 5
More informationRisk Based Capital Guidelines; Market Risk. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Market Risk Disclosures. As of December 31, 2013
Risk Based Capital Guidelines; Market Risk The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Market Risk Disclosures As of December 31, 2013 1 Basel II.5 Market Risk Annual Disclosure Introduction Since January
More informationDodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST) Reporting Instructions
Dodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST) Reporting Instructions OCC Reporting Form DFAST-14A December 2014 1 Table of Contents GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS... 5 NEW ELEMENTS IN DFAST 2015... 5 WHO MUST REPORT...
More informationFirst Republic Bank. Annual Company-Run Stress Test Results. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure. Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario
First Republic Bank Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario June 23, 2016 June 23, 2016 About First Republic Bank First Republic Bank ( First Republic or the Bank )
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: Supervisory Methodologies in CCAR 2012
Frequently Asked Questions: Supervisory Methodologies in CCAR 2012 On March 21 and March 22, 2012, the Federal Reserve held five industry outreach calls to provide the bank holding companies (BHCs) that
More informationSUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 12 CFR Part 46 [Docket ID OCC-2011-0029] RIN 1557-AD58 Annual Stress Test AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ( OCC ).
More informationPortfolio Management for Banks
Enterprise Risk Solutions Portfolio Management for Banks RiskFrontier, our industry-leading economic capital and credit portfolio risk management solution, along with our expert Portfolio Advisory Services
More information2 0 1 6 A N N U A L S T R E S S T E S T D I S C L O S U R E
2 0 6 A N N U A L S T R E S S T E S T D I S C L O S U R E Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario June 23, 206 2 0 6 A N N U A L S T R E S S T E S T D I S C L O S U R E
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Reducing excessive variability in banks regulatory capital ratios A report to the G20 November 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org).
More informationICAAP Required Capital Assessment, Quantification & Allocation. Anand Borawake, VP, Risk Management, TD Bank anand.borawake@td.com
ICAAP Required Capital Assessment, Quantification & Allocation Anand Borawake, VP, Risk Management, TD Bank anand.borawake@td.com Table of Contents Key Takeaways - Value Add from the ICAAP The 3 Pillars
More informationU.S. regulatory capital: Basel III liquidity coverage ratio final rule
U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III liquidity coverage ratio final rule Overview and key highlights November 2014 DRAFT - For Discussion Purposes Only Contents U.S. Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
More informationRegulatory Stress Testing For Mortgage Loan Portfolios
Regulatory Testing For Mortgage Loan Portfolios Introduction testing of loan portfolios is a concept that has been around for many years, but as an outgrowth of the credit crisis, stress testing has become
More informationE-ALERT Financial Institutions
E-ALERT Financial Institutions INTRODUCTION February 24, 2014 FEDERAL RESERVE FINALIZES ENHANCED PRUDENTIAL STANDARDS FOR LARGE U.S. BANK HOLDING COMPANIES AND FOREIGN BANKING ORGANIZATIONS On February
More informationComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review: Objectives and Overview
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review: Objectives and Overview March 18, 2011 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System I. Executive Summary The Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR)
More informationSANTANDER WOULD MAINTAIN CAPITAL STRENGTH IN SEVERELY ADVERSE SCENARIO, BASED ON FEDERAL RESERVE STRESS TEST
EX 99.1 2 pressrelease.htm Exhibit 99.1 SANTANDER WOULD MAINTAIN CAPITAL STRENGTH IN SEVERELY ADVERSE SCENARIO, BASED ON FEDERAL RESERVE STRESS TEST Boston, March 5, 2015 The capital ratios of Santander
More informationMortgage Bankers. Association Investing in communities. Project: Proposed Revisions to FR Y-14Q, (Quarterly Collection) MSR Valuation Schedule
Mortgage Bankers Association Investing in communities August 31, 2012 Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20 th Street and Constitution Avenue NW Washington,
More informationStress Test Modeling in Cards Portfolios
Stress Test Modeling in Cards Portfolios José J. Canals-Cerdá The views expressed here are my own and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve or its staff. Credit Card Performance: Charge-off Rate
More informationBank of Queensland Limited
APRA 30 April 2012 The Basel II Capital Accord principles took effect in Australia on 1 January 2008. The framework for the application of Basel II in Australia is comprised of three pillars: Pillar 1:
More informationThe first quarter was highlighted by:
Mercantile Bank Corporation Reports Strong First Quarter 2013 Results Diluted earnings per share increased 79 percent Continued asset quality improvement and outlook remains positive GRAND RAPIDS, Mich.,
More informationIntroduction. Legal Update March 3, 2014
Legal Update March 3, 2014 Federal Reserve Issues Final Regulation Implementing Dodd- Frank Section 165 Enhanced Prudential Standards for Large US and Non-US Banking Organizations Introduction On February
More informationERM from a Small Insurance Company Perspective
ERM from a Small Insurance Company Perspective NABRICO Sept 30, 2011 Agenda Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 ERM Introduction Key Risks Streamlined Quantitative Process Other Influences 1 1 Section
More informationEarnings Conference Call January 28, 2015
Fourth Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call January 28, 2015 Steven G. Bradshaw Chief Executive Officer Daniel H. Ellinor Chief Operating Officer Steven Nell Chief Financial Officer Stacy Kymes Chief
More informationProfit from Big Data flow. Regulatory Stress Testing For Mortgage Loan Portfolios. 2013 by Opera Solutions, LLC. All rights reserved.
Profit from Big Data flow Regulatory Testing For Mortgage Loan Portfolios Regulatory Testing For Mortgage Loan Portfolios Introduction testing of loan portfolios is a concept that has been around for many
More informationMorgan Stanley Reports Third Quarter 2015:
Media Relations: Michele Davis 212-761-9621 Investor Relations: Kathleen McCabe 212-761-4469 Morgan Stanley Reports Third Quarter 2015: Net Revenues of $7.8 Billion and Earnings per Diluted Share of $0.48
More informationBank Capital Adequacy under Basel III
Bank Capital Adequacy under Basel III Objectives The overall goal of this two-day workshop is to provide participants with an understanding of how capital is regulated under Basel II and III and appreciate
More informationStress testing & scenario analysis. Riding out the storm
Stress testing & scenario analysis 1 Enterprise stress testing and scenario analysis, the process whereby s assess their financial resilience to macro-economic or market-driven scenarios, has changed almost
More informationRisk Based Financial Planning Beyond Basel 2
Risk Based Financial Planning Beyond Basel 2 By Roy Choudhury January 2007 Roy Choudhury is Senior Manager at Ernst & Young - Financial Services Risk in London and specialises in Enterprise Risk Management,
More informationStrategic and Operational Overview May 11, 2016
Strategic and Operational Overview May 11, 2016 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains several forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are those that use words such as believe,
More informationStandard Chartered Bank (Thai) PCL & its Financial Business Group Pillar 3 Disclosures 30 June 2015
Standard Chartered Bank (Thai) PCL & its Financial Business Group Registered Office: 90 North Sathorn Road, Silom Bangkok, 10500, Thailand Overview During 2013, the Bank of Thailand ( BOT ) published the
More informationBasel II, Pillar 3 Disclosure for Sun Life Financial Trust Inc.
Basel II, Pillar 3 Disclosure for Sun Life Financial Trust Inc. Introduction Basel II is an international framework on capital that applies to deposit taking institutions in many countries, including Canada.
More informationCP FOR DRAFT RTS ON RWS/LGDS ARTICLES 124 AND 164 CRR EBA/CP/2015/12. 6 July 2015. Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2015/12 6 July 2015 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the conditions that competent authorities shall take into account when determining higher risk-weights, in particular
More informationICAAP of SNS Bank. Arno van Eekelen Senior Consultant SNS Bank Global Association of Risk Professionals. June 2014
ICAAP of SNS Bank Arno van Eekelen Senior Consultant SNS Bank Global Association of Risk Professionals June 2014 Table of contents 1. SNS REAAL 2. ICAAP a) Basic elements and environment b) ICAAP stages
More informationBasel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2014
BASEL III PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014 Table of Contents Page 1 Morgan Stanley... 1 2 Capital Adequacy of Bank Holding Companies... 1 3 Capital Structure...
More informationU.S. regulatory capital: Basel III supplementary leverage ratio final rule. Key highlights for advanced approaches banks
U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III supplementary leverage ratio final rule Key highlights for advanced approaches banks October 2014 Contents U.S. Basel III supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) rule is finalized
More informationUS Federal Reserve Revising draft propose To Authorize New BHC System forteledata Project
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 193 / Thursday, October 4, 2012 / Notices 60695 deterring defaults than the three percent used in some earlier auctions. In light of these considerations, the Bureaus propose
More informationNews Release April 29, 2016. Performance Review: Quarter ended March 31, 2016
News Release April 29, Performance Review: Quarter ended March 31, 16% year-on-year growth in domestic advances; retail portfolio crossed ` 2,00,000 crore (US$ 30.2 billion) during the quarter ended March
More informationFR Y-14 Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions
FR Y-14: Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions General Guidance FR Y-14 Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions The Basel III and Dodd-Frank quarterly and annual schedules collect historical
More informationComprehensive Assessment Q&A. 22 October 2014
Comprehensive Assessment Q&A 22 October 2014 This document has been prepared to assist the ECB media team with queries on the comprehensive assessment. SSM in Numbers Description Number Number of banks
More informationBasel III Pillar 3 and Leverage Ratio disclosures of ALTERNA BANK
of ALTERNA BANK 1. Scope of Application CS Alterna Bank, a member of the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation ( CDIC ), operates under the name Alterna Bank. It is a Schedule 1 Bank and received letters
More informationBanking System Stress Testing
Date: 7.5.214 Number: Date: 17.6.214 14-4a Number: 14-55a Case Study www.riskcontrollimited.com Contents Introduction... 3 Generating Consistent Macroeconomic Scenarios... 4 Loan Portfolio Modelling...
More informationMorgan Stanley - Current Net Income and Statements of Performance
Media Relations: Michele Davis 212-761-9621 Investor Relations: Kathleen McCabe 212-761-4469 Morgan Stanley Reports Second Quarter 2015: Net Revenues of $9.7 Billion and Earnings per Diluted Share of $0.85
More informationQ3 INTERIM MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Presentation to analysts and investors. 28 October 2014
INTERIM MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Presentation to analysts and investors 28 October HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF Continued successful execution of our strategy and further improvement in financial
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT REPORT (for the Financial Year Ended 31 March 2012)
RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT (for the Financial Year Ended 31 March 2012) Integrated Risk Management Framework The Group s Integrated Risk Management Framework (IRMF) sets the fundamental elements to manage
More informationMeasurement of Banks Exposure to Interest Rate Risk and Principles for the Management of Interest Rate Risk respectively.
INTEREST RATE RISK IN THE BANKING BOOK Over the past decade the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee) has released a number of consultative documents discussing the management and
More informationNews Release January 28, 2016. Performance Review: Quarter ended December 31, 2015
News Release January 28, 2016 Performance Review: Quarter ended December 31, 20% year-on-year growth in total domestic advances; 24% year-on-year growth in retail advances 18% year-on-year growth in current
More informationPART B INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP)
Framework (Basel II) Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment PART A OVERVIEW...2 1. Introduction...2 2. Applicability...3 3. Legal Provision...3 4. Effective Date of Implementation...3 5. Level of Application...3
More informationEBA-GL-2015-02. 23 July 2015. Guidelines. on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators
EBA-GL-2015-02 23 July 2015 Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators Contents EBA Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery
More informationDNB Liquidity Pillar 2 Supervision. Seminar Das neue SREP Konzept der Aufsicht Clemens Bonner (c.bonner@dnb.nl)
DNB Liquidity Pillar 2 Supervision Seminar Das neue SREP Konzept der Aufsicht Clemens Bonner (c.bonner@dnb.nl) Legal framework Act on Financial Supervision (Wft) Decree on Prudential Rules pursuant to
More informationVIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. www.regulations.gov. June 12, 2013.
Nationwide. Mark R. Thresher. Executive Vice President. Chief Financial Officer. Nationwide Insurance. VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. www.regulations.gov June 12, 2013. Robert dev. Frierson, Secretary. Board
More informationIntegrated Stress Testing
Risk & Compliance the way we see it Integrated Stress Testing A Practical Approach Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Stress Testing Framework 4 3 Data Management 6 3.1 Data Quality 6 4 Governance 7 4.1 Scenarios,
More informationPrinciples and Practices in Credit Portfolio Management
International Association of Credit Portfolio Managers Principles and Practices in Credit Portfolio Management Findings of the 2013 Survey Survey Goal IACPM Members share their views on the state of CPM
More informationDodd Frank Act and the Consumer Affect on Banks
A Point of View Dodd Frank Act: Partner your way to Compliance With the passage of the Dodd Frank Act, banks and financial institutions are grappling with a highly restrictive environment and burgeoning
More informationCITIGROUP INC. BASEL II.5 MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2013
CITIGROUP INC. BASEL II.5 MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 DATED AS OF MAY 15, 2013 Table of Contents Qualitative Disclosures Basis of Preparation and Review... 3 Risk
More informationMay 29,2007. Regulation Comments Chief Counsel's Office Office of Thrift Supervision 1700 G Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20552
john F. Robinson Executive Vice President Corporate RirkManagement 1301 Second Avenue WMC3201 Seattle, WA 98101 May 29,2007 Regulation Comments Chief Counsel's Office Office of Thrift Supervision 1700
More informationTD Bank Financial Group Q4/08 Guide to Basel II
TD Bank Financial Group Q4/08 Guide to Basel II 1. OVERVIEW General Information on Basel can be found on the Canadian Bankers Association website at www.cba.ca. Choose Issues, Standards, Rules and Guidelines
More informationBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Instructions for Preparation of Annual Company-Run Stress Test Report For State Member Banks, Bank Holding Companies, and Savings and Loan Holding Companies
More informationCapital Cost Implications of Pending and Proposed Regulatory Changes
J State Street s Digest of Topics in Securities Finance In View ISSUE 3 AUG. 2014 Capital Cost Implications of Pending and Proposed Regulatory Changes As we noted in our first In View article entitled,
More informationGroup-wide Stress Testing: A Case Study. Enrico Piotto
Group-wide Stress esting: A Case Study Enrico Piotto Background Severe Losses Beyond scope of risk models Reluctance to statistical models Emphasis on stress testing as risk control and risk management
More informationWhat s Next for Stress Testing: Expect Surprises, Less Heroic Effort
September 2015 What s Next for Stress Testing: Expect Surprises, Less Heroic Effort By Oleg A. Blokhin, Jack A. Gregory, and David W. Keever As more and more banks are subject to Dodd-Frank Act stress-testing
More informationConsistent projections of balance sheet, risk-weighted assets, and income
Consistent projections of balance sheet, risk-weighted assets, and income Model Symposium June 2013 Anna Kovner Federal Reserve Bank of NY The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author
More informationBasis of the Financial Stability Oversight Council s Final Determination Regarding General Electric Capital Corporation, Inc.
Introduction Basis of the Financial Stability Oversight Council s Final Determination Regarding General Electric Capital Corporation, Inc. Pursuant to section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
More informationStress Testing in an Uncertain World
Stress Testing in an Uncertain World Anthony Bice & Garreth Sweeney Oliver Wyman This presentation has been prepared for the Actuaries Institute 2014 Financial Services Forum. The Institute Council wishes
More informationHow To Make Money From A Bank Loan
NEWS RELEASE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: WEBSITE: www.bnccorp.com TIMOTHY J. FRANZ, CEO TELEPHONE: (612) 305-2213 DANIEL COLLINS, CFO TELEPHONE: (612) 305-2210 BNCCORP, INC. REPORTS THIRD QUARTER NET INCOME
More informationMorgan Stanley Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015:
Media Relations: Michele Davis 212-761-9621 Investor Relations: Kathleen McCabe 212-761-4469 Morgan Stanley Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015: Fourth Quarter Net Revenues of $7.7 Billion and Earnings
More informationGuidance for the Development of a Models-Based Solvency Framework for Canadian Life Insurance Companies
Guidance for the Development of a Models-Based Solvency Framework for Canadian Life Insurance Companies January 2010 Background The MCCSR Advisory Committee was established to develop proposals for a new
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT 30 june 2011 Contents Page 1. Introduction... 3 2. Process for determining the solvency need... 4 2.1. The basis for capital management... 4 2.2. Risk identification...
More informationMorgan Stanley Reports First Quarter 2016:
Media Relations: Michele Davis 212-761-9621 Investor Relations: Kathleen McCabe 212-761-4469 Morgan Stanley Reports First Quarter 2016: Net Revenues of $7.8 Billion and Earnings per Diluted Share of $0.55
More informationCitigroup Inc. Pillar 3. Basel III Advanced Approaches Disclosures
Citigroup Inc. Pillar 3 Basel III Advanced Approaches Disclosures For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 3 Organization 3 Regulatory Capital Standards and Disclosures 3
More informationPrinciples for An. Effective Risk Appetite Framework
Principles for An Effective Risk Appetite Framework 18 November 2013 Table of Contents Page I. Introduction... 1 II. Key definitions... 2 III. Principles... 3 1. Risk appetite framework... 3 1.1 An effective
More information