Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION
|
|
- Esmond Anthony
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: PILOT FLYING J FUEL REBATE MDL Docket No CONTRACT LITIGATION (No. II) RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF SHORELINE TRANSPORTATION OF ALABAMA U.S.A., INC. IN OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION AND TRANSFER COMES NOW, the Plaintiff Shoreline Transportation of Alabama U.S.A., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Shoreline ) and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C and the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, respectfully submits this Response in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Consolidate and Transfer this Action to the Eastern District of Tennessee. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The undersigned represents Plaintiff Shoreline Transportation of Alabama USA, Inc., in Shoreline Transportation of Alabama USA, Inc. v. Pilot Corporation, et al., 2:13-cv (M.D. Ala.). Plaintiff filed its action in the Circuit Court of Butler County, Alabama on April 25, 2013 (Civil Action No. 10-CV ). The case was removed to the Middle District of Alabama on May 28, 2013, and the case was assigned to the Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III, Montgomery Division. Defendants Pilot Corporation, Pilot Oil Corporation, and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC were served, and their answers were originally due on June 4, On June 4, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff s Complaint, and that motion was granted by Judge Albritton on June 5, Defendants responsive pleadings are due July 8, On June 14, 2013, Defendants filed an Unopposed Motion to Stay. The stay was granted by Judge Albritton on June 17, 2013.
2 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 2 of 11 ARGUMENT Shoreline originally supported consolidation and transfer in MDL 2468, when it appeared that possibly hundreds of lawsuits could be filed regarding Pilot s fraudulent conduct. Shoreline now opposes consolidation where there are only a few opt out cases remaining. 28 U.S.C makes clear that an MDL transfer and pretrial coordination is only appropriate when: (i) the actions involve one or more common questions of fact; (ii) transfer would be for the convenience of the parties and witnesses ; and (iii) the transfer will promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions. See 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) (2012). Prior to the original Motion for consolidation (MDL No. 2468), these factors appeared to have been met. Now that most of the actions have been consolidated in a separate proceeding and only a limited amount of cases remain, consolidation and transfer are no longer warranted I. THE PILOT ACTIONS SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED In Defendants Motion for Consolidation, they state that the Panel has already found that common questions of fact exist. While this may have been accurate when faced with hundreds of potential lawsuits, it is no longer the case. The limited number of cases that remain will surely have different factual scenarios and likely will have different wrongdoers (i.e. sales associates) in each case. Each Plaintiff that was affected by Pilot s fraudulent schemes, including Shoreline Transportation, will likely have been defrauded in unique manners and by different Pilot employees, negating the common questions of fact that would have been present with hundreds of lawsuits pending. For this reason, consolidation is not appropriate. Even if there are still common questions of fact, the Panel has held time and time again that common questions alone are not sufficient to warrant MDL coordination, but rather the Panel must also be satisfied that the transfer would be for the convenience of the parties and 2
3 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 3 of 11 witnesses ; and promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions. See Evans v. Equinox Holdings, Inc., 764 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (J.P.M.L. 2011) (refusing transfer and holding, [w]hile we agree that common factual issues exist, the Panel is not persuaded that Section 1407 centralization is necessary either to assure the convenience of the parties and witnesses or for the just and efficient conduct of this litigation at this time. ); In re Drowning Incident at Quality Inn Northeast, Washington, D.C., 405 F. Supp. 1304, 1306 (J.P.M.L. 1976) (stating, the existence of common questions of fact between actions is, as we have often noted, but one condition precedent to transfer under Section Before a transfer will be ordered, the Panel must be satisfied that all the statutory criteria have been met. ); In re Highway Accident Near Rockville, Connecticut, on December 30, 1972, 388 F. Supp. 574, 575 (J.PM.L. 1975) (finding, the fact that these two actions arise from the same disaster does not ipso facto mean that their coordination or consolidation under Section 1407 is appropriate. Before transfer will be ordered, the Panel must be satisfied that all of the statutory criteria have been met. ); In re Truck Accident Near AlamaGordo, New Mexico, 387 F. Supp. 732, 733 (J.P.M.L 1975). In In re Truck Accident Near AlamaGordo, the Panel refused to Order an MDL transfer despite the fact that the cases at issue contained substantially identical allegations, which has also been argued by the Pilot Defendants. Id. at 733. In so holding the Panel explained that: Id. Indeed we recognize the existence of common, if not identical, questions of fact among these actions. Nevertheless, a mere showing that common questions of fact exist amongst the actions for which Section 1407 treatment is proposed is not sufficient, in and of itself, to warrant transfer by the Panel. The other criteria of the statute must also be satisfied. And we are not persuaded that with respect to this particular litigation the overall convenience of the parties and witnesses and the just and efficient conduct of the litigation will be enhanced by a Section 1407 transfer. 3
4 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 4 of 11 While the seven actions at issue here may share some common issues of fact, transfer and coordination pursuant to 28 U.S.C is inappropriate because the overall convenience of the parties and witnesses and the just and efficient conduct of the litigation will not be enhanced by a Section 1407 transfer. To the contrary, consolidation will now inconvenience the parties to this litigation, mainly the Plaintiffs, where plaintiff counsel will be forced to conduct discovery and attend depositions irrelevant to their own individual cases, which in turn will increase the costs of litigation for each Plaintiff. For example, a wrongdoer in Shoreline s case (i.e. the specific sales representative that defrauded Shoreline) is likely not the same wrongdoer in one of the New Jersey cases (i.e. the New Jersey sales representative that defrauded the New Jersey trucking company). If consolidated, plaintiff counsel for each individual case will be subjected to the other actions discovery, making it more inconvenient and costly for the Plaintiffs. Although consolidation may be more convenient to the Pilot Defendants, convenience to a Defendant who has admitted to defrauding its customers and has had several employees indicted for their misconduct should not be taken into consideration. Moreover, the discovery in each case will likely be minimal where Pilot has already admitted to wrongdoing and the Federal Bureau of Investigation has already conducted a substantial investigation into Pilot s misconduct. It is significant to note that in denying Motions for MDL coordination where there is not extensive discovery to be conducted, but where there is some discovery needed, this Panel has routinely held that the parties and the presiding courts can easily take steps to coordinate whatever discovery needs to be accomplished. See In re Magic Marker Securities Litigation, 470 F. Supp. 862, (J.P.M.L. 1979); In re Home Depot U.S.A. Inc., Wage and Hour Litigation, 818 F. Supp2d 1367 (J.P.M.L. 2011); In re Raymond Lee Organization, Inc. Securities Litigation, 446 F. Supp. 1266, 1268 (J.P.M.L. 1978) 4
5 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 5 of 11 (noting communication and cooperation between the California and New York courts, if deemed appropriate by the courts, along with cooperation of the parties, would minimize the possibility of conflicting pretrial rulings. ). For example, where some overlapping discovery is necessary, the Panel has often suggested the following: (1) that notices of a particular deposition, interrogatories and requests for production could be served in all of the actions, thereby making them applicable in each action; (2) the parties could seek to agree upon a stipulation that any past and future discovery relevant to each of the actions may be used in any action; and (3) any party could seek orders from the involved courts directing the parties to coordinate their pretrial efforts. In re: Children s personal Care Products Liability Litigation, 655 F.Supp.2d 1365 (J.P.M.L. 2009); In re Magic Marker Securities Litigation, 470 F. Supp. 862, 865 (J.P.M.L. 1979); In re Commercial Lighting Products, Inc. Contract Litigation, 415 F. Supp. 392, 393 (J.P.M.L. 1976). These are measures that certainly could be taken, if necessary, in the seven cases at issue here. WHEREFORE, the Pilot Defendants Motion to Consolidate and Transfer should be denied. II. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, IF CONSOLIDATION IS WARRANTED, THE PILOT ACTIONS SHOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA In the alternative, if this Panel believes that consolidation and transfer is appropriate, Shoreline Transportation submits that the MDL should not be consolidated in the Eastern District of Tennessee, but should be consolidated in the Northern District of Alabama. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the cases be transferred and consolidated in the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division. The Northern District of Alabama, Southern 5
6 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 6 of 11 Division, is the best location for the transferee court, if a transferee court is necessary, and is the most convenient location for all of the remaining parties to this litigation. The majority of the filed opt out cases are already pending in Alabama and the Defendant is headquartered in the adjacent District. The Defendant also has ten store locations in the state of Alabama. See This Panel has previously found the Northern District of Alabama to be an appropriate forum for MDL proceedings, including: IN RE: Chantix (Varenicline) Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2092). The Northern District of Alabama also has a well-managed docket: the median time from filing to trial was 21.9 (during a 12 month period ending March 31, 2013). 1 The Northern District of Alabama is an efficient district with only one pending MDL. Moreover, other outside factors weigh against selection of a court in the State of Tennessee. The Chief Executive Officer of the Defendant is James A. Jimmy Haslam, III, also a Defendant in some actions. Most importantly, Mr. Haslam s brother, William Edward Bill Haslam, is the Governor of Tennessee and has a substantial ownership interest in Pilot, which unlike the Governor s other assets, is not part of a blind trust. 2 Moreover, the Haslam family owns fifty-nine (59) percent of Pilot. 3 Adding to the political sensitivities, one of the current United States Senators from Tennessee, Bob Corker, was CEO Haslam s roommate at the University of Tennessee. 4 Furthermore, unlike Tennessee, the Northern District of Alabama is outside the Sixth Circuit providing additional insulation from possible accusations of political influence. These actions are based on events that have been widely publicized in the media, especially in Knoxville, Tennessee, where the Eastern District of Tennessee is located. 1 See 2 See 3 See 4 See 6
7 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 7 of 11 Consolidation in the Northern District of Alabama may avoid any potential questioning of the impartiality of the MDL s proceedings, whether by any party or by the public, solidify a public perception of impartiality, and ultimately help insulate the transferee Court from criticism or public clamor. At the same time, the Northern District of Alabama is directly adjacent to the Eastern District of Tennessee, making it the most convenient location outside of the State of Tennessee. Consolidation in the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division, offers specific advantages in addition to its efficient docket. Birmingham is the largest city in Alabama 5 and is home to a number of hotels that can affordably accommodate the needs of out of state counsel. The newly renovated Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport offers more than 100 daily flights from over 25 cities throughout the United States. 6 Three major interstates run through Birmingham, including I-65, I-20 and I-59, and the drive from Knoxville can be made in approximately four hours. 7 The Hugo L. Black United States Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama is a state-of-art facility that is located approximately six miles from the Birmingham- Shuttlesworth International Airport. Birmingham is also within driving distance to the Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, the largest airport in the world based on airport traffic. The efficiency and caseload of the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division, supports its selection as the location for MDL No. 2515, if this Court believes that consolidation is warranted. Under 28 U.S.C. 1407, the transfer and coordination will serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses, counsel, and the judicial system better than the Eastern District of Tennessee. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Shoreline Transportation of Alabama USA, Inc. respectfully requests that the Honorable Panel enter an Order denying Defendants Motion for Transfer and Consolidation, and, in the alternative, if this Court believes that consolidation is warranted that such coordination be centralized in the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division
8 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 8 of 11 Dated: January 6, 2014 FRIEDMAN, DAZZIO, ZULANAS & BOWLING P.C. /s/ Matt Conn Jeff Friedman (FRI018) J. Michael Bowling (BOW046) Matt Conn (CON062) FRIEDMAN, DAZZIO, ZULANAS & BOWLING, P.C. Post Office Box Birmingham, Alabama Phone: (205) Fax: (205) jfriedman@friedman-lawyers.com mbowling@friedman-lawyers.com mconn@friedman-lawyers.com Attorneys for Shoreline Transportation 8
9 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 9 of 11 PROOF OF SERVICE In compliance with Rule 4.1(a) of the Rules of Procedure for the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing were served on all parties electronically via ECF, or as indicated below, on January 6, 2014: Also Served Via Timothy K. Saia, Esq. Shawn J. Organ, Esq. MORGAN, MELHUISH, ABRUTYN Douglas R. Cole, Esq. 651 West Mount Pleasant Avenue, Suite 200 ORGAN COLE + STOCK, LLP Livingston, NJ Dublin Road, Suite 104D (973) Columbus, OH tsaia@morganlawfirm.com (614) (Tel) Attorney for Mario s Express Service, Inc. (614) (Fax) (2:13-cv-05398); and, sjorgan@ocslawfirm.com National Retail Transportation, Inc., drcole@osclawfirm.com Keystone Freight Corp. Attorneys for FST Express, Inc., J.F. Freight Company, Inc. (2:13-cv-01005) F. Michale Haney, Esq. Jeffrey C. Kirby, Esq. Matthew P. Skelton, Esq. William T. Johnson, III, Esq. INZER HANDEY MCWHORTER & HANEY, LLC KIRBY JOHNSON, PC PO Box 287 One Independence Plaza Dr., Ste 520 Gadsden, AL Birmingham, AL (256) (Tel) (205) (Tel) (256) (Fax) (205) (Fax) mikehaney@bellsouth.net jkirby@kirbyjohnsonlaw.com mattskelton23@gmail.com bjohnson@kirbyjohnsonlaw.com Attorney for Osborn Transportation, Inc. Attorneys Osborn Transportation Inc (4:13-cv-00897) (4:13-cv-00897) Roger E. Yarbro, Esq. Stephen D. Brody, Esq. YARBRO & ASSOCIATES O MELVENY & MYERS, LLP PO Box Eye Street NW Cloudcroft, NM Washington, D.C (575) (Tel) (202) (Tel) (575) (Fax) sbrody@omm.com yabrocc@tularosa.net Attorney for James A. Haslam Attorney for Triple D Supply, LLC and (1:13-cv & 2:13-cv-04798) Don Doak (2:13-cv-00655) Martin G. Durkin, Jr., Esq. Gordon Ball, Esq. HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP GORDON BALL ATTORNEY 131 S. Dearborn Street, 30 th Floor 7001 Old Kent Drive Chicago, IL Knoxville, TN (312) (Tel) (865) (Tel) (312) (Fax) Martin.durkin@hklaw.com (865) (Fax) gball@gordonball.com Attorney for John Freeman and Brian Mosher Attorney for Mark Hazelwood (1:13-cv & 2:13-cv-04798) (1:13-cv & 2:13-cv-04798) 9
10 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 10 of 11 Glen M. Kurtz, Esq. James F. Logan, Jr. Esq. WHITE & CASE, LLP LOGAN-THOMPSON, PC 1155 Avenue of the Americas 30 2 nd Street NW New York, NY Cleveland, TN (212) (Tel) (423) (Tel) (212) (Fax) (423) (Fax) gkurtz@whitecase.com Attorney for Jay Stinnett Attorney for Pilot Corporation, Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, Pilot Flying J (1:13-cv & 2:13-cv-04798) Stephen M. Tunstall STEPHEN M. TUNSTALL, P.C. PO Box 152 Mobile, AL (251) (Tel) (251) (Fax) stephentunstall@yahoo.com Attorney for Wright Transportation, Inc. Served Via U.S. Mail: Ashley Judd Pilot Travel Centers, LLC d/b/a Pilot Flying J 5508 Lonas Drive Knoxville, TN Defendant Kevin Clark Pilot Travel Centers, LLC d/b/a Pilot Flying J 5508 Lonas Drive Knoxville, TN Defendant Holly Radford Pilot Travel Centers, LLC d/b/a Pilot Flying J 5508 Lonas Drive Knoxville, TN Defendant Arnold Ralenkotter Pilot Travel Centers, LLC d/b/a Pilot Flying J 5508 Lonas Drive Knoxville, TN Defendant 10
11 Case ALM/2:13-cv Document 26 Filed 01/06/14 Page 11 of 11 Dated: January 6, 2014 FRIEDMAN, DAZZIO, ZULANAS & BOWLING P.C. /s/ Matt Conn Jeff Friedman (FRI018) J. Michael Bowling (BOW046) Matt Conn (CON062) FRIEDMAN, DAZZIO, ZULANAS & BOWLING, P.C. Post Office Box Birmingham, Alabama Phone: (205) Fax: (205) Attorneys for Shoreline Transportation 11
Case MDL No. 2583 Document 1-1 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2583 Document 1-1 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION In re: ) ) THE HOME DEPOT, INC. SECURITY ) BREACH LITIGATION ) MDL Docket No. ) PLAINTIFFS
More informationUNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2151 TRANSFER ORDER Before
More informationCase: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365
Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO: 11-2372 ORDER AND REASONS
Dixon et al v. Mark Starring and Associates, Inc. et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHARLES DIXON, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 11-2372 MARK STARRING AND ASSOCIATES,
More information8:09-mn-02054-JFA Date Filed 06/28/12 Entry Number 228 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION
8:09-mn-02054-JFA Date Filed 06/28/12 Entry Number 228 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION IN RE: LANDAMERICA 1031 EXCHANGE SERVICES, INC., INTERNAL
More informationCase MDL No. 2557 Document 167 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
Case MDL No. 557 Document 167 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: AUTO BODY SHOP ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 557 TRANSFER ORDER * Before the Panel:
More informationMultidistrict Litigation In Patent Infringement Cases
Multidistrict Litigation In Patent Infringement Cases Jamie H. McDole Aaron D. Charfoos 1 1 Jamie McDole and Aaron Charfoos are both associates at the Chicago office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Over the past
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ Doc 4110 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re: LOUIS J. PEARLMAN, et al. / Case No. 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ Chapter
More informationCase 4:10-cv-00019-CDL Document 13 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
Case 4:10-cv-00019-CDL Document 13 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION ATS INTERMODAL, LLC, a corporation; GARLAND B. BEASLEY;
More informationCase MDL No. 2592 Document 122 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
Case MDL No. 2592 Document 122 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2592 TRANSFER ORDER
More informationCase 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035
Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
More informationCase 1:03-cv-01711-HHK Document 138-1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:03-cv-01711-HHK Document 138-1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARILYN VANN, RONALD MOON, DONALD MOON, CHARLENE WHITE, RALPH THREAT, FAITH RUSSELL,
More informationCase 12-80802 Doc 352 Filed 05/31/12 Entered 05/31/12 12:23:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5
Document Page 1 of 5 Texas State Bar No. 24046903 Texas Attorney General's Office P. O. Box 12548 Tele.: (512) 463-2173 Fax: (512) 482-8341 Attorneys for Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts IN THE UNITED
More informationCase MDL No. 2391 Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 13 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 13 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: BIOMET M2a MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No.
More informationHow To Stay A Criminal Case From Being Resolved In An Administrative Proceeding
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RECEIVED MAY 28 2015 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16463 ------------------------------------------------------X
More informationE-FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Peter MacKinnon, Jr. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CASE NO. 111 CV 193767
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. ) adam@gutridesafier.com SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. ) seth@gutridesafier.com TODD KENNEDY (State Bar No. 0) todd@gutridesafier.com GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP Douglass Street San
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN RE: * * [Debtor s Name] * (***-**-last four digits of SSN) * Case No. - [Joint Debtor s Name, if any * Chapter 13 (***-**-last
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION LISA COINER, STEPHEN COINER, and JARED COINER, a minor under the age of 18 years, who sues by his father,
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Aliano et al. v. Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC, Case No. 2014-CH-15667 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., Ill.) IF YOU PURCHASED TEMPLETON RYE WHISKEY FROM JANUARY 1, 2006 TO
More informationCase 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Goodridge v. Hewlett Packard Company Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHARLES GOODRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION H-07-4162 HEWLETT-PACKARD
More informationCase 2:14-cv-00445-CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:14-cv-00445-CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6 Karra J. Porter, 5223 Karra.Porter@chrisjen.com David C. Richards, 6023 David.Richards@chrisjen.com CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN, P.C. 15 West South
More informationCase: 4:12-cv-00080-CEJ Doc. #: 309 Filed: 01/30/14 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 7791
Case: 4:12-cv-00080-CEJ Doc. #: 309 Filed: 01/30/14 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 7791 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationDownloaded from CJOnline.com
Case 2:12-cv-02752-JWL-KGG Document 282 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS LAURA V. LOPEZ-AGUIRRE, ) Individually, as Administrator of the Estate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PARKER, et al. Plaintiffs v. NO. 1:03CV00213(EGS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al. Defendants MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE COME NOW Plaintiffs in Seegers,
More informationPersonal Injury Litigation
Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction
More informationCase: 4:13-cv-02652-SL Doc #: 32 Filed: 09/02/14 1 of 10. PageID #: <pageid> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 4:13-cv-02652-SL Doc #: 32 Filed: 09/02/14 1 of 10. PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JERRY P. TAMARKIN, et al., ) CASE NO. 4:13cv2652 ) )
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION PETITION TO QUASH CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND DATED JULY 24,2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION In re NATIONAL PROCESSING COMPANY, et al PETITION TO QUASH CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND DATED JULY 24,2013 Venable LLP Jeffrey D. Knowles Ellen
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: Case No. DT 09-08254 AURORA OIL & GAS CORPORATION, Chapter 11 Hon. Scott W. Dales Debtor. / Page 1 of 5 FRONTIER ENERGY, LLC,
More informationCase 1:15-cv-00009-JMS-MJD Document 29 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: <pageid>
Case 1:15-cv-00009-JMS-MJD Document 29 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION DARYL HILL, vs. Plaintiff, WHITE JACOBS
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: MICHAEL TODD CHRISLEY, Chapter 7 Case No. 13-56132-MGD Debtor. JASON L. PETTIE, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE
More informationCase 2:13-cv-01601-AKK Document 41 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:13-cv-01601-AKK Document 41 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 11 FILED 2014 Jan-24 PM 02:31 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. WILLIAM M. LOGAN Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene JJ.
More informationThe trademark lawyer as brand manager
The trademark lawyer as brand manager This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Brands in the Boardroom 2005 May 2005 For further information please visit www.iam-magazine.com Feature The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND TRIAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND TRIAL If you were employed as a Registered Nurse (and not solely as a Supervisory, Managerial,
More informationCase 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you settled a personal injury or worker s compensation claim with Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company,
More informationCase 2:14-cv-02032 Document 2 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA MOTION
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0 Page of 0 TAMARA W. ASHFORD Acting Assistant Attorney General KAYCEE M. SULLIVAN Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box, Ben Franklin Station Washington,
More informationBEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban Products Liability Litigation Kieonna Littlejohn and Audrey Oakley v. Janssen Research & Development, et
More informationCase 1:11-mc-00512-GK-DAR Document 12 Filed 01/11/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-mc-00512-GK-DAR Document 12 Filed 01/11/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Petitioner, -v.- DELOITTE TOUCHE
More informationAndrew C. Snyder, Esq. 8400 East Prentice Avenue, #1500 Case No. 2013CV31667 Denver, Colorado 80111 Ctrm.: 269 Phone Number: 303-409-7777
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 FRED J. JOSEPH, Securities Commissioner for The State of Colorado, Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENCE FINANCIAL SERVICES,
More informationA settlement has been reached in a class action about LG and Kenmore-branded French Door Refrigerators.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CONNIE MCLENNAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-03604 (WJM (MF A settlement has been reached in
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : SAM STINSON, on his behalf : and on behalf of all persons : similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs : Civil Action File v.
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Anthony Abbott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., Defendants. Case No. 06-cv-701 Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan NOTICE OF CLASS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. STEPHEN J. HARMELIN, RECEIVER AD LITEM, et al. : v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN J. HARMELIN, RECEIVER AD LITEM, et al. : CIVIL ACTION v. : MAN FINANCIAL INC., et al. : NO. 06-1944 MEMORANDUM RE: UBS
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:07-cv-00172-MJR-CJP Document 8-1 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, Plaintiff, and PEARLE PHILLIPS,
More informationCase 1:07-cv-00347-B Document 7 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
Case 1:07-cv-00347-B Document 7 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:13-cv-00563-RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-00563-RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00563-RBJ-BNB W. L. (BILL) ARMSTRONG;
More informationCase 1:07-cr-00220-BSJ Document 30 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cr-00220-BSJ Document 30 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. 07 Cr. 220 (BSJ) PAUL BARNABA, GOVERNMENT S MEMORANDUM
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY If you bought Dreamfields Pasta you could get a cash payment from a class action settlement. (A federal court authorized this notice. This is
More informationDefendant: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY COURT USE ONLY Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc R. Levy, #11372
GRANTED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: May 27, 2010 DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND
More informationWorkers Compensation - An Appropriate Method to Calculate the Average Weekly Wage
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BESSEMER DIVISION GREGORY PILKERTON Plaintiff, VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV 10-276 COOL TEMP, INC., a corporation or other business entity and A,B,C, and D,
More informationCase 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584
Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationPlaintiffs, * CIRCUIT COURT. CHARLES L. SCHNEE, M.D., et al., * BALTIMORE CITY, PART 23. Defendants. * Case No.: 24-C-10-008951
JOHN M. ALDAVE, et al., * IN THE Plaintiffs, * CIRCUIT COURT v. * FOR CHARLES L. SCHNEE, M.D., et al., * BALTIMORE CITY, PART 23 Defendants. * Case No.: 24-C-10-008951 * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 EDDIE BAUER HOLDINGS, Case No. 09-12099 (MFW INC., et al., Debtors. Jointly Administered Re: Docket Nos. 9, 214 Objection Deadline:
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER AYDEN BREWSTER, individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUN TRUST MORTGAGE, INC., Defendant, No. 12-56560 D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00448-
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED WHETHER YOU ACT OR DON T ACT ON THE SETTLEMENT. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY.
NOTICE OF $7,000,000.00 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO PERSONS WHO PAID A FEE TO A CHECK CASHING BUSINESS KNOWN AS THE CHECK CASHING STORE OR THE CCS PAYMENT STORE IF PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 2001 YOU ENTERED INTO
More informationto Consolidate, ECF No. 13,1 filedon August 21, 2014. Therein, Sprinkle argued that this Court
Case 2:14-cv-00251-LRL Document 21 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use ofsprinkle
More information2:13-cv-11754-DPH-MJH Doc # 4 Filed 04/18/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
2:13-cv-11754-DPH-MJH Doc # 4 Filed 04/18/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ADDICTION & DETOXIFICATION ) INSTITUTE, LLC, ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:13-cv-00903-SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31
Case: 1:13-cv-00903-SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary
More informationIi) ~ f' ~ ~H ih. ll' ~ rj ~ ih ~ ~,~ l~d1. ' 'J Ü ~ ~~~ j ~ ''lti ~,;,.~ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRAE COMMISSION
Ii ~ f' ~ ~H ih ll' ~ rj ~ ih ~ ~,~ l~d1. ' 'J Ü ~ ~~~ j ~ ''lti ~,;,.~ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRAE COMMISSION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES In the Matter of DANIEL CHAPTER ONE,
More information2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 09-14271 HON.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:14-cv-00034-SNLJ Doc. #: 93 Filed: 07/01/14 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:07-cv-10533-LPZ-MKM Document 28 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:07-cv-10533-LPZ-MKM Document 28 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GEOFFREY N. FIEGER, NANCY FISHER and FIEGER, FIEGER, KENNEY
More informationCase 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 545 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-md-0-crb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN CLEAN DIESEL MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
More information11-15463-shl Doc 8710 Filed 06/14/13 Entered 06/14/13 11:58:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 6
Pg 1 of 6 STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL 55 Elm Street, P.O. Box 120 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0120 Telephone (860) 808-5150 Facsimile (860) 808-5383 Denise S. Mondell, Assistant Attorney
More information2015 IL App (3d) 140144-U. Order filed September 2, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 140144-U Order filed
More informationCase 0:12-cv-61735-WJZ Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2013 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61735-WJZ Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2013 Page 1 of 5 BROWARD BULLDOG, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, and DAN CHRISTENSEN, founder, operator and editor of the BrowardBulldog.com
More informationCase: 1:09-cv-06448 Document #: 48 Filed: 10/08/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:<pageid>
Case: 1:09-cv-06448 Document #: 48 Filed: 10/08/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PRIME RECEIVABLES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. ASSOCIATED
More informationHow To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line
Case 1:10-cv-02129-JLK Document 32 Filed 11/10/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 10-CV-02129-JLK WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v. Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
More informationCase 5:14-cv-00093-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:14-cv-00093-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 MARY SOWELL et al., Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION Page 1 of
More informationCase: 1:10-cv-00363-WHB Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/02/10 1 of 14. PageID #: 172
Case: 1:10-cv-00363-WHB Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/02/10 1 of 14. PageID #: 172 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES MEYER, v. Plaintiff, DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION KIMBERLY L. HARRIS, MALIA COLEMAN, BETTY CURRY, ELSIE STATHAM, DEANA BAKIR and TAMMALEE WILSON, on behalf of themselves
More information3:14-cv-00300-JFA Date Filed 07/31/14 Entry Number 80 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
3:14-cv-00300-JFA Date Filed 07/31/14 Entry Number 80 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Kaleigh R. Dittus, Courtney A. Snyder, ) Civil
More informationHIPAA IN A NUTSHELL: A Synopsis of How the HIPAA Privacy Rules Impact Ex Parte Communications. By Larry A. Golston, Jr.
HIPAA IN A NUTSHELL: A Synopsis of How the HIPAA Privacy Rules Impact Ex Parte Communications By Larry A. Golston, Jr. BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 272 COMMERCE STREET POST OFFICE
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JAMES MICHAEL WATSON 03-13355 DEBTOR CHAPTER 7
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CASE NO. JAMES MICHAEL WATSON 03-13355 DEBTOR CHAPTER 7 SECURITY RESOURCES, L.L.C. ADV. NO and INTERFACE SECURITY SYSTEMS, L.L.C. 04-1005
More informationCase 2:11-cv-02555-RDR-KGS Document 90 Filed 04/16/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
Case 2:11-cv-02555-RDR-KGS Document 90 Filed 04/16/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS PAULA M. MARS Executor of the estate of Mindy Knopf, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO If you initiated a money transfer in the United States with Western Union between January 1, 2001 and January 3, 2013 and your money transfer was not redeemed
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:13-cv-11370-GCS-RSW Doc # 45 Filed 03/28/14 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 672 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Catherine Phillips, et al. Case no. 2:13-cv-11370 Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY. Case No. CVCV036641
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY DUANE SMITH and BROOKE SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No. CVCV036641 Plaintiffs, v. MARTIN BROTHERS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY,
More informationCase 12-51502 Doc 3203 Filed 03/13/13 Entered 03/13/13 17:19:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI In Re: ) Chapter 11 ) Case No. 12-51502-659 PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION, et al., ) Jointly Administered ) Honorable Kathy Surratt-States
More informationMOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS
Nos. 13-cv-348 & 13-cv-358 [notice of appeal filed April 1, 2013 and April 4, 2013] No. 13-cv-1059 [notice of appeal filed September 23, 2013] IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia,
More informationCase 12-49219 Doc 2193 Filed 03/07/14 Entered 03/07/14 11:33:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5
Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 EDISON MISSION ENERGY, et al., Case No. 12-49219 (JPC Debtors. 1 (Jointly Administered
More informationCase 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 1119 Filed 09/17/2004 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 11 Filed 09/17/04 Page 1 of 5 LOD 1 BINGHAM, McCUTCHEN LLP KAREN KENNARD - 1425 2 KRISTEN A. PALUMBO - 215857 3 San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re ORACLE CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION SCOTT OZAKI, derivatively and on behalf of ORACLE CORPORATION,
More informationNotice of Class Action Settlement
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION KOTA OF SARASOTA, INC. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,
More informationORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE
Pulitano v. Thayer St. Associates, Inc., No. 407-9-06 Wmcv (Wesley, J., Oct. 23, 2009) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy
More informationCASE 0:10-cv-04822-DSD -JJK Document 30 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.
CASE 0:10-cv-04822-DSD -JJK Document 30 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 6 E-Shops, Corp., an Arizona corporation, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated doing business as Paintball Punks,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. Chapter 11 Jointly Administered
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re: LOUIS J. PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. / Case No. 6:07-bk-00761-ABB Chapter 11 Jointly Administered DEFENDANTS 1 OBJECTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY, ) DUNCAN SCHOOL OF LAW, ) ) Case No: 3:11-CV-608 Plaintiff, ) ) Honorable Thomas A. Varlan v.
More informationCase 8:11-ap-00418-KRM Doc 14 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:11-ap-00418-KRM Doc 14 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: CHARLES F. STEINBERGER Case No. 8:10-bk-19945-KRM PAMELA J. PERRY
More informationAPPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF JOHN K. CUNNINGHAM, PRO HAC VICE
Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Caption in compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-2(c) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP (Formed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) Michael J. Viscount,
More informationCase: 1:05-cv-06583 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:17360
Case: 1:05-cv-06583 Document #: 534 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:17360 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GEORGE MCREYNOLDS, MAROC HOWARD,
More informationCase 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD MEYER and KATHLEEN LEONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
More informationCase 1:04-cv-04461-DEW-RML Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: <pageid>
Case 1:04-cv-04461-DEW-RML Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 3:09-cv-00080-TMB Document 71 Filed 03/15/2010 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:09-cv-00080-TMB Document 71 Filed 03/15/2010 Page 1 of 11 KAREN L. LOEFFLER United States Attorney RICHARD L. POMEROY Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY If You Currently Subscribe to Cablevision Cable Television Services, or If You Subscribed at Any Time Since April 30, 2004, You Could Benefit
More informationYour legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are the original owner of certain MacBook or MacBook Pro computers and/or you purchased a standalone 60W or 85W MagSafe power adapter
More informationAppeal No. 10-15113 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Case: 10-15113 07/08/2010 Page: 1 of 5 ID: 7398322 DktEntry: 17-1 Appeal No. 10-15113 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
More information