Employment Tax Considerations for Businesses When Addressing Litigation with Employees or Former Employees
|
|
- Lucy Francis
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Employment Tax Considerations for Businesses When Addressing Litigation with Employees or Former Employees William Hays Weissman Littler Mendelson, P.C. San Francisco, California It is a common fact of life that businesses get sued from time to time by employees and former employees. It is critical that businesses understand the potential employment tax considerations associated with such litigation, whether involving a settlement or judgment. Businesses that fail to understand the potential tax implications can find themselves liable for substantial taxes, penalties and interest when the taxing authorities come calling. This article provides a brief primer on the major employment tax considerations businesses should understand. Important Point # 1: The IRS and state taxing agencies are not parties to the litigation and therefore not bound by the parties or a court s determination as to the tax consequences of the litigation. The IRS and state tax agencies are not required to respect the tax consequences inherent in the settlement of litigation, and a settlement agreement s characterization or division of settlement amounts is not binding on the government. 1 Rather, the nature of the claim that was the basis for actual settlement, and not the validity of the claim, controls the characterization of the income for tax purposes. 2 Determination of the nature of the claim is primarily a factual question that is generally made by reference to the settlement agreement. 3 Inquiry is based on payor s intent or dominant reason for making payment. 4 Important Point # 2: A settlement agreement should specifically allocate amounts being paid based on the payor s intent in light of the facts and circumstances, and the amounts should be arrived at through arm s length, adversarial negotiations. In order for the allocation in a settlement agreement to be respected, it must be entered into (1) in an adversarial relationship; (2) at arm s length; and (3) in good faith. It is not enough for the parties to reach a settlement figure in an adversarial relationship; rather, the allocation must also be based on adversarial positions. For example, in Robinson v. Commissioner, following a jury verdict for about $60 million, including $6 million for lost profits, $1.5 million for mental anguish, and $50 for punitive damages, the parties settled for about $10 million. The plaintiff wanted to allocate 95 percent of 1 Hemelt v. Comm r, 122 F.3d 204, 208 (4th Cir. 1997); Vincent v. Comm r, T.C. Memo ; see also Treas. Reg. Section (a)-1(c). 2 Bagley v. Comm r, 105 T.C. 396, 406 (1995); Allum v. Comm r, T.C. Memo Robinson v. Comm r, 102 T.C. 116, 126 (1994). 4 Knuckles v. Comm r, 349 F.2d 610, 613 (10th Cir. 1965); Metzger v. Comm r, 88 T.C. 834, 847 (1987). 14
2 settlement to mental anguish (which was not taxable at the time). The court rejected the settlement allocation because it was not based on a reasonable allocation consistent with the claims alleged in the lawsuit. 5 Important Point # 3: It is necessary to understand what types of damages are available under the alleged causes of action. From a taxing agency perspective, the primary concern with respect to a settlement agreement involving an employer and employee is whether a reasonable amount of the settlement was allocated to wages, and thereafter that the correct amount of taxes were withheld and remitted. To the extent that there may be multiple allocations for non-wage (but taxable) payments, there is less incentive or interest for the taxing agency to address the matter with the employer because no employment taxes attached to such payments. The natural starting place for determining whether the allocation made in a settlement agreement is appropriate is the plaintiff s complaint. Certain claims and causes of action are only entitled to certain damages. For example, claims under the ADEA do not allow for tort type damages, and therefore no amount could be allocated to a claim under the ADEA for personal physical injury. 6 Once the claims and potential damages are determined, the relative strength of any claims should be reviewed. For example, a claim for back pay must be determined in light of whether the employee continued to be employed during the period at issue. Also, plaintiffs are obligated to mitigate their damages. Thus, it should be determined whether the employee obtained other employment, how quickly, and at what rate of pay. In at least some cases, despite claims for back pay, the facts may demonstrate that the employee lost little if any wages because he or she obtained other employment quickly for the same or a higher rate of pay. In such situations the amount of a settlement reasonably allocated to wages may well be small relative to other payments being made. Important Point # 4: Know the tax consequences of various forms of damages and how they apply to your case. After figuring out what forms of damages are available based on the causes of action in the complaint, it is then necessary to figure out the potential employment tax consequences of paying such damages. Below is a short explanation of the tax consequences of typical damages in litigation between employers or employees. A. Back pay claims All payments of wages are treated as wages subject to employment taxes unless specifically exempted, and no statute or regulation exempts back pay from the definition of wages for tax 5 See also Vincent v. Comm r, T.C. Memo Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323 (1995). 15
3 purposes. 7 This is true even if the workers receiving the payments are no longer employed by the payor for other purposes at the time the payment is made. 8 In Social Security Bd. v. Nierotko, 9 the United States Supreme Court held that back pay awarded under the National Labor Relations Act to an employee who had been wrongfully discharged was wages under the Social Security Act. The Court noted that the back pay constituted remuneration and also held that the remuneration was for employment even though the back pay related to a period during which the petitioner did not perform any service. 10 Nierotko has been cited in numerous case dealing with the question of whether payments upon settlement of claims constituted wages for employment tax purposes. 11 B. Emotional distress and personal physical injuries Under Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code ), amounts received on account of personal physical injury or illness are not income subject to tax. Prior to 1996, emotional distress was generally treated as falling within the exemption under Code Section 104(a)(2). However, for payments made after August 21, 1996, emotional distress was expressly carved out of Code Section 104(a)(2). The IRS has defined personal physical injury or sickness requires an observable bodily harm such as bruising, cuts, swelling and bleeding. 12 In contrast, emotional distress generally includes the physical symptoms of the emotional distress, such as stomach aches, ulcers, and headaches triggered by emotional distress. 13 Thus, it is important to understand that emotional distress is taxable income while personal physical injuries are exempt from taxation. Payments on account of personal physical injuries are not reported, while emotional distress damages are reported on IRS Form 1099-MISC, box 3 (other income) if over $600. Emotional distress is not taxable, however, up to the amount of any unreimbursed medical expenses actually paid by the plaintiff. Accordingly, when fashioning a settlement, it is useful to know if any medical expenses exist. Also, while emotional distress is taxable income, it is not wages because it is not intended to be in lieu of wages paid in employment. Therefore, it is not subject to employment taxes. C. Attorney fees 7 Code Section 3401; United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co., 532 U.S. 200 (2001). 8 Treas. Reg. Section (a)-1(a)(5). 9 Social Security Bd. v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 (1946). 10 Id., at E.g., Mayberry v. United States, 151 F.3d 855 (8th Cir. 1998); Hemelt v. United States, 122 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 1997). The exception to this general rule is when the back pay is received on account of a personal physical injury or illness. E.g., Johnson v. United States, 76 Fed. Appx. 873 (10th Cir. 2003). 12 See IRS Private Letter Ruling Conference Committee Report to the 1996 Act. 16
4 Most settlements involve some form of payment of attorney fees. In two consolidated cases in 2005 the United States Supreme Court ruled that attorney fees are taxable income to the plaintiffs. 14 To the extent income is reported to an attorney, such income is reported on Form 1099-MISC generally in accordance with Code Section 6045(f). 15 Congress alleviated the problem of plaintiffs being taxed on attorney fees in most employment related litigation in the JOBs Act of Under the Act a plaintiff may take a deduction for attorney fees paid for discrimination cases that is above-the-line, making it potentially tax neutral, but only up to the amount of the settlement award. 16 This provision is only effective for payments made after October 22, In Revenue Ruling , 18 the IRS explained the income tax and employment tax consequences of interest and attorney fees being awarded by a court in connection with claims for back pay. Specifically, it stated that interest and attorney fees are generally not wages to the employee unless there is no specific allocation. These same principles would apply to settlements. D. Liquidated damages and interest Liquidated damages, such as those available under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and interest are treated as taxable income but not wages. 19 Important Point # 5: Document the efforts taken to determine the allocations being made. A reasonable allocation that is clearly specified in a settlement agreement is most likely to be respected, particularly when there is evidence to establish the reasons for the allocation. 14 See Banks v. Commissioner, 543 U.S. 426 (2005). Whether attorneys fees are income to a plaintiff under a fee shifting statute is unsettled (the Supreme Court in Banks declined to address the issue) and may depend upon state law. For example, under California law, when there is no contract providing for the disposition of such fees, they belong to the attorney that earned them. See Flannery v. Prentice, 26 Cal. 4th 572 (2001). This would suggest that attorneys fees under a fee shifting statute are not income to the plaintiff. Nonetheless, there is no truly definitive law to date on this issue from a tax reporting perspective. 15 See also Treas. Reg. Section Code Section 62(a)(20). For example, parties settle a discrimination case for $100,000 in damages to plaintiff and $125,000 in attorneys fees. Plaintiff would have $225,000 in gross income, but a $125,000 above-the-line deduction, resulting in net taxable income of only $100,000, the same amount as she actually receives. 17 There is also currently an administrative exception to the rule that attorneys fees are income to the plaintiffs in class action settlements. This exception is based on an IRS memorandum. While the legal justification for IRS position is somewhat suspect, because it benefits taxpayers it has not been challenged. See Office of Chief Counsel Memorandum, PRENO , May 18, Thus, to the extent that any settlement is a claims made settlement, it should be possible to exclude the attorneys fees from inclusion in income for the plaintiffs. However, this is subject to change at the IRS s discretion. 18 Rev. Rul , C.B. 294, I.R.B See, e.g., 2008 Form 1099-MISC Instructions, p. 4 (liquidated damages under ADEA not wages); Rev. Rul (liquidated damages are not wages subject to employment taxes); Kern v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 63 F. Supp. 120 (N.D. Iowa 1945), aff d 157 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1946) (liquidated damages under the FLSA are not wages for employment or income tax withholding purposes); 2008 Form 1099-INT (interest income); Rev. Rul (interest is not wages subject to employment taxes). 17
5 The reasons for payment - based on whatever investigation has been done - should be documented by the company for future use. Doing so will help in any audits of the settlement agreements. The IRS has now made audits of settlements a routine part of general corporate income tax and employment tax audits. Thus, for example, if an investigation reveals that a plaintiff claiming harassment visited a psychologist several times over the ordeal, it may support the company s decision to pay an amount for emotional distress or other compensatory damages relating to the harassment claim. Such evidence should be documented as part of the decision to allocate amounts to such damages. Nonetheless, there is no bright line test for determining the reasonableness of an allocation. Often the amount of any settlement is less than the potential damages that could be awarded under one cause of action, let alone the entire complaint. This is particularly true when dealing with claims of labor code violations (e.g., wage and hour violations) on a class action basis. Thus, it becomes most critical to make sure that the negotiations process is well documented and conducted in an adversarial arm s length manner. This, more than any other factor, is likely to establish that the allocations were reasonable in nature. Important Point # 6: If you cannot settle the matter, make sure you get jury instructions that take into account the tax consequences. Assuming that settlement does not occur, it is a good idea to get jury instructions that point out that any amounts awarded to an employee are subject to deductions as required by law. Thus, if a jury awards $50,000 in back wages, such amount should be minus applicable taxes. Important Point # 7: Think about the tax consequences before settling the matter and not afterwards. It is not uncommon for parties to agree to settle litigation at the end of a long day of mediation for a lump sum, and then afterwards look around to figure out what to do with it. It is a much better practice to consider the potential employment tax consequences before reaching that figure, and even better to negotiate each allocation separately. Doing so will help ensure the reasonableness of all allocations and that the settlement is respected by the taxing agencies. 18
TAX TREATMENT OF RECOVERIES IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES
TAX TREATMENT OF RECOVERIES IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES Committee on Labor & Employment Law AUGUST 2009 THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 42 WEST 44 TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10036 TAX TREATMENT
More informationTax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments
Tax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments Dominic L. Daher, MAcc, JD, LLM in Taxation Director of Internal Audit and Tax Compliance Adjunct Professor of Law University of San Francisco Dawn G. Mayer, JD,
More informationElizabeth Erickson & Ira B. Mirsky, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP
Tax Consequences of Employment Cases Elizabeth Erickson & Ira B. Mirsky, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employment-related litigation is not only a major business concern it involves substantial tax ramifications
More informationEmployers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims
Employers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims Contributed by: Elizabeth Erickson * & Ira B. Mirsky **, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employee litigation alleging discrimination
More informationISSUES. (1) When are attorney s fees paid by an employer as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee subject to employment taxes?
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Release Number: 20133501F Release Date: 8/30/2013 CC:TEGE:FS:MABAL:MRLenius POSTF-129928-13 Release Number: Release Date: 8/30/2013 date: July
More informationThe Tax Consequences of Settlement Agreements
COMPENSATION/Compliance The Tax Consequences of Settlement Agreements Compensation & Benefits Review 42(5) 426 431 2010 SAGE Publications Reprints and permission: http://www. sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav
More informationTAX IMPLICATIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS OF DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT CASES
TAX IMPLICATIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS OF DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT CASES Brian Jorgensen Jones Day 2727 N. Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-3741 bmjorgensen@jonesday.com Stephen Harris Jones Day
More informationIncome and Employment Tax Consequences and Proper Reporting of Employment- Related Judgments and Settlements
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET2:SLHartford FILES-102495-07 UILC: 61.00-00, 3101.00-00, 3111.00-00, 3402.00-00 date: October 22, 2008 to: Lee Patton Deputy Associate Chief Counsel (General Legal Services) Neil Worden
More informationTaxation of Terminations, Settlements and Judges
2015 YLD Bridge the Gap Seminar Taxation of Terminations, Settlements and Judges 11:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Presented by: David Repp Dickinson Mackaman Tyler & Hagen PC 699 Walnut St. Suite 1600 Des Moines,
More informationFEDERAL INCOME TAX AND PERSONAL INJURY JUDGMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS By Fred A. Simpson 1
FEDERAL INCOME TA AND PERSONAL INJURY JUDGMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS By Fred A. Simpson 1 For eighty years federal law did not impose income tax on damages or settlements on account of personal injuries. 2
More informationSETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS YOU MEAN I HAVE TO PAY TAXES?
SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS YOU MEAN I HAVE TO PAY TAXES? By: Geoffrey N. Taylor, Esq. I. INCOME TO PLAINTIFF A. Distinction between settlements and judgments. B. Basic rule is the origin of claims test.
More informationLawsuits, Awards, and Settlements Audit Techniques Guide
Lawsuits, Awards, and Settlements Audit Techniques Guide NOTE: This document is not an official pronouncement of the law or the position of the Service and cannot be used, cited, or relied upon as such.
More informationGUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS
GUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS Office of the State Controller State of Colorado Revised January, 1997 I. Purpose The purpose of this guide is to provide information necessary
More informationThis page left intentionally blank.
This page left intentionally blank. Insert IRS Mission Statement This page left intentionally blank. LAWSUIT AWARDS AND SETTLEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION vii Chapter 1, ISSUES 1-1 Issues for Lawsuit
More informationSO YOU THINK YOU VE WON THE TAXATION OF SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS. December 7, 2011
SO YOU THINK YOU VE WON THE TAXATION OF SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS December 7, 2011 Michal E. Yarborough, CPA Carruthers & Roth, P.A. 235 N. Edgeworth Street Post Office Box 540 Greensboro, North Carolina
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-156 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD W. RAMEY AND JONI J. RAMEY,
More informationIRS Releases MSSP Audit Guide for Lawsuit Awards
IRS Releases MSSP Audit Guide for Lawsuit Awards The Service has released a Market Segment Specialization Program audit guide that contains examination techniques for lawsuit awards and settlements. Document
More informationEmployment Article June 8, 2004
Employment Article June 8, 2004 TAX IMPLICATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT SETTLEMENTS AND DAMAGE AWARDS Herman Spence, hspence@rbh.com I. Overview A. No distinction between settlements and judgments. It makes no
More informationT.C. Memo. 2012-71 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. SALVADOR F. NERI AND GUADALUPE NERI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-71 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SALVADOR F. NERI AND GUADALUPE NERI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20420-09. Filed March 15, 2012. 1. Held: Ps have failed
More informationLost Wages in Personal Injury Awards Are Not Taxable
letter to the editor Lost Wages in Personal Injury Awards Are Not Taxable by Francis J. Carney, Esq. TO THE EDITORS: Mike Deamer s piece in the last Utah Trial Journal on taxation of personal injury settlements
More informationT.C. Memo. 2007-224 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. DOUGLAS A. GIBSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2007-224 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DOUGLAS A. GIBSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13125-05. Filed August 13, 2007. Dwight M. Montgomery, for petitioner.
More informationPART 3 REPRESENTATION, PRACTICE, AND PROCEDURES. Taxpayer's ability to pay the tax (e.g., installment agreements, offer in compromise)
PART 3 REPRESENTATION, PRACTICE, AND PROCEDURES Section 2: Representation before the IRS Part 3 Taxpayer s Financial Situation Taxpayer's ability to pay the tax (e.g., installment agreements, offer in
More informationThe "Physical" Requirement in IRC 104(a)(2) and Taxable Interest in a Settlement or Judgment
2005 Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. The "Physical" Requirement in IRC 104(a)(2) and Taxable Interest in a Settlement or Judgment Marjorie Suisman, Esq. Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. The Physical Requirements
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax Stock Option Compensation Warnings for the Unwary Stock options are a popular form of compensation provided to employees of corporations.
More informationT.C. Memo. 2003-329 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EUGENE AMOS, JR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2003-329 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EUGENE AMOS, JR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13391-01. Filed December 1, 2003. Terrance A. Costello, for petitioner.
More informationAs a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled
More informationTop 10 Tax Developments Impacting Litigation Recoveries By Robert W. Wood
Top 10 Tax Developments Impacting Litigation Recoveries By Robert W. Wood Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood & Porter, San Francisco (www.woodporter.com), and is the author of Taxation of Damage Awards
More information141 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KATHLEEN S. SIMPSON AND GEORGE T. SIMPSON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
141 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KATHLEEN S. SIMPSON AND GEORGE T. SIMPSON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 26619-11. Filed October 28, 2013. P-W sued E, her
More information122 T.C. No. 23 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. MARTY J. MEEHAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
122 T.C. No. 23 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARTY J. MEEHAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 219-02L. Filed June 14, 2004. Before the effective date of sec. 6330, I.R.C.,
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TAXATION OF COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES FOR INDIVIDUALS
NOTE: This article was referenced in the June 2005 In Brief in the article entitled, Taxes on Attorney Fees. It is a more detailed explanation of the issues discussed in that article. Our thanks to Philip
More informationT.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14226-08. Filed November 18, 2010. R determined a deficiency
More informationCase 3:13-cv-01238-JPG-PMF Document 18 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-01238-JPG-PMF Document 18 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #78 RICHARD M. O DONNELL, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS v. Case No. 13-cv-1238-JPG-PMF
More informationTAX LAW FOR THE LITIGATOR - 2001 UPDATE
CLE & Ski January 14, 2002 Big Sky, Montana TAX LAW FOR THE LITIGATOR - 2001 UPDATE RICHARD M. BASKETT Attorney - CPA Baskett Law Office Suite 234 210 North Higgins Avenue Missoula, Montana 59802 (406)
More informationTax Issues: Damages, Rescission and Debt Cancellation as Client Income by Dennis Brager
Vol. 10 No. 2 T H E C O N S U M E R A D V O C A T E 9 Tax Issues: Damages, Rescission and Debt Cancellation as Client Income by Dennis Brager Many clients and some lawyers assume that damages received
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200924034 Release Date: 6/12/2009 Index Number: 468B.00-00, 468B.04-01, 468B.07-00, 461.00-00, 162.00-00, 172.00-00, 172.01-00, 172.01-05, 172.06-00 -----------------------
More information"This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code."
PRIVATE RULING 9131023 "This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code." Dear * * * This is in reply to a letter dated October 30, 1990, and subsequent
More informationT.C. Memo. 2000-161 UNITED STATES TAX COURT
T.C. Memo. 2000-161 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ESTATE OF KENNETH F. SCHOENEMAN, DECEASED, JOANN METZ AND JAMES J. RILEY, EXECUTORS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15230-97.
More informationIncome Tax Considerations In Settlements And Judgments (With Sample Provisions And Drafting Checklists)
Income Tax Considerations In Settlements And Judgments (With Sample Provisions And Drafting Checklists) Mickey R. Davis Mickey R. Davis is a partner in the Houston law firm of Bracewell and Giuliani LLP.
More informationQUALIFIED SETTLEMENT TRUSTS A Useful Tool in Multi-Party Litigation
2005, Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT TRUSTS A Useful Tool in Multi-Party Litigation Marjorie Suisman, Esq. Davis Malm & D Agostine P.C. I. Introduction. A Designated Settlement Fund
More informationDate: February 16, 2001
,QWHUQDO5HYHQXH6HUYLFH Number: 200121031 Release Date: 5/25/2001 Index No.: 104.03-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To: CC:ITA:1 PLR-122136-00
More informationTAXATION OF DAMAGE AWARDS: CURRENT LAW AND IMPLICATIONS. Tyler J. Bowles and W. Cris Lewis* Introduction
TAXATION OF DAMAGE AWARDS: CURRENT LAW AND IMPLICATIONS Tyler J. Bowles and W. Cris Lewis* Introduction Congress, as part of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, l has apparently settled the
More information1. Whether a shareholder and CEO of a company is subject to tax on the exchange of old
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 20131601F Release Date: 4/19/2013 CC:LB&I:HMT:NEW:1:NConnelly POSTF-123943-11 date: February 19, 2012 to: Angela Nyagu Internal Revenue
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Number: 200102004 Release Date: 1/12/2001 CC:IT&A:01/TL-N-2327-00 UILC: 446.04-03 August 14, 2000 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR FROM:
More informationWOODCRAFT. tax notes. Top 10 Tax Mistakes Made by Contingent Fee Lawyers. By Robert W. Wood
Top 10 Tax Mistakes Made by Contingent Fee Lawyers By Robert W. Wood Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood & Porter in San Francisco (http://www.woodporter.com) and is the author of Taxation of Damage
More informationNotice of Proposed Rules Regarding Employment Taxation of Transfers Incident to Divorce
Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Notice of Proposed Rules Regarding Employment Taxation of Transfers Incident to Divorce Notice 2002-31 I. Overview and Purpose This notice sets
More informationmemorandum Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Number: 201533011 Release Date: 8/14/2015 CC:FIP:B04 POSTF-146000-13
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum Number: 201533011 Release Date: 8/14/2015 CC:FIP:B04 POSTF-146000-13 UILC: 832.00-00, 162.04-03 date: May 06, 2015 to: from: Gwen Schoen Attorney
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 201045005 Release Date: 11/12/2010 Index Number: 162.25-05 ----------------------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
More informationCOMMENTS ON DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPLOYMENT TAXES IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXERCISE OF NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTIONS
COMMENTS ON DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPLOYMENT TAXES IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXERCISE OF NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTIONS The following comments are the individual views of the members of the Section of Taxation
More informationTEN WAYS TAXES IMPACT LEGAL FEES
TEN WAYS TAXES IMPACT LEGAL FEES By Robert W. Wood 1 No one likes paying legal fees, but tax deductions make them less painful. For example, if your combined state and federal tax rate is 40%, $10,000
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE. DEBORAH A. BUTLER ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL (Field Service) CC:DOM:FS
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 June 12, 2000 Number: 200043011 Release Date: 10/27/2000 CC:DOM:FS:FI&P WTA-N-107454-00 UILC: 162.04-03 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 201429007 Release Date: 7/18/2014 Index Number: 1504.02-00, 832.00-00, 832.06-00 --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
More informationFederal Income Taxation Chapter 3 Compensation for Losses
Presentation: Federal Income Taxation Chapter 3 Compensation for Losses Professors Wells August 26, 2015 Clark v. Commissioner p.90 Facts: Clark paid $19,941.10 by tax counsel to compensate Clark for consequences
More informationBlaney + AMT = Opportunities?
Blaney + AMT = Opportunities? by Herman Wacker and Monna Lux CPA 1 The October, 2002 Blaney decision by Division I of the Court of Appeals added much complexity to the already problematic issue of assessing
More informationT.C. Memo. 2015-103 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. MOHAMMAD A. KAKEH AND TONI L. KAKEH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2015-103 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MOHAMMAD A. KAKEH AND TONI L. KAKEH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 10728-13L. Filed June 2, 2015. Thomas Kevin Spencer,
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200741003 Release Date: 10/12/2007 Index Number: 468B.07-00, 162.00-00, 461.00-00, 461.01-00, 172.01-00, 172.01-05, 172.06-00, 108.01-00, 108.01-01, 108.02-00 -----------------------
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAY AND FRANCES SEWARDS, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 12-72985 T.C. No. 24080-08
More informationTax Aspects of Litigation Awards and Settlements
Tax Aspects of Litigation Awards and Settlements DAVID SHECHTMAN, ESQUIRE Chairman, Tax Section Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 Tel: (215) 772-7314/Fax:
More informationYou Are Served : Litigation In The Workplace
You Are Served : Litigation In The Workplace Presented by: Wendy J. Mellk, Esq. Jackson Lewis LLP 58 South Service Rd., Ste. 410 Melville, NY 11747 (631) 247-0404 mellkw@jacksonlewis.com Copyright 2008
More informationT.C. Memo. 2006-235 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. JORGE O. AND CLELIA E. SVOBODA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2006-235 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JORGE O. AND CLELIA E. SVOBODA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13195-04. Filed November 2, 2006. Jorge O. and Clelia
More informationThis Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum Number: 201147024 Release Date: 11/25/2011 CC:ITA:5 POSTF-115572-11 UILC: 61.49-01, 263.00-00, 1001.00-00, 1012.00-00, 1221.00-00, 1222.00-00
More informationEmployee Compensation & Employment Taxes
Employee Compensation & Employment Taxes Charles R. Beaudrot, Jr. cbeaudrot@mmmlaw.com (404) 504-7753 Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP 3343 Peachtree Road, NE 1600 Atlanta Financial Center Atlanta, Georgia
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-137 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MICHELE K. GARNER AND ROGER ALLEN
More informationApril 2013. Contra Costa Lawyer Online
April 2013 The Contra Costa Lawyer is the official publication of the Contra Costa County Bar Association (CCCBA), published 12 times a year in six print and 12 online issues. 1 2 Contents Inside: Guest
More informationDoes the arrangement described below constitute insurance within the meaning
Part I Section 801. Tax Imposed Rev. Rul. 2014-15 ISSUE Does the arrangement described below constitute insurance within the meaning of subchapter L of the Internal Revenue Code? If so, does the issuer
More informationInternal Revenue Service. Number: 200452027 Release Date: 12/24/2004 Index Number: 61.09-18, 117.02-04, 3121.01-00, 3306.02-00, 3401.
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200452027 Release Date: 12/24/2004 Index Number: 61.09-18, 117.02-04, 3121.01-00, 3306.02-00, 3401.01-00 --------------------------- -------------------------------- ---------------------
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-102 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DIANE L. HARGREAVES, Petitioner
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING This notice relates to the proposed settlement of a class and collective action lawsuit against First
More informationA recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
Daily Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Daily Tax Report, 192 DTR J-1, 10/3/14. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com Tax Audits As the Internal
More informationT.C. Memo. 2010-235 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. GARY LEE COLVIN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2010-235 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GARY LEE COLVIN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17167-09L. Filed October 26, 2010. Gary Lee Colvin, pro se. Chris Sheldon,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Number: 200215053 Release Date: 4/12/2002 UIL: 3121.04-00 CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1 WTA-N-115133-01 MEMORANDUM
More informationAvoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements
Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements Julie K. Kwon A. Introduction 1. Parties negotiating the resolution of their disputes regarding interests in trusts
More informationFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
APPEALS INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATED ISSUE PAPER ISSUE: INDUSTRY: COORDINATOR: MINING INDUSTRY WHETHER COSTS INCURRED DURING A STRIKE ARE DEDUCTIBLE FROM GROSS INCOME FROM THE PROPERTY FOR
More informationAttorney Fee Structured Settlements by. John J. McCulloch, JD, CSSC, FLMI EPS Settlements Group
Attorney Fee Structured Settlements by John J. McCulloch, JD, CSSC, FLMI EPS Settlements Group The Problem With Taking Attorney Fee Compensation in Cash Problem: A lump sum of income is subject to Federal
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
More informationTaxation of Patronage Dividends from Worker Cooperatives: Are They Subject to Employment Tax? By: Gregory R. Wilson 1
A. The Issue Taxation of Patronage Dividends from Worker Cooperatives: Are They Subject to Employment Tax? By: Gregory R. Wilson 1 Are patronage dividends paid by worker cooperatives subject to self-employment
More informationInternal Revenue Service Number: 200702006 Release Date: 1/12/2007 Index Number: 3406.00-00, 6041.03-00, 6041.05-00, 6045.00-00, 6049.
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200702006 Release Date: 1/12/2007 Index Number: 3406.00-00, 6041.03-00, 6041.05-00, 6045.00-00, 6049.01-00 -------------------------------- ------------------------------------
More informationWOODCRAFT. tax notes. Can Class Action Attorney Fees Be Structured? By Robert W. Wood
Can Class Action Attorney Fees Be Structured? By Robert W. Wood Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood & Porter in San Francisco (http://www.woodporter.com) and is the author of Taxation of Damage Awards
More informationOffice of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200406015 Release Date: 2/06/2004 CC:INTL:6 POSTN-141356-03 -----------
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200406015 Release Date: 2/06/2004 CC:INTL:6 POSTN-141356-03 ----------- UILC: 927.01-00 date: September 22, 2003 to: ----------------------,
More informationIs THE CONTINGENT LEGAL FEE TAX
Is THE CONTINGENT LEGAL FEE TAX CONTROVERSY OVER?* Richard Mason** I. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of the United States recently ruled 8 to 01 that where a litigant's recovery constitutes income under
More informationDISCHARGE OF INDEBTEDNESS INCOME PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES
DISCHARGE OF INDEBTEDNESS INCOME PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES Thomas Mammarella Gordon, Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A. 1925 Lovering Avenue Wilmington, DE 19806 Tel: (302) 652-2900 Fax: (302) 652-1142 tmammarella@gfmlaw.com
More informationTHE TOP TEN INSURANCE PLANNING MISTAKES IN AN ESTATE PLANNING CONTEXT
THE TOP TEN INSURANCE PLANNING MISTAKES IN AN ESTATE PLANNING CONTEXT LAWRENCE BRODY BRYAN CAVE LLP Copyright 2011. Lawrence Brody. All Rights Reserved. 3585078.1 THE TOP TEN INSURANCE PLANNING MISTAKES
More informationQualified Settlement Funds: A Quick Guide for Trial Lawyers
Qualified Settlement Funds: A Quick Guide for Trial Lawyers By Jason D. Lazarus, Esq. Introduction Assume you just settled a personal injury case for John Doe who is married to Jane. John has a significant
More informationSETTLING CASES AND TAXES
SETTLING CASES AND TAXES WILLIAM A. ROBERTS The Roberts Law Firm (972) 661-1040 bill@therobertslawfirm.com State Bar of Texas 28 TH ANNUAL ADVANCED CIVIL TRIAL COURSE August 31 September 2, 2005 - Austin
More informationDefending Taxpayer Penalties - Audit, Appeals and Litigation Considerations
Walter Doggett, VP Taxes, E*Trade Tom Cullinan, Partner, Sutherland Joe DePew, Partner, Sutherland Defending Taxpayer Penalties - Audit, Appeals and Litigation Considerations 1 Accuracy-Related Penalties
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM. Taxpayer s Name: Taxpayer s Address:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM Number: 200101001 Release Date: 1/5/2001 Third Party Contact: None Index (UIL) No.: 166.03-00 CASE MIS No.: TAM-103260-00/CC:ITA:B6
More informationT.C. Memo. 2015-26 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION B. SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2015-26 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION B. SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
More informationILLINOIS INDEPENDENT TAX TRIBUNAL
ILLINOIS INDEPENDENT TAX TRIBUNAL JOHN E. AND FRANCES L. ROGERS, ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) 14 TT 153 ) Judge Brian F. Barov ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT ) OF REVENUE, ) Respondent. ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
More informationT.C. Memo. 2010-18 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. GINN DOOSE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2010-18 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GINN DOOSE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 29738-08L. Filed February 1, 2010. Ginn Doose, pro se. Catherine G. Chang, for
More informationLiability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02)
Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02) This memorandum addresses the California and federal law protections that exist to shield volunteer directors of nonprofit corporations
More informationFIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02
More informationAnother Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments
Another Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments idan netser I. Introduction The sale of a company in an M&A transaction often involves consideration to the selling shareholders
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRICT COUNSEL
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 September 22, 1999 Number: 199952011 Release Date: 12/30/1999 CC:DOM:FS:FI&P TL-N-2896-99 UILC: 832.06-02 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEHZAD MOUSAI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, CLASS/COLLECTIVE ACTION Case No. C 06-01993 SI NOTICE
More informationT.C. Memo. 2015-178 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. GARY WAYNE RODRIGUES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2015-178 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GARY WAYNE RODRIGUES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 27277-11L. Filed September 10, 2015. Gary Wayne Rodrigues, pro se.
More informationSpecial Rules for Health Insurance Costs of 2-Percent Shareholder-Employees
Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Special Rules for Health Insurance Costs of 2-Percent Shareholder-Employees Notice 2008-1 PURPOSE This notice provides rules under which a 2-percent
More informationGross Income. Robert W. Wood, J.D. Robert W. Wood, P.C. San Francisco, CA
Gross Income Structured Settlements and Nonqualified Assignments Structured settlements and assignments are commonly used in physical injury cases when the recoveries are excludible from income, but can
More informationWorld Shipping Council. Federal Maritime Commission
Comments of the World Shipping Council Submitted to the Federal Maritime Commission In the Matter of Organization and Functions; Rules of Practice and Procedure; Attorney Fees Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
More informationINCOME TAX ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURING ATTORNEY FEES IN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND WORKER S COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS
INCOME TAX ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURING ATTORNEY FEES IN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND WORKER S COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS By John J. Campbell, Esq. Introduction The use of structured settlements to settle third
More information2:12-cv-12284-GCS-MKM Doc # 42 Filed 02/26/13 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 687 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-12284-GCS-MKM Doc # 42 Filed 02/26/13 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 687 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARY C. VANDENHEEDE, vs. Plaintiff, FRANK B. VECCHIO, individually
More information