1 PART 3 REPRESENTATION, PRACTICE, AND PROCEDURES Section 2: Representation before the IRS Part 3 Taxpayer s Financial Situation Taxpayer's ability to pay the tax (e.g., installment agreements, offer in compromise) IRS encourages taxpayers to use installment payment plans for delinquent taxes. Approval of an application for an installment plan is guaranteed if the amount of tax due is no more than $10,000. The offer in compromise is a means by which to negotiate the principal amount of the tax deficiency where the taxpayer's financial position makes it unlikely that the full amount of tax, penalty, and interest will be collected. a. Such offers may include reductions in tax or penalty amounts, or installment payment plans (perhaps for the reduced amounts). b. The IRS can waive the user fee for an offer in compromise, and allows a delay in the payment schedule, if the taxpayer s income level is modest. Offers in compromise are appropriate in the following situations. a. There is doubt as to the taxpayer s liability. b. Collectibility of the full tax is questionable. c. Disputed tax amount would cause an economic hardship for the taxpayer. Closing agreements are quite common and serve a useful purpose of getting the water under the bridge. They are almost a must with the winding up of sizable estates and the liquidation of large corporations. They are binding on both the IRS and the taxpayer.
2 General financial health (e.g., filed for bankruptcy, lawsuits, garnishments, Liquidation under Chapter 7 is a common form of bankruptcy. It is available to individuals who cannot make regular, monthly, payments toward their debts. Businesses choosing to terminate their enterprises may also file Chapter 7. Chapter 7 provides relief to debtors regardless of the amount of debts owed or whether a debtor is solvent or insolvent. A Chapter 7 Trustee is appointed to convert the debtor s assets into cash for distribution among creditors. To take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws and get a fresh start, it is important that taxpayers do not continue to incur additional debt. If all or part of the reason taxpayers are filing bankruptcy is overdue federal tax debts, they may need to increase their withholding and/or estimated tax payments. Find basic information about Chapter 7 bankruptcy below. For more detailed information see the U.S. Courts Bankruptcy Basics web page. Federal Tax Refunds During Bankruptcy Taxpayers can receive tax refunds while in bankruptcy. However, refunds may be subject to delay, to turnover requests by the Chapter 7 Trustee, or used to pay down tax debts. Discharge At the conclusion the Chapter 7 bankruptcy taxpayers will receive a discharge of debt. A discharge releases the debtor from personal liability for certain dischargeable debts. Some taxes may be dischargeable. Whether a federal tax debt may be discharged depends on the unique facts and circumstances of each case. Taxpayers should consult with a bankruptcy attorney to determine which tax debts may be discharged.
3 Lawsuit and Settlements and Award Proceeds The following determinations should be made when reviewing lawsuit verdicts and settlements received after August 20, Determine if any taxable lawsuit, award or settlement proceeds are unreported. Determine if proper amounts were allocated between compensatory and punitive damages. This is especially important for out of court settlements. Because many cases are settled to avoid the imposition of punitive damages, it is anticipated that some taxpayers may erroneously allocate amounts between excludable and punitive damages in these cases. This allocation may also have an impact on the deductibility of attorneys fees and court costs since IRC 265 expressly denies any deduction for expenses related to tax-exempt income. Determine if any of the lawsuit, award or settlement proceeds constituted punitive damages. All punitive damages are taxable whether received in relation to a physical or non-physical injury or sickness. (Caution: See IRC 104(c) exception when applicable State law provides only punitive damages may be awarded in wrongful death actions, i.e., Alabama.) Determine if any of the settlement proceeds are designated as interest, and if so, such interest is reported as income. Verify that amounts excluded from income were received in a case of physical injury or physical sickness. Damages for emotional distress on account of physical injuries or sickness are excludable by IRC 104(a)(2). However, costs incurred to treat emotional distress, even those due to physical injury, are taxable if they were previously deducted as a medical expense in a prior year. Verify the amount of out of pocket expense excluded for emotional distress in non-physical injury cases (e.g., discrimination, fraud, etc.). Damages for emotional distress in these cases are only excluded to the extent of paid medical expenses. Verify that the taxpayer reported taxable amounts at gross rather than reporting them net of legal and other fees paid. Determine if allowable legal fees were deducted properly. They should be deducted on Schedule A as miscellaneous itemized deductions, unless the origin of the claim litigated is related to a Schedule C or a capital transaction.
4 Verify that expenses were paid on or after October 24, 2004 in cases involving IRC 62(a)(20) (relating to costs involving discrimination suits). For cases involving IRC 62(a)(21) (relating to the deductibility of attorney fees paid in connection to a whistleblower s award), verify the information provided as part of the claim had been provided on or after December 20, In both instances, verify total deductions have been limited to the amount includible in the taxpayer s gross income on account of the underlying discrimination suit or whistleblower award. These sections allow above the line deduction of legal costs. Verify that for a non-corporate taxpayer, legal fees deducted as a Schedule A miscellaneous itemized deduction are not allowed for purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax (AMT). Verify that for purposes of the AMT Credit, legal fees that are disallowed for purposes of calculating the AMT do not contribute to the amount of the credit. They are "exclusion" items. Taxability of Lawsuit Payments General rule relative to taxability of amounts received from lawsuit settlements is IRC 61 that states that all income is taxable from whatever source derived, unless exempted by another section of the Code. Terminology/Definitions
5 Types of Claims Tort: A civil wrong, not involving breach of contract, for which a remedy may be obtained; A wrongful act committed by one person against another person or his/her property; The breach of a legal duty imposed by law, other than by contract; May cause or constitute, but is not necessarily, a personal injury. A tort award may be received from litigation or settlement of a claim for physical injury or illness, mental pain and suffering, interference with economic relations, and/or property damage. Example 1 X punches Y, thus committing the tort of battery. Example 2 X sets foot on Y s property, thus committing the tort of trespass, but causing no personal injury. Contractual: Claims based on rights given by contract. A remedy provided specifically by the contractual agreement or as interpreted by a court. Whether damages based on a contractual claim are taxable usually depends on the underlying claim. Example 3 X forces Y to leave his employment before the time specified in an employment contract, thereby breaching the contractual agreement. Example 4 X refuses to pay Y the amount specified in a homebuilding contract, thereby breaching the contractual agreement.
6 Types of Damages/Awards Compensatory Damages intended to compensate the taxpayer for a loss, i.e., payment to compensate the injured party for the injury sustained, and nothing more. This loss may be purely economic, for example, arising out of a contract, or personal, for example, sustained by virtue of a physical injury. Generally speaking, most people view the term "compensatory" to mean "nontaxable." However, the term compensatory merely means that the payment compensated the taxpayer for a loss. Thus, determinations of the taxability of lawsuit awards cannot always be made by simply referring to the terminology used, that is, compensatory or punitive; contractual or tort. For example, not all torts constitute personal injuries. Some torts may involve invasion of property rights, conversion, interference with economic interests, tortious interference with contractual relations, purely personal interests, or defamation. Further, not all compensation payments for personal injuries are received on account of any personal physical injury or illness. Moreover, damages arising from contractual claims can be taxable, such as those paid for lost wages and benefits, profits, and other forms of business receipts, or non-taxable. For example, X receives an insurance policy to replace one previously purchased that had lapsed due to an insurance agent s misappropriation of premiums paid. The facts and circumstances of each lawsuit settlement must be considered to determine the purpose for which the money was received. Then, it can be determined whether these amounts are excludable. A key question is In lieu of what were the damages awarded? Finally, if prior deductions under IRC 213 or any other applicable Code section were taken (that is, medical deductions; interest expense, attorney fees, etc.) then pursuant to the Tax Benefit Rule, amounts received for reimbursement of these expenses would be taxable to the extent includible under IRC 111.
7 Punitive Generally, punitive damages are not awarded for simple breach of contract or negligent tort. They are added to any compensatory damages where the defendant acted recklessly, with malice or deceit, or in any other manner that would justify penalizing the wrongdoer or making an example to others. Punitive damages are often awarded when the defendant acted Knowingly Willingly Deliberately Recklessly Fraudulently Generally, punitive damages are taxable, but there are exceptions (See Wrongful Death discussed below.) Resolution of Claims Determining the correct allocations among taxable payments and non-taxable payments is usually the most difficult part of an examination. Claims are generally resolved in one of two ways: Jury/Court Verdicts If damages have been clearly allocated to an identifiable claim in an adversarial proceeding by judge or jury, the Service will usually not challenge their character because of the impartial and objective nature of the determinations. However, care should be taken where the Court s decision is simply a ratification of a settlement entered into by the parties. See Robinson v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 116, 122 (1994), aff d in part and remanded, 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir. 1995) and Kightlinger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo In Robinson, the Court incorporated the parties allocation of damages in its judgment by reference to their settlement agreement. However, the Service successfully argued that the allocation was not a bona fide allocation that was reached at arms length. Robinson, 102 T.C.at 133. Although both of these cases are pre 1996 Amendment cases, they show how in cases where there was not an impartial and objective determination of the allocation of the award to its components, a reconsideration of the allocation is warranted.
8 Settlements Out of Court Many lawsuits are settled prior to a jury verdict. When damages are received pursuant to a settlement agreement, the nature of the claim that was the actual basis for settlement controls whether such damages are excludable under IRC 104(a)(2). These settlements should be closely reviewed, and the underlying facts and circumstances should be carefully determined. The allocation among the various claims of the settlement can be challenged where the facts and circumstances indicate that the allocation does not reflect the economic substance of the settlement. See these pre 1996 Amendment cases to illustrate such reallocations; Bagley v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396 (1995), aff d, 121 F.3d 393 (8th Cir. 1997); Robinson v. Commissioner, 102 T.C 116, 122 (1994), aff d in part and remanded, 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir. 1995);.Phoenix Coal Company, Inc. v. Commissioner, 231 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1956). The Court in LeFleur v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo , a pre 1996 Amendment case, addressed the reallocation issue in a case involving claims for breach of contract, emotional distress (pain and suffering), and punitive damages. In an out-of-court settlement, the parties expressly agreed to allocate $800,000 of the $1 million sum to personal injuries, $200,000 to contract, and none to punitive damages. The taxpayers included the $200,000 of settlement proceeds allocated to the contract claim in their gross income on Schedule C, and excluded the $800,000 allocated to the personal injury claim under IRC 104(a)(2). The Service disregarded the terms of the written settlement agreement and reallocated the previously excluded $800,000 to income. The Tax Court upheld the IRS s reallocation and referring to the settlement agreement stated, "the allocation did not accurately reflect the realities of the petitioner s underlying claims." LeFleur at 9. In determining the $800,000 was not excludable under IRC 104(a)(2), the Court stated: In light of the facts and circumstances, we conclude that petitioner suffered no injury to his health that could be attributed to the actions of the defendants, and we are not persuaded that such injury was the basis of any payment to him. LeFleur at 10. For additional information on issues dealing with the allocation or reallocation of settlements, see discussions of "Physical Injury or Sickness" and "Non-Physical Injury or Sickness" below.
9 Tax Treatment of Awards and Settlements Awards and settlements can be divided into two distinct groups. One group includes claims arising from a physical injury and the other group includes those arising from a non-physical injury. The claims from each of the two groups will usually fall into three categories: 1. Actual damages resulting from the physical or non-physical injury; 2. Emotional distress damages arising from the actual physical or non-physical injury; and 3. Punitive damages Garnishments If a levy on wages, bank account or other property is causing a hardship, the taxpayer should: Contact the IRS at the telephone number on the levy or correspondence immediately and explain your financial situation. Service is available from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. local time, Monday through Friday. If it is determined the levy is creating an immediate economic hardship, the levy may be released. A levy release does not mean taxpayers are exempt from paying the balance. The IRS will work with taxpayers to establish payment plans or take other steps to help pay off the balance. Employers generally have at least one full pay period after receiving a Form 668-W, Notice of Levy on Wages, Salary and Other Income before they are required to send any funds from their employee s wages..
10 Discharge of the tax liability in bankruptcy The Bankruptcy Code provides rules for debtors to consolidate and resolve their debts to various creditors, including the Service, in various ways. Section 301 of the Bankruptcy Code allows debtors to commence a bankruptcy case by filing a voluntary petition with the bankruptcy court. Once a petition is filed, creditors have an opportunity to file proofs of claim. 11 U.S.C A proof of claim asserts the right of a creditor to payment and can include rights that are fixed, contingent, liquidated, or unliquidated. See 11 U.S.C. 101(5). A properly filed proof of claim is prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of the claim. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(f). The proof of claim is deemed allowed, unless a party in interest objects. 11 U.S.C. 502(a). If a party in interest objects, the bankruptcy court, after notice and a hearing, determines the validity and amount of the claim as of the date of the petition and allows the claim in the proper amount. 11 U.S.C. 502(b). Generally, the bankruptcy court may determine the amount or legality of any tax, any fine or penalty relating to a tax, or any addition to tax, whether or not previously assessed and whether or not paid. 11 U.S.C. 505(a)(1). This includes the determination of the eligibility of a debtor for relief from joint and several liability under section 6015 in appropriate cases. See In re French, 242 B.R. 369 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999). The determination of the bankruptcy court on the merits of a claim is a final judgment and, unless appealed, is binding on the parties to a contested matter. See Freytag v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 35 (1998). The determination also precludes subsequent litigation by a debtor over the merits of the liability under principles of res judicata. See id. at 40. The Supreme Court in Commissioner v. Sunnen explained the rule of res judicata: [W]hen a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final judgment on the merits of a cause of action, the parties to the suit and their privies are thereafter bound not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. 333 U.S. 591, 597 (1948) (quoting Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 352 (1876)). Although filing a bankruptcy petition commences a case, a bankruptcy case is simply an aggregation of controversies. See In re Martin Bros. Toolmakers, Inc., 796 F.2d 1435, 1437 (11th Cir. 1986). In order to bring a controversy before the bankruptcy court, a party generally moves for relief in a contested matter under
11 Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9014 or initiates an adversary proceeding under Rule The merits of a tax liability are generally raised in one of two ways. Either the debtor or the Service can seek a determination of a tax liability under section 505 of the Bankruptcy Code, or a party in interest can object to a proof of claim listing tax liabilities under section 502(a). See In re Taylor, 132 F.3d 256, 262 (5th Cir. 1998). Unless a party in interest moves for relief or initiates a proceeding, the merits of a tax liability are not before the bankruptcy court, and the bankruptcy court does not inquire into the merits of the tax liability or enter a final judgment fixing the tax liability. IRS Collection Financial Standards Collection Financial Standards are used to help determine a taxpayer's ability to pay a delinquent tax liability. Allowable living expenses include those expenses that meet the necessary expense test. The necessary expense test is defined as expenses that are necessary to provide for a taxpayer s (and his or her family's) health and welfare and/or production of income. National Standards for food, clothing and other items apply nationwide. Taxpayers are allowed the total National Standards amount for their family size, without questioning the amount actually spent. National Standards have also been established for minimum allowances for out-ofpocket health care expenses. Taxpayers and their dependents are allowed the standard amount on a per person basis, without questioning the amount actually spent. Maximum allowances for housing and utilities and transportation, known as the Local Standards, vary by location. In most cases, the taxpayer is allowed the amount actually spent, or the local standard, whichever is less. Generally, the total number of persons allowed for necessary living expenses should be the same as those allowed as exemptions on the taxpayer s most recent year income tax return. If the IRS determines that the facts and circumstances of a taxpayer s situation indicate that using the standards is inadequate to provide for basic living expenses, we may allow for actual expenses. However, taxpayers must provide documentation that supports a determination that using national and local expense standards leaves them an inadequate means of providing for basic living expenses.
12 Third-party research (e.g., property assessment for municipal taxes, asset values, state and local tax information)
Lawsuits, Awards, and Settlements Audit Techniques Guide NOTE: This document is not an official pronouncement of the law or the position of the Service and cannot be used, cited, or relied upon as such.
Tax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments Dominic L. Daher, MAcc, JD, LLM in Taxation Director of Internal Audit and Tax Compliance Adjunct Professor of Law University of San Francisco Dawn G. Mayer, JD,
This page left intentionally blank. Insert IRS Mission Statement This page left intentionally blank. LAWSUIT AWARDS AND SETTLEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION vii Chapter 1, ISSUES 1-1 Issues for Lawsuit
IRS Releases MSSP Audit Guide for Lawsuit Awards The Service has released a Market Segment Specialization Program audit guide that contains examination techniques for lawsuit awards and settlements. Document
Tax Consequences of Employment Cases Elizabeth Erickson & Ira B. Mirsky, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employment-related litigation is not only a major business concern it involves substantial tax ramifications
Employment Tax Considerations for Businesses When Addressing Litigation with Employees or Former Employees William Hays Weissman Littler Mendelson, P.C. San Francisco, California It is a common fact of
1. The Right to Be Informed Taxpayers have the right to know what they need to do to comply with the tax laws. They are entitled to clear explanations of the laws and IRS procedures in all tax forms, instructions,
SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS YOU MEAN I HAVE TO PAY TAXES? By: Geoffrey N. Taylor, Esq. I. INCOME TO PLAINTIFF A. Distinction between settlements and judgments. B. Basic rule is the origin of claims test.
Employers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims Contributed by: Elizabeth Erickson * & Ira B. Mirsky **, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employee litigation alleging discrimination
T.C. Memo. 2010-18 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GINN DOOSE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 29738-08L. Filed February 1, 2010. Ginn Doose, pro se. Catherine G. Chang, for
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO In re: ALAN GREENWAY, Bankruptcy Case No. 04-04100 dba Greenway Seed Co., Debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Appearances: D. Blair Clark, RINGERT,
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: DONALD BONUCHI and, Case No. 04-21387-drd-7 CINDY BONUCHI, Debtors. Adv. No. 04-2044-drd JANICE A. HARDER, Trustee, Plaintiff,
One Division Avenue Room 200 Grand Rapids, MI 49503-3132 Phone : (616) 456-2693 http://www.miwb.uscourts.gov/ WHAT IS CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY? Chapter 7 bankruptcy, sometimes call a straight bankruptcy is
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
From Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Bankruptcy Basics, Public Information Series. Chapter 7 Liquidation Under the Bankruptcy Code The chapter of the Bankruptcy Code providing for "liquidation,"
T.C. Memo. 2015-26 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION B. SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: JOSEPH R. O LONE, Case No.: 3:00-bk-5003-JAF Debtor. Chapter 7 / FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW This case
INCOME TAX ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURING ATTORNEY FEES IN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND WORKER S COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS By John J. Campbell, Esq. Introduction The use of structured settlements to settle third
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-156 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD W. RAMEY AND JONI J. RAMEY,
2005, Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT TRUSTS A Useful Tool in Multi-Party Litigation Marjorie Suisman, Esq. Davis Malm & D Agostine P.C. I. Introduction. A Designated Settlement Fund
I. What causes someone to file for bankruptcy? Bad investments, too great an assumption of risk, circumstances beyond their control. II. The options A. Individuals Chapter 7, Chapter 11, i Chapter 13 B.
T.C. Memo. 2012-71 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SALVADOR F. NERI AND GUADALUPE NERI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20420-09. Filed March 15, 2012. 1. Held: Ps have failed
T.C. Memo. 2010-235 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GARY LEE COLVIN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17167-09L. Filed October 26, 2010. Gary Lee Colvin, pro se. Chris Sheldon,
Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements Julie K. Kwon A. Introduction 1. Parties negotiating the resolution of their disputes regarding interests in trusts
The Sale of Structured Settlements in Minnesota Structured Settlements The term structured settlement is defined in Minnesota statutes as an arrangement: for the periodic payment of damages for personal
OVERVIEW OF PRESENT LAW RELATING TO THE INNOCENT SPOUSE, OFFERS-IN-COMPROMISE, INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT, AND TAXPAYER ADVOCATE PROVISIONS OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Scheduled for a Public Hearing Before
Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code ) provides the means by which a debtor or trustee in bankruptcy may seek a determination
Tax Issues for Bankruptcy & Insolvency By David S. De Jong, Esquire, CPA Stein, Sperling, Bennett, De Jong, Driscoll & Greenfeig, PC 25 West Middle Lane Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-838-3204 email@example.com
TAX TREATMENT OF RECOVERIES IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES Committee on Labor & Employment Law AUGUST 2009 THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 42 WEST 44 TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10036 TAX TREATMENT
Individual Debt Adjustment Bankruptcy - Chapter 13 Public Information Series of the Bankruptcy Judges Division May 1995 While the information presented herein is accurate as of the date of publication,
Income Tax Considerations In Settlements And Judgments (With Sample Provisions And Drafting Checklists) Mickey R. Davis Mickey R. Davis is a partner in the Houston law firm of Bracewell and Giuliani LLP.
Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec. 213.001. Representation in Court... 2 Sec. 213.002. Prosecution of Criminal Actions...
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: : CHAPTER 13 ROBERT EDWARD GRAVES AND MARY LOU GRAVES, DEBTORS. : : BANKRUPTCY NO. 09-12649-MDC MEMORANDUM BY: MAGDELINE
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled
T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14226-08. Filed November 18, 2010. R determined a deficiency
TABAS FREEDMAN Attorneys One Flagler Building 14 Northeast First Avenue, Penthouse Miami, Florida 33132 Telephone 305.375.8171 Facsimile 305.381.7708 www.tabasfreedman.com Gary M. Freedman firstname.lastname@example.org
1 of 8 6/23/2005 8:28 AM November 30,1994 The Honorable Winona E. Rubin Director of Human Services State of Hawaii 1390 Miller Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Dear Ms. Rubin: Re: Dischargeability of Court-Ordered
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement. Payment Terms. Parties should agree on the amount if money
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 Liquidation ) marchfirst, INC., et al., ) CASE NO. 01 B 24742 ) (Substantively Consolidated)
Trust Deed Equivalents in Australia, Canada and the U.S. Australia A personal insolvency agreement (PIA) under Part X of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 is a way for a debtor to come to an agreement with their
T.C. Memo. 2000-161 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ESTATE OF KENNETH F. SCHOENEMAN, DECEASED, JOANN METZ AND JAMES J. RILEY, EXECUTORS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15230-97.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA IN THE MATTER OF: JOSHUA & SHAUNA RHEA, CASE NO. BK04-42427 Debtor(s. CH. 7 MEMORANDUM Hearing was held in Lincoln, Nebraska, on October
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy 101 A Guide to Personal Bankruptcy Brought to you by Jon Martin, Esq. Http://www.TheSinCityLawyer.com Bankruptcy laws help people who can no longer pay their creditors get a fresh start by liquidating
TAX IMPLICATIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS OF DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT CASES Brian Jorgensen Jones Day 2727 N. Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-3741 email@example.com Stephen Harris Jones Day
Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
Federal Tax Issues in Bankruptcy A View From Your Friends at the IRS and DOJ Richard Charles Grosenick Office of Chief Counsel IRS Special Assistant United States Attorney 211 W. Wisconsin Ave. Suite 807
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CASE NO. JAMES MICHAEL WATSON 03-13355 DEBTOR CHAPTER 7 SECURITY RESOURCES, L.L.C. ADV. NO and INTERFACE SECURITY SYSTEMS, L.L.C. 04-1005
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200442011 Release Date: 10/15/2004 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Index Number: 382.12-08, 468B.02-00 ---------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Special definitions for this section Benefits Claim Defence costs The General terms and conditions and the following terms and conditions all apply to this section. Any compensation awarded to an employee
Notice to Delinquent Taxpayers Department of the Treasury Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau TTB P 5610.1 (1/04) Previous Editions are Obsolete NOTICE TO DELINQUENT TAXPAYERS INTRODUCTION When you
Bankruptcy - An Overview Goals of the Bankruptcy System A fundamental goal of the federal bankruptcy laws enacted by Congress is to give debtors a financial " fresh start" from burdensome debts. The Supreme
Law Related to Fraud Bankruptcy (Insolvency) Fraud Bankruptcy Court Filed in a local district of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Bankruptcy judges hear all cases involving: Debtors and creditors rights Approval
CHAPTER 1 Martin J. O Leary Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance The following is a brief, general overview of coverage afforded under the Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
B 201A (Form 201A) (12/09) WARNING: Effective December 1, 2009, the 15-day deadline to file schedules and certain other documents under Bankruptcy Rule 1007(c) is shortened to 14 days. For further information,
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
T.C. Memo. 2012-264 UNITED STATES TAX COURT PAUL A. BILZERIAN AND TERRI L. STEFFEN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 3648-98. Filed September 12, 2012. Paul A. Bilzerian
Local Rules of Court Geauga County Court of Common Pleas Probate Division (Effective July 1, 2009) Index to Rules Local Probate Rule 1...Hours of Court Local Probate Rule 2...Examination of Files, Records
U.S. COURTS HTTP://WWW.USCOURTS.GOV/FEDERALCOURTS/BANKRUPTCY/BANKRUPTCY BASICS/CHAPTER9.ASPX CHAPTER 9 Municipality Bankruptcy The chapter of the Bankruptcy Code providing for reorganization of municipalities
Entered: July 31, 2013 Case 13-00202 Doc 20 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 10 Date signed July 31, 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at GREENBELT In Re: Fely Sison Tanamor
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTOR S OBJECTION TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE S MOTION
A Publication of the Law Office of Richard L. Williams Williams Bankruptcy A Debt Relief Agency helping people eliminate debt and obtain relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code Tips for Questionnaire
GUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS Office of the State Controller State of Colorado Revised January, 1997 I. Purpose The purpose of this guide is to provide information necessary
When clients need protection from creditors, tax debts can be resolved as well. by Donald L. Ariail, CPA/CFP Michael M. Smith, Esq., CPA Neil Deininger, Esq., CPA and Reba M. Wingfield, Esq. Discharging
Tax Basics: What Every Bankruptcy Attorney Should Know 1 Areas of Focus 1. Secured tax claims and tax claims entitled to priority 2. Nondischargeable tax claims 3. The short tax year election 4. Cancellation
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO Lori Davis, Michelle Smith and Paul Stockman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: CHERYL A. HERALD f/k/a CHERYL A. ROE, Debtor. FOR PUBLICATION CASE NO. 99-20788 DECISION & ORDER David D. MacKnight, Esq. Kenneth W. Gordon,
Chapter 12 Background: Chapter 12 is designed for "family farmers" or "family fishermen" with "regular annual income." It enables financially distressed family farmers and fishermen to propose and carry
Income Tax Valuation Insights Income Tax Discharge Considerations in an Individual Debtor s Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Robert F. Reilly, CPA, and Ashley L. Reilly Many professional practitioners and small business
BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION SHEET BANKRUPTCY LAW IS A FEDERAL LAW. THIS SHEET GIVES YOU SOME GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS IN A BANKRUPTCY CASE. THE INFORMATIONHERE IS NOT COMPLETE. YOU MAY NEED LEGAL
Understanding Bankruptcy What is Bankruptcy? Bankruptcy is a legal process where an individual or organizational debtor is able to seek some financial relief. A fundamental goal of the federal bankruptcy
Bankruptcy Document last updated 2/2/2012. Individuals and businesses use bankruptcy as a way to obtain relief from debts owed to creditors. The United States Constitution authorizes Congress to pass uniform
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount
T.C. Memo. 2014-217 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JACQUELINE D. BURRELL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 8349-12. Filed October 14, 2014. Michael Stephen McNair, for petitioner.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION In re: Case No. 8:90-bk-10016-PMG THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, Debtor. Chapter 11 ORDER ON PROPERTY DAMAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE S MOTION
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document was signed electronically on January 28, 2009, which
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: ALFRED AND SHARON WHITSON, Debtors. CASE NO. 4:02-bk-20854M CHAPTER 7 ORDER On September 24, 2002, Alfred Eugene
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x NOT FOR PUBLICATION In re: Chapter 11 824 SOUTH EAST BOULEVARD REALTY,
AGOSTINO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. IRS Collections Presented by : Frank Agostino DISCLAIMER: The following materials and accompanying Access MCLE, LLC audio program are for instructional purposes only. Nothing
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14-2052 IN RE: EDWARD J. PAJIAN, Debtor-Appellant. Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois,