An Overview of Mayo Clinic Tests Designed for Detecting Drug Abuse
|
|
|
- Lucinda Hensley
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Drug Testing An Overview of Mayo Clinic Tests Designed for Detecting Drug Abuse Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER). All rights reserved. MAYO, MAYO CLINIC, MAYO MEDICAL LABORATORIES and the triple-shield Mayo logo are trademarks and/or service marks of MFMER.
2 Table of Contents Limits of Detection (LOD) Table - 3 Approximate Detection Times 8 Alcohol 11 Amphetamine-Type Stimulants (ATS) 13 Barbiturates 14 Benzodiazepines 15 Buprenorphine 17 Cocaine and Metabolite 18 Fentanyl 19 Ketamine 20 Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) 21 Marijuana delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) 22 Methadone Opiates 25 Phencyclidine (PCP) Masking Agents/Adulterants 29
3 Limits of Detection (LOD) Table - Prescription and OTC Drugs Last Updated November 2015 The limits of detections (LODs) listed below reflect the concentrations at which the specific drugs can be reliably detected. If the drug is detected at a level below the listed LOD, it will be reported only if it meets laboratory quality criteria for identification. Drugs other than those listed below may be detected by GC-MS library matching and will be reported if they meet laboratory quality criteria for identification. Note: Submission of less than the minimum sample volume requires increasing the limit of detection. Generic Name LOD (mcg/ml) Acetaminophen 10.0 Notes Urine Serum Amitriptyline 1.0 Variability in Amobarbital Bupropion 1.0 Butabarbital Butalbital Caffeine 15.0 Carbamazepine 2.0 Carisoprodol 5.0 Chlordiazepoxide Chlorpheniramine 1.0 Chlorpromazine 5.0 Chlorpropamide Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 1.0 Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 10.0 Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 5.0 Preferred test for detection of benzodiazepines is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Citalopram 1.0 Unable to differentiate between R- and S-citalopram, reported as citalopram. Variability in Variability in Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 3
4 Generic Name LOD (mcg/ml) Notes Urine Serum Clomipramine 1.0 Variability in Clozapine 1.0 Cyclobenzaprine 1.0 Desipramine 5.0 Variability in Dextromethorphan 5.0 Diazepam Diltiazem 1.0 Diphenhydramine Preferred test for detection of benzodiazepines is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Doxepin 1.0 Variability in Doxylamine 5.0 EDDP (methadone metabolite) Ethosuximide 5.0 Etomidate 1.0 Felbamate 5.0 Fentanyl Fluconazole 5.0 Fluoxetine 4.0 Gemfibrozil 5.0 Hydrocodone 2.5 Preferred test for detection of methadone and metabolite is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 1.0 Preferred test for detection of fentanyl is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 5.0 Preferred test for detection of opiates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Variability in Hydroxyzine 5.0 Variability in Ibuprofen 25.0 Variability in Imipramine 0.5 Variability in Lamotrigine 25.0 Variability in Variability in Only detected in urine Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 4
5 Generic Name LOD (mcg/ml) Lidocaine 1.0 Lorazepam Notes Urine Serum 5.0 Preferred test for detection of benzodiazepines is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Variability in Meperidine 1.0 Variability in Mephobarbital Meprobamate 5.0 Metaxalone 1.0 Methadone 1.0 Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 1.0 Preferred test for detection of methadone is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Variability in Methocarbamol 2.5 Variability in Methsuximide 1.0 Methylphenidate 10.0 Metronidazole 5.0 Midazolam Mirtazapine 1.0 Naproxen 30.0 Nordiazepam 1.0 Normethsuximide 10.0 Norpropoxyphene 1.0 Preferred test for detection of benzodiazepines is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 10.0 Preferred test for detection of propoxyphene is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Nortriptyline 1.0 Variability in Oxcarbazepine Metabolite 5.0 Paroxetine 20.0 Variability in Pentazocine 5.0 Pentobarbital Pentoxifylline Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Variability in Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 5
6 Generic Name Phencyclidine Phenobarbital LOD (mcg/ml) Phenytoin 5.0 Primidone 5.0 Promethazine 1.0 Propofol 5.0 Notes Urine Serum 1.0 Preferred test for detection of PCP is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 5.0 Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Quetiapine 5.0 Variability in Quinidine 5.0 Variability in Salicylate 5.0 Secobarbital 1.0 Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Sertraline 1.0 Variability in Temazepam Theophylline 5.0 Thiopental Thioridazine 1.0 Ticlopidine 1.0 Topiramate 5.0 Tramadol Preferred test for detection of benzodiazepines is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation 1.0 Preferred test for detection of barbiturates is a specific request; see Specific Drug Group Confirmation Variability in Variability in Variability in Trazodone 2.0 Trimipramine 1.0 Valproic Acid 5.0 Venlafaxine 2.0 Verapamil 1.0 Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 6
7 Generic Name LOD (mcg/ml) Zolpidem 1.0 Notes Urine Serum Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 7
8 Approximate Detection Times All Specific Drug Groups Last Updated November 2015 LOQ (ng/ml) Detection time* up to Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Amphetamine 25 3 days Methamphetamine 25 3 days 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) 25 2 days 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) 25 2 days Phentermine 25 Ephedrine/pseudoephedrine 25 5 days Barbiturates Long-Acting Phenobarbital days Intermediate-Acting Butalbital days Amobarbital days Short-Acting Pentobarbital days Secobarbital days Benzodiazepines Long-Acting 10 days Diazepam 100 Nordiazepam 100 Intermediate-Acting 5 days Alprazolam 100 Lorazepam 100 Oxazepam 100 Temazepam 100 Chlordiazepoxide 100 Clonazepam 100 Flunitrazepam 50 Short-Acting 2 days Triazolam 100 Flurazepam 100 Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 8
9 LOQ (ng/ml) Detection time* up to Buprenorphine Buprenorphine days Norbuprenorphine days Cocaine & Metabolite Cocaine 50 <1 day Benzoylecgonine 50 5 days Fentanyl Fentanyl days Norfentanyl days Ketamine Ketamine 25 2 days Norketamine 25 2 days Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) LSD 0.5 <1 day 2-Oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD 5 5 days Marijuana/Cannabis (THC-COOH) Single Use 3 3 days Moderate Use (4 times per week) 5 days Heavy Use (daily) 10 days Chronic Heavy Use 30 days Methadone Methadone days EDDP (methadone metabolite) days Opiates 6-MAM 5 1 day Morphine days Codeine days Hydrocodone days Hydromorphone days Oxycodone days Oxymorphone days Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 9
10 Phencyclidine LOQ (ng/ml) Detection time* up to Phencyclidine 25 8 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Note: These tests do not differentiate between dextro (+) amphetamine (dexamphetamine) and racemic mixtures of dextro (+) and levo (-) isomers that are present in "street" amphetamine. These tests do not differentiate between ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 10
11 Alcohol Ethanol is cleared at an approximate rate of 15 ml per hour (healthy, nonalcoholic adults will clear 1 drink per hour). 1 standard bar drink (1.5 ounces of 80 proof liquor) = 1 standard glass of wine = 1 bottle of regular (4.5%) beer. Alcoholics clear ethanol faster than normal. Alcohol concentration is performed by headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) (reference method to demonstrate intoxication potential in blood). Serum may be submitted, but is not preferred. Urine alcohol concentration is not a good indicator of intoxication. Note: Urine alcohol concentration depends on a number of alcoholic drinks consumed, fluid intake, and number of hours since last voiding. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 11
12 Widmark Equation The Widmark Equation is a useful tool for: Predicting Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC). Predicting time elapsed since the last drink. Estimating how many drinks were consumed if the time of the last drink and BAC are known. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 12
13 Amphetamine-Type Stimulants (ATS) Alias: Amfetamine Interpretation Metabolites The presence of ATS >LOQ indicates exposure within a 2- to 3-day interval preceding specimen collection. Methamphetamine is metabolized to amphetamine; both can be present in urine after methamphetamine use. Methamphetamine > Amphetamine Selegiline, femprofazone, and benzphetamine are all metabolized to methamphetamine and amphetamine. Clobenzorex is metabolized to amphetamine. Amphetamine is not metabolized to methamphetamine; absence of methamphetamine in the presence of amphetamine indicates the primary drug of use is amphetamine. 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy, MDMA) is metabolized to 3,4- methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA). 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine >3,4-methylenedioxy-amphetamine Approximate Detection Times Amphetamine-Type Stimulants LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Amphetamine 25 3 days Methamphetamine 25 3 days 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) 25 2 days 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) 25 2 days Phentermine 25 Ephedrine/pseudoephedrine 25 5 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Note: These tests do not differentiate between dextro (+) amphetamines (eg, dexamphetamine) and racemic mixtures of dextro (+) and levo (-) isomers that are present in "street" amphetamines. These tests do not differentiate between ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 13
14 Barbiturates Interpretation Metabolites If there is a question as to a patient's therapeutic compliance, a serum test request for the specific drug of interest may be of help. Mephobarbital is metabolized to phenobarbital. Mephobarbital > Phenobarbital Approximate Detection Times Barbiturates LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Long-Acting Phenobarbital days Intermediate-Acting Butalbital days Amobarbital days Short-Acting Pentobarbital days Secobarbital days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 14
15 Benzodiazepines Interpretation Metabolites If there is a question as to a patient's therapeutic compliance, a serum test request for the specific drug of interest may be of help. Benzodiazepines are extensively metabolized, and the parent compounds are not detected in urine. Diazepam is metabolized to nordiazepam, oxazepam, and temazepam; all may be detected after diazepam use. Diazepam > Nordiazepam, Oxazepam, and Temazepam Chlordiazepoxide is metabolized to nordiazepam and oxazepam; all may be detected after chlordiazepoxide use. Chlordiazepoxide > Nordiazepam and Oxazepam Alprazolam is detected as the metabolite alpha-hydroxyalprazolam. Triazolam is detected as the metabolite alpha-hydroxytriazolam Clonazepam is detected as the metabolite 7-aminoclonazepam. Flunitrazepam is detected as the metabolite 7-aminoflunitrazepam. Flurazepam is detected as the metabolite hydroxyethyl-flurazepam. Approximate Detection Times Benzodiazepines LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Long-Acting 10 days Diazepam as metabolites 100 Nordiazepam 100 Intermediate-Acting 5 days Alprazolam as metabolite 100 Lorazepam 100 Oxazepam 100 Temazepam 100 Chlordiazepoxide as metabolite 100 Clonazepam as metabolite 100 Flunitrazepam as metabolite 50 Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 15
16 Benzodiazepines LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Short-Acting Triazolam as metabolite 100 Flurazepam as metabolite days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 16
17 Buprenorphine Interpretation The elimination half-lives have ranged from 1.2 to 7.2 hours after intravenous injection; elimination half-lives after sublingual or transdermal use are longer and may range from 20 to 36 hours or more. Buprenorphine is metabolized through N-dealkylation to the pharmacologically active metabolite N- dealkylbuprenorphine (norbuprenorphine) through cytochrome P450 3A4 and by conjugation to glucuronide metabolites. The presence of buprenorphine or norbuprenorphine >LOQ indicates exposure to buprenorphine within 7 days. Approximate Detection Times Buprenorphine LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Buprenorphine days Norbuprenorphine days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 17
18 Cocaine and Metabolite Interpretation Metabolites The presence of cocaine >LOQ indicates exposure to cocaine within 1 day prior to specimen collection. The presence of benzoylecgonine >LOQ indicates exposure to cocaine within 5 days prior to specimen collection. Cocaine is metabolized to several inactive metabolites, the predominant one being benzoylecgonine. Cocaine > Benzoylecgonine Approximate Detection Times Cocaine & Metabolite LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Cocaine 50 <1 day Benzoylecgonine 50 5 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 18
19 Fentanyl Interpretation The presence of fentanyl or norfentanyl >LOQ indicates exposure to fentanyl within 3 days. Metabolites Fentanyl is metabolized primarily by oxidative N-dealkylation to norfentanyl. Fentanyl > Norfentanyl Approximate Detection Times Fentanyl LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Fentanyl days Norfentanyl days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 19
20 Ketamine Interpretation The presence of ketamine or norketamine >LOQ indicates exposure to ketamine within 2 days. Metabolites Ketamine is metabolized by N-demethylation to the active metabolite norketamine. Ketamine > Norketamine Approximate Detection Times Ketamine LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Ketamine 25 2 days Norketamine 25 2 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 20
21 Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) Interpretation Metabolites The clearance half-life of LSD averages 3 hours, while the clearance half-life of LSD metabolite averages 12 hours. The presence of LSD >LOQ indicates exposure to LSD within 1 day. The presence of 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD >LOQ indicates exposure to LSD within 2 to 5 days. LSD is metabolized to 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD. LSD > 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD Approximate Detection Times Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to LSD 0.5 <1 day 2-Oxo-3-hydroxy-LSD 5 5 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 21
22 Marijuana delta 9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Interpretation The parent drug, delta 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), has a clearance half-life of less than 30 minutes and is not detectable in urine. Following a dose of THC, the metabolite typically appears in the urine within 60 minutes, but can take as long as 4 hours. Note: The presence of the major THC-COOH >LOQ indicates exposure to THC within 3 days after a single use, to approximately 30 days in heavy chronic users. Metabolites The major metabolite is tetrahydrocannabinol carboxylic acid (THC-COOH). THC-COOH is inactive and very lipid soluble. delta 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) > tetrahydrocannabinol carboxylic acid (THC-COOH) Approximate Detection Times Marijuana/Cannabis (THC-COOH) LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Single Use 3 3 days Moderate Use (4 times per week) Heavy Use (daily) Chronic Heavy Use 5 days 10 days 30 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 22
23 Methadone Interpretation Metabolites The clearance half-life of methadone averages 30 hours. Urinary methadone excretion is ph dependent; excretion is decreased with increased urinary ph. Patients who are taking methadone for therapeutic purposes excrete both parent methadone and metabolite in their urine. The absolute concentration found in a patient's urine sample can be highly variable; however, patients who are known to be compliant with their methadone therapy have ratios of EDDP:methadone >0.60. If there is a question as to a patient's therapeutic compliance, a serum test request for the specific drug of interest may be of help. The presence of methadone >LOQ indicates exposure to methadone within 6 to 7 days prior to specimen collection. Methadone is metabolized to an inactive metabolite, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3- diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP). Methadone > 2-Ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3- diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) Approximate Detection Times Methadone LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Methadone days EDDP (methadone metabolite) days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 23
24 Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 24
25 Opiates Interpretation Metabolites Opiates are the natural or synthetic drugs that have a morphine-like pharmacological action. Medically, opiates are used primarily for relief of pain. Opiates include morphine and drugs structurally similar to morphine (eg, codeine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone). Heroin (diacetylmorphine) is a synthetic opiate made from morphine and is rarely detectable in body fluids. It has a half-life of a few minutes. Illicit heroin often contains small amounts of acetylcodeine. The presence of both codeine and morphine in urine does not rule out the use of heroin; however, the ratio of morphine to codeine can be helpful in discriminating between heroin and codeine use. Ingestion of bakery products containing poppy seeds can also cause morphine to be excreted in urine. If excessively large amounts are consumed, this can result in urine morphine concentrations up to 2000 ng/ml for a period of 6 to 12 hours after ingestion. Due to first-pass metabolism, no pharmacologic effect is experienced from poppy seed ingestion. If there is a question as to a patient's therapeutic compliance, a serum test request for the specific drug of interest may be of help. The presence of an opiate >LOQ indicates exposure to that opiate within 2 to 3 days prior to specimen collection. The presence of 6-MAM is conclusive evidence of prior heroin use. However, due to its short half-life, it is only detectable in urine for about 8 hours after administration. Heroin (diacetylmorphine) is metabolized to morphine. Heroin undergoes rapid deacetylation to 6- monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), which is about 6 times more potent than morphine. 6-MAM is further deacetylated to morphine. The effects of heroin are attributed to the combined effect of heroin, 6-MAM, and morphine. Diacetylmorphine > 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) > Morphine Codeine is metabolized to morphine. The presence of morphine in urine can indicate exposure to morphine, heroin, or codeine. Codeine > Morphine Hydromorphone is a minor metabolite of morphine and may be excreted in urine at concentrations up to 2.5% of the morphine concentration. Consequently, the detection of minor amounts of hydromorphone in urine containing high concentrations of codeine should not be interpreted as evidence of hydromorphone use. Hydrocodone is a minor metabolite of codeine that is metabolized to hydromorphone and may be excreted in urine at concentrations up to 11% of the codeine concentration. Consequently, the detection of minor amounts of hydrocodone in urine containing high concentrations of codeine should not be interpreted as evidence of hydrocodone use. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 25
26 Hydrocodone > Hydromorphone Oxycodone is metabolized to oxymorphone. Oxycodone > Oxymorphone Approximate Detection Times Opiates LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to 6-MAM 5 <1 day Morphine days Codeine days Hydrocodone days Hydromorphone days Oxycodone days Oxymorphone days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 26
27 Phencyclidine (PCP) Interpretation The clearance half-life of PCP averages 15 hours. The presence of PCP >LOQ indicates exposure to PCP within 2 to 8 days prior to specimen collection. Approximate Detection Times Phencyclidine LOQ (ng/ml) Detection Time* up to Phencyclidine 25 8 days *These are approximate detection times for the drug or metabolites in urine. The actual detection time depends on dose, frequency of use, and individual metabolism. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 27
28 Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 28
29 Masking Agents/Adulterants Drug of abuse tests performed in the Toxicology and Drug Monitoring Laboratory are used to monitor compliance with treatment programs and should be utilized in a clinical setting where test results can be definitively used to make a diagnosis. Specimen adulteration can have a significant, potentially damaging, effect on treatment decisions. For this reason, the Toxicology and Drug Monitoring Laboratory utilizes a multistep process to evaluate specimens for adulteration. The specimen adulteration evaluation involves the following tests: creatinine, specific gravity, ph, and oxidants. When one or more of these results are outside the normal reference value, an adulterant comment is added to the final report that identifies the specific adulterant found. View the Adulterant Survey Algorithm. Printed on August 18, :59 pm CST Page 29
DUI in Southern Ohio MATT 2006
DUI in Southern Ohio MATT 2006 Laureen J. Marinetti, M.S., Ph.D. Chief Toxicologist Montgomery County Coroner s s Office & Miami Valley Regional Crime Lab (MVRCL) Dayton, Ohio Region The MVRCL is a regional
Toxicology CPT Code Changes for 2016
Beginning January 1, 2016, CMS deleted all 2015 drug testing G codes and will continue to not recognize the AMA CPT codes for drug testing. CMS created three G codes for presumptive testing and four G
Tests Impacted by 2015 CPT Changes
Toxicology Changes for 2015 HPV Examples of Toxicology Panels Molecular Pathology, FISH and Anatomic Pathology 1 Toxicology Changes for 2015 80100 Test Code Dos Test Name 2015 2015 Medicare 5229 Drug Screen,
Urine drug screens. Screening Methods
Screening Methods Urine drug screens Urine drug screens are generally performed using either immunoassays or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). 2 Immunoassay UDS contain specific antibodies
Comprehensive LC/MS Analysis of Illicit and Pain Management Drugs, Including Their Metabolites, in Urine
Comprehensive LC/MS Analysis of Illicit and Pain Management Drugs, Including Their Metabolites, in Urine Application Note Authors Peter JW Stone and Kevin McCann Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara,
The CPT code for Human papillomavirus (HPV) has changed from 87621 to 87624. This code (87624) covers testing for HPV High Risk genotypes.
January 2015 2015 CPT Code Updates Dear Client: The American Medical Association (AMA) publishes the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Coding Manual on an annual basis. For 2015, the AMA made several
PtProtect Pain Medication Management Program Monitors Patient Compliance
PHYSICIAN UPDATE 2013 Edition PtProtect Pain Medication Management Program Monitors Patient Compliance The PtProtect (Patient Protect) program offers pain medication management panels designed to improve
Interagency Guideline on Opioid Dosing for Chronic Non-cancer Pain (CNCP)
Appendix D: Urine Drug Testing for Monitoring Opioid Therapy i. Monitoring opioid therapy with urine drug testing (UDT) ii. UDT algorithm for monitoring opioid therapy iii. UDT clinical vignettes iv. Frequently
Simultaneous Quantitation of 43 Drugs in Human Urine with a Dilute-and-Shoot LC-MS/MS Method
Simultaneous Quantitation of 4 Drugs in Human Urine with a Dilute-and-Shoot LC-MS/MS Method Xiang He and Marta Kozak, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA Application Note 76 Key Words TSQ Quantum Access
Appropriate utilization of drug tests for pain management patients
Appropriate utilization of drug tests for pain management patients Gwen McMillin, PhD, DABCC (CC, TC) Medical Director, Toxicology, ARUP Laboratories Associate Professor (clinical), University of Utah
Simultaneous Quantitation of 78 Drugs and Metabolites in Urine with a Dilute-And-Shoot LC MS-MS Assay
Journal of Analytical Toxicology 2015;1 12 doi:10.1093/jat/bkv024 Journal of Analytical Toxicology Advance Access published April 1, 2015 Article Simultaneous Quantitation of 78 Drugs and Metabolites in
Appropriate Use of UDT to Improve Patient Care
Published on OpioidRisk (http://www.opioidrisk.com) Home > Urine Drug Testing Urine Drug Testing This guide provides: Download Entire Guide [1] Appropriate use of Urine Drug Testing (UDT) to improve patient
Indiana State Department of Toxicology 2012 Annual Report
Indiana State Department of Toxicology 2012 Annual Report Pictured on the cover is the State of Indiana Forensic and Health Sciences Laboratories facility housing the Indiana State Department of Toxicology.
What Does the Drug Test Tell Us
What Does the Drug Test Tell Us QUALITATIVE TOXICOLOGY TESTING for CLINICAL MANAGEMENT of the PATIENT Background The qualitative drug test is often referred to as the drug screen - a misnomer Testing performed
Urine Drug Toxicology and Pain Management Testing. Kara Lynch, PhD, DABCC University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA
Urine Drug Toxicology and Pain Management Testing Kara Lynch, PhD, DABCC University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA Learning Objectives Describe what chronic pain is, who is affected and
2013 Annual Toxicology Report
213 Annual Toxicology Report Department of Justice Forensic Science Division Toxicology Department 2679 Palmer Street Missoula, MT 5988 [email protected] Personnel Phil Kinsey Scott Larson Scott Schlueter
Clinic Reference Guide
Clinic Reference Guide 2010 Alliance Toxicology LLC PO Box 5000, PMB 190 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 AllianceToxicologyLLCprovidesclinicaldrugtestingservicesforphysicians.Our companyprovidesacomprehensivedrugtestingpanelwhichincludesover40
LC-MS for Pain Management Support. Gwen McMillin, PhD, DABCC(CC,TC) University of Utah ARUP Laboratories
LC-MS for Pain Management Support Gwen McMillin, PhD, DABCC(CC,TC) University of Utah ARUP Laboratories Outline Overview of drug testing, as a component of the therapeutic plan, in the management of chronic
LC-MS for Pain Management Support
LC-MS for Pain Management Support Gwen McMillin, PhD, DABCC(CC,TC) University of Utah ARUP Laboratories Outline Overview of drug testing, as a component of the therapeutic plan, in the management of chronic
Oral Fluid Drug Testing March 23 rd, 2015
Oral Fluid Drug Testing March 23 rd, 2015 Drug Testing Options Breath Blood Meconium Vitreous Hair Sweat Urine Oral Drug Testing Options Oral Fluid and Blood and Breath Actual levels (immediate use, up
What Americans Believe. Grant Beardsley, MS, MT(ASCP) 10/12/2015. Interpreting: Urine Drug Test Results in Chronic Opioid Therapy and Drugs of Abuse
Interpreting: Urine Drug Test Results in Chronic Opioid Therapy and Drugs of Abuse Grant D. Beardsley, M.S., MT(ASCP) Clinical Toxicologist, Grant Beardsley, MS, MT(ASCP) I have nothing to disclose. I
Collection Instructions for ARUP Drug Screen Kit #49204
Collection Instructions for ARUP Drug Screen Kit #49204 Manufacturer Purpose of Kit / Reagent (tests) Kit / Reagent Contents (list components) Other Supplies Needed ARUP Laboratories For Point of Collection
Making the Leap to LC/MS/MS: Enhancing and Accelerating Clinical Research and Forensic Toxicology Applications
Making the Leap to LC/MS/MS: Enhancing and Accelerating Clinical Research and Forensic Toxicology Applications Introduction The resolving power of chromatography combined with the sensitivity and selectivity
1. Carrying Personal Medications into Thailand A. Medications containing narcotic drugs of category 2
Guidance for Travellers to Thailand under Treatment Carrying Personal Medications Containing Narcotic Drugs/Psychotropic Substances into/out of Thailand This guidance issued by the Narcotics Control Division,
Emit Drugs of Abuse Urine Assays Cross-Reactivity List. Answers for life.
Emit Drugs of Abuse Urine Assays Cross-Reactivity List Answers for life. Contents Emit II Plus Amphetamines...4 Emit II Plus Barbiturate...8 Emit II Plus Benzodiazepine... 12 Emit II Plus Cannabinoid...
A Generic LC-MS Method for the Analysis of Multiple of Drug of Abuse Classes with the Thermo Scientific Exactive TM System
A Generic LC-MS Method for the Analysis of Multiple of Drug of Abuse Classes with the Thermo Scientific Exactive TM System Kent Johnson Fortes lab, Wilsonville Oregon List of drug of abuse candidates for
Making the Leap to LC/MS/MS: Enhancing and Accelerating Clinical Research and Forensic Toxicology Applications
TECHNICAL NOTE Toxicology Making the Leap to LC/MS/MS: Enhancing and Accelerating Clinical Research and Forensic Toxicology Applications Introduction The resolving power of chromatography combined with
CITY OF MONTEREY Substance Abuse Policy General Employees of Monterey (GEM) July 1, 2003
Page 1 ATTACHMENT C CITY OF MONTEREY Substance Abuse Policy General Employees of Monterey (GEM) July 1, 2003 PURPOSE This policy provides guidelines for the detection and deterrence of alcohol and drug
Understanding Drug Screens & PharmCAS Drug Screening Program Overview. Suzi Arant, Senior Business Developer July 8, 2011
Understanding Drug Screens & PharmCAS Drug Screening Program Overview Suzi Arant, Senior Business Developer July 8, 2011 Presentation Overview Drug Screening in Healthcare Drug Screening Panels Drugs of
2013 IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES: TOXICOLOGY TRENDS
Toxicology Program Trends 213 213 IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES: TOXICOLOGY TRENDS Overview and Background This report discusses trends in the toxicology program, as well as the number of toxicology
OU MEDICAL CENTER Human Resource Policy and Procedure Manual. Subject: Drug and Alcohol
OU MEDICAL CENTER Human Resource Policy and Procedure Manual Subject: Drug and Alcohol Section: HR 6-10 Page: 1 of 5 Origination Date: 6/2004 Revision Date: 2/2006, 9/2008, 7/2009 Coverage: All OUMC employees
Oral Fluid as an alternative matrix in workplace drug testing: which drugs at which cutoff concentration?
Oral Fluid as an alternative matrix in workplace drug testing: which drugs at which cutoff concentration? Michael Böttcher MVZ Labor Dessau Gmb, Dessau, Germany a d d i c t i o n / a b u s e r e l e v
Improved Method for the Analysis of 31 Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluid samples using the Thomson extreme FV by LC-MS/MS
htslabs.com [email protected] 800 541.4792 760 757.8080 760 757.9367 Improved Method for the Analysis of 31 Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluid samples using the Thomson extreme FV by LC-MS/MS Nadine Koenig 2,
Comparison of EMIT II, CEDIA and DPC RIA Assays for the Detection of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in Forensic Urine Samples*
Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol, 26, October 2002 Comparison of EMIT II, CEDIA and DPC RIA Assays for the Detection of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in Forensic Urine Samples* Russell F. Wiegand, Kevin
AppNote 6/2011. Determination of Pain Management Drugs using Automated Disposable Pipette Extraction and LC-MS/MS KEYWORDS ABSTRACT
AppNote 6/2011 Determination of Pain Management Drugs using Automated Disposable Pipette Extraction and LC-MS/MS Fred D. Foster, John R. Stuff, Edward A. Pfannkoch Gerstel, Inc., 701 Digital Dr. Suite
CUT-OFF CONCENTRATIONS FOR DRUGS OF ABUSE IN SALIVA FOR DUI, DWI OR OTHER DRIVING-RELATED CRIMES
CUT-OFF CONCENTRATIONS FOR DRUGS OF ABUSE IN SALIVA FOR DUI, DWI OR OTHER DRIVING-RELATED CRIMES Vina SPIEHLER 1, Dene BALDWIN 2, Christopher HAND 2 1 DABFT, Newport Beach, United States of America 2 Cozart
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SEPTEMBER 2013. 2012 Report
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SEPTEMBER 2013 2012 Report Data Collection The Office of Vital Statistics reported more than 178,000 deaths occurred in Florida during 2012. Of these, the medical
Clinical Drug Testing in Primary Care
Clinical Drug Testing in Primary Care Technical Assistance Publication Series TAP 32 Clinical Drug Testing in Primary Care TAP Technical Assistance Publication Series 32 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Drug Utilization Is On The Rise
Objectives Identify the clinical issues related to opioid prescribing for chronic pain indications Define the clinical needs and expectations of urine drug testing in pain management Address preanalytical
Urine Drug Testing Methadone 101 Methadone for hospitalists
Urine Drug Testing Methadone 101 Methadone for hospitalists Dr. Patricia Mark MB, BCh LEARNING OBJECTIVES Clarify the purpose of urine drug testing Distinguish between UDT for detection of illicit drug
Utility of Oral Fluid in Compliance Monitoring of Opioid Medications
Pain Physician 2014; 17:63-70 ISSN 1533-3159 Prospective Evaluation Utility of Oral Fluid in Compliance Monitoring of Opioid Medications Till Conermann, MD, Ankur R. Gosalia, MD, Abraham Jack Kabazie,
PROFILE -V MEDTOXScan Drugs of Abuse Test System INSERT
PROFILE -V MEDTOXScan Drugs of Abuse Test System INSERT 1. INTENDED USE The PROFILE -V MEDTOXScan Drugs of Abuse Test System consists of the PROFILE -V MEDTOXScan Test Devices and the MEDTOXScan Reader.
Triage TOX Drug Screen Product Insert Rapid Qualitative simultaneous detection of drug and/or the major urinary metabolites of 10 different drug
Triage TOX Drug Screen Product Insert Rapid Qualitative simultaneous detection of drug and/or the major urinary metabolites of 10 different drug classes (11 unique assays). Product Insert Catalog#: 94400
Urine Drug Testing. Why drug test? Set the Standard!
Urine Drug Testing Urine drug testing is a valuable tool for the physician when making treatment decisions. Patients and physicians benefit from safe and effective treatment of pain but there are always
Rapid Screening Method for Illicit Drugs, Using an Advanced Solid Core UHPLC Column and UHPLC System with MS/MS Detection
Rapid Screening Method for Illicit Drugs, Using an Advanced Solid Core UHPLC Column and UHPLC System with MS/MS Detection Derek Hillbeck, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Runcorn, UK Application Note 2999 Key
Prevalence and risk of driving under influence of psychoactive substances: Results from epidemiological studies
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 25, 2015 Prevalence and risk of driving under influence of psychoactive substances: Results from epidemiological studies Bernhoft, Inger Marie; Hels, Tove Publication
June 2016 Updated Crosswalk:
June 2016 Updated Crosswalk: 2016 HCPCS G0279 G6001 G6002 G6003 G6004 deleted f Radiology Coding BCBSNC currently considers this service investigational and will not cover either the HCPCS CPT s. Diagnostic
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interpretation of Urine Drug Testing for Pain Patients: An Evidence-Based Approach
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interpretation of Urine Drug Testing for Pain Patients: An Evidence-Based Approach Amadeo Pesce 1, Cameron West 1, Kathy Egan-City 1 and William Clarke 2 2 1 Millennium Research
Chronic Opioid Therapy (COT) Safety Guideline For Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
Chronic Opioid Therapy (COT) Safety Guideline For Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Major Changes as of August 2014... 2 Background... 2 Prescribing... 3 Management of Patients on COT... 5 Tapering
This is the written version of our Hot Topic video presentation available at: MayoMedicalLaboratories.com/hot-topics
This is the written version of our Hot Topic video presentation available at: MayoMedicalLaboratories.com/hot-topics Welcome to Mayo Medical Laboratories Hot Topics. These presentations provide short discussion
Amy LaHood MD MPH FAAFP December 19, 2012
Amy LaHood MD MPH FAAFP December 19, 2012 Identify trends & consequences of the current opioid epidemic Review evidence & expert guidelines for prescribing controlled substances Identify challenges/solutions
SMART DISCHARGE. Client s Name: Client ID: Partial Hospitalization Clinically Managed Medium Intensity Residential Treatment
SMART DISCHARGE Client s Name: Client ID: DATE OF DISCHARGE: Reason for Discharge Completed Treatment no further treatment needed Completed Treatment Plan/Referred Incomplete Client Left Before Completing
The potential of oral fluid as a specimen in various drug testing programs
The potential of oral fluid as a specimen in various drug testing programs *Christine Moore, Cynthia Coulter, Katherine Crompton, Warren Rodrigues, Michael Vincent, James Soares Immunalysis Corporation,
Hair Drug & Alcohol Testing FAQs
HAIR DRUG TESTING More than DNA Hair Drug & Alcohol Testing FAQs Need advice about testing? Contact us using our online SMS service or call Cellmark free on 0800 043 4247 2045 Introduction Cellmark is
Drug- and Alcohol-Related Intoxication Deaths in Maryland, 2014
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor Van Mitchell, Secretary May, 215 Drug- and Alcohol-Related Intoxication Deaths in Maryland, 214 Table
MVP s Medicare Stars Ratings: High Risk Medications
MVP s Medicare Stars Ratings: High Risk Medications The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses the Star Rating System to evaluate Medicare Advantage health plans as well as their networks
Drugs of abuse testing (DAT) Detection of drug abuse and misuse using biological samples
Drugs of abuse testing (DAT) Detection of drug abuse and misuse using biological samples cobas modular platform Flexible configurations for tailor made solutions Introduction to DAT With the cobas modular
Patterns and Trends in Drug Abuse in Los Angeles County, California: 2013
Patterns and Trends in Drug Abuse in Los Angeles County, California: 2013 Mary-Lynn Brecht, Ph.D. 1 ABSTRACT A key finding in the Los Angeles area in this reporting period was the continuing increase in
A Series of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Seizure Cases Involving Illicit Fentanyl Alone and in Combination with Heroin, Cocaine or Heroin and Cocaine
Journal of Analytical Toxicology ;38:592 598 doi:10.1093/jat/bku086 Special Issue A Series of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Seizure Cases Involving Illicit Fentanyl Alone and in Combination with Heroin,
Drug Abuse Trends in Miami-Dade County, Florida: 2009-2010
Drug Abuse Trends in Miami-Dade County, Florida: 2009-2010 James N. Hall 1 ABSTRACT Cocaine consequences as a proportion of all drug problems continue to be higher in South Florida than in most of the
Hillsborough Community College - Ybor City Campus 1025C Laboratory Exercise 9: Testing Urine for the Presence of Drugs Introduction
Hillsborough Community College - Ybor City Campus 1025C Laboratory Exercise 9: Testing Urine for the Presence of Drugs Introduction Drug testing beyond the health care and criminal justice systems has
How To Understand The Health Effects Of Prescription Drugs
Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, Florida Trends of Nonmedical Prescription Drug Misuse in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach Counties, and the State of Florida: 2010 James N. Hall 1 ABSTRACT The
Port Hedland Port Authority. Fitness for Duty Procedure Alcohol and Drugs PR HS014
Port Hedland Port Authority Fitness for Duty Procedure Alcohol and Drugs PR HS014 Alcohol and Drugs: PR HS014 Table of Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. OBJECTIVE...
Clinical Drug Screening and/or Drug Testing
Manual: Policy Title: Reimbursement Policy Clinical Drug Screening and/or Drug Testing Section: Laboratory & Pathology Subsection: None Date of Origin: 10/26/2011 Policy Number: RPM016 Last Updated: 1/8/2016
The DRE DUI & DRUGS. Captain George Crum Fullerton Police Department
The DRE DUI & DRUGS Captain George Crum Fullerton Police Department What is a DRE? Drug Recognition Expert Experienced officer Selected by their department Special training in detecting drug influence/impairment
Confirmatory Drug Testing for Substance Abuse and Chronic Pain Treatment
Clinical Position Statement Confirmatory Drug Testing for Substance Abuse and Chronic Pain Treatment CLINICAL POSITION STATEMENT In most cases, immunoassay (qualitative) drug testing is sufficient for
a. positive vs. negative reinforcement b. tolerance vs. sensitization c. drug classes einforcement
Drug Abuse (chapter 18) 1. Definitions iti a. positive vs. negative reinforcement b. tolerance vs. sensitization c. drug classes 2. Neural Mechanisms of Re einforcement a. mesolimbic dopamine system b.
Drugs of Abuse. Dr Charles Appleton - MBBS, FRCPA Director of Biochemistry/Toxicology. Occupational Pathology Services
Drugs of Abuse Dr Charles Appleton - MBBS, FRCPA Director of Biochemistry/Toxicology Occupational Pathology Services CONTENTS Why implement a drug testing program 2 Why not impairment testing 2 Choice
Drug Abuse Trends in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties, South Florida: June 2014
Drug Abuse Trends in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties, South Florida: June 2014 James N. Hall 1 ABSTRACT The key finding for this reporting period is that there has been substantial progress in reducing
1.7.8.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 12, 2010, unless a later date is cited at the end of a section. [1.7.8.5 NMAC - Rp, 1.7.8.5 NMAC, 02/12/2010]
TITLE 1 CHAPTER 7 PART 8 GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION STATE PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 1.7.8.1 ISSUING AGENCY: State Personnel Board. [1.7.8.1 NMAC - Rp, 1.7.8.1 NMAC, 02/12/2010]
OPIOIDS. Petros Levounis, MD, MA Chair Department of Psychiatry Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
OPIOIDS Petros Levounis, MD, MA Chair Department of Psychiatry Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Fundamentals of Addiction Medicine Summer Series Newark, NJ July 24, 2013
DRUG SCREENING POLICY AND PROCEDURES Effective August 31, 2015
DRUG SCREENING POLICY AND PROCEDURES Effective August 31, 2015 The signatory parties recognize that drug abuse is an illness that creates serious problems for workers, their families, the workplace and
How To Test For Drugs And Alcohol
Group Policy GE Healthcare issued By. HUMAN RESOURCES NO 2.7 To be Reviewed: November 2013 Date 9/13/10 subject DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE I. INTRODUCTION GE Healthcare believes that its employees are the Company's
Palliative Care Drug Plan (Plan P) Formulary List of drugs PharmaCare covers
Palliative Care Drug Plan (Plan P) Formulary List of drugs PharmaCare covers Important Notes: Last Updated: May 11, 2015 Pharmacists must submit a claim on PharmaNet at the time of purchase to enable coverage.
Drug Trends in Phoenix and Arizona: 2013
Drug Trends in Phoenix and Arizona: 213 James K. Cunningham, Ph.D. 1 ABSTRACT Two key findings for the Phoenix area (Maricopa County) in 213 were a 5-year increase in treatment admissions for other opioids
Central Government Laboratory Department of Health and Environment
Central Government Laboratory Department of Health and Environment Overview who we are and what we do What is available and what is protocol for good science Sample collection Screening Tests Confirmation
Urine Drug Testing in Pain Medicine
260 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2004 Review Article Urine Drug Testing in Pain Medicine Howard A. Heit, MD, FACP, FASAM and Douglas L. Gourlay, MD, MSc, FRCPC, FASAM Department
Drug Testing & Office Based Detoxification
Drug Testing & Office Based Detoxification Laxmaiah Manchikanti, M.D. 1 DISCLAIMER Chief Executive Officer, ASIPP, SIPMS Medical Director, PMCP, ASC, PCS Associate Clinical Professor Anesthesiology and
Amphetamine ELISA Kit
Amphetamine ELISA Kit Catalog Number KA0926 96 assays Version: 03 Intended for research use only www.abnova.com Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Intended Use... 3 Background... 3 Principle of the Assay...
Amphetamines Assay 2 SUMMARY 3 METHODOLOGY 4 REAGENTS 1 INTENDED USE
2 SUMMARY August 2010 Catalog Quantity/ Number Product Description Volume OSR9C229 Emit II Plus Amphetamines Assay OSR9C618 R1 (Antibody/Substrate Reagent 1) OSR9C648 R2 (Enzyme Reagent 2) 2 x 33 ml 2
Identification of Substance Use Disorders: SBIRT/ DSM-V/ Screening Instruments/ Biochemical Testing
Identification of Substance Use Disorders: SBIRT/ DSM-V/ Screening Instruments/ Biochemical Testing AOAAM Essentials in Addiction Medicine OMED Oct 18, 2015 Orlando, Florida Stephen A. Wyatt, DO Medical
Drug addiction. These factors increase the likelihood of your having an addiction to a legal or an illegal drug:
Drug addiction You may be hooked emotionally and psychologically. You may have a physical dependence, too. If you're addicted to a drug whether it's legal or illegal you have intense cravings for it. You
Chapter 2 Pharmacology of Commonly Abused Drugs
Chapter 2 Pharmacology of Commonly Abused Drugs Abstract Various drugs are abused and workplace drug testing depending on the half-life of the abused drug tests for the presence of either the abused drug
PAYMENT POLICY STATEMENT
PAYMENT POLICY STATEMENT Original Effective Date Next Annual Review Date Last Review / Revision Date 01/01/2014 04/05/2017 04/05/2016 Policy Name Policy Number Drug Screening Tests PY-0020 Policy Type
