Charts for the Everyday Litigator Katherine L. Gallo
|
|
|
- William Harrington
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Califnia Civil Discovery Charts f the Everyday Litigat Katherine L. Gallo
2 Page 2 I. DEPOSITIONS Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part. Remedies DEPOSITIONS ( ) ( ) A. DISCOVERY 1. Parties a. Testimony Only ( ) b. Testimony and Documents ( ) ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with 30 days befe 30 days befe ( (a) 10-day notice ( (a)) 10-day notice ( (a)) 1 depo per deponent ( (a)) 75 miles from residence within county in which action is pending and within 150 miles of residence ( (a)) Notice to state: nature of deposition date, time, place deponent s rights and duties; and penalties f disobedience subpoena, witness fee and mileage on befe deposition ( (a)(1) (6)) Documents described with reasonable particularity ( (a)(4)) Written objection due within 3 calendar days ( (a)) Motion f ( ) ( (c)) Written objection due within 3 calendar days ( (a)) Motion f ( ) ( (c)) Sanctions
3 Page 3 Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part. Remedies 2. Nonparty Witnesses a. Testimony Only ( ) ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with 30 days befe 10-day notice ( (a)) Personal service ( (b),(c)) Notice to state: date, time, place ( (a)) nature of deposition ( (b)(1)) deponent s rights and duties ( (b)(2)) and penalties f disobedience ( (b)(3)) subpoena, witness fee and mileage on befe deposition ( (b)(3)) to recd audio video ( (c), (d) ( )) Motion f ( ) Sanctions Contempt ( ) b. Business Recds only ( ) ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with 30 days befe 15-day after service 20 days after issuance. ( (c)) Personal service ( (b)) Documents described with reasonable particularity ( (a)) ( )) Motion f ( ) Contempt ( )
4 Page 4 Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part. Remedies c. Recds and Testimony ( ) d. Recds of Consumers ( ) ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with 30 days befe 30 days befe 10-day notice unless consumer recds involved ( (a)(1) & (c)) 5-day notice to consumer and 15-days after service 20 days after issuance ( (b), (c) & (e), (c)) Personal service ( (b)) Comply with ( (a)(1)) Designate business recds with reasonable particularity ( (a)(2)) Specify any sampling testing ( (a)(3)) Personal service ( (b)) Notice of Privacy Rights Service at least 10 days befe the date set f production and at least 5 days befe service on the custodian of recds ( (c)) ( )) Motion f ( ) Subpoenaing party s failure to comply with is grounds not to comply with subpoena. ( (k)) ( )) Motion f ( , ) Sanctions Contempt ( ) Contempt ( ) 3. Entity ( (a)) Plaintiff: 20 days summons defendant s appearance in 30 days befe 10-day notice unless consumer recds involved ( (a)(1) & (c), ) Personal service if entity not a party ( (b)) Notice shall describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. ( (e) & Written objection due within 3 calendar days ( (a))
5 Page 5 Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part. Remedies action. Ct. can grant earlier depo with ) Notice shall advise the ganization of its duty to designate and produce most qualified Person ( (e), ) ( )) Motion f ( , ) Sanctions 4. Expert a. Retained ( ) b. Independent ( ) 10-day notice unless consumer recds involved ( (a)(1) & (c), ) 10-day notice unless consumer recds involved ( (a)(1) & (c)) Retaining party to bring expert f deposition within 75 miles of court house where the action is pending ( ) Deposing party must tender expert fee pri to deposition ( , ) Need subpoena f documents ( citing (b)) Special notice if expert video to be used at trial in lieu of live testimony ( (d)) Personal Service Witness fee and mileage ( ) May have to be paid expert fees ( ) Special notice if expert video to be used at trial in lieu of live testimony ( (d)) Written objection due within 3 calendar days ( (a)) ( )) Motion f ( ) Subpoenaing party s failure to comply with is grounds not to comply with subpoena. ( (k)) ( )) Motion f ( )
6 Page 6 Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part. Remedies B. MOTIONS 1. Deposition without Documents a. ( , ) b. ( , (c)) c. Compel Answers ( ) Promptly ( ) 60 days after completion of recd of deposition ( (b)) Good Unwarranted, annoyance, embarrassment, oppression undue burden and expense ( (b)) No personal service required ( (c)(3)) Service problems/technical defects No personal service required ( (c)(3)) Notice to all parties and deponent ( (c)) Transcript lodged with court 5 days befe hearing ( (d)) ( (a)) ( (c)) ( (b)) Sanctions ( (d)) ( (c)) ( ) ( (d)) ( (f)) ( 639(e)) d. Compel Appearance ( ) 2. Deposition with Documents a. Compel Documents None Separate statement of questions in dispute (CRC ) No personal service required ( (c)(3)) Failed to appear Good ( (b)(1)) Good f document production hearing ( (d)) ( (b)(2)) ( (b)(1)) Awarded in fav of any party attending ( , , (c)(2)) Awarded in fav of any party attending ( , , (c)(2))
7 Page 7 Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part. Remedies 3. Nonparty Depositions a. Subpoena ( (g), ) b. ( , ) c. Compel Compliance ( ) 4. Expert Retained 10 days befe ( ) Independent ( ) Anytime befe depo date Sanctions No good required No ( ) Promptly No good required No ( (c)) No good required Contempt ( ) ( ) Motion requirements are same as f party deposition motions Motion requirements are same as f non-party deponents with counsel who retained expert. Sanctions are same as f motions against a party. No Sanctions are same as f motions against non-party.
8 Page 8 II. INTERROGATORIES Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part.Rem. Sanctions INTERROGATORIES ( ) A. Discovery 1. Official Fm ( (a)(2)) 2. Specially Prepared ( (b)) Plaintiff: 10 days after service.. ( (b)) Ct. may grant plaintiff leave to propound at an earlier time upon showing of good ( (c)) Plaintiff: 10 days after service.. ( (b)) 30 days befe 30 days befe 3. Supplemental 30 days befe B. Motions 1. ( , ) 30-day notice ( (a)) 30-day notice ( (a)) Promptly ( (a)) On any party ( (a)) Written objections ( (a)(3)) On any party ( (a)) Me than 35 interrogaties with declaration 1. Complexity quantity of issues 2 Depos expensive 3. Expedience of discovery method ( ) On any party ( (b)) Twice pri to initial trial setting conference and once after. ( (a)) Good ( (b)) ( (e)) Written objections ( (a)(3)) Motion f ( ) Written objections ( (a)(3)) Motion f ( ) ( (c)) ( (d)) 2. Compel Answers ( (b)) None No response ( (b)) No Relief from waiver ( (c))
9 Page 9 ( (a)) 3. Compel Further Answers ( ) 45 days after response supplemental response ( (c)) Statement of disputed interrogaties and responses (CRC ) ( (b)) ( (d)) III. INSPECTION DEMAND Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part.Rem. Sanctions INSPECTION DEMAND ( ) A. Discovery 1. Demands ( ) B. Motions 1. ( , ) 2. Compel Answers ( (b)) 3. Compel Further Answers ( ) 4. Compel Compliance ( (a)) Plaintiff: 10 days summons ( (a)) Ct. may grant plaintiff leave to propound at an earlier time upon ( (c)) 30 days befe 30 days ( (c)(2)) Promptly ( (a)) None 45 days after response supplemental response ( (c)) On any party ( (a)) No limit on number Time and place f inspection Description by categy with reasonable particularity ( (c)) Good ( (b)) No response ( (b)) Good showing ( (a)) Statement of disputed requests and responses (CRC ) ( (a)) No ( (a)) Written objections ( (3), ) Relief from waiver ( (a)) ( (d)) ( (c)) ( (d)) None No ( (b), & (c))
10 Page 10 IV. PHYSICAL/MENTAL EXAM Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part.Rem. Sanctions PHYSICAL/MENTAL EXAM ( ) A. Discovery 1. Physical Exam ( ) 2. Mental Exam ( )) B. Motions Compel Response ( (b)) After defendant has been served appeared ( (b)) After defendant has been served appeared ( (b)) 30 days befe 30 days befe ( (a) 30-day notice ( (d)) 20-day response ( (b)) 30-day notice ( (d)) 20-day response ( (b)) No painful protracted intrusive test ( (a)(1)) Within 75 miles of residence ( (a)(2)) Licensed physician other appropriate licensed health care practitioner ( (b)) Specification of scope and tests ( (c)) Rept due within 30 days after demand within 15 days of trial, whichever is earlier ( ) Court der ( (a)) Specification of scope and tests ( (b)) Good ( (a)) Physician clinical psychologist ( (c)) No observers ( (b)) May audiotape ( (a)) promptly No authity under 2032; Maybe None No response ( (b)) ( (c)) ( (b)) Response in 20 days ( ) Relief from waiver ( (a)) Plaintiff stipulation 1. no claim f unusual mental and emotional distress. 2. No expert testimony regarding the usual mental and emotional distress ( (c)) ( (c)) None ( (c), , )
11 Page Unsatisfacty Response, Compel Attendance ( ) 4. Enfcing Delivery of Rept ( ) None Response ( (a)) ( (a)) None Demand copy of rept ( ) ( (a)) ( (b), , ) ( (b)) V. REQUEST FOR ADMISSION Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part.Rem. Sanctions REQUEST FOR ADMISSION ( ) A. Discovery 1. Truth Facts ( ) 2. Genuineness of Documents ( ) B. Motions 1. ( )) Plaintiff: 10 days summons ( (a)) ( (b)) Plaintiff: 10 days summons ( (a)) ( (b)) Ct. may grant plaintiff leave to propound at an earlier time upon ( (c)) 30 days befe 30 days befe 30-day notice ( ) 30-day notice ( ) Promptly ( (a)) Another party in the action ( ) 35 limit ( (a)) Declaration of necessity complexity the quality of the existing and potential issues ( (a), ) No limit ( (c)) Availability of iginals ( (g)) Unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression undue burden and expense ( (b)) ( (a)) Object in lieu of admitting denying ( )) Object in lieu of admitting denying ( )) ( (d))
12 Page Establishing Admissions ( ) 3. Compel Further Answers ( (c)) None 45 days after response supplemental response ( (c)) No response ( (a)) Statement of requests and response to RFA in dispute (CRC ) No ( (b)) Tardy response defeats motion; response must be substantially in compliance ( (b)) Mandaty ( (c)) Monetary ( (d)) Deemed admitted if court der disobeyed ( (e))
13 Page 13 VI. EXPERT WITNESSES Type Commences Closes Time Limit Requirements MT/Conf. Op.Part.Rem. Sanctions EXPERT WITNESSES ( ) A. Discovery 1. Disclosure List ( ) 2. Supplemental List ( ) DEMAND--70 days befe trial 10 days after trial settlement conference, whichever is closer to trial date ( ) 20 days after exchange ( (a)) RESPONSE--50 days befe trial 20 days after demand, whichever is closer to trial date ( ) Simultaneous exchange of (1) expert lists ( (b)) (2) declarations ( (c)) (3) repts of experts ( ) Limited to adding experts in area opposing party named in initial exchange ( (a)) Served expert witness declaration in compliance with CCP ( (a)) Exclusion of expert by motion in limine ( ) B. Motions 1. ( ) 2. Augment List ( ) 3. Submit Tardy Expert Infmation ( ) Promptly ( (a)) Sufficient time, befe 15-day cutoff ( (b)) Sufficient time, befe 15-day cutoff ( (b)) Good ( (b)) No prejudice ( (a),(b)) Excuse reasonable diligence could not have found out ( (c)(1),(2)) Infmation served ( (c)(2)(B)) Experts available f deposition ( (d)) No prejudice ( (a),(b)) Excuse reasonable diligence could not ( (c)) ( (c)) ( (c)) ( (d)) ( ) ( (d)) ( )
14 Page 14 have found out ( (c)(1),(2)) Infmation served ( (c)(2)(B)) Experts available f deposition ( (d))
2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery
2 California Evidence (5th), Discovery I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. [ 1] Purpose of Discovery. B. [ 2] Modern Discovery Procedures. C. [ 3] Relation to Pretrial Conference. D. Overview of California Discovery
PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380 AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND TO MAKE CONFORMING CHANGES TO
Family Law Discovery Issues
Research Guide Last Updated: January 2013 Table of Contents How to Prepare and Serve Form Interrogatories on the Other Party (JC Form #FL-145)... 2 How to Respond to Family Law Form Interrogatories (not
RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK
RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK 10.1 General. A Judge of the District Court may order that any monies in actions pending before the Court be invested in any local financial institution for safe keeping.
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5
Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5 An act to amend Sections 2016.020, 2031.010, 2031.020, 2031.030, 2031.040, 2031.050, 2031.060, 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, 2031.250, 2031.260, 2031.270, 2031.280,
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination
Article 31 of the N.Y. Civil Practice Law and Rules (hereinafter referred to
Introduction and Overview of Discovery Under Article 31 of the N.Y. Civil Practice Law and Rules By: D. Daniel Engstrand, Jr., Esq. and John P. Bracken, Esq. Article 31 of the N.Y. Civil Practice Law and
Key differences between federal practice and California practice
Discovery and deposition practice in federal court Key differences between federal practice and California practice BY BRIAN J. MALLOY Federal law governs procedural matters for cases that are in federal
Last amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011.
Last amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FOUR PRETRIAL PROCEDURES, DEPOSITIONS AND PRODUCTION AT TRIAL Rule 4:5. Depositions Upon Oral Examination.
Discovery Depositions 1 Part I: Practical Considerations in Planning and Preparing to Take a Discovery Deposition
Discovery Depositions 1 Part I: Practical Considerations in Planning and Preparing to Take a Discovery Deposition Purpose of Depositions: Perpetuate testimony Discover knowledge of facts and observations
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
SUBCHAPTER 10L INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION FORMS SECTION.0100 WORKERS COMPENS ATION FORMS
SUBCHAPTER 10L INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION FORMS SECTION.0100 WORKERS COMPENS ATION FORMS 04 NCAC 10L.0101 FORM 21 AGREEMENT FOR COMPENSATION FOR DISABILITY (a) (Effective until July 1, 2015) The parties to
Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey
View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/6-569-5426 Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey EZRA ROSENBERG, MICHELLE HART YEARY AND THOMAS J. MILLER, DECHERT LLP, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION
ANSWERING THE CALL: RESPONDING TO A TEXAS CIVIL SUBPOENA
ANSWERING THE CALL: RESPONDING TO A TEXAS CIVIL SUBPOENA I. Introduction Your client has just received a subpoena from a Texas civil court in a case in which she is not a party. She calls you and inquires
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 0064
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO STACY MCDOWELL, et al., : Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 0064 vs. : Judge McBride PATRICK SHELDON : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant : Schwartz Manes Ruby & Slovin,
Subchapter 2.300 Discovery
Subchapter 2.300 Discovery Rule 2.301 Completion of Discovery (A) In circuit and probate court, the time for completion of discovery shall be set by an order entered under MCR 2.401(B)(2)(a). (B) In an
SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES
City of Seattle OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES Adopted May 8, 2014 Office of Hearing Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4000 Mailing: PO Box 94729 Seattle,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM. To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page2
Documentary Evidence: From Subpoena to Admission
Tab 17: Documentary Evidence: From Subpoena to Admission Presenters Hilary Martin Masson and Fatini, LLP. Richard Masson Masson and Fatini, LLP. Moderator Cynthia Holton Public Law Center Documentary Evidence:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL The following provisions apply to civil matters: 1. General Provisions The court may conduct
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.
Published on Arkansas Judiciary (https://courts.arkansas.gov) Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. (a) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods:
Friday 31st October, 2008.
Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules
Rule 34. Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes
PURSUANT TO RULE 27(f) OF THE MISSISSIPPI RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, THE RULES COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE SEEKS COMMENTS FROM THE BENCH, THE BAR AND THE PUBLIC ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered February 16, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rules
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
Med-Legal, Inc. Copy Service Tables
Med-Legal, Inc. Copy Service Tables Table 1. Deposition Subpoena - Nonparty - Notice Delivery of Records Notice Authority Copied by Copy Service Records Only Deposition Subpoena of nonparty where records
Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-064 PA/PI-CIR RE: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES Rule 1.200(c) of the Florida Rules of
A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California
What is ediscovery? Electronic discovery ( ediscovery ) is discovery of electronic information in litigation. ediscovery in California is governed generally by the Civil Discovery Act. In 2009, the California
DISCOVERY: Using the Civil and Criminal Rules of Discovery in DSS Cases
DISCOVERY: Using the Civil and Criminal Rules of Discovery in DSS Cases Maitri Mike Klinkosum Assistant Capital Defender Office of the Capital Defender-Forsyth Regional Office Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Discussion. Discussion
same way as any other testimony. The deposition need not be included in the record of trial. (h) Objections. (1) In general. A failure to object prior to the deposition to the taking of the deposition
RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TO UNDERSTAND PROCEDURES IN THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURTS, PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT S (LASC
ALL OF THE BELOW DUTIES ARE ASSUMED TO, AND MUST BE, UNDER THE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED ATTORNEY.
CIVIL LITIGATION PARALEGAL 2007 revision and update by Barbara Biondolillo of Berenbaum, Weinshienk & Eason, P.C., and Peggy Upton, formerly of the same firm. 2007 Revision and update reviewed by Larry,
ILLINOIS WHISTLEBLOWER REWARD AND PROTECTION ACT
. ILLINOIS WHISTLEBLOWER REWARD AND PROTECTION ACT 175/1. Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act. 175/2. Definitions 2. Definitions. As used in this Act: (a)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal
LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds Note: all names have been changed. Ted
Federal Rule Changes Affecting E-Discovery Are Almost Here - Are You Ready This Time?
Federal Rule Changes Affecting E-Discovery Are Almost Here - Are You Ready This Time? An Overview of the Rules, History and Commentary Absent congressional action to reject, modify or defer proposed amendments
Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
31.02.01.00 Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Subtitle 02 POWERS AND DUTIES HEARINGS Chapter 01 Hearings Authority: Insurance Article, 2-109 and 2-205 2-215; State Government Article, 10-206;
Illinois False Claims Act
Illinois False Claims Act (740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 175/1 to 175/8) i 740 ILCS 175/1. [Short title] Sec. 1. This Act may be cited as the Illinois False Claims Act. 740 ILCS 175/2. Definitions Sec. 2.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION
1 1 1 1 1 BOURNE INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, CHET STOLER; SOUTH SEAS TRADING CO., Defendants. STIPULATION NO. C0-0RJB PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 2:04-cv-01053-HGB-DEK Document 190 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO.
Case 2:04-cv-01053-HGB-DEK Document 190 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 04-1053 EDUCATION MANAGEMENT,
Katherine Gallo, Esq. Discovery Referee, Special Master, and Mediator 1-650-571-1011
FIVE OF THE MOST ANNOYING OBJECTIONS BY OPPOSING COUNSEL AND THE RULINGS THAT ARE SURE TO FOLLOW Katherine Gallo Christopher Cobey Reprinted from August/September 1998 The Docket San Mateo County Bar Association
INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
TEXAS DISCOVERY RULES
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W TEXAS DISCOVERY RULES COMPLETE TEXT TEXAS CIVIL RULES OF DISCOVERY WITH OFFICIAL SUPREME COURT COMMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 9. EVIDENCE AND DISCOVERY... 4 Explanatory
Arkansas Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act*
Arkansas Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act* (Ark. Code Ann. 20-77-901 to 911) i * Statute provides for awards, but does not permit qui tam actions 20-77-901. Definitions. As used in this subchapter: (1)
Computing and Extending Time; Time. The following rules apply in
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 6. Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers (a) Computing Time. The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in these
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 [email protected] Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES 1. Filing Pleadings: A Cover Sheet must be filed with the Complaint and any Cross-Complaint stating whether the case is contested or uncontested,
Title 40 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Part I. Workers' Compensation Administration Subpart 2. Hearing Rules. Chapter 55. General Provisions
5501. Purpose; Definitions Title 40 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Part I. Workers' Compensation Administration Subpart 2. Hearing Rules Chapter 55. General Provisions Subchapter A. Definitions A. The purpose of
The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules
The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules The List (1) The rules now refer to electronically stored information, which is on equal footing with paper. Rules 26(a)(1), 26(b)(2), 26(b)(5)(B),
Recommended Chapter Title and Rule. Current Montana Chapter Title and Rule V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY
Current Montana Chapter Title and Rule V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY RULE 26. GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY Recommended Chapter Title and Rule V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY RULE 26. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Former Law Office of Vincent DiCarlo
Former Law Office of Vincent DiCarlo As of September 1, 2008,Vincent DiCarlo is no longer engaged in the private practice of law. This site is no longer maintained, may no longer be accurate, and is provided
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION GENERAL ORDER I. COMPLAINTS A. All complaints must: 1. Include
PART ONE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 minutes)
PART ONE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 minutes) ANSWER THE QUESTIONS IN THIS PART OF THE EXAMINATION IN ANSWER BOOK/S SEPARATE FROM THE ANSWER BOOK/S CONTAINING ANSWERS TO OTHER PARTS OF THE EXAMINATION Question
ORDER. This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the motion to adopt the Rule For Expedited
Serial: 149640 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 89-R-99025-SCT IN RE: UNIFORM RULES OF CIRCUIT AND COUNTY COURT PRACTICE ORDER This matter is before the Court, en banc, on the motion to adopt the
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES RULE 1. MEDIATION IN MALPRACTICE CASES In order to alleviate the burden to the parties
RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL
RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL Application (1) This rule does not apply to summary trials under Rule 19, except as provided in that rule. Witness to testify orally (2) Subject to any Act, statute
What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit
What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit Jennifer G. Hall Meadowbrook Office Park 4268 I-55 North Jackson, MS 39211 601.351.2483 [email protected] What can Trigger a Lawsuit? Anything and everything
HB 2845. Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT
REFERENCE TITLE: state false claims actions State of Arizona House of Representatives Fiftieth Legislature Second Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA
(1) If a defendant has served a notice of taking a deposition or otherwise sought discovery, or
On October 21, 2015, the Nebraska Supreme Court adopted the following rule amendments to Neb. Ct. R. Disc. 6-327, 6-330, 6-331, and 6-332, effective January 1, 2016: Article 3: Nebraska Court Rules of
Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents
Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents Part I: General provisions. Rule 101: Application and interpretation. Rule 102: Duties of a party. Rule 103: Conducting a lawsuit. Part II: The
Personal Injury Litigation
Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-74 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. [November 14, 2013] PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the regular-cycle report of proposed rule amendments
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 249 Proposed Amendment of Rules 4009.1, 4009.11, 4009.12, 4009.21, 4009.23, and 4011 Governing Discovery of Electronically
What to Expect In Your Lawsuit
What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated.
Discovery Expert Reports
Discovery Expert Reports Local Rule 4002.1 Filing Discovery Material. Requests for Expert Reports in Professional Negligence and All requests for production of expert reports made in professional negligence
Table of Contents. LR 3.1 Filing Complaint by Electronic Means... 2. LR 3.2 Filing Complaint on Paper... 2
LOCAL CIVIL RULES Table of Contents LR 1.1 Definitions.................................................... 1 (a) Court........................................................ 1 (b) Presiding Judge................................................
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MURIELLE MOLIERE, Plaintiff, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM RE: ) Supreme Court Case No. PRM 06-006 ) ) QMENDING PROMULGATION ORDER ) PROMULGATION ORDER NO. YO. 06-006-02 ON THE LOCAL RULES 06-006-10 DF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM )
BILL ANALYSIS. C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE C.S.S.B. 1309 gives the State of Texas civil remedies to be invoked by the attorney general
HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE THE TEXT MESSAGE
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE THE TEXT MESSAGE In terms of divorce practice, this time period could easily be called the electronic age. We have an increasing number of clients who are extremely well versed (many
Damages Discovery. Instructors: Gary M. Gilbert Ernest C. Hadley EXCEL 2009 1
Damages Discovery Instructors: Gary M. Gilbert Ernest C. Hadley EXCEL 2009 1 1 Basics of Discovery What you absolutely need: 29 C.F.R. 1614.109(d); EEOC Management Directive 110, Chapter 7; EEOC Handbook
Defending The Workers' Compensation Adjuster's Deposition
Defending The Workers' Compensation Adjuster's Deposition Robert D. Ingram, Esq. Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele, LLP Marietta, Georgia Table Of Contents Preparing Adjuster Pre-deposition conference Determine
51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013
SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING
Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act
Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act 36.001. Definitions In this chapter: (1) Claim means a written or electronically submitted request or demand that: (A) is signed by a provider or a fiscal agent and
SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION Trial/Hearing Rules for Probate Judge: Mary Fingal Schulte, Supervising Judge Judge: Gerald Johnston Judge: Randall Sherman Clerks: Dept. L72, Mary Torrez
ARIZONA RULES OF FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE
CORRELATION TABLE FORMS REFERENCE TABLE ARIZONA RULES OF FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE I. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Rule 1. Scope of Rules 2. Applicability of Other Rules 3. Definitions 4. Time 5. Consolidation 6.
I-2 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS
INTERNET RESOURCE Time Deadlines Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure Contents I-1 Introduction I-2 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts I-3 Federal Rules of
PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS. [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013] RULE 500. GENERAL RULES
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS IN THE 397 th DISTRICT COURT
FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS IN THE 397 th DISTRICT COURT RULE 1.1. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS A. Application Without Supporting Affidavit. 1. If a party applies for a temporary restraining order without a
The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer
The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer The information provided here contains general information about how to represent yourself in a hearing. This information is to help you prepare
PRODOC FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE
PRODOC FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE Whether you practice criminal defense in federal court or want to expand in that area, the automated ProDoc Federal Criminal Defense volume is for you. You will find the
CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...
CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3
