A REVIEW OF AUTOMATED DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVING TILLAGE OPERATIONS

Transcription

1 Recepción/ 14 junio 2019 Aceptación/ 25 agosto 2019 A REVIEW OF AUTOMATED DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVING TILLAGE OPERATIONS UNA REVISIÓN DE LAS TÉCNICAS DE APOYO A LA DECISIÓN AUTOMATIZADA PARA MEJORAR LAS OPERACIONES DE TRABAJO Haider Fawzi a,b, Desa Ahmed a, Salama A. Mostafa c,*, Mohd Farhan Md Fudzee c, Mazin Abed Mahmood d, Subhi R.M. Zeebaree e, Dheyaa Ahmed Ibrahim f a Department of Biological and Agriculture Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia, b Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering Technical College Al-Musaib, Al- Furat Al Awsat Technical University, [email protected], [email protected] c Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400, Johor, Malaysia, {salama, farhan}@uthm.edu.my d College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Anbar, 31001, Iraq, [email protected] e Duhok Polytechnic University, Duhok, Iraq and Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq, [email protected] f Computer Engineering Techniques Department, Imam Ja'afar Al-Sadiq University, Baghdad, Iraq, [email protected] 219 ABSTRACT/ Agricultural activity is fundamentally carried out for developing the different crop yields local to a different neighbourhood in the world's ecological system. This assorted variety needs distinctive agrarian innovations appropriate for every neighbourhood. Distinctive innovations and automation frameworks must be given that match the condition of the farming. Mechanization in agriculture has been characterized in various ways. Maybe the most extensive and fitting definition is that it involves all levels of cultivating and preparing innovations, from basic and essential hand devices to more complex and mechanized implements. It incorporates all apparatuses, implements and hardware and can utilize human, animal or mechanized power sources. Automation facilitates and lessens manual work (drudgery), calms work deficiencies, enhance cultivation work profitability, enhances efficiency and convenience of farming activities, enhances the productive utilization of assets, improves economy access and adds to relieving atmosphere related risks. This paper looks at the various literature on mechanization in agriculture, starting with tillage and tillage methods, tillage implements suitable for primary tilling, tillage power, tillage operations and performance. Moreover, it looks at the measurement of tillage efficiency parameters and tools including tillage power, vibration, fuel consumption and slippage. Subsequently, it reviews in details the automated tillage Decision Support System (DSS) and decision making applications. This include in details DSS, DSS classification, decision-making frameworks, agricultural data and data acquisition mechanisms for decision making, a sensor for data capturing and data incorporation for DSS. The review covers different data sources including research articles, books, reports and links of the dataset. Keywords: Decision support system, tillage operations, tillage evaluation parameters, Artificial Intelligence, automated decision-making. RESUMEN/ La actividad agrícola se lleva a cabo fundamentalmente para desarrollar los diferentes rendimientos de cultivos locales en un vecindario diferente en el sistema ecológico del mundo. Esta variedad variada necesita innovaciones agrarias distintivas apropiadas para cada vecindario. Se deben dar innovaciones distintivas y marcos de automatización que coincidan con la condición de la agricultura. La mecanización en la agricultura se ha caracterizado de varias maneras. Quizás la definición más extensa y adecuada es que involucra todos los niveles de cultivo y preparación de innovaciones, desde dispositivos manuales básicos y esenciales hasta implementos más complejos y mecanizados. Incorpora todos los aparatos, implementos y hardware y puede utilizar fuentes de energía humana, animal o mecanizada. La automatización facilita y disminuye el trabajo manual (trabajo pesado), calma las deficiencias de trabajo, mejora la rentabilidad del trabajo de cultivo, mejora la eficiencia y la conveniencia de las actividades agrícolas, mejora la utilización productiva de los activos, mejora el acceso a la economía y contribuye a aliviar los riesgos relacionados con la atmósfera. Este artículo analiza la literatura variada sobre mecanización en agricultura, comenzando con métodos de labranza y labranza, implementos de labranza adecuados para labranza primaria, potencia de labranza, operaciones de labranza y rendimiento. Además, analiza la medición de los parámetros y herramientas de eficiencia de labranza, incluida la potencia de labranza, la vibración, el consumo de combustible y el deslizamiento. Posteriormente, revisa en detalle el sistema automatizado de soporte de decisiones de labranza (DSS) y las aplicaciones de toma de decisiones. Esto incluye en detalle DSS, clasificación DSS, marcos de toma de decisiones, mecanismos de datos agrícolas y adquisición de datos para la toma de decisiones, un sensor para la captura de datos e incorporación de datos para DSS. La revisión cubre diferentes fuentes de datos, incluidos artículos de investigación, libros, informes y enlaces del conjunto de datos.

2 Palabras clave: sistema de soporte de decisiones, operaciones de labranza, parámetros de evaluación de labranza, inteligencia artificial, toma de decisiones automatizada. Introduction In last decades, tillage operation has dramatically changed; one of the most important changes is the evolution in the method of measuring performance during tillage operation; three of major indicators of performances are vibration, fuel consumption and slippage ratio [1], [2]. Recently, researchers did not focus on the measurement of vibration during tillage operation except in theoretical aspect or on mini tractors, because the necessary equipment in measuring the high ratio of vibration are expensive and they need a suitable place in a tractor; due to high vibration ratio affecting the accuracy of the measurement [3]. Ordinary methods to measure fuel consumption and slippage ratio take more time and efforts and it s not really accurate. The modern method is more about using sensors for measuring. Sensors are fast and very accurate [4]. However, this method faces the challenge of providing stable power to the sensors and their electric circuits during tillage operations. Numerous sorts of tillage frameworks are in existence, for example, extraordinary mixes of ploughs as primary implements and harrows as secondary equipment [5]. Draft and power information for a considerable lot of these devices are inadequate or unavailable. Power input information for a scope of accepted or traditional primary culturing devices under confined circumstances is vital for choosing the most energy effective and adept frameworks [6]. Then again, precedent comprehensive studies demonstrated that the draft need of chisel plough was almost a portion (half) of the draft necessity of the moldboard plough in equivalent width and profundity activity. As of late, chisel plough has replaced moldboard plough in dry cultivating. This extensive activity has been carried out globally. One of the fundamental notes of power utilization in tillage activity is the total energy adequacy or effectiveness of tractor [5]. The total power proficiency is the ratio of the transmitted power from tractor (for equipment take-off) and energy commensurate with the fuel utilization in various tasks [7]. The comprehensive energy effectiveness shows the overall state of tractor efficacy. This indicator is more critical in contrasting draft effectiveness with particular fuel utilization in a review of tractor efficacy. Researchers disclosed that the typical range for comprehensive energy proficiency is 10 20%. A tractor-equipment amalgamation having general power effectiveness beneath 10% shows poor load coordinating or/and low tractive productivity, while over 20% demonstrates a decent load coordinate or/and high tractive proficiency. Numerous analysts believe that the expanding total power proficiency for tractor and equipment and revise coordinating of tractor and farming apparatus can be compelling in diminishing fuel utilization [8]. The most important primary tillage tools are the moldboard plough, the chisel plough, and the disk plough. Disc plough is the best among them in terms of vibration ratio [2]. In Marsili et al. [9], a study was carried out various field conditions both interfacing and detaching the suspension for the front pivot as well as absorber (shock) for the tool. Their study demonstrates that vehicle suspension could cause a significant decrease in speeding (up to 36%) and that the vehicle suspension could hamper the driver's wellbeing through an increment in an everyday exposure time of around half amid ploughing and of over 100% amid harrowing [10]. The organizing of this paper starts with the Introduction Section that is followed by an overview of the tillage operations in Section II. Section III presents the Decision Support Systems that are related to tillage operations. Finally, Section IV presents conclusions and future works of the emerging trends in the area of tillage DSSs. 220

3 221 II. Tillage/Culture Overview Tillage activities in different structures have been exercised from the beginning of plant growth. The early man utilized instruments tools to prepare the earth for seed placements. The word tillage comes from old English words Tilian and Teolian, signifying to plough and process dirt for seed sowing, to develop and to grow crops. Jethrotull, who is seen as the father of tillage recommended that intensive furrowing is vital to make the dirt into fine particles. Tillage can be defined as mechanical manipulation (digging, stirring, overturning, etc.) of land for any purpose, but usually to nourish crops [3]. Primary tillage which is a type of tillage operation performed in preparing a field with the purpose of bringing it under cultivation. It is one of the most expensive tillage operations, and among the most important primary tillage tools is the disc plough. Ploughs can be implemented on and take their power from animals or machines. Tillage is the physical state of soil acquired out of culturing or it is essentially the aftereffect of culturing. The Tillage can be coarse, fine or moderate. Tillage is pivotal for harvest foundation, development and eventually, yields [2]. A decent soil administration program shields the dirt from water and wind erosion provides a decent seedbed that is void of weed for planting, dismantles hardpans or compacted layers that may constrain root advancement, and permits conservations or even an increment in the natural matter [11]. Tillage frameworks are site particular and rely upon plant type, soil composes and the climatic conditions. Tillage activities impact soil s physical, synthetic and biological properties, which thus may influence plant development and yield [6], [10]. A. Plough Types Ploughs assist to set up the dirt for seeding or crops planting: making open grooves by hauling through the dirt. The quicker the land can be worked is directly proportional to the amount of food that can be delivered. With the end goal to continue developing good harvest is not all those nutrient-rich territories, the earth should be stirred up so supplements rise to the top. Ploughs do precisely turning up the dirt to convey crisp supplements to the surface and keeping plant buildup beneath where it will disintegrate [4]. As circulating air through and loosening the dirt stands as one of the first and most vital strides to take before planting or making a farm, this procedure circulates air through the earth empowering it to retain more water. One can utilize hand implements for little farmlands; however, a farm plough makes the undertaking vastly easier and simpler as the area expands [2], [5]. Ploughs come in many shapes and types. The common ones are Moldboard Plough, Rotating (rotary) Plough, Sub-surface Plough (Subsoil Plough) or Chisel Plough and Disc Plough. Moldboard plough: A moldboard plough consists of a sharp blade (Share) at the bottom and two wings at the top that direct the flow of the soil as it rolls to the surface. A moldboard plough can plough shallow or deep depending on the type of soil being worked and the desired result. Typically, one requires a moldboard plough when in need of overturning weeds or residues from last year's crop [2]. When set at the proper depth, moldboard ploughs are perfect for burying weeds or dead plant matter in order to facilitate decomposition and even to kill pests and diseases. In a grass field or grassland, moldboard plough can be utilized to break up the soil to sow an initial crop. The moldboard ploughs are classified into a general purpose, stubble, sod or breaker compose and slat compose. Rotating hoe/tiller or rotating plough: This kind of plough arrangement is extremely well known these days because of their particular use in seedbed groundwork. A rotary plough consists of offset blades on a central axis. Soil breaking is carried out by these steel blades. This set up is commonly seen on walk-behind ploughs, which makes it suitable for small home plots. However, large rotary farm ploughs exist for tractors. Rotating ploughs, to be specific as follows:

4 o Pull Type: in this kind of setting, tractor pulls the rotating digger and the assistant motor is joined to supply the needed force. The edges are made to run utilizing this combination. o Tractor Mounted: these require tractor mounts and PTO shaft deals with the running procedure. o Self-Propelled: these sorts of diggers are typically self-propelled. They are equipped with an engine and are viable in little ranches or gardens where the administrator strolls nearby. Chisel plough or sub-surface plough: Chisel ploughs, also known as sub-soilers, break the ground deeply to loosen the subsoil for better root penetration in the normally tightly packed earth. They are not for a fainthearted tractor since pulling them in hard soil is tough work. Chisel ploughs are utilized to get through and smash compacted or generally impermeable hardpans or layers of soil. Profound culturing smashes hardpans and improves better water penetration in the yield root area. The enhanced soil structure likewise brings about better advancement of root development and the yield of products.in addition, tolerance of plants during droughts is improved. The practical part of the system incorporates reversible share, tine (etch or chisel), bar, top-link and cross shaft association. A chisel plough. The purpose of the sub-soiler is to infiltrate further than the regular development hardware and separate dirt layers, which are hardpan as a result of being compacted by moving heavy-duty equipment or because of nonstop ploughing at a consistent profundity. These compacted regions restrict natural draining of the soil and furthermore hinder the movement of air and supplements through the dirt structure. The sub-soiler comprises of heavier tine in comparison with the \chisel plough to get through the impenetrable layer, crushing the sub-soil to a profundity of 45 to 75 cm. 60 to 100 hp is required to work it. The focal points are similar to chisel ploughs; the reason they are most times known as chisel ploughs. Disc plough: The name takes after the structure of this equipment. It comprises of a line of concave circular edges that breaks up chunks of soil. It is as a plate i.e. Plate (curved shape). It cuts, turns and in few instances breaks grooves by methods for independently mounted expansive steel plates. It is structured with a perspective of diminishing resistance (friction) by making a moving furrow base as opposed to sliding furrow base [2]. In a situation where moldboard plough does not work properly, a disc plough functions admirably. This plough can't be utilized at more prominent velocity as the soil-cutting procedure requires moderate speed. Contrasted with Moldboard, Disk Plow has a lower cost of maintenance. The benefits of the disc plough are it can be compelled to enter into the dirt which is extremely hard and dry than for a moldboard plough. In a sticky soil that a moldboard plough is unable to scour, a disk plough functions admirably. In deep ploughing, a disk plough is more valuable. A disk plough is safely utilizable in stony and short soils with less likelihood of damage. It functions admirably even after an extensive piece of the disc is worn off in rough soil. In loose soil (for example, peat), it works well with little clogging [2]. In covering surface waste and weeds, it is not viable effective as a moldboard plough. Comparatively, it leaves the dirt in harsh and cloudier condition than a moldboard plough would. In terms of weight, disc furrow is considerably heavier than moldboard plough for equivalent limits since the depth of penetration influenced to a great extent by its weight as opposed to suction. The moldboard plough is pushed into the ground by the suction of the plough, while the disk plough is constrained into the ground by its own weight; this is one critical distinction between moldboard plough and disk plough [12]. Other types of ploughs: A type of ploughing machine called a mole plough allows flexible drainage pipes to be installed underground without digging a trench. Bottom ploughs or turning ploughs are either a sharply pointed plough with a wide wing that rolls a mass of dirt over when pulled, thus the 222

5 223 alternate name turning plough [12]. They can be 12, 14, 16, 18, inches or larger, and are ganged in sets of 8 or more, depending on the size tractor. Another less common turning plough is a large concave disc of metal that rolls the dirt over. Cultivators are gangs of ploughs mounted on a toolbar. They run between the rows to remove weeds and to throw dirt toward the roots of the crop. There are hoppers on some of these that distribute fertilizer as they run. There may be several different widths and styles of plough points on a cultivator, from sweeps up to 16 inches wide (they resemble a bat or delta-shaped aircraft wings), to chisels, to scooters, depending on the soil and exact job they are used for [3]. There are other ploughs, like fire lane ploughs, that are massive machines used to plough through forests to create a fire break during a wildfire. These are usually pulled by a bulldozer, not a farm tractor. Since it is off topic, we won t discuss snow ploughs, except to say they also throw material, but not soil. In summary, the objectives of tillage are; to oversee soil moisture, i.e. wetness and dryness and soil aeration; to guarantee appropriate seedbed preparation; control weeds; control or destroy pests such as all stages of metamorphosis of insects and breading environments; diminish wind and water eroding capability having a coarse soil surface; and blend and add soil supplements, for example, hummus and lime based compost [12]. Generally, tillage requirement differs as per farming methodology to be utilized. What might be attractive for one might be absolutely improper for another on the grounds that soil is a complex biophysical matter, comprised of living and non-living parts, and all culturing tasks have in excess of one impact. B. Tillage Performance Evaluation Parameters There are different tillage performance evaluation parameters in the literature. This study covers the main parameters that are related to automated tillage operations DSS. They are tillage power, vibration, fuel consumption and slippage. The details of these parameters and their measurement are given in the following subsections. 1) Tillage Power In mechanized tillage systems today, tractors have been alluded to as a focal power station in that it gives the capacity to numerous exercises, both portable and stationary [12]. The main purpose of tractors, particularly the average power type, is to carry out the task of traction at a low speed. The importance of a tractor is seen by the measure of work performed in relation to the incurred cost and working ecological condition in getting the job done [13]. Early tractor designs were based on the concept of substituting mechanical pulling or draft power for the draft animal classically associated with pulling ploughs through the soil, operating reaper and binder machines through fields of corn, or mowers through fields of grass. Cumbersome steam-powered engines were soon to be replaced by the more energy efficient and compact internal combustion engine. An example was the massproduced and low-cost Fordson tractor introduced by Henry Ford in Soon and after the Irish inventor and agricultural engineer, Harry Ferguson recognized the utility of greater integration of the tractor with the implements and machines (ploughs, seeders, agrochemical applicators, harvesters, feeders), which were pulled behind it by a simple drawbar hitch. Ferguson developed a hydraulically activated three-point hitch to which implements could be attached and which could lift and lower implements to the required working position. Ferguson also developed automatic control systems (draft, position) which greatly enhanced the performance of the equipment. Draft control is a system whereby the drawbar pull can be maintained at a constant level by automatically adjusting the position of the implement (e.g. plough) in response to variations in the draft (e.g. soil resistance). Position control is a system whereby the position of a fully mounted implement (sprayer or fertilizer distributor, whose weight is totally on the tractor) is

6 automatically maintained in a constant position (e.g. operating height over the ground) despite leakages in the hydraulic system tending to lower the position of the implement [14]. Sophisticated hydraulic systems are now available on all modern tractors capable of performing additional functions including the operation and control of a multiplicity of implements and machines mounted to the rear, front or side of the tractor including loaders, mowers, agrochemical applicators, harvesters and feeders. While many of these are mechanically driven through the powertake-off (PTO) shaft at the rear of the tractor, hydraulic-drive systems provide additional flexibility due to the flexible power that interconnects the driving and driven units [14]. The tractor also powers the mounted equipment via various independent means; the drawbar or 3-point hitch provide draft power, hydraulic remote blocks gives fluid power, the engine via the gear system to the PTO shaft transmits rotational power, and through several electrical outlets located around the interior and exterior of the tractor cabin provides electrical power. The most efficient transmission (approximately 90% of net engine power) for an agricultural tractor to a towed/trailing equipment needing rotational force, be it stationary or mobile is through the PTO shaft (ASABE Standards, [15]). Understanding the tractor power parameters is very vital with respect to the final result and in turn, helps in matching implements appropriately to effectively and efficiently mitigate and utilize tractor power. Moreover, engine power alone isn't adequate to set up the states of any tractor. In the power output estimation, it is important to decide the effectiveness and optional impacts involved in producing this power. Additional and exciting technological developments are taking place in tractor design with an emphasis on precision farming, communications and information technologies. These are intended to enhance performance and take account of energy conservation, environmental protection and sustainability considerations [14], [15]. 2) Vibration Vibration estimation is intricate on account of its numerous parts movement, speed, increasing speed, and frequencies. In addition, these parts can be estimated in various ways. Much study has been done to enhance the drive-feel of agrarian tractors yet so far the spotlight has just been about vibration on the cabin and more on driver seat [9]. A number of researchers estimated the seclusion characteristics of suspensions for a seat in the research facility, utilizing institutionalized vehicle vibration spectra, and the segregation characteristics of seat suspensions which were put in vehicles moved on ordinary surfaces. As a result, in Hostens et al. [16], it was recommended another enhanced suspension framework that incorporates an air spring with extra air volume and variable air damping. In Duke and Goss [17], a driver seat furnished with springs having a non-linear stiffness/firmness and an on-off damper was discovered to accomplish a 40% decrease and arms increasing speed levels contrasted with the direct, inactively damped seat, with no end stop effects. A portion of the examination also placed emphasis on the suspension frameworks of the front and back axles utilized by heavy duty tractors; most mid-sized and light/small tractors are without suspension frameworks in order to diminish expenses and real-life intricacy when used to prepare delicate plastic soils [18]. Vibration estimations more often consider vibration movements, speed, and rate of change of speed and others' estimation, as a rule, in making gadget known as a vibration sensor that converts the vibration into usable electrical power [19]. A previous study made by Vaghela and Jain, [20] on vibration in the seat and mini tractor clutch found that vibration increases as the forward speed of mini tractor increased, and decreased on footrest, steering and brake as forwarding speed of mini tractor increased. The data were collected and a database of mini tractor vibration characteristics was developed. Vibration extents of the front, rear pivot and tractor body depended significantly 224

7 225 on tractor speed (the greatest value for acceleration was m/s2, m/s2 and m/s2at at a forward velocity of 1.16 m/s, 1.49 m/s and 1.79 m/s respectively) [10]. The traditional ways to measure fuel consumption has many disadvantages as the manual reading is deficient such as errors in taking reading, accuracy, external conditions affecting readings, delayed work [21]. Fluid flow/liquid stream rate sensors are required for checking flow rate, in light of the fact that these sensors are by and large employed in tough conditions, a robust, low-cost transducer is alluring. A reasonably cheap and adaptable printed resistive component can function as a stream sensor, a singular alignment, however, is required to coordinate the sensor's yield voltage to a specific stream speed in meters every second. Fuel consumption decreases in ploughing because of the high engine power of tractor [4]. The similar pointer of fuel utilization is to bring down maximum load (>50% M max) and medium velocity (from 1100 to 1900 rpm) [22]. A few endeavours have been done to quantify the slippage ratio. Doppler radar impact, electronic circuits utilizing photo- transducer, and so are some of the diverse strategies utilized by different scientists for exact estimation of slippage. These plans were confounded and exorbitant. The precision and unwavering quality of estimation of momentary slip figures utilizing the previously mentioned methods in the troublesome landscape has not been generally revealed. For the most part, these procedures depended on figuring of hypothetical speed on test ground as opposed to working on a difficult surface. The 'zero' condition characterized was not exact subsequently demonstrating incorrect slip estimate figures. Additionally, estimation of a slip of tractor tires with various equipment and field properties makes the indication of momentary slip more troublesome. With the dominating utilization of chip, an examination was carried out at IIT, Kharagpur, India which results in the buildup of a microcontrollerbased wheel slip sensor for a 2WD tractor to improve drawbar yield [23]. The interaction between the tractor and the landscape, contingent on the territory that the tractor is crossing and the travel speed creates agricultural tractor vibrations [10]. In a simple term, power tiller administrators/operators are opened to an abnormal state of vibration starting from the dynamic interaction between the dirt and the machine. From the power tiller, vibration is transferred from the handle to hands, arms and shoulders. The most astounding vibration figures were seen in x- bearing in every one of the trials. Vibration can likewise be ascribed to the mechanical coupling finesse of the moving parts of the tractor and its accessories in general. Human riding comfort, driver exhaustion and safety are directly affected by vehicle vibration. On one hand, when a driver operates the tractor control points like steering, brakes, clutch, etc., vibration affects hands and a. The exhibition is called hand-arm vibration exposure. Hand-arm vibration is more in the small and medium-sized farm where hand tractor is used. Hand tractors are particularly useful where traditional tractors with fourwheel drive are either uneconomical or difficult to utilize such as rice growing areas. When an operator sits on a tractor seat, the effect of vibration opened to impacts the whole body in entirety. This is referred to as whole body vibration exposure [20]. One of the significant anxiety and concerns for the safety of a user of power tiller had been the unfavourable impact of introduction to a great degree of hand-arm vibrations. Power is created by a single cylinder diesel motor on a power tiller and the vibration transmitted via Hand during operation of a power tiller is extremely serious as the handlebar is a cantilever shaft. These handle vibrations transmitted to the hands, arms and shoulders bring about uneasiness and early tiredness to the administrator [19]. Physical, physiological and musculoskeletal disorders can result from such weakness/fatigue experienced over a time period of months and years in the course of operation. Hand-transmitted vibration

8 exposure may cause a decline in skin temperature as a direct relation with diminished blood supply to the fingers and in addition increments concentration of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine. Scientists have announced diverse hotspots for handarm vibration in power tiller activity. Different research revealed that handle vibration in hand-operated machines was chiefly as a result of the responding movement of the primary moving parts [22]. The significant excitations of the hand-transmitted vibration of a mobile tractor are the unequal inactivity power of the motor and the roughness of the surface. It is reasoned that the primary driver of vibration was motor and the vibrations in the handle were extremely solid and truly influences mobile tractor administrator's wellbeing. Vibration measurement, on one hand, is an important tool in tractor designs e.g. a good tractor-seat development. On another hand, a fitting measure of vibrations in culturing devices is critical for lessening soil compaction. Analyses and tests with various types of vibrating culturing apparatuses have demonstrated that the draft of a culturing instrument can be diminished when the peak speed of vibration is more prominent than the speed of the device carrier [23]. The aggregate power need for a vibratory culturing device is more noteworthy than for a comparable nonvibratory apparatus. The extra power is used in expanding soil fracture. It is notable that culturing apparatus vibrations lessen the draft effort amid culturing activities if the peak speed of vibration is higher than the speed of the equipment [24]. Besides, the sizes of lumps diminish while the number of breaks in the dirt increments thereby advancing the infiltration of the plant roots, nutrients, water and the flow of air in all the tillage which are essential for plant development. In a classic damage diagnostic, the technical conditions of an analyzed machine are identified based on the measured symptoms such as performance, thermal state or vibration parameter [25]. Mechanical vibrations reduce friction in agricultural machinery because friction forces account for a significant share of the total power required in several agricultural processes, such as tillage [1]. 3) Fuel Consumption The dominant energy sources on conventional farms in the developed world are diesel oil (to power tractors and other self-propelled equipment) and electricity (to provide light, heat and refrigeration; and to power electric motors to run milking machines, animal feeding systems, ventilation fans, water supply and irrigation systems) [14]. Energy frameworks, transport and farming are mentioned as the primary segments that need more consideration for the suitable measures with the end goal to cut down fuel usage and unpleasant effect on the ecosystem [26]. Fuel utilization and fumes, including hazardous parts, can be decreased just by complex advancement of mechanical procedures and tractor working modes [4], [6], [22], [27]- [29]. Fuel consumption in tillage operations is an essential parameter for selecting an appropriate machine. Fuel requirements for all field operations vary somewhat by the location and rate of operation. Tillage fuel requirements are especially difficult to predict, [12] reported that fuel consumption depends upon many factors, such as the size of the machine used and kind of implement attached, travel speed, and soil conditions. In addition, the pressure of tires and wheel stack are both effectively overseen parameters which assume a huge function in tillage exercises for restricting slip which includes power wastage. To a higher degree, this angle influences fuel utilization and the time required for soil culturing has shown an increase in speed is in direct proportion with an increase in fuel consumption. Wheel slip is a vital index for fuel utilization and field limit [4], [30]. The recent increase in fuel prices is becoming a more and more important reason for reducing the energy consumption problem [31]. General connections equipped for foreseeing tractor diesel fuel utilization are exceptionally helpful for budgeting and farm administration [13]. 226

9 227 Moreover, and by common consent, diesel oil (used to power the compression ignition engines, so dominant in agriculture) is a nonrenewable resource. Attempts to find or identify a diesel fuel substitute that could be used in conventional diesel engines have made some progress. In particular, the use of oils from renewable oilseeds has enjoyed some limited success in countries such as Austria, where generous tax remission is allowable on a fuel that is otherwise uneconomic. Oil from oilseeds such as rapeseed, corn oil or sunflower oil needs to be esterified to reduce its viscosity close to that of diesel before use in a diesel engine. The oil from oilseeds cannot be regarded as a potential economic byproduct in the same way as sugarcane bagasse, a byproduct of sugar manufacture used as feedstock for the manufacture of car alcohol fuel, or straw from cereals, used as fuel in boilers, are so regarded [30]. Even when oilseeds (esterified, partially refined or crude) are used as diesel fuel extenders, the economic difficulty still persists and will continue until such time as diesel oil supplies begin to dwindle or until a more appropriate substitute fuel (renewable or nonrenewable) should emerge. Should diesel fuel supplies run out and an appropriate substitute fuel fails to emerge, tractors and other engine-driven equipment could convert to spark-ignition engines [27]. These are more versatile in terms of fuel use (e.g. renewable alcohol, as well as nonrenewable hydrocarbons) even if less suited to the heavy workloads in agriculture. However, although the renewable alcohols can be produced from agricultural byproducts (cereal straw, sugarcane bagasse) the economics are even more unfavourable given the complex manufacturing process that includes fermentation and distillation [14]. 4) Slippage Slip is characterized as a relative reduction in the movement toward travel direction at the common contact surface of a tractive or transport equipment and the surface which holds it. Slip can likewise be considered as the decrease in a real vehicle travelling velocity in comparison with the hypothetical velocity that ought to be achieved from the velocity of the tire or track surface. There are many factors affecting slippages such as draft, load, speed, soil condition and type. Different researchers concluded that, wheel slippage increase with an increase in load. Slip can never be eliminated entirely, but sometimes can be minimized by increasing the load, and working in a lower gear, and it may be remedied by adding weight, fitting streaks or fitting alternative types of the wheel or track equipment. Measuring and indicating wheel slip is an absolute necessity for the tractor to achieve peak drawbar output [23]. Previously, Researchers have shown that the intensity of power needed to pull an attached implement to a drawbar has been a research field. These researches created information obtaining frameworks otherwise known as data acquisition systems (DAQs) that were equipped for estimating the measure of the resistance an implement exerts on the drawbar and ground speed of the hardware with wheel slippage. Driving-wheel slip and moving opposition are viewed as the fundamental origin of energy wastage. 20 to 55% of accessible tractor power, as shown by researchers, is lost during the time spent on the association among tires and soil surface. Moving constraint or resistance and a slip of driving haggles are two factors that impact tractor pulling power, and these variables are interconnected. For the tractor driving on a hard-surface, moving opposition of the wheels moves toward becoming lower when there is an increase in the tires pressure [32]. On the dirt, the lower the tire pressure, the more shallow the track and less moving opposition. For the tractor during low-speed drives (e.g., for soil culturing tasks) pulling power is constrained by contact territory among tires and the dirt. Driving wheels do not convey all accessible motor power because of the way that the grasp between driving haggles soil acknowledges lesser propulsive power [33]. With the aim of increasing the pulling power, it is important to enhance the conditions for the grasp between soil and the drive wheels.

10 Slip is low when driving wheels are stacked with enormous weights. For this situation, the power is utilized to convey the abundance mass and press the dirt, and fuel utilization may go up by 15%. Investigation of research materials such as [4], [11], [34] and [35] demonstrate that ideal tractor slip in soil ought to be in the scope of 8-12%. Many analysts in their studies take care of the issue of tractor tire slip standardization by including counterbalance masses and decreasing the pressure of tires. In any case, the impact of the change in pressure of tires and additional mass on tractor fuel utilization when tire slip is in the typical range (7-15%) is viewed as just reasonably. Moitzi et al. in [7] investigated the impact of varying tillage depth on wheel slip, diesel consumption and field capacity. The tractor (92 kw) was equipped with a data acquisition system for the engine speed, real speed (measured with radar-sensor), theoretical speed (measured with an inductive-sensor from the gear wheel) and fuel consumption (measured with an integrated flow-meter in the fuel system). A 2x4 mould board plough (two-way rear mounted) of 1.70 m working width and a heavy cultivator (subsoiler - 3 m working width) was used to investigate the influence of four-wheel drive, speed and working depth on slippage and fuel usage. The outcomes indicate that the wheel slippage is a vital index for fuel usage and field capacity. III. Tillage DSSs A Decision Support System (DSS) is characterized as an intuitive PC based framework expected to help makers of decision use information and models with the end goal to distinguish and tackle issues and decide. They are intended to help administrators in semi-organized or unstructured basic leadership forms went for enhancing the viability, as opposed to the proficiency of choices. DSS has come a long way [36]. Numerous frameworks are accessible which aid the decision procedure. These include different sensors and connectivity-embedded gadgets, for example, infrared thermometer, chlorophyll meter, computerized camera and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) sensor, which have been intended to collect information on the environment [37], [38]. Assortments of ICT programming modules in agribusiness have been used to help agriculturists in making a basic decision. Some examples of these models of programming apparatuses in agribusiness are programming instruments for precise farming [38], versatile connectivity [39], distributed computing and web applications [40], administration programs [41], Decision Support Systems [42-44], GIS pests and diseases monitoring [45] and etc. The adequacy of these DSSs in agriculture is dependent on the kind of environment, plant and other information that is gathered by sensors which can be coordinated into the DSS or additionally questioned by utilizing data mining or different examination systems. Because of various factors influencing crop development, the precision of the current DSSs utilizing conventional insights examination is still in uncertainty. The nature of information can be enhanced by creating dependable information procurement gadgets, for example, the remote/wireless sensor frameworks. There is no globally acknowledged scientific categorization of DSS. Diverse researchers have proposed distinctive orders for classifying DSSs. Utilizing the association with the client as the rule, researchers separate DSSs into latent (passive), dynamic (active), and collaborative (cooperative) types. A latent DSS is a framework that guides the procedure for making a decision; however, they cannot give solutions or unequivocal suggestive decisions. A dynamic DSS can give solutions and at the same time provide suggestive decisions. A cooperative DSS permits the user (or its counsellor) to adjust, finish, or refine the choice recommendation given by the framework, before sending them back to the framework for approval. The framework again enhances, finishes, and refines the recommendations of the leader and sends them back to for approval. The entire 228

11 229 procedure at that point begins once more, until the point where an agreed arrangement is created. The essential sorts of DSSs in the literature are: A DSS is said to be model-driven when it underscores access to and control of a factual, money related enhancement, or reproduction model. A model-driven DSS utilizes information and indices given by clients to help decision-makers in evaluating a circumstance; they are not really information intensive. Dicodess is a case of an open source DSS generator that is model-driven [46]. A DSS is communication-driven when it bolsters in excess of one individual taking a shot at a mutual activity; precedents incorporate coordinated devices like Microsoft's NetMeeting or Groove [47]. An information-driven DSS or information oriented DSS prioritize access to and control of a periodic arrangement of internal organization information and, in some cases, external information [36]. A DSS is said to be document-driven when it oversees, recovers and controls unstructured data in various electronic configurations. When a DSS gives particular critical problem-solving mastery in the form of certainties, principles, processes, or in comparative structures, such DSS is knowledge-driven [48]. A. Decision Making Frameworks Past studies have stated that the decisions regularly made my decision makers are done under strain, with deficient data, or an overburden of data and take part in practices which are difficult to assess and unimportant to the association and setting [49]. The rationale for the basic process in decision making has been recognized in the work of Franklin [50]. The procedure comprises of the accompanying stages: characterize the choice condition, recognize other options, assess these options, select the best option and actualize the picked option. The essential process in decision making has been progressively employed in different fields, for example, in support application for business to show graphical data [51]. The figure below shows basic decision making architecture; Figure 1. The decision-making process [51] There are precedents where specialists in agriculture have employed and adapted the basic decision-making hypothesis to develop agriculturist decision making structures. Armstrong et al. [52] suggested a basic decision making structure in agriculture concentrating on data stream course for data distribution. The streaming procedure was intended to help in decision making for agriculturists and it was dependent on the process for data distribution to agriculturists. Reddy and Reddy and Ankaiah [53] have additionally recommended a decision-making structure in agriculture, concentrating on a data distribution framework. Every one of these structures is dependent on precise and significant informational indexes to give the way to help farmers make choices and to have the capacity to fuse these procedures into decision support frameworks. Different Artificial Intelligent techniques are been implemented on data sources form decision-making. As examples, Jani and Mostafa [54] proposed a case-based reasoning model for assisting in requirements quality analysis. The work of Ghani et al [55] proposed a framework that includes a fuzzy logic and expert system for decision-making of services centre management. Mostafa et al [56] proposed a decision-making model based on software agent and expert system integration. Lastly, Mohammed et al [57] proposed a decision-making framework of faults diagnosis that includes genetic algorithm and case-based reasoning. Such examples are scarcely seen in the agriculture domain.

12 B. Decision Support Systems Various distinctive definitions have developed to portray a DSS. For instance, researchers characterized DSS as PC frameworks that gather assets and utilize the capacity of the PC to improve decision qualities by concentrating on semi-organized issues. The fundamental aim of DSS is to help and enhance basic decision making [58]. Arnott and Pervan [59] presumed that DSS can be arranged into seven categories as following: individual DSS, group support networks, transaction support frameworks and intelligent DSS [57]. Others are knowledge management based DSS, executive data frameworks/business intelligence and information warehousing. As examples, Mohammed et al. [60] proposed a DSS based on artificial neural network for assisting in cancer diagnosis. French et al. [61], in 2009 show the 4 levels DSS can be categorized into. The classes are considered by the space of operation and level of assistance. The space of action mirrors the level of choices from the individual level to the corporate level. Level 0 includes the introduction and obtaining information. Level 1 is an investigation and anticipating/predicting data. Level 2 is centred on recreation and anticipating the outcomes of the different elective systems for the user. Level 3 gives assessment and positioning of elective methodologies. The limit of each level can be altered. Moreover, the level of help can be balanced. For instance, information mining might be ordered into level 2 or level 3 since information mining can be utilized as expert frameworks or predicting information. DSS might be made out of four principal parts: database, model base, information base and graphical UIs [58], [62]. A few authors stretch out the number of segments to five by adding clients/users [36]. The usefulness of the information base is to store, recover and sort out the crude information that will be utilized as data to make choices in the knowledge engine part. The systematic abilities of subjective models are contained in the model base. The usefulness of the knowledge engine is intended to oversee all the critical thinking process, the issue acknowledgement and the creation of resolutions. The UI part is intended to encourage clients' communication with the framework. DSS, in general, has been arranged into three classifications depending on issues for making decisions: organized, unorganized and semiorganized. Organized issues can be settled efficiently, while unstructured issues are issues which are undesigned. Semi-organized issues are issues that cannot check the ideal decision making [58]. Then again, Zhang et al. [63] suggested an alternate technique to classify DSSs. This technique depends on functionalities in classifying DSSs. The authors sorted DSSs into nine distinct designs. The usefulness of the DSS is controlled by its framework design architecture. For instance: Capturing, overseeing and giving external data identified with choice inquiries in areas like strategy, economy, society, condition, market and innovation to the association. Capturing, overseeing and giving internal data identified with choice inquiries in areas like request order, capacity status, production ability and commerce to the association. Capturing, overseeing and giving assessments, criticism and reactions to every choice option execution, for example, contract handling, supply chain management and implementation of production. In light of the above classifications, Zhang et al. [63] proposed a general DSS framework configuration. The structure included basic modules for DSS: processing framework for the transaction, DSS database, connectivity innovation, information mining modules, choice output and UI. DSSs are intended for various reasons. The study looked into the patterns in DSSs' advancement. The authors bring to attention that DSSs are "projectoriented" structures for a particular reason. Another case of farming DSS engineering configuration was suggested by Adinarayana et al. [64]. The engineering configuration is made up of information module, handling information module and an output module. Zigbee Mote based WSN and Wi-Fi base WSN are intended to gather ecological information 230

13 231 from sensors [36]. The handling module of the DSS is the Sensor Observation Service (SOS) database. Shared application customers give the output of the framework, which disseminates data to clients. C. The DSS in Agricultural DSS can be deployed to all procedures in farming. For administration issues in homesteads, the introduction of intelligent agricultural DSSs to track and help agriculturists to settle on choices in a convenient way have seen some successes [65]. Moreover, structuring a DSS is very perplexing; it needs refined information from different multidisciplinary fields, for example, plant agronomy, PC equipment and programming, mathematical science and statistical measurements to investigate information. Figure 2. The basic structure of a DSS [65] Adinarayana et al. [64] proposed a data, correspondence and distribution framework called GeoSense. The framework is intended to help in making the decision for precise cultivating. The framework comprises of five modules: plant water needs, simulation of rice yield, the balance of energy and study of climate profile and plant disease and pest forecasting [66]. Remote sensor and cloud systems and services were utilized to give users live and constant data. Different investigations have been carried out to structure DSSs for farming frameworks. For instance, Adinarayana et al. [64] structured a DSS to watch and foresee incidences of pests in rice plantations; Tamayo et al. [43] employed DSS for plant development control, fertilization and disease forecast. Just two kinds of sensors, temperature and moisture were used in their framework for estimating peak and minimum temperatures, soil temperatures and moisture. Jiber et al. [67] concentrated their research on structuring a monitoring system for precision farming. Moreover, this investigation was constrained by its inability to utilize test beds to assess the productivity of their monitoring frameworks. In the course of operation, size and tractor power necessity, size and topography of land holding, size of the implement and the available time for completing the work are going to be in consideration. The utilization of DSS was exhibited in the study of Mehta et al. [68] to choose either equipment to match the tractor or to choose a tractor to match the equipment under various soil and working conditions. They utilize Visual Basic 6.0 as a program and a database developed with Microsoft Access developed a DSS for conditions in Indian, which assists in the determination of equipment and coordinating tractor or the selection of a tractor and an appropriate implement match to build yield and profitability in Indian agricultural area. DSS has also been employed in other agricultural activities such as Phosphorus DSS (PDSS). PDSS framework improvement started in 1990 [58]. This system is aimed at knowledge capturing, including both practical successes and the supporting logical reasoning and scientific knowledge related with the Diagnosis, Forecast, Economic Analysis, and Recommendations affiliated with overseeing phosphorus (P) nutrients in systems for the production of food in tropical areas and the objective is to Capture a management structure of Phosphorus in a decision-aid PC program that would enhance the Phosphorus

14 nutrient management. Some researchers utilize Decision-Aid to analyze and make manure suggestions at the field-level. This brought about the Nutrient Management Support System for Personal Digital Assistants (NuMaSS-PDA). These researchers integrated models for simulation output for use by local cultivators in their endeavours to apply management of area-specific supplement on their territory [69]. In addition, the Nutrient Management Support System (NuMaSS) Project was intended to join the independently created Decision-Aid DSS (ADSS) and PDSS, with a novel framework to be fashioned from a Decision-Aid for Nitrogen [65]. In coordinating and disseminating tools in Decision-Aid that analyze soil supplement and mineral limitations, the NuMaSS Project was built. It also makes suitable management operation appropriate for particular area conditions. The methodology was to grow all universally adaptable, to a great extent PC based, coordinated Decision-Aid that could both analyze and recommend a suitable fix for soil supplement limitations. Papathanasiou et al. [70] developed a DSS for regional farm planning in light of the potential improvement of the sectors of agriculture in connection with the processing ventures in agriculture of the area with the aim of guaranteeing and ensuring the development of regional farms via improved usage of accessible farming recourses and ventures in agriculture. The DSS used Linear and Goal Programming models and accommodates diverse objectives, production alternative designs that streamline the utilization of accessible recourses. Andrew et al. [42] depicted the following rundown of DSS application for farming: 3-PG, APSIM, CABALA, GrassGroTM, GrazFeedTM, MetAccessTM, YieldProphet. These DSS instruments have been developed for particular reasons. For instance, 3-PG of [41] is a software or program for forest development modelling to be used by foresters. Agricultural Production Systems Simulator, (APSIM) is a cultivating framework that simulates plant yield from ecological factors. A program for simulation of the crop is the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer model. DSS apparatuses were partitioned into four classes as far as applications are concerned; they are animal and animal products, land water and environment, plant and agribusiness and markets. In addition, MyCrop, ROOTMAP, YieldCalculator and SPLAT are Models of plant DSS [36]. D. Automated Decision-Making In decision making, the required agricultural information can be classified into three broad categories: ecological information, plant/crop information and economic information. External factors influencing crop development are Ecological information i.e. environmental information [49]. Soil, water, diseases and pests, weather and climatic conditions are good examples of environmental data. Plant/crop information is plant development, crop output, stress, chlorophyll content, plant dry weight, blossoming time, root biomass parameter, screening and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) picture, etc. Seeding expenses, costs of harvest, grain costs, and compost/fertilizer supplements and pesticide usage are examples of financial or economic information. These classifications might be used when a specialist is structuring an array of factors to be utilized as a contribution to a DSS to help make better decisions [58]. Weather and climatic information, for example, temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation influence plant development directly. Every plant needs temperature, relative humidity and solar radiation for development but in dissimilar levels. A similar plant at dissimilar plant development stages needs a dissimilar level of temperature, relative humidity and radiation. Plant/crop information is imperative in decision making for agricultural purposes. Plant development or growth and yield are results from ecological variables influence to plant development. Numerous systems to quantify plant/crop information have been depicted in [64], for example, farmers deciding the key 232

15 233 advancement phases of the plant, shade temperature, stomatal conductance and water relations, parameters on spectral reflectance and colour estimation and NDVI. Models of works where farming datasets have been utilized for making basic decisions incorporate work by Bache and Lichman [71] that depicted the utilization of soybean disease from the machine learning store. These datasets have likewise been used in a study by Jain and Arora [72] to examine their methodology to form clusters by mixing different patterns. E. Agricultural Data Acquisition The manner by which information is captured is not the only factor that affects the accuracy and precision of data; it is also identified with the rate at which the information is collected [73]. High recurrence of information sampling increases the accuracy and precision of data. High recurrence of information sampling, however, needs additional investment in instruments and is tedious. In general, the rates of procuring agricultural information are hourly, day by day or week by week. In farming decision making, there are a considerable amount of techniques for collecting information. Agricultural information capturing can be said to be dependent on the accompanying criteria [74]-[76]: Location to gather information: Field capturing, study tests and agriculturist exhibition trials are areas in which a scientist can obtain information. Field capturing is the most immediate and least complex strategy for information gathering. With this strategy, ecological or environmental information and crop information have been used to decide key formative phases. Specialists have gathered information through research preliminaries, plant reproducing and variety preliminaries [45]. Agriculturists may gather information through rancher exhibition preliminaries. Methods used to gather information: Manual, automatic and integration are the three techniques for gathering information: Manual strategy is the least complex and direct technique to gather information on crops. This technique is key formative stages and inspecting soil for dampness, supplement and root content as examples. In any case, manual strategies are tedious and entail gathering information routinely [36]. Tools to gather information: There are different apparatuses for gathering information in farming, for example, specific instruments in farming, ICT devices in agribusiness and climate devices. Specialized agricultural instruments include Precedents of penetrometers, probes for soil dampness, chlorophyll meters, tensiometer, Near Infrared (NIR) sensors and NDVI. Sensor systems frameworks are instances of ICT devices in agriculture. Environmental or ecological sensor and Complementary Metal-oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) picture gadgets have been developed to coordinate with remote (wireless) sensor systems [75]. The distance of catching information: A distance of catching information might be divided into three classes - ground level, aeronautical and satellite. Remote detecting or Satellite imaging has been used to evaluate plant development and output changeability for agricultural precision [74]. Other ways of data collection are the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, UAVs, climate stations and spraying with the use of precision sensors [76]. Farmers and researches have been encouraged by the development of automatic techniques to facilitate and capturing information. With is technique, information can be gathered continuously in real time. It lessens time compared with manual data or information acquisition. Numerous fields or areas of interest, for example, information technology, biochemistries and material science i.e. physics, have been coordinated to make apparatuses for gathering information. For instance, X-ray sensors and gamma-rays sensors deployed on a tractor to monitor the majority of a paddy field to map the soil to help the agriculturist to evaluate soil properties everywhere throughout the paddy field. The benefits of both manual strategies and automatic techniques strategies are entailed in the integrated technique.

16 F. Sensors for Automated Data Capturing Diverse sensors have been utilized to capture information on agriculture. These sensors have been utilized to estimate and evaluate varieties of soil types, plant and ecological properties or environmental qualities. To be described are the measurement strategies for sunlight based (solar) radiation, air temperature, relative humidity, soil supplements, soil water, NDVI and remote (wireless) sensor [43], [66]. Acronyms such as Rs and units (MJ m-1 day- 1) are used for solar or shortwave radiation. solarimeters, radiometers or pyranometers are used to measure solar radiation. These devices are level clear surfaces with sensors integrated into them. Acronyms T and unit (0C) represent air temperature symbols and measurement unit and are estimated using thermometers, thermistors or thermocouples [37]. Ordinarily, in agriculture, the air temperature utilizes the daily mean air temperature (Tmean) for a 24- hour time frame which is ascertained from the mean of the peak (Tmax) and least temperatures (Tmin). The ratio of the measure of water available in the encompassing air and the measure of saturation vapour pressure could hold at a similar temperature is referred to as relative humidity. A hygrometer is used to measure relative humidity and acronym RH and symbol (%) represents relative humidity and measurement unit respectively [36], [66]. Soil makes available air, water and supplements as a medium for plant development. Soil as described as common unconsolidated and naturally occurring materials on the surface of the earth [38]. Soil components are categorized by Osman [77] into four noteworthy parts: mineral part, organic part, water and air. Soil testing is an immediate technique to gauge characteristics of the soil, for example, rock, structure/texture, minerals and soil water content. Seventeen chemical components have been perceived as fundamental for plants development or growth, for example, nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, etc.. Major elements (macronutrients) and minor elements (micronutrients) are the two broad categories where these chemical components fall into [77]. Plants need a large number of major elements (greater than 1,000 mg kg-1) while minor elements are required in moderately little sums (lesser than 100 mg kg-1). Soil sampling is a proficient, economical and convenient technique to examine soil characteristics [74]. Soil sampling has been used to gauge dampness or soil water substance, supplement and root content. Acronyms W and (mm) are utilized to represent soil water content and measurement unit respectively [64]. Soil sampling apart, another technique is measuring with tensiometers, electrical resistance sensor for soil water tension measurement and gravimetric and volumetric direct estimations. Adamchuk et al. [78] examined and categorized types of soil sensor based on the wavelength of the sensor, a technique for recognition, dynamic sensors or inactive sensors, intrusive or non-intrusive sensors, stationary activity or portable task. Depending on energy detection, electromagnetic (Gamma rays, X-rays, optical, microwave, radio wave), electrical, electrochemical, and mechanical are the four categories of soil sensor devices can be separated into. NDVI is a method to quantify the size of canopy and greenness of vegetation. Early cover, nitrogen content, post-anthesis stay-green and pre-anthesis biomass can be estimated using the size of canopy and greenness of vegetation. The benefits of NDVI estimation are that it is fast, simple and low-cost, integrative and not destructive. The idea of NDVI imaging has been used by numerous scientists in studies concentrated on the health of plants [38], [74], [79], [80]. These researchers used NDVI in expansive territories through remote detecting techniques, for example, satellite. Despite the fact that NDVI has been used in agricultural decision making to assess plant wellbeing, no current study has been centred on incorporating NDVI with DSS in small farm zones. Precedents of works where NDVI have been utilized for making decision incorporate work by Govaerts and Verhulst [79] who 234

17 235 portrayed subtle elements for utilizing a NDVI handheld sensor in a little plot zone at ground level. One case study used a NDVI sensor to anticipate potential grain yield in winter wheat. Another case study employing NDVI is an investigation of the relationship of NDVI with the rotation of crop, culturing and management of residue in a small plot of land. Also, an NDVI sensor was used by Lopes and Reynolds [80] to decide on the connections among NDVI, chlorophyll and phenology. Researchers have developed wireless sensors as an independent unit and associated as systems called wireless (remote) sensors network (WSN). WSN has comparative structures to general PCs and can be partitioned into two primary parts: software and hardware [43]. The sensor node or mote is the fundamental equipment (hardware) in a remote. This hardware comprises of six segments: miniaturized controller unit, memory modules, power supply unit, inputoutput part, radio module and antenna [36]. There are various difficulties and requirements in creating remote sensor systems, for example, decreasing energy consumption, autonomy, development challenges and security. The remote sensor has been designed in monitoring and controlling framework for nurseries [38]. In another example of Paventhan et al. [81], sensors have been being the research. G. Incorporating Datasets for Automated Agricultural DSSs There are various precedents of studies which have captured information that can be successfully utilized for DSSs in Agriculture which has integrated continuous WSNs, information mining, picture handling and DSSs [58]. A variety of distinctive methods have been stated for investigating information in agriculture, including utilization of crop models, conventional demography, and precision farming systems. There are various methods in computer science that have been utilized to evaluate horticultural information to assist in making decisions using information mining, computerized image handling, neural system and other elective procedures, for example, precision farming, modelling of crops and conventional figures [65], [82]-[84]. Different precedents exist of how informational collections or datasets can be utilized to create DSSs to enhance decision making for various situations. For instance, Tamayo et al. [43] concentrated on gathering information for monitoring crops in real time. Adinarayana et al., [64], developed DSSs that concentrated on foreseeing vermin occurrence. Other decision support systems have been tested on various plants, for example, rice, pomegranates and maize. There is potential to likewise incorporate information mining methods to evaluate information further in order to expand the precision of these DSSs. VI. Conclusion This paper focuses on reviewing Decision Support Systems (DSS) that are applied in different agricultural tillage mechanization. The review covers a total of 81 data sources including research articles, books, reports and links of the dataset. The review covers the implementation of various frameworks, models and tools that have been used to make tillage and farming more effective and efficient in order to increase crop yields. The applications of the DSS in this field involve automation and monitoring tools of tractors that are primarily implemented for tillage operations with an emphasis on ploughs types and performance evaluation parameters. Essentially, the review shows that there is a need for formulating DSS architecture or adopting other architectures that better fit with this research an application domain. The DSS might include advanced decision making artificial intelligence techniques such as expert systems, casebased reasoning, software agent, neural network or a genetic algorithm. Moreover, the reviewed works have elaborated the need for advanced data acquisition sensors and sensors control architectures for better and more reallive stream abilities of heterogeneous data. This can lead to better evaluations of the DSS parameters and assist in more accurate decision-making.

18 Acknowledgment This project is partially sponsored by the Department of Biological and Agriculture Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia. References [1] KATTENSTROTHRALF, HANS-HEINRICH H., WIEBOLD W. and JENS T. (2010). Reducing Friction By Ultrasonic Vibration Exemplified By Tillage. Equipment Engineering for Production Conference. Canada. [2] MAHMOOD, H. F., SUBHI Q. A. and HUSSEIN E. K. (2011). "Comparison of Vibrations, Tillage Depths and Soil Properties for Moldboard and Disk Ploughs at Three Tillage Speeds." Asian Journal of Agricultural Research 5(1): [3] FILIPOVIĆ, D., KOSUTIĆ, S., GOSPODARIĆ, Z. (2004). Energy efficiency in conventional tillage of clay. The Union of Scientists Rousse: Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering, Rousse, Bulgaria. pp [4] MOITZI, G., HAAS, M., WAGENTRISTL, H., BOXBERGER, J., GRONAUER, A. (2013). Energy consumption in cultivating and ploughing with traction improvement system and consideration of the rear furrow wheelload in ploughing. Soil & Tillage Research, 134. pp [5] ANI, A. O., AKUBUO, C. O., ODIGBO, E. U. (2004). Tractability Conditions for Disc Ploughing on a Loamy Sand soil in the Ilorin Agro-Ecological Zone. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and 26th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Nigerian Institution of Agricultural Engineers (NIAE). pp [6] KHEIRALLA, A. F., AZMI, Y., ZOHADIE, M., & ISHAK, W. (2004) Modelling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. Soil & Tillage Research, 78, doi: /j.still [7] MOITZI, G., WEINGARTMANN, H., BOXBERGER, J. (2006). Effects of tillage systems and wheel slip on fuel consumption. The Union of Scientists Rousse: Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering, Rousse, Bulgaria. pp [8] SAMIEI Far, A., KAZEMI, N., RAHNAMA, M., GHASEMI N., M., Simultaneous comparison of the effects of shaft load and shaft positions on tractor OEE in two soil conditions (cultivated and uncultivated). Int. J. Farm Allied Sci. 43, [9] MARSILI A, RAGNI L, SANTORO G, SERVADIO P, VASSALINI G. Innovative systems to reduce vibrations on agricultural tractors: comparative analysis of acceleration transmitted through the driving seat. Biosyst Eng 2002;81(1): [10] CUONG, D. M., ZHUA S. and ZHUA Y. (2013). "Effects of tyre inflation pressure and forward speed on vibration of an unsuspended tractor." Journal of Terramechanics 50(3): [11] BATTIATO, A., DISERENS, E. (2017). Tractor traction performance simulation on differently textured soils and validation: A basic study to make traction and energy requirements accessible to the practice. Soil & Tillage Research, 166. pp [12] EIDAM, A. (1999). Tillage Implements Performance As Affected By Tractor Power And Forward Speed. [13] GRISSO, R. D., VAUGHAN D. H. and ROBERSON G. T. (2008). Fuel Prediction for Specific Tractor Models. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 24(4): [14] MCNULTY, P. B. (2009). Agricultural mechanization and automation. Book January 2009 DOI: / [15] ASABE Standards. (2006). Agricultural machinery management. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, USA; ASABE EP [16] HOSTENS I., K. DEPREZ, RAMON H., An improved design of air suspension for seats of mobile agricultural machines. Journal of Sound and Vibration [267], [17] DUKE M., GOSS G., Investigation of tractor driver seat performance with nonlinear stiffness and on-off damper. Biosystems Engineering [96],

19 237 [18] NGUYEN VN, INABA S. Effects of tire inflation pressure and tractor velocity on dynamic wheel load and rear axle vibrations. J Terramech 2011;48:3 16. [19] CHAURASIYA, H. (2012). "Recent Trends of Measurement and Development of Vibration Sensors. International Journal of Computer Science Issues 9(4): 9. [20] VAGHELA, G. J. and JAIN K. K. (2013). "Vibration characteristics of mini tractor (8.7 kw) on tarmacadam." Agric Eng Int: CIGR Journal 15(2): 6. [21]KOTASTHANE, A. and H. S.G (2013). "Implementation of Automatic Meter Reading." International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology 2(12): [22] JANULEVIČIUS, A., JUOSTAS A. and PUPINIS G. (2013). Engine performance during tractor operational period. Energy Conversion and Management 68: [23] RAHEMAN, H., JHA, S. K. (2007). Wheel slip measurement in 2WD tractor. Journal of Terramechanics, 44. pp [24] SOEHARSONO, S. and SETIAWAN R. P. A. (2010). "analytical study of self-excited vibration On single degree of freedom vibratory-tillage." ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 5(9): [25] MICHALSKI, R. and ARENDT R. (2013). Selection of Diagnostic Functions In A Wheeled Tractor. Diagnostyka 14(4): [26] DAGILIŪTĖ, R., JUKNYS, R. (2012). Ecoefficiency: trends, goals and their implementation in Lithuania. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20(4). pp [27] BACKMAN, J., OKSANEN, T., & VISALA, A. (2013). Applicability of the ISO network in a distributed combined guidance system for agricultural machines. Biosystems Engineering, 114, [28] MAGALHÃES, A. C., SOUZA, J. M, SANTANA, M. A., & SABBAG, O. J. (2013). Analysis of the Mechanization Index of Wheel Tractors in Rural Farm Holdings. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(44), [29] KHAMBALKAR, V., POHARE, J., KATKHEDE, S., BUNDE, D., & DAHATONDE, S. (2010). Energy and Economic Evaluation of Farm Operations in Crop Production. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(4), [30] DAMANAUSKAS V., JANULEVIČIUS G. and PUPINIS G. (2015). Influence of Extra Weight and Tire Pressure on Fuel Consumption at Normal Tractor Slippage [31] SARAUSKIS E., K. ROMANECKAS, VAITAUSKIENE K., SAKALAUSKAS A., E. VAICIUKEVICIUS and PETRAUSKAS R. (2013). Influence of soil hardness on traction force of different design coulters. Engineering for rural development. Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia 12: [32] LYASKO M. I. (2010). How to calculate the effect of soil conditions on tractive performance. Journal of Terramechanics, 47. pp [33] XIA K. (2011). Finite element modeling of tire/terrain interaction: Application to predicting soil compaction and tire mobility. Journal of Terramechanics, 48. pp [34] KELLER T. (2005). A model for the prediction of the contact area and the distribution of vertical stress below agricultural tyres from readily available tyre parameters. Biosystems Engineering, 92(1). pp [35] BATTIATO, A., DISERENS, E., LALOUI, L., SARTORI, L. (2013). A Mechanistic Approach to Topsoil Damage due to Slip of Tractor Tyres. Journal of Agricultural Science and Applications, 2(3). pp [36] TAECHATANASAT, P., & ARMSTRONG, L. (2014). Decision support system data for farmer decision making. Proceedings of AFITA 2014, ASICTA pp [37] RODRIGUES Jr, F. A., BRAMLEY, R. G. V., & GOBBETT, D. L. (2015). Proximal soil sensing for precision agriculture: Simultaneous use of electromagnetic induction and gamma radiometrics in contrasting soils. Geoderma, 243, [38] GAMON, J. A., HUEMMRICH, K. F., STONE, R. S., & TWEEDIE, C. E. (2013). Spatial and

20 temporal variation in primary productivity (NDVI) of coastal Alaskan tundra: Decreased vegetation growth following earlier snowmelt. Remote sensing of environment, 129, [39] YING, Y., & WU, J. (2010). Value innovation of mobile communication industry in China rural area: A case study on "Tianfu agriculture information network". Paper presented at the Future Information Technology and Management Engineering (FITME). [40] BO, Y., & WANG, H. (2011). The application of cloud computing and the internet of things in agriculture and forestry. Paper presented at the International Joint Conference on Service Science. [41] SIGGINS, A. (2011). 3-PG productivity modelling, < [42] ANDREW, M., GRUNDY, M., & HARRIS, C. (2013). Decision support tools for agriculture, < re/flagships/sustainable-agriculture- Flagship/Decision-support-tools-agri.aspx>. [43] TAMAYO, R. A. C., IBARRA, M. L., & MACÍAS, J. A. G. (2010, September). Better crop management with decision support systems based on wireless sensor networks. In th International Conference on Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control (pp ). IEEE. [44] LENG, Z. X., & HAIMID, Y. (2008, December). Environmental decision support system development for soil salinization in the arid area oasis. In 2008 International Seminar on Business and Information Management (Vol. 1, pp ). IEEE. [45] MOSTAFA, S. A., Hazeem, A. A., Khaleefah, S. H., Mustapha, A., & Darman, R. (2018). A Collaborative Multi-agent System for Oil Palm Pests and Diseases Global Situation Awareness. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (pp ). Springer, Cham [46] GACHET, A. (2004). Building model driven decision support systems with Dicodess. vdf Hochschulverlag AG. [47] MIR, S. A., & QUADRI, S. M. K. (2009). Decision support systems: concepts, progress and issues A review. In Climate change, intercropping, pest control and beneficial microorganisms (pp ). Springer, Dordrecht. [48] AGRAHARI, A., & TRIPATHI, S. (2012). A theoretical framework for development of decision support system for agriculture. International Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(6), [49]Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012). Toward a theory of evidence based decision making. Management decision, 50(5), [50] FRANKLIN, C. L. (2013). Developing expertise in management decision-making. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), [51] HAMZAH, M., Sobey, A., & Koronios, A. (2010, April). Supporting decision making process with information visualisation: A theoretical framework. In nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (pp ). IEEE. [52] ARMSTRONG, L. J., DIEPEVEEN, D. A., & Tantisantisom, K. (2010). An eagriculture- Based decision support framework for information dissemination. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 1(4), [53] REDDY, P. K., & ANKAIAH, R. (2005). A framework of information technology-based agriculture information dissemination system to improve crop productivity. Current Science, 88(12), [54] JANI, H. M., & MOSTAFA, S. A. (2011). Implementing case-based reasoning technique to software requirements specifications quality analysis. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 3(1). [55] GHANI, M. K. A., MOHAMMED, M. A., IBRAHIM, M. S., MOSTAFA, S. A., & IBRAHIM, D. A. (2017). Implementing an Efficient Expert System for Services Center Management by Fuzzy Logic Controller. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 95(13). [56] MOSTAFA, S. A., MUSTAPHA, A., HAZEEM, A. A., KHALEEFAH, S. H., & 238

21 239 MOHAMMED, M. A. (2018). An Agent-Based Inference Engine for Efficient and Reliable Automated Car Failure Diagnosis Assistance. IEEE Access, 6, [57] TURBAN, E., ARONSON, J. E., & LIANG, T. P. (2005). Decision support systems and intelligent systems (7th ed.). New Jersey, USA.: Pearson Prentice Hall. [58]Ogudo, K.A.; Muwawa Jean Nestor, D.; Ibrahim Khalaf, O.; Daei Kasmaei, H. A Device Performance and Data Analytics Concept for Smartphones IoT Services and Machine-Type Communication in Cellular Networks. Symmetry 2019, 11, 593. [59] MOHAMMED, M. A., Ghani, M. K. A., Arunkumar, N., Hamed, R. I., Mostafa, S. A., Abdullah, M. K., & Burhanuddin, M. A. (2018). Decision support system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma discrimination from endoscopic images using artificial neural network. The Journal of Supercomputing, [60] MOHAMMED, M. A., GHANI, M. K. A., ARUNKUMAR, N., OBAID, O. I., MOSTAFA, S. A., JABER, M. M.,... & IBRAHIM, D. A. (2018). Genetic case-based reasoning for improved mobile phone faults diagnosis. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 71, [61] FRENCH, S., MAULE, J., & PAPAMICHAIL, N. (2009). Decision behaviour, analysis and support. Cambridge University Press. [62] MANSOURI, S. A., GALLEAR, D., & ASKARIAZAD, M. H. (2012). Decision support for build-to-order supply chain management through multiobjective optimization. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), [63] ZHANG, H. T., YANG, Q., LAI, C. S., & LAI, L. L. (2012, October). New trends for decision support systems. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp ). IEEE. [64] ADINARAYANA, J., SUDHARSAN, D., TRIPATHY, A. K., SAWANT, S., MERCHANT, S. N., DESAI, U. B., & KIURA, T. (2012). GEOSENSE: an information communication and dissemination system for decision support in precision farming. In Third National Conference on Agro-Informatics and Precision Agriculture. [65] HEINEMANN, P. H. (2010). Decision Support Systems for Food and Agriculture. Interactions: Food, Agriculture and Environment-Volume II, 164. [66] TRIPATHY, A. K., ADINARAYANA, J., & SUDHARSAN, D. (2012). Data mining and wireless sensor network for groundnut pest thrips dynamics and predictions. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(6), [67] JIBER, Y., HARROUD, H., & KARMOUCH, A. (2011, July). Precision agriculture monitoring framework based on WSN. In th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (pp ). IEEE. [68] MEHTA, C. R., SINGH, K., & SELVAN, M. M. (2011). A decision support system for selection of tractor implement system used on Indian farms. Journal of Terramechanics, 48(1), [69] GHAIDA MUTTASHAR ABDULSAHIB and OSAMAH IBRAHIM KHALAF, AN IMPROVED ALGORITHM TO FIRE DETECTION IN FOREST BY USING WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS.International Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET) - Scopus Indexed.Volume:9,Issue:11,Pages: [70] PAPATHANASIOU, I. (2016). A decision support system for farm regional planning. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 15(1). [71] Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf, Ghaida Muttashar Abdulsahib and Muayed Sadik, A Modified Algorithm for Improving Lifetime WSN. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13: [72] JAIN, R., & ARORA, A. (2012). Approach for mining multiple patterns from clusters. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 67(1). [73] MALAVERRI, J. E. G., & MEDEIROS, C. B. (2012, November). Data Quality in Agriculture Applications. In GeoInfo (pp ). [74] YANG, C., EVERITT, J. H., DU, Q., LUO, B., & CHANUSSOT, J. (2013). Using highresolution airborne and satellite imagery to assess crop growth and yield variability for

22 precision agriculture. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(3), [75] SHOUYI, Y., LEIBO, L., RENYAN, Z., ZHONGFU, S., & SHAOJUN, W. (2013). Design of wireless multi-media sensor network for precision agriculture. China Communications, 10(2), [76] Ayman Dawood Salman1, Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf and Ghaida Muttashar Abdulsahib, An adaptive intelligent alarm system for wireless sensor network. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, July 2019, pp. 142~147 [77] OSMAN, K. T. (2012). Soils: principles, properties and management. Springer Science & Business Media. [78] ADAMCHUK, V. I., ROSSEL, R. A. V., SUDDUTH, K. A., & LAMMERS, P. S. (2011). Sensor fusion for precision agriculture. In Sensor fusion-foundation and applications. IntechOpen. [79] Osamah Ibrahem Khalaf, Ghaidaa Muttasher et al., Improving video Transmission Over Heterogeneous Network by Using ARQ and FEC Error Correction Algorithm, vol. 30, no.8, pp.24-27, Nov 2015 [80] LOPES, M. S., & REYNOLDS, M. P. (2012). Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology. Journal of experimental botany, 63(10), [81] Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf, Bayan Mahdi Sabbar''An overview on wireless sensor networks and finding optimal location of node'',periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Vol 7, No 3 (2019) [82] MASELENO, A., TANG, A. Y., MAHMOUD, M. A., OTHMAN, M., NEGORO, Y. S., BOUKRI, S., & MUSLIHUDIN, M. (2018). M., The Application of Decision Support System by using Fuzzy SAW Method in Determining the Feasibility of Electrical Installations in Customer s House. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(16), [83] KHASHFEH, M., MAHMOUD, M. A., AHMAD, M. S., & GUNASEKARAN, S. S. (2018). A conceptual model for searching relevant scientific publications in large databases using agent-based text mining. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(6S), [84] IDRUS, A., MAHMOUD, M. A., AHMAD, M. S., YAHYA, A., & HUSEN, H. (2017, June). A negotiation algorithm for decision-making in the construction domain. In International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (pp ). Springer, Cham 240