26 Protection Programs Undergo Our First Test Using Windows 8
|
|
|
- Cleopatra Cameron
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Test: Internet Security Packages 1/ Protection Programs Undergo Our First Test Using Windows 8 Windows 8 is considered to be a secure system thanks to its internal protection package containing Windows Defender, System Tools and Firewall. AV-TEST therefore decided to investigate the extent to which the use of an additional Internet security package can increase the basic protection provided by Windows 8 even further. The results of the test show that combining the Windows 8 package with another software suite significantly increases the average security of the system. Markus Selinger Windows 8 features a complete security package formed from Windows Defender and other system tools such as the Windows Firewall and filter in Internet Explorer. This basic package was not amended or deactivated in the AV-TEST study. The Internet Explorer SmartScreen Filter also remained constantly activated throughout the test unless explicitly deactivated by a security product. The good news from the AV-TEST study is that the average zero-day protection provided by all of the programmes increased from 92 percent when tested with Windows 7 in our previous study to 95 percent when tested with Windows 8. The Test Candidates A total of 26 products from the developers AhnLab, Avast, AVG, Avira, Bitdefender, BullGuard, Check Point, Comodo, ESET, F-Secure, G Data, GFI, Kaspersky Lab, Lavasoft, McAfee, Microworld, Norman, Panda Security, PC Tools, Qihoo, Symantec, Tencent, Trend Micro and Webroot participated in our latest study comparing Internet security suites. All of the programs had to undergo tests in the following three categories: For more information, please visit You can find the latest information concerning this test and other background information online on the AV-TEST GmbH website. You can also use the website to directly submit any enquiries you may have about our tests. This document may be copied free of charge but the source must be stated and the AV-TEST GmbH logo must be displayed. 1
2 Bitdefender Internet Security: The security solution from Bitdefender displayed the best overall performance in the test, achieving 17.0 of 18.0 possible points. Bitdefender also achieved the top score of 6.0 points in the important category of protection together with five of its rival products. The protection provided by the products was tested in two stages. The products were first exposed to attacks from so-called zero-day malware, namely brand-new attackers (in a real-world test). The second test used the AV-TEST reference set, which contains over 18,000 new pieces of malware from the last four weeks. A maximum total of 6 points was available in this category. The system load of the products was tested in an everyday situation. The laboratory measured specific times in a system with no protection package and then compared these with the load caused when a package was used. The times measured involved activities such as loading websites, scanning downloads, installing and starting up programs and scanning and copying files. A maximum total of 6 points was also available in this category. The usability of the products was tested by recording false warnings and blockages involving clean websites and software. We also registered false positives displayed in connection with files and installations that were actually not Test Results: Internet Security Suites Used with Windows 8 Ranking in the Category of Protection In the first test using Windows 8, a large number of products performed excellently in the protection category. Six packages achieved the maximum total of 6.0 points in the test and of these six, the security solutions from Bitdefender, BullGuard and Kaspersky Lab are also at the top of the overall ranking. Manufacturer Product Points (max. 6) Bitdefender Internet Security 6.0 BullGuard Internet Security 6.0 F-Secure Internet Security 6.0 G Data Internet Security 6.0 Kaspersky Lab Internet Security 6.0 Trend Micro Titanium Maximum Security 6.0 AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition 5.5 Avast Free AntiVirus 5.5 AVG Internet Security 5.5 Microworld escan internet security suite 5.5 Symantec Norton Internet Security 5.5 ESET Smart Security 5.0 Qihoo 360 Antivirus 5.0 Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete 5.0 GFI VIPRE Internet Security 4.5 Lavasoft Ad-Aware Pro Security 4.5 McAfee Internet Security 4.5 Panda Security Cloud Antivirus FREE 4.5 Avira Internet Security 4.0 Norman Security Suite Pro 4.0 Tencent PC Manager 4.0 Check Point ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus Firewall Comodo Internet Security Premium 3.5 PC Tools Internet Security 3.5 AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2.0 Microsoft Windows Defender 2.0 Please note: Products with the same points totals are listed in alphabetical order. This document may be copied free of charge but the source must be stated and the AV-TEST GmbH logo must be displayed. 2
3 malicious. The overall friend or foe identification of the suites was tested by making them scan over 600,000 clean files and programs. A maximum total of 6 points was also available in this category. The Test Results A maximum overall total of 18 points were available in the test. None of the packages tested were able to achieve all 18 points. The best score in the overall test ranking was a total of 17 points, which were awarded to the protection package from Bitdefender, thus giving it the best overall performance. This package was closely followed by the product from BullGuard with a total of 16.5 points, while the Internet security suite from Kaspersky Lab came in at third place with 16 points. Test Results: Internet Security Suites Used with Windows 8 The Best Security Suites when Used with Windows 8 1/2013 The suite from Bitdefender achieved the best result in this comparison by scoring 17.0 of the maximum possible total of 18.0 points. This program was relatively closely followed by the packages from BullGuard and Kaspersky Lab. The packages from AhnLab and Comodo, however, were unable to reach the points total achieved by the basic Windows 8 protection package. Manufacturer Product Protection System Load Usability Overall Points Total (max. 18.0) 1 Bitdefender Internet Security BullGuard Internet Security Kaspersky Lab Internet Security AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition G Data Internet Security Symantec Norton Internet Security Tencent PC Manager Trend Micro Titanium Maximum Security 4 Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete 5 Avast Free AntiVirus AVG Internet Security Qihoo 360 Antivirus ESET Smart Security F-Secure Internet Security Panda Security Cloud Antivirus FREE Check Point ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus Firewall 8 Lavasoft Ad-Aware Pro Security GFI VIPRE Internet Security Avira Internet Security McAfee Internet Security PC Tools Internet Security Microworld escan internet security suite 10 Norman Security Suite Pro Microsoft Windows Defender AhnLab V3 Internet Security Comodo Internet Security Premium Please note: Products with the same points totals are listed in alphabetical order. This document may be copied free of charge but the source must be stated and the AV-TEST GmbH logo must be displayed. 3
4 although BullGuard and Kaspersky Lab displayed a slight deviation. These top packages were closely followed by the products from AVG (both versions), Avast, Symantec and Microworld, which scored a total of 5.5 points. Windows Defender: Microsoft s internal security solution for Windows 8 was used as an additional basic protection package in the test. The free version of the AVG protection package achieved a surprisingly high total of 15.5 points, as did the products from G Data, Symantec, Tencent, Trend Micro and Webroot. The extensive middle area of the table features points totals of between 15.0 and 12.5 points and contains products from Avast, AVG (purchasable version), Qihoo, ESET, F-Secure, Panda, Check Point, Lavasoft, GFI, Avira, McAfee and PC Tools. These are followed by the products from Microworld and Norman with a total of 12.0 points. The solutions from AhnLab and Comodo, on the other hand, scored just 10.0 points and therefore did not perform as well as the basic protection from Windows 8. They did, however, both score the minimum number of points required for the AV-TEST test certificate. Protection The main focus of the test was the protection provided by each package. After all, if software performs poorly in this category, the speed at which it works or its other abilities become virtually irrelevant. The best value of 6 points in the protection category was achieved by the packages from Bitdefender, BullGuard, F-Secure, G Data, Kaspersky Lab and Trend Micro. Almost all of these packages were able to identify 100 percent of the malware used in the test, The middle and lower area of the table contains the products that scored between 5.0 and 3.5 points, namely those from ESET, Qihoo, Webroot, GFI, Lavasoft, McAfee, Panda Security, Avira, Norman, Tencent, Check Point, Comodo and PC Tools. The amount of protection provided by the AhnLab package was on exactly the same level as the protection from the basic Windows 8 package, with detection rates of between 81 and 86 percent in the real-world test. Both packages were able to identify 99 percent of the malware in the AV-TEST reference set. System Load during the Test In this context, it should also be taken into consideration that a security package can significantly slow down a system on a day-today basis. This particularly rings true during the copying of files, when programs designed to protect a system sometimes tend to turn on the brakes. The best scores in the system load category, namely 6.0 and 5.5 points, were achieved by the packages from Webroot and Tencent. These are followed by Bitdefender and BullGuard, the top two packages in the Protection category, with 5.0 points each. BullGuard: Although it has a rather minimalist appearance, the BullGuard suite was able to achieve second place in the overall ranking. This document may be copied free of charge but the source must be stated and the AV-TEST GmbH logo must be displayed. 4
5 AVG (free version): The free package from AVG scored a total of 15.5 points, which enabled it to achieve an excellent position in the upper half of the table and even beat the purchasable version of the AVG software included in the test by half a point. that it classified too many clean files as malware in its friend or foe identification. Summary The middle area of the table starts off with the Kaspersky Lab suite, which achieved a total of 4.5 points, and also contains eleven other packages with points totals of up to 4.0. Where its system load was concerned, the internal protection package from Windows 8 scored a total of 3.5 points, as did the solutions from AhnLab, Avast, ESET, Comodo and PC Tools. The packages at the bottom of the table, namely those from Microworld and McAfee, scored just 2.0 and 3.0 of the maximum possible total of 6.0 points and were therefore the worst programs in the test in terms of their load on the system. Quite Good Usability Many of the suites tested were able to score a large number of points for the overall ranking by achieving excellent results in the usability category. Microsoft Defender set the bar high in this category by scoring a basic value of 6.0 points. Only eight of the packages tested, namely those from Avast, Bitdefender, Check Point, ESET, McAfee, Panda Security, Symantec and Tencent, were able to achieve the same level of success. Eleven other packages succeeded in scoring impressive totals of 5.5 and 5.0 points, while five programs were lower down in the ranking with 4.5 points. Only the suite from Comodo was given a total of 3.0 points due to the fact The basic protection provided by Windows 7 can indeed be improved to a certain extent by combining the package with an Internet security suite. Users who want to be able sit back, relax and surf the web without having to ask their entire family whether anyone knows the sender of every single attachment should therefore put their trust in an external security package. The products in the top 9 places in this recent AV-TEST study provide excellent protection for users' computers whilst only causing a small amount of system load and without constantly scaring users with false warnings. The number one product that boasted the best performance in this test using Windows 8 was the package from Bitdefender. Magdeburg, Germany, 7 th April 2013 Author: Markus Selinger You can access an overview of the test and all of the individual assessments of the products tested for free online at Please contact the team at AV-TEST GmbH if you have any questions. [email protected] Tel.: +49 (0) Website: This document may be copied free of charge but the source must be stated and the AV-TEST GmbH logo must be displayed. 5
AV-TEST Examines 22 Antivirus Apps for Android Smartphones and Tablets
Protection Apps for Android Feb. 2013 AV-TEST Examines 22 Antivirus Apps for Android Smartphones and Tablets Millions of Android smartphones are currently accessing the Internet without any protection.
Endurance Test: Does antivirus software slow
23rd April 2015 created by Markus Selinger Endurance Test: Does antivirus software slow down PCs? Critics maintain that protection software for Windows really puts the brakes on PCs. In a 14-month, extremely
Fully supported Antivirus software (Managed Antivirus)
You are here: Antivirus > Managed Antivirus Vendors Fully supported Antivirus software (Managed Antivirus) Antivirus (AV) vendors often release software updates. We hard-code the update into our RMM agent
PCSL. PCSL IT Consulting Institute 机 安 全 软 件 病 毒 检 测 率 测 试
2014 IT Consulting Institute ⓫ 手 机 安 全 软 件 病 毒 检 测 率 测 试 报 告 目 录 Table of Contents P1 P2 P3 测 试 背 景 测 试 流 程 待 测 软 件 P4 P6 P7 测 试 结 果 月 度 奖 项 相 关 信 息 P8 权 利 说 明 P9 免 责 声 明 CHAP. 1 Background 1 CHAP. 2 Test
Supported Anti Virus from ESAP 2-6-1
Supported Anti Virus from ESAP 2-6-1 avast! Antivirus (4.8.x) avast! Antivirus (4.x) avast! Antivirus (managed) (4.x) avast! Antivirus Professional (4.8.x) avast! Antivirus Professional (4.x) avast! Business
Anti-Virus Comparative
Anti-Virus Comparative File Detection Test of Malicious Software including false alarm test Language: English September 2015 Last Revision: 15 th October 2015 Table of Contents Tested Products 3 Introduction
Anti-Virus Comparative
Anti-Virus Comparative File Detection Test of Malicious Software including false alarm test Language: English March 2015 Last Revision: 30 th April 2015 Table of Contents Tested Products 3 Introduction
Performance test November 2014 / www.avlab.pl 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 TESTED PROGRAM VERSIONS..2 WHAT AND HOW WE TESTED. 3 OTHER PRINCIPLES...
PE RF ORMANCET E S TOFF RE E ANT I VI RUSS OF T WARE ANDI NT E RNE TS E CURI T YS UI T E S NOVE MBE R14 Per f or medt estdat e: Oct ober-november14 Performance test November 14 / www.avlab.pl 1 INTRODUCTION...
AV-Comparatives. Support-Test (UK) Test of English-Language Telephone Support Services for Windows Consumer Security Software 2016
AV-Comparatives Support-Test (UK) Test of English-Language Telephone Support Services for Windows Consumer Security Software 2016 Language: English March 2016 Last Revision: 14 th April 2016 Commissioned
List of Products supported by ESAP 2.2.1
List of Products supported by ESAP 2.2.1 Table of Contents Products supported on:... 2 Junos Pulse Secure Access Service 7.2Rx / Junos Pulse Access Control Service 4.2Rx... 2 Products supported on:...
Products supported by ESAP 1.3.8 FIREWALL PRODUCTS: Product Name. AOL Firewall (1.x) AOL Privacy Wall (2.x) AVG 8.0 [Firewall] (8.
Products supported by ESAP 1.3.8 FIREWALL PRODUCTS: Product Name AOL Firewall (1.x) AOL Privacy Wall (2.x) AVG 8.0 [Firewall] (8.x) AVG Firewall (7.x) AhnLab Security Pack (2.x) AhnLab V3 Internet Security
Products supported by ESAP 1.4.7 FIREWALL PRODUCTS:
Products supported by ESAP 1.4.7 FIREWALL PRODUCTS: Product Name AOL Firewall (1.x) AOL Privacy Wall (2.x) AVG 8.0 [Firewall] (8.x) AVG Firewall (7.x) AhnLab Security Pack (2.x) AhnLab V3 Internet Security
Products supported by ESAP 1.5.3 FIREWALL PRODUCTS:
Products supported by ESAP 1.5.3 FIREWALL PRODUCTS: Product Name AOL Firewall (1.x) AOL Privacy Wall (2.x) AVG 8.0 [Firewall] (8.x) AVG Firewall (7.x) AhnLab Security Pack (2.x) AhnLab V3 Internet Security
Anti-Virus Protection and Performance
Anti-Virus Protection and Performance ANNUAL REPORT 2015 Dennis Technology Labs www.dennistechnologylabs.com Follow @DennisTechLabs on Twitter.com CONTENTS Annual Report 2015... 1 Contents... 2 Introduction...
Security Industry Market Share Analysis
Security Industry Market Share Analysis September 2011 Introduction The Research OPSWAT releases quarterly market share reports for several sectors of the security industry. This quarter s report includes
MRG Effitas Online Banking / Browser Security Assessment Project Q2 2013 Results
MRG Effitas Online Banking / Browser Security Assessment Project Q2 2013 Results 1 Contents: Introduction 3 The Purpose of this Project 3 Tests employed 3 Security Applications Tested 4 Methodology Used
Anti-Virus Comparative
Anti-Virus Comparative Performance Test (Suite Products) Impact of Internet Security Software on System Performance Language: English October 2013 Last Revision: 19 th November 2013 Table of Contents 1.
Director Test Research: David Walkiewicz
7th August 2015 created by Markus Selinger Test: Parental control software for Windows and Mac OS X Those who don't want their children to be exposed to early unattended lessons in the birds and the bees
IT Security Survey 2014
IT Security Survey 2014 Language: English Last Revision: 28 th February 2014-1 - Overview Use of the Internet by home and business users continues to grow in all parts of the world. How users access the
Host Checker Security software requirements
Host Checker Security software requirements In this document we describe requirements on security software in computers that are to be used together with the feature Host Checker in Telia Secure Remote
Henry Ford Health System Remote Access Support Details
Henry Ford Health System Remote Access Support Details Last Updated: March 5 th, 2014 Access Disclaimer: This document assumes that you already have an ID to access the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS)
How To Test For Performance On A 64 Bit Computer (64 Bit)
Anti-Virus Comparative Performance Test Impact of Security Software on System Performance Language: English May 2015 Last Revision: 30 th June 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Tested products
Anti-Virus Comparative - Performance Test (AV Products) May 2014
Anti-Virus Comparative Performance Test (AV Products) Impact of Anti-Virus Software on System Performance Language: English May 2014 Last Revision: 10 th June 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2.
IT Security Survey 2012
IT Security Survey 2012 Language: English Last Revision: 7 th April 2012-1 - Overview The Internet has without a doubt changed our lives. Online banking, shopping, gaming, and digital communication with
Global Antivirus Software Package Market 2015-2019
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3498718/ Global Antivirus Software Package Market 2015-2019 Description: About antivirus software package An antivirus scans the
Windows 8 Malware Protection Test Report
Windows 8 Malware Protection Test Report A test commissioned by Kaspersky Lab and performed by AV-Test GmbH Date of the report: January 11 th, 2013, last update: January 11 th, 2013 Executive Summary In
MaaS360 Application Support Matrix
MaaS360 Application Support Matrix May 2010 MatrtrixMatrixProductSupportVisibility Service Table of Contents MaaS360 Application Support Matrix User Guide... 3 Support Legend... 3 Definitions... 3 Change
ESAP 2.7.4 Release Notes
ESAP 2.7.4 Release Notes SDK Version: Mac and Windows 3.6.9845.2 (V2 Unified + V3). Note: The SDK embedded in this ESAP version has been tested and qualified to interoperate with a limited list of end
Online Banking and Endpoint Security Report October 2012
Online Banking and Endpoint Security Report October 2012 1 Contents: Introduction 3 The Purpose of this Report 3 Security Applications Tested 5 Methodology Used in the Test 5 Test Results 7 Analysis of
Real World and Vulnerability Protection, Performance and Remediation Report
Real World and Vulnerability Protection, Performance and Remediation Report A test commissioned by Symantec Corporation and performed by AV-Test GmbH Date of the report: September 17 th, 2014, last update:
Firewall Test. Firewall protection in public networks. Commissioned by CHIP. Language: English. Last Revision: 11 th April 2014
Firewall Test Firewall protection in public networks Commissioned by CHIP Language: English Last Revision: 11 th April 2014 www.av-comparatives.org Commissioned by - 1 - Contents Firewall protection in
PCSL. PCSL IT Consulting Institute 手 机 安 全 软 件 病 毒 检 测 率 测 试. Malware Detection Test. Celebrating Technology Innovation
2015 IT Consulting Institute ❹ Android Malware Detection Test 手 机 安 全 软 件 病 毒 检 测 率 测 试 Celebrating Technology Innovation 报 告 目 录 Table of Contents P1 P2 P3 测 试 背 景 Background 测 试 流 程 Test Process 待 测
DSD230001 avast! Pro Antivirus 1-PC 1 jaar 33,99 41,13 DSD230002 avast! Pro Antivirus 3-PC 1 jaar 42,99 52,02
ABBYY DSD310010 ABBYY FineReader Pro for MAC 81,82 99,00 DSD310011 ABBYY PDF Transformer+ 57,02 68,99 DSD310006 ABBYY Business Card Reader 2.0 20,62 24,95 DSD310008 ABBYY Screenshot Reader 8,22 9,95 DSD310012
ABBYY Référence Nom Prix HTVA Prix TVAC DSD310010 ABBYY FineReader Pro for Mac 73,55 89 DSD310011 ABBYY PDF Transformer+ 57,02 68,99 DSD310006 ABBYY
ABBYY DSD310010 ABBYY FineReader Pro for Mac 73,55 89 DSD310011 ABBYY PDF Transformer+ 57,02 68,99 DSD310006 ABBYY Business Card Reader 2.0 20,62 24,95 DSD310008 ABBYY Screenshot Reader 8,22 9,95 DSD310012
Cisco Identity Services Engine Supported Windows AV/AS and Patch Management Products Compliance Module Version 3.6.9981.2
Cisco Identity Services Engine Supported Windows AV/AS and Patch Management Products Compliance Module Version 3.6.9981.2 This document provides Windows AV/AS and Patch Management support information on
Can Consumer AV Products Protect Against Critical Microsoft Vulnerabilities?
ANALYST BRIEF Can Consumer AV Products Protect Against Critical Microsoft Vulnerabilities? Author Randy Abrams Tested Products Avast Internet Security 7 AVG Internet Security 2012 Avira Internet Security
Anti-Spam Test. Anti-Spam Test. (Consumer Products) Language: English. March 2016 Last Revision: 20 th April 2016. www.av-comparatives.
Anti-Spam Test Anti-Spam Test (Consumer Products) Language: English March 2016 Last Revision: 20 th April 2016 Commissioned by PC Magazin Table of Contents Tested Products 3 Introduction 4 Test procedure
WTCS180003 Acronis True Image 2014 1-PC 60 avast!
ABBYY WTCS310004 ABBYY FineReader Express Edition for Mac 89 WTCS310010 ABBYY FineReader Pro for MAC 89 WTCS310003 ABBYY PDF Transformer 3.0 Pro 65 WTCS310011 ABBYY PDF Transformer+ 69 WTCS310006 ABBYY
KASPERSKY ENDPOINT SECURITY FOR BUSINESS: TECHNOLOGY IN ACTION
KASPERSKY ENDPOINT SECURITY FOR BUSINESS: TECHNOLOGY IN ACTION For the threats you can see and those you can t kaspersky.com/business #Securebiz CONTENTS Protect your business from the threats you can
OPSWAT Antivirus Integration SDK 3.5.3633.2
OPSWAT Antivirus Integration SDK 3.5.3633.2 360Safe.com 360 Antivirus 360 杀 毒 360 杀 毒 360 Antivirus 360 杀 毒 360 Antivirus 360 杀 毒 360 Antivirus Product Name Product Version Product ID Check Virus Definitions
Endpoint Business Products Testing Report. Performed by AV-Test GmbH
Business Products Testing Report Performed by AV-Test GmbH January 2011 1 Business Products Testing Report - Performed by AV-Test GmbH Executive Summary Overview During November 2010, AV-Test performed
Security Industry Market Share Analysis
Security Industry Market Share Analysis December Introduction The Research OPSWAT releases quarterly market share reports for several sectors of the security industry. This report includes both worldwide
Online Payments Threats
July 3, 2012 Introduction...2 Tested Products...2 Used Configuration...3 Real Malware Inspiration...3 Total Scores Chart...4 Conclusion...4 About matousec.com...4 Detailed Descriptions of Tests...5 Detailed
Standalone Sidegrade Tool
Standalone Sidegrade Tool Manufacturer Product Display Name Agnitum Agnitum Outpost Firewall Pro 1.0 Ahnlab AhnLab V3 VirusBlock Internet Security 2007 Ahnlab AOL Authentium, Inc. Authentium, Inc. Authentium,
The Antivirus Industry: Quo Vadis? VirusBulletin
The Antivirus Industry: Quo Vadis? VirusBulletin October 1, 2008 Our perspective AV: An industry under assault? A clean slate Our possibly unique perspective through recent development and marketing efforts.
Home Anti-Virus Protection
Home Anti-Virus Protection APRIL - JUNE 2013 Dennis Technology Labs www.dennistechnologylabs.com This report aims to compare the effectiveness of anti-malware products provided by well-known security companies.
ESAP 2.7.9. Release Notes. Version Published
ESAP 2.7.9 Release Notes Version Published Mac and Windows 3.6.10004.2 (V2 Unified + V3) July 2015 Note: The SDK embedded in this ESAP version has been tested and qualified to interoperate with an extensive
Contact details For contacting ENISA or for general enquiries on information security awareness matters, please use the following details:
Malicious software About ENISA The European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) is an EU agency created to advance the functioning of the internal market. ENISA is a centre of excellence for
