Operating Budget Data
|
|
|
- Barnard Fleming
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 J00A04 Debt Service Requirements Maryland Department of Transportation Operating Budget Data ($ in Thousands) FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY % Change Actual Working Allowance Change Prior Year Special Fund $200,455 $255,370 $282,667 $27, % Adjusted Special Fund $200,455 $255,370 $282,667 $27, % Adjusted Grand Total $200,455 $255,370 $282,667 $27, % The fiscal 2016 allowance for debt service payments on Consolidated Transportation Bonds totals $282.7 million, an increase of $27.3 million (10.7%) compared to the fiscal 2015 working appropriation. The fiscal 2015 working appropriation is overstated, however, because it has not been adjusted to reflect the smaller debt issuances in fiscal 2014 and 2015 that had been assumed when the fiscal 2015 budget was originally introduced. Based on the actual amount of debt issued in fiscal 2014 and the lower projected level of issuances for fiscal 2015, debt service for fiscal 2015 will be $232.4 million. The Maryland Department of Transportation s (MDOT) financial forecast shows that it plans to issue $490.0 million of debt in fiscal 2015 (down from the $740.0 million level projected when the budget was introduced) and $875.0 million in fiscal Debt outstanding at the end of fiscal 2016 is projected at $2.9 billion. Nontraditional debt outstanding at the end of fiscal 2016 is projected at $685.4 million. Note: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. For further information contact: Steven D. McCulloch Phone: (410)
2 Analysis in Brief Major Trends Department s Coverage Ratios Remain Above Minimum Requirements: MDOT s ability to issue debt is limited by the statutory debt outstanding limit of $4.5 billion and two bond resolution provisions, which require annual net income and pledged taxes from the prior year to be at least 2.0 times greater than the maximum level of future debt service payments. The department s two coverage ratios are expected to be 5.2 for the pledged taxes test and 3.0 for the net income test in fiscal By fiscal 2020, the last year of the forecast period, the net income ratio is projected to decline to 2.7, and debt outstanding is projected at $4.3 billion. Operating Budget Recommended Actions 1. Add annual budget bill language establishing the debt outstanding limit for Consolidated Transportation Bonds. 2. Add annual budget bill language requiring reports on nontraditional debt. 3. Add annual budget bill language establishing the debt outstanding limit for nontraditional debt. 2
3 J00A04 Debt Service Requirements Maryland Department of Transportation Budget Analysis Program Description Consolidated Transportation Bonds The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) issues 15-year Consolidated Transportation Bonds (CTB), which are tax-supported debt. Bond proceeds are dedicated for construction projects. Revenues from taxes and fees and other funding sources are combined in the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) to pay debt service and operating budget requirements and to support the capital program. Debt service on CTBs is payable solely from the TTF. Nontraditional Debt MDOT also uses nontraditional debt, which is any debt instrument that is not a CTB or a Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicle (GARVEE) bond. This includes, but is not limited to, Certificates of Participation (COP); debt backed by customer facility charges, passenger facility charges, or other revenues; and debt issued by the Maryland Economic Development Corporation (MEDCO), the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA), or any other third party on behalf of MDOT. Proposed Budget The fiscal 2016 allowance for CTB debt service totals $282.7 million, an increase of $27.3 million (10.7%) from the fiscal 2015 working appropriation. The fiscal 2015 working appropriation is overstated, however, because it has not been adjusted to reflect the reduction in planned CTB debt issuance for fiscal 2015 from the $740.0 million assumed when the fiscal 2015 budget was approved to the $490.0 million issuance level assumed for fiscal 2015 in the current MDOT forecast. Adjusting for the lower level of fiscal 2015 debt service, debt service costs in fiscal 2016 would increase by $50.3 million (21.6%) over the current year. Decisions by the New Administration May Alter Projections of Future Debt Levels The discussion of planned debt issuance levels and the resulting projections of debt outstanding and debt service amounts contained below are based on MDOT s six-year financial and capital program forecasts. Decisions by the new administration regarding transportation revenues, financing, and capital spending may directly and/or indirectly alter the assumptions upon which this analysis is based. 3
4 Department s Coverage Ratios Remain Above Minimum Requirements State law and agency debt practices limit CTB issuances with three criteria: a debt outstanding limit and two coverage tests. The debt outstanding limit is set in statute at $4.5 billion. The statute further requires the General Assembly to establish in the budget for any fiscal year the maximum outstanding aggregate amount of these bonds at the end of the fiscal year which may not exceed the overall limit previously mentioned. The limit is periodically increased to reflect the revenue growth and potential of the TTF and was last increased in the 2013 session. CTBs are included within the State debt affordability limits, and the level of debt service and debt outstanding are, therefore, evaluated annually by the Capital Debt Affordability Committee. The two coverage tests are established in the department s bond resolutions and require that annual net income and pledged taxes from the prior year each equal at least 2.0 times the maximum level of future debt service payments on all CTBs outstanding and to be issued. The department has adopted a management practice that requires minimum coverages of 2.5 times maximum future debt service. The income coverage test is the ratio of all the prior year s income (excluding federal capital, bond proceeds, and third-party reimbursements) minus prior year operating expenses to maximum annual future debt service and typically is the limiting coverage ratio. The pledged taxes coverage test measures annual net revenues from vehicle excise, motor fuel, rental car sales, and corporate income taxes (excluding refunds and all statutory deductions) as a ratio of maximum future annual debt service. If either of these coverage ratios fall below the 2.0 times level, the department has agreed not to issue additional debt until the ratios are once again at the minimum 2.0 times level. Projected CTB issuances in fiscal 2015 will increase the total amount of debt outstanding to almost $2.2 billion, and the debt service coverage ratios in fiscal 2015 are estimated to be 5.5 times for pledged taxes and 3.0 times for the net revenues test. In fiscal 2016, the level of debt outstanding is expected to increase to almost $2.9 billion, with the pledged taxes coverage ratio declining to 5.2 times and the net income ratio remaining at 3.0 times maximum future annual debt service. In fiscal 2020, the final year of the current forecast, the net income to maximum annual debt service is expected to be 2.7, and the pledged taxes are projected at 4.1 times maximum annual debt service. Debt outstanding will total almost $4.3 billion in fiscal Based on current revenue and debt issuance projections, CTB debt levels meet both the statutory limit on maximum debt outstanding and the pledged taxes and net income to maximum annual debt service ratios set forth in bond resolutions for the entire six-year period of the forecast. Section of the Transportation Article requires the General Assembly to establish in the budget the maximum amount of CTB debt that may be outstanding at the end of each fiscal year. It is recommended that the limit for fiscal 2016 be set at $2.86 billion. Language is included in the Recommended Actions section of this analysis to implement this recommendation. Historical Trends in CTB Debt Exhibit 1 shows annual new CTB issuances and net debt outstanding from fiscal 2006 to
5 Debt Issued J00A04 MDOT Debt Service Requirements Exhibit 1 Bond Sales and Debt Outstanding Fiscal Actual and Fiscal Estimated ($ in Millions) $1,000 $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $ $4,800 $4,200 $3,600 $3,000 $2,400 $1,800 $1,200 $600 $0 Debt Outstanding Bonds Issued CTB Debt Outstanding CTB: Consolidated Transportation Bonds Source: Maryland Department of Transportation The limit on debt outstanding was increased during the 2004 session and again during the 2007 special session to $2.0 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. Both increases were made possible by revenue increases passed in those two sessions. To maintain capital spending during the recession, the department chose to increase the amount of debt it issued in fiscal 2008 and 2009 compared to the amount it had issued during the preceding three years. From fiscal 2010 to 2013, the department issued smaller amounts of debt, relying instead on higher than expected fund balances and using cash to support the capital program. At the 2013 session, gas tax and farebox revenue increases were passed with the gas tax revenues being phased in over three years. At the same time, the limit on debt outstanding was increased to $4.5 billion. MDOT added $4.4 billion in new capital projects to the six-year capital program, which required an increased reliance on debt issuances due to the scheduled phase-in of the revenue increase. 5
6 CTB Debt Outlook J00A04 MDOT Debt Service Requirements As Exhibit 2 shows, new CTB debt issuances totaling $490 million in fiscal 2015 and $875 million in fiscal 2016 are planned. The 2015 to 2020 MDOT forecast includes a significant increase in debt issuances compared to prior six-year forecasts. This naturally leads to increasing levels of debt outstanding and debt service costs. Debt outstanding is projected to more than double between fiscal 2014 and 2020 and debt service almost doubles. Appendix 3 shows debt service and debt outstanding by fiscal year for current CTB debt (debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014). Exhibit 2 Debt Service Payments and Bond Issuances Fiscal 2014 Actual Data and Fiscal Estimated Data ($ in Millions) $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $ Bonds Issued Debt Service Source: Maryland Department of Transportation The department is planning to issue $3.6 billion in debt from fiscal 2015 to 2020 for the capital program. This is slightly less ($145 million) than was included in last year s six-year forecast. In total, debt issuances support almost 38% of the six-year special fund capital program. As a result of the debt issuances, debt outstanding will total $4.3 billion by fiscal Debt service payments will increase from $200 million in fiscal 2014 to $391 million in fiscal 2020, an increase of nearly 89%. As shown in Exhibit 3, however, MDOT does not usually end up issuing as much debt as forecast. Actual debt issued was less than originally projected for 15 out of 20 MDOT forecasts from 1990 to
7 7 Percent Variance from Planned Six-year Debt Issuances Exhibit 3 Variance from Six-year Planned Debt Issuance Level MDOT Six-year Forecasts: ($ in Millions) 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100% Variance from Planned -7% 49% 106% -51% -68% -55% -74% -42% 24% 75% -11% -12% -9% -13% 49% -11% -19% -31% -48% -24% Six-year Planned Issuances ,005 1,040 1,110 1, ,075 1,185 1,405 1,985 1,485 Actual Six-year Issuances ,015 1,092 1, ,037 1,135 MDOT: Maryland Department of Transportation Source: Maryland Department of Transportation
8 Nontraditional Debt In addition to CTBs, the department uses nontraditional debt. Nontraditional debt is any instrument that is not a CTB or a GARVEE bond. This includes, but is not limited to, COPs; debt backed by customer facility charges, passenger facility charges, or other revenues; and debt issued by MEDCO or MDTA. Exhibit 4 shows that the department currently has 11 nontraditional debt issuances outstanding with 1 additional issuance planned. Combined, these issuances are projected to have $650.4 million in unpaid principal outstanding at the end of fiscal 2016, not including the $35.0 million planned issuance. The planned issuance is for the construction of a parking garage at the proposed State Center development. MEDCO will issue the debt for the State Center garage with the debt service to be paid by parking revenues and the TTF. Appendix 4 shows debt service and debt outstanding by fiscal year for current nontraditional debt (debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014). Exhibit 4 Nontraditional Debt Outstanding and Debt Service Payments ($ in Thousands) Year Issued and Maturity Principal Outstanding (06/30/16) Fiscal 2016 Debt Service Payment Purpose Certificates of Participation $12,410 $1,658 Expand Pier B and a de-icing facility at the Baltimore/Washington International (BWI) Thurgood Marshall Airport ,475 1,166 Construction of a parking garage at Maryland Area Regional Commuter/Amtrak station near BWI Marshall Airport ,200 1,366 Purchase buses for parking garage shuttle operations at BWI Marshall Airport ,270 2,337 Construction of a paper shed at South Locust Point. Subtotal $39,355 $6,527 Maryland Transportation Authority Revenue Bonds $148,055 $19,798 Construction of Elm Road parking garage near BWI Marshall Airport, roadway improvements, enhanced pedestrian access, and upgrading of utility plants. Bonds backed by parking fees. 8
9 Year Issued and Maturity Principal Outstanding (06/30/16) Fiscal 2016 Debt Service Payment Purpose ,900 8,979 Construction of consolidated rental car facility at BWI Marshall Airport. Bonds back by customer facility charge of $3.25 per vehicle rental per day ,500 4,044 Passenger Facility Charge revenue bonds to construct B/C concourse connector /32 118,760 10,139 Passenger Facility Charge to complete Runway Safety Area and Pavement Management Program improvements ,985 2,957 Passenger Facility Charge revenue bonds to construct D/E concourse connector. Subtotal $439,200 $45,917 Maryland Economic Development Corporation Debt $14,580 $2,791 Construction of new Maryland Department of Transportation headquarters building ,235 14,766 Construction of a new 11-gate Concourse A and reconstruction of a portion of Concourse B at BWI Marshall Airport. Subtotal $171,815 $17,557 Total Issued Debt $650,370 $70,001 Pending TBD $35,000 $0 Construction of a parking garage at State Center. Total Issued and Pending $685,370 $70,001 TBD: to be determined Source: Maryland Department of Transportation The General Assembly began placing limits on COPs in fiscal 2002 and then all of MDOT s nontraditional debt in fiscal The limits on nontraditional debt are established in the same manner as the limits placed on CTBs. The General Assembly limits the amount of nontraditional debt outstanding to the amount proposed by the department during the legislative session. If the agency finds that circumstances warrant additional issuances, the department must report to the budget committees on any proposed debt and provide the committees with 45 days to review and comment on the proposal. It is recommended that the General Assembly continue the policy limiting total 9
10 nontraditional debt outstanding. It is also recommended that the amount of debt outstanding at the end of fiscal 2016 be limited to $685.4 million. The General Assembly annually requires that MDOT report to the budget committees on nontraditional debt when it releases its September and January forecasts. Specifically, the language requires that MDOT report on the outstanding and proposed issuances, debt service costs, and annual debt outstanding. The report should cover the current fiscal year and the following 10 fiscal years. It is recommended that the General Assembly again require that the department report on the costs of nontraditional debt when it releases its September and January forecasts. Total Debt Outstanding Exhibit 5 shows that MDOT s total debt outstanding from all sources was $1.8 billion in fiscal 2005 and is projected to increase to $4.8 billion by fiscal Debt outstanding from nontraditional debt is expected to total just over 10% of all debt in fiscal Exhibit 5 Total Transportation Debt Outstanding Fiscal ($ in Millions) $5,500 $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 Actual Estimated CTB Debt Outstanding Nontraditional Debt Outstanding CTB: Consolidated Transportation Bonds Source: Maryland Department of Transportation; Department of Legislative Services 10
11 Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles J00A04 MDOT Debt Service Requirements GARVEEs are transportation bonds that are issued by states and public authorities that are backed by future federal aid highway and transit appropriations. While the source of funds used to repay GARVEE issuances originates with the federal government, the federal government s agreement to the use of its funds in this manner does not constitute any obligation on the part of the federal government to make these funds available. If for any reason federal appropriations are not made as anticipated, the obligation to repay GARVEEs falls entirely to the State agency or authority that issued them. To increase the GARVEE bond rating and reduce borrowing costs, the State pledges TTF revenues should federal appropriations be insufficient to pay GARVEE debt service. Since paying the debt is an obligation of the State and TTF revenues have been pledged, GARVEE bonds are considered State debt. Chapters 471 and 472 of 2005 authorized the use of GARVEE bonds for the InterCounty Connector (ICC) project. The law stipulates that the State may issue no more than $750.0 million in GARVEE bonds, and that bond maturity may not exceed 12 years after date of issue. MDTA issued $325.0 million in GARVEE bonds on May 22, 2007, with a net premium of $16.9 million to support construction of the ICC. A second GARVEE debt issuance of $425.0 million was issued on December 11, 2008, with a net premium of $17.7 million. GARVEE debt service payments are $87.5 million from fiscal 2010 to 2019 and $51.4 million in fiscal 2020, the last year of debt service payments. 11
12 Operating Budget Recommended Actions 1. Add the following language: Consolidated Transportation Bonds may be issued in any amount provided that the aggregate outstanding and unpaid balance of these bonds and bonds of prior issues may not exceed $2,855,105,000 as of June 30, Further provided that the amount paid for debt service shall be reduced by any proceeds generated from net bond sale premiums, provided that those revenues are recognized by the department and reflected in the Transportation Trust Fund forecast. Further provided that the appropriation for debt service shall be reduced by any proceeds generated from net bond sale premiums. To achieve this reduction, the Maryland Department of Transportation may either use the proceeds from the net premium to reduce the size of the bond issuance or apply the proceeds from the net premium to any eligible debt service. Explanation: Section of the Transportation Article requires the General Assembly to establish the maximum debt outstanding each year in the budget bill. The level will be based on outstanding debt as of June 30, 2015, plus projected debt issued during fiscal 2016 in support of the transportation capital program. 2. Add the following language: The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) shall submit with its annual September and January financial forecasts information on: (1) anticipated and actual nontraditional debt outstanding as of June 30 of each year; and (2) anticipated and actual debt service payments for each outstanding nontraditional debt issuance from fiscal 2015 through Nontraditional debt is defined as any debt instrument that is not a Consolidated Transportation Bond or a Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicle bond; such debt includes, but is not limited to, Certificates of Participation, debt backed by customer facility charges, passenger facility charges, or other revenues, and debt issued by the Maryland Economic Development Corporation or any other third party on behalf of MDOT. Explanation: The General Assembly is interested in monitoring the use of nontraditional debt by MDOT. The information requested provides the budget committees with additional information on the usage and annual costs of nontraditional debt. 12
13 Information Request Nontraditional debt outstanding and anticipated debt service payments 3. Add the following language: Author MDOT Due Date With the September forecast With the January forecast The total aggregate outstanding and unpaid principal balance of nontraditional debt, defined as any debt instrument that is not a Consolidated Transportation Bond or a Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicle bond issued by the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT), may not exceed $685,370,000 as of June 30, Provided, however, that in addition to the limit established under this provision, MDOT may increase the aggregate outstanding unpaid and principal balance of nontraditional debt so long as: (1) MDOT provides notice to the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee stating the specific reason for the additional issuance and providing specific information regarding the proposed issuance, including information specifying the total amount of nontraditional debt that would be outstanding on June 30, 2016, and the total amount by which the fiscal 2016 debt service payment for all nontraditional debt would increase following the additional issuance; and (2) the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee have 45 days to review and comment on the proposed additional issuance before the publication of a preliminary official statement. The Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee may hold a public hearing to discuss the proposed increase and shall signal their intent to hold a hearing within 45 days of receiving notice from MDOT. Explanation: This language limits the amount of nontraditional debt outstanding at the end of fiscal 2016 to the total amount that is projected to be outstanding from all previous nontraditional debt issuances as of June 30, 2015, and all anticipated sales in fiscal The language allows MDOT to increase the amount of nontraditional debt outstanding in fiscal 2016 by providing notification to the budget committees regarding the reason that the additional issuances are required. Information Request Justification for increasing nontraditional debt outstanding Author MDOT Due Date 45 days prior to publication of a preliminary official statement 13
14 Appendix 1 Current and Prior Year Budgets Current and Prior Year Budgets MDOT Debt Service ($ in Thousands) Fiscal 2014 General Special Federal Fund Fund Fund Reimb. Fund Total Legislative Appropriation $0 $212,224 $0 $0 $212,224 Deficiency Appropriation Budget Amendments Reversions and Cancellations 0-11, ,768 Actual Expenditures $0 $200,455 $0 $0 $200,455 Fiscal 2015 Legislative Appropriation $0 $255,370 $0 $0 $255,370 Cost Containment Budget Amendments Working Appropriation $0 $255,370 $0 $0 $255,370 Note: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. The fiscal 2015 working appropriation does not include January 2015 Board of Public Works reductions and deficiencies. 14
15 Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2014 expenditures were $11,768,368 lower than the legislative appropriation due to a reduction in the amount of debt issued (only $325 million of the estimated $395 million was issued during the fiscal year), and the use of premium and Build America Bond subsidy funds to offset debt service costs. Fiscal 2015 The fiscal 2015 legislative appropriation remains unchanged. 15
16 J00A04 MDOT MDOT Debt Service Requirements 16 Appendix 2 Object/Fund Difference Report MDOT Debt Service Requirements FY 15 FY 14 Working FY 16 FY 15 - FY 16 Percent Object/Fund Actual Appropriation Allowance Amount Change Change Objects 13 Fixed Charges $ 200,455,245 $ 255,369,913 $ 282,666,738 $ 27,296, % Total Objects $ 200,455,245 $ 255,369,913 $ 282,666,738 $ 27,296, % Funds 03 Special Fund $ 200,455,245 $ 255,369,913 $ 282,666,738 $ 27,296, % Total Funds $ 200,455,245 $ 255,369,913 $ 282,666,738 $ 27,296, %
17 Appendix 3 Consolidated Transportation Bonds Debt Service and Debt Outstanding On Debt Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 Fiscal Year Debt Service Debt Outstanding at End of Fiscal Year 2015 $232,403,973 $1,660,255, ,379,238 1,490,105, ,526,688 1,284,245, ,463,063 1,085,615, ,957, ,695, ,368, ,990, ,953, ,765, ,950, ,060, ,981, ,335, ,015, ,535, ,478, ,870, ,654, ,080, ,096,125 77,845, ,724,831 31,790, ,545,719 0 Source: Maryland Department of Transportation 17
18 Appendix 4 Nontraditional Debt Debt Service and Debt Outstanding On Debt Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 Fiscal Year Debt Service Debt Outstanding at End of Fiscal Year 2015 $67,146,297 $690,990, ,000, ,370, ,621, ,630, ,056, ,955, ,975, ,710, ,978, ,695, ,971, ,815, ,452, ,660, ,274, ,780, ,285, ,015, ,726, ,870, ,985, ,525, ,815, ,405, ,403, ,665, ,388,333 95,475, ,406,983 60,710, ,710,749 38,000, ,716,726 14,075, ,740,591 2,840, ,953,600 0 Source: Maryland Department of Transportation 18
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Plan
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Plan Plan for Financing Anticipated NJDOT/NJT Capital Program Outlays for Fiscal Year 2016 NEW JERSEY TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND
Operating Budget Data
Q00K00 Criminal Injuries Compensation Board Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services Operating Budget Data ($ in Thousands) FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 16-17 % Change Actual Working Allowance Change
Basic Accounting. Course Objective. General Budgetary Terms 12/8/2015. Presented by: Local Government Services
Basic Accounting Presented by: Local Government Services Course Objective To give an overview of the different requirements, processes, transactions, and forms relating to your job as clerk General Budgetary
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Debt Issuance and Management Policy June 20, 2016
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Debt Issuance and Management Policy June 20, 2016 a) Purpose for Policy and Debt; Use of Debt Proceeds The purpose of this policy is to establish a framework
Community Unit School District 220 4:40 Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of 5 DEBT MANAGEMENT The policies set forth in this Debt Management Policy (the Policy ) have been developed to provide guidelines relative to the issuance, sale, statutory compliance, and investment
Colorado Legislative Council Staff FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT LIMITS ON STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT BORROWING
Colorado Legislative Council Staff FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT Amendment 61 Date: Fiscal Analyst: Fiona Sigalla, 303-866-3556 BALLOT TITLE: LIMITS ON STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT BORROWING Fiscal Impact Summary*
Transportation Funds Forecast
Transportation Funds Forecast February 2015 Released March 2, 2015 February 2015 Forecast Executive Summary Revenues up 14 million in Highway User Tax Distribution (HUTD) Fund in FY 2014-15 The February
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts AUDITOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts AUDITOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, ROOM 1819 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 A. JOSEPH DeNUCCI AUDITOR TEL. (617) 727-6200 NO. 2008-1461-3A INDEPENDENT STATE
Approval of Virginia College Building Authority 9(d) Financing Resolution FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE. August 13, 2015
Approval of Virginia College Building Authority 9(d) Financing Resolution FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE August 13, 2015 Section 9(d) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia allows for the issuance of
Transportation Funds Forecast. February 2013. Transportation Funds Forecast. Released March 1, 2013. February 2013 Forecast Executive Summary
Transportation Funds Forecast The purpose of this document is to serve as the official guide to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) forecast for the six transportation funds: Highway User
SECTION D CAPITAL PROGRAM CAPITAL PROGRAM 1999 2013 D 1 FEDERAL TAX LAW D 2 STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT D 2 FINANCING SUMMARY D 3 AGENCY DETAIL D 4
SECTION D CAPITAL PROGRAM CAPITAL PROGRAM 1999 2013 D 1 FEDERAL TAX LAW D 2 STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT D 2 FINANCING SUMMARY D 3 AGENCY DETAIL D 4 Capital Budget CAPITAL BUDGET 1999 2013 RECOMMENDED EXECUTIVE
D70J00 Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund. ($ in Thousands)
D70J00 Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund Operating Budget Data ($ in Thousands) CY 12 CY 13 CY 13 CY 14 CY 13-14 CY 13-14 Actual Budgeted Actual* Budgeted $ Change % Change Insured Division $44,908 $46,028
DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY ANNUAL UPDATE HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA
DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY ANNUAL UPDATE HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA July, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. ABILITY TO AFFORD EXISTING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT, AUTHORIZED FUTURE GENERAL OBLIGATION
North Carolina s Reference to the Internal Revenue Code Updated - Impact on 2015 North Carolina Corporate and Individual income Tax Returns
June 3, 2016 North Carolina s Reference to the Internal Revenue Code Updated - Impact on 2015 North Carolina Corporate and Individual income Tax Returns Governor McCrory signed into law Session Law 2016-6
FY2008 First Quarter Consolidated Financial Results:
FY2008 First Quarter Consolidated Financial Results: For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 July 30, 2007 Company name Stock exchange listing Representative URL Contact person : Isuzu Motors Limited
Incurring of Indebtedness
Incurring of Indebtedness Goals for this Session Basic Understanding of: The decision to borrow Financing options Overview of the State Bond Commission The Decision to Borrow Develop a long range plan
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE
SAMPLE TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE PROCEEDINGS (A copy of these documents must be filed with the Department of Community and Economic Development prior to issuance of the note. This is a sample,
v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002
v02979gl.doc PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2002 March 12, 2003 Board of Trustees Public Employees Retirement System of
Chapter Eighteen. Governmental Entities: Other Governmental Funds and Account Groups OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS. Scope of Chapter
Chapter Eighteen Governmental Entities: Other Governmental Funds and Account Groups Scope of Chapter This chapter presents a discussion and illustration of accounting and reporting for a governmental entity
TOWNSHIP OF ROLLAND ISABELLA COUNTY, MICHIGAN AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010
ISABELLA COUNTY, MICHIGAN AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditor s Report.. 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Government Wide Statement of Net Assets. 2 Government Wide
SECTION 7 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET
SECTION 7 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET In Accordance With NRS 350.013 June 30, 2015 7-1 Table of Contents Introduction... 7-3
MINISTRY OF SMALL BUSINESS AND REVENUE
The ministry's mission is to promote small business growth by working in partnership with British Columbians; to streamline and simplify the regulatory system to stimulate business growth and investment,
PART II STATE DEBT SERVICE
PART II STATE DEBT SERVICE STATE DEBT SERVICE AND FINANCING AGREEMENT PAYMENTS DEBT SERVICE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2006-07 The 2006-07 recommended debt service appropriations meet all of the State s potential
Office of Legislative Research Connecticut General Assembly OLR ACTS AFFECTING. Banking. By: Jennifer Gelb, Associate Attorney
Office of Legislative Research Connecticut General Assembly OLR ACTS AFFECTING Banking By: Jennifer Gelb, Associate Attorney 2004-R-0473 June 9, 2004 Mary M. Janicki, Director Phone (860) 240-8400 FAX
Treasurer of State OVERVIEW
Treasurer of State OVERVIEW The Treasurer of State collects, invests, and protects state funds. The Treasurer s Office functions as a custodian of the public s money, manager of the state s investment
114CSR61 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE RULE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER SERIES 61 CREDIT PERSONAL PROPERTY INSURANCE
114CSR61 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIVE RULE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER SERIES 61 CREDIT PERSONAL PROPERTY INSURANCE Section 114-61-1. General. 114-61-2. Definitions. 114-61-3. Amount, Term and Coverage of Credit
Air Methods Corporation NASDAQ: AIRM. Corporate Presentation November 2015
Air Methods Corporation NASDAQ: AIRM Corporate Presentation November 2015 Forward Looking Statements/ Non-GAAP Financial Information Forward Looking Statements: Forward-looking statements in this news
ASPIRE CHARTER ACADEMY, INC. A Charter School and Component Unit of the District School Board of Orange County, Florida
Financial Statements with Independent Auditors Reports Thereon June 30, 2015 CONTENTS Page Management s Discussion and Analysis 1 6 Report of Independent Auditors on Basic Financial Statements and Supplementary
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO QUARTERLY REPORT DATED JULY 17, 2014 00163411; 1
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO QUARTERLY REPORT DATED JULY 17, 2014 00163411; 1 Table of Contents Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 RISK FACTORS... 3 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS... 18 FISCAL CONDITION... 25 THE ECONOMY...
RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the Council ) of the City of Ashland (the City ) that: Section 1. Findings
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF CITY OF ASHLAND, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF WATER REVENUE BONDS FOR A TOTAL OF NOT TO EXCEED $5,975,000, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF NOTICE.
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Index Number: 7702.00-00 7702.20-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Number: 200006030 Release Date: 2/11/2000 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To:
Action: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to: (a) section 6(c) of the Investment
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. IC-32163; File No. 812-14523] MainStay Funds Trust, et al.; Notice of Application June 27, 2016 Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission
Table of Contents. Interest Expense and Income 185.32 Why do financing accounts borrow from Treasury? 185.33 Why do financing accounts earn interest?
SECTION 185 FEDERAL CREDIT Table of Contents General Information 185.1 Does this section apply to me? 185.2 What background information must I know? 185.3 What special terms must I know? 185.4 Are there
Office of the State Treasurer 200 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 1204, West Tower Atlanta, Georgia 30334-5527 www.ost.ga.gov
Office of the State Treasurer 200 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 1204, West Tower Atlanta, Georgia 30334-5527 www.ost.ga.gov INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER POLICY December 2015 O.C.G.A.
City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy December 2009
City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy December 2009 I. INTRODUCTION While the issuance of debt is often an appropriate method of financing capital projects and major equipment acquisition, it needs
RECREATIONAL FACILITY REVENUE BOND FUNDS IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
RECREATIONAL FACILITY REVENUE BOND FUNDS IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2008 0961-8021-BC04
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2014 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE. Income Tax Credit - Student Loan Payments
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2014 Session SB 632 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Senate Bill 632 Budget and Taxation (Senator Madaleno, et al.) Income Tax Credit - Student Loan Payments
TABLE OF CONTENTS Insuring of Industrial Mortgages
Connecticut Industrial Building Commission Sec. 32-13 page 1 (9-97) TABLE OF CONTENTS Insuring of Industrial Mortgages Application and fees... 32-13- 1 Commitment or unacceptance... 32-13- 2 Covenant for
A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001
fiscal forum A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001 Mitchell E. Bean, Director P. O. Box 30014, Lansing, MI 48909-7514 517-373-8080! FAX 517-373-5874! www.house.state.mi.us/hfa
State of Arkansas Construction Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Program
Independent Auditor s Report and Financial Statements Contents Independent Auditor s Report... 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis... 4 Financial Statements Statements of Net Position... 9 Statements
CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION FINANCING AUTHORITY Meeting Date: February 18, 2014
CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION FINANCING AUTHORITY Meeting Date: February 18, 2014 Request to Consider and Approve Emergency Regulations for the Property Assessed Clean Energy
GUIDANCE FOR TRANSIT FINANCIAL PLANS
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration GUIDANCE FOR TRANSIT FINANCIAL PLANS JUNE 2000 Prepared By: Federal Transit Administration Office of Planning Office of Program Management
Massport, Delta & Terminal A. Presented by Betsy Taylor May 21, 2007
Massport, Delta & Terminal A Presented by Betsy Taylor May 21, 2007 Topics of the Day Overview of Logan Airport Logan s Physical Challenge Original Project The Revised Lease Financial Structure Logan is
The Water and Power Employees Retirement Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan
The Water and Power Employees Retirement Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan Review of the Death Benefit Fund as of July 1, 2014 Family Death Benefit Allowance Fund Supplemental Family Death Benefit
GENERA L OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE SUMMARY
GENERA L OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE SUMMARY General Obligation debt is secured by and payable from the receipts of annual ad valorem taxes, within legal limits, on taxable property within the City. The City
Investor Conference Call
Investor Conference Call Fiscal Year 2015 Third Quarter February 28, 2015 April 17, 2015 at 10:00 am ET 2 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are based
General fund revenues expected to show moderate growth over the forecast horizon
A-13 REVENUE FORECAST The Commonwealth's total revenue consists of two types of resources: the general fund and nongeneral funds. About half of state revenues are "nongeneral funds," or funds earmarked
The University Of California Home Loan Program Corporation (A Component Unit of the University of California)
Report Of Independent Auditors And Financial Statements The University Of California Home Loan Program Corporation (A Component Unit of the University of California) As of and for the periods ended June
Montana Legislative Fiscal Division. September 19, 2000. Prepared by Greg DeWitt, Senior Fiscal Analyst
Montana Legislative Fiscal Division Highway State Special Revenue Account: Working Capital Update September 19, 2000 Prepared by Greg DeWitt, Senior Fiscal Analyst Highway State Special Revenue Account:
