Modeling Drivers of Cost and Benefit for Policy Development in Cancer
|
|
- Beverly Greer
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Modeling Drivers of Cost and Benefit for Policy Development in Cancer Harms? Benefits? Costs? Ruth Etzioni Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, Washington
2 The USPSTF recommends against routine screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49 years. The decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography before the age of 50 years should be an individual one and take into account patient context, including the patient s values regarding specific benefits and harms.
3 For biennial screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49 years, there is moderate certainty that the net benefit is small. The USPSTF emphasizes the adverse consequences for most women who will not develop breast cancer.
4 USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines Net benefit is small NNS to save one life: 1904 for women aged years based on updated review of the evidence and meta-analysis Mortality reduction: reduction in the likelihood of breast cancer death based on 6 models: Screening women aged 50-69: 17% (range 15-23%) reduction Screening women aged 40-69: 20% reduction Life years gained also considered but reported as secondary result Adverse consequences False positive tests: can cause anxiety and lead to additional imaging studies. More common in younger women Overdiagnosis
5 Results From 6 Breast Cancer Screening Models: Mortality Reduction Mandelblatt et al, 2009
6 Results From 6 Breast Cancer Screening Models: LY Saved
7 Current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for prostate cancer in men younger than age 75 years (I statement). Do not screen for prostate cancer in men age 75 years or older. (Grade D recommendation).
8 Basis for USPSTF Decision to Stop PSA Screening at Age 75 The USPSTF was able to establish an upper bound for the potential magnitude of the benefit of treating screen-detected prostate cancer in this age group by extrapolating from evidence of treatment for clinically detected prostate cancer in this age group. For a population of men with an average life expectancy of 10 years of fewer, the USPSTF determined that the benefits of prostate cancer screening and treatment would range from small to none. Weighing this against the moderate-to-substantial psychological and physical harms associated with prostate cancer screening and treatment Bill-Axelson A et al. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:
9 USPSTF Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines Moderate to substantial psychological and physical harms Associated with treatment: sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bowel dysfunction Associated with screening: Overdiagnosis and also, pain associated with prostate biopsy, anxiety over false positive results Overdiagnosis: A major harm of PSA screening We estimated that 36% of men have onset in their lifetimes Before PSA, only 9% diagnosed before other-cause death
10 Summary Screening policy in the US appears to rest on key drivers of cost and benefit Cost drivers are particularly important in the presence of modest benefit Mammography: False positives in younger women PSA screening: Overdiagnosis in older men Different policy panels may emphasize different drivers of cost and benefit Two prostate cancer panels that I have worked with that differ considerably in terms of their key drivers American Cancer Society: Overdiagnosis and overtreatment National Comprehensive Cancer Network: False negatives
11 Prostate Cancer Screening Panels American Cancer Society Ad hoc group re-formed every 5 years to review most current evidence and develop recommendations by a consensus process. Mostly MD s, including internists, oncologists, some urologists. Guidelines: 2008, 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Standing committee of approximately 15 members that teleconference annually to propose changes to an existing, elaborate guideline. Almost exclusively MD urologists and urologic oncologists/surgeons. US Preventive Services Task Force Standing panel that reviews evidence and develops policies for a variety of preventive and early detection interventions for a wide range of conditions. Mostly primary care clinicians. Guidelines: 2002, 2009
12 Guidelines over the years US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening. US Preventive Services Task Force (2008) There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening before age 75. Do not screen after age 75 American Cancer Society (2008): Screening should be offered following discussion of risks and limitations to men age 50+ at average risk of PC and with at least 10 year LE American Cancer Society (2010) Informed decision making with provider after discussion of risks and limitations National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2009) Average risk men should be screened annually by age 50 with consideration of biopsy for PSA > 2.5 ng/ml or high PSA velocity.
13 NCCN: 2009 Guideline
14 Issues With The NCCN Guideline PSA Threshold Lowering the PSA threshold from 4.0 ng/ml to 2.5 ng/ml will double the number of men referred to biopsy. However, 15% of men with PSA less than 4.0 ng/ml have disease. ERSPC cutoff was 3.0 in most centers. Starting Age Lowering the age at which to start screening to 40 in average risk men could greatly increase the number of tests with low yield of cancers detected and uncertain incremental benefit. Median age at diagnosis before PSA was 76. PSA velocity PSA velocity is not helpful in detecting cancers or in detecting clinically significant cancers when PSA is low. Screening Interval In the ERSPC most centers had 4 years between screens this study showed significant benefit (mortality RR for screened vs control groups = 0.8)
15 Bringing Modeling To The Table Issue: Idea: NCCN guideline is aggressive and is likely to generate significant costs in terms of numbers of tests and overdiagnoses Panel members place an extremely high cost on delayed diagnosis and this dominates their policy decisions The frequency of aggressive disease transitioning to an incurable state at low PSA is not known There is no quantitative sense of the tradeoff between the harms and benefits of more versus less aggressive strategies How many more lives will be saved by a strategy of 2.5 vs 4.0 ng/ml? How many more men will be overdiagnosed? Provide panel members with the technology (MODEL) to evaluate a range of outcomes and focus on those that are most meaning
16 Some Words About Disease Modeling Step 1: Model concept A sequence of states in disease progression Sojourn time Step 2: Model calibration Estimate the transition rates between the states Step 3: Model deployment healthy latent symptomatic death (clinical) Project the outcomes of the interaction between the intervention and the model
17 Why Do We Need A Model?
18 Key Points The model should not be too detailed Must be able to estimate transition rates from available data Typically: Need data from a screened cohort The model should be detailed enough Must be able to address your questions Example: healthy latent symptomatic death What is the likely impact of screening with a specific PSA cutoff on disease-specific deaths?
19 Key Points The model should not be too detailed Must be able to estimate transition rates from available data Typically: Need data from a screened cohort The model should be detailed enough Must be able to address your questions Lead time Example: healthy latent symptomatic death Screen detected! Screening will advance the date of diagnosis How does this impact survival? Through a change in disease stage? If so, need to include stage progression in the model!
20 A Stage-Based Model Healthy Latent Symptomatic Normal Early stage Low grade Early stage Low grade Early stage High grade Early stage High grade Late stage Low grade Late stage Low grade Late stage High grade Late stage High grade Draisma et al, Int J Cancer 2007 Parameters: Stage transition rates, screen sensitivity in each stage
21 Criteria For The NCCN Model We want to compare competing PSA-based criteria for biopsy in terms of their impact on early detection The model should link PSA growth with disease progression and/or disease-specific survival Model should project a full range of outcomes that drive cost and benefit Model should be accessible to panel members with a user-friendly interface that will allow them to select strategies for comparison and view different outcomes Model should reflect population biopsy and treatment practices given test results and cancer diagnosis
22 PSA FHCRC Prostate Model PSA growth: Joint model of PSA growth and disease progression Changepoint model with individual-specific changepoints reflecting disease onset Risk of onset is proportional to age Risk of metastasis and clinical detection increase with PSA Grade of disease determined at onset; PSA growth is grade-dependent Model parameters: Onset risk Risk of progression to metastasis Risk of progression to clinical onset metastasis clinical death
23 FHCRC Prostate Model Parameter Estimation FHCRC disease model has two components: PSA growth: Estimated using serial PSA data from the Prostate Cancer Prevention trial Progression: Estimated using data on prostate cancer incidence in the population Given PSA growth, what disease onset and progression rates yield ageand stage-specific incidence that best match that observed in the US? Algorithm: Simulated maximum likelihood Local-regional Distant/Advanced
24 FHCRC Prostate Model Calibration Fitted Incidence Trends Corresponding To 20 Seeds Local-regional stage incidence Distant-stage incidence Inoue et al JASA 2007; Gulati et al, Biostatistics 2010
25 FHCRC Prostate Model Overdiagnosis The calibrated model produces a simulated population of disease histories that are consistent with observed data Can use this population to empirically estimate quantities of interest that would not otherwise be observable Lifetime probabilities of disease onset and metastasis Lead time, overdiagnosis FHCRC model after calibration Lifetime probability onset 33% Prob(clinical onset) 38% Mean lead time Overdiagnosed 6 years 28% of scrdetected Draisma et al, JNCI 2009
26 Aside: Cross-Country Comparisons Europe vs. US MISCAN model fit to data from the Netherlands with 1991 incidence (absence of screening) and data from the ERSPC Rotterdam (presence of screening) Overdiagnosis frequency: 66% Lower rate of clinical progression Higher test sensitivity Fit to US incidence data: Overdiagnosis frequency: 42% Higher rate of clinical progression Lower test sensitivity Conclusion: Drivers of cost may be very context-dependent Draisma et al, JNCI 2009
27 FHCRC Prostate Model Survival Modeling In absence of screening: stage- and grade-based disease-specific survival using SEER data from men diagnosed before the PSA era In the presence of screening: A fraction of men who would have died in the absence of screening are cured Probability of cure: selected so we replicate the Goteborg trial result under biannual screening and good compliance (RR=0.56) The lower the PSA cutoff: The greater the fraction cured The greater the fraction diagnosed The more men referred to biopsy
28 FHCRC Model Interface
29 FHCRC Model Deployment July 2010 One week before 2010 NCCN conference call: Sent a link to the calculator with a brief description of goals and function to all panel members Attached a more detailed document that ran the calculator for a range of policies and tabulated the results During the call, reviewed goals of the calculator and noted that a request for (anonymous) feedback would be forthcoming Within one week after the conference call: Sent a short questionnaire about perceptions of usefulness for this call and for the future Also solicited suggestions for improvements
30 Comparisons of Policies Provided to Panel Outcomes projected: Tests performed False positives Overdiagnoses Prostate cancer deaths Years of life saved Mean lead time
31 Comparisons of Policies Cohort of 100,000 men aged 40 in the year 2000
32 Some more comparisons
33 Our Conclusions More aggressive strategies produce substantial increases in overdiagnoses and false positives and modest increases in years of life saved For almost every strategy that uses a threshold of 2.5 ng/ml, there is a dominating strategy that uses 4.0 ng/ml, whether in terms of false positives or overdiagnoses
34 FHCRC Model Deployment Panelists responses
35 After Communicating This Information
36 Summary Policy panels in the US tend to focus on drivers of cost Different cancers will have different cost drivers of primary importance Different panels will focus on different drivers of cost Modeling is being brought into the policy development process Not all panelists appreciate the value of models or trust their results I always have problems with invalid assumptions used in these models --- they never comport with the realities of clinical practice, where clinical judgment affects treatment outcomes Some are supportive I think that [her] modeling is absolutely the way of the future and we have to get into this 100% We have to be on board with this. Information on the different drivers of cost should be made available to panels so that they can determine cost-benefit tradeoffs that are most relevant to them. American urologists do not appear to prioritize harms or cost in their decision making.
37 Italian cardiologists appear to take cost-effectiveness information into account when deciding whether to use new treatments.
38 Acknowledgements CISNET Eric Feuer Angela Mariotto FHCRC Roman Gulati Lurdes Inoue Jeff Katcher Breast Cancer and USPSTF Jeanne Mandelblatt Model deployment and feedback: Cornerstone Systems NW Lauren Clarke
The PLCO Trial Not a comparison of Screening vs no Screening
PSA Screening: Science, Politics and Uncertainty David F. Penson, MD, MPH Hamilton and Howd Chair of Urologic Oncology Professor and Chair, Department of Urologic Surgery Director, Center for Surgical
More informationCancer in Primary Care: Prostate Cancer Screening. How and How often? Should we and in which patients?
Cancer in Primary Care: Prostate Cancer Screening How and How often? Should we and in which patients? PLCO trial (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian) Results In the screening group, rates of compliance
More informationProstate Cancer Screening: Are We There Yet? March 2010 Andrew M.D. Wolf, MD University of Virginia School of Medicine
Prostate Cancer Screening: Are We There Yet? March 2010 Andrew M.D. Wolf, MD University of Virginia School of Medicine Case #1 A 55 yo white man with well-controlled hypertension presents for his annual
More information4/8/13. Pre-test Audience Response. Prostate Cancer 2012. Screening and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: The 2013 Perspective
Pre-test Audience Response Screening and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: The 2013 Perspective 1. I do not offer routine PSA screening, and the USPSTF D recommendation will not change my practice. 2. In light
More informationAmerican Urological Association (AUA) Guideline
1 (AUA) Guideline EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: AUA GUIDELINE Approved by the AUA Board of Directors April 2013 Authors disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and author/staff contributions
More informationPROSTATE CANCER. Normal-risk men: No family history of prostate cancer No history of prior screening Not African-American
PROSTATE CANCER 1. Guidelines for Screening Risk Factors Normal-risk men: No family history of prostate cancer No history of prior screening Not African-American High-risk men: Family history of prostate
More informationPSA Screening and the USPSTF Understanding the Controversy
PSA Screening and the USPSTF Understanding the Controversy Peter C. Albertsen Division of Urology University of Connecticut Farmington, CT, USA USPSTF Final Report 1 Four Key Questions 1. Does PSA based
More informationCancer research in the Midland Region the prostate and bowel cancer projects
Cancer research in the Midland Region the prostate and bowel cancer projects Ross Lawrenson Waikato Clinical School University of Auckland MoH/HRC Cancer Research agenda Lung cancer Palliative care Prostate
More informationControversites: Screening for Prostate Cancer in Older Adults
Controversites: Screening for Prostate Cancer in Older Adults William Dale, MD, PhD University of Chicago Sections of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine and Hematology/Oncology Director, Specialized Oncology
More informationTO SCREEN OR NOT TO SCREEN: THE PROSTATE CANCER
TO SCREEN OR NOT TO SCREEN: THE PROSTATE CANCER DILEMMA Thomas J Stormont MD January 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jd 7bAHVp0A&feature=related related INTRODUCTION A government health panel (the
More informationClinical Practice Guidelines and Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Dr. Roger Luckmann Associate Professor Family Medicine and Community Health UMass Medical School Disclosures I have
More informationClinical Practice Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guidelines Prostate Cancer Screening CareMore Quality Management CareMore Health System adopts Clinical Practice Guidelines for the purpose of improving health care and reducing unnecessary
More informationNCCN Prostate Cancer Early Detection Guideline
NCCN Prostate Cancer Early Detection Guideline Joan McClure Senior Vice President National Comprehensive Cancer Network African American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 22, 2006 Washington,
More informationScreening for Prostate Cancer
Screening for Prostate Cancer It is now clear that screening for Prostate Cancer discovers the disease at an earlier and more curable stage. It is not yet clear whether this translates into reduced mortality
More informationThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) seeks stakeholder comments on the following clinical quality measure under development:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) seeks stakeholder comments on the following clinical quality measure under development: Title: Non-Recommended PSA-Based Screening Description: The percentage
More informationProstate Cancer Screening: Phantom menace to society. Folusho Ogunfiditimi, DM, MPH, PA-C Vattikuti Urology Institute Henry Ford Health System
Prostate Cancer Screening: Phantom menace to society Folusho Ogunfiditimi, DM, MPH, PA-C Vattikuti Urology Institute Henry Ford Health System Objectives USPTF Recommendations on PSA testing Justification
More informationScreening for Cancer in Light of New Guidelines and Controversies. Christopher Celio, MD St. Jude Heritage Medical Group
Screening for Cancer in Light of New Guidelines and Controversies Christopher Celio, MD St. Jude Heritage Medical Group Screening Tests The 2 major objectives of a good screening program are: (1) detection
More informationPSA Testing for Prostate Cancer An information sheet for men considering a PSA Test
PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer An information sheet for men considering a PSA Test What is the aim of this leaflet? Prostate cancer is a serious condition. The PSA test, which can give an early indication
More informationProstate Cancer Early Detection: Update 2010
Prostate Cancer Early Detection: Update 2010 Prostate Cancer. Disease Burden The most common non-skin cancer, and the second leading cause of cancer death among U.S. men It is estimated that: 1 in 6 men
More informationVitamin Supplementation amongst Otherwise Healthy Individuals
01.13.14 SOURCE: HTTP://WWW.ONEILLINSTITUTEBLOG.ORG/FOUR-THINGS- PROBABLY-STOP-NAME-PUBLIC-HEALTH-2014/# FOUR THINGS WE SHOULD PROBABLY STOP DOING IN THE NAME OF PUBLIC HEALTH IN 2014 BY BRIAN J. HONERMANN
More informationPSA screening: Controversies and Guidelines
PSA screening: Controversies and Guidelines John Phillips, MD, FACS Department of Urology Urology Center of Westchester New York Medical College Historical PerspecGve Cancer of the prostate, although rare,
More informationGuidelines for Cancer Prevention, Early detection & Screening. Prostate Cancer
Guidelines for Cancer Prevention, Early detection & Screening Prostate Cancer Intervention Comments & Recommendations For primary prevention, it has been suggested that diets low in meat & other fatty
More informationProstate Cancer Screening Clinical Practice Guideline. Approved by the National Guideline Directors November, 2013
Prostate Cancer Screening Clinical Practice Guideline This guideline is informational only. It is not intended or designed as a substitute for the reasonable exercise of independent clinical judgment by
More informationUpdate on Prostate Cancer: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Making Sense of the Noise and Directions Forward
Update on Prostate Cancer: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Making Sense of the Noise and Directions Forward 33 rd Annual Internal Medicine Update December 5, 2015 Ryan C. Hedgepeth, MD, MS Chief of
More informationProstate Cancer Screening in Taiwan: a must
Prostate Cancer Screening in Taiwan: a must 吳 俊 德 基 隆 長 庚 醫 院 台 灣 醫 學 會 105 th What is the PSA test? The blood level of PSA is often elevated in men with prostate cancer, and the PSA test was originally
More informationCancer Screening. Robert L. Robinson, MD, MS. Ambulatory Conference SIU School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine.
Cancer Screening Robert L. Robinson, MD, MS Ambulatory Conference SIU School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine March 13, 2003 Why screen for cancer? Early diagnosis often has a favorable prognosis
More informationProstate Cancer Screening. Dr. J. McCracken, Urologist
Prostate Cancer Screening Dr. J. McCracken, Urologist USPSTF Lifetime risk for diagnosis currently estimated at 15.9% Llifetime risk of dying of prostate cancer is 2.8% Seventy percent of deaths due to
More informationPROSTATE CANCER SCREENING PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING
3:45 4:45pm Screening Guidelines for Men's Health SPEAKER Radha Rao, MD Presenter Disclosure Information The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Radha Rao, MD: No financial relationships
More information7. Prostate cancer in PSA relapse
7. Prostate cancer in PSA relapse A patient with prostate cancer in PSA relapse is one who, having received a primary treatment with intent to cure, has a raised PSA (prostate-specific antigen) level defined
More informationThe 4Kscore blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer
The 4Kscore blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer Prostate cancer tests When to use the 4Kscore Test? Screening Prior to 1 st biopsy Prior to negative previous biopsy Prognosis in Gleason 6
More informationProstate-Specific Antigen Based Screening: Controversy and Guidelines
Prostate-Specific Antigen Based Screening: Controversy and Guidelines Eric H. Kim and Gerald L. Andriole Institutional Address: Washington University School of Medicine 4960 Children's Place Campus Box
More informationOveruse of PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer in Older Men. Elizabeth Jaramillo, MD January 17, 2014
Overuse of PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer in Older Men Elizabeth Jaramillo, MD January 17, 2014 Screening Prostate cancer screening occurs in patients with no clinical sign or suspicion of disease Screening
More informationPSA screening in asymptomatic men the debate continues www.bpac.org.nz keyword: psa
PSA screening in asymptomatic men the debate continues www.bpac.org.nz keyword: psa Key messages: PSA is present in the benign and malignant prostate There is currently no national screening programme
More informationDECISION AID TOOL PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING WITH PSA TESTING
DECISION AID TOOL PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING WITH PSA TESTING This booklet is what is often called a decision aid. The goals of a decision aid are to help people better understand their medical choices
More informationThomas A. Kollmorgen, M.D. Oregon Urology Institute
Thomas A. Kollmorgen, M.D. Oregon Urology Institute None 240,000 new diagnosis per year, and an estimated 28,100 deaths (2012) 2 nd leading cause of death from cancer in U.S.A. Approximately 1 in 6 men
More informationPSA Testing 101. Stanley H. Weiss, MD. Professor, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School. Director & PI, Essex County Cancer Coalition. weiss@umdnj.
PSA Testing 101 Stanley H. Weiss, MD Professor, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School Director & PI, Essex County Cancer Coalition weiss@umdnj.edu September 23, 2010 Screening: 3 tests for PCa A good screening
More informationAnalysis of Prostate Cancer at Easter Connecticut Health Network Using Cancer Registry Data
The 2014 Cancer Program Annual Public Reporting of Outcomes/Annual Site Analysis Statistical Data from 2013 More than 70 percent of all newly diagnosed cancer patients are treated in the more than 1,500
More informationSaving healthcare costs by implementing new genetic risk tests for early detection of cancer and prevention of cardiovascular diseases
Saving healthcare costs by implementing new genetic risk tests for early detection of cancer and prevention of cardiovascular diseases Jeff Gulcher, MD PhD Chief Scientific Officer and co-founder decode
More informationEstablishing a Cohort of African-American Men to Validate a Method for using Serial PSA Measures to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancers
Establishing a Cohort of African-American Men to Validate a Method for using Serial PSA Measures to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancers James R. Hebert, Sc.D., Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
More informationProstate Cancer Screening Report and Recommendations
Working together to improve health care quality, outcomes, and affordability in Washington State. Prostate Cancer Screening Report and Recommendations September 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary...
More informationThe PSA Controversy: Defining It, Discussing It, and Coping With It
The PSA Controversy: Defining It, Discussing It, and Coping With It 11 TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEN S HEALTH June 12, 2013 The PSA Controversy Defining It, Discussing It and Coping With It As of May 2012,
More informationPCa Commentary. Volume 73 January-February 2012 PSA AND TREATMENT DECISIONS:
1101 Madison Street Suite 1101 Seattle, WA 98104 P 206-215-2480 www.seattleprostate.com PCa Commentary Volume 73 January-February 2012 CONTENTS PSA SCREENING & BASIC SCIENCE PSA AND TREATMENT 1 DECISIONS
More informationNovember 25, 2015. Albert L Siu, MD, MSPH Chair, US Preventive Services Task Force 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A Rockville, MD 20857
November 25, 2015 Men's Health Network P. O. Box 75972 Washington, D.C. 20013 202-543-MHN-1 (6461) Fax 202-543-2727 Albert L Siu, MD, MSPH Chair, US Preventive Services Task Force 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail
More informationPSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Information for Care Providers
All men should know they are having a PSA test and be informed of the implications prior to testing. This booklet was created to help primary care providers offer men information about the risks and benefits
More informationScreening for Prostate Cancer
Screening for Prostate Cancer Review against programme appraisal criteria for the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) Version 1: This document summarises the work of ScHARR 1 2 and places it against
More informationClinical Indicator Ages 19-29 Ages 30-39 Ages 40-49 Ages 50-64 Ages 65+ Frequency of visit as recommended by PCP
SCREENING EXAMINATION & COUNSELING UPMC Health Plan Clinical Indicator Ages 19-29 Ages 30-39 Ages 40-49 Ages 50-64 Ages 65+ Annually Physical Exam and Counseling 1 Blood Pressure 2 At each visit. At least
More informationBreast Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries A Framework To Choose Screening Strategies
Breast Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries A Framework To Choose Screening Strategies Richard Wender, MD Session code: www.worldcancercongress.org A Five Step Framework to Guide Screening
More information2010 SITE REPORT St. Joseph Hospital PROSTATE CANCER
2010 SITE REPORT St. Joseph Hospital PROSTATE CANCER Humboldt County is located on the Redwood Coast of Northern California. U.S census data for 2010 reports county population at 134,623, an increase of
More informationBeyond the PSA: Genomic Testing in Localized Prostate Cancer
Beyond the PSA: Genomic Testing in Localized Prostate Cancer Kelvin A. Moses, MD, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Wednesday, December 2, 2015 5:00 p.m. ET/2:00 p.m. PT About ZERO ZERO s mission
More informationInferences for the Lead Time in Breast Cancer Screening Trials under a Stable Disease Model
Cancers 0, 3, 3-40; doi:0.3390/cancers303 Article OPEN ACCESS cancers ISSN 07-6694 www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Inferences for the Lead Time in Breast Cancer Screening Trials under a Stable Disease Model
More informationExamples of good screening tests include: mammography for breast cancer screening and Pap smears for cervical cancer screening.
CANCER SCREENING Dr. Tracy Sexton (updated July 2010) What is screening? Screening is the identification of asymptomatic disease or risk factors by history taking, physical examination, laboratory tests
More information1. What is the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test?
1. What is the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test? Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a protein produced by the cells of the prostate gland. The PSA test measures the level of PSA in the blood. The doctor
More informationColorado Cancer Coalition Priorities: 2016 2018
Option 3 of 10: Screening & Early Detection: Screening Rates Presenter: Toni Panetta, MA, Director of Mission Programs, Susan G. Komen Colorado Goal 5: Objective 5.1: Objective 5.2 Focus Area: Focus Area:
More informationU.S. Preventive Services Task Force
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Prostate Cancer: Recommendation Statement See related Putting Prevention into Practice on page 283. This summary is one in a series excerpted from the
More informationProstate Cancer Patients Report on Benefits of Proton Therapy
Prostate Cancer Patients Report on Benefits of Proton Therapy Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC Vienna, VA 703.260.1760 www.dobsondavanzo.com Prostate Cancer Patients Report on Benefits of Proton Therapy
More informationSee also: Web-Only CME quiz
Guidance Statements Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Guidance Statement From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA; Michael J. Barry, MD; Thomas
More informationProstate Cancer 2014
Prostate Cancer 2014 Eric A. Klein, M.D. Chairman Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine Incidence rates, US Men Mortality Rates, US Men
More informationMeasures of Prognosis. Sukon Kanchanaraksa, PhD Johns Hopkins University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationHEALTH NEWS PROSTATE CANCER THE PROSTATE
HEALTH NEWS PROSTATE CANCER THE PROSTATE Prostate comes from the Greek meaning to stand in front of ; this is very different than prostrate which means to lie down flat. The prostate is a walnut-sized
More informationProstate cancer. Christopher Eden. The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford & The Hampshire Clinic, Old Basing.
Prostate cancer Christopher Eden The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford & The Hampshire Clinic, Old Basing. Screening Screening men for PCa (prostate cancer) using PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen blood
More informationHow To Decide If You Should Get A Mammogram
American Medical Women s Association Position Paper on Principals of Breast Cancer Screening Breast cancer affects one woman in eight in the United States and is the most common cancer diagnosed in women
More informationSTATEMENT ON ESTIMATING THE MORTALITY BURDEN OF PARTICULATE AIR POLLUTION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL
COMMITTEE ON THE MEDICAL EFFECTS OF AIR POLLUTANTS STATEMENT ON ESTIMATING THE MORTALITY BURDEN OF PARTICULATE AIR POLLUTION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL SUMMARY 1. COMEAP's report 1 on the effects of long-term
More informationThe 4Kscore blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer
The 4Kscore blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer Early detection of aggressive prostate cancer Challenges Serum PSA has a high false positive rate Over 1 million prostate biopsies performed
More informationProstate cancer screening. It s YOUR decision!
Prostate cancer screening It s YOUR decision! For many years now, a test has been available to screen for. The test is called the prostate-specific antigen blood test (or PSA test). It is used in combination
More informationThe PSA Test for Prostate Cancer Screening:
For more information, please contact your local VA Medical Center or Health Clinic. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Patient Care Services Health Promotion and Disease
More informationPreventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Low Risk Adults Age 18 through 64
Preventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Low Risk Adults Age 18 through 64 1. BMI - Documented in patients medical record on an annual basis. Screen for obesity and offer intensive counseling and behavioral
More informationGleason Score. Oncotype DX GPS. identified for. about surveillance. time to get sophisticated
patient: MARK SMITH PSA 6.2 Gleason Score 6 Oncotype DX GPS 8 identified for active surveillance time to get sophisticated about surveillance Accurate prediction of prostate cancer risk is needed at the
More informationTheories on Metastasis: Innovative Thinking An Advocacy Perspective
Theories on Metastasis: Innovative Thinking An Advocacy Perspective Project LEAD Workshop NBCC Annual Advocacy Conference 2011 Musa Mayer AdvancedBC.org 1 The Big Question If we want to end death from
More informationProstate Cancer. Screening and Diagnosis. Screening. Pardeep Kumar Consultant Urological Surgeon
The Royal Marsden Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Pardeep Kumar Consultant Urological Surgeon Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnosis 08 02 2013 2 Screening 1 3 Q1.Lots of men have prostate cancer
More informationPreventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Elderly Patients Age 65 and Over
Preventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Elderly Patients Age 65 and Over 1. BMI - Documented in patients medical record on an annual basis up to age 74. Screen for obesity and offer counseling to encourage
More informationSubmitted Electronically. United State Preventive Services Taskforce Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850
Submitted Electronically United State Preventive Services Taskforce Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 Re: Draft USPSTF Recommendations on Breast Cancer Screening
More informationClinical Trials and Screening: What You Need to Know
Scan for mobile link. Clinical Trials and Screening: What You Need to Know What is a Clinical Trial? At A Glance A clinical trial is a research study that tests how well new medical techniques work in
More informationProstate cancer screening: clinical applications and challenges
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 22 (2004) 353 357 Seminar article Prostate cancer screening: clinical applications and challenges Otis W. Brawley, M.D.* Winship Cancer Institute,
More informationProstate Cancer Screening Guideline
Prostate Cancer Screening Guideline Contents Prevention 2 Screening Recommendations 2 Shared Decision Making 2 Test Recommendations 3 Follow-up/Referral 3 Treatment Overview 4 Evidence Summary 4 References
More informationThere are many different types of cancer and sometimes cancer is diagnosed when in fact you are not suffering from the disease at all.
About Cancer Cancer is a disease where there is a disturbance in the normal pattern of cell replacement. The cells mutate and become abnormal or grow uncontrollably. Not all tumours are cancerous (i.e.
More informationOncology Annual Report: Prostate Cancer 2005 Update By: John Konefal, MD, Radiation Oncology
Oncology Annual Report: Prostate Cancer 25 Update By: John Konefal, MD, Radiation Oncology Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, with 232,9 new cases projected to be diagnosed in the U.S. in
More informationBreast Cancer Pathway
Breast Cancer Pathway Risk Stratified Follow Up Dr Dorothy Goddard, Associate Medical Director for Cancer Macmillan Consultant Medical Advisor Survivorship What is risk stratified follow up? Refers to
More informationWhat the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Missed in Its Prostate Cancer Screening Recommendation
In the Balance 201207170 M12-0991 open early What the USPSTF Missed in Its Prostate Cancer Screening Recommendation What the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Missed in Its Prostate Cancer Screening
More informationBiostatistics and Epidemiology within the Paradigm of Public Health. Sukon Kanchanaraksa, PhD Marie Diener-West, PhD Johns Hopkins University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationPre test Question 2. Emily D. Babcock, DHSc, PA C, DFAAPA CAPA Annual Conference Palm Springs, California October 4, 2013
Emily D. Babcock, DHSc, PA C, DFAAPA CAPA Annual Conference Palm Springs, California October 4, 2013 Objectives After completion of this presentation, the participant will be able to: Explain the current
More informationAn Introduction to PROSTATE CANCER
An Introduction to PROSTATE CANCER Being diagnosed with prostate cancer can be a life-altering experience. It requires making some very difficult decisions about treatments that can affect not only the
More informationUpdate on Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines
www.medscape.com Update on Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines Christine Gonzalez, PharmD, CHHC US Pharmacist Abstract and Introduction Introduction In the United States, prostate cancer is the most common
More informationANNEX 2: Assessment of the 7 points agreed by WATCH as meriting attention (cover paper, paragraph 9, bullet points) by Andy Darnton, HSE
ANNEX 2: Assessment of the 7 points agreed by WATCH as meriting attention (cover paper, paragraph 9, bullet points) by Andy Darnton, HSE The 7 issues to be addressed outlined in paragraph 9 of the cover
More informationVirtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2011, Volume 13, Number 1: 10-15.
Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2011, Volume 13, Number 1: 10-15. CLINICAL CASE The Debate Over Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines Commentary by Karen E. Hoffman,
More informationThe U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) makes
Annals of Internal Medicine Clinical Guidelines Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* Description: Update of the
More informationPSA Test Provides the Early Prostate Cancer Detection That Has Saved the Life of Thousands of Men
PSA Test Provides the Early Prostate Cancer Detection That Has Saved the Life of Thousands of Men Table of Contents 1. What the research shows on the effectiveness of the PSA test p. 2 2. PSA test guidelines
More informationWisconsin Cancer Data Bulletin Wisconsin Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Office of Health Informatics
Wisconsin Cancer Data Bulletin Wisconsin Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Office of Health Informatics In Situ Breast Cancer in Wisconsin INTRODUCTION This bulletin provides information
More informationBreast Cancer Screening 101:
Breast Cancer Screening 101: Screening Guidelines and Imaging Modalities Robert Smith, PhD American Cancer Society Cheryl Herman, MD NAPBC Education Committee November 23, 2015 Webinar Topics - Burden
More informationDraft Clinical Practice Guidelines. PSA Testing and Early Management of Test-Detected Prostate Cancer
Draft Clinical Practice Guidelines PSA Testing and Early Management of Test-Detected Prostate Cancer Draft November 2014 Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia and Cancer Council Australia ISBN: This
More informationSRO Tutorial: Prostate Cancer Treatment Options
SRO Tutorial: Prostate Cancer Treatment Options May 7th, 2010 Daniel M. Aebersold Klinik und Poliklinik für Radio-Onkologie Universität Bern, Inselspital Is cure necessary in those in whom it may be possible,
More informationEarly Prostate Cancer: Questions and Answers. Key Points
CANCER FACTS N a t i o n a l C a n c e r I n s t i t u t e N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e s o f H e a l t h D e p a r t m e n t o f H e a l t h a n d H u m a n S e r v i c e s Early Prostate Cancer:
More informationEarly detection through mammography. Early breast cancer detection improved chances of recovery
Early detection through mammography Early breast cancer detection improved chances of recovery Contents 03 Experts recommend breast screening (mammography) 04 What is mammogram? 05 What is screening? What
More informationBREAST CANCER AWARENESS FOR WOMEN AND MEN by Samar Ali A. Kader. Two years ago, I was working as a bedside nurse. One of my colleagues felt
Ali A. Kader, S. (2010). Breast cancer awareness for women and men. UCQ Nursing Journal of Academic Writing, Winter 2010, 70 76. BREAST CANCER AWARENESS FOR WOMEN AND MEN by Samar Ali A. Kader Two years
More informationLow-dose CT Imaging. Edgar Fearnow, M.D. Section Chief, Computed Tomography, Lancaster General Hospital
Lung Cancer Screening with Low-dose CT Imaging Edgar Fearnow, M.D. Section Chief, Computed Tomography, Lancaster General Hospital Despite recent declines in the incidence of lung cancer related to the
More informationCancer Prevention and Screening Hong Kong Perspective Professor TH LAM
Cancer Prevention and Screening Hong Kong Perspective Professor TH LAM Chairman, Cancer Expert Working Group on Prevention and Screening Chair Professor of Community Medicine, School of Public Health,
More informationLung Cancer Screening
Lung Cancer Screening Middlesex Hospital Total Lung Care Center Megin Iaccarino RN, BSN Lung Pathway Coordinator and Lung Nurse Navigator Middlesex Hospital Cancer Center and Surgical Alliance Lung Screening
More informationAn Empirical Evaluation of Guidelines on Prostate-specific Antigen Velocity in Prostate Cancer Detection
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr028 ARTICLE JNCI djr028 MA JOURNAL NAME Art. No. CE Code The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
More informationThe Minnesota Chlamydia Strategy: Action Plan to Reduce and Prevent Chlamydia in Minnesota Minnesota Chlamydia Partnership, April 2011
The Minnesota Chlamydia Strategy: Action Plan to Reduce and Prevent Chlamydia in Minnesota Minnesota Chlamydia Partnership, April 2011 Section 5: Screening, Treating and Reporting Chlamydia While the information
More informationOpportunities for advancing biomarkers for patient stratification and early diagnosis in liver disease
Opportunities for advancing biomarkers for patient stratification and early diagnosis in liver disease 80 Liver Disease and Obesity Liver disease biomarkers: Percent of adult population (United States)
More informationA New Biomarker in Prostate Cancer Care: Oncotype Dx. David M Albala, MD Chief of Urology Crouse Hospital Syracuse, NY
A New Biomarker in Prostate Cancer Care: Oncotype Dx David M Albala, MD Chief of Urology Crouse Hospital Syracuse, NY Learning Objectives Review the current challenges in the prediction and prognosis of
More information