Teaching quality KIMEP-wide
|
|
- Alexander Hunt
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research Teaching quality KIMEP-wide Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 REPORT Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research KIMEP, 2011
2 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Regular FTES * 2011 was conducted during April following the standard format: online mode, voluntary approach, standard 15-item instrument. Teaching quality assessment Teaching quality at KIMEP is assessed by students with 4.37 points out of the maximum Assessments of academic units vary in ranges 7 (LC) (BCB). Assessing the various aspects of teaching process, students most frequently express the agreement ( strongly agree and agree ) with positive statements of questionnaire % of cases. Preparedness for classes, Ability to spend time on relevant issues and Clarity of course requirements are identified as the most strong aspects of teaching process: 2, 4.44 and 4.43 correspondingly. These are the traditional points of students appreciation since Faculty s ability to stimulate interest in the subject, Relevance of session materials to local environment and Helpfulness of texts and other materials are appreciated relatively less: 4.22; 4.39 and 4.37 accordingly, which is also traditional trend of assessment since Students willingness to recommend the courses and faculty members to friends is expressed with grades 4.34 and Teaching quality dynamics during KIMEP-wide: Overall level of students satisfaction has risen from 4.27 in 2007 to 4.37 in 2011 with the period of stagnation from 2008 till 2010 (~ ). Strengths and weaknesses of teaching quality, traditionally identified by students during the observed period, completely coincide with those indicated in the current semester. By separate departments/areas: LC and PS&IR demonstrate steady growth trajectories of teaching quality assessment with peak results in 2011 Econ, Fin, MM and PA face changeable growth of teaching evaluations with peak results in 2008 or 2009; their 2011 grades are higher than 2007 ones OMIS, SGE and SL grades peaked in 2010 and have since remained at the same level or slowly declined Acc and Journ underwent several increases and decreases of student satisfaction; their 2011 grades are lower than 2007 ones. By academic ranks of faculty members: Professorial courses, mostly evaluated by senior undergraduates and masters, reflect the continuous improvement of teaching quality. Lecturers courses, assessed mostly by undergraduates, receive evaluations that form a changeable growth trajectory (total amplitude = 0.15). Scores fluctuation could reflect the changes in faculty composition, list of courses offered as well as respondents subjectivity due to their age and attitude. Instructors are mostly evaluated by freshmen, taking LC and SGE courses. Their grades follow a changeable trajectory (total amplitude = 0.27). Taking into consideration the relative stability of LC and SGE curriculum and faculty composition, the changeable assessment could be mostly attributed to subjectivity of respondents opinion due to the lack of learning experience at KIMEP. Resume Analysis of teaching quality dynamics during the last four years allows suggesting the following ways to further improve KIMEP academic services to students: - identifying the reasons of decline in KIMEP s strongest teaching quality faculty preparedness for classes - providing faculty members with professional development opportunities in the sphere of teaching methods and student psychology - continuing work on improving the teaching materials with regard to general helpfulness and applicability to Kazakhstani environment - clarifying the reasons that cause fluctuations in student satisfaction with the teaching process in separate departments/areas. * Please, kindly consider the list of abbreviations on the next page.
3 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 ABBREVIATIONS Acc AY BCB CISC CSS Econ Fin FTES Journ KSA LC LCD MM OMIS PA PS&IR QAIR SGE SL SQL VPAA Area of Accounting, Bang College of Business Academic year Bang College of Business Computer and Information Systems Center College of Social Sciences Department of Economics, College of Social Sciences Area of Finance, Bang College of Business Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey Department of International Journalism and Mass Communications, College of Social Sciences KIMEP Students Association Language Center Liquid Crystal Display Area of Management and Marketing, Bang College of Business Area of Operations Management and Information Systems, Bang College of Business Department of Public Administration, College of Social Sciences Department of Political Science and International Relations, College of Social Sciences Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research School of General Education School of Law Structured Query Language Vice President of Academic Affairs Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research
4 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 CONTENT Management summary Abbreviations Background 3 Purpose 3 Technique 3 Data treatment 3 Results presentation 3 Survey results 3 Response statistics 3 Unit s results overview 3 CSS results overview by departments 4 Comparison of FTES results, Purpose 7 Results 7 - KIMEP-wide 7 - By departments/areas 7 - By academic ranks of faculty member 8 Resume 9 Attachment 1: Questionnaire 16 Attachment 2: FTES results: tables 17 Attachment 3: FTES results, F2007-S2011: tables 18 Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 2
5 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Background Purpose. FTES is conducted on semestrial basis to measure the quality of teaching at the Institute s level by retrieving students opinion on the instructional effectiveness, quality of teaching and learning experience for every subject they are enrolled. Technique. Standard approach: voluntary, online mode, 3-section instrument approved in 2007 (att. 1). Questionnaire access links at KIMEP website: Summer 1 registration page, main page banner, U-mail, and L-drive. The survey schedule (April 11 24) avoids interference with final exams session. To cover intensive courses of LC and SGE, an additional survey is conducted on February 16 22, The information campaign employs regular channels: banners, posters, s, LCD presentations, website announcements, class announcements by KSA members, and info items in social networks. Also, this semester students of Introduction to PR course have produced survey promo video with participation of the key figures of the Institute s community: VPAA, faculty members and KSA. This input is made under the guidance of Dr. Kozhamkulova in cooperation with QAIR team. Data treatment. The CISC renders technical support in data gathering and treatment. Student inputs are stored in SQL server to be further processed and used for analysis. Results presentation. The results were made accessible to faculty and academic management via Intranet upon the submission of all final grades to the Registrar s Office by faculty members (May 20, 2011). Since 2010, Intranet reports include total quality indexes calculated as a product of the average faculty grade (quality index 1 ) and share of student registrations (quantity index 2 ). Survey results Response statistics The KIMEP-wide response rate comprises 30.58% of total number of student/course registrations: out of The response rates by units lie between ~25% (SL) and ~32% (LC and BCB; table A). Table A. Response rate: KIMEP-wide and by units Units BCB CSS Econ Journ PS&IR PA LC SGE SL KIMEP Data # of student registrations # of student responses Response rate out of student registrations, % In general, the distribution of responses by units reflects the composition of the enrolled student body. Thus, the answers of BCB students present the majority of responses (~47%), followed by students of SGE and CSS courses (~28% and ~14% accordingly; graph 1). Among the evaluations of CSS courses, the courses of PA respondents are prevailing (~35%; graph 2). Units results overview The KIMEP overall assessment comprises 4.37 points out of 5.00 (share of answer strongly agree with questionnaire s positive statements comprises ~64% of all answers). Overall grades of different units also show relatively high satisfaction level: 4.32 (BCB) - 7 (LC; graphs 3-4). In general, students evaluate Faculty, Class sessions and Course (3 instrument s sections) with high grades: 4.36, 4.41 and 4.39 out of 5.00 accordingly. Across the units, LC is evaluated with maximum grades (7-4.6), and BCB with relative minimums ( ; graph 5). 1 Quality index - weighed average calculated according to standard formula. 2 Quantity index the ratio of student registrations in all courses of a faculty member to the total number of student registrations in corresponding academic unit. Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 3
6 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 By separate aspects of teaching process, respondents identify the following stronger and weaker points (graphs 6-8): Faculty s preparedness for each class (Q1), their ability to spend time on relevant issues (Q10) and the clarity of course requirements from the start of semester (Q11) are assessed with higher grades. Faculty ability to stimulate interest in subject (Q3), relevance of session materials to local environment (Q9) and helpfulness of texts and other course materials (Q12) are evaluated with relatively lower scores. The above trend (most and least appreciated items) has been continuously reflected in FTES results since the latest changes in survey instrument ( 2007). Following exceptions are presented by 2011 LC and SL students: in their opinion, the clarity of session objectives compared with the relevance of session materials is the weaker aspect (Qs 8-9). Also, LC students consider helpfulness of texts/materials as the strong point, and assignments contribution to learning as the weak one (Qs12-13; graphs 6-8). Generally, the students are willing to recommend KIMEP courses and faculty (Qs 14-15): 4.34 and 4.31 correspondingly. By units, they mostly recommend the courses and faculty of LC and SL. Courses of SGE and faculty of BCB are recommended the least (graph 10). CSS results overview by departments Within the CSS, PS&IR department was evaluated most highly (4.61), while Econ department got the lowest assessment (4.31; graph 3). By accessing the Faculty, Class session and Course, CSS students mostly follow the KIMEP-wide trends. Few exceptions are presented by evaluations of Journ and PS&IR departments (graph 11): Journ students highly appreciate ability of faculty members to encourage questions and class participation (Q4) and relevance of session materials to local environment (Q9). They are least satisfied with class sessions being spent on relevant issues (Q10) and assignments contribution to learning (Q13). PS&IR respondents are most satisfied with assignments contribution to learning (Q13) and least with faculty s ability to provide helpful feedback on assignments (Q6). Graph 1. Responses composition by units source: table A, p.3 SGE 27.56% SL 2.89% BCB 47.11% Graph 2. CSS responses composition by department source: table A, p.3 PA 34.80% Econ 30.54% LC 8.14% CSS 14.30% PS&IR 21.32% IJMC 13.34% Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 4
7 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 3. Overall evaluation source: att. 2, table BCB CSS LC SGE SL KIMEP Graph 4. Distribution of ratings by units source: att. 2, table 2 100% strongly agree 4 - agree 3 - neutral 0% BCB CSS LC SGE SL KIMEP 2 - disagree 1 - strongly disagree Graph 5. Evaluation in sections Faculty, Class sessions and Course source: att. 2, table 1 BCB CSS LC SGE SL KIMEP Faculty Class sessions Course Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 5
8 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 6. Evaluation in individual questions, section Faculty source: att. 2, table 1 KIMEP 4.65 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 SL BCB Q5 Q6 Q7 0 SGE CSS LC Graph 7. Evaluation in individual questions, Graph 8. Evaluation in individual questions, section Class sessions section Course source: att. 2, table 1 source: att. 2, table 1 SL KIMEP 4.60 BCB Q8 Q9 Q10 SL KIMEP 4.63 BCB Q11 Q12 Q SGE CSS SGE CSS LC LC Graph 9. Evaluation in questions 14. I would recommend this course and 15. I would recommend this faculty member source: att. 2, table 1 BCB CSS LC SGE SL KIMEP Recommend this course Recommend this faculty member Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 6
9 Graph 10. Overall evaluations of CSS departments source: att. 2, table Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Econ Journ PS&IR PA Graph 11. Evaluation of CSS departments in individual questions source: att. 2, table Econ Journ PS&IR PA 4.43 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Faculty Class sessions Course Summary questions Comparison of FTES results, Purpose: to identify general tendencies in teaching quality dynamics since 2007 (last revision of questionnaire). Results KIMEP-wide overall satisfaction with teaching quality has increased from 4.27 in 2007 to 4.37 in 2011 with the period of stagnation ( ), with grades within ranges (graph 12). Rise in evaluation is observed with regard to all aspects of teaching process, except for faculty s preparedness for classes (Q1): it dropped by 0.13 points in 2008 and, despite following increases, hasn t yet reached the level of 2007 (graph 13). During the analyzed period, same strengths and weaknesses have been continuously identified by students (graphs 13): - Faculty s preparedness for classes, Class time spent on relevant issues, and Clarity of course requirements form the stable quality pillars. - Faculty s ability to stimulate interest, Relevance of session materials to local environment, and Helpfulness of textbooks/course materials are the traditional areas of lower satisfaction. By departments/areas The analysis of 8-semeters evaluations of teaching by separate departments/areas allow distinguishing four types of quality dynamics (graphs 14-17): - Steady growth LC and PS&IR: by 2011 grades reached the highest levels since Growth trajectories are relatively smooth with no significant decreases. - Changeable growth Econ, Fin, MM and PA: 2011 grades are higher than 2007 ones. The peak performance is demonstrated in 2008 or Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 7
10 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, Stalled growth OMIS, SGE and SL: grades reached the peak by 2010 and since then have remained at the same level (SL) or slowly declined (OMIS, SGE). - Lowering evaluations Acc and Journ: by 2011 grades became lower than in During the period there were several noticeable fluctuations of students satisfaction. By academic ranks of faculty members Overview of teaching quality dynamics by separate ranks faculty professors, lecturers and instructors shows some rank-specific peculiarities (graph 18) 1. Professorial courses are mostly evaluated by senior undergraduates and masters. Students satisfaction with their performance has been steadily increasing during the 8 semesters (total amplitude = 0.28) grades are higher than 2007 ones (+0.27 points). This may reflect the continuous improvement of teaching quality. Lecturers courses, assessed mostly by undergraduates (freshmen to seniors), receive evaluations that form a changeable growth trajectory (total amplitude = 0.15). The peak grades were assigned between s and the bottom ones - between grades are close to 2007 ones (+0.01 points). Scores fluctuation could be the result of changes in faculty composition, list of courses offered and, to some degree, respondents subjectivity due to their age and attitude. Instructors are mostly evaluated by freshmen, taking LC and SGE courses. Similar to lecturers evaluations, their grades follow a changeable trajectory (total amplitude = 0.27). The highest results were achieved in AY and the lowest ones in AY grades are close to 2007 ones (+0.01 points). Taking into consideration the relative stability of LC and SGE curriculum and faculty composition, the changeable assessment could be mostly attributed to subjectivity of respondents opinion due to the lack of learning experience at KIMEP. In terms of strongest and weakest items of teaching performance, the evaluations of all ranks faculty are very close to the common KIMEP-wide trends mentioned earlier (p. 7; graphs 19-21). The distinctive features of each rank s evaluation are presented below. Professorial faculty (graph 19) - Faculty : gap between professors preparedness for classes (Q1) and their ability to stimulate students interest in the subject (Q3) has almost twice narrowed: from 0.69 points in 2007 to 0.32 points in Provision of helpful feedback on assignments (Q6) and clarity of explanation (Q2) are consistently indicated as the relatively weak qualities. - Class sessions : during the period, students appreciation for the least satisfactory item - relevance of materials to local environment (Q9) - has grown the most (0.32 points) compared to the rest of items. - Course : each semester respondents assess the helpfulness of study materials (Q12) and assignments contribution to learning (Q13) very closely (difference <=0.04 points). - Summary questions : gap between willingness to recommend courses (Q14) and faculty members (Q15) has gradually narrowed from in AY to 0.02 in AY Lecturers (graph 20) - Faculty : student satisfaction with preparedness for classes (Q1) has declined by 0.13 points from 2007 to Clarity of explanation (Q2), appreciated by students in AYs , has turned into one of the least satisfactory items in AYs Class sessions : students evaluation has risen with regard to relevance of materials to local environment (Q9; overall points), while assessment of the rest of section s aspects has decreased. - Course : the grade assigned to clarity of course requirements (Q11) lowered by 0.04 points from 2007 to 2011, while the scores of two other aspects have grown. 1 Calculation of ranks results was based on corresponding Faculty lists and excluded the courses taught by more than one faculty member. Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 8
11 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, Summary questions : in 2007 students were more willing to recommend faculty members (Q15) than courses (Q14). In the rest of the period, courses (Q14) are more strongly recommended than faculty members (Q15). Instructors (graph 21) - Faculty : over the period, evaluations declined with regard to two items - instructors preparedness for classes (Q1) and the clarity of explanation (Q2). Faculty accessibility outside the class (Q7) has increased the most (0.12 points). - Class sessions : appreciation for relevance of materials to local environment (Q9) has grown by 0.10 points satisfaction with other aspects is close to the 2007 level (±0.01 points). - Course : while evaluations of all aspects changed significantly within the observed period (both up and down), by the end of it they have almost returned to the 2007 level. - Summary questions : students willingness to recommend courses (Q14) and faculty members (Q15) at the end of discussed period was lower than at its beginning (by 0.09 and 0.07 points accordingly). Resume Analysis of teaching quality dynamics during the last four years allows suggesting the following ways to further improve KIMEP academic services to students: - identifying the reasons of decline in KIMEP s strongest teaching quality faculty preparedness for classes - providing faculty members with professional development opportunities in the sphere of teaching methods and student psychology - continuing work on improving the teaching materials with regard to general helpfulness and applicability to Kazakhstani environment - clarifying the reasons that cause fluctuations in student satisfaction with the teaching process in separate departments/areas. Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 9
12 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 12. KIMEP-wide teaching quality: overall grade dynamics, F2007-S2011 source: att. 3, table F2007 S2008 F2008 S2009 F2009 S2010 F2010 S2011 Graph 13. KIMEP-wide teaching quality: grade dynamics by questions, F2007-S2011 source: att. 3, table Faculty section Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Class session section Q8 Q9 Q Course section Summary questions Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 10
13 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 14. Teaching quality F2007-S2011: units with steady growth source: att. 3, table LC PS&IR Graph 15. Teaching quality F2007-S2011: units with changeable growth source: att. 3, table Econ Fin MM PA Graph 16. Teaching quality F2007-S2011: units with stalled growth source: att. 3, table OMIS SGE SL Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 11
14 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 17. Teaching quality F2007-S2011: units with lowering evaluations source: att. 3, table Acc Journ Graph 18. Teaching quality dynamics by faculty ranks, source: att. 3, table '07 '08 '08 '09 '09 '10 '10 '11 '07 '08 '08 '09 '09 '10 '10 '11 '07 '08 '08 '09 '09 '10 '10 '11 Professors Lecturers Instructors Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 12
15 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 19. Professorial teaching quality dynamics, source: att. 3, table 3 Faculty section Class session section Course section Summary questions 4.6 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q Legend Faculty Course Q1. Is prepared for each class Q11. Course requirements are made clear at the start of the course Q2. Explains concepts and ideas clearly Q12. Texts and other course materials are helpful Q3. Stimulates my interest in the subject Q13. Assignments contribute to my learning Q4. Encourages questions and class participation Q5. Evaluates work fairly Summary questions Q6. Provides helpful feedback on assignments Q14. I would recommend this course Q7. Is accessible outside the class Q15. I would recommend this faculty member Class sessions Q8. Session objectives are made clear at the start Q9. Sessions relate materials to local environment where appropriate Q10. Class time is spent on relevant issues Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 13
16 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 20. Lecturers teaching quality dynamics, source: att. 3, table 3 Faculty section Class session section Course section Summary questions 4.6 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q Legend Faculty Course Q1. Is prepared for each class Q11. Course requirements are made clear at the start of the course Q2. Explains concepts and ideas clearly Q12. Texts and other course materials are helpful Q3. Stimulates my interest in the subject Q13. Assignments contribute to my learning Q4. Encourages questions and class participation Q5. Evaluates work fairly Summary questions Q6. Provides helpful feedback on assignments Q14. I would recommend this course Q7. Is accessible outside the class Q15. I would recommend this faculty member Class sessions Q8. Session objectives are made clear at the start Q9. Sessions relate materials to local environment where appropriate Q10. Class time is spent on relevant issues Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 14
17 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Graph 21. Instructors teaching quality dynamics, source: att. 3, table 3 Faculty section Class session section Course section Summary questions 4.7 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 4.6 Q8 Q9 Q Q11 Q12 Q Q14 Q Legend Faculty Course Q1. Is prepared for each class Q11. Course requirements are made clear at the start of the course Q2. Explains concepts and ideas clearly Q12. Texts and other course materials are helpful Q3. Stimulates my interest in the subject Q13. Assignments contribute to my learning Q4. Encourages questions and class participation Q5. Evaluates work fairly Summary questions Q6. Provides helpful feedback on assignments Q14. I would recommend this course Q7. Is accessible outside the class Q15. I would recommend this faculty member Class sessions Q8. Session objectives are made clear at the start Q9. Sessions relate materials to local environment where appropriate Q10. Class time is spent on relevant issues Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 15
18 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Attachment 1 QUESIONNAIRE Dear Student, We kindly invite you to take part in regular Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey 2010, which is a critical tool to maintain and promote the quality of teaching at our Institute. As recognition grows in Kazakhstan and internationally of KIMEP as an institution educating tomorrow's leaders, your input and commitment to institute's development become critical to prove this good reputation. Take the lead with your education. Have your say. Please, note: your personal data will be treated strictly confidentially Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research will process and analyze the survey responses without the access to your individual information. Course Faculty member Faculty 1. Is prepared for each class 2. Explains concepts and ideas clearly 3. Stimulates my interest in the subject 4. Encourages questions and class participation 5. Evaluates work fairly 6. Provides helpful feedback on assignments 7. Is accessible outside the class Class Sessions 8. Session objectives are made clear at the start 9. Sessions relate materials to local environment where appropriate 10. Class time is spent on relevant issues Course 11. Course requirements are made clear at the start of the course 12. Texts and other course materials are helpful 13. Assignments contribute to my learning Summary Questions 14. I would recommend this course 15. I would recommend this faculty member Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly agree disagree Is there anything that you would like to tell us about your faculty member? Is there anything you want to tell us about the course or the class sessions? Thank you for you valuable contribution! Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 16
19 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Attachment 2 FTES RESULTS: TABLES Table 1. Assessment of KIMEP units Units BCB CSS Econ Journ PS&IR PA LC SGE SL KIMEP Survey results Section Faculty AVG Is prepared for each class StDev AVG Explains concepts and ideas clearly StDev AVG Stimulates my interest in the subject StDev AVG Encourages questions and class participation StDev AVG Evaluates work fairly StDev AVG Provides helpful feedback on assignments StDev AVG Is accessible outside the class StDev AVG Overall section grade StDev Section Class sessions AVG Session objectives are made clear at the start StDev Sessions relate materials to local environment AVG where appropriate StDev AVG Class time is spent on relevant issues StDev AVG Overall section grade StDev Section Course 11. Course requirements are made clear at the AVG start of the course StDev AVG Texts and other course materials are helpful StDev AVG Assignments contribute to my learning StDev AVG Overall section grade StDev Summary questions AVG I would recommend this course StDev AVG I would recommend this faculty member StDev AVG Overall weighed average grade StDev Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 17
20 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Table 2. Distribution of rating by units Units BCB CSS Econ Journ PS&IR PA LC SGE SL KIMEP Rating 5 Strongly Agree 4 Agree 3 Neutral 2 Disagree 1 Strongly Disagree Total # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Attachment 3 FTES RESULTS, F2007-S2011: TABLES Table 1. KIMEP-wide assessment, F2007-S2011 Semesters Survey results F2007 S2008 F2008 S2009 F2009 S2010 F2010 S2011 Section Faculty AVG Is prepared for each class StDev Explains concepts and ideas AVG clearly StDev Stimulates my interest in the AVG subject StDev Encourages questions and class AVG participation StDev AVG Evaluates work fairly StDev Provides helpful feedback on AVG assignments StDev AVG Is accessible outside the class StDev Section Class sessions 8. Session objectives are made AVG clear at the start StDev Sessions relate materials to local AVG environment where appropriate StDev Class time is spent on relevant AVG issues StDev Section Course 11. Course requirements are made AVG clear at the start of the course StDev Texts and other course AVG materials are helpful StDev Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 18
21 Report on KIMEP Faculty Teaching Evaluation Survey, 2011 Semesters Survey results F2007 S2008 F2008 S2009 F2009 S2010 F2010 S Assignments contribute to my AVG learning StDev Summary questions AVG I would recommend this course StDev I would recommend this AVG faculty member StDev Overall weighed average grade AVG StDev Table 2. Overall assessment of KIMEP units/areas, F2007-S2011 Unit Acc Fin MM OMIS SL Econ Journ PS&IR PA LC SGE KIMEP Semester Table 3. Teaching quality assessment by faculty academic ranks, F2007-S2011 Question Semester Professors Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Total Lecturers Instructors Department of Quality Assurance and Institutional Research 19
EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY. Assessment of Academic Achievement ANNUAL ASSESSMENT PLAN ACCOUNTING. Master of Science
EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY Assessment of Academic Achievement ANNUAL ASSESSMENT PLAN ACCOUNTING Master of Science Spring 2009 Assessment Plan for the Department of Accounting THE PROGRAM The Accounting program
More informationA Guide. to Assessment of Learning Outcomes. for ACEJMC Accreditation
A Guide to Assessment of Learning Outcomes for ACEJMC Accreditation Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications, 2012 This guide explains ACEJMC s expectations of an assessment
More informationProgram: Speech Pathology and Audiology B.S. Department: Speech Pathology and Audiology. Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 220
Program: Speech Pathology and Audiology B.S Department: Speech Pathology and Audiology Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 220 Faculty member completing template: Laureen O Hanlon
More informationCo-operative Education and Internship Handbook. Revised April 20, 2016
Co-operative Education and Internship Handbook Revised April 20, 2016 1 Form Originating Office: Vice President of Academic Affairs Revised April 20, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction...3 Bay College
More informationMUNDUS GRADUATE IMPACT SURVEY
NOVEMBER 2015 ERASMUS MUNDUS Graduate Impact Survey 1 / 29 REPORTED BY: DR. THOMAS KRÜGER AND KONRAD KLEIN, UZBONN 2 / 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 5 II METHODOLOGY 5 III RESULTS OF THE GRADUATE
More informationColorado Community College System SPRING 2010 STUDENT SURVEY SUMMARY
Colorado Community College System SPRING 2010 STUDENT SURVEY SUMMARY APRIL 2010 1 Colorado Community College System Spring 2010 Student Survey Summary In spring 2010, currently enrolled Colorado Community
More informationMeasuring Online Course Design: A Comparative Analysis
Internet Learning Volume 3 Issue 1 Spring 2014 Article 6 March 2014 Measuring Online Course Design: A Comparative Analysis Jiyu You The University of Toledo Sue Ann Hochberg The University of Toledo Phoebe
More informationGraduate Student Perceptions of the Use of Online Course Tools to Support Engagement
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Volume 8 Number 1 Article 5 January 2014 Graduate Student Perceptions of the Use of Online Course Tools to Support Engagement Stephanie
More informationstudents to complete their degree online. During the preliminary stage of included Art, Business, Computer Science, English, Government, History, and
Texas Woman s University College of Arts and Sciences Bachelor of General Studies Program Undergraduate Program Review May 2012 I. PROGRAM REVIEW AND MISSION A. History Texas Woman s University has a proud
More informationSubject Experience Survey Instrument Questions
Quality of Teaching and Learning - Subject Review Procedure SCHEDULE A Subject Experience Survey (SES) SCHEDULE Subject Experience Survey Instrument Questions The SES is structured so as to have a group
More informationWriting a degree project at Lund University student perspectives
1 Writing a degree project at Lund University student perspectives Summary This report summarises the results of a survey that focused on the students experiences of writing a degree project at Lund University.
More informationTEST-DRIVEN accountability is now the
Ten Big Effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on Public Schools The Center on Education Policy has been carefully monitoring the implementation of NCLB for four years. Now Mr. Jennings and Ms. Rentner
More informationStudent and Academic Support Services Assessment Information Packet
Student and Academic Support Services Assessment Information Packet Assessment Plan and Status Report Format for Student and Academic Support Services Review Schedule Examples of Assessment Activities
More informationWHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM REVISED SPRING 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Development And Evaluation Process: Tenure Track Faculty... 4 Overview Of Mentoring And Evaluation Process
More informationMaster of Business Administration
Master of Business Administration At Morehead State University, you will find much more than you might imagine. We are much more than college classes... much more engaged... much more personal. We deliver
More informationREQUEST TO COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE FOR CURRICULAR IMPROVEMENTS
REQUEST TO COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE FOR CURRICULAR IMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: MGMT PROPOSED EFFECTIVE SEMESTER: Fall 2014 COLLEGE: Business PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Academic Program Substantive Course Changes
More informationMaster of Business Administration
College of Business & Public Affairs 213D Bert Combs Building Phone: 606-783-2183 Fax: 606-783-5025 msu-mba@moreheadstate.edu www.moreheadstate.edu/mba MSU is an affirmative action, equal opportunity,
More informationInternational Baccalaureate
Preparation for International Baccalaureate Camdenton High School 2007-2008 Frequently Asked Questions Who should attempt to earn the IB Diploma? Students seeking the International Baccalaureate should
More informationASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ENHANCEMENT
ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ENHANCEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Table of Contents Outcomes Assessment... 3 Assessment Learning Cycle... 4 Creating assessment for Learning... 4 Nine Principles-Assessment
More informationSTUDENT SATISFACTION REPORT (STUDENT OPINION SURVEY) SPRING
STUDENT SATISFACTION REPORT (STUDENT OPINION SURVEY) SPRING 2008 LANE COLLEGE Prepared by: The Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness October 28, 2008 Executive Summary Lane College 2008 Student
More informationStudent Feedback on Online Summer Courses
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses October 8, 2015 Santa Clara University Office of Assessment Report Introduction In the summer of 2015, approximately 700 undergraduate students were enrolled in
More informationSample Satisfaction Surveys
Continuous Quality Improvement Tool Kit Sample Satisfaction Surveys Page 15 Emergency Services Satisfaction Survey [Organization] strives to treat all clients with dignity, respect and fairness. We also
More informationTeaching large lecture classes online: Reflections on engaging 200 students on Blackboard and Facebook
Teaching large lecture classes online: Reflections on engaging 200 students on Blackboard and Facebook By Marcus Messner, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, VCU School of Mass Communications VCU Online Learning
More informationIT Investment and Business Process Performance: Survey Questionnaire
IT Investment and Business Process Performance: Survey Questionnaire Thank you for participating in the study being conducted by the EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research (ECAR). This survey is a critical
More informationStudents perceptions of user stories
4 th WIETE Annual Conference on Engineering and Technology Education 2013 WIETE Cairns, Australia, 11-15 February 2013 Students perceptions of user stories V. Mahnic University of Ljubljana Ljubljana,
More informationThe Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs
Open Research Online The Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs Using LibQUAL+ R to Identify Commonalities in Customer Satisfaction: The Secret to Success? Journal
More informationFocusing on LMU s Undergraduate Learning Outcomes: Creative and Critical Thinking
Focusing on LMU s Undergraduate Learning Outcomes: Creative and Critical Thinking www.lmu.edu/about/services/academicplanning/assessment/university_assessment_reports.htm Loyola Marymount University is
More informationPresented at the 2014 Celebration of Teaching, University of Missouri (MU), May 20-22, 2014
Summary Report: A Comparison of Student Success in Undergraduate Online Classes and Traditional Lecture Classes at the University of Missouri Presented at the 2014 Celebration of Teaching, University of
More informationBusiness Process Reengineering (BPR) for Engineering Management (EM) Majors: Industry Perspective and Students Feedback
Business Process Reengineering (BPR) for Engineering Management (EM) Majors: Industry Perspective and Students Feedback Rashmi Jain, PhD Associate Professor Stevens Institute of Technology Rashmi.Jain@stevens.edu
More informationWhen I first tried written assignments in my large-enrollment classes,
Calibrated Peer Review Essays Increase Student Confidence in Assessing Their Own Writing By Lauren Likkel The online writing software Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) is a useful tool for assigning writing
More information1. Basic Information Course Code and Title: FN5202 Advanced Corporate Finance
Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research Bang College of Business (BCB) Fall Semester 2013 Course Syllabus for: FN5202 Advanced Corporate Finance 1. Basic Information Course
More informationProfessional Skills and Practices are assessed accordingly: Midterm Site Supervisor Assessment. Final Site Supervisor Assessment
Department of Counseling and Student Affairs Programs in Clinical Mental Health Counseling; Marriage, Couple, and Family Counseling; and School Counseling 2013/2014 Assessment Report Introduction Each
More informationLIU Jung-Ching, FUJIMOTO Takeshi, YOKOYAMA Kenji
Diploma Policy, Quality Assurance and Degree Accreditation System of Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University LIU Jung-Ching, FUJIMOTO Takeshi, YOKOYAMA Kenji Degrees from Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University
More informationAn Evaluation of the National Institute for School Leadership: Executive Development Program in Milwaukee Public Schools INTERIM REPORT YEAR TWO
An Evaluation of the National Institute for School Leadership: Executive Development Program in Milwaukee Public Schools INTERIM REPORT YEAR TWO Roisin P. Corcoran, Ph.D. Joseph M. Reilly Steven M. Ross,
More informationAssessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Undergraduate Program. Assessment Measures
Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Undergraduate Program Assessment Measures The Department of Psychology uses the following measures to assess departmental learning
More informationTOWARDS THE PATHWAYS VISION MODEL OF INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING. Michael S. Wilson, PhD, CPA, CGMA
TOWARDS THE PATHWAYS VISION MODEL OF INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING Michael S. Wilson, PhD, CPA, CGMA Associate Professor Metropolitan State University St Paul, MN 55106 Michael.wilson@metrostate.edu (612) 659-7279
More informationMASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH STUDENT MANUAL
MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE EXPERIENCE IN PUBLIC HEALTH BACH 5397 BIOS 5397 EOHS 5397 EPID 5397 HMAP 5397 PHED 5397 STUDENT MANUAL SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE
More informationJanuary 2014 Preliminary survey report: the skill needs of major Canadian employers
Preliminary survey report: the skill needs of major Canadian employers Preliminary survey report: the skill needs of major Canadian employers About the Initiative This document is one of a series of reports
More informationAnnual Assessment Report 2013 Department of Design
Annual Assessment Report 2013 Department of Design The Department of Design, within the College of Arts and Letters, offers a Bachelor of Arts in Photography and Interior Design, and a Bachelor of Science
More informationComparison of Student Performance in an Online with traditional Based Entry Level Engineering Course
Comparison of Student Performance in an Online with traditional Based Entry Level Engineering Course Ismail I. Orabi, Ph.D. Professor of Mechanical Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
More informationGreat Plains POD Conference, 6-2-07
Academic Service-Learning in a Research Methods Course: Using Student Work to Assess Course Goals Renee Michael Department of Psychology Rockhurst tuni University it Kansas City, Missouri What can be learned
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Financial Instrument Accounting Survey. CFA Institute Member Survey
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Financial Instrument Accounting Survey CFA Institute Member Survey November 2009 Contents 1. PREFACE... 3 1.1 Purpose of Survey... 3 1.2 Background...
More informationSession T1D Assessing Course Outcomes for a Freshman Engineering Computer Programming Course
Assessing Course Outcomes for a Freshman Engineering Computer Programming Course Robert Rabb, Monika Bubacz, Jason Howison, and Kevin Skenes The Citadel, rrabb@citadel.edu, mbubacz@citadel.edu, jhowison@citadel.edu,
More informationThe Export Import Bank of the United States Small Business Exporter Customer Survey Summary Results May 15, 2014
The Export Import Bank of the United States Small Business Exporter Customer Survey Summary Results May 15, 2014 1 To: From: Subject: Fred P. Hochberg, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
More informationThe Effects Of Unannounced Quizzes On Student Performance: Further Evidence Felix U. Kamuche, (E-mail: fkamuche@morehouse.edu), Morehouse College
The Effects Of Unannounced Quizzes On Student Performance: Further Evidence Felix U. Kamuche, (E-mail: fkamuche@morehouse.edu), Morehouse College ABSTRACT This study explores the impact of unannounced
More informationCourt Service Communication Strategy 2003-2006
Court Service Communication Strategy 2003-2006 0 A Communication Strategy for the Northern Ireland Court Service Contents Page Introduction 2 The Need 2 Theme 3 Purpose 4 Objectives 4 Baseline Measurement
More informationUsing PBL Assignments in Undergraduate Operations Management Course
Using PBL Assignments in Undergraduate Operations Management Course Bijayananda Naik The University of South Dakota Problem-based learning (PBL) assignments may be embedded within the traditional format
More informationINSTRUCTION AT FSU THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF DISTANCE LEARNING. A Guide to Teaching and Learning Practices
7th Edition Office of Distance Learning INSTRUCTION AT FSU A Guide to Teaching and Learning Practices Version 12.02.11 ODL/rg THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF DISTANCE LEARNING 7th Edition Office
More informationCOMPETENCY ACC LEVEL PCC LEVEL MCC LEVEL 1. Ethics and Standards
ICF CORE COMPETENCIES RATING LEVELS Adapted from the Minimum Skills Requirements documents for each credential level (Includes will-not-receive-passing-score criteria- gray background) COMPETENCY ACC LEVEL
More informationPurposes and Processes of Reading Comprehension
2 PIRLS Reading Purposes and Processes of Reading Comprehension PIRLS examines the processes of comprehension and the purposes for reading, however, they do not function in isolation from each other or
More informationArticle VII Sabbatical Program
Article VII Sabbatical Program General Information: MSU Faculty Sabbatical Program Section 1: Background and Purpose The purpose of Minot State University s Faculty Sabbatical Program is to renew and embolden
More informationTAXREP 01/16 (ICAEW REP 02/16)
TAXREP 01/16 (ICAEW REP 02/16) January 2016 ICAEW research survey: HMRC Customer Service Standards 2015 Results of the ICAEW 2015 research survey among ICAEW smaller agents about HMRC service standards.
More informationEvaluation of E-Learning Management Systems by Lecturers and Students in Ugandan Universities: A Case of Muni University
Evaluation of E-Learning Management Systems by Lecturers and Students in Ugandan Universities: A Case of Muni University Businge Phelix Mbabazi 1, Guma Ali 2 Lecturer, Department of Computer and Information
More informationUCLA Undergraduate Fully Online Course Approval Policy
Introduction The use of technology for instruction has been growing and innovative uses of online interaction have become more common. UCLA undergraduate students have responded well to these new learning
More informationPrior Learning Assessment 2012-2013
Prior Learning Assessment 2012-2013 Office of Academic Affairs Atlanta Metropolitan State College A Unit of the University System of Georgia Contents Preface... 2 Introduction... 3 CAEL Standards... 4
More informationHow U.S. News Calculated the 2015 Best Colleges Rankings
How U.S. News Calculated the 2015 Best Colleges Rankings Here's how you can make the most of the key college statistics. The U.S. News Best Colleges rankings can help prospective students and their families
More informationIACBE Annual Report For Academic Year: 2012-2013
IACBE Annual Report For Academic Year: 2012-2013 Mission of the School of Business: Student Learning Information for Accounting (BBA) Program Intended Student Learning Outcomes for the Accounting Program
More informationWeb Advisor Instructions Link to WebAdvisor through Sacred Heart Website by clicking on MYSHU Log In and Choose Faculty Point of Entry
Using Web Advisor How Do I Web Advisor Instructions Link to WebAdvisor through Sacred Heart Website by clicking on MYSHU Log In and Choose Faculty Point of Entry How do I view my course schedule From the
More informationWashback of IELTS on the Assumption College English Program
Washback of IELTS on the Assumption College English Program SUCHADA SANONGUTHAI Assumption College Thonburi, Thailand Bio Data: Suchada Sanonguthai, is the head of the English Program Academic Department
More informationWest Virginia Children and Families Funding Study
West Virginia Children and Families Funding Study Update and Report on Nine Year Trends in Public Expenditures FY 1999 through FY 2007 June, 2009 Supported By: Division of Criminal Justice Services / Department
More informationAdding a Section to a Single Component Course
Adding a Section to a Single Component Course This tutorial will explain how to Add a Section to a Single Component Course. Begin by clicking on Curriculum Management Schedule of Classes Maintain Schedule
More informationNoel- Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Results: Disaggregated by Undergraduate and Graduate
Noel- Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Results: Disaggregated by Undergraduate and Graduate Gallaudet University Spring 2015 Report December 18, 2015 Office of Institutional Research Gallaudet Student
More informationAssessing the Impact of a Tablet-PC-based Classroom Interaction System
STo appear in Proceedings of Workshop on the Impact of Pen-Based Technology on Education (WIPTE) 2008. Assessing the Impact of a Tablet-PC-based Classroom Interaction System Kimberle Koile David Singer
More informationDepartment of Management Information Systems Terry College of Business The University of Georgia. Major Assessment Plan (As of June 1, 2003)
Department of Management Information Systems Terry College of Business The University of Georgia Major Assessment Plan (As of June 1, 2003) Note to Readers: The MIS Faculty takes seriously our challenge
More informationAPPENDIX 16 MATH REDESIGN ABSTRACT. Cleveland State Community College DSPM Redesign Abstract
APPENDIX 16 MATH REDESIGN ABSTRACT DSPM Redesign Abstract is a two year institution in the Tennessee Board of Regents system with an annual enrollment of approximately 2100 FTE and 3100 headcount. Developmental
More informationUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Mechanical Engineering Department. 2005 ABET Program Outcome and Assessment
2005 ABET Program Outcome and Assessment 3. Program Outcomes and Assessment Program Outcomes We define our program educational outcomes as statements that describe what students are expected to be able
More informationProgram Review Document Department of Accounting
Program Review Document Department of Accounting A. Summarized Review of Degree Program Report 1. Mission, Centrality, and Uniqueness The mission of the Department of Accounting at Kansas State University
More informationUniversity Senate Task Force on Faculty Evaluations FINAL REPORT January 9, 2015
Task Force Members: Andrew Baker, Marketing (Fall) University Senate Task Force on Faculty Evaluations FINAL REPORT January 9, 2015 Marcie Bober-Michel, Learning Design and Technology (Senate Officer Representative)
More informationSociology Department Faculty Expectations Handbook For Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure
Sociology Department Faculty Expectations Handbook For Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure Department of Sociology Fayetteville State University Version Monday, January 8, 2009 1 DEPARTMENT
More informationTeaching Hybrid Principles Of Finance To Undergraduate Business Students Can It Work? Denise Letterman, Robert Morris University
Teaching Hybrid Principles Of Finance To Undergraduate Business Students Can It Work? Denise Letterman, Robert Morris University ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between
More informationTEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF DOCTORAL STUDIES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF EDUCATION (COLLEGE TEACHING
TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF DOCTORAL STUDIES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF EDUCATION (COLLEGE TEACHING OF AN ACADEMIC SUBJECT) AUGUST 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Responsibilities
More informationPolicy on Student Ratings of Teaching
May 5, 2015 Page 1 of 6 PURPOSE: To outline policy regarding the selection of a Student Rating of Teaching (SRT) instrument and how SRT rankings shall be viewed in faculty evaluation. Supersedes SP 07-12
More informationProgram Review. MA in Leadership Studies. Graduate School of Education and Professional Development
1 Program Review MA in Leadership Studies Graduate School of Education and Professional Development November 2012 MARSHALL UNIVERSITY Program Review 4 Program: MA in Leadership Studies College: Graduate
More informationRole Expectations Report for Sample Employee and Receptionist
Role Matching of Sample Employee and Receptionist Page 1 Role Expectations Report for Sample Employee and Receptionist TUTORIAL WORKSHEET In order to match a candidate to a particular role, look at several
More informationSTUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY SUMMARY
STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY SUMMARY SPRING 2010 INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & PLANNING PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER Student Satisfaction Survey Summary Spring 2010 1 Community College of Denver Spring 2010 Student
More informationforum Forecasting Enrollment to Achieve Institutional Goals by Janet Ward Campus Viewpoint
forum Campus Viewpoint Forecasting Enrollment to Achieve Institutional Goals by Janet Ward As strategic and budget planning commences at community colleges, baccalaureate institutions, and comprehensive
More informationInternal Communications Strategy
Internal Communications Strategy 2011 2013 Alison Cummins Communications Manager January 2011 INTRODUCTION 3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 5 EVALUATION OF THE INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY 2007-2009 6 TARGETS
More informationConsultation on Canada's International Education Strategy
Consultation on Canada's International Education Strategy In Budget 2011, the Government of Canada announced funding for the development and implementation of an international education strategy that will
More information2. Incidence, prevalence and duration of breastfeeding
2. Incidence, prevalence and duration of breastfeeding Key Findings Mothers in the UK are breastfeeding their babies for longer with one in three mothers still breastfeeding at six months in 2010 compared
More informationSPEA CRIMINAL JUSTICE 3 RD YEAR REPORT MAY 2008
Assessment Contact Person: Barbara Peat SPEA CRIMINAL JUSTICE 3 RD YEAR REPORT MAY 2008 Annual reports for 2004 and 2006 are attached. Program completed a 3 rd year report in 2005 and was not required
More informationStudent Learning Assessment for Associate of Arts in Business Administration Program
Student Learning Assessment for Academic Year 2011-2012 Business Programs Student Learning Assessment for Associate of Arts in Business Administration Program Intended Student Learning Outcomes for Associate
More informationINSTRUCTOR TOOL KIT for ONLINE COURSE EVALUATIONS. The. Guide to your Course Evaluations
INSTRUCTOR TOOL KIT for ONLINE COURSE EVALUATIONS The How to Guide to your Course Evaluations Your Course Evaluations Team Who we are & what we do Queries & Concerns: course.evaluations@utoronto.ca Cherie
More informationTexas State University-San Marcos Library Operating Letter (OL)
Texas State University-San Marcos Library Operating Letter (OL) Title: Calculation of Departmental Allocations for LB/OL No. 06.02 Library Materials by the University Library Department of Origin: Acquisitions
More informationThe Impact of Living Learning Community Participation on 1 st -Year Students GPA, Retention, and Engagement
The Impact of Living Learning Community Participation on 1 st -Year Students GPA, Retention, and Engagement Suohong Wang, Sunday Griffith, Bin Ning AIR Forum May 31, 2010 Chicago Presentation Overview
More informationSimulations, Games and Experiential Learning Techniques:, Volume 1,1974
EXPERIENCES WITH THE HARVARD MANAGEMENT GAME Ralph M. Roberts, The University of West Florida The Harvard Management Game [1] was introduced at The University of West Florida in the Fall of 1971, as the
More informationPerceived Stress among Engineering Students
Perceived Stress among Engineering Students Lisa Schneider Cornell University Abstract Previous surveys of students in Cornell s College of Engineering suggest that, over the past 2 decades, students perceived
More informationDepartment of Chemistry University of Colorado Denver Outcomes Assessment Plan. Department Overview:
Department of Chemistry University of Colorado Denver Outcomes Assessment Plan Department Overview: The Department of Chemistry offers both the B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemistry. Students at the B.S.
More informationReview of Existing Academic Programs: User Guide
Review of Existing Academic Programs: User Guide Kentucky public postsecondary institutions conduct periodic reviews of approved academic programs for the purposes of quality improvements, more efficient
More informationBeef Demand: What is Driving the Market?
Beef Demand: What is Driving the Market? Ronald W. Ward Food and Economics Department University of Florida Demand is a term we here everyday. We know it is important but at the same time hard to explain.
More informationRCSA QUARTERLY HIRING INTENTIONS SURVEY OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2013 REPORT AUSTRALIA
RCSA QUARTERLY HIRING INTENTIONS SURVEY OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2013 REPORT AUSTRALIA 1 Principal Partner RECRUITMENT AND CONSULTING SERVICES ASSOCIATION AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND 1. Executive Summary The purpose
More informationA Synopsis of Chicago Freshman Enrollment at DePaul University Fall 2004 2008
A Synopsis of Chicago Freshman Enrollment at DePaul University Fall 2004 2008 Prepared and presented in May 2009 by David H. Kalsbeek, Ph.D. Senior Vice President for Enrollment Management and Marketing
More informationInformation for Parents and Students
Information for Parents and Students CONTENTS Welcome... 3 Obtaining entry into medicine... 4 What should I do now? Three years from completing high school... 8 Two years from completing high school...
More informationJournal of College Teaching & Learning - December 2005 Volume 2, Number 12 ABSTRACT
Project SOAR Supporting Disadvantaged Students Technology Needs Diane H. Jackman, (E-mail: djackman@niu.edu), Northern Illinois University Nina G. Dorsch, (E-mail: ndorsch@niu.edu), Northern Illinois University
More informationCONSUMER AWARENESS AND SATISFACTION SURVEY 2014
CONSUMER AWARENESS AND SATISFACTION SURVEY 2014 October 2014 Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore 10 Pasir Panjang Road #10-01 Mapletree Business City Singapore 117438 Tel: (65) 6211 0888 Fax: (65)
More informationThe Relationship between the Strategy of Knowledge Folders and Study Skills. Clara J. Heyder Virginia Beach City Public Schools
The Relationship between the Strategy of Knowledge Folders and Study Skills Clara J. Heyder Virginia Beach City Public Schools December 2008 2 Introduction Over the past several years, I have had students
More informationWhat do advertising professionals really want? Preparing University graduates for careers in the Middle East
Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 27-32 What do advertising professionals really want? Love 27 What do advertising professionals really want? Preparing University graduates for careers in the Middle East By Don Love
More informationFORMAL AND INFORMAL FEEDBACK TOOLS TO ENHANCE THE STUDENT LEARNING PROCESS
FORMAL AND INFORMAL FEEDBACK TOOLS TO ENHANCE THE STUDENT LEARNING PROCESS Raymond J Elson*, DBA, CPA Associate Professor of Accounting Langdale College of Business Valdosta State University Valdosta,
More informationProfessional Graduate Business School Standards
Professional Graduate Business School Standards Japan University Accreditation Association Legend In this Standards, related regulations are abbreviated as follows: Ordinance No. 11 : Ordinance for Enforcement
More informationWHERE ARE WE NOW?: A REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING AN ONLINE LEARNING SYSTEM TO ENHANCE A DEVELOPMENTAL MATHEMATICS COURSE.
WHERE ARE WE NOW?: A REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING AN ONLINE LEARNING SYSTEM TO ENHANCE A DEVELOPMENTAL MATHEMATICS COURSE Alvina Atkinson Georgia Gwinnett College 1000 University Center Lane Lawrenceville,
More informationMOOC experiences at San Jose State University
Charles W. Davidson! College of Engineering!! One Washington Square! San José, CA 95192-0080! www.engr.sjsu.edu! MOOC experiences at San Jose State University Ping Hsu College of Engineering, SJSU! 1 SJSU/Udacity
More information