SMITH COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
|
|
|
- Elvin McCoy
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SMITH COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Pursuant to the authority of Chapter 826 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, the Smith County Commissioners Court adopts the following ordinances to protect the public health, safety, and welfare in the unincorporated areas of Smith County. DEFINITIONS A. Dog means any member of the canine family. B. Animal means any mammal, domesticated or wild. (Tex. Admin. Code Title 25, Part I, Ch ) C. Animal Control Authority, hereinafter Sheriff, means any peace officer of the State of Texas, officer of the Northeast Texas Public Health District (hereinafter NETPHD ), animal control officer, or other entity that the Commissioners Court considers appropriate. Among other duties, the Sheriff shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance by issuing citations when deemed appropriate, and shall impound animals when appropriate. D. Owner means a person, or persons, who harbor, shelter, keep, manage, possess, or has any interest in any dog. E. Dangerous dog means any dog that (I) makes an unprovoked attack on a person that causes bodily injury and occurs in a place other than an enclosure in which the dog was being kept and such enclosure was reasonably certain to the ordinary person to prevent the dog from leaving the enclosure on its own; or (2) commits unprovoked acts in a place other than an enclosure in which the dog was being kept and such enclosure was reasonably certain to the ordinary person to prevent the dog from leaving the enclosure on its own, and those acts cause a person to reasonably believe that the dog will attack and cause bodily injury to that person. F. Neighborhood means: (1) any subdivision as defined in Texas Local Government code Section on which the filing of a plat is required under Chapter 232 of the Texas Local Government Code, regardless of whether a plat is actually filed or not; or Last revised May 11,
2 (2) any area specifically designated by Commissioners Court by Ordinance for inclusion in this ordinance. Such area should be included as a neighborhood under this ordinance when two or more of the property owners and residents of the proposed area request the area to be included in this ordinance, and after public hearing and approval by the Commissioners Court. (3) an area included within the definition of a neighborhood may choose to opt out of this ordinance by petitioning Commissioners Court subject to public input and approval by the Commissioners Court. G. Secure means a restraint or enclosure that is reasonably designed to confine a dog, taking into account the size, strength, agility, age, and history of the dog. H. Vaccinated means properly injected with a rabies vaccine licensed for use in that species by the United States Department of Agriculture and administered by a veterinarian licensed to practice in the State of Texas. II. ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS 1. Animal control officers are those officers specifically hired to enforce this ordinance. The sole responsibility of an animal control officer is to enforce this ordinance. 2. Animal control officers shall wear distinctive uniforms as required by the SheriWs office. 3. Animal control officers shall drive a marked vehicle which has red and blue light bars on top. 4. Animal control officers must either be certified animal control officers when they are hired, or shall become certified animal control officers within 12 months of their date of hire. 5. It is discretionary with the Sheriff whether to conduct patrols in the enforcement of the ordinance. In general, the enforcement of the ordinance will be complaint driven. 6. The Sheriff should respond to complaints regarding dogs that fall under this ordinance. It is discretionary with the Sheriff whether to respond to calls under this ordinance that do not pertain to dogs. Last revised May II,
3 The order of response, if any, to calls under the ordinance, is discretionary with the Sheriff. With respect to animal control officers, final approval of decisions pertaining to response to calls should be made by the Sheriff. All provisions of this ordinance shall be enforced by the Sheriff in the exercise of his or her discretion, with final approval of any decisions by an animal control officer to be made by the Sheriff. All issues not specifically addressed in this ordinance andlor these guidelines are discretionary with the Sheriff, in compliance with all applicable laws, with final approval of any decisions by an animal control officer to be made by the Sheriff. III. RABIES CONTROL A. Vaccinations: Every owner of a dog four (4) months of age or older shall have such dog(s) vaccinated against rabies, and shall vaccinate each dog annually thereafter. Any person moving into Smith County from a location outside of Smith County shall comply with this ordinance within (30) days after having moved into Smith County. If a dog has inflicted a bite on any person, then the owner of such dog shall report the bite to the NETPHD, and no rabies vaccine shall be administered until after a ten-day observation period. (Tex. Admin. Code Title 25, Part I, Ch ) B. Certificate of Vaccination: Upon Vaccination, a veterinarian shall execute and furnish to the owner of a dog as evidence of vaccination, a certificate upon a form furnished by the veterinarian. The veterinarian shall retain a duplicate copy of such certificate. Such certificate shall contain the following information (Tex. Admin. Code Title 25, Part 1, Ch ): (1) The name, address and telephone number of the owner of the vaccinated dog; (2) The date of the vaccination; (3) The type of rabies vaccine used, including producer, serial number, and expiration date; (4) The year and number of rabies tag issued; Last revised May 11, 2009
4 (5) The predominate breed, approximate age, color, size, and sex including neutering of the vaccinated dog; and (6) The signature of the Veterinarian. C. Rabies Tags: Concurrent with the issuance and delivery of the certificate of vaccination referred to in section 111(B), a veterinarian shall issue a metal tag serially numbered to correspond with the vaccination certificate number, and bearing the year of issuance and the name of the issuing veterinarian and the veterinarian s address. The owner shall cause a collar or harness with the attached metal vaccination tag to be worn by the vaccinated dog at all times. D. Duplicate Tags: In the event of loss or destruction of the original tag provided in section II, C, the owner of a dog shall obtain a duplicate tag. Vaccination certificates and tags shall be valid only for the dog for which it was originally issued. E. Furnishing Proof of Vaccination: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person who owns or harbors a vaccinated dog to fail or refuse to exhibit his or her copy of the certificate of vaccination upon demand to any person charged to enforce this ordinance. F. Harboring an Unvaccinated Dog: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to harbor any dog that has not been vaccinated against rabies, as provided herein, or that cannot be identified as having a current vaccination certificate. G. Animals Exposed to Rabies: Any person having knowledge of the existence of any animal known to have been, or suspected of being exposed to rabies must immediately report such knowledge to the NETPHD, giving any information that may be required. For any animal known to have been, or suspected of being exposed to rabies, the following rules must apply. (Tex. Admin. Code Title 25, Part 1, Ch ) (1) Animals having a current vaccination must be revaccinated immediately and confined according to the method prescribed by the NETPHD for a period of not more than forty-five (45) days at a facility approved by the NETPHD. (2) Animals not having a current vaccination should be humanely destroyed. However, if the owner of such an animal elects, he or she may, at the owners own expense and in a manner prescribed by Last revised May 11,
5 the NETPHD, confine said animal. Such animal must be vaccinated immediately following exposure and isolated (as determined and approved by the NETPHD) for not less than three (3) months. A revaccination shall be done at the third and eighth weeks of isolation. (3) Each day an owner of an animal described in section III, G, (1) and (2) above fails to abide by those sections constitutes a separate offense. H. Any person having knowledge of an animal bite to a human shall report the incident to the NETPHD as soon as possible, but no later than twenty-four (24) hours from the time of the incident. (1) The owner of the biting animal shall place that animal in quarantine (as required under state law) in a facility acceptable to the NETPHD. (Tex. Admin. Code Title 25, Part I, Ch ) (2) Bites from rabbits and rodents are excluded from these reporting requirements. (3) If a licensed veterinarian determines that the animal does not show clinical signs of rabies, the animal may be reclaimed by its owner upon satisfying the applicable vaccination requirements as determined and approved by the NETPHD, and upon payment of any costs or fees if applicable. The Sheriff, animal control officer, and/or Sheriffs deputy will report any exposure to rabies or animal bite to a human to the NETPHD. J. Sheriff office, animal control officers, NETPHD, and any other applicable peace officer will work in conjunction to enforce the ordinance, including, but not limited to, quarantine violations and quarantine enforcement. IV. ABANDONED ANIMALS A. It is prohibited and shall be unlawful for any person to willfully abandon any animal, or to withhold food or water from any animal such that its health is endangered, or to cause an animal to suffer unduly. B. Abandoned or neglected animals shall be handled in cooperation with the Sheriffs Department on a case-by-case basis, at the discretion of the Sheriff. Last revised May 11, 2009
6 V. RESTRAINT OF DOGS REQUIRED A. Each dog found to be in a neighborhood must be restrained by its owner, regardless of whether the dog or the owner reside in the neighborhood and regardless of the owner s knowledge or mental state. A dog shall be considered restrained if: (1) The dog remains on the premises of its owner; (2) The dog is under the control of a person by means of a leash or is at heel under the verbal command of its owner. (3) The dog is secure within its owner s vehicle. B. Notwithstanding the above, a dangerous dog or a dog that is a danger to other animals must be restrained at all times by a secure leash or in a secure enclosure. C. Each unrestrained dog may be detained or impounded by the Sheriff. At his option, the Sheriff may elect to issue a citation to a person who violates Section V. of this ordinance without detaining or impounding the dog if the Sheriff deems the public health safety and welfare is no longer in eminent danger. D. A person commits an offense if the person fails or refuses to restrain a dog owned by the person that is required to be restrained under this ordinance. An offense under this section is a Class C Misdemeanor. VI. DOGS THAT ARE A DANGER TO ANIMALS A. The owner of a dog that is accustomed to run, worry, or kill livestock or domesticated animals may not permit the dog to run at large. This provision applies regardless of the owner s knowledge or mental state. 13. A person who violates this section commits an offense punishable by a fine. C. Each time a dog runs at large in violation of this section constitutes a separate offense. VII. IMPOUNDMENT OF DOGS A. The Sheriff is authorized to detain or impound: Last revised May 11, 2009
7 (1) Any dog that is required to be restrained and is not restrained; (2) Any dog that has bitten or scratched a person, or is reasonably suspected to be rabid, or is kept under conditions that could endanger the public health or health of any animal; (3) Any dog that is a danger to animals; or (4) Any dog not exhibiting evidence of being vaccinated. B. When a dog is impounded, the Sheriff authorized by the Commissioners Court shall collect the fees as approved by ordinance of the Commissioners Court, from the owner before the dog may be released to the owner, C. If any dog is found upon the premises of any person, the owner or occupant of the premises shall have the right to confine such dog in a humane manner until he or she can notify the Sheriff to retrieve the dog for impoundment, provided, however, that they notify the Sheriff as soon as possible of such confinement. D. Reasonable efforts shall be made by the Sheriff to contact the owner of any dog impounded that is wearing a current rabies vaccination tag, however, final responsibility for location of an impounded dog is that of the owner. E. The owner may reclaim possession of any impounded dog, except a dog under quarantine or observation under this ordinance, upon payment of impoundment fees and any veterinarian bills incurred by the Sheriff for the welfare of the dog, and upon compliance with the vaccination provisions of this ordinance. F. Commissioners Court shall select and establish a place for impounding dogs under the provisions of this ordinance. G. Any dog not reclaimed by the owner, if any, may be humanely euthanized after being impounded for three (3) working days, except that any dog wearing a current rabies tag may be impounded for six (6) days before the dog is euthanized. Any dog not reclaimed after the three (3) or six (6) day period described in this paragraph may be provided for adoption except those dogs in quarantine, or under observation. H. An owner who no longer wishes to have responsibility for a dog, or believes the dog to be ill or in an injured condition may sign a written waiver supplied by the Sheriff allowing the dog to be immediately euthanized Last revised May 1 1,
8 in a humane manner, providing that no dog that has bitten a human being shall be euthanized before the expiration of the ten (10) day quarantine period. The owner shall pay all such related costs of a quarantine and br euthanization. I. Any vicious or wild animal, unless there is reason to believe it has an owner, may be immediately disposed of as may be deemed appropriate by the Sheriff. J. The Sheriff may elect to issue a citation to an owner of a dog that is in violation of this ordinance, in addition to, or in lieu of, impoundment. K. All dogs picked up by the Sheriff under the impoundment provisions of the ordinance will be taken to a designated location in the County. L. If a dog picked up by the Sheriff has tags identifying its owner, the Sheriff will attempt to contact the owner. Upon impoundment, another attempt will be made to contact the owner. VIII. INJURED OR ILL DOGS 1. Sheriff may impound for treatment of an injured or ill dog. IX. EUTHANASIA 1. Dogs may be euthanized by a licensed veterinarian or by the personnel of a recognized animal shelter or humane society who are trained in the humane destruction of animals. X. DEFENSE OF A PERSON 1. In addition to the provisions set forth in the Euthanasia section above, the Sheriff may humanely destroy an animal posing an imminent threat of danger to a person under a circumstance of emergency. XI. COSTS, FEES, AND/OR FINES 1. If there is an identifiable owner of the dog, then the owner must pay all applicable fines, fees and/or costs associated with the enforcement of the ordinance. 2. If no identifiable owner exists, then the County may pay any applicable costs or fees associated with the enforcement of the ordinance, at its discretion. If, Last revised May 11,
9 at a later time, an owner is identified, the County may seek reimbursement andlor collection of any applicable fees, costs and fines from said owner. XII. MISCELLANEOUS A. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. B. This ordinance does not affect the applicability of any other law, rule, order, ordinance, or other valid legal requirement of the State of Texas or an applicable political subdivision of the State of Texas, and this ordinance shall not grant any greater rights than allowed by the laws of the State of Texas. C. The Commissioners Court of Smith County hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety. D. The promulgation and establishment of these ordinances by the Smith County Commissioners Court shall not prevent or jeopardize a corporate municipality within the County from establishing any rules and ordinances to prevent the introduction and spread of rabies and the control of animals within their corporate limits, and such ordinances established by the said corporate municipalities shall supersede the County ordinance within the municipality so that dual enforcement will not occur. E. Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to allow or otherwise condone the possession or ownership of any wild or exotic animal within Smith County. F. It is a violation of this ordinance for any person to make a false report or complaint regarding a violation of this ordinance to a Sheriff. G. Fines, costs, and/or fees retained by the County under this ordinance shall be deposited in the treasury of the County and may be used only to defray the cost of administering these ordinances. H. Any offense under this ordinance is a Class C Misdemeanor. 1. No payment of fines or fees under this ordinance shall relieve an owner or harborer of any dog from the jurisdiction of any court over any matter or violation of law. Last revised May 11, 2009
10 Adopted and Approved by the Smith County Commissioners Court on this 1 l~ ~ day of May, JOEL BAKER County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 Absent WILLIAM MCGiNNIS Commissioner, Pct. 2 Commissioner, Pct. 3 Commissioner, Pet. 4 ATTEST: County Clerk S... rn 4 ) :~ -...,... bf APPROVED: Civil A sistant District Attorney Last revised May 11, 2009
Laws and Regulations Relating to RABIES. Excerpts from the. California Health and Safety Code. and the. California Code of Regulations
Laws and Regulations Relating to RABIES Excerpts from the California Health and Safety Code and the California Code of Regulations CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASE
Chapter No. 765] PUBLIC ACTS, 2004 1 CHAPTER NO. 765 HOUSE BILL NO. 3229. By Representatives West, Marrero. Substituted for: Senate Bill No.
Chapter No. 765] PUBLIC ACTS, 2004 1 CHAPTER NO. 765 HOUSE BILL NO. 3229 By Representatives West, Marrero Substituted for: Senate Bill No. 2840 By Senator Cohen AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated,
MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE
MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE SECTION I. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE These rules are promulgated pursuant to and in conformity with statutory authority granted to the Montgomery
(b) Safeguard and protect property of Taylor County citizens,
Chapter 54 Animal Control Regulations Page 1 of 7 CHAPTER 54 ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS 54.01 PURPOSE. (1) The purpose of this chapter is to: (a) Regulate and control dogs, cats, and other animals within
I ci H 1 8 L. U e. These regulations shall become effective on January 1, 2014. These rules TETON COUNTY, WYOMING
TETON COUNTY, WYOMING TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TETON COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS Chapter 1 Authority 1-1-1 Authority to Promulgate Regulations: a. Wyoming Statute 11-31-301 (LexisNexis
The Jefferson County Board of Supervisors does ordain as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 24 The Jefferson County Board of Supervisors does ordain as follows: 24.1 TITLE. This ordinance shall be known and cited as the Jefferson County Rabies Control Ordinance. 24.2 PURPOSE. Medical
How To Control A Dog
TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE : ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS (EXCEPT MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION ACT REGULATIONS) PART 30 ANIMAL CONTROL ACT Section 30.10 Definitions
age of four months be spayed or neutered, except under specified circumstances. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
BILL NO. 2009- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE THAT DOGS AND CATS OVER THE AGE OF FOUR MONTHS BE SPAYED OR NEUTERED, EXCEPT UNDER SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES, AND TO PROVIDE FOR OTHER RELATED MATTERS.
Animal Control Ordinance
Pender County Health Department Building a healthier tomorrow Animal Control Ordinance Updated 6/7/2010 1 Section 3 ANIMALS Sec. 3-1. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to protect the public health,
Williamson County, Texas Regulations for the Control Of Rabies & Animal Control Contact Telephone Number: (512) 352-4129
Williamson County, Texas Regulations for the Control Of Rabies & Animal Control Contact Telephone Number: (512) 352-4129 Part I. IN GENERAL Section 1. Authority These regulations are adopted by the Commissioners
ARTICLE XVII REGULATION OF DOGS
ARTICLE XVII REGULATION OF DOGS STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This bylaw is intended to guide those persons owning or keeping dogs in their role as responsible pet owners so as not to adversely affect the residents
ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS NAVAJO NATION NAVAJO NATION ANIMAL CONTROL. Fort Defiance, Arizona (928)729-4023 - (928)729-4239 Many Farms, Arizona
NAVAJO NATION ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS NAVAJO NATION ANIMAL CONTROL Fort Defiance, Arizona (928)729-4023 - (928)729-4239 Many Farms, Arizona rock, New Mexico (928)7814380 (505)368-1235 Tuba City, Arizona Crownpoint,
RULES PERTAINING TO RABIES CONTROL
RULES PERTAINING TO RABIES CONTROL Arkansas State Board of Health Effective January 1, 2010 RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO RABIES CONTROL Table of Contents AUTHORITY... 1 SECTION I. DEFINITIONS...
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 771 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 771.1) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 771 CONTROLLING POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS ANIMALS The Board of Supervisors of the
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE #728 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 545; N0W CODIFIED AS CODE OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOWE, CHAPTER 2, ANIMAL CONTROL; REGULATING THE KEEPING OF DOGS AND CATS IN THE CITY OF HOWE, TEXAS
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ORDINANCE NO.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE 10-029-O CITY PROPOSAL: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE IX, OF THE DULUTH CITY CODE, 1959, AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO DANGEROUS DOGS. The city of Duluth does
STATE RABIES AND ANIMAL CONTROL STATUTES (effective November 20, 2002) TITLE IV of the state health law RABIES
STATE RABIES AND ANIMAL CONTROL STATUTES (effective November 20, 2002) TITLE IV of the state health law RABIES Section 2140. Definitions. 2141. Compulsory vaccination. 2142. Rabies; emergency provisions.
ORDIANCE 63 DOG CONTROL PAGE 63-2
PAGE 63-1 SUPERIOR TOWNSHIP WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 63 DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE THE TOWNSHIP OF SUPERIOR, COUNTY OF WASHTENAW, STATE OF MICHIGAN, ORDAINS: Section 63-01 Short Title This Ordinance
BERRIEN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE. County of Berrien, Michigan
BERRIEN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE County of Berrien, Michigan AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO AND PROVIDING FOR ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BERRIEN COUNTY; PURPOSE OF ORDINANCE:
ALLECHANY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE. Section 1. Definitions: As used in this ordinance the fol1owing terms mean:
ALLECHANY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Section 1. Definitions: As used in this ordinance the fol1owing terms mean: (a) Owner: Any person, group of persons, firm, partnership or corporation owning, keeping,
by a tether of some kind, is not at heel or not a working dog in the field, that dog shall be deemed at large.
Title 6 ANIMALS Chapter 6.04 DOGS 6.04.010 Purpose. 6.04.020 Definitions. 6.04.030 Dog control officers--powers and duties. 6.04.040 Interfering with officers prohibited. 6.04.050 Failing to prevent running
WARREN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
WARREN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Section I. Warren County Animal Control Department Authority is hereby granted to the Warren County Animal Control Department to establish and maintain an animal
EXHIBIT A. The Jefferson County Code is amended as follows: Chapter 6.04 DOGS
EXHIBIT A The Jefferson County Code is amended as follows: 6.04.009E Note to Chapter 6.04 *Prior ordinance history: Ord. O-84-2000. Chapter 6.04 DOGS 6.04.010 Definitions. As used in this chapter the following
B: It turns over garbage cans or waste containers, or otherwise causes garbage or waste to be scattered on property other than its owners;
TOWN OF SUGAR HILL DOG ORDINANCE Pursuant to the authority conferred by New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, Chapter 31:39, in order to promote the general welfare of the citizens of the Town of Sugar
THE COUNTY OF EMMET ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE NUMBER 79-15
THE COUNTY OF EMMET ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE NUMBER 79-15 INDEX PAGE Article I - Purpose..... 2 Article II - Definitions.... 2 Article III -Animal Control Officer s Duties. 4 Article IV - Licensing and
ORDINANCE NO. 05-5351
ORDINANCE NO. 05-5351 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BILLINGS, PROVIDING THAT THE BILLINGS, MONTANA, CITY CODE BE AMENDED BY REVISING SECTIONS 4-401, 4-402, 4-404, 4-405, 4-405.7, 4-406, 4-407, 4-409, 4-411,
Updated on-line 7/26/07
Updated on-line 7/26/07 Lane Code CHAPTER 7 CONTENTS ANIMAL CONTROL 7.005 Animal Control - Definitions. 7.010 Animal Control Code Supercedes State Law. 7.015 Animal Regulation Authority Powers and Duties.
HARRIS COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS
HARRIS COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS SECTION 1. AUTHORITY A. These Regulations are promulgated pursuant to and in conformity with the following statutory authority: (1) The Rabies Control Act of 1981, specifically
DISPOSITION OF FINES Section 120
DISPOSITION OF FINES Section 120! All such fines or penalties shall be retained by the municipality to be used only for controlling dogs and enforcing Article 7 and for subsidizing both the spaying and
WATAUGA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL ORDINANCE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WATAUGA WATAUGA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL ORDINANCE SECTION I. AGENCY AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY There is hereby created a Department of Animal Care and Control
KNOX COUNTY CODE. Chapter 6 ANIMALS*
KNOX COUNTY CODE Chapter 6 ANIMALS* Article I. In General Secs. 6-1 6-30. Reserved. Article II. Animal Control Division 1. Generally Sec. 6-31. Definitions. Sec. 6-32. Animals at Large. Sec. 6-33. Animals
347.50 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1.Terms. For the purpose of sections 347.50 to 347.56, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/index.php 347.50 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1.Terms. For the purpose of sections 347.50 to 347.56, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2.Dangerous
SHERBURNE COUNTY. Ordinance Number 150 AN ORDINANCE FOR DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS IN SHERBURNE COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY Ordinance Number 150 AN ORDINANCE FOR DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS IN SHERBURNE COUNTY Adopted by the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners on the 10th day of July, 2007.
DOG CONTROL BYLAW EFFECTIVE JUNE 21, 1995 AMENDED JULY 28, 2005 AMENDED JANUARY 10, 2011. Summary of Bylaw Amendments at end of Bylaw
EFFECTIVE JUNE 21, 1995 AMENDED JULY 28, 2005 AMENDED JANUARY 10, 2011 Summary of Bylaw Amendments at end of Bylaw BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTETOWN RELATING TO THE REGISTRATION AND CONTROL OF
Animal Ordinances for the City of Columbus, Georgia
Animal Ordinances for the City of Columbus, Georgia If you would like to make a complaint regarding an animal in Muscogee County, please contact our administrative office at: 706.653.4512. The administrative
ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS 4-4.10 KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS AS CONSTITUTING PUBLIC NUISANCE 4-4.13 ANIMALS AT LARGE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
ARTICLE 4 ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS Section Subject Matter 4-4.01 DEFINITIONS 4-4.05 ENFORCEMENT 4-4.10 KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS AS CONSTITUTING PUBLIC NUISANCE 4-4.11 UNNECESSARY NOISES 4-4.12 ABANDONMENT
PITT COUNTY DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE
ANIMAL CONTROL -------------------------- ORDINANCE NO. 3 PITT COUNTY DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Pitt County Board of Commissioners has received recommendations from the Pitt County Animal Control
CHAPTER 7. 1. Section 2 of P.L.1999, c.336 (C.56:8-93) is amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 7 AN ACT concerning the sale of cats and dogs, and amending and supplementing P.L.1999, c.336. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. Section 2 of P.L.1999,
B. Immunization. No license or tag for a dog shall be
CITY OF PALMER, ALASKA ORDINANCE NO. 416 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PRLMER MUNICIPAL CODE. CHAPTER 6.04.110 D, RESTRAINT, CHAPTER 6.12, LICENSING, CHAPTER 6.14, DOG BITE AND ATTACK INCIDENTS, CHAPTER 6.16.020,
Winnebago County, Illinois, Code of Ordinances >> - COUNTY CODE >> Chapter 14 - ANIMALS
Winnebago County, Illinois, Code of Ordinances >> - COUNTY CODE >> Chapter 14 - ANIMALS ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL Sec. 14-1. - Short title. Sec. 14-2. - Purposes of chapter. Sec. 14-3. - Interpretation of
City of Easthampton, Massachusetts City Ordinance CHAPTER 11. DOGS
City of Easthampton, Massachusetts City Ordinance CHAPTER 11. DOGS Sec. 11-1. License required. Any owner or keeper of a dog six (6) months of age or older in the City of Easthampton shall cause that dog
BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RULES AND REGULATIONS
GOVERNING ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ANIMAL CODE HOUSING CODE NOISE CONTROL ORDINANCE CHAPTER 8 (ANIMALS) CHAPTER 11 (CHILD CARE) CHAPTER 17 (EMERGENCY MEDICAL VEHICLES) CHAPTER 24
PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER D-100 RESPECTING THE REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF DOGS
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER D-100 RESPECTING THE REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF DOGS BE IT ENACTED by the Council of the Halifax Regional Municipality as follows: Short Title 1 This By-law
DOG LAW OF 1919 Act 339 of 1919. The People of the State of Michigan enact:
DOG LAW OF 1919 Act 339 of 1919 AN ACT relating to dogs and the protection of live stock and poultry from damage by dogs; providing for the licensing of dogs; regulating the keeping of dogs, and authorizing
By-law Number Date Passed: Section(s) Amended: 6496-11 June 27, 2011 Section 1(amended) Section 4 (replaced)
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITBY Cat and Dog By-law Being a by-law to regulate the keeping of cats and dogs This document has been reproduced for convenience only and is a consolidation of the Cat
ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, some animal control regulations within the PMC need to be clarified based upon federal and state case law; and
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP amending Puyallup Municipal Code sections 6.08.150, 8.04.010, 8.04.020, 8.04.120, 8.04.160, and 8.18.020, and adding new sections 8.04.085, 8.04.185 and
CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 13880. Surrey Dog Responsibility By-law, 1999, No. 13880
CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 13880 Surrey Dog Responsibility By-law, 1999, No. 13880 As amended by By-law No. 14453, 07/23/01; 15142, 10/27/03; 16488, 12/03/07; 17071, 12/14/09; 17312, 01/10/11; 17558, 02/06/12;
Fort Bend County. Roy L. Cordes, Jr. Fort Bend County Attorney
Fort Bend County Roy L. Cordes, Jr. Fort Bend County Attorney Law Enforcement Meeting Provide overview of legal issues Describe the administrative process triggered by dangerous dogs Answer questions Why
The policy of the Metropolitan Police Department is to take the appropriate enforcement action to handle animal related calls for service.
GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Title Animal Complaints and Reporting Animal Bitings Series / Number GO OPS 401.07 Effective Date Distribution September 3, 2004 A Replaces / Rescinds General Order 401.7
SECTION 1: Chapter 4 of Division 4 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF DIVISION 4, AND ARTICLE 6, CHAPTER 4 OF DIVISION 2, OF THE VENTURA COUNTY ORDINANCE
DOG BY LAW NO. 4755 ADOPTED: October 28, 2013
DOG BY LAW NO. 4755 ADOPTED: October 28, 2013 DM#321424 v.10 BY LAW NO. 4755 SHORT TITLE... 2 PURPOSE... 2 INTERPRETATION... 2 LICENCES... 5 KENNELS... 7 GENERAL PROHIBITIONS... 7 PROTECTION OF DOGS...
Chapter 4 ANIMALS* ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS* Animal shall mean every living non-human creature, excluding tropical fish.
Chapter 4 ANIMALS* * Editors Note: Ord. No. 2179, 1--15, adopted Feb. 17, 1999, amended ch. 4 in its entirety to read as set forth in 4-1--4-15. Formerly, ch. 4, 4-1--4-5, pertained to similar subject
ORDINANCE NO. 05-02 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 05-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE II OF THE LEON COUNTY CODE OF LAWS ENTITLED ANIMAL CONTROL ; AMENDING SECTION
MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS
For By-Law information contact the Municipal Clerk Tel: (902)690-6133 Fax: (902)678-9279 E-mail: [email protected] BY-LAW # 71A DOG BY-LAW DEFINITIONS 1. In this By-Law: (f) (g) "Corporate
CITY OF ST. CATHARINES Q5-302 BY-LAW NO. A By-law to provide for the licensing and regulating the keeping of
, {i ~ f r ' ~ ( CITY OF ST. CATHARINES BY-LAW NO. Q5-302 A By-law to provide for the licensing and regulating the keeping of dogs. WHEREAS Section 210, subsection 8 of the Municipal Act, R. S. O. 1990,
Town of West New York Hudson County, NJ Notice for R.F.P. (Request for Proposal) Animal Control Shelter Services (2 nd Occasion)
Town of West New York Hudson County, NJ Notice for R.F.P. (Request for Proposal) Request for Proposals will be received by the Town Clerk of the Town of West New York, in the County of Hudson, New Jersey,
NC General Statutes - Chapter 67 1
Chapter 67. Dogs. Article 1. Owner's Liability. 67-1. Liability for injury to livestock or fowls. If any dog, not being at the time on the premises of the owner or person having charge thereof, shall kill
Chapter 8-9 DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS
Chapter 8-9 DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS Sections: 8-9-1 Definitions 8-9-2 Keeping Of Dangerous Animals Prohibited 8-9-3 Dangerous Animal Exceptions 8-9-4 Seizure, Impoundment And Disposition Of Dangerous
WARREN COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 21 CHAPTER 21 ANIMAL CONTROL
TITLE III PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY CHAPTER 21 ANIMAL CONTROL 21.01 Purpose 21.07 Right to Kill 21.02 Definitions 21.08 Keeping of Vicious Dogs and Dangerous Animals Prohibited 21.03 Responsibilities of
SENATE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary
Second Regular Session Sixty-fourth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO PREAMENDED This Unofficial Version Includes Committee Amendments Not Yet Adopted on Second Reading LLS NO. 0-0.01 Stephen Miller HOUSE
WOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
WOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE TITLE: Rabies Control Policy and Procedure EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/93 DATE REVIEWED/REVISED: 8/05, 11/08, 2/09, 5/09 AUTHORIZED BY: Sue Kunferman, Director/Health
TITLE VIII PUBLIC PEACE AND SAFETY
TITLE VIII PUBLIC PEACE AND SAFETY 8.05 Animal Control 8.10 Parades 8.20 Noise Regulations 8.35 Intoxicated Persons 8.40 Seditious or Obscene Language, Obstruction of Public Ways, Picketing, etc. 8.43
http://library.municode.com/print.aspx?clientid=14972&htmrequest=http%3a%2f%2fli...
Page 1 of 17 Fresno County, California, Code of Ordinances >> Title 9 - ANIMALS >> TITLE 9 - ANIMALS Chapters: 9.04Dog Licensing and Control 9.08Pets or Novelties 9.12Estray Impoundment 9.16Rodents and
Animal Ordinance Loudoun County, Virginia
Animal Ordinance Loudoun County, Virginia LARRY D. YATES, R.E.H.S., CHIEF DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LOUDOUN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH LOCAL (703) 777 0234 METRO 478-8408
KALAMAZOO COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCMENT ORDINANCE COUNTY OF KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN
KALAMAZOO COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCMENT ORDINANCE COUNTY OF KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN An Ordinance relating to and providing for animal control within the boundaries of Kalamazoo County, purpose of the Ordinance;
RABIES CONTROL REGULATIONS 2012
RABIES CONTROL REGULATIONS 2012 Adopted July 31, 2012 Effective Date September 1, 2012 Be it ordered by the Board of Health of the Delaware General Health District, State of Ohio. CONTENTS OF REGULATIONS:
Cabarrus County Animal Control Ordinance
Cabarrus County Animal Control Ordinance Sec. 10-1. Jurisdiction of chapter. This chapter shall apply to all areas of the county which lie outside of the corporate limits of any municipality and to those
ORDINANCE NO. 2299.2
ORDINANCE NO. 2299.2 AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING DOG AND CAT LICENSING AND REGULATION WHEREAS, the City Council of City of Cudahy finds that a more complete and comprehensive change is needed to create consistency
RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP IN OKLAHOMA CITY (LOOSE, BARKING AND POOPING DOGS)
RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP IN OKLAHOMA CITY (LOOSE, BARKING AND POOPING DOGS) Published as a series in the Quail Creek Home Owners Association Monthly Newsletter In: Oklahoma City, OK (written October 12,
Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT PROCEDURE
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT PROCEDURE I. Purpose and Applicability The purpose of this policy (herein called Policy ) is to implement the applicable provisions
CHAPTER: ANIMAL CONTROL
CHAPTER: ANIMAL CONTROL Section 1. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Chapter to regulate ownership and possession of animals; prohibit certain acts, omissions and conditions which interfere with the health,
TITLE 3 ANIMAL CONTROL AND PROTECTION
TITLE 3 ANIMAL CONTROL AND PROTECTION CHAPTER 3-01... 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 3-0l-0l. Definitions... 1 3-0l-02. Restrictions of the Keepinq and Raising of Animals and Fowl... 2 3-0l-03. Sale of Turtles
An Ordinance Governing the General Control Of Animals in Randolph County
1 An Ordinance Governing the General Control Of Animals in Randolph County PURPOSE To provide for the orderly, humane treatment of domesticated animals, to control and prevent the spread of rabies and
CHAPTER 90 ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS. Enforcement agents; responsibility of owners
CHAPTER 90 ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS ARTICLE I Dog Control S90-1. S90-2. S90-3. S90-4. S90-5. S90-6. S90-7. Definitions Enforcement agents; responsibility of owners Declaration of nuisance Restraint and Control
/ Macoupin County Animal Control Ordinance Index
/ Macoupin County Animal Control Ordinance Index Page 1,2 Index to the Macoupin County Animal Control Ordinance DIVISION I. GENERALLY Page 3 (ACO 1.1) Purpose of Chapter Page 3,4,5 (ACO 1.2)...Definitions
Sec. 90-27. Certificates of use.
Sec. 90-27. Certificates of use. (1) It is hereby deemed unlawful for any person to open or operate any business and/or occupy any structure within the town limits for the privilege of engaging in any
How To Control Dogs In Michigan
INGHAM COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE AS ADOPTED BY THE INGHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1972 AND AMENDED THROUGH DECEMBER 12, 2006. PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE I, Helen B. Everitt, Deputy
How To Get A Dog Service Officer In Clackamas County
TITLE 5 ANIMALS Summary 5.01 ANIMAL LICENSING, SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT... 1 TITLE 5 ANIMALS 5.01 ANIMAL LICENSING, SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT... 1 Table of Contents 5.01 ANIMAL LICENSING, SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT...
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2015
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2015 By: Representatives Byrd, Taylor To: Judiciary B HOUSE BILL NO. 1261 AN ACT TO CREATE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES FOR FAILING TO 1 2 KEEP DANGEROUS DOGS SECURELY
PETS 101. Landlord/Tenant law concerning animals in the City of West Hollywood
PETS 101 Landlord/Tenant law concerning animals in the City of West Hollywood City of West Hollywood - Rent Stabilization & Housing Division - (323) 848-6450 2 Important Note: This presentation explains
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside ordain as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 558 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 558.13) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 558 TO AUTHORIZE TRADITIONAL AND REMOTE CALLER BINGO GAMES The Board of Supervisors of the County
PART II - CODE OF ORDINANCES GENERAL ORDINANCES Chapter 2 - ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE XVI. - BOARDS, COUNCILS, COMMISSIONS AND AUTHORITIES
DIVISION 11. CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD Sec. 2-2201. Establishment of the Atlanta Citizen Review Board. Sec. 2-2202. Appointment of members. Sec. 2-2203. Composition of board. Sec. 2-2204. Time limit on appointments.
ORDINANCE NO. 11 THE PEOPLE OF THE COUNTY OF BERRIEN, MICHIGAN, ORDAINS: ARTICLE I PURPOSE
ORDINANCE NO. 11 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO AND PROVIDING FOR ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BERRIEN COUNTY; PURPOSE OF ORDINANCE: DEFINITIONS: COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER, HIS DUTIES, AUTHORITY,
Animal Control Ordinances
Animal Control Ordinances Sample Ordinances Compiled by the South Dakota Municipal League July 2002 Contents Legislative Authority & SD Supreme Court Case Law Summary International Municipal Lawyers Association
Monroe County ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
Monroe County ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 7, 2008 Compliments of the MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Tilman L. Crutchfield, Sheriff ARTICLE I The Board of Commissioners of the County of
Ordinance: Policy Manual, Part 3 Regulations, Chapter 5 Animals, Section 1 Animal Control Regulation
Ordinance An Ordinance Adopting Policy 3.5.1 Animal Control Regulation. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County, Colorado that the existing Policy 3.5.1 regarding Animal
TUSCOLA COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE ARTICLE I PURPOSE. To protect the public heath, safety, convenience and welfare and to provide for the
0/. TUSCOLA COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE County of Tuscola, Michigan ARTICLE I PURPOSE To protect the public heath, safety, convenience and welfare and to provide for the orderly and unifonn administration
Ordinance No. 822. Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance 810. Champaign County Animal Control Ordinance
Ordinance No. 822 Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance 810 Champaign County Animal Control Ordinance Section 1. Definitions As used in this article, the following terms shall mean as indicated below: Act: The
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE BY-LAW 98-211
PAGE 1 OF 7 THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE BY-LAW 98-211 LICENSING: (R.1.2.4.) A by-law for licensing dogs, for requiring the registration of dogs and for prohibiting the running at large
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Guidelines on Police Response Procedures in Domestic Violence Cases
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Guidelines on Police Response Procedures in Domestic Violence Cases Issued October 1991 Revised November 1994 Introduction. These general guidelines consolidate the police response procedures
Anderson County SC Ordinances pertaining to Animal Control
Anderson County SC Ordinances pertaining to Animal Control DIVISION 4. ANIMALS* *State law references: Animals, livestock and poultry, S.C. Code 1976, Title 47; authority to enact ordinances and promulgate
