Technology Integration and Instructional Design
|
|
- Hope Beasley
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Technology Integration and Instructional Design By Jennifer Summerville and Angelia Reid-Griffin We required that students consider how they will use the model to design, and plan their lessons to best meet the needs of their learners and the requirements of the state and NETS. T eaching pre-service and in-service teachers to use technologies in their classrooms begins with their training at the university. Many teacher education programs require students to take a foundational level course in technology education. As these foundational courses are continually revamped to include technologies for various disciplines, teacher education programs find it difficult to establish a consistent platform for preparing students to incorporate instructional design principles with new instructional technology tools. Instructional design is a widely-acknowledged system of planning, implementing, and evaluating instruction (Gagne, Wager, Golas, & Keller, 2005; Reiser & Dick, 1996; Shelly, Cashman, Gunter, & Gunter, 2006). Historically, instructional design was recognized for its use in the military, and now gradually has become more mainstream in teacher education programs. The premise of instructional design is to make learning more efficient. Reiser and Dick (1996), Morgan (1989), and Bowsher (1989) note that employing this organized approach in such diverse settings as schools, developing countries, and business has lead to valuable methods of instruction. Snellbecker (1947) and Morrison, Ross, and Kemp (2007) proposed that this structured systematic process establishes the link between educational research and practical application. There are instructional design models that incorporate technology integration. One notable example is the U.S. Air Force model, which was the pioneer of instructional design models, according to Seels and Glasgow (1998). This model addressed the need for a systematic approach to instruction for military courses that focused on technology integration (p. 172). Other instructional design models incorporating technology integration include the Reiser and Dick model; the ASSURE model; the Teacher Decision Making model, which gives explanation to the ADDIE process (Analysis, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate); and the Kemp model. We used each of the models in previous teaching practices and found the models did not entirely address the needs of our Instructional Technology course. Therefore, we chose to develop a model that would be a good fit with our own teaching pedagogy. We were able to develop a platform, using a systematic approach that blends the principles of instructional planning with technology integration. Instructors of our Instructional Technology course collaborated to develop modules aligned with principles of instructional design. This seemed to be an ideal way to provide students additional opportunities to design instructional activities that incorporated appropriate technology for their curriculum and grade levels. This marriage of technology integration and the use of technology as a tool through instructional design offers the population of students we serve numerous opportunities to engage in lesson-building activities. Volume 52, Number 5 TechTrends September/October
2 The eight modules of the Instructional Technology course provide students with experiences to meet some of the basic computer competencies stated in ISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) and Students (NETS-S). Although research indicates the use of instructional design models to deliver technology-enhanced instruction can lead to effective teaching, there are few models for developing design skills that integrate technology within the education curriculum. This article addresses this research need by focusing on the instructional design model that we used to teach pre-service students to plan activities effectively integrating technologies. Since most of the students enrolled in the Instructional Technology courses have already taken the undergraduatelevel course Instructional Design and Evaluation for Pre-service Teachers, we will focus the discussion on how the model was used with a module that specifically addressed instructional design principles, incorporating the integration of technology in lesson planning. Context The course Instructional Technology is required of all education majors at a four-year university in the southeastern region of the United States. We were both instructors of Instructional Technology courses during the development and implementation of the model described in this article. They also served as instructors of the university s instructional design course for teacher education candidates. The students enrolled in the Instructional Technology courses were teacher education candidates with novice-level computer skills. We categorized the students as traditional and non-traditional students. Traditional students were defined as undergraduates obtaining their first bachelor s degree, immediately following high school; non-traditional students were defined as returning students who had a college degree or were returning to school after several years away from formal schooling. These students sought to teach at the Pre-K, elementary, middle, or secondary level with discipline interests varying from Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies, Physical Education, Music Education, and Special Education. All sections of the course used Integrating Technology and Digital Media into the Classroom from the Shelly Cashman Series (Shelly et al., 2006). The instructors sequenced the text into eight modules. Each of the eight modules was completed in approximately two weeks,, and this course lasted about 15 weeks. Students were required to read the chapter(s) for each module and prepare for discussions about relevant issues, usually in an online discussion forum or in class, on campus. At the end of each module, students completed a project based upon the content of the chapters and appropriate technology tools. The course was presented to students in either an online or blended teaching platform, based on the instructor s teaching preference. The online and blended platforms utilized webbased teaching tools such as Blackboard Campus Edition or Vista to present materials and interact with students. The blended courses offered some face-to-face meetings on campus as well as online meetings. As instructors of the course, we generalized that the students technology experiences differed greatly. Many of the traditional students had some experience using the technologies and software programs, while the non-traditional students had little or no experience using the tools. Depending on their levels of confidence using the tools, students chose to enroll in either the online or blended sections of the course. Because many of the students enrolled in our courses may have had some experience with instructional design, we developed a module that specifically addressed using principles of instructional design in the design and development of lesson plans using technology tools. In particular, we used a product called TaskStream as a portfolio builder for students to use from their initial courses in education through completion of their degrees. Within TaskStream, students are able to choose from a selection of tools that allow multiple options for using their lesson plans in the future, including saving all of their materials onto the site for use in other classes. Students could also the plans to the instructors or peers. To provide reflective practice we required students in our courses to publish their lesson plans for review so that feedback could be given from a variety of sources. The focus of the module, entitled Using Technology to Enhance Instructional Design is a lesson plan model that we use in our state. Within this module, students build a sample lesson using an online version of the Lesson Plan template from TaskStream (Shelly et al., 2006). Students are required to plan a simple lesson on a topic of their choice, given their major and subject area. The lesson must be based on state standards and the National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS), which 46 TechTrends September/October 2008 Volume 52, Number 5
3 they must include and cite in their lesson plan, and designed appropriately for their learners. Students must also cite any references used in developing the lesson. The lesson plan template in TaskStream allows students to fill-in critical information such as subject, topic, grade level and a summary of the lesson (see Appendix A). Using the template, students complete the lesson plan based on sound pedagogy. It is not sufficient for students to simply fill-in the blanks of the lesson template. We required that students consider how they will use the model to design, and plan their lessons to best meet the needs of their learners and the requirements of the state and NETS. A model for instructional design for pre-service teachers A model often comes from a theoretical perspective. As Seels and Glasgow (1998) note, many differences of opinion concerning instructional design models have come from constructivists due to the cognitive principles expressed in many models (p. 183). Building on a constructivist framework, we prepared an instructional design model for how to apply the theory in practice. The model combines both theory and practice and eliminated some of the fixed steps from other traditional models. Some of these instructional models include Reiser and Dick, Teacher Decision Making model (ADDIE), and ASSURE. These models, used previously in our teaching practices, did not address the needs of the Instructional Technology course, which led to the analysis of these models along with Kemp s Model for Instructional Design (see Figure 1) and later to the development of our own model. We found that some of the models incorporated methodical features for the incorporation of technology use in teaching, however the rather linear and inflexible designs of their approaches to planning and delivering instruction were too limiting to pedagogical practices. The Reiser and Dick (1996) seven series model proved to be problematic when students tried to incorporate a variety of approaches to using technology with their instructional plans. The model as noted by Shambaugh and Magliaro (2006) did not leave any room for the in-depth analysis of the curriculum that supports technology integration. The model seemed to maintain instruction at the forefront of the planning process (Shambaugh & Magliaro, 2006, p. 40). Although Reiser and Dick (1996) indicated the importance of flexibility in planning instruction, their plan was not as flexible as they suggested. They based their steps solely on teachers first stating instructional goals and then allowing the rest to follow along that statement (p. 6). The integration of technologies by users of this model Figure 1: The Kemp Model of Instructional Design can be implemented in the choice of media step. Reiser and Dick (1996) describe this step as the physical means by which instruction is delivered to students (p. 68). We felt that because preparing teachers to select the correct media for their curriculum served as the main goal of this course, this model s approach was too restrictive. Therefore we decided against the use of the Reiser and Dick model with this course. We also considered the more widely known ASSURE model in the field of instructional technology (Heinich et al., 2002; Shelly et al., 2006). This model provides processes for implementing instruction that uses technology effectively. Shelly et al. indicated that when using technology, an instructional design model and planning take on a more important role for the teacher (2006, p. 6.22). The six stages of the ASSURE model are analyze learner; state objectives; select methods, media, and materials; utilize media and materials; require learner participation; and evaluate and revise (Shelly et al., 2006). At first glance, this model seemed ideal for our course, however, in an effort to provide students with instructional design process skills that were flexible and encompassed the principles of educational research and practice, this model seemed to fall short of our expectations. It failed to support our practice of teaching students to develop instruction that focuses not only on the learners needs but also adheres to the requirements of the state and NETS. This left us again searching for an instructional design process that would meet our goals for the courses. In teaching our instructional design courses, we came across the Shambaugh Volume 52, Number 5 TechTrends September/October
4 Figure 2: The Summerville Integrated Model. and Magliaro (2006) Teacher Decision Making process which described many of the points found in ADDIE. ADDIE is one of the most widely used processes in instructional design but has come under scrutiny as to whether it is a model or process. As explained by Molenda (2003), the ADDIE model does not exist and is merely a colloquial label for the systematic development process (Morrison, Ross, Kemp, 2006, p. 13). The Teacher Decision Making process too failed to allow flexibility in it linear arrangement. Jennifer Summerville had used the Kemp Model of Instructional Design previously in an instructional design course and thought that it may be a good design for this course. The Kemp model (Kemp & Smellie, 1994) has an elliptical nature in addressing the core processes for instruction. We both found the unique design of the model to be a good fit with our own teaching pedagogy. However, we both felt that the model did not address how knowledge is transferred among the tiers. We felt it would not help our student effectively incorporate technology in planning their instructional tasks. Jennifer Summerville, the author of the model shown in Figure 2, took a more circular, cyclical approach to the design of instruction and less of a linear approach. This circular model allowed incorporation of the different elements that are important to the overall design of instruction and supported design of instruction developed and implemented for preservice teachers in the undergraduate course. The model s outer layers of Learner Analysis, Instructional Strategies and Task Analysis are the beginning steps in the process of instructional design. We addressed the first tier only briefly in this course because they are covered more thoroughly in the instructional design course. The focus of the instructional technology courses begins with the second tier where one finds Media (which includes both Design and Selection), Content Analysis, Government Mandates and Lesson Planning. We continue through both Assessment and Evaluation and finally end with our most important goal, the Transfer of knowledge. This is not only a design model but also a teaching model. The circular nature of the new instructional design model allows for maximum flexibility in design. We view the use of this model as stressing re-visitation of each section within each tier. One can begin with Government Mandates, for example, and revisit them at any time. However, movement from one tier to the next does not indicate that the previous tier should be forgotten. Therefore, we believe the review of the first tier is essential for students in this course. Each of the tiers does have its own importance and should be visited and somewhat completed in a sequential order. After all, one does not begin with the concept of Transfer. That is an endstate. How the course modules fit the design model The eight modules of the Instructional Technology course provide students with experiences to meet some of the basic computer competencies stated in ISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) and Students (NETS-S). Within each of the modules, students learn the mechanics of the technologies and demonstrate an understanding of how to integrate them into the classroom. Aligning with the model, the course goal is for students to develop lessons that impact the learners cognition and academic achievement (Anonymous, 2004). Each module supports this goal by providing instructional activities for students to obtain application skills as they interact with various media. During these interactions with different media, students learn to focus on applications relevant to their specific content as they develop their lesson. Each module project is evaluated by a group of peers for adherence to required criteria. Students have an opportunity to review and discuss the projects prior to final review by the instructor. They also have an opportunity to review and evaluate their own work in a final portfolio project in which they can make changes to all of the modules to create the best body of work possible to represent their knowledge of a variety of media. 48 TechTrends September/October 2008 Volume 52, Number 5
5 Module one: In this first module, students are required to have an understanding of NETS (International Society for Technology in Education, ) and apply that understanding of the standards to a project in which they are given a budget for purchasing technology and supportive equipment and materials. They write up the budget and rationale using a word processing program. Within the first module, students must take into account media, government mandates, content analysis, and planning. They also begin to touch on the inner circles of assessment, evaluation, and transfer. Module two: Students select an educational website for evaluation. The website is of their choosing but must be educational in nature (as opposed to a website for business or training). The evaluation form focuses on critical evaluation of not only media attributes but what students learn from the site. In addition, we require students to explain how the website that they review may or may not meet NETS and how the site may or may not be appropriate in the classroom (as a part of both content analysis and lesson planning). The emphasis of this project is on the whole of the process from media attributes to transfer. Module three: Students use TaskStream to help them develop a lesson plan. Students must identify state standards and possibly NETS that apply to their lessons, they select media, methods and materials to use in their classrooms, they analyze content for the lesson, and they plan the lesson, using the Six Point Lesson Plan template (see Appendix A). Students also plan for assessment and evaluation within their lesson plan. In addition, because this project is so comprehensive, the emphasis is on transfer of knowledge from one daily lesson to the next. Students not only learn how to encourage transfer within their own lessons but they, as students, are encouraged to transfer their own knowledge of lessons, media and instructional design to other modules. The key to this module is not the tool but the use of the tool in an appropriate manner. Some students initially fill in the blanks with minimal verbiage. We discourage surface thinking and encourage students to consider their actual classrooms while they design their lessons. Since students have the ability to easily share their plans with others with the click of a button they can receive feedback on the quality of their lessons from multiple resources. Module four: Students use PowerPoint for a part of the lesson that they have designed. They are to take state standards and NETS into account when they create their PowerPoint lesson. They subscribe to good media design standards as they create their PowerPoint so that they use the media to its best advantage (as opposed to creating something loud with clashing colors). Students use the PowerPoint presentation that they created for Module 4 as a part of an overall lesson plan and analyze the content that they include in the presentation. The product should align with their lesson created in module three. In this module, the following standards are addressed: NETS-S 3A, 3B, 4A, and 6B (International Society for Technology in Education, ). This module allows students to further analyze media and content relevant for developing the activity. Students are required to plan for the assessment of the content that they present in their PowerPoint and should plan to have their media, methods, and materials evaluated by peers and possibly their own students. Module five: Students use the Microsoft Excel program to develop classroom record keeping skills by creating an electronic grade book. Student use the tools in Excel to calculate students grades and create graphs to compare students performances. In addition to creating a grade book, students produce a progress report they would distribute to parents. The assignment requires students to compare the scores of an individual student in their grade book with that of the entire class through the use of graphs. Students also are required to use the If-Then command and create their own quizzes using the instructions given. They are encouraged to share their If-Then quizzes with a peer to check for accuracy. Module six: Students create a WebQuest for use in their classroom. The comprehensive nature of a WebQuest lends itself to the whole of the circular module. WebQuests can be a powerful tool for educators because they can be implemented at almost every grade level and with different subject matter. They also make good use of timely information gained from online resources, which may be updated more often than print-based materials (Summerville, 2000).The development of these tools further extends students exposure to lesson design by requiring analysis of appropriate media and awareness of government mandates in publishing items on-line. Each module project is evaluated by a group of peers for adherence to required criteria. Students have an opportunity to review and discuss the projects prior to final review by the instructor. Volume 52, Number 5 TechTrends September/October
6 Module seven: Students evaluate media by completing evaluation of one of the computer software programs available in the education computer lab. Kathy Shrock s (2006) Website Evaluation Form and the Software Evaluation Rubric developed by Shelly et al. (2006) were used in this module. As with the web evaluation, students discussed the relevance of the program to their curriculum and grade level. The software evaluation tool allows students to develop skills using decision making rubrics as they learn to select appropriate materials for their learner s needs. This module leads to competence in evaluating media that will empower learners to transfer knowledge learned into real classroom settings. Module eight: Students create a PowerPoint presentation regarding the integration of emerging technologies in their classrooms. It is a persuasive presentation with a main objective of the assignment being that students are able to address objections about newer technologies and how those technologies can be used effectively and efficiently in the classroom. Once again, the presentations are peer reviewed, either in a faceto-face class setting or online. The final evaluation tool for this course consists of an electronic portfolio in which students compile their products from the eight modules. The portfolio is developed on TaskStream and the required products are consistent for each section of the Instructional Technology course. The products are evaluated by peers and individual instructors of the Instructional Technology course. The portfolio provides evidence that students are competent in complying with the basic computer NETS and are able to transfer knowledge of computer integration into an actual classroom. All core education courses require the use of TaskStream to build a pre-admittance portfolio whereby assignments can be used in methods classes and reviewed by methods faculty. The Instructional Technology final portfolio can be used as a stand-alone representation of the work completed in Instructional Technology and as a model for creating a portfolio product for other classes. Use of the model in reflective practice Due to the circular nature of the Summerville Integrated Model, students and practitioners are encouraged to explore each ring of the model, section by section, until one is satisfied that each section is completed in an appropriate and thorough manner. As in the real world of the professional instructional designer, sections may be revisited as warranted by formative evaluation. If, for example, it is discovered that a NETS or state standard has been overlooked or shortchanged, the missing information can be included before it impacts transfer. As one may note from both the model and the explanation of the modules within the undergraduate Instructional Technology course, we strive for students to understand that integrating technology into instruction is not a simple matter of using the tools. It is also not a use it and forget it proposition. Everything that we do every tool that we select every standard to which we adhere all the content that we design every time we assess, evaluate and revise, we are working toward a common goal (Summerville, 2006). That goal is the transfer of knowledge to other subjects. To this end, the Summerville Integrated Model is a model of instructional design both for teachers as learners and for them to take with them into their own classrooms. Summary and recommendations We have found that this model and approach to learning has worked well for teaching pre-service teachers and appears to be a positive learning experience for our students. Many of the methods faculty are pleased with the abilities of students to create lessons that are learner appropriate. Students feel more confident about designing lessons and using the toolsets presented in class as a part of their own classrooms. Some of our colleague s concerns include the amount of time needed to address the instructional planning issue in the Instructional Technology course. Many fear that too much time allocated in the course for instructional design may take away from the instructional time for teaching new technologies. Although we have not found this to be the case as yet, the increasing complexity of the tools may necessitate that the course be redesigned or even split into two separate courses (e.g., Tools and Integration ). The model that we proposed allows for higher-level thinking and reflection of teacher candidates. It provides for the opportunity of peer and self-evaluation. The practical experiences that students are presented with during these courses lead to quality products that they can use in their own classrooms. Students are able to focus on the process of instructional design and technology integration, so the inevitable obsolescence of tools becomes less of an issue. Instead of a focus on cutting edge, changeable technology tools, our students focus on transfer and that is our main goal. 50 TechTrends September/October 2008 Volume 52, Number 5
7 Taskstream Lesson Plan Template Vital Information Author: Title of Lesson: Subject(s): Topic or Unit of Study: Grade/Level: Summary: Focus and Review (Establish Prior Knowledge) Statement (Inform) of Objectives Teacher Input (Present Tasks, Information, and Guidance) Guided Practice (Elicit Performance) Independent Practice: Seatwork and Homework (Retain and Transfer) Closure (Plan for Maintenance) Standards North Carolina Standard Course of Study: NETS-Students: NETS-Teachers: References Cite Standards from lesson curriculum area and NETS (for students) and cite all references. Save copy of lesson on USB drive in initials folder. Upload lesson on WEBCT and submit Desktop Project Assignment. Appendix A: Taskstream Lesson Plan Template Jennifer Summerville serves as the Associate Dean for Distance Learning and the Weekend College at Collin College and was previously an Associate Professor of Instructional Design at University of North Carolina at Wilmington and an Assistant Professor of Instructional Design and Technology at Emporia State University. Her research interests include learner-centered and policy issues in online and distance education and cognitive and personality issues in the design and development of instruction in both corporate and educational environments. She received her Ph.D. from University of Northern Colorado in Educational Technology, holds an M.S. in Computer Education and Cognitive Systems from University of North Texas, and has a B.B.A in Marketing from Baylor University. dr_j2@yahoo.com Angelia Reid-Griffin is an Assistant Professor in the Instructional Technology, Foundations and Secondary Education Department at the University of North Carolina Wilmington s School of Education. Her teaching and research interests include using technology as an instructional and learning tool, motivating students to enter science, math, and technology careers and minority teacher shortage. griffin@uncw.edu References Anonymous. (2004). Instructional technology education syllabus. UNC-Wilmington: Watson School of Education. Bowsher, J. E. (1989). Educating America: Lessons learned in the nation s corporations. New York: Wiley. Gagne, R., Wager, W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Heinich, M., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall. (Shelly book).international Society for Technology in Education. ( ). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved November 1, 2006, from cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_profile-stu.html Kemp, J. & Smellie, D. (1994). Planning, producing, and using instructional technologies (7 th ed.). Harper Collins Publishers. Morgan, R. M. (1989). Instructional systems development in third world countries. Educational Technology Research & Development, 37, Morrison, G. R., S. M. Ross, et al. (2007). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reiser, R. A., & W. Dick (1996). Instructional Planning: A guide for teachers. Boston, Allyn and Bacon. Schrock, K. (2006). Critical evaluation of a web site: Websites for use by educators. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from Seels, B., & Z. Glasgow (1998). Making instructional design decisions. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall. Shambaugh, N., & S. G. Magliaro (2006). Instructional Design: A systematic approach for reflective practice. Boston, Pearson A and B. Shellbecker, G. (1974). Learning theory, instructional theory, and psychoeducational design. New York: McGraw-Hill. Shelly, G., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, G. A., & Gunter, R. E. (2006). Teachers discovering computers: Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom (4th ed.). Boston: Thomson Course Technology. Summerville, J. (2006). The Summerville Integrated Model of Instructional Design. Summerville, J. (2000). WebQuests as a part of technology integration: Training preservice teachers. TechTrends, March/April. TaskStream. ( ). TaskStream Tools of Engagement. Retrieved May 8, 2004, from Volume 52, Number 5 TechTrends September/October
8
THE TEACHER AS PROFESSIONAL EDUCATOR
COURSE SYLLABUS Southeast Missouri State University THE TEACHER AS PROFESSIONAL EDUCATOR Department of Middle and Secondary Education Course No.: SE 683 Course Title: Instructional Design & Technology
More information[CONVERTING YOUR COURSE TO A BLENDED FORMAT]
Instructor Guide Prepared by Dalia Hanna, Manager, Learning and Teaching, Ryerson University 2012. Table of Contents Introduction and objectives 3 Unit 1: Communication 3 Unit 2: Pre-Planning Strategies
More informationOTTAWA ONLINE ECE-30050 Early Childhood Math Methods
Course Description OTTAWA ONLINE ECE-30050 Early Childhood Math Methods Examines theories of cognitive development framework to understand how young children acquire math skills, concepts and abilities.
More informationRunning head: THE FIELD OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY. Instructional Design. Teresa Hill. University of Houston ClearLake
Design 1 Running head: THE FIELD OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY Instructional Design Teresa Hill University of Houston ClearLake In partial fulfillment of the requirements for INST 5131 Assignment 3 Caroline
More informationAnalysis of Three Instructional Design Models
Analysis of Three Instructional Design Models 1 2 Abstract Instructional design models provide for a systematic approach of implementing the instructional design process for a specific educational initiative
More informationInstructional Design for Career and Technical Education TECH 3181/5181 (330:181g) Syllabus MEET YOUR INSTRUCTOR
of 5 Instructional Design for Career and Technical Education TECH 3181/5181 (330:181g) Syllabus MEET YOUR INSTRUCTOR Ali Kashef, Professor in Technology Management & Manufacturing area and Coordinator
More informationLeadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition
VOLUME 31, NUMBER 4, 2013 Leadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition Lisa Bertrand, EdD Professor and Program Coordinator Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling
More informationRevisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
More informationEffectiveness of Online Instruction
Effectiveness of Online Instruction Delar K. Singh, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Education Eastern Connecticut State University Willimantic, CT 06226 E-mail: singhd@easternct.edu Paper presented
More informationA New Approach to Equip Students with Visual Literacy Skills:
Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Computer Education and Instructional Technology A New Approach to Equip Students with Visual Literacy Skills: Use of Infographics in Education Pınar Nuhoğlu Kibar
More informationInstructional Scaffolding for Online Courses
Instructional Scaffolding for Online Courses Helen M. Grady Mercer University grady_h@mercer.edu Abstract Instructional scaffolding is a process by which an instructor supports a student in executing a
More informationADDIE. Instructional Design Model. Leshin et. Al. in 1992 labeled instructional design as instructional system
1 ADDIE Instructional Design Model Background information: Leshin et. Al. in 1992 labeled instructional design as instructional system development, in which an individual completes an ordered set of activities
More informationMIT 512 Instructional Design Syllabus
MIT 512 Instructional Design Syllabus Instructor: Jeff Ertzberger, Ed. D. Office: ED Building Rm 227 Office Phone: 910-962-7670 E-Mail: Through Course web site or ertzbergerj@uncw.edu Course web site http://learn.uncw.edu
More informationEssays on Teaching Excellence. Assessing Students Online Learning: Strategies and Resources
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 17, Number 3, 2005-06 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
More informationRunning head: CONCEPTUALIZING INTELLIGENT AGENTS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING. Conceptualizing Intelligent Agents For Teaching and Learning
Running head: CONCEPTUALIZING INTELLIGENT AGENTS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Conceptualizing Intelligent Agents For Teaching and Learning Ali Jafari, Ph.D. Professor of Computer Technology Director of CyberLab
More informationA Paradigm for Selecting an Institutional Software
A Paradigm for Selecting an Institutional Software Diana Kao, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Faculty of Business Administration, University of Windsor 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N9B 3P4 519-253-3000
More informationThe Development of High Quality E-Learning Courseware For Students in Higher Education 1 : Empirical Findings from Chiang Mai University.
1 The Development of High Quality E-Learning Courseware For Students in Higher Education 1 : Empirical Findings from Chiang Mai University Abstract Dr. Thanomporn Laohajaratsang 2 In order to make the
More informationEDIT 610 Instructional Design and Technology Integration
EDIT 610 Instructional Design and Technology Integration Instructor: Dr. Jeremy Dickerson Professor Office: Prince Hall 205B Office Hours: Online and F2F hours by appointment, otherwise T/Th 8:00-11:00
More informationCreating Effective Course Content in WebCT An Instructional Design Model. By Randy L. Stamm and Bernadette Howlett
Creating Effective Course Content in WebCT An Instructional Design Model By Randy L. Stamm and Bernadette Howlett As one part of its faculty development mission, the Instructional Technology Resource Center
More informationPREPARING PERSERVICE MATH TEACHERS TO TEACH WITH TODAY'S TECHNOLOGY: KEEPING THEM UP TO DATE
PREPARING PERSERVICE MATH TEACHERS TO TEACH WITH TODAY'S TECHNOLOGY: KEEPING THEM UP TO DATE William Blubaugh University of Northern Colorado 501 20 th Street, Campus Box 122 Greeley, CO 80639-0098 Bill.Blubaugh@unco.edu
More informationThe Teacher Educator Standards
The Teacher Educator Standards From the Association of Teacher Educators Winter Conference Standards Clinic New Orleans, LA February, 2008 Facilitators: Dr. Robert Fisher Dr. Barbara Short Dr. Robin McBee
More informationSt. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors
St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors Brooklyn Campus Long Island Campus 245 Clinton Avenue 155 West Roe Boulevard Brooklyn, NY
More informationED385608 1994-04-00 Teacher Portfolio Assessment. ERIC/AE Digest.
ED385608 1994-04-00 Teacher Portfolio Assessment. ERIC/AE Digest. ERIC Development Team www.eric.ed.gov Table of Contents If you're viewing this document online, you can click any of the topics below to
More informationAssessment Coordinator: Bill Freese 214 Reid Hall 994 3072
MSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2009 2010 Department: Education Department Head: Dr. Joanne Erickson Assessment Coordinator: Bill Freese 214 Reid Hall 994 3072 Degrees/Majors/Options Offered by Department
More informationCourse duration Author name Course overview
Course duration Author name Course overview Course 3: DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING YOUR ONLINE COURSE 3 hours Professor Jennifer C. Richardson, Ph.D., Purdue University The purpose of this course is to help
More informationIMPLICATIONS OF TWO WELL-KNOWN MODELS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS IN DISTANCE EDUCATION: DICK-CAREY VERSUS MORRISON-ROSS-KEMP
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE April 2007 ISSN 1302 6488, Volume: 8 Number: 2 Article: 5 IMPLICATIONS OF TWO WELL-KNOWN MODELS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS IN DISTANCE EDUCATION: DICK-CAREY
More informationOnline Course Proposal Form Form 1
If using Firefox, you must download the form. Click the download icon in the top right corner (looks like a down arrow on a sheet of paper). You will then be asked in the pop window if you want to open
More informationESE 6939 Instructional Design
ESE 6939 Instructional Design The mission of the College of Education is to prepare exemplary practitioners and scholars; to generate, use and disseminate knowledge about teaching, learning and human development;
More informationTraining for faculty who teach online
Training for faculty who teach online David Batts Leslie Pagliari William Mallett Cheryl McFadden Dr. Batts is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina
More informationMark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper
Running Head: BCC MATH SUCCESS Preparing for math success: Brevard Community College preparatory math courses Mark J. Quathamer Brevard Community College Quality Enhancement Plan White Paper Running Head:
More informationINSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN IN EDUCATION: NEW MODEL
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN IN EDUCATION: NEW MODEL Prof. Dr. Aytekin İŞMAN Sakarya University, Turkey isman@sakarya.edu.tr & ismanay@hotmail.com, www.aytekinisman.com INTRODUCTION Instruction is a plan of teaching
More informationPBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus 1
PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus 1 Title Implementing Effective Writing Workshops (Grades 1-3) Formerly titled "Effective Writing Instruction" Target Audience This course is intended for pre-service and
More informationPreparation Institute
EPI Educator Preparation Institute Course Information EPI 0003 Technology Course Title: EPI0003 Technology 3 credit hours Location: Provided by EPI office (813.253.7893 or 813.253.7945) Time: Saturday
More informationJennifer Durham, Ph.D.
Jennifer Durham, Ph.D. 2318 North Quantico Street Arlington, VA 22205 703.869.2140 durhams@mac.com EDUCATION Ph.D. Education 2010 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Major: Special Education, Minor:
More informationA Study of Student Attitudes and Performance in an Online Introductory Business Statistics Class
A Study of Student Attitudes and Performance in an Online Introductory Business Statistics Class Sue B. Schou Idaho State University ABSTRACT Due to economic constraints, more and more distance education
More informationInstructional Delivery Rationale for an On and Off-Campus Graduate Education Program Using Distance Education Technology
Instructional Delivery Rationale for an On and Off-Campus Graduate Education Program Using Distance Education Technology Kathryne A. Newton, Mathias J. Sutton, and Duane D. Dunlap Purdue University Session
More informationPBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus
1 Title Inspire Elementary Students with Engineering Target Audience This course is intended for pre-service and in-service teachers of grades PreK to 6 th grade. Prerequisites To successfully participate
More informationOnline Teaching and Learning
Teaching online requires faculty members to shift their roles from instructor to facilitator or coach. Content shifts to customized materials and learning includes many active components. Simonson, Smaldino,
More informationDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Sciences
Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences DEGREES Learning Technologies (MS) Instructional Design and Technology (MS) CERTIFICATES Learning Technologies Virtual Worlds in Education Instructional
More informationProgram Status Report 1. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Program Folio Status Report
Program Status Report 1 FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Program Folio Status Report Program: Degree Level: Program Leader: Program Faculty: Special Education Master of Science Cramer
More informationAll students are admitted during the summer and begin their coursework in the fall. Students must commit to completing these courses in sequence.
Department of Special Education Initial Licensure and Added Endorsement the Special Education Generalist Overview and Assessment Plan Purpose for Program Change In the Fall of 2013 the Department of Special
More informationFaculty Handbook for Alternative Delivery Classes 2011-2012
Faculty Handbook for Alternative Delivery Classes 2011-2012 Learning Technologies Department Table of Contents Overview for All Alternate Delivery Classes... 1 Delivery Methods... 1 Enhancement and Tools...
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM
GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & HUMAN SERVICES Dr. Hank Weddington, Dean Dr. Kim Matthews, Chair SCHOOL OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADMINISTRATION OFFERED IN ASHEVILLE
More informationMaster of Arts in Teaching/Science Education Master of Arts in Teaching/Mathematics Education
Master of Arts in Teaching/Science Education Master of Arts in Teaching/Mathematics Education Assessment F12-S13 FOR ACADEMIC YEAR: 2012-2013 PROGRAM: MAT/Science and Mathematics Education SCHOOL: NS&M
More informationTeacher Education. Electronic Evidences Handbook. Initial A Licensure. School of Education NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
Teacher Education Initial A Licensure Electronic Evidences Handbook School of Education NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY Spring 2013 P a g e 2 Table of Contents Overview... 3 Getting Started with TaskStream...
More informationEDET / AEET 722 Instructional Design and Assessment
I. Descriptive Information EDET / AEET 722 Instructional Design and Assessment A. Course Number/Title Instructional Design and Assessment B. Catalog Description: Principles and models of instructional
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Instructor: David Dietrich, Ph.D. Office: 219 McWherter, Jackson State Community College, Jackson, TN 38301 Phone: 731.267.2949 or
More informationCTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT
CTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT 1 Because the Office of Undergraduate Studies is now requiring program assessment reports that are similar to CTL program assessment reports; The Office of Research, Evaluation,
More informationCourse Syllabus. PSY/SPED 535 Applied Behavior Analysis. Fall 2015. Dr. Kelly M. Carrero, BCBA
1 Course Syllabus PSY/SPED 535 Applied Behavior Analysis Fall 2015 Dr. Kelly M. Carrero, BCBA Office: Henderson 227 Email: Kelly.Carrero@tamuc.edu Office Hours: Tuesdays 2pm-4pm at Mesquite Campus Fridays
More informationElementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework
Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework Shaping Tomorrow: Ideas to Action The Early Elementary Education program for prospective elementary education candidates
More informationInstructional Design Models. UBC/KFUPM Workshop 2009
Instructional Design Models UBC/KFUPM Workshop 2009 Instructional Design? The process for designing instruction based on sound practices. Instructional design is based on the assumption that learning is
More informationJennifer M. Scagnelli Comprehensive Exam Question (O Bannon) Instructional Technology - Fall 2007
Jennifer M. Scagnelli Comprehensive Exam Question (O Bannon) Instructional Technology - Fall 2007 Instructional design is a system of procedures used to plan and develop instructional materials and activities
More informationBest Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design
Best Practices for Online Courses 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design The following criteria are meant to act as guidelines for the course development process. Some of these guidelines would
More informationSTUDENT HANDBOOK FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE GRADES EDUCATION MAJORS
STUDENT HANDBOOK FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE GRADES EDUCATION MAJORS TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page General Information 3 Mission Statement 3 First Year Seminar 4 TRACS Advising 4 WHEE Teach LLC / WHEE Teach
More informationHigher Education E-Learning Courseware: Pedagogical-Based Design and Development
Higher Education E-Learning Courseware: Pedagogical-Based Design and Development Jintavee Monsakul, Ed.D. Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Educational Technology, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
More informationCGMB 123 MULTIMEDIA APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT
CGMB 123 MULTIMEDIA APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT Chapter 7 Instructional System Design Models T.J.Iskandar Abd. Aziz tjiskandar@uniten.edu.my Part I Instructional Design Terms & Definition Objectives 3 Upon
More informationAn Analysis of how Proctoring Exams in Online Mathematics Offerings Affects Student Learning and Course Integrity
An Analysis of how Proctoring Exams in Online Mathematics Offerings Affects Student Learning and Course Integrity Introduction Reliable assessment is central to education and educational institutions for
More informationComparative Analysis between System Approach, Kemp, and ASSURE Instructional Design Models
International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 3 No. 12 December 2015 Comparative Analysis between System Approach, Kemp, and ASSURE Instructional Design Models By Ahmad Abdullahi Ibrahim Ahmad.daneji@yahoo.com
More informationModule I - Introduction to Instructional Technology
Master of Science in Secondary Education of Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Educational Technology and Teaching Module I - Introduction to Instructional Technology Week 1 National Technical Institute
More informationCalifornia State University San Marcos: College of Education. EDUC 422 - Technology Tools for Teaching and Learning
California State University San Marcos: College of Education EDUC 422 - Technology Tools for Teaching and Learning Instructor: Dr. Kathy Hayden Office Phone: 70-84 Office: UH 218 Lab: UH 271 Office Hours:
More informationOTTAWA ONLINE EDC-7683 Instructional Theory and Strategy in Technology Integration
OTTAWA ONLINE EDC-7683 Instructional Theory and Strategy in Technology Integration Course Description Focus on development and implementation of educational technological policies that systematize the
More informationSummary of the Case Cornerstone University Teacher Education Department Undergraduate Elementary and Secondary Programs
Summary of the Case Cornerstone University Teacher Education Department Undergraduate Elementary and Secondary Programs The Summary of the Case is written by the auditors and approved by program faculty.
More informationCourse Descriptions for MS degree in Instructional Design and Technology:
TM Instructional Design & Technology 1200 Commercial St. Emporia, KS 66801-5087 620.341.5829 idt@emporia.edu Fax 620.341.5785 Course Descriptions for MS degree in Instructional Design and Technology: Instructional
More informationThe UCSC Master of Arts in Education and Teacher Credential Program Philosophy of the Master of Arts in Education/ Teacher Credential Program
" The UCSC Master of Arts in Education and Teacher Credential Program prepares teachers for California's underserved students. Through a combination of coursework, classroom placements and research projects,
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM
GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & HUMAN SERVICES Dr. Hank Weddington, Dean Dr. Kim Matthews, Chair SCHOOL OF EDUCATION MASTER OF ARTS IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADMINISTRATION OFFERED IN ASHEVILLE
More informationCourse Syllabus. Instructional Design and Technology 573 Online Professional Development Use of Technologies in the K-12 Classroom
Course Syllabus Instructional Design and Technology 573 Online Professional Development Use of Technologies in the K-12 Classroom STAR-Online IDT 573 Online Professional Development: Use of Technologies
More informationTexas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy
Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy Policy Statement Texas Wesleyan University recognizes the goal of distance education is to increase accessibility to learning by providing
More informationWATSON SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON
WATSON SCHOOL OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON BACHELOR OF ARTS DEGREE IN ELEMENTARY EDUCATION Program Goals and Objectives The goal of the elementary education program at UNCW is to
More informationCTL Online Workshop Program Referral Resource Sheet
ACADEMIC POLICIES THAT CAN AFFECT YOU AS A UMUC FACULTY MEMBER Familiarizes faculty with UMUC Academic Policies and their effect on faculty responsibilities and expectations for students Intended for all
More informationProfessional Education Unit Assessment System School of Education and Child Development Drury University
Plan 7-30-12 1 Professional Education Unit Assessment System School of Education and Child Development Drury University Overview and Goals The PEU assessment system is designed to facilitate collection
More informationOnline Course Development Guide and Review Rubric
Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric Thank you for participating in our online course review process! Your input is extremely valuable to us, and we appreciate the time you are taking to help
More informationGEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
More informationHMID 5003: Principles and Practices of Instructional Design
HMID 5003: Principles and Practices of Instructional Design Welcome and Introduction to the Course What a wonderful phrase this is: instructional design! Most times, students or people at large are curious
More informationTaskStream and Outcomes Assessment Guide for Students
TaskStream and Outcomes Assessment Guide for Students TaskStream for Assessment What is TaskStream and why use it? TaskStream in general is an online outcomes and assessment system. It has two components:
More informationa. A brief description of the assessment, its use in the program, and how the assessment is aligned to standards
National Education Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS*Teachers) Undergraduates enrolled in ETC 447 Fall 2011 Fall 2014 (1) Alignment & Data Findings a. A brief description of the assessment, its use
More informationOregon State University College of Education. SYLLABUS TCE 553 Critical Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics
Oregon State University College of Education SYLLABUS TCE 553 Critical Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Credits: 3 Instructor s Name: Karen M. Higgins Instructor s Email and phone: higginsk@oregonstate.edu
More informationGardner-Webb University Gardner-Webb University School of Education Master of Arts in Executive Leadership Studies Handbook
Gardner-Webb University Gardner-Webb University School of Education Master of Arts in Executive Leadership Studies Handbook Page 2 of 145 Table of Contents Program Description... 5 Program Format Descriptions...
More informationHow To Teach A College Of Education And Behavior Science Course
Western Kentucky University Special Education School of Teacher Education EXED 533 Seminar: Curriculum for Learning and Behavior Disorders Prerequisites: SPED 516 & SPED 531 Office: Gary Ransdell Hall
More informationRationale for the Change
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Middle Grades Education, with Licensure in Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Appalachian State University
More informationTeaching and Encouraging Meaningful Reading of Mathematics Texts
Teaching and Encouraging Meaningful Reading of Mathematics Texts Jane Friedman, Perla Myers and Jeff Wright Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park, San
More informationINST 5500 Online Course Development. Course Syllabus. Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours
INST 5500 Online Course Development Course Syllabus Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours COURSE DESCRIPTION Designed to synthesize information from educational technology coursework and experiences.
More informationDepartment of Human Services Introduction to Applied Behavior Analysis. SPE 439 Spring 2013
Credit: Department of Human Services Introduction to Applied Behavior Analysis 3 semester hours Semester: Spring 2013 Instructor: e-mail: Dr. Kathleen Sheriff SPE 439 Spring 2013 d2l e-mail is the primary
More informationProgram Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) 2007 Standards - Option A
Program Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) 2007 Standards - Option A NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION
More informationVirtual Programs and Assessment in Graduate Teacher Education. Nedra Atwell Marge Maxwell Western Kentucky University. Abstract
Virtual Programs and Assessment in Graduate Teacher Education Nedra Atwell Marge Maxwell Western Kentucky University Abstract This research goes to the very heart of professional education preparation
More informationA Technology Snapshot: Teacher Preparation Program and the Local Public Schools
Mulholland, R. (2006). A technology snapshot: Teacher preparation program and the local public schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), 284-292. A Technology Snapshot: Teacher
More informationCOMPARISON OF LIBRARY SCHOOLS IN COLORADO
COMPARISON OF LIBRARY SCHOOLS IN COLORADO In general, all programs said the following: You have to have a teaching degree first in order to become a teacher/librarian or media endorsed librarian unless
More informationSeminar in Instructional Technology
Joe Winslow jwinslow@coastal.edu Kearns Hall 211B COURSE DESCRIPTION: Capstone experience in the design, development, implementation, evaluation and management of instructional technologies and their potential
More informationProgram Status Report 1. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Program Folio Status Report
Program Status Report 1 FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Program Folio Status Report Program: Education Degree Level: MAT Program Leader: Maria L. Fernandez, PhD Program Faculty: Maria
More informationTen Strategies to Improve Blended Course Design
Ten Strategies to Improve Blended Course Design This Magna White Paper is based on a March 6, 2012, Magna Online Seminar titled Ten Ways to Improve Blended Course Design. The seminar was cosponsored by
More informationMaster of Arts in Teaching Elementary Education (MAT)
Master of Arts in Teaching Elementary Education (MAT) The Master of Arts in Teaching: Elementary Education (MAT) is a program of study that prepares career changers who do not have an undergraduate degree
More informationA Standards-Based Technology Integration Path at Towson University
Wizer, D., & Ryan, P. (2004). A Standards-based technology integration path at Towson University. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 73-80. A Standards-Based Technology Integration
More informationGraduate Certificate in University Teaching Handbook
Graduate Certificate in University Teaching Handbook Contents Overview of Graduate Certificate in University Teaching... 2 Program Overview... 2 Why a Graduate Certificate in University Teaching at Concordia?...
More informationProfessional Education Unit
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY Professional Education Unit ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK 2011/2012 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK Table of Contents The Unit Assessment System Overview...
More informationUsing a Learning Management System to Foster Independent Learning in an Outcome-Based University: A Gulf Perspective
Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Volume 7, 2010 Using a Learning Management System to Foster Independent Learning in an Outcome-Based University: A Gulf Perspective Azzedine Lansari
More informationEDUC 450/451/550/551: ART EDUCATION METHODS FOR ELEMENTARY (2credits) AND SECONDARY (2credits) CLASSROOM
1 Janice Thom, BS, M.Ed. Office: FA 131 Office: 301-687- 4148 during Office Hours Office Hours: 1:00 1:30pm, Tuesday and Wednesday and by Appointment Email: jdthom@frostburg.edu or djthom@atlanticbb.net
More informationTeacher Certification
100% online coursework Self-paced program Approved by the Texas Education Agency/State Board for Educator Certification Low upfront cost Teacher Certification Course Catalog www.etools4education.com Main
More informationB. Public School Partners Involvement in the Revisioning of the Program and Continued Involvement in the Delivery and Evaluation of the Program
Re-Visioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina MA in History, Secondary Education with Licensure in History and Social Studies Appalachian State University A. Description of how the Proposed
More informationHow To Test Online Information Literacy
Pilot Study Examining Student Learning Gains Using Online Information Literacy Modules Corinne Bishop, Francisca Yonekura, and Patsy Moskal Introduction Since the release of the Information Literacy Competency
More informationClassroom Management & Instruction EDU 163-OL1
Course Syllabus Classroom Management & Instruction EDU 163-OL1 Spring Semester 2013 Class/credit hours: 3 hours Class meets: ONLINE Instructor: Jennifer A. Whittington Office location: Office Phone: E-mail:
More information