REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JASON P. NIELSEN
|
|
- Lydia Lester
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JASON P. NIELSEN
2 BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY S PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF ELIGIBILITY FOR INVESTMENT IN WHISPERING WILLOW EAST, RENEWABLE ENERGY RECOVERY ADJUSTMENT, AND 0 RATE MPUC DOCKET NO. E001/M-- OAH DOCKET NO REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JASON P. NIELSEN Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is Jason P. Nielsen. My business address is 00 First Street SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 01. Q. Have you previously filed direct testimony in this proceeding on behalf of Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL)? A. Yes. Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony? A. The purpose of my rebuttal testimony is to provide clarification of the Whispering Willow East Wind Farm (WWE) cost recovery amounts that IPL is requesting and explain perceived discrepancies that Minnesota Department of Commerce (Department) witness Mr. Mark Johnson points out in his April, 01, revised corrected direct testimony. I will also address Mr. Johnson s recommendation that IPL s cost recovery for WWE should be based on actual generation output from WWE, which would be unlike any other Minnesota utility-owned wind generation facility. Finally, I will discuss IPL s alternative proposal for WWE cost 1
3 recovery. Q. Please summarize your rebuttal testimony. A. My testimony provides: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) clarification of the differences in IPL s calculation of its annual revenue requirement in some filings; clarification of IPL s actual 0 through 0 annual revenue requirements in relation to IPL s estimated 0 through 0 annual revenue requirements that were based on levelized costs of $. per megawatt hour (MWh) and $0.1 per MWh, respectively; clarification on how IPL s annual revenue requirements are being calculated for WWE and why neither WWE s actual or estimated net capacity factor (NCF) is relevant to that calculation; explanation of how using an actual NCF to establish and adjust rate recovery for a utility-owned wind generation facility would violate traditional rate making practices; explanation of the cost recovery alternative presented by IPL with a summary of the annual revenue requirement amounts IPL proposes to collect for 0 through Q. Are you sponsoring any exhibits in the filing? A. Yes. I am sponsoring Exhibit (JPN-), which includes the following schedules: 01 Revenue Requirement: A; B; B-1; B-; C; C-1; D; E Alternative Levelized Cost Model: F. Q. What is the order of your testimony? A. I have included the following subsections: Clarifications;
4 Output-based Recovery is Not Appropriate; and Alternative Cost Recovery Method. CLARIFICATIONS Q. Please start by addressing Mr. Johnson s request for clarification of some slight differences in IPL s Compliance Filing in IPL s 0 Minnesota Rate Case - Docket No. E-001/GR--. A. On page of Mr. Johnson s revised corrected direct testimony, he requests that IPL explain why the calculation of its annual revenue requirement for years 0 through 0 is not completely consistent with IPL s Compliance Filing made on December, 0, in Docket No. E-001/GR-- (Compliance Filing). Mr. Johnson acknowledges that the differences are relatively small in magnitude. Q. Please explain these differences. A. The amounts shown in IPL s Compliance Filing at Section V, Schedule A-, Line 1, ($1,,000), and Section V, Schedule A-, Page of ($1,1,01), are the Minnesota revenue requirement calculation that equates to levelized cost of $1 per MWh. The difference in these two amounts is related to rounding. IPL makes this calculation by determining the capital disallowance that would equate to a levelized cost of $1 per MWh. IPL used a rounded number on Section V, Schedule A-, Line 1 of the Compliance Filing. Q. Please explain the difference between the 0 through 0 revenue requirements proposed by IPL and levelized cost calculations for those years as shown on IPL Exhibit (DV-1), Schedule B.
5 A. In his revised corrected direct testimony on pages to, Mr. Johnson states that IPL s proposed recovery of actual 0 through 0 annual revenue requirements totals $,,0, while the estimated 0 through 0 annual revenue requirements included in the levelized cost calculations of $. per MWh and $0.1 per MWh total $,,1 and $,,, respectively. Mr. Johnson indicated that these differences were not explained by IPL. As I will explain below, the difference is based on IPL s proposal to credit Production Tax Credits (PTCs) as a separate adjustment, while Mr. Johnson s levelized cost calculations include PTCs in the basic revenue requirement. Q. Please explain the different approaches to PTCs and the effect. A. As shown on DOC Ex. MJ-, Line, that information came from IPL Exhibit (DV-1), Schedule B, in Docket No. E001/M--. IPL Exhibit (DV- 1), Schedule B, shows the revenue requirement calculations for years 0 through 0, and states (in parenthesis) that the final annual revenue requirement numbers do not include PTCs. By contrast, the 0 through 0 annual revenue requirements that are included in the levelized cost calculations of $. per MWh and $0.1 per MWh include an assumed level of PTCs. In short, Mr. Johnson is comparing annual revenue requirements using numbers that include PTCs versus numbers that do not include PTCs. Q. Does this mean that IPL s proposal would not provide to customers the reduction in costs resulting from PTCs?
6 A. No. Under IPL s proposal, customers get full benefit of the PTCs that are generated by WWE. These amounts would be calculated and tracked separately from other cost components. Q. Are the actual 0 through 0 revenue requirement amounts higher than what IPL is currently recovering? A. Yes. IPL has under-recovered its actual revenue requirements from 0 through 0. In the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Order issued on August, 0, in Docket No. E-001/GR--, the Commission ordered that the costs associated with WWE be removed from base rates and recovered through a renewable rider at a temporary rate of $1 per MWh, which IPL calculated as an annual revenue requirement of $1,,000 for WWE, which include PTCs. Actual WWE annual revenue requirements, after accounting for PTCs, for 0 ($,,0), 0 ($,,), and 0 ($,,) are higher than the temporary $1,,000 annual recovery level established in the IPL 0 Minnesota Rate Case. Q. Is there anything else that you would like to clarify? A. Yes. On page of his revised corrected direct testimony, Mr. Johnson recommends that IPL confirm his understanding that WWE s annual revenue requirements are still being calculated using the standard revenue requirement calculation assuming a capacity factor of. percent, rather than based on actual output. Q. How have you determined the IPL revenue requirements for various years?
7 A. IPL is using the standard revenue requirement calculation (rate base multiplied by authorized rate of return plus depreciation expense, operating and maintenance expense, etc.). The standard revenue requirement calculation, which has been used for all Minnesota utility-owned wind generation facilities included in riders, does not use or consider the NCF, either actual or assumed. In other words, the NCF has no bearing on the revenue requirement development for all other Minnesota utility-owned wind generation. Thus, neither of Mr. Johnson s alternatives (actual or assumed NCFs) is relevant or related to the traditional revenue requirement calculation. OUTPUT-BASED RECOVERY IS NOT APPROPRIATE Q. Do you agree with Mr. Johnson s approach that would apply recent actual NCFs to determine the annual revenue requirement? A. No. I am not aware of any other Minnesota utility limited in its cost recovery for a wind generation investment to the actual NCF. Further, that approach would also be inconsistent with the approach to cost recovery for other utility-owned generation facilities. I also note that IPL witness Randy D. Bauer provides some energy output comparisons between WWE and the other utility projects identified by the Department and he concludes that the WWE experience is comparable. Q. Please explain how the Department s approach is inconsistent with cost recovery for other utility-owned generation facilities. A. Most utilities, including IPL, have several different resources in its portfolio including coal-fired power plants, gas-fired power plants, flexible fuel peaking
8 power plants (ex. combustion turbines) and renewable resources like wind turbine-generators. Each of these types of facilities have different output levels. To establish a recovery level for each of these types of resources based on actual output would be contrary to long standing practice and completely unreasonable. Setting a revenue requirement level for wind generation should be treated no differently than any other type of generation resource required to provide regulated utility service, and that is the approach that the Commission has followed. The recovery of this renewable resource should follow the Commission s traditional ratemaking principles that have been used to establish rate recovery of other fixed utility investments in generation. Traditional ratemaking is the most acceptable and fair way for the utility and its customers to benefit from the investment that a utility makes to serve its customers. Basing recovery on output would be inconsistent with traditional regulatory ratemaking. ALTERNATIVE COST RECOVERY METHOD Q. Please explain IPL s alternative if the Commission does not provide full cost recovery for WWE that you mentioned earlier. A. As indicated in the rebuttal testimony of IPL witness Erik C. Madsen, IPL is providing a potential alternative for cost recovery if the Commission does not believe that IPL should receive full cost recovery for WWE. This alternative provides less than full cost recovery for WWE during the period up to January 1, 01, and indirectly reflects concerns raised by the Department regarding NCF limitations during the early years of WWE s
9 operations, while maintaining traditional ratemaking policies in Minnesota. The alternative option also includes a lower revenue requirement amount (starting January 1, 01) than IPL initially proposed, and this is reflective of lower operations and maintenance (O&M) costs that have been achieved. My rebuttal testimony specifically supports the revenue requirement development and implementation for this alternative recovery method. Mr. Madsen also will provide the rationale behind the alternative. Q. Please describe the revenue requirement associated with IPL s alternative. A. The IPL alternative would establish the cost recovery level for WWE consistent with traditional ratemaking principles and Minn. Stat. 1B.1 Subd. a (the Renewable Cost Recovery Statute). The 01 revenue requirement under this alternative would be based on a 0 historical test year (01 Revenue Requirement). The 0 historical test year costs would be adjusted for lower cost of the new service and maintenance agreement with the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), as explained by IPL witness Michelle L. Arenson in her rebuttal testimony. That adjustment would be included as a known and measurable change, since it took effect January 1, 01. (This calculation of the 01 revenue requirement also provides information as to the actual revenue requirement for 0.) The 01 Revenue Requirement developed under IPL s alternative would not include PTCs. However, customers would continue to receive the benefit of the PTCs because the PTCs would continue to flow through the Renewable Energy Rider, as described by Mr. Madsen in his rebuttal testimony, and the
10 PTCs would be reconciled annually. This PTC recovery treatment is also consistent with how IPL has proposed to handle PTCs in its proposal for full WWE cost recovery in its direct testimony. Under IPL s alternative proposal, all costs and credits would be handled through the rider until the next rate case, but only PTCs would be reconciled. The base revenue requirement (before PTCs) would be fixed for purposes of developing the annual rate to be charged to customers. Q. Why is IPL proposing to develop the revenue requirement for its alternative based on a calendar year 0? A. There are two primary reasons. First, IPL believes that it is important to establish rates consistent with traditional, cost-based ratemaking principles. The use of an average of estimated levelized costs of other utilities and an output-based recovery mechanism both violate long-standing Minnesota regulatory practices for utility owned generation facilities and is not a fair and reasonable method to set rates. Second, IPL continues to believe that the full costs of WWE were reasonable and prudently incurred, and this is documented in the testimonies of IPL witnesses Madsen, Bauer and Arenson. However, over three years have passed since WWE was initially placed into service and there is now a record for operational costs and performance that can be relied on for setting rates on a going forward basis. Also, as indicated by Ms. Arenson in her rebuttal testimony, O&M costs have been reduced in 01 as a result of changes to the service and maintenance agreement with the OEM, which is important to incorporate as a
11 known and measurable change. These facts should be reflected in the rates for WWE beginning as of January 1, 01, as all the costs have been proven by IPL to be prudently incurred. Q. Please explain how the 01 Revenue Requirement was developed. A. The 01 WWE Revenue Requirement was developed based on actual, historic 0 information, using the same approach that is reflected in my direct testimony for 0 and 0, subject to the known and measureable change for O&M costs. The 01 WWE Revenue Requirement is approximately $. million (before consideration of approximately $1. million in PTCs). I will discuss the impact of PTCs later in my rebuttal testimony. The following costs are included in the 01 Revenue Requirement: a. Return on Investment IPL calculated the 01 Revenue Requirement using a rate of return on investment of. percent for WWE. IPL applied that return on 1-month average utility plant in service balance for WWE, which is approximately $ million, including allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC). The Minnesota portion is approximately $ million. The capital structure used to determine the rate of return was developed from the balances for short-term, long-term debt, preferred stock and common equity as of November 0, 0. A. percent return on equity (ROE) used to determine the rate of return is the same ROE approved by the Commission in Docket No. E-001/GR--. The development of the capital structure and resulting rate of return is shown on Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule E.
12 b. Depreciation Depreciation expense was determined based upon the capital expenditures for WWE, using the straight-line method and a depreciable life of years. A full year of depreciation was booked in 0. The Minnesota portion was determined using the standard allocation method. Rebuttal Workpaper A- shows the detailed depreciation calculation for WWE in total, and the allocation to Minnesota. c. O&M Expenses The total O&M expenses for WWE were $. million in 0 (before allocation to the Minnesota jurisdiction). The Minnesota portion of O&M expenses for 0 is $0,. These O&M expenses represent actual annual expenses to operate and maintain WWE, including labor costs, equipment costs, service agreement costs, replacement part costs, and maintenance materials. The calculation of the total IPL 0 O&M expenses and the allocation to Minnesota is shown on Rebuttal Workpaper A-1. The test year O&M expenses were reduced by $,0 to account for a pro forma adjustment for the known and measurable change related to the new 1 service and maintenance agreement. This calculation of the pro forma adjustment for the new service and maintenance agreement and the allocation to Minnesota is shown on Rebuttal Workpaper B-1. d. Taxes Property taxes were determined based on the eligibility of WWE for reductions in assessed value at decreasing percentages over the first six years
13 of operation under Iowa Code B.. As shown on Rebuttal Workpaper A-, the property taxes associated with WWE for 0 was $, (before allocation to the Minnesota jurisdiction). The Minnesota portion of property taxes for 0 is $,0. Income tax expense was determined in the same manner as used in the Docket No. E-001/GR--. Taxable income is determined by taking deductions for O&M expenses, property taxes, interest expense (calculated using the interest synchronization method), and miscellaneous taxes. Additionally, an adjustment was made for book-tax temporary differences related to depreciation. The calculation of Minnesota income taxes is shown on Rebuttal Workpaper A-. e. Interconnection Costs The 01 WWE Revenue Requirement includes direct costs that are incurred at or before WWE s point of interconnection to the transmission system (Interconnection facilities), but no other transmission costs. f. AFUDC IPL has accrued AFUDC during the construction of WWE in the traditional manner. When WWE was placed in service, the AFUDC that was capitalized was added to the rate base. The AFUDC interest costs for WWE were capitalized using the appropriate monthly AFUDC rates in effect during the construction period, but substituting an ROE of.0 percent, which is the ROE approved by the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) for WWE in IUB Docket No. RPU-0-. The Minnesota portion of the AFUDC was determined using the standard allocator.
14 g. Other Expenses, Including Expenses for Energy Storage IPL is not proposing any additional costs, such as energy storage. Q. Please explain how IPL s alternative is consistent with the Renewable Cost Recovery Statute and traditional ratemaking principles. A. In determining the 01 Revenue Requirement, I applied the following traditional ratemaking principles that are also applied under the Renewable Cost Recovery Statute: General Assumptions: The 01 Revenue Requirement is based upon 0 test year costs; All jurisdictional allocation factors are the same as those contained in Docket No. E-001/GR--, but updated to 0; Rate Base: 1-month average historical balances; Components include: 1. utility plant in service (UPIS);. accumulated depreciation and amortization (AD);. accumulated deferred income taxes (ADIT) and;. working capital that includes materials and supplies and cash working capital (CWC). CWC was determined using the lead-lag study as approved in Docket No. E-001/GR--. Income Statement: Expenses were based upon historical calendar year; Depreciation expense was based upon the capital expenditures for WWE, using the straight-line method and a depreciable life of years; 1
15 Income taxes were determined by applying statutory tax rates to taxable income. Cost of Capital: Capital structure was developed using the capital structure from Docket No. E-001/GR--. Q. Which of the above cost components of the revenue requirement will change over time? A. All the above cost components will change except for the cost of the original investment that was placed into service. As time goes by, the O&M expense, cost of capital, and other various cost items will change. Q. How is this different than what is used in calculating a levelized cost? A. The costs will reflect what was actually experienced and not just estimates. When calculating a levelized cost, the company uses estimates based on the best available information at a particular point in time. As time goes by, those costs could change for various reasons. Q. How were costs allocated to other jurisdictions? A. The approach to cost allocation is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. The proposed 01 Revenue Requirement includes only those costs that are related to Minnesota s share. The jurisdictional allocator is the standard allocator and excludes the portion of Company costs not related to serving Minnesota customers by multiplying the Company total by the System Coincident Peak (SCP) allocation factor for 0. This step allocates a share of the costs to the Iowa jurisdiction as well as the Minnesota jurisdiction based on SCP. Minnesota s allocated portion of the WWE costs is approximately percent of the 1
16 total costs. By applying the SCP allocator, the Company ensures that the Iowa jurisdiction is allocated its share of the costs. Q. Please further explain how you developed 0 operating expenses. A. The approach to developing operating expenses is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. Lines - of Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule A, column (a) show operating expenses related to WWE for 0. The operating expenses are O&M, depreciation, property taxes, and miscellaneous taxes as shown on lines,,,, and, respectively. O&M expenses represent annual expenses to operate and maintain WWE, including labor costs, equipment costs, service agreement costs, replacement part costs, and maintenance materials such as oils and lubricants and other incidentals. All operating expenses, except miscellaneous taxes, were allocated to the Minnesota electric jurisdiction on the basis of SCP. Miscellaneous taxes are comprised of payroll-related taxes and, accordingly, were allocated to the Minnesota electric operations on the basis of direct payroll. This is reasonable because there is a direct relationship between payroll taxes and direct payroll. Q. Please explain the cost of service adjustments that were made. A. The adjustments were comparable to those presented in my direct testimony, except for the new service and maintenance agreement. The purpose of Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule B is to itemize the cost of service adjustments made to the actual test year results that were summarized in column (b) of Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule A. More specifically, Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule B provides a reference to the underlying schedule that supports each adjustment, 1
17 along with the amount, the cost of service category it impacts, the related income tax effects, and the resulting effect on operating income. Column (f), of Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule B shows the pro forma adjustments, by cost of service category, which supports column (b) of Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule A, lines 1-. The significant adjustment made to cost of service relates to the new service and maintenance agreement. Q. Please explain the calculation of the WWE rate base. A. The approach to rate base is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule C summarizes the Minnesota WWE rate base. This was allocated to the Minnesota electric jurisdiction by taking the total IPL WWE UPIS and AD and allocating it to Minnesota based on the SCP allocator. The other rate base components are ADIT and working capital (material and supplies and CWC). These were allocated based on the same allocation method used above for UPIS and AD. Column (b) of Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule C reflects the actual unadjusted 0 calendar year 1-month average balances. Column (c) presents adjustments for known and measurable changes, and Column (d) presents the proposed rate base for this proceeding. The total WWE Minnesota rate base proposed for the test year is $1. million, as shown on line 0, column (d). Q. Please explain how the CWC requirement was determined. A. The approach to CWC is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. The determination was made consistent with the approach used in Docket No. E- 001/GR--. Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule C-1 presents the expenses 1
18 incurred during the year-ending December 1, 0, for the allocated portion of Minnesota s WWE operations. Q. Please explain the adjustments to rate base and CWC. A. The approach to adjustments and CWC is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule D is a summary of adjustments that have been made to the rate base. The Schedule contains the same categories as the rate base shown on Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule C. Q. How did you calculate the income taxes for 0? A. The approach to calculation of income taxes is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. Income tax expense was determined in the same manner as used in Docket No. E-001/GR--. Taxable income is determined by taking deductions for O&M expenses, property taxes, interest expense (calculated using the interest synchronization method), and miscellaneous taxes. Additionally, an adjustment was made for book-tax temporary differences related to depreciation. The taxable income was then used to calculate current federal and state income taxes at the current effective rates of 1. percent and. percent, respectively. Federal deferred income taxes were calculated on the book-tax temporary differences using the statutory percent federal tax rate. Q. Does your revenue requirement include PTCs in the income tax calculation? A. No. As mentioned previously, IPL proposes to pass the federal PTCs to customers through the Renewable Energy Rider instead of including them in the basic rider rates for WWE. The credit will be taken for years as currently 1
19 permitted by the Internal Revenue Service. Q. What is the 01 Revenue Requirement for WWE that IPL is proposing for its alternative? A. The 01 Revenue Requirement is $,0, (before PTCs). Q. What is the process that IPL uses to ensure that costs associated with only WWE are not being accounted for elsewhere? A. The approach to this issue is the same as I presented in my direct testimony. Costs associated with WWE are directly charged to the project and are captured in a unique operating unit. The calculated 01 Revenue Requirement is incremental costs and is not recovered elsewhere in rates. Q. When would the 01 Revenue Requirement under the potential alternative become effective? A. IPL suggests that this alternative would become effective to determine the revenue requirement beginning January 1, 01. Q. For how long would the 01 Revenue Requirement under the potential alternative last? A. IPL suggests that this treatment cease with IPL s next Minnesota retail electric rate case, specifically with the implementation of interim rates in that future rate case. Q. Under IPL s potential alternative for cost recovery, does IPL continue to propose a true-up or reconciliation of the actual revenue requirements to the temporary rate levels recovered between July, 0, and December 1, 0? 1
20 1 1 A. No. Under this alternative, IPL includes no true-up rate recovery for the entire duration of temporary rate levels, which would be effective from July, 0 through December 1, 0. This also means that IPL would forgo cost recovery back to the start of its original filing in this docket, which was April, 0. Therefore, IPL would under recover its WWE costs for almost three years. Q. What is the financial impact to IPL by foregoing a reconciliation of the temporary rate level under the alternative? A. IPL would under collect a total of $1.0 million in revenues associated with WWE under its alternative if it did not reconcile revenue requirements prior to January 1, 01. Below is a table that shows the calculation of the revenue undercollection by IPL. This table only shows the under-collection amounts between the 01 Revenue Requirement calculation and the current rate level. If I were to use the actual costs in the revenue requirements for prior years, as proposed in IPL s direct testimony, the differences would be larger. 1
21 Table 1: IPL Revenue Under-Collection By Foregoing Reconciliation of Temporary Rate Levels Year 01 Revenue Requirement () Temporary Recovery Difference 0 (1) $1,, $, $0, 0 $,,1 $1,,000 $,1 0 $,1,0 $1,,000 $,0 Total $,0, $,1, $1,0, (1) Recovery for 0 begins with the effective date of interim rates in Docket No. E-001/GR--, which is July, 0. () Each calendar year s specific revenue requirement is based on the 01 Revenue Requirement ($,0,) adjusted for actual PTC amounts experienced. The actual PTC amounts by year, after a tax gross-up for ratemaking, are as follows: 0 - $,1; 0 - $1,01,; and 0 - $1,0,11. Q. How does this alternative affect a levelized cost-equivalent analysis of WWE cost recovery? A. Since IPL would be recovering a lower amount of costs through the Renewable Energy Rider for the first several years of WWE s life (0 through 0), the levelized cost equivalent of cost recovery for WWE would be significantly reduced from IPL s primary position of full cost recovery. If the January 1, 01 effective date for commencement of the 01 Revenue Requirement is accepted by the Commission, the equivalent levelized cost for WWE becomes $.0 per MWh. I have included Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule F, which contains IPL s levelized cost calculation for the IPL alternative recovery method. This reflects rate levels for years 0 through 0 set at IPL s current temporary rate in its Renewable Energy Rider ($1,,000 annually). 0
22 I would like to note that the calculation of this levelized cost was developed solely to compare IPL s alternative recovery method to the other facilities that the Department used. As we have explained, IPL does not support the use of levelized costs of energy for setting regulated utility rates and recognizes that this calculation is still based on estimated information. Q. How was the new levelized cost model shown on Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule F developed? A. I started with the levelized cost model that I included in my direct testimony as Exhibit (JPN-1), Schedule K. Two adjustments were made to that levelized cost model in order to reflect IPL s alternative recovery method. An adjustment was made to reduce O&M levels for the new service and maintenance agreement for the future years 01 through 0. The other adjustment was to reflect revenues for the first three years of the project at the temporary recovery level of $1,,000 annually as IPL would forgo a reconciliation of temporary rate levels in its alternative recovery. I would like to provide one clarification. The revenue requirement for 01 represented in the levelized cost model shown in Exhibit (JPN-), Schedule F ($1,0,1) closely approximates the 01 Revenue Requirement in IPL s alternative recovery method ($1,,) but does not match because of differences in the calculation methods used. This difference does not materially change the results of the levelized cost calculation. Q. Please summarize the annual revenue recovery IPL proposes under its alternative recovery method. 1
23 A. Below is a table showing the summary of annual revenue recovery under IPL s alternative proposal. The difference between the $. million revenue requirement for 01 and the $1. million revenue recovery shown below is due to the application of PTCs. Table : WWE Annual Revenue Recovery Under IPL s Alternative Recovery Method Year Annualized Revenue Requirement 0 $1,,000 0 $1,,000 0 $1,, (1) $1,, (1) Starting in 01 under IPL s alternative recovery, PTCs are assumed in this number but are proposed to be reconciled separately. Estimated PTCs for 01 are based on. percent NCF. After a tax gross-up for ratemaking, the estimated PTCs for 01 are $1,,. Q. Have you determined the effect if the Commission were to decide to limit WWE cost recovery to the same level that the IUB has approved? A. Yes. As IPL explained in Docket No. E-001/GR--, the IUB made a decision in IPL s last Iowa rate case (IUB Docket No. RPU ) to limit the recovery of capital costs for WWE. If the Commission made a similar decision in this case, the equivalent levelized cost would be a $. per MWh. IPL s alternative recovery method clearly recognizes a significantly lower level of WWE cost recovery when compared to the recovery level granted by the IUB. Q. Does this conclude your prepared rebuttal testimony? A. Yes.
Group Exercise I: Calculating the Revenue Requirement
Group Exercise I: Calculating the Revenue Requirement Ron Davis Principal Economist Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies Public Utilities Commission 1560 Broadway, Suite 250 Denver, CO 80202 P 303.894.2883
More informationENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. GAS SERVICE Effective: June 1, 2009 Filed: May 1, 2009 Supersedes: New Schedule
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. GAS SERVICE Effective: June 1, 2009 Filed: May 1, 2009 RIDER SCHEDULE GFRP-3 Supersedes: New Schedule Schedule Consist of: Three Sheets Plus Attachments A - F Page 13.1 GAS FORMULA
More informationR8-67 RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY PORTFOLIO STANDARD (REPS) (a) Definitions. (1) The following terms shall be defined as provided in G.S.
R8-67 RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY PORTFOLIO STANDARD (REPS) (a) Definitions. (1) The following terms shall be defined as provided in G.S. 62-133.8: "Combined heat and power system"; "demand-side
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ON BEHALF OF COMMISSION STAFF
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE APPLICATION OF TIDEWATER UTILITIES, INC. FOR A GENERAL RATE INCREASE IN WATER BASE RATES & TARIFF REVISIONS (FILED NOVEMBER 25, 2013) ) ) )
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATION BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MONTANA * * * * *
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATION BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MONTANA * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) REGULATORY DIVISION Of MONTANA-DAKOTA UTILITIES CO., )
More informationITC Midwest, LLC For the 12 months ended 12/31/2016
MW2016 Discount ITC Midwest, LLC Projected Rate Computation with Rate Discount Projected Year 2016 No. 1 Revenue Requirement without discount $ 350,373,980 2 3 Discount (Note) $ 4,125,000 4 5 Revenue Requirement
More informationConstruction Work in Progress: An Effective Financial Tool to Lower the Cost of Electricity
February 2012 Construction Work in Progress: An Effective Financial Tool to Lower the Cost of Electricity Executive Summary New nuclear power plants are large, capital-intensive projects. They provide
More informationWhat is Cost of Service Regulation? Basic Issues in Rate Proceedings. Basic COS Component: Operating Expenses
Tariff Development I: The Basic Ratemaking Process The Ratemaking Formula and Basic Components Darryl Tietjen Public Utility Commission of Texas Briefing for the NARUC/INE Partnership 1 2 What is Cost
More informationNorthern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Application for Authority to Increase Electric Rates in Minnesota November 3, 2010 Volume 2A Testimony
More informationStormGeo, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 StormGeo, Inc. and Subsidiary December 31, 2012 Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors Report... 1-2 Consolidated
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION. On October 26, 2009, the Commission received a Stipulation Regarding Change
- BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of Rocky Mountain Power
More informationTreatment of Income Taxes In Utility Ratemaking
Treatment of Income Taxes In Utility Ratemaking A White Paper Prepared for The Oregon Legislative Assembly By Public Utility Commission of Oregon Staff February 2005 Prepared By Ed Busch and Judy Johnson
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OAH 80-2500-31796 PUC E-111/GR-14-482 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION In the Matter of the Application by Dakota Electric Association for Authority
More informationVirginia Electric and Power Company Subsection A 4 Rate Adjustment Clause. Direct Testimony and Exhibits
Virginia Electric and Power Company Subsection A 4 Rate Adjustment Clause Table of Contents Direct Testimony and Exhibits David M. Wilkinson James D. Jackson, Jr. Paul B. Haynes Filing Schedule 46 Filing
More informationDEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSES
Filed: September, 00 Exhibit C Tab Schedule Page of DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSES.0 INTRODUCTION The depreciation and amortization expense for Hydro One s Distribution business in its 00 test
More informationAPPENDIX VIII FORMULA FOR CALCULATING ANNUAL BASE TRANSMISSION REVENUE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SDG&E S TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF
APPENDIX VIII FORMULA FOR CALCULATING ANNUAL BASE TRANSMISSION REVENUE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SDG&E S TRANSMISSION OWNER TARIFF This Appendix VIII sets forth the formula for calculating the annual Base Transmission
More information153 FERC 61,374 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20426. December 30, 2015
153 FERC 61,374 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20426 December 30, 2015 In Reply Refer To: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. Docket No. ER16-208-000 Stuntz, Davis & Staffier,
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 0 ELECTRIC RESOURCE PLAN ) ) ) ) DOCKET
More informationDOCKET NO. 42004. DIRECT TESTIMONY of DANE A. WATSON. on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY. (Revenue Requirement) Table of Contents
DOCKET NO. 42004 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES AND TO RECONCILE FUEL AND PURCHASED POWER COSTS FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 PUBLIC
More informationIntroduction to Regulatory Accounting
Introduction to Regulatory Accounting John Caldwell, Ph.D. Director of Economics EEI Advanced Rates Training Course July 23, 2012 Agenda for Today s Presentation 1. Review of General Ratemaking Concepts
More informationAAA PUBLIC ADJUSTING GROUP, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [ X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationNORTHWESTERN ENERGY REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2015 FINANCIAL RESULTS
NorthWestern Corporation d/b/a NorthWestern Energy 3010 W. 69 th Street Sioux Falls, SD 57108 www.northwesternenergy.com NYSE: NWE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NORTHWESTERN ENERGY REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2015 FINANCIAL
More informationChesapeake Regulatory Consultants, Inc 1698 Saefern Way Annapolis, MD 21401-6529
Chesapeake Regulatory Consultants, Inc 1698 Saefern Way Annapolis, MD 21401-6529 Phone: 410.849.3210 email: rgtsbs@comcast.net Robert G. Towers Basil L. Copeland, Jr. David E. Peterson December 17, 2009
More informationTITLE PAGE MINNESOTA POWER ELECTRIC RATE BOOK
MINNESOTA POWER SECTION I PAGE NO. 1 ELECTRIC RATE BOOK REVISION 4 th TITLE PAGE MINNESOTA POWER ELECTRIC RATE BOOK This book contains Minnesota Power's retail rates and related information per the Minnesota
More informationFinancial Statements Years Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. LB&B Associates Inc.
Financial Statements Years Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 LB&B Associates Inc. LB&B Associates Inc. Contents Page Report of Independent Auditors 1 Financial Statements Balance Sheets 2 Statements of
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON
ENTERED 05/19/09 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UE 197 In the Matter of PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Request for a general rate revision. DISPOSITION: RECONSIDERATION
More informationInternal Revenue Service Number: 200632006 Release Date: 8/11/2006 Index Number: 167.22-01
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200632006 Release Date: 8/11/2006 Index Number: 167.22-01 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- --------------------------------------------
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE ) LETTER NO. 1-ELECTRIC FILED BY ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) DOCKET NO. AL- E COLORADO TO REVISE
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR-10-971 Exhibit (LHP-2) Depreciation and Remaining Lives
Rebuttal Testimony and Schedules Lisa H. Perkett Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation
More informationCHAPTER 26. SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS.
26.201. Cost of Service. (a) (b) (c) Application. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, in this section the term "utility," insofar as it relates to telecommunications utilities, shall refer
More informationWATER UTILITY REFERENCE MANUAL
Utility Plant and Accumulated Depreciation Capitalization Policy Costs are capitalized in the utility plant accounts, rather than being expensed in the current year, if: the service life is more than one
More informationWORKING CAPITAL AND LEAD/LAG
Updated: February 23, 2007 EB-2005-0501 Exhibit D1 Tab 1 Schedule 5 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION WORKING CAPITAL AND LEAD/LAG 4 5 6 7 Working capital is the amount of funds required to finance the
More informationCASH FLOW STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET GUIDE
CASH FLOW STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET GUIDE The Agriculture Development Council requires the submission of a cash flow statement and balance sheet that provide annual financial projections for the business
More informationRATE BASE, RATE-OF-RETURN REGULATION OVERVIEW
RATE BASE, RATE-OF-RETURN REGULATION OVERVIEW PURPOSE OF REGULATION Regulation is a proxy or surrogate for public ownership or competition Public Ownership Rate Regulation Competitive Market 2 CAUGHT IN
More informationPublic Service Company of North Carolina, Incorporated Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Public Service Company of North Carolina, Incorporated Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, December 31, Assets Gas Utility Plant $1,341,820 $1,325,608 Accumulated Depreciation (295,733) (290,081)
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR-13-868 Exhibit (GET-2)
Rebuttal Testimony and Schedules George E. Tyson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More informationMinnesota Council of Nonprofits, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (With Independent Auditor's Report
Consolidated Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (With Independent Auditor's Report Thereon) MINNESOTA COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT... 3 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAY JOYCE ON BEHALF OF APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND WHEELING POWER COMPANY
JJ Exhibit No. 1 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAY JOYCE ON BEHALF OF APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND WHEELING POWER COMPANY CASE NO. 10-0699-E-42T JJ Exhibit No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS POSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS...
More informationNWN OPUC Advice No. 15-11 / UG (UM 1635 / UG 221)
ONITA R. KING Rates & Regulatory Affairs Tel: 503.721.2452 Fax: 503.721.2516 Email: ork@nwnatural.com July 31, 2015 NWN OPUC Advice No. 15-11 / UG (UM 1635 / UG 221) VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Public Utility
More informationFORTISALBERTA INC. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FORTISALBERTA INC. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS May 1, 2015 The following ( MD&A ) of FortisAlberta Inc. (the Corporation ) should be read in conjunction with the following: (i) the unaudited interim
More informationA Guide To Utility Ratemaking
A Guide To Utility Ratemaking Guide To Utility Ratemaking Contents Introduction...1 Terms...1 Questar Gas Regulatory Environment...3 Types of Rate Cases...5 Purchased-Gas Adjustments...6 General Rate Cases...6
More informationAmerica Online: On-line or Off-track
America Online: On-line or Off-track America Online, Inc. (AOL) offers the largest consumer on-line service in the United States. Subscribers to its on-line service receive a broad line products, including
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL INVESTOR INFORMATION. Fourth Quarter 2012
SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTOR INFORMATION Fourth Quarter 2012 Kevin Bryant Tony Carreño VP Investor Relations and Strategic Director Investor Relations Planning & Treasurer 816-556-2782 816-654-1763 anthony.carreno@kcpl.com
More informationPUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PAGE 1 OF 9 SUBSTANTIVE RULE, CHAPTER 25. ELECTRIC.
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PAGE 1 OF 9 The Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) adopts an amendment to 25.237, relating to Fuel Factors with no changes to the proposed text as published
More informationHOUSE BILL No. 1423. Koch, VanNatter
*HB1423.1* January 28, 2014 HOUSE BILL No. 1423 DIGEST OF HB 1423 (Updated January 27, 2014 9:54 am - DI 103) Citations Affected: IC 8-1. Synopsis: Allows the owner of a private generation project to sell
More information130 FERC 61,013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER AUTHORIZING DISPOSITION OF TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
130 FERC 61,013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Marc Spitzer and Philip D. Moeller. American Electric Power Service Corporation
More informationInstructions for E-PLAN Financial Planning Template
Instructions for E-PLAN Financial Planning Template The EPLAN template will assist you in preparing financial projections for your existing business. The template uses Microsoft Excel to prepare your projected
More informationFILED IN THE MATTER OF THE P TITION OF ) ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR AN ) ACCOUNTING ORDER AUTHORIZING ) ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGULATORY )
BEFORE THE r r r ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMI&@ FILED IN THE MATTER OF THE P TITION OF ) ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR AN ) ACCOUNTING ORDER AUTHORIZING ) ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGULATORY ) DOCKET NO. 08 -
More informationCustomer Meeting Questions 2-1: Regarding SPS s response to Customer Meeting Question 1-4, please provide the following:
Customer Meeting Questions 2-1: Regarding SPS s response to Customer Meeting Question 1-4, please provide the following: A. A detailed explanation, including the formula rate implications, of the statement
More information141 FERC 61,117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
141 FERC 61,117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, Cheryl A. LaFleur, and Tony T. Clark. Wyoming
More informationIndiana Michigan Power Company Docket No. ER12- -000
Legal Department American Electric Power 801 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 320 Washington, DC 20004-2615 AEP.com February 29, 2012 Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First
More informationUnited States SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q
United States SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended:
More informationOPTIONAL WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING CALL REPORT APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES (Not to be submitted with your bank's Call Report) For December 31, 2009
OPTIONAL WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING CALL REPORT APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES (Not to be submitted with your bank's Call Report) For December 31, 2009 This optional worksheet is designed to assist certain banks
More informationRhode Island Renewable Energy Standard (RES) Annual RES Compliance Report For Compliance Year 2012
Rhode Island Renewable Energy Standard (RES) Annual RES Compliance Report For Compliance Year 2012 (Revised 3/25/14) February 2014 Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission 89 Jefferson Boulevard Warwick,
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application No: A.1-0-01 Exhibit No.: Witness: M. Woodruff In The Matter of the Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 G) and Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) for a Certificate of
More informationRe: June, 2012 Request for Information (RFI) of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs
December 5, 2012 Ms. Michelle Fisher Senior Technical Manager IFRS Foundation / IASB 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Re: June, 2012 Request for Information (RFI) of the International Accounting
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Each response shall be answered under oath or, for representatives of a public or OF KENTUCKY
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: ALTERNATIVE RATE FILING ADJUSTMENT FOR ) CASE NO. DELAPLAIN DISPOSAL COMPANY ) 2010-00349 COMMISSION STAFF'S SECOND INFORMATION
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationDG 02-203 NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. Inventory Financing Vehicle. Order Approving the Use of the Money Pool Agreement to Finance Fuel Inventory
DG 02-203 NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. Inventory Financing Vehicle Order Approving the Use of the Money Pool Agreement to Finance Fuel Inventory O R D E R N O. 24,095 December 13, 2002 On November 4, 2002,
More informationExhibit C SCE Depreciation Testimony in 2015 CPUC General Rate Case
Exhibit C SCE Depreciation Testimony in 2015 CPUC General Rate Case DOCKET DIRECT TESTIMONY of DANE A. WATSON on behalf of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAL EDISON COMPANY (Revenue Requirement) (Filename: DWatsonRRDirect.doc)
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Parts 35, 101, 154, 201, 346, and 352. Docket No. RM02-7-000, Order No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Parts 35, 101, 154, 201, 346, and 352 Docket No. RM02-7-000, Order No. 631 Accounting, Financial Reporting, and Rate Filing Requirements
More informationA&R MARINE CORP. D/B/A PRUDENCE & BAY ISLANDS TRANSPORT GENERAL RATE FILING RIPUC DOCKET NO. 4586 BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
A&R MARINE CORP. D/B/A PRUDENCE & BAY ISLANDS TRANSPORT GENERAL RATE FILING RIPUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF DAVID J. EFFRON ON BEHALF OF THE
More informationConsolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012 Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and Subsidiary
Consolidated Financial Statements Minnesota Council of Nonprofits and Subsidiary www.eidebailly.com Table of Contents Independent Auditor s Report... 1 Consolidated Financial Statements 3 Consolidated
More informationHow To Calculate Financial Performance For Construction Contractors
Understanding Construction Accounting Understanding Construction Accounting David O Brien, CPA, CGMA Member & Director of Construction Team James F. Weber, CPA, CGMA Managing Member This session is eligible
More informationAlice Miller Energy Consultant September 28, 2011
Rate Design and Billing Systems Alice Miller Energy Consultant September 28, 2011 What is Rate Design? Principal goals of rate design Meet revenue requirement Equity among service classes Customer impacts
More informationBIOQUAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATE:MENTS MAY 31, 2014 AND 2013
BIOQUAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATE:MENTS MAY 31, 2014 AND 2013 Table of Contents Page Independent Auditor's Report 1-2 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated
More informationSEC. 1301. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON MODERNIZATION OF ELECTRICITY GRID.
TITLE XIII--SMART GRID SEC. 1301. STATEMENT OF POLICY ON MODERNIZATION OF ELECTRICITY GRID. It is the policy of the United States to support the modernization of the Nation's electricity transmission and
More informationUNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR CLASS C WATER COMPANIES
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR CLASS C WATER COMPANIES Kentucky Public Service Commission 211 Sower Boulevard Frankfort, Kentucky 40602 The 1996
More informationTHE NATIONAL GRID USA COMPANIES INCENTIVE THRIFT PLAN II. (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2015)
Page 1 of 91 THE NATIONAL GRID USA COMPANIES INCENTIVE THRIFT PLAN II (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2015) 3505578_2.DOC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 of 91 ARTICLE 1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1. In General...1
More informationTOPIC ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES SUB-SECTION 03.00.00 SUB-SECTION INDEX REVISION NUMBER 99-004
Page 1 of 1 TOPIC ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES SUB-SECTION 03.00.00 SECTION ISSUANCE DATE JUNE 30, 1999 SUB-SECTION INDEX REVISION NUMBER 99-004 03 Accounting Principles 10 Organization Structure of State Government
More informationUS REGULATORY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM. Presented by: Moshrek M. Sobhy, IURC Staff
US REGULATORY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM Presented by: Moshrek M. Sobhy, IURC Staff Accounting and Regulation Accounting is a core regulatory skill. Accounting and accountability go hand in hand. Annual financial
More informationFlorida Foundation Seed Producers, Inc.
Florida Foundation Seed Producers, Inc. Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Reports CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report 1 Financial Statements: Statements of Cash Flows 2 Statements of Financial
More informationCH 23 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS SELF-STUDY QUESTIONS
C H 2 3, P a g e 1 CH 23 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS SELF-STUDY QUESTIONS (note from Dr. N: I have deleted questions for you to omit, but did not renumber the remaining questions) 1. The primary purpose of
More informationEconomic and Rate Impact Analysis of Clean Energy Development in North Carolina 2015 Update
February 2015 Economic and Rate Impact Analysis of Clean Energy Development in North Carolina 2015 Update Prepared for North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association 4800 Six Forks Rd Suite 300 Raleigh,
More informationSAMPLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND SUPPLENTARY INFORMANTION For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND SUPPLENTARY INFORMANTION For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 The financial statement, prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant, is essential for bonding purposes.
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING INSURANCE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING INSURANCE COMPANY "DRAFT VERSION FOR FIRST REVIEW ONLY" Submitted to: Minstry of Finance and Economy Head of Insurance Department Republic of Armenia Submitted by: BearingPoint
More informationPG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. 2013 Annual Report
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2013 Annual Report Table of Contents Financial Highlights 1 Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Shareholder Return 2 Selected Financial Data
More informationHow To Calculate A Trial Balance For A Company
THE BASIC MODEL The accounting information system is designed to collect and organize data into information that is useful for stakeholders. The Accounting Equation The basic accounting equation is what
More informationPreparing Agricultural Financial Statements
Preparing Agricultural Financial Statements Thoroughly understanding your business financial performance is critical for success in today s increasingly competitive agricultural environment. Accurate records
More informationHow To Make Money From A Bank Loan
NEWS RELEASE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: WEBSITE: www.bnccorp.com TIMOTHY J. FRANZ, CEO TELEPHONE: (612) 305-2213 DANIEL COLLINS, CFO TELEPHONE: (612) 305-2210 BNCCORP, INC. REPORTS THIRD QUARTER NET INCOME
More informationBoard of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Darrell Dorsey September, 2010
Board of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Darrell Dorsey September, 2010 Q: Please state your name and your business address. A: My name is Darrell Dorsey, 312 E. 65 th Street, Kansas City, Kansas.
More informationTAX INCENTIVES FOR FINANCING RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
June 14, 2011 TAX INCENTIVES FOR FINANCING RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS A. APPLICABLE TAX INCENTIVES. In the United States, most renewable energy projects are financed in part by relying on significant tax
More informationConsolidated Balance Sheet
Consolidated Balance Sheet -Pro forma Dec. 31, 2013 Dec. 31, 2012 Dec. 31, 2012 Assets Non-current assets Investment properties $ 34,153 $ 30,956 $ 31,696 accounted investments 9,281 7,470 8,038 Other
More information2) Switch to a personal phone and follow the guidance/procedures established by the University for the Communication Technology Allowance.
MEMO To: Extension Fiscal Staff From: Extension Fiscal Office Date: November 12, 2010 Re: Cell Phone Policy There have been many questions lately regarding the use of University owned cell phones for personal
More informationCITY OF AVENTURA POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AND 2013
CITY OF AVENTURA POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AND 2013 CITY OF AVENTURA POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AND 2013 TABLE
More informationCARINGBRIDGE Eagan, Minnesota
Eagan, Minnesota FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Including Independent Auditors' Report As of and For the Years Ended December 31,2014 and 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditors' Report Statements of Financial
More informationMINNESOTA AGGREGATE FINANCIAL DATA REPORTING GUIDEBOOK. Annual Calls for Experience Valued as of December 31, 2015
MINNESOTA AGGREGATE FINANCIAL DATA REPORTING GUIDEBOOK Annual Calls for Experience Valued as of December 31, 2015 11/5/2015 ANNUAL CALLS FOR EXPERIENCE As the licensed Data Service Organization in Minnesota,
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT
STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY TEN FRANKLIN SQUARE NEW BRITAIN, CT 06051 DOCKET NO. 14-05-06 APPLICATION OF THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY TO AMEND RATE SCHEDULES December
More informationOREGON HEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION For the Years Ended December
More informationNSTAR Gas Company Table of Contents. Independent Auditors' Report 1
NSTAR Gas Company Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Together With Independent Auditors' Reports NSTAR Gas Company Table of Contents Independent
More information7300 PAYROLL FACTOR. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Internal Procedures Manual Multistate Audit Technique Manual. Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of 13 7300 PAYROLL FACTOR 7310 RECONCILIATION OF PAYROLL FACTOR 7320 COMPENSATION DEFINED 7330 EMPLOYEE DEFINED 7340 CASH VS. ACCRUAL 7345 COMPENSATION ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONBUSINESS INCOME 7350 CAPITALIZED
More informationFlorida Senate - 2016 SB 534
By Senator Hays 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill to be entitled An act relating to water and wastewater; creating s. 159.8105, F.S.; requiring the Division
More informationOrder Authorizing Securitization of Certain Additional Transition Costs and Related Transactions
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Release No. 35-28040; 70-10329) CenterPoint Energy, Inc., et al. Order Authorizing Securitization of Certain Additional Transition Costs and Related Transactions September
More informationIncome Taxes - Practice Questions Irfanullah.co
1. Using accelerated method of depreciation for reporting purposes and straight-line method for tax purposes would most likely result in a: A. Temporary difference. B. Valuation allowance. C. Deferred
More informationCHAPTER 79A WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURANCE
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2010 79A.01 CHAPTER 79A WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURANCE 79A.01 DEFINITIONS. 79A.02 SELF-INSURERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE. 79A.03 SELF-INSURANCE APPLICATIONS. 79A.04 PRIVATE SELF-INSURING
More informationIN THE MATTER OF. and. Terasen Gas (Whistler) Inc. 2010 2011 Revenue Requirements and Rates Application O R D E R
B RITISH COLUMBIA U TILITIES COMMISSION O RDER N UMBER G 138 10 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER, BC V6Z 2N3 CANADA web site: http://www.bcuc.com TELEPHONE: (604) 660 4700 BC TOLL FREE:
More informationRESIDENTIAL ENERGY BILL CHARGES. The following charges may appear on your Electric bill:
Distribution/Delivery Service The following charges may appear on your Electric bill: Delivery/Distribution charges are applicable to full-service and retail open access (electric choice) customers. Delivery
More informationRIDER GER GAS ENERGY EFFICIENCY COST RECOVERY
d/b/a Ameren Illinois 2 nd Revised Sheet No. 41 Gas Service Schedule Ill. C. C. No. 2 (Canceling 1 st Revised Sheet No. 41) APPLICABILITY * * Rider GER-Gas Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery (Rider GER) is
More informationThe Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 The
More information