Policy Statement Responsibilities Definitions Related Legislation and Documents

Transcription

1 PROCEDURE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DOCTORAL DEGREES: CQ16 DOCTOR OF EDUCATION CU56 DOCTOR OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES Policy Statement Responsibilities Definitions Related Legislation and Documents 1 PURPOSE The Doctor of Education and the Doctor of Professional Studies programs are doctoral degrees that make: a significant and original contribution to knowledge in the context of professional practice. The emphasis in the learning outcomes and research may differ between the different forms of Doctoral Degree qualifications but all graduates will demonstrate knowledge, skills and the application of the knowledge and skills at AQF level 10 (Australian Qualifications Framework, 2013, p. 63). The Doctor of Education (EdD) and the Doctor of Professional Studies (DProfSt) are doctoral programs of supervised research and research tasks designed for practitioners, comprising of: four research tasks; confirmation of candidature; and thesis component. These programs are governed by the University s Program Rules for the Degree of Doctor of Education and Program Rules for the Degree of Doctor of Professional Studies which provide details regarding all aspects of admission, progression, submission and examination. In the first term of enrolment, candidates may be required to undertake a prescribed course in research methods and continued candidature will be dependent on the successful completion of this course, if it is a requirement of admission. Candidates who successfully complete this course may claim this as one of the Research Tasks (RTs). As per the program rules of the EdD and DProfSt the program of study will consist of a portfolio of written work incorporating the supervision of four Research Tasks, the Confirmation of Candidature and a Thesis. 2 SCOPE This procedure applies to candidates enrolled in the Doctor of Education or Doctor of Professional Studies program at CQUniversity Australia. 3 EFFECTIVE DATE 10 November LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Central Queensland University Act 1998 Qld 5 PARENT POLICY There is no parent policy. Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 1 of 11

2 6 PROCEDURE The Research Tasks 6.1 Candidates will enter these programs with different backgrounds, interests and experience in research and different workplaces. Some may have a very clear idea of their final thesis and structure all their tasks to that end. Others, perhaps by changing circumstances of their work, may discover, alter or significantly sharpen their focus as they proceed through the degree. 6.2 The four supervised Research Tasks are the first component of the study within the program and are negotiated directly between the candidate and their supervisory panel. The Tasks can consist of, but are not limited to: literature Reviews; research Methodology; position Papers; critical Reflective Writing (e.g. results of a pilot study); refereed Writing for example, journal article, book chapter or refereed conference paper; courses in research methods or other research training, approved via the Office of Research Services. 6.3 The specifics of each Task might require several rounds of drafting to meet the expectations of each. Approximately 5,000 words per task as a final draft might be expected. Each of the Tasks will contribute to a portfolio of work for the degree. Note that usually the portfolio should contain no more than two refereed publications. Examination of Research Tasks 6.4 All Tasks will be individually formally externally examined or refereed prior to the candidate submitting their next Task. The portfolio is retained in the student file. 6.5 The Examiner of the each Task shall be external to the supervisory panel and appointed by the Dean of Graduate Studies or nominee. The Office of Research Services will administer the Task examination process. 6.6 As each of the Tasks has a defined focus, and this focus is established in consultation between the candidate and the supervisory panel, information will be provided on a form in relation to details of the task to be examined (See Appendix A). 6.7 The external examiner is invited to make comment on the following criteria: a) A well-structured paper, which signals its organisation to the reader and clearly addresses the task title/topic. b) The content of the paper is coherent and logical, with links between the parts. c) There is clear development of an argument/position by the writer, drawing critically upon appropriate literature and experience. d) Appropriate links are drawn between argument and practice, where relevant. e) A technically sound paper, i.e. references are accurate and use a consistent and recognised format, spelling and grammar are correct, proper sentence structure is used, and good use of word length. f) The task shows development of understanding in relation to acquiring knowledge of the discipline. g) Other Comments. h) Required Changes. i) General Recommendations the examiner is invited to make recommendations to the candidate and supervisory panel about future directions. 6.8 The grading categories for the Tasks are Satisfactory, Revisions Required or Unsatisfactory. Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 2 of 11

3 6.9 For writing tasks submitted as RTs (book chapter or journal paper), the peer review process replaces the examination. The following criteria are applied to the accreditation of papers as a peer-reviewed writing task. Note the portfolio usually should not include more than two refereed publications: meets HERDC requirements for research; meets HERDC requirements for a Book Chapter, Journal Article or Refereed Conference Paper; must be related to the proposed research topic; can be co-authored, however the co-author must be a member of the supervisory panel; and co-authored paper, where a supervisor is not the co-author, will only accumulate percentage points. For example, a paper co-authored by three other authors will represent a 25% point allocation. The candidate will be required to accumulate the total of 100 points to equal one refereed writing task The application form for acceptance of a peer-reviewed writing task is provided in Appendix B. Advanced Standing Credit 6.11 Advanced standing credit may be applicable for up to a maximum of 2 of the 4 RTs; however this will be subject to the determination of the Deputy Dean (Research), School of Education and the Arts in consultation with the Supervisors (Principal and Associate). It will be approved by the Dean, Graduate Studies and by Research Higher Degrees Committee Advanced standing credit may be applicable for the successful completion of a research methods course (or equivalent) or other recent, relevant research-related work. Application for this credit must be made in writing and be supported by the candidate s supervisors. Confirmation of Candidature 6.13 Following successful completion of the 4 Research Tasks (RTs), the candidate will complete the Confirmation of Candidature, as per the CQUniversity Confirmation of Candidature Procedures A Portfolio will be prepared for the Confirmation of Candidature process that will include (a) confirmation of completion for each of the 4 RTs, (b) copies of the work submitted for each task where appropriate, and (c) the Confirmation of Candidature research proposal document. Thesis 6.15 The thesis will be based on the research proposal approved at Confirmation of Candidature. The thesis shall constitute a substantial investigation into a selected aspect of educational practice and be approximately 70,000 words in length or a thesis deemed equivalent by the Research Higher Degrees Committee The thesis will be examined by two examiners external to the University (as per the Program Rules). It will not include the Portfolio, although a summary of the SRTs completed will be listed in the front of the thesis document. Suggested Study Plan 6.17 Full Time (Internal or External) Year First 6 months Second 6 months 1 RT 1 submitted for examination. RT 2 submitted for examination. 2 Confirmation of Candidature (CoC) Research and Thesis commences (post-coc) RT 3 submitted for examination. RT 4 submitted for examination. Research and Thesis 3 Research and Thesis Research and Thesis Submission of Thesis for examination. Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 3 of 11

4 6.18 Part Time (Internal or External) Year First 6 months Second 6 months 1 RT 1 submitted for examination RT 2 submitted for examination 2 RT 3 submitted for examination RT 4 submitted for examination 3 Confirmation of Candidature (CoC) Research and Thesis commences (post-coc) Research and Thesis 4 Research and Thesis Research and Thesis 5 Research and Thesis Research and Thesis 6 Research and Thesis Submission of Thesis for examination Program Rules 6.19 The Program Rules for the Degree of Doctor of Education and the Degree of Doctor of Professional Studies are located in the University s policy portal By the completion of the Research Tasks, candidates should have a substantial background in the discipline area, an understanding of the role and functions of educational research, knowledge of appropriate research skills, including an understanding of the way to access and process information including research information at a Doctoral level. 7 RESPONSIBILITIES Compliance, Monitoring and Review 7.1 The Dean of Graduate Studies is responsible for ensuring the policy document complies with relevant legislation and University requirements, and it is implemented and monitored, e.g. adherence to the policy document, changing policy environment or emerging issues; and is reviewed to evaluate its continuing effectiveness, e.g. external and internal compliance, achieving its purpose, relevancy. Records Management 7.2 All records relevant to these procedures are to be maintained in a recognised University recordkeeping system. 8 DEFINITIONS HERDC: Higher Education Research Data Collection Refer to the University glossary for the definition of terms used in this policy. 9 RELATED LEGISLATION AND DOCUMENTS Related Policy Document Suite Program Rules for the Degree of Doctor of Education Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 4 of 11

5 Approval and Review Details Approval Authority Academic Board Advisory Committee to Approval Authority Research Higher Degrees Committee Administrator Dean, Graduate Studies Next Review Date 30/09/2018 Approval and Amendment History Details Original Approval Authority and Date Academic Board 30/09/2015 Amendment Authority and Date Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 5 of 11

6 APPENDIX A RESEARCH TASK COVER SHEET Please write in BLOCK letters using a black pen or TYPE 1 CANDIDATE DETAILS Family Name Given Name/s Student Number Program Principal Supervisor Associate Supervisor TASK DETAILS (cross one) TASK NAME 2 TASK DESCRIPTION/ABSTRACT (10 LINES) 3 NOMINATED EXAMINER Name Contact Details (Candidate) (Principal Supervisor) Office Use Only Contact Examiner: Task Sent: Task Returned: Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 6 of 11

7 RESEARCH TASK EXAMINER S REPORT Please write in BLOCK letters using a black pen or TYPE 1 CANDIDATE DETAILS Family Name Given Name/s Student Number Program 2 TASK DETAILS Task Name & Number Title (if applicable) Examiner 3 TECHNICAL/PRESENTATION Please provide any general recommendations to candidate and supervisor about future directions of the research. A well structured paper, which signals its organisation to the reader and clearly addresses the task title/topic. COMMENT The content of the paper is coherent and logical, with links between the parts. There is a clear development of an argument/position by the writer, drawing critically upon appropriate literature and experience. Appropriate links are drawn between argument and practice, where relevant. A technically sound paper, i.e. references are accurate and use a consistent and recognised format (e.g. Harvard or APA); spelling and grammar are correct, proper sentence structure is used and good use of word length. Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 7 of 11

8 This task shows development of understanding in relation to acquiring knowledge of the discipline through a critical reflection on literature to a depth and in a manner appropriate to that discipline. Other comments: Required changes: OVERALL RESULT Satisfactory Revisions Required Unsatisfactory Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 8 of 11

9 APPENDIX B APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH TASK ACCREDITATION PEER- REVIEWED WRITING TASK BOOK CHAPTER Please write in BLOCK letters using a black pen or TYPE 1 DETAILS Candidate s Name Student Number Program Task Name Task Number Name of Authors Chapter Title Book Title Publisher Place Published Is this a 1 st edition? Yes No Volume/Number This Chapter Page Start Total Number of Chapters in Book This Chapter Page End Total Number of Pages in Book Total Number of Pages in this Chapter ISBN Number DOI Number 2 VERIFICATION DETAILS (please attach photocopies of the following items to this proforma) 1 Full chapter 2 Front and Back Cover of the Book 3 Contents Page 4 Preface and Introduction 5 Evidence of peer review 6 Bibliographic page (showing ISBN, DOI, publisher, place published, year of publication, edition (Candidate) Print Name (Surname, Title, Initial) Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 9 of 11

10 APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH TASK ACCREDITATION PEER- REVIEWED WRITING TASK JOURNAL ARTICLE Please write in BLOCK letters using a black pen or TYPE 1 DETAILS Candidate s Name Student Number Program Task Name Task Number Name of Authors Article Title (in full, as published) Journal Name Publisher Volume Page Number Start URL (for electronic journals) ISSN Number Page Number End Number DOI Total Number of Pages 2 VERIFICATION DETAILS (please attach photocopies of the following items) Photocopy or offprint of article/contribution Photocopies of the following: Title page of journal Table of Contents Proof of refereeing: This may be demonstrated by any of the following items: Statement in the journal contributions refereed or Statement from editor contributions refereed or Copy of referee s assessment relating to the article Bibliographic page (showing ISSN, DOI,publisher, place published, issue number and year) (Candidate) Print Name (Surname, Title, Initial) Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 10 of 11

11 APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH TASK ACCREDITATION PRESCRIBED COURSE COMPLETION Please write in BLOCK letters using a black pen or TYPE 1 DETAILS Candidate s Name Student Number Program Task Name Task Number VERIFICATION DETAILS Please provide a copy of your course or program transcript. (Candidate) Print Name (Surname, Title, Initial) Reference Number/Code: 3009 Page 11 of 11