Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan. Year Ended December 31, Financial Statements

Transcription

1 Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan Year Ended December 31, 2012 Financial Statements

2 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis 5 Basic Financial Statements Statement of Plan Net Position 10 Statement of Changes in Plan Net Position 11 Notes to Financial Statements 13 Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress 22 Schedule of Employer Contributions 22 Internal Control and Compliance Independent Auditors Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 23

3 2330 East Paris Ave., SE PO Box 6547 Grand Rapids, MI Ph: Fx: INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT May 31, 2013 Members of the Board of Trustees of the Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan Grand Rapids, Michigan Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the financial statements of the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan (the "Plan", a pension trust fund of the County of Kent, Michigan), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Plan's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors' Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors' judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. 1

4 We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the Plan financial position of the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan at December 31, 2012, and the change in financial position for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matters As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements referred to above present only the Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the County of Kent, Michigan as of December 31, 2012, and the changes in its financial position for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America. Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management s discussion and analysis and schedules of funding progress and employer contributions, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. 2

5 Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated May 31, 2013 on our consideration of the Plan's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Plan's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. 3

6 This page intentionally left blank. 4

7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 5

8 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Management's Discussion and Analysis The following is a discussion and analysis of the financial performance and position of the Kent County Employee s Retirement Plan (the Plan ) for the year ended December 31, This analysis should be read in conjunction with the Independent Auditors Report and with the financial statements, which follow this section. Financial Highlights Plan assets exceeded liabilities at December 31, 2012 by $654,383,951 (reported as net position). The Plan s funding objective is to meet the long-term benefit obligations through contributions and investment income. At December 31, 2012, the funded ratio was 94.9 percent. Additions to net position for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $93,670,965 which is comprised of contributions of $16,252,271 and investment income, net of investment expense, of $77,418,694. Deductions from net position increased 3.5% from 2011 to 2012 (from $28,254,664 to $29,291,041), and were comprised primarily of benefit payments to plan members. The Statement of Plan Net Position and the Statement of Changes in Plan Net Position This report consists of two financial statements: the Statement of Plan Net Position and the Statement of Changes in Plan Net Position. These financial statements report information about the Plan, as a whole, and about its financial condition that should help answer the question: Is the Plan better off or worse off as a result of this year s activities? These statements include all assets and liabilities using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Under the accrual basis of accounting, all revenues and expenses are taken into account regardless of when cash is received or paid. The Statement of Plan Net Position presents all of the Plan s assets and liabilities with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases and decreases in net position measure whether the Plan s financial position is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Changes in Plan Net Position presents how the Plan s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. These two financial statements should be reviewed along with the Schedule of Funding Progress and the Schedule of Employer Contributions (presented after the footnotes as required supplementary information) to determine whether the Plan is becoming financially stronger or weaker and to understand changes over time in the funded status of the Plan. Financial Analysis Total assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $664,395,961 and $604,717,829, respectively, and were comprised mainly of investments and receivables. Total assets increased $ 59,678,132 or 9 percent from December 31, 2011 to December 31, Total liabilities as of December 31, 2012 were $10,012,010, and consisted of obligations under securities lending transactions and amounts due to brokers. Total liabilities decreased $4,701,792 or approximately 47 percent from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, primarily due to declines in securities lending activities. Plan assets exceeded its liabilities at the close of 2012 by $654,383,951. 6

9 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Management's Discussion and Analysis Assets Cash $ 2,644 $ 9,255 Receivables 1,314,546 1,590,598 Investments 663,078, ,117,976 Total assets 664,395, ,717,829 Liabilities Due to brokers 48, ,637 Liability under securities lending 9,963,335 14,268,165 Total liabilities 10,012,010 14,713,802 Total net position $ 654,383,951 $ 590,004,027 Revenue - Additions to Plan Net Position Net Position December 31, The reserves needed to finance retirement benefits are accumulated though the collection of employer and employee contributions and through earnings on investments. Contributions and net investment income for 2012 and 2011 totaled $93,670,965 and $28,679,721, respectively. Total contributions and net investment income increased $64,991,244 from 2011 to 2012 due to large increase in the net appreciation in fair value of securities in The employer contribution rate was 9.29% for both 2012 and Expenses - Deductions from Plan Net Position The primary expenses of the Plan include the payment of pension benefits to members and beneficiaries, refunds of contributions to former members, and cost of administering the Plan. Total deductions for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were $29,291,041 and $28,254,664, respectively. Pension benefit payments increased by $1,472,176 or 5.6 percent from $26,243,874 to $27,716,050 from 2011 to 2012, respectively. Benefit payments may fluctuate annually based on the mix of retirees currently receiving benefits. 7

10 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Management's Discussion and Analysis Additions Contributions $ 16,252,271 $ 15,469,416 Net investment income 77,418,694 13,210,305 Total additions 93,670,965 28,679,721 Deductions Benefit payments 27,716,050 26,243,874 Administrative expenses 1,108,105 1,397,226 Refunds of contributions 466, ,564 Total deductions 29,291,041 28,254,664 Change in net position 64,379, ,057 Net position, beginning of year 590,004, ,578,970 Net position, end of year $ 654,383,951 $ 590,004,027 Economic Factors, Investment Returns, and Other Important Matters Favorable investment experience during 2012 yielded an actual return of 13.6%. The Plan outperformed its benchmark by 60 basis points. The Plan s purpose is to provide long-term benefit payments to its members through long-term investing. Through its investment policy, the Plan has positioned the investment portfolio for this long-term objective. Contacting the Plan's Financial Management Changes in Net Position Year Ended December 31, In addition, to maximize investment returns and preserve fund assets, the Plan carefully monitors the performance of each of its investment managers and takes the necessary corrective action to ensure acceptable investment results. The additional latitude afforded to public pension plans in the overhaul of Public Act 314 will enable the Plan to further maximize a long-term investment strategy. This financial report is designed to provide the public, citizens, and other interest parties with a general overview of the Plan s financial position. If you have questions about this report or need additional financial information, contact Michelle Balcom, Pension Administrator, County of Kent, 300 Monroe Ave. NW, Grand Rapids, MI

11 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 9

12 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Statement of Plan Net Position December 31, 2012 Assets Cash $ 2,644 Receivables: Accrued interest receivable 959,964 Due from brokers 354,582 Investments, at fair value: U.S. government obligations $ 39,076,042 U.S. government agency obligations 38,385,030 Municipal obligations 492,372 Corporate obligations 41,648,150 Common stock 318,335,318 Foreign obligations 6,648,324 Money market funds 23,429,512 International equity mutual funds 69,756,210 Domestic fixed income mutual funds 44,837,336 Real estate and infrastructure securities 54,037,950 Mortgage-backed securities fund 26,432,527 Total investments 663,078,771 Total assets 664,395,961 Liabilities Due to brokers 48,675 Liability under securities lending transactions 9,963,335 Total liabilities 10,012,010 Net position held in trust for pension benefits (a schedule of funding progress is presented on page 22) $ 654,383,951 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. 10

13 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Statement of Changes in Plan Net Position For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Additions Contributions: Employer $ 8,547,559 Employee 7,704,712 Total contributions 16,252,271 Investment income: Net appreciation in fair value of securities $ 66,458,993 Net appreciation in fair value of collateral under securities lending 93,704 Interest 4,467,703 Dividends 9,082,066 Net increase in fair value of investments 80,102,466 Investment expense (2,683,772) Net investment income 77,418,694 Total additions 93,670,965 Deductions Benefit payments 27,716,050 Administrative expenses 1,108,105 Refunds of contributions 466,886 Total deductions 29,291,041 Change in net position 64,379,924 Net position held in trust for pension benefits: Beginning of year 590,004,027 End of year $ 654,383,951 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. 11

14 This page intentionally left blank. 12

15 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 13

16 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Notes to Financial Statements 1. PLAN DESCRIPTION The Kent County Employees Retirement Plan (the Plan ) is a single-employer defined benefit contributory retirement plan that provides pension, death and disability benefits covering substantially all full-time and regular part-time employees of the County of Kent, Michigan (the County ). The Plan was established by the Kent County Board of Commissioners and is administered by the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan Pension Board. Accordingly, it is included as a pension trust fund in the County s comprehensive annual financial report. Employee contribution requirements were established and may be amended subject to collective bargaining agreements and approval by the Kent County Board of Commissioners. Plan membership consisted of the following at December 31, 2012, the date of the most recent actuarial valuation: Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 1,196 Terminated employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 221 Vested and non-vested active participants 1,605 Total membership 3,022 Retirees and their beneficiaries are eligible for postemployment healthcare benefits if they are receiving a pension from the Plan. The Kent County Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (VEBA) pays these benefits. These benefits are accounted for in the VEBA trust fiduciary fund, included in the County s comprehensive annual financial report. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Accounting The Plan s financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Member contributions are recognized in the period in which they are due. The County s contributions are recognized when due and the employer has made a formal commitment to provide them. Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Valuation of Investments and Income Recognition The Plan s investments are stated at fair value. Short-term investments are reported at cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on a national or international exchange are valued at the last reported sales price at current exchange rates. Mortgages are valued on the basis of future principal and interest payments, and are discounted at prevailing interest rates for similar instruments. The fair value of real estate and infrastructure investments is based on independent appraisals. Investments that do not have established market values are reported at estimated fair value. Investments for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair values as determined by the custodian under the direction of the Plan s Board of Trustees, with the assistance of a valuation service. 14

17 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Notes to Financial Statements Dividend income is recognized based on the ex-dividend date, and interest income is recognized on the accrual basis as earned. All realized gains and losses on investments are recognized at the point of sale and are included in investment income. Purchases and sales of investments are recorded as of the trade date, which is the date when the transaction is initiated. Administration Administrative costs are financed through the Plan s investment earnings. 3. DEPOSITS, INVESTMENTS AND SECURITIES LENDING Cash and Short-term Investments The Plan does not maintain any checking or other demand/time deposit accounts. The amounts reported as cash and money market funds in the statement of plan net position are insured by the Securities Investors Protection Act for up to $500,000 each. The carrying amount of these accounts as of December 31, 2012, was $23,432,156, of which the insured amount was $3,283,059. The remaining balance of $20,149,097 is uninsured and uncollateralized. Investments The Plan is authorized by the Michigan Public Employees Retirement Systems Investment Act 314 of 1965, as amended, to invest in stocks, government and corporate securities, mortgages, real estate, and various other instruments, subject to certain limitations. The Plan s Board of Trustees is responsible for adopting the investment policies and strategies, and retaining/monitoring the various investment managers, trustees, advisors, actuaries and other fiduciaries utilized by the Plan. The Plan s investments are held in fourteen portfolios administered by seven investment managers. Following is a summary of the Plan s investments as of December 31, 2012 (investments at fair value, as determined by quoted market price): Not on Securities Loan On Securities Loan Totals Investments at fair value U.S. government obligations $ 32,411,443 $ 6,664,599 $ 39,076,042 U.S. government agency obligations 38,385,030-38,385,030 Municipal obligations 492, ,372 Corporate obligations 39,300,118 2,348,032 41,648,150 Common stock 318,335, ,335,318 Foreign obligations 5,879, ,711 6,648,324 Money market funds 23,429,512-23,429,512 International equity mutual funds 69,756,210-69,756,210 Domestic fixed income mutual funds 44,837,336-44,837,336 Real estate and infrastructure securities 54,037,950-54,037,950 Mortgage-backed securities fund 26,432,527-26,432,527 Total investments $ 653,297,429 $ 9,781,342 $ 663,078,771 15

18 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Notes to Financial Statements Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. The Plan s investment policy requires that bonds have a minimum quality rating of BBB/Baa at the time of purchase. The overall portfolio is expected to maintain an average credit quality of AA or higher. Money market instruments shall have a minimum quality rating comparable to an A bond rating and commercial paper shall not be rated less than A1/P1 unless held in a diversified short-term commingled fund. As of December 31, 2012, the Plan s investments were rated as follows: Not on Securities Loan On Securities Loan Totals Standard and Poors AAA $ 4,529,743 $ - $ 4,529,743 Standard and Poors AA 5,608, ,980 6,408,629 Standard and Poors A 16,171, ,002 17,114,938 Standard and Poors BBB 10,842,481 1,333,185 12,175,666 Standard and Poors BB 41,185 40,576 81,761 Moody AAA 1,398,318-1,398,318 Moody AA3 43,173-43,173 Moody A1 90,603-90,603 Moody A2 203, ,505 Unrated 94,989,579-94,989,579 Not subject to credit risk 519,378,257 6,664, ,042,856 Total investments $ 653,297,429 $ 9,781,342 $ 663,078,771 Custodial Credit Risk. For investments, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty to a transaction, the Plan will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. Although uninsured and unregistered, the Plan s investments are not exposed to custodial credit risk since the securities are held by the counterparty s trust department or agent in the Plan s name. Short-term investments in money market funds and open-end mutual funds are not exposed to custodial credit risk because their existence is not evidenced by securities that exist in physical or book form. Concentration of Credit Risk. Concentration of credit risk is the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of the Plan s investment in a single issuer. For fixed income portfolios, the Plan s Investment Policy provides that, with the exception of U.S. treasuries and agencies, no more than 3 percent of the portfolio shall be invested in the obligations of any one issuer. As of December 31, 2012, the Plan had no investment in a single issuer, other than U.S. treasuries and agencies, that exceeded 3 percent of total investments. Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency risk is the risk that changes in exchange rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment or deposit. The Plan mitigates foreign currency risk by requiring the portfolio to be broadly diversified by number of holdings, by geographic location and across industry sectors. Country exposures are monitored through a quarterly performance report. 16

19 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Notes to Financial Statements The Plan s exposure to foreign currency risk as of December 31, 2012, is as follows: Investment (currency in U.S. dollar) Fair Value International equity mutual funds $ 69,756,210 Foreign obligations 6,648,324 Total $ 76,404,534 Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will adversely affect the fair market value of an investment. The Plan s policy provides for its fixed income portfolio to have an average duration of no more than 120 percent of the duration of the stated benchmark (Barclays Aggregate Bond Index). At December 31, 2012, maturities of the Plan s investments were as follows: Not on Securities Loan On Securities Loan Totals Less than 1 year $ 3,755,692 $ 121,179 $ 3,876, years 41,254,161 3,994,388 45,248, years 28,682,975 3,082,981 31,765,956 More than 10 years 42,775,747 2,582,794 45,358,541 No maturity 536,828, ,828,854 Total investments $ 653,297,429 $ 9,781,342 $ 663,078,771 Securities Lending Risk. State statutes and a contract approved by the Plan s Board of Trustees permit the pension trust fund to lend its securities to broker-dealers and other entities (borrowers) for collateral that will be returned for the same securities in the future. The lending agreement requires collateral of 102 percent of the aggregate market value of loaned securities for domestic securities lent. There are no restrictions on the amount of securities that can be loaned. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Plan loaned certain U.S. government and agency obligations and equities under securities lending agreements, and received cash as collateral. The cash was used to invest in various investment types, as noted in the summary of Plan investments above. Inasmuch as the Plan has the ability to use cash pledged as collateral by the borrower without borrower default, the investments purchased with such funds and a corresponding liability equal to the amount of original securities on loan have been recorded on the Statement of Net Position. At year-end, the Plan has no credit risk exposure to borrowers because the amounts the Plan owes the borrowers exceed the amounts the borrowers owe the Plan. At December 31, 2012, the fair value of securities loaned by the Plan to the broker was $9,781,342, for which the Plan received cash collateral of $9,963,

20 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Notes to Financial Statements 4. ANNUAL REQUIRED CONTRIBUTIONS After meeting eligibility requirements, active Plan members are required to contribute to the Plan based on their bargaining unit or management group contribution rate. Member rates are variable and based on union contracts in place. The variable rate ranged from 6.5 to 7.5 percent for the year ended December 31, The County s funding policy provides for periodic employer contributions at actuarially determined rates that are expressed as percentages of annual covered payroll, and are designed to accumulate sufficient assets to pay benefits when due. The County s contribution rate for the year ended December 31, 2012, was 9.29 percent of projected valuation payroll. The normal cost and amortization payment were determined using an entry age actuarial funding method. Unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities are being amortized as a level percent of payroll over an open period of 25 years. Historical information on the Plan s actual employer contributions is presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements. 5. FUNDED STATUS AND FUNDING PROGRESS Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment and mortality. Actuarially determined amounts are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, present multiyear trend information about whether the actuarial values of assets held in trust are increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. The entry-age actuarial cost method is used to determine plan liabilities. Significant actuarial assumptions used in determining the entry-age actuarial accrued liability include (a) a rate of return on investments of 7 percent per year compounded annually (b) projected salary increases of 4 percent attributable to inflation and 0.2 to 5.1 percent per year, depending on age, attributable to seniority/merit. The actuarial value of assets was determined using techniques that smooth the effects of short-term volatility in the market value of investments over a four-year period. Funded Status and Funding Progres s. As of December 31, 2012, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the Plan was 94.9 percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $678,725,155, and the actuarial value of assets was $644,210,465, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $34,514,690. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the Plan) was $91,209,371, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 37.8 percent. During the year ended December 31, 2012, total contributions of $16,252,271 were made in accordance with actuarially determined requirements, computed through an actuarial valuation performed as of December 31, The County contributed $8,547,559 (9.29% of projected valuation payroll); employees contributed $7,704,712. The County s contribution consisted of $7,609,076 normal cost (8.27% of projected valuation payroll) plus $938,483 in amortization of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability and cost-of-living adjustment (1.02% of projected valuation payroll). 18

21 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Notes to Financial Statements 6. RISK MANAGEMENT The Plan is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, errors and omissions. The Plan participates in the County of Kent, Michigan s risk management program for all of these exposures. The County s risk management program is primarily a self-insured program with reinsurance for amounts in excess of aggregate loss funds. The County estimates the liability for unpaid claims (including claims incurred but not reported) and allocates the cost to all appropriate entities and funds. There is no further exposure to the Plan that would require a liability to be recorded in the financial statements. 19

22 This page intentionally left blank. 20

23 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 21

24 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress (amounts in millions) Actuarial Accrued UAAL as a Actuarial Liability Unfunded Percentage Actuarial Value of (AAL) - AAL Funded Covered of Covered Valuation Assets Entry Age (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Payroll Date (a) (b) (b-a) (a / b) (c) ((b-a) / c) 12/31/2007 $ $ $ (60.3) 111.5% $ % 12/31/ (26.6) 104.8% % 12/31/ (2.5) 100.4% % 12/31/ % % 12/31/ % % 12/31/ % % Schedule of Employer Contributions (amounts in millions) Annual Year Ended Required Percentage December 31, Contributions Contributed 2007 $ % % % % % % 22

25 2330 East Paris Ave., SE PO Box 6547 Grand Rapids, MI Ph: Fx: INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS May 31, 2013 Members of the Board of Trustees of the Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan Grand Rapids, Michigan We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan (the "Plan", a pension trust fund of the County of Kent, Michigan), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Plan s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 31, Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Plan s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Plan s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Plan s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. 23

26 Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Plan s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Plan s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. 24

27 Rehmann Robson 2330 East Paris Ave., SE Grand Rapids, MI Ph: Fx: INDEPENDENT AUDITORS COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE May 31, 2013 Board of Trustees Kent County Employees Retirement Plan Grand Rapids, Michigan We have audited the financial statements the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan (the Plan, a pension trust fund of the County of Kent, Michigan) for the year ended December 31, 2012, and have issued our report thereon dated May 31, Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit. Our Responsibility Under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards As stated in our engagement letter dated January 28, 2013, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to express an opinion about whether the financial statements prepared by management with your oversight are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities. As part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the Plan. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of Plan s compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously communicated to you in our engagement letter and our meeting about planning matters on February 19, Significant Results of the Audit Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the Plan are described in Note 2 to the financial statements. The Plan adopted Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards (GASB Statement) No. 63, Financial Reporting of Deferred Outflows of Resources, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position and No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities, in the current year. While reclassifications of certain amounts were made in the balance sheets and terminology changed, there was no net effect of this change in accounting principle

28 on beginning equity. We noted no transactions entered into by the Plan during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. There are no significant transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements in a different period than when the transaction occurred. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were: The assumptions used in the actuarial valuations of the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan are based on historical trends and industry standards. Management s estimate of the valuation of certain investment securities recorded at fair value. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Attachment B to this letter summarizes uncorrected misstatements of the financial statements. Management has determined that their effects are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. In addition, our audit procedures identified an error that initially overstated both investments and liabilities under securities lending transactions by approximately $1.9 billion. Management has recorded the appropriate correction, and the balances are properly reported in the audited financial statements. The net impact of this adjustment to ending net position held in trust was $585,433, which did not have a significant effect on the Plan. Upcoming Changes in Accounting Standards Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are continually changing in order to promote the usability and enhance the applicability of information included in external financial reporting. While it would not be practical to include an in-depth discussion of every upcoming change in professional standards, Attachment C to this letter contains a brief overview of recent pronouncements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and their related effective dates. Management is responsible for reviewing these standards, determining their applicability, and implementing them in future accounting periods. Page 2

29 Page 3 Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Management Representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the attached management representation letter dated May 31, Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a second opinion on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the entity s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Other Audit Findings or Issues We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the governmental unit s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. This information is intended solely for the use of the governing body and management of the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Very truly yours,

30 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Attachment A - Consideration of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting For the December 31, 2012 Audit We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Kent County Employees' Retirement Plan (the "Plan", a pension trust fund of the County of Kent, Michigan), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Plan s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 31, In planning and performing our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we considered the Plan s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Plan s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Plan s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. Other Matters Completeness of Actuarial Data Each year, the Plan submits information on active employees, retirees, benefit plan provisions, and other relevant pension data to an actuary. The resulting actuarial valuation determines required County contribution to the Plan for future periods and estimates the liability for future pension benefits. Accordingly, it is important that the information submitted to the actuary is complete and accurate. During our audit, we noted 6 current year retirees that had been inadvertently excluded from the submitted data. These individuals were all part of a benefit group that did not previously have any retirees and therefore was not included in the input worksheet. We expect the impact on the actuarial report to be inconsequential for a plan of this size. However, we recommend for future years that the Plan reconcile data submitted to the actuaries to payroll records and other system reports to ensure its accuracy and completeness. A1

31 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN Attachment B - Schedule of Adjustments Passed (SOAP) For the December 31, 2012 Audit In accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we have prepared the following schedule of proposed audit adjustments, which we believe are immaterial both individually and in the aggregate. We are providing this schedule to both management and those charged with governance to receive their assurance that they agree that the amounts listed below are not material to the financial statements, either individually or in the aggregate, and do not need to be recorded. Effect of Passed Adjustment - Over(Under)Statement Beginning Assets Liabilities Net Position Additions Deductions Effect of not accruing employer and employee contributions for the last payroll of the year that were paid in January $ (630,400) $ - $ (617,254) $ - $ 13,146 Effect of not accruing fourth quarter expenses and fees that were paid in January and February of the subsequent year - (887,289) 686,533 - (200,756) $ (630,400) $ (887,289) $ 69,279 $ - $ (187,610) Misstatement as a percentage of total assets -0.10% -0.14% 0.01% 0.00% -0.03% B1

32 KENT COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN Attachment C Upcoming Changes in Accounting Standards For the December 31, 2012 Audit The following pronouncements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) have been released recently and may be applicable to the Plan in the near future. We encourage management to review the following information and determine which standard(s) may be applicable to the Plan. For the complete text of these and other GASB standards, visit and click on the pronouncements tab. If you have questions regarding the applicability, timing, or implementation approach for any of these standards, please contact your audit team. GASB Technical Corrections (an Amendment to GASB 10 and GASB 62) Effective 12/15/2013 (your FY 2013) This standard was issued to eliminate conflicting guidance that resulted from the issuance of GASB 54 and GASB 62, which are both already effective. GASB 10 was amended to allow for risk financing activities to be accounted for in whichever fund type is most applicable (no longer limited to the general fund or an internal service fund). GASB 62 was amended to modify specific guidance related to (1) operating leases with scheduled rent increases, (2) purchase of loans at an amount other than the principal amount, and (3) service fees related to mortgages that are sold when the service rate varies significantly from the current (normal) service fees. We do not expect GASB 66 to have any significant impact on the Plan at this time. GASB 67 Financial Reporting for Pension Plans Effective 06/15/2014 (your FY 2014) This standard establishes the requirements for pension plans administered by trusts to report on their operations, including setting new uniform requirements for actuarial valuations of the total pension liability, and reporting various 10-year trend data as required supplementary information. The financial statements of pension plans will not change substantially as a result of GASB 67, though the additional note disclosures and required supplementary information will be significant. Additionally, actuarial valuations conducted in accordance with GASB 67 will have to match the government s fiscal year, or be rolled forward to that date by the actuary. GASB 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Effective 06/15/2015 (your FY 2015) This standard establishes new requirements for governments to report a net pension liability for the unfunded portion of its pension plan. Governments that maintain their own pension plans (either single employer or agent multiple-employer) will report a liability for the difference between the total pension liability calculated in accordance with GASB 67 and the amount held in the pension trust fund. Governments that participate in a cost sharing plan will report a liability for their proportionate share of the net pension liability of the entire system. Historically, governments have only been required to report a net pension obligation to the extent that they have not met the annual required contribution (ARC) in any given year. Upon implementation of this standard, governments will be required to report a net pension liability based on the current funded status of their pension plans. Changes in this liability from year to year will largely be reflected on the income statement, though certain amounts will be deferred and amortized over varying periods. C1