Institute of Medicine Workshop: Research Issues in the Assessment of Birth Settings

Transcription

1 Institute of Medicine Workshop: Research Issues in the Assessment of Birth Settings Brynne Potter, CPM Provider Perspectives: Midwives and Home Birth March 7, 2013

2 Disclosure CEO and Founder EHR and HIT Platform for Maternity Care

3 Home Birth in the US Polarized Marginalized Disruptive Racialized Politicized

4 Wax Analysis: (mis)conclusions Discrepancies in sample size and inclusion criteria for neonatal and perinatal death rates Causation of low morbidity/intervention in home birth erroneously linked to mortality Questionable cohort for neonatal death drives widely influential ACOG published opinion In an era of evidence-based medicine, it is incomprehensible that medical society opinion can be formulated on research that does not hold to the most basic standards of methodological rigor. -Michal, Janssen, Vedam, Hutton, dejonge Planned Home vs Hospital Birth: A Meta-Analysis Gone Wrong; 2011 Carl A. Michal, PhD; Patricia A. Janssen, PhD; Saraswathi Vedam, SciD; Eileen K. Hutton, PhD; Ank de Jonge, PhD,

5

6 Why do women choose home birth? Safety"" " " Control of environment & process of care Privacy Cultural Congruency Comfort and Convenience" Spiritual Accommodation Self-Determination" Low Intervention" " Family Involvement Relaxed and peaceful (Jackson 2012, Blix 2011, Symon 2010, Lindgren 2010, Hendrix 2010, Boucher 2009, Janssen 2006, Hildingsson 2010, 2003,)

7 Why do women choose home birth? Comfortable setting, we can make decisions without pressure $om staff 1st baby born in hospital I want to feel safe and comfortable. I have confidence in myself to have a natural birth. I like the one on one attention I wi& receive using a midwife. 1st born in a birth center I think that I wi& be able to relax in a home setting and not feel pressured by time constraints Expecting 1st baby

8 Home Birth Safety Olsen and Clausen, Cochrane 2012 Conclusions: Only one trial (n=11) met rigorous criteria, but quality of observational studies greatly increased..there is no strong evidence to favor either planned hospital or planned home birth for selected, low risk pregnant women Recommend all countries facilitate evidence-based integration of home birth services for low-risk women From an autonomy-based ethical perspective the only justification for practices that restrict a woman s autonomy and her $eedom of choice, would be clear evidence that these restrictive practices do more good than harm Enkin (1995), Olsen (1998, 2012) Olsen, Clausen, (2012 Cochrane Collaborative Review) Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth

9 Best Observational Data de Jonge, et al, ,688 women - Netherlands ( ) Planned home births: 321,301 (60%) Planned hospital births: 163, 261 (31%) No significant differences between home and hospital for any of the main outcomes including perinatal death Janssen, 2009 Prospective five-year matched cohort study - British Columbia midwife-attended planned home birth (N=2802) physician attended hospital birth group (N=5985) midwife attended hospital birth group (N=5984). Similar or reduced rates of adverse outcomes with significantly fewer intrapartum interventions de Jonge A, van der Goes B, Ravelli A, Amelink-Verburg M, Mol B, Nijhuis J, et al.perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009 Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee Sk. Outcomes of planned home births with registered midwife versus versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ 2009

10 Making home birth as safe as possible Access to qualified care providers with appropriate equipment Appropriate risk assessment Respectful communication/collaboration that maintains continuity and relationship Integrated transfer of data Fully implemented QI measures Mechanisms to address unprofessional conduct. (Licensure) Reimbursement, including Medicaid

11 Risk Assessment Home Birth is a safe choice for essentially healthy women. Risk equals probability times consequence. Safety is the level of acceptable risk Ron DuPlain, Private Practice-Maternity, Systems Engineer What factors should influence choice of birth setting, and which factors have no bearing on that choice? Perceptions of risk and safety linked to medical perspective. (Bryers, 2010) Recognize impact of imposing limitation of scope in one setting on demand for services in another.

12 Access Research should address lack of access to birth services using same criteria identified by home birth opponents: 1. Safety 2. Patient Satisfaction 3. Cost 4. Ethics

13 Mutual Accommodation How can we develop mutual respect and understanding between providers with different approaches to care? How can we optimize the expertise of providers in each setting? Instead of a maternity system based on fear and misinformation, we need a system based on co&aboration and mutual respect. Melissa Cheyney, PhD, LM, CPM

14 Intrapartum Transport Develop standards to improve quality and safety during non-emergent and emergent transfers of care

15 Human Rights and Birth Choices Is it not the opposite of autonomy to support only those choices which increase the woman s reliance upon the physician? Lauren A. Plante, MD, MPH, FACOG Choice of Birth Setting Shared Decision Making Patient Autonomy Plante LA. Mommy, What Did You Do in the Industrial Revolution? Meditations on the Rising Cesarean Rate. The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. Spring 2009;2(1): DOI: /FAB

16 Suggestions for Comparative Effectiveness Research 1. Include birth setting in review of low-risk cesarean rates (Harmann 2012) 2. Address race disparity for birth options. Development of community-based health workers.(doula Care Reduces Cesarean Deliveries in Medicaid Patients. Medscape. Feb 19, 2013.) 3. Patient derived data in EHR and other HIT innovations to address patient satisfaction and shared decision making.(dhanireddy, S 2012; Leveille, S 2012, Delbanco, T 2010) 4. Relocation; Impact on rural women (Kaczorowsk, J. 2000; Kornelsen, 2005, 2011; Gao, 2010; Klein,M. 2002; Thomassen, H. 2005; Grzybowski, S. 2007; Godwin,M. 2002)

17 Home Birth-Like Woman-centered, family friendly, community based Pregnancy and birth are treated as a unified process of care that includes social, emotional, physical, cultural and spiritual accommodation A resolute environment for undisturbed, physiologic birth

18 Factors that Disturb Birth Joint Normal Physiologic Birth Statement (2012) Unsupportive environment, i.e., bright lights, cold room, lack of privacy, multiple providers, lack of supportive companions Time constraints, including those driven by institutional policy and/or staffing Separation of mother and infant Any situation in which the mother feels threatened or unsupported Opiates, regional analgesia, or general anesthesia Episiotomy Operative vaginal (vacuum, forceps) or abdominal (cesarean) birth Immediate cord clamping Induction or augmentation of labor Nutritional deprivation, e.g., food & drink

19 Benefits of physiologic labor and birth Value of Home Birth Reduces likelihood of fetal compromise Increased confidence and capacity to mother Reduces instrumental or surgical intervention. Improves physical & mental health mother and baby Enhanced infant growth & development Mother-infant attachment Diminished incidence of chronic disease Maintains delicate hormone physiology Epigenetic impact of childbirth References: Dahlen HG et al. The EPIIC hypothesis: Intrapartum effects on the neonatal epigenome and consequent health outcomes. Med Hypotheses (2013) Goer H. & Romano A. (2012) Optimal Care in Childbirth; The case for a physiologic approach, Classic Day Publishing, Seattle, WA Fahy, Fourer, Hastie. (2008) Birth Territory & Midwifery Guardianship, Elsevior Publishing, Philadelphia, PA The Hormonal Physiology of Childbearing (Buckley, Childbirth Connection; 2013-draft)

20

21 Thank You Brynne Potter, CPM Provider Perspectives: Midwives and Home Birth March 7, 2013