Are All Dividend Equity Strategies Created Equal?

Transcription

1 Are All Dividend Equity Strategies Created Equal? BY MATTHEW J. ARNOLD, CFA, SENIOR ETF STRATEGIST, SPDR ETFs, STATE STREET GLOBAL ADVISORS Dividend equity investing has experienced something of a renaissance in recent years, as investors have sought alternatives to low-yielding core fixed income assets. In addition to compensating for the low levels of income generated by traditional sources, investors have been attracted by the defensive qualities of some dividend-based strategies. Burnt by two severe bear markets since 2, investors on both sides of the Atlantic have found comfort in dividend and low volatility equity strategies, believing each offers a means of participating in the equity market while reducing volatility and potential drawdowns. But are all dividend strategies created equal? And what should investors think about when implementing a dividend-based approach to equity investing? Here, we examine the results of several index-based high dividend equity strategies and make several suggestions for investors evaluating their dividend equity options in the current environment. We show that index strategies incorporating some element of dividend sustainability, such as a requirement for constituents to exhibit a consistent record of growing dividends, have performed better than naïve indexing approaches, where constituents are selected on trailing yield alone. We also show that dividend growth strategies have delivered in terms of lowering volatility and reducing average drawdowns over time. In short, we contend that not all dividend approaches are created equal and that as with most investment strategies, the devil is often in the detail. A BRIEF RECAP THE INCOME CHALLENGE The low interest rate environment of the last several years has fundamentally changed the landscape for income-oriented investors. Bank deposits pay near-zero interest rates, yields on many stable net asset value cash funds barely cover expenses and core fixed income assets currently generate meagre levels of income. Partly as a function of the interest rate environment, but also likely a reaction to the two brutal bear markets experienced since 2, dividend-based equity strategies have recently been exceptionally popular with investors the world over. But as with most investment approaches there are numerous ways to gain exposure to the high dividend equity beta. What an investor wants to get out of their dividend-based strategy is also a consideration. Are they looking to outperform the cap-weighted market, be that over the short or long term? Or are they looking to generate a little income and perhaps invest in the equity market in a slightly more defensive manner? Certainly, if the goal is to outperform the broad market, results are likely be time dependent. Dividends being a traditional value factor will likely perform well during periods when stocks with value characteristics do well. On the flipside, they will likely struggle where growth-oriented characteristics are more highly valued by the market. In any case, there are many things to think about when adopting a dividend-oriented investment strategy. DIVIDEND GROWTH VERSUS DIVIDEND YIELD WHAT PERFORMS BEST? What makes a successful dividend equity strategy? And how can investors go about implementing a dividend-based strategy efficiently? From simply screening a universe of stocks by trailing dividend yield to buying a basket of stocks from a traditional high yielding sector such as utilities, there are many means of gaining exposure to the dividend theme. Many investors simply hire an active fund manager, leaving them to build a portfolio of stocks that delivers a relatively high level of current income. The Equity Income category, one of the largest fund categories in Europe, has long been the domain of the active manager, with passive options few and far between until a few years ago. Their approaches vary significantly: some managers emphasise yield alone, while others favour companies that have shown an ability to grow their dividends over time. There are a range of index fund and ETFs available too, from sector funds through to funds that track customised high dividend equity indices. Broadly speaking the various implementation options can be divided into those that focus on dividend growth and those that focus on dividend yield. We examine the merits of each approach below. spdrseurope.com

2 The S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats Index is designed to measure the performance of large cap companies within the S&P 5 index which have followed a managed-dividends policy of increasing their dividends every year for the last 25 years, subject to various market capitalisation and liquidity requirements. The constituents are equally weighted and the index is rebalanced quarterly. The index is reconstituted annually in January. S&P has also created Dividend Aristocrats indices covering other markets. The markets and a brief description of the methodologies are detailed below: S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index tracks S&P 15 companies that have grown dividends for 2 years, subject to various market capitalisation and liquidity constraints. The index is dividend-weighted, with all qualifying companies added to the index. This index is the benchmark for two SPDR ETFs, one domiciled in the US, one domiciled in Europe. S&P UK High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index tracks UK companies within the S&P Europe BMI index that have grown or maintained stable dividends for at least 1 years. It is dividend-weighted, with only the top 3 (by dividend yield) companies included in the index. In addition to liquidity and market capitalisation constraints, sector weights are capped at 3%. This index is the benchmark for a European-domiciled SPDR ETF. S&P Euro High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index tracks eurozone companies within the S&P Europe BMI index that have grown or maintained stable dividends for at least 1 years. It is dividend-weighted, with only the top 4 (by dividend yield) companies included in the index. In addition to liquidity and market capitalisation constraints, both sector and country weights are capped at 3%. This index is the benchmark for a European-domiciled SPDR ETF. S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index tracks companies within the S&P Global BMI index that have grown or maintained stable dividends for at least 1 years. It is dividend-weighted, with only the top 1 (by dividend yield) companies included in the index. In addition to liquidity and market capitalisation constraints, both sector and country weights are capped at 25%. This index is the benchmark for two SPDR ETFs, one domiciled in the US, one domiciled in Europe. S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats index tracks companies within the S&P Pan Asia BMI index that have grown their dividends for at least 7 years. It is dividend-weighted, with a maximum of 1 constituents included in the index. The minimum number of constituents is 4. In addition to liquidity and market capitalisation constraints, both sector and country weights are capped at 3%. This index is the benchmark for a European-domiciled SPDR ETF. Source: S&P Dividend Aristocrats index methodology papers. For more information including full criteria and exceptions to the above, please consult spdji.com. For information on the corresponding SPDR ETFs, please consult spdrs.com or spdrseurope.com. According to Ned Davis Research, the sell-side research house, US companies that have grown their dividends or initiated a dividend payment have outperformed companies employing alternative dividend strategies over the long term. Their analysis compared the performance of stocks in the S&P 5 based on the company s dividend policy. They constructed equal-weighted portfolios of stocks that fell into the following categories: 1. Dividend Growers and Initiators 2. All Dividend-Paying Stocks 3. Dividend Payers with no Change in Dividends 4. Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks Since 1972, the Dividend Growers and Initiators averaged total annualised returns of 9.9%, outperforming stocks in the other three categories. Dividend Payers with No Change in Dividends returned 7.5% annually, while Non-Dividend- Paying stocks delivered only 2.2% annually. This compared to the 7.4% annual gain for the equal-weighted S&P 5 Index. 1 They expanded their research to look at stocks in Europe, and while the history is shorter (data here goes back to 1987), results were similar with Dividend Growers outperforming other categories. 2 Analysis of the S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats Index provides further evidence of strong performance from companies that have shown the ability to grow their dividends over time. The S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats is an equal-weighted index consisting of S&P 5 constituents that have grown their dividends for at least the last 25 years. The index has history back to We compared the performance of that index to the equal-weighted S&P 5 index, and two high yield sectors, Telecoms and Utilities. Simply buying either or both sectors for yield alone is perhaps an example of a naïve investment strategy one that exposes investors to risks above and beyond the exposure to the high dividend equity factor. Telecoms for instance experienced a significant boom and bust during the late 199s and early 2s, their performance the result of sector-specific issues far more than them being historically high dividend payers. Likewise, Utilities stocks have been bid up over the last several years but suffered something of a setback in May when US Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, announced the possibility that bond purchases would be tapered. Since one of the attractive elements of a well-executed dividend strategy is reduced volatility and increased downside protection, these naïve approaches thus fall short in some regards. As illustrated in Figure 1, our own research appears to confirm the results of the Ned Davis study. The broad-based S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats Index has outperformed the sector indices as well as the S&P 5 equal- and capitalisation-weighted indices. A word of warning, however: the strong long-term results of the dividend growth strategy, as represented by the S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats index, should not hide the fact that results are very much time-dependent. If one evaluated the strategy towards the end of the 199s for example, both naïve sector-based approaches would have outperformed the Dividend Aristocrats approach. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 2

3 FIGURE 1: PERFORMANCE SINCE 199 DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS NAÏVE SECTOR STRATEGIES Jan 199 Dividend Aristocrats Telecoms Dec Utilities Financials S&P 5 Equal Weighted S&P 5 Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Dec 1989 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats, Financials, Telecoms, S&P 5 and Utilities indices and the S&P 5 index. Total cumulative return in USD. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. FIGURE 2: AVERAGE ROLLING RETURNS DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS NAÏVE SECTOR STRATEGIES Dividend Aristocrats Average 3 Years Rolling Return Financials Telecoms Utilities S&P 5 S&P 5 Equal Weighted Average 5 Years Rolling Return Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices Dec 1989 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats, Financials, Telecoms, S&P 5 and Utilities indices and the S&P 5 index. Average 3 and 5 year rolling total returns (annualised) in USD. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. And if we evaluate the strategies based on the average rolling 3-year returns (see Figure 2), the Financials sector strategy actually generated a higher average 3-year annualised return. Nonetheless, at almost a quarter of a century, the cumulative results are indeed quite robust, incorporating the tech and telecom boom and bust, the credit bubble and the global financial crisis that followed. ARE DIVIDEND EQUITY STRATEGIES LESS VOLATILE THAN THE MARKET? We hear from investors that one of the main attractions of adopting a high dividend-based equity strategy is the prospect of reducing overall portfolio volatility. But have high dividend stocks really delivered on that front? Analysing the long-term results it is clear that the Dividend Aristocrats have been less volatile than the broad market and have also offered some downside protection. From December 1989 through to December, the annualised standard deviation was 13.77%, less than both the equal-weighted and cap-weighted S&P 5 indices, while the average drawdown over that period was -8.57%, also less than the broad market indices. Clearly, in times of market stress, Steady Eddies companies that have been able to grow dividends through good times and bad times generally hold up much better than the more cyclical companies whose businesses experience ebb and flow in line with the broader economic conditions. This lower volatility combined with a strong record of returns, contributed to the index having a higher Sharpe ratio over all time periods than all of the alternative strategies below. The risk of single sector strategies is clear, with financials and telecoms indices having maximum declines of close to 8% certainly not what is sought by the typical dividend equity investor. WHEN DO DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS OUTPERFORM? Earlier, we highlighted the strong results of the Dividend Aristocrats approach when viewed on an average rolling 3- and 5-year basis. On a calendar year basis, the evidence is just as compelling. The S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats index has declined in just four out of 24 calendar years 1999, 22, 27 and was the tail end of the technology and telecom boom while 27 marked the beginning of the global financial crisis. 22 and 28 were bear markets, with the equal-weighted index declining 18.18% and 39.72%, respectively. In these years, the Dividend Aristocrats index declined 9.87% and 21.88%, significantly less than the broader market. Despite the strong long-term results, the Dividend Aristocrats index only outperformed the equal-weighted index half the time, generally underperforming in years when the more cyclical stocks have been favoured by the market. These results highlight again that while companies that have shown an ability to grow their dividends have performed well over the long term, there have been periods where this characteristic has not been rewarded by the market. This has implications for investors, particularly those with a relative return orientation. FIGURE 3: PRICE VOLATILITY DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS NAÏVE SECTOR STRATEGIES 3 YEARS 5 YEARS 1 YEARS 15 YEARS 2 YEARS SINCE DEC 1989 Dividend Aristocrats Financials Telecoms Utilities S&P 5 Equal Weighted S&P Source: Morningstar Direct. Dec 1989 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats, Financials, Telecoms, S&P 5 and Utilities indices and the S&P 5 index. Standard deviations based on total return indices using monthly data in USD. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. Price volatility is measured by standard deviation. 3

4 DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS DOGS OF THE DOW Much space in investment publications has been given to the Dogs and the Dow theory. In essence the strategy involves blindly investing in the highest yielders in the Dow Jones Industrial Average at the beginning of the year, at an equal weight, and holding them until the end of the year. You might say this is the ultimate naïve investment strategy investing in stocks solely based on historic dividend yield, with no regard to sustainability or diversification and is similar to methodologies employed by some of the more basic dividend equity indices currently available in the market. While it may have beaten the Dow Jones Industrial Average itself an anarchic price weighted index how has this strategy done relative to the S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats index? Unfortunately, we do not have a track record going back to 1989 for the Dogs of the Dow strategy, but with a history which goes back to 2 we have a reasonable length of time to judge its success. It has indeed outperformed the Dow Jones Industrial Average, but it has significantly underperformed the S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats index. FIGURE 4: PERFORMANCE SINCE 2 DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS DOGS OF THE DOW Dividend Aristocrats S&P 5 Jan 21 Dow Jones Industrial Average Dec S&P 5 Equal Weighted Dogs of the Dow Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Dec 2 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats and S&P 5 indices, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Dow Jones High Yield Select 1 index and S&P 5 index. Total cumulative return in USD. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. As one might expect, the Dividend Aristocrats index has proved to be considerably less volatile than the Dogs of the Dow since the inception of the official index (Dow Jones High Yield Select 1) in 2. Over this time period at least, the high quality dividend growth approach has clearly outperformed the naïve approach, both in terms of superior performance and more favourable risk characteristics. This work seems to suggest that dividend growth, rather than dividend yield, is the factor that investors should evaluate when building a dividendbased equity portfolio. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. FIGURE 5: PRICE VOLATILITY DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS DOGS OF THE DOW Dividend Aristocrats 3 YEARS 5 YEARS 1 YEARS SINCE DEC Dogs of the Dow S&P 5 Equal Weighted S&P Dow Jones Industrial Average Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Dec 2 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats and S&P 5 indices, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Dow Jones High Yield Select 1 index and S&P 5 index. Standard deviation based on monthly total returns in USD. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. Price volatility is measured by standard deviation. IMPLEMENTING A HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY STRATEGY While the current low rate environment has contributed to the popularity of dividend-based equity strategies, we believe they represent a time-tested means of investing in the equity market. We think investors considering a high dividend equity approach should ask themselves the following questions: 1. What are we trying to achieve with our dividend equity program? Are we solely looking to increased levels of current income or are we also attempting to lower the volatility of our equity portfolio and/or increase the quality characteristics? 2. Are we attempting to outperform the broad market indices over time and/or are we looking to capitalise on current valuation opportunities? 3. Are we comfortable accepting the style bias present in most high dividend strategies or will we require offsetting investments? 4. Do we believe in active management of dividend equity strategies or do we prefer to gain exposure to the high dividend equity beta passively through index funds and/or ETFs? Thoroughly considering the questions above should help investors as they evaluate the various implementation options. We find that the active versus passive question is often not a case of either/or. Many investors choose to gain exposure to asset class segments through both active and passive strategies. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS THE CHANGING SHAPE OF DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS While the universe of US companies which have grown their dividends each and every year for 25 years is relatively constant, there are changes over time as companies merge and markets evolve. This may present challenges for investors attempting to make broad valuation calls based on what an index traded at historically versus its current levels. If we look at the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index for example, the benchmark for two of our most popular SPDR ETFs (one domiciled in the US, one domiciled in Europe) we can see that the sector weights of that index have changed since its inception in 25. 4

5 FIGURE 6: SECTOR WEIGHTING OVER TIME S&P HIGH YIELD DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS INDEX 1 8 FIGURE 8: HISTORIC PRICE-TO-BOOK RATIOS S&P HIGH YIELD DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS INDEX VERSUS S&P Further complicating the issue is the fact that S&P Dow Jones Indices have evolved their index methodology over time, both in terms of number of constituents from 5 companies at inception, to all qualifying today and years of dividend growth required from 25 years at index inception to 2 years today. As the chart above illustrates, the sector weights of this index have changed over time, with less weight in financials and more weight in consumer staples in recent times. Relative valuation characteristics have also changed over time, and while some of the increase in valuation of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats index may be a function of investor demand for high quality dividend paying companies it is also reflects the different make-up of the index. FIGURE 7: HISTORIC DIVIDEND YIELD S&P HIGH YIELD DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS INDEX VERSUS S&P Dec 25 Consumer Discretionary Consumer Staples Energy Financials Health Care Dec Industrials Information Technology Materials Telecommunication Services Utilities Source: FactSet, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Quarter-end sector weights. Weights are as of the date indicated, are subject to change, and should not be relied upon as current thereafter. Dec 25 S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Dec S&P 5 Source: FactSet, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Quarter-end trailing dividend yield (gross). Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. The exhibits below also raise an interesting question that we will examine in a later paper. Has the strong performance of S&P s Dividend Aristocrats indices been purely a function of investors rewarding companies that have shown the ability to grow their dividends over time, or have they actually been paying for exposure to the quality factor, typically measured by earnings variability, debt to equity ratios and return on equity? CONCLUSION High quality dividend investing has stood the test of time. While Steady Eddies like S&P s Dividend Aristocrats are unlikely to capture the imagination in the way that a Twitter or a Facebook might, they have an enviable record of long-term wealth generation and have delivered through the full range of market cycles. They may offer slightly lower levels of current income, but we believe diversified strategies incorporating some element of dividend growth are superior to single sector and pure yield-based approaches, offering both strong return and risk reduction potential. And, as we ve shown, not all dividend strategies are equal judicious choice of an index that that targets consistency in dividend growth can offer very real benefits to investors in terms of performance. Notes: The author would like to thank Ned Davis Research. 4 2 Dec 25 S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Dec S&P 5 Source: FactSet, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Quarter-end trailing dividend yield (gross). Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. 5

6 APPENDIX APPENDIX FIGURE 1: CALENDAR YEAR RETURNS DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS NAÏVE SECTOR STRATEGIES DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS FINANCIALS TELECOMS UTILITIES S&P 5 EQUAL WEIGHTED S&P 5 'DOGS OF THE DOW' DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS OUTPERFORMS Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats, Financials, Telecoms, S&P 5 and Utilities indices and the S&P 5 index. Calendar year total returns in USD. Dogs of the Dow represents Dow Jones High Yield Select 1 index. Dividend Aristocrats outperforms is yes in years when the S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats Index outperforms the S&P 5 Equal Weighted Index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. APPENDIX FIGURE 2: DRAWDOWN AND RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS NAÏVE SECTOR STRATEGIES MAX DRAWDOWN AVERAGE DRAWDOWN RATIO 1 YRS RATIO 15 YRS RATIO 2 YRS RATIO SINCE DEC 1989 Dividend Aristocrats Financials Telecoms Utilities S&P 5 Equal Weighted S&P Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Dec 2 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats and S&P 5 indices, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Dow Jones High Yield Select 1 index and S&P 5 index. Sharpe ratio is arithmetic calculation based on monthly returns. Risk free rate is US Treasury T-Bill Auction Average 3 mth rate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. The index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. APPENDIX FIGURE 3: DRAWDOWN AND RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS DIVIDEND ARISTOCRATS VERSUS DOGS OF THE DOW MAX DRAWDOWN AVERAGE DRAWDOWN RATIO 1 YRS RATIO SINCE DEC 2 Dividend Aristocrats Dogs of the Dow S&P 5 Equal Weighted S&P Dow Jones Industrial Average Source: Morningstar Direct, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Dec 2 Dec. Equal weighted S&P 5 Dividend Aristocrats and S&P 5 indices, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Dow Jones High Yield Select 1 index and S&P 5 index. Sharpe ratio is arithmetic calculation based on monthly returns. Risk free rate is US Treasury T-Bill Auction Average 3 mth rate. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. The index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income. 6

7 ABOUT SPDR ETFS Offered by State Street Global Advisors, SPDR ETFs provide professional investors with the flexibility to select investments that are precisely aligned to their investment strategy. Recognised as an industry pioneer, State Street Global Advisors created the first ETF in 1993 (SPDR S&P 5 ETF ticker SPY US). Since then, each new member of the SPDR ETFs family has been built to reflect our intimate knowledge of the ETF market and over 3 years of indexing experience. Today we manage nearly $385B in over 2 ETFs worldwide. We believe ETFs are about finding simple solutions to precisely meet investors needs. This belief is reflected in every member of the SPDR ETFs family. All of our ETFs are physically backed, providing a simple, transparent way to access each market segment. State Street Global Advisors is a global leader in asset management. The firm is relied on by sophisticated investors worldwide for its disciplined investment process, powerful global investment platform and access to every major asset class, capitalisation range and style. State Street Global Advisors is the asset management business of State Street, one of the world s leading providers of financial services to institutional investors. SPDR S&P 5 ETF (SPY US) is not registered for sale in Europe. As of 31 March 214. BLOOMBERG PAGE Enter SPDR <GO> to find us on Bloomberg. CONTACT US Visit spdrseurope.com. Contact our SPDR ETFs Sales and Support team at spdrseurope@ssga.com or +44 () Or call your local SPDR ETFs representative. Benelux +31 () France +33 () Germany +49 () Ireland +353 () Italy Middle East & North Africa +971 () Nordics +32 () Spain +33 () Switzerland +41 () United Kingdom +44 () Returns of S&P 5 Stocks by Dividend Policy. 31 January 1972 to 3 September. Ned David Research. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 2 Returns of MSCI UK and MSCI Europe ex-uk Stocks by Dividend Policy. 31 December 1987 to 3 September. Ned Davis Research. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Important Information This document has been issued by State Street Global Advisors Limited ( SSgA ). Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered No VAT No Registered office: 2 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HJ. Telephone: Facsimile: Web: ssga.com. SPDR ETFs is the exchange traded funds ( ETF ) platform of State Street Global Advisors and is comprised of funds that have been authorised by European regulatory authorities as open-ended UCITS investment companies ( Companies ). SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I plc issue SPDR ETFs, and is an open-ended investment company with variable capital having segregated liability between its sub-funds. The Company is organised as an Undertaking for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) under the laws of Ireland and authorised as a UCITS by the Central Bank of Ireland. SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe II plc issue SPDR ETFs, and is an open-ended investment company with variable capital having segregated liability between its sub-funds. The Company is organised as an Undertaking for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) under the laws of Ireland and authorised as a UCITS by the Central Bank of Ireland. SPDR ETFs is a French open-ended investment company organised as an Undertaking for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) under the laws of France and authorised by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers. Holdings and sectors shown are as of the date indicated and are subject to change. This information should not be considered a recommendation to invest in a particular sector or to buy or sell any security shown. It is not known whether the sectors or securities shown will be profitable in the future. This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an offer or any other step in furtherance of a public offering in the United States, Canada or any province or territory thereof, where the Companies are not authorised or registered for distribution and where the Companies prospectuses have not been filed with any securities commission or regulatory authority. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States. The Companies have not and will not be registered under the Investment Company Act of 194 or qualified under any applicable state securities statutes. SPDR ETFs may not be available or suitable for you. This document does not constitute investment advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase shares. The information in this document is designed solely for use by sophisticated, professional and institutional investors and any other persons should not rely on this communication. You should obtain and read the Companies prospectuses prior to investing. Prospective investors may obtain the current Prospectuses, the articles of incorporation, the Key Investor Information Documents ( KIIDs ) as well as the latest annual and semi-annual reports free of charge from SSgA, or from spdrseurope.com. For Investors in Finland: The offering of funds by the Companies has been notified to the Financial Supervision Authority in accordance with Section 127 of the Act on Common Funds ( /48) and by virtue of confirmation from the Financial Supervision Authority the Companies may publicly distribute its Shares in Finland. Certain information and documents that the Companies must publish in Ireland pursuant to applicable Irish law are translated into Finnish and are available for Finnish investors by contacting State Street Custodial Services (Ireland) Limited, 78 Sir John Rogerson s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland. For Investors in France: This document does not constitute an offer or request to purchase shares in the Companies. Any subscription for shares shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the complete Prospectuses, the KIIDs, the addenda as well as the Companies Supplements. These documents are available from the Companies centralizing correspondent: State Street Banque S.A., rue Delariviere- Lefoullon, 9264 Paris La Defense Cedex or on the French part of the site spdrseurope.com. The Companies are undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) governed by Irish law and accredited by the Central Bank of Ireland as a UCITS in accordance with European Regulations. European Directive no dated 2 December 1985 on UCITS, as amended, established common rules pursuant to the cross-border marketing of UCITS with which they duly comply. This common base does not exclude differentiated implementation. This is why a European UCITS can be sold in France even though its activity does not comply with rules identical to those governing the approval of this type of product in France. These compartments have been authorised to be sold by the Financial Services Authority. For Investors in Germany: The offering of SPDR ETFs by the Companies has been notified to the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) in accordance with section 132 of the German Investment Act. Prospective investors may obtain the current sales Prospectuses, the articles of incorporation, the KIIDs as well as the latest annual and semi-annual report free of charge from State Street Global Advisors GmbH, Brienner Strasse 59, D-8333 Munich. Telephone +49 () Facsimile +49 () continued on next page 7

8 continued For Investors in Luxembourg: This document is directed only at sophisticated investors. In Luxembourg, the sale of the shares for certain of the funds has not been authorised by the Commission du Surveillance du Secteur Financier and, accordingly, those shares have not been and may not be offered, directly or indirectly, to the public in or from Luxembourg, unless the relevant legal and regulatory requirements for public offerings have been complied with. For Investors in the Netherlands: This communication is directed at qualified investors within the meaning of Section 2:72 of the Dutch Financial Markets Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht) as amended. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description should not rely on this communication. Distribution of this document does not trigger a licence requirement for the Companies or SSgA in the Netherlands and consequently no prudential and conduct of business supervision will be exercised over the Companies or SSgA by the Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank N.V.) and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten). The Companies have completed their notification to the Authority Financial Markets in the Netherlands in order to market their shares for sale to the public in the Netherlands and the Companies are, accordingly, investment institutions (beleggingsinstellingen) according to Section 2:72 Dutch Financial Markets Supervision Act of Investment Institutions. For Investors in Norway: The offering of SPDR ETFs by the Companies has been notified to the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway (Kredittilsynet) in accordance with applicable Norwegian Securities Funds legislation. By virtue of a confirmation letter from the Financial Supervisory Authority dated 28 March the Companies may market and sell their shares in Norway. For Investors in Spain: SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I plc and SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe II plc have been authorised for public distribution in Spain and are registered with the Spanish Securities Market Commission (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores) under no.1244 and no A copy of the Prospectuses and Key Investor Information Documents, the Marketing Memoranda, the fund rules or instruments of incorporation as well as the annual and semi-annual reports of SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I plc and SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe II plc may be obtained from the Spanish distributors. The complete lists of the authorised Spanish distributors of SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe I plc and SSgA SPDR ETFs Europe II plc is available on the website of the Securities Market Commission (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores). For Investors in Switzerland: This document is directed at qualified investors only, as defined by Article 1(3) of the Swiss Act on Collective Investment Schemes (CISA) and Article 6 of the Swiss Ordinance on Collective Investment Schemes (CISO). Certain of the funds are not registered with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) which acts as supervisory authority in investment fund matters. Certain of the funds referenced herein have not been authorised by the FINMA as a foreign Collective Investment Scheme under Article 12 of the Collective Investment Schemes Act of June 23, 26. Accordingly, the shares of these funds may not be offered to the public in or from Switzerland unless they are placed without public solicitation as such term is defined by FINMA from time to time. In relation to those funds which are registered with FINMA, prospective investors may obtain the current sales Prospectuses, the articles of incorporation, the KIIDs as well as the latest annual and semi-annual reports free of charge from the Swiss representative, State Street Fund Management Ltd., Beethovenstrasse 19, 827 Zurich, from the Swiss paying agent, State Street Bank GmbH Munich, Zurich Branch, Beethovenstrasse 214 State Street Corporation. All Rights Reserved. ID1353-IBGE Expiration Date: 31/5/215 19, 827 Zurich as well as from the main distributor in Switzerland, State Street Global Advisors AG, Beethovenstrasse 19, 827 Zurich. Before investing please read the Prospectuses and KIIDs, copies of which can be obtained from the Swiss representative, or at spdrseurope.com. For Investors in the UK: The Companies are recognised schemes under Section 264 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2 ( the Act ) and are directed at professional clients in the UK (within the meaning of the rules of the Act) who are deemed both knowledgeable and experienced in matters relating to investments. The products and services to which this communication relates are only available to such persons and persons of any other description should not rely on this communication. Many of the protections provided by the UK regulatory system do not apply to the operation of the Companies, and compensation will not be available under the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Exchange traded funds (ETFs) trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk and will fluctuate in market value. The value of the investment can go down as well as up and the return upon the investment will therefore be variable. Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of an investment. Further, there is no guarantee an ETF will achieve its investment objective. Risks associated with equity investing include stock values which may fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Investing in foreign domiciled securities may involve risk of capital loss from unfavourable fluctuation in currency values, withholding taxes, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. Investments in emerging or developing markets may be more volatile and less liquid than investing in developed markets and may involve exposure to economic structures that are generally less diverse and mature and to political systems which have less stability than those of more developed countries. Investments in small-sized companies may involve greater risks than in those of larger, better known companies. The financial products referred to herein are not sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by MSCI and MSCI bears no liability with respect to any such financial products or any index on which such financial products are based. The Prospectus contains a more detailed description of the limited relationship MSCI has with SSgA and any related financial products. Dow Jones Global Real Estate Securities is a trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC ( Dow Jones ) and is licensed by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and its affiliates ( S&P Dow Jones Indices ) and State Street Global Advisors. The SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate Securities is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Dow Jones or S&P Dow Jones Indices. SPDR is a registered trademark of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC ( S&P ) and has been licensed for use by State Street Corporation. STANDARD & POOR S, S&P, S&P 5 and S&P MIDCAP 4 are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC. No financial product offered by State Street Corporation or its affiliates is sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P or its Affiliates, and S&P and its affiliates make no representation, warranty or condition regarding the advisability of buying, selling or holding units/shares in such products. Further limitations and important information that could affect investors rights are described in the prospectus for the applicable product. 8