2012 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey
|
|
|
- Angela Booth
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2012 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey October 2012 Conducted by ERC 6700 Beta Drive, Suite 300, Mayfield Village, OH / ERC
2 About ERC ERC is rtheast Ohio's largest organization dedicated to HR and workplace programs, practices, training and consulting. ERC membership provides employers access to an incredible amount of information, expertise, and cost savings that supports the attraction, retention, and development of great employees. We also host the nationally recognized rthcoast 99 program and sponsor the ERC Health insurance program. For more information about ERC, please visit ERC
3 Introduction & Methodology This report summarizes the results of ERC s survey of organizations in rtheast Ohio, conducted in August of 2012, on practices related to talent management. The survey reports trends in: Employee engagement Defining & retaining top/key talent Succession planning Training & development Reward & recognition All ERC members were invited to participate in the survey in August via invitation and other promotions, and participated in the survey throughout the month. The survey officially closed on September 7, In order to provide the most reliable and accurate information, data was cleaned and duplicate records were removed. Any outliers or invalid data were also eliminated, yielding a final data set of 102 participating organizations, only from rtheast Ohio. Qualitative data was coded where applicable or analyzed according to commonality or major themes, and all quantitative data was analyzed using statistical software to ensure data validity and reliability. This report shows several frequencies and response distributions. Frequencies of data responses may not total 100% exactly in some cases due to rounding of decimals or the ability for participating organizations to select multiple response options. In some cases, breakouts are not included due to quantity of data or insufficient sample. ERC
4 Employee Engagement Nearly all respondents indicate that their organization uses some formalized method to collect employee feedback (87%). Exit interviews/surveys are by far the most common method (84%), regardless of industry or organizational size. In general, smaller organizations appear to be less likely to use any one of the methods below than their larger counterparts. Figure 1 Which of the following methods does your organization use to collect employee feedback? Exit interviews/surveys 84% Employee opinion surveys 46% Suggestion boxes One-on-one interviews Employee engagement surveys New-hire surveys/feedback 35% 34% 32% 30% Post-training surveys Focus groups Training needs surveys formal method Confidential phone line Social media or blog Other 22% 18% 17% 13% 11% 10% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% ERC
5 The most common interval in which participants perform employee engagement or opinion surveys is once per year (29%). The distribution for all of the time intervals is fairly consistent across all breakouts. Figure 2 How often does your organization perform either an employee engagement or employee opinion/ satisfaction survey? Quarterly Bi-annually Annually Every other year Every 3-5 years > 5 years N/A 4% 6% 6% 10% 14% 29% 31% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% The most common uses for the employee survey data being collected are to identify areas for improvement (68%) and share the information with the management team at the organization (67%). Figure 3 How does your organization use the data collected from employee surveys? Identifty areas for improvement Share with management 68% 67% Determine training needs Evaluate policies & procedures 46% 44% Monitor trends 36% Other 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% ERC The
6 Defining & Retaining Top/Key Talent 2012 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey Just over one-third (37%) of organizations indicate that they currently have a formal definition for top/key talent in place. This is more common at larger organizations (201 employees and up). Figure 4 Does your organization currently have a formal definition of top/key talent in place? 37% 63% Although many organizations lack a formal definition for top/key talent (see Figure 4 above), 63% of respondents indicate that they have identified individuals as top/key talent at their organization. This is consistent across all industry breakouts. Figure 5 Has your organization indentified top/key talent in your organization? 37% 63% ERC
7 Organizations use a wide variety of competencies/characteristics when identifying top/key talent. In general, manufacturers appear to be less focused on leadership and employee development skills and more focused on overall performance than non-manufacturers and non-profits. For example, the most common characteristic, leadership (37%), is reported by only 27% of manufacturers, but by 50% and 40% of non-manufacturers and nonprofits, respectively. However, overall performance is used by 42% of manufacturers- well over the 27% average. Figure 6 What competencies/characteristics are used to identify top/key talent at your organization? Leadership 37% Innovation/creativity Communication/teamwork Overall performance Job expertise/skills 31% 29% 27% 27% Delivery of results 20% Positive energy/attitude Passion/motivation Commitment to culture/mission Customer focus Integrity Dedication/dependability Willing to go above and beyond Potential for growth/development Strategy/execution 16% 16% 14% 14% 14% 12% 12% 10% 10% Work ethic 6% Decision making 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% ERC
8 Respondent opinions about the challenge of keeping top/key talent at their organization are evenly divided between agree, neutral and disagree. Only a combined 19% of organizations indicate a strong opinion, either positively or negatively, about the issue. Figure 7 Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement: Retaining top/key talent is currently a major challenge at my organization. Strongly agree 12% Agree 26% Neutral Disagree 27% 28% Strongly disagree 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Despite reporting a wide range of strategies to retain top/key talent, monetary strategies dominate. Other prominent examples include offering training/development opportunities (57%) as well as two strategies addressing the personal needs of employees, i.e. work-life balance (38%) and flex-time/telecommuting (35%). n-manufacturing and non-profit organizations utilize this type of strategy more often than manufacturers. Figure 8 Which of the following strategies does your organization utilize to retain top/key talent? Competitive compensation 70% Bonuses 62% Training/development 57% Extensive benefits package Work-life balance Flex-time/telecommuting 35% 40% 38% Succession planning 26% Mentors Counteroffers 19% 18% Stock options 13% Job rotation Retention agreements Other 4% 4% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% ERC
9 Succession Planning Over half (59%) of all respondents indicate that their organization is not well prepared for the departure of top leaders. Only 16% of organizations agree or strongly agree with this statement. major differences of opinion can be seen between industry types or organizational sizes. Figure 9 Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement: My organization is well prepared for the departure of its top leaders. Strongly agree 3% Agree 13% Neutral 24% Disagree 46% Strongly disagree 13% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Informal succession plans are by far the most common type among participating organizations. Formal succession plans, one where there is an actual documented plan on file at that organization, are present for executives at only 16% of organizations and for management at only 9% of organizations. Figure 10 What type of succession plan does your organization have in place for each of the following groups of employees? Formal sucession plan 0% 9% 16% Informal succession plan 38% 39% 46% succession plan 46% 46% 58% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Executive Management n-management ERC
10 Of those organizations that have a succession plan (whether formal or informal), the content consists primarily of the four features listed below with all four being included in around 30% of the plans. Figure 11 Which of the following features are included in your organization s succession plan? Performance mgmt/support structure Skills assessment 34% 36% Development plan Leadership development plan 29% 28% Other 2% N/A 36% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Training & Development A specific amount of training each year, measured either in courses or hours, is required for executives, management and non-management employees by 11%, 16% and 17% of participating organizations, respectively. This requirement is lowest among non-profit organizations for both hours and courses. Figure 12 For each employee group, please indicate how many training hours or training courses are required annually # of required training courses # of required training hours Executive Management n-management ERC
11 The most common types of financial assistance offered to employees are those with a direct connection to skills building for their current job. Formal degree programs at the undergraduate and graduate level are still offered by about half of participating organizations. Small organizations (1-50 employees) are the least likely to offer any of the programs listed below. The gap between the financial assistance offered by these small organizations and those with more than 50 employees is even more pronounced for those programs resulting in a formal degree/diploma. Figure 13 Does your organization provide financial assistance to employees to upgrade their skills for any of the following programs? Job-related training Conferences 79% 82% Professional societies/orgs 72% Undergraduate programs Graduate programs 50% 53% Post-graduate programs 32% GED programs Other 6% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% The majority of annual training budgets, reported as a percent of payroll, fell below 1%. There is no clear trend in terms of the level of spending allocated to training among industry types or organizational sizes. Figure 14 What is your organization s annual training budget as a percent of payroll? training budget (0%) 27% Less than 1% 33% 1-2% 18% 3-4% 15% 5-6% 2% Over 6% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% ERC
12 The vast majority of participants indicate that their organization does not have a career development program in place for employees (80%). Figure 15 Does your organization have a career development program or initiative in place for employees? 20% 80% New employee mentorship programs are the most common type of mentorship program reported with 21% of respondents indicating they have this in place at their organization. Most organizations (64%) have no mentorship (or similar) program. Figure 16 Does your organization have a mentorship (or similar) program in place? 21%, for new employees 64% 14%, for existing employees, for interns 11% ERC
13 Reward & Recognition Organizations report that most employees are eligible to receive both non-monetary and monetary rewards & recognition without respect to FLSA status. However, part-time employees are less likely to be eligible for rewards & recognition than their full time counterparts. The non-profits breakout does not follow this trend, as it appears that part-time employees are just as likely to be eligible for reward & recognition as the other employee groups. Figure 17 At your organization, who is entitled or eligible to receive the following types of reward & recognition? n-monetary reward & recognition 51% 71% 74% 80% Monetary reward & recognition 45% 73% 71% 78% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Full time employees Part-time employees Exempt employees n-exempt employees ERC
14 The types of pay for performance options being offered by participating organizations are fairly consistent between each employee group. Merit increases and bonuses are the most common with over 50% of each employee group being indicated as eligible for these options. In general, non-profits reported lower use of pay for performance methods than manufacturers and non-manufacturers, particularly outside of these first two offerings. Figure 18 Which of the following pay for performance options are offered at your organization for each employee group? Merit increases 65% 69% 70% Bonuses 53% 63% 69% Profit sharing 28% 28% 28% Sales incentives 19% 25% 25% Stock options 8% 14% 12% Gain-sharing 3% 3% 4% Other 3% 4% 4% N/A 13% 12% 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Executive Management n-management ERC
15 Individualized reward & recognition methods in the form of personal thanks (71%) or praise (61%) are the most common types of low-cost programs reported by participating organizations. Larger organizations (over 200 employees) tend to offer a wider variety of these programs than smaller organizations. Figure 19 Does your organization use any of the following low-cost reward & recognition methods? Personal thanks 71% praise 61% Lunches 60% Public praise 57% n-cash reward 44% Thank you notes 40% Events 40% Newsletter/bulletin board 33% Certificate of appreciation 28% Employee of the month 14% Other 13% Wall of fame 12% Gift Cards 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% ERC I
16 The most common alternative forms of reward & recognition being utilized by participating organizations center around increasing employee involvement in making decisions or brainstorming new ideas. Overall, manufacturers tend to have lower usage of nearly all of the alternative methods listed below than non-manufacturers and nonprofits. Figure 20 Does your organization use any of the following alternative methods of reward & recognition? Asking for opinions/ideas 71% Training/development opportunities Involving ee's in decisions 56% 61% Allowing ee's to pursue ideas 44% Providing flexible work hours Allowing ee's to leave early Extra coaching/mentoring/support New on-the-job learning opportunities 38% 35% 33% 31% Discussing/granting career options Increasing ees' authority Granting extra time off work 25% 24% 23% Giving ee's choice of assignments 12% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% ERC
17 Respondent Demographics One-hundred and two (102) organizations in rtheast Ohio participated in this survey; a breakdown of the industries and sizes they represent is provided below. Figure 21 Respondent demographics by industry & organizational size All Organizations Percent Manufacturing 46% n-manufacturing 39% n-profit 15% % % % Over % ERC
18 Appendix A: Type & Breakouts Figure 1a Which of the following methods does your organization use to collect employee feedback? Exit interviews/surveys All Organizations 84% 16% Manufacturing 89% 11% n-manufacturing 83% 18% n-profit 73% 27% % 30% % 13% % 9% Over % 10% Employee opinion/satisfaction surveys (measures employees overall level of happiness/satisfaction) All Organizations 46% 54% Manufacturing 47% 53% n-manufacturing 45% 55% n-profit 47% 53% % 83% % 60% % 26% Over % 30% ERC
19 Suggestion boxes All Organizations 35% 65% Manufacturing 43% 57% n-manufacturing 33% 68% n-profit 20% 80% % 70% % 69% % 57% Over % 60% One-on-one interviews All Organizations 34% 66% Manufacturing 32% 68% n-manufacturing 38% 63% n-profit 33% 67% % 52% % 73% % 65% Over % 60% ERC
20 Employee engagement surveys (measures employees level of motivation/engagement in the workplace) All Organizations 32% 68% Manufacturing 34% 66% n-manufacturing 25% 75% n-profit 47% 53% % 96% % 69% % 52% Over % 40% New-hire surveys/feedback All Organizations 30% 70% Manufacturing 28% 72% n-manufacturing 30% 70% n-profit 40% 60% % 83% % 73% % 61% Over % 50% ERC
21 Post-training surveys/evaluations All Organizations 22% 78% Manufacturing 21% 79% n-manufacturing 28% 73% n-profit 7% 93% % 91% % 87% % 61% Over % 50% Focus groups All Organizations 18% 82% Manufacturing 19% 81% n-manufacturing 15% 85% n-profit 20% 80% % 100% % 87% % 65% Over % 60% ERC
22 Training needs surveys All Organizations 17% 83% Manufacturing 13% 87% n-manufacturing 25% 75% n-profit 7% 93% % 87% % 91% % 74% Over % 60% formal method for collecting employee feedback All Organizations 13% 87% Manufacturing 6% 94% n-manufacturing 15% 85% n-profit 27% 73% % 74% % 87% % 96% Over 500 0% 100% ERC
23 Confidential phone line All Organizations 11% 89% Manufacturing 9% 91% n-manufacturing 10% 90% n-profit 20% 80% % 96% % 93% % 83% Over % 70% Social media or blog All Organizations 10% 90% Manufacturing 9% 91% n-manufacturing 10% 90% n-profit 13% 87% % 96% % 96% % 78% Over % 80% ERC
24 Other All Organizations 6% 94% Manufacturing 4% 96% n-manufacturing 8% 93% n-profit 7% 93% % 96% % 93% % 96% Over % 90% Other reported methods include: Roundtable meetings and open forums Collection and distribution of best practices from team members. Confidential internet mail Open Door Policy-allows for confidential feedback CEO round table meetings Lunch with CEO 2012 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey Figure 2a How often does your organization perform either an employee engagement or employee opinion/satisfaction survey? Biannually other year years years Every Every 3-5 > 5 Quarterly Annually N/A All Organizations 4% 6% 29% 10% 14% 6% 31% Manufacturing 4% 2% 26% 17% 17% 2% 30% n-manufacturing 3% 13% 23% 5% 13% 13% 31% n-profit 7% 0% 53% 0% 7% 0% 33% % 4% 17% 4% 4% 9% 61% % 5% 30% 14% 16% 0% 33% % 13% 26% 13% 17% 9% 13% Over % 0% 50% 0% 20% 20% 0% ERC
25 Figure 3a How does your organization use the data collected from employee surveys? Indentify areas for improvement All Organizations 68% 32% Manufacturing 70% 30% n-manufacturing 68% 33% n-profit 60% 40% % 52% % 42% % 9% Over % 0% Share with management All Organizations 67% 33% Manufacturing 72% 28% n-manufacturing 65% 35% n-profit 53% 47% % 70% % 36% % 9% Over % 0% ERC
26 Determine training needs All Organizations 46% 54% Manufacturing 45% 55% n-manufacturing 53% 48% n-profit 33% 67% % 74% % 64% % 17% Over % 40% Evaluate policies & procedures All Organizations 44% 56% Manufacturing 53% 47% n-manufacturing 40% 60% n-profit 27% 73% % 52% % 62% % 48% Over % 50% ERC
27 Monitor trends All Organizations 36% 64% Manufacturing 40% 60% n-manufacturing 38% 63% n-profit 20% 80% % 78% % 69% % 57% Over % 20% Other All Organizations 6% 94% Manufacturing 4% 96% n-manufacturing 8% 93% n-profit 7% 93% % 96% % 93% % 96% Over % 90% Other reported uses include: Use data to develop programs or make changes to employee benefit plans Create supervisor action plans for department Feedback on leadership effectiveness Share the results with employees to define the action plan. Exit interview information is shared with Director of OD and Agency Director Share with employees with action plans Regional goal setting, recognition opportunities Benefits Satisfaction Develop action plans and objectives for managers Still trying to figure out what works best for us. ERC
28 Figure 4a Does your organization currently have a formal definition of top/key talent in place? All Organizations 37% 63% Manufacturing 40% 60% n-manufacturing 31% 69% n-profit 40% 60% % 70% % 73% % 52% Over % 30% Figure 5a Has your organization indentified top/key talent in your organization? All Organizations 63% 37% Manufacturing 64% 36% n-manufacturing 62% 38% n-profit 67% 33% % 48% % 39% % 26% Over % 30% ERC
29 Figure 6a What competencies/characteristics are used to identify top/key talent at your organization? Leadership All Organizations 37% 63% Manufacturing 27% 73% n-manufacturing 50% 50% n-profit 40% 60% % 63% % 70% % 62% Over % 50% Innovation/creativity All Organizations 31% 69% Manufacturing 31% 69% n-manufacturing 28% 72% n-profit 40% 60% % 88% % 70% % 62% Over % 63% ERC
30 Communication/teamwork All Organizations 29% 71% Manufacturing 12% 88% n-manufacturing 50% 50% n-profit 40% 60% % 50% % 80% % 77% Over % 63% Overall performance All Organizations 27% 73% Manufacturing 42% 58% n-manufacturing 6% 94% n-profit 20% 80% % 100% % 55% % 77% Over % 88% ERC
31 Job expertise/skills All Organizations 27% 73% Manufacturing 27% 73% n-manufacturing 33% 67% n-profit 0% 100% % 50% % 80% % 69% Over % 88% Delivery of results All Organizations 20% 80% Manufacturing 15% 85% n-manufacturing 22% 78% n-profit 40% 60% % 88% % 85% % 77% Over % 63% ERC
32 Positive energy/attitude All Organizations 16% 84% Manufacturing 27% 73% n-manufacturing 0% 100% n-profit 20% 80% % 100% % 80% % 77% Over % 88% Passion/motivation All Organizations 16% 84% Manufacturing 19% 81% n-manufacturing 17% 83% n-profit 0% 100% % 63% % 85% % 85% Over 500 0% 100% ERC
33 Commitment to culture/mission All Organizations 14% 86% Manufacturing 19% 81% n-manufacturing 11% 89% n-profit 0% 100% % 88% % 90% % 69% Over 500 0% 100% Customer focus All Organizations 14% 86% Manufacturing 8% 92% n-manufacturing 17% 83% n-profit 40% 60% % 100% % 85% % 92% Over % 63% ERC
34 Integrity All Organizations 14% 86% Manufacturing 4% 96% n-manufacturing 22% 78% n-profit 40% 60% % 88% % 90% % 85% Over % 75% Dedication/dependability All Organizations 12% 88% Manufacturing 19% 81% n-manufacturing 6% 94% n-profit 0% 100% % 75% % 85% % 92% Over 500 0% 100% ERC
35 Willing to go above and beyond All Organizations 12% 88% Manufacturing 19% 81% n-manufacturing 6% 94% n-profit 0% 100% % 75% % 90% % 85% Over 500 0% 100% Potential for growth/development All Organizations 10% 90% Manufacturing 12% 88% n-manufacturing 6% 94% n-profit 20% 80% % 100% % 90% % 85% Over % 88% ERC
36 Strategy/execution All Organizations 10% 90% Manufacturing 15% 85% n-manufacturing 6% 94% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 95% % 85% Over % 75% Work ethic All Organizations 6% 94% Manufacturing 4% 96% n-manufacturing 11% 89% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 90% % 100% Over % 88% ERC
37 Decision making All Organizations 2% 98% Manufacturing 0% 100% n-manufacturing 6% 94% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 100% % 92% Over 500 0% 100% Figure 7a Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement: Retaining top/key talent is currently a major challenge at my organization. Strongly Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Agree disagree All Organizations 12% 26% 28% 27% 7% Manufacturing 13% 24% 28% 30% 4% n-manufacturing 14% 30% 24% 24% 8% n-profit 7% 21% 36% 21% 14% % 30% 30% 22% 13% % 27% 27% 30% 2% % 20% 25% 30% 15% Over % 20% 30% 20% 0% ERC
38 Figure 8a Which of the following strategies does your organization utilize to retain top/key talent? Competitive compensation All Organizations 70% 30% Manufacturing 77% 23% n-manufacturing 75% 25% n-profit 33% 67% % 26% % 33% % 22% Over % 40% Bonuses All Organizations 62% 38% Manufacturing 68% 32% n-manufacturing 63% 38% n-profit 40% 60% % 48% % 38% % 30% Over % 30% ERC
39 Training/development All Organizations 57% 43% Manufacturing 64% 36% n-manufacturing 50% 50% n-profit 53% 47% % 65% % 40% % 35% Over % 30% Extensive benefits package All Organizations 40% 60% Manufacturing 32% 68% n-manufacturing 48% 53% n-profit 47% 53% % 48% % 62% % 70% Over % 50% ERC
40 Work-life balance All Organizations 38% 62% Manufacturing 30% 70% n-manufacturing 48% 53% n-profit 40% 60% % 70% % 69% % 52% Over % 40% Flex-time/telecommuting All Organizations 35% 65% Manufacturing 21% 79% n-manufacturing 50% 50% n-profit 40% 60% % 61% % 80% % 48% Over % 50% ERC
41 Succession planning All Organizations 26% 74% Manufacturing 28% 72% n-manufacturing 20% 80% n-profit 40% 60% % 91% % 78% % 61% Over % 50% Mentors All Organizations 19% 81% Manufacturing 21% 79% n-manufacturing 13% 88% n-profit 27% 73% % 100% % 78% % 74% Over % 70% ERC
42 Counteroffers All Organizations 18% 82% Manufacturing 26% 74% n-manufacturing 13% 88% n-profit 7% 93% % 74% % 89% % 83% Over % 70% Stock options All Organizations 13% 87% Manufacturing 13% 87% n-manufacturing 18% 83% n-profit 0% 100% % 83% % 89% % 83% Over 500 0% 100% ERC
43 Job rotation All Organizations 6% 94% Manufacturing 4% 96% n-manufacturing 8% 93% n-profit 7% 93% % 100% % 93% % 96% Over % 80% Retention agreements All Organizations 4% 96% Manufacturing 6% 94% n-manufacturing 3% 98% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 96% % 100% Over % 80% ERC
44 Other All Organizations 4% 96% Manufacturing 6% 94% n-manufacturing 3% 98% n-profit 0% 100% % 96% % 100% % 96% Over % 80% Other reported strategies include: 2012 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey Roles with impact and authority Exposure to top leaders (local/corporate) through lunches, meetings, 1:1; lead strategic projects; local and international assignments. Challenging work Figure 9a Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement: My organization is well prepared for the departure of its top leaders. Strongly Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Agree disagree All Organizations 3% 13% 24% 46% 13% Manufacturing 2% 9% 24% 50% 15% n-manufacturing 3% 15% 26% 46% 10% n-profit 7% 21% 21% 36% 14% % 9% 22% 48% 17% % 14% 25% 45% 14% % 9% 27% 45% 14% Over 500 0% 30% 20% 50% 0% ERC
45 Figure 10a What type of succession plan does your organization have in place for each of the following groups of employees? Formal succession plan (i.e. there is a documented plan on file) Executive Management n-management All Organizations 16% 9% 0% Manufacturing 11% 9% 0% n-manufacturing 18% 5% 0% n-profit 27% 20% 0% % 0% 0% % 4% 0% % 13% 0% Over % 40% 0% Informal succession plan Executive Management n-management All Organizations 38% 46% 39% Manufacturing 40% 45% 34% n-manufacturing 33% 45% 43% n-profit 47% 53% 47% % 22% 30% % 49% 33% % 70% 61% Over % 30% 30% ERC
46 succession plan Executive Management n-management All Organizations 46% 46% 58% Manufacturing 47% 47% 64% n-manufacturing 45% 45% 53% n-profit 47% 47% 53% % 74% 57% % 49% 64% % 17% 39% Over % 40% 80% Figure 11a Which of the following features are included in your organization s succession plan? Performance management/support structure All Organizations 36% 64% Manufacturing 34% 66% n-manufacturing 33% 68% n-profit 53% 47% % 78% % 71% % 48% Over % 40% ERC
47 Skills assessment All Organizations 34% 66% Manufacturing 32% 68% n-manufacturing 38% 63% n-profit 33% 67% % 78% % 73% % 48% Over % 40% Development plan All Organizations 29% 71% Manufacturing 70% 73% n-manufacturing 70% 50% n-profit 73% 60% % 63% % 70% % 62% Over % 50% ERC
48 Leadership development plan All Organizations 28% 72% Manufacturing 26% 74% n-manufacturing 28% 73% n-profit 40% 60% % 87% % 73% % 57% Over % 70% Other All Organizations 2% 98% Manufacturing 2% 98% n-manufacturing 3% 98% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 100% % 96% Over % 90% Other features reported include: Potential assessment, cross-validation, incentive cross-functional movements Key hires or turnover within the past 12 months ERC
49 N/A (i.e. organization does not have a succession plan) All Organizations 36% 64% Manufacturing 32% 68% n-manufacturing 43% 58% n-profit 33% 67% % 43% % 64% % 74% Over % 80% Figure 12a For each employee group, please indicate how many training hours or training courses are required annually? Average number of required training courses Executive Management n-management All Organizations Manufacturing n-manufacturing n-profit N/A N/A N/A 1-50 N/A N/A 7 2 Over ERC
50 Average number of required training hours Executive Management n-management All Organizations Manufacturing n-manufacturing n-profit Over Figure 13a Does your organization provide financial assistance to employees to upgrade their skills for any of the following programs? Job-related training All Organizations 82% 18% Manufacturing 89% 11% n-manufacturing 75% 25% n-profit 80% 20% % 26% % 18% % 13% Over % 0% ERC
51 Conferences All Organizations 79% 21% Manufacturing 85% 15% n-manufacturing 75% 25% n-profit 73% 27% % 22% % 20% % 26% Over % 10% Professional societies/organizations All Organizations 72% 28% Manufacturing 79% 21% n-manufacturing 65% 35% n-profit 67% 33% % 48% % 24% % 17% Over % 30% ERC
52 Undergraduate programs All Organizations 53% 47% Manufacturing 70% 30% n-manufacturing 30% 70% n-profit 60% 40% % 78% % 44% % 35% Over % 20% Graduate programs All Organizations 50% 50% Manufacturing 68% 32% n-manufacturing 25% 75% n-profit 60% 40% % 83% % 44% % 43% Over % 20% ERC
53 Post-graduate programs All Organizations 32% 68% Manufacturing 43% 57% n-manufacturing 18% 83% n-profit 40% 60% % 91% % 73% % 48% Over % 40% GED programs All Organizations 9% 91% Manufacturing 15% 85% n-manufacturing 5% 95% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 91% % 83% Over % 90% ERC
54 Other All Organizations 6% 94% Manufacturing 6% 94% n-manufacturing 6% 93% n-profit 6% 100% % 91% % 93% % 96% Over 500 0% 100% Other financial assistance programs reported include: 2012 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey Personal Training/Massage Therapy (due to them utilizing their degree/certification to benefit our wellness program.) Figure 14a What is your organization s annual training budget as a percent of payroll? training budget < 1% 1-2% 3-4% 5-6% > 6% All Organizations 27% 33% 18% 15% 2% 5% Manufacturing 37% 26% 16% 16% 2% 2% n-manufacturing 21% 41% 18% 12% 3% 6% n-profit 9% 36% 27% 18% 0% 9% % 39% 13% 0% 0% 4% % 32% 11% 18% 5% 5% % 32% 21% 26% 0% 5% Over 500 0% 25% 63% 13% 0% 0% ERC
55 Figure 15a Does your organization have a career development program or initiative in place for employees? All Organizations 20% 80% Manufacturing 17% 83% n-manufacturing 18% 82% n-profit 36% 64% % 91% % 75% % 83% Over % 70% Figure 16a Does your organization have a mentorship (or similar) program in place?, for new employees All Organizations 21% 79% Manufacturing 17% 83% n-manufacturing 23% 78% n-profit 27% 73% % 87% % 87% % 65% Over % 60% ERC
56 , for existing employees All Organizations 14% 86% Manufacturing 17% 83% n-manufacturing 5% 95% n-profit 27% 73% % 91% % 84% % 87% Over % 80%, for interns All Organizations 11% 89% Manufacturing 11% 89% n-manufacturing 10% 90% n-profit 13% 87% % 83% % 91% % 87% Over 500 0% 100% ERC
57 mentorship program All Organizations 64% 36% Manufacturing 68% 32% n-manufacturing 65% 35% n-profit 47% 53% % 35% % 31% % 43% Over % 50% Figure 17a At your organization, who is entitled or eligible to receive the following types of reward & recognition? Monetary reward & recognition Full time ee s Part time ee s Exempt ee s n-exempt ee s All Organizations 78% 45% 73% 71% Manufacturing 85% 43% 79% 77% n-manufacturing 80% 45% 73% 73% n-profit 53% 53% 53% 47% % 35% 70% 65% % 42% 73% 69% % 65% 74% 78% Over % 30% 70% 70% ERC
58 n-monetary reward & recognition Full time ee s Part time ee s Exempt ee s n-exempt ee s All Organizations 80% 51% 71% 74% Manufacturing 77% 43% 66% 68% n-manufacturing 88% 58% 78% 83% n-profit 73% 60% 67% 67% % 35% 52% 52% % 49% 69% 73% % 74% 83% 87% Over % 40% 90% 90% Figure 18 Which of the following pay for performance options are offered at your organization for each employee group? Merit increases Executive Management n-management All Organizations 65% 69% 70% Manufacturing 70% 72% 74% n-manufacturing 73% 80% 78% n-profit 27% 27% 33% % 61% 57% % 62% 67% % 83% 87% Over % 80% 70% ERC
59 Bonuses Executive Management n-management All Organizations 69% 63% 53% Manufacturing 66% 60% 34% n-manufacturing 83% 75% 33% n-profit 40% 40% 0% % 65% 57% % 62% 53% % 65% 52% Over % 60% 50% Profit sharing Executive Management n-management All Organizations 28% 28% 28% Manufacturing 34% 34% 34% n-manufacturing 33% 33% 33% n-profit 0% 0% 0% % 22% 22% % 31% 31% % 22% 22% Over % 50% 50% ERC
60 Sales incentives Executive Management n-management All Organizations 19% 25% 25% Manufacturing 26% 23% 21% n-manufacturing 18% 33% 35% n-profit 0% 13% 13% % 26% 26% % 22% 20% % 30% 35% Over % 30% 30% Stock options Executive Management n-management All Organizations 14% 12% 8% Manufacturing 15% 13% 9% n-manufacturing 18% 13% 8% n-profit 0% 7% 7% % 17% 13% % 9% 4% % 13% 9% Over % 10% 10% ERC
61 Gain sharing Executive Management n-management All Organizations 3% 3% 4% Manufacturing 0% 2% 4% n-manufacturing 8% 5% 5% n-profit 0% 0% 0% % 0% 0% % 2% 4% % 4% 4% Over % 10% 10% Other Executive Management n-management All Organizations 3% 4% 4% Manufacturing 4% 4% 4% n-manufacturing 0% 3% 3% n-profit 7% 7% 7% % 0% 0% % 2% 2% % 4% 4% Over % 20% 20% ERC
62 N/A (i.e. do not pay for performance) Executive Management n-management All Organizations 13% 12% 15% Manufacturing 9% 6% 9% n-manufacturing 5% 5% 13% n-profit 47% 47% 40% % 17% 17% % 13% 18% % 4% 9% Over % 10% 10% Figure 19a Does your organization use any of the following low-cost reward & recognition methods? Personal thanks All Organizations 71% 29% Manufacturing 64% 36% n-manufacturing 80% 20% n-profit 67% 33% % 35% % 40% % 13% Over % 10% ERC
63 praise All Organizations 61% 39% Manufacturing 55% 45% n-manufacturing 70% 30% n-profit 53% 47% % 52% % 44% % 22% Over % 30% Lunches All Organizations 60% 40% Manufacturing 70% 30% n-manufacturing 50% 50% n-profit 53% 47% % 43% % 44% % 35% Over % 30% ERC
64 Public praise All Organizations 57% 43% Manufacturing 57% 43% n-manufacturing 55% 45% n-profit 60% 40% % 48% % 49% % 35% Over % 30% n-cash award All Organizations 44% 56% Manufacturing 45% 55% n-manufacturing 43% 58% n-profit 47% 53% % 74% % 60% % 39% Over % 30% ERC
65 Thank you notes All Organizations 40% 60% Manufacturing 36% 64% n-manufacturing 38% 63% n-profit 60% 40% % 78% % 67% % 43% Over % 30% Events All Organizations 40% 60% Manufacturing 47% 53% n-manufacturing 30% 70% n-profit 47% 53% % 74% % 64% % 48% Over % 30% ERC
66 Newsletter/bulletin board All Organizations 33% 67% Manufacturing 28% 72% n-manufacturing 40% 60% n-profit 33% 67% % 87% % 78% % 48% Over % 20% Certificate of appreciation All Organizations 28% 72% Manufacturing 30% 70% n-manufacturing 25% 75% n-profit 33% 67% % 87% % 69% % 74% Over % 40% ERC
67 Employee of the month All Organizations 14% 86% Manufacturing 13% 87% n-manufacturing 15% 85% n-profit 13% 87% % 91% % 87% % 91% Over % 60% Other All Organizations 13% 87% Manufacturing 15% 85% n-manufacturing 13% 88% n-profit 7% 93% % 96% % 89% % 78% Over % 80% Other methods reported include: Sales Club for meeting or exceeding goals; get company paid dinner and prizes Dinner with management team Quarterly CEO's award to an employee Seniority plaques Service Award Program Snowbell, San of the Year, monthly Silver-Gold Star Anniversary gifts in 5-year multiples Quarterly recognition of employees who are nominated by manager and selected by upper management to receive gift certificate and name in newsletter Annual recognition awards Perfect Attendance Award, Top 20 Customers Award P.R.I.D.E. Board - Recognition by peers and above Service award program ERC
68 Wall of fame All Organizations 12% 88% Manufacturing 6% 94% n-manufacturing 10% 90% n-profit 33% 67% % 96% % 93% % 87% Over % 50% Gift cards All Organizations 7% 93% Manufacturing 11% 89% n-manufacturing 5% 95% n-profit 0% 100% % 100% % 91% % 87% Over 500 0% 100% ERC
69 Figure 20a Does your organization use any of the following alternative methods of reward & recognition? Asking for opinions/ideas All Organizations 71% 29% Manufacturing 62% 38% n-manufacturing 80% 20% n-profit 73% 27% % 30% % 31% % 22% Over % 40% Training/development opportunities All Organizations 61% 39% Manufacturing 62% 38% n-manufacturing 58% 43% n-profit 67% 33% % 52% % 42% % 26% Over % 30% ERC
70 Involving employees in decisions All Organizations 56% 44% Manufacturing 49% 51% n-manufacturing 65% 35% n-profit 53% 47% % 39% % 53% % 30% Over % 40% Allowing employees to pursue ideas All Organizations 44% 56% Manufacturing 45% 55% n-manufacturing 40% 60% n-profit 53% 47% % 57% % 58% % 48% Over % 70% ERC
71 Providing flexible work hours All Organizations 38% 62% Manufacturing 26% 74% n-manufacturing 53% 48% n-profit 40% 60% % 65% % 73% % 48% Over % 40% Allowing employees to leave early All Organizations 35% 65% Manufacturing 21% 79% n-manufacturing 53% 48% n-profit 33% 67% % 48% % 69% % 70% Over % 70% ERC
72 Extra coaching/mentoring/support All Organizations 33% 67% Manufacturing 30% 70% n-manufacturing 38% 63% n-profit 33% 67% % 74% % 73% % 48% Over % 60% New on-the-job learning opportunities All Organizations 31% 69% Manufacturing 34% 66% n-manufacturing 33% 68% n-profit 20% 80% % 87% % 71% % 57% Over % 50% ERC
73 Discussing/granting career options All Organizations 25% 75% Manufacturing 19% 81% n-manufacturing 33% 68% n-profit 20% 80% % 78% % 76% % 78% Over % 60% Increasing employee s authority All Organizations 24% 76% Manufacturing 28% 72% n-manufacturing 25% 75% n-profit 7% 93% % 78% % 76% % 78% Over % 70% ERC
74 Granting extra time off work All Organizations 23% 77% Manufacturing 9% 91% n-manufacturing 38% 63% n-profit 27% 73% % 57% % 87% % 83% Over % 70% Giving employees choice of assignments All Organizations 12% 88% Manufacturing 13% 87% n-manufacturing 10% 90% n-profit 13% 87% % 100% % 93% % 78% Over % 60% ERC
75 ERC Talent Management Practices Survey Conducted by ERC 6700 Beta Drive, Suite 300 Mayfield Village, OH / Be sure to follow us online for the latest survey information from ERC: linkedin.com/groups?gid=86241 twitter.com/connectwitherc ERC
ERC Training & Development Practices Survey
ERC Training & Development Practices Survey March 2010 Conducted by ERC 6700 Beta Drive, Suite 300, Mayfield Village, OH 44143 440/684-9700 440/684-9760 (fax) www.ercnet.org ERC, 2010 www.ercnet.org 0
A WorldatWork Survey Brief. Trends in Employee Recognition 2005
A WorldatWork Survey Brief Trends in Employee Recognition 2005 A Survey of Members of WorldatWork and the National Association of Employee Recognition (NAER) May, 2005 About WorldatWork and WorldatWork
Incentive Plan Design and Employee Recognition Programs. June 11, 2008
Incentive Plan Design and Employee Recognition Programs June 11, 2008 Agenda Incentive Plan Design Background Port of Portland s Dive into Incentive Comp Total Rewards Study Outcomes of Study Original
Talent as a Top Priority and Challenge
Talent as a Top Priority and Challenge Talent is viewed as source of competitive advantage and driver of performance, but it remains a challenge for today s organizations. Mercer s 2013 Talent Barometer,
CERTIFICATIONS IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL HRMP EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE
CERTIFICATIONS IN HUMAN RESOURCES» HRMP HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL HRMP EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE HRMP EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE AT-A-GLANCE HRMP EXAM WEIGHTING BY FUNCTIONAL AREA:» HR as a Business
HRBP Human Resource business professional HRBP SM
certification in human resources» HRBP Human Resource business professional HRBP SM body OF KNOWLEGE HR certification institute hrci.org HR Certification Institute 1 HRBP BODY OF KNOWLEDGE AT-A-GLANCE
DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. A Human Resource Management Framework
DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM A Human Resource Management Framework HR POLICY AND PLANNING DIVISION HUMAN RESOURCE BRANCH Public Service Secretariat April, 2008 Government of Newfoundland
Running Head: HEARTSHARE S MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAM
HeartShare s Management Training Program 1 Running Head: HEARTSHARE S MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAM HeartShare s Management Training Program COA Innovative Practices Award Case Study Submission HeartShare
What s On the Minds of HR Directors? Neil Reichenberg Executive Director International Public Management Association for Human Resources
What s On the Minds of HR Directors? Neil Reichenberg Executive Director International Public Management Association for Human Resources The International Public Management Association for Human Resources
Good Beginnings Make Good Employees
Good Beginnings Make Good Employees Transforming Your Orientation into an Engaging Onboarding Experience Judi Clements President of Judi Clements Training & Development www.judiclements.com Copyright 2016
Released December 18 th, 2007
THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OFFICE STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2008-2012 Released December 18 th, 2007 (Updated as of June 16 th, 2008) Table of Contents Mission and Vision 3 Imperative 1: Customer Satisfaction
Private Company Incentive Pay Practices. research. A Research Report by WorldatWork and Vivient Consulting October 2007
Private Company Incentive Pay Practices research A Research Report by WorldatWork and Vivient Consulting October 2007 About WorldatWork Media Contact: Marcia Rhodes 14040 N. Northsight Blvd. Scottsdale,
Organizational Application Managing Employee Retention as a Strategy for Increasing Organizational Competitiveness
Applied H.R.M. Research, 2003, Volume 8, Number 2, pages 63-72 Organizational Application Managing Employee Retention as a Strategy for Increasing Organizational Competitiveness Sunil Ramlall, Ph.D. University
Everyone agrees that an employee referral is the best way to find great people for your organization. The numbers bear this out.
Tips to improve your Employee Referral Program Opening the doors of opportunity to talented professionals. Everyone agrees that an employee referral is the best way to find great people for your organization.
Guide to Building a Student Internship Program
Guide to Building a Student Internship Program 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Preface... 3 Legal Disclaimer... 3 Overview... 4 Planning... 5 Compensating Interns... 5 Developing Detailed Job
Promotional Guidelines. research. A report by WorldatWork December 2012
Promotional Guidelines research A report by WorldatWork December 2012 Contact: WorldatWork Customer Relations 14040 N. Northsight Blvd. Scottsdale, Arizona USA 85260-3601 Toll free: 877-951-9191 Fax: 480-483-8352
Debunking 4 Myths in Talent Management
Debunking 4 Myths in Talent Management Webinar conversation on March 10, 2015 Webinar Objectives 1. Define terms 2. Apply data and analytics to your business story 3. Debunk 4 Myths in Talent Management
Succession Planning Process
Planning Process INTRODUCTION planning is a systematic approach to: Building a leadership pipeline/talent pool to ensure leadership continuity Developing potential successors in ways that best fit their
Flexible Work: Trends & Best Practices
03 Flexible Work: Trends & Best Practices Introduction With the expanding number of dual-income households, emergence of a multi-generational workforce, prevalence of a diversity of family structures,
What specific talent groups will be necessary to achieving strategic business goals?
NORTH AMERICAN CRITICAL TALENT FEB 2014 INTRODUCTION In August 2013, Mercer surveyed Canadian and US organizations regarding their critical talent practices. As the economy cautiously rebounds, global
Effective Employee Incentive Programs Bring Out The Best In Your Firm
Effective Employee Incentive Programs Bring Out The Best In Your Firm By Lisa A. Rozycki 2006 All Rights Reserved An incentive program is a planned activity designed to motivate people to achieve predetermined
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN NORTH CAROLINA NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN NORTH CAROLINA NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS By WREN DAVISSON A paper submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment
How To Understand Performance Management System
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Research Performance Management Survey SHRM / PDI Peformance Management Survey Contents 3 About This Report 4 Sponsors 5 A Message from the SHRM Foundation 6 Executive
KPMG 2013 / 2014 HR & Reward Practices Survey. kpmg.com/ng
KPMG 2013 / 2014 HR & Reward Practices Survey kpmg.com/ng 2 KPMG 2013 / 2014 HR & Reward Practices Survey Executive Overview Human capital is one of the most critical assets of any business. Many organisations
Employee Engagement Survey
Employee Engagement Survey (SAMPLE EXTENDED REPORT) Presented by: 11 River Street Wellesley Hills, MA 02481 Table of Contents Topic Page Introduction 2 Engagement Research 4 Quantitative Results - Averages
HHS MENTORING PROGRAM. Partnering for Excellence MENTORING PROGRAM GUIDE
HHS MENTORING PROGRAM Partnering for Excellence MENTORING PROGRAM GUIDE November 17, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. VISION STATEMENT.... 2 II. MISSION STATEMENT. 2 III. INTRODUCTION...2 IV. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES.
Compensation Programs and Practices 2012. research. A report by WorldatWork, October 2012
Compensation Programs and Practices research A report by WorldatWork, October Contact: WorldatWork Customer Relations 14040 N. Northsight Blvd. Scottsdale, Arizona USA 85260-3601 Toll free: 877-951-9191
Total Rewards and Employee Well-Being. research. A report by WorldatWork February 2012
Total Rewards and Employee Well-Being research A report by WorldatWork February 2012 Contact: WorldatWork Customer Relations 14040 N. Northsight Blvd. Scottsdale, Arizona USA 85260-3601 Toll free: 877-951-9191
2012 Allied Workforce Mobility Survey: Onboarding and Retention
About the 2012 Research The 2012 Allied Workforce Mobility Survey, conducted in March 2012, captures the voice of HR professionals on critical topics relating to workforce mobility, which is defined as
Employee engagement is promoted by a myriad of
SHRM Foundation Executive Briefing Employee Engagement: Your Competitive Advantage Sponsored by Randstad Employee engagement is promoted by a myriad of consultants, books and articles, but does it really
Best Practices for Executive Directors and Boards of Nonprofit Organizations
for Executive Directors and Boards of Nonprofit Organizations The following document on best practices was developed from a highly-successful training program called MATRIX* that was conducted in 1999
CERTIFICATIONS IN HUMAN RESOURCES» ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL IN HUMAN RESOURCES. aphr EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE
CERTIFICATIONS IN HUMAN RESOURCES» aphr ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL IN HUMAN RESOURCES aphr EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE aphr TM EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE AT-A-GLANCE aphr TM EXAM WEIGHTING BY FUNCTIONAL AREA» HR Operations
Workplace Survey American Psychological Association Harris Interactive. March 2012
Workplace Survey American Psychological Association Harris Interactive March 2012 Methodology The Stress in the Workplace survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf
HR certification: basic course
HR certification: basic course What makes the program unique: It is a modular program covering all major areas of the integrated talent It combines theoretical and practical training components Trainings
HANDBOOK FOR MANAGERS/SUPERVISORS OF PROFESSIONAL/GENERAL STAFF
HANDBOOK FOR MANAGERS/SUPERVISORS OF PROFESSIONAL/GENERAL STAFF Section 1: Managing and Developing People at CSU... 3 Section 2: People Management, the Broad Structure... 3 Section 3: Principles... 4 Section
Human Capital Management Challenge: Fostering Employee Mentoring, Engagement, and Development in a Limited Budget Environment
Human Capital Management Challenge: Fostering Employee Mentoring, Engagement, and Development in a Limited Budget Environment By Carolyn M. Taylor Chief Human Capital Officer, Government Accountability
The 5 Forces that are Changing Employee www.namely.com Performance Reviews
REINVENTING THE PERFORMANCE REVIEW The 5 Forces that are Changing Employee Performance Reviews 1 REINVENTING THE PERFORMANCE REVIEW The 5 Forces that are Changing Employee Performance Reviews Summary This
Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework JOB SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES
Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework JOB SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES What is employee satisfaction? Employee satisfaction is the individual employee s general attitude towards the job. It is also an employee
Class & Labor Implementation Committee Summarized Report of Action Steps & Ongoing Owners
Class & Labor Implementation Committee Summarized Report of Action Steps & Ongoing Owners The Class & Labor Implementation Committee has 17 members and began meeting in March 2013 to advice on the implementation
Winning Leadership in Turbulent Times Developing Emotionally Intelligent Leaders
Working Resources is a Leadership Consulting, Training and Executive Coaching Firm Helping Companies Assess, Select, Coach and Retain Emotionally Intelligent Leaders; Emotional Intelligence-Based Interviewing
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Spring 2013. In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Spring 2013 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce May 29, 2013 Introduction Twice a year, Globoforce conducts a survey with the Society
Internship Guide. Get Started
Internship Guide This guide provides a roadmap for any company, no matter the size of the business or the industry. Whether you re just getting started or already have an internship program that you want
Helping employers create lasting employee relationships
KELLY SERVICES PRESENTS Insight for human resource and staffing professionals THE KELLY INTELLIGENCE REPORT Helping employers create lasting employee relationships Six Strategies for Effective On-boarding
RESEARCH REPORT SHRM / GLOBOFORCE. Employee Recognition Survey WINTER 2012 REPORT THE IMPACT OF RECOGNITION ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND ROI
SHRM / GLOBOFORCE Employee Recognition Survey WINTER 2012 REPORT THE IMPACT OF RECOGNITION ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND ROI RESEARCH REPORT SHRM/Globoforce Winter 2012 Report // 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For the
WHITE PAPER Wellness that Works
WHITE PAPER Wellness that Works How program integration can maximize participation and create a culture of total health and wellness Written by the behavioral experts at eni www.eniweb.com Successfully
BSBHRM403A Support performance management process
BSBHRM403A Support performance management process Revision Number: 1 BSBHRM403A Support performance management process Modification History Not applicable. Unit Descriptor Unit descriptor This unit describes
Employee Engagement FY15. 1. Introduction. 2. Employee Engagement. 3. Management Approach
1. Introduction This document forms part of our Disclosures on Management Approach (DMA) series, prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative s G4 Guidelines. The DMA series is designed
University College London Staff survey 2013: results presentation
University College London Staff survey 2013: results presentation Classification: Private Agenda Headline results Employee engagement Key drivers of engagement within UCL Other key themes Summary and next
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR POLICY
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR POLICY Service Area: Office of the City Clerk Policy No.: HRDEV POL - 0001 Department: Human Resources Approval Date: March 23, 2015 Division: Organizational Development
Critical Skills Needs and Resources for the Changing Workforce. Keeping Skills Competitive
A study by the Society for Human Resource Management and WSJ.com/ Careers Critical Skills Needs and Resources for the Changing Workforce Keeping Skills Competitive Critical Skills Needs and Resources for
Introduction. This white paper outlines the key findings from the survey and provides an analysis of its implications
The Value of HR Certification Around the World Introduction In recent years, there has been a growing appreciation of the benefits of HR credentials among HR professionals. Increasing competition for HR
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
WHITE PAPER BY PATRICIA DAVIS LEADER, PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ROBERT W. ROGERS PRESIDENT, DDI WHITE PAPER GETTING THE MOST FROM YOUR 1 GETTING THE MOST FROM YOUR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Is your organization
Talent Management A Holistic Approach to Managing your Workforce
Talent Management A Holistic Approach to Managing your Workforce Robyn Warren and Stacy Edwards-Adrian Los Angeles Unified School District Successful organizations, both public and private, are recognizing
Online Technologies and Their Impact on Recruitment Strategies: Using Social Networking Websites To Attract Talent
Online Technologies and Their Impact on Recruitment Strategies: Using Social Networking Websites To Attract Talent Introduction Building relationships and networking has always been one of the best ways
CORPORATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL JULY 2005 www.corporateleadershipcouncil.com
CORPORATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL JULY 2005 www.corporateleadershipcouncil.com LITERATURE Integrating Performance Management and Talent Review Processes Finding 1: Performance management involves the entire
Wellness in the Workplace 2012: An Optum Research Update
Resource Center for Health & Wellbeing Wellness in the Workplace 2012: An Research Update Page 1 Health and Wellness: Strategic Differentiators for Successful Organizations Health and wellness programs
INTERNS: Trends & Best Practices in Management & Pay
INTERNS: Trends & Best Practices in Management & Pay INTERNS Their Role in Organizations The majority of organizations employ interns. Most notably, interns help develop a talent pipeline in organizations.
A new era for HR. Trinity College Dublin Human Resources Strategy 2014 to 2019
A new era for HR Trinity College Dublin Human Resources Strategy 2014 to 2019 Introduction This revised HR strategy is a response from the HR function in College to the new College Strategy 2014-2019,
Contact: Marty Imes, Director of Vision & Culture Phone: (805) 546-1430 (office) or (805) 748-9879 mobile Email: marty@advantage-plus.
Sept. 22, 2014 Contact: Marty Imes, Director of Vision & Culture Phone: (805) 546-1430 (office) or (805) 748-9879 mobile Email: [email protected] FORTUNE Magazine Lists San Luis Obispo Firm as Among
A REPORT BY HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW ANALYTIC SERVICES Frontline Managers: Are They Given the Leadership Tools to Succeed?
A REPORT BY HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW ANALYTIC SERVICES Frontline Managers: Are They Given the Leadership Tools to Succeed? Sponsored by Frontline Managers: Are They Given the Leadership Tools to Succeed?
H U M A N R E S O U R C E S F R A M E W O R K
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY Planning for Change Seizing Opportunities Safeguarding Our Future H U M A N R E S O U R C E S F R A M E W O R K Why Are We Here Today? To inform Council about our greatest
Defining Human Resources Moving to Strategic HR
Defining Human Resources Moving to Strategic HR P r e s e n t e d b y : S a s k a t c h e w a n S c h o o l B o a r d s A s s o c i a t i o n S c h o o l F o r T r u s t e e s - J a n u a r y 1 7, 1 8,
Career Management. Making It Work for Employees and Employers
Career Management Making It Work for Employees and Employers Stuck in neutral. That s how many employees around the world would describe their career. In fact, according to the 2014 Global Workforce Study,
Raise Your Voice, Raise Your Skills
ASHHRA s Initiative Raise Your Voice, Raise Your Skills Tool 00 Please fax d Tool to ASHHRA at --77 Attn: Jamie Macander ASHHRA s Initiative Raise Your Voice, Raise Your Skills Introduction Changes are
www.pwc.com/workforce-analytics City and County of Denver 2015 Employee Engagement Survey
www.pwc.com/workforce-analytics City and County of Denver 2015 Employee Engagement Survey Prepared for and Presented to the City and County of Denver August 28, 2015 Overview Background Survey Objectives
MCQ s Unit-II: Organizing the Sales Force
MCQ s Unit-II: Organizing the Sales Force 1. involves identifying activities management feels the salespeople should perform to produce the desired results. a. SWOT analysis b. Environmental audit c. Training
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL AND NON-TEACHING PROFESSIONAL STAFF
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL AND NON-TEACHING PROFESSIONAL STAFF For Evaluation Period Ending: Employee Name: Department: Title: Manager KEY
The Porch Gift Shop Strategic Human Resource Plan Jessica Akers Bus 261
The Porch Gift Shop Strategic Human Resource Plan Jessica Akers Bus 261 1 Page Organization and Strategy The Porch Gift Shop is a new business that has begun as a family owned organization. We strive to
EMPLOYEE PROPOSED COMPENSATION PLAN- Subject of Public Hearing CENTERVILLE CITY SALARY ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES- FY 2013
EMPLOYEE PROPOSED COMPENSATION PLAN- Subject of Public Hearing CENTERVILLE CITY SALARY ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES- FY 2013 The City's compensation program is designed to compensate employees fairly, to
Course Descriptions for the Business Management Program
Course Descriptions for the Business Management Program Upon completion of two quarters, students will earn a Professional Certificate in Business Management with a specialization in a chosen area: HR,
POSITION DESCRIPTION KEY RESULT AREAS
POSITION DESCRIPTION Position Title: Human Resources Officer Date: Feb 2013 Department: Human Resources Sub department: HR ANZ Location: Sydney Reports to: Human Resources Manager ANZ Direct Reports: Nil
DTRQ9FO8D9N/TGDTRbzN2v4v. Sample Leader Leader Sample
DTRQ9FO8D9N/TGDTRbzNvv Sample Leader Leader Sample Feedback Report //0 About This Survey Leader Sample, //0 This multirater survey is designed to provide a basis for your professional development. As an
Employee Retention Guide: How to keep your top talent on board. aicpa.org/worklife
Employee Retention Guide: How to keep your top talent on board aicpa.org/worklife The AICPA, through its Women s Initiatives Executive Committee, is dedicated to helping CPAs and organizations recruit
2012 Metrics and Analytics: Patterns of Use and Value. research. A report by WorldatWork and Mercer July 2012
2012 Metrics and Analytics: Patterns of Use and Value research A report by WorldatWork and Mercer July 2012 Contact: WorldatWork Customer Relations 14040 N. Northsight Blvd. Scottsdale, Arizona USA 85260-3601
STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLANNING LATEST TRENDS AND LEADING PRACTICE EXAMPLES
STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLANNING LATEST TRENDS AND LEADING PRACTICE EXAMPLES BERLIN, 21 MAY 2015 Julia Howes Mercer Workforce Analytics & Planning A WORKFORCE TSUNAMI IS APPROACHING COPYRIGHT MERCER 2015 STRATEGIC
EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION TOOLKIT DAY WEEK MONTH QUARTER YEAR CAREER M THE MANAGER GUIDE. Employee Orientation Toolkit
EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION TOOLKIT DAY WEEK MONTH QUARTER YEAR CAREER M THE MANAGER GUIDE Employee Orientation Toolkit EMPLOYEE elcome ORIENTATION TOOLKIT DAY WEEK MONTH QUARTER YEAR CAREER M Manager Roles The
Workforce Insights Employee Satisfaction Surveying
Workforce Insights Employee Satisfaction Surveying Overview One significant factor in your call center s success is how happy and satisfied the employees are. Employee satisfaction has an extremely high
Employee Engagement Drives Client Satisfaction and Employee Success in Professional Services
Employee Engagement Drives Client Satisfaction and Employee Success in In professional services, business success is achieved through employee success. Organizations that prioritize top talent gain competitive
Objectives & Ideas to create Unique Compelling Propositions (UCP's)
Objectives & Ideas to create Unique Compelling Propositions (UCP's) 1. Demonstrate proven results 2. Offer a proposition to the first prospects (eg. business health check) 3. Provide information
The Impact of Rewards Programs on Employee Engagement. research. Dow Scott, Ph.D., Loyola University Tom McMullen, Hay Group WorldatWork June 2010
The Impact of Rewards Programs on Employee Engagement research Dow Scott, Ph.D., Loyola University Tom McMullen, Hay Group WorldatWork June 00 Media Contact: Marcia Rhodes 00 N. Northsight Blvd. Scottsdale,
research report SHRM / GLOBOFORCE Employee Recognition Survey SPRING 2013 REPORT DRIVING STRONGER PERFORMANCE THROUGH EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
SHRM / GLOBOFORCE Employee Recognition Survey SPRING 2013 REPORT DRIVING STRONGER PERFORMANCE THROUGH EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION research report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHRM/Globoforce Spring 2013 Report // 2 Employee
The Value of Tuition Assistance
The Value of Tuition Assistance A 21st Century Benefit for 21st Century Challenges Tuition assistance has the potential to be a very powerful benefit within an organization, providing employees with opportunities
Talent management strategy template
Talent management strategy template 2012 Halogen Software Inc. All rights reserved. Halogen, Halogen eappraisal, Halogen ecompensation, Halogen elearning Manager, Halogen esuccession, Halogen e360 Multirater,
A9. What is the total number of employees worldwide including Denmark by headcount?
SURVEY OF EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES OF MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES OPERATING IN DENMARK Home-based English version Please select a language: SECTION A: INTRODUCTION English... 1 Danish... 2 First page: EMPLOYMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF CONTINUING AND PROFESSIONAL STUDIES MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF PROGRAMS IN BUSINESS MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Lecture 5 Part II (Chapter 13 of textbook) Incentive Compensation
1 Lecture 5 Part II (Chapter 13 of textbook) Incentive Compensation Learning Objectives Explain the concept of incentive compensation and why its use is spreading. Identify the key objectives of incentive
Human Resources Department
Human Resources Department Mission Hire, develop and retain a competent, committed and diverse workforce to provide high quality and cost-effective services to Scottsdale citizens. Cultivate an environment
