TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. January 2016
|
|
|
- Shonda Parsons
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN January 2016
2 PROMULGATION STATEMENT The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and contents within is a guide to how the University conducts all-hazards response. The EOP is written in support of emergency management and is built upon the National Response Framework as scalable, flexible, and adaptable coordinating structures to align key roles and responsibility. This plan and contents within shall apply to all university personnel participating in mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. Furthermore, tasked organizations supporting EOP guidelines shall maintain their own procedures/guidelines and actively participate in the training, exercise, and maintenance needed to support this plan. The EOP is intended to capture specific authorities and best practices for managing incidents of any size or scope. The EOP was prepared by Texas A&M staff and approved by executive management, thereby enabling activities contained within this document to be performed within the University s capability. Furthermore, this EOP has been made available to the Texas A&M System and with external agencies that may be affected by its implementation. This EOP is also accessible via the web at 12/1/2014 v.3.0 Page 1
3 APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION This Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) was prepared by Texas A&M University to develop, implement, and maintain a viable all hazards response capability and to establish a comprehensive approach to providing consistent, effective, and efficient coordination across a spectrum of activities. This plan shall apply to all university personnel participating in mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. Furthermore, the EOP may be applied to any Universitysponsored events, whether on or off campus, and all public or private Universitysanctioned activities. This plan addresses emergency response activities at the Texas A&M University College Station campus. It does not address emergency response activities at the Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M Galveston, Texas A&M University at Qatar, or the Texas A&M University Law School. These campuses have established and maintain separate plans and procedures specific to their operations. The University s Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security shall be responsible for plan oversight and coordination with applicable stakeholders. This EOP is based on the all-hazards concept and plans for natural and man-made disasters and incidents. The plan is flexible in that part of the plan or the entire plan may be activated based on the specific emergency and decision by University executive management. This EOP and its supporting contents are hereby approved, supersedes all previous editions formerly referred to as the Crisis Management Plan, and is effective immediately upon the signing of all signature authorities noted below. Approved: Date: Christopher M. Meyer, Assistant Vice President Office of Safety and Security, Texas A&M University Approved: Date: Dr. Jerry R. Strawser, Vice President Division of Finance and Administration Texas A&M University Approved: Date: Michael K. Young, President Texas A&M University January 2016 v.3.0 Page 2
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: PURPOSE, SCOPE, SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS...6 A. PURPOSE...6 B. SCOPE...7 C. SITUATION OVERVIEW...7 D. THREAT AND VULNERABILITY...8 E. CAPABILITY AND MITIGATION OVERVIEW...8 F. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS...9 SECTION II: CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS...11 A. GENERAL...11 B. KEY AREAS OF EMERGENCY PLANNING AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT...12 C. NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS)...12 D. RESOURCE DESIGNATION LEVELS...13 E. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ACTIVATION AUTHORITY...14 F. OUTSIDE REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE...14 SECTION III: ORGANIZATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES...15 A. ORGANIZATION...15 B. UNIVERSITY POSITION ROLES AND EXPECTED ACTIONS...16 C. NOTIFICATION AND WARNING...17 D. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS...17 E. EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION...17 F. NON-EMERGENCY EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS...17 SECTION IV: DIRECTION, CONTROL AND COORDINATION...18 A. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (CEOC) AND INCIDENT COMMAND POST (ICP) INTERFACE...18 B. INCIDENT COMMAND POST (ICP)...19 C. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (CEOC)...20 SECTION V: ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE, AND LOGISTICS...21 A. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES (FMS)...21 B. FUNDING AND TRACKING OF RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES...22 SECTION VI: PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE...22 SECTION VII: AUTHORITY AND REFERENCES...23 SECTION VIII: TESTING, TRAINING AND EXERCISE...25 PLAN CONTACT INFORMATION...27 RECORD OF CHANGE...28 RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION...29 ATTACHMENT 1 - NIMS SUMMARY...30 ATTACHMENT 2 - TAMU EMERGENCY RESPONSE COVERAGE...31 ATTACHMENT 3 - SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS...34 ATTACHMENT 4 - SUPPLEMENTAL EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS...36 ATTACHMENT 5 - CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS REQUIRING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE...39 January 2016 v.3.0 Page 3
5 ANNEXES TO BASIC PLAN Annex A Warning Annex B Communications Annex C Shelter and Mass Care Annex D Radiological Protection (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex E Evacuation Annex F Firefighting (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex G Law Enforcement (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex H Health and Medical Services Annex I Public Information Annex J Recovery- Institutional Continuity Plan Annex K Public Works and Engineering (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex L Energy and Utilities (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex M Resource Support (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex N Direction and Control (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex O Human Services Annex P Hazard Mitigation (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex Q Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Annex R Search and Rescue (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex S Transportation (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex T Donations Management (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) January 2016 v.3.0 Page 4
6 Annex U Legal (See Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan) Annex V Acts of Violence Annex W Easterwood Airport Emergency Plan January 2016 v.3.0 Page 5
7 SECTION I: PURPOSE, SCOPE, SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS A. PURPOSE The purpose of the Texas A&M Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is to outline the University s approach to emergency operations and to enable local, state and federal coordination. It provides general guidance for emergency management activities. The EOP and its contents describe the University s emergency response organization and assigns responsibilities for various emergency tasks. Specific support materials found in the EOP annexes and attachments describes details of who does what, when and how. Additionally, the EOP describes capabilities and resources, as well as establishes responsibilities and operational processes, to help protect the University from natural and manmade hazards, to save lives, to protect public health, safety, property, and the environment; and to reduce adverse psychological consequences and disruptions. Although emergencies, disasters and catastrophic incidents typically result in impacts far beyond the immediate or initial incident area, the EOP provides a framework to enable the management of cascading impacts and multiple incidents, as well as, the prevention of and preparation for subsequent events. The EOP supports the Brazos County Inter-jurisdictional Emergency Management Plan, and functions in conjunction with the Community Emergency Operations Center (CEOC) Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs). It is the responsibility of those referenced in this plan to integrate their departmental procedures, guidelines, and emergency management activities, such as task performance and organization, while also participating in training, exercises, plan integration, and maintenance needed to support a collective process. Additionally, the EOP Outlines the duties and responsibilities of the University divisions and departments. Empowers employees in an incident to act quickly and knowledgably. Informs and trains key stakeholders on their roles and responsibilities before, during, and after an incident. Provides other members of the community with assurances that the University has established guidelines and procedures to respond to incidents/hazards in an effective way. Establishes intra-agency and multi-jurisdictional mechanisms for involvement in and coordination of incident prevention, response, and recovery operations. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 6
8 Provides guidance for emergency operations and the utilization of all available university resources for the protection of lives, property, and the continuance of university operations in an emergency. B. SCOPE This plan and all contents contained herein shall apply to all university personnel participating in mitigation and prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. An incident or event affecting the university may also impact the surrounding community; therefore, this plan and all contents contained herein shall support the Brazos County Inter-jurisdictional Emergency Management Plan and any supporting Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or Memorandums of Agreement (MOA). The scope of the EOP applies to incidents and/or events of all sizes, including those that exceed the University s response services and capabilities, and may result in mutual aid activation, multijurisdictional response, and/or CEOC activation. The University s EOP outlines the expectations of university personnel, roles and responsibilities, direction and control systems, internal and external communications, training and sustainability of the EOP, authority and references as defined by local, state, and federal government mandates, common and specialized procedures, and specific hazard vulnerabilities and response/recovery. C. SITUATION OVERVIEW Texas A&M University ranks among the nation s largest academic institutions in virtually all categories and is a major stakeholder in the local, state, and national disaster arenas. The University is exposed to many hazards, some of which have the potential for disrupting the University community and causing widespread damage and casualties, because of its geographic location, population concentration, high-rise buildings, rail, air and highway traffic, and other risk factors. University Demographics, Population and Building Information For information on University demographics, population and building information, please see: January 2016 v.3.0 Page 7
9 D. THREAT AND VULNERABILITY The University is a signatory on the Brazos County Hazard Mitigation Plan. County stakeholders, including the University, participate in the hazard assessment process, utilizing various methods to calculate threat and risk for the University and surrounding community. Additional information is available in the Brazos County Hazard Mitigation Plan accessible at: % _0.pdf E. CAPABILITY AND MITIGATION OVERVIEW Texas A&M University is a signatory of the Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan. The University and the surrounding emergency management community have assessed their capabilities to respond to the most likely hazards and measures are in place to address those hazards. The University works with the emergency management staff of the cities of Bryan and College Station, and Brazos County on a daily basis. A cooperative working relationship and team approach between the University and municipal governments for emergency response is a major strength on which the University relies. Prevention, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation capabilities are taken into consideration along with the adequacy of training, equipment, and personnel needs. o The University is dependent upon the local municipalities for fire and rescue services, major hazardous material response capabilities, EMS backup, bomb squad response, police tactical responses, and assistance in emergency operations staffing and support. A list of current MOA/MOUs can be found in Attachment 3. o The University maintains a commissioned police force, an Advanced Life Support (ALS) emergency medical ambulance service, and a Hazardous Material Response Team, which augments the College Station Fire Department HazMat Response Team. In addition to supporting the Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan and other local, private, and regional stakeholders, the University has adopted and supports the phases of emergency management (mitigation and prevention, preparedness, response and recovery) in the planning process. The University is committed to January 2016 v.3.0 Page 8
10 developing and exercising comprehensive robust plans, and training and exercising University emergency responders in coordination with local emergency responders. F. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS The Texas A&M University EOP is based on the following planning assumptions and considerations as presented in this section. Any employee of Texas A&M University may be tasked by this EOP. Incidents are typically managed at the lowest possible geographic, organizational, and jurisdictional level. External resources may be requested to assist the University if the nature of the incident overwhelms local capability. Incident management activities will be initiated and conducted in accordance with the National Incident Management System (NIMS). Local emergency response resources will be available in emergency situations affecting the University. It is possible for a major disaster to occur any time and any place in or near the University. In some cases, timely dissemination of warnings and increased readiness measures may be possible. However, many disasters can, and may, occur with little or no warning. University officials and representatives recognize their responsibilities for the safety and well-being of students, faculty, staff, and visitors, and assume their responsibilities in the implementation of this emergency EOP. Proper implementation and understanding of these guidelines through training and exercising will reduce or prevent disaster-related losses. The local police and fire departments will respond where support agreements or mutual aid agreements exist. The University is included in the Brazos County 911 District. Emergencies on the University campus may involve multiple responding departments and agencies which could include, but not be limited to, University Police, Environmental Health and Safety, Emergency Medical Services, Facilities Services / SSC Service Solutions, Marketing and Communications, Transportation Services, Utility and Energy Services, College Station Fire Department, and other appropriate University, city, county, state and federal agencies. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 9
11 In most cases, the fire department or law enforcement personnel will assume Incident Command, depending on the type of emergency. Hazardous conditions may follow any major disaster thereby increasing the risk of injuries and death. Casualties will be transported to local area hospitals. A.P. Beutel Health Center is a freestanding, ambulatory care facility with no emergency room. It is not equipped to receive patients from mass casualty incidents. Other University agencies or system components operating on the campus shall coordinate their emergency actions with this EOP. Regardless of the threat or type of emergency, it is possible that the following results may be encountered: o Death, injury, or illness of people and/or animals o Interruption or disruption to transportation o Interruption or disruption to normal communications o Interruption or disruption to utilities and other essential services o Congregation of large numbers of people at the scene, at central locations, at shelters, etc. o Significant numbers of people being displaced, requiring some, or all of the following: evacuation, shelter, feeding, welfare, and other assistance o Structural damage to streets, buildings, utilities, and other property o Contamination of food, water, personnel, vehicles, property, and other substances o Shortages of essential items o Periods of civil unrest or disorder, including looting, rioting, mob scenes, violence, etc. o Initial confusion of the affected population, with probable delays in response due to disaster incidents o Extensive need for public information o Disruption of business activities o Other January 2016 v.3.0 Page 10
12 SECTION II: CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS A. GENERAL It is the responsibility of the University to protect life and property from the effects of disasters within its own jurisdiction. Texas A&M University has the primary responsibility for initial emergency management activities. Information located in this section is designed to give an overall picture of incident management. It will primarily clarify the purpose, and explain the University s overall approach to an emergency (i.e., what should happen, when, and at whose direction) to include the division of local, state, federal, and any intermediate inter-jurisdictional entities. Top priorities for incident management are to: Save lives and protect the health and safety of students, faculty, staff, visitors, responders and recovery workers Ensure security of the University Protect and restore critical infrastructure and key resources Conduct law enforcement investigations to resolve the incident, apprehend the perpetrators, and collect and preserve evidence for prosecution and/or attribution Protect property and mitigate damages and impacts to individuals, the community, and the environment Facilitate recovery of individuals Recover operations This EOP is based on the all-hazards approach. The plan is flexible in that part of the plan or the entire plan may be activated based on the specific emergency and decision by University executive management. The University s concept of operations is that the emergency functions of various agencies/organizations/divisions/departments involved in emergency management will generally parallel normal day-to-day functions or operations. To the maximum extent possible, the same personnel and material resources will be employed in both cases. Day-to-day functions that do not contribute directly to the emergency response may be suspended for the duration of any emergency. The efforts that would normally be required for those functions may be redirected to the accomplishment of emergency tasks by the department, division, or agency concerned. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 11
13 The EOP addresses all preparedness activities embedded within the key areas of emergency planning. B. KEY AREAS OF EMERGENCY PLANNING AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT In the event of an incident, the University will utilize the definitions below that are predicated on an all-hazards approach. The University acknowledges that most responsibilities and functions performed during an emergency are not hazard specific. Likewise, these guidelines account for activities pre-incident, incident and post-incident; consequently, key areas are noted as the following: Mitigation and Prevention Mitigation is the effort to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of disasters and emergencies. It involves the structural and non-structural measures taken to limit the impact of disasters and emergencies. Prevention focuses on preventing human hazards, primarily from terroristic attacks and involve those activities that help detect and prevent an incident from occurring. Preparedness Preparedness activities serve to develop the response capabilities needed should an emergency arise. Planning and training are among the activities conducted under this phase. Response Response is the actual provision of emergency services during a crisis. These activities help to reduce casualties and damage, and speed recovery. Response activities include warning, fire response, evacuation, rescue, and other similar operations. Recovery Recovery is both a short-term and long-term process. Short-term operations seek to restore vital services to the University and provide for the basic needs of students, faculty, and staff. Long-term recovery focuses on restoring the university to its normal pre-disaster, or an improved, state of affairs. The recovery period is also an opportune time to institute future mitigation measures, particularly those related to the recent emergency. C. NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) According to Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 and the U.S. Department of Education, Institutions of Higher Education are among local agencies that must adopt NIMS if they receive Federal grant funds. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 12
14 The National Incident Management System (NIMS) is a set of principles adopted by the University. NIMS provides a systematic, proactive approach guiding government agencies at all levels, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector to work seamlessly to prevent, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of incidents, regardless of cause, size, location, or complexity, in order to reduce the loss of life or property and harm to the environment. This system ensures that those involved in incident response/recovery understand what their roles are and have the tools they need to be effective. The University has adopted NIMS and the use of the Incident Command System (ICS) and in accordance with the U.S. Department of Education (ED) guidance, has identified key personnel such as Executive Leaders, General Personnel, Command Staff, and Incident Managers to complete specific courses in order for individuals to meet the organizational NIMS compliance. The University participates in local governments NIMS preparedness programs. Identified University personnel participate in training and exercising the EOP s procedures and hazard-specific annexes. The University is charged with ensuring that the training and equipment necessary for an appropriate response will be available. In a major emergency or disaster, University facilities may be damaged or need to be evacuated, people may be injured, and/or other incident management activities may need to be initiated. These activities must be organized and coordinated to ensure efficient incident management. The Incident Command System (ICS), a component of NIMS, will be used to manage all incidents and major planned events. For more information on NIMS, see Attachment 1: NIMS Summary. D. RESOURCE DESIGNATION LEVELS Most emergencies follow some recognizable build-up period during which actions can be taken to achieve readiness. Actions of specific departments involved in emergency response are detailed in the appropriate sections of these guidelines; however, it is acknowledged that disasters are unique occurrences, which require specific resources dependent upon the type, nature, and extent of the emergency. In this regard, this document is not all-inclusive, nor does it limit or restrict reasonable or prudent actions. If an incident occurs, the University may immediately determine it to be a Campus Incident, a Community Incident or State Level Incident. The following Resource Designation Levels will be used as a means of delineating resource requirements: January 2016 v.3.0 Page 13
15 Campus Incident: University response services and capabilities meet the needs of the circumstance without activation of the CEOC. Minor injuries to individuals or little damage to facilities may apply. Necessary community resources such as College Station Fire Department may be needed. Community Incident: University response services and capabilities are exceeded by the demands and needs of the circumstance. The CEOC may be activated for a coordinated response in support of the Incident Commander. State Level Incident: The University s and the community s response services and capabilities are exceeded by disastrous conditions resulting in activation of the CEOC. Mass casualties, severe injuries to persons, and/or severe damage to property exist. MOUs/MOAs are put into effect in coordination with additional support requested from local, state and federal entities. E. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ACTIVATION AUTHORITY: The Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security is the University s Emergency Management Director (EMD) and the responsible authority for coordinating emergency measures for the University. If the University s EMD should be unavailable, the order of succession is: 1. Emergency Management Coordinator, Office of Safety Security 2. Director and Chief of Police, University Police Department 3. Director, Environmental Health & Safety The University EMD, or designee, will obtain a briefing from the Incident Commander (IC) on the nature of the incident and assessment of the situation. Following the incident briefing and a brief discussion of next steps, the EMD will brief the executive management. F. OUTSIDE REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE Requests for emergency support may be received from any number of entities. Requests should be communicated to the Emergency Management Director and the Emergency Management Coordinator. Information on the request will be January 2016 v.3.0 Page 14
16 forwarded through the chain of command to the Office of the President for concurrence. Commitment of resources such as food services, transportation, security, etc. to these requests should only be granted if excess capacity - beyond that needed by the University - is available. SECTION III: ORGANIZATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES A. ORGANIZATION Emergency Management for Texas A&M University is comprised of the following: Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security As the University Emergency Management Director (EMD), the Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security is responsible for emergency management planning and operations for the University. Upon the activation of the CEOC for a University incident, the Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security may assume the role as CEOC Manager, unless delegated. Executive Policy Group The Executive Policy Group is comprised of the Associate VP for Finance & Operations and the Vice President for Finance and Administration, or their designees. The Executive Policy Group will work with other community leaders to provide guidance and direction during an incident in coordination with the CEOC Manager. The Executive Policy Group will serve as the liaison between the CEOC and the University s executive management including the Provost and President. Executive Management University executive management is comprised of the President, Provost and Executive Vice President, and Vice Presidents of the university. Executive management will monitor response activities, support Marketing and Communications in media relations and lead recovery efforts as set forth in Annex J, Institutional Recovery. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 15
17 B. UNIVERSITY POSITION ROLES AND EXPECTED ACTIONS Upon learning of an incident occurring on University grounds, the following position roles and actions should guide implementation of the EOP: The Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security shall: o Serve as the University s Emergency Management Director (EMD) and is responsible for directing all emergency measures within the University. o If the situation warrants activation of the CEOC, the University EMD may assume the role of the CEOC Manager, unless delegated. The CEOC Manager is responsible for coordination and collaboration with the City of College Station, Brazos County, and City of Bryan upon activation of the CEOC. o Ensure effective communications to the university community including overseeing activation of emergency notification systems (i.e., Code Maroon), communications with university and System executive management and appropriate emergency response entities. Office of Safety and Security shall: o Provide support and resources to the incident commander as requested o Assist with CEOC readiness if activated o Staff positions in the CEOC as needed Administrative Departments (non-academic) shall: o Shall support the activation of the EOP accordingly from the onset of notification of an incident. o Shall retain administrative and policy control over their employees and equipment, during emergency operations. However, personnel and equipment may be utilized to support the mission assignments directed by the Incident Commander, or the CEOC. o Should begin to formulate a plan to provide adequate time for personnel and crew rest while maintaining continuous relief efforts. Initial reaction to a major incident may require extended operations with work crews operating in shifts. o Upon CEOC activation, personnel, as assigned, will direct the efforts of their departments or organizations from the CEOC, unless advised otherwise, according to their respective guidelines for emergency operations or standard January 2016 v.3.0 Page 16
18 operating procedures (if applicable) or send a liaison to the CEOC if managing their efforts from a department operation center. Supervisors at all levels must repeatedly emphasize safety of students, faculty, staff, visitors, and the public. Requests for additional resources and coordination with other jurisdictions/agencies. If the CEOC is not activated, requests for additional support may be made to the University Police Dispatch, the Facilities Services / SSC Service Solutions Communication Center, or the EMD, and as appropriate, from the incident command post. In the event of CEOC activation, requests will be made in accordance with the CEOC guidelines. C. NOTIFICATION AND WARNING Timely warnings of emergency conditions are essential to preserve the safety and security of the University community and critical to an effective response and recovery. Detailed information on Notification and Warning may be found in Annex A: Warning. D. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS Reliable and interoperable communications systems are essential to obtain the most complete information on emergency situations and to direct and control the resources responding to those incidents. Detailed information on communications for first responders may be found in Annex B: Communication. E. EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION The Division of Marketing and Communications has primary responsibility for communications efforts during an emergency; however, the University Police Department Public Information Officer (PIO) or the local Emergency PIO Group may provide additional support. Detailed information on emergency public information may be found in Annex I: Public Information. F. NON-EMERGENCY EXTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS During an incident, the University expects to receive a high volume of calls seeking information as to the welfare of students, staff, and faculty from concerned parents, relatives, spouses, friends, and loved ones. The surge in January 2016 v.3.0 Page 17
19 volume of calls to the University s main numbers may quickly exceed the system s capabilities. It is essential that call centers are activated and staffed as soon as possible to handle anticipated volume of non-emergency calls related to the incident. Call centers may also be a resource in helping to control rumors. Call centers will only release information that has been approved by the Incident Commander and Marketing and Communications. Student Affairs and the Association of Former Students have resources available to set up a call center. These resources should be activated through the heads of their departments or organization. See Annex O: Human Services for more detailed information. SECTION IV: DIRECTION, CONTROL AND COORDINATION A. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (CEOC) AND INCIDENT COMMAND POST (ICP) INTERFACE A clear division of responsibilities between the ICP and the CEOC (if activated) during an emergency is critical to an effective and timely operation. A general division of responsibilities is outlined below. A division of responsibilities may be modified based upon unique specific incidents and operations. If an incident warrants additional resources, the University EMD or Incident Commander would initiate activation of the Community Emergency Operations Center (CEOC). Upon activation of the CEOC for an University incident, the University EMD, or designee, may serve as the CEOC Manager as outlined by the CEOC Standard Operating Guidelines. Texas A&M has the responsibility for emergency disaster operations within its jurisdiction. Other local government agencies responding to a request for assistance will normally be under the authorities granted by their jurisdiction; however, they are under the direction of the incident commander. The services of the Emergency Management Coordinators within Brazos County will normally be available to each jurisdiction, whether the disaster is localized or countywide. They may serve as liaisons to the City Mayors, County Judge, or other local government agencies and may fill positions in the CEOC. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 18
20 B. INCIDENT COMMAND POST (ICP) Incident Command Post is located within safe proximity to the emergency site and is generally responsible for incident response management as follows: Serves as a temporary field location for tactical-level on-scene incident command and management. Is the on-site headquarters for the Incident Commander, Command Staff, and General Staff. Serves as a field collection point for tactical intelligence and analysis. Conducts all operations using the Incident Command System (ICS). Is typically established prior to activation of the CEOC. Provides the initial securing of the perimeter of the area, coordinates the actions of the operating units, and remains operational during the field actions (rescue, response, recovery, etc.) phases, as required. Incident Command or Unified Command shall: Coordinate the actions of Fire, Police, EMS, and all other responding emergency units to the scene through a Unified Command System. o o The University Police Department assumes Incident Command/Unified Command in all civil disturbances, bomb incidents, and terrorist activity operations (local and state police will coordinate with arriving FBI at a suspected terrorist event). The College Station Fire Department assumes Incident Command/Unified Command in all emergencies except those specifically assigned to the police department. Command all field activities and has the authority to direct all on site incident activities within the University s jurisdiction. Establish an ICP and provide an assessment of the situation to the University EMD or other officials, identify incident management resources required, and direct the on-scene incident management activities from the command post. The first trained emergency responder on-scene will assume the role of Incident Commander until a more qualified individual can assume command. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 19
21 The Incident Commander will also ensure the following, if applicable to the incident: Isolate the incident site and maintain control of the inner and outer perimeters Establish tactical communications and designate a primary radio channel Facilitate tactical planning and contingency planning Brief first responder personnel Designate a staging area for supporting agencies Ensure documentation of tactical decisions and activities Provide situational updates to the CEOC at regular intervals, if activated Approve requests for additional resources or for the release of resources (demobilization) through Dispatch or the CEOC, if activated Approve additional alerts as needed Establish immediate priorities Coordinate any specific transportation issues (such as helicopter landing zones, EMS locations, morgue location, etc., as appropriate) Determine security boundaries Notifies Dispatch or CEOC (if activated) of needs, including personnel recall from other departments as required Perform other duties as required by the situation. Approve emergency public information messaging prior to release by the Public Information Officer. Participate in the after action review process C. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (CEOC) Upon activation, the CEOC becomes the centralized communication and coordination facility for Texas A&M University emergency response. The CEOC is the key to successful coordinated efforts and responsible for supporting the Incident Commander and consequence management actions. More detailed information may be found in the CEOC Standard Operating Guidelines. The CEOC, if applicable: Serves as the central meeting and gathering location for critical management and support personnel, and serves as the incident support operations and resource center. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 20
22 Facilitates the flow of communication and coordination between the different operating agencies, different levels of government, and the public. Supports the Incident Commander by mobilizing and deploying resources as requested. Assembles accurate information about the incident and provides situational analysis Issues community-wide warnings and alerts Provides public information services and coordinating activities with the on-scene Public Information Officer (PIO) and the Joint Information Center, if established Communicates and implements policy-level decisions from the Executive Policy Group Organizes and implements evacuation Coordinates traffic control beyond the incident scene Obtains local, state, and federal assistance as needed EOC Locations Include: The Primary EOC o Brazos Valley Community Emergency Operations Center (CEOC) at 110 N. Main Street in downtown Bryan. The Alternate EOC o City of College Station EOC at 1207 Texas Ave in College Station. The Second Alternate EOC o Kyle Field Command at 756 Houston Street on the Texas A&M University Campus. SECTION V: ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE, AND LOGISTICS A. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES (FMS) FMS will issue a project number for the incident response effort, and will disseminate the project number for use by all departments participating. This project number will be utilized in conjunction with the applicable accounting code to document all response and recovery costs associated with any disaster or emergency that requires a substantial January 2016 v.3.0 Page 21
23 response effort. FMS will prepare and submit support documentation, such as, reimbursement costs, etc. B. FUNDING AND TRACKING OF RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES Emergency operations may require significant resources. Tracking those resources is vital for several reasons: Knowing what resources are on hand and available Anticipating what will be needed Tracking resources and returning resources at the conclusion of the operation Tracking costs as necessary for reimbursements FEMA reimbursable expenditures should be tracked using FEMA forms, which can be found via the FEMA website at SECTION VI: PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE The EOP utilizes existing program expertise and personnel to provide prevention, protection, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery efforts of post event consequences. Structured as demonstrated in the Comprehensive Planning Guidelines 101 (CPG 101, Nov. 2010) while also following the principles of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP), the EOP addresses response, training, exercises, equipment, evaluation, and corrective action practices. The University s Office of Safety and Security shall oversee and/or coordinate with applicable partners the following EOP actions: The EOP shall be reviewed annually and modified as necessary by staff of the Office of Safety and Security. Final results of the reviews and any changes to the EOP shall be presented to the Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security for approval before being submitted to the President through administrative channels. The plan will be submitted for signatures every three years or sooner if significant changes are proposed. Each University unit or department identified as having a role in this EOP is responsible for communicating the content of the EOP to their staff and ensuring key staff have the opportunity to attend EOP training and exercise activities. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 22
24 The organization and upkeep of the EOP includes process changes such as an EOP review and update schedule. The review cycle includes basic updates by the Office of Safety and Security staff and the generation of a draft document that will be sent to the relevant partners for review and recommendations. After a review period and consideration of stakeholder comments, the document will be finalized and signatures obtained. Substantive changes between review periods such as changes in roles or responsibilities will prompt notification to listed stakeholders. Minor edits such as grammar or spelling changes will require no notification. Ensure that the EOP is consistent and compatible with the Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan. Ensure EOP compliance with the state and federal guidelines listed in Section VII: Authority and References. SECTION VII: AUTHORITY AND REFERENCES These guidelines apply to Texas A&M University. The organizational and operational concepts set forth in these guidelines are promulgated under the following authorities: Federal o Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, PL as amended. o The Disaster Relief Act of 1974, PL as amended. o Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, PL o Emergency Management and Assistance, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44. o Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, PL (Title III, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 ). o Comprehensive Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, PL (CERCLA or Superfund ). o Clean Water Act, (Section 311 of USC 1251). o Clean Air Act, (40 CFR Part 51). o Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). o Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act (42 CFR Part 73) January 2016 v.3.0 Page 23
25 o Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002; Possession, Use and Transfer of Biological Agents and Toxins (7 CFR Part 331 and 9 CFR Part 121) o Higher Education Act of 1965 as amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) of 2008, Public Law o Homeland Security Act of 2002 (CIKR, Intro-2, CPG 101) o Homeland Security Presidential Directive: HSPD 3, 5 and 8 o National Response Framework o National Protection Framework State o Vernon s Texas Civil Statutes, Sections 7, 8, and 10, Article 5890e. o The Texas Disaster Act of 1975, V.T.C.A. Government Code, Title 4, Chapter 418. o Executive Order by the Governor, Executive Order RP-01 or current version. o Attorney General Opinion MW-140. o Hazard Communication Act, Title 83 Article o Texas Hazardous Substances Spill Prevention and Control Act, Chapter 26, Subchapter G. Texas Water Code. o State Solid Waste Disposal Act, Texas Civil Statutes Article o State of Texas Emergency Management EOP (Disaster EOP). Local o Texas A&M University System Policy for Emergency Management (34.07) o o o o Texas A&M University System Regulation for Emergency Management EOP for System Campuses ( ) Texas A&M University Rule for Environmental Health and Safety Programs ( M4) Brazos County Inter-jurisdictional Emergency Management Plan Standard Operating Guidelines Community Emergency Operations Center January 2016 v.3.0 Page 24
26 SECTION VIII: TESTING, TRAINING AND EXERCISE Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) compliant exercises shall be held annually to train response personnel and evaluate the adequacy of the EOP. A full scale exercise shall be performed at least once every three years. Following HSEEP guidelines, an After Action Report (AAR) as appropriate, for each exercise shall be developed and submitted to the System Office of Safety. All exercises will be conducted in accordance with Texas A&M University System Policy for Emergency Management (34.07) and System Policy for Emergency Management Plans ( ). AFTER ACTION REVIEWS After action reviews of emergency responses can yield valuable feedback to the emergency planning process and enable Texas A&M University (TAMU) to improve future emergency responses. The scope of after action reviews may range from small to large depending upon the complexity of the response and the number of TAMU departments and outside entities involved. Criteria for Conducting an After Action Review: Activation of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Death of an employee, student or visitor Significant release of a hazardous substance, e.g., natural gas release in occupied space, laboratory fire or explosion, and environmental release of hazardous materials At the discretion of the Environmental Health and Safety, the University Police Department, TAMU Emergency Medical Services, Facilities Services, the Emergency Management Coordinator, the Emergency Management Director, or University executive management. After action reviews are intended to be examinations of the emergency response effort and/or the ensuing recovery efforts. Investigations into the root cause of an incident are not the focus of this section. Input for the after action report may come from after action debriefings or follow-up meetings or from written comments provided by any person involved in or observing the emergency response action. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 25
27 The after action report should be written and, at a minimum, provide the information to include a summary of the incident, participating response organizations, and major strengths and areas for improvement regarding the response. A copy of the report should be provided to involved responders, the administrator(s) of the responding departments, and the Emergency Management Director (EMD). The EMD shall retain a copy of the report, including any recommendations for corrections or improvements, for a minimum of two years. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 26
28 PLAN CONTACT INFORMATION NAME AND POSITION PHONE NUMBER ALTERNANT PHONE NUMBER Christopher M. Meyer Assistant Vice President Office of Safety & Security DEPARTMENT: Office of Safety & Security January 2016 v.3.0 Page 27
29 RECORD OF CHANGE CHANGE NUMBER DATE OF CHANGE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Minor grammatical corrections. Signatory authorities/executive policy group updates to reflect Throughout 7/31/2013 administrative changes. Updates referencing Dining Services and Facilities Services to reflect new status. Minor grammatical changes. Signatory authorities/executive policy Throughout 12/1/2014 group updates to reflect administrative changes. Compass Group USA changed to SSC Service Solutions. Minor grammatical changes and terminology changed throughout. Throughout 1/13/2016 Signatory authorities/executive policy group updates to reflect administrative changes. Note: SASE stands for the Office of Safety & Security. CHANGE MADE BY: SASE SASE SASE January 2016 v.3.0 Page 28
30 RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION Texas A&M University distributes an annually to all students, faculty, and staff with information about emergency procedures and links to electronic version of the emergency operations plan. The plan is available on the emergency preparedness website at the following link: January 2016 v.3.0 Page 29
31 ATTACHMENT 1: NIMS SUMMARY ATTACHMENT 1 NIMS SUMMARY See Attachment 7 of the Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management Plan January 2016 v.3.0 Page 30
32 ATTACHMENT 2: TAMU EMERGENCY RESPONSE COVERAGE ATTACHMENT 2 TAMU EMERGENCY RESPONSE COVERAGE January 2016 v.3.0 Page 31
33 ATTACHMENT 2: TAMU EMERGENCY RESPONSE COVERAGE OFF CAMPUS LOCATIONS Effective February 2003 DESCRIPTION STREET CITY EMS POLICE FIRE LOCATION LOCATION University Services 3380 University Building Drive East College Station C T C John B. Connally Building 301 Tarrow Street College Station C T C Riverside Campus County P/B T P/B Business Management 1501 Texas Services Building Avenue College Station C T C Geochemical & Environmental Research 833 Graham Road College Station C T C Group (GERG) USDA Complex F&B Road College Station C T C Animal Science Teaching & Research Center (ASTREC) TEES State Headquarters Bldg Texas A&M System Building (AMSB) Waste Water Treatment Plant 7707 Raymond Stotzer Parkway County B T P 200 William D. Fitch Pkwy College Station C T C 200 Technology Way College Station C T C 9685 White s Creek Road College Station C T C University Farm F.M. 60 Burleson County O T O *Note: A list of local leased space is maintained on file. Key: T = TAMU EMS, UPD C = College Station EMS, Fire, PD B = Bryan EMS, FD, PD P = Precinct 4, FD O = Outside Agencies January 2016 v.3.0 Page 32
34 ATTACHMENT 2: TAMU EMERGENCY RESPONSE COVERAGE ON CAMPUS LOCATIONS Effective February 2003 DESCRIPTION Campus Fire Training School Nuclear Reactor Easterwood Airport McKenzie Terminal Easterwood Airport General Aviation/Tower Hazardous Waste Storage Facility Bush Library STREET LOCATION 1595 Nuclear Science Road 2522 Nuclear Science Road 1 McKenzie Terminal Blvd George Bush Drive West 2655 Dairy Science Road 1000 George Bush Drive West CITY LOCATION EMS POLICE FIRE TAMU T T C TAMU C T C TAMU C T C TAMU C T C TAMU C T C TAMU C T C College Station T T C Key: T = TAMU EMS, UPD C = College Station EMS, Fire, PD B = Bryan EMS, FD, PD P = Precinct 4, FD January 2016 v.3.0 Page 33
35 ATTACHMENT 3: SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS ATTACHMENT 3 SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS January 2016 v.3.0 Page 34
36 ATTACHMENT 3: SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS 1. Brazos County Interjurisdictional Mutual Aid Agreement (January 7, 2004) 2. Brazos Valley Regional Mutual Aid Agreement (February 11,2004) 3. College Station and Texas A&M University Memorandum of Agreement and Understanding (December 3, 1971) for fire suppression on Texas A&M University property 4. College Station and Texas A&M University Interlocal Agreement (February 1, 2009) for fire suppression at Easterwood Airport 5. Community Emergency Operations Center Interlocal Agreement (June 19, 2007) 6. Law Enforcement Assistance Interlocal Agreement (October 2, 2008) January 2016 v.3.0 Page 35
37 ATTACHMENT 4: SUPPLEMENTAL EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS ATTACHMENT 4 SUPPLEMENTAL EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS January 2016 v.3.0 Page 36
38 ATTACHMENT 4: SUPPLEMENTAL EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS GENERAL ATHLETIC EVENTS EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS Emergency protocols have been established for responding to emergencies that could endanger lives of patrons or personnel at athletic events on the Texas A&M University campus. The full text for each athletic facility s emergency protocols is available upon request by contacting the Assistant Vice President for Safety and Security. PURPOSE/RESPONSIBILITIES During normal operations, personnel from University Police Department, Athletic Department, Bryan/College Station Fire and Police Departments, TAMU Emergency Medical Services, TAMU Environmental Health and Safety, Facilities Services/SSC Service Solutions, and Transportation Services will respond as necessary to a given emergency at a facility holding an athletic event. Staffing at each event may change as required to enable an effective emergency response. Decisions concerning crowd control and emergency management of critical situations during athletic events are the ultimate responsibility of the University Police Department, but will be made in consultation with the TAMU Athletic Department. The Game Manager and the Director of Security and University Police, or their designees, will maintain a constant communication capability and fully discuss situations that are occurring. The Director of Athletics and TAMU President will be notified of a critical incident. Emergency situations related to crowd management, communications, evacuations and sheltering, traffic management, staging, and triage areas are addressed in the emergency protocols. Response to specific critical incidents, such as, bomb threat, working fire, and weather emergency, are also addressed. ATHLETIC FACILITIES WITH EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS Kyle Field Reed Arena Bluebell Park Aggie Softball Complex Anderson Track and Field Complex Varsity Tennis Center January 2016 v.3.0 Page 37
39 ATTACHMENT 4: SUPPLEMENTAL EMERGENCY PROTOCOLS Ellis Field (Aggie Soccer Stadium) McFerrin Athletic Center Rec Center Natatorium (Specific for NCAA events) Equestrian Events at the Hildebrand Equine Complex* Cross Country Events* Athletic Department Events at Traditions Golf Course* [Note: (*) designates that the emergency protocol is still in draft form] January 2016 v.3.0 Page 38
40 ATTACHMENT 5: CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS REQUIRING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE ATTACHMENT 5 CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS REQUIRING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE January 2016 v.3.0 Page 39
41 ATTACHMENT 5: CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS REQUIRING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE This attachment outlines additional considerations for persons requiring special assistance during emergencies. GENERAL In order to overcome barriers as described in the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) Section 427, Texas A&M University has identified several university departments and programs on campus that have resources that can be accessed prior to and during an emergency to aid those on campus who may require special assistance. These individuals may include those who have disabilities; who live in institutionalized settings; who are elderly; who are children; who are from diverse cultures; who have limited English proficiency or are non-english speaking; or who are transportation disadvantaged. The university encourages individuals who require special assistance during an emergency to discuss their needs with someone in their building prior to an emergency. Students may register with Disability Services (described below), while faculty and staff may contact Human Resources and/or their supervisor. NOTIFICATION The following highlights the ways that the university ensures notifications are made more accessible for persons requiring special assistance. For additional information on notification and warning, see Annex A: Warning. Text messages and s sent via the Code Maroon System allow the university to communicate effectively with individuals who may be deaf or hard of hearing. Campus EAS messages appear captioned on the campus cable televisions. All registrar-controlled classrooms have installed audio alert systems that relay a Code Maroon message over loud speakers to aid those without text message capabilities or the blind to receive the message. Door-to-door contact will be utilized when appropriate to communicate with individuals who may have language barriers. Emergency responders carry visual translators to aid in communication or can utilize language translators through their dispatch centers. The Department of Residence Life purchased visual translators for their staff to utilize during an emergency with their non-english speaking population. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 40
42 ATTACHMENT 5: CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS REQUIRING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE EVACUATION The following highlights the ways that the university will provide reasonable accommodations for persons requiring special assistance to evacuate. For additional information on evacuation, see Annex E: Evacuation. Individuals requiring assistance to evacuate a building should first seek aid from others within their facility. If help is unavailable or additional help is needed, individuals should call 911. Emergency responders are equipped with specialized equipment to aid in the extraction and evacuation of persons with physical disabilities. During an evacuation from campus, persons requiring transportation assistance may contact Transportation Services or University Police Dispatch for paratransit assistance. SHELTERING The following highlights the ways that the university will provide reasonable accommodations for persons requiring special assistance during a sheltering operation. For additional information on sheltering, see Annex C: Shelter & Mass Care. All university facilities are accessible to persons with physical disabilities and meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. University shelters will also comply with FEMA s guidance on Functional Needs Support Services in General Population Shelters. Should the university need to provide a temporary shelter, persons requiring special assistance may request the following accommodations. Note: Other accommodations not listed here should be requested through shelter management. o Service animals will be allowed to accompany their owners into facilities. Service animals are defined as any canine that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability. Owners should come prepared to care for their animals for the duration of the sheltering operation. o Persons requiring refrigeration for their medications may contact shelter management, who will provide assistance by either providing access to a January 2016 v.3.0 Page 41
43 ATTACHMENT 5: CONSIDERATIONS FOR PERSONS REQUIRING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE refrigerator or another means to cool their medications, such as a cooler with ice. o Individuals who require electricity to power or charge their medically necessary equipment may notify shelter management, who will provide them access to electrical outlets within the facility. o Individuals may require communications assistance. These accommodations should be requested through staff management. Examples of such accommodations are below. Persons who are blind or have low vision may have shelter staff read them printed notices, advisories, and other written information. Translators can be made available for non-english speakers. Telecommunications devices for the deaf (TDD) can be made available for persons with hearing or speech difficulties. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Disability Services offers students accommodations, counseling, evaluation referral, disability-related information, adaptive technology services, sign language interpreting, and transcription services for academically related purposes. This is a voluntary program as students have the option to utilize Disability Services resources, but are not required to contact or report to the department. o Pre-emergency education Each student, as part of their intake appointment upon registering with Disability Services, receives a copy of the 12 th Man Emergency Playbook (or is directed to an online resource) as well as guidance on how to access special assistance during an emergency. o Emergency Response During an emergency, Disability Services can be accessed through the Associate Vice President for Risk and Compliance and his ties to the ADA Compliance Committee. Dean of Faculties Faculty members may contact the Dean of Faculties to discuss reasonable accommodations. Human Resources Policy and Practice Review provides departmental staff with information on understanding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and works with departments on reasonable accommodations for specific staff employees, to include building access. January 2016 v.3.0 Page 42
ANNEX W OVERARCHING ACADEMIC/BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLAN (OA/BCP)
ANNEX W OVERARCHING ACADEMIC/BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLAN (OA/BCP) Ver. 3.0 APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Annex W Overarching Academic/Business Continuity Plan This overarching Academic/Business Continuity Plan
University of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
University of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN University of San Francisco Emergency Operations Plan Plan Contact Eric Giardini Director of Campus Resilience 415-422-4222 This plan complies with
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Midwestern State University Emergency Management Plan Midwestern State University is committed to the safety and security of students, faculty, staff,
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Last Edit 2/8/2011 OVERVIEW This document provides a management framework for responding to incidents that may threaten the health and safety of
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) INDEPENDENT STUDY COURSE INTRO TO INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM FOR FEDERAL WORKERS (IS-100.
This Study Guide has been created to provide an overview of the course content presented in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Independent Study Course titled IS-100.FWA Intro to Incident Command
LAWRENCE COUNTY, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ESF-13
LAWRENCE COUNTY, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND SECURITY ESF-13 Coordinates and organizes law enforcement and security resources in preparing for, responding to and recovering from
Cornell University EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Cornell University EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 Section 2 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS... 3 Prevention-Mitigation Plan... 3 Preparedness
University of California Santa Cruz EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
University of California Santa Cruz EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN September 2007 University of California, Santa Cruz Page 2 of 11 I. INTRODUCTION... 3 A. Purpose... 3 B. Scope... 3 C. Authority... 3 D. Mission...
Emergency Response & Recovery Basic Plan
The University of Vermont Emergency Response & Recovery Basic Plan Introduction and Overview One measure of an organization's strength is its ability to respond well in an emergency. Since every scenario
United States Department of the Interior
United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 IN REPLY REFER TO: DIRECTOR'S ORDER #55: INCIDENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Effective Date: Sunset Date:
Page Administrative Summary...3 Introduction Comprehensive Approach Conclusion
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Administrative Summary...3 Introduction Comprehensive Approach Conclusion PART 1: PLANNING General Considerations and Planning Guidelines... 4 Policy Group Oversight Committee Extended
ON-SITE INCIDENT MANAGEMENT
ON-SITE INCIDENT MANAGEMENT Capability Definition Onsite Incident is the capability to effectively direct and control incident activities by using the Incident Command System (ICS) consistent with the
Lesson 1: What Is the National Incident Management System (NIMS)? Summary of Lesson Content
Lesson 1: What Is the National Incident Management System (NIMS)? Lesson Overview On February 28, 2003, President Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5. HSPD 5 directed the Secretary of
Western Washington University Basic Plan 2013. A part of Western s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
2013 A part of Western s Record of Changes Change # Date Entered Description and Location of Change(s) Person making changes 2 1. PURPOSE, SCOPE, SITUATION OVERVIEW, ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS A. PURPOSE
NIMS Study Guide. Lesson One: What Is the National Incident Management System (NIMS)? What is NIMS?
NIMS Study Guide Lesson One: What Is the National Incident Management System (NIMS)? What is NIMS? NIMS is a comprehensive, national approach to incident management that is applicable at all jurisdictional
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KANSAS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. ESF14-Long Term Community Recovery
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KANSAS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ESF14-Long Term Community Recovery Planning Team Support Agency Coffeyville Public Works Independence Public Works Montgomery County Public Works 1/15/2009
Houston County Emergency Management Agency Emergency Operations Plan
County Emergency Management Agency Emergency Operations Plan Plan Approved: 30-OCT-09 Revised: 06-NOV-09 Please insert your local resolution here. RECORD OF REVISIONS Date Author Section Detail 10-30-2009
All-Hazard Continuity of Operations Plan. [Department/College Name] [Date]
d All-Hazard Continuity of Operations Plan [Department/College Name] [Date] TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: INTRODUCTION... 3 Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 3 Goal... 4 Purpose... 4 Objectives...
NIMS ICS 100.HCb. Instructions
NIMS ICS 100.HCb Instructions This packet contains the NIMS 100 Study Guide and the Test Questions for the NIMS 100 final exam. Please review the Study Guide. Next, take the paper test - record your answers
ANNEX A WARNING PROMULGATION STATEMENT
ANNEX A WARNING PROMULGATION STATEMENT Annex A: Warning, and contents within, is a guide to how the University issues warnings of emergency situations to the campus community. The Annex is written in support
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2020: PRIORITY ACTIONS
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2020: PRIORITY ACTIONS INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to list the aligned with each in the Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan 2015-2020 (THSSP).
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX 3 REFERENCES
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX 3 REFERENCES The City of Kent Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan was developed and is maintained pursuant to, but not limited
University of California San Francisco Emergency Response Management Plan PART 1 PART 1 OVERVIEW OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.
PART 1 OVERVIEW OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 UCSF Description... 1-1 Relationship to local, state & federal emergency Mgt Agencies... 1-2 Emergency Management Model...
PART 2 LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEMS, LAWS, AND AUTHORITIES. Table of Contents
PART 2 LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEMS, LAWS, AND AUTHORITIES (Updates in Yellow Highlight) Table of Contents Authorities: Federal, State, Local... 2-1 UCSF s Emergency ManagemenT
Search & Rescue Merit Badge
FEMA Course IS-100b Introduction to the Incident Command System for Search & Rescue Merit Badge Visual 1.1 Search & Rescue Merit Badge (requirement #5) Complete the training for ICS-100, Introduction to
ESF 14. Long-Term Community Recovery
1. Purpose This annex provides an overview of the general process to be followed in recovering from the economic results of a natural disaster or other major emergency that may impact Coos County. It outlines
Emergency Response Plan
Emergency Response Plan Public Version Contents INTRODUCTION... 4 SCOPE... 5 DEFINITION OF AN EMERGENCY... 5 AUTHORITY... 6 ACTION PRIOR TO DECLARATION... 6 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION & PRIVACY PROTECTION...
South Puget Sound Community College Emergency Operations Plan Annex H RECOVERY
I. PURPOSE South Puget Sound Community College Emergency Operations Plan Annex H RECOVERY The purpose of this annex is to provide a process to facilitate the College s transition from a disaster situation
ESF 12: Energy & Utilities
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Purpose... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 1.3 ESF Activation & Plan Maintenance... 2 1.4 Policies... 2 2.0 Situation & Assumptions... 2 2.1 Situation... 2 2.2 Assumptions...
Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management. Preparedness Standards for Emergency Management in Texas TDEM-100
Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management Preparedness Standards for Emergency Management in Texas June 2000 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Requests for additional copies of
Draft 8/1/05 SYSTEM First Rev. 8/9/05 2 nd Rev. 8/30/05 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
Draft 8/1/05 SYSTEM First Rev. 8/9/05 2 nd Rev. 8/30/05 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE - The University of Hawaii System Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) provides procedures for managing
ANNEX J INSTITUTIONAL CONTINUITY PLAN
ANNEX J INSTITUTIONAL CONTINUITY PLAN PROMULGATION STATEMENT Annex J: Institutional Continuity Plan, and contents within, is a guide to how the University operates and resumes normal functions during an
ESF-9 LAW ENFORCEMENT
ESF-9 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTENTS PAGE I. PURPOSE ESF 9.1 II. SITUATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS ESF 9.1 A. Situations ESF 9.1 B. Assumptions ESF 9.1 III. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ESF 9.2 A. General ESF 9.2 B. Operational
UNION COLLEGE INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN
UNION COLLEGE INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN The college is committed to supporting the safety and welfare of all its students, faculty, staff and visitors. It also consists of academic, research and other facilities,
B E F O R E T H E E M E R G E N C Y
B E F O R E T H E E M E R G E N C Y RESPONSIBILITY / LIABILITY for Homeland Security / Emergency Management Duty of Care - Counties and Cities ARE responsible for the safety of their citizens. Following
Colorado College. Emergency Management Plan
Colorado College Emergency Management Plan An Emergency Preparedness Message from the President of Colorado College Dear Colorado College Community: As we learned this past summer in the cases of the Waldo
BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLANNING
Policy 8.3.2 Business Responsible Party: President s Office BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLANNING Overview The UT Health Science Center at San Antonio (Health Science Center) is committed to its employees, students,
ESF 8. Public Health and Medical Services
ESF 8 Public Health and Medical Services This page left blank intentionally. 1 Introduction Emergency Support Function 8 ensures that the following services are provided to disaster victims and emergency
Cornell University PREPAREDNESS PLAN
Cornell University PREPAREDNESS PLAN Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TRAINING, TESTING, AND EXERCISES...2 1.1 National Incident Management System Training...2
Table of Contents ESF-12-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 2 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
Green Mountain College EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND RECOVERY PLAN
Green Mountain College EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND RECOVERY PLAN INTRODUCTION Green Mountain College recognizes that one measure of an organization's strength is its ability to respond well in an emergency.
Emergency Operations Plan ANNEX K - UTILITIES RESTORATION ESF #3, #12 I. MNWALK REQUIREMENTS. Item #: 1, 4, 46, 53, 54
ANNEX K - UTILITIES RESTORATION ESF #3, #12 I. MNWALK REQUIREMENTS Item #: 1, 4, 46, 53, 54 II. PURPOSE The purpose of this annex is to describe the organization, operational concepts and responsibilities
Table of Contents ESF-3-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 3 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
Georgia Emergency Operations Plan. Emergency Support Function # 5 Annex Emergency Management
Emergency Support Function # 5 Annex Emergency Management 2015 Emergency Support Function #5 E S F C o o r d i nator and Support Ag e n c i e s ESF C oordi na t or Georgia Emergency Management Agency/Homeland
Introduction. Catastrophic Incident Annex. Cooperating Agencies: Coordinating Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Catastrophic Incident Annex Coordinating Agency: Department of Homeland Security Cooperating Agencies: All Federal departments and agencies (and other organizations) with assigned primary or supporting
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN Revised 3/17/08 (abridged)
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN Revised 3/17/08 (abridged) This document is a synopsis of the planning and preparation the College has undertaken to handle emergencies in a professional, efficient,
Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services
Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services March 2014 MT DPHHS Emergency Operations Plan March 2014 v.7 Page 1 Record of Change Date Description of Change Initials November ALB Total rewrite
Continuity of Operations Plan Template
Continuity of Operations Plan Template Office of Water (4608-T) EPA 817-B-14-007 November 2014 Please note: The golden key sticky notes located throughout the template provide additional information and
Emergency Operations Plan Executive Summary
The City of Palmdale Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) was written in compliance with California s Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the National Incident Management System (NIMS) guidelines,
State of Utah Emergency Operations Plan. APPENDIX #1 TO ESF #11 Cultural Property
State of Utah Emergency Operations Plan APPENDIX #1 TO ESF #11 Cultural Property Lead Agencies: Department of Agriculture and Food/ESF #11 Support Agencies: Lead Support Agency The Cultural Property Team
Final Exam for: IS-700.a: National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction
Final Exam for: IS-700.a: National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction Each time that this test is taken online, questions and answers are scrambled to protect the integrity of the exam Completion
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS List of Tables...vii List of Figures...vii What Is the National Incident Management System?...1 PREFACE... 3 INTRODUCTION
Plan Development and Review Guidance for local Emergency Operations Plans
Nancy J. Dragani, Executive Director Ohio Emergency Management Agency 2855 West Dublin-Granville Road Columbus, Ohio 43235-2206 www.ema.ohio.gov Plan Development and Review Guidance for local Emergency
CAPABILITY 3: Emergency Operations Coordination
Emergency operations coordination is the ability to direct and support an event 38 or incident 39 with public health or medical implications by establishing a standardized, scalable system of oversight,
PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
Ohio University PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN September 2014 Maintained by Emergency Programs in Risk Management and Safety Table of Contents I. Plan Authorization.... 3 II. Executive Summary....
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
VI. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION General 1. The overall responsibility for emergency preparedness rests with government on all levels, including all agencies of state, county and city in coordination
Alabama Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan
Alabama Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan Emergency Support Function (ESF) #1 - Transportation Primary Support Agency: Support Agencies: Secondary Agencies: Transportation Public Safety Military
ANNEXS TRANSPORTATION
ANNEXS TRANSPORTATION Brazos County Interjurisdictional Emergency Management January 2013 Ver 2.0 APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Annex S Transportation This annex is hereby approved for implementation and supersedes
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN. Emergency Planning Guidelines for the University of Indianapolis
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Emergency Planning Guidelines for the University of Indianapolis February 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Letter of Promulgation University
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH BASIC DISASTER PLAN
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH BASIC DISASTER PLAN I. BASIC PLAN A. PURPOSE This document establishes a framework through which the City of Myrtle Beach may prevent or mitigate the impacts of, prepare for, respond
ElizabEth City StatE ECSU. EmErgENcy OpErAtiONs plan
ElizabEth City StatE U n i v E r S i t y ECSU EmErgENcy OpErAtiONs plan ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN 2014 Elizabeth City State University Emergency Operations Plan Page intentionally
ANNEX 3 ESF-3 - PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING. SC Budget and Control Board, Division of Procurement Services, Materials Management Office
ANNEX 3 ESF-3 - PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING PRIMARY: SUPPORT: SC Budget and Control Board, Division of Procurement Services, Materials Management Office Clemson University Regulatory and Public Service
DEFINITIONS: Active shooter refers to an offender actively shooting causing death and great bodily harm to persons.
University of Wisconsin Madison Police Policy: 46.1 SUBJECT: CRITICAL INCIDENTS-UNIVERSITY RESPONSE PLAN EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/01/10 REVISED DATE: 11/01/14, 05/15/15 REVIEWED DATE: 06/01/12 INDEX: 46.1.1
Massachusetts Department of Fire Services Implementation Plan for State and Local Level National Incident Management Systems (NIMS)
Massachusetts Department of Fire Services Implementation Plan for State and Local Level National Incident Management Systems (NIMS) June 2005 Incident Commander Public Information Officer Safety Officer
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (revised June 2012)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (revised June 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 2 1. Objectives and Priorities 2. Review and Assessment Authority... 3 Supporting Documentation... 4 Key Terms and Roles...
ICS for LAUSD EOC and DOC Operation
ICS for LAUSD EOC and DOC Operation Below is some background information on the Incident Command System (used at our schools and in other field operations) and how it applies in an EOC environment. From
TOWN OF MINETTO COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
TOWN OF MINETTO COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Advisory: This plan represents general guidelines that can be modified by the Incident Commander in the field as appropriate. This plan does not
Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management. Local Emergency Management Planning Guide. TDEM-10 Revision 4
Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management Local Emergency Management Planning Guide TDEM-10 Revision 4 January 2008 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Requests for additional copies
The Role of Elected Officials During Disasters. The Florida Division of Emergency Management
The Role of Elected Officials During Disasters The Florida Division of Emergency Management Bryan W. Koon Director Florida Division of Emergency Management Introduction Florida s elected officials play
PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE. Functional Coordinator: Fire Chiefs
Option for Public Safety or Tasks can be combined with Law Enforcement depending on jurisdiction PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE Functional Coordinator: Fire Chiefs Purpose This function provides procedures for preparedness,
ANNEX P HAZARD MITIGATION
ANNEX P HAZARD MITIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNEX P MITIGATION COVER... i AUTHORITY & IMPLEMENTATION... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS... iii 1. AUTHORITY...1 2 PURPOSE...1 3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS...1
Maryland Emergency Operations Plan
Maryland Emergency Operations Plan Purpose The purpose of the Maryland Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is to outline an approach and designate responsibilities intended to minimize the consequences of
UCF Office of Emergency Management. 2013-2018 Strategic Plan
UCF Office of Emergency Management 2013-2018 Strategic Plan Table of Contents I. Introduction... 2 Purpose... 2 Overview... 3 Mission... 5 Vision... 5 II. Mandates... 6 III. Accomplishments and Challenges...
Pike County General Health District. Emergency Response Plan
Pike County General Health District Emergency Response Plan Updated October 2014 Basic Plan Primary Agency Support Agencies Introduction Purpose Scope Phases of Emergency Management Situations Assumptions
LAW ENFORCEMENT ESF 16
ESF 16 ESF 16: Law Enforcement Page 1 of 13 ESF 16 Primary Agency: Baca County Sheriffs Office Support Agencies: Springfield Police Department Walsh Police Department Campo Police Department Colorado State
NAIT Guidelines. Implementation Date: February 15, 2011 Replaces: July 1, 2008. Table of Contents. Section Description Page
Recommended by Emergency Preparedness Committee: January 26, 2011 Recommended by President s Council: February 11, 2011 Approved by Executive Committee: February 14, 2011 NAIT Guidelines CS1.1 Emergency
Hospital Emergency Operations Plan
Hospital Emergency Operations Plan I-1 Emergency Management Plan I PURPOSE The mission of University Hospital of Brooklyn (UHB) is to improve the health of the people of Kings County by providing cost-effective,
Emergency Support Function #13 PUBLIC SAFETY & SECURITY. Policies
Emergency Support Function #13 PUBLIC SAFETY & SECURITY Lead Agency Virginia State Police (VSP) Support Agencies and Organizations Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Department of Conservation
NEBRASKA STATE HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY
NEBRASKA STATE HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY 2014-2016 Nebraska Homeland Security Policy Group/Senior Advisory Council This document provides an overall framework for what the State of Nebraska hopes to achieve
Emergency Management Plan. Basic Plan
Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan June 2011 Chapter 1 Basic Plan I. Letter of Promulgation June 2011 Page 1 1 II. Purpose, Scope, Situations, and Assumptions A. Purpose and Scope 1. This basic plan
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT PLAN
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY 2009 Public Web Version Getting Help Immediately Any situation requiring immediate response from police, fire, or emergency medical services to preserve
SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Sharon L. Contreras, Superintendent of Schools Effective Date: September 2014 1 Table of Contents Contents Section I. Introduction:... 4 1.1 Purpose...
All. Presidential Directive (HSPD) 7, Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection, and as they relate to the NRF.
Coordinating Agency: Department of Homeland Security Cooperating Agencies: All INTRODUCTION Purpose Scope This annex describes the policies, responsibilities, and concept of operations for Federal incident
MESA COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
MESA COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN 09/01/2013 Mesa County Emergency Operations Plan The Mesa County Emergency Operations Plan is an all-discipline, all-hazards plan that establishes a single, comprehensive
H Functional Annex Emergency Medical Services Resource Management
H Functional Annex Emergency Medical Services Resource Management Approved (April 20, 2007) This page left blank intentionally Table of Contents 1 Purpose... 3 2 Situation and Assumptions... 3 2.1 Situation...
For Official Use Only. Springfield-Greene County, Missouri Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan 2016-2018 (TEP) July 27, 2015. For Official Use Only
For Official Use Only Springfield-Greene County, Missouri Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan 2016-2018 (TEP) July 27, 2015 For Official Use Only SPRINGFIELD-GREENE COUNTY Point of Contact Erin Pope
Walla Walla County CEMP BASIC PLAN
BASIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION A. Mission Coordinate and facilitate resources to minimize the impacts of disasters and emergencies on people, property, the environment and the economy of Walla Walla County.
NIMS IMPLEMENTATION FOR HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS GUIDANCE
NIMS IMPLEMENTATION FOR HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS GUIDANCE BACKGROUND Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-5, Management of Domestic Incidents, called for the establishment of a single, comprehensive
Emergency Quick Reference Guide
Township of Rideau Lakes - Emergency Response Plan 1 Emergency Quick Reference Guide Upon the arrival of three or more members, the Community Control Group (CCG) may initiate its function. Ensure that
University of Prince Edward Island. Emergency Management Plan
Emergency Management Plan March 2012 ON CAMPUS Emergency Dial Security Assistance Dial 566-0384 OFF CAMPUS SUPPORT AGENCIES Fire & Ambulance... 9-1-1 Charlottetown Fire Department... 566-5548 Fire Marshal...
Submitted By Dutchess County Emergency Response Coordinator John Murphy Date:
THE DUTCHESS COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE FIRE ~ RESCUE ~ EMS MUTUAL AID PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF DUTCHESS RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION BY: DUTCHESS COUNTY FIRE AND SAFETY ADVISORY BOARD ORIGINAL DATED
MANITOBA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Ver. 2.1
SCHEDULE 1 MANITOBA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Ver. 2.1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Emergency Response Most emergencies are resolved within a comparatively short time by emergency responders attending
ANNEX B COMMUNICATIONS
ANNEX B COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Annex B Communications This emergency management plan is hereby approved. This plan is effective immediately and supersedes all previous editions. Jeff
OPERATIONAL AREA FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION SECTION Function Specific Handbook
STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APPROVED COURSE OF INSTRUCTION EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER COURSE G611 OPERATIONAL AREA FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION SECTION Function Specific Handbook CHAPTER THREE
Business Continuity Planning Toolkit. (For Deployment of BCP to Campus Departments in Phase 2)
Business Continuity Planning Toolkit (For Deployment of BCP to Campus Departments in Phase 2) August 2010 CONTENTS: Background Assumptions Business Impact Analysis Risk (Vulnerabilities) Assessment Backup
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN Revised 1/2016 (abridged)
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN Revised 1/2016 (abridged) This document is a synopsis of the planning and preparation the College has undertaken to handle emergencies in a professional, efficient,
