Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
|
|
|
- Jemimah Nichols
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1. Purpose. a. This Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") has been adopted by the Singapore Network Information Centre (SGNIC) Private Limited ("SGNIC") as the registration authority for the Singapore country code top level domain ("Singapore cctld"). b. The Policy is incorporated by reference into the Domain Name Registration Agreement between SGNIC and the registrant or domain name holder of a ".sg" Internet domain name (the "Registrant"), and sets out the terms and conditions governing how a dispute between the Registrant and any party other than SGNIC over the registration and use of the Registrant's ".sg" Internet domain name are to be resolved. c. Any party who wishes to rely on this Policy, or who participates in an administrative proceeding under Paragraph 4 of this Policy, must abide by the terms of this Policy. d. Administrative proceedings under Paragraph 4 of this Policy will be conducted according to the Rules for the Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules of Procedure") and the Supplemental Rules for the Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules") issued jointly by the Singapore Mediation Centre ("SMC") and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ("SIAC") as the joint operators of the secretariat established to provide the administrative dispute resolution service under this Policy. 2. The Registrant's Representations. By applying to register a domain name, or by asking SGNIC to maintain or renew a domain name registration, the Registrant represents and warrants to SGNIC that: a. the statements that the Registrant made in the Registrant's Application Form for Registration of Domain Name are complete and accurate; b. to the Registrant's knowledge, the registration of the domain name will not infringe upon or otherwise violate the rights of any third party; c. the Registrant is not registering the domain name for an unlawful purpose; and d. the Registrant will not knowingly use the domain name in violation of any applicable laws or regulations. It is the Registrant's responsibility to determine whether the Registrant's domain name registration infringes or violates someone else's rights. 3. Cancellations, Transfers, and Changes. (Version 1 6 November 2001)
2 a. SGNIC will cancel, transfer or otherwise make changes to domain name registrations under the following circumstances: (i) subject to the provisions of Paragraph 8, SGNIC's receipt of written or appropriate electronic instructions from the Registrant or the Registrant's authorized agent to take such action; (ii) SGNIC's receipt of an order from a court in Singapore requiring such action; and/or (iii) SGNIC's receipt of a decision of an Administrative Panel requiring such action in any administrative proceeding to which the Registrant was a party and which was conducted under this Policy or a later version of this Policy adopted by SGNIC. (See Paragraphs 4(i) and (k) below.) b. SGNIC may also cancel, transfer or otherwise make changes to a domain name registration in accordance with the terms of the Registrant's Domain Name Registration Agreement or other legal requirements. 4. Mandatory Administrative Proceeding. This Paragraph sets out the type of disputes for which the Registrant is required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding. These proceedings will be conducted before an Administrative Panel appointed by the secretariat established and operated by the SMC and the SIAC to provide the administrative dispute resolution service under this Policy (the "Provider"). a. Applicable Disputes. The Registrant is required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding in the event that a third party (a "Complainant") asserts to the Provider, in compliance with the Rules of Procedure, that: (i) the Registrant's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name, trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Registrant has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain (iii) name; and the Registrant's domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith. In the administrative proceeding, the Complainant must prove that each of these three elements is present. If the Complainant proves that each of these three elements is present, the Complainant shall be entitled to the remedies set out in Paragraph 4(i). b. Evidence of Registration and use in Bad Faith. For the purposes of Paragraph 4(a)(iii), the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the Administrative Panel to be present, shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith: (i) circumstances indicating that the Registrant has registered or acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the Complainant, who bears the name or is the owner of the trademark or service mark, or to a competitor of that Complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of the Registrant's documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name; (ii) the Registrant has registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner (Version 1 6 November 2001) 2
3 (iii) (iv) of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that the Registrant has engaged in a pattern of such conduct; the Registrant has registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor; or by using the domain name, the Registrant has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to the Registrant's website or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant's name or mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the Registrant's website or location or of a product or service on the Registrant's website or location. c. How to Demonstrate the Registrant's Rights to and Legitimate Interests in the Domain Name in Responding to a Complaint. When the Registrant receives a complaint, the Registrant should refer to Paragraph 5 of the Rules of Procedure in determining how the Registrant's response should be prepared. Any of the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the Administrative Panel to be proved based on its evaluation of all evidence presented, shall demonstrate the Registrant's rights to or legitimate interests in the domain name for the purposes of Paragraph 4(a)(ii): (i) before any notice to the Registrant of the dispute, the Registrant's use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; (ii) the Registrant (as an individual, business, or other organization) has been commonly known by the domain name, even if the Registrant has acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or (iii) the Registrant is making a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue. d. Initiation of Administrative Proceeding and Process and Appointment of Administrative Panel. The Rules of Procedure state the process for initiating and conducting an administrative proceeding and for appointing the panel that will decide the dispute (the "Administrative Panel"). e. Choice of Procedure. The Complainant and the Registrant will be invited to consider whether they wish to have the dispute mediated by the Administrative Panel before the Administrative Panel is called upon to decide the dispute. (i) (ii) (iii) If both the Complainant and the Registrant agree to have the dispute mediated by the Administrative Panel before the Administrative Panel is called upon to decide the dispute, the Administrative Panel will facilitate discussions between the parties to help them resolve the dispute amicably. If either the Complainant or the Registrant does not wish to have the dispute mediated by the Administrative Panel, the dispute will not be mediated and the Administrative Panel will decide the dispute. If the parties agree on a settlement, whether as a result of mediation by the (Version 1 6 November 2001) 3
4 Administrative Panel or otherwise, and the parties consent to having the terms of the settlement reflected in a decision of the Administrative Panel, the Administrative Panel shall render a decision that is consistent with the terms of the settlement and state that the decision is made pursuant to a settlement between the parties. If the parties agree on a settlement, whether as a result of mediation by the Administrative Panel or otherwise, but any party does not consent to having the terms of the settlement reflected in a decision of the Administrative Panel, the Administrative Panel (or, if the Administrative Panel has not been appointed yet, the Provider) shall terminate the administrative proceeding, such termination to be without prejudice to the initiation of another administrative proceeding in respect of the same matter. (iv) If the parties fail to reach an agreement after mediation by the Administrative Panel, and the parties do not agree that the dispute may be decided by the Administrative Panel that mediated the dispute, the Administrative Panel shall terminate the administrative proceeding, such termination to be without prejudice to the initiation of another administrative proceeding by the Complainant in respect of the same matter, with a request that the Provider appoint a different Administrative Panel to decide the dispute. If the parties fail to reach an agreement after mediation by the Administrative Panel, but the parties agree that the dispute may be decided by the Administrative Panel that mediated the dispute, the Administrative Panel shall proceed to decide the dispute. f. Consolidation. In the event of multiple disputes between the Registrant and a Complainant, either the Registrant or the Complainant may apply to consolidate the disputes before a single Administrative Panel. This application shall be made to the Provider before the Provider appoints different Administrative Panels to hear different pending disputes between the parties. The Provider may consolidate any or all such disputes in its sole discretion, provided that the disputes being consolidated are governed by this Policy or a later version of this Policy. g. Fees. All fees charged by the Provider in connection with any dispute before an Administrative Panel pursuant to this Policy shall be paid by the Complainant, except in cases where the Registrant elects to expand the Administrative Panel from one to three panellists as provided in Paragraph 5(b)(iv) of the Rules of Procedure, in which case all fees will be split evenly by the Registrant and the Complainant. h. SGNIC's Involvement in Administrative Proceedings. SGNIC does not, and will not, participate in the administration or conduct of any proceeding before an Administrative Panel. In addition, SGNIC will not be liable as a result of any decisions rendered by an Administrative Panel. i. Remedies. The remedies available to a Complainant pursuant to any proceeding before an Administrative Panel shall be limited to requiring the cancellation of the Registrant's domain name or the transfer of the Registrant's domain name registration to the Complainant. j. Notification and Publication. The Provider shall notify SGNIC of any decision made by an Administrative Panel with respect to a domain name that the (Version 1 6 November 2001) 4
5 Registrant has registered with SGNIC. All decisions under this Policy will be published in full over the Internet, except when an Administrative Panel decides in an exceptional case to edit portions of its decision. k. Availability of Court Proceedings. The mandatory administrative proceeding requirements set forth in Paragraph 4 shall not prevent either the Registrant or the Complainant from submitting the dispute to a Singapore court for independent resolution. However, the Registrant and the Complainant shall not commence any court proceedings in respect of the Registrant's domain name while an administrative proceeding is pending in respect of that domain name. If an Administrative Panel decides that the Registrant's domain name registration should be cancelled or transferred, SGNIC will wait ten (10) working days ("working day" means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday) after SGNIC is informed by the Provider of the Administrative Panel's decision before implementing that decision. SGNIC will then implement the decision unless SGNIC has received from the Registrant during that ten (10) working day period a sealed copy of a writ of summons or an originating summons showing that the Registrant has commenced a lawsuit against the Complainant in Singapore in respect of the domain name. If SGNIC receives such documentation within the ten (10) working day period, SGNIC will not implement the Administrative Panel's decision, and SGNIC will take no further action, until SGNIC receives: (i) evidence satisfactory to SGNIC of a resolution between the parties; (ii) evidence satisfactory to SGNIC that the Registrant's lawsuit has been dismissed or withdrawn; or (iii) a copy of an order from a Singapore court dismissing the Registrant's lawsuit or ordering that the Registrant does not have the right to continue to use the domain name. l. Nature of Administrative Proceeding. For avoidance of doubt: (i) an administrative proceeding is not an arbitration but an alternative dispute resolution mechanism for resolving disputes over the registration and use of ".sg" Internet domain names; (ii) the submission of a dispute to an administrative proceeding does not constitute a submission of the dispute to arbitration; and (ii) the Policy, the Rules of Procedure and the Supplemental Rules do not constitute an arbitration agreement or procedural rules for arbitration. 5. All Other Disputes and Litigation. All other disputes between the Registrant and any party other than SGNIC regarding the Registrant's domain name registration that are not brought pursuant to the mandatory administrative proceeding provisions of Paragraph 4 shall be resolved between the Registrant and such other party through any court, arbitration or other proceedings that may be available. 6. SGNIC's Involvement in Disputes. (Version 1 6 November 2001) 5
6 SGNIC will not participate in any way in any dispute between the Registrant and any party other than SGNIC regarding the registration and use of the Registrant's domain name. The Registrant shall not name SGNIC as a party or otherwise include SGNIC in any such proceeding. In the event that SGNIC is named as a party in any such proceeding, SGNIC reserves the right to raise any and all defences deemed appropriate, and to take any other action necessary to defend itself. 7. Maintaining the Status Quo. SGNIC will not cancel, transfer, activate, deactivate, or otherwise change the status of any domain name registration under this Policy except as provided in Paragraph 3 above. 8. Transfers During a Dispute. The Registrant shall not transfer a domain name registration to another holder: (i) during a pending administrative proceeding brought pursuant to Paragraph 4 or for a period of fifteen (15) working days ("working day" means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday) after such proceeding is concluded; or (ii) during a pending court proceeding or arbitration commenced regarding the domain name, unless the party to whom the domain name registration is being transferred agrees, in writing, to be bound by the decision of the court or arbitrator. SGNIC reserves the right to cancel any transfer of a domain name registration to another holder that is made in violation of this paragraph. 9. Policy Modifications. SGNIC reserves the right to modify this Policy at any time. SGNIC will post its revised Policy at at least thirty (30) calendar days before it becomes effective. Unless this Policy has already been invoked by the submission of a complaint to the Provider, in which event the version of this Policy in effect at the time it was invoked will apply to the Registrant until the dispute is over, all such changes will be binding upon the Registrant with respect to any domain name registration dispute, whether the dispute arose before, on or after the effective date of SGNIC's change. In the event that the Registrant objects to a change in this Policy, the Registrant's sole remedy is to cancel the Registrant's domain name registration with SGNIC, provided that the Registrant will not be entitled to a refund of any fees that the Registrant has paid to SGNIC. The revised Policy will apply to the Registrant until the Registrant cancels the Registrant's domain name registration. (Version 1 6 November 2001) 6
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Copyright 2011 Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (ictqatar) Table of Contents 1. Definitions... 4 2. Purpose... 4 3. Your Representations... 5 4.
1. This policy is now in effect. See www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-schedule.htm for the implementation schedule.
Policy Adopted: August 26, 1999 Implementation Documents Approved: October 24, 1999 Notes: 1. This policy is now in effect. See www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-schedule.htm for the implementation schedule. 2.
UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY FOR.TZ
UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY FOR.TZ 1. Purpose and application. This Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.tz (the "Policy") has been adopted and is incorporated in the Registration
THE POLICY. 2003-2013 MYNIC BERHAD. All rights reserved.
MYNIC'S (.my) DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY THE POLICY 2003-2013 MYNIC BERHAD. All rights reserved. MYNIC's (.my) Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy THE POLICY 1. Purpose 1.1 MYNIC's (.my) Domain
In the context of these regulations, the following definitions apply: the list of potential panelists published by the center;
These Dispute Resolution Regulations for.nl Domain Names came into effect on February 28, 2008 and were most recently amended on March 4, 2010. From that first date, any registrant of a.nl domain name
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY 1.0 Title: Reserve Names Challenge Policy Version Control: 1.0 Date of Implementation: 2015-03-16 2.0 Summary This Reserved Names Challenge Policy (the Policy ) has been
Chapter I. 1. Purpose. 2. Your Representations. 3. Cancellations. 4. Mandatory Administrative Proceeding. dotversicherung-registry GmbH
Chapter I.versicherung Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.versicherung. 2. The
Rules for the Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules")
(the "Rules") Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy shall be governed by these Rules and also by the Supplemental Rules for
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Version 1.3 (August 22, 2011) PARAGRAPH 1 INTRODUCTION
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Version 1.3 (August 22, 2011) PARAGRAPH 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) is to provide
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Rules
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Copyright 2011 Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (ictqatar) Table of Contents Rules for Qatar Domains Registry Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy...
CIRA POLICIES, RULES, AND PROCEDURES
CIRA POLICIES, RULES, AND PROCEDURES CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Version 1.2 PARAGRAPH 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this CIRA Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) is to
.ME. Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") (As approved by domen on November 13, 2015)
.ME Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") (As approved by domen on November 13, 2015) Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Uniform Dispute
KENYA NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE ALTERNATIVE DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
KENYA NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE ALTERNATIVE DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I... 4 Definitions Interpretation and Applications... 4 Definitions and Interpretation... 4 Application...
Chinese Domain Names Dispute Resolution Policy. (Trial Implementation)
Chinese Domain Names Dispute Resolution Policy (Trial Implementation) (Promulgated by the China Internet Network Information Center on November 1 2000 and effective as of 30 days after promulgation.) Article
THE RULES. 2003-2013 MYNIC BERHAD. All rights reserved.
MYNIC'S (.my) DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY THE RULES 2003-2013 MYNIC BERHAD. All rights reserved. MYNIC's (.my) Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy THE RULES 1. General 1.1 All domain name disputes
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Net2Phone Inc. vs. Basheer Hallak Case No. D2000-0665 1. The Parties Complainant is Net2Phone Inc., a Delaware Corporation, located at
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") As approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 30 October 2009.
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") As approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 30 October 2009. These Rules are in effect for all UDRP proceedings in which a complaint
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Hennion & Walsh, Inc. v. Robert Isom Claim Number: FA0712001118409
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Hennion & Walsh, Inc. v. Robert Isom Claim Number: FA0712001118409 PARTIES Complainant is Hennion & Walsh, Inc. ( Complainant ), represented by Debbie Williams, 2001
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. American Society of Plumbing Engineers v. Lee Youngho Claim Number: FA0701000882390
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION American Society of Plumbing Engineers v. Lee Youngho Claim Number: FA0701000882390 PARTIES Complainant is American Society of Plumbing Engineers ( Complainant ), represented
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sanofi v. Domain Manager, eweb Development Group / ProxyTech Privacy Services Inc. / Privacy Manager Case No.
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sanofi v. Domain Manager, eweb Development Group / ProxyTech Privacy Services Inc. / Privacy Manager Case No. D2014-1185 1. The Parties Complainant
Domain Names & Trademarks: UDRP Fundamentals in the Context. Christopher R. Smith and Garrett M. Weber
Domain Names & Trademarks: UDRP Fundamentals in the Context of Real-World Cases Christopher R. Smith and Garrett M. Weber Internet Structure Basics ICANN -Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
Administration and Dispute Resolution of.hk Domain Names. By: Jonathan Shea CEO of HKIRC/HKDNR
Administration and Dispute Resolution of.hk Domain Names By: Jonathan Shea CEO of HKIRC/HKDNR Outline Administration of the.hk Domain Name About HKIRC and HKDNR.hk Domain Name Categories Chinese Domain
Artisan Metal Works. and. Mr. Dave Bennett
PO Box 2502 Grand Cayman KY1-1104 CAYMAN ISLANDS Tel: (345) 946-ICTA (4282) Fax: (345) 945-8284 Web: www.icta.ky.ky DISPUTE RESOLUTION Information and Communications Technology Authority (the 'Authority'
TABLE OF CONTENTS UDRP FUNDAMENTALS: NAVIGATING DOMAIN NAME TRADEMARK DISPUTES I. OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM DOMAIN-NAME DISPUTE-RESOLUTION POLICY...
UDRP FUNDAMENTALS: NAVIGATING DOMAIN NAME TRADEMARK DISPUTES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM DOMAIN-NAME DISPUTE-RESOLUTION POLICY.... 2 A. Internet Structure Basics.... 2 B. The UDRP and
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Rules Version 1.5 (July 28, 2014)
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Rules Version 1.5 (July 28, 2014) Proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ), shall be governed by
THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES and SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THE CANADIAN DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION SYSTEM. David Allsebrook LudlowLaw
THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES and SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THE CANADIAN DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION SYSTEM. David Allsebrook LudlowLaw Since January 1, 2000 a fast, inexpensive arbitration
.eu Domain Name Registration Terms and Conditions
.eu Domain Name Registration Terms and Conditions 1/15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents...2 Definitions...3 Object and Scope...5 Section 1. Eligibility Requirements...5 Section 2. First Come, First
Complaint Policy and Procedure
Complaint Policy and Procedure Policy Statement This policy is intended to provide fair and prompt consideration to all staff complaints. The University encourages all staff to use the complaint procedure
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Aeropostale, Inc. v. Private Registration (name) c/o Private Registration (name) Claim Number: FA0912001296979
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Aeropostale, Inc. v. Private Registration (name) c/o Private Registration (name) Claim Number: FA0912001296979 PARTIES Complainant is Aeropostale, Inc. ( Complainant
Domain Name Disputes in India
Domain Name Disputes in India This document is an extract from the book IPR & Cyberspace Indian Perspective authored by Rohas Nagpal. This book is available as courseware for the Diploma in Cyber Law and
1. "The Procedure" means the Trademark Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PDDRP).
THE ASIAN DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES TO THE INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS (ICANN) TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE AND PDDRP RULES
.eu Domain Name Registration. Terms and Conditions
.eu Domain Name Registration Terms and Conditions 1/15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... 2 Definitions...... 3 Object and Scope... 5 Section 1. Eligibility Requirements... 5 Section 2. First Come,
Domain Name Disputes: How to Get the Bad Guys Off Your Domain
Domain Name Disputes: How to Get the Bad Guys Off Your Domain By Karen McDaniel and Rebecca Bishop Introduction In times of great exploration, there always seem to be those who wish to share in the bounty
CHAPTER NINE DISPUTES SETTLEMENT ARTICLE 187 Scope of the Chapter The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the settlement of disputes concerning
CHAPTER NINE DISPUTES SETTLEMENT ARTICLE 187 Scope of the Chapter The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Treaty, including:
Independent Arbitration Service for Micro-Business Disputes (RECC) May 2015 Edition
May 2015 Edition 1. Introduction 1.1 The Renewable Energy Consumer Code (the Code) sets out the standards applicable to the selling or leasing of small-scale heat and power generators, whether from renewable
Misappropriation of Trademarks on the Internet
SM Misappropriation of Trademarks on the Internet September 14, 2010 2010 Patterson Thuente Christensen Pedersen, P.A., some rights reserved - www.ptslaw.com DISCLAIMER: This presentation and any information
MEDIATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MEDIATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 Introductory provisions 1. Prior to commencement of proceedings before an arbitration court or common court, or during the
HOURLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT
4245 Kemp Blvd., Suite 1007 Wichita Falls, Texas 76308 HOURLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT This is an agreement between Personal Money Planning ( Advisor ), and ( Client ). By this agreement, Client retains Advisor
1.2 Applicant means an entity who submits an application for registration.
REGISTRATION OF DOMAIN NAMES The BermudaNIC Registrar may change the terms and conditions of the Policy Statement from time to time as provided in this Policy Statement. 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Administrative
ENOM, INC. REGISTRATION AGREEMENT
ENOM, INC. REGISTRATION AGREEMENT This Registration Agreement ("Agreement") sets forth the terms and conditions of your use of enom, Inc.'s ("enom") domain name registration services to register an Internet
TABLE OF CONTENTS Arbitration of Extended Warranty Contracts
Insurance Department Sec. 42-260 page 1 (9-97) TABLE OF CONTENTS Arbitration of Extended Warranty Contracts Applicability... 42-260- 1 Definitions... 42-260- 2 Mediation... 42-260- 3 Arbitration... 42-260-
.SANDVIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES
.SANDVIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES Page 1 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. Definitions, scope of application and eligibility... 3 Article 1. Definitions... 3 Article 2. Scope of application...
.hk Domain Name Dispute Resolution ARBITRATION PANEL DECISION. 景 豐 电 子 有 限 公 司 (King Fung Electronics Company Limited) 甘 枫 (Kam Fung)
.hk Domain Name Dispute Resolution ARBITRATION PANEL DECISION Case ID: DHK - 0400005 Disputed Domain Name: kf.hk Case Administrator: Dennis Choi Submitted by: Mark Lin Participating Panelist: Mark Lin
Domain Registration Agreement
Domain Registration Agreement IF YOU ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT WITHOUT READING IT IN ITS ENTIRETY YOU ARE STILL BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY 1. AGREEMENT. In this Registration Agreement ("Agreement")
MEDIATION PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES
6465 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Phone: 800-474-2371 Fax: 952-345-1160 www.adrforum.com MEDIATION PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES July 11, 2014 1 FORUM Request
domain name database. DCC shall not be obligated to refund any fees paid by Registrant if Registrant terminates this Agreement.
Terms of Service A. INTRODUCTION In this Registration Agreement, the term Registrant refers to you, your agents, and each person listed in your account information as being associated with your account.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON.EU DOMAIN NAME
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON.EU DOMAIN NAME Introduction... 2 1) What are the goals underlying the creation of the Top Level Domain (TLD).eu?... 2 2) Who can act as an.eu TLD Registry?... 2 3) Has the Registry
CHAPTER 11 APPEALS AND DISPUTES
CHAPTER 11 APPEALS AND DISPUTES In this Chapter look for... 11. General 11.1 Deleted 11.2 Administrative Appeals 11.3 Disputes 11.4 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) 11. General. The Virginia Public
This Agreement (herein after called "Agreement") is made on the day of, 20 in by and between:
Bangladesh Telecommunications Company Ltd.BD Domain Name Registration Agreement This Agreement (herein after called "Agreement") is made on the day of, 20 in by and between: (a) The Bangladesh Telecommunications
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATING DISPUTES BETWEEN TWO STATES
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATING DISPUTES BETWEEN TWO STATES 39 OPTIONAL ARBITRATION RULES TWO STATES CONTENTS Introduction 43 Section I. Introductory Rules 45 Scope of Application
Council of Country Code Administrators ( CoCCA ) Dispute Resolution Service
Council of Country Code Administrators ( CoCCA ) Dispute Resolution Service CoCCA Case No. mn-2015-01 facebook.mn 1. Parties Complainant: Facebook, Inc 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park California 94025 United
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Client: Client and/or Spouse or Institutional Client
This Agreement sets forth the contract terms between CARTER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ( Advisor ), and Client and/or Spouse or Institutional Client In consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from the
CAESAR S TOTAL REWARDS PROMOTIONAL CARD TERMS & CONDITIONS FEES ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR GIFT CARD
CAESAR S TOTAL REWARDS PROMOTIONAL CARD TERMS & CONDITIONS FEES ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR GIFT CARD Lost/Stolen/Damaged Replacement Card Fee Subject to applicable law, if your Card is lost or stolen or damaged,
Domain Name Registrant Agreement
Domain Name Registrant Agreement Preamble 1. Who BNNIC is. Brunei Darussalam Network Information Centre Sdn Bhd ("BNNIC") is the national registry of.bn domain names in Brunei Darussalam. As the registry,
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Chapter I Introductory provisions 1 Court of Arbitration 1. The Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce (the
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES EDWARD E. SHARKEY 4641 MONTGOMERY AVENUE SUITE 500 BETHESDA, MD 20814 (301) 657-8184 [email protected] WWW.SHARKEYLAW.
DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES EDWARD E. SHARKEY 4641 MONTGOMERY AVENUE SUITE 500 BETHESDA, MD 20814 (301) 657-8184 [email protected] WWW.SHARKEYLAW.COM CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Domain Name Basics... 4 Trademark
Insurance Market Solutions Group, LLC Sub-Producer Agreement
Insurance Market Solutions Group, LLC Sub-Producer Agreement This Producer Agreement is made and entered into effective the day of, 20, by and between Insurance Market Solutions Group, LLC a Texas Company
.paris Registration Policy
REGISTRY-REGISTRAR AGREEMENT Appendix 1.paris Registration Policy Contents 1. Acceptance of this Registration Policy 2. Registration of Your.paris domain name 2.1 Eligibility conditions 2.2 "First come,
Purchase Order Terms and Conditions
Purchase Order Terms and Conditions "Avanade" means Avanade Asia Pte Ltd (Company Registration No.: 20005969E), a company incorporated in Singapore, having its offices at 238A Thomson Road, #25-01 Novena
DECISION. Richard O Barry v. Private Registrant / A Happy DreamHost Customer Claim Number: FA1509001639391
DECISION Richard O Barry v. Private Registrant / A Happy DreamHost Customer Claim Number: FA1509001639391 PARTIES Complainant is Richard O Barry ( Complainant ), represented by Henry L. Self III of Self
ABN 69 008 651 232. Between: Emirates (a Dubai Corporation) and Shellball Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ABN 44 055 035 839. Matter: audrp 14/08
ABN 69 008 651 232 LEADR Domain Name Dispute - Administrative Panel Decision (single panellist) Regarding domain names: and 1. The Parties Between: Emirates
Buckeye Brainiacs Support Terms of Service
Buckeye Brainiacs Support Terms of Service 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS OF SERVICE The Brainiacs Terms of Service ( Service Terms ) are available to you ( Customer ) at our website www.buckeyecableystem.com
Expedited Dispute Resolution Bond (P3 Form)
Expedited Dispute Resolution Bond (P3 Form) Bond No. KNOW ALL WHO SHALL SEE THESE PRESENTS: THAT WHEREAS, (the "Owner") has awarded to (the "Obligee"), a Public-Private Agreement (the PPA ) for a project
ISTANBUL ARBITRATION CENTRE ARBITRATION RULES
ISTANBUL ARBITRATION CENTRE ARBITRATION RULES Section I INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS ARTICLE 1 The Istanbul Arbitration Centre and the Board of Arbitration 1. The Istanbul Arbitration Centre is an independent
CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY Dispute Number: DCA-1123-CIRA Domain name: extremefitness.ca Complainant: Extreme Fitness, Inc. Registrant: Gautam Relan Registrar:
.paris Registration Policy
.PARIS REGISTRATION POLICY 1.paris Registration Policy Contents 1. Acceptance of this Registration Policy 2. Registration of Your.paris domain name 2.1 Eligibility conditions 2.2 "First come, first served"
INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AGREEMENT AGILITY FOREX LTD INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AGREEMENT
INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AGREEMENT INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AGREEMENT The following terms and conditions apply to individuals who are transacting: for their own account, as a sole proprietor of a business, as a trustee
ELMBROOK TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Domain Names Standard Terms & Conditions (for.nz Domain Names)
ELMBROOK TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Domain Names Standard Terms & Conditions (for.nz Domain Names) All domain name registrations, renewals and other domain name maintenance services provided by Elmbrook Technologies
Domain Name Registration Agreement
Domain Name Registration Agreement THIS AGREEMENT HAS A PROVISION FOR ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES. This Services Agreement ("Agreement") sets forth the terms and conditions of your use
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION. InfoMedia Services Ltd v Bugel Pty Ltd. LEADR Case No. 04/2003
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION InfoMedia Services Ltd v Bugel Pty Ltd LEADR Case No. 04/2003 Panel Member: Name of complainant: Name of respondent: Domain name at issue: S F Stretton InfoMedia Services
