Domain Names & Trademarks: UDRP Fundamentals in the Context. Christopher R. Smith and Garrett M. Weber
|
|
|
- Emory Summers
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Domain Names & Trademarks: UDRP Fundamentals in the Context of Real-World Cases Christopher R. Smith and Garrett M. Weber
2 Internet Structure Basics ICANN -Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Domain Name System (DNS) Links web site addresses ( to internet protocol locations ( ). Domain Names: Top Level Domain:.com Second-Level Domain: lindquist Over 153 million registered domain names. Over 33 million registered in ICANN created and controls the UDRP.
3 UDRP: The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy Established by ICANN in Purpose: Provides rules and procedures for trademark owners to resolve infringement in domain names. Applies to all.com,.biz,.info,.name,.net, and.org toplevel domains, and some country code top-level domains. Binds all internet registrars and all domain name owners within these top-level domains. Remedy: Transfer ownership of domain name.
4 Practical Applications of the UDRP Used to stop trademark infringement occurring within a domain name space. Stop customer confusion. Stop customers from being diverted to competitors. Obtain a valuable web address. Increase web site traffic. Can result in the elimination of traditional trademark infringement on the associated website. Common targets of UDRP actions: Competitors seeking market advantage. Cybersquatters seeking to sell domain name. Typosquatters obtaining advertising revenue. Junior trademark owners unaware of a senior trademark owner.
5 UDRP Arbitrations ICANN approved provides for arbitration process: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). National Arbitration Forum (NAF). The Czech Arbitration Court Arbitration Center for Internet Disputes. Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre. Three Set of Rules: The UDRP. The UDRP Rules. Each arbitration provider's Supplemental Rules. Highly developed body of UDRP opinions at WIPO and NAF.
6 UDRP Arbitration Procedure Proceeding on the Papers: UDRP provides for a mandatory arbitration proceeding on written filings only, without a discovery period and without a hearing. Supplemental Rules: Each arbitration provider issues Supplemental Rules controlling the procedure for the arbitration proceeding. Panel: Panel of one or three arbitrators, at either parties' election. Fees: Filing fee from $1300 to $2600 for single domain, depending upon panel size. Additional fee for supplemental statements. Parties: Parties are "Complainant"and"Respondent." Filings: Complaint and Response with supporting affidavits and exhibits. Supplemental responsive statements can be provided. Court Action Available: At the election of either party, the Policy allows for submitting the dispute to a court either before an arbitration is commenced or after it has concluded.
7 UDRP Arbitration Timeline Timing: WIPOand NAFproceedings usually completed within 60 days of filing. Day 1: Case filing. Day 3: Within three days, Arbitration provider sends copy of Complaint to registrar and respondent commencing action. Day 23: Respondent must file Answer. Day 28: Provider has five days from receipt of response or the deadline to respond to appoint a panel. Day 42: Panel must provide decision within 14 days of appointment. Day 45: Panel has three days to notify parties of decision. 10 Business Days Later: The registrar will implement the decision of the panel canceling or transferring the domain name, unless the adversely affected domain registration owner has filed suit in a court of mutual jurisdiction by this date.
8 Identifying Domain Owner Identify Owner: Before filing a complaint, contact information for the owner of subject domain must first be identified. WHOISSearches: Searchable databases of domain registration owners. Search domain name in a general WHOISdatabase. e.g., Google.com, Internic.com, Who.is. Identify the relevant domain registrar and its website. Search domain name in the registrar's WHOISdatabase to find the domain registrant's contact information. Privacy Services: Many registrar's provide domain privacy services that hide the contact information of domain registration owners for a fee. Registrar's must provide the name and contact information to the arbitration provider when a UDRP complaint is filed.
9 Elements of a UDRP Claim 1. Domain name is identical or confusingly similarto a trademark in which the complainant had rights. 2. Domain owner has no rights or legitimate interestsin the domain name. 3. Domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. All three elements must be established to prevail.
10 Element 1: Confusing Similarity Requires complainant to have trademark rights. Federal trademark registration not mandatory, but helpful. Trademark registration or use should pre-date domain name registration. Panel compares trademark to domain name. Generic components (.com or generic terms) generally not considered. Design elements generally not considered.
11 Element 2: No Rights or Legitimate Interests Can be established by showing... Domain is not used with bona fide offering of goods and services. Domain owner is not commonly known by domain name. If use is noncommercial, it is intended to misleadingly divert consumers or tarnish a complainant s trademark.
12 Element 3: Bad Faith Registration and Use Can be established by showing... Domain was registered to be later sold or rented to trademark owner. Pattern of registering domains to prevent trademark owners from registering. Domain was registered for the purpose of disrupting business of competitor. Domain was registered to confuse and divert internet traffic from trademark owner s web site for commercial gain. Both bad faith registration andbad faith use must be established.
13 Practice Considerations Always First Determine the Registration Dates. Determine the date of the trademark registration and the date of the domain registration. Avoid a Barebones Complaint or Answer. The pleading may be the only chance you have to explain facts and cite to relevant prior decisions. Failing to File Answer is Dangerous. All assertions in a complaint are generally taken as true where a respondent does not answer. Provide Relevant and Ample Documentary Evidence. Providing an affidavit with supporting facts and documents is generally advisable.
14 Example: Sportsmanswarehous.com SPORTSMAN S WAREHOUSE
15 Sportsmanswarehous.com Website
16 Why Was Complaint Successful? Trademark ownership predated domain name ownership. Domain parking is generally non-legitimate use. Typosquatting generally indicates bad faith. Result: Domain name transferred.
17 Example: grouphealth.com GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE
18 Grouphealth.com Website
19 Why Was Defense Successful? Domain name registration predated trademark registrations by 10 years. Group Health is generic term in insurance industry. Domain parking is generally legitimate where domain name is generic term. No evidence of bad faith registration. Result: Complaint denied.
20 Key Elements for a Winning UDRP Case Rights in a strong trademark. Trademark nearly identical to target domain name. Trademark rights predate domain name registration. Lack of legitimate domain name use. Evidence of bad faith use andregistration.
21 UDRP Statistics Over 20,000 UDRP complaints filed since Top five business sectors in which complaints were filed in 2007: biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, banking and finance, information technology, retail, and entertainment. Large percentage of defaults. On average, less than 15% of decisions favor domain owners.
22 Christopher R. Smith Garret M. Weber Intellectual Property Attorneys LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. Minneapolis, Minnesota (612)
TABLE OF CONTENTS UDRP FUNDAMENTALS: NAVIGATING DOMAIN NAME TRADEMARK DISPUTES I. OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM DOMAIN-NAME DISPUTE-RESOLUTION POLICY...
UDRP FUNDAMENTALS: NAVIGATING DOMAIN NAME TRADEMARK DISPUTES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFORM DOMAIN-NAME DISPUTE-RESOLUTION POLICY.... 2 A. Internet Structure Basics.... 2 B. The UDRP and
1. This policy is now in effect. See www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-schedule.htm for the implementation schedule.
Policy Adopted: August 26, 1999 Implementation Documents Approved: October 24, 1999 Notes: 1. This policy is now in effect. See www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-schedule.htm for the implementation schedule. 2.
UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY FOR.TZ
UNIFORM DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY FOR.TZ 1. Purpose and application. This Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.tz (the "Policy") has been adopted and is incorporated in the Registration
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Copyright 2011 Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (ictqatar) Table of Contents 1. Definitions... 4 2. Purpose... 4 3. Your Representations... 5 4.
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sanofi v. Domain Manager, eweb Development Group / ProxyTech Privacy Services Inc. / Privacy Manager Case No.
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sanofi v. Domain Manager, eweb Development Group / ProxyTech Privacy Services Inc. / Privacy Manager Case No. D2014-1185 1. The Parties Complainant
Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
1. Purpose. a. This Singapore Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") has been adopted by the Singapore Network Information Centre (SGNIC) Private Limited ("SGNIC") as the registration authority
Misappropriation of Trademarks on the Internet
SM Misappropriation of Trademarks on the Internet September 14, 2010 2010 Patterson Thuente Christensen Pedersen, P.A., some rights reserved - www.ptslaw.com DISCLAIMER: This presentation and any information
THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES and SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THE CANADIAN DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION SYSTEM. David Allsebrook LudlowLaw
THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES and SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THE CANADIAN DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION SYSTEM. David Allsebrook LudlowLaw Since January 1, 2000 a fast, inexpensive arbitration
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Net2Phone Inc. vs. Basheer Hallak Case No. D2000-0665 1. The Parties Complainant is Net2Phone Inc., a Delaware Corporation, located at
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Hennion & Walsh, Inc. v. Robert Isom Claim Number: FA0712001118409
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Hennion & Walsh, Inc. v. Robert Isom Claim Number: FA0712001118409 PARTIES Complainant is Hennion & Walsh, Inc. ( Complainant ), represented by Debbie Williams, 2001
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY 1.0 Title: Reserve Names Challenge Policy Version Control: 1.0 Date of Implementation: 2015-03-16 2.0 Summary This Reserved Names Challenge Policy (the Policy ) has been
Domain Name Disputes: How to Get the Bad Guys Off Your Domain
Domain Name Disputes: How to Get the Bad Guys Off Your Domain By Karen McDaniel and Rebecca Bishop Introduction In times of great exploration, there always seem to be those who wish to share in the bounty
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. American Society of Plumbing Engineers v. Lee Youngho Claim Number: FA0701000882390
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION American Society of Plumbing Engineers v. Lee Youngho Claim Number: FA0701000882390 PARTIES Complainant is American Society of Plumbing Engineers ( Complainant ), represented
DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES EDWARD E. SHARKEY 4641 MONTGOMERY AVENUE SUITE 500 BETHESDA, MD 20814 (301) 657-8184 [email protected] WWW.SHARKEYLAW.
DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES EDWARD E. SHARKEY 4641 MONTGOMERY AVENUE SUITE 500 BETHESDA, MD 20814 (301) 657-8184 [email protected] WWW.SHARKEYLAW.COM CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Domain Name Basics... 4 Trademark
In the context of these regulations, the following definitions apply: the list of potential panelists published by the center;
These Dispute Resolution Regulations for.nl Domain Names came into effect on February 28, 2008 and were most recently amended on March 4, 2010. From that first date, any registrant of a.nl domain name
Domain Names: Tackling Infringement & the UDRP & Nominet DRS. Nick Wood [email protected] September 2005
Domain Names: Tackling Infringement & the UDRP & Nominet DRS Nick Wood [email protected] September 2005 Summary Why domain infringement happens Who does it Remedies Negotiation Dispute Resolution
Artisan Metal Works. and. Mr. Dave Bennett
PO Box 2502 Grand Cayman KY1-1104 CAYMAN ISLANDS Tel: (345) 946-ICTA (4282) Fax: (345) 945-8284 Web: www.icta.ky.ky DISPUTE RESOLUTION Information and Communications Technology Authority (the 'Authority'
Strategies & Tactics for Domain Disputes. Presented by: Gretchen M. Olive Director of Marketing, CSC
Strategies & Tactics for Domain Disputes Presented by: Gretchen M. Olive Director of Marketing, CSC What we will cover today The typical scenarios which trigger the desire to obtain a domain from 3 rd
Importance of Website Domain Ownership for Managing your Brand
Importance of Website Domain Ownership for Managing your Brand Kerigan Marketing Associates Ford Henley Digital Marketing Manager February 24, 2015 850.229.4562 3706 Hwy 98, Suite 103 Mexico Beach, FL
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Aeropostale, Inc. v. Private Registration (name) c/o Private Registration (name) Claim Number: FA0912001296979
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Aeropostale, Inc. v. Private Registration (name) c/o Private Registration (name) Claim Number: FA0912001296979 PARTIES Complainant is Aeropostale, Inc. ( Complainant
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Dispute Settlement World Intellectual Property Organization 4.2 Domain Name Dispute Resolution ii Dispute Settlement N O T E The Course on Dispute Settlement
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") As approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 30 October 2009.
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") As approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 30 October 2009. These Rules are in effect for all UDRP proceedings in which a complaint
Expert Q&A on Brand Protection in the Expanded gtld Program
Expert Q&A on Brand Protection in the Expanded gtld Program Practical Law Intellectual Property & Technology An expert Q&A with Lisa W. Rosaya of Baker & McKenzie LLP on the expanded generic top level
CIRA POLICIES, RULES, AND PROCEDURES
CIRA POLICIES, RULES, AND PROCEDURES CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Version 1.2 PARAGRAPH 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this CIRA Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) is to
DECISION. Richard O Barry v. Private Registrant / A Happy DreamHost Customer Claim Number: FA1509001639391
DECISION Richard O Barry v. Private Registrant / A Happy DreamHost Customer Claim Number: FA1509001639391 PARTIES Complainant is Richard O Barry ( Complainant ), represented by Henry L. Self III of Self
Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. HUGEDOMAINS.COM, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Version 1.3 (August 22, 2011) PARAGRAPH 1 INTRODUCTION
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Version 1.3 (August 22, 2011) PARAGRAPH 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) is to provide
"Branding Strategies in light of the. Kevin G. Smith Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, D.C.
"Branding Strategies in light of the new Top Level Domains" What Brand Owners Can do to Protect Themselves and the Mechanism of the TMCH Kevin G. Smith Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, D.C. [email protected]
Chapter I. 1. Purpose. 2. Your Representations. 3. Cancellations. 4. Mandatory Administrative Proceeding. dotversicherung-registry GmbH
Chapter I.versicherung Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.versicherung. 2. The
Working Through the Internet: Intellectual Property, Privacy, and Other Issues for Non-Profits. September 28, 2010
Working Through the Internet: Intellectual Property, Privacy, and Other Issues for Non-Profits September 28, 2010 Presenters David L. Cavanaugh is co-vice chair of s Intellectual Property Department. Michael
THE POLICY. 2003-2013 MYNIC BERHAD. All rights reserved.
MYNIC'S (.my) DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY THE POLICY 2003-2013 MYNIC BERHAD. All rights reserved. MYNIC's (.my) Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy THE POLICY 1. Purpose 1.1 MYNIC's (.my) Domain
Domain Name Disputes in India
Domain Name Disputes in India This document is an extract from the book IPR & Cyberspace Indian Perspective authored by Rohas Nagpal. This book is available as courseware for the Diploma in Cyber Law and
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON.EU DOMAIN NAME
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON.EU DOMAIN NAME Introduction... 2 1) What are the goals underlying the creation of the Top Level Domain (TLD).eu?... 2 2) Who can act as an.eu TLD Registry?... 2 3) Has the Registry
Administration and Dispute Resolution of.hk Domain Names. By: Jonathan Shea CEO of HKIRC/HKDNR
Administration and Dispute Resolution of.hk Domain Names By: Jonathan Shea CEO of HKIRC/HKDNR Outline Administration of the.hk Domain Name About HKIRC and HKDNR.hk Domain Name Categories Chinese Domain
MAHYAR REZVANI A.K.A. MIKE REZVANI V. FAISAL K. AL-NAIBARI
MAHYAR REZVANI A.K.A. MIKE REZVANI V. FAISAL K. AL-NAIBARI Domain name: CPR Case Number 0212 Date of Commencement: June 10, 2002 Single Panellist: Dr. Bernardo M. Cremades 1. The Parties The
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Legião Urbana Produções Artísticas Ltda. and Giuliano Manfredini v. Domain Admin, Epik.com Private Registration / Yoko Sayuri Case No.
.paris Registration Policy
.PARIS REGISTRATION POLICY 1.paris Registration Policy Contents 1. Acceptance of this Registration Policy 2. Registration of Your.paris domain name 2.1 Eligibility conditions 2.2 "First come, first served"
.paris Registration Policy
REGISTRY-REGISTRAR AGREEMENT Appendix 1.paris Registration Policy Contents 1. Acceptance of this Registration Policy 2. Registration of Your.paris domain name 2.1 Eligibility conditions 2.2 "First come,
.ME. Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") (As approved by domen on November 13, 2015)
.ME Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") (As approved by domen on November 13, 2015) Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Uniform Dispute
The Theft Of Domain Names: How Can I Stop Them From Using My Company s Name For Their Web site? By: Houston Putnam Lowry 1
The Theft Of Domain Names: How Can I Stop Them From Using My Company s Name For Their Web site? By: Houston Putnam Lowry 1 I. What is a domain name and what can a domain name be used for? A. Web site 1.
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Combined Insurance Group Ltd v. Xedoc Holding SA c/o domain admin Claim Number: FA0905001261545
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Combined Insurance Group Ltd v. Xedoc Holding SA c/o domain admin Claim Number: FA0905001261545 PARTIES Complainant is Combined Insurance Group Ltd ( Complainant ),
THE UNIVERISITY OF MELBOURNE FACULTY OF LAW Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 30
THE UNIVERISITY OF MELBOURNE FACULTY OF LAW Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 30 2002 The ICANN Domain Name Dispute Resolution System as a Model for Resolving other Intellectual Property Disputes
.Brand TLD Designation Application
.Brand TLD Designation Application Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ( ICANN ) 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90094 Attention: New gtld Program Staff RE: Application
Chinese Domain Names Dispute Resolution Policy. (Trial Implementation)
Chinese Domain Names Dispute Resolution Policy (Trial Implementation) (Promulgated by the China Internet Network Information Center on November 1 2000 and effective as of 30 days after promulgation.) Article
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Rules
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Copyright 2011 Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (ictqatar) Table of Contents Rules for Qatar Domains Registry Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy...
Protecting Trademarks and Domain Names with Arbitration and UDRP
Protecting Trademarks and Domain Names with Arbitration and UDRP The UDRP Made Simple MARQUES TODAY? THE PLAN 1 Know what to do where there is an abusive registration of a domain name that incorporates
IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO THE CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY ("CIRA") DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (THE "POLICY")
IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO THE CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY ("CIRA") DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (THE "POLICY") Complainant: Complainant Counsel: Registrant: Disputed
Can A Domain Name Trump Trademark Rights? --By Roberta L. Horton and Rachel Baylis, Arnold & Porter LLP
Published by Intellectual Property Law360 on July 17, 2014. Also ran in Media & Entertainment Law360. Can A Domain Name Trump Trademark Rights? --By Roberta L. Horton and Rachel Baylis, Arnold & Porter
Policy Overview and Definitions
Overview The following policies, which govern the top level domain (TLD or Registry) indicated on Schedule A, are based on policies and best practices drawn from ICANN, WIPO, and other relevant sources,
CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY DECISION
CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY DECISION Domain Name: tucowsreseller.ca Complainant: Tucows.com Co Registrant: Interex Corporate Registration Services Inc.
An Analysis of the Most Infringed Terms within Domain Names
I. Executive Summary...1 II. Background...2 III. Methodology and Research...3 IV. Real-World Example.7 V. Conclusion...8 About CSC...9 I. Executive Summary Domain name infringers target names that deliver
UDRP extension beyond the domain name
UDRP extension beyond the domain name UDRP-like alternative dispute resolution remedies should be made available for a broader range of IP violations. Lawrence Nodine Partner Ballard Spahr LLP, Atlanta
EXPERT DETERMINATION LEGAL RIGHTS OBJECTION TLDDOT GmbH v. InterNetWire Web-Development GmbH Case No. LRO2013-0052
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER EXPERT DETERMINATION LEGAL RIGHTS OBJECTION TLDDOT GmbH v. InterNetWire Web-Development GmbH Case No. LRO2013-0052 1. The Parties The Objector/Complainant is TLDDOT GmbH,
JTA BULLETIN, Issue no. 7
JTA BULLETIN, Issue no. 7 Cybersquatting through use of a domain name has been written into law as an unfair competition act in a recently passed bill revising part of the Unfair Competition Prevention
CIETAC Online ADR Practice. Domain Name Dispute Resolution System
CIETAC Online ADR Practice Domain Name Dispute Resolution System Li Hu Introduction The article intends to introduce and discuss CIETAC Online ADR practice its domain name dispute resolution system. For
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. statefarmc.com c/o Guro-gu Claim Number: FA0607000746782
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. statefarmc.com c/o Guro-gu Claim Number: FA0607000746782 PARTIES Complainant is State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
DECISION OF THE THIRD-PARTY DECIDER. Henkel KGaA v. MADEurope.com. Case No. 4014: fa.be
BELGIAN CENTRE FOR ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION DECISION OF THE THIRD-PARTY DECIDER Henkel KGaA v. MADEurope.com Case No. 4014: fa.be 1. The Parties The Complainant in the administrative proceeding is Henkel
KENYA NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE ALTERNATIVE DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY
KENYA NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE ALTERNATIVE DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I... 4 Definitions Interpretation and Applications... 4 Definitions and Interpretation... 4 Application...
How to Keep One s Registered Trademark from Becoming a.xxx Domain Name
September 2011 How to Keep One s Registered Trademark from Becoming a.xxx Domain Name BY ROBERT L. SHERMAN & BRADFORD E. YOUNG After years of consideration, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
General Terms & Conditions for the Registration of.vg Domain Names April 14, 2014
General Terms & Conditions for the Registration of.vg Domain Names April 14, 2014 KSregistry GmbH (operating under the trade name Nic.VG) administers and operates the registry for internet Domain Names
Bad Faith Registration and Use of a Domain Name by Panels
UDRP Dilemma In Proving Bad-Faith Domain Registrations Part I The purpose of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, known as the UDRP (hereafter the Policy), is to determine disputes relating to the registration
1.3 By requesting us to register or manage a domain names or names on your behalf, you agree to:
SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR DOMAIN NAME MANAGEMENT SERVICES (DOMAIN PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT SERVICE, LOCAL PRESENCE SERVICES AND ANONYMOUS REGISTRATION SERVICES) 1. Services 1.1 These Special Terms and
