Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey

Transcription

1 Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey Characteristic Category Weighted Un-weighted Number % Number % Age 18 years old years old 1, years old 1, years old 1, years old 1, years old 2, years old 2, years or older 13, , Student Affiliation 8, , , , Year in school/program Freshman 1, Sophomore 1, Junior 2, Senior 2, Prof 1st year 7, , Prof 2nd year 4, , Prof 3rd year 2, Prof 4th year or higher 2, Year first enrolled in the college or university 2010 or earlier 2, , , , , or , , Hispanic or Latino? Yes 2, No 22, ,

2 Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey (continued) Characteristic Category Weighted Un-weighted Number % Number % Race White only 13, , Black only 1, Asian only 8, , Other/Multi race 1, Gender Identity Female 12, , Male 12, , Other Sexual Orientation Heterosexual 21, , Non-Heterosexual 3, Since enrolled in college or university, have you been in a partnered relationship? Yes 19, , No 5, , Did not answer the question Have a disability registered with the university? Yes No 24, , Did not answer the question

3 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) If someone were to report sexual assault or sexual misconduct to an official, how likely is it that... Students would support the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely The alleged offender(s) or their associates would retaliate against the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take the report seriously. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

4 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Campus officials would protect the safety of the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would conduct a fair investigation. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take action against the offender(s). Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual assault or sexual misconduct. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

5 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr If someone were to report sexual assault or sexual misconduct to an official, how likely is it that... Students would support the person making the report. Not at all s s A little Somewhat Very Extremely The alleged offender(s) or their associates would retaliate against the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take the report seriously. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

6 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Campus official would protect the safety of the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely s s Campus officials would conduct a fair investigation. Not at all A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely Campus officials would take action against the offender(s). Not at all A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual assault or sexual misconduct. Not at all A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

7 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Have you been in any of the following situations? (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) If so, what did you do? Suspected a friend was sexually assaulted Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Spoke to my friend or someone else to seek help Took action in another way No Witnessed drunk person heading for sexual encounter Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Directly intervened to stop it Spoke to someone else to seek help Took action in another way No

8 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Witnessed someone acting in sexually violent or harassing manner Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Directly intervened to stop it Spoke to someone else to seek help Took action in another way No

9 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Have you been in any of the following situations? If so, what did you do? Suspected a friend was sexually assaulted Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do s s s s Did nothing for another reason Spoke to my friend or someone else to seek help Took action in another way No Witnessed drunk person heading for sexual encounter Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do s s Did nothing for another reason Directly intervened to stop it Spoke to someone else to seek help s s s s Took action in another way s s No

10 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Witnessed someone acting in sexually violent or harassing manner Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do s s Did nothing for another reason s s Directly intervened to stop it s s Spoke to someone else to seek help s s s s Took action in another way s s No Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

11 Table 1.3. Perceptions Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Sexual assault or sexual misconduct a problem at university Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct on campus Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct off campus at university-sponsored events Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

12 Table 1.3. Perceptions Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Sexual assault or sexual misconduct a problem at university Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct on campus Not at all A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct off campus at university-sponsored events Not at all A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

13 Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Awareness of services Aware of services provided by Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Aware of services provided by Gender-Based Misconduct Office Aware of services provided by Columbia Health/Student Health Services Aware of services provided by Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services Aware of services provided by Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action Aware of services provided by University Public Safety Aware of services provided by Residential Programs Aware of services provided by Office of the University Chaplain Aware of services provided by Human Resources Aware of services provided by Disability Services Aware of services provided by Alice! Health Promotion Aware of services provided by Ombuds Office

14 Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Knowledgeable about how sexual assault and sexual misconduct defined at university Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely Knowledgeable about where to get help at university if student or friend experience sexual assault or sexual misconduct Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely Knowledgeable about where to make a report if student or friend experience sexual assault or sexual misconduct at university Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely

15 Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Knowledgeable about what happens when a student reports sexual assault or sexual misconduct at university Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely Initial university orientation included information about sexual assault or sexual misconduct Yes Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely No I didn't attend orientation s s I don't remember Per 100 students.

16 Table 3.1a. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed Attempted Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

17 Table 3.1b. Percent of Graduate Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed Attempted Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

18 Table 3.1c. Percent of Male Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed s s s Attempted s s s Incapacitation only s s s Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation s s s 1 Per 100 students.

19 Table 3.1d. Percent of Graduate Male Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed s s s Attempted Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation s s s Per 100 students.

20 Table 3.1e. Percent of Students of Other Gender Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed Attempted s s s Incapacitation only s s s Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only s s s Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

21 Table 3.1f. Percent of Graduate Students of Other Gender Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration s s s s s s Physical force only s s s s s s Completed s s s s s s Attempted Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only s s s s s s Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

22 Table 3.2. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment 1, 2, 3 Status Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native s s s s Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander s s s s White Disability Yes s s No Marital status Never married Not married but living with a partner Married Divorced or separated s s Other

23 Table 3.2. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Year in School and Timing of Incidents Current year Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Since entering college Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior

24 Table 3.2. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Graduate/ Current year 1st year nd year rd year s s 4th year th year th year or higher Since entering college 1st year nd year rd year th year th year th year or higher s s 1 Since enrolled in the college. Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

25 Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment 1, 2, 3 Status Penetration Sexual Touching Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native s s Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander s s White Disability Yes No Marital status Never married Not married but living with a partner Married s s Divorced or separated Other

26 Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Year in School and Timing of Incidents Current year Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Since entering college Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate/ Current year 1st year nd year rd year th year s s - - s s 5th year th year

27 Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Since entering college 1st year nd year rd year th year th year s s 6th year Since enrolled in the college. Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

28 Table 3.4a. Number of Times Females Experienced Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Enrollment Status for the Current year and Since Entering College 1, 2 (n=1,163) (n=2,817) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Current school year Number of times 0 times time times times s s s s 4 or more times s s Since entering college Number of times 0 times time times times or more times Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force or c) by incapacitation.

29 Table 3.4b. Number of Times Students Reported Nonconsensual Sexual Touching by Physical Force or Incapacitation by Current School Year or Since Entering Current College by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Current school year Number of times 0 times time times times s s s s 4 or more times s s Since entering college Number of times 0 times time times s s times s s 4 or more times Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force or b) by incapacitation.

30 Table 3.5a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break Some incidents occurred during academic break All incidents occurred during academic break Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes No On university property University residence hall/dorm Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single-sex org Other residential housing Non-residential building s s Other property (e.g., outdoors) Not on university property Private residence Fraternity or Sorority house s s - - Other space used by single-sex org Restaurant, bar, or club Other social venue Outdoor or recreational space s s Some other place Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

31 Table 3.5b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break Some incidents occurred during academic break All incidents occurred during academic break Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes No On university property University residence hall/dorm Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single-sex org - - s s Other residential housing Non-residential building Other property (e.g., outdoors) Not on university property Private residence Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single-sex org - - s s Restaurant, bar, or club Other social venue Outdoor or recreational space Some other place Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

32 Table 3.5c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break Some incidents occurred during academic break s s All incidents occurred during academic break s s Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes No On university property University residence hall/dorm Fraternity or Sorority house s s Other space used by single-sex org Other residential housing s s Non-residential building s s s s Other property (e.g., outdoors) s s Not on university property Private residence s s Fraternity or Sorority house - - s s Other space used by single-sex org Restaurant, bar, or club s s Other social venue s s Outdoor or recreational space s s s s Some other place s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

33 Table 3.6a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female Male Other gender identity - - s s Number of offenders 1 offender offenders or more offenders University affiliation Student Faculty or instructor s s Coach or trainer Other staff or administrator Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) s s s s The person was not affiliated with university s s Don t know association with university Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor Co-worker, boss or supervisor s s Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other s s s s Don t Know s s s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

34 Table 3.6b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female Male Other gender identity Number of offenders 1 offender offenders or more offenders University affiliation Student Faculty or instructor s s s s Coach or trainer Other staff or administrator s s - - Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) s s - - The person was not affiliated with university Don t know association with university Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor s s - - Co-worker, boss or supervisor s s Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other s s Don t Know s s s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

35 Table 3.6c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female Male Other gender identity s s - - Number of offenders 1 offender offenders s s 3 or more offenders University affiliation Student Faculty or instructor s s - - Coach or trainer Other staff or administrator s s s s Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with university s s Don t know association with university s s Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor s s - - Co-worker, boss or supervisor Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other s s - - Don t Know s s s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

36 Table 3.7a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes No Don't know Offender using drugs Yes No Don't know Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes No Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes No Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain I suspect, but I am not certain No Don't know Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes No Not sure Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

37 Table 3.7b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes No Don't know Offender using drugs Yes No Don't know Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes No Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes No Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain s s I suspect, but I am not certain - - s s No Don't know Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes No Not sure Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

38 Table 3.7c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes No s s Don't know Offender using drugs Yes No Don't know Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes No Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes s s - - No Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain I suspect, but I am not certain No Don't know Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes s s No Not sure s s Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

39 Table 3.8a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries s s Bruises, black-eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling Chipped or knocked out teeth Broken bones s s - - Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) s s Other injuries Contract a sexually transmitted disease s s Become pregnant from the experience s s None of the above Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams Fearfulness or being concerned about safety Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness Nightmares or trouble sleeping Feeling numb or detached Headaches or stomach aches Eating problems or disorders Increased drug or alcohol use None of the above Per 100 victims. 2 Penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

40 Table 3.8b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries s s Bruises, black-eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling s s - - Chipped or knocked out teeth Broken bones Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) - - s s Other injuries s s s s Contract a sexually transmitted disease - - s s Become pregnant from the experience - - s s None of the above Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams Fearfulness or being concerned about safety Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness Nightmares or trouble sleeping Feeling numb or detached Headaches or stomach aches Eating problems or disorders Increased drug or alcohol use None of the above Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

41 Table 3.8c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries - - s s Bruises, black-eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling - - s s Chipped or knocked out teeth Broken bones Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) Other injuries Contract a sexually transmitted disease Become pregnant from the experience None of the above Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams Fearfulness or being concerned about safety s s s s Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness Nightmares or trouble sleeping Feeling numb or detached Headaches or stomach aches s s s s Eating problems or disorders s s s s Increased drug or alcohol use None of the above Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

42 Table 3.9a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and 1, 2, 3 Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Behavior and Tactic Penetration Sexual Touching By Force By Incapacitation By Force By Incapacitation Report of incident to a Program % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Reported to a Program Yes No Did not contact a Program Did not know where to go or who to tell Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult I did not think anyone would believe me I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared negative social consequences I did not think anything would be done I feared it would not be kept confidential Incident was not on campus or associated with the school s s s s Incident did not occur while attending school Other Reason

43 Table 3.9a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Behavior and Tactic 1, 2, 3 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Report to others By Force By Incapacitation By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Friend Family member Faculty s s Someone else I didn t tell anyone else Per 100 victims. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

44 Table 3.9b. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation Reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did 1, 2, 3 Not Report to a Program by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program Reported to a program Inapplicable No Yes Did not contact a program Did not know where to go or who to tell s s - - Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult I did not think anyone would believe me s s s s I did not think anything would be done s s I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared it would not be kept confidential I feared negative social consequences Incident did not occur while attending school s s Incident was not on campus or associated with the school s s - - Other Reason Report to others Friend Family member s s s s Faculty Someone else I didn t tell anyone else Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

45 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Gender-Based Misconduct Office Columbia Health/Student Health Services % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program When contacted Fall of present Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall 2012 s s How useful Not at all s s s s A little s s Somewhat s s s s Very s s s s Extremely s s Evaluation of Contact made since fall of 2014 Pressure from university on whether to proceed Yes s s To proceed s s Not to proceed - - s s - - No

46 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 (continued) Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Gender-Based Misconduct Office Columbia Health/Student Health Services % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program Program showed respect towards victim Excellent s s Very good s s Good s s Fair s s s s s s Poor s s s s Helped to understand options Excellent s s Very good s s s s Good s s s s Fair s s s s Poor s s

47 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 (continued) Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action University Public Safety % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program When contacted Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s s s Fall of Summer of s s Prior to Fall s s How useful Not at all A little Somewhat s s Very s s s s Extremely Evaluation of Contact made since fall of 2014 Pressure from university on whether to proceed Yes s s - - To proceed s s - - Not to proceed s s No s s

48 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 (continued) Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action University Public Safety % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program Program showed respect towards victim Excellent s s s s Very good s s Good Fair s s s s Poor s s s s - - Helped to understand options Excellent s s s s Very good s s s s Good Fair s s Poor s s s s

49 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 (continued) New York City Police Department (local law enforcement) Residential Programs % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program When contacted Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s Fall of Summer of 2013 s s Prior to Fall s s How useful Not at all s s A little Somewhat s s s s Very s s s s Extremely s s - - Evaluation of Contact made since fall of 2014 Pressure from university on whether to proceed Yes To proceed s s - - Not to proceed s s - - No

50 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 (continued) New York City Police Department (local law enforcement) Residential Programs % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program Program showed respect towards victim Excellent s s Very good Good - - s s Fair s s s s Poor Helped to understand options Excellent s s s s Very good s s - - Good - - s s Fair Poor s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation.

51 Table 4.1 Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Behavior, Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College, Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Current school year Coercion s s s s Penetration s s s s s s - - Sexual touching s s s s s s Absence of affirmative consent Penetration Sexual touching Since entering college Coercion s s Penetration s s s s - - Sexual touching s s s s s s Absence of affirmative consent Penetration Sexual touching

52 Table 4.1 Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Behavior, Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College, Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Current school year Coercion Penetration Sexual touching Absence of affirmative consent Penetration s s s s Sexual touching s s Since entering college Coercion Penetration Sexual touching Absence of affirmative consent Penetration s s Sexual touching Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

53 Table 4.2. Number of Times Students Experienced Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Behavior, Tactic, Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Current school year Coercion Penetration 0 times time s s s s times times s s or more times Sexual Touching 0 times time s s s s s s 2 times times s s or more times Without affirmative consent Penetration 0 times time times s s s s 3 times s s or more times s s

54 Table 4.2. Number of Times Students Experienced Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Behavior, Tactic, Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Without affirmative consent Sexual Touching 0 times time times s s 3 times s s 4 or more times Since entering college Coercion Penetration 0 times time s s s s times times s s - - s s or more times s s - - Sexual Touching 0 times time s s s s s s 2 times s s times s s or more times

55 Table 4.2. Number of Times Students Experienced Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Behavior, Tactic, Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Without affirmative consent Penetration 0 times time times s s s s 3 times or more times s s s s Sexual Touching 0 times time times s s times s s s s 4 or more times s s s s 1 Per 100 students. 2 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

56 Table 4.3. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Absence of Affirmative Consent by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White Disability Yes s s No

57 Table 4.3. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Absence of Affirmative Consent by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Never married Not married but living with a partner s s Married s s Divorced or separated s s - - s s - - s s Other Year in School and Timing of Incidents Current year Freshman Sophomore s s - - Junior s s - - Senior Since entering college Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior

58 Table 4.3. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Absence of Affirmative Consent by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Graduate/ Current year 1st nd rd th s s 5th s s th year or more s s - - s s Since entering college 1st nd rd s s 4th th s s 6th year or more s s 1 Per 100 students. 2 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

59 Table 4.4. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Absence of Affirmative Consent by Victim Characteristics, Behavior and Enrollment Status 1,2 Penetration Sexual Touching Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native s s Asian Black or African American s s Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White Disability Yes s s No Marital status Never married Not married but living with a partner Married Divorced or separated s s s s Other s s - - s s - - s s

60 Table 4.4. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Absence of Affirmative Consent by Victim Characteristics, Behavior and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Year in School and Timing of Incidents Current year Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Since entering college Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Graduate/ Current year 1st year nd year rd year th year s s th year s s s s 6th year s s s s

61 Table 4.4. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Absence of Affirmative Consent by Victim Characteristics, Behavior and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Since entering college 1st year nd year rd year th year th year s s th year s s Per 100 students. 2 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

62 Table 4.5a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Offender Characteristics by Behavior and Tactic 1, 2 Coercion Absence of Affirmative Consent Penetration Sexual Touching Penetration Sexual Touching % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Male Female Other gender identity s s - - Number of offenders 1 offender offenders or more offenders University affiliation Student s s s s Faculty or instructor s s s s Other staff or administrator - - s s s s Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) - - s s s s The person was not affiliated with university s s Don t know association with university s s

63 Table 4.5a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Offender Characteristics by Behavior and Tactic 1, 2 (continued) Coercion Absence of Affirmative Consent Penetration Sexual Touching Penetration Sexual Touching % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with s s Someone I had dated or was intimate with s s s s Teacher or advisor s s s s Co-worker, boss or supervisor - - s s s s Friend or acquaintance - - s s Stranger Other - - s s s s Don t Know s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

64 Table 4.5b. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Offender Characteristics by Behavior and Tactic 1, 2 Coercion Absence of Affirmative Consent Penetration Sexual Touching Penetration Sexual Touching % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Male s s s s Female s s s s Other gender identity s s s s Number of offenders 1 offender s s s s offenders s s or more offenders s s s s University affiliation Student s s s s Faculty or instructor s s Other staff or administrator s s The person was not affiliated with university - - s s Don t know association with university s s

65 Table 4.5b. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent by Offender Characteristics by Behavior and Tactic 1, 2 (continued) Coercion Absence of Affirmative Consent Penetration Sexual Touching Penetration Sexual Touching % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with s s Someone I had dated or was intimate with - - s s s s Teacher or advisor s s Co-worker, boss or supervisor s s Friend or acquaintance s s Stranger Other s s s s Don t Know - - s s - - s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

66 Table 4.6. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent Since Enrolling at University by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) TGQN (n=83) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration Sexual Touching TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

67 Table 4.7a. Percent of s Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent Since Enrolling at University by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=1,163) Male (n=855) TGQN (n=42) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration Sexual Touching TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

68 Table 4.7b. Percent of Graduate and Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent Since Enrolling at University by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=2,817) Male (n=1,800) TGQN (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration Sexual Touching TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

69 Table 4.8. Percent of Seniors Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent Since Enrolling at University by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=340) Male (n=254) TGQN (n=10) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation s s Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force s s Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using physical force s s Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using physical force Penetration Sexual Touching s s 1 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

70 Table 4.9. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent for Current Year by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) TGQN (n=83) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

71 Table 4.10a. Percent of s Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent for Current Year by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=1,163) Male (n=855) TGQN (n=42) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

72 Table 4.10b. Percent of Graduate and Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent for Current Year by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=2,817) Male (n=1,800) TGQN (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration s s Sexual Touching Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force Penetration Sexual Touching TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

73 Table Percent of Seniors Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force, Incapacitation, Coercion and Absence of Affirmative Consent for Current Year by Tactic and Gender 1 Female (n=340) Male (n=254) TGQN (n=10) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation s s s s Penetration s s s s Sexual Touching s s - - Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force s s Penetration s s Sexual Touching s s - - Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force s s Penetration s s Sexual Touching s s - - Completed using Physical Force or Incapacitation or Coercion or Absence of Affirmative Consent; Attempted Penetration using Physical Force s s Penetration s s Sexual Touching s s 1 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

74 Table 5.1a. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Percent of Students Reporting Harassment University-associated individual: made sexual remarks, or insulting/offensive jokes or stories made inappropriate comments regarding body, appearance, or sexual activity said crude or gross sexual things or tried to engage in sexual conversation transmitted offensive sexual remarks, stories, jokes, pictures, videos asked to go out, get dinner, drinks, or have sex, despite refusal Percent of Victims of Harassment Number of offenders 1 person persons or more persons

75 Table 5.1a. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Number of incidents since beginning of 2014 term 0 times time times times times or more times Association with university Student Faculty Coach, religious leader, or other non-academic advisor s s Other staff or administrator Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with [University] Don t know association with [University]

76 Table 5.1a. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor Co-worker, boss or supervisor Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other Don t Know

77 Table 5.1a. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Percent of Students Reporting Harassment University-associated individual: made sexual remarks, or insulting/offensive jokes or stories made inappropriate comments regarding body, appearance, or sexual activity said crude or gross sexual things or tried to engage in sexual conversation transmitted offensive sexual remarks, stories, jokes, pictures, videos asked to go out, get dinner, drinks, or have sex, despite refusal Percent of Victims of Harassment Number of offenders 1 person persons or more persons

78 Table 5.1a. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Number of incidents since beginning of 2014 term 0 times s s s s 1 time times times times or more times s s Association with university Student Faculty Coach, religious leader, or other non-academic advisor s s s s Other staff or administrator Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with [University] Don t know association with [University]

79 Table 5.1a. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with s s Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor Co-worker, boss or supervisor Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other Don t Know - - s s 1 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

80 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Reporting to Others Friend Family member Faculty Someone else I didn t tell anyone else

81 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Reporting to a Program Contacted at least one program in university list Contacted Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Most recent contact Fall of present s s Fall of Summer of s s - - Fall of Summer of s s Prior to Fall of s s s s - - s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s s s - - Somewhat s s s s Very s s Extremely s s s s - -

82 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted Gender-Based Misconduct Office Most recent contact Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s s s s s Fall of Summer of s s - - s s Prior to Fall of s s s s s s - - Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all A little s s s s Somewhat Very s s s s s s Extremely s s s s s s

83 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Columbia Health/Student Health Services (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Most recent contact Fall of present s s Fall of Summer of s s Fall of Summer of s s - - s s Prior to Fall of s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s - - A little s s s s Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s s s

84 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Most recent contact Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s Fall of Summer of s s s s s s Prior to Fall of s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s s s

85 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Most recent contact Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s - - s s - - Fall of Summer of s s s s s s - - Prior to Fall of 2012 s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s s s A little s s Somewhat s s s s s s Very s s s s s s Extremely

86 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted University Public Safety Most recent contact Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s - - Fall of Summer of s s s s - - s s Prior to Fall of Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little s s s s - - Somewhat s s s s Very s s - - s s Extremely s s - -

87 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted New York City Police Department (local law enforcement) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s Fall of Summer of s s s s Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of 2012 s s - - s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s s s Somewhat s s - - s s Very s s - - s s s s - - Extremely

88 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted Residential Programs s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s Fall of Summer of s s Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s - - s s A little s s Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s

89 Table 5.1b. Percent of Victims of Harassment Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Did not contact any programs Reason Did not know where to go or who to tell Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult I did not think anyone would believe me s s I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared negative social consequences I did not think anything would be done I feared it would not be kept confidential Incident was not on campus or associated with the school Incident did not occur while attending school Other Per 100 victims. 2 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

90 Table 5.2a. Percent of Students in Partnered Relationships Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1, 2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Percent of Students in Partnered Relationships Reporting Intimate Partner Violence (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Partner controlled or tried to control Partner threatened to harm student, family, or themselves Partner used physical force Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Number of offenders 1 person persons or more persons s s s s Number of incidents since beginning of 2014 term 0 times time times times times or more times s s

91 Table 5.2a. Percent of Students in Partnered Relationships Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Harassment 1, 2 TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Percent of Students in Partnered Relationships Reporting Intimate Partner Violence Partner controlled or tried to control Partner threatened to harm student, family, or themselves s s Partner used physical force Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Number of offenders 1 person persons or more persons s s s s Number of incidents since beginning of 2014 term 0 times s s s s 1 time s s s s 2 times - - s s 3-5 times s s 6-9 times - - s s 10 or more times s s Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college. 2 Percent of students who reported being in a partnered relationship since entering college (question A13 on questionnaire).

92 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Reporting to Others Friend Family member Faculty s s s s Someone else I didn t tell anyone else

93 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Reporting to a Program Contacted at least one program in university list s s Contacted Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Most recent contact Fall of present s s - - Fall of Summer of 2014 s s - - s s s s - - Fall of Summer of 2013 s s s s - - s s - - Prior to Fall of s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little s s s s - - Somewhat s s s s s s Very s s s s - - s s Extremely s s s s

94 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted Gender-Based Misconduct Office s s s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s - - Fall of Summer of s s Fall of Summer of s s Prior to Fall of Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s - - A little s s s s Somewhat Very s s s s Extremely s s - - s s

95 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Columbia Health/Student Health Services (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s - - Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s - - Fall of Summer of s s s s Fall of Summer of 2013 s s s s Prior to Fall of 2012 s s - - s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little s s - - s s s s - - Somewhat s s s s - - Very s s s s s s Extremely s s s s

96 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Most recent contact Fall of present Fall of Summer of s s s s s s Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of s s s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s - - Somewhat s s Very Extremely s s

97 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present 100 _ s s s s Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little s s s s Somewhat Very Extremely

98 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted University Public Safety s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s s s - - Fall of Summer of s s s s s s s s Fall of Summer of 2013 s s s s s s Prior to Fall of 2012 s s - - s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little s s s s s s - - Somewhat s s s s s s - - Very s s s s Extremely s s s s - - s s

99 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted New York City Police Department (local law enforcement) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s s s s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s - - s s Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of 2013 s s s s - - Prior to Fall of Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s - - s s A little s s s s s s Somewhat s s - - s s Very s s s s - - Extremely

100 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted Residential Programs s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s - - s s Fall of Summer of 2014 s s s s Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of 2012 s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s A little Somewhat s s s s Very s s s s s s Extremely s s s s

101 Table 5.2b. Percent of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Did not contact any programs Reason Did not know where to go or who to tell s s Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult I did not think anyone would believe me s s s s I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared negative social consequences I did not think anything would be done I feared it would not be kept confidential s s Incident was not on campus or associated with the school Incident did not occur while attending school s s Other Per 100 victims. 2 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

102 Table 5.3a. Percent of Students Experiencing Stalking by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Stalking 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Percent of Students Reporting Stalking (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Unwanted calls, s, messages, pictures, video on social networking that caused fear for personal safety Showed up somewhere or waited for student in manner that caused fear for personal safety Spied on, watched, or followed in manner that caused fear for personal safety Percent of Victims of Stalking Number of incidents since beginning of 2014 term 0 times s s time s s s s 2 times s s 3-5 times times s s or more times Association with university Student Faculty s s s s Coach, religious leader, or other non-academic advisor Other staff or administrator s s s s Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with university Don t know association with university s s - - s s s s s s s s s s

103 Table 5.3a. Percent of Students Experiencing Stalking by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Stalking 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with s s s s Teacher or advisor s s s s Co-worker, boss or supervisor Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other s s Don t Know s s s s

104 Table 5.3a. Percent of Students Experiencing Stalking by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Stalking 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Percent of Students Reporting Stalking s s Unwanted calls, s, messages, pictures, video on social networking that caused fear for personal safety Showed up somewhere or waited for student in manner that caused fear for personal safety s s s s Spied on, watched, or followed in manner that caused fear for personal safety s s Percent of Victims of Stalking Number of incidents since beginning of 2014 term 0 times s s time times s s times s s times s s s s 10 or more times Association with university Student s s Faculty s s s s Coach, religious leader, or other non-academic advisor - - s s Other staff or administrator s s - - Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with university Don t know association with university s s s s

105 Table 5.3a. Percent of Students Experiencing Stalking by Type, Gender, Enrollment Status and Characteristics of Stalking 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with s s s s Someone I had dated or was intimate with s s - - Teacher or advisor s s - - Co-worker, boss or supervisor s s - - Friend or acquaintance Stranger s s s s Other s s - - Don t Know Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

106 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Reporting to Others Friend Family member Faculty Someone else I didn t tell anyone else s s s s

107 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Reporting to a Program Contacted at least one program in university list Contacted Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s - - Fall of Summer of s s s s Fall of Summer of 2013 s s - - s s Prior to Fall of 2012 s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s - - s s A little s s s s Somewhat s s Very s s s s Extremely s s s s s s - -

108 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted Gender-Based Misconduct Office s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of 2013 s s s s Prior to Fall of 2012 s s - - s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s Somewhat s s s s s s Very s s s s s s Extremely s s - - s s

109 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Columbia Health/Student Health Services (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s Fall of Summer of 2014 s s s s Fall of Summer of 2013 s s - - s s Prior to Fall of Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all A little s s Somewhat s s s s Very s s s s Extremely s s

110 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Most recent contact Fall of present s s Fall of Summer of s s Fall of Summer of 2013 s s - - s s - - s s Prior to Fall of 2012 s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s - - s s A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s s s

111 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s s s - - s s Most recent contact Fall of present 100 _ s s s s - - s s Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s s s Somewhat s s - - s s Very Extremely

112 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted University Public Safety s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s Fall of Summer of 2014 s s s s s s Fall of Summer of s s s s - - s s Prior to Fall of s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s s s Somewhat s s s s Very s s s s Extremely s s s s

113 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Contacted New York City Police Department (local law enforcement) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) s s s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s s s s s Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of s s - - s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s A little s s s s s s Somewhat s s - - s s Very s s Extremely

114 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Contacted Residential Programs s s s s s s Most recent contact Fall of present s s - - s s Fall of Summer of s s - - s s - - Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall of 2012 s s s s Usefulness of Report in School Year Not at all s s s s s s s s A little s s s s Somewhat s s - - s s Very s s s s Extremely

115 Table 5.3b. Percent of Victims of Stalking Reporting to Others, Reporting to a Program, Timing of Report to Program, Usefulness of Report in last school year and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Did not contact any programs Reason Did not know where to go or who to tell s s s s Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult s s I did not think anyone would believe me s s - - I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared negative social consequences s s - - I did not think anything would be done I feared it would not be kept confidential s s s s Incident was not on campus or associated with the school Incident did not occur while attending school s s s s Other Per 100 victims. 2 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

116 Table 5.4. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment, Intimate Partner Violence or Stalking by Type of Incident, Gender and Enrollment Status of Victim 1, 2 Female (3,980) Male (2,655) (1,163) (2,817) (855) (1,800) Harassment Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander s s White Intimate partner violence Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native s s s s Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander s s s s - - s s White

117 Table 5.4. Percent of Students Experiencing Harassment, Intimate Partner Violence or Stalking by Type of Incident, Gender and Enrollment Status of Victim 1, 2 (continued) Female (3,980) Male (2,655) (1,163) (2,817) (855) (1,800) Stalking Sexual orientation Heterosexual Non-Heterosexual Ethnicity Hispanic Not Hispanic Race American Indian or Alaska Native s s s s s s Asian s s Black or African American s s Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander s s s s - - White Per 100 students. 2 Estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.