U.S. LEVERAGED BUYOUT MARKET
|
|
|
- Hugh George
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 M E R G E R S & A C Q U I S I T I O N S U.S. LEVERAGED BUYOUT MARKET MAY 2003 Douglas J. Lawson Vice President [email protected] Tina D. Chan Associate [email protected]
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I: Overview of the Leveraged Buyout Market... 2 Part II: Leveraged Buyout Market From Overview... 5 Leveraged Buyout Volume... 5 Number of Leveraged Buyouts... 6 Number of Financial Sponsors... 7 Breakdown of Leveraged Buyouts By Size... 8 Leveraged Buyouts by Sector Leveraged Buyout Activity Versus M&A Activity Global Leveraged Buyouts Part III: Leveraged Buyout Market Drivers Overview Leverage Valuations Availability of Targets Availability of Capital Part IV: Conclusion U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
3 PART I: OVERVIEW OF THE LEVERAGED BUYOUT MARKET The leveraged buyout market rose to prominence in the late 1980s when private equity firms such as Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts ( KKR ) and Fortsmann Little were consistently making headlines with large buyouts including the largest leveraged buyout ever, KKR s $25 billion buyout of RJR Nabisco in The success of these financial sponsors (i.e., private equity firms) and others in completing transactions and earning favorable returns attracted many other parties to the industry. There are currently hundreds of financial sponsors focused on buying companies of all sizes across many industries. With an estimated $120 billion in uninvested capital, hundreds of financial sponsors, and a difficult M&A environment, private equity firms currently face a challenging environment. As the buyout community moves forward in this competitive environment, we think it is appropriate to look back at leveraged buyouts over the last 22 years. In this M&A Insights article, we review the trends and drivers of the U.S. leveraged buyout market over the period. Our data comes from a number of different sources including Thomson Financial (i.e., Securities Data Corporation ( SDC ), Venture Economics and Buyouts), Standard & Poor s Portfolio Management Data, Loan Pricing Corporation, FactSet, Moody s and FitchRatings. In some cases, complete data back to 1980 was not available. In other cases, the data available was incomplete or contradictory. In particular, we suspect that many smaller leveraged buyouts are not reported due to the difficulty in obtaining data. In addition, some deals do not report transaction size. However, we have used what we believe to be the most complete and reliable data available. We believe that the data available captures many of the important trends. In relevant sections and exhibits, our analysis is based on disclosed transactions that are either of completed or pending status. Our analysis of volume (i.e., deal value) is based on total enterprise value (e.g., total rank value as reported by SDC) reported by each respective source. The data represents U.S. leveraged buyouts unless otherwise indicated. The data and our analysis revealed the following about the leveraged buyout market over the period: Leveraged Buyout Volume Peaked in the Late 1980s From , SDC reported leveraged buyouts totaling $505 billion. Approximately 56%, 29% and 15% of the leveraged buyout volume was in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s ( ), respectively. The period from was the most active, accounting for approximately 51% of the deal volume. Leveraged buyout volume declined significantly in the early 1990s and then increased in the late 1990s and 2000s. The Late 1980s was the Period with the Greatest Number of Leveraged Buyouts Over the period , SDC reported 4,310 leveraged buyouts. Between 1985 and 1989, there was a total of 1,290 leveraged buyouts, averaging 258 per year. This compares to an average of 216 and 235 per year in the 1990s and 2000s, respectively. Unlike the case with the volume of leveraged buyouts, the annual number of leveraged buyouts from was relatively flat. 2 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
4 Competition in the Leveraged Buyout Market has Continued to Increase According to data published by Buyouts, the number of financial sponsors increased from 229 in 1994 to 346 in While we believe the trend is accurate, we currently track more than 500 private equity firms. The Majority of Leveraged Buyouts were with Small to Midsized Companies From , 79% of leveraged buyouts had a total deal value of $250 million or less, and 61% had a total deal value of $100 million or less. The average and median size of leveraged buyouts was the highest in the late 1980s. Although average and median deal size in the 1990s and 2000s was not as high as in the late 1980s, the average and median deal size did gradually trend upward. The Majority of Leveraged Buyouts were with Manufacturing Businesses Over the period, almost 50% of leveraged buyouts (by number of deals and volume) were with manufacturing businesses. Approximately 25% (by number of deals and volume) were with service businesses. Leveraged Buyouts Represented a Relatively Small Percentage of the Overall M&A Market From , leveraged buyouts represented 5% of the total M&A volume and 4% of the total number of M&A transactions. Over this period, annual leveraged buyout volume and the number of transactions were generally lower than 4% of the total M&A market except for the late 1980s when the volume and number of transactions were in the 20% to 30% and 9% to 10% range, respectively. The Leveraged Buyout Market Outside the United States has Grown in Importance in Recent Years From , leveraged buyouts outside of the United States accounted for approximately 39% of the global leveraged buyout volume. Leveraged buyouts outside of the United States accounted for 10%, 50% and 67% of global leveraged buyout volume in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, respectively. We reviewed a variety of data in order to determine what was driving these trends in the leveraged buyout market over the period. The data revealed clear drivers for the high level of leveraged buyout activity of the late 1980s. The data also provided insight into the higher leveraged buyout volume in the late 1990s versus the early 1990s. The following drivers were evident from the data we examined: Leverage The lending multiples (as measured by total debt/ebitda) peaked at more than 8.5x in the late 1980s, coinciding with the period of the greatest leveraged buyout activity. The lower lending multiples of the 1990s and 2000s (as compared to the 1980s) resulted in lower leveraged buyout activity. As the lending multiples increased through the mid-1990s, so did the value of leveraged buyouts (but not the number of deals). Over the period, lending multiples decreased while the volume of leveraged buyouts generally increased and the number of leveraged buyouts did not show a trend. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
5 Valuations The high leveraged buyout activity of the late 1980s was also the period when overall M&A valuations were relatively low. The combination of relatively low valuations and high lending multiples made the late 1980s an attractive period for leveraged buyouts. However, this same trend was not evident after the 1980s. That is, leveraged buyout volume was not higher during periods of lower valuations. In fact, the opposite trend is evident during periods in the 1990s. Availability of Targets There were significantly more leveraged buyouts in which the target was a corporate divestiture or a public company during the late 1980s than in the 1990s and 2000s. The high level of leveraged buyouts in which the target was a corporate divestiture likely reflected the favorable environment (i.e., leverage and valuations), combined with a time when corporations were focusing on core competencies and disposing of non-core assets. We suspect that the fallout in going private transactions in the 1990s and the 2000s (i.e., transactions in which the target was a public company) was primarily driven by corporate law and regulatory developments. In addition, the initial public offering market was much more active in the 1990s and 2000s, presenting sellers with an attractive exit alternative to selling to financial sponsors and strategic buyers. Availability of Capital The availability of buyout capital increased in the late 1990s and 2000s resulting in more participants entering the industry. This increase in available capital was likely a driver of the increase in leveraged buyout volume in the late 1990s and 2000s versus the early 1990s. In Part II, we review the trends in the leveraged buyout market over the period. In Part III, we review the key drivers of the leveraged buyout market over Finally, in Part IV, we provide some concluding comments about the leveraged buyout market including some of the strategies private equity firms are considering and/or adopting. 4 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
6 PART II: LEVERAGED BUYOUT MARKET FROM Overview In Part II, we review trends in the leveraged buyout market over the period. Generally, we do not review the drivers of these leveraged buyout trends until Part III. In this part, we review the following leveraged buyout trends: Leveraged Buyout Volume Number of Leveraged Buyouts Number of Financial Sponsors Breakdown of Leveraged Buyouts by Size Leveraged Buyouts by Sector Leveraged Buyout Activity Versus M&A Activity Global Leveraged Buyouts Leveraged Buyout Volume From , the total leveraged buyout volume as reported by SDC was $505 billion. As a percentage of total leveraged buyout volume over the period, the breakdown of leveraged buyout volume by the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s was 56%, 29%, and 15%, respectively. The period from was a particularly active period for leveraged buyouts, accounting for approximately 51% of the total leveraged buyout volume. Leveraged buyout volume grew from a few billion dollars in 1980 to a peak of $97 billion in 1988 (Exhibit I). Leveraged buyout volume in the 1980s totaled $285 billion. In the late 1980s, average leveraged buyout volume was $52 billion per year. The volume of leveraged buyouts declined in the early 1990s, averaging approximately $10 billion per year over the period. Leveraged buyout volume increased in the late 1990s, peaking in 1999 at $32 billion. Leveraged buyout volume reached $40 billion in 2000 and declined to $12 billion in Leveraged buyout volume was $23 billion in Exhibit I LBO VOLUME $120 $100 Domestic LBO Value ($ in billions) $80 $60 $40 $20 $ Source: Securities Data Corporation U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
7 Number of Leveraged Buyouts From , the number of leveraged buyouts as reported by SDC was 4,310. Approximately 35% of leveraged buyouts occurred in the 1980s, 49% in the 1990s and 16% in the 2000s. The average annual number of leveraged buyout deals between 1985 and 1989 was 258 deals (we excluded due to insufficient data). The average annual number of leveraged buyouts during the 1990s and 2000s was 210 and 235 deals, respectively. The leveraged buyout market grew from few reported deals in the early 1980s to 315 deals in 1989 (Exhibit II). Over the period, the annual number of deals varied from a low of 187 deals to a high of 233 deals. The number of leveraged buyouts peaked in 2000 at 341 deals, declined in 2001 to 179 deals, and rebounded to 185 deals in The trend of higher leveraged buyout activity in the late 1980s was not as pronounced when comparing the number of deals (Exhibit II) to volume (Exhibit I). This suggests higher average deal size in the late 1980s (versus the 1990s and 2000s). In addition, unlike the case with leveraged buyout volume, the number of leveraged buyouts did not show the increasing trend from the early 1990s to the late 1990s and 2000s. Again, this suggests a change in deal size. Exhibit II NUMBER OF LBO DEALS Domestic LBO Transactions Source: Securities Data Corporation 6 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
8 Number of Financial Sponsors Over , the number of financial sponsors as reported by Buyouts increased from 229 to 346 (Exhibit III). The available data only tracked the number of financial sponsors from While we have used Buyouts as the source of information to track the growth in private equity firms, our internal database currently has more than 500 firms. We note that the increase in financial sponsors over the period is not associated with an increase in the number of leveraged buyouts. While the data may be incomplete, it does suggest that the environment is much more challenging for private equity firms. Exhibit III FINANCIAL SPONSORS Number of LBO Firms Source: Buyouts U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
9 Breakdown of Leveraged Buyouts by Size The majority of leveraged buyouts have been with small and midsized companies. Over the period, the breakdown of leveraged buyouts by deal size for transactions with reported enterprise value was: deals less than $250 million accounted for 79%; deals between $250 million and $500 million accounted for 10%; deals between $500 million and $1 billion accounted for 6%; and deals greater than $1 billion accounted for 5%. The percentage breakdown of leveraged buyouts by deal size remained relatively consistent in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Exhibit IV BREAKDOWN OF LBO DEALS BY DEAL SIZE Number of Deals Deals less than $250 million Deals $500 million - $1 billion Deals $250 million - $500 million Deals greater than $1 billion Note: Data is based on transactions with reported enterprise value (i.e., rank value) Source: Securities Data Corporation Average and Median Deal Size Average Deal Size From , the average leveraged buyout deal size was $221 million. The average leveraged buyout deal size was significantly higher in the 1980s as compared to the 1990s and 2000s. Average leveraged buyout deal size showed a generally increasing trend from the early 1990s through the late 1990s and 2000s. Average leveraged buyout deal size in the early 1980s was slightly more than $150 million. By the late 1980s, average leveraged buyout deal size increased to more than $300 million. The average leveraged buyout deal size declined dramatically in the early 1990s, falling to $63 million in Through the rest of the 1990s, the average leveraged buyout deal size steadily increased, reaching $237 million in In 2001, the average leveraged buyout deal size slumped to $121 million but rebounded to $253 million in We suspect that the average leveraged buyout deal size is somewhat overstated as a result of the difficulty in obtaining information on the smaller transactions. 8 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
10 Median Deal Size From , the median leveraged buyout deal size shows a similar but more modest trend than the average leveraged buyout deal size. Over this period, the median leveraged buyout deal size was $55 million. The median leveraged buyout deal size in the late 1980s peaked at $123 million in 1986 and remained around $120 million from In the early to mid-1990s, median leveraged buyout deal size decreased and remained at levels between $20 million and $50 million. The median leveraged buyout deal size increased in the late 1990s, peaking at $101 million in So far in the 2000s, the median leveraged buyout deal size is $36 million. Exhibit V AVERAGE VERSUS MEDIAN LBO DEAL SIZE $560 $480 Deal Size ($ in millions) $400 $320 $240 $160 $80 $ Average LBO Deal Size Median LBO Deal Size Note: Data in 1980 was omitted because it was not meaningful. Source: Securities Data Corporation Top Leveraged Buyouts The top ten leveraged buyouts in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s amounted to $61 billion, $17 billion and $25 billion, respectively (Exhibit VI). The 1980s accounted for many of the largest leveraged buyouts, including the largest leveraged buyout ever, KKR s $25 billion purchase of RJR Nabisco. While there were fewer large leveraged buyouts in the 1990s, there have already been a number of large transactions so far in the 2000s. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
11 Exhibit VI TOP TEN LEVERAGED BUYOUTS (1) (2) 2000s Date Deal Value Announced Acquirer Target Industry ($ in billions) 08/20/2002 Carlyle Group Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe Qwest Commun Intl - QwestDex Communications $7 09/23/2002 David H. Murdock Dole Food Food 3 08/07/2000 Schroder Ventures Avnet Arrow Electronics VEBA Electronics Computer 2 10/20/2000 Berkshire Hathaway Shaw Industries Consumer 2 05/29/2000 BC Partners Mark IV Industries Automotive 2 03/29/2000 Veritas Software Silver Lake Partners Seagate Technology Technology 2 01/16/2001 Forstmann Little Citadel Communications Communications 2 11/07/2002 Thomas H. Lee Bain Capital Houghton Mifflin Publishing 2 04/13/2002 Kelso & Company LP Nortek Management Nortek Building Products 2 01/31/2001 First Reserve Corporation Odyssey Investment Dresser Equipment Group Energy 2 DEG Management Total $ s Date Deal Value Announced Acquirer Target Industry ($ in billions) 07/02/1998 Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe Centennial Cellular Communications $3 09/12/1994 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts Borden Inc Food 2 06/28/1999 Thomas H. Lee Roger Altman Big Flower Holdings Advertising 2 08/12/1997 Hicks Muse Tate & Furst LIN Television Broadcasting 2 05/11/1999 Texas Pacific Group Motorola (Semiconductor Group) Semiconductors 2 07/02/1990 Forstmann Little General Instrument Cable/Television 2 04/25/1990 Investcorp Bank EC BATUS (Saks Fifth Avenue) Retail 2 09/08/1999 dba Communications LLC GTE (Assets) Communications 1 05/09/1995 RIC Holdings Inc Riverwood International Paper 1 02/09/1996 Bain Capital Thomas H. Lee TRW Information Systems Group Financial 1 Total $ s Date Deal Value Announced Acquirer Target Industry ($ in billions) 10/24/1988 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts RJR Nabisco Tobacco and Food $25 10/16/1985 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts Beatrice Companies Food/Consumer 5 07/25/1986 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts Safeway Stores Retail - Grocery 4 06/22/1988 FH Acquisition Corp Fort Howard Paper Paper 4 03/28/1989 Wings Holdings NWA Airline 4 01/21/1988 BFB Acquisition Montgomery Ward Retail 4 04/13/1987 Merrill Lynch Capital Partners/ Borg-Warner Holdings Borg-Warner Automotive/Manufacturing 4 07/03/1987 JT Acquisition Southland Convenience Stores 4 12/11/1986 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts/ Owens-Illinois Holdings Owens-Illinois Packaging 4 09/15/1988 HCA Management Group Hospital Corp of America Hospitals 4 Total $61 (1) Lists primary acquirers only. (2) From Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray and Securities Data Corporation 10 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
12 Leveraged Buyouts by Sector Volume Over the period, the breakdown of leveraged buyout volume by sector as a percentage of total leveraged buyout volume was: manufacturing businesses accounted for 49%; service businesses accounted for 25%; distribution businesses accounted for 17%; and other sectors accounted for 9%. Manufacturing businesses have accounted for the largest percentage (by volume) of leveraged buyouts in all three periods. In the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s they accounted for 54%, 44%, and 42% of the volume of leveraged buyouts, respectively. However, leveraged buyouts of service businesses have increased in the 1990s and 2000s, during which time they accounted for 32% of the volume. Exhibit VII NUMBER OF LBO DEALS BY SECTOR $120 $100 LBO Deal Value ($ in billions) $80 $60 $40 $20 $ Manufacturing Business Services Distribution Other Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray and Securities Data Corporation U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
13 Number of Deals From , the breakdown of the number of leveraged buyouts by sector as a percentage of the total leveraged buyouts mirrored the results previously discussed when leveraged buyouts were broken down by volume. The trends in each time period (i.e., the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s) were also similar. The breakdown of leveraged buyouts by sector from was: manufacturing businesses accounted for 48%; service businesses accounted for 25%; distribution businesses accounted for 15%; and other sectors accounted for 12%. Exhibit VIII NUMBER OF LBO DEALS BY SECTOR Number of LBOs Manufacturing Business Services Distribution Other Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray and Securities Data Corporation 12 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
14 Leveraged Buyout Activity Versus M&A Activity Volume Over the period , the total leveraged buyout volume of $505 billion amounted to 5% of the total M&A volume of $10 trillion. Leveraged buyout volume as a percentage of M&A volume was highest in the late 1980s, peaking at 29% in From , leveraged buyout volume as a percentage of M&A volume was generally less than 5%. The exceptions were in 1992 and 2002 when leveraged buyout volume was 7% and 6%, respectively. Exhibit IX LBO VERSUS M&A VOLUME LBO Volume Versus M&A Volume $1,750 $1,500 LBO Deal Value ($ in billions) $1,250 $1,000 $750 $500 $250 $ LBO Volume M&A Volume LBO Volume as a Percentage of M&A Volume (1) 35.0% 30.0% LBO Deal Value / M&A Deal Value 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% (1) Data in 1980 was omitted because it was not meaningful. Source: Securities Data Corporation U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
15 Number of Deals Over the period , the total number of leveraged buyouts was 4,310, accounting for 4% of the total number of M&A transactions of 120,360. The number of leveraged buyouts as a percentage of M&A deals was highest in the late 1980s, ranging from approximately 8% to 10%. In the 1990s and 2000s, the number of leveraged buyouts as a percentage of M&A deals was generally less than 4%. Exhibit X LBO VERSUS M&A NUMBER OF DEALS Number of LBO Deals Versus Number of M&A Deals 12,000 10,000 Number of Transactions 8,000 6,000 4,000 2, LBO Transactions M&A Transactions 12.0% Number of LBO Deals as a Percentage of Number of M&A Deals (1) LBO Transactions / M&A Transactions 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% (1) Data in 1980 was omitted because it was not meaningful. Source: Securities Data Corporation 14 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
16 Average and Median Deal Size Average Deal Size Over the period, the average leveraged buyout deal size of $221 million was larger than the average M&A deal size of $188 million. In the late 1980s, the average deal size for leveraged buyouts was significantly higher than the average deal size for M&A transactions (Exhibit XI). Over the period, the average deal size of a leveraged buyout was $345 million versus $175 million for the overall M&A market. During the 1990s, the average deal size of leveraged buyouts of $149 million was closer to the average deal size of M&A transactions of $177 million. So far in the 2000s, the average deal size of leveraged buyouts and M&A transactions have been $188 million and $271 million, respectively. Median Deal Size From , the median leveraged buyout deal size was $55 million, which was higher than the median M&A deal size of $20 million. Median leveraged buyout deal size in the late 1980s was $100 million as compared to $40 million for M&A transactions. During the 1990s, the median deal size was $40 million for leveraged buyouts and $17 million for M&A transactions. So far in the 2000s, the median deal sizes of leveraged buyouts and M&A transactions have been $34 million and $22 million, respectively. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
17 Exhibit XI LBO VERSUS M&A DEAL SIZE LBO Versus M&A Average Deal Size $560 $480 $400 Deal Size ($ in millions) $320 $240 $160 $80 $ Average LBO Deal Size Average Domestic M&A Deal Size LBO Versus M&A Median Deal Size $400 $350 $300 Deal Size ($ in millions) $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $ Median LBO Deal Size Median Domestic M&A Deal Size Note: Data in 1980 was omitted because it was not meaningful. Source: Securities Data Corporation 16 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
18 Global Leveraged Buyouts Over , the total global leveraged buyout volume was $834 billion. U.S. leveraged buyouts accounted for $505 billion (60%) of global volume versus $329 billion (40%) of the volume for leveraged buyouts outside of the United States. Since the late 1980s, non-u.s. leveraged buyouts accounted for an increasingly large portion of the global market. Reported leveraged buyouts outside of the United States rose from $4 billion in 1987 to nearly $60 billion in Non-U.S. leveraged buyouts accounted for 50% of the total global leveraged buyout volume in the 1990s. So far in the 2000s, this percentage has increased to 67%. Exhibit XII U.S. VERSUS NON-U.S. LBO VOLUME $120 $100 LBO Deal Value ($ in billions) $80 $60 $40 $20 $ Non-U.S. LBO Volume U.S. LBO V olume Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray and Securities Data Corporation U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
19 PART III LEVERAGED BUYOUT MARKET DRIVERS Overview Leveraged Buyout Trends from As set out in Part II, there have been a number of changes in the leveraged buyout market over the period. The most significant trends were: Leveraged buyout volume and the number of leveraged buyouts were the highest in the late 1980s. Leveraged buyout volume was greater in the late 1990s and early 2000s as compared to the early 1990s. The number of buyout firms has increased significantly. The average and median leveraged buyout deal size was significantly larger in the 1980s versus the 1990s and 2000s. Leveraged buyouts represented a much higher percentage of M&A activity in the late 1980s as compared to other periods. In this part, we review the drivers behind some of these trends. 18 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
20 Leveraged Buyout Returns In the 1970s and early 1980s, there were few participants in the leveraged buyout market and many of them earned exceptional returns. For example, in the 1982 leveraged buyout of Gibson Greetings a $330,000 investment was turned into $66 million in 18 months. The successes of these initial participants attracted many more players to the industry. Leveraged buyout returns are generally a function of one or more of the following factors: (i) leverage; (ii) growth; (iii) margin enhancement; and (iv) multiple expansion. Leverage has historically been the most important driver of buyout returns. Growth and margin enhancements have been important contributors to returns in a number of industries. Private equity firms have also benefited from multiple expansion, that is, buying the target for a lower multiple than that which is received upon an exit. This multiple expansion may be driven by growth, margin enhancement or conditions in the financial markets (e.g., higher valuation multiples). Exhibit XIII sets out the net buyout returns (i.e., buyout returns to the limited partners) as reported by Venture Economics. We suspect that this data is incomplete as a result of the challenges in obtaining this information. However, we believe it to be the most complete reported data. From , buyout returns averaged 41%, with the top quartile of leveraged buyout returns averaging 92%. In the 1990s, average buyout returns were significantly lower than in the late 1980s; returns averaged 16% and the top quartile averaged 34%. So far in the 2000s, top quartile buyout returns have declined to an average of 8%. Exhibit XIII BUYOUT RETURNS 160.0% 140.0% 120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Returns 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% (20.0%) (40.0%) Buyout Returns Top Quartile Buyout Returns Source: Venture Economics U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
21 Buyout returns generally exceeded returns from the S&P 500 during the 1980s (Exhibit XIV). In the 1990s, average buyout returns and average S&P 500 returns both were approximately 16%. In the 2000s, average buyout returns and average S&P 500 returns were approximately 5% and 12%, respectively. Exhibit XIV BUYOUT RETURNS VERSUS S&P 500 RETURNS 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% Returns 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% (10.0%) (20.0%) Buyout Returns S&P 500 Returns Source: Venture Economics As long as returns were relatively attractive, parties were drawn to the leveraged buyout industry. Over the period, top financial sponsors have earned extremely attractive returns. The lure of exceptional returns continued to attract participants to the industry over this period of time. While there has been an increase in participants in the leveraged buyout market, the activity has not approached the levels seen in the late 1980s. Over the period, the high activity of the late 1980s and lower levels in later years were driven primarily by the following: (i) leverage; (ii) valuations; and (iii) the availability of attractive targets. In addition, the increased availability of capital has continued to attract participants to the industry and has contributed to the increased competitive environment. We discuss these four drivers in the following sections. 20 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
22 Leverage Overview Leverage has historically been the most important driver of the leveraged buyout market. Generally, the higher the leverage and the lower the equity contribution, the higher the total returns. In the leveraged buyout community, leverage is generally measured by total debt/ebitda. While the debt is composed of a number of instruments such as senior debt, high yield debt and mezzanine debt, a discussion of these components is beyond the scope of this article. Leverage Lending Multiples Total debt/ebitda multiples averaged 5.4x over the period (Exhibit XV). Lending multiples declined from a peak of 8.8x in 1987 to 3.8x in (The available data only reported average lending multiples since 1987.) The high lending multiples of the late 1980s coincided with the period of the greatest leveraged buyout activity. The average lending multiples in the 1990s and 2000s were 5.3x and 3.8x, respectively. The decline in lending multiples was driven by an increase in default rates and regulatory pressure. The lower lending multiples in the 2000s have been driven by the downturn in the economy, the consolidation of lending institutions, a less receptive high yield market, and an increase in default rates. The lower leverage multiples after 1989 coincided with lower leveraged buyout activity as compared to the late 1980s. From , leveraged buyout volume (but not number of deals) generally increased as leverage multiples trended upwards. Over the period, lending multiples decreased while the volume of leveraged buyouts generally increased and the number of leveraged buyouts did not show a trend. Exhibit XV AVERAGE LENDING MULTIPLES 10.0x 8.8x 8.0x 7.1x 6.7x Multiples 6.0x 4.0x 2.0x 4.7x 3.7x 5.3x 3.4x 3.4x 5.0x 5.2x 5.3x 5.2x 3.3x 2.6x 2.7x 2.8x 5.8x 5.7x 5.3x 3.5x 3.6x 3.5x 4.5x 3.3x 4.0x 2.9x 3.7x 3.8x 2.2x 2.4x 0.0x Total Debt / EBITDA Senior Secured Debt / EBITDA Note: There were too few deals in 1991 to provide a meaningful sample. Source: Standard & Poor s Portfolio Management Data U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
23 In conjunction with lending multiples, we looked at lending volumes over the period. M&A leverage lending volume peaked in the late 1980s, which was consistent with the trend in leveraged buyout activity (Exhibit XVI). Volume in the leverage lending market was also higher in the late 1990s and 2000s versus the early 1990s. Exhibit XVII sets out the issuance in the high yield market over the period; this is total issuance and not just M&A-related issuance. The percentage of issuance related to M&A was much higher in the 1980s versus the 1990s. Exhibit XVIII sets out the high yield default rates. The high yield default rates in the early 1990s are consistent with the decline in lending multiples that occurred since the late 1980s. The high yield default rates in the 2000s are consistent with the decline in lending multiples in the 2000s. Exhibit XVI M&A LEVERAGE LOAN VOLUME $160 $140 Loan Volume ($ in billions) $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $ Source: Loan Pricing Corporation 22 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
24 Exhibit XVII HIGH YIELD DEBT MARKET $175 1,000 $ Proceeds ($ in billions) $105 $ Number of Issues $ $ High Yield Proceeds Number of Issues Source: Securities Data Corporation Exhibit XVIII HIGH YIELD BOND DEFAULTS $90 12% $75 10% Default Volume ($ in billions) $60 $45 $30 8% 6% 4% Default Rates $15 2% $ % Default Volume Default Rate Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray; Moody s; and FitchRatings U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
25 Capital Structure In conjunction with leverage, we looked at the equity contributions in leveraged buyouts over the period (data was not available prior to 1987). The low equity contributions of the late 1980s are consistent with the higher leveraged buyout volume during this period of time. However, equity contributions increased over the period during which time the leveraged buyout volume increased and the number of leveraged buyouts remained relatively stable. Average equity contribution increased from 7% in 1987 to 41% in 2002, which was consistent with the decrease in lending multiples over this time period. In the late 1980s, equity contribution averaged approximately 10%. In the 1990s and 2000s, the equity contribution averaged approximately 25% and 40%, respectively. Exhibit XIX LBO EQUITY CONTRIBUTION 50% 40% Equity Contributed Percentage 30% 20% 10% 0% 40.6% 41.0% 35.7% 37.8% 30.0% 31.6% 20.7% 22.0% 25.2% 26.2% 23.7% 22.9% 13.4% 9.7% 7.0% Note: There were too few deals in 1991 to provide a meaningful sample. Source: Standard & Poor s Portfolio Management Data 24 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
26 Valuations Valuation Multiples We examined M&A valuations over the period to see if there was a correlation between leveraged buyout activity and valuation multiples. Prior to 1984, there were no relevant valuation multiples reported by SDC. Over the period, EBITDA transaction multiples (i.e., enterprise value/ebitda) averaged 7.9x, ranging between 5.3x and 10.0x. Over the period, valuation multiples were relatively low, averaging 7.2x and varying between 5.3x and 8.0x. These relatively low valuation multiples occurred during the period of the highest leveraged buyout activity. Between 1993 and 2002, average EBITDA multiples increased to 8.6x, while leveraged buyout activity declined from the levels in the late 1980s. However, the lower valuations of the early 1990s were not associated with higher leveraged buyout activity; in fact, the activity was relatively low during this period. Exhibit XX OVERALL M&A VALUATIONS Multiples 16.0x 14.0x 12.0x 10.0x 8.0x 6.0x 4.0x 2.0x 0.0x EBIT Multiple EBITDA Multiple Note: There were no relevant valuation multiples reported by SDC prior to Source: Securities Data Corporation U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
27 Availability of Targets Overview The availability of attractive targets is an important driver of leveraged buyout activity. An attractive leveraged buyout candidate is typically associated with some or all of the following characteristics: Stable cash flow Non-cyclical business Fixed assets that can be used as collateral Low level of debt Low capital expenditures Assets and/or divisions that can be sold to pay down debt Experienced management with a proven track record Opportunity for cost reduction and margin improvement Companies with these characteristics generally have a high borrowing capacity and have the ability to service significant levels of debt. Manufacturing companies often have many of the aforementioned characteristics. As discussed in Part II, the majority of leveraged buyouts have been with manufacturing companies over (Exhibit XXI). In addition to the characteristics mentioned above, financial sponsors are looking for companies that have the potential to generate high returns through growth, margin enhancement and multiple arbitrage. We note that the decrease in leveraged buyouts is consistent with the shift to the service sector, representing a larger portion of the economy. However, in absolute terms this does not necessarily contribute to the falloff in leveraged buyouts in the 1990s and 2000s. Exhibit XXI BREAKDOWN OF LBOS BY SECTOR Number of LBOs Manufacturing Business Services Distribution Other Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray and Securities Data Corporation 26 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
28 Public Market Activity We examined the activity in the public markets over the period in order to determine if it may have affected leveraged buyout activity. An initial public offering provides an alternative to selling to a strategic or financial buyer for a seller of a private company or division of a public company. When the public equity markets have higher valuations and higher investor demand, an initial public offering becomes relatively more attractive than a leveraged buyout. We examined the number and volume of initial public offerings over the period as well as public company valuations as represented by price/earnings ratios. Initial public offering activity was significantly higher in the 1990s and 2000s as compared to the 1980s (Exhibit XXII). In addition, public company valuations were higher in the 1990s and 2000s as compared to the 1980s. We suspect that the more favorable conditions in the initial public offering market in the 1990s and 2000s influenced the lower level of leveraged buyouts as compared to the late 1980s. However, we note that this in isolation does not support the higher leveraged buyout activity in the late 1990s and 2000s versus the early 1990s. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
29 Exhibit XXII PUBLIC MARKET ACTIVITY Initial Public Offerings $ Proceeds ($ in billions) $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $ Number of IPOs $ Proceeds ($ in billions) Number of IPOs S&P 500 Price to Earnings Ratio Versus LBO Volume 50.0x $ x $100 S&P PE Ratio 30.0x 20.0x $75 $50 LBO Volume ($ in billions) 10.0x $25 0.0x $- PE Ratio LBO Volume Source: U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray; Securities Data Corporation; and FactSet 28 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
30 Leveraged Buyout by Divestitures, Public and Private Targets We also reviewed leveraged buyouts by type of target: divestitures, private targets and public targets over the period in order to see if the availability of any of these targets was higher during the late 1980s. From , 4,231 (98%) leveraged buyouts out of the total of 4,310 reported deal type. Out of the 4,231 leveraged buyouts, there were 2,416 (58%) divestitures, 1,118 (26%) private targets and 697 (16%) public targets. Over the period, the leveraged buyout volume by target was as follows: $205 billion (40%) were divestitures, $267 billion (52%) were public companies and $42 billion (8%) were private companies. We suspect that the results related to low private company volume and number of deals are a function of the difficulty in obtaining this information. Corporate Divestitures The leveraged buyout volume in which divestitures were the target was significantly higher in the late 1980s than in the 1990s or 2000s (Exhibit XXIII). Between 1986 and 1989, the average annual leveraged buyouts of corporate divestitures were $19 billion and 159 transactions. These numbers dropped to $7 billion and 126 deals in the 1990s. So far in the 2000s, the numbers are $14 billion and 112 transactions. We suspect that the relatively large divestiture activity in the late 1980s was driven by a period of time when corporations were focusing on their core competencies and disposing of non-core businesses. In addition, private equity firms were in a stronger position to compete for the divestitures as a result of the high leverage multiples and low valuations in that period. While the absolute level of divestitures in the overall M&A market was not higher in the late 1980s versus the 1990s and 2000s, on a relative basis, they were higher than public and private company M&A transactions. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
31 Exhibit XXIII DIVESTITURES Leveraged Buyout Divestitures $ $ LBO Volume ($ in billions) $15 $ Number of LBOs $5 40 $ Divestiture LBO Volume Number of Divestitures M&A Deals by Type 8,000 7,000 6,000 Number of Deals 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1, Private Divestiture Public Source: Securities Data Corporation 30 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
32 Public Companies Similar to corporate divestitures, the leveraged buyout volume of public companies peaked in the late 1980s (Exhibit XXIV). Between 1985 and 1989, the average annual leveraged buyouts of public companies amounted to $34 billion and 55 transactions. In the 1990s, these figures fell to $6 billion and 22 transactions. So far in the 2000s, the average annual leveraged buyouts of public companies has amounted to $10 billion and 45 transactions. The lower leveraged buyout activity of the 1990s and 2000s (versus the late 1980s) likely reflects the increased challenge for leveraged buyouts of public companies as a result of regulatory changes and developments in corporate law (e.g., the Revlon duties). For example, if a financial sponsor approaches a public company with the idea of a going private transaction, it is likely that if the company is receptive, a competitive auction will be triggered. The result is that the financial sponsor could spend significant time and money without being successful in consummating a going private transaction. Exhibit XXIV PUBLIC TARGET LBOS $ $ LBO Volume ($ in billions) $45 $ Number of LBOs $15 25 $ Public LBO Volume Number of Public LBOs Source: Securities Data Corporation U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
33 Private Companies The trend with respect to leveraged buyouts of private companies in the late 1980s versus the 1990s and 2000s was much less pronounced than the case with divestitures and public companies (Exhibit XXV). We believe that the data with respect to private company leveraged buyouts is the least reliable compared to divestiture and public data because of the difficulty in compiling this information. Between 1985 and 1989, average annual private company leveraged buyout volume and number of deals were $2 billion and 55 deals, respectively. In the 1990s, these figures were $2 billion and 60 transactions. So far in the 2000s, the figures are $1 billion and 64 transactions. Exhibit XXV PRIVATE TARGET LBOS $6 125 $5 100 LBO Volume ($ in billions) $4 $ Number of LBOs $1 25 $ Private LBO Volume Number of Private LBOs Source: Securities Data Corporation 32 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
34 Availability of Capital Over the period, new participants continued to enter the leveraged buyout industry because of the increased availability of equity capital. Buyout fundraising increased significantly in the late 1990s (Exhibit XXVI). The uninvested capital of buyout firms also increased significantly in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Exhibit XXVII). The result of these trends is that many more participants have been able to enter the industry, creating a more competitive environment. Exhibit XXVI BUYOUT FUNDRAISING $80 $70 Buyout Funds Raised ($ in billions) $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $ Source: Venture Economics Exhibit XXVII UNIVESTED CAPITAL FOR LBOS $140 $120 Annual Capital ($ in billions) $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $ YTD 9/30/02 Source: Venture Economics U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
35 PART IV: CONCLUSION The leveraged buyout industry has undergone significant changes over the period. Leveraged buyout activity peaked in the late 1980s. Leveraged buyout activity was higher in the late 1990s and 2000s as compared to the early 1990s. The number of private equity firms has increased, driven by the attraction of high returns and the availability of equity capital. The major drivers of the leveraged buyout activity over this period were leverage, valuations, and the availability of attractive targets and capital. Currently, the leveraged buyout industry faces a challenging environment due to the availability of relatively low leverage, $120 billion in uninvested capital, hundreds of financial sponsors, and a difficult M&A environment. The current leveraged buyout industry is very competitive. We suspect that many of the current players in the private equity community will not survive this more competitive environment. However, we believe that it will take a number of years for many of the less competitive firms to exit the industry. The gradual exits will be driven by the less competitive firms continuing to employ uninvested capital and only gradually selling off low return portfolio companies. The firms with a track record of producing exceptional returns will continue to attract interest from investors (i.e., the limited partners such as pension funds and insurance companies). As firms adjust to this more competitive environment, we see firms considering or adopting one or more of the following strategies in order to compete in this increasingly competitive environment: Industry Specialization Industry specialization allows private equity firms to better recognize attractive opportunities. In addition, this specialization may aid the private equity firm in sourcing deals and in successfully enhancing the value of the business. Operating Professionals Operating expertise allows financial sponsors to more competitively source opportunities, recognize and enhance value. Focus on Smaller Transactions Some firms have focused on smaller companies in the belief that the market for these companies is not as competitive. International Markets Private equity firms are exploring international markets in which the industry is less developed and there is a greater volume of attractive opportunities. In-house Financing Some private equity firms now have the ability to provide both the debt and equity in a leveraged buyout. This often provides them with an advantage over the competition. Risk Sharing Some financial sponsors are partnering with their competitors in order to share resources and spread risk. While we expect the private equity industry to continue to evolve, we believe that industry leaders will continue to enjoy attractive returns. 34 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
36 NOTES U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
37 NOTES Nondeposit investment products are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or other obligations of or guaranteed by U.S. Bank National Association or its affiliates, and involve investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. 36 U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights
38 U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY M&A REPORT INDEX M&A Industry Reports Our industry reports identify industries with consolidation opportunities and valuation trends. - Valuations in the Packaging Industry - European Food Industry - Packaging Industry Public Acquirers - Earnings Per Share Accretion/Dilution Considerations - Mergers & Acquisitions - Value Drivers For Companies in the Packaging Industry - Mergers & Acquisitions in the Packaging Industry 2002 Year in Review - Industrial Distribution - Housewares & Household Products - Construction Materials Update - Plastics - Mining Higher Aggregate Values - Die-Casting M&A Insights These articles focus on technical issues in the M&A marketplace. - U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From The Effect of an Acquisition on Earnings Per Share - Accretion/Dilution Analysis - Tax-Free Acquisitions - Trends in Acquisition Consideration - UK Orphan Companies - Private Equity Survey - Taxable Sales of C Corporations - Taxable Sales of S Corporations - Middle Market M&A Outlook - The Furor Over Purchase & Pooling - Putting the Collar on Stock Deals - What About a Dutch Auction? - Endangered Species Update - Wall Street s Endangered Species - Make Your Cash Flow Sing, Your Stock Will Dance - Leveraged Recapitalizations: Financing Tools For Financial Buyers - Mezzanine Financing Demystified M&A Monitor We publish a weekly e-newsletter that analyzes M&A activity and features topics of interest to the M&A marketplace. The Wrap We publish a monthly e-newsletter that covers topics related to current M&A activity in the packaging industry. To access the above listed products in Adobe Acrobat PDF format, please visit our web site at or call to request a copy. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray M&A Insights U.S. Leveraged Buyout Market From
39 CONTACTS Middle Market Mergers & Acquisitions Glenn A. Gurtcheff Jeff A. Rosenkranz Managing Director Managing Director Co-Head Co-Head David P. Crosby Managing Director Daniel E. Kubes Managing Director Michael R. Dillahunt Principal John A. Hogan, Jr. Principal Robert D. Frost Vice President Douglas J. Lawson Vice President Walter D. Murphy Vice President Michael E. Pohlen Vice President Heather D. Goodwin VP, Marketing U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. David I. Wilson Managing Director Matthew J. Flower Vice President Investment Banking Brad F. England Senior Managing Director Head of Investment Banking CONSUMER Murray C. Huneke Managing Director Head of Consumer David M. Jacquin Managing Director Scott R. LaRue Managing Director FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Robert P. Rinek Managing Director Head of Financial Institutions HEALTH CARE J. Thomas Halverson Principal John A. Barrymore Vice President John T. Twichell Vice President Peter M. Gill Managing Director Jon W. Salveson Managing Director Head of Health Care Robert A. DeSutter Managing Director Head of Health Care M&A Daniel J. Gulbrandson Principal Edward A. Lagerstrom Principal TECHNOLOGY & COMMUNICATIONS Chad R. Abraham Managing Director Head of Technology & Communications David M. Jacquin Managing Director Head of Technology & Communications M&A Hugh J. Hoffman Managing Director Jason D. Hutchinson Managing Director Steven R. Rickman Managing Director Eric M. Nicholson Principal (c)2003 U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc., 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800, Minneapolis, Minnesota
40 Equity Capital Markets Mergers & Acquisitions MINNEAPOLIS SAN FRANCISCO NEW YORK CHICAGO MENLO PARK LONDON* TEL AVIV** M&A Web Site: Web Site: Institutional/Corporate Clients: Individual Investors: Securities products and services are offered through U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc., member of SIPC and NYSE, Inc., a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp and in the United Kingdom through its affiliated company U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Capital Markets Ltd., which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. *U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Capital Markets Ltd. **Strategic alliance: Securities products and services are offered in Israel through Nessuah Zannex Ltd. under an agreement with USBPJI. 04/
One COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Leveraged Buyout Overview. http://www.pbookshop.com. Part
Part One Leveraged Buyout Overview leveraged buyout (LBO) is a fundamental, yet complex acquisition commonly used in the investment banking and private equity industries. We A will take a look at the basic
Mergers & Acquisitions Environment for the Battery Power Industry
Mergers & Acquisitions Environment for the Battery Power Industry 1 Current Themes in M&A U.S. M&A activity returned strongly since 2010 after a drop off in volume in 2009 and has remained relatively healthy
The Art of the LBO. Agenda. November 2004
The Art of the LBO November 2004 Agenda I. An Overview of Leveraged Buyouts II. The Building Blocks III. Putting It All Together IV. How It Happens in Reality 2 1 I. An Overview of Leveraged Buyouts What
Third-Quarter Financial Release Discussion Material
Third-Quarter Financial Release Discussion Material 22 October 2015 Certain statements in this presentation relate to future events and expectations and are forward-looking statements within the meaning
INTERACTIVE DATA REPORTS FOURTH-QUARTER AND FULL- YEAR 2014 RESULTS
Press Release INTERACTIVE DATA REPORTS FOURTH-QUARTER AND FULL- YEAR 2014 RESULTS New York February 12, 2015 Interactive Data Corporation today reported its financial results for the fourth quarter and
The Adjusted Present Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1
Chapter 17 Valuation and Capital Budgeting for the Levered Firm 17A-1 Appendix 17A The Adjusted Present Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1 Introduction A leveraged buyout (LBO) is the acquisition
The Adjusted Present Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1 Introduction
Chapter 18 Valuation and Capital Budgeting for the Levered Firm 18A-1 Appendix 18A The Adjusted Present Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1 Introduction A leveraged buyout (LBO) is the acquisition
Greif Reports Fourth Quarter 2014 Results
Contacts Analyst: Robert Lentz Media: Scott Griffin 614-876-2000 740-657-6516 Greif Reports Fourth Quarter 2014 Results Net sales for the fourth quarter 2014 were flat compared to the fourth quarter 2013
Industry Presentation 14 th Annual Factoring Conference San Diego, CA. Milestone Advisors, LLC. Commercial Finance Industry Overview.
Industry Presentation 14 th Annual Factoring Conference San Diego, CA April 9 12, 2008 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS CORPORATE FINANCE MERCHANT BANKING Milestone Advisors, LLC Milestone Advisors, LLC ( Milestone
The Adjusted-Present-Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1)
IE Aufgabe 4 The Adjusted-Present-Value Approach to Valuing Leveraged Buyouts 1) Introduction A leveraged buyout (LBO) is the acquisition by a small group of equity investors of a public or private company
3/22/2011. Financing an ESOP Transaction. Table of Contents. I. The Leveraged ESOP Transaction. John L. Miscione Managing Director
Presented by John L. Miscione Managing Director Table of Contents I. The Leveraged ESOP Transaction II. ESOP Tax Benefits III. Debt Capacity IV. Financing Markets and Terms V. The Lender s Perspective
HOW THE COMING LBO BOOM WILL AFFECT YOUR BONDS
FIXED INCOME HOW THE COMING LBO BOOM WILL AFFECT YOUR BONDS Krishna Memani CIO Fixed Income Wall Street s animal spirits are coming back, judging by the amount of leveraged buyout (LBO) activity across
Corporate Restructuring. Dr. Edward Altman Max L. Heine Professor of Finance NYU Stern School of Business
Corporate Restructuring Dr. Edward Altman Max L. Heine Professor of Finance NYU Stern School of Business Corporate Restructuring Defined as: Any substantial change in a company s business portfolio or
Regulatory Story. RNS Number : 8343I. DCD Media PLC. 08 July 2013. TR-1: NOTIFICATION OF MAJOR INTEREST IN SHARES i
1 of 7 25/11/2013 11:51 Regulatory Story Go to market news section Company TIDM Headline Released DCD Media PLC DCD Holding(s) in Company 15:19 08-Jul-2013 8343I15 RNS : 8343I DCD Media PLC 08 July 2013
Note on Leveraged Buyouts
Note on Leveraged Buyouts Introduction A leveraged buyout, or LBO, is an acquisition of a company or division of another company financed with a substantial portion of borrowed funds. In the 1980s, LBO
US PE/VC Benchmark Commentary Quarter and Year Ending December 31, 2013
US PE/VC Benchmark Commentary Quarter and Year Ending December 31, 2013 In 2013, US private equity and venture capital turned in their best annual performance since 2006 and 1999, respectively. Strong
THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC CHARITES AND PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS IN HAWAII. By: Hugh.R.Jones i
THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC CHARITES AND PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS IN HAWAII By: Hugh.R.Jones i There are over 5,000 public charities and private foundations in Hawaii according to Internal Revenue Service data.
MetLife Investments Steve Kandarian Chief Investment Officer
June 2007 MetLife Investments Steve Kandarian Chief Investment Officer Safe Harbor Statement These materials contain statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Large and Small Companies Exhibit Diverging Bankruptcy Trends
JANUARY, 22 NUMBER 2-1 D I V I S I O N O F I N S U R A N C E Bank Trends Analysis of Emerging Risks In Banking WASHINGTON, D.C. ALAN DEATON (22) 898-738 [email protected] Large and Small Companies Exhibit
Mezzanine Finance. by Corry Silbernagel Davis Vaitkunas Bond Capital. With a supplement by Ian Giddy
Mezzanine Finance by Corry Silbernagel Davis Vaitkunas Bond Capital With a supplement by Ian Giddy Mezzanine Debt--Another Level To Consider Mezzanine debt is used by companies that are cash flow positive
2012 M&A, Private Equity, and Capital Markets Update
2012 M&A, Private Equity, and Capital Markets Update May 2012 lklklklklklkl klklklklklkl klklklklklkl kl 1 Nathan N. Balint, Shareholder For more information: 407.419.8470 [email protected] Nate
Sankaty Advisors, LLC
Leveraged Loans: A Primer December 2012 In today s market environment of low rates and slow growth, we believe that leveraged loans offer a unique diversification option for fixed income portfolios due
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FINANCING-RELATED PROVISIONS IN LEVERAGED BUYOUTS
RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN FINANCING-RELATED PROVIION IN LEVERAGED BUYOUT DAVID J. ORKIN AND ERIC M. WEDENBURG JANUARY 2006 During the course of 2005, a number of large U.. private equity transactions have
INTERNAL REGULATIONS OF THE AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITEE OF BBVA COLOMBIA
ANNEX 3 INTERNAL REGULATIONS OF THE AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITEE OF BBVA COLOMBIA (Hereafter referred to as the Committee) 1 INDEX CHAPTER I RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 NATURE 3 2.
How To Invest In High Yield Bonds
Investment Perspectives For high-yield bonds, market volatility can bring new opportunities Kevin Lorenz and Jean Lin, portfolio managers for TIAA-CREF High-Yield Fund Article Highlights: The decline in
By Seth Gillston, with commentary from Tom Kim
M&A Risk Management: Collateral Liabilities and Solutions By Seth Gillston, with commentary from Tom Kim M&A Risk Management: Collateral Liabilities and Solutions Seth Gillston with commentary from Tom
Strategic Advisors. Marketing Presentation Recapitalizations May 2005. Middle Market Investment Bankers
Marketing Presentation Recapitalizations May 2005 Strategic Advisors Middle Market Investment Bankers 400 Southpointe Blvd. Plaza I, Suite 120 Canonsburg, PA 15317 (724) 743-5800 www.strategicad.com An
Recent Trends in the Mergers & Acquisitions and Private Equity Markets
Recent Trends in the Mergers & Acquisitions and Private Equity Markets Charles Uhrig Managing Director Raymond James August 31, 2007 Section 1 Recent Trends in the Mergers & Acquisitions Market Recent
NXP Semiconductors Reports Third Quarter 2015 Results
Q3 Revenue $1,522 million GAAP Gross margin 48.6% GAAP Operating margin 24.6% GAAP Diluted earnings per share $1.49 Non-GAAP Gross margin 49.1% Non-GAAP Operating margin 29.5% Non-GAAP Diluted earnings
Workflow Administration of Windchill 10.2
Workflow Administration of Windchill 10.2 Overview Course Code Course Length TRN-4339-T 2 Days In this course, you will learn about Windchill workflow features and how to design, configure, and test workflow
Update Presentation with Larry Holzenthaler. January 2016
Update Presentation with Larry Holzenthaler January 2016 Reminder Loans Have First Priority Loans have priority over Bonds, Preferred Shares, Common Equity Most senior tranche of the capital structure
How To Invest In Infrastructure Investment
Institutional Investor Trends for 214 Survey probity n. [from Latin probitas: good, proper, honest.] adherence to the highest principles, ideals and character. On an ongoing basis, Probitas Partners offers
Use this section to learn more about business loans and specific financial products that might be right for your company.
Types of Financing Use this section to learn more about business loans and specific financial products that might be right for your company. Revolving Line Of Credit Revolving lines of credit are the most
Class V Common Stock FAQ
A) General Questions 1) What is the tracking stock? Class V Common Stock FAQ The tracking stock will be a class of common stock ( Class V Common Stock ) issued by the parent company ( Denali ) of Dell
Corporate Strategy Meeting
Corporate Strategy Meeting February 18, 2015 Sony Corporation Today s agenda 1. 2. 3. 4. Review of the First Mid-Range Plan (FY 2012~2014*) Second Mid-Range Plan (FY 2015~2017) Business Strategies and
Bank BPH Group Financial Report. 3 quarters
Bank BPH Group Financial Report 3 quarters SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 3 quarters in accruals (current year) from 01.01. to 30.09. PLN'000 3 quarters in accruals (previous year) from 01.01. to 30.09. 3 quarters
Risks and Rewards in High Yield Bonds
Risks and Rewards in High Yield Bonds Peter R. Duffy, CFA, Partner, Senior Portfolio Manager Navy Yard Corporate Center, Three Crescent Drive, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19112 www.penncapital.com 1 What
The future of M&A in telecom
The future of M&A in telecom McKinsey & Company s analysis of past telecom mergers and acquisitions provides new insights into where the industry is likely headed. By Jean-Christophe Lebraud and Peter
1 of 7 31/10/2012 18:34
Regulatory Story Go to market news section Company TIDM Headline Released Number Ironveld PLC IRON Holding(s) in Company 18:01 31-Oct-2012 0348Q18 RNS Number : 0348Q Ironveld PLC 31 October 2012 TR-1:
Tenet, United Surgical Partners International and Welsh Carson to Create the Nation s Largest Ambulatory Surgery Platform
NEWS RELEASE Tenet, United Surgical Partners International and Welsh Carson to Create the Nation s Largest Ambulatory Surgery Platform Tenet and USPI to Combine Their Ambulatory Surgery and Imaging Centers
Stratex International Plc ('Stratex' or 'the Company') Holdings in Company
Regulatory Story Go to market news section Company TIDM Headline Released Stratex International PLC STI Holding(s) in Company 17:30 04-Feb-2010 7233G17 RNS : 7233G Stratex International PLC 04 February
CONTACTS: PRESS RELATIONS BETSY CASTENIR (212) 339-3424 INVESTOR RELATIONS ROBERT TUCKER (212) 339-0861 FSA HOLDINGS FIRST QUARTER 2004 RESULTS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACTS: PRESS RELATIONS BETSY CASTENIR (212) 339-3424 INVESTOR RELATIONS ROBERT TUCKER (212) 339-0861 FSA HOLDINGS FIRST QUARTER 2004 RESULTS NET INCOME $84 Million in Q1 04 (+28%
Understanding a Firm s Different Financing Options. A Closer Look at Equity vs. Debt
Understanding a Firm s Different Financing Options A Closer Look at Equity vs. Debt Financing Options: A Closer Look at Equity vs. Debt Business owners who seek financing face a fundamental choice: should
The benefits of private equity investment
The benefits of private equity investment David Wilton, Chief Investment Officer, International Finance Corporation (IFC), looks at how private equity can be beneficial; the different investment strategies
The Search for Yield Continues: A Re-introduction to Bank Loans
INSIGHTS The Search for Yield Continues: A Re-introduction to Bank Loans 203.621.1700 2013, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC Executive Summary With the Federal Reserve pledging to stick to its zero interest-rate
Erie County Property Taxes Greg Michalek University at Buffalo Law Student
FACT SHEET May 2, 2009 Erie County Property Taxes Greg Michalek University at Buffalo Law Student What is a property tax? It is a tax on the assessed value of real property. Typically set by school boards,
Product and Distribution Update: Looking Beyond the Headlines
HIGHLIGHTS OF A WEB SEMINAR FOR SEI CLIENTS Product and Distribution Update: Looking Beyond the Headlines Mutual funds, ETFs, managed accounts and alternatives all of these product categories enjoyed robust
Valuation of Investment Management ( IM ) Firms
Valuation of Investment Management ( IM ) Firms PRESENTATION BY: Terence L. Griswold, ASA Managing Director Empire Valuation Consultants, LLC CFA Society of Rochester March 26, 2013 Agenda Part I: Operating
Select Medical Holdings Corporation Announces Results for Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2015
R E L E A S E FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4714 Gettysburg Road Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 Select Medical Holdings Corporation Announces Results for Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2015 NYSE Symbol: SEM MECHANICSBURG,
KKR Income Opportunities Fund Declares Monthly Distributions of $0.125 Per Share and. Announces Quarterly Investor Call Date
KKR Income Opportunities Fund Declares Monthly Distributions of $0.125 Per Share and Announces Quarterly Investor Call Date New York, NY, January 27 th, 2016 KKR Income Opportunities Fund (the Fund ) (NYSE:
Eurostat's 2010 Survey Questionnaire on Access to Finance
From: Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2012 Access the complete publication at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2012-en Eurostat's 2010 Survey Questionnaire on Access to Finance Please cite this
SOFTWARE CEO GUIDE: Valuation Analysis Online Marketing Software
SOFTWARE CEO GUIDE: Valuation Analysis Online Marketing Software TTM CAGR Valuation Analysis FTM GP RR Published July 2014, Copyright From the Partners Determining the value of a private software company
2013 Mergers & Acquisitions Survey Results
Exceptional service. Dykema delivers. www.dykema.com California Illinois Michigan Minnesota North Carolina Texas Washington, D.C. Executive Summary Moving slowly forward, but moving forward The expression:
MORGAN STANLEY Financial Supplement - 3Q2004 Table of Contents
Financial Supplement - 3Q2004 Table of Contents Page # 1. Financial Summary 2. Quarterly Consolidated Income Statement 3. Quarterly Total Company Financial Information and Statistical Data 4. Quarterly
AUSTRALIA S BROKEN HOUSING SYSTEM
Cost of living The cost of housing is the single biggest cost of living issue in Australia today. Compared to other expenditure items, housing costs comprise the biggest share of household budgets accounting
High Yield Bonds A Primer
High Yield Bonds A Primer With our extensive history in the Canadian credit market dating back to the Income Trust period, our portfolio managers believe that there is considerable merit in including select
INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION REPORTS SECOND-QUARTER RESULTS AND REAFFIRMS 2004 OUTLOOK
INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION REPORTS SECOND-QUARTER RESULTS AND REAFFIRMS 2004 OUTLOOK Second-quarter Revenue Increases 6.7%; Net Income Increases by 7.5% BEDFORD, Mass July 22, 2004 Interactive Data Corporation
I know it s a busy day as HSBC are also reporting. and we re doing the same again today. with the equivalent period in 2008
Barclays Interim Management Statement 10 November 2009 Chris Lucas Good morning and thanks for joining us I know it s a busy day as HSBC are also reporting so I m going to talk for about fifteen minutes
A GUIDE TO FLOATING RATE BANK LOANS:
Contact information: Advisor Services: (631) 629-4908 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.catalystmf.com A GUIDE TO FLOATING RATE BANK LOANS: An Attractive Investment for a Rising Interest Rate Environment
Introduction to Financial Models for Management and Planning
CHAPMAN &HALL/CRC FINANCE SERIES Introduction to Financial Models for Management and Planning James R. Morris University of Colorado, Denver U. S. A. John P. Daley University of Colorado, Denver U. S.
Insurance Agents & Brokers Mergers & Acquisition Activity is Accelerating
Insurance Agents & Brokers Mergers & Acquisition Activity is Accelerating Insurance agents and brokers in the U.S. are benefitting from the beginning of a long-awaited hard market, a slowly improving U.S.
NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc. New York Office. Harness the Benefits of Real Estate Lending
NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc. New York Office Harness the Benefits of Real Estate Lending Forward Looking Statements This sales material includes forward-looking statements that can be identified
Conseco reports fourth consecutive profitable quarter and year-end 2009 results
For Release Immediate Contacts (News Media) Tony Zehnder, Corporate Communications 312.396.7086 (Investors) Scott Galovic, Investor Relations 317.817.3228 Conseco reports fourth consecutive profitable
Opportunities in credit higher quality high-yield bonds
Highlights > > Default rates below the long-term average > > Valuations wide of historical average in BB and B rated credit > > Despite sluggish economy, high yield can still perform well > > High yield
Frankfurt am Main 27 April 2010. Deutsche Bank reports first quarter 2010 net income of EUR 1.8 billion
Release Frankfurt am Main 27 April 2010 Deutsche Bank reports first quarter 2010 net income of EUR 1.8 billion Net revenues of EUR 9.0 billion, up 24% Second best quarterly income before income taxes of
R162-2f-206c. Certification of Continuing Education Course. (1) (a) The division may not award continuing education credit for a course that is
R162-2f-206c. Certification of Continuing Education Course. (1) (a) The division may not award continuing education credit for a course that is advertised in Utah to real estate licensees unless the course
SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF
SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF Summary Prospectus-October 31, 2015 PSK (NYSE Ticker) Before you invest in the SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF (the Fund ), you may want to review the Fund's prospectus
Regulation On Attainment of Doctor of Sciences Degree at SEEU (PhD)
According to article 118 of the Law on Higher Education of Republic of Macedonia; articles 60, 68 and 69 of SEEU statute ; based on decision of Council of Teaching and Science of SEEU of date April 12th
Understanding Fixed Income
Understanding Fixed Income 2014 AMP Capital Investors Limited ABN 59 001 777 591 AFSL 232497 Understanding Fixed Income About fixed income at AMP Capital Our global presence helps us deliver outstanding
2014 Survey of Credit Underwriting Practices
2014 Survey of Credit Underwriting Practices Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Washington, D.C. December 2014 Contents Introduction... 1 Part I: Overall Results... 3 Primary Findings... 3 Commentary
PEI: New Strategies for Risk Management in Private Equity
PEI: New Strategies for Risk Management in Private Equity Risk in non-traditional secondary strategies By Augustin Duhamel and Vidar Bergum, 17Capital Introduction As the private equity industry has matured,
SACRS Fall Conference 2013
SACRS Fall Conference 2013 Bank Loans November 14, 2013 Allan Martin, Partner What Are Floating Rate Bank Loans? Senior secured floating rate debt: Current Typical Terms: Spread: LIBOR + 5.00%-6.00% LIBOR
Waste Management Announces Second Quarter Earnings
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Waste Management Announces Second Quarter Earnings Collection and Disposal Income from Operations Grows 3.4% HOUSTON July 26, 2012 Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) today announced
Wells Fargo Energy Capital
Wells Fargo Energy Capital IPAA Private Capital Conference Mark M. Green January 21, 2014 Table of Contents I Overview of the Wells Fargo Energy Group II Wells Fargo Energy Capital III Market Activity
How To Make Index Option Contracts In Karnival Stock Exchange
REGULATIONS GOVERNING INDEX OPTION CONTRACTS [Gazette Notification of MAY 02, 2012] REGULATIONS GOVERNING INDEX OPTION CONTRACTS OF THE KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE (GUARANTEE) LIMITED 1. PREAMBLE WHEREAS in
Quarterly report for the first quarter of 2000 SAB - Q I/2001 Form (for banks)
Quarterly report for the first quarter of 2000 SAB - Q I/2001 Form (for banks) Pursuant to 46, clause 1, item 2 of the Council of Ministers Ordinance dated December 22, 1998 (Dz. U. No. 163, item 1160)
Priority Senior Secured Income Fund, Inc.
Priority Senior Secured Income Fund, Inc. This material is neither an offer to sell nor the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Such an offer can be made only by prospectus, which has been filed
I will now give you an overview of our third quarter financial results using the document titled Consolidated Results of Operations.
I will now give you an overview of our third quarter financial results using the document titled Consolidated Results of Operations. Please turn to page two. 1 For the nine months to December, net revenue
ATEL Growth Capital Fund 8, LLC. Financing Tomorrow s Technologies... Today
ATEL Growth Capital Fund 8, LLC Financing Tomorrow s Technologies... Today RISK FACTORS Investors are encouraged to carefully read the Prospectus for ATEL Growth Capital Fund 8, LLC which has been provided
CHAPTER 19 WYOMING PROPERTY TAX RELIEF PROGRAM
CHAPTER 19 WYOMING PROPERTY TAX RELIEF PROGRAM Section 1. Authority. These rules are promulgated under the authority of W.S. 16-3-103 and W.S. 39-11-102(b). Section 2. Purpose. These rules are intended
Sankaty Advisors, LLC
Middle Market Overview March 2013 Overview of Middle Market We view the middle market as having three distinct segments, defined by a company's ownership type, prospects, and access to capital. Companies
Leveraged Buyout Model Quick Reference
Leveraged Buyout (LBO) Model Overview A leveraged buyout model shows what happens when a private equity firm acquires a company using a combination of equity (cash) and debt, and then sells it in 3-5 years.
for Analysing Listed Private Equity Companies
8 Steps for Analysing Listed Private Equity Companies Important Notice This document is for information only and does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to subscribe or purchase any products.
UPDATED INFORMATION ON USE OF FORM W-8IMY (REVISION DATE FEBRUARY 2006) BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2015
UPDATED INFORMATION ON USE OF FORM W-8IMY (REVISION DATE FEBRUARY 2006) BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2015 This Form W-8IMY (revision date April 2014) reflects the changes made in the Foreign Account Tax Compliance
ASSET MANAGER DEALS:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ASSET MANAGER DEALS: Trends in Asset Manager M&A Five-Year Empirical Deal Study Christopher S. Harrison Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP Negotiating
