Building ADRC Recruitment and Research Data Management Tools: Lessons Learned in Wisconsin
|
|
|
- Zoe Copeland
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Building ADRC Recruitment and Research Data Management Tools: Lessons Learned in Wisconsin Nevin Olson, BS, Sr. Research Specialist University of Wisconsin-Madison Dept. of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics
2 Presentation Overview Starting point Using a Systems approach Defining data needs and processes Identifying opportunities Process planning Achieving results
3 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management A Systems view of Data Management Data management as a process within the ADRC Multiple data management processes Data needs within and across all processes
4 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Needs Clinical Core Subjects AD / MCI diagnosed Healthy Older Adult Controls Middle-aged at-risk Adults (parental history positive/negative)
5 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Needs Current/past Wisconsin Comprehensive Memory Program (WCMP) participants 2,000+ in database Outreach and recruitment to underserved / underrepresented populations Low-income Minorities Rural communities
6 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Process Needs Recruitment Demographics Source of referral Anonymous until consent Screening / eligibility Multiple screening processes Multiple protocol eligibility Participant tracking Participation by protocol Contacts by study coordinator Research Data/Protocol Management Research administration Protocol set-up / management Visit tracking/data capture Study data management Cost of research visit
7 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Process Requirements Study Data Management Tracking / reporting Analysis Collaboration Timeliness Study visit window Data reporting window NACC Uniform Data Set (UDS) Neuropathology (NP) Performance monitoring Recruitment Study participation Data integrity
8 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Needs Two distinct data management systems Management of Participation Management of Research Data
9 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Solutions ADRC recruitment - Web-based Registry (REGGIE TM ) Screening, Registration & Contact Management Workflow Management Recruitment Measurement & Reporting Research data - UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) Web-based OnCore database Protocol Set-up & Management Visit Tracking & Data Capture and Management Data Reporting and Analysis Optimal use of each system Focus on workflow within each system
10 Development of Web-base Registry REGGIE TM Original ADRC database 2,000+ current/past participants No participant contact management workflow Limited participant screening information Limited ability for staff to collaborate Limited ability to query useful information for recruitment or identifying participation
11 Developing Registry Specifications Biostatistics & Data Management core met with Administrative and Clinical core staff biweekly / 4 months Defined data needs Defined registry specifications Biostatistics & Data Management core conducted assessment of options Determined Customer Relationship Management (CRM) best fit contact management needs CRM database solution agreed to by Biostatistics & Data Management, Administrative and Clinical cores
12 Why Customer Relationship Management software? Volunteer participants are the key customers during the research process Streamlined and standardized contact and screening processes Cross-collaboration and participation Easier profiling and targeting Improved customer service and follow-up Business maturity of the CRM model Operational efficiency of the CRM model
13 Major Functions in Web-base Registry REGGIE TM Web-based access Storage of contact and initial screening information Intuitive data-mining of contact and screening information Shared study recruitment workflow Activity coordination, planning and collaboration Shared communication and workflow scheduling All-in-one recruitment/screening/tracking
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 Wisconsin ADRC Performance Monitoring recruitment / referral sources, reasons for contact # recruitment activities # participants from recruitment activities % recruitment / referral source categories % recruitment / referral source categories eligible / enrolled in ADRC % demographic categories % demographic categories eligible / enrolled in ADRC % demographic categories eligible / enrolled in other studies, protocols % recruitment / referral source categories active in studies participants recruited/eligible for ADRC, by category participants recruited/eligible for other studies, protocols
25 Wisconsin ADRC Performance Monitoring # / % of participants continuing year-to-year, by category reasons for loss of participants, by category # participants active in other studies, protocols % recruitment / referral source categories eligible / enrolled in other studies, protocols demographics (age range, gender, ethnicity, race, zip code) # participants added per month, by category # completed visits, by category # completed data sets, by category average time, number of contacts needed to recruit into studies/protocols, by category # / % recruits active in ADRC, by category # / % recruits active in other studies, protocols
26 UW-Madison ICTR OnCore CTSA research management system Secure web-based information management system Designed to help make clinical research efficient, well organized, and accurate throughout the life cycle of a protocol Currently ~ 200 protocols / 3,000 subjects across UW-Madison
27 OnCore for ADRC Research Data Research Administration Protocol Setup & Management Visit Tracking & Data Capture Study Data Management Protocols Basic Protocol Setup Regulatory Tracking (e.g., IRB, CTRC) Protocol activation DSMC Reviews Subjects Screening Registration Consenting Eligibility Subject Status SAEs Deviations Calendars Procedures & Evaluations Initial & Follow Up Schedules Visit Tolerances Foot Notes ecrfs Forms Design Assign forms to studies Financials Study Budgets Negotiated Rates SOC vs. Research CMS compliance assistance Payment Milestones Visits Automated subject calendars Visit & Procedure tracking Additional Visits & Procedures ecrf completion Query resolution Biospecimen tracking Data Monitoring Data Discrepancy Management Data Export for Analysis & Reporting Financial Management Automated invoice items Generate Invoices Study Payment tracking Unplanned visits & procedures Exceptions
28 Wisconsin ADRC OnCore Data Management process Study Protocol set-up Subject registration Identification/demographics Consent Eligibility On-Study Visits ecrfs data entry NACC (UDS and NP) and Wisconsin ADRC data Biospecimen tracking Tracks subjects from protocol screening through autopsy
29
30 Wisconsin ADRC Summary of Lessons Learned Research participant is a key customer Collaboration across Cores is critical to success New Center advantage of learning from other Center experiences Do s and Don'ts Wish lists
31 Wisconsin ADRC Summary of Lessons Learned Optimal use of each system Maximize data use within each process Minimize points of intersection / data crossover Focus on workflow within each system Minimize data export / import Maximize data workflow within the system
32 Wisconsin ADRC Summary of Lessons Learned Use of web-based technologies Maximize standardization across sites Minimize variations among users Focus on Data needs across the systems Complementary functions Identify common elements Same / similar format Minimum critical specifications
33 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Collaborators Biomedical Computing Group (BCG): Dave Towers, Tom Mish, Preethy Kaprakattu, David Tolmie, Debbie Yoshihara, Neeraja Deshpande, Ayuta Padhi, Vince Streif, Jenifer Kriplean, Christopher Harrison, Nevin Olson Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR): Tracy Ohrt, Tamara Walker Biostatistics & Medical Informatics: Maritza Dowling, Rick Chappell, Jodi Barnet, Rachel Hunter-Merrill Wisconsin ADRC: Sanjay Asthana, Carey Gleason, Cindy Carlsson, Hanna Blazel, Amy Hawley, Kari Paterson, Tamara Markgraf, Jane Sachs, Jackie Lee, Heidi Walaski, Mirriam Rosen, Alyce Marsh
34 Wisconsin ADRC Data Acknowledgements REGGIE TM copyright 2010 University of Wisconsin-Madison Biomedical Computing Group, All rights reserved OnCore copyright PercipEnz Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved
35 Wisconsin ADRC Data Management Contact Information Nevin Olson Sr. Research Specialist University of Wisconsin-Madison
Informatics Resources for Clinical Research. Jim Cimino, Geoff Gordon, Matt Wyatt and James Willig UAB Informatics Institute April 6, 2016
Informatics Resources for Clinical Research Jim Cimino, Geoff Gordon, Matt Wyatt and James Willig UAB Informatics Institute April 6, 2016 Today s Take-Home Messages Overview of the clinical informatics
Integrating a Research Management System & EMR: Motivations and Benefits Host
Integrating a Research Management System & EMR: Motivations and Benefits Host Lisa Haddican, Content Marketing Specialist Specialized Solutions by Forte Developed with the expertise of 20,000 trials Clinical
Background OnCore Billing Compliance EMR/OnCore Integration Goals Integration Options. OnCore Billing Compliance Workflow Demonstration
Srini Kalluri, Founder, President & Chief Customer Officer Carrie Nemke, Business Development Manager CTMS Support of Billing Compliance Best Practices Research Compliance Conference Austin TX, June 2013
How to Increase Site Productivity with a CTMS. Manage financials, meet timelines, increase compliance, and more...
How to Increase Site Productivity with a CTMS Manage financials, meet timelines, increase compliance, and more... By Introduction Clinical trials are essential to the development and safety of new drugs
Clinical Trials Management System (CTMS) Overview
Clinical Trials Management System (CTMS) Overview 8.DEC.2011 Biomedical Informatics Core (BIC) Retreat Elizabeth Micalizzi, Director, Communications and Integrated Technology, Research Affairs and VCU
Clinical Research Management Webinar Series: Results of Huron s Clinical Trials Management System Survey
Clinical Research Management Webinar Series: Results of Huron s Clinical Trials Management System Survey Wednesday, October 24, 2012 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. CT About our speakers Rick Rohrbach Managing
Meaningful Use Stage 1:
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
2013 Meaningful Use Dashboard Calculation Guide
2013 Meaningful Use Dashboard Calculation Guide Learn how to use Practice Fusion s Meaningful Use Dashboard to help you achieve Meaningful Use. For more information, visit the Meaningful Use Center. General
Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR
GE Healthcare Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR Are you Ready to Report? GE Healthcare EMR Consulting CHUG Fall Conference October 2010 Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR The EMR Consulting
Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality
EMR Name/Model EMR Vendor Epic Epic Stage 1 objectives Use CPOE Use of CPOE for orders (any type) directly entered by authorizing provider (for example, MD, DO, RN, PA, NP) Stage 1 measures For EPs, CPOE
Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the
EMR Name/Model EMR Vendor Allscripts Stage 1 objectives Eligible professionals Hospitals Use CPOE Use of CPOE for orders (any type) directly entered by authorizing provider (for example, MD, DO, RN, PA,
Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor
Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor 1 CPOE (Computerized Physician Order Entry) More than 30 percent of all unique patients with at least
REDCap Web-interface Database System
REDCap Web-interface Database System Jonathan D. Mahnken, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics Director, October 6, 2012 1 What is REDCap? Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) [REDCap]
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338 http://www.wtxhitrec.org/ Grant award - $6.6m Total number
The Monitoring Visit. Denise Owensby, CCRP Sr. Clinical Research Coordinator Clinical & Translational Science Center University of California, Davis
The Monitoring Visit Denise Owensby, CCRP Sr. Clinical Research Coordinator Clinical & Translational Science Center University of California, Davis Disclosure The information herein is not intended to
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 CORE OBJECTIVES (17 total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Stage 2 Objective Stage 2 Measure Use CPOE for medication
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals
Stage 1 vs. Comparison for Eligible Professionals CORE OBJECTIVES (17 Total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Objective Measure Use CPOE for Medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare
IMS Meaningful Use Webinar
IMS Meaningful Use Webinar Presented on: May 9 11:00am 12:00pm (PDT) May 13 12:00pm 1:00pm (EST) This Webinar Will Be Recorded! Please send questions that you may have after the session to: [email protected]
A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives
A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives A White Paper by DrFirst Copyright 2000-2012 DrFirst All Rights Reserved. 1 Table of Contents Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012
CORE OBJECTIVES (16 total) Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012 Stage 1 Objective Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed
OnCore Clinical Research Management System Standard Operating Procedures
Purpose: This standard operating procedure (SOP) provide definitions for terms used in the OnCore clinical research management system at Georgia Regents University (GRU). 2.0 Scope: Applies to all site
Overview. For Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Data Management. the protocol centric information system
For Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Data Management Esprit Health, LLC 773-472-5602 www.esprithealth.com [email protected] Overview esphere is a new paradigm for healthcare information systems
Meaningful Use - The Basics
Meaningful Use - The Basics Presented by PaperFree Florida 1 Topics Meaningful Use Stage 1 Meaningful Use Barriers: Observations from the field Help and Questions 2 What is Meaningful Use Meaningful Use
Quality Monitoring Checklist
Quality Monitoring Checklist Instructions: For each task below, the Quality Monitor indicates in the appropriate column if the Monitor accomplished the task by using the following codes Yes No N/A = Monitor
penelope athena software case management software IMPACT OF PENELOPE BY STAFF ROLE www.athena-software.net [email protected]
case management software IMPACT OF PENELOPE BY STAFF ROLE athena software www.athena-software.net [email protected] 1st floor, 33 Dupont Street East Waterloo, Ontario Canada N2J 2G8 NORTH AMERICA
Office of Clinical Research and the. Institute (CTSI) Patricia Emmanuel, MD
Office of Clinical Research and the Clinical and Translational Research Institute (CTSI) Patricia Emmanuel, MD Office of Clinical Research- Priorities Review processes for clinical study implementation,
EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified
EMR Name/ Model EMR Vendor meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified meridianemr, Inc Core Set of Measures Objective Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures EMR Module/ Feature 1 Use CPOE for medication orders
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS CORE MEASURES must meet all CPOE for Medication, Laboratory and Radiology Orders Objective: Use computerized provider order entry
Office of Clinical Research (OCR)
Office of Clinical Research (OCR) Your Partner in the Clinical Research Process h3p://bsdocr.bsd.uchicago.edu Phone: 834-1238 Susan L. Cohn, MD Dean for Clinical Research Professor of Pediatrics OCR Created
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Proposed Rule On April 15, 2015 CMS Issued a new proposal rule for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive
Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid Table of Contents What is Meaningful Use?... 1 Table 1: Patient Benefits... 2 What is an EP?... 4 How are Registration and Attestation Being Handled?... 5 What are
Quest to Attest 2014 Stage 1 Meaningful Use. Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, Stage 1 Meaningful Use
Quest to Attest 2014 Stage 1 Meaningful Use Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, Stage 1 Meaningful Use Goals Discussion of MU and the Incentive Program Analysis of Stage 1 Objectives Summary of RevolutionEHR
Europa Re s web-based underwriting. Platform. Presented by Insurance Systems Inc. Terry Neilson, President & CEO Dave Hanley, VP Business Development
Europa Re s web-based underwriting Platform Presented by Insurance Systems Inc. Terry Neilson, President & CEO Dave Hanley, VP Business Development 1 Insurance Systems Inc. (ISI) Brief Introduction Founded
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.) TARGETING CANCER CARE Objective Objective Description Measure/Attestation Requirement
Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express*
Insight Software, LLC 3050 Universal Blvd Ste 120 Weston FL 33331-3528 Tel. 877-882-7456 www.myvisionexpress.com Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express* Eligible Professional
EMR Systems and the Conduct of Clinical Research. Daniel E Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean for Clinical Investigation Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
EMR Systems and the Conduct of Clinical Research Daniel E Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean for Clinical Investigation Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Clinical Research Environment Research protocols are becoming
Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP) and Clinicaltrials.gov (CT.gov) Helpful tips and guidance
Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP) and Clinicaltrials.gov (CT.gov) Helpful tips and guidance Objectives NCI s Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP) Overview CTRP What is it? CTRP is an NCI mandated
E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS CERTIFICATION AND THE HITECH INCENTIVE PROGRAM The Incentives On July 13, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services finalized the Electronic Health Record
Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method
Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method Use Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by
Infoset builds software and services to advantage business operations and improve patient s life
Infoset builds software and services to advantage business operations and improve patient s life Clinical Data Management ecrf & EDC Patient Support Programs Medication Adherence Mobile e-health Big Data
Level 4 Diploma in Hospitality Management (7148-41)
Level 4 Diploma in Hospitality Management (7148-41) Candidate logbook 600/6626/X www.cityandguilds.com June 2013 Version 1.0 About City & Guilds As the UK s leading vocational education organisation, City
RPMS EHR Remote Support and Configuration
RESOURCE AND PATIENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RPMS EHR Remote Support and Configuration Agenda April 30 th May 4th, 2012 IHS Office of Information Technology (OIT) Albuquerque, New Mexico & Samuel Simmonds Memorial
Interview patient Perform Physician; Nursing; Medical Assistant Take history Document 7.1(Document a progress note for each encounter)
Reference Workflow Taonomy Patient centric Outpatient encounter 1 Intake and Nurse assessment Clinician* assessment Check in Document 1.16 (Access patient demographic data), 7.6 (Document date of birth),
Meaningful Use Objectives
Meaningful Use Objectives The purpose of the electronic health records (EHR) incentive program is not so much the adoption of health information technology (HIT), but rather how HIT can further the goals
OnCore Interfaces. UCSF Medical Center Care Technology Governance Meeting CTG - September 5 th, 2013
UCSF Medical Center Care Technology Governance Meeting CTG - September 5 th, 2013 Interfaces UCSF -Office of Research - 1 Requesting Phase 1 Prioritization - Will return to CTG for Phase 2 prioritization.
BRISSkit: Biomedical Research Infrastructure Software Service kit. Jonathan Tedds. http://www.le.ac.uk/brisskit #brisskit #umfcloud
BRISSkit: Biomedical Research Infrastructure Software Service kit http://www.le.ac.uk/brisskit #brisskit #umfcloud Jonathan Tedds University of Leicester [email protected] @jtedds JISC University Modernisation
PREP Course #17: Are we there yet? Achieving Enrollment Success
PREP Course #17: Are we there yet? Achieving Enrollment Success Cerdi Beltre, CIP, CCRP Administrative Director, Clinical Research Service Director, Clinical Research Operations, NSLIJ 516-562-0340, [email protected]
Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures
Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures Core Measures Objective # Objective Title / Explanation Goal Attestation Response - Values below reflect reponses of most radiologists Explanation
BIOBANK QUALITY. [email protected] Office: 602-546-1285
BIOBANK QUALITY David F Carpentieri, M.D. Pediatric Pathologist and Biorepository Director, Phoenix Children s Hospital Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Clinical Pathology, University of Arizona Assistant
STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
Meaningful Use: Registration, Attestation, Workflow Tips and Tricks
Meaningful Use: Registration, Attestation, Workflow Tips and Tricks Allison L. Weathers, MD Medical Director, Information Services Rush University Medical Center Gregory J. Esper, MD, MBA Vice Chair, Neurology
Data Collection Database options and Data Management considerations. Paul Donnelly George Clinical The George Institute for Global Health
Data Collection Database options and Data Management considerations Paul Donnelly George Clinical The George Institute for Global Health 1 Overview Introduction and types of studies Scope of research studies
Meaningful Use Qualification Plan
Meaningful Use Qualification Plan Overview Certified EHR technology used in a meaningful way is one piece of a broader Health Information Technology infrastructure intended to reform the health care system
Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM
Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11 Michael L. Brody, DPM Disclaimers Sammy Sponsor of this presentation PICA Biomedix All Pro Imaging The Brave New World of HIT Today s Topics: PQRS E-Rx EMR Health Information
Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual
Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual Terms EP Eligible Professional Medicare Eligible Professional o Doctor of Medicine or Osteopathy o Doctor of Dental Surgery or Dental Medicine o Doctor of Podiatric
Yale Cancer Center Data and Safety Monitoring Committee Charter
Yale Cancer Center Data and Safety Monitoring Committee Charter Purpose/Mission The purpose of the Yale Cancer Center (YCC) Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) is to provide ongoing data and safety
Clinical Trials (Post Award and CRMS) Dorothy Damron, Oncology Research Manager and CRMS Lead Scott Streibich, Clinical Research Revenue Cycle
Clinical Trials (Post Award and CRMS) Dorothy Damron, Oncology Research Manager and CRMS Lead Scott Streibich, Clinical Research Revenue Cycle 1 Objectives Key CRMS Functionality for Financial RAPs Centralizing
AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria
AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria On July 13, 2010, the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a Final Rule establishing the criteria with which eligible pediatricians,
Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) Readiness Review Checklist For Statewide Medicaid Managed Care Long-Term Care Program (SMMC LTC) DRAFT
1.0 PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1.1 Organization and Governance 1.1.1 The ADRC Board of Directors demonstrates an understanding of the ADRC role under SMMC LTC and is actively functioning in the capacity
MICROMD EMR VERSION 9.0 2014 OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS
MICROMD EMR VERSION 9.0 2014 OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE Welcome to MicroMD EMR... i How This Guide is Organized... i Understanding Typographical Conventions... i Cross-References...
Guide To Meaningful Use
Guide To Meaningful Use Volume 1 Collecting the Data Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 CORE SET... 4 1. DEMOGRAPHICS... 5 2. VITAL SIGNS... 6 3. PROBLEM LIST... 8 4. MAINTAIN ACTIVE MEDICATIONS LIST... 9 5. MEDICATION
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
Twin Cities Healthy Start Pregnancy Psychosocial Risk Screening Validation Study
Twin Cities Healthy Start Pregnancy Psychosocial Risk Screening Validation Study Amy Godecker, Ph.D. Stacye Ballard, B.A. Minneapolis Department of Health and Family Support 1 Background and context for
A New Paradigm for Large, Simple Trials Based on Electronic Health Records
A New Paradigm for Large, Simple Trials Based on Electronic Health Records KyungMann Kim [email protected] University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA May 20, 2013 Outline Introduction New Initiatives
EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)
EMR Name/ Model EMR Vendor Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP) Cerner Corporation Core Set of Measures 1 Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional
Survey Tracker TM DATABASE-LINKED SURVEY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Survey Tracker TM DATABASE-LINKED SURVEY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE A specialist package of web-based software for managing your complete resident survey programme. Conduct surveys by post, phone, SMS, online
EMR Technology Checklist
Patient Accessibility/Scheduling/Account Maintenance: Able to interact with schedule through an online portal pre register VIP status to move patient to the front of the line Access and pre registration
uently Asked NextGen Questions Share Frequently Asked uently Asked Questions Frequently Asked FAQ Pre-General Release (April-June 2014)
uestions Frequently Asked Questions Fre uestions Frequently Asked Questions Fre uestions FAQ Frequently Asked Questions Fre uestions Frequently Asked Questions Fre uestions Frequently Asked Questions Fre
From Fishing to Attracting Chicks
The Greater Plains Collaborative: a PCORNet Clinical Data Research Network s Strategies for Creating an Interoperable Architecture From Fishing to Attracting Chicks Russ Waitman, PhD Associate Professor,
Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2
Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2 Miranda Ladue, Manager, Product Management Adam Plotts, Manager, Product Management Copyright 2011 Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. Agenda Review MU Timeline MU
MicroMD EMR version 7.6
MicroMD EMR version 7.6 H I T E C H M E A S U R E C a l c u l a t i o n s MICROMD EMR HITECH MEASURE CALCULATIONS VERSION 7.6 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE Welcome to MicroMD EMR... i How This Guide is Organized...
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
