IT-Symposium

Transcription

1 SharePoint Integration 1C05 IT-Symposium 2007 April 17th, 2007 CongressCenter Nürnberg, Germany SharePoint Integration Jan-Jürgen Eden Solution Architect 16 th April

2 Agenda Introduction Internal HP Systems Solutions for the People Ready Business Manufacturing Financial Services Questions & Answers Introduction HP Largest implementation of SPS 2003 outside of Microsoft Member of MOSS 2007 TAP programme Heterogeneous Environment Heterogeneous Customers 2

3 How we use SPS 2003 Secure Extranet partner collaboration Intranet Presence Professions (Business departments) Team sites (internal collaboration) Internal collaboration Team site on demand to all employees IT Control 260,000 users 80,000 concurrent 1200 web sites created a month 900 deleted/removed a month 80 TB of data Strategic replacement for other solutions Challenges and Benefits Benefits Reduced Reduced time for projects Faster response Knowledge Management On-demand Challenges Deleted data? Site design English only (except Japan Japanese only) IT Control Which Farm? 3

4 HP Team spaces roadmap SharePoint (non-kim) eroom eroom (external) Groove Groove (limited) SharePoint V2 SharePoint 2001 SharePoint 2007 LiveLink Domino FY05 FY06 FY07 SharePoint Current deployments SNO (Australia) Local Workspaces Bus. Specific Portals (in progress) JPN (Tokyo) Deployed in Japanese Localized Workspaces Bus. Specific Portals (in progress) NA (Houston, USA) part of NA2 Local workspaces NA2 (Houston, USA) Largest deployment Company wide portals Local workspaces Owned by HP In partnership Custom solutions (worldwide IPG, migration ongoing) - Singapore, - Israel - Barcelona, SP - Vancouver, CAN EMEA 1 UK Local Workspaces Bus. Specific Portals EMEA2 France 2 Custom solutions Bangalore, STSD India, GDIC India 4

5 SharePoint Future deployments Migration target for KIM Japan KIM Sydney LiveLink (KMS) LiveLink (Konnect) Eroom IPG farm in Singapore etc Migration target for Houston NA farm eroom LiveLink (KMS) IPG farm in Canada etc SGP (Singapore, KIM) Localized Workspaces Bus. Specif ic Portals local Workspaces Bus. Specific Portals with WSS Japanese language pack DC Austin EMEA (Swindon, UK, KIM) Local Workspaces Bus. Specific Portals Details: Austin f arm (lef t): local Workspaces Bus. Specific Portals HA and BC 4 front ends multiple search and index dedicated crawl box 16TB initial storage Owned by HP Migration target for LiveLink (KMS) IPG farm in Israel and Barcelona etc NA2 (Houston, USA, KIM) Largest deployment (6 TB) Local workspaces Global enterprise wide portals Local bus. specific Portal Lotus Notes, Domino, Public Folder) Details: Austin f arm (right): internal mission critical Workspaces and Portals External Customer and partner Workspaces HA, BC and DRP 2 front end each 2x8 TB initial storage DC Austin Migration Objectives Upgrade to new SharePoint version Move from legacy to central data centers Improve the service Improve manage-ability by segmenting the service Improve reliability by reducing customizations Eliminate junk sites Re-factor some portals and large sites 5

6 Move to SharePoint 2007 (MOSS 2007) The product team has four main goals Upgrade over time not forced to do an all-at-once Don t require the complete shutdown of SharePoint Ability to write-your-own upgrade code Consistent set of experiences There are three main upgrade approaches in-place (Small farms) gradual (Medium Large) content DB (To build a new farm) Upgrade approaches In-place upgrade Updates existing databases and servers Easiest approach, environment offline while it runs Gradual upgrade upgrade site collections Granular control: one to many site collections at a time Run old and new versions side-by-side; rollback to SPS supported More complex and resource intensive Content DB migration upgrade into separate farm Attach SPS content database to MOSS farm and upgrade runs SPS stays available and untouched by upgrade Content only, requires new farm, has many manual steps 6

7 Summary of tradeoffs Upgrade Approach In-Place Gradual DB Migration PROs Simple Upgrade smaller sets of data at a time SPS & MOSS stay live Can revert to original Uses existing HW Upgrade & move to new farm SPS is a separate farm, not affected CONs Entire farm offline during upgrade No revert ability Hardware intensive: memory & SQL storage Redirects for SPS URLs during upgrade Many complex manual steps required, higher risk of error Requires new farm, double the SQL storage HP Hosting Service HP hosting service Launch April 2007 Takes advantage of MOSS 2007 features Priced per user or per GB storage used 7

8 HP & Microsoft Solutions for the People-Ready Business The Enterprise HP Services Microsoft Technology Messaging & Unified Communications Collaboration & Content Management Business Intelligence Business Process Integration HP Technology Core Infrastructure The full strength of HP Physical to digital reference information Archive HP AutoStore HP Output Server HP StorageWorks Array Document Capture Manage & Retain Document Delivery 8

9 Distributed Scanning Financial FrontOffice New Account BizProc Frmk - Functional Modules Detailed SharePoint 2007 Document Management 1million docs/year Records Management 10 year retention Collaboration Workspace K2.Net 2003 Business Processes Layer HP.BizProc frmk Frontend WebParts on the Workspace Visual Studio Rapid GUI development pack 9

10 Typical Initial set-up (August 2006) Manufacturing - The Final Config? Partner Extranet Perimeter Network Corporate Network Main Server Farm Secondary Farm (Japan)? 10

11 In Summary HP Biggest users of SPS outside of Microsoft Migration to MOSS 2007 under way Solutions for the People Ready Business Hosting Consulting to our customers Manufacturing Financial Government Thank you! Questions & Answers 11