XXXXX File No Petitioner v. Issued and entered this 1st day of July 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
|
|
- Blaze King
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX File No Petitioner v Aetna Life Insurance Company Respondent / Issued and entered this 1st day of July 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 9, 2010, XXXXX (Petitioner) filed a request for external review with the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation under the Patient s Right to Independent Review Act, MCL et seq. The Commissioner notified Aetna Life Insurance Company (Aetna) of the external review and requested the information used in making its adverse determination. On March 16, 2010, the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation received the information and accepted the case for review. The Petitioner has group health care coverage. Her benefits are defined in Aetna s MI Open Choice PPO 3-07 Certificate of Coverage (the certificate). The issue here can be decided by applying the terms of the certificate. The Commissioner reviews contractual issues pursuant to MCL (7). This matter does not require a medical opinion from an independent review organization.
2 Page 2 II FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Petitioner experienced bilateral foot pain and was diagnosed as having calcaneal varus and Morton s neuroma in the left and right foot. As a result of these diagnoses, she was casted for custom foot orthotics on December 21, Upon receiving the claim for the custom orthotics, Aetna denied coverage on the basis that they are excluded from coverage. The Petitioner appealed the denial. After completing Aetna s internal grievance process, the Petitioner received Aetna s final adverse determination dated March 4, 2010, upholding its original decision. III ISSUE Did Aetna correctly process the claim for Petitioner s foot orthotics? Petitioner s Argument IV ANALYSIS The Petitioner says she contacted Aetna for precertification of the foot orthotics and was told they would be 100% covered. She also says an Aetna customer service representative verified that the medical diagnosis code she received from her physician was correct and would be accepted; now Aetna will not honor what it told her. The Petitioner wants Aetna to cover her foot orthotics. Respondent s Argument Aetna, in its March 4, 2010, final adverse determination, told the Petitioner: According to the MI Open Choice PPO 3-07 Summary Plan Description (SPD) under Other Medical Expenses; a list of covered medical expenses include; Artificial limbs and eyes. Not included are charges for: orthopedic shoes, foot orthotics, or other devices to support the feet, unless necessary to prevent complications of diabetes.
3 Page 3 The Certificate of Coverage specifically indicates that foot orthotics or other devices to support the feet are not a covered benefit unless necessary to prevent complications of diabetes. According to our records there is no indication that you are diabetic. Aetna s Medical Clinical Policy Bulletins apply to all medical benefit plans and are used in conjunction with the terms of the member s benefit plan and other Aetna-recognized criteria to determine health care coverage for Aetna s members. However, since the plan specifically states the foot orthotics are not covered except in cases to prevent diabetic complications, the Clinical Policy Bulletin would not apply in this case. Aetna contends its benefit determination for Petitioner s claim was in compliance with the terms of the certificate. Commissioner s Review The certificate, in the section Comprehensive Medical Expense Coverage, contains this language (pp. 5, 11-12): Here is a list of Covered Medical Expenses. Other Medical Expenses Charges for the following Artificial limbs and eyes. Not included are charges for: eyeglasses; vision aids; hearing aids; communication aids; and orthopedic shoes, foot orthotics, or other devices to support the feet, unless necessary to prevent complications of diabetes. [Underlining added] This provision is clear: there is no coverage for foot orthotics under the Petitioner s certificate unless they are necessary to prevent complications from diabetes. Neither the Petitioner
4 Page 4 nor her physician said that she had diabetes and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the foot orthotics were prescribed to prevent complications of diabetes. The Commissioner therefore concludes that Aetna correctly denied coverage under the terms and conditions of the certificate. The Petitioner argues that her foot orthotics should be covered because she was misinformed by Aetna s representatives, impliedly saying that she detrimentally relied on Aetna s representations that the orthotics would be covered. However, Aetna says it reviewed the calls and found nothing to indicate that the Petitioner was told Aetna would cover the foot orthotics. This kind of dispute cannot be resolved under the Patient s Right to Independent Review Act (PRIRA) because the act does not provide for the type of hearing that would allow the Commissioner to make fact-findings based on oral statements. Moreover, even if it is true that Aetna misinformed the Petitioner, the Commissioner cannot order the relief she requests. Under PRIRA, the Commissioner s role here is limited to determining if the health care service is covered under the certificate or required by state law. See MCL The Commissioner, unlike the circuit courts of this state to which PRIRA orders may be appealed, does not have the authority to order equitable relief as part of a decision in this case. The Commissioner finds Aetna correctly processed Petitioner s claim according to the terms of the certificate. V ORDER The Commissioner upholds Aetna s final adverse determination of March 4, Aetna is not required to provide coverage for the Petitioner s foot orthotics provided on December 21, This is a final decision of an administrative agency. Under MCL , any person aggrieved by this Order may seek judicial review no later than sixty days from the date of this Order
5 Page 5 in the circuit court for the county where the covered person resides or in the circuit court of Ingham County. A copy of the petition for judicial review should be sent to the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation, Health Plans Division, Post Office Box 30220, Lansing, MI
XXXXX Petitioner File No. 111988-001 v. Issued and entered this 5 th day of January 2011 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered This 21 st day of April 2008 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance REgulation XXXXX Petitioner File
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner
More informationXXXXX Petitioner File No. 100383-001 v. Issued and entered this 30 th day of December 2008 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner File No. 100383-001 v
More informationXXXXX Petitioner File No. 115016-001 v. Issued and entered this 28 th day of April 2011 by R. Kevin Clinton Commissioner ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered This 26 th day of February 2008 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services In the matter of XXXX v Petitioner File No.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services XXXXX Petitioner File No.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services XXXXX Petitioner File No.
More informationPetitioner v File No. 122214-001 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Respondent
In the matter of XXXXX STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation Petitioner
More informationv File No. 122116-001 Aetna Life Insurance Company Respondent Issued and entered this 5 th day of December 2011 by R. Kevin Clinton Commissioner
In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation
More informationIssued and entered this 23 rd day of December 2009 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered this 14 th day of October 2008 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner File
More informationXXXXX Petitioner File No. 112357-001 v Humana Insurance Company Respondent /
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationXXXXX File No. 108655-001 Petitioner v. Issued and entered this 28 th day of June 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX File No.
More informationIssued and entered this 30 th day of September 2008 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner File
More informationXXXXX Petitioner v File No. 121439-001. Issued and entered this 27 TH day of October 2011 by R. Kevin Clinton Commissioner ORDER
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered this 20 th day of December 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered this _6th_ day of October 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered this 19 th day of July 2011 by R. Kevin Clinton Commissioner ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner
More informationXXXXX Petitioner File No. 113467-001 v. Issued and entered this _12th_ day of October 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered this 8 th day of September 2009 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of XXXXX Petitioner
More informationIssued and entered this day of June 2010 by Ken Ross Commissioner ORDER I BACKGROUND
In the matter of STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Regulation XXXXX Petitioner
More informationthis j?hay of July 2015 by Joseph A. Garcia Special Deputy Director
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director ofinsurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Petitioner v File No. 148140-001-SF State of Michigan, Plan Sponsor
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director oflnsurance and Financial Services In the matter of:
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director oflnsurance and Financial Services In the matter of: v Petitioner, State of Michigan, Plan Sponsor, File No. 143.159-001-SF
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Petitioner, v Blue Care Network of Michigan, Respondent. File
More informationthis^j?day of March 2015 by Joseph Garcia Special Deputy Director
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Petitioners v File No. 146715-001 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
More informationthis 7^ day of September 2014 by Randall S. Gregg Special Deputy Director
r STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Petitioner, v File No. 143525-001 Health Alliance Plan of Michigan,
More informationI. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: v Petitioner Standard Insurance Company Respondent File No. 147809-001
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: v Petitioner Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Respondent File
More informationthis /ffi1* day of March 2016 by Randall S. Gregg Special Deputy Director
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of:, Petitioner, v File No, 152069-001 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan,
More information, a registered nurse and the authorized representative of (Petitioner), filed a request with the Director ofinsurance and Financial
y*^s^\ STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Petitioner v Alliance Health and Life Insurance Company
More informationThe Appeals Process For Medical Billing
The Appeals Process For Medical Billing Steven M. Verno Professor, Medical Coding and Billing What is an Appeal? An appeal is a legal process where you are asking the insurance company to review it s adverse
More informationDocket No. 2011-50152 QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER
IN THE MATTER OF: STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 Appellant / DECISION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Marie L. Falquet, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1297 Agency No.
More information2015 IL App (3d) 150059-U. Order filed October 2, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 150059-U Order filed
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carmel Bouman, No. 1262 C.D. 2014 Petitioner Submitted November 14, 2014 v. Department of Public Welfare, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, Judge
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2013 WY 86
NICHOLAS A. PICOZZI, Appellant (Respondent), IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2013 WY 86 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2013 July 16, 2013 v. STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel., WYOMING WORKERS SAFETY AND COMPENSATION
More information(Commissioner of Personnel, decided April 1, 2005)
In the Matter of County Correction Officer Certification OL042077, Gloucester Count DOP Docket No. 2005-3484 (Commissioner of Personnel, decided April 1, 2005) Gloucester County, represented by Ila Bhatnagar,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IN THE MATTER OF: Reg. No.: Issue No.: Case No.: Hearing Date: County: 2001 June 18,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, No. 167 C.D. 2015 Submitted August 14, 2015 Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Insurance Department, Theresa
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-8066 TRN Case No. 29629449 DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket
More information"HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 11 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHAPTER 160 MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA. Debilitating Medical Conditions
"HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 11 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHAPTER 160 MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA Subchapter 1 General Provisions 11-160-1 Purpose 11-160-2 Definitions 11-160-3 Severability 11-160-4 Disclaimer
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. Case No. 2012-4691-CH OPINION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JOHN E. BUTERBAUGH and CARRIE BUTERBAUGH, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2012-4691-CH SELENE FINANCIAL, LP, JPMORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
More informationKENT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING
KENT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING Kent County Health Department Environmental Health Division 700 Fuller Avenue N.E. Grand Rapids, MI 49503 TELEPHONE: (616) 632-6900
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KENNETH ADMIRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 15, 2011 v No. 289080 Ingham Circuit Court AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 07-001752-NF Defendant-Appellant.
More information2013 IL App (5th) 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION
NOTICE Decision filed 08/20/13. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2013 IL App (5th 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC
More informationCurrent Workers Compensation Law Compared to the 2013 Workers Compensation Reform Act
Current Workers Compensation Law Compared to the 2013 Workers Compensation Reform Act Area Addressed Current Law Reform Act Workers Compensation Division The Division of Workers Compensation operates under
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Verizon Pennsylvania Inc., Petitioner v. No. 1188 C.D. 2013 Argued February 11, 2014 Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Ketterer), Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE
More informationDECISION AND ORDER. After due notice, a hearing was held on. (Appellant) appeared and testified on her own behalf.
STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Appellant
More informationChapter 15 Claim Disputes and Member Appeals
15 Claim Disputes and Member Appeals CLAIM DISPUTE AND STATE FAIR HEARING PROCESS (FOR PROVIDERS) Health Choice Arizona processes provider Claim Disputes and State Fair Hearings in accordance with established
More informationCHAPTER 59A-23 WORKERS COMPENSATION MANAGED CARE ARRANGEMENTS 59A-23.001 Scope. 59A-23.002 Definitions. 59A-23.003 Authorization Procedures.
CHAPTER 59A-23 WORKERS COMPENSATION MANAGED CARE ARRANGEMENTS 59A-23.001 Scope. 59A-23.002 Definitions. 59A-23.003 Authorization Procedures. 59A-23.004 Quality Assurance. 59A-23.005 Medical Records and
More information[J-119-2012] [MO: Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : DISSENTING OPINION
[J-119-2012] [MO Saylor, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.C., v. Appellee STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant No. 35 MAP 2012 Appeal
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION September 6, 2005 9:00 a.m. v No. 251798 Washtenaw Circuit Court GAYLA L. HUGHES, LC No. 03-000511-AV
More informationCase 12-32065 Document 187 Filed in TXSB on 07/06/12 Page 1 of 5
Case 12-32065 Document 187 Filed in TXSB on 07/06/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: TAXMASTERS, INC. CASE NO. 12-32065-H2 Debtor
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Sharon A. Jones, Petitioner v State Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1214 Agency
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of XXXXX XXXXX, Petitioner v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-407 Agency
More informationShould the commission desire to adopt the proposed settlement agreement, the following resolution is presented for your consideration:
Office of the City Attorney 211 South Williams Street Royal Oak, MI 48067 Woodward 14 Associates, LLC. v. City of Royal Oak Proposed Settlement: Sign Ordinance Dispute November 10, 2015 The Honorable Mayor
More information19:13-2.1 Who may file
CHAPTER 13 SCOPE OF NEGOTIATIONS PROCEEDINGS Authority N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4d, 34:13A-11 and 34:13A-27. SOURCE AND EFFECTIVE DATE R.2011 d.238, effective August 11, 2011. See: 43 N.J.R. 1189(a), 43 N.J.R.
More informationV. : COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
#308-15 (OAL Decision Not yet available online) KIMBERLYNN JURKOWSKI, PETITIONER, V. COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE DECISION CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC COUNTY, AND DONNA HAYE,
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION ORKERS OMPENSATION: INJURY
WORKERS ORKERS COMPENSATION OMPENSATION: WHAT TO DO IN CASE OF AN ON-THE THE-JOB INJURY In general the purpose of the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act, N.C. G.S. 97-1 et. seq., is to put in place
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH J. SWARTZ, Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN P. SWARTZ, Petitioner v. No. 2254 C.D. 1999 ARGUED April 12, 2000 WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD
More informationDivision of Hearings and Appeals
FH STATE OF WISCONSIN Division of Hearings and Appeals In the Matter of DECISION MPA/166002 PRELIMINARY RECITALS Pursuant to a petition filed May 12, 2015, under Wis. Stat. 49.45(5), and Wis. Admin. Code
More informationWorkers' Compensation - A Review of Case Summary
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON March 9, 2001 Session MARY REGINA BLALOCK v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court
More informationv. CASE NO.: 2007-CA-13354-O Writ No.: 07-60 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STEPHEN SMITH, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 2007-CA-13354-O Writ No.: 07-60 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION. LLC (hereafter, ''NA Dulles"). The CTCV had previously filed a Certificate of Take on April
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER OF VIRGINIA, v. Petitioner, NA DULLES REAL ESTATE INVESTOR, LLC. Respondent. Case No. 49961 MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) LIBERTY POWER DELAWARE LLC ) for approval of a renewable energy plan to ) Case
More informationIN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2007 MTWCC 52. WCC No. 2006-1625 BARRY SHELLEY. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2007 MTWCC 52 WCC No. 2006-1625 BARRY SHELLEY Petitioner vs. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY Respondent/Insurer. ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT/INSURER
More informationHEALTH INSURANCE APPEALS
Your Guide to filing HEALTH INSURANCE APPEALS Sometimes a health plan will make a decision that you disagree with. The plan may deny your application for coverage, determine that the healthcare services
More informationThe Pennsylvania Insurance Department s. Your Guide to filing HEALTH INSURANCE APPEALS
Your Guide to filing HEALTH INSURANCE APPEALS Sometimes a health plan will make a decision that you disagree with. The plan may deny your application for coverage, determine that the healthcare services
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 10-3272 In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor NOT PRECEDENTIAL ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. On Appeal from the United States District
More informationMICHIGAN APPELLATE ASSIGNED COUNSEL SYSTEM (MAACS) BASIC INFORMATION SHEET
MICHIGAN APPELLATE ASSIGNED COUNSEL SYSTEM (MAACS) BASIC INFORMATION SHEET NOTICE: Pursuant to MCL 780.712; MSA 28.114(102), lawyers wishing to receive appellate assignments from any circuit court must
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying
More informationCHAPTER 14 DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION SUBCHAPTER 14A RULEMAKING SECTION.0100 - RULEMAKING
CHAPTER 14 DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION SUBCHAPTER 14A RULEMAKING SECTION.0100 - RULEMAKING 10A NCAC 14A.0101 PETITIONS (a) Any person wishing to submit a petition requesting the adoption,
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2003. Appeal No. 03-0258 DISTRICT IV
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel: 08/23/2013 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationSTATE OF MICIDGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION
STATE OF MICIDGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION Before the Commissioner of the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation In the matter of:
More informationT.C. Memo. 2014-234 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. RONALD L. KIRKPATRICK, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2014-234 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD L. KIRKPATRICK, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6525-13L. Filed November 17, 2014. Donald W. Pemberton, for
More informationCompliance Assistance Group Health and Disability Plans
Compliance Assistance Group Health and Disability Plans Benefit Claims Procedure Regulation (29 CFR 2560.503-1) The claims procedure regulation (29 CFR 2560.503-1) provides minimum procedural requirements
More informationAPPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Pierce County: JAMES J. DUVALL, Judge. Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Human Capital, LLC, Petitioner, v Case No.
More informationRHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF REHABILITATION SERVICES Section 115.12 POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Rev. 11/00
APPEALS/IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS (HEARING AND MEDIATION) I. LEGAL AUTHORITY: The Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Section 102(a), (d); 29 USC 722(c) and 34 CFR 361.57; Rhode Island General Laws 42-35 entitled
More informationTAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS
TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS THESE FORMS ARE NOT REQUIRED BUT PREFERRED; THE CONTENTS IS REQUIRED: 1. PREPARE THE PETITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDANCE SET FORTH ON THE ATTACHED. 2. SERVE ALL TAXING AUTHORITIES
More informationHow To Appeal A Health Insurance Claim
INTRODUCTION Most people now get their health care through some form of managed care plan a health maintenance organization (HMO), 1 preferred provider organization (PPO), 2 or point-of-service plan (POS).
More informationINITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDERS Sent on Concentra Integrated Services Letter Head
INITIAL INFORMATION LETTER TO INSURED/CLAIMANT/PROVIDERS Sent on Concentra Integrated Services Letter Head Dear Insured and/or Eligible Injured Person/Medical Provider: Please read this letter carefully
More informationILLINOIS: Frequently Asked Questions About the Autism Insurance Reform Law
ILLINOIS: Frequently Asked Questions About the Autism Insurance Reform Law What does Public Act 95 do? Broadly speaking, the Act does two main things: 1. It requires many private insurers to begin covering
More informationCertain exceptions apply to Hospital Inpatient Confinement for childbirth as described below.
Tennessee Applicable Policies PRECERTIFICATION Benefits payable for Hospital Inpatient Confinement Charges and confinement charges for services provided in an inpatient confinement facility will be reduced
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-53891 QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-53891
More informationTina Ploof v. Franklin County Sheriff s Department and (August 8, 2014) Trident/Massamont STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Tina Ploof v. Franklin County Sheriff s Department and (August 8, 2014) Trident/Massamont STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Tina Ploof Opinion No. 13-14WC v. By: Phyllis Phillips, Esq. Hearing Officer
More informationRE: HF No. 173, 2009/10 Gary Timm v. Meade School District 46-1 and Associated School Boards of South Dakota Worker s Compensation Trust Fund
March 29, 2011 James D. Leach Attorney at Law 1617 Sheridan Lake Road Rapid City, SD 57702-3783 Jessica L. Filler Tieszen Law Office Prof. LLC PO Box 550 Pierre, SD 57501 Letter Decision and Order RE:
More informationHOW TO APPEAL A MEDICAL ASSISTANCE DENIAL OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
HOW TO APPEAL A MEDICAL ASSISTANCE DENIAL OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY Figure 1: Doctor s prescription. Prepared by: Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania www.drnpa.org 1-800-692-7443 [Voice] 1-877-375-7139
More informationMINIMUM STANDARDS FOR UTILIZATION REVIEW AGENTS
MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR UTILIZATION REVIEW AGENTS Title 15: Mississippi State Department of Health Part 3: Office of Health Protection Subpart 1: Health Facilities Licensure and Certification Post Office
More informationTITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1. 900 Consumer Rights. 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims
DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1 900 Consumer Rights 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims 1.0 Purpose and Statutory Authority 1.1 The purpose of this Regulation is to implement
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION
2008 ACO # 156 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION MARY A. BUTLER, APPEAL FROM DEPUTY DIRECTOR CZYRKA. HARRY D. HIRSH FOR RICHARD R. WEISER FOR DEFENDANTS ACCIDENT FUND
More informationNo. 3--05--0771 APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2007
No. 3--05--0771 Filed June 6, 2007. IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2007 COLLEEN ALLTON, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the 12th Judicial Circuit, Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Will
More informationINDIANA: Frequently Asked Questions About the Autism Insurance Reform Law. What does Indiana s Autism Spectrum Disorder Insurance Mandate do?
INDIANA: Frequently Asked Questions About the Autism Insurance Reform Law What does Indiana s Autism Spectrum Disorder Insurance Mandate do? Broadly speaking, the insurance mandate requires insurance providers
More informationThe Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook
The Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook Introduction The Healthy Michigan Plan is a health care program through the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH). The Healthy Michigan Plan provides health
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IN THE MATTER OF: New Reg. No.: Old Reg. No.: Issue No.: Case No.: Hearing Date: County:
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IA Construction Corporation and : Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., : Petitioners : : v. : No. 2151 C.D. 2013 : Argued: November 10, 2014 Workers Compensation Appeal
More information