ISAAC Risk Assessment Training
|
|
|
- Carmella Armstrong
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ISAAC Risk Assessment Training v2013 Information Technology Risk Management 1
2 Agenda Why Assess? Information Security Standards Risk Assessment Process Using ISAAC Information Technology Risk Management 2
3 Why Assess? Identify risks to confidentiality, integrity and availability of data and information systems Provide data to be used for risk management planning Regulatory Compliance Texas Administrative Code 202 University Rule M1 Security of Electronic Information Resources Information Technology Risk Management 3
4 INFORMATION SECURITY STANDARDS Information Technology Risk Management 4
5 Texas Administrative Code 202 Security standards for institutions of higher education: C?tac_view=5&ti=1&pt=10&ch=202&sch=C&rl=Y Information Technology Risk Management 5
6 TAC 202 Summary Security Standards Policy Management and Staff Responsibilities Managing Security Risks Managing Physical Security Business Continuity Planning Information Resources Security Safeguards Security Incidents User Security Practices Removal of Data from Data Processing Equipment Information Technology Risk Management 6
7 TAMU Information Resources SAPs TAC (7) requires IHEs to have information security policies TAMU Information Security Policies: Rule: M1 Security of Electronic Information Resources SAPs: M1.* Information Technology Risk Management 7
8 TAMU Information Resources SAPs Information Technology Risk Management 8
9 Social Security Number Scanning Required by TAMU SAP M1.29 Data Classification and Protection Annual scan of data files SSNs cannot be retained without permission from the Vice President and Associate Provost for Information Technology. Report & Request Exception at: s.php Information Technology Risk Management 9
10 RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS Information Technology Risk Management 10
11 TAMU IT Risk Management Process Unit Completion of Unit ISAAC Assessments Assessment Review and Validation Remediation and Monitoring IT Risk Management Plan Creation NIS ITRM Data Analysis Aggregate Reporting University IT Risk Remediation Planning University IT Risk Identification Information Technology Risk Management 11
12 ISAAC Risk Assessment Period 9/1/2013 through 11/27/2013 Information Technology Risk Management 12
13 Identify Resources Departmental Risk Assessment Process Classify & Categorize Resources Assess Compliance Plan Remediation Certify Assessment Information Technology Risk Management 13
14 What is an Information Resource? The procedures, equipment, and software that are designed, employed, operated, and maintained to collect, record, process, store, retrieve, display, and transmit information or data. University Rule M1 Security of Electronic Information Resources Information Technology Risk Management 14
15 Hosts Applications Facilities Identify Resources Physical servers Virtual servers Desktop workstations Portable Devices Laptops, Notebooks, Tables, Smartphones, etc. Other Hardware Programs Databases Web Sites Data Centers Server Rooms Information Technology Risk Management 15
16 Resource Details Name Description Quantity Value ($) TAC (c) Usage Who are your users? How many users? Responsible Parties Who owns the business process supported by the resource? Who maintains the resource? Information Technology Risk Management 16
17 Classify Information Resources Classify data stored, processed or transmitted by Level of Criticality Level of Sensitivity Classification is the responsibility of the information resource owner TAMU SAP M1.29 Information Technology Risk Management 17
18 Classification by Sensitivity Public Information meant for public consumption Information subject to disclosure or release under the Texas Public Information Act Sensitive Defined by the university or data owner Data requires some level of protection, and May be subject to disclosure or release under the Texas Public Information Act Confidential Information protected from unauthorized disclosure or public release because of: State or federal law Contractual agreements Source: TAMU SAP Data Classification and Protection Information Technology Risk Management 18
19 Classification by Criticality Mission Critical University or owner-defined. Essential to the mission of the University or department Data unavailability may result in: Significant financial loss Institutional embarrassment Regulatory non-compliance Closure of the university or department Not Critical All other non-mission critical data May still be important May still have high availability requirements Source: TAMU SAP Data Classification and Protection Information Technology Risk Management 19
20 Information Technology Risk Management 20
21 Group Resources for Assessment Identify similar resources based on: configuration protection needs data classification security posture authentication etc. Perform separate assessments on dissimilar resources or where practical based on your operating environment Information Technology Risk Management 21
22 Information Technology Risk Management 22
23 Desktops Assess managed and unmanaged systems on separate assessments Managed systems are more likely to be compliant with security requirements Security controls on unmanaged systems may vary from system to system Information Technology Risk Management 23
24 Complex Information Systems Separate systems into layers Assess each layer separately Servers and Operating Systems Database Application (ex: Oracle, MS SQL, MySQL, etc) Software applications that use the Database Server Assess from the point of view of the custodian who logs into the server to maintain it. Assess from the point of view of the database environment: Does it use local accounts or enterprise accounts? What are the security controls on the database application? What is the audit logging like? How is confidential information managed? Assess from the point of view of the application: How are users authenticated? What are the security controls protecting the data within the application Information Technology Risk Management 24
25 Determine Protection Needs Confidentiality How important is it to prevent unauthorized disclosure of data? Integrity How important is it to prevent unauthorized modification or deletion of data? Availability How important is it that this resource be available? Information Technology Risk Management 25
26 Information Technology Risk Management 26
27 Preparing for Assessment 1. Identify people whose assistance you may require to answer questions, such as a. Managers or Faculty b. IT Staff c. End Users d. CIS e. Vendors 2. Identify people that should sign the assessment Information Technology Risk Management 27
28 Identify Signatories Assessor Information Resource Owner Management (Dept Head, Dean, etc.) Optional Information Resource Custodian Information Security Administrator Other (any other role) Information Technology Risk Management 28
29 Information Technology Risk Management 29
30 Assess Resources 1. Answer questions 2. Identify deficiencies 3. Plan remediation activities 4. Certify assessment Information Technology Risk Management 30
31 Assessment Questions Separated into modules and sections based on security controls (technical, administrative, physical) Mapped to regulations: Texas Administrative Code 202 TAMU Information Resources SAPs Associated with: Resource Type Data Classification Information Technology Risk Management 31
32 Information Technology Risk Management 32
33 Information Technology Risk Management 33
34 Plan Remediation Activities Any question with an answer of No, Planning Stages, or Partially Compliant requires one or more of the following: Corrective Action Risk Management Decision SAP Exclusion Information Technology Risk Management 34
35 Information Technology Risk Management 35
36 Corrective Action Plan to remedy the deficiency, including Target completion date Estimated cost Responsible party Based on value of asset, protection needs, and risk. Information Technology Risk Management 36
37 Risk Management Decision Explanation of why the deficiency exists Rationale for not correcting it Identification of workarounds Acknowledgement of risk Information Technology Risk Management 37
38 SAP Exclusion M1.27 Exclusions from Required Risk Mitigation Measures Requests are submitted within the ISAAC application Information Technology Risk Management 38
39 Certify Assessment 1. Print out assessment report 2. Review assessment with information resource owners and management 3. Have owners/management check and initial accepted corrective actions and/or risk management decisions 4. Obtain all required signatures 5. Mark assessment as Completed/Certified in ISAAC Information Technology Risk Management 39
40 Records Retention Assessments are not complete until they are signed ITRM does not maintain copies of signed reports Departments must maintain signed documents for FE (Fiscal Year End) + 3 years Information Technology Risk Management 40
41 USING ISAAC Information Technology Risk Management 41
42 Authentication Login with NetID and password through CAS No local accounts Claim NetID at Affiliates may log in if sponsored by departments Request NetID at ountrequestform.pdf Information Technology Risk Management 42
43 ISAAC Steps 1. Select Unit(s): Identify the units that own and use the information resources you're assessing. 2. Create Contacts: Create contact records for information resource owners, custodians, and others who will sign the assessment. 3. Create Resources: Create records for the resources you are assessing, so you may select them when you create an assessment. 4. Perform Assessment: Select the resources to be assessed, answer questions, and plan for remediation if necessary. 5. Print Report: When done, print an assessment for review and signature by appropriate individuals. 6. Mark Assessment Completed/Certified: Mark the assessment as completed/certified after obtaining all signatures. Information Technology Risk Management 43
44 ISAAC Steps Select Unit(s) Identify the units that own and use the information resources you're assessing. Create Contacts Create contact records for information resource owners custodians any others who will sign the assessment Create Resources Create records for the resources you are assessing, so you may select them when you create an assessment. Perform Assessment Select the resources to be assessed Answer questions Plan for remediation if necessary Print Report When done, print an assessment for review and signature by appropriate individuals. Mark Assessment Completed/Certified Mark the assessment as completed/certified after obtaining all signatures. Information Technology Risk Management 44
45 Assessment Methodology Level of risk assigned to each question based on Protection needs (C-I-A) of resources being assessed Inherent risk to C-I-A based on vulnerabilities the required security controls address Based on highest C-I-A rating for each Information Technology Risk Management 45
46 Risk Matrix Information Technology Risk Management 46
47 Assessment Report Primary focus is risk Compliance with individual security standards detailed in Appendix D Generated as PDF only Information Technology Risk Management 47
48 Information Technology Risk Management 48
49 ISAAC Liaisons Individuals, usually IT Managers, Directors, or other equivalent Read-only access to users, resources, and assessments At unit (department), college/division, and organization level Each unit that manages its own IT or whose IT staff monitors End User assessment use should have one Information Technology Risk Management 49
50 Information Technology Risk Management (979) Information Technology Risk Management 50
Information Security Program
Stephen F. Austin State University Information Security Program Revised: September 2014 2014 Table of Contents Overview... 1 Introduction... 1 Purpose... 1 Authority... 2 Scope... 2 Information Security
Information Security Policy and Handbook Overview. ITSS Information Security June 2015
Information Security Policy and Handbook Overview ITSS Information Security June 2015 Information Security Policy Control Hierarchy System and Campus Information Security Policies UNT System Information
Information Resources Security Guidelines
Information Resources Security Guidelines 1. General These guidelines, under the authority of South Texas College Policy #4712- Information Resources Security, set forth the framework for a comprehensive
Executive Summary Program Highlights for FY2009/2010 Mission Statement Authority State Law: University Policy:
Executive Summary Texas state law requires that each state agency, including Institutions of Higher Education, have in place an Program (ISP) that is approved by the head of the institution. 1 Governance
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
10/25/2012 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN Procedure Name: LIT Risk Management Information Technology Plan ver 2.31.docx Risk Management Plan Issue Date: TBD Procedure Owner:
INITIAL APPROVAL DATE INITIAL EFFECTIVE DATE
TITLE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES DOCUMENT # 1107 APPROVAL LEVEL Alberta Health Services Executive Committee SPONSOR Legal & Privacy / Information Technology CATEGORY Information and Technology
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard Title: Scope: Data Handling and Storage Standard This standard is applicable to all VCU School of Medicine personnel. Approval
LAMAR STATE COLLEGE - ORANGE INFORMATION RESOURCES SECURITY MANUAL. for INFORMATION RESOURCES
LAMAR STATE COLLEGE - ORANGE INFORMATION RESOURCES SECURITY MANUAL for INFORMATION RESOURCES Updated: June 2007 Information Resources Security Manual 1. Purpose of Security Manual 2. Audience 3. Acceptable
Security Tool Kit System Checklist Departmental Servers and Enterprise Systems
Security Tool Kit System Checklist Departmental Servers and Enterprise Systems INSTRUCTIONS System documentation specifically related to security controls of departmental servers and enterprise systems
Central Agency for Information Technology
Central Agency for Information Technology Kuwait National IT Governance Framework Information Security Agenda 1 Manage security policy 2 Information security management system procedure Agenda 3 Manage
Information Technology Internal Audit Report
Information Technology Internal Audit Report Report #2013-03 August 9, 2013 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... 3 Background Information... 4 Background... 4 Audit Objectives... 4 Scope... 5 Testing
HIPAA Privacy and Information Security Management Briefing
HIPAA Privacy and Information Security Management Briefing Karen Pagliaro-Meyer Privacy Officer [email protected] (212) 305-7315 Soumitra Sengupta Information Security Officer [email protected] (212)
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05-050
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05-050 Adopting Multnomah County HIPAA Security Policies and Directing the Appointment of Information System Security
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard Title: Scope: Business Continuity Management Standard for IT Systems This standard is applicable to all VCU School of Medicine
Information Security @ Blue Valley Schools FEBRUARY 2015
Information Security @ Blue Valley Schools FEBRUARY 2015 Student Data Privacy & Security Blue Valley is committed to providing an education beyond expectations to each of our students. To support that
INFORMATION SECURITY SPECIFIC VENDOR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (VCP) ACME Consulting Services, Inc.
INFORMATION SECURITY SPECIFIC VENDOR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (VCP) ACME Consulting Services, Inc. Copyright 2016 Table of Contents INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS 3 VENDOR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM OVERVIEW 4 VENDOR COMPLIANCE
Information Security Policy
Information Security Policy Touro College/University ( Touro ) is committed to information security. Information security is defined as protection of data, applications, networks, and computer systems
HIPAA: Understanding The Omnibus Rule and Keeping Your Business Compliant
1 HIPAA: Understanding The Omnibus Rule and Keeping Your Business Compliant Introduction U.S. healthcare laws intended to protect patient information (Protected Health Information or PHI) and the myriad
Introduction. Purpose. Reference. Applicability. HIPAA Policy 7.1. Safeguards to Protect the Privacy of PHI
Office of Regulatory Compliance 13001 E. 17 th Place, Suite W1124 Mail Stop F497 Aurora, CO 80045 Main Office: 303-724-1010 Main Fax: 303-724-1019 HIPAA Policy 7.1 Title: Source: Prepared by: Approved
Unified Security Anywhere HIPAA COMPLIANCE ACHIEVING HIPAA COMPLIANCE WITH MASERGY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Unified Security Anywhere HIPAA COMPLIANCE ACHIEVING HIPAA COMPLIANCE WITH MASERGY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HIPAA COMPLIANCE Achieving HIPAA Compliance with Security Professional Services The Health Insurance
PROCESSING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ON PORTABLE COMPUTERS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PROCESSING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ON PORTABLE COMPUTERS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division Audit Report 05-32 July 2005 PROCESSING CLASSIFIED
State of Oregon. State of Oregon 1
State of Oregon State of Oregon 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Information Asset Management...2 3. Communication Operations...7 3.3 Workstation Management... 7 3.9 Log management... 11 4. Information
Information Technology Internal Audit Report
Information Technology Internal Audit Report Report #2014-05 July 25, 2014 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... 3 Background Information... 4 Background... 4 Audit Objectives... 4 Scope and Testing
HIPAA: Compliance Essentials
HIPAA: Compliance Essentials Presented by: Health Security Solutions August 15, 2014 What is HIPAA?? HIPAA is Law that governs a person s ability to qualify immediately for health coverage when they change
How To Write A Health Care Security Rule For A University
INTRODUCTION HIPAA Security Rule Safeguards Recommended Standards Developed by: USF HIPAA Security Team May 12, 2005 The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule, as a
Privacy Impact Assessment. For. Non-GFE for Remote Access. Date: May 26, 2015. Point of Contact and Author: Michael Gray michael.gray@ed.
For Non-GFE for Remote Access Date: May 26, 2015 Point of Contact and Author: Michael Gray [email protected] System Owner: Allen Hill [email protected] Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
Automation Suite for. 201 CMR 17.00 Compliance
WHITEPAPER Automation Suite for Assurance with LogRhythm The Massachusetts General Law Chapter 93H regulation 201 CMR 17.00 was enacted on March 1, 2010. The regulation was developed to safeguard personal
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Introduction Purpose Audience Implications Sensitive Digital Data Management In an effort to protect credit card information from unauthorized access, disclosure
SUBJECT: SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 (HIPAA)
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICY SUBJECT: SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 (HIPAA) DATE: March 18, 2005 I. SCOPE This
Rowan University Data Governance Policy
Rowan University Data Governance Policy Effective: January 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Regulations, Statutes, and Policies... 4 3. Policy Scope... 4 4. Governance Roles... 6 4.1. Data
Information Security Policy
Information Security Policy Policy Contents I. POLICY STATEMENT II. REASON FOR POLICY III. SCOPE IV. AUDIENCE V. POLICY TEXT VI. PROCEDURES VII. RELATED INFORMATION VIII. DEFINITIONS IX. FREQUENTLY ASKED
Information Security Risk Assessment Checklist. A High-Level Tool to Assist USG Institutions with Risk Analysis
Information Security Risk Assessment Checklist A High-Level Tool to Assist USG Institutions with Risk Analysis Updated Oct 2008 Introduction Information security is an important issue for the University
Utica College. Information Security Plan
Utica College Information Security Plan Author: James Farr (Information Security Officer) Version: 1.0 November 1 2012 Contents Introduction... 3 Scope... 3 Information Security Organization... 4 Roles
The Protection Mission a constant endeavor
a constant endeavor The IT Protection Mission a constant endeavor As businesses become more and more dependent on IT, IT must face a higher bar for preparedness Cyber preparedness is the process of ensuring
BERKELEY COLLEGE DATA SECURITY POLICY
BERKELEY COLLEGE DATA SECURITY POLICY BERKELEY COLLEGE DATA SECURITY POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Definitions 2 3 General Roles and Responsibilities 4 4 Sensitive Data
DHHS Information Technology (IT) Access Control Standard
DHHS Information Technology (IT) Access Control Standard Issue Date: October 1, 2013 Effective Date: October 1,2013 Revised Date: Number: DHHS-2013-001-B 1.0 Purpose and Objectives With the diversity of
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY CREDIT CARD SECURITY POLICY
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY CREDIT CARD SECURITY POLICY Page 1 of 6 Summary The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), a set of comprehensive requirements for enhancing payment account
University System of Maryland University of Maryland, College Park Division of Information Technology
Audit Report University System of Maryland University of Maryland, College Park Division of Information Technology December 2014 OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITS DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES MARYLAND
Vulnerability Management Policy
Vulnerability Management Policy Policy Statement Computing devices storing the University s Sensitive Information (as defined below) or Mission-Critical computing devices (as defined below) must be fully
Central Texas College District Human Resource Management Operating Policies and Procedures Manual Policy No. 294: Computer Security Policy
Central Texas College District Human Resource Management Operating Policies and Procedures Manual Policy No. 294: Computer Security Policy I. PURPOSE To identify the requirements needed to comply with
ensure prompt restart of critical applications and business activities in a timely manner following an emergency or disaster
Security Standards Symantec shall maintain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for the Symantec Network designed to (i) protect the security and integrity of the Symantec Network, and (ii)
GOALS. Server Management Program Review / Training. To Review SMP structure, requirements, logistics. To increase quality and benefit of documentation
Server Management Program Review / Training GOALS To Review SMP structure, requirements, logistics To increase quality and benefit of documentation Provide/review examples and upgraded templates Unit IT
Data Management Policies. Sage ERP Online
Sage ERP Online Sage ERP Online Table of Contents 1.0 Server Backup and Restore Policy... 3 1.1 Objectives... 3 1.2 Scope... 3 1.3 Responsibilities... 3 1.4 Policy... 4 1.5 Policy Violation... 5 1.6 Communication...
Qatar University Information Security Policies Handbook November 2013
Qatar University Information Security Policies Handbook November 2013 Information Security Policies Handbook November 2013 Produced by Information Technology Services Department / Information Security
Department of Public Utilities Customer Information System (BANNER)
REPORT # 2010-06 AUDIT of the Customer Information System (BANNER) January 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary..... i Comprehensive List of Recommendations. iii Introduction, Objective, Methodology
6. AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR NETWORK ADMINISTRATION AND SECURITY AUDITING
6. AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR NETWORK ADMINISTRATION AND SECURITY AUDITING The following is a general checklist for the audit of Network Administration and Security. Sl.no Checklist Process 1. Is there an Information
The Second National HIPAA Summit
HIPAA Security Regulations: Documentation and Procedures The Second National HIPAA Summit Healthcare Computing Strategies, Inc. John Parmigiani Practice Director, Compliance Programs Tom Walsh, CISSP Practice
micros MICROS Systems, Inc. Enterprise Information Security Policy (MEIP) August, 2013 Revision 8.0 MICROS Systems, Inc. Version 8.
micros MICROS Systems, Inc. Enterprise Information Security Policy (MEIP) Revision 8.0 August, 2013 1 Table of Contents Overview /Standards: I. Information Security Policy/Standards Preface...5 I.1 Purpose....5
ISMS Implementation Guide
atsec information security corporation 9130 Jollyville Road, Suite 260 Austin, TX 78759 Tel: 512-615-7300 Fax: 512-615-7301 www.atsec.com ISMS Implementation Guide atsec information security ISMS Implementation
UF IT Risk Assessment Standard
UF IT Risk Assessment Standard Authority This standard was enacted by the UF Senior Vice President for Administration and the UF Interim Chief Information Officer on July 10, 2008 [7]. It was approved
Information Security Program Management Standard
State of California California Information Security Office Information Security Program Management Standard SIMM 5305-A September 2013 REVISION HISTORY REVISION DATE OF RELEASE OWNER SUMMARY OF CHANGES
The Impact of HIPAA and HITECH
The Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA), enacted 8/21/96, was created to protect the use, storage and transmission of patients healthcare information. This protects all forms of patients
Contact: Henry Torres, (870) 972-3033
Information & Technology Services Management & Security Principles & Procedures Executive Summary Contact: Henry Torres, (870) 972-3033 Background: The Security Task Force began a review of all procedures
SENSITIVE DATA SECURITY AND PROTECTION CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LOS ANGELES. Audit Report 11-52 January 3, 2012
SENSITIVE DATA SECURITY AND PROTECTION CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LOS ANGELES Audit Report 11-52 January 3, 2012 Henry Mendoza, Chair Melinda Guzman, Vice Chair Margaret Fortune Steven M. Glazer William
Specific observations and recommendations that were discussed with campus management are presented in detail below.
CSU The California State University Office of Audit and Advisory Services INFORMATION SECURITY California State University, San Bernardino Audit Report 14-55 March 18, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OBJECTIVE
Supplier Security Assessment Questionnaire
HALKYN CONSULTING LTD Supplier Security Assessment Questionnaire Security Self-Assessment and Reporting This questionnaire is provided to assist organisations in conducting supplier security assessments.
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY
PURPOSE The University of Rochester recognizes the vital role information technology plays in the University s missions and related administrative activities as well as the importance in an academic environment
05.118 Credit Card Acceptance Policy. Vice Chancellor of Business Affairs. History: Effective July 1, 2011 Updated February 2013
05.118 Credit Card Acceptance Policy Authority: Vice Chancellor of Business Affairs History: Effective July 1, 2011 Updated February 2013 Source of Authority: Office of State Controller (OSC); Office of
Hamilton College Administrative Information Systems Security Policy and Procedures. Approved by the IT Committee (December 2004)
Hamilton College Administrative Information Systems Security Policy and Procedures Approved by the IT Committee (December 2004) Table of Contents Summary... 3 Overview... 4 Definition of Administrative
HIPAA Security. 2 Security Standards: Administrative Safeguards. Security Topics
HIPAA Security SERIES Security Topics 1. Security 101 for Covered Entities 5. 2. Security Standards - Organizational, Security Policies Standards & Procedures, - Administrative and Documentation Safeguards
Indiana University of Pennsylvania Information Assurance Guidelines. Approved by the Technology Utilities Council 27-SEP-2002
Indiana University of Pennsylvania Information Assurance Guidelines Approved by the Technology Utilities Council 27-SEP-2002 1 Purpose... 2 1.1 Introduction... 2 1.1.1 General Information...2 1.1.2 Objectives...
Checklist of Requirements for Protection of Restricted Data College of Medicine Departments (v 03/2014)
hecklist of Requirements for Protection of Restricted ata ollege of Medicine epartments (v 03/2014) These requirements must be met to comply with U data protection policies, including HIPAA Policies and
Information Security It s Everyone s Responsibility
Information Security It s Everyone s Responsibility The University of Texas at Dallas Information Security Office (ISO) Purpose of Training Information generated, used, and/or owned by UTD has value. Because
Information Security for Managers
Fiscal Year 2015 Information Security for Managers Introduction Information Security Overview Enterprise Performance Life Cycle Enterprise Performance Life Cycle and the Risk Management Framework Categorize
Supplier Information Security Addendum for GE Restricted Data
Supplier Information Security Addendum for GE Restricted Data This Supplier Information Security Addendum lists the security controls that GE Suppliers are required to adopt when accessing, processing,
WHITEPAPER XMEDIUSFAX CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE AND HIPAA COMPLIANCE
WHITEPAPER XMEDIUSFAX CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE AND HIPAA COMPLIANCE INTRODUCTION The healthcare industry is driven by many specialized documents. Each day, volumes of critical information are sent to and from
Montclair State University. HIPAA Security Policy
Montclair State University HIPAA Security Policy Effective: June 25, 2015 HIPAA Security Policy and Procedures Montclair State University is a hybrid entity and has designated Healthcare Components that
Disaster Recovery Plan (Business Continuity) Template
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2786932/ Disaster Recovery Plan (Business Continuity) Template Description: The Disaster Planning Template is over 200 pages and
Authorized. User Agreement
Authorized User Agreement CareAccord Health Information Exchange (HIE) Table of Contents Authorized User Agreement... 3 CareAccord Health Information Exchange (HIE) Polices and Procedures... 5 SECTION
CENG Information Technology Services University of North Texas
CENG Information Technology Services University of North Texas for the Information Technology Services as applied To the University of North Texas College of Engineering 1.0 Agreement 1.1 Purpose CENGITS
Index .700 FORMS - SAMPLE INCIDENT RESPONSE FORM.995 HISTORY
Information Security Section: General Operations Title: Information Security Number: 56.350 Index POLICY.100 POLICY STATEMENT.110 POLICY RATIONALE.120 AUTHORITY.130 APPROVAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF POLICY.140
Information Security Policy. Document ID: 3809 Version: 1.0 Owner: Chief Security Officer, Security Services
Information Security Policy Document ID: 3809 Version: 1.0 Owner: Chief Security Officer, Security Services Contents 1 Purpose / Objective... 1 1.1 Information Security... 1 1.2 Purpose... 1 1.3 Objectives...
DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management
January 2013 Page 1 DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management This paper describes DeltaV s integrated solution for meeting FDA 21CFR Part 11 requirements in process automation applications
VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY RISK ANALYSIS SURVEY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
ASSESSABLE UNIT: ENTER THE NAME OF YOUR ASSESSABLE UNIT HERE BUSINESS PROCESS: ENTER YOUR BUSINESS PROCESS HERE BANNER INDEX CODE: ENTER YOUR BANNER INDEX CODE HERE Risk: If you monitor the activity and
Estate Agents Authority
INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY PROTECTION POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR ESTATE AGENTS Estate Agents Authority The contents of this document remain the property of, and may not be reproduced in whole or in
Disaster Recovery Plan (Business Continuity) Template - Version 8.2
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3630899/ Disaster Recovery Plan (Business Continuity) Template - Version 8.2 Description: ISO 27000, SOX, PCI-DSS & HIPAA Compliant
ITS HIPAA Security Compliance Recommendations
ITS HIPAA Security Compliance Recommendations October 24, 2005 Updated May 31, 2010 http://its.uncg.edu/hipaa/security/ Table of Contents Introduction...1 Purpose of this Document...1 Important Terms...1
Information Security: Roles, Responsibilities, and Data Classification. Technology Services 1/4/2013
Information Security: Roles, Responsibilities, and Data Classification Technology Services 1/4/2013 Roles, Responsibilities, and Data Classification The purpose of this session is to: Establish that all
Information Technology Branch Access Control Technical Standard
Information Technology Branch Access Control Technical Standard Information Management, Administrative Directive A1461 Cyber Security Technical Standard # 5 November 20, 2014 Approved: Date: November 20,
MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL AUDIT REPORT THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL ...The auditor general shall conduct post audits of financial transactions and accounts of the state and of
CHIS, Inc. Privacy General Guidelines
CHIS, Inc. and HIPAA CHIS, Inc. provides services to healthcare facilities and uses certain protected health information (PHI) in connection with performing these services. Therefore, CHIS, Inc. is classified
2012 Risk Assessment Workshop
2012 Risk Assessment Workshop Agenda Risk Assessment Strategy for Texas State Device Registration Application Risk Assessment using ISAAC Review Server Management responsibilities 1 Risk Assessment Strategy
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FINAL REPORT INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT AND ACCESS CONTROL POLICIES Audit Report December 17, 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 Background...1
Vendor Assessment Worksheet:
Vendor Assessment Worksheet: A sample set of IT security controls for evaluation of third party vendors capacity to protect institutional research data 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Vendor
UTech Services Compliance, Auditing, Risk, and Security (CARS) Team Charter
Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education California University of Pennsylvania UTech Services Compliance, Auditing, Risk, and Security (CARS) Team Charter Version [1.0] 1/29/2013 Revision History
