REFERENCES. Arizona Dept. of Education. (1994) Inquiry and Complaint System Relating to the Education of Exceptional Children.

Transcription

1 REFERENCES Ahern, E. M. (1994) Mediation and Due Process Procedures in Special Education: An Analysis of State Policies. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Arizona Dept. of Education. (1994) Inquiry and Complaint System Relating to the Education of Exceptional Children. Author Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982). Budoff, M. & Orenstein, A. (1982) Due Process In Special Education: On Going To A Hearing. Cambridge, MA.: Ware Press. reported in Forbis (1994). Congressional Record, 94th Congress, Vol. 121, (18), ( ), July 21, 1975, consideration of H.R. 7217, Education for all Handicapped Children Act of Congressional Record, 93rd Congress, Vol. 120, (12) ( ), May 20, 1974, debate on S.1539 A Bill To Amend And Extent Certain Acts Relating To Elementary And Secondary Education Programs And For Other Purposes. Coulombe, T. (1997) Maine Department of Education, Personal communication regarding contracted expenses for due process. Dragan, E.F. (1996) After a Due Process Hearing Then What? The School Administrator 53 (52-3). Doiron, D. (1996). Memorandum from the Maine Department of the Attorney General to Leigh Phillips, Due Process Team, Maine Department of Education, August 21, Forbis, J. W. (1994). The Perceptions Of Illinois School Administrators And Parents Regarding Mediated Special Education Disputes. (Doctoral Dissertation, Saint Lois University) Dissertation Abstracts International, Order #

2 Goldberg, S.S. and Kuriloff, P.J. (1987). Doing Away with Due Process: Seeking Alternative Dispute Resolution in Special Education. Education Law Reporter 42 ( ). Goldberg, S.S. (1989). The Failure of Legalization in Education: Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Education of All Handicapped Children Act of Journal of Law and Education, 18, (3). Goldberg, S.S. and Kuriloff, P.J. (1991). Evaluating the fairness of special education hearings. Exceptional Children, 57(6). Goldberg, S.S. and Huefner, D.S. (1995). Dispute resolution in special education: an introduction to litigation alternatives. Education Law Reporter 99 ( ). Gubernick, L. & Conlin, M (1997). The Special Education Scandal. Forbes Today, 2/10/97 Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986, P.L , (1986). Hehir, T.F. (1992). The Impact Of Due Process On The Programmatic Decisions Of Special Education Directors, The Special Education Leadership Review, 1(1), (63-76). Hehir, T.F. (1994) OSEP Memorandum (Complaint Procedures). Office of Special Education Programs U. S. Department of Education, 21 IDELR 85. Hehir, T.F. (1995a). Letter to Ash (State Complaint Procedures). Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education(23 IDELR 647). Hehir, T.F. (1995b). Letter to Senator William S. Cohen. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education(23 IDELR 443). Harpin, G.L. and Rzepski, B. (n.d.). Problems In Due Process: Factors Which Result In More Adversarial Procedures. Monograph distributed by the Triad System for Technical Assistance and Resources, Univ. of N. Carolina, Chapel Hill. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C et seq. Jones, P. R. (1981). A Practical Guide to Federal Special Education Law - Understanding and Implementing PL N.Y., N.Y.: CBS College Publishing 114

3 Lakes, Marsha K.; And Others, (Mar 1995) Frontier Justice: Adaptations of Nevada s IDEA Complaint Investigation Process for Rural/Remote Areas. Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES), ERIC NO: ED Kierstaid, J. (1997). Maine Department of Education, personal communication, Oct. 31, Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups - A Practical Guide for Applied Research 2nd. Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Maloney M. and Shenker, B. (1995). The Continuing Evolution Of Special Education Law Individuals with Disabilities Education Law Report, Special Report #12, L.R.P. Publications. March, J. and Simon, H. (1993). Organizations. 2nd Ed., Blackwell Pub., Cambridge, MA. Maine Administrative Procedures Act. Title 5, Section et seq., Maine Revised Statutes, Annotated. Maine Department of Education (1995). Chapter 101. Maine Special Education Regulations Maine Dept of Ed. (1997). Personal communication with John Keirstead, Division of Special Services, Oct. 31, 1997 Mills v. the D. of C. Board of Education (348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972)). Neal and Kirp (1985). The Allure of Legalization Reconsidered: the Case of Special Education, Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 48: (1) Opuda, M. (1992) The Third Wave of Due Process - State Special Education Complaint Investigations. Paper presented at the 70th Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children (Baltimore, MD). ERIC Clearinghouse #: EC Opuda, M. (1995). The State of Due Process in Maine, Paper presented at the Winter Conference of the Maine Association of Special Education Directors, Jan. 29, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 344 F. Supp. 1257(E.D. Pa. 1971)) and (343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa 1972)). 115

4 Regan, K. (1990). Analysis Of Mediation And Hearings To Resolve Parent School Disputes In Special Education. (Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers University) Dissertation Abstracts International, Order # Sachen, D. (1988). Reflections on an Adversarial Process: The Confessions of a Special Education Hearing Officer. Monograph distributed by The Council of Administrators of Special Education, Research Committee, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. Schumack, S. and Stewart, A. (1995). When Parents and Educators Do Not agree: Using Mediation to Resolve Conflicts About Special Education: A guidebook for Parents. Harvard Univ. Center for Law and Education, Cambridge, MA. Schrag, J. A. (1996a). Mediation in Special Education: A Resource Manual for Mediators. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Schrag, J. A. (1996b). Mediation and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures in Special Education. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. SPSS (1996). Statistical Products and Services Solutions, Version 7.5 for Windows. Chicago, IL. Stockdale, B.S. (1994). The Characteristics Of Parents Who Have And Have Not Requested A Due Process Hearing. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alabama) Dissertation Abstracts International, Order # Suchey, N. (1997) Personal correspondence, Preliminary results of a survey of SEA Complaint Procedures. Symington, G. T. (1995). Mediation as an Option in Special Education. Final Report. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Turnbull, R.H. (1993). Free Appropriate Public Education: The Law And Children with Disabilities. Denver, CO.: Love 116

5 Turnbull, R.H. & McGinley, K.H. (1987). Evaluating the effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to the due process theory in special education. Final report. Kansas University, Lawrence Department of Special Education. ERIC document No. ED Upper Valley Assoc. for Handicapped Citizens v. Blue Mountain Union Sch. Dist. No. 21, 26 IDELR 406 (D. Vt. 1997). U.S. Dept. of Education (1995). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 34 Code of Federal Regulations, part 99. U.S. Dept. of Education (1995). Education - General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), 34 Code of Federal Regulations, parts U.S. Dept. of Education (1995). Seventeenth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. U.S. Department of Education (1997). 34 C.F.R. Parts 300, 301 and 303 Assistance To States For The Education Of Children With Disabilities, Preschool Grants For Children With Disabilities And Early Intervention Program For Infants And Toddlers With Disabilities; Proposed Rules. Federal Register, October 22, U.S. Department of Education (1999). 34 C.F.R. Parts 300 and 303 Assistance To States For The Education Of Children With Disabilities And the Early Intervention Program For Infants And Toddlers With Disabilities; Final Regulations. Federal Register, March 12, Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Weatherly, R. & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special Education Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47 (2). Zirkel, P. A. (1993). Special Education: Needless Adversariness? Phi Delta Kappan, 74(10). 117