MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
|
|
- Leon Hunt
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND INSURANCE * REVIEW OF A RECOMMENDED ADMINISTRATION * DECISION ISSUED BY EXREL GX-H * DAVID HOFSTETTER Complainant * AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE v. * OF THE MARYLAND OFFICE OF LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE * ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CORPORATION and INTEGRITY * TITLE, ESCROW & SETTLEMENT * CORPORATION * OAH No.: MIA-CC Licensee * MIA No.: MIA * * * * * * * * * * * * * FINAL ORDER Pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Ins (d) and COMAR O-2H, the undersigned Maryland Insurance Commissioner, hereby issues this summary affirmance of the proposed decision below. On April 13, 2011, this case was heard by Administrative Law Judge ( AU ) Hofstetter. On May 13, 2011, the AU issued a Proposed Decision, and on the same date the Office of Administrative Hearings mailed the Proposed Decision to the Complainant, G.Y-H., to Lawyers Title, to Integrity Title and Escrow Settlement Corporation, to Fidelity National Title Group and to P. Randi Johnson of the Maryland 1
2 Insurance Administration. Attached to the Proposed Decision were the Appeal Rights advising all parties that pursuant to Md. Code Ann., State Gov t and COMAR , they were given an opportunity to file written exceptions with the undersigned, within twenty (20) days from receipt ofthe Proposed Decision. No Exceptions were filed by any of the parties. I have carefully evaluated the documentary record in this case, and the Proposed Decision by AU Hofstetter. In consideration thereof, and pursuant to COMAR D, I am persuaded that the result reached by the AU is correct. A Proposed Decision summarily affirmed under COMAR H is not precedent within the rule of stare decisis in other cases. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Proposed Decision of AU Hofstetter be adopted as the Commissioner s Final Order, and it is further ORDERED that the complaint made by the Complainant be DENIED AND DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the records and publications of the Maryland Insurance Administration reflect this decision. It is so ORDERED this th 8 day of July, THERESE M. GOLDSMITH Commissioner Signature on file with Orignal Deputy Comm issioner -2-
3 MARYLAND INSURANCE * BEFORE DAVID HOFSTETTER, ADMINISTRATION, * AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE EX REL.: * OF THE MARYLAND OFFICE, * OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COMPLAINANT * OAH No.: MIA-INS * MIANo.: LAWYERS TITLE INSIJRANCE * CORPORATION and INTEGRITY * TITLE, ESCROW & SETTLMENT * CORPORATION, * LICENSEES * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROPOSED DECISION 1 STATEMENT OF TUE CASE ISSUE SUMMARY OF TUE EVIDENCE FINDINGS OF FACT DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PROPOSED ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE On March 19, 2010, the Maryland Insurance Administration (MIA) received a complaint 1 Under the relevant statute and regulations, the Insurance Commissioner may, on a case-by-case basis, delegate to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAR) the authority to issue: (a) proposed or final findings of fact; (b) proposed or final conclusions of law; (c) proposed or final findings of fact and conclusions of law; or (d) a proposed or final order. Md. Code Ann., State Govt (2009); Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) (A)(2). Here, the Commissioner has delegated to OAH the authority to issue proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law and a proposed order.
4 from (Complainant) alleging unfair claims settlement practices by Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation (Lawyers Title) and Integrity Title, Escrow & Settlement Corporation s (Integrity) arising from errors in the recording of the deed for property she purchased in Upper Marlboro, Maryland in 2005 (Lawyers Title and Integrity will be referred to collectively as the Licensees). After an investigation, the MIA found no violation ofthe Maryland Insurance Article by the Licensee, and notified the Complainant and the Licensees of its finding by a letter dated December 13, On December 29, 2010, the Complainant requested a hearing. Md. Code Ann., Ins (Supp. 2010). On February 22, 2010, the MIA referred this matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) for a hearing. Md. Code Ann., State Govt (2009). In its delegation, the MIA directed the hearingjudge to pay specific attention to sections and of the Maryland Insurance Article. I held a hearing on April 13, 2011 at the OAH in Hunt Valley, Maryland. Md. Code Ann., State Govt (e) (2009). The Complainant appeared without representation. Carson Mills, Esquire, represented Lawyers Title. Despite proper notice, Integrity failed to appear for the hearing. 2 The contested case provisions ofthe Administrative Procedure Act, the procedural regulations for MIA hearings, and the Rules of Procedure of the OAH govern procedures in this case. Md. Code Ann., State Gov t ~ through (2009 & Supp. 2010); Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) ; and COMAR Integrity s license was revoked by the MIA on September 9, 2009 for matters unrelated to the present case. MIA Ex. 33. The company is apparently out of business. 2
5 ISSUE Did each Licensee s refusal to pay the Complainant s claim based on the failure to properly record a deed constitute an unfair claim settlement practice? SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE Exhibits I incorporated the entire MIA file, consisting of 35 exhibits, into the record. Neitherthe Licensee nor the Appellant offered additional exhibits. Ihave attached a complete Exhibit List as an Appendix. Testimony The Complainant testified on her own behalf. Carson Mills, Esquire, presented argument on behalf oflawyers Title. FINDINGS OF FACT I find the following facts by a preponderance ofthe evidence: 1. In 2005, the Complainant contracted to purchase a home at Village Drive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland (the Property). 2. On November 15, 2005, Integrity Title conducted the settlement for the purchase of the Property. 3. In conducting the settlement, Integrity Title acted as the agent for Lawyers Title, which provided title insurance concerning the transaction. 4. The transaction involved two deeds and two deeds of trust which were all to be recorded with the Prince George s County Land Records Division. 3
6 5. The first deed was a quitclaim deed between the Seller and the Seller s sister, vesting title in the Seller. That deed was dated October 15, 2005 and was properly recorded on February 27, A second deed, this one from the Seller to the Complainant, was dated October 22, (The Yarborough-Hall Deed.) The Yarborough-Hall deed was prepared by Integrity Title. 7. Two deeds of trust from the Complainant to Argent Mortgage Company were each dated November 15, 2005 and were each properly recorded February 27, Shortly after the settlement, Integrity presented for recording all four deeds at the Prince George s County Department offinance. All four deeds were stamped and payment was made for county transfer and recordation taxes. Integrity received receipts for the submitted deeds. Only three deeds were recorded, however; the Yarborough-Hall Deed was apparently lost and was not recorded. 9. Following the settlement on the property and prior to 2007, a portion ofthe Complainant s mortgage payment was designated for payment of her property taxes and the property tax bill was paid by the mortgagee. In February 2007, the Complainant re-financed her mortgage with a new lender and the property taxes were no longer paid by the mortgagee. 10. After re-financing her mortgage in February 2007, the Complainant received tax bills from the county, but the bills were in the name ofthe seller s sister, rather than in the Complainant s name. 4
7 11. After re-financing her mortgage in February 2007, the Complainant stopped paying real estate taxes on the Property because the tax bills were not in her name. 12. Prince George s County will accept real estate tax payments from any source, regardless of the name on the tax bill. 13. As a result of the Complainant s failure to pay real estate taxes on the Property, the Property went to a tax sale in April At some point afterthe tax sale, the Property was redeemed by the Complainant by paying her back tax bills. 15. Upon learning ofthe matter in June 2009, Lawyers Title took steps to resolve the matter, including locating the Seller, acquiring and reviewing all relevantrecords, and interviewing all relevant parties, including employees of Prince George s County. 16. As a result of its efforts, Lawyers Title obtained a replacement deed from the Seller. The replacement deed, dated July 31, 2009 was recorded on October 22, Lawyers Title paid the Complainant approximately $2, to reimburse her for payments associated with redeeming the tax sale and associated legal fees. 18. No dispute currently exists concerning payments or any other matter between the Complainant and Lawyers Title. 19. At some point prior to the successful recording of the replacement deed on October 22, 2009, the Complainant retained attorney Donald M. Zimmerman to review the matter. The Complainant paid Mr. Zimmerman $ in legal fees. 5
8 The Complainant has not received reimbursement from any source for this payment. DISCUSSION The burden of proofin this case is by a preponderance of the evidence, Md. Code Ann., State Gov t (2009), and rests with the Complainant, as the party asserting the affirmative on the issue of an unfair claim settlement practice. Garrett v. State of Maryland, 124 Md. App. 23, (1998). When the MIA referred this case to OAH, it directed the Administrative Law Judge conducting the hearing to pay particular attention to Md. Code Ann., Ins and (Supp. 2010). The Complainant asserts that the Licensees violated that statute by engaging in unfair claim settlement practices. Section (a)(1), in relevant part, provides that the Connnissioner of Insurance may suspend or revoke the license of a licensee which has willfully violated this article or other another law of the State that relates to insurance. Section (2) prohibits an insurer or nonprofit health service plan from refusing to pay a claim for an arbitrary or capricious reason. Neither the statute nor any regulation promulgated by the MIA defines the arbitrary or capricious standard in the context of an administrative review of an insurer s refusal to pay a claim. In Berkshire Life Insurance Co. v. Maryland Insurance Administration, 142 Md. App. 628 (2002), however, the Court ofspecial Appeals quoted the following discussion of the meaning of arbitrary and capricious by the Maryland Insurance Commissioner in Gabler v. American Manufacturers, Order of Remand at 6-7, MIA No. 60-7/97 (March 11, 1998): [A] claimant must prove that the insurer acted based on arbitrary and capricious reasons. The word arbitrary means a denial subject to individual judgment or discretion, Webster s II New Riverside University Dictionary 121 (1984) and made without adequate determination ofprinciple. Black s Law Dictionary 55 6
9 (Abridged 5 th Ed. 1983). The word capricious is used to describe a refusal to pay a claim based on an unpredictable whim. Webster s at 227. Thus, under [Insurance Article] , an insurer may properly deny a claim if the insurer has an otherwise lawful principle or standard which it applies across the board to all claimants and pursuant to which the insurer has acted reasonably or rationally based on all available information. 142 Md. App. at 671. The Berkshire Court clarified and approved the Insurance Commissioner s interpretation of arbitrary and capricious as applied to the facts of the Berkshire case. Id. at 672. In this case, the Complainant s troubles began when the deed transferring the Property to her was not recorded. After the settlement on November 15, 2005, Integrity properly delivered all four relevant deeds to the Prince George s County Department of Finance for recording in the Land Records Division. The appropriate fees and taxes were paid and Integrity received a receipt for the deeds. For reasons that are not known (or at least not apparent on the record), the Deed was never recorded. While the failure to record the deed was clearly a problem requiring correction, the Complainant compounded her difficulties by deciding not to pay her property taxes after she refinanced her mortgage in February Prior to the refinancing, the tax payment had been part of the Complainant s monthly mortgage payment, but thereafter it became her responsibility to pay the taxes directly to the county. The tax bill that the Complainant received during this period did not have her name on it, however. Because ofthe failure to record the deed, the tax bill was mailed with the name ofthe seller s sister (the ownerbefore the transaction intended to transfer ownership to the Complainant.) Because the tax bill was not in her name, the Complainant believed that she did not have to, or should not, pay the tax bill. (Of course, the county would have acceptedpayment from any source and the fact that the bill incorrectly identified the owner did not exempt the Complainant from her obligation to pay taxes 7
10 on the Property.) As a result ofher failure to pay property taxes, the Property went to a tax sale and the Complainant had to pay her back taxes as well as certain other costs to redeem the property. The Complaint Against Lawyers Title and Integrity Lawyers Title became aware of the title problem in June 2009 and acted promptly and reasonably to remedy it. Lawyers Title located the seller, acquired and reviewed all relevant records from the Complainant, Integrity, Prince George s County authorities and other sources, and interviewed relevant parties. Lawyers Title communicated regularly with the Complainant and kept her apprised as all developments in the case. As a result of its efforts, Lawyers Title obtained a replacement deed from the Seller and, on October 22, 2009, that deed was properly recorded. Lawyers Title argues that it acted properly and cites Paragraph 9 of the relevant policy in this matter which provides that [i]f the company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance... in a reasonably diligent manner by any method... it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. MIA Ex. 33. While this particular policy provision is not controlling in this case, it is clear that Lawyers Title did act diligently to establish title in the Complainant and, therefore, did not act in an arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise illegal fashion. Without admitting any wrongdoing concerning the Complainant s complaint, Lawyers Title nevertheless reimbursed the Complainant $2,321.76, which represents the total fees to redeem the tax sale and associated legal fees. Indeed, the Complainant is satisfied with Lawyers Title s conduct and stated at the hearing that she does not now consider herself to have any dispute with or complaint 8
11 concerning Lawyers Title. Based on these factors, it is clear that the Complaint against Lawyers Title must be denied and dismissed. As to the complaint against Integrity, there is no evidence as to why the l Deed was not recorded. Nothing in the record establishes (or even suggests) that the failure to record this deed was as a result ofany act or omission on the part ofintegrity. Although Integrity may have shown bad faith by failing to appear at the hearing in this matter, the burden ofproofremains with the Complainant and thereis no evidence that Integrity engaged in an unfair settlement practice concerning the Complainant s claim. 3 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I conclude as a matter of law that the Complainant did not show that the Licensee Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation denied the Complainant s claim for an arbitrary and/or capricious reason based on all available information. I thus further conclude that the Complainant did not show that the Licensee Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation engaged in an unfair claim settlement practice under the Maryland Insurance Article when it denied the Complainant s claim. Md. Code Ann., Ins (2) (Supp. 2010). 1 conclude as a matter oflaw that the Complainant did not show that the Licensee Integrity Title, Escrow & Settlement Corporation denied the Complainant s claim for an arbitrary and/or capricious reason based on all available information. I thus further conclude that the Complainant did not show that the Licensee Integrity Title, Escrow & Settlement Corporation engaged in an unfair claim settlement practice under the Maryland Insurance Article when it denied the Complainant s claim. Md. Code Ann., Ins (2) (Supp. 2010). ~At the hearing, the Complainant testified that the only monetary relief she seeks from Integrity is reimbursement of the $ in legal fees that she paid to Attorney Zimmerman.. 9
12 PROPOSED ORDER Upon the foregoing Findings offact, Discussion, and Conclusions of Law, I PROPOSE that the Licensee Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation not be found to have violated section or section of the Maryland Insurance Article, and that the charges made by the Complainant therefore be DENIED AND DISMISSED. Upon the foregoing Findings offact, Discussion, and Conclusions of Law, I PROPOSE that the Integrity Title, Escrow & Settlement Corporation not be found to have violated section or section (2) of the Maryland Insurance Article, and that the charges made by the Complainant therefore be DENIED AND DISMISSED. I further PROPOSE that the records and publications ofthe Maryland Insurance Administration reflect this decision. May 13, 2011 Date Decision Mailed DH/rs # Signature on file with Orignal David Hofstetter Administrative Law Judge RIGHT TO FILE EXCEPTIONS Upon receipt of this recommended decision, affected parties have twenty (20) days to file exceptions with the Insurance Commissioner. COMAR B(1). If they wish to have a transcript of the hearingbefore filing exceptions, they have ten (10) days to file with the Insurance Commissioner a copy of their written request to a private stenographer for preparation of a transcript. COMAR B(2). If a transcript is requested, the transcript must be filed with the Conimissioner within sixty (60) days of the request, and then the parties have thirty (30) days after the filing ofthe transcript to file exceptions with the Commissioner. COMAR iD. Written exceptions and copies of requests for transcripts should be addressed to the Insurance Commissioner, Maryland Insurance Administration, 200 St. Paul Place, Suite 2700, Baltimore, MID The Office of Administrative Hearings is not a party to any review process. 10
13 Copies Mailed To: Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation Attn: Carson Mills, Esquire 9891 Broken Lane Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, MD P. Randi Johnson Maryland Insurance Administration 200 St. Paul Place, Suite 2700 Baltimore, MD Intgrity, Title Escrow Settlement Corporation Attn: Natasha Rones 1325 G. Street, Suite 500 Washington, DC Fidelity National Title Group Attn: Sara Seinrich 6601 Frances Street Omaha, NE
14 MARYLAND INSURANCE * BEFORE DAVID HOFSTETTER, ADMINISTRATION, * AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE EX REL.: * OF THE MARYLAND OFFICE, * OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COMPLAINANT * OAH No.: MIA-INS V. * MIA No.: LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE * CORPORATION and INTEGRITY TITLE, ESCROW & SETTLMENT CORPORTATION, LICENSEES * * * * * * * * * * * * APPENDIX - EXHIBIT LIST I incorporated the entire MIIA file, consisting of 35 exhibits, into the record. Neither the Complainant nor the Licensees offered any additional exhibits. MIA Ex. 1 - DLLR Fax Cover Sheet to Jason Decker from Stacy Lewis, dated March , with copy of complaint, dated February 27, 2010 MIIA Ex. 2 - Letter to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, datedmarch 24, 2010 MIA Ex. 3 - Letterto David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated March 27, 2010, with 11 page attachment MIA Ex. 4 - MIA Ex. 5 - Letter to Sir/Madam from David Zitterbart, dated April 7, 2010, with three page attachment Letter to Carson Mills from David Zitterbart, dated April , with 14 page attachment
15 MIAEx. 6- MIAEx.7- MIAEx. 8- MIAEx.9- MIIAEx. 10- MIAEx. 11- MIAEx. 12- MIAEx. 13- MIAEx. 14 MIAEx. 15- MIAEx. 16- MIAEx. 17- MIAEx. 18- MIAEx. 19- MIAEx. 20- MIAEx. 21- MIAEx. 22- MIAEx. 23- MI[AEx s between Natasha Rones, Carson Mills, and David Zitterbart, dated April 14, 2010 Letter to Carson Mills from David Zitterbart, dated May 3, 2010, with attached Certified Mail Receipt and 16 page attachment Letter to David Zitterbart from Carson Mills, dated May 10, 2010, with 101 page attachment Letter to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated May 20, 2010, with three page attachment to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, undated to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated June 7, s between the Complainant, David Zitterbart, on June 7, 2010, forwarding s between Tamra Corp, Carson Mills and the Complainant in to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated June 18, to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated June 19, to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated July 29, to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated July 30, to Carson Mills from David Zitterbart, dated August 12, 210 to David Zitterbart from Carson Mills, dated August 12, to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated August 13, to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated August 15, 2010 Letter to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated August 16, 2010, with 16 page attachment Letter to Carson Mills from Davis Zitterbart, dated August 23, 2010, with one page attachment to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated August 29, 2010, with seven page attachment to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated August 29, 2010, with one page attachment 2
16 Fax to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated August 29, 2010, with four MIAEx. 25page attachment MIAEx to David Zitterbart from Sara Weinrich, dated August 30, 2010 MIAEx.27- to Sara Weinrich from David Zitterbart, dated August 30, 2010 MIAEx.28- to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated September 2, 2010 MIAEx.29- to David Zitterbart from the Complainant, dated September 3, 2010 MIAEx.30- E-mil to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated September 7, 2010 MIAEx. 31- Letter to David Zitterbart from Sara Weinrich, dated September 7, 2010 M[AEx.32- Letter to David Zitterbart from Sara Weinrich, dated September 7, 2010 and date stamped received September 9, 2010 MIAEx. 33- Letter to the Complainant from David Zitterbart, dated December 13, 2010, with 93 page attachment MIAEx. 34- Letter to Commissioner, MIA, from the Complainant requesting a hearing, dated December 27, 2010 MIAEx. 35- Letter to the Complainant, Carson Mills, and Natasha Rones from Dinetta Ingrssia, dated January 7,
BEFORE THE MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION. v. Case No. MIA-2011-05-O11 * MEMORANDUM AND FINAL ORDER
BEFORE THE MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION MARYLAr~DINSURANCE ADMINISTRATION ExREL.M.B. 1 * Complainant * v. Case No. MIA-2011-05-O11 * STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY * Licensee * * * * * * * *
More informationBEFORE THE MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRA1~ION
BEFORE THE MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRA1~ION MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Ex REL. C.K. 1 * Complainant * * Case No. MIA-2011-04-039 V. * STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY * Licensees * * * * *
More informationTitle 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
31.02.01.00 Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Subtitle 02 POWERS AND DUTIES HEARINGS Chapter 01 Hearings Authority: Insurance Article, 2-109 and 2-205 2-215; State Government Article, 10-206;
More information* * * * * * * * * * * * * DECISION
XXXX XXXX v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE * * * * * BEFORE DOUGLAS E. KOTEEN, AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE OF THE MARYLAND OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OAH No. DHMH-MCP-11A-06-31952 * *
More informationTHE FOLLOWING INFORMAL ADMONITION WAS ISSUED BY BAR COUNSEL ON May 5, 2006. In re Harvey A. Kirk, Esquire Bar Docket No. 108-00
THE FOLLOWING INFORMAL ADMONITION WAS ISSUED BY BAR COUNSEL ON May 5, 2006 BY FIRST-CLASS AND CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7160 3901 9848 5461 9933 Harvey A. Kirk, Esquire c/o Albert Brault, Esquire Brault, Graham,
More informationSTEPHEN S. EDWARDS, individually and as Trustee of the Super Trust Fund, u/t/d June 15, 2001, Plaintiff/Appellant,
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZ. R. SUP. CT. 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STEPHEN
More information1. Adigun S. Bakare ( Bakare ) was issued a license to act as a resident producer individual,
MARYLAND INSURANCE THE STATE OF MARYLAND ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND INSURANCE v. ADMINISTRATION ADIGUN BAKARE CASE NO.: MIA-2007-06-004 8610 INDIAN SPRINGS ROAD LAUREL, MD 20724 RPI NO. 116886 Enf. File No.:
More informationINFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPLAINT PROCESS
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF SAVINGS & MORTGAGE LENDING Douglas Foster Commissioner INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPLAINT PROCESS The Texas Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending (the Department) accepts signed,
More informationCHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES
CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES Section 1. Authority. These Uniform County Board of Equalization Practice and Procedure Rules are promulgated by authority of
More informationv. STATE BOARD Appellee Opinion No. 00-17 OPINION
JOHN F. MAYHORNE, Appellant BEFORE THE MARYLAND v. STATE BOARD HARFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, OF EDUCATION Appellee Opinion No. 00-17 OPINION In this appeal, Appellant argues that the local board s
More information[Cite as State ex rel. McDulin v. Indus. Comm., 89 Ohio St.3d 390, 2000-Ohio- 205.]
[Cite as State ex rel. McDulin v. Indus. Comm., 89 Ohio St.3d 390, 2000-Ohio- 205.] THE STATE EX REL. MCDULIN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. McDulin v. Indus.
More informationv. STATE BOARD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appellee Opinion No. 04-33 OPINION
DALLAS CROSBY, Appellant BEFORE THE MARYLAND v. STATE BOARD ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, OF EDUCATION Appellee Opinion No. 04-33 OPINION This is the appeal of the decision of the local board
More informationAPPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District
More informationCredit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148
Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148 Chapter 8 Credit Services Organization Act Section 131 Short Title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Credit Services Organization Act". Added
More informationCONSUMER LOAN BROKER ACT. 81-19-11. Investigation of applicant; issuance or denial of license; time limit for acting on applications.
CONSUMER LOAN BROKER ACT Section 81-19-1. Short title. 81-19-3. Definitions. 81-19-5. License requirement; penalty for violation. 81-19-7. Exclusions from chapter coverage. 81-19-9. License application;
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 10-3272 In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor NOT PRECEDENTIAL ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. On Appeal from the United States District
More informationCase 2:06-cv-13665-MOB-VMM Document 9 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:06-cv-13665-MOB-VMM Document 9 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: CARLA CRAIG-LIKELY, Debtor, / CARLA CRAIG-LIKELY, v.
More informationNo. 2 CA-CV 2014-0086 Filed January 21, 2015
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO IN RE $170.00 U.S. CURRENCY; 2012 HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE, REG. AZ/JGMC3Z No. 2 CA-CV 2014-0086 Filed January 21, 2015 THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Bank of Am. v. Kuchta, 2012-Ohio-5562.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) BANK OF AMERICA Appellee C.A. No. 12CA0025-M v. GEORGE M. KUCHTA,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Office of Financial and Insurance Services,
More informationMARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION MARYLAND INSURANCE REVIEW OF A RECOMMENDED ADMINISTRATION DECISION ISSUED BY EXRELR.A.B. MARYSHOCK Complainant AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE v. OF THE MARYLAND OFFICE OF
More informationSMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
More information: SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION
: IN THE MATTER : BEFORE THE : SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION OF : : Docket No.: C11-03 WILLIAM PATTERSON : SOMERDALE BOARD OF EDUCATION : DECISION CAMDEN COUNTY : : PROCEDURAL HISTORY The above matter arises
More informationBEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION In the Matter of CHERIE G. SMITH and BEST INSURANCE CONSULTANTS, LLC
More informationFILED November 9, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2007 Term No. 33067 LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner FILED November 9, 2007 released at 10:00 a.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT
More informationThe Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer
The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer The information provided here contains general information about how to represent yourself in a hearing. This information is to help you prepare
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE
Link to Final Agency Decision OAH Docket No. 3-1005-16498-2 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Christopher Douglas Dorpat, Real Estate
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBRA R. JOYNER, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2012-CV-000003-A-O Lower Case No.: 2010-CC-010676-O v. ONE THOUSAND OAKS, INC.,
More informationNovember 52002. Opinion No. JC-0572
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. STATE OF TEXAS JOHN CORNYN November 52002 Mr. Richard F. Reynolds Executive Director Texas Workers Compensation Southfield Building, MS-4D 4000 South IH-35 Austin, Texas
More information2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
More informationDISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO. Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiff: JOHN GLEASON, in his official capacity as Supreme Court Attorney Regulation Counsel vs.
More informationColumn B Taxable Value (35% of Column A)
DTE FORM 1 (Revised 01/02) BOR NO. DATE RECEIVED R.C. 5715.13, 5715.19 COMPLAINT AGAINST THE VALUATION OF REAL PROPERTY ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS AND TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION READ INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK
More informationINFORMATION ABOUT THE RECOVERY FUND PROCESS
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF SAVINGS & MORTGAGE LENDING Douglas B. Foster Commissioner INFORMATION ABOUT THE RECOVERY FUND PROCESS The Texas Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending accepts signed, written claims
More informationORDER. ( the Commissioner ) against Joseph B. Jehoich ( Jehoich ) pursuant to Maryland Code
MARYLAND INSURANCE BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATION v. MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION JOSEPH B. JEHOICH 5128 HEMLOCK AVENUE VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23464 CASE NO.: MIA-2007-09-016 NPI NO.: 99966478 Enf. File No.:
More informationHON. GEORGE E. PATAKI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, et al.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, AND SAMUEL POE, individually and on behalf of all other persons
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SHELBY E. WATSON, Appellant, v. No. SC93769 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., ET AL., Respondents. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS The Honorable
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION KIMBERLY OWEN ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,050,199 MARKIN GROUP ) Respondent ) AND ) ) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY )
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 9, 2014
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 9, 2014 GARY ATCHLEY v. TENNESSEE CREDIT, LLC Appeal from the Chancery Court for Warren County No. 11073 Larry B. Stanley, Jr.,
More information* * * * * * * * * * * * * DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE ISSUE SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE FINDINGS OF FACT DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ORDER
[REDACTED], APPELLANT v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE BEFORE JOHN M. ZELL, AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE OF THE MARYLAND OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OAH NO.: DHMH-MCP-11E-07-05791 DECISION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. WILLIAM M. LOGAN Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene JJ.
More informationB. Material breach means the failure to comply with this CO in whole or in part by commission or omission.
CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS ---------------------------------------------------------------------X DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, Complainant, -against- BRASS PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS
More informationCase 2:08-cv-04597-LDD Document 17 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:08-cv-04597-LDD Document 17 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUZANNE BUTLER, Individually and as : Administratrix of the Estate
More informationBEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. FINAL ORDER (Pursuant to K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 40-4909(a) & (b)
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Kansas ) Resident Insurance Agent s ) Docket No. 3525-SO License of DALLAS E. AUCH ) FINAL ORDER (Pursuant to K.S.A. 2005
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2002
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2002 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DERRICK S. CHANEY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. II-22-201
More informationFiscal Year 2014 Report to the Maryland General Assembly on Absence of Good Faith Cases Filed under 27-1001 of the Maryland Insurance Article MSAR #
Fiscal Year 2014 Report to the Maryland General Assembly on Absence of Good Faith Cases Filed under 27-1001 of the Maryland Insurance Article MSAR # 6587 Therese M. Goldsmith, Commissioner December 15,
More informationOHIO BOARD OF TAX APPEALS
OHIO BOARD OF TAX APPEALS Larry Marshall dba Larry Marshall Janitorial, Appellant, vs. Roger W. Tracy, Tax Commissioner of Ohio, Appellee. CASE NO. 98-P-923 (SALES TAX DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES: For
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 20, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 20, 2014 Session FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CITIZENS BANK Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 13-6-185 Telford
More informationBEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA STATEMENT OF CHARGES
BEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA InRe: David S. Hart, a member of Bar No.: 7976 The West Virginia State Bar I.D. No.: 14-01-037 To: STATEMENT OF CHARGES David S. Hart, Esquire
More informationCODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationNo. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,
No. 05-11-00700-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016616444 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 30 P8:40 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS WELLS FARGO BANK,
More informationCLINTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION RULES OF PROCEDURE
CLINTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION RULES OF PROCEDURE The Board of Revision hereby enacts the following as its Rules of Procedure pursuant to the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) 5715.02 et seq. and HB294 323.66.
More informationNO. COA12-981 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 March 2013. 1. Motor Vehicles Lemon Law disclosure requirement
NO. COA12-981 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 19 March 2013 TINA HARDISON and DALTON HARDISON, Plaintiffs, v. Craven County No. 10 CVS 01538 KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., Defendant. 1. Motor Vehicles
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,569 In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed February 27, 2015.
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
Drew et. al. v. Drew et. al., No. 174-6-10 Cacv (Teachout, J., Sept. 23, 2013). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the
More informationCredit Application/Agreement. Company Name: Check one: Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Limited Liability Co.
En-Net Services, LLC Phone: 301-846-9901 Fax: 301-846-9902 712 N East Street Frederick, MD 21701 Internet: www.en-netservices.com Email: administration@en-netservices.com Credit Application/Agreement Company
More informationBN-20172.etc OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424-0001
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY NORTHEAST REGION LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Respondent and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, COUNCIL 163 Charging Party Paul N. Bley, Esquire For the Respondent
More information) GLOBAL TITLE, LLC, ) d/b/a GLOBAL TITLE SERVICES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No: CL-2011-6749 ) CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP. ) ) Defendant.
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY ) GLOBAL TITLE, LLC, ) d/b/a GLOBAL TITLE SERVICES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No: CL-2011-6749 ) CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP. ) ) Defendant. ) ) AMENDED
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA FRANK GAY PLUMBING, INC. Appellant, CASE NO.: 2012-CV-19 Lower Case No.: 2011-SC-6767-A- O v. MCO ENTERPRISES, INC.,
More informationPatricia Clarey, President; Richard Costigan, and Lauri Shanahan, DECISION. This case is before the State Personnel Board (SPB or the Board) after the
MICHAEL BAYLISS v. SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Appeal from Dismissal BOARD DECISION AND ORDER (Precedential) No. 13-02 October 24, 2013 APPEARANCES: Hubert Lloyd, Labor Relations Representative, CSUEU,
More informationComplaint Hearings at the Maryland dinsurance Administration. Joy Hatchette Associate Commissioner Consumer Education & Advocacy September 2011
Complaint Hearings at the Maryland dinsurance Administration i i Joy Hatchette Associate Commissioner Consumer Education & Advocacy September 2011 1 Who Has The Right To A Hearing Section 2-210(a)(2) of
More informationCourt Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Policy Statement 1105.1 Effective date: 12/14/2000 Page 2
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Page 2 III. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The General Counsel is delegated authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2672 to consider, ascertain,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION PINE RIDGE SOUTH IV CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Student Hearing Office 810 First Street, NE, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20002
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Student Hearing Office 810 First Street, NE, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20002 OSSE Student Hearing Office January 23, 2014 PETITIONER,
More informationADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND CONSENT ORDER
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF: * OAH Case No. OAG-SD-50-35471 MARYLAND RETIREMENT SERVICES, * SD Case No. 2008-0179 INC. * Respondent. * * *
More informationHAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i
HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i Section 672B-1 Definitions 672B-2 Administration of chapter 672B-3 Design claim conciliation
More informationSIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES SECTION 1 - POLICY It is the policy of the Sixth Judicial District ( district ) to encourage out-of-court
More informationELAINE MORRIS, TRUSTEE, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-52-A-O TRULIET INVESTMENTS, LLC
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ELAINE MORRIS, TRUSTEE, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-52-A-O TRULIET INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Appellant, CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA Appellee.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND At Greenbelt
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND At Greenbelt In Re: : : BADTEC, INC. : Case No. 11-33795-TJC : (Chapter 7) : Debtor : TRUSTEE S MOTION TO APPROVE THE SALE OF IMPROVED
More informationNo. 1-10-2072 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). SIXTH DIVISION JUNE 30, 2011 IN
More informationMARYLAND INSURANCE * BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATION * 200 ST. PAUL PLACE, SUITE 2700 * MARYLAND INSURANCE
MARYLAND INSURANCE * BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATION * 200 ST. PAUL PLACE, SUITE 2700 * MARYLAND INSURANCE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21202 COMMISSIONER VS. * * JOHN HANCOCK LIFE & HEALTH * INSURANCE COMPANY * (NAIC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,491 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement
More informationCollection Escrow Instructions
Collection Account No. Payee/Seller Name: Address: Telephone No. Email: To: Attn: Collection Escrow Instructions Escrow No. Obligor/Buyer Name: Address: Telephone No. Email: Pacific Trust Deed Servicing
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Case No.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS Arbitration of Extended Warranty Contracts
Insurance Department Sec. 42-260 page 1 (9-97) TABLE OF CONTENTS Arbitration of Extended Warranty Contracts Applicability... 42-260- 1 Definitions... 42-260- 2 Mediation... 42-260- 3 Arbitration... 42-260-
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State ex rel. Tax Lien Law Group, L.L.P. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Treasurer, 2014-Ohio-215.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100181
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEAL BOARD DECISION APPEARANCES
KEYWORD: Guideline F DIGEST: Although the Judge acted hastily in dismissing the possibility that Applicant has been making payments on her IRS debts, there is an adequate basis for the Judge s ultimate
More informationCHAPTER 454M MORTGAGE SERVICERS
CHAPTER 454M MORTGAGE SERVICERS SECTION 454M-1 Definitions 454M-2 License required 454M-2.5 Unlicensed foreclosure actions voided 454M-3 Exemptions 454M-4 License; fees; renewals; voluntary surrender of
More informationBond Form Commentary and Comparison
Bond Form Commentary and Comparison AIA Document A310 2010, Bid Bond, and AIA Document A312 2010, Performance Bond and Payment Bond INTRODUCTION Since the first publication of The Standard Form of Bond
More informationAPPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-72-204(6)(A), C.R.S. 2013
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 JOHN W. SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Colorado Attorney General, Applicant,
More informationT.C. Memo. 2014-234 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. RONALD L. KIRKPATRICK, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2014-234 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD L. KIRKPATRICK, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6525-13L. Filed November 17, 2014. Donald W. Pemberton, for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 11-13574. D. C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-80735-WPD. versus
Case: 11-13574 Date Filed: 07/18/2012 Page: 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-13574 D. C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-80735-WPD [DO NOT PUBLISH] ANGELA BIRSTER, PAUL
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING ) CONSENT ORDER EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, ) a limited liability company. ) FILE NO. 102 3252 ) The Federal
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 6/30/11 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 1
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document was signed electronically on January 28, 2009, which
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 2, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-520 Lower Tribunal No. 09-56724 Wells Fargo Bank,
More informationIN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MTWCC 13. WCC No. 2015-3545 CAR WERKS, LLC. Petitioner. vs. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND
IN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MTWCC 13 WCC No. 2015-3545 CAR WERKS, LLC Petitioner vs. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND Respondent/Third Party Petitioner vs. JAMES E. GAWRONSKI
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION ATLANTIC CITY DISTRICT
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION ATLANTIC CITY DISTRICT CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER : (Jeffrey Davis) Petitioner, : CLAIM PETITION NO. 2012-28812 v. : RESERVED
More informationThird Circuit Approves Use of Escrow Agreements Funded by Acquirers to Pay Junior Creditors Before Senior Creditors
Alert Third Circuit Approves Use of Escrow Agreements Funded by Acquirers to Pay Junior Creditors Before Senior Creditors September 21, 2015 An asset purchaser s payments into segregated accounts for the
More informationMilwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration
Milwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration Attached are the Rules for the arbitration of fee disputes on behalf of the Milwaukee Bar Association. In consideration of the arbitration services to be rendered,
More informationTITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1. 900 Consumer Rights. 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims
DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1 900 Consumer Rights 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims 1.0 Purpose and Statutory Authority 1.1 The purpose of this Regulation is to implement
More informationA consumer guide to. insurance INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
A consumer guide to Title insurance INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Table of Contents Introduction 1 What Is Title Insurance? 1 Who Is Protected By Title Insurance? 1 How Is A Title Insurance Policy Different
More informationTerms Completed. ORDER SUMMARY Case Number: C-10-301-12-CO01 1st Rate Home Mortgage Inc Jasjit Singh Chugh
Terms Completed Name(s): ORDER SUMMARY Case Number: C-10-301-12-CO01 1st Rate Home Mortgage Inc Chugh Order Number: Effective : License Numbers: Or NMLS Identifier [U/L] License Effect: C-10-301-12-CO01
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as In re Estate of Keytack, 2008-Ohio-6563.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: ESTATE OF JOHN MICHAEL : O P I N I O N KEYTACK, DECEASED : CASE NO. 2008-T-0039
More informationOffice of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.
Citation: Arkansas Code Annotated 21-1-601 through 608, 21-1-610; 21-1-123 and 124 Office of Personnel Management Policy 1 Forms: Fraud Reporting Complaint Form Definitions Adverse action: To discharge,
More informationGeneral complaint form for video/cable customers
Michigan Public Service Commission Formal Video/Cable Complaint General complaint form for video/cable customers I Want to File a Formal Complaint First, you must attempt to resolve your complaint directly
More informationUnited States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals
Cite as: Matter of SPARCcom & Assocs., SBA No. BDPT-501 (2013) United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals IN THE MATTER OF: SPARCcom & Assocs., Petitioner SBA No. BDPT-501
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING In re: J.H.S. Moxie Corp., and Jacqueline O Shaughnessy, Respondent. * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-10426 Document: 00513359912 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CYNTHIA TREVINO GARZA, Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth
More information