1 International Journal of Electronics and Computer Science Engineering 700 Available Online at ISSN An Assessment between Software Development Life Cycle Models of Software Engineering Er. KESHAV VERMA 1, Er. PRAMOD KUMAR 2, Er. MOHIT KUMAR 3,Er.GYANESH TIWARI Department of Computer Science & Engineering FIET, BAREILLY 4 ANACET,BAREILLY Abstract This research deals with an essential and important subject in Digital world. It is related with the software managing processes that inspect the part of software development during the development models, which are called as software development life cycle. It shows five of the development models namely, waterfall, Iteration, V-shaped, spiral and Extreme programming. These models have advantages and disadvantages as well. So, the main objective of this research is to represent dissimilar models of software development and make a comparison among them to illustrate the features and defects of every model. Keywords:- Software Management Processes, Software Development, Development Models, Software Development Life Cycle, Comparison among five models of Software Engineering 1. Introduction No one can disagree with the significance of computer in our life, mainly during the current time. Actually, computer has become indispensible in today's life as it is used in several areas of life for example industry, medicine, commerce, education and still agriculture. It has become an important component in the industry and technology of superior as well as developing countries. Now a day, organizations become more dependent on computer in their works as an outcome of computer technology. Computer is use as a time saving device and its progress helps in executing difficult, lengthy, iterated processes in a minimum time with a high speed. Additionally to using computer for work, people use it for fun and entertainment. obviously, the number of companies that construct software programs for the purpose of facilitating works of offices, administrations, banks, etc, has enlarged just which results in the difficulty of enumerating such companies. Throughout the previous four decades, software has been build from a tool used for analyzing information or solving a problem to a product in itself. However, the early programming stages have created a lot of problems turning software an obstacle to software development principally those relying on computers systems. Software consists of documents and programs that contain a collection that has been established to be a part of software engineering procedures. Furthermore, the aim of software engineering is to create an appropriate work that constructs programs of high quality.
2 An Assessment between Software Development Life Cycle Models of Software Engineering Software Process Models A software process model is an abstract representation of a process. It presents a description of a process from some particular perspective as: 1. Specification. 2. Design. 3. Validation. 4. Evolution. Common Software Process Models are as follows: 1. Waterfall model: Separate and distinct phases of Specification and development. 2. Prototype model. 3. Rapid application development model (RAD). 4. Evolutionary development: Specification, development and validation are interleaved. 5. Incremental model. 6. Iterative model. 7. Spiral model. 8. Component-based software engineering: The system is assembled from existing components. There are several variants of these models e.g. proper development where a waterfall like process is used, but the specification is formal that is refined through a number of stages to an implementable design . 3. Six Models A Programming process model is an abstract illustration to describe the process from a particular perspective. There are lots of general models for software processes, like: Waterfall model, Evolutionary development, Formal systems development and Reuse based development, etc. This research will view the following six models: 1. Waterfall model. 2. Iteration model. 3. V-shaped model. 4. Spiral model. 5. RAD model. 6. Extreme model These models are selected because their features correspond to most software development programs. 3.1 The Waterfall Model
3 IJECSE, Volume 2, Number 2 Er. KESHAV VERMA et al. 702 The waterfall model is the classical model of software engineering. This model is one of the oldest models and is broadly used in government projects and in many major companies. As this model emphasizes planning in early stages, it ensures design flaws before they develop. Besides, its intensive document and planning make it work well for projects in which quality control is a major concern. The pure waterfall lifecycle contains of several nonoverlapping stages, as shown in the following figure. The model begins with establishing system necessities and software requirements and continues with architectural design, detailed design, coding, testing, and maintenance. The waterfall model serves as a baseline for several other lifecycle models. The following list details the steps for using the waterfall model: 1 System requirements: Establishes the components for building the system, including the hardware requirements, software tools, and other necessary components. Examples include decisions on hardware, such as plug-in boards (lots of channels, acquisition speed, and so on), and decisions on outside pieces of software, such as databases or libraries.
4 An Assessment between Software Development Life Cycle Models of Software Engineering Software requirements: Establishes the expectations for software functionality and identifies which system requirements the software affects. Requirements analysis includes determining interaction needed with other applications and databases, performance requirements, user interface requirements, and so on. 3 Architectural designs: Determines the software framework of a system to meet the specific requirements. This design defines the major components and the interaction of those components, but it does not define the structure of each component. The external interfaces and tools used in the project can be determined by the designer. 4 Detailed designs: Examines the software components defined in the architectural design stage and produces a specification for how each component is implemented. 5 Coding: Implements the detailed design specification. 6 Testing: Determines whether the software meets the specified requirements and finds any errors present in the code. 7 Maintenance: Addresses problems and enhancement requests after the software releases. In some organizations, a change control board maintains the quality of the product by reviewing each change made in the maintenance stage. Consider applying the full waterfall development cycle model when correcting problems or implementing these enhancement requests. In each stage, documents that explain the objectives and describe the requirements for that phase are created. At the end of each stage, a review to determine whether the project can proceed to the next stage is held. Your prototyping can also be incorporated into any stage from the architectural design and after. Many people believe that this model cannot be applied to all situations. For example, with the pure waterfall model, the requirements must be stated before beginning the design, and the complete design must be stated before starting coding. There is no overlap between stages. In real-world development, however, one can discover issues during the design or coding stages that point out errors orgaps in the requirements. The waterfall method does not prohibit returning to an earlier phase, for example, returning from the design phase to the requirements phase. However, this involves costly rework. Each completed phase requires formal review and extensive documentation development. Thus, oversights made in the requirements phase are expensive to correct later. Because the actual development comes late in the process, one does not see results for a long time. This delay can be disconcerting to management and customers. Many people also think that the amount of documentation is excessive and inflexible. Although the waterfall model has its weaknesses, it is instructive because it emphasizes important stages of project development. Even if one does not apply this model, he must consider each of these stages and its relationship to his own project . Advantages : 1. Easy to understand and implement. 2. Widely used and known (in theory!). 3. Reinforces good habits: define-before- design, design-before-code. 4. Identifies deliverables and milestones. 5. Document driven, URD, SRD etc. Disadvantages : 1. Idealized doesn t match reality well. 2. Doesn t reflect iterative nature of exploratory development. 3. Unrealistic to expect accurate requirements so early in project. 4. Software is delivered late in project, delays discovery of serious errors. 5. Difficult to integrate risk management. 6. Difficult and expensive to make changes to documents, swimming upstream. 7. Significant administrative overhead, costly for small teams and projects . Pure Waterfall This is the classical system development model. It consists of discontinuous phases: 1. Concept. 2. Requirements. 3. Architectural design. 4. Detailed design. 5. Coding and development.
5 IJECSE, Volume 2, Number 2 Er. KESHAV VERMA et al Testing and implementation. Table 1: Strengths & Weaknesses of Pure Waterfall Pure Waterfall Summary The pure waterfall model performs well for products with clearly understood requirements or when working with well understood technical tools, architectures and infrastructures. Its weaknesses frequently make it inadvisable when rapid development is needed. In those cases, modified models may be more effective. Modified Waterfall The modified waterfall uses the same phases as the pure waterfall, but is not based on a discontinuous basis. This enables the phases to overlap when needed. The pure waterfall can also split into subprojects at an appropriate phase (such as after the architectural design or detailed design). Table 2: Strengths & Weaknesses of Modified Waterfall Modified Waterfall Summary Risk reduction spirals can be added to the top of the waterfall to reduce risks prior to the waterfall phases. The waterfall can be further modified using options such as prototyping, JADs or CRC sessions or other methods of requirements gathering done in overlapping phases . 3.2 Iterative Development The problems with the Waterfall Model created a demand for a new method of developing systems which could provide faster results, require less up-front information, and offer greater flexibility. With Iterative Development, the
6 An Assessment between Software Development Life Cycle Models of Software Engineering 705 project is divided into small parts. This allows the development team to demonstrate results earlier on in the process and obtain valuable feedback from system users. Often, each iteration is actually a mini-waterfall process with the feedback from one phase providing vital information for the design of the next phase. In a variation of this model, the software products, which are produced at the end of each step (or series of steps), can go into production immediately as incremental releases. 3.3 V-Shaped Model Development is started; a system test plan is created. The test plan focuses on meeting the functionality specified in requirements gathering. The high- Just like the waterfall model, the V-Shaped life cycle is a sequential path of execution of processes. Each phase must be completed before the next phase begins. Testing is emphasized in this model more than the waterfall model. The testing procedures are developed early in the life cycle before any coding is done, during each of the phases preceding implementation. Requirements begin the life cycle model just like the waterfall model. Before level design phase focuses on system architecture and design. An integration test plan is created in this phase in order to test the pieces of the software systems ability to work together. However, the lowlevel design phase lies where the actual software components are designed, and unit tests are created in this phase as well. The implementation phase is, again, where all coding takes place. Once coding is complete, the path of execution continues up the right side of the V where the test plans developed earlier are now put to use. Advantages 1. Simple and easy to use. 2. Each phase has specific deliverables.
7 IJECSE, Volume 2, Number 2 Er. KESHAV VERMA et al Higher chance of success over the waterfall model due to the early development of test plans during the life cycle. 4. Works well for small projects where requirements are easily understood. Disadvantages 1. Very rigid like the waterfall model. 2. Little flexibility and adjusting scope is difficult and expensive. 3. Software is developed during the implementation phase, so no early prototypes of the software are produced. 4. This Model does not provide a clear path for problems found during testing phases . 3.4 Spiral Model The spiral model is similar to the incremental model, with more emphases placed on risk analysis. The spiral model has four phases: Planning, Risk Analysis, Engineering and Evaluation. A software project repeatedly passes through these phases in iterations (called Spirals in this model). The baseline spirals, starting in the planning phase, requirements are gathered and risk is assessed. Each subsequent spiral builds on the baseline spiral. Requirements are gathered during the planning phase. In the risk analysis phase, a process is undertaken to identify risk and alternate solutions. A prototype is produced at the end of the risk analysis phase. Software is produced in the engineering phase, along with testing at the end of the phase. The evaluation phase allows the customer to evaluate the output of the project to date before the project continues to the next spiral. In the spiral model, the angular component represents progress, and the radius of the spiral represents cost. Advantages 1. High amount of risk analysis. 2. Good for large and mission-critical projects. 3. Software is produced early in the software life cycle. Disadvantages 1. Can be a costly model to use. 2. Risk analysis requires highly specific expertise. 3. Project s success is highly dependent on the risk analysis phase. 4. Doesn t work well for smaller projects . Spiral model sectors 1. Objective setting: Specific objectives for the phase are identified. 2. Risk assessment and reduction: Risks are assessed and activities are put in place to reduce the key risks. 3. Development and validation: A development model for the system is chosen which can be any of the general models. 4. Planning: The project is reviewed and the next phase of the spiral is planned .
8 An Assessment between Software Development Life Cycle Models of Software Engineering 707 WinWin Spiral Model The original spiral model [Boehm 88] began each cycle of the spiral by performing the next level of elaboration of the prospective system's objectives, constraints and alternatives. A primary difficulty in applying the spiral model has been the lack of explicit process guidance in determining these objectives, constraints, and alternatives. The Win-Win Spiral Model [Boehm 94] uses the theory W (win-win) approach [Boehm 89b] to converge on a system's next-level objectives, constraints, and alternatives. This Theory W approach involves identifying the system's stakeholders and their win conditions, and using negotiation processes to determine a mutually satisfactory set of objectives, constraints, and alternatives for the stakeholders. In particular, as illustrated in the figure, the nine-step Theory W process translates into the following spiral model extensions: 1. Determine Objectives: Identify the system life-cycle stakeholders and their win conditions and establish initial system boundaries and external interfaces. 2. Determine Constraints: Determine the conditionsunder which the system would produce win-lose or loselose outcomes for some stakeholders. 3. Identify and Evaluate Alternatives: Solicit suggestions from stakeholders, evaluate them with respect to stakeholders' win conditions, synthesize and negotiate candidate win-win alternatives, analyze, assess, resolve winlose or lose-lose risks, record commitments and areas to be left flexible in the project's design record and life cycle plans. 4. Cycle through the Spiral: Elaborate the win conditions evaluate and screen alternatives, resolve risks, accumulate appropriate commitments, and develop and execute downstream plans . 3.5 RAPID APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT (RAD) RAD originated from rapid prototyping approaches and was first formalized by James Martin (1991), who believed that it refers to a development life cycle designed for high quality systems with faster development and lower costs than the traditional lifecycle provided. By the mid 1990s the definition of RAD became used as an umbrella term to encompass a number of methods, techniques and tools by many different vendors applying their own interpretation and approach. This unstructured and extemporized ad hoc evolution of RAD means that the rationale behind its use is not always clear. It is perceived as an IS system methodology, a method for developers to change their development processes or as RAD tools to improve development capabilities. (Beynon-Davies 1999).
9 IJECSE, Volume 2, Number 2 Er. KESHAV VERMA et al. 708 RAD projects are sometimes distinguished in terms of intensive and non-intensive forms. A non-intensive approach refers to projects where system development is spread over a number of months involving incremental delivery compared to the intensive RAD where project personnel are closeted away to achieve set objectives with a 3-6 week timeframe (Beynon-Davies 1999). Iterative Application Development Methodology The developers adopted their own in-house commercial Iterative Application Development (IAD) approach to promote a controlled, structured but flexible development methodology aimed at providing incremental delivery. This involved a series of time-boxed mini iterations and a number of software release and test iterations to provide flexibility to meet the recognized volatile needs of the business environment. They believe this methodology offers all the main benefits of a RAD type approach and is suited to the uncertainty of, and continually changing business requirements. IAD, like RAD, involves prototyping and iterative delivery but without the problems of lack of rigour, creeping scope and overrun that are perceived as associated with RAD and an iterative development life cycle. Its similarity is extended to using the same main features i.e. JAD (Joint Application Design) workshops, time-boxing, prototyping, intensive user involvement, iterative development and incremental delivery, which they maintain are increasingly used for system functionality development. The developers believe that a major benefit of an iterative approach to development is that it affords early visibility of the system being developed. Thus early validation of the system by the users and the business analysts provides the flexibility to incorporate user feedback and handle any new or changing requirements within the volatile business environment a key goal of the RAD approach. 3.6 Extreme Programming Practices Incremental planning: Requirements are recorded on Story Cards and the Stories to be included in a release are determined by the time available and their relative priority. The developers break these stories into development "Tasks".
10 An Assessment between Software Development Life Cycle Models of Software Engineering 709 Small Releases: The minimal useful set of functionality that provides business value is developed first. Releases of the system are frequent and incrementally add functionality to the first release. Simple Design: Enough design is carried out to meet the current requirements and no more. Test first development: An automated unit test framework is used to write tests for a new piece of functionality before functionality itself is implemented. Refactoring: All developers are expected to re-factor the code continuously as soon as possible code improvements are found. This keeps the code simple and maintainable. Pair Programming: Developers work in pairs, checking each other s work and providing support to do a good job. Collective Ownership: The pairs of developers work on all areas of the system, so that no islands of expertise develop and all the developers own all the code. Anyone can change anything. Continuous Integration: As soon as work on a task is complete, it is integrated into the whole system. After any such integration, all the unit tests in the system must pass. Sustainable pace: Large amounts of over-time are not considered acceptable as the net effect is often to reduce code quality and medium term productivity. On-site Customer: A representative of the end-user of the system (the Customer) should be available full time for the use of the XP team. In an extreme programming process, the customer is a member of the development team and is responsible for bringing system requirements to the team for implementation. XP and agile principles 1. Incremental development is supported through small, frequent system releases. 2. Customer involvement means full-time customer engagement with the team. 3. People not process through pair programming, collective ownership and a process that avoids long working hours. 4. Change supported through regular system releases. 5. Maintaining simplicity through constant refactoring of code . Advantages 1. Lightweight methods suit small-medium size projects. 2. Produces good team cohesion. 3. Emphasizes final product. 4. Iterative. 5. Test based approach to requirements and quality assurance. Disadvantages 1. Difficult to scale up to large projects where documentation is essential. 2. Needs experience and skill if not to degenerate into code-and-fix. 3. Programming pairs is costly. 4. Test case construction is a difficult and specialized skill . Conclusion and Future Work After completing this research, it is concluded that: 1. There are many existing models for developing systems for different sizes of projects and requirements. 2. These models were established between 1970 and Waterfall model and spiral model are used commonly in developing systems. 4. Each model has advantages and disadvantages for the development of systems, so each model tries to eliminate the disadvantages of the previous model finally, some topics can be suggested for future works: 1. Suggesting a model to simulate advantages that are found in different models to software process management. 2. Making a comparison between the suggested model and the previous software processes management models. 3. Applying the suggested model to many projects to ensure of its suitability and documentation to explain its mechanical work.
11 IJECSE, Volume 2, Number 2 Er. KESHAV VERMA et al. 710 REFERENCES  Ian Sommerville, "Software Engineering", Addison Wesley, 9th edition.  CTG. MFA 003, "A Survey of System Development Process Models", Models for Action Project: Developing Practical Approaches to Electronic Records Management and Preservation, Center for Technology in Government University at Albany / Suny,  Steve Easterbrook, "Software Lifecycles", Universityof Toronto Department of Computer Science,  National Instruments Corporation, "Lifecycle Models",2006,  JJ Kuhl, "Project Lifecycle Models: How They Differ and When to Use Them",  Karlm, "Software Lifecycle Models', KTH,2006.  Rlewallen, "Software Development Life Cycle Models", 2005,  Barry Boehm, "Spiral Development: Experience,Principles, and Refinements", edited by Wilfred J.Hansen, 2000  IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 5, September 2010 ISSN (Online):  IEEE Transactions on Software,Engineering, VOL.14, NO.10, October,1988  Beynon-Davies, P, Carne, C, Mackay, H & Tudhope, D (1999), Rapid application development (RAD): an empirical review, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 8, pp  Beynon-Davies, P, Mackay, H & Tudhope, D (2000), It s lots of bits of paper and ticks and post-it notes and.. a case study of a RAD project, Information Systems Journal, vol. 10, pp  Boehm, B (1999), Making RAD work for your Project, IEEE Computer, March, pp
International Journal of Research in Information Technology (IJRIT) www.ijrit.com ISSN 2001-5569 A Comparison between Five Models of Software Engineering Surbhi Gupta, Vikrant Dewan CSE, Dronacharya College
94 A Comparison Between Five Models Of Software Engineering Nabil Mohammed Ali Munassar 1 and A. Govardhan 2 1 Ph.D Student of Computer Science & Engineering Jawahrlal Nehru Technological University Kuktapally,
ASSESSMENT OF SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELS Akhilesh Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science, Manav Bharti University, Solan (H.P.) ABSTRACT The field of software engineering is related to the development
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN COMPUTING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY An International online open access peer reviewed journal Research Article ISSN 2277 9140 ABSTRACT Analysis and tabular comparison
6. Software Lifecycle Models A software lifecycle model is a standardised format for planning organising, and running a new development project. Hundreds of different kinds of models are known and used.
Process Methodology for Wegmans Deli Kiosk Version 1.0 Prepared by DELI-cious Developers Rochester Institute of Technology September 15, 2013 1 Table of Contents 1. Process... 3 1.1 Choice... 3 1.2 Description...
4 Software Development Life Cycle M MAJOR A J O R T TOPICSO P I C S Objectives... 52 Pre-Test Questions... 52 Introduction... 53 Software Development Life Cycle Model... 53 Waterfall Life Cycle Model...
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Supriyo Bhattacharjee MOF Capability Maturity Model (CMM) A bench-mark for measuring the maturity of an organization s software process CMM defines 5 levels of process
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and Development Methods There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness is the true method. Herman Melville Capability Maturity Model (CMM) A Capability
Analysis of various Software Process Models Ashwini Mujumdar*, Gayatri Masiwal**, P. M. Chawan*** *(Department of Computer Science, VJTI, Mumbai) ** (Department of Computer Science, VJTI, Mumbai) *** (Department
Rapid software development Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 17 Slide 1 Objectives To explain how an iterative, incremental development process leads to faster delivery of
1. Software Process Models (Sommerville Chapters 4, 17, 19, 12.4) A software process model is a standardised format for planning organising, and running a development project. 1 Hundreds of different models
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE (SDLC) ANALYTICAL COMPARISON AND SURVEY ON TRADITIONAL AND AGILE METHODOLOGY Sujit Kumar Dora 1 and Pushkar Dubey 2 1 Programmer, Computer Science & Engineering, Padmashree
Software Engineering Prof. N. L. Sarda Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 2 Introduction to Software Engineering Challenges, Process Models etc (Part 2) This
RESEARCH ARTICLE International Journal of Computer Techniques - Volume 2 Issue 4, July - Aug Year Evolving a Ultra-Flow Software Development Life Cycle Model Divya G.R.*, Kavitha S.** *(Computer Science,
LECTURE 1. SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1.1 INFORMATION SYSTEMS System A system is an interrelated set of business procedures used within one business unit working together for a purpose A system has nine characteristics
1. Software Process Models (Sommerville Chapters 4, 17, 19, 12.4) A software process model is a standardised format for planning organising, and running a development project. 1 Hundreds of different models
CHAPTER_3 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (PROCESS MODELS) Prescriptive Process Model Defines a distinct set of activities, actions, tasks, milestones, and work products that are required to engineer high quality
Software Engineering Rapid Software Development Based on Software Engineering, 7 th Edition by Ian Sommerville Objectives To explain how an iterative, incremental development process leads to faster delivery
A Cynical View on Agile Software Development from the Perspective of a new Small-Scale Software Industry Apoorva Mishra Computer Science & Engineering C.S.I.T, Durg, India Deepty Dubey Computer Science
Agent and Object Technology Lab Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Informazione Università degli Studi di Parma Advanced Software Engineering Software Development Processes Prof. Agostino Poggi Software Development
The Journal of Applied Science Vol. 11 No. Vol. 2:45-50 11 No. 2  ISSN 1513-7805 Printed in Thailand Review Article Software Development Process Selection Approaches Phongphan Danphitsanuphan Department
CSC 492 The Practice of Software Engineering Lecture 3 University of Mount Union Software Life Cycle Models Software Life Cycle Models Every program (no matter what size) has several distinct phases that
Software Life Cycle Lecture Objectives What happens in the life of software To look at the life cycle of a software To understand the software process and its related elements To relate to the different
1.1 Methodology Research 1.1.1 Spiral Model The Spiral development model is a risk-driven process model generator. It is used to guide multi-stakeholder concurrent engineering of software-intensive systems.
www.ijcsi.org 441 A Comprehensive Study of Commonly Practiced Heavy and Light Weight Software Methodologies 1 Asif Irshad Khan, 2 Rizwan Jameel Qurashi and 3 Usman Ali Khan 1 Department of Computer Science
What is a system? Software Engineering Software Processes A purposeful collection of inter-related components working together to achieve some common objective. A system may include software, mechanical,
Software Development Life Cycle Models- Comparison, Consequences Abstract- Software Development Life Cycle is a well defined and systematic approach, practiced for the development of a reliable high quality
Fundamentals: Software Engineering Dr. Rami Bahsoon School of Computer Science The University Of Birmingham email@example.com www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~rzb Office 112 Y9- Computer Science Unit 1. Introduction
1 Software Engineering Lecture 2: Software Life Cycles Stefan Hallerstede Århus School of Engineering 25 August 2011 2 Contents Naive Software Development Code & Fix Towards A Software Process Software
2009 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications IPCSIT vol.2 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore Umbrella: A New Component-Based Software Development Model Anurag Dixit and P.C.
Volume 4, Issue 6, June 2014 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com Comparative Analysis
ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY Selecting a Software Development Methodology based on Organizational Characteristics BY Adrienne Farrell An essay submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES, TRENDS, AND IMPLICATIONS Xihui Zhang University of North Alabama firstname.lastname@example.org Hua Dai University of Wisconsin-La Crosse email@example.com Tao Hu King College firstname.lastname@example.org
CSE 435 Software Engineering Sept 16, 2015 2.1 The Meaning of Process A process: a series of steps involving activities, constraints, and resources that produce an intended output of some kind A process
A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE MODELS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Mr. Ashish Kumar Gupta Assistant Professor, Dept. of C.S.E., I.T.S. Engineering College, Greater Noida,
Lifecycle Planning Rapid Development & Software Project Survival Guide Steve McConnell Dave Root (Developed with Mel Rosso-Llopart) Version 1.4 David Root, 2005, all rights reserved 1 Topics Who am I to
Using Simulation to teach project management skills Dr. Alain April, ÉTS Montréal email@example.com Agenda of the workshop 1 The software project management theory overview (40 minutes) 2 Why use SDLC
A Review of Risk Management in Different Software Development Methodologies Haneen Hijazi Hashemite University Zarqa, Jordan Thair Khdour Al Balqa Applied University Salt, Jordan Abdulsalam Alarabeyyat
System/Software Development Life Cycle Anurag Srivastava Associate Professor ABV-IIITM, Gwalior Why Life Cycle Approach for Software? Life cycle is a sequence of events or patterns that are displayed in
Improving Resource and Manpower Allocation Using Enhanced Software Development Model for Efficient Generation of Software 1 Nagajan Tarkhala, Prof. Chintan N. Kanani 1 Student, Master of Engineering, Darshan
Chapter 3 Agile Software Development 1 Topics covered ² Agile methods ² Plan-driven and agile development ² Extreme programming 2 Rapid software development ² Rapid development and delivery is now often
3.0 Methodology 3.1 Introduction In this chapter, five software development life cycle models are compared and discussed briefly. The most suitable system methodology for the proposed system is drawn out.
Processing Models Of SDLC Mrs. Nalkar Sanjivani Baban Asst. Professor, IT/CS Dept, JVM s Mehta College,Sector 19, Airoli, Navi Mumbai-400708 Nalkar_sanjivani@yahoo.co.in Abstract This paper presents an
Software Processes Objectives To introduce software process models To describe three generic process models and when they may be used To describe outline process models for requirements engineering, software
Software Quality and Assurance in Waterfall model and XP - A Comparative Study Dr. Sana a Jawdat Khalaf Sana_j_11@hotmail.com Dr. Mohamed Noor Al-Jedaiah firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract: -Dealing with
CS4507 Advanced Software Engineering Lectures 2 & 3: Software Development Lifecycle Models A O Riordan, 2015 Some diagrams from Sommerville, some notes from Maciaszek/Liong Lifecycle Model Software development
Software Processes CSC 221 Introduction to Software Engineering software processes extract from Sommerville s chapter 3 slides Alan Dix Coherent sets of activities for specifying, designing, implementing
Life Cycle Models V. Paúl Pauca Department of Computer Science Wake Forest University CSC 331-631 Fall 2013 Software Life Cycle The overall framework in which software is conceived, developed, and maintained.
Agile Processes Software processes that are: Incremental (small software releases with rapid cycles) Cooperative (customer and developer working together with close communication) Straightforward (method
Agile Processes and Methodologies: A Conceptual Study Sheetal Sharma Amity School of Engineering & Technology Amity University Noida Sheetal.email@example.com Darothi Sarkar Amity School of Engineering &
Available Online at www.ijcsmc.com International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing A Monthly Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology IJCSMC, Vol. 2, Issue. 5, May 2013, pg.262
Various Software Development Life Cycle Models Sahil Jindal, Puneet Gulati, Praveen Rohilla Dronacharya College of Engineering, India Abstract:An SDLC model is a conceptual framework describing different
CSCI-485: Software Design Lecture 6 Note: Some slides adapted from Software Engineering by Ian Sommerville Software Processes Code-and-fix model Software process model used in the early days of computing
Life-Cycle Model Software Life-Cycle Models Xiaojun Qi It specifies the various phases/workflows of the software process, such as the requirements, analysis (specification), design, implementation, and
Chakra - A new era in Software Lifecycle modeling technique R.P.Muthu Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Abstract: Every old thing has to be modified
ECE155: Engineering Design with Embedded Systems Winter 2013 Lecture 21 March 7, 2013 Patrick Lam version 1 Software Development Lifecycle If you re asked to develop a software project, you re likely to
Software Engineering Objectives Designing, building and maintaining large software systems To define software engineering and explain its importance To discuss the concepts of software products and software
Christina Wallin ABB Corporate Research Department of Industrial IT 721 78 Västerås +46 (0)21 34 50 74 firstname.lastname@example.org Software Development Lifecycle Models The Basic Types Rikard Land Mälardalens
The software process Software Development Methods Bayu Adhi Tama, ST., MTI. email@example.com A structured set of activities required to develop a software system Specification; Design; Validation; Evolution.
Software Quality Assurance in Agile, XP, Waterfall and Spiral A Comparative Study S. Vijayakumar firstname.lastname@example.org School of Computer and Information Science University of South Australia,
Module 2 Software Life Cycle Model Lesson 4 Prototyping and Spiral Life Cycle Models Specific Instructional Objectives At the end of this lesson the student will be able to: Explain what a prototype is.
SE464/CS446/ECE452 Software Life-Cycle and Process Models Instructor: Krzysztof Czarnecki 1 Some of these slides are based on: Lecture slides by Ian Summerville accompanying his classic textbook software
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design What is a System? A system is a set of interrelated components that function together to achieve a common goal. The components of a system are called subsystems.
Lecture 3 Software Development Processes Software Engineering ITCS 3155 Fall 2008 Dr. Jamie Payton Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina at Charlotte September 2, 2008 Lecture Overview
Lesson 1 Introduction to Rapid Application Development using Visual Basic RAD (Rapid Application Development) refers to a development life cycle designed to give much faster development and higher-quality
Software Development Life Cycle at SSPL An Summary of Methodologies We Offer 10/29/2009 Table of Contents The SSPL Advantage... 2 Commonly Used SDLC Models at SSPL... 2 Waterfall Model... 2 Agile Model...
www.ijcsi.org 457 Agile-Fall Process Flow Model A Right Candidate for Implementation in Software Development and Testing Processes for Software Organizations Prakash.V SenthilAnand.N Bhavani.R Assistant
Information Systems Development Process (Software Development Life Cycle) Phase 1 Feasibility Study Concerned with analyzing the benefits and solutions for the identified problem area Includes development
Software Development Process Models and their Impacts on Requirements Engineering Organizational Requirements Engineering Prof. Dr. Armin B. Cremers Sascha Alda Overview Phases during Software Development
Non-Technical Issues in Software Development David E. Kieras! University of Michigan 1 Introduction Question: Why isn't software of higher quality?! More useful, more usable, more reliable?! Many large
Classical Software Life Cycle Models SWEN 301 Trimester 1, 2015 Lecturer: Dr Hui Ma Engineering and Computer Science Lecture slides make use of material provided on the textbook's companion website Motivation
Peter Mileff PhD SOFTWARE ENGINEERING The Basics of Software Engineering University of Miskolc Department of Information Technology Introduction Péter Mileff - Department of Information Engineering Room