Review of Sports Betting Regulation 31 March 2011
|
|
- Allen Blankenship
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Review of Sports Betting Regulation 31 March 2011
2 CONTENTS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 REPORT BACKGROUND 5 THE EXISTING REGULATORY REGIME 6 Approval of sporting events 7 Contingencies 7 Approval of sports controlling bodies 7 Offering bets without a betting agreement 8 THE GROWTH OF SPORTS BETTING 9 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 12 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 14 Approval of events for betting purposes 14 Approval of sports controlling bodies 16 Requirements on sports betting providers 18 Information sharing agreements 20 The prohibition or otherwise of betting on certain contingencies 22 The adequacy of sports controlling bodies integrity mechanisms 24 The role and powers of the VCGR in relation to sports betting 25 Other relevant matters 26 CONCLUSION 28 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS 29 APPENDIX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE 30 APPENDIX 2 CONSULTATION 31 APPENDIX 3 LIST OF APPROVED SPORTS CONTROLLING BODIES 32 APPENDIX 4 LIST OF APPROVED SPORTS BETTING EVENTS 33 Front Cover: Melbourne Cricket Ground Exterior (3) by Steel Wool 2
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this review, as expressed in the terms of reference, was to examine the regulation of sports betting to assess its effectiveness in: strengthening public confidence in the integrity of sports; protecting the integrity of betting that takes place on sports; protecting betting consumers; providing sporting bodies with a fair share of the revenues from betting that takes place on their sports. The review is required to provide advice to the Minister for Gaming on the effectiveness of existing requirements and processes, and suggest how these can be enhanced. The terms of reference included a number of matters to be considered by the review. The review met with a number of stakeholders, including the currently approved sports controlling bodies, some sporting bodies who do not have controlling body status, and a number of sports betting providers. The review also conducted research into the regulatory regimes for sports betting both interstate and overseas. The review found overwhelming support for the Victorian sports betting legislation. The sports controlling bodies emphasised the benefits that had accrued to them as a result of the introduction of the legislation and were complimentary in their comments about Victoria s progressive stance in this area of regulation. However, it was also clear to the review that mirror legislation in other states is needed for the regulatory regime to be fully effective. The Victorian legislation only covers events that occur within Victoria. The sports controlling bodies are currently leveraging off the agreements they have made under the Victorian legislation to receive payment from sports betting providers for events occurring in other states and territories, and in one case, overseas. The result of this situation is that sports controlling bodies have differing ability to negotiate with sports betting providers. For example, the AFL, with the majority of games held in Victoria, has considerable power; withdrawal of their agreement to allow betting on AFL games in Victoria would have a significant effect on a sports betting provider. At the other end of the scale, the NRL, with most games held in NSW, has minimal power. Withdrawal of their agreement to allow betting on NRL games in Victoria would be largely a token gesture. The review has been unable to form a view as to whether the legislation has strengthened public confidence in the integrity of sports. Whilst the growing expenditure on sports betting may indicate confidence in the product by betting consumers, there is no definitive evidence to support such an assumption. In the absence of any evidence about public confidence, the integrity of that betting is highly important. The review notes that public confidence in the integrity of any sporting competition is critical to continued public support of that competition both at the ticket box and through commercial broadcasting. Loss of public confidence through an integrity lapse can carry with it potentially damaging consequences for the continued sustainability of a sporting competition. In terms of protecting the integrity of betting that takes place on sports and hence, protecting both the sustainability of the sports and the interests of betting consumers, the review has concluded that the legislation has one major deficiency, namely the lack of provision for 3
4 ongoing monitoring by the regulator. Information provided to the review suggests that the level of integrity assurance being undertaken by the sports controlling bodies varies. While some sports controlling bodies were able to demonstrate proactive and robust integrity procedures aimed at ensuring no breaches of codes of conduct, including education programs for participants, others appeared less diligent, with integrity processes only coming in to play after a breach had occurred. Whilst the VCGR considers whether a sporting body has adequate policies, rules, codes of conduct and other mechanisms designed to ensure integrity at the time of determining whether to approve an application for sports controlling body status, there is currently no provision for monitoring of adherence to such policies and this is the subject of one of the review s recommendations. The review is satisfied that the existing sports betting legislation has benefited those sports that have gained sports controlling body status in terms of ensuring that they receive a fair share of the revenues from betting that takes place on their sports. The legislation gives the sports controlling bodies the power to negotiate the fee to be paid by a sports betting provider. While some sports controlling bodies indicated that they may seek to renegotiate the fee in the future, there was no evidence given to the review that suggested that any sports controlling body believes the share of revenues they currently receive is unfair. 4
5 INTRODUCTION Report Background In May 2007, the Parliament amended the Gambling Regulation Act 2003 via passage of the Gambling and Racing Legislation Amendment (Sports Betting) Act (the amending Act). The amending Act made substantial changes to the way sports betting is regulated in Victoria. The new regulatory scheme introduced by the amending Act was intended to strengthen public confidence in the integrity of sporting events and the betting that takes place on those events and to ensure that sporting bodies receive their fair share of the revenues from betting that takes place on their sports. 1 Since passage of the legislation, there have been considerable changes in the sports betting industry and substantial market growth. While these changes have brought benefits to both industry and consumers, there are growing concerns that increased gambling on sport has created greater integrity risks and that these risks have the potential to undermine public confidence in sporting events. There are also concerns about the impact that these risks may have on the consumers of gambling products. As a result of these concerns, Mr Des Gleeson, former chairman of stewards for Racing Victoria, was appointed to undertake this review with the aim of providing the Minister for Gaming with advice on whether further measures can be adopted to enhance the existing regulatory regime. 1 Minister for Gaming, Legislative Assembly, 15 March
6 THE EXISTING REGULATORY REGIME Approval of sporting events Prior to the passage of the amending Act, the Ministers for Gaming and Racing were responsible for approving sporting and other non-racing events for the purposes of betting. The amending Act transferred responsibility for approving these events to the VCGR. The GRA specifies criteria that the VCGR must consider when deciding whether to approve an event for betting purposes. These criteria are designed to ensure that betting is only conducted on events that can be adequately managed from an integrity perspective. In making its decision, the VCGR considers: whether the event is exposed to unmanageable integrity risks whether the event is administered by a body that is capable of ensuring integrity of the event whether betting on the event is offensive or contrary to the public interest except in the case of a sporting event, whether the approval would represent an unreasonable extension of the scope of gambling in Victoria. The VCGR may impose any conditions it thinks fit on an approval at the time of giving the approval or at any later time. Once an event is approved, betting on the event can be conducted by a sports betting provider 2, provided they have an agreement with the relevant approved sports controlling body (if there is one). To date, twenty-one types of event have been approved for fixed odds betting and two for tote odds betting, as detailed in Appendix 4. Contingencies Approval of an event allows for betting to occur on any type of contingency. For example, in AFL, bets may be taken on the winning margin, half time result, player who kicks the most goals and so on. The VCGR approval does not specify what contingencies can or cannot be bet on. Certain types of contingencies are more vulnerable to manipulation and fixing than others. For example, betting on how many wides are bowled in the first over of a cricket match may raise greater integrity concerns than betting on the winning team. The GRA empowers the VCGR to prohibit a contingency that it considers inappropriate for betting purposes. The GRA makes it an offence for a sports betting provider to offer or place bets on a contingency that has been prohibited by the VCGR. The GRA allows for the VCGR to prohibit betting on a contingency if it: would expose the relevant event to unmanageable integrity risks; or 2 A sports betting provider is defined at s of the GRA as a person who, in Victoria or elsewhere, provides a service that allows a person to place a bet on a sports betting event 6
7 is offensive; or is contrary to the public interest; or should be prohibited for any other reason. No contingency has been prohibited by the VCGR to date. Approval of sports controlling bodies Under the GRA, a sporting body can apply to the VCGR to be approved as the sports controlling body for an approved sporting event. In making its decision, the VCGR must consider whether the sporting body has the capacity to adequately manage the integrity of the sporting event. Controlling body status provides a sporting body with the legal right to negotiate fees and information sharing arrangements with sports betting providers. This provides a strong incentive for sporting bodies to invest time and resources into developing appropriate integrity systems. In determining an application for approval as a sports controlling body, the GRA provides that the VCGR must have regard to: whether the applicant has control of the event or organises or administers the event whether the applicant has adequate policies, rules, codes of conduct or other mechanisms designed to ensure the integrity of the event whether the applicant supports compliance with relevant international codes and conventions applicable to the event that relate to integrity in sport whether the applicant has the expertise, resources and authority necessary to administer, monitor and enforce the integrity systems whether the applicant has clear policies on the provision of information that may be relevant to the betting market whether the applicant has clear processes for reporting the results of the event and hearing appeals and protests regarding those results whether the applicant has clear policies on the sharing of information with sports betting providers for the purpose of investigating suspicious betting activity whether the applicant is the most appropriate body to be approved as the sports controlling body for the event whether the approval is in the public interest. The VCGR must also consider any objections to the application and may have regard to any other matter in determining whether to approve the application. The VCGR may also impose any condition it thinks fit on an approval at the time of giving the approval or at any later time. To date, six sports controlling bodies for sports betting events have been approved, as detailed at Appendix 3. 7
8 Offering bets without a betting agreement For sports for which a sports controlling body has been approved, the GRA makes it an offence for a sports betting provider to offer bets on those sports without either the written agreement of the sports controlling body or a binding determination of the VCGR. This offence applies to sporting events held in Victoria. The written agreement between a sports controlling body and a sports betting provider must cover information sharing, and the payment of a fee, if any, to the sports controlling body. Details of the agreement, including the type and level of fee, are determined by the parties to the agreement. If a sports betting provider and a sports controlling body are unable to reach agreement, the sports betting provider may apply to the VCGR to have the dispute resolved The VCGR may make a binding determination on the outstanding issues, having regard to criteria in the GRA that guide the VCGR as to the appropriate terms and conditions for such agreements. 8
9 THE GROWTH OF SPORTS BETTING The level of betting that takes place on sports, both in Victoria and Australia as a whole, has increased considerably in the last decade and a half. The 26 th edition of Australian Gambling Statistics indicates that expenditure on sports betting in Victoria in was $2.257 million (Figure 1) from turnover of $ million (Figure 2) or, in real terms $3.198 million from $32.54 million (Figures 3 and 4). By that figure had risen to $ million from turnover of $ million, or $39.77 million from $ million in real terms. Figure 1 - Total sports betting expenditure ($m) ACT NSW NT QLD SA TAS VIC WA Source: Australian Gambling Statistics, to , 26 th edition Figure 2 - Total sports betting turnover ($m) ACT NSW NT QLD SA TAS VIC WA Source: Australian Gambling Statistics, to , 26 th edition In Victoria over the period to , the annual average increase in expenditure has been per cent, or per cent in real terms. Over the same period, the annual average increase in turnover has been per cent, or per cent in real terms. 9
10 Assuming that this rate of growth continues, product fees paid by sports betting providers will constitute an increasing proportion of the revenues available to sports in future. In , expenditure on sports betting in Australia totalled $ million from turnover of $ million, rising to expenditure of $ million from turnover of $2, million in In real terms, expenditure in was $ million from turnover of $ million, growing to expenditure of $ million from turnover of $2, in It should be noted that the Northern Territory figures reflect its status as the home of the majority of Australia s corporate bookmakers. Figure 3 - Real total sports betting expenditure ($m) ACT NSW NT QLD SA TAS VIC WA Source: Australian Gambling Statistics, to , 26 th edition Figure 4 - Real total sports betting turnover ($m) ACT NSW NT QLD SA TAS VIC WA Source: Australian Gambling Statistics, to , 26 th edition 10
11 The latest edition of Australian Gambling Statistics only provides data up until the financial year but it is possible that the repeal of the advertising restrictions in Victoria and NSW will contribute to additional growth in sports betting. Until 2009, advertising by interstate bookmakers was illegal in Victoria. In 2008, the laws relating to advertising restrictions in both Victoria and NSW were challenged in the Federal Court by two interstate wagering service providers, Betfair Pty Ltd (licensed in Tasmania), and Sportingbet Australia Pty Ltd (licensed in the Northern Territory). These laws were challenged in response to an earlier High Court decision in the matter of Betfair v Western Australia which ruled that certain laws in Western Australia were invalid as they were contrary to section 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution. The High Court decision made it clear that legislation must not treat interstate wagering service providers in a discriminatory fashion based on their location. Following the decision of the High Court in the Betfair v Western Australia case and challenges to Victorian and NSW legislation, the Victorian Government undertook to review provisions relating to the prohibition of advertising by interstate wagering service providers. In 2009, both Victoria and NSW repealed their advertising restrictions, allowing interstate wagering service providers to advertise their services in both states. Apart from direct advertising, the other possible contributor to growth is the media. Sports commentary often includes quoting of odds supplied by sports betting providers. This type of surreptitious advertising is widespread on television and radio as well as appearing on electronic scoreboards at events. It is noted that this issue is currently under consideration by the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform. 11
12 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The review makes a number of recommendations aimed at improving the regulatory regime. These recommendations fall into the following categories: enforcement of existing legislation improving integrity assurance suggested legislative amendments matters requiring national action. Enforcement of existing legislation Recommendation 1 That the sports controlling bodies be required to provide the VCGR with a list of sports betting providers with whom they have agreements. Recommendation 2 That the VCGR prosecute sports betting providers who are offering markets on events for which they have no agreement with the relevant sports controlling body. Improving integrity assurance Recommendation 3 That smaller sports be encouraged to consider setting up an integrity body to service their collective integrity needs and enable them to obtain sports controlling body status. Recommendation 4 That the sports controlling bodies be encouraged to share information with each other about their integrity policies and processes in the interests of ensuring best practice. Recommendation 5 That the sports controlling bodies, either through COMPPS or some other mechanism, consider developing a model code of conduct and guidelines for the conduct of education programs that would act as a minimum standard for all sports. Recommendation 6 That the sports controlling bodies be encouraged to negotiate agreements that include the power to ban betting on contingencies that raise reasonable integrity concerns. Suggested legislative amendments Recommendation 7 That, in the event other Australian jurisdictions move to introduce sports betting legislation, Victoria grants reciprocal rights to out-of-state approved sports controlling bodies and encourages other jurisdictions to do likewise. Recommendation 8 That the penalty for offering a betting service on a sports betting event without the agreement of the relevant sports controlling body be increased. 12
13 Recommendation 9 That the GRA be amended to provide for the VCGR to have an ongoing monitoring role to ensure that sports controlling bodies are applying their integrity policies and processes Recommendation 10 That consideration be given to amending the GRA to allow the VCGR to adjudicate if a sports controlling body and a sports betting provider cannot reach agreement on the banning of a particular contingency. Recommendation 11 That the Department of Justice (DOJ) liaise with Sport and Recreation Victoria in relation to the development of criminal provisions to deter and deal with match-fixing. Matters requiring national action Recommendation 12 That the Minister for Gaming place the issue of mirror sports betting legislation on the agenda of the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform or other appropriate national forum. Recommendation 13 That the Minister place the issue of retention and supply of betting information by sport betting providers on the agenda of the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform or other appropriate national forum. Recommendation 14 That the Minister place the issue of amending the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 to remove the ban on internet betting in the run on the agenda of the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform or other appropriate national forum. 13
14 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION The approval of events for betting purposes and the matters the VCGR must have regard to when determining whether to approve an event. The VCGR is responsible for approving sporting and other non-racing events for the purposes of betting. The GRA specifies criteria that the VCGR must consider when deciding whether to approve an event for betting purposes. These criteria are designed to ensure that betting is only conducted on events that can be adequately managed from an integrity perspective. In making its decision, the VCGR considers: whether the event is exposed to unmanageable integrity risks whether the event is administered by a body that is capable of ensuring integrity of the event whether betting on the event is offensive or contrary to the public interest except in the case of a sporting event, whether the approval would represent an unreasonable extension of the scope of gambling in Victoria. Once an event is approved, betting on the event can be conducted by a sports betting provider, provided they have an agreement with the relevant approved sports controlling body (if there is one). Sporting events that bets can be taken on but that are not under the control of an approved sports controlling body present some issues in terms of ensuring integrity. Although the VCGR is required to consider whether such events are exposed to unmanageable integrity risks and whether the event is administered by a body that can ensure integrity, this falls short of the more detailed integrity requirements that apply to sports controlling bodies. It is arguable that, ideally, betting on sports that do not have an approved sports controlling body should not be permitted. However, the reality is that such a ban in Victoria would be largely ineffective. Betting consumers would still be able to bet on these events with sports betting providers located outside Victoria. The net effect would be to disadvantage Victorian based sport betting providers without providing any increase in sports integrity. Through consultation, the review has become aware that the major concern for bookmakers is to ensure that they can compete. Interstate sports betting providers, particularly those located in the Northern Territory, are able to offer an enormous range of betting options. Although they may not hold many bets on the more exotic markets, the ability to offer these markets provides them with free publicity, with media often featuring small articles on the more outlandish bets available. This free marketing may lead punters to open an account with an interstate sports betting provider who then becomes their main betting provider, to the detriment of Victorian sports betting providers who are unable to offer a similar range of products. Despite this inequity, it is important to consider the integrity around events. For example, 14
15 reality television show results have no integrity assurance in place and have not been approved for betting purposes in Victoria but are offered for betting purposes by interstate bookmakers. While the review has some sympathy for Victorian sports betting providers in terms of their inability to compete, it is also of the view that integrity must remain at the forefront of the consideration of whether to approve an event for betting purposes. 15
16 The approval of sports controlling bodies and the matters the VCGR must have regard to when determining whether to approve a sports controlling body. Under the GRA, a sporting body can apply to the VCGR to be approved as the sports controlling body for an approved sporting event. In making its decision, the VCGR must consider whether the sporting body has the capacity to adequately manage the integrity of the sporting event. Controlling body status provides a sporting body with the legal right to negotiate fees and information sharing arrangements with sports betting providers. This provides a strong incentive for sporting bodies to invest time and resources into developing appropriate integrity systems. In determining an application for approval as a sports controlling body, the GRA provides that the VCGR must have regard to: whether the applicant has control of the event or organises or administers the event whether the applicant has adequate policies, rules, codes of conduct or other mechanisms designed to ensure the integrity of the event whether the applicant supports compliance with relevant international codes and conventions applicable to the event that relate to integrity in sport whether the applicant has the expertise, resources and authority necessary to administer, monitor and enforce the integrity systems whether the applicant has clear policies on the provision of information that may be relevant to the betting market whether the applicant has clear processes for reporting the results of the event and hearing appeals and protests regarding those results whether the applicant has clear policies on the sharing of information with sports betting providers for the purpose of investigating suspicious betting activity whether the applicant is the most appropriate body to be approved as the sports controlling body for the event whether the approval is in the public interest. To date, only six sporting bodies have received sports controlling body approval from the VCGR. Two other sporting bodies have lodged applications which are currently under consideration. The review is concerned that there is betting taking place on a number of other sports that have not applied for sports controlling body status and as a result these sports are not benefiting from that wagering. Equally, there is some risk to punters in betting on sports that may not have robust integrity procedures in place. For example, the review notes that the Ballarat Football League has come to an arrangement with a sports betting provider to allow that provider to take bets on Ballarat League games in return for a set amount of money per year. While the legislation does not compel the Ballarat Football League to seek sports controlling body status, betting on these games is a risk for punters as there is no guarantee that the League has any integrity procedures in place. Equally, while the deal may turn out to be financially advantageous for 16
17 the League, if there is a large amount of betting on games, they may not benefit as much as they may have if they had negotiated an agreement under the auspices of the legislation. The review has been made aware that the costs involved in seeking sports controlling body status, in particular the costs involved in setting up appropriate integrity systems, is a contributor to this reluctance to seek sports controlling body status. It may be more cost effective for the smaller sporting bodies to set up an integrity body that could service their collective integrity needs. This could potentially be funded from the product fee paid by sports betting providers. Stakeholders with whom the review raised this option were generally supportive though there were some concerns expressed about who would run the body and how it would be funded. If other Australian jurisdictions move to introduce sports betting legislation, it would be helpful if reciprocal rights applied i.e. if a sporting body is approved as a sports controlling body in one Australian jurisdiction, this status should be recognised in the other Australian jurisdictions. This would ensure that sports controlling bodies are saved the expense of applying for status in each jurisdiction. Recommendations That smaller sports be encouraged to consider setting up an integrity body to service their collective integrity needs and enable them to obtain sports controlling body status. That, in the event other Australian jurisdictions move to introduce sports betting legislation, Victoria grants reciprocal rights to out-of-state approved sports controlling bodies and encourages other jurisdictions to do likewise. 17
18 The requirements on sports betting providers, including the requirement to make an agreement with the relevant sports controlling bodies and the required content of those agreements For sports for which a sports controlling body has been approved the GRA makes it an offence for a sports betting provider to offer bets on those sports without either the written agreement of the sports controlling body or a binding determination of the VCGR. This offence applies to sporting events held in Victoria. The written agreement between a sports controlling body and a sports betting provider must cover information sharing, and the payment of a fee, if any, to the sports controlling body. Details of the agreement, including the type and level of fee, are determined by the parties to the agreement. If a sports betting provider and a sports controlling body are unable to reach agreement, the sports betting provider may apply to the VCGR to have the dispute resolved The VCGR may make a binding determination on the outstanding issues, having regard to criteria in the GRA that guide the VCGR as to the appropriate terms and conditions for such agreements. The sports controlling bodies have been unanimous in their agreement that sports betting providers have been very co-operative in making agreements. The general opinion of those parties the review met with is that the sports betting providers recognise that integrity assurance benefits them as much as the sports controlling bodies and punters by limiting the ability for events to be fixed. Under the standard agreement negotiated between the sports controlling bodies and sports betting providers, each sports controlling body receives five per cent of the sports betting providers gross profit from betting that takes place on events controlled by the sports controlling body. The regulatory regime enables the sports controlling body to negotiate the type and level of fee payable. The current fee payable by the sports betting providers was agreed upon by the members of COMPPS and several of the sports controlling bodies suggested that they may seek to renegotiate the fee in the future. The review was also made aware that, in addition to the fee payable under the standard agreement, a number of sports controlling bodies have negotiated sponsorship arrangements with sports betting providers. The review understands that these arrangements are of considerable benefit to some sports. It is also noted that a number of individual clubs in a variety of sports have negotiated their own separate sponsorship agreements with sports betting providers. There is some concern about the ability of the sports controlling bodies to negotiate higher fees, owing to the limited coverage of the Victorian regulatory regime. Whilst the sports controlling bodies have been able to leverage the current situation to ensure they receive payment from sports betting providers for events occurring outside Victoria, sports betting providers may not be so willing to continue this arrangement if the sports controlling bodies attempt to push for higher fees, or fees based on turnover rather than profit. The consequence of this may be that sports betting providers may only be prepared to negotiate arrangements that cover events occurring within Victoria. This concern was raised with the review by more than one sports controlling body. 18
19 There is some evidence of sports betting providers betting on events for which they do not have an agreement in place. The sports controlling bodies, while aware that this occurs, have limited resources to police this. It has been suggested that the VCGR could take a more active role in enforcing the requirement for sports betting providers to make an agreement with the relevant sports controlling body on whose events they are taking wagers. The review notes that there is no requirement for sports controlling bodies to notify the VCGR with whom they have agreements. If the sports controlling bodies were required to provide the VCGR with a list of sports betting providers with whom they have agreements, this would make the VCGR s enforcement role easier. The current penalty of 60 penalty units (currently $7,167.00) may also need to be increased in order to act as a deterrent. Of course, the lack of sports betting legislation outside Victoria means that this penalty only applies if a sports betting provider is taking bets on an event held within Victoria. As noted previously, the sports controlling bodies have been able to leverage the current situation to ensure they receive payment from sports betting providers for events occurring outside Victoria, but this is a precarious situation. The legislation needs to be replicated in other Australian jurisdictions to ensure integrity is enforced and sports are fairly remunerated. Recommendations That the sports controlling bodies be required to provide the VCGR with a list of sports betting providers with whom they have agreements. That the VCGR prosecute sports betting providers who are offering markets on events for which they have no agreement with the relevant sports controlling body. That the penalty for offering a betting service on a sports betting event without the agreement of the relevant sports controlling body be increased. That the Minister for Gaming place the issue of mirror sports betting legislation on the agenda of the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform or other appropriate national forum. 19
20 Information sharing agreements between sports betting providers and sports controlling bodies. The written agreement between a sports controlling body and a sports betting provider must cover information sharing arrangements. Details of the agreement are determined by the parties to the agreement. Consultation undertaken as part of this review has revealed that the form of the agreement between the sports controlling bodies and the sports betting providers is based on a standard agreement devised by COMPPS. All sports controlling bodies are members of COMPPS, which was active in lobbying for the introduction of the amending Act. Information provided to the review by stakeholders suggests that the amount of information sharing taking place between the sports controlling bodies and sports betting providers varies. The relationship between sports and wagering is a relatively new one and is still only a minor source of revenue for sport. However, it was clear to the review that the level of integrity assurance being undertaken by the sports controlling bodies varies enormously. It would be useful if the sports controlling bodies, whether through COMPPS or some other mechanism, shared information on the integrity policies and processes they have put in place. The United Kingdom s Department for Culture, Media and Sport established a Sports Betting Integrity Panel in 2009 to make recommendations as to the design and implementation of an integrated strategy to uphold integrity in sport and associated betting. The Panel s report 3, delivered in February 2010, made a number of recommendations relating to integrity. In particular, the Panel recommended that a Code of Conduct on integrity in sports in relation to sports betting should be developed and that it should include minimum standards which all sports should observe and cover in their rules on betting. Additionally, the Panel recommended that sports provide regular education and communication programs on sports betting integrity to all competitors and participants. The review believes that these recommendations may be useful in the Victorian context. The sports controlling bodies, either through COMPPS or some other mechanism, may wish to consider developing a model code of conduct and guidelines for the conduct of education programs that would act as a minimum standard for all sports. This may assist the smaller sports in putting together the building blocks of their integrity systems. The VCGR has advised that it considers its application forms to be a guide to applicants for sports controlling body status as to best practice in integrity assurance. While the review is confident that the VCGR has properly assessed applications and that the sports controlling bodies have satisfied the legislative requirements, it is a concern that there is no postapproval monitoring function. An issue raised with the review was the need for sports betting providers to retain and make available information to the sports controlling bodies that will assist them in their investigations, for example, telephone caller identification and IP address information. The evidence suggests that the quality of information available varies depending on the sports betting provider. The review considers that, while this is a reasonable request, it requires an 3 Report of the Sports Betting Integrity Panel February
21 Australia-wide approach. It is noted that the issue has been raised by COMPPS with the Federal Minister for Sport. Recommendations That the sports controlling bodies be encouraged to share information with each other about their integrity policies and processes in the interests of ensuring best practice. That the sports controlling bodies, either through COMPPS or some other mechanism, consider developing a model code of conduct and guidelines for the conduct of education programs that would act as a minimum standard for all sports. That the Minister place the issue of retention and supply of betting information by sport betting providers on the agenda of the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform or other appropriate national forum. 21
22 The prohibition or otherwise of betting on certain contingencies, including betting in the run. Approval of an event allows for betting to occur on any type of contingency. For example, in AFL, bets may be taken on the winning margin, half time result, player who kicks the most goals and so on. The VCGR approval does not specify what contingencies can or cannot be bet on. Certain types of contingencies are more vulnerable to manipulation and fixing than others. For example, betting on how many wides are bowled in the first over of a cricket match may raise greater integrity concerns than betting on the winning team. The GRA empowers the VCGR to prohibit a contingency that it considers inappropriate for betting purposes. The GRA makes it an offence for a sports betting provider to offer or place bets on a contingency that has been prohibited by the VCGR. The GRA allows for the VCGR to prohibit betting on a contingency if it: would expose the relevant event to unmanageable integrity risks; or is offensive; or is contrary to the public interest; or should be prohibited for any other reason. No contingency has been prohibited by the VCGR to date. Betting on contingencies is an area of concern in relation to the integrity of sports. As noted above, some contingencies are more vulnerable to manipulation and fixing than others, and despite the fact that such manipulation may not affect the ultimate outcome of a game or match, it represents an enormous risk to the integrity of sports. It was put to the review that some sports controlling bodies would like an absolute power of veto over the contingency markets offered by sports betting providers. Perhaps unsurprisingly, sports betting providers expressed concern about the potential application of such a power, and the possibility that sports controlling bodies may choose to veto some sports betting providers from offering certain markets, but not others, or use the power to effectively ban betting altogether. Sports controlling bodies are able to negotiate veto arrangements as part of their agreements with sports betting providers. It was suggested to the review that the concerns of sports betting providers about the application of such a power could be allayed somewhat if the agreements were clear that such a power would only be invoked where the sports controlling body has reasonable integrity concerns. Additionally, the VCGR s power to determine an application by a sports betting provider, if the sports betting provider and the sports controlling body cannot reach agreement, could be extended to include an adjudication power if the parties cannot reach agreement on the banning of a particular contingency. There was widespread agreement amongst all stakeholders that the ban on internet betting in the run contained in the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cwlth) serves no useful purpose. If betting consumers wish to bet in the run, they are still able to do this over the telephone or 22
23 over the counter at TAB outlets and, if they prefer to do so online, they are able to do so with overseas sports betting providers. The net result of this is that Australian bookmakers lose customers and, consequently, sports controlling bodies lose both revenue and access to betting information. It was also put to the review that, in some cases, in the run betting was to be preferred. Certain betting markets may be better served from an integrity perspective if they can only be bet on during the game, as this would avoid the possibility of pre-game collusion. Recommendations That the sports controlling bodies be encouraged to negotiate agreements that include the power to ban betting on contingencies that raise reasonable integrity concerns. That consideration be given to amending the GRA to provide for the VCGR to adjudicate if a sports controlling body and a sports betting provider cannot reach agreement on the banning of a particular contingency. That the Minister place the issue of amending the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 to remove the ban on internet betting in the run on the agenda of the COAG Select Council on Gambling Reform or other appropriate national forum. 23
24 The adequacy of sports controlling bodies policies, rules, codes of conduct and other mechanisms designed to ensure the integrity of an event. The existing regulatory regime requires the sports controlling bodies to have adequate policies, rules, codes of conduct or other mechanisms designed to ensure the integrity of the events being bet on, as well as the expertise, resources and authority necessary to administer and enforce those systems. The adequacy of sports controlling bodies policies, rules, codes of conduct and other mechanisms designed to ensure the integrity of an event is assessed by the VCGR as part of determining whether to approve an application for sports controlling body status. The VCGR has advised the review that it is confident that the sports controlling bodies are investigating all instances of suspicious betting. Aside from formal correspondence, the VCGR maintains less formal contact with the sports controlling bodies, via telephone and face-to-face meetings, to obtain assurance that all matters of concern are thoroughly investigated. To date, the number of incidents requiring investigation has been small and has included the allegations of tanking in the AFL and the NRL Melbourne Storm issue. The review is concerned, however, that there is no post-approval monitoring function to ensure that integrity mechanisms are being implemented. A sport may have comprehensive policies, rules and codes of conduct but they serve no purpose if they are not understood by the people that are bound by them. Consultation undertaken as part of the review suggests varying levels of enforcement by the sports controlling bodies. The agreement between the sports controlling bodies and sports betting providers is twoway. Whilst sports are entitled to be paid for putting on the show, equally, sports betting providers and their customers are entitled to expect those sports to enforce their integrity processes. Regular monitoring of integrity mechanisms would assist in ensuring that enforcement is occurring. Recommendation That the GRA be amended to provide for the VCGR to have an ongoing monitoring role to ensure that sports controlling bodies are applying their integrity policies and processes. 24
25 The role and powers of the VCGR in relation to sports betting, including in relation to alleged integrity breaches. The main role and powers of the VCGR in relation to sports betting are currently: Approval of events for betting purposes and the variation and revocation of an approval Approval of sports controlling bodies and the variation and revocation of an approval Determination of agreements between sports controlling bodies and sports betting providers if agreement cannot be reached, and the variation and revocation of a determination Prohibition of betting on contingencies. The major deficiency in these powers is the lack of a role for the VCGR in terms of postapproval monitoring. Although the GRA gives the VCGR the power to vary or revoke approvals, without an ongoing monitoring function, it is unclear on what basis such action would be taken. The power to conduct ongoing monitoring would assist in ensuring that enforcement of integrity mechanisms. Recommendation That the GRA be amended to provide for the VCGR to have an ongoing monitoring role to ensure that sports controlling bodies are applying their integrity policies and processes. 25
26 Other relevant matters Stakeholders, particularly the sports controlling bodies, were clear in their agreement that the sports betting legislation has genuinely benefited sports. However, it is also clear that mirror legislation in other states is needed for the regulatory regime to be fully effective. The sports controlling bodies are currently leveraging off the agreements they have made under the Victorian legislation to receive payment from sports betting providers for events occurring outside Victoria. However, this means that sports controlling bodies have differing ability to negotiate with sports betting providers. For example, the AFL, with the majority of games held in Victoria, has considerable power; withdrawal of their agreement to allow betting on AFL games in Victoria would have a significant effect on a sports betting provider. In contrast, the NRL, with most games held in NSW, does not have the same power. Withdrawal of their agreement to allow betting on NRL games in Victoria would be largely a token gesture. In terms of protection of sports integrity, the other missing link is specific cheating legislation. Such legislation would make it easier for Victoria Police to take action and also potentially act as a deterrent if significant penalties were attached. The NSW Law Reform Commission has commenced the development of legislation to deal with fraudulent sports betting and match-fixing and is currently undertaking public consultation and exploring international models. A recent meeting of the Sport and Recreation Ministers Council was advised that the NSW LRC has indicated that it is willing to share its considerations in an effort to promote a nationally consistent approach to this matter. The Sport and Recreation Ministers Council agreed to explore the development of a nationally consistent approach to legislation to deter and deal with match-fixing. The review considered whether there was a case for seeking a reduction in the $10,000 AUSTRAC reporting limit, albeit specifically for betting purposes, to say, $1,500. During the course of consultation, it become clear that this would only affect a small number of sports betting providers as the majority are purely account based and the reporting requirement relates only to cash. However, there was no evidence that such a reduction would serve any real purpose. In terms of integrity related incidents, for example, the irregular betting that took place on the NRL Bulldogs v Cowboys game was a series of $200 bets placed with Tabcorp on a particular contingency. In this case, a reduction in the reporting limit would not have assisted to identify the betting consumer in question. In any case, Tabcorp has in place procedures to identify suspect betting consumers, including the ability to withhold payment for a winning ticket until identification is produced. The review also considered whether all sports betting should be required to be account based. As a practical example, such a requirement would mean that a betting consumer could walk into their local TAB and have a $20 cash bet on Black Caviar but be required to have an account to have a $20 bet on the Western Bulldogs to beat Essendon. The other option would be to apply such a restriction to both sports and racing but this is an impractical solution when one considers on-course bookmakers. On balance, the review has concluded that, while compulsory account based betting may offer a small increase in integrity assurance, it is not a workable solution. There may be a case to require betting consumers to provide identification when placing cash bets or collecting winnings above a certain limit. However, for this to be effective it would need to apply nationally. While this would not be a panacea for cheating, it would 26
COALITION OF MAJOR PROFESSIONAL & PARTICIPATION SPORTS SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BROADBAND, COMMUNICATIONS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
COALITION OF MAJOR PROFESSIONAL & PARTICIPATION SPORTS SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BROADBAND, COMMUNICATIONS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY REVIEW OF THE INTERACTIVE GAMBLING ACT 2001 2 INTRODUCTION The Coalition
More informationNational Policy on Match-Fixing in Sport
As agreed by Australian Governments on 10 June 2011... Corruption in sport is an emerging and critical issue facing Australian and international sport... the integrity of sport must be protected. Sport
More informationANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2012
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2012 Alan Jackson Chairman New Zealand Racing Board Financial highlights 2011 2012 Betting turnover $1.533b $1.622b Net betting revenue $228m $238m Operating
More informationCOMPPS RESPONSE TO INQUIRY INTO THE ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF GAMBLING SERVICES IN SPORT SUBMITTED TO THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON GAMBLING REFORM
COMPPS RESPONSE TO INQUIRY INTO THE ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF GAMBLING SERVICES IN SPORT SUBMITTED TO THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON GAMBLING REFORM 1 MARCH 2013 2 Background COMPPS COMPPS consists of
More informationSUBMISSION. March 2014
SUBMISSION QLD Criminal Code (Cheating at Gambling) Amendment Bill 2013 March 2014 Australian Wagering Council A: Level 12, 95 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 P: +61 2 8079 5204 E: admin@australianwageringcouncil.com
More informationReview of the Electronic Gaming Machine, Club Keno and Wagering Licences and Funding Arrangements for the Racing Industry Post-2012
Review of the Electronic Gaming Machine, Club Keno and Wagering Licences and Funding Arrangements for the Racing Industry Post-2012 Funding Arrangements for the Racing Industry Post-2012 Issues Paper Gambling
More informationBETFAIR AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO THE NSW LAW REFORM COMMISSION REVIEW INTO CHEATING AND GAMBLING 14 FEBRUARY 2011
BETFAIR AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO THE NSW LAW REFORM COMMISSION REVIEW INTO CHEATING AND GAMBLING 14 FEBRUARY 2011 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 BETFAIR S COMMITMENT TO INTEGRITY...3 ACCOUNT-BASED BETTING...4
More informationSPORTSBET PTY LTD SUBMISSION TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES LAW REFORM COMMISSION S CONSULTATION PAPER INTO CHEATING AT GAMBLING
SPORTSBET PTY LTD SUBMISSION TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES LAW REFORM COMMISSION S CONSULTATION PAPER INTO CHEATING AT GAMBLING 6 MAY 2011 CONTENTS ABOUT SPORTSBET 3 NEED FOR AN INDEPENDENT WAGERING BODY 4 ALL
More informationONLINE WAGERING IN AUSTRALIA NAGS CONFERENCE GOLD COAST NOVEMBER 2014
ONLINE WAGERING IN AUSTRALIA NAGS CONFERENCE GOLD COAST NOVEMBER 2014 AWC members are Australian licensed & operated wagering service providers who offer online wagering Products offered by AWC members
More informationSUBMISSION TO AUSTRALIAN TAXATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. Better Tax - Wagering Reform Proposal. Nationals Senator, Bridget McKenzie
SUBMISSION TO AUSTRALIAN TAXATION REVIEW COMMITTEE Better Tax - Wagering Reform Proposal Nationals Senator, Bridget McKenzie 1. GENERAL SUBMISSION The Better Tax Discussion Paper invites submissions on
More informationOnline Gambling. The main forms of online gambling are online wagering and online gaming.
Online Gambling The main forms of online gambling are online wagering and online gaming. Online wagering is comprised of betting on racing (thoroughbred, harness and dog), sports betting (such as the outcome
More informationTHE COALITION OF MAJOR PROFESSIONAL AND PARTICIPATION SPORTS INCORPORATED INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF ILLEGAL OFFSHORE WAGERING
THE COALITION OF MAJOR PROFESSIONAL AND PARTICIPATION SPORTS INCORPORATED SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF ILLEGAL OFFSHORE WAGERING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMPPS consists
More informationSWIMMING AUSTRALIA LIMITED GAMBLING, BETTING AND MATCH FIXING POLICY. Swimming Australia Limited - Gambling, Betting and Match Fixing Policy Page 1
SWIMMING AUSTRALIA LIMITED GAMBLING, BETTING AND MATCH FIXING POLICY Swimming Australia Limited - Gambling, Betting and Match Fixing Policy Page 1 CONTENTS PAGE BACKGROUND 3 REVIEW HISTORY 4 GAMBLING,
More informationThe Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports (COMPPS) consists of the following organisations:
Mr Laurie Glanfield Director General Criminal Law Review NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice GPO Box 6 Sydney NSW 2001 Dear Mr. Glanfield, COMPPS SUBMISSION CRIMES AMENDMENT CHEATING AT GAMBLING
More informationSubmission to the NSW Law Reform Commission- Cheating and Gambling
Submission to the NSW Law Reform Commission- Cheating and Gambling February 2011 Page 1 of 7 Table of contents Overview... 3 Introduction... 3 The Importance of Sport in Australia... 3 The Importance of
More informationPOLICY TITLE: MATCH FIXING POLICY
POLICY TITLE: MATCH FIXING POLICY RELATED POLICIES: RESPONSIBLE OFFICERS: AUTHORITY: APPLICABLE FORMS: Player Contract Disciplinary Policy Chief Executive Officer Bowls Australia Board Nil APPROVED: July,
More informationLegislative Council Panel on Home Affairs. Authorization of Football Betting Betting Duty (Amendment) Bill
For discussion on 14 March 2003 LC Paper No. CB(2)1419/02-03(02) Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs Authorization of Football Betting Betting Duty (Amendment) Bill Introduction The Government plans
More informationChairman Frank, Members of the Committee, the Isle of Man Government welcomes the opportunity to submit written testimony to your Committee.
House Financial Services Committee Hearing Can Internet Gambling be Effectively Regulated to Protect Consumers and the Payments Systems June 8, 2007 Statement for the Hearing Record Submitted by Mary Williams,
More informationAustralian sport and the Commonwealth constitution
Bond University epublications@bond Sports Law ejournal Faculty of Law 12-7-2012 Australian sport and the Commonwealth constitution Chris Davies James Cook University Follow this and additional works at:
More informationThe European Lotteries
The European Lotteries SPORTS INTEGRITY ACTION PLAN The 7 Point Programme for THE BENEFIT AND THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF SPORT IN EUROPE March 2013 THE EUROPEAN LOTTERIES SPORTS INTEGRITY ACTION PLAN The
More informationISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice
More informationCRIME PROFILE SERIES ORGANISED CRIME IN PROFESSIONAL SPORT
Threats to the integrity of professional sport in Australia Organised criminal groups currently have a limited presence in professional sports in Australia. However, there are vulnerabilities within the
More informationOptimal Product Fee Models for Australian Sporting Bodies. July 2012
Optimal Product Fee Models for Australian Sporting Bodies July 2012 Optimal Product Fee Models for Australian Sporting Bodies 2 Contents Definitions and Acronyms 4 Executive Summary 5 1 High Court Decision
More informationI will then turn my attention to the strategies we have adopted to meet the challenges, and broadly the reasons why.
Ladies and Gentlemen Firstly, let me congratulate the organizers of today s meeting for their initiative and foresight in bringing together such a large cross-section of racing industry participants to
More informationRegulation of Bookmakers Policy Paper
Regulation of Bookmakers Policy Paper Content from this publication may be reproduced with appropriate acknowledgement, as permitted under the Commonwealth s Copyright Act 1968. Government of South Australia
More informationUK - legal overview by John Hagan and Melanie Ellis
The Gambling Act 2005 ( the 2005 Act ), which came into force on 1 September 2007, regulates all forms of gambling in the UK with the exception of the National Lottery and spread betting. This legislation
More informationFor personal use only
A S X R E L E A S E 30 April 2012 AS X : TTV Cash Flow Statement and Investor Update Two Way Limited attaches its cash flow statement for the quarter ended 31 March 2012. Investor Update Performance of
More informationAdministrator National Health Funding Pool Annual Report 2012-13
Administrator National Health Funding Pool Annual Report 2012-13 Design Voodoo Creative Printing Paragon Printers Australasia Paper-based publications Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright.
More informationAustralian Gambling Statistics. 1984 85 to 2009 10 28th edition
Australian Gambling Statistics 1984 85 to 2009 10 28th edition Australian Gambling Statistics 28th edition Released December 2012 Prepared by the Government Statistician, Queensland Treasury and Trade.
More informationSubmission of Sportsbet Pty Ltd. Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform
Submission of Sportsbet Pty Ltd Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform Inquiry into the advertising and promotion of gambling services in sport 19 March 2013 1 1. Executive Summary Online
More informationSubmission by Greyhounds Australasia to the Inquiry into interactive and online gambling and gambling advertising
Sandown Greyhound Racing Complex Lightwood Road Springvale 3171 Telephone: (03) 9548 3500 Facsimile: (03) 9548 3488 Email: admin@galtd.org.au Submission by Greyhounds Australasia to the Inquiry into interactive
More informationTabcorp Wagering (VIC) Pty Ltd
Tabcorp Wagering (VIC) Pty Ltd Responsible Gambling Code of Conduct Approved 3 April 2014 1 CONTENTS Responsible Gambling Mission Statement... 3 1. About Tabcorp... 4 2. Tabcorp Wagering Responsible Gambling
More informationSupporting Australia s Live Music Industry: Suggested principles for best practice
Supporting Australia s Live Music Industry: Suggested principles for best practice 2010 2010 Commonwealth of Australia, in conjunction with the governments of the Australian Capital Territory, New South
More informationNSWLR116. (1) Bets with bookmakers must be for a win, or win and place, unless otherwise approved by the Controlling Body.
HARNESS RACING NSW Local Rules of Bookmakers and Betting BETTING Control of Forms of Betting Bets Off Dead Heats Doubles Betting Each Way Betting Place Only Betting Quinella Betting Qualification On Obligation
More informationApproximately 76 per cent of the bets taken by Sportsbet are on racing, with the remaining 24 per cent being on sporting or other events.
Introduction Sportsbet Pty Ltd (hereafter, Sportsbet, we and our ) welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission (VCEC) as part of the Commission
More informationHow To Gamble Online In Australia
Internet Gambling Regulation Richard Brading Principal Solicitor Wesley Community Legal Service Mediums for interactive gambling Internet gambling on a computer Phone gambling voice or interactive phone
More informationLEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY BOOKMAKERS ACT 1985 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM DETERMINATION OF RULES FOR SPORTS BETTING
1997 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY BOOKMAKERS ACT 1985 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM DETERMINATION OF RULES FOR SPORTS BETTING INSTRUMENT NO. 237 OF 1997 Circulated by the Authority
More informationPolicy Statement on. Associations. Eligibility to apply for a Scheme under Professional Standards Legislation May 2014
Policy Statement on on Code Business of Conduct Entity Associations Eligibility to apply for a Scheme under Professional Standards Legislation May 2014 Table of Contents Professional Standards Council
More informationRacing Administration Regulation 2012
New South Wales under the Racing Administration Act 1998 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Regulation under the Racing Administration Act 1998.
More informationBETFAIR AUSTRALASIA SUBMISSION TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY INTO GAMBLING - 2009
BETFAIR AUSTRALASIA SUBMISSION TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY INTO GAMBLING - 2009 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 5 WAGERING REGULATION AND PROBLEM GAMBLING... 7 Probity...
More informationNATIONAL COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT POLICY
1. Introduction NATIONAL COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT POLICY The Commonwealth, state and territory governments have agreed to harmonised work health and safety laws to improve work health and safety, provide
More informationRACING VICTORIA LIMITED BOOKMAKERS INTERNET BETTING RULES 2001. Bookmakers' Internet Betting Rules 2001 - Effective 26 Oct 10.docx
RACING VICTORIA LIMITED BOOKMAKERS INTERNET BETTING RULES 2001 Bookmakers' Internet Betting Rules 2001 - Effective 26 Oct 10.docx INDEX Rule Page 1. PRELIMINARY... 1 1.1 Title... 1 1.2 Purpose... 1 1.3
More informationDTI Consultation on Proposals for a Special Administrator Regime for Energy Network Companies Ofgem s Response
DTI Consultation on Proposals for a Special Administrator Regime for Energy Network Companies Ofgem s Response June 2003 Introduction Ofgem welcomes the DTI consultation on proposals for a special administrator
More informationHow To Write An Act Of Parliament
Version: 1.7.2014 South Australia Authorised Betting Operations Act 2000 An Act to provide for the regulation of totalisator and other betting operations. Contents Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title 3 Interpretation
More informationChanges to Interactive Gambling Regulation? It is Anyone s Bet
Changes to Interactive Gambling Regulation? It is Anyone s Bet Niranjan Arasaratnam and a team of lawyers from the Allens TMT practice group take a look at proposed changes to interactive gambling laws.
More informationSubmission by AFA Pty Ltd on the development of new Terms of Reference for the Financial Ombudsman Service
Submission by AFA Pty Ltd on the development of new Terms of Reference for the Financial Ombudsman Service Preamble AFA Pty Ltd does not operate as an insurer in its own right, but offers its products
More informationPokies, Punters and Policy: What is to be done to tackle problem gambling?
Pokies, Punters and Policy: What is to be done to tackle problem gambling? An Australian Overview The Asia Pacific Conference on Gambling and Commercial Gaming Research November 5-8, 2012 Macao What is
More informationEUROPEAN FOOTBALL UNITED FOR THE INTEGRITY OF THE GAME
EUROPEAN FOOTBALL UNITED FOR THE INTEGRITY OF THE GAME European football united for the integrity of the game Recent publicity has highlighted the risk of match-fixing in European football. It is a global
More informationProtecting betting integrity
Protecting betting integrity October 2013 1 Introduction 1.1 The UK Gambling Commission (the Commission) was set up under the Gambling Act 2005 to regulate commercial gambling in Great Britain. We are
More informationBOOKMAKER ELECTRONIC BETTING AND APPROVED PREMISE BETTING RACING NSW STANDARD CONDITIONS
BOOKMAKER ELECTRONIC BETTING AND APPROVED PREMISE BETTING RACING NSW STANDARD CONDITIONS 1 INTRODUCTION These Racing NSW standard conditions apply to bookmakers who have been authorised by the Minister
More informationHelen Grant MP Minister for Sport and Tourism Department for Culture, Media and Sport 100 Parliament Street LONDON SW1A 2BQ 29 January 2014
Helen Grant MP Minister for Sport and Tourism Department for Culture, Media and Sport 100 Parliament Street LONDON SW1A 2BQ 29 January 2014 Dear Minister Following the meeting on 10 December 2013 with
More informationDaymark Community Monitor. Community Attitudes to Sports Betting
Community Attitudes to Sports Betting April 2011 About the Daymark Community Monitor Daymark is a specialist public relations agency which helps clients navigate their way through tough reputational issues.
More informationAustralian Hotels Association
Australian Hotels Association Submission to the Review into Illegal Offshore Wagering wageringreview@dss.gov.au Monday 16 November 2015 Contact: Stephen Ferguson AHA National CEO PO Box 4286 MANUKA ACT
More informationReview Impact of Illegal Offshore Wagering. Submission from the National Integrity of Sport Unit - Department of Health
Review Impact of Illegal Offshore Wagering Submission from the National Integrity of Sport Unit - Department of Health Executive Summary While noting the Review s wide-ranging scope and terms of reference,
More informationNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON E-HEALTH
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON E-HEALTH Council of Australian Governments An agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the States and Territories, being: The State of New South Wales The State
More informationAustralian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission: Regulatory Approach Statement
Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission: Regulatory Approach Statement This statement sets out the regulatory approach of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC). It
More informationMODULE 4 WINDING UP A BUSINESS
MODULE 4 WINDING UP A BUSINESS PART OF A MODULAR TRAINING RESOURCE Commonwealth of Australia 2015. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted all material presented in
More informationBOOKMAKER TELEPHONE, ELECTRONIC BETTING AND APPROVED BETTING PREMISE OR AUTHORISED BETTING OFFICE RACING NSW STANDARD CONDITIONS
BOOKMAKER TELEPHONE, ELECTRONIC BETTING AND APPROVED BETTING PREMISE OR AUTHORISED BETTING OFFICE 1 INTRODUCTION RACING NSW STANDARD CONDITIONS These Racing NSW standard conditions apply to bookmakers
More informationTABCORP Wagering Responsible Gambling Code of Conduct
TABCORP Wagering Responsible Gambling Code of Conduct Approved by the VCGLR 26 March 2012 1 CONTENTS Responsible Gambling Message... 3 1. About Tabcorp... 4 2. Tabcorp Wagering Responsible Gambling Code
More informationA National Snapshot of Harm Minimisation Strategies
A National Snapshot of Introduction State and Territory Governments have the primary responsibility for the regulation of gambling in Australia. In the past decade State and Territory Governments have
More informationSubmission by Free TV Australia
Submission by Free TV Australia Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Interactive Gambling Amendment (Sports Betting Reform) Bill 2015 12 February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE
More informationSupplementary information on reform to betting duty system of horse race betting
Supplementary information on reform to betting duty system of horse race betting LC Paper No. CB(2)1880/04-05(01) (a) The turnover and betting duty of football betting, lotteries, horse race betting for
More informationNorthern Territory. Code of Practice For Responsible Gambling
Northern Territory Code of Practice For Responsible Gambling 2 Statement This Code of Practice reflects a partnership between Northern Territory gambling providers, Government, regulators and counseling
More informationReview of the Tasmanian Building Regulatory Framework. Response from the Board of Architects of Tasmania
Review of the Tasmanian Building Regulatory Framework Response from the September 2014 1. Introduction The Board of Architects commends the Department of Justice for reviewing this industry framework which
More informationOnline Gambling: The State of Play
Online Gambling: The State of Play EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rapid expansion of internet technologies, combined with the increasing availability and accessibility of online or interactive gambling present some
More informationRE: Inquiry into the advertising and promotion of gambling services in sport
Committee Secretary Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia 4 March 2013 To whom it may concern, RE: Inquiry into the advertising and promotion
More informationCommunications Law Centre, UTS. Submission to draft Commercial Radio Code of Practice 9- Promotion of Live Odds in Sports Coverage
Communications Law Centre, UTS Submission to draft Commercial Radio Code of Practice 9- Promotion of Live Odds in Sports Coverage 21/12/2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction...
More informationMemorandum of Understanding. between the
Memorandum of Understanding between the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES NORTHERN TERRITORY STATE OF QUEENSLAND STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA STATE OF TASMANIA
More informationChapter 5 2013/14. Heading
Chapter 5 2013/14 Heading A Database On Australia s Gambling Industry Published and Prepared by the Australasian Gaming Council (AGC). DISCLAIMER Whilst a great deal of care has been taken in the preparation
More informationAPPELLANT'S CHRONOLOGY. The chronology is in a form suitable for publication on the Internet.
\', (), IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY BETWEEN: No. S118 of2011 SPORTSBET PTY LTD (ACN 088 326 612) Applicant STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES First Respondent RACING NEW SOUTH
More informationINQUIRY INTO TICKET SCALPING IN AUSTRALIA Senate Economics References Committee
10 February 2014 Senate Standing Committees on Economics PO Box 6100 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 INQUIRY INTO TICKET SCALPING IN AUSTRALIA Senate Economics References Committee Live Performance
More informationCompliance and enforcement. How regulators enforce the Australian Consumer Law
Compliance and enforcement How regulators enforce the Australian Consumer Law This publication was developed by: Australian Capital Territory Office of Regulatory Services Australian Competition and Consumer
More informationGAMBLING LAW & REGULATION
GAMBLING LAW & REGULATION Recent developments in Australian gambling law December 2011 Level 12 60 Carrington Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 DX 262 SYDNEY Tel +61 2 8915 1000 Fax +61 2 8916 2000 www.addisonslawyers.com.au
More informationRemote gambling taxation reform
Remote gambling taxation reform Who is likely to be affected? This measure will affect all gambling operators who supply remote gambling to UK customers. Some terrestrial gambling operators will also be
More informationS.I.A Sydney Safety Conference
S.I.A Sydney Safety Conference Harmonised Work Health and Safety Laws Presenter: Bill Kritharas, Partner Date: 23 October 2012 adelaide brisbane canberra melbourne newcastle perth sydney upper hunter Introduction
More informationNorthern Territory Code of Practice for Responsible Gambling
Northern Territory Code of Practice for Responsible Gambling Table of contents Statement... 1 Objective... 1 What is responsible gambling?... 1 What is problem gambling?... 1 Expected outcomes... 1 The
More informationIndependent Review of Wagering in NSW - a framework for future growth and Sustainability of the NSW Racing Industry.
Independent Review of Wagering in NSW - a framework for future growth and Sustainability of the NSW Racing Industry. A Response to the March 2008 Issues Paper Prepared by Alan Cameron A.M. A Response submitted
More informationACCOUNT APPLICATION FORM & IDENTIFICATION FORM
ACCOUNT APPLICATION FORM & IDENTIFICATION FORM This form may be used to apply for a new Account or to verify the identity of an existing Provisional account holder. INSTRUCTIONS Please complete Section
More informationOptus Submission to Productivity Commission Inquiry into National Frameworks for Workers Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety
Optus Submission to Productivity Commission Inquiry into National Frameworks for Workers Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety June 2003 Overview Optus welcomes the opportunity to provide this
More informationRegulatory Impact Statement
Regulatory Impact Statement Match-Fixing Criminal Offences Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by Sport New Zealand and provides an analysis of options to ensure
More informationwww.sportnz.org.nz NEW ZEALAND POLICY ON SPORTS MATCH-FIXING AND RELATED CORRUPTION
www.sportnz.org.nz NEW ZEALAND POLICY ON SPORTS MATCH-FIXING AND RELATED CORRUPTION Foreword New Zealand has a hard earned reputation in international sport. Our talented athletes are respected because
More informationCode of Practice. Queensland responsible gambling Code of Practice. Section I V4.1 2015
Department of Justice and Attorney-General Queensland responsible gambling Code of Practice Section I V4.1 2015 Code of Practice Produced by the Department of Justice and Attorney-General www.business.qld.gov.au/liquor-gaming
More informationSubmission by Sportsbet Pty Ltd. to the. Review of the Australian Communications and Media Authority
Submission by Sportsbet Pty Ltd to the Review of the Australian Communications and Media Authority August 2015 Executive Summary Sportsbet welcomes the review by the Department of Communications (Department)
More informationBetting: advice for remote, non-remote and betting intermediaries Advice note
Betting: advice for remote, non-remote and betting intermediaries Advice note October 2013 (updated October 2014) 1 Summary 1.1 This advice note explains the approach adopted by the Gambling Commission
More informationGAMBLING. Approved by the National Council November 2014
Public Issues Advisory Committee GAMBLING Approved by the National Council November 2014 Between 80,000 and 160,000 Australian adults have severe gambling problems and the estimated negative social cost
More informationACE Insurance Limited ELITE II PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE POLICY
ELITE II PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE POLICY Renewal Proposal Form - Miscellaneous ABN 23 001 642 020 AFSL 239687 Page 1 of 8 ACE ELITE II PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE RENEWAL PROPOSAL FORM Miscellaneous
More informationLuxbet CASH OUT TERMS AND CONDITIONS ( Luxbet Cash Out T&Cs )
Luxbet CASH OUT TERMS AND CONDITIONS ( Luxbet Cash Out T&Cs ) 1. WHAT IS LUXBET CASH OUT AND HOW DO I USE IT? 1.1 What is Luxbet Cash Out? Luxbet Cash Out is a function that allows Eligible Participants
More informationWagering and Betting Licence
Wagering and Betting Licence Gambling Regulation Act 2003 (Vic) The Honourable Michael O'Brien MP, Minister for Gaming for and on behalf of the Crown in right of the State of Victoria Tabcorp Wagering
More informationBETTING AND OTHER ANTI-CORRUPTION VIOLATIONS RULES
BETTING AND OTHER ANTI-CORRUPTION VIOLATIONS RULES Edition July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 2. Application and Scope... 1 3. Rule Violations... 2 4. Burden and Standard of Proof... 3 5.
More informationContract Disputes How to prevent them; How to deal with them
Contract Disputes How to prevent them; How to deal with them Presentation by Geoff Browne, Victorian Small Business Commissioner to the Victorian Waste Management Association 27 May 2014 Thank you for
More informationACT GAMBLING AND RACING COMMISSION
ACT GAMBLING AND RACING COMMISSION Review of the Gambling and Racing Control (Code of Practice) Regulation 2002 Paper October 2012 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Scope of the Review... 4 3. Requirements
More informationREGULATION OF SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE NSW WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM. Submission to WorkCover March 2011
REGULATION OF SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE NSW WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM Submission to WorkCover March 2011 Executive Summary In many regards, the interests of employers and workers as key stakeholders in
More informationANTI-CORRUPTION (SPORTS BETTING) POLICY. Scottish Target Shooting Federation
ANTI-CORRUPTION (SPORTS BETTING) POLICY Scottish Target Shooting Federation Approved by the STSF Council on: 19/03/2014 Page 1 of 15 CONTENTS Section 1: Section 2: Introduction Sporting Integrity Section
More informationVICTORIAN LOCAL RULES
VICTORIAN LOCAL RULES PART 22: BOOKMAKERS AND BETTING VLR3 The Controlling Body may make determinations relating to Betting, Bookmakers and Clerks. VLR4 A person shall not carry on the business of a bookmaker
More informationCommunity Housing Providers (Adoption of National Law) Bill 2012
Passed by both Houses [] New South Wales Community Housing Providers (Adoption of National Law) Bill 2012 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions
More informationWORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002
1 WORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE Objectives of the legislation To provide for miscellaneous amendments to the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996. Reason for the Bill
More informationHaving stated that, we will now set out below our views in response to the pertinent questions.
Mr. Nigel Wakelin Gambling Team Nyon, 9 November 2011 Subject: EPFL s Response to the Department for Culture Media and Sport's Consultation on the proposed amendments to Schedule 6 of the Gambling Act
More informationProducing a TVC promoting Gambling and Gaming - applicable to interactive gambling, wagering, casinos and gaming machines
INFORMATION SHEET Producing a TVC promoting Gambling and Gaming - applicable to interactive gambling, wagering, casinos and gaming machines Commercials promoting gambling and gaming must comply with the
More informationQuestions raised by deputations
LC Paper No. CB(2)2674/04-05(02) I Questions raised by deputations (1)(a) The Hong Kong Jockey Club (HKJC) has made an assessment of the illegal betting market on the basis of a combination of internal
More informationFOREIGN LAWYERS AND THE PRACTISE OF FOREIGN LAW IN AUSTRALIA
FOREIGN LAWYERS AND THE PRACTISE OF FOREIGN LAW IN AUSTRALIA AN INFORMATION PAPER LAW COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA Disclaimer This information paper has been prepared by the Law Council of Australia with the aim
More information