Taxation of Terminations, Settlements and Judges
|
|
- Paula Ferguson
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2015 YLD Bridge the Gap Seminar Taxation of Terminations, Settlements and Judges 11:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Presented by: David Repp Dickinson Mackaman Tyler & Hagen PC 699 Walnut St. Suite 1600 Des Moines, IA Phone: Thursday, May 14, 2015
2 Taxation of Terminations, Settlements and Judgments by David M. Repp 4/10/2015 Unless specifically exempted, every employer making payment of wages to an employee is required to withhold Federal income taxes and to pay such withheld taxes to the United States Treasury. IRC 3402(a)(1). The term wages is defined as all remuneration for services performed by an employee including the value of remuneration paid in a medium other than cash unless specifically excluded. IRC 3401(a). A similar (but not identical) set of rules apply to FICA withholding. IRC 3101; 3121(a). This article discusses some of the more common forms of compensation paid to a terminating employee and whether such payments are subject to income tax and FICA withholding. Severance Pay. The most common type of payment to a terminated employee is severance pay, which is taxable compensation income. IRC 61; Ramella v. Comr TCM 177. Severance pay is taxable even if, as part of their separation agreements, departing employees sign waivers releasing their former employers from potential future claims, including claims of unlawful discrimination. Webb v. Comr., 1996 TCM 50; Sodoma v. Comr., 1996 TCM 275; Foster v. Comr., 1996 TCM 276. Amounts paid to a terminated employee are compensatory and taxable as severance pay, even where the employer had no legal obligation to make the payments. Schwartz v. Comr., 1989 TCM 97. Severance or dismissal pay is treated as supplemental wages and fully subject to federal income tax withholding. IRC 3402(o); Treas. Reg (a)-1(b)(4). The IRS allows two alternative withholding methods on severance pay: the flat rate method and the aggregate method. IRS Information Letter Optional flat rate withholding method. This method allows an employer to withhold from the severance payment at a flat rate of 25% without regard to the employee's filing status or allowances claimed on Form W-4. An employer may only use this method if it has also withheld income tax from regular wages paid to the employee during the same calendar year as the severance payment, or in the preceding calendar year if the supplemental wages are separately stated on the employer's payroll records. Aggregate method. Under the aggregate method, the employer adds the supplemental and regular wages (if any) for the most recent payroll period in the current year together, and then figures the income tax withholding as if the total were a single payment. This calculation takes into consideration the employee's filing status and withholding allowances. Employers may use this method in any situation where they are paying an employee supplemental wages that do not exceed $1 million in a calendar year. Severance pay is also subject to FICA tax withholding. U.S. Quality Stores, Inc. U.S. 134 S.Ct (2014). The Court, in a unanimous decision, observed that 699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600, Des Moines, IA Phone: Fax:
3 TAXATION OF TERMINATIONS, SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS Page 2 Congress used extremely broad language in defining wages for FICA purposes and that severance payments clearly fall within that definition. There is a certain, limited, exception from FICA tax when severance payments are tied to the receipt of state unemployment benefits. In such case, the payments are exempt from FICA taxation but not income tax withholding. Rev. Rul This would seem to be contrary to the Supreme Court s decision in U.S. Quality Stores, Inc. which held that wages for FICA is defined broadly and includes severance pay. The Court identified this inconsistent treatment by the IRS in Revenue Ruling Consequently, the IRS has been given a green light by the Supreme Court to tax supplemental unemployment benefits for FICA tax purposes if it so desired. Back Pay. Back pay is compensation paid to an individual to compensate him or her for pay he or she would have received up to the time of settlement or court award but for the employer's wrongful conduct. For example, back pay is awarded to an employee if he or she is illegally terminated by an employer, or to an applicant for employment who is not hired for illegal reasons. In most cases, back pay is taxable, subject to FICA and income tax withholding, and must be reported on Form W-2 in the year payment is received (rather than the year payment should have been received). Cleveland Indians Baseball Co. v. U.S. 532 U.S. 200 (2001). Back pay for lost wages received on account of personal physical sickness or physical injury is not subject to FICA and income tax withholding. Anderson v. United States, 929 F.2d 648, 654 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (payments which are excluded from IRC 61 s definition of gross income are not subject to income tax or FICA withholding). In the Eighth Circuit, back pay (and front pay) awarded for an illegal refusal to hire is not subject to FICA and income tax withholding. Newhouse v. McCormick & Co., 157 F.3d 582; 82 AFTR 2d (8 th Cir. 1998) (explaining that no employment relationship existed so character of the payment could not be wages ). However, the back pay is taxable to the recipient and reportable by the payer on Form 1099-MISC, Box 3 Other Income. In every other Circuit, such back pay is subject to FICA and income tax withholding and reportable on Form W-2. Rev. Rul ; see also IRS Publication 957. Front Pay. Front pay is paid to an individual to compensate him or her for pay he or she would have received after the settlement date or court award but for the employer's wrongful conduct and the circumstances e.g., extreme animosity between the employer and employee which make it impracticable to place the employee in the position. Front pay in all Federal Circuit courts except the Fifth Circuit is considered wages subject to FICA and income tax withholding and must be reported on Form W-2. Gerbec v. United States, 164 F.3d 1015, 1026 (6th Cir. 1999); Mayberry v. United States, 151 F.3d 855, 860 (8th Cir. 1998); and Hemelt v. United States, 122 F.3d 204, 209 (4th Cir. 1997). The Fifth Circuit holds that only back pay is subject to FICA and income tax withholding. Dotson v. U.S., (CA ) 78 AFTR 2d ( wages is compensation for services already performed, not for services that will not be performed). However, front pay in the Eighth Circuit is exempt from FICA and income tax withholding when no employment relationship existed. Newhouse v. McCormick & Co., 157 F.3d 582; 82 AFTR 2d 699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600, Des Moines, IA Phone: Fax:
4 TAXATION OF TERMINATIONS, SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS Page (8 th Cir. 1998) Employment Contracts. An amount paid to an employee as consideration for cancellation of an employment contract and relinquishment of contract rights is ordinary income, and wages for purposes of FICA, FUTA, and Federal income tax withholding. Rev. Rul Prior to the issuance of Revenue Ruling , severance payments made to an employee in consideration for early termination of an employment contract was not considered wages or compensation, but ordinary income and not subject to FICA, FUTA or income tax withholding. Rev. Rul ; Rev. Rul ; Rev. Rul Amounts Paid in Settlement of Personal Injury Suits. Damages and other amounts received on account of certain personal injuries or sickness are excludable from the recipient s income. Code Sec. 104(a)(2). This rule applies to amounts received as a result of a lawsuit or the settlement of a lawsuit or under workers compensation acts. In the past, the rule was liberally applied and permitted the exclusion of amounts received on account of nonphysical, tort or tortlike injuries such as emotional distress. However, as a result of a law change, for amounts received after August 20, 1996, and in tax years ending after that date, Code Sec. 104(a)(2) has been amended to provide that the exclusion applies to damages other than punitive damages that are received on account of personal, physical injuries or physical sickness. Code Sec. 104(a)(2), as amended by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (P.L ). In addition, if an action has its origin in a physical injury or physical sickness, then all damages (other than punitive damages) that flow therefrom are treated as payments received on account of physical injury or physical sickness whether or not the recipient of the damages is the injured party. For example, damages (other than punitive) received by an individual on account of a claim for loss of consortium due to the physical injury or physical sickness of such individual s spouse are excludable from gross income. Conf. Rept. to the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (P.L ); PLR (taxpayer s loss of consortium claim excludable resulting from spouse s asbestos-related disease). In addition, damages (other than punitive) received on account of a claim for wrongful death continue to be excludable from taxable income as under prior law. Damages Received on Account of a Nonphysical Injury or Sickness, Such As Age Discrimination or Injury to Reputation, Are Not Excludable From Gross Income. The 1996 amendment to Code Sec. 104(a)(2), in effect, prospectively overturns court decisions which held that damages attributable to nonphysical personal injuries or sickness may be excludable under that section. As under the former rule, the IRS clearly views back pay received in satisfaction of a claim for denial of a promotion due to employment discrimination under Title VII as taxable income because it is not attributable to a personal injury or sickness. Rev. Rul Damages for emotional distress and the physical symptoms of emotional distress may not be treated as damages on account of a personal, physical injury or sickness, except for amounts paid for medical care that is attributable to emotional distress. Code Sec. 104(a), as amended by P.L ; Rev. Rul ; Wells v. Commissioner, TC Memo However, damages for emotional distress and similar nonphysical injuries or sickness remain excludable from a 699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600, Des Moines, IA Phone: Fax:
5 TAXATION OF TERMINATIONS, SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS Page 4 recipient s taxable income to the extent that they are attributable to a physical injury or sickness House Committee Report to P.L Payroll Withholding on Amounts in Settlement of Personal Injury Suits and Nonphysical Injury Suits. Personal injury damages are not wages for purposes of FICA, FUTA and income tax withholding. Anderson v. United States, 929 F.2d 648, 654 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (payments which are excluded from IRC 61 s definition of gross income are not subject to income tax or FICA withholding); I.R.C. 3121(a), 3306(b) and 3401(a) (defining wages subject to withholding as remuneration for employment ). Any other portion of a settlement payment which does not represent wages, such as attorney fees and interest, and even emotional distress, is not subject to payroll taxes, provided the settlement or judgment makes a specific allocation indicating the amount of nonwage payments. Rev. Rul ; TAM (emotional distress payment not subject to employment tax; provides nice summary of FICA and tax withholding rules). If no allocation is made, the Internal Revenue Service will treat the entire payment as wages subject to payroll taxes. Rev. Rul In addition, the emotional distress must be documented and the allocation reasonable. TAM Therefore, if unnecessary payroll taxes are to be avoided, it is crucial that the settlement agreement or judgment clearly indicate how much of the total amount received by the plaintiff constitutes wages subject to withholding and how much represents other types of payments. If the other type of payment is for emotional distress, the emotional distress must be real and not simply fabricated at the time of settlement. TAM The Eighth Circuit recently overruled a long standing IRS rule that an employer has an obligation to withhold income and FICA taxes for employment discrimination even if an employer/employee relationship never existed. Newhouse v. McCormick & Co. 82 AFTR2d (10/2/98, CA8). The taxpayer, Newhouse, worked for McCormick for 23 years before being terminated as a result of outsourcing. He worked for an unrelated employer for five years before applying for a new position at McCormick & Co. but was denied employment due to age discrimination. A district court granted Newhouse a large settlement for lost back pay and front pay. McCormick & Co. withheld income tax and FICA tax on the settlement payments but Newhouse complained and filed suit demanding that McCormick & Co. pay the entire amount. The Eighth Circuit agreed with Newhouse saying that if no employment relationship ever existed, the settlement payments cannot be subject to employment taxes (such as FICA) and income tax withholding. This is contrary to the IRS position set forth in Rev. Rul and in other Circuits, but it is now the law in the Eighth Circuit. Even though the court held that no wage withholding or FICA tax was applicable, settlement payments are still subject to income tax to the recipient. Misclassification of Employment Status Can Result In Large Penalties. Employers that misclassify employees as nonemployees or independent contractors will face substantial financial penalties as the result of not withholding income tax, failing to withhold and pay employment taxes, and failing to file the correct reports and returns with the IRS, Social Security Administration (SSA), and state government agencies. The IRS penalty for unintentionally failing to withhold federal income tax is 1.5% of the wages paid. This assessment is doubled to 699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600, Des Moines, IA Phone: Fax:
6 TAXATION OF TERMINATIONS, SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS Page 5 3% if the employer failed to file an information return (Form 1099-MISC) for the worker with the IRS. The IRS penalty for unintentionally not withholding the employee's share of Social Security and Medicare taxes is 20% of the employee's share of the tax. The penalty is doubled to 40% if the employer failed to file an information return for the worker with the IRS. If an employer intentionally misclassifies the worker as an independent contractor, even after determining that an employer-employee relationship exists, the above penalties do not apply, and the employer is liable for the full amount of federal income tax that should have been withheld, and 100% of the employee's and employer's share of Social Security and Medicare taxes. An employer misclassifying workers will also be subject to state penalties. An employer that misclassified workers as independent contractors may have to retroactively pay employment benefits in addition to employment taxes. In 1996, a federal appeals court held that Microsoft Corporation, which had agreed to reclassify freelancers as employees after an IRS employment tax audit, also had to include the misclassified workers in its 401(k) plan and 423 employee stock purchase plan [Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., CA9, 78 AFTR 2d , 10/3/96]. Dead People's Wages. The Internal Revenue Service has a set of strange and confusing rules for tax withholding on a deceased employee s final paycheck. There are three relevant taxes that need to be managed: Federal income tax withholding, FICA tax withholding and FUTA tax. For Federal income tax withholding, the Internal Revenue Service states that no income tax withholding needs to be made on a deceased employee s final paycheck and the wages should never be reported as taxable income (box 1) on the employee s W-2 Form. Instead, the gross wages are reported on a Form 1099-MISC (box 3, miscellaneous income) issued to the estate of the decedent but only if the wages are $600 or more. In addition to issuing a 1099-MISC to the estate of the deceased employee, an employer is required to withhold, account for and pay FICA (both Social Security and Medicare, if applicable) and FUTA taxes on a deceased employee s final paycheck if the final paycheck is delivered in the same calendar year in which the employee died. In such case, the employee s W-2 Form for the year will include the final paycheck amount as gross wages for Social Security (box 3) and Medicare (box 5) purposes (nothing goes in box 1), subject of course to the Social Security wage limitation. Such inclusion will also increase the decedent s wage base for purposes of computing the surviving spouse s and dependent s survivor benefits for Social Security. If the final paycheck is delivered in a calendar year following the year of death, then no FICA or FUTA taxes need be withheld or paid by the employer. Clearly, this may present some planning opportunities for the employer and the estate. Assuming FICA taxes are substantial, the estate and the employer would be better off to postpone receipt of the decedent s final paycheck until the next calendar year, even though it may slightly reduce Social Security survivor benefits. Such a decision should be joint. If not a joint decision, an employer has an obligation to pay the decedent s last wages upon demand by the decedent s duly appointed executor or administrator. 699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600, Des Moines, IA Phone: Fax:
7 TAXATION OF TERMINATIONS, SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS Page 6 For further information on withholding and payment of taxes from a deceased employee s wages or salary, see Internal Revenue Service Revenue Ruling and instructions to Form W-2. Attorney Fees Paid Out of Judgment or Settlement Award. Until two recent events, plaintiffs receiving taxable judgment or settlement awards would direct the defendant to pay the plaintiff s attorney fees directly to the attorney from the judgment or settlement proceeds. The Second, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits held that attorney fees paid directly to plaintiff s attorney by the defendant was not gross income to the plaintiff. Raymond v. U.S. 91 AFTR 2d (D.C. VT 12/17/2002); Srivastava, Sudhir P. v. Comr, 220 F.3d 353 (5 th Cir. 2000); Clarks, Arthur L Estate v. U.S., 202 F.3d 854 (6 th Cir. 2000); Banaitis v. Comr. 340 F.3d 1074 (9 th Cir. 2003), cert. granted, No (S.Ct. Mar. 29, 2004); Foster, Mattie v. U.S. 106 F. Supp 2d 1234 (DC Ala. 2000). All the other circuit courts and the IRS held that the plaintiff was taxable on the entire judgment or settlement award with an offsetting deduction for the attorney fees. The deduction, however, was limited and in some cases completely unavailable due to the Alternative Minimum Tax. The first event that changed the legal landscape regarding the taxation of judgment or settlement awards was the enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act of The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 provides that in cases of unlawful discrimination a plaintiff s attorney fees and costs may now be deducted by the plaintiff in calculating adjusted gross income (an above-the-line deduction). Codified at IRC 62(a)(20) & (e). The deductions may not exceed the amount includible in income by the plaintiff. Thus, the deduction will apply only in cases of unlawful discrimination in which the plaintiff received an award or a settlement of damages that are taxable to the plaintiff. The deduction would not apply if the damage award or settlement were nontaxable (such as awards on account of a personal injury) and would not apply if the plaintiff were not successful in receiving a damage award or settlement. The second event was a decision issued by the United States Supreme Court on January 25, In Commissioner v. Banks and Banaitis, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), the Court held that attorney fees paid to a plaintiff s attorney is taxable to the plaintiff regardless of whether the plaintiff is or is not entitled to a deduction for the attorney fees. The Court reasoned that the law of agency applies to such cases where the attorney is the agent and the plaintiff is the principal. The attorney, in his capacity as agent, is duty bound to act only in the interests of the principal and so it is appropriate to treat the full amount of the recovery as income to the principal. In summary, in all situations in which a judgment or settlement award is taxable, the plaintiff is required to include in taxable income the full amount of the judgment or settlement award. The plaintiff will then be entitled to an above-the-line deduction for attorney fees if the judgment or settlement award arose due to unlawful discrimination. In all other cases, the plaintiff will be entitled to a below-the-line deduction for attorney fees which may be limited by the alternative minimum tax or otherwise. If the settlement agreement between the plaintiff and defendant requires the defendant to pay the plaintiff s attorney fees directly to the plaintiff s attorney, two Form 1099-MISCs must be generated. The first will report the amount of attorney fees in Box 3, Other Income, and be issued to the plaintiff. The second will report the amount of 699 Walnut Street, Suite 1600, Des Moines, IA Phone: Fax:
8 attorney fees in Box 14 and be issued to the plaintiff s attorney. Treas. Reg (f); W:\DOCS\CLIENT\FIRM\DREPP\ DOC
9 Tax and Reporting Treatment of Judgment/Settlement Payments to Employees (reprinted from Chief Counsel Memorandum PMTA ) Tax and Reporting Treatment of Judgment/Settlement Payments to Employees Payment Character Income Taxable? Wages (FICA and ITW)? Reporting Requirement Back pay (other than Yes Yes 1 W-2 lost wages received on account of personal physical injury or physical sickness) Front pay Yes 2 Yes W-2 Dismissal/severance pay Yes Yes W-2 Compensatory or consequential damages paid on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness Compensatory damages not paid on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness (e.g., emotional distress) Consequential damages not paid on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness Punitive/Liquidated Generally, no Generally, yes No None No 1099-MISC, Box 3 Yes No 1099-MISC, Box 3 Yes No 1099-MISC, Box 3 damages Interest Yes No 1099-INT, Box 1 (if $600 or more) Costs Yes No 1099-MISC, Box 3 Medical expenses Generally, No None no Overtime Yes Yes W-2 Restoration of benefits: Health Premiums, TSP employee and employer contributions, and retirement contributions To be determined To be determined To be determined Taxes employee income tax or employee Yes Yes. See Publication 15-A W-2
10 portion of FICA Travel if requirements No No No of 62(c) (accountable plan) are met Travel if requirements Yes Yes W-2 of 62(c) are not met 1 In the Eighth Circuit, back pay (and front pay) awarded for an illegal refusal to hire is not subject to FICA and income tax withholding. Newhouse v. McCormick & Co., 157 F.3d 582; 82 AFTR 2d (8 th Cir. 1998) (explaining that no employment relationship existed so character of the payment could not be wages ). 2 The Fifth Circuit holds that only back pay is subject to FICA and income tax withholding. Dotson v. U.S., (CA ) 78 AFTR 2d ( wages is compensation for services already performed, not for services that will not be performed). Tax and Reporting Treatment of Attorneys Fees Total Employer Payment Made Jointly to Attorney and Employee: Nature of Payment Income Taxable to employee? Employee Attorney Court award Yes attorneys Attorneys fees Box 14 of 1099 designating fees generally reportable in Box 3 MISC in the amount attorneys fees1 taxable to of 1099-MISC (not W-2). Treas. Reg (f)(1) and (2). of the check payable jointly to employee and attorney. Treas. Reg (a), and (f) Ex. 1. Court award without Yes attorneys The total award is Box 14 of 1099 designation of fees generally reportable, as MISC in the amount attorneys fees taxable to appropriate (on 1099-MISC or W-2). Settlement payment Yes attorneys fees generally taxable to To be determined, based on the nature of the action. If wages, reportable on W-2. If not wages, reportable in Box 3 of 1099MISC. of the check payable jointly to employee and attorney Treas. Reg (a), and (f) Ex. 1. Box 14 of 1099MISC in the amount of the check payable jointly to employee and attorney Treas. Reg (a), and (f) Ex.
11 Separate Employer Payments to Employee, and to Attorney for Attorneys Fees: Nature of Payment Income Taxable to Employee? Employee Attorney Court award Yes attorneys Attorneys fees Box 14 of 1099 designating fees generally reportable in Box 3 MISC to attorney in attorneys fees1 taxable to of 1099-MISC (not W-2) even though paid separately to attorney. Treas. Reg (f)(1) and (2). the amount of check payable to attorney. Treas. Reg (a), and (f) Ex. 3. Court award without Yes attorneys The total award is Box 14 of 1099 designation of fees generally reportable, as MISC to attorney in attorneys fees taxable to Settlement payment Yes attorneys fees generally taxable to appropriate (on 1099-MISC or W-2) even though attorneys fees paid separately to attorney. Treas. Reg (f)(1) and (2). To be determined, based on the nature of the action. If wages, reportable on W-2. If not wages, reportable in Box 3 of 1099MISC. 1 Workers rights statutes, such as Title VII, generally include fee-shifting provisions. Total Employer Payment to Employee: the amount of check payable to attorney. Treas. Reg (a), and (f) Ex. 3. Box 14 of 1099MISC to attorney in the amount of check payable to attorney. Treas. Reg (a), and (f) Ex. 3. Nature of Payment Income Taxable to Employee? Employee Attorney Court award Yes attorneys Attorneys fees None. See, e.g., designating fees generally reportable in Box 3 Treas. Reg. attorneys fees1 taxable to of 1099-MISC (not W-2). Treas. Reg (a), (d)(4), and (f) Ex (f)(1) and (2). Court award without Yes attorneys The total award is None. See, e.g., designation of fees generally reportable, as Treas. Reg. attorneys fees taxable to appropriate (on 1099-MISC or W-2) (a), (d)(4), and (f) Ex. 4.
12 Settlement payment Yes attorneys fees generally taxable to To be determined, based on the nature of the action. If wages, reportable on W-2. If not wages, reportable in Box 3 of 1099MISC. None. See, e.g., Treas. Reg (a), (d)(4), and (f) Ex. 4. Total Employer Payment to Attorney: Nature of Payment Income Taxable to Employee? Employee Attorney Court award under Yes attorneys Attorneys fees Total amount of check fee-shifting statute fees generally reportable in Box 3 reported on 1099 designated as taxable to of 1099-MISC (not MISC, box 14. Treas. attorneys fees1 W-2). Treas. Reg (f)(1) and (2). Reg (a) and (d)(4). Court award Yes attorneys The total award is Total amount of check without fees generally reportable, as reported on 1099 designation of taxable to appropriate (on MISC, box 14. Treas. attorneys fees 1099 or W-2). Reg (a) and (d)(4). Settlement Yes attorneys To be determined, Total amount of check payment fees generally taxable to based on the nature of the action. If wages, reportable on W-2. If not wages, reportable in Box 3 of 1099MISC. 1 Workers rights statutes, such as Title VII, generally include fee-shifting provisions. reported on MISC, box 14. Treas. Reg (a) and (d)(4).
Income and Employment Tax Consequences and Proper Reporting of Employment- Related Judgments and Settlements
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET2:SLHartford FILES-102495-07 UILC: 61.00-00, 3101.00-00, 3111.00-00, 3402.00-00 date: October 22, 2008 to: Lee Patton Deputy Associate Chief Counsel (General Legal Services) Neil Worden
More informationTAX TREATMENT OF RECOVERIES IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES
TAX TREATMENT OF RECOVERIES IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES Committee on Labor & Employment Law AUGUST 2009 THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 42 WEST 44 TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10036 TAX TREATMENT
More informationTAX IMPLICATIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS OF DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT CASES
TAX IMPLICATIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS OF DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT CASES Brian Jorgensen Jones Day 2727 N. Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-3741 bmjorgensen@jonesday.com Stephen Harris Jones Day
More informationISSUES. (1) When are attorney s fees paid by an employer as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee subject to employment taxes?
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Release Number: 20133501F Release Date: 8/30/2013 CC:TEGE:FS:MABAL:MRLenius POSTF-129928-13 Release Number: Release Date: 8/30/2013 date: July
More informationEmployment Tax Considerations for Businesses When Addressing Litigation with Employees or Former Employees
Employment Tax Considerations for Businesses When Addressing Litigation with Employees or Former Employees William Hays Weissman Littler Mendelson, P.C. San Francisco, California It is a common fact of
More informationElizabeth Erickson & Ira B. Mirsky, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP
Tax Consequences of Employment Cases Elizabeth Erickson & Ira B. Mirsky, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employment-related litigation is not only a major business concern it involves substantial tax ramifications
More informationTax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments
Tax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments Dominic L. Daher, MAcc, JD, LLM in Taxation Director of Internal Audit and Tax Compliance Adjunct Professor of Law University of San Francisco Dawn G. Mayer, JD,
More informationSETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS YOU MEAN I HAVE TO PAY TAXES?
SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS YOU MEAN I HAVE TO PAY TAXES? By: Geoffrey N. Taylor, Esq. I. INCOME TO PLAINTIFF A. Distinction between settlements and judgments. B. Basic rule is the origin of claims test.
More informationNotice of Proposed Rules Regarding Employment Taxation of Transfers Incident to Divorce
Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Notice of Proposed Rules Regarding Employment Taxation of Transfers Incident to Divorce Notice 2002-31 I. Overview and Purpose This notice sets
More informationA recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
Daily Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Daily Tax Report, 192 DTR J-1, 10/3/14. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com Tax Audits As the Internal
More informationThe Tax Consequences of Settlement Agreements
COMPENSATION/Compliance The Tax Consequences of Settlement Agreements Compensation & Benefits Review 42(5) 426 431 2010 SAGE Publications Reprints and permission: http://www. sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav
More informationEmployment Article June 8, 2004
Employment Article June 8, 2004 TAX IMPLICATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT SETTLEMENTS AND DAMAGE AWARDS Herman Spence, hspence@rbh.com I. Overview A. No distinction between settlements and judgments. It makes no
More informationFEDERAL INCOME TAX AND PERSONAL INJURY JUDGMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS By Fred A. Simpson 1
FEDERAL INCOME TA AND PERSONAL INJURY JUDGMENTS AND SETTLEMENTS By Fred A. Simpson 1 For eighty years federal law did not impose income tax on damages or settlements on account of personal injuries. 2
More informationDate: February 16, 2001
,QWHUQDO5HYHQXH6HUYLFH Number: 200121031 Release Date: 5/25/2001 Index No.: 104.03-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To: CC:ITA:1 PLR-122136-00
More informationINCOME TAX ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURING ATTORNEY FEES IN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND WORKER S COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS
INCOME TAX ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURING ATTORNEY FEES IN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND WORKER S COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS By John J. Campbell, Esq. Introduction The use of structured settlements to settle third
More informationGUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS
GUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS Office of the State Controller State of Colorado Revised January, 1997 I. Purpose The purpose of this guide is to provide information necessary
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax Stock Option Compensation Warnings for the Unwary Stock options are a popular form of compensation provided to employees of corporations.
More informationThis page left intentionally blank.
This page left intentionally blank. Insert IRS Mission Statement This page left intentionally blank. LAWSUIT AWARDS AND SETTLEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION vii Chapter 1, ISSUES 1-1 Issues for Lawsuit
More information122 T.C. No. 23 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. MARTY J. MEEHAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
122 T.C. No. 23 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARTY J. MEEHAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 219-02L. Filed June 14, 2004. Before the effective date of sec. 6330, I.R.C.,
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200924034 Release Date: 6/12/2009 Index Number: 468B.00-00, 468B.04-01, 468B.07-00, 461.00-00, 162.00-00, 172.00-00, 172.01-00, 172.01-05, 172.06-00 -----------------------
More informationSO YOU THINK YOU VE WON THE TAXATION OF SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS. December 7, 2011
SO YOU THINK YOU VE WON THE TAXATION OF SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS December 7, 2011 Michal E. Yarborough, CPA Carruthers & Roth, P.A. 235 N. Edgeworth Street Post Office Box 540 Greensboro, North Carolina
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TAXATION OF COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES FOR INDIVIDUALS
NOTE: This article was referenced in the June 2005 In Brief in the article entitled, Taxes on Attorney Fees. It is a more detailed explanation of the issues discussed in that article. Our thanks to Philip
More informationLawsuits, Awards, and Settlements Audit Techniques Guide
Lawsuits, Awards, and Settlements Audit Techniques Guide NOTE: This document is not an official pronouncement of the law or the position of the Service and cannot be used, cited, or relied upon as such.
More informationEmployers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims
Employers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims Contributed by: Elizabeth Erickson * & Ira B. Mirsky **, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employee litigation alleging discrimination
More informationIRS Releases MSSP Audit Guide for Lawsuit Awards
IRS Releases MSSP Audit Guide for Lawsuit Awards The Service has released a Market Segment Specialization Program audit guide that contains examination techniques for lawsuit awards and settlements. Document
More informationEmployee Compensation & Employment Taxes
Employee Compensation & Employment Taxes Charles R. Beaudrot, Jr. cbeaudrot@mmmlaw.com (404) 504-7753 Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP 3343 Peachtree Road, NE 1600 Atlanta Financial Center Atlanta, Georgia
More informationThis notice provides that Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 8922, Third-Party
Reporting Sick Pay Paid by Third Parties Notice 2015-6 PURPOSE This notice provides that Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 8922, Third-Party Sick Pay Recap, must be used by third parties and employers
More informationCase 3:13-cv-01238-JPG-PMF Document 18 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-01238-JPG-PMF Document 18 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #78 RICHARD M. O DONNELL, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS v. Case No. 13-cv-1238-JPG-PMF
More informationInternal Revenue Service. Number: 200452027 Release Date: 12/24/2004 Index Number: 61.09-18, 117.02-04, 3121.01-00, 3306.02-00, 3401.
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200452027 Release Date: 12/24/2004 Index Number: 61.09-18, 117.02-04, 3121.01-00, 3306.02-00, 3401.01-00 --------------------------- -------------------------------- ---------------------
More information1 of 5 11/21/2006 2:25 PM
1 of 5 11/21/2006 2:25 PM Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2006-40 October 2, 2006 Notice 2006-83 Individual Chapter 11 Debtors Table of Contents Section 1. PURPOSE Section 2. BACKGROUND AND GENERAL LEGAL PRINCIPLES
More informationROLLOVERS FROM QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLANS AND IRAS: A PRIMER
ROLLOVERS FROM QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLANS AND IRAS: A PRIMER Louis A. Mezzullo Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP Rancho Santa Fe, CA lmezzullo@luce.com (October 21, 2011) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I.
More informationT.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14226-08. Filed November 18, 2010. R determined a deficiency
More informationLeased Employees and Employee Classification
llllcharles C. Shulman, Esq., LLC Employee Benefits, Employment & Executive Compensation Law www.ebeclaw.com www.employeebenefitslaw.info NJ Office & Mailing Address 632 Norfolk St., Teaneck, NJ 07666
More informationTAXATION OF DAMAGE AWARDS: CURRENT LAW AND IMPLICATIONS. Tyler J. Bowles and W. Cris Lewis* Introduction
TAXATION OF DAMAGE AWARDS: CURRENT LAW AND IMPLICATIONS Tyler J. Bowles and W. Cris Lewis* Introduction Congress, as part of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, l has apparently settled the
More informationFederal Income Taxation Chapter 3 Compensation for Losses
Presentation: Federal Income Taxation Chapter 3 Compensation for Losses Professors Wells August 26, 2015 Clark v. Commissioner p.90 Facts: Clark paid $19,941.10 by tax counsel to compensate Clark for consequences
More informationObjectives. Discuss S corp fringe benefits.
S Corporations Objectives Define an S corp. Identify the benefits of being an S corp. Determine how an entity elects to be an S corp. Establish how an S corp is taxed. Describe the S corp shareholder s
More informationThe "Physical" Requirement in IRC 104(a)(2) and Taxable Interest in a Settlement or Judgment
2005 Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. The "Physical" Requirement in IRC 104(a)(2) and Taxable Interest in a Settlement or Judgment Marjorie Suisman, Esq. Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. The Physical Requirements
More informationNotice 2014-21 SECTION 1. PURPOSE
1 Notice 2014-21 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This notice describes how existing general tax principles apply to transactions using virtual currency. The notice provides this guidance in the form of answers to frequently
More informationTax Treatment of Health Care Benefits Provided With Respect to Children Under Age 27
Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Section 105 - Amounts Received Under Accident and Health Plans (Also Sections 106-Contributions by Employers to Accident and Health Plans, 162(l)-
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM Number: 200502040 Release Date: 01/14/2005 Index (UIL) No.: 61.53-00, 79.03-00, 83.05-00 CASE-MIS No.: TAM-144621-03 -------------------------------------
More informationThe Evolution of Taxation of Split Dollar Life Insurance. by Christopher D. Scott. I. Introduction
The Evolution of Taxation of Split Dollar Life Insurance by Christopher D. Scott I. Introduction The federal government recently published final regulations and issued a revenue ruling that changes the
More informationPRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO WORKER CLASSIFICATION FOR FEDERAL TAX PURPOSES
PRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO WORKER CLASSIFICATION FOR FEDERAL TAX PURPOSES Scheduled for a Public Hearing before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON SELECT REVENUE MEASURES and the SUBCOMMITTEE ON INCOME SECURITY
More informationS Corporations General Overview
S Corporations General Overview Richard Furlong Jr. Senior Stakeholder Liaison Define an S Corp An "S corporation" is a an entity that qualifies as a small business corporation that has an S election in
More informationTAX LAW FOR THE LITIGATOR - 2001 UPDATE
CLE & Ski January 14, 2002 Big Sky, Montana TAX LAW FOR THE LITIGATOR - 2001 UPDATE RICHARD M. BASKETT Attorney - CPA Baskett Law Office Suite 234 210 North Higgins Avenue Missoula, Montana 59802 (406)
More informationAgenda. IRS Payroll Tax Audit Initiatives. Auditor of State David Yost 2011 Local Government Official s Conference Employment Tax Update
Auditor of State David Yost 2011 Local Government Official s Conference Employment Tax Update April 7, 2011 Janice M. Zajac, CPA, MBA, MB Agenda IRS Payroll Tax Audit Initiatives Independent Contractors
More informationWorker Classification Federal and Virginia Rules and Programs
Worker Classification Federal and Virginia Rules and Programs Seminar prepared for the Virginia Society of Enrolled Agents (October 2014) by Challengers to IC Classification? 1. Internal Revenue Service
More informationTax Aspects of Litigation Awards and Settlements
Tax Aspects of Litigation Awards and Settlements DAVID SHECHTMAN, ESQUIRE Chairman, Tax Section Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP 123 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 Tel: (215) 772-7314/Fax:
More information1/5/2016. S Corporations. Objectives. Define an S Corp
S Corporations Objectives Define an S corp. Identify the benefits of being an S corp. Determine how an entity elects to be an S corp. Establish how an S corp is taxed. Describe the S corp shareholder s
More information1386 - CLAIMS. Table of Contents
1386 - CLAIMS TC-1 Table of Contents.01 Purpose.02 Objectives.03 Authority.04 Responsibility.05 Definitions.1 Claims Which Must Be Submitted to the General Accounting Office.11 Filing Requirements.12 Statutory
More informationNon-Qualifi ed Fringe Benefi t Planning
Employee benefi t packages are increasingly viewed as an important form of compensation. The right mix of salary and other benefits can attract, and keep, top-quality employees. Non-Qualifi ed Fringe Benefi
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-156 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD W. RAMEY AND JONI J. RAMEY,
More informationTop 10 Tax Developments Impacting Litigation Recoveries By Robert W. Wood
Top 10 Tax Developments Impacting Litigation Recoveries By Robert W. Wood Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood & Porter, San Francisco (www.woodporter.com), and is the author of Taxation of Damage Awards
More informationLost Wages in Personal Injury Awards Are Not Taxable
letter to the editor Lost Wages in Personal Injury Awards Are Not Taxable by Francis J. Carney, Esq. TO THE EDITORS: Mike Deamer s piece in the last Utah Trial Journal on taxation of personal injury settlements
More informationAvoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements
Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements Julie K. Kwon A. Introduction 1. Parties negotiating the resolution of their disputes regarding interests in trusts
More informationAnother Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments
Another Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments idan netser I. Introduction The sale of a company in an M&A transaction often involves consideration to the selling shareholders
More informationHealth Savings Accounts
Health Savings Accounts I. What Are HSAs and Who Can Have Them? What is an HSA? An HSA is a tax-exempt trust or custodial account established exclusively for the purpose of paying qualified medical expenses
More informationInternal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury CC:TEGE:QP2 - PLR-167048-01. Entity E =
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Number: 200301032 Release Date: 01/03/2003 Index No. 106.00-00 457.01-00 403.04-00 457.10-00 Legend Entity E = CC:TEGE:QP2 - September 30, 2002 Dear
More informationTEN WAYS TAXES IMPACT LEGAL FEES
TEN WAYS TAXES IMPACT LEGAL FEES By Robert W. Wood 1 No one likes paying legal fees, but tax deductions make them less painful. For example, if your combined state and federal tax rate is 40%, $10,000
More information1. Whether a shareholder and CEO of a company is subject to tax on the exchange of old
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 20131601F Release Date: 4/19/2013 CC:LB&I:HMT:NEW:1:NConnelly POSTF-123943-11 date: February 19, 2012 to: Angela Nyagu Internal Revenue
More informationThe Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely
Tax Controversy Services IRS Insights In this issue: The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely... 1 The Court of Federal Claims
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Number: 200102004 Release Date: 1/12/2001 CC:IT&A:01/TL-N-2327-00 UILC: 446.04-03 August 14, 2000 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR FROM:
More informationUnderstanding Structured Settlements
ab Understanding Structured Settlements Table of Contents Financial Solutions for Unexpected Events...1 What Is a Structured Settlement? Flexible Payments...2 How Are Structured Settlements Funded?...3
More informationQUALIFIED SETTLEMENT TRUSTS A Useful Tool in Multi-Party Litigation
2005, Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT TRUSTS A Useful Tool in Multi-Party Litigation Marjorie Suisman, Esq. Davis Malm & D Agostine P.C. I. Introduction. A Designated Settlement Fund
More informationYour Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education
Rev. 12/05 Your Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education Summary Plan Description for the General Employees Pension Plan Police Officer s Pension Plan Firefighter s
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200741003 Release Date: 10/12/2007 Index Number: 468B.07-00, 162.00-00, 461.00-00, 461.01-00, 172.01-00, 172.01-05, 172.06-00, 108.01-00, 108.01-01, 108.02-00 -----------------------
More informationINDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR OR EMPLOYEE? TRAINING MATERIALS DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Training 3320-102(10-96) TPDS 84238I
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR OR EMPLOYEE? TRAINING MATERIALS THIS MATERIAL WAS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAY AND FRANCES SEWARDS, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 12-72985 T.C. No. 24080-08
More informationInternal Revenue Service Number: 200702006 Release Date: 1/12/2007 Index Number: 3406.00-00, 6041.03-00, 6041.05-00, 6045.00-00, 6049.
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200702006 Release Date: 1/12/2007 Index Number: 3406.00-00, 6041.03-00, 6041.05-00, 6045.00-00, 6049.01-00 -------------------------------- ------------------------------------
More information2013 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Coralville
2013 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Coralville LITIGATION TRACK Work Comp 101 2:30 pm.-3:30 p.m. Presented by Tim Semelroth RSH Legal 425 Second Street SE, Suite 1140 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 Phone: 319-365-9200
More informationT.C. Memo. 2000-161 UNITED STATES TAX COURT
T.C. Memo. 2000-161 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ESTATE OF KENNETH F. SCHOENEMAN, DECEASED, JOANN METZ AND JAMES J. RILEY, EXECUTORS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15230-97.
More information40.65 DUTY DISABILITY AND SURVIVOR BENEFITS Wisconsin Retirement System ET-5103 (11/2013)
40.65 DUTY DISABILITY AND SURVIVOR BENEFITS Wisconsin Retirement System ET-5103 (11/2013) Table of Contents DUTY DISABILITY BENEFIT What Is A Duty Disability Benefit? 2 Am I Eligible To Apply? 3 Presumptive
More information2012 Regional Forums. Employee Benefits & Employment Taxes. Mark H. Misselbeck, C.P.A., M.S.T. Katz, Nannis + Solomon, P.C.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1. Federal Tax Day - Current, L.1, Code Sec. 119: Meals Provided to Airline Employees While on Duty Were Excluded From Gross Income (CCA 201151020), (Dec. 28, 2011) 2011 Thomson Reuters/RIA.
More informationCOMMENTS Concerning FSA 199926034: FICA Liability for ESPPs
COMMENTS Concerning FSA 199926034: FICA Liability for ESPPs The following comments are the individual views of the members of the Section of Taxation who prepared them and do not represent the position
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 201045005 Release Date: 11/12/2010 Index Number: 162.25-05 ----------------------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
More informationSeptember 11th Victim Compensation Fund Payments Are Tax- Free
September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Payments Are Tax- Free The Service has confirmed that periodic payments from the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund to victims of the terrorist attacks will
More informationNews Release Date: 6/25/12
News Release Date: 6/25/12 Hire Spouse to Work in a Family Business Tax Issue A sole proprietor can deduct health care costs that are paid for an employee as a business expense. By deducting the expenses
More informationStructured Attorney s Fees
STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS Structured Attorney s Fees Preparing for Your Financial Future 7/13 26169-13B Table of Contents Managing Your Retirement... 2 The Power of Tax Deferral... 3 Structured Attorney s
More informationDIVORCE AND LIFE INSURANCE, QUALIFIED PLANS AND IRAS 2013-2015
DIVORCE AND LIFE INSURANCE, QUALIFIED PLANS AND IRAS 2013-2015 I. INTRODUCTION In a divorce, property is generally divided between the spouses. Generally, all assets of the spouses, whether individual,
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE. DEBORAH A. BUTLER ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL (Field Service) CC:DOM:FS
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 June 12, 2000 Number: 200043011 Release Date: 10/27/2000 CC:DOM:FS:FI&P WTA-N-107454-00 UILC: 162.04-03 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Index Number: 61.53-00 and 79-00.00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Number: 200033011 Release Date: 8/18/2000 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To:
More informationPERSONAL INCOME TAX BULLETIN 2005-03
PERSONAL INCOME TAX BULLETIN 2005-03 Issued: October 12, 2005 First Revision: December 22, 2005 Second Revision: September 08, 2006 Deferred Compensation Under Nonqualified Plans Part I. Overview. (a)
More informationPreventing and Managing Independent Contractor Risks
Preventing and Managing Independent Contractor Risks Innovative Tax and Employment Law Strategies to Address Increasing Government and Private Enforcement Threats Charles Hurley (202) 263 3260 Andrew Rosenman
More information4/4/2012. IRS 1099 Reporting of Settlements and Payments to Attorneys
4/4/2012 IRS 1099 Reporting of Settlements and Payments to Attorneys PROGRAM PRESENTED APRIL 10, 2012 1 1 Marianne Couch, JD Cokala Tax Information Reporting Solutions, LLC PO Box 2224 Ann Arbor, MI 48106
More informationHealth Law Update: Health Savings Account Provisions in the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
Health Law Update: Health Savings Account Provisions in the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 This Update summarizes the provisions of the Medicare Prescription Drug,
More informationTOP 10 TAX ISSUES THAT NON-TAX EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS SHOULD KNOW. June 27 30, 2012. Nancy L. Farnam Varnum Law Novi, Michigan
TOP 10 TAX ISSUES THAT NON-TAX EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS SHOULD KNOW I. IRC 409A A. General June 27 30, 2012 Nancy L. Farnam Varnum Law Novi, Michigan 1. If an agreement is subject to IRC 409A, it must be in
More informationHow To Get A Structured Settlement Attorney S Fee Annuity
STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS Structured Attorney s Fees Preparing for Your Financial Future 1/13 26169-13A Table of Contents Planning for the Future by Structuring the Attorney s Fee... 1 Managing Your Retirement...
More informationSoften the blow by providing tax-free fringe benefits to terminated employees
Soften the blow by providing tax-free fringe benefits to terminated employees Kent N. Schneider East Tennessee State University ABSTRACT When laid-off or induced to take early retirement, a former employee
More informationT.C. Memo. 2012-50 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. QUNNIA SHANTEL HATCH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-50 UNITED STATES TAX COURT QUNNIA SHANTEL HATCH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 19685-09. Filed February 23, 2012. Qunnia Shantel Hatch, pro se. Joel
More information26 CFR 1.121-1: Exclusion of gain from sale or exchange of a principal residence. (Also: 61, 165, 691, 1001; 1.61-6, 1.165-1, 1.691(a)-1, 1.1001-1.
Section 121. Exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence 26 CFR 1.121-1: Exclusion of gain from sale or exchange of a principal residence. (Also: 61, 165, 691, 1001; 1.61-6, 1.165-1, 1.691(a)-1,
More informationTAX CONSIDERATIONS BUSINESSES. Marty Verdick
TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES Marty Verdick RSM McGladrey, Inc. Overview of Topics General federal tax issues Federal tax incentives Entity selection tax issues State tax issues Sales & use tax
More information"This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code."
PRIVATE RULING 9131023 "This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code." Dear * * * This is in reply to a letter dated October 30, 1990, and subsequent
More informationStructured Attorney s Fees
STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS Structured Attorney s Fees Preparing for Your Financial Future 6/15 26169-15A Table of Contents Managing Your Retirement... 2 The Power of Tax Deferral... 3 Structured Attorney s
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Number: 200215053 Release Date: 4/12/2002 UIL: 3121.04-00 CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1 WTA-N-115133-01 MEMORANDUM
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax Supplemental Unemployment Benefits Although the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed with Quality Stores 1 and held that regular severance
More informationTaxes. Chapter 5: Financial information. General
Taxes General Although it may be tempting to pay under the table to avoid what seems like reams of paperwork, not to mention the additional costs involved, do not do it! It is illegal and the consequences
More informationUNITED STATES TAX COURT. SARA J. BURNS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Docket No. 11924-04. Filed September 12, 2007.
T.C. Memo. 2007-271 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SARA J. BURNS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 11924-04. Filed September 12, 2007. John W. Sunnen, for petitioner. Erin
More informationEstate Planning With Qualified Plans
Estate Planning With Qualified Plans Gayle Evans A. Introduction Gayle Evans a member of Chinnery Evans & Nail PC, in Lee s Summit, Missouri, as well as DosterUllom, LLC, in Chesterfield, Missouri, has
More informationDiscussion. Incorporated Worksite Employer
Tax Memo Our PEO Company ( BCC ) has developed a professional employer organization ( PEO ) program to provide lower cost health insurance, and other benefits, to small businesses and self-employed individuals.
More informationG. IRC 501(c)(7) ORGANIZATION
G. IRC 501(c)(7) ORGANIZATION 1. Introduction Social and recreational clubs were originally granted exemption in the Revenue Act of 1916. Congress stated that the reason for their exemption was that the
More information