1 COMPENSATION/Compliance The Tax Consequences of Settlement Agreements Compensation & Benefits Review 42(5) SAGE Publications Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav DOI: / Elizabeth Erickson, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, and Ira B. Mirsky, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Abstract Employment-related disputes are a major business concern for many companies. These lawsuits are often brought by former employees and can include wage and hour claims (for missed rest breaks, overtime pay and off-the-clock work), discrimination and/or harassment claims, retaliation claims and wrongful termination claims. Claimed damages can include wage damages (such as lost wages, benefits and severance pay), nonwage damages (such as emotional distress, humiliation and injury to reputation), punitive damages, injunctive relief, statutory penalties, interest and attorneys fees and costs. Companies periodically agree to settle these types of lawsuits and may enter into agreements to make payments to the claimants and/or their lawyers. The tax reporting of settlement payments can be quite complex, and companies making such payments should be aware of approaches to handle some of the most common issues that arise under these settlement agreements and be aware of the recent Internal Revenue Service guidance on handling these issues. Keywords employer, lawsuit, settlement, tax, payments Determining Taxable Amounts Articulating and Allocating Settlement Amounts A company s settlement of a lawsuit should be articulated in a settlement agreement and reflect the company s analysis of its exposure should the claims proceed to trial. Best practices dictate that companies have a policy in place so that every settlement agreement explicitly states the purpose for all payments. For example, where appropriate, such a policy should designate specific amounts as payments in lieu of wages, damages, attorneys fees and so forth. A second useful recommendation is to have the settlement agreement approved by a court, when possible, in an effort to confirm that any allocation of amounts between multiple claims is reasonable. In the absence of such review, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) sometimes argues that the claimant and the taxpayer that settles the claims collude to structure the settlement with the most favorable tax status (i.e., typically with very little allocation to wages). Review and approval by an independent third party will in many cases help negate any adverse inferences by the IRS. If a company does not specifically articulate the purpose for each settlement payment in the settlement agreement, any allocation of amounts between multiple claims generally will be determined by reference to the underlying nature of the claims alleged, as well as to evidence of the parties intent in settling those claims. See, for example, S&B Restaurant v. Comm r, 73 T.C. 1226, 1232 (1980). After-the-fact allocations of lawsuit settlement payments are inherently more susceptible to challenge by the IRS but can be sustained in some cases where there is contemporaneous, extrinsic evidence supporting the allocation, such as attorney notes, settlement offers and counter offers or interrogatory responses. Taxability of Settlement Payments After payments are allocated to specific claims, the next step is to determine whether each type of settlement payment is taxable to the claimant. The determination of the taxability of the payments is important because the settling Corresponding Author: Elizabeth Erickson, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20005, USA
2 Erickson and Mirsky 427 company must file an information return (Form W-2 or Form 1099) for all amounts taxable to the claimant. It is crucial to note that, for settlements of the most common types of claimed damages in lawsuits brought by former employees, it is not unusual for the entire settlement amount to be taxable to the claimant. Taxable payments. The general rule is that settlement amounts paid to a claimant are taxable to the claimant. Carter v. Comm r, 298 F.2d 192, 194 (8th Cir. 1962); Republic Automotive Parts v. Comm r, 68 T.C. 822, (1977). This includes payments made to settle the following types of claims: Salary, wages, back pay, front pay, severance pay, overtime pay Benefits Penalties (unless paid to a governmental entity) 1 Punitive damages and double or treble damages Liquidated damages Compensatory damages Interest, including prejudgment interest and postjudgment interest Loss of enjoyment of life, shame, humiliation, anxiety, worry, loss of self-esteem, injury to reputation and emotional distress (unless accompanied by physical sickness) Attorneys fees and costs Nontaxable payments for physical injury. Internal Revenue Code section provides a limited exception to taxability for certain selected payments made to a claimant in settlement of claims for a physical injury, including the following: Payments for personal physical injury or physical sickness Emotional distress (only when accompanied by physical sickness) Out of pocket medical expenses Attorneys fees and costs associated with the recovery of nontaxable physical injury payments Under Code section 104(a)(2), all damages (other than punitive damages) that flow from a personal physical injury or physical sickness are not taxable to the claimant, including amounts for lost wages/earnings that would otherwise be taxable but for the physical injury. As a result, it is not necessary in these cases to separately state how much of the award represents wages or other damages because no Form W-2 or Form 1099 will be issued to the claimant. Nevertheless, it will be necessary to issue a Form 1099 to the attorney if the check is written in a manner that gives the attorney the right to cash the check (as discussed in more detail below). 3 Injunctive Relief In some cases, a company may settle a lawsuit by agreeing to injunctive relief (i.e., agreeing to perform certain actions or agreeing to stop certain activities). In those cases, and assuming there are no other payments to the claimant, the claimant may not have any taxable income as a result of the settlement unless attorneys fees are also paid. Here again, the payment of attorneys fees may raise additional issues, as discussed below. Attorneys Fees and Costs It is typical in most lawsuits filed against an employer or former employer for the claimant to request the reimbursement of attorneys fees and costs. Accordingly, in settling lawsuits companies may specifically designate an amount to be paid as attorneys fees. These fees may be paid to the claimant, to the lawyer or to the claimant and lawyer jointly. The taxation of attorneys fees has generated much controversy but the general rule is that the payment of attorneys fees is taxable to the claimant regardless of the type of fee arrangement (i.e., flat fee, hourly or contingent) and even if the fees are not paid directly to the claimant. Attorneys fees and costs are generally taxable to the claimant. As a general rule, attorneys fees are taxable to the claimant, even if the claimant owes these amounts to another or the payment is made jointly or separately to the claimant and another person. Treas. Reg (f). The Supreme Court has also specifically held that when a claimant recovers taxable damages and is obligated to pay contingent attorneys fees, those fees are as a general rule included in the taxable income of the claimant. 4 Comm r v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426, 430 (2005); Treas. Reg (f), Examples 1, 3. This is consistent with the idea that when a payment is made to satisfy the obligation of a claimant to a third party, the amount of the payment is generally includible in the claimant s gross income. Even if claimants never actually receive such payments, they receive the benefit of the payment, and the amount is therefore gross income. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Comm r, 279 U.S. 716, (1929). Attorneys fees associated with a physical injury. Just as there is a narrow exception to the general rule that settlement payments are taxable to the claimant unless they compensate the claimant for a physical injury, attorneys fees and costs associated with the recovery of nontaxable physical injury payments also are not taxable to the claimant. Treas. Reg (f), Example 2.
3 428 Compensation & Benefits Review 42(5) Attorneys fees paid under a fee-shifting statute. The law regarding the taxability of attorneys fees paid under a fee-shifting statute is not clear. The Supreme Court in Banks noted that cases involving fee-shifting statutes raise additional issues but declined to address them. 543 U.S. at Some guidance in this area can be found in Sinyard v. Commissioner, 268 F.3d 756, 758 (9th Cir. 2001), aff g T.C. Memo In Sinyard, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Tax Court in holding that statutory attorneys fees awarded under the fee-shifting provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act in an optin class action suit were taxable to the claimant as income. In contrast, in Flannery v. Prentice, 28 P.3d 860, 871 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 2001), the Supreme Court of California examined whether an award made under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, a fee-shifting statute, was the property of the client or the lawyer. Although not a tax case, the court found that, absent proof of an enforceable agreement to the contrary, the attorneys fees belonged to the attorneys who labored to earn them. Unfortunately, a recent memorandum from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel relating to employment-related settlement payments (discussed in more detail below) does not clarify the fee-shifting issue. Because of the uncertainty in the law, the safest course for any company making a settlement agreement is to treat attorneys fees awarded under fee-shifting statutes as taxable to the claimant under the general rule of inclusion. Attorneys fees paid in connection with injunctive relief. As with fee-shifting statutes, the Supreme Court in Banks noted that cases involving injunctive relief raise additional issues but declined to address them. 543 U.S. at The recent memorandum from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel relating to employment-related settlement payments (referred to above and discussed in more detail below) also does not clarify the injunctive relief issue. Here again, with no clear authority on the tax treatment of any attorneys fees paid under these circumstances, the safer course is for companies to treat these attorneys fees as taxable to the claimant under the general rule of inclusion (unless another exception applies). Claimant not liable for attorneys fees. In rare circumstances where the claimant is not liable for the payment of attorneys fees incurred in connection with employment litigation, it is possible that such a payment of attorneys fees may not be includible in the gross income of the claimant. The rationale is that, in this case, the fees are actually expenses of another person or entity rather than expenses of the claimant receiving the judgment or settlement. An example of this type of case is seen in Rev. Rul , C.B. 294 (Situation 3), where a union filed claims on behalf of its members against a company. Subsequently, the union and the company entered into a settlement agreement, later approved by a federal district court, that provided that the company would pay the union $40x dollars in full settlement of all claims. The union paid $6x dollars of the settlement for attorneys fees and returned $34x dollars to the employees for back pay owed to them. The employees had to include in their gross income only the $34x they actually received and did not have to include any part of the $6x attorneys fees. This was because the portion of the settlement paid by the union for attorneys fees was a reimbursement for expenses incurred by the union. Attorneys fees in class actions. Applying the rationale in Rev. Rul to class action lawsuits, the IRS has ruled that legal fees paid directly to class counsel out of a settlement fund are not income to a taxpayer-class member if (a) the taxpayer-class member did not have a separate contingency fee arrangement or retainer agreement with the class counsel and (b) the litigation was an opt-out class action. 5 The IRS relied on the rationale in Rev. Rul that in this circumstance the class member is not liable for the attorneys fees. P.L.R (Mar. 14, 2006). 6 This same reasoning was applied in Eirhart v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, 726 F. Supp. 700, (N.D. Ill. 1989). Here, the court held that separately dep osited funds paid to the optout class members attorneys in settlement of class action claims arising under Title VII did not result in gross income to the class members. Outside these specific factual circumstances, however, the safer course for companies making settlement agreements is to treat attorneys fees paid in class action lawsuits as taxable to the claimant under the general rule of inclusion. Deduction for attorneys fees in certain limited cases. As part of settlement negotiations, it is useful for companies to know that the impact of including attorneys fees in the income of claimants may be mitigated in some cases because Code Sections 62(a)(20) and 62(e) permit an above-the-line deduction for attorneys fees incurred in connection with certain lawsuits. Specifically, Code Section 62(a)(20) permits individuals to deduct attorneys fees paid for claims relating to (a) unlawful discrimination; (b) the enforcement of civil rights; (c) any provision of federal law prohibiting discharge, discrimination or other forms of retaliation or reprisal against an employee for asserting rights or taking actions permitted under federal law (popularly known as whistleblower protection provisions) or (d) any provision of federal, state or local law or common law claims permitted under federal, state or local law providing for the enforcement of civil rights; or regulating any aspect of the employment relationship, including claims for wages, compensation or benefits; or prohibiting the discharge of an employee, the discrimination
4 Erickson and Mirsky 429 against an employee or any other form of retaliation or reprisal against an employee. 7 This above-the-line deduction, while very broad, will not apply in every case. With respect to actions where the above-the-line deduction does not apply, taxpayers may be subject to tax with respect to a portion of any such attorneys fees for which they cannot claim a deduction. Reporting Taxable Amounts to Claimant All payments in excess of $600 that are taxable to the claimant (including attorneys fees) must be reported on either a Form W-2 or Form I.R.C. 6041; Treas. Reg (a). All taxable amounts are reportable to the claimant even if the payments are made to the claimant s attorney. Treas. Reg (f); Treas. Reg (f), Examples 1, 3. If a claimant receives only amounts that are nontaxable, no information reporting to the claimant is required. I.R.C. 104(a)(2); Treas. Reg (f), Example 2. Form W-2 Reporting All payments attributable to wage-related claims must be reported on a Form W-2 issued to the claimant. The company should issue a Form W-2 to the claimant for the total amount of all such payments, even if the check is issued directly to the claimant s attorney (or to the attorney and the claimant jointly), and even if a separate Form 1099 is issued to the claimant s attorney for some or all of the amount. Treas. Reg (a), -1(f), -2; Treas. Reg (f), Examples 1, 3. Only payments attributable to wage claims are reportable on Form W-2. All other taxable payments are reportable on Form For example, both punitive damages and attorneys fees are reportable on Form 1099, not Form W-2. 8 Form 1099 Reporting All taxable nonwage payments, such as punitive damages, liquidated damages, compensatory damages, payments for emotional distress, interest and attorneys fees and legal costs associated with the recovery of taxable amounts, must be reported on a Form 1099 issued to the claimant. See General Instructions for Forms 1099, 1098, 5498, and W-2G (specifically listing attorneys fees and punitive damages among the types of payments to be reported on Form 1099-MISC); Treas. Reg (a)(1)(iii), -1(a)(2). Companies should issue a Form 1099 to the claimant for the total of all such payments, even if the check is issued directly to the claimant s attorney (or to the attorney and the claimant jointly) and even if a separate Form 1099 is issued to the claimant s attorney for some or all of the amount. Treas. Reg (a), -1(f), -2; Treas. Reg (f), Examples 1, 3. In summary, the total amount reported on the Form W-2 issued to the claimant and the total amount reported on the Form 1099 issued to the claimant should equal the total amount of payments taxable to the claimant. Reporting to Claimant s Attorney General Requirements Once a company determines its reporting obligations to the claimant, the company must also determine its reporting obligations to the claimant s attorney. Treas. Reg (a)(1)(iii) states that: a person who, in the course of a trade or business, pays $600 of taxable damages to a claimant by paying that amount to the claimant s attorney is req uired to file an information return under Section 6041 with respect to the claimant, as well as another information return under Section 6045(f) with respect to the claimant s attorney. The company should therefore issue a Form to the attorney for the full amount of the check, whenever the check is written in a manner that gives the attorney the right to cash the check. This applies even if the check is for more than just attorneys fees and even if the entire amount or some of the amount is not taxable to the claimant. Treas. Reg (f), Examples 1-3. In addition, these rules do not vary depending on the nature of the underlying lawsuit. Thus, if the attorney has the authority to cash the check, a Form 1099 must be issued to the attorney in the settlement of class action lawsuits, fee shifting cases, injunctive relief situations and so forth. As a result of this rule, in some circumstances a company will be required to issue two Forms 1099 for the same amount one to the claimant and one to the attorney. Therefore, the company might be required to issue Form 1099 for more than the total settlement amount. For example, in addition to the reporting requirements relating to the claimant: If the check is written only to the attorney, a Form 1099 must be issued to the attorney in the full amount. Treas. Reg (a). If the check is written to both the attorney and the claimant, a Form 1099 must be issued to the attorney in the full amount. Treas. Reg (f), Example 1.
5 430 Compensation & Benefits Review 42(5) If the check is written to the attorney s client trust fund, a Form 1099 must be issued to the attorney in the full amount. Treas. Reg (d)(4). Specific Circumstances The attorney is not a payee when the attorney s name is included on the payee line as in care of, as, for example, a check written to client, c/o attorney or when the check is written in any other manner that does not give the attorney the right to negotiate the check. Treas. Reg (d)(4). The attorney is also not a payee if the check is written only to the claimant but delivered to the attorney. Treas. Reg (f), Example 4. The attorney does not need a Form 1099 if the check is written only to the claimant even if the settlement agreement designates part of the settlement amount as a payment for attorneys fees or the claimant ends up paying the attorney a portion of the settlement amount. Treas. Reg (f), Example 4. If more than one attorney is listed as a payee on the check, settling companies should issue a Form 1099 to only the attorney to whom the check is delivered for the entire amount of the check. If the check is delivered to a nonpayee or a payee nonattorney, a Form 1099 must be filed by the company to the first-listed payee attorney on the check. That attorney (to whom the company issues the Form 1099) must then file Forms 1099 for any payments made to other payee attorneys. Treas. Reg (b)(1) and (2); Treas. Reg (f), Example 5. IRS Office of Chief Counsel Memorandum As this discussion has shown, the complexities of tax issues in settlement payments are considerable. In an attempt to provide practical guidance on these issues, the IRS Office of Chief Counsel produced an internal memorandum dated October 22, 2008 (but released only in July 2009). See Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum ( IRS Counsel Memorandum ), dated October 22, 2008, UILC: , , , , Income and Employment Tax Consequences and Proper Reporting of Employment-Related Judgments and Settlements. The IRS Counsel Memorandum outlines both the income and employment tax consequences, as well as the appropriate reporting, of employment-related settlement payments and contains useful information for companies settling employment-related lawsuits. The IRS Counsel Memorandum sets forth a fourstep process for determining the correct treatment of employment-related settlement payments. First, the taxpayer should determine the character of the payment being made and the nature of the claim giving rise to the payment. Second, the taxpayer should determine whether the payment is taxable to the claimant (i.e., an item of gross income). Third, the taxpayer should determine whether the payment is wages. Fourth, the taxpayer should determine the appropriate tax reporting for the payment, whether it is on IRS Form 1099-MISC or Form W-2. The issues to consider in the four-step process have been discussed at length in this article. Although helpful, the IRS Counsel Memorandum is not a comprehensive one-stop-shopping guide to determining the correct tax treatment of employment-related settlement payments. Notably absent is guidance relating to the following: The implications surrounding employment-related settlement payments for physical injury (since the IRS Counsel Memorandum presumes such payments are unlikely to exist) The implications of settling a lawsuit by agreeing to perform certain actions or agreeing to stop certain activities (i.e., injunctive relief) The implications surrounding class action lawsuits (including the payment of attorneys fees) The implications of using qualified settlement funds in conjunction with making employmentrelated settlement payments The IRS Counsel Memorandum also is not a wellbalanced discussion of the authorities, because it fails to acknowledge the indications by the Supreme Court in Banks that attorneys fees awarded pursuant to a feeshifting statute might not be taxable to a claimant. The Banks decision leads to the practice point of clearly documenting either the allocation of a portion of a courtordered judgment to statutory attorneys fees or expressly documenting in the terms of a settlement agreement that an amount paid to the claimant s attorney was in lieu of statutory fees. In addition, the IRS Counsel Memorandum only superficially addresses the nuances surrounding the tax information reporting for attorneys fees, particularly if a company is required to issue two Forms 1099-MISC (one to the claimant and one to the attorney), or if it is required to issue Forms 1099-MISC totaling more than the amount of the judgment or settlement actually received by the claimant. Finally, the Memorandum offers no definitive help in resolving the unclear issues when a judgment or settlement payment includes multiple elements, each of which may or may not be wages.
6 Erickson and Mirsky 431 It is uncertain whether the IRS will issue future clarification on these issues. However, employers who may develop their own guidelines for dealing with settlement tax issues should continue to be alert for any changes in IRS positions on the issues discussed here, particularly the volatile issue of attorneys fees. Given the likelihood that the number of employment-related lawsuits will continue to increase (the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported that in 2008 it received more than 95,000 claims alleging discrimination for age, race, religion, gender or other reasons, up 15% from the year before and the most since the agency was formed in 1965), it seems reasonable to suppose that new matters arising in litigation will require future agency clarification on tax issues. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article. Notes 1. If, as part of a settlement, a company makes a payment of fines or penalties to a governmental entity, those payments will not be taxable income to the claimant. In addition, such payments may not be deductible by the company. I.R.C. 162(f); Treas. Reg (b)(1)(iii). 2. Code references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, unless otherwise noted. 3. Code section 104(a)(2) excludes from gross income the amount of damages received (whether by suit or agreement) on account of physical injury or sickness. The current regulations under section 104(a)(2) (and controlling guidance at the time that both the IRS memorandum and this article were written) explain that damages received (whether by suit or agreement) generally means an amount received through a legal judgment or award based upon tort or tort type rights, or a settlement agreement in lieu of such a lawsuit. Treas. Reg (c). On September 15, 2009, the IRS proposed amendments to the regulations that would eliminate the so-called tort type rights test, so that damages received for physical injuries may qualify for the exclusion from gross income under Section 104(a)(2), even though the nature of the injury or the scope of remedies available under state or common law are not defined as a tort. REG Fed. Reg. Vol. 74, No. 177, p (September 15, 2009). 4. Although attorney fees may be taxable income to the claimant (and reportable on a Form 1099), they are not wages and are not subject to FICA/Medicare tax withholding. Rev. Rul , C.B In opt out class action lawsuits, potential class members generally do not need to take any action to be considered part of the class. A class member does, however, have the right and power to affirmatively exclude himself from the class. 6. Because attorney fees paid under the specific fact pattern described above will not be income to the class members, companies will not have reporting requirements to the class members for these fees. However, such companies should issue a Form 1099 to class counsel if the check is written in a manner that gives the class counsel the right to cash the check. 7. See I.R.C. 62(a)(20), 62(e) for a complete list of enumerated claims. 8. See Rev. Rul , C.B All information reporting to a claimant s attorney is made on Form The company should not issue a Form W-2 to the claimant s attorney, even if part of the settlement is for wage-related claims. See generally the Code and Regulations under 6041 and Bios Elizabeth Erickson is a partner in the Tax Department of McDermott Will & Emery LLP s Washington, D.C., office. She focuses on tax controversies, including tax litigation, with significant experience in disputes before the U.S. Tax Court, U.S. District Courts, the Internal Revenue Service Appeals and Examination Divisions and the Internal Revenue Service National Office. Ira B. Mirsky is a partner in the Employee Benefits Department of McDermott Will & Emery LLP s Washington, D.C., office. He focuses on tax controversy matters related to employee compensation, fringe and welfare benefits, deferred compensation arrangements and employment tax and information reporting issues in general.
Employers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims Contributed by: Elizabeth Erickson * & Ira B. Mirsky **, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employee litigation alleging discrimination
Tax Consequences of Employment Cases Elizabeth Erickson & Ira B. Mirsky, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employment-related litigation is not only a major business concern it involves substantial tax ramifications
Employment Tax Considerations for Businesses When Addressing Litigation with Employees or Former Employees William Hays Weissman Littler Mendelson, P.C. San Francisco, California It is a common fact of
TAX TREATMENT OF RECOVERIES IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES Committee on Labor & Employment Law AUGUST 2009 THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK 42 WEST 44 TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10036 TAX TREATMENT
Tax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments Dominic L. Daher, MAcc, JD, LLM in Taxation Director of Internal Audit and Tax Compliance Adjunct Professor of Law University of San Francisco Dawn G. Mayer, JD,
TAX IMPLICATIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPACTS OF DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT CASES Brian Jorgensen Jones Day 2727 N. Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 969-3741 email@example.com Stephen Harris Jones Day
2015 YLD Bridge the Gap Seminar Taxation of Terminations, Settlements and Judges 11:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Presented by: David Repp Dickinson Mackaman Tyler & Hagen PC 699 Walnut St. Suite 1600 Des Moines,
SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS YOU MEAN I HAVE TO PAY TAXES? By: Geoffrey N. Taylor, Esq. I. INCOME TO PLAINTIFF A. Distinction between settlements and judgments. B. Basic rule is the origin of claims test.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-156 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD W. RAMEY AND JONI J. RAMEY,
,QWHUQDO5HYHQXH6HUYLFH Number: 200121031 Release Date: 5/25/2001 Index No.: 104.03-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To: CC:ITA:1 PLR-122136-00
Daily Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Daily Tax Report, 192 DTR J-1, 10/3/14. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com Tax Audits As the Internal
GUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS Office of the State Controller State of Colorado Revised January, 1997 I. Purpose The purpose of this guide is to provide information necessary
INCOME TAX ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURING ATTORNEY FEES IN THIRD PARTY LIABILITY AND WORKER S COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS By John J. Campbell, Esq. Introduction The use of structured settlements to settle third
APPEALS INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATED ISSUE PAPER ISSUE: INDUSTRY: COORDINATOR: MINING INDUSTRY WHETHER COSTS INCURRED DURING A STRIKE ARE DEDUCTIBLE FROM GROSS INCOME FROM THE PROPERTY FOR
Top 10 Tax Developments Impacting Litigation Recoveries By Robert W. Wood Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood & Porter, San Francisco (www.woodporter.com), and is the author of Taxation of Damage Awards
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled
DEDUCTIBILITY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES: HALF A LOAF? 1 by Robert W. Wood It is now well-known that most lawsuit proceeds received by way of settlement or judgment represent taxable income. Logic suggests that
2005, Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT TRUSTS A Useful Tool in Multi-Party Litigation Marjorie Suisman, Esq. Davis Malm & D Agostine P.C. I. Introduction. A Designated Settlement Fund
Case 3:13-cv-01238-JPG-PMF Document 18 Filed 10/21/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #78 RICHARD M. O DONNELL, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS v. Case No. 13-cv-1238-JPG-PMF
letter to the editor Lost Wages in Personal Injury Awards Are Not Taxable by Francis J. Carney, Esq. TO THE EDITORS: Mike Deamer s piece in the last Utah Trial Journal on taxation of personal injury settlements
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax Stock Option Compensation Warnings for the Unwary Stock options are a popular form of compensation provided to employees of corporations.
NOTE: This article was referenced in the June 2005 In Brief in the article entitled, Taxes on Attorney Fees. It is a more detailed explanation of the issues discussed in that article. Our thanks to Philip
Is THE CONTINGENT LEGAL FEE TAX CONTROVERSY OVER?* Richard Mason** I. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of the United States recently ruled 8 to 01 that where a litigant's recovery constitutes income under
THE GEORGIA NON-PROFIT AND LAWS PREVENTING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT By: Benjamin D. Briggs Anna C. Curry TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 600 Peachtree Street NE Bank of America Plaza, Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia
District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 September 22, 1999 Number: 199952011 Release Date: 12/30/1999 CC:DOM:FS:FI&P TL-N-2896-99 UILC: 832.06-02 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
T.C. Memo. 2012-71 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SALVADOR F. NERI AND GUADALUPE NERI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20420-09. Filed March 15, 2012. 1. Held: Ps have failed
CHAPTER 1 Martin J. O Leary Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance The following is a brief, general overview of coverage afforded under the Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
Blaney + AMT = Opportunities? by Herman Wacker and Monna Lux CPA 1 The October, 2002 Blaney decision by Division I of the Court of Appeals added much complexity to the already problematic issue of assessing
SO YOU THINK YOU VE WON THE TAXATION OF SETTLEMENTS AND JUDGMENTS December 7, 2011 Michal E. Yarborough, CPA Carruthers & Roth, P.A. 235 N. Edgeworth Street Post Office Box 540 Greensboro, North Carolina
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
141 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KATHLEEN S. SIMPSON AND GEORGE T. SIMPSON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 26619-11. Filed October 28, 2013. P-W sued E, her
U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store
ENDORSEMENT NO: This endorsement, effective 12:01 am, policy number forms part of issued to: by: THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION John Gatti For various non-tax reasons, the use of entities that are taxed as partnerships including limited liability companies,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO Lori Davis, Michelle Smith and Paul Stockman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public,
Employment Practices Liability Coverage Part In consideration of the payment of the premium and subject to all terms, conditions and limitations of this Coverage Part and the General Terms and Conditions
Settling a False Claims Act Case: Practicalities and Pitfalls Brian A. Hill firstname.lastname@example.org Jeffrey M. Hahn email@example.com Overview Because the vast majority of FCA cases are settled, every FCA practitioner
Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements Julie K. Kwon A. Introduction 1. Parties negotiating the resolution of their disputes regarding interests in trusts
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Ilya Zaydenberg v. Crocs Retail, Inc., et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC554214; Christopher S. DuRee, et al. v.
March 2011 New York s New Wage Theft Law: What It Means, and What To Do Now BY ALLAN S. BLOOM & REBECCA E. RAISER The New York Wage Theft Prevention Act (the WTPA ) takes effect on April 9, 2011. The new
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
TAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES I. Introduction By Bruce A. Emard 1 California taxes liquidation sales of tangible personal property (TPP) under its Sales and Use Tax Law (the Sales and Use Tax Law
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin
Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to comply with the requirements in Section 6032 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (the DRA ), which amends Section 1902(a) of the Social Security
Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS, INC., in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. CF-2102 (Ed. 9-15) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE PART ENDORSEMENT THIS ENDORSEMENT PROVIDES CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED COVERAGE.
Income Tax Considerations In Settlements And Judgments (With Sample Provisions And Drafting Checklists) Mickey R. Davis Mickey R. Davis is a partner in the Houston law firm of Bracewell and Giuliani LLP.
POLICY NUMBER: CL CG 04 57 07 09 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYMENT-RELATED PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the
SETTLING CASES AND TAXES WILLIAM A. ROBERTS The Roberts Law Firm (972) 661-1040 firstname.lastname@example.org State Bar of Texas 28 TH ANNUAL ADVANCED CIVIL TRIAL COURSE August 31 September 2, 2005 - Austin
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Number: 200102004 Release Date: 1/12/2001 CC:IT&A:01/TL-N-2327-00 UILC: 446.04-03 August 14, 2000 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR FROM:
1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200442011 Release Date: 10/15/2004 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Index Number: 382.12-08, 468B.02-00 ---------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING This notice relates to the proposed settlement of a class and collective action lawsuit against First
SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Separation Agreement and General Release ( this Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the Agency ) (collectively, the Parties
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 June 12, 2000 Number: 200043011 Release Date: 10/27/2000 CC:DOM:FS:FI&P WTA-N-107454-00 UILC: 162.04-03 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEHZAD MOUSAI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, CLASS/COLLECTIVE ACTION Case No. C 06-01993 SI NOTICE
T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14226-08. Filed November 18, 2010. R determined a deficiency
Lawsuits, Awards, and Settlements Audit Techniques Guide NOTE: This document is not an official pronouncement of the law or the position of the Service and cannot be used, cited, or relied upon as such.
Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,
Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these
VOL. 34, NO. 4 SPRING 2009 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L Split Circuits Does Charging Party s Receipt of a Right-to-Sue Letter and Commencement of a Lawsuit Divest the EEOC of its Investigative
Litigation Costs in Contingent Fee Contracts - Loans or Business Expenses An Update By Daniel L. Britt, Jr., and Christopher Eastwood 1 January 31, 2012 Risk is endemic to any business enterprise; none,
When Is a Partner a Partner For New York Tax Purposes? by Peter L. Faber Peter L. Faber is a partner with McDermott Will & Emery LLP, New York. A New York administrative law judge has held that a lawyer
G Department of Energy No. AL 2014-03 Acquisition Regulation January 6, 2014 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Senior Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA.
This page left intentionally blank. Insert IRS Mission Statement This page left intentionally blank. LAWSUIT AWARDS AND SETTLEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION vii Chapter 1, ISSUES 1-1 Issues for Lawsuit
Undocumented Workers Employment Rights YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS 1. What legal rights do I have as an undocumented worker? With a few exceptions, undocumented workers enjoy the legal rights and remedies provided
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 20141002F Release Date: 3/7/2014 CC:LB&I:CTM: ----:---------- POSTF-148188-13 date: January 28, 2014 to: ---------------, Team Manager,
The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part In consideration of the payment of the premium and subject to the General Terms and Conditions, the Insurer and the Insureds agree as follows:
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.
USING IRC 7430(g) AS A STRATEGIC LITIGATION TOOL I. Internal Revenue Code ( IRC ) 7430 grants taxpayers the right to recover costs, including fees of experts and attorneys, paid or incurred in connection
ARTICLE 30 Life Insurance in Qualified Defined Contribution Plans By Elizabeth A. LaCombe At first blush, offering life insurance in a qualified defined contribution plan sounds like a cost efficient way
In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insureds agree as follows: I. INSURING
IRS Releases MSSP Audit Guide for Lawsuit Awards The Service has released a Market Segment Specialization Program audit guide that contains examination techniques for lawsuit awards and settlements. Document
Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02) This memorandum addresses the California and federal law protections that exist to shield volunteer directors of nonprofit corporations
4/4/2012 IRS 1099 Reporting of Settlements and Payments to Attorneys PROGRAM PRESENTED APRIL 10, 2012 1 1 Marianne Couch, JD Cokala Tax Information Reporting Solutions, LLC PO Box 2224 Ann Arbor, MI 48106
Tax Controversy Services IRS Insights In this issue: The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely... 1 The Court of Federal Claims
T.C. Memo. 2015-178 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GARY WAYNE RODRIGUES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 27277-11L. Filed September 10, 2015. Gary Wayne Rodrigues, pro se.
T.C. Memo. 2015-26 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION B. SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent RICHARD E. SNYDER AND MARION SNYDER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
FIDUCIARY LIABILITY COVERAGE PART I. INSURING AGREEMENTS Fiduciary Liability The Insurer shall pay Loss on behalf of the Insureds resulting from a Fiduciary Claim first made against the Insureds during
STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS Structured Attorney s Fees Preparing for Your Financial Future 7/13 26169-13B Table of Contents Managing Your Retirement... 2 The Power of Tax Deferral... 3 Structured Attorney s