Building a Dynamic Infrastructure with IBM Power Systems: A Closer Look at Private Cloud TCO
|
|
- Junior Atkins
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Building a Dynamic Infrastructure with IBM Power Systems: A Closer Look at Private Cloud TCO Scott A. Bain Fehmina Merchant Bob Minns John J Thomas IBM SWG Competitive Project Office March, 2010
2 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Executive Summary... 3 A Virtuous Circle to Reduce IT Costs... 4 Take Cost Out Through Virtualization... 5 Labor and the Server Provisioning Lifecycle...10 Standardization Helps Lower Labor Costs...14 Automation Can Help Lower Labor Costs Even Further!...17 Putting It All Together...21 Summary...23 Page 2 of 24
3 Executive Summary Many companies are finding their need for greater business agility being frustrated by an increasingly costly and rigid IT infrastructure. The culprits are many. Maintenance of the current environment accounts for over 70% of the IT budget, leaving less than 30% available for new projects. Annual operational costs (power, cooling, and labor) of distributed systems and networking exceed their acquisition cost by 2-3X and continue to climb. Utilization rates of these commodity servers hover around 5-15% on average, leading to excess capacity going to waste. Time to provision new servers can be as long as six months, hampering lines-of-business efforts to quickly respond to competitive threats or new opportunities. As a result, LOB units are beginning to go outside the datacenter to public cloud providers like Amazon in hopes of lowering their costs and improving their responsiveness. To avoid disintermediation, IT needs to re-invent the datacenter by moving towards a more dynamic infrastructure. One that takes out cost through the use of virtualization to improve utilization levels with a commensurate reduction in power consumption. One that embraces a private cloud model that uses standardized workloads and service automation to dynamically provision IT services in minutes/hours rather than months (and at lower cost) via self-service portals. Customers can build such an environment using IBM s Power Systems servers coupled with Tivoli service management software. This paper examines the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for a dynamic infrastructure built around private cloud services and compares it to public cloud alternatives as well as conventional one-application-perdistributed server models. The results show that private cloud implementations built around new POWER7 based servers can be up to 90% less expensive than public cloud options over a three year period and over 70% less than a distributed stand-alone server approach. Page 3 of 24
4 A Virtuous Circle to Reduce IT Costs Figure 1 depicts a three-pronged approach to how customers can reduce their overall IT costs through the implementation of a dynamic infrastructure built on virtualization, standardization, and automation. A Virtuous Circle To Reduce I/T Costs Reduce Labor Costs Improve Service Automate Reduce Hardware, Software, Power, and Labor Costs Reduce Labor Costs Enable Automation Virtualize Standardize Figure 1 Although enterprise usage of these three approaches is expected to rise to 50% by 2012, adoption thus far has been limited to around 12% 1. One of the reasons for the tepid adoption rate so far has been an inability to quantify the impact these capabilities have on reducing IT costs. Customers want a better understanding of the savings they can anticipate through the application of these technologies before committing resources to their implementation. To that end, the rest of this paper takes a look at each approach in more detail and provides some guidelines on how customers can go about estimating cost savings for their own company. 1 Internal IBM Cloud study 2009 Page 4 of 24
5 Take Cost Out Through Virtualization A recent IBM internal study of its nearly 4000 distributed servers showed annual operational costs attributed to each server to be over $34,000, with almost 90% due to software maintenance and systems administration. It stands to reason that reducing the number of physical servers to fewer, larger, more capable machines can serve to greatly reduce these costs. Indeed, the virtues of virtualization to accomplish this have been well-publicized. What has proven to be more elusive, however, is the quantification of these benefits. How many workloads can actually be consolidated onto a given platform while maintaining acceptable service level agreements? Which platform gives you the greatest economy of scale, producing the lowest cost per virtual machine image/workload? To answer this question, the CPO evaluated three different alternatives for running 75 heavy Linux workloads as shown in Figure 2 below: Dynamic Infrastructure - Compare Options For Deploying Heavy Workloads Which platform provides the lowest TCA over 3 years? Buy standalone servers 75 Linux Workloads IBM WebSphere Application Server Online banking workloads, each driving 745 transactions per second Public Cloud Private Cloud Rent virtual servers Buy POWER 7 servers and provision your own virtual servers (Power/VM) Figure 2 The workload in question was an online banking application built using IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) and requiring an average throughput of 745 transactions per second. We first ran this workload on a stand-alone, 8-core Intel server (Xeon 5500 or Nehalem processors at 2.93 GHz), which resulted in an average utilization of 12%. A VM image of the online banking application was then created to see how many images could be placed on a Power 750 server (32-cores). Multiple running Page 5 of 24
6 instances of this VM image were added incrementally to the servers until it could no longer handle any additional throughput. It should be noted, however, that this approach drives the machine to 100% utilization with no consideration of workload variation. In practice, real world workloads have variability in demand. This variability has an effect on what CPU utilization can be tolerated on the target virtualization platform. Ideally, you want to be able to run utilization levels high enough to achieve the highest consolidation ratio, but still keep it less than 100% to allow for peaks caused by this variance in workload demand. One way to gauge the impact of workload variability on consolidation ratios is to use statistical models. If we were to track average utilization over time of workloads with varying demand, the results would tend to exhibit a bell curve type distribution pattern as shown below. Theory tells us that 95% of all values fall within two standard deviations from the mean. Thus, if we had a Service Level Agreement (SLA) that called for us to be able to handle 95% of all workload demand that occurs on the system over a given time period, we would need to size a machine with a capacity of the mean + two times the standard deviation (sigma). Statistical Models Can Be Used To Account For Workload Variability Mean 3 σ 3 standard deviations from the mean Approximately 97.7% of all values are less than this 2 σ 2 standard deviations from the mean Approximately 95% of all values are less than this To meet an SLA that requires 95% of the workload be run satisfactorily, we need a server with capacity M+2σ. In this case, Mean Utilization = M/(M+2σ) Figure 3 Based on an IBM internal survey of workload variability of over 3200 distributed servers, the standard deviation or sigma for our class of workload is approximately 2.5 times the mean. This suggests that for a single workload, our server should be able to handle 12% + 2(2.5 * 12%) or 72% peak utilization, easily within the SLA requirement of 95%. But what happens when you combine workloads? It turns out that when you aggregate workloads with variable demand, the overall variability of the combined workloads gets smaller. This phenomenon is often referred to as the Central Limit Theorem. We further observe that when we pool n workloads, the additional capacity required to handle the variations does not go up Page 6 of 24
7 by n, it goes up only by the square root of (n). For example, when you combine four workloads of roughly equal size, you only need a server capable of handling 3.5 times the average demand or utilization. Combining 16 workloads results in needing only 2.25 times the mean, whereas if you consolidate 144 workloads, you would only need 1.42 times the mean. Thus, larger machines capable of accommodating more workloads can run at higher utilization levels than smaller ones. When we apply an SLA of 95% to our benchmark data, the maximum number of VM images that can be supported on our 32-core Power 750 server is 24 (Figure 4). As a result, we would need up to four Power 750 servers and two Power 770 (64-core) systems to handle our 75 workloads. Consolidation Ratio For Power 750 P750 Friendly Bank 32 cps 12% Nehalem Workload %TOT Machine Utilization 94.96% x M Utilization Peak utilization for n workloads LPARS 24 VMs = M(1 + (2*Sigma)/M* n ) Figure 4 If we were to try and add more than one of our 12% heavy workloads onto a hypervisor-enabled version of this same 8-core Intel server, the statistical model shows that you wouldn t be able to do so without violating the SLA. By combining just two workloads, the overall demand placed on the server would exceed 109%. Had we used smaller, more lighter-weight workloads, then a virtualized x86 server would likely have been a viable option. It is also important to note that these consolidation ratios assume flat-out operation. In practice, not all servers/images are used all the time. Experience from customers and public cloud providers have shown typical usage patterns of 14 hours per day (59%). This means in theory, we should be able to reduce our virtualized hardware requirements by 1.7X in order to support our 75 workloads. Applying this factor to our Power Systems configurations means we only need two Power 750 servers and one Power 770 server as shown in Figure 5. Page 7 of 24
8 Compare Options For Deploying Heavy Workloads Which platform provides the lowest TCA over 3 years? Requirements Buy 75 8-core Intel Nehalem servers 75 Workloads IBM WebSphere Application Server Online banking workloads, each driving 745 transactions per second 600 cores 45 LPARs 45 LPARs Public Cloud 64 cores 64 cores Rent 225 of the largest compute instances 2 Buy 4 32-way Power 750 (3.55GHz) servers 1 Buy 2 64-way Power 770 (3.1GHz) server Figure 5 In selecting the appropriate compute instance size required to handle our workload, we found that we would need to cluster three of the largest instances available from a leading public cloud provider in order to match the performance we achieved with a single 8-core Intel server. As a result, this drove the total number of paid compute instances needed up to 225 (75 x 3). When you look at the four options from a Total Cost of Acquisition (TCA) perspective, the Power Systems servers are the lowest cost alternative, around 70% lower than the stand-alone servers and one-tenth the cost of the public cloud option (Figure 6): Page 8 of 24
9 Hardware And Software Costs Per Image for Linux Workloads (3 Yr TCO) Cost per Workload/Image (USD) $167K Software $62.3K Buy Standalone Servers Public Cloud $16.0K Private Cloud p750 Hardware/Compute Instance $20.0K Private Cloud p770 Figure 6 Page 9 of 24
10 Labor and the Server Provisioning Lifecycle Now that we have a handle on the impact of virtualization on hardware and software costs, what about the effects of labor? Any discussion of labor needs to start with a process that describes the tasks associated with the acquisition, deployment and retirement of servers. Servers are first planned and acquired, then they are handed over to administrators to configure, set up and deploy. The operating systems software is installed, Hypervisors are configured, virtual servers configured, security profiles for users established, and the server is tested and deployed into production. Monthly maintenance continues including routine patches and fixes, and upgrades. The servers are ultimately cleansed and retired from service. Figure 7 below depicts this provisioning lifecycle approach. It includes some procurement functions, set up and deployment functions, maintenance, troubleshooting and ultimate tear down. The labor categories included setup and tear down costs as well as the ongoing monthly maintenance and troubleshooting costs for physical servers and software virtual images. Server Provisioning Lifecycle: Labor Components focus of labor model Procurement Maintenance Business IT Set-Up and Deploy Tear-down and Retire Troubleshoot Figure 7 To quantify the impact of labor, we developed a labor model for servers (Figure 8). The formula represents the total labor hours ascribed to the management of a server environment as comprised of the hours spent managing a physical server over its lifetime plus the hours spent managing the software images over their lifetime. Total hardware server labor hours (H) include the set up and deployment hours representing one-time events such as sizing and configuring workloads, and testing of a physical Page 10 of 24
11 computing element. They also include hours for scrubbing of servers, decommissioning, maintenance and troubleshooting for physical servers over the analysis period. Total software labor hours (S) include both the initial installation labor associated with the software stack or virtual images on the physical server along with ongoing maintenance and troubleshooting over the assessment period. These tasks include periodic patching and upgrades, associated testing functions, analysis of errors, debugging, fixes, testing and reboots. Labor Model For Servers Hardware Labor Hours (H) # of Physical Servers + Software Stack Labor Hours (S) # of Unique Software Stacks = Total Labor Hours Set-up +, Maintenance + Troubleshooting + Tear-down per server over a given time period Set-up +, Maintenance + Troubleshooting + Tear-down per image over a given time period Over a given time period Figure 8 Solving this equation for a stand-alone x86 environment gives us a picture of how much labor was required before virtualization. Similarly, solving the equation for the Power Systems-based environment gives us insight into the total hours needed after virtualization. Fortunately, we have data from customer case studies that can help us evaluate both equations as shown in Figure 9: Page 11 of 24
12 Using Customer Data to Derive Average Number of Servers per Administrator Customer Data Power/VM x86 hypervisor Dist Intel Servers per FTE Dist UNIX Average Figure 9 For the stand-alone x86 server case, this works out to be 30.7 servers/fte, while the virtualized Power Systems server case turns out to be 55.9 servers per administrator. We then wanted to calculate the portion of FTE labor needed to manage a server. Calculating the FTEs per server for stand-alone and virtualized x86-based servers Stand-alone x86 data shows 30.7 servers managed per FTE, 1/30.7=.0326 FTE s needed per server Virtualized Power Systems data shows 55.9 virtual servers managed per FTE, 1/55.9 =.0179 FTE s needed per server Next, we wrote equations to represent the total FTE hours required to manage our 75 Linux workloads each year for both stand-alone and virtualized Power Systems platforms. Page 12 of 24
13 We assumed 2,080 hours or 52 weeks per year, 8-hour days for 1 year. FTE hours needed to manage 75 workloads for 1 year: Multiply FTEs needed per server * total hours over 1 yr * number of software images.0326 * 2,080 *75 = 5,086 hours needed for all stand-alone x86 servers.0179 * 2,080 *75 = 2,792 hours needed for all virtualized Power Systems servers On balance, this shows a virtualized Power Systems-based environment requires 45% less total labor hours to manage 75 Linux workloads for 1 year than the stand-alone x86 scenario. But what percentage of that time can be attributed to managing the hardware (H) vs. managing the software images (S)? From our earlier analysis, it took 75 8-core Intel Nehalem servers to handle 75 Linux workloads. For the virtualized Power Systems case, we found that you could handle 75 workloads on a single 64-core Power 770 server. Thus, we are left with the following equations: (1) Stand-alone x86 75H i +75S = 5,086 (2) Virtualized Power Systems 1H p +75S = 2,792 While the amount of time to install software on either a Power-based or x86 server is about the same, our own hands-on usage of a Power-based server showed that it took roughly twice the amount of hours to administer as a stand-alone x86 platform. Thus, substituting H p = 2H i allows us to solve the equations for their respective H and S values. Subtracting equation 2 from equation 1 to solve for H i, H p, and S: H i = 32 hours per year H p = 64 hours per year S = 36 hours per year Therefore, over a 1-year planning horizon, the total hardware labor (H i ) to manage one x86 server is 32 hours while the Power Systems server labor hours (H p ) requires twice that (64 hours). The cost to manage a single software image (S) is 36 hours. Page 13 of 24
14 Standardization Helps Lower Labor Costs Servers need a full load of software to run a workload. This includes not only an operating system, middleware and the application itself, but also things like patches and configuration specifications. We refer to all of this software as a software stack. Without controls, the variety of software stacks tends to proliferate, driving up labor costs. For example, many stacks will have different levels of software installed, along with different patches and product selections. The standardization of these software stacks, however, can reduce labor costs. Uniformity reduces the number of unique stacks to manage and allows for greater re-use. We refer to the concept of re-using a standard software stack as cloning. The question is, how can we quantify the material impact standardization has on reducing labor costs? To estimate this, we applied a cloning factor to our original equation as shown below in Figure 10: Use of Standardized Stacks Can Drive Down the Labor Hours for Software Images This is the number of unique stacks Hardware Labor Hours # of Physical Servers + Software Stack Labor Hours # of Software Images Clone Factor C = Total Labor Hours Where C = average number of copies deployed for each unique software stack (from 1 to 75 in our example) Figure 10 Solving this equation for the virtualized Power 770 environment discussed earlier in the paper yields the following: 1H p + 75(S/C) = total labor hours per year Since we already know H p and S from our previous calculations, we can substitute those values, resulting in the following: 1(64) + 75(36)/C = total labor hours per year Page 14 of 24
15 Expressing the formula this way allows us to play some what if games with the clone factor (C) to gauge the impact of standardization on total labor hours. For example, applying a clone factor of five would mean that out of 75 servers there are 75/5 or 15 unique images deployed, of which the rest are duplicates of the original fifteen unique templates. When calculated over three years, this reduces the overall labor hours from the original virtualized Power Systems case of 8,372 to 1,823, a reduction of 78%! The graph below in Figure 11 shows the labor savings to be had as you adjust the clone factor C between no clones (1) and 75 clones (75). Benefit Of Cloning Factor On Software Labor Costs In A Virtualized Environment Total Software Labor Hours Over 3 Years (75 Linux Workloads) 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 No Clones Software Labor declines by 1/C 2 Clones 5 Clones 10 Clones 75 Clones Clones per unique image 21 Figure 11 As you can see from the curve, total software labor hours decline by roughly the inverse of the cloning factor. Based on this revised labor model that takes into account the use of clones, we can make the following observations as shown in Figure 12: Page 15 of 24
16 Effects of Virtualization and Standardization On Labor Costs Total Hardware Labor Hours Total Software Labor Hours Hardware Labor Hours # of Physical + Software Stack Servers Labor Hours # of Software Images Clone Factor C = Total Labor Hours (per year) The greater the consolidation you can achieve, the lower you can drive hardware labor hours The more images you can standardize and clone, the lower you can drive software labor hours Figure 12 One of the levers in reducing labor costs is to reduce the number of physical servers you have to manage. Put another way, the more workloads you can consolidate on a given platform, the more you can lower your labor costs. This makes larger, more scalable systems like the IBM Power Systems family an ideal virtualization and consolidation platform for implementing private clouds. Another lever is the degree to which you can use workload standardization and cloning in your environment. Simply stated, the higher the clone factor, the greater the reduction in labor costs associated with deploying and maintaining software virtual images. Page 16 of 24
17 Automation Can Help Lower Labor Costs Even Further! While virtualization and standardization can go a long way in reducing overall labor costs, the task of deploying a software stack as a VM image onto a virtualized server has historically been a highly laborintensive task. For instance, one has to first deploy and configure the OS along with all requisite patches. After that, the administrator has to install and configure the application server and all its constituent components (e.g. HTTP server, etc.) as well as patches and other fixes. For applications requiring a database, that becomes yet another piece of middleware that needs to be installed and configured. Then there is the application itself. Collectively, deploying and testing a complete application manually can require days or weeks to accomplish depending upon its overall complexity. In a private cloud environment, this kind of turnaround is untenable. The use of automation promises to reduce the labor required dramatically. Figure 13 depicts such an environment with a self-service portal that enables users to request IT services on demand and have the request fulfilled in minutes/hours versus days/weeks/months. Automated Self Provisioning Further Reduces Labor Costs And Speeds Up Delivery Use service Request service Self Service Portal Service Service Service Capture Deploy Catalog Stack Operating System Hypervisor Physical Resources Auto Manage Deploy via: Image copy (fastest) Automated install (scripts) 51 Figure 13 In this environment, services are initially defined/created and stored in a service catalog. Requesters can then browse the catalog to find and select the desired service. After submitting the request, it gets routed for approval and then fulfilled by the underlying infrastructure. The software needed as part of the overall service is typically deployed in one of two ways: image copy (the fastest) or via automated Page 17 of 24
18 install using scripts. When the service is no longer needed, the affected resources are freed up so that they can be claimed by other subsequent requests. In order for all of this to work seamlessly and transparently to the user, there needs to be automated management software that undergirds each step in the process. IBM offers Tivoli Service Automation Manager (TSAM) to manage this cloud services lifecycle and deliver request-driven provisioning for a private cloud environment. It leverages Tivoli Service Request Manager (TSRM) to provide a self-service UI for users to search against the catalog and select the desired service. It also utilizes Tivoli Provisioning Manager (TPM) to provision hardware and software resources according to best practices to satisfy the service request (Figure 14). Example: IBM Tivoli Service Automation Manager (TSAM) Delivers Fast Self-Service Provisioning TSAM Service Catalog Automated Provisioning TSAM starts the deployment process via IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager workflow User browses service catalog Adds service to shopping cart Submits request TSAM enables standardization via a catalog of service offerings New Virtual Server Virtual Server PowerVM Power Hardware Virtual Server TSAM provides automated provisioning Figure 14 To help assess the extent to which the use of TSAM can reduce labor hours, we conducted a hands-on study as shown on Figure 15 below: Page 18 of 24
19 Deployment Study On The Labor Benefits Of Self- Service Provisioning and Automated Install Manual Install Self-Service Provisioning and Automated Install App Administrator App User WAS WAS Service Management HTTP HTTP Self-service Automation Linux Linux Power/VM Power/VM IBM Power 750 (8-core, 3.55 GHz) IBM Power 750 (8-core, 3.55 GHz) Source: CPO internal study Figure 15 This study tracked the time it took to deploy and instantiate a WebSphere-based application on a virtual server using Power/VM. We captured metrics for doing this manually as well as using TSAM. The results from this study show that the use of automation via TSAM can reduce software image labor hours by as much as 67%! (Figure 16): Page 19 of 24
20 Benefit Of Automated, Self Provisioning On Labor Costs 300 Total Deployment Time (minutes) min 67% reduction 40 min 0 Manual Install Automated Install Applying this labor savings ratio reduces Software Labor (S) from 36 to 12 for each VM image! Figure 16 Page 20 of 24
21 Putting It All Together As our analysis shows, there are significant labor savings to be had through the use of virtualization, standardization, and automation. For our example of 75 Linux workloads over three years, virtualization by itself yields a 46% reduction while standardization alone reduces labor hours up to 78% with just a modest clone factor (C=5). Using Tivoli Service Automation Manager for automation in conjunction with Power/VM hypervisor on a Power Systems server yields a reduction of 60%. Taken collectively, companies can reduce their labor costs by up to 95% compared to a traditional stand-alone x86 environment and manual deployment methods (Figure 17): Total Hardware and Software Labor Hours for 75 Linux Workloads Over 3 Years 18,000 Total Hardware and Software Labor Hours Over 3 Years (75 Linux Workloads) 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Distributed (Intel) 46% less Virtualized (POWER) 78% less Virtualized + Standardized (C=5) 60% less 95% less Virtualized + Standardized (C=5) + Automation Figure 17 Now that we have been able to quantify the labor savings through the use of virtualization, standardization, and automation, we need to combine these with our earlier hardware and software numbers in order to show a complete cost picture. As shown in Figure 18, you see that the Power Systems 750 and 770 server options come in at the lowest cost per image over three years for our 75 workloads at $25.5K and $30.5K, respectively. This works out to be a savings of over 70% compared to the stand-alone x86 server alternative and almost 90% for the public cloud option. Page 21 of 24
22 Let s Put It All Together In Our Example- Cost Per Image for Linux Workloads (3 Yr TCO) Cost per Workload/Image (USD) Figure $105K Buy Standalone Servers No standardization $248K Public Cloud No standardization $25.5K Private Cloud p750 Administration Software Hardware/Compute Instance $30.5K Private Cloud p770 With standardization and automation Page 22 of 24
23 Summary Escalating business requirements will continue to drive companies toward datacenter transformation. This includes pursuing ways to take costs out of their existing infrastructure through the use of virtualization, standardization, and automation. The labor model described in this paper can be used to estimate potential savings for a number of different deployment scenarios and technology choices. In our example, we chose to highlight the advantages of using IBM Power Systems servers in conjunction with Tivoli service management software as a means to deliver a cost-effective private cloud environment. Some of the benefits that can be expected include: Private clouds built on IBM Power Systems servers and Tivoli service management software can be up to 70-90% less expensive on a cost/image basis than stand-alone x86 servers or public cloud alternatives The greater the consolidation you can achieve, the lower you can reduce total physical server labor hours The more images you can standardize and clone, the lower you can reduce software image labor hours The use of Tivoli Service Automation Manager can reduce labor hours for a unique software image by up to 67% compared to manual deployment on an IBM Power Systems server Page 23 of 24
24 Copyright IBM Corporation 2010 IBM Corporation Software Group Route 100 Somers, NY10589 USA Produced in the United States March 2010 All Rights Reserved IBM, the IBM logo, DB2 and WebSphere are trademarks or registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. Java and all Java-based trademarks are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States, other countries, or both. Intel and Xeon are registered trademarks of the Intel Corporation in the United States and other countries. Other company, product or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others. The information contained in this documentation is provided for informational purposes only. While efforts were made to verify the completeness and accuracy of the information contained in this documentation, it is provided as is without warranty of any kind, express or implied. In addition, this information is based on IBM s current product plans and strategy, which are subject to change by IBM without notice. IBM shall not be responsible for any damages arising out of the use of, or otherwise related to, this documentation or any other documentation. Nothing contained in this documentation is intended to, nor shall have the effect of, creating any warranties or representations from IBM (or its suppliers or licensors), or altering the terms and conditions of the applicable license agreement governing the use of IBM software. References in these materials to IBM products, programs, or services do not imply that they will be available in all countries in which IBM operates. Product release dates and/or capabilities referenced in these materials may change at any time at IBM s sole discretion based on market opportunities or other factors, and are not intended to be a commitment to future product or feature availability in any way. POW03043USEN-00 Page 24 of 24
A Study on Reducing Labor Costs Through the Use of WebSphere Cloudburst Appliance
A Study on Reducing Labor Costs Through the Use of WebSphere Cloudburst Appliance IBM Software Group, Competitive Project Office Scott Bain Faisal Rajib Barbara Sannerud Dr. John Shedletsky Dr. Barry Willner
More informationThe Benefits of POWER7+ and PowerVM over Intel and an x86 Hypervisor
The Benefits of POWER7+ and PowerVM over Intel and an x86 Hypervisor Howard Anglin rhbear@us.ibm.com IBM Competitive Project Office May 2013 Abstract...3 Virtualization and Why It Is Important...3 Resiliency
More informationTaking control of the virtual image lifecycle process
IBM Software Thought Leadership White Paper March 2012 Taking control of the virtual image lifecycle process Putting virtual images to work for you 2 Taking control of the virtual image lifecycle process
More informationIBM PureApplication System for IBM WebSphere Application Server workloads
IBM PureApplication System for IBM WebSphere Application Server workloads Use IBM PureApplication System with its built-in IBM WebSphere Application Server to optimally deploy and run critical applications
More informationIBM SmartCloud Monitoring
IBM SmartCloud Monitoring Gain greater visibility and optimize virtual and cloud infrastructure Highlights Enhance visibility into cloud infrastructure performance Seamlessly drill down from holistic cloud
More informationCloud Computing Capacity Planning. Maximizing Cloud Value. Authors: Jose Vargas, Clint Sherwood. Organization: IBM Cloud Labs
Cloud Computing Capacity Planning Authors: Jose Vargas, Clint Sherwood Organization: IBM Cloud Labs Web address: ibm.com/websphere/developer/zones/hipods Date: 3 November 2010 Status: Version 1.0 Abstract:
More informationEnterprise Cloud System (ECS)
Enterprise System (ECS) TCO Comparisons with Competitive Solutions Jose Castano Director, IBM System z New Workloads & Solutions Fehmina Merchant, Ph. D. Senior Consulting Engineer, IBM Competitive Project
More informationWhite Paper. The Value of IBM zenterprise for Deploying Heterogeneous Private Clouds
89 Fifth Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.theedison.com 212.367.7400 White Paper The Value of IBM zenterprise for Deploying Heterogeneous Private Clouds Printed in the United States of America
More informationHow To Use An Orgs.Org Database With An Orgorora Cloud Management Pack For Database (For Cloud)
ORACLE CLOUD MANAGEMENT PACK FOR ORACLE DATABASE THE INDUSTRY S ONLY COMPLETE SOLUTION FOR DATABASE CLOUD MANAGEMENT. KEY FEATURES Consolidation Planning Out-of-the-box Self Service Portal Enterprise Service
More informationIBM RATIONAL PERFORMANCE TESTER
IBM RATIONAL PERFORMANCE TESTER Today, a major portion of newly developed enterprise applications is based on Internet connectivity of a geographically distributed work force that all need on-line access
More informationORACLE CLOUD MANAGEMENT PACK FOR ORACLE DATABASE
ORACLE CLOUD MANAGEMENT PACK FOR ORACLE DATABASE Oracle Enterprise Manager is Oracle s integrated enterprise IT management product line, and provides the industry s first complete cloud lifecycle management
More informationAn Oracle White Paper November 2010. Oracle Real Application Clusters One Node: The Always On Single-Instance Database
An Oracle White Paper November 2010 Oracle Real Application Clusters One Node: The Always On Single-Instance Database Executive Summary... 1 Oracle Real Application Clusters One Node Overview... 1 Always
More informationSeven Practical Steps to Help You Run Your On-Premise Cloud Like a Business. Whitepaper
Seven Practical Steps to Help You Run Your On-Premise Cloud Like a Business Whitepaper Think about it. When a product or service is free, the demand for it is potentially infinite. But, once that product
More informationLife insurance policy administration: Operate efficiently and capitalize on emerging opportunities.
Life insurance policy administration: Operate efficiently and capitalize on emerging opportunities. > RESPOND RAPIDLY TO CHANGING MARKET CONDITIONS > DRIVE CUSTOMER AND AGENT LOYALTY > ENHANCE INTEGRATION
More informationCloud Computing Payback. An explanation of where the ROI comes from
Cloud Computing Payback An explanation of where the ROI comes from November, 2009 Richard Mayo Senior Market Manager Cloud Computing mayor@us.ibm.com Charles Perng IBM T.J. Watson Research Center perng@us.ibm.com
More informationConsolidate and Virtualize Your Windows Environment with NetApp and VMware
White Paper Consolidate and Virtualize Your Windows Environment with NetApp and VMware Sachin Chheda, NetApp and Gaetan Castelein, VMware October 2009 WP-7086-1009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...
More informationIT@Intel. Comparing Multi-Core Processors for Server Virtualization
White Paper Intel Information Technology Computer Manufacturing Server Virtualization Comparing Multi-Core Processors for Server Virtualization Intel IT tested servers based on select Intel multi-core
More informationGuide to Database as a Service (DBaaS) Part 2 Delivering Database as a Service to Your Organization
Guide to Database as a Service (DBaaS) Part 2 Delivering Database as a Service to Your Organization Introduction There are often situations in which you need to spin up a new database. But in a traditional
More informationHow To Improve The Fit For Purpose Model At Nationwide It
Nationwide IT Nationwide s Private Cloud Journey Brian Callaghan, AVP IT Engineering -Nationwide Insurance Introduction For over eight years Nationwide has been striving to improve our virtualization and
More informationIBM Sales and Distribution IBM and Manhattan Associates
IBM Sales and Distribution IBM and Manhattan Associates Innovating across the supply chain and beyond 2 IBM and Manhattan Associates Market-leading companies realize that their supply chains are strategic
More informationSOLUTION WHITE PAPER. BMC Manages the Full Service Stack on Secure Multi-tenant Architecture
SOLUTION WHITE PAPER BMC Manages the Full Service Stack on Secure Multi-tenant Architecture Table of Contents Introduction................................................... 1 Secure Multi-tenancy Architecture...................................
More informationTCO for Application Servers: Comparing Linux with Windows and Solaris
TCO for Application Servers: Comparing Linux with Windows and Solaris Robert Frances Group August 2005 IBM sponsored this study and analysis. This document exclusively reflects the analysis and opinions
More informationThe Journey to Cloud Computing: from experimentation to business reality
The Journey to Cloud Computing: from experimentation to business reality Judith Hurwitz, President Marcia Kaufman, COO Sponsored by IBM The Journey to Cloud Computing: from experimentation to business
More informationCloud computing: Innovative solutions for test environments
IBM Global Services April 2009 Cloud computing: Innovative solutions for test environments Speed test cycles and reduce cost to gain a competitive edge Page No.2 Contents 2 Executive summary 3 Leading
More informationORACLE OPS CENTER: VIRTUALIZATION MANAGEMENT PACK
ORACLE OPS CENTER: VIRTUALIZATION MANAGEMENT PACK KEY FEATURES LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT OF VIRTUALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES MADE SIMPLE Automation of lifecycle management reduces costs and errors while improving
More informationIBM Rational Asset Manager
Providing business intelligence for your software assets IBM Rational Asset Manager Highlights A collaborative software development asset management solution, IBM Enabling effective asset management Rational
More informationIBM Tivoli Service Request Manager
Deliver high-quality services while helping to control cost IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager Highlights Streamline incident and problem management processes for more rapid service restoration at an appropriate
More informationRealize the Full Potential of Virtualized Java Applications
An Oracle White Paper April, 2010 Realize the Full Potential of Virtualized Java Applications Oracle WebLogic Server on Oracle JRockit Virtual Edition Oracle Virtual Assembly Builder The performance of
More informationIBM Sterling Order Management
IBM Sterling Order Management Manage orders and grow revenue across your extended enterprise Overview In this Solution Overview, you will learn: How to obtain cross-channel excellence by efficiently orchestrating
More informationLearn How to Leverage System z in Your Cloud
Learn How to Leverage System z in Your Cloud Mike Baskey IBM Thursday, February 7 th, 2013 Session 12790 Cloud implementations that include System z maximize Enterprise flexibility and increase cost savings
More informationPlatform as a Service: The IBM point of view
Platform as a Service: The IBM point of view Don Boulia Vice President Strategy, IBM and Private Cloud Contents 1 Defining Platform as a Service 2 The IBM view of PaaS 6 IBM offerings 7 Summary 7 For more
More informationIntel Service Assurance Administrator. Product Overview
Intel Service Assurance Administrator Product Overview Running Enterprise Workloads in the Cloud Enterprise IT wants to Start a private cloud initiative to service internal enterprise customers Find an
More informationVirtualization: Benefits of a Candy Bowl Strategy
Virtualization: Benefits of a Candy Bowl Strategy A CIOview White Paper by Scott McCready and Eitan Hoenig Support links Learn more about virtualization TCO software at: http://www.cioview.com/products/prod_wsv.html
More informationIntel Cloud Builder Guide: Cloud Design and Deployment on Intel Platforms
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Intel Cloud Builder Guide Intel Xeon Processor-based Servers Red Hat* Cloud Foundations Intel Cloud Builder Guide: Cloud Design and Deployment on Intel Platforms Red Hat* Cloud Foundations
More informationPrivate Cloud for WebSphere Virtual Enterprise Application Hosting
Private Cloud for WebSphere Virtual Enterprise Application Hosting Tracy Smith Nationwide Insurance February 7, 2013 Session Number 12884 www.linkedin.com/in/tracysmith2 smitht40@nationwide.com Private
More informationDeploying a private database cloud on z Systems
Deploying a private database cloud on z Systems How DPS evolved over time and what is coming next SAP on z IBM Systems Conference Holger Scheller - IBM April 13 th, 2016 Trademarks The following are trademarks
More informationFiserv. Saving USD8 million in five years and helping banks improve business outcomes using IBM technology. Overview. IBM Software Smarter Computing
Fiserv Saving USD8 million in five years and helping banks improve business outcomes using IBM technology Overview The need Small and midsize banks and credit unions seek to attract, retain and grow profitable
More informationWhite Paper. Better Performance, Lower Costs. The Advantages of IBM PowerLinux 7R2 with PowerVM versus HP DL380p G8 with vsphere 5.
89 Fifth Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.theedison.com 212.367.7400 White Paper Better Performance, Lower Costs The Advantages of IBM PowerLinux 7R2 with PowerVM versus HP DL380p G8 with vsphere
More informationAn Oracle White Paper August 2011. Oracle VM 3: Server Pool Deployment Planning Considerations for Scalability and Availability
An Oracle White Paper August 2011 Oracle VM 3: Server Pool Deployment Planning Considerations for Scalability and Availability Note This whitepaper discusses a number of considerations to be made when
More informationIntel Cloud Builder Guide to Cloud Design and Deployment on Intel Platforms
Intel Cloud Builder Guide to Cloud Design and Deployment on Intel Platforms Ubuntu* Enterprise Cloud Executive Summary Intel Cloud Builder Guide Intel Xeon Processor Ubuntu* Enteprise Cloud Canonical*
More informationThe business value of improved backup and recovery
IBM Software Thought Leadership White Paper January 2013 The business value of improved backup and recovery The IBM Butterfly Analysis Engine uses empirical data to support better business results 2 The
More informationService-Oriented Cloud Automation. White Paper
Service-Oriented Cloud Automation Executive Summary A service-oriented experience starts with an intuitive selfservice IT storefront that enforces process standards while delivering ease and empowerment
More informationJOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY
JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY Online at www.jot.fm. Published by ETH Zurich, Chair of Software Engineering JOT, 2009 Vol. 8, No. 3, May-June 2009 Get Your Head In The Clouds! Mahesh H. Dodani, IBM, U.S.A.
More informationWindows Server Virtualization An Overview
Microsoft Corporation Published: May 2006 Abstract Today s business climate is more challenging than ever and businesses are under constant pressure to lower costs while improving overall operational efficiency.
More informationSession Title: Cloud Computing 101 What every z Person must know
2009 System z Expo October 5 9, 2009 Orlando, FL Session Title: Cloud Computing 101 What every z Person must know Session ID: ZDI08 Frank J. De Gilio - degilio@us.ibm.com 2 3 View of Cloud Computing Application
More informationIBM SmartCloud Workload Automation
IBM SmartCloud Workload Automation Highly scalable, fault-tolerant solution offers simplicity, automation and cloud integration Highlights Gain visibility into and manage hundreds of thousands of jobs
More informationThis presentation provides an overview of the architecture of the IBM Workload Deployer product.
This presentation provides an overview of the architecture of the IBM Workload Deployer product. Page 1 of 17 This presentation starts with an overview of the appliance components and then provides more
More informationENABLING VIRTUALIZED GRIDS WITH ORACLE AND NETAPP
NETAPP AND ORACLE WHITE PAPER ENABLING VIRTUALIZED GRIDS WITH ORACLE AND NETAPP Generosa Litton, Network Appliance, Inc. Monica Kumar, Frank Martin, Don Nalezyty, Oracle March 2008 WP-7037-0208 EXECUTIVE
More informationServer Migration from UNIX/RISC to Red Hat Enterprise Linux on Intel Xeon Processors:
Server Migration from UNIX/RISC to Red Hat Enterprise Linux on Intel Xeon Processors: Lowering Total Cost of Ownership A Case Study Published by: Alinean, Inc. 201 S. Orange Ave Suite 1210 Orlando, FL
More informationSystem and Storage Virtualization For ios (AS/400) Environment
Date: March 10, 2011 System and Storage Virtualization For ios (AS/400) Environment How to take advantage of today s cost-saving technologies for legacy applications Copyright 2010 INFINITE Corporation.
More informationcan you simplify your infrastructure?
SOLUTION BRIEF CA Virtual Desktop Automation for Vblock Platforms can you simplify your infrastructure? agility made possible You Can. With services that increase the speed of virtual provisioning on Vblock
More informationIBM Maximo Asset Management Essentials
Enterprise asset capabilities for small and midsized organizations IBM Maximo Asset Essentials Highlights Leverage enterprise asset capabilities in a package specifically designed for small and midsized
More informationWANT TO SLASH DOWNTIME? FOCUS ON YOUR SERVER OPERATING SYSTEM
WANT TO SLASH DOWNTIME? FOCUS ON YOUR SERVER OPERATING SYSTEM Ask any IT executive their biggest day-to-day fear, and they ll likely tell you something about reducing or even eliminating downtime. Not
More informationCLOUD TECH SOLUTION AT INTEL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ICApp Platform as a Service
CLOUD TECH SOLUTION AT INTEL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ICApp Platform as a Service Open Data Center Alliance, Inc. 3855 SW 153 rd Dr. Beaverton, OR 97003 USA Phone +1 503-619-2368 Fax: +1 503-644-6708 Email:
More informationORACLE INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE PRIVATE CLOUD WITH CAPACITY ON DEMAND
ORACLE INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE PRIVATE CLOUD WITH CAPACITY ON DEMAND FEATURES AND FACTS FEATURES Hardware and hardware support for a monthly fee Optionally acquire Exadata Storage Server Software and
More informationA proven 5-step framework for managing supplier performance
IBM Software Industry Solutions Industry/Product Identifier A proven 5-step framework for managing supplier performance Achieving proven 5-step spend framework visibility: benefits, for managing barriers,
More informationW H I T E P A P E R. Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software
W H I T E P A P E R Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................ 3 Why is
More informationVirtualizing Apache Hadoop. June, 2012
June, 2012 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 VIRTUALIZING APACHE HADOOP... 4 INTRODUCTION TO VSPHERE TM... 4 USE CASES AND ADVANTAGES OF VIRTUALIZING HADOOP... 4 MYTHS ABOUT RUNNING
More informationWhite Paper. The Business and Economic Advantages of SmartCloud Entry for Power Systems. June 2013
P 89 Fifth Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.theedison.com 212.367.7400 White Paper The Business and Economic Advantages of SmartCloud Entry for Power Systems June 2013 This report was developed
More informationzenterprise The Ideal Platform For Smarter Computing Eliminating Redundant Software
zenterprise The Ideal Platform For Smarter Computing Eliminating Redundant Software Eliminating Redundant Software Is Harder To Do Than Infrastructure Consolidation but potential savings are greater! To
More informationSponsored by: IBM. February 2010
W H I T E P A P E R L e v e r a g i n g a D y n a m i c A p p l i c a t i o n I n f r a s t r u c t u r e f o r E f f e c t i v e P r i v a t e C l o u d C o m p u t i n g Sponsored by: IBM Maureen Fleming
More informationOracle Platform as a Service (PaaS) FAQ
Oracle Platform as a Service (PaaS) FAQ 1. What is Platform as a Service (PaaS)? Platform as a Service (PaaS) is a standardized, shared and elastically scalable application development and deployment platform
More informationAn Oracle White Paper August 2010. Higher Security, Greater Access with Oracle Desktop Virtualization
An Oracle White Paper August 2010 Higher Security, Greater Access with Oracle Desktop Virtualization Introduction... 1 Desktop Infrastructure Challenges... 2 Oracle s Desktop Virtualization Solutions Beyond
More informationManage your IT Resources with IBM Capacity Management Analytics (CMA)
Manage your IT Resources with IBM Capacity Management Analytics (CMA) New England Users Group (NEDB2UG) Meeting Sturbridge, Massachusetts, USA, http://www.nedb2ug.org November 19, 2015 Milan Babiak Technical
More informationCA Automation Suite for Data Centers
PRODUCT SHEET CA Automation Suite for Data Centers agility made possible Technology has outpaced the ability to manage it manually in every large enterprise and many smaller ones. Failure to build and
More informationDIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION
DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION A DIABLO WHITE PAPER AUGUST 2014 Ricky Trigalo Director of Business Development Virtualization, Diablo Technologies
More informationWhite paper December 2008. Addressing single sign-on inside, outside, and between organizations
White paper December 2008 Addressing single sign-on inside, outside, and between organizations Page 2 Contents 2 Overview 4 IBM Tivoli Unified Single Sign-On: Comprehensively addressing SSO 5 IBM Tivoli
More informationThe Mainframe Virtualization Advantage: How to Save Over Million Dollars Using an IBM System z as a Linux Cloud Server
Research Report The Mainframe Virtualization Advantage: How to Save Over Million Dollars Using an IBM System z as a Linux Cloud Server Executive Summary Information technology (IT) executives should be
More informationIBM Cloud Computing for SAP. 2010 IBM Corporation
IBM Cloud Computing for SAP Agenda IBM Strategy and Offering for Cloud Computing SAP Product Strategy Cloud Computing for SAP Customers IBM Cloud Solutions for SAP Customers 2 IBM Strategy and Offerings
More informationHybrid Cloud Delivery Managing Cloud Services from Request to Retirement SOLUTION WHITE PAPER
Hybrid Cloud Delivery Managing Cloud Services from Request to Retirement SOLUTION WHITE PAPER Contents Executive Summary................................................ 1 Hybrid Cloud Delivery..............................................
More informationTivoli Automation for Proactive Integrated Service Management
Tivoli Automation for Proactive Integrated Service Management Gain advantage with Tivoli Automation portfolio Optimizing the World s Infrastructure 24 October 2012, Moscow 2012 IBM Corporation Acknowledgements,
More informationThe Enterprise Linux Server
The Enterprise Linux Server The Best Choice for In-House Linux Clouds Most IT executives running Linux applications have the perception that their best option is to execute them either standalone or virtualized
More informationIBM PureFlex System. The infrastructure system with integrated expertise
IBM PureFlex System The infrastructure system with integrated expertise 2 IBM PureFlex System IT is moving to the strategic center of business Over the last 100 years information technology has moved from
More informationHow To Manage Your It From A Business Perspective
ORACLE ENTERPRISE MANAGER CLOUD CONTROL TRANSFORM ENTERPRISE IT THROUGH TOTAL CLOUD CONTROL Create self-service IT, simplify and automate IT operations, and deliver enterprise clouds that provide maximum
More informationAccelerating the Transition to Hybrid Cloud with Oracle Managed Cloud Integration Service
Accelerating the Transition to Hybrid Cloud with Oracle Managed Cloud Integration Service How to Connect Applications More Quickly and with Less Risk O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R O C T O B E R 2 0 1
More informationTotal Cost of Ownership (TCO): Comparing System z and Distributed Platforms
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Comparing System z and Distributed Platforms Chris Rohrbach Senior IT Consultant rohrbach@us.ibm.com Marlin Maddy Executive IT Consultant mmaddy@us.ibm.com February 15, 2007
More informationDevOps for the Cloud. Achieving agility throughout the application lifecycle. The business imperative of agility
DevOps for the Cloud Achieving agility throughout the application lifecycle We don t have to tell you that your company is under increasing pressure to respond more quickly to changing business conditions.
More informationSmartCloud Monitoring - Capacity Planning ROI Case Study
IBM Tivoli Software SmartCloud Monitoring - Capacity Planning ROI Case Study Document version 1.0 Venkata Somisetty, Anindya Neogi (Ph.D.), Chris Nero i Copyright International Business Machines Corporation
More informationCA Server Automation. Overview. Benefits. agility made possible
PRODUCT SHEET: CA Server Automation CA Server Automation agility made possible CA Server Automation is an integrated data center management solution that automates provisioning, patching, and configuration
More informationwe can Automating service delivery for the dynamic data center of the future Brandon Whichard
Executive Brief Automate Service Delivery September, 2010 addressing today s problems while setting the stage for an agile infrastructure Automating service delivery for the dynamic data center of the
More informationPositioning the Roadmap for POWER5 iseries and pseries
Positioning the Roadmap for POWER5 iseries and pseries Guy Paradise Larry Amy Ian Jarman Agenda The Case For Common Platforms Diverse Markets: the pseries and iseries Common Platform: the Roadmap for pseries
More informationWhite Paper Take Control of Datacenter Infrastructure
Take Control of Datacenter Infrastructure Uniting the Governance of a Single System of Record with Powerful Automation Tools Take Control of Datacenter Infrastructure A new breed of infrastructure automation
More informationIBM Software Services for Collaboration
An introduction to: IBM Collaboration Services for ProjExec ProjExec is easy to use professional project management software that is combined with innovative social features to provide project teams a
More informationSizing Server Platforms To Meet ERP Requirements
IT@Intel White Paper Intel Information Technology Enterprise Resource Planning March 1 Sizing Server Platforms To Meet ERP Requirements Executive Overview We developed a quantitative model to assist with
More informationPolicy-based optimization
Solution white paper Policy-based optimization Maximize cloud value with HP Cloud Service Automation and Moab Cloud Optimizer Table of contents 3 Executive summary 5 Maximizing utilization and capacity
More informationThe Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of migrating to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for System z
The Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of migrating to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for System z This White Paper explores the financial benefits and cost savings of moving workloads from distributed to mainframe
More informationIBM Digital Experience meets IBM WebSphere Commerce
Portal Arbeitskreis - 27.10.2014 IBM Digital Experience meets IBM WebSphere Commerce Stefan Koch Chief Programmer IBM Digital Experience 2013 IBM Corporation 2 2013 IBM Corporation Integration Pattern
More informationSOLUTION WHITE PAPER. Building a flexible, intelligent cloud
SOLUTION WHITE PAPER Building a flexible, intelligent cloud Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Building a hybrid cloud 2 Provision complete cloud services 3 Service catalog 3 The user portal 4 Multi-tier
More informationLEVERAGE VBLOCK SYSTEMS FOR Esri s ArcGIS SYSTEM
Leverage Vblock Systems for Esri's ArcGIS System Table of Contents www.vce.com LEVERAGE VBLOCK SYSTEMS FOR Esri s ArcGIS SYSTEM August 2012 1 Contents Executive summary...3 The challenge...3 The solution...3
More informationCloud How to gain capacity from today s Datacenter A new model for IT Services Delivery & IT use? Cost reduction AND increased flexibility?
Cloud How to gain capacity from today s Datacenter A new model for IT Delivery & IT use? Cost reduction AND increased flexibility? 2010 IBM Corporation Cloud Computing is a model of shared network-delivered
More informationCloud computing: the IBM point of view
Building an Smarter Planet with Dynamic Infrastructure Cloud computing: the IBM point of view Ciro Puglisi, Infrastructure Offering Leader, CEEMEA cpug@ch.ibm.com, +41 58 333 4157 Cloud Computing can go
More informationSimplify IT and Reduce TCO: Oracle s End-to-End, Integrated Infrastructure for SAP Data Centers
Simplify IT and Reduce TCO: Oracle s End-to-End, Integrated Infrastructure for SAP Data Centers Over time, IT infrastructures have become increasingly complex and costly to manage and operate. Oracle s
More informationRethink IT. Rethink Business. Cloud Computing. October 18-19, 2011. Jim Sanders
Rethink IT. Rethink Business Cloud Computing October 18-19, 2011 Jim Sanders Pressures like workforce mobility and increasing productivity are placing greater demands on IT systems. Increased expectations
More informationTelekom Malaysia Berhad gains competitive advantages from innovative customer service system
IBM Case Study Telekom Malaysia Berhad gains competitive advantages from innovative customer service system Overview Challenge To differentiate itself in an increasingly competitive market, one of Malaysia
More informationSUSE Linux Enterprise Server for VMware
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for VMware Leverage the Power of Linux on vsphere 2010 VMware Inc. All rights reserved Agenda VMware industry leader Customer challenges What is SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
More informationCost Savings with Tcat
A quantitative TCO comparison study Abstract: Many web applications currently do not require a full JEE application server and will run fine on a light- weight, agile application server such as Tcat, an
More informationPrivate Cloud for the Enterprise: Platform ISF
Private Cloud for the Enterprise: Platform ISF A Neovise Vendor Perspective Report 2009 Neovise, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Background Cloud computing is a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network
More informationIBM Tivoli Netcool network management solutions for enterprise
IBM Netcool network management solutions for enterprise The big picture view that focuses on optimizing complex enterprise environments Highlights Enhance network functions in support of business goals
More information