AB 21: New Attorney Conflict Rules Invalidate Transfers and Restrict Compensation. by MARK J. PHILLIPS
|
|
- Prosper Abel Phelps
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AB 21: New Attorney Conflict Rules Invalidate Transfers and Restrict Compensation by MARK J. PHILLIPS In response to a number of well-publicized cases of abuse in Orange County, the California legislature has adopted numerous statutory changes seeking to protect clients and beneficiaries from the acts of over-reaching attorneys. The reforms fall into two categories: (1) restrictions to prevent attorneys who act as fiduciaries from charging both for fiduciary and attorney services, and (2) rules to invalidate transfers under dispositive documents to drafting attorneys. Although particularly shocking, the latter abuse is sufficiently uncommon and unwise that the rules regarding transfers to drafters are unlikely to affect most practitioners. Far more common, however, will be the circumstances in which estate planning and post-death administration attorneys find themselves in a dual capacity, and accordingly the far-reaching rules prohibiting dual compensation have much broader application. Rules Restricting Dual Compensation It has long been the public policy in this state to prohibit an attorney who serves as a personal representative or testamentary trustee from receiving fees both in his fiduciary capacity and for legal services tendered on behalf of the estate or trust. Known as the Parker rule, the prohibition stems from Estate of Parker (1926) 200 C 132, 135, 251 P 907, 909, which stated: "An executor, administrator, or testamentary trustee who is himself an attorney at law may properly employ another attorney to render the necessary legal services for the estate, and he may be entitled to an allowance out of the estate for the value of such legal services. [Citation omitted.] But if the executor, administrator, or testamentary trustee, being himself a practicing lawyer, elects to act as his own attorney in the performance of the legal services incident to the administration of the estate, the general rule is that he will not be entitled to an allowance against the estate for his professional services, in the absence of some statutory provision entitling him thereto." The rationale for the Parker rule was twofold. First, personal representatives have the obligation to retain the highest quality legal service available in the community, and if the personal representative is tempted to lure either himself or his own firm he places himself "in a position where there would be a clash between his own personal interests and his duty to employ the ablest counsel obtainable." 200 C at 139, 251 P at 910. Second, if the personal representative shares in any compensation earned by the attorney retained, he will have been allowed compensation in excess of that which would have been allowable to him by statute. The Parker rule did not absolutely prohibit the charging of legal fees by the law firm of which the personal representative was a member, if it was agreed between the personal representative and the balance of the firm that the former was not to share in the money received by the firm for its services. The Parker court did, however, establish the presumption, in the absence of a showing that a personal representative would not share, that such sharing of fees would take place. Assembly Bill 21 (Umberg and Morrow), signed into law on August 2, 1993 (Stats 1993,
2 ch 292), broadens the public policy against dual compensation to cover conservatorships, guardianships, and trusts. It does so in a fashion consistent with the overall concept of Parker but differing in a myriad of details. Practitioners who feel comfortable with the Parker rule will find some frustration in the application of the now statutory scheme as it applies to fiduciary relationships other than probates. Conservatorships and Guardianships New Prob C 2645 provides that an attorney who serves as a conservator or guardian may not receive legal fees unless the court specifically approves the right to that compensation with a finding that it is to the advantage, benefit, and best interests of the conservatee or ward. There is no requirement that the attorney charge or receive fees for acting as the conservator or guardian for the prohibition to take effect. Because this new section is silent where other new sections are not, it appears that the attorney-conservator may obtain the court's approval after the services have been rendered but before payment is sought. Existing Prob C require such court approval before payment in all circumstances. New Prob C 2645 does not apply if the attorney who is serving as conservator or guardian is related by blood or marriage to, or cohabitates with, the conservatee or ward, but if such relationship does not exist the prohibition against dual compensation applies to the attorney, his relatives, and the law firm of which he is a member. There is no exception for attorneys and firms who agree not to share fees as there is for a personal representative who is an attorney in a probate. Prob C It can be expected that few practitioners will be discomfited by Prob C 2645, because few attorneys routinely agree to serve as a conservator or a guardian of someone who is not a family member. The task is generally a thankless one. Probates The Parker rule was codified in California soon after its issuance. Current Prob C states that a personal representative who is an attorney may receive the personal representative compensation but not the compensation for services as the estate attorney, unless expressly authorized by the decedent's will. "The prohibition against dual compensation applies notwithstanding any provision in the decedent's will." The ability of the testator to approve in advance dual compensation was codification of prior case law, exemplified by Estate of Thompson (1958) 50 C.2d 613, 617, 328 P.2d 1, 3. In Thompson, the California Supreme Court carved out an exception to the Parker rule in which a testator specifically approved the dual compensation in his will. Citing the permissiveness of the Restatement of Trusts, which permitted dual compensation when approved by a trust instrument, the court stated: "It is well settled that the paramount rule in the construction of a will is that the will must be interpreted according to the intention of the testator.... In the present case there can be no dispute as to the intention of the testatrix and hence the only problem is the fulfillment of that intention."
3 However, consistent with the underlying theme of AB 21 that estate planning clients need to be protected from the over-reaching of certain avaricious attorneys. Prob C has been amended to eliminate the client's discretion to expressly permit dual compensation under the terms of his or her will. Amended Prob C now provides that the prohibition against dual compensation applies notwithstanding any provision in the decedent's will. Curiously, courts have not been quick to prevent other professionals from retailing their own services in conjunction with estate administration. Accountants, for example, can retain themselves or their firms to render extraordinary accounting or tax services and pay themselves an additional fee for those services. Estate of Haviside (1980) 102 CAM 365, 162 CR 393. They may not, however, pay themselves an additional accounting fee for services that are ordinary in nature and would otherwise have been performed by them as personal representative. Estate of Billings (1991) 228 CAM 426, 278 CR 439, reported at 12 CEB Est Plan R 125 (Apr. 1991). Although these judicial rules for accountants prevent dual compensation to a single personal representative for the same service, they defeat the underlying principle of the Parker rule of eliminating the temptation to retain less than the ablest professional available. But the legislature that taketh away can also giveth; under new Prob C dual compensation to an attorney who serves both as personal representative and as attorney, clearly prohibited before, may now be specifically approved by the court if consent to the arrangement is obtained in advance and the court finds that the dual compensation is to the advantage, benefit, and best interests of the decedent's estate. Trusts The most sweeping changes in the dual compensation area affect trusts. Under existing law, a trustee was entitled to indemnity or reimbursement for expenses necessarily incurred in administration, including expenses for attorneys' fees and costs. Batik of Am. v Long Beach Fed Sav. & Loan Ass'n (1956) 141 CA2d 618, 297 P2d 443. Probate Code codified the prior case law, permitting the trustee to reimbursement for properly incurred expenses. However, if an attorney served as a testamentary trustee, courts would generally apply Parker to permit him only to take his trustee fees and not claim compensation for professional attorney services. See also Estate of Vokal (1953) 121 CA2d 252, 260, 263 P2d 64, 69 and cases that follow that line of authority, including Estate of Gilmaker (1962) 57 C2d 627, 21 CR 585. This line of cases most often applied the Parker rule when it was determined that the trustee had breached the trust, was hostile, or had failed to perform trust obligations. However, particularly in inter vivos trust situations, court review and potential denial of dual compensation rarely occurred. New Prob C provides that an attorney who serves as trustee may receive only the trustee's compensation or compensation for legal services, but not both, unless the trustee obtains approval for the right to dual compensation. Unlike the probate and conservatorship rules, the attorney-trustee clearly can elect the greater of the two compensations, an evident retreat from the public policy pronouncements in Parker designed to eliminate the temptation of a fiduciary to select less than the ablest counsel available. Again, the section is not applicable if the trustee is related by blood or marriage to, or is a cohabitant with, the trust settlor. Prob C 15687(c).
4 Approval is obtained for dual compensation by giving full disclosure of the nature of the compensation and of the relationship, and then obtaining either a court order approving the compensation or the passage of 30 days without objection following the giving of notice to all persons interested in the trust under Prob C If an objection is received, the attorneytrustee must then obtain the requisite court approval under Prob C Unlike the advance notice required under amended Prob C described above, it would appear from a reading of all of the new trust sections that approval under new Prob C need only be obtained before payment, not before the rendition of services. If the legal services are rendered by relatives of the attorney-trustee or by his or her law firm, fees may not be collected for such services unless the trustee waives compensation for the services as trustee or unless the requisite court approval is obtained. Prob C 15687(b). The section is effective for all services rendered on or after January 1, 1994, and any attempted waiver in the instrument of this section is void in the interest of public policy. Prob C 15687(c), (f). "If the legal services are rendered by relatives of the attorney-trustee or by his or her law firm, fees may not be collected for such services unless the trustee waives compensation." The reach of this new section is considerable, and in practice may affect practitioners in circumstances where over-reaching is not exercised and dual compensation not intended. For example, if the drafting attorney serves as trustee of an irrevocable trust used to fund and hold life insurance on the life of the trust settlor, this new section may prohibit the charging for ordinary and necessary services. In such circumstances, the attorney routinely charges only a single time for his hours expended, but those hours may consist of services typical both of trustee and of attorney. The attorney will, for example, make bank deposits, pay premium bills, balance check books, and send out Crummey notices. Because these services are performed in the interest of a client of the attorney's law firm, they are normally charged at the attorney's hourly rate. The services are not legal in nature, but they must be performed by the attorney in his capacity as trustee. If the attorney charges at his legal rate, he may either be overcharging for a trustee service or charging for legal services not consonant with the restriction against dual compensation under new Prob C In most cases, the attorney-trustee will be able to obtain the consent of the trust beneficiaries under 15687(d)(2). If consent is not available, the attorney-trustee must apply to the court for approval if economically feasible, and if not the attorney is going to he placed in a position of either refusing to serve, in which case another professional trustee is going to have to be obtained at greater expense, or refusing to charge at any rate for services rendered in his legal capacity, which is unfair to the attorney. There is no reason to believe that the prohibition against dual compensation rules can be avoided by having the compensation paid by someone other than the trust; as, for example, when such compensation is paid by the client-trustor of an irrevocable inter vivos trust. The dual compensation rules of AB 21 are rooted in public policy, and are not waivable by statute. Where similar rules have been in existence for probates, the courts have held that agreements for additional compensation are not binding on the court, and, to the extent that they purport to authorize compensation higher than allowed by statute, are void. Prob C 10803, 10813; Estate of Baum (1989) 209 CAM 744, 750, 257 CR 566, 571. Commentators state that there is authority for State Bar discipline for attorneys who attempt to circumvent these rules against additional compensation.
5 "The key to these accounting sections, and the sections which follow, is the definition of a 'disqualified person."' In the area of required accountings, amendments have been made to Prob C and to stem the ability of drafting attorneys to relieve themselves as future trustees from the obligation to account to beneficiaries. Section 16062, which sets forth the requirement of a trustee to account, was always subject to the exceptions set forth in 16064, which previously stated that a trustee is not required to report information or to account to a beneficiary to the extent that the trust instrument waived the report or account. The legislature has previously tinkered with this exception, instituting effective January 1, 1993, a limitation on such waiver following a showing that it is reasonably likely that a material breach of the trust has occurred. Though still new, that change is of questionable benefit when a beneficiary would need accounting information in order to make the requisite showing of material breach. Assembly Bill 21 has now added language to 16064(a) and 16062(c) providing that it is against public policy, and void, for a trust instrument to waive an obligation to account as to any sole trustee who is a "disqualified person" as defined in Prob C 21350(b)(1). As an account is more comprehensive than a report, it would appear that the failure of Prob C 16062(e) to find void a waiver of a report is of no real consequence. The key to these accounting sections, and the sections which follow, is the definition of a "disqualified person." The definition appears in new Prob C dealing with the prohibition of transfers to individuals who draft dispositive instruments. Section 21350(b)(1) defines "disqualified person" as any of the following persons specified in 21350(a): (1) A person, including an attorney, conservator or other person having a fiduciary relationship with the transferor, who drafted, transcribed, or caused to be drafted or transcribed, the instrument. (2) A person who is related by blood or marriage to, is a cohabitant with, or is an employee of, the person who drafted, transcribed, or caused to be drafted or transcribed, the instrument. (3) Any partner or shareholder of any partnership or corporation in which any person described in subparagraph (1) or (2) has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest, or any employee of any such person, partnership, or corporation. The term "disqualified person" excludes situations in which the transferor is related by blood or marriage to, or is a cohabitant with the person who drafted, transcribed or caused to be drafted or transcribed, the instrument. It would appear, therefore, that under Prob C and a waiver of accounting is void if the sole trustee is any person, including an attorney or the fiduciary, who drafted, transcribed, or caused to be drafted or transcribed, the dispositive instrument, but not a relative of such a person, nor would the exception apply if such a person were related to the trustor.
6 "The presumption applies to persons who drafted the instrument, but does not apply to their relatives." In order to facilitate removal of a "disqualified person" serving as trustee, new Prob C 15642(b)(6) has been added, establishing a presumption that a sole trustee defined as a "disqualified person" in Prob C 21350(b)(1) should be removed as trustee unless the court finds it fair, just, and equitable that the trustee should continue to serve. In making this examination, the court may consider the intent of the settlor and all other facts and circumstances. Like the accounting sections, the presumption applies to persons, including attorneys and other fiduciaries, who drafted, transcribed, or caused to be drafted or transcribed, the instrument, but does not apply to their relatives, nor is there an exception when the drafting or transcribing individual is a relative of the settlor. New Prob C 15642(b)(6) is not applicable to instruments that became irrevocable on or before January 1, Finally, new Prob C 17200(b)(21) has been added, providing the court clear authority to determine whether dual compensation is reasonable and in the best interests of the trust. In determining reasonableness, the subparagraph specifically states that the court may consider whether prior approval was obtained for such dual compensation, making it clear that such court approval can be obtained following rendition of the services but before payment. Rules Restricting Transfers to Drafters Although never statutorily proscribed before, transfers to attorneys under testamentary instruments drafted by them have historically been suspect. Estate of Morey (1905) 147 C 495, 82P 57; Estate of Lances (1932) 216 C 397, 14 P2d 768; Anno, 19 ALR3d 575 (1968). Where a drafting attorney benefits under the dispositive provisions of the instrument he drafts, the courts have long imposed a presumption of undue influence which the attorney must rebut by clear and convincing evidence. Estate of Clegg (1978) 87 CA3d 594, 603, 151 CR 15 8, 162; Estate of Lind (1989) 209 CA3d 1424,257 CR 853, reported at 10 CEB Est Plan R 154 (June 1989). In Clegg, the court stated the general rule as follows. The relationship of an attorney to his client is both fiduciary and confidential. Hence, when an attorney, by advice or action, takes part in the preparation or execution of a will, the presumption of undue influence arising from the confidential or fiduciary relationship is applicable where the will benefits the attorney. Like most presumptions, that of undue influence by attorneys who benefit under wills that they draft can be rebutted. Estate of Teed (1955) 13 6 CA2d 401, 28 8 P2d Assembly Bill 21 has added Prob C , which seek to discourage, and in some cases invalidate, transfers to certain defined "disqualified persons." Under 21350, any donative transfer is invalid if it benefits the disqualified persons" described previously, including drafters, their relatives, and members and employees of their law firms. The term "relative by blood or marriage" is further defined to include a person's spouse or predeceased spouse, relatives within the third degree, and the spouse of any such third degree relation. By specific reference, the intestate definitional sections applicable to half-bloods, posthumous children, and parent-child relationships are incorporated into Prob C 6406, 6407, Specifically excluded from the definition
7 of a disqualified person" are those circumstances described in 21351, including when the transferor is related by blood or marriage to, or is a cohabitant with, the person who drafted, transcribed, or caused to be drafted or transcribed, the dispositive instrument. Also excluded are circumstances in which the dispositive instrument is reviewed by an attorney not related to, or associated with, the drafter or the beneficiary of the transfer, as long as that independent attorney counsels the transferor and signs and delivers to the transferor a certificate of Independent review. Prob C (b). The language of that certificate is specifically set forth in the statute. Also excluded from the prohibited transfers are those circumstances in which the probate court was aware of all of the circumstances and ordered the transfer instituted under the substituted judgment proceedings of Prob C Prob C 21351(c). Finally, for instruments executed on or before July 1, 1993, the court can, on clear and convincing evidence, find that the transfer was not the product of fraud, menace, duress, or undue influence and that the transfer is fair, just, and equitable to all persons affected. In making its determination, the court is to exclude the testimony of any "disqualified person," and if the court finds that the transfer was the product of fraud, menace, duress, or undue influence, the "disqualified person" bears all costs of the proceeding, including attorneys' fees. Prob C 1351(d). Not covered by new Prob C is the issue of whether a transfer which does not fall under the proscription of the subpart can still be challenged as being the result of fraud, menace, duress, or undue influence. If the recipient was a "disqualified person" and the transfer is approved by either the court sitting in the conservatorship matter under 21351(c) or by the probate court following the death of the transferor under 21351(d), presumably the transfer cannot otherwise be challenged in the absence of some compelling fraud or misinformation perpetrated on the court sufficient to eliminate the bar of res judicata. If, however, the transfer is not proscribed simply because of the fact that the transferor is related by blood or marriage to, or is a cohabitant with, the drafting person, there is no converse presumption that the transfer is a valid one. New Prob C ' set forth administrative provisions. Section states that no person is liable for making a prohibited transfer under the new sections unless that person has received actual notice of the possible invalidity of the transfer, presumably eliminating a concern that fiduciaries, and their counsel, would be required to investigate each donee to be certain he or she is not a "disqualified person." Once actual notice is received, the person cannot be held liable for failing to make the transfer unless and until the validity of the transfer has been conclusively determined by a court. Section states that if a transfer fails under the "disqualified person" rules, the transfer is to be made as if the "disqualified person" predeceased the transferor without spouse or issue. Section states that the rules apply notwithstanding a contrary provision in the instrument. Finally, states that the rules are applicable to instruments that became irrevocable, or are executed by persons dying, on or after September 1, 1993.
15 GCA ESTATES AND PROBATE CH. 7 TESTAMENTARY ADDITIONS
CHAPTER 7 TESTAMENTARY ADDITIONS TO TRUSTS, LIFE INSURANCE AND OTHER TRUSTS; BEQUESTS TO MINORS; DISCLAIMER OF TESTAMENTARY AND OTHER INTERESTS 2014 NOTE: Unless otherwise indicated, this Title includes
More informationAs the Boston Bar Journal went to press, the Massachusetts Uniform Trust Code ( MUTC ) was
THE BBA The Boston Bar Journal CONTACT US Heads Up The Massachusetts Uniform Trust Code By Raymond H. Young and Leiha Macauley As the Boston Bar Journal went to press, the Massachusetts Uniform Trust Code
More informationChapter 8: Posthumous Application of the Attorney-Client Privilege
Evidence Chapter 8: Posthumous Application of the Attorney-Client Privilege Justin Delacruz Code Sections Affected Evidence Code 953, 957 (amended); Probate Code 12252 (amended). AB 1163 (Tran); 2009 STAT.
More informationIndex to Rules. Local Probate Rule 1...Hours of Court. Local Probate Rule 2...Examination of Files, Records and Other Documents
Local Rules of Court Geauga County Court of Common Pleas Probate Division (Effective July 1, 2009) Index to Rules Local Probate Rule 1...Hours of Court Local Probate Rule 2...Examination of Files, Records
More informationQuestion Presented. Short Answer
To: Wendy Johnson From: Law Clerk, Christina Andreoni Date: July 21, 2014 RE: Probate Law Questions re: Jeff Cheyne research request Question Presented Why was the California Probate Code regarding no
More informationTitle 7. Probate Rules. Chapter 1. General Provisions
Title 7. Probate Rules Chapter 1. General Provisions Rule 7.1. Probate rules Rule 7.2. Preliminary provisions Rule 7.3. Definitions and use of terms Rule 7.4. Waiver of rules in probate proceedings Rule
More informationETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO WILLS, TRUSTS, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES AND TRUSTS
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO WILLS, TRUSTS, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES AND TRUSTS Testamentary Capacity by John Paul Parks 1 Attorney at Law 14362 N. Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard, Suite 1000
More informationATTORNEY S FEES IN PROBATE MATTERS. Colorado Bar Association Elder Law Committee October 20, 2005
ATTORNEY S FEES IN PROBATE MATTERS Colorado Bar Association Elder Law Committee October 20, 2005 Martha L. Ridgway, Esq. and Thomas A. Rodriguez, Esq. Ridgway, Romeo & Vincent, LLC 1070 Century Drive,
More informationLEGISLATIVE BILL 72. Approved by the Governor May 13, 2015
LEGISLATIVE BILL 72 Approved by the Governor May 13, Introduced by Schumacher, 22. A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to decedents' estates; to amend sections 30-3880, 30-3881, 30-3882, and 77-2018.02, Reissue
More informationFOR THE COUNTY OF REDWOOD
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Please note: This sample document is redacted from an actual research and writing project we did for a customer some time ago. It reflects the law as of the date we completed it. Because
More informationDurable Power of Attorney For Finances
Durable Power of Attorney For Finances Choosing Someone to Handle Your Property And Finances in Case of Disability Washtenaw County Probate Court Shared/Social/Resources/DPOA for Finances FOREWORD We all
More informationTEN THINGS THAT EVERY TRUST BENEFICIARY IN TEXAS SHOULD KNOW
TEN THINGS THAT EVERY TRUST BENEFICIARY IN TEXAS SHOULD KNOW INTRODUCTION: We have specialized in estate planning, probate, guardianship and trust law for over forty five years. For the past fifteen years
More informationGIFTS TO LAWYERS AND OTHER DISQUALIFIED PERSONS
GIFTS TO LAWYERS AND OTHER DISQUALIFIED PERSONS 732.806, FLORIDA STATUTES EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2013 PRESENTED FOR THE MANATEE ESTATE PLANNING COUNCIL OCTOBER 24, 2013 JEFFREY S. GOETHE BARNES WALKER GOETHE
More informationAn Overview of Ethical Issues in Estate Planning
An Overview of Ethical Issues in Estate Planning Bill Ambrunn, Esq. Law Offices of Bill Ambrunn 1906 Market Street, #938 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 724-0498 ambrunnlaw@yahoo.com 1 Course Outline 1.
More informationUNDERSTANDING PROBATE. The Family Guide PREPARED BY ROBERT L. FERRIS
UNDERSTANDING PROBATE The Family Guide PREPARED BY ROBERT L. FERRIS I FIRST STEPS: WHAT TO DO 1. Obtain certified copies of the Death Certificate. When a person dies in California, an official Death Certificate
More informationTexas Probate Handbook
Texas Probate Handbook This handbook presents only a basic outline; no attempt has been made to address many of the legal issues that may arise during the administration of an estate in Texas. Persons
More informationUNDERSTANDING PROBATE: A BASIC GUIDE TO THE PROBATE PROCESS
WHAT IS PROBATE? JAY D. FULLMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 800 South Beach Boulevard, Suite A La Habra, California 90631 Telephone (562) 694-6005 or (714) 255-2960 Facsimile (562) 697-7700 E-Mail: jdfullman@mminternet.com
More informationEstate Planning Checklist
Estate Planning Checklist BASIC DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD BE PART OF EVERY PLAN Last Will and Testament Living Will Durable Power of Attorney For Healthcare Durable Power of Attorney For Finances and Property
More informationInsurance (Amendment) Bill
Bill No. 28/08. Insurance (Amendment) Bill Read the first time on th October 08. A BILL i n t i t u l e d An Act to amend the Insurance Act (Chapter 142 of the 02 Revised Edition) and to make related amendments
More informationSTATE OF COLORADO STATUTORY FORM POWER OF ATTORNEY IMPORTANT INFORMATION
On April 9, 2009, Colorado enacted the Uniform Power of Attorney Act, C.R.S. 15-14-701, et seq., effective January 1, 2010. The Act significantly changes the laws concerning the use of powers of attorney
More informationTitle 13-B: MAINE NONPROFIT CORPORATION ACT
Title 13-B: MAINE NONPROFIT CORPORATION ACT Chapter 7: DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS Table of Contents Section 701. BOARD OF DIRECTORS... 3 Section 702. NUMBER AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS... 3 Section 703. VACANCIES...
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 94-1
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 94-1 SINCE THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY IS A NEWLY DESIGNATED ENTITY WHICH, BY STATUTE, PURPORTS TO AFFORD LIMITED LIABILITY TO ITS MEMBERS, AND RECOGNIZING
More informationGifts to Caretakers: Acts of Gratitude or Disguised Malfeasance? New Statutes May Decide for Us
Gifts to Caretakers: Acts of Gratitude or Disguised Malfeasance? New Statutes May Decide for Us By Robert Barton, Lisa M. Lukaszewski, and Stacie T. Lau Robert Barton is an associate in the Los Angeles,
More informationA Summary of California Trustee Responsibilities, Beneficiary Rights, and Elder Law Issues
A Summary of California Trustee Responsibilities, Beneficiary Rights, and Elder Law Issues David W. Tate, Esq. http://davidtate.us; tateatty@yahoo.com The following discussion is a summary of the trustee
More informationHot Topics in Probate Litigation
Hot Topics in Probate Litigation Tri-State Trust Forum of the Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont Bankers Associations September 26, 2011 Radisson Hotel Manchester, New Hampshire By John J. Pankauski, Esquire
More informationTHE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA. Do I Need a Living Trust?
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA Do I Need a Living Trust? 1. What is a living trust? 2. What can a living trust do for me? 3. Should everyone have a living trust? 4. How could a living trust be helpful if
More informationPA Regulatory & Legislative Update
October 30, 2014 PA Regulatory & Legislative Update Raymond Pepe Copyright 2014 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Act 95 of 2014: Power of Attorney Amendments New Requirements for Execution of Powers
More informationL E G A L F A C T S O F L I F E
T H E S TAT E B A R O F C A L I F O R N I A DO I NEED A LIVING TRUST? GET THE L E G A L F A C T S O F L I F E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Do I need a living trust? What is a living trust?
More informationTENNESSEE STATUTE TITLE 34, CHAPTER 6, PART 2 DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE. As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
TENNESSEE STATUTE TITLE 34, CHAPTER 6, PART 2 DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE 34-6-201. Definitions. As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Durable power of attorney
More informationAttorney/Guardian/Client Memorandum: re Personal Care
Attorney/Guardian/Client Memorandum: re Personal Care The Duties and Powers of a Guardian/ Attorney of the Person The powers and duties of a guardian/attorney of the person are fully set out in the Substitute
More informationBasics of Estate Planning
Basics of Estate Planning THE CORNERSTONE OF ANY ESTATE PLAN ARE THE DOCUMENTS THAT SET FORTH YOUR WISHES FOR THE DISPOSITION AND OVERSIGHT OF YOUR ASSETS AT YOUR DEATH. IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING GUIDELINES
More informationWills, Power of Attorney & Enduring Guardianship
Wills, Power of Attorney & Enduring Guardianship What is a Will? A Will is a written legal document by which the person making it sets out how he or she wishes their property to be distributed after their
More informationGUIDE TO DIRECTORS DUTIES UNDER THE BVI BUSINESS COMPANIES ACT 2004
GUIDE TO DIRECTORS DUTIES UNDER THE BVI BUSINESS COMPANIES ACT 2004 CONTENTS PREFACE 1 1. Directors of Companies in the BVI 2 2. Statutory Duties of Directors in the BVI 3 3. Disclosure of Director Interests
More informationWealth Strategies. www.rfawealth.com. Your Guide to Estate Planning. www.rfawealth.com. Your Guide to Estate Planning WEALTH STRATEGIES Page 6
www.rfawealth.com Wealth Strategies Your Guide to Estate Planning Part 1 of 12 ESSENTIAL ESTATE PLANNING ensure the settlement of your estate remains PRIVATE? Why Should You Care? Through estate planning
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 30 Article 1A 1
Article 1A. Elective Share. 30-3.1. Right of elective share. (a) Elective Share. The surviving spouse of a decedent who dies domiciled in this State has a right to claim an "elective share", which means
More informationThe State Bar of California Trusts and Estates Section 2016 Summer Education Conference Sheraton Grand Sacramento Hotel.
The State Bar of California Trusts and Estates Section 2016 Summer Education Conference Sheraton Grand Sacramento Hotel Sacramento, CA Session 4 Recovering and Defeating Attorney Fees in Trust/Probate
More informationCONSULTATION PAPER P006-2007 July 2007. Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2007 on Nomination of Beneficiaries
CONSULTATION PAPER P006-07 July 07 Insurance (Amendment) Bill 07 on Nomination of Beneficiaries Insurance (Amendment) Bill 07 on Nomination of Beneficiaries July 07 PREFACE 1 Presently, there are no provisions
More informationThe following content is taken from the Florida Bar website. To learn more, please contact an attorney.
The following content is taken from the Florida Bar website. To learn more, please contact an attorney. WHAT IS A WILL? A will is a written direction controlling the disposition of property at death. The
More informationWhat is Estate Planning?
What is Estate Planning? Estate planning is one of the most important steps any person can take to make sure that their final property and health care wishes are honored, and that loved ones are provided
More informationProbate Courts in Ohio
Probate Courts in Ohio Prepared and issued as a public service by Ohio Association of Probate Judges HISTORY OF THE PROBATE COURT The term "probate" comes from the Latin word probatio, meaning "to prove,"
More informationChapter 3 Probate of Wills and Administration. Part 1 General Provisions
Chapter 3 Probate of Wills and Administration Part 1 General Provisions 75-3-101 Devolution of estate at death -- Restrictions. The power of a person to leave property by will and the rights of creditors,
More informationPlease call the Legal Assistance Office for an appointment (301)619-2221/2065
Please call the Legal Assistance Office for an appointment (301)619-2221/2065 Directions: Enter the Main Gate (7 th Street), take an immediate left turn onto Porter Street, take your third right onto Fraim
More informationABILITY TO TRANSFER "S" CORPORATION STOCK TO INTER VIVOS TRUSTS (Business Advisory No. 10)
ABILITY TO TRANSFER "S" CORPORATION STOCK TO INTER VIVOS TRUSTS (Business Advisory No. 10) Over the years, we have found that many of our clients elect to transfer their shares of "S" corporation stock
More informationCHAPTER 30.1-05 ELECTIVE SHARE OF SURVIVING SPOUSE
CHAPTER 30.1-05 ELECTIVE SHARE OF SURVIVING SPOUSE 30.1-05-01. (2-202) Elective share. 1. The surviving spouse of a decedent who dies domiciled in this state has a right of election, under the limitations
More informationSOUTH CAROLINA BAR. Wills and the Law
SOUTH CAROLINA BAR Wills and the Law DO YOU NEED A WILL? Anyone who owns property and wants to control who receives the property after his or her death should have a will, regardless of the value of the
More informationColorado's New Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act
Colorado's New Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act by Susan L. Boothby and Kim Willoughby This article outlines Colorado's new Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act, which takes effect
More informationINSURANCE BENEFICIARY CHANGES
LEGISLATIVE GENERAL COUNSEL 6 Approved for Filing: E. Chelsea-McCarty 6 6 01-14-13 12:28 PM 6 H.B. 65 1 INSURANCE BENEFICIARY CHANGES 2 2013 GENERAL SESSION 3 STATE OF UTAH 4 Chief Sponsor: Jim Bird 5
More informationESTATE SETTLEMENT BASICS
ESTATE SETTLEMENT BASICS by Steven D. Beres Florida Bar Board Certified Wills, Trusts & Estates Lawyer The steps necessary to properly settle an estate upon the death of a family member or friend vary
More informationLife Cycle of the Estate 101. Allison C. Treitler Estates and Special Investments Harvard University
Life Cycle of the Estate 101 Allison C. Treitler Estates and Special Investments Harvard University Outline Review the probate process (Massachusetts) Trusts Protecting charitable interests during the
More informationYour agent is entitled to reasonable compensation unless you state otherwise in the special instructions.
STATE OF COLORADO STATUTORY FORM POWER OF ATTORNEY (effective January 1, 2010) IMPORTANT INFORMATION This power of attorney authorizes another person (your agent) to make decisions concerning your property
More informationIOWA STATUTORY POWER OF ATTORNEY
THE IOWA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Official Form No. 120 FOR THE LEGAL EFFECT OF THE USE OF THIS FORM, CONSULT YOUR LAWYER IOWA STATUTORY POWER OF ATTORNEY 1. POWER OF ATTORNEY This power of attorney authorizes
More informationANTICIPATING DEATH IN DIVORCE
ANTICIPATING DEATH IN DIVORCE by Katherine H. Tiffany Carter, Smith, Merriam, Rogers & Traxler, P.A. P.O. Box 10828 Greenville, S.C. 29603 (864) 242-3566 Katherine.Tiffany@carterlawpa.com Greenville County
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF RULES OF COURT FOR THE COMMON PLEAS COURT PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO JUDGMENT ENTRY Pursuant to Superintendence
More informationCHAPTER 2016-46. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494
CHAPTER 2016-46 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494 An act relating to digital assets; providing a directive to the Division of Law Revision and Information; creating
More informationMEDICAL LIEN CONTRACT. Date Patient Name Patient Date of Birth Date of Loss
MEDICAL LIEN CONTRACT Date Patient Name Patient Date of Birth Date of Loss Payment to Provider: I, ( Patient ), hereby authorize and direct you ( Attorney ), to pay directly to ( Provider ) AND/OR TO ANY
More informationChapin Law Firm, LLC 11212 Johnson Dr. Shawnee, Kansas 66203 www.chapinlawfirm.com Phone: 913-385-0600 Fax: 913-385-0613
Chapin Law Firm, LLC 11212 Johnson Dr. Shawnee, Kansas 66203 www.chapinlawfirm.com Phone: 913-385-0600 Fax: 913-385-0613 Thank you for contacting the Chapin Law Firm, LLC regarding estate planning information
More informationVol 48 No. 1 January - February 2012. Docket. Official Publication of the San Mateo County Bar Association
Vol 48 No. 1 January - February 2012 Docket Official Publication of the San Mateo County Bar Association In the Dark of Night on a Pitching Deck From the Trenches to the Benches Bankrupt and Loving It
More informationTHE LAW OF SUCCESSION: DEATH TESTATE OR INTESTATE
4 THE LAW OF SUCCESSION: DEATH TESTATE OR INTESTATE DEATH WITH A WILL TESTACY (HOWER 90) Terminology Related to Wills (Hower 90) Holographic Will (Hower 91) As noted in the text, California does recognize
More informationGLOSSARY OF ESTATE PLANNING TERMS
GLOSSARY OF ESTATE PLANNING TERMS A-B trust - a trust created by a couple while both are living which calls for the division of the overall estate into the two halves (A is usually the surviving partner
More informationAvoiding the Trusts and Estate Traps: The Top 10 Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Practitioners. By: John L. Pritchard, Esq.
Avoiding the Trusts and Estate Traps: The Top 10 Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Practitioners Reprinted from the New Jersey Law Journal, May 24, 1999, p. S-1, 156 N.J.L.J. 673 Estate planning poses significant
More informationRecommended Procedures for Bank Officers in Guaranteeing Customers' Signatures
FOLLOWING ARE SAMPLE PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION STAMP IN A RETAIL BANKING SETTING. THESE SAMPLE PROCEDURES SHOULD BE AMENDED TO APPLY TO YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. Recommended
More informationfrom Every Canadian s Guide to the Law (HarperCollins 2005) by Linda Silver Dranoff
from Every Canadian s Guide to the Law (HarperCollins 2005) by Linda Silver Dranoff Planning for a Will A last will and testament, usually called simply a will, is the document of instructions that a mentally
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF HANCOCK COUNTY, OHIO Probate Division Probate Rules. 3 Examination of Probate Files, Records, and 3 other Documents
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF HANCOCK COUNTY, OHIO Probate Division Probate Rules Rule Page 1 Hours of Court 3 2 Conduct in the Court 3 3 Examination of Probate Files, Records, and 3 other Documents 4 Summons
More informationEstate Planning Council Newsletter Virginia Law Developments 2014 CASES. Dean v. Morris, 287 Va. 531, 756 S.E.2d 430 (April 17, 2014)
Contract to Make Will Estate Planning Council Newsletter Virginia Law Developments 2014 CASES No Contract for Step-Daughters to Inherit Dean v. Morris, 287 Va. 531, 756 S.E.2d 430 (April 17, 2014) Shirley
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011 JON AGEE and SUSAN AGEE, Appellants, v. ROGER L. BROWN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF HERBERT G. BIRCK and
More informationTitle 18-A: PROBATE CODE
Title 18-A: PROBATE CODE Article 6: NONPROBATE TRANSFERS Table of Contents Part 1. MULTIPLE-PARTY ACCOUNTS... 3 Section 6-101. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 6-102. OWNERSHIP AS BETWEEN PARTIES, AND OTHERS;
More informationTRUSTS & ESTATES SECTION
TRUSTS & ESTATES SECTION T HE STATE B AR OF CALIFORN IA APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR A PROPOSED CONSERVATEE WHO MAY LACK THE CAPACITY TO HIRE COUNSEL LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL (T&E-2010-06) TO: FROM; Saul Bercovitch,
More informationWHAT ARE MY RIGHTS IN THE CONSERVATORSHIP PROCESS?
California s Protection & Advocacy System Toll-Free (800) 776-5746 Probate Conservatorship Probate Code Sections 1400 et seq. WHAT IS PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP? August 2001, Pub #5230.01 Probate Conservatorship
More information(3) (a) whether an attorney/executor or trustee may retain his law firm as attorney for a trust or estate for which he is serving as fiduciary;
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1515 ATTORNEY DRAFTING INSTRUMENT WHICH NAMES SELF EITHER AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OR TRUSTEE OR WHICH DIRECTS SUCH OTHER DESIGNEE TO EMPLOY ATTORNEY AS FIDUCIARY ADMINISTRATOR.
More informationEstate Planning means many different things to people. However, the areas that most people think of as being estate planning include the following:
ESTATE PLANNING; CHOOSING AN ATTORNEY By Harold S. Small, J.D., CPA, AEP 12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92130 858.759.4600 hss@halsmall.com Estate Planning means many different
More informationLoretta s Law Changes the Way Powers of Attorney are Drafted in Maryland Unedited Version of the January Maryland Bar Bulletin Article
Unedited Version of the January Maryland Bar Bulletin Article Michael G. Day & Associates The article published in the January Maryland Bar Bulletin was substantially shortened to meet Bar Bulletin publishing
More informationHon. JAMES A. STEELE (Ret.) Representative Cases Probate, Trusts & Estates
Hon. JAMES A. STEELE (Ret.) Representative Cases Probate, Trusts & Estates Dispute involving Probate Code 850 Petition between two individuals both claiming to be decedent s surviving spouse and entitled
More informationHOUSTON POLICE OFFICERS PENSION SYSTEM ESTATE-PLANNING POLICY SECTION 3100
ESTATE-PLANNING POLICY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 3100 INTRODUCTION... 3 3101 PURPOSE... 3 3102 ELIGIBILITY... 3 3103 STAFF ATTORNEY... 3 3104 CERTIFICATION BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION...
More informationA. ALTERNATIVE METHODS: KNOWING YOUR OPTIONS
BEING THOROUGH TO CLOSE THE ESTATE WITHOUT A HITCH Jill M. Scherff Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 1900 Cincinnati, OH 45202 (513) 977-8109 jill.scherff@dinsmore.com A. ALTERNATIVE METHODS:
More informationPresented as part of the Mecklenburg County Bar 2013 Estate Planning Series. by Christian L. Perrin
Presented as part of the Mecklenburg County Bar 2013 Estate Planning Series by Christian L. Perrin A General Discussion Regarding Fiduciaries and Related Topics A Gentle Critique of the Rules of Professional
More informationBERMUDA 1978 : 25 LIFE INSURANCE ACT
Title 17 Laws of Bermuda Item 50 BERMUDA 1978 : 25 LIFE INSURANCE ACT 1978 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Interpretation 2 Application 3 Insurer to issue policy 4 Contents of policy 5 Contents of group policy
More informationTrust & Estates Litigation Lunch & Learn
Trust & Estates Litigation Lunch & Learn Presentation 4: Staying on Course The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Fiduciary Exception Introductions Mary Akkerman Trusts & Estates, Partner in the Sioux Falls
More informationYour Will. The maker of a Will must be at least 18 years old, of sound mind and free from improper influence.
Your Will Who may make a Will? The maker of a Will must be at least 18 years old, of sound mind and free from improper influence. How should a Will be Made? The Will should be written, witnessed and signed
More informationWILLS AND ESTATES MAKING A WILL, OBTAINING GRANTS OF REPRESENTATION, DISPUTES & CLAIMS AGAINST A DECEASED ESTATE & ESTATE PLANNING
WILLS AND ESTATES MAKING A WILL, OBTAINING GRANTS OF REPRESENTATION, DISPUTES & CLAIMS AGAINST A DECEASED ESTATE & ESTATE PLANNING The most difficult time in any person s life is when a loved one is ill
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 19, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.
More informationHow To Save Your Family From Deep Financial Mistakes With Proper Estate Planning
How To Save Your Family From Deep Financial Mistakes With Proper Estate Planning Wills, Living Trusts, and How To Avoid Time Consuming and Expensive Probates. By: Brian Willie, Attorney At Law Orange County
More informationMinnesota Laws -Wills
Minnesota Laws -Wills A will is the most common document used to specify how an estate should be handled after death. Anyone designated to receive property under a will (or trust) is called a beneficiary.
More informationWISCONSIN BASIC POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR FINANCES AND PROPERTY SECTION 243.10
WISCONSIN BASIC POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR FINANCES AND PROPERTY SECTION 243.10 NOTICE: THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT. BEFORE SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT, YOU SHOULD KNOW THESE IMPORTANT FACTS. BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT,
More informationTil Death Do Us Part: Avoiding Pitfalls Associated with Life Insurance Provisions in Family Law Matters
January 2016 Til Death Do Us Part: Avoiding Pitfalls Associated with Life Insurance Provisions in Family Law Matters A well drafted Matrimonial Settlement Agreement will contain language addressing appropriate
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO PROBATE/JUVENILE DIVISION PROBATE COURT RULES
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO PROBATE/JUVENILE DIVISION PROBATE COURT RULES IN RE: ) COUNTY LOCAL PROBATE RULES ) CASE NO. 2009 MM 00001 OF THE PROBATE COURT OF ) COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO
More informationBUSINESS LAW SECTION
BUSINESS LAW SECTION CORPORATIONS COMMITTEE T HE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 180 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-1639 http://www.calbar.org/buslaw/corporations STATUTORY CLOSE CORPORATIONS LEGISLATIVE
More informationDURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY
This document was prepared by: John Doe 100 Main Street Miami, Florida 33109 Return To: John Doe 100 Main Street Miami, Florida 33109 DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY OF John Doe I. PRINCIPAL AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
More informationYour Guide to Guardianships And Conservatorships in Georgia
2002 Summit Boulevard NE, Suite 300Atlanta, Georgia 30319 Phone: 404.410.6820 Fax:888.679.3040 Email:paul@pvblack.com Web: www.pvblack.com Your Guide to Guardianships And Conservatorships in Georgia Becoming
More informationProbate Proceeding Checklist (see Surrogate s Court Form P-1, rev. 2/08)
Probate Proceeding Checklist (see Surrogate s Court Form P-1, rev. 2/08) If the will was previously admitted to probate the petitioner should submit Administration c.t.a. form CTA-1. This Checklist is
More informationAdministrator. Any person to whom letters of administration have been issued to administer an intestate estate.
An Estate Planning Glossary The estate planning process is a complex one. During the course of your research into the firm to choose to handle your needs in administering your assets you will hear numerous
More informationFINANCIAL ADVISING BY ATTORNEYS. Prepared by Thomas E. Geyer Updated November 1, 2003
BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW One Columbus 10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100 Columbus, Ohio 43215-3422 telephone 614.221.3155 facsimile 614.221.0479 www.baileycavalieri.com FINANCIAL ADVISING BY
More informationStandard Provisions of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (Northern Ireland version)
Standard Provisions of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (Northern Ireland version) 1. INTRODUCTORY 1(1) These Provisions may be called the standard provisions of the Society of Trust and Estate
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO JAMES A. SHRIVER, JUDGE JAMES C. HENDERSON, MAGISTRATE 2379 Clermont Center Drive Batavia, Ohio 45103 LOCAL RULES Effective January 1, 2012
More informationThe Pension Death Benefits Trust (Scottish Law version)
For customers The Pension Death Benefits Trust (Scottish Law version) Page 1 of 10 Completion notes 1. This document must only be used if you wish the Trust to be governed by Scottish law. If you wish
More informationCALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE
CALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE 4600. Short title This division may be cited as the Health Care Decisions Law. 4603. Definitions governing construction of this division Unless the provision or context otherwise
More informationGUARDIANSHIP LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA for General Guardians - Guardians of the Person-Guardians of the Estate
GUARDIANSHIP LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA for General Guardians - Guardians of the Person-Guardians of the Estate IMPORTANT The Clerk of Superior Court in all 100 counties in North Carolina serves as the judge
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF SUPERINTENDENCE FOR THE COURTS OF OHIO. Initial publication for comment
AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF SUPERINTENDENCE FOR THE COURTS OF OHIO The following amendments to the Standard Probate Forms in the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio (Probate Form 14.0 and new
More informationConsumer Legal Guide. Your Guide to a Living Trust
Consumer Legal Guide Your Guide to a Living Trust WHAT IS A LIVING TRUST? Most of us share the same objectives for our estate plan: 1) Provide for our spouse or dependent children; 2) distribute our property;
More informationEstate Planning In Saskatchewan
Estate Planning In Saskatchewan (Last Revised April, 2005, by Allan Haubrich) The following is general information only, regarding some of the issues relating to estate planning in Saskatchewan. You should
More informationSeniors and the Law. Public Legal Information. Contents: In Newfoundland and Labrador. www.publiclegalinfo.com
In Newfoundland and Labrador www.publiclegalinfo.com Public Legal Information Association of NL Contents: Wills Enduring Power of Attorney Advance Health Care Directives Glossary of Terms Seniors and The
More information