Instructional Design for Online Educators Online

Transcription

1 SYLLABUS Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Course Description Instructional Design for Online Educators Online focuses on the development of skills and knowledge related to the design of online instruction. The course begins with a description and background of the instructional design field and then defines the role of the instructional designer. Various instructional design models and types of online courses are analyzed. The course explores the design cycle, which includes conducting a needs analysis, determining goals and outcomes, and preparing course content. Elements of course building are examined including multimedia, storyboarding, interactions, authoring, and delivery methods. Finally, online course implementation and evaluation methods are evaluated. Over the length of the course, participants will develop an instructional design plan to create an online course that meets student requirements for successful online learning. Course Alignments This PLS 3rd Learning course is aligned to Charlotte Danielson s Framework for Teaching: Domain 1 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, and 1F Domain 2 2B Domain 3 3A, 3C and 3D Domain 4 4A, 4B, 4E, and 4F Course Outcomes Upon completion of this class, the learner will be able to: 1. Describe the major components of the instructional design process. 2. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of various instructional design models. 3. Compare the various types of online course formats. 4. Complete a needs analysis for an online course. 5. Create measurable goals and objectives for an online course. 6. Design online assessment activities to evaluate student performance. 7. Evaluate and select potential content and resources for inclusion in an online course. 8. Organize content on the macro and micro levels by outlining and chunking course content. N E W Y O R K P E N N S Y L V A N I A K E N T U C K Y PLSclasses.com

2 9. Select appropriate instructional strategies to support student learning in an online course. 10. Determine appropriate visual design principles to maximize course usability and accessibility. 11. Prepare an online course for implementation using various multimedia, authoring, and delivery tools. 12. Differentiate between formative and summative evaluations. 13. Identify elements of an online course to be evaluated formatively and summatively. 14. Generalize course content to reflect how the multicultural, special needs and gifted, and other diverse populations within classrooms have their needs met by the application of the skills, strategies, and knowledge gained in this course. 15. Reflect continuously on personal expertise, using the knowledge and skills associated with this course, and use these insights actively as the basis for ongoing professional growth. 16. Work collaboratively to share knowledge, skills, and experiences; refine understanding of content; give and receive feedback; and improve expertise. Required Text There is no formal textbook requirement for this course. Instructors and learners will use instructor-generated materials, learner-generated materials, and Webbased resources to facilitate learning. Topical Outline Introduction to Instructional Design Instructional Design Models Types of Online Courses List of Concepts Overview of instructional design and a brief introduction to its systematic approach; history of the field of instructional design; benefits of using the process of instructional design; the responsibilities of the instructional designer role ADDIE instructional design model and process; overview of additional instructional design models including Dick and Carey, Smith and Ragan, Kemp, Morrison, and Ross, and Rapid Prototyping Synchronous course format; asynchronous course format; additional online course options including selfpaced vs. structured, blended/hybrid, and combination asynchronous/synchronous 2 Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

3 Conducting an Analysis Determining Course Outcomes Curating Course Content Building the Course Running the Course Evaluating the Course Definition of and rationale for a needs analysis; determining the context variables that will influence course design; analyzing the learners characteristics; synthesizing the needs analysis to determine course needs Definition of and rationale for a task analysis; similarities and differences between goals and objectives; writing detailed goals and objectives; creating assessments using various online tools; aligning assessments to goals and objectives Developing a high level course outline; creating and choosing appropriate content; copyright considerations for online course content; chunking information on the micro and macro levels; employing instructional strategies to enhance learning Applying the principles of visual design to online courses; accessibility considerations; planning and creating storyboards for course content layout; types of multimedia and their usages; authoring types and tools for creating courses Overview of learning management systems and their effects on online course design; additional course delivery methods; conducting quality checks; preparing yourself and/or others to the course Overview of formative and summative evaluations; assessing student performance; evaluating the course content and design; evaluating the course instructor; finalizing personal instructional design plan Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May

4 Course Assessments and Links to Institutional Outcomes and Course Outcomes Throughout the course, the learner will be assessed and evaluated on the completion of the following assessments. Learning activities include whole-group and small-group discussions and assessments for a total of 446 points. Modules Topics of Modules Points Correlations With Course Outcomes Module 1: Introduction to Instructional Design 60 1, 15, 16 Module 2: Instructional Design Models 30 1, 2, 15, 16 Module 3: Types of Online Courses 27 1, 3, 15, 16 Module 4: Conducting an Analysis 63 1, 4, 15, 16 Module 5: Determining Course Outcomes 48 1, 5, 6, 15, 16 Module 6: Curating Course Content 48 1, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16 Module 7: Building the Course 48 1, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16 Module 8: Running the Course 45 1, 11, 15, 16 Module 9: Evaluating the Course 77 1, 12, 13, 15, 16 Total 446 Criteria specific to each assessment will be explained in conjunction with the instructional activities. Instructional Methodology The instructional methodology of this course focuses on developing, enhancing, and improving the instructional expertise and pedagogical knowledge base of practicing educators. Strategies include presentation of new content through online readings, active construction of knowledge through practice and problem solving, collaborative group work, personal reflection, structured small-group or whole-class discussion, analysis of assigned reading, and the application of course content and skills to participant s individual grade level, subject area(s), and classroom. Grading Scale The course facilitator will post the college-specific grading scale. PLS 3rd Learning s Late Policy There will be a 10% deduction of points per day for all posts and submitted assignments that are late. Replies posted after the due date will earn no points. In rare cases, partially or poorly completed assignments may be resubmitted for partial credit at the discretion of the instructor. The following exceptions apply: If a participant is sick/hospitalized or has a death in the family, the timing of makeup work may be arranged with the course facilitator. No points will be deducted if the work is completed according to the agreement. If a participant is on vacation/traveling/etc., the participant must contact the course facilitator ahead of time to avoid a penalty. This type of absence may occur only once during a course. All posts should be submitted for the missed module before leaving. 4 Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

5 If a participant has difficulty completing everything in a week, an extension can be granted if the participant contacts the facilitator during the week (not at the last minute). PLS 3rd Learning s Participant Drop Policy Participants are eligible to receive a refund if they attend class for one week or less. This means participants must withdraw by the end of Module 1 to receive a refund. Refunds of the balance of tuition paid will be given, minus the $50 deposit. PLS 3rd Learning s Academic Integrity Policy PLS 3rd Learning expects absolute academic honesty and integrity from every course participant. The specific Academic Integrity and Honor Code Policies of our partner colleges and universities are embraced and enforced by PLS 3rd Learning instructors. The following are considered to be serious violations: Plagiarism: the use of another s ideas, data, or words without proper acknowledgement. Fabrication: the use of invented information or the falsification of research or other findings with the intent to deceive. Collusion: improper collaboration with another in preparing assignments or projects. Cheating: an act of deception by which a student misrepresents that he or she has mastered information on an academic exercise that he or she has not mastered. Academic Misconduct: tampering with grades, or taking part in obtaining or distributing any part of student work that is not his or her own. Violation or suspected violation will be investigated and pursued according to specific college/university procedures. Identity Authentication The college/university, PLS 3rd Learning, and students share a joint responsibility to ensure that each student s contribution in an online course activity comes from that student alone. For the student, this responsibility has two parts: 1. Students are responsible for positively ensuring that every contribution to an online course created with the student s computer account is made by the student alone. Contributions covered under this policy include: written assignments; quiz and exam submissions; discussion forum postings; live participation in text-based chat sessions, phone conferences, and videoconferences. If a student allows another person to write or make any kind of submission to an online activity in the student s name, then this constitutes cheating and will be treated as a violation of academic honesty. 2. Students are responsible for ensuring the integrity of their computer account security by following the actions required of them by the PLS 3rd Learning Acceptable Use Policy. These actions include keeping passcodes private, updating passcodes when required by PLS 3rd Learning, and reporting breaches of the security policy to the IT Helpdesk. Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May

6 Course Evaluation The evaluation of learner work will be based on the defined criteria for learner assessments. The criteria for learner assessments will be outlined for students prior to instructional activities and engagement with student learning targets (outcomes). Grading is based solely on the evaluation of student learning targets and defined criteria for learner assessments. Formative assessment of learning outcomes is conducted throughout the course, using a variety of means that include the following: completion of assessments; constructive contributions to class discussions (whole-class as well as small-group); sharing of valuable, pertinent, and/or applicable ideas and experiences; and active participation in online interactions. It is expected that each participant will contribute to the academic quality of the course. Summative assessment includes the completion of weekly learning activities and assignments for which the participant will need to synthesize class content, apply it to his or her own practice, and complete a plan for implementing the major components of content and skill acquired during the course. 6 Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

7 Alignments to Charlotte Danielson s Framework for Teaching Each PLS 3rd Learning course is aligned to the components in Charlotte Danielson s Framework for Teaching. The alignments for this course are listed below. DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1A. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1B. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1C. Setting Instructional Outcomes 1D. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1E. Designing Coherent Instruction 1F. Designing Student Assessments DOMAIN 2: THE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT 2B. Establishing a Culture for Learning DOMAIN 3: INSTRUCTION 3A. Communicating with Students 3C. Engaging Students in Learning 3D. Using Assessment in Instruction DOMAIN 4: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES 4A. Reflecting on Teaching 4B. Maintaining Accurate Records 4E. Growing and Developing Professionally 4F. Showing Professionalism Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May

8 Course Outcome Correlations With INTASC Standards for Teachers Course Outcomes Standard 1: Learner Development The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences. Standard 2: Learning Differences The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14 Standard 3: Learning Environments The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation. 3, 4, 6, 9, 11 Standard 4: Content Knowledge The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Standard 5: Application of Content The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Standard 6: Assessment The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher s and learner s decision making. 5, 6, 12, 13, 15, 16 8 Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

9 Standard 7: Planning for Instruction The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, crossdisciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context. Standard 8: Instructional Strategies The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14 6, 9, 11 Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner. 12, 13, 15, 16 Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning, to collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth, and to advance the profession. 15, 16 The Interstate New Teacher Assessment and the Support for Consortium (InTASC) standards were developed by the Council of the Chief State School Officers and member states. Copies may be downloaded from the Council s website at Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011, April). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource for State Dialogue. Washington, DC: Author. Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May

10 Course Outcome Correlations With National Board of Professional Teaching (NBPTS) Five Core Propositions Proposition 1: Teachers are Committed to Students and Their Learning. Course Outcomes NBCTs are dedicated to making knowledge accessible to all students. They believe all students can learn. They treat students equitably. They recognize the individual differences that distinguish their students from one another and they take account for these differences in their practice. 9, 11, 14 9, 11, 14 NBCTs understand how students develop and learn. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14 They respect the cultural and family differences students bring to their classroom. They are concerned with their students self-concept, their motivation and the effects of learning on peer relationships. NBCTs are also concerned with the development of character and civic responsibility. 4, 14 6, 9, 11 6, 9, 11 Proposition 2: Teachers Know the Subjects They Teach and How to Teach Those Subjects to Students. NBCTs have mastery over the subject(s) they teach. They have a deep understanding of the history, structure and real-world applications of the subject. They have skill and experience in teaching it, and they are very familiar with the skills gaps and preconceptions students may bring to the subject. They are able to use diverse instructional strategies to teach for understanding. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 6, 9, 11 Proposition 3: Teachers are Responsible for Managing and Monitoring Student Learning. NBCTs deliver effective instruction. They move fluently through a range of instructional techniques, keeping students motivated, engaged and focused. They know how to engage students to ensure a disciplined learning environment, and how to organize instruction to meet instructional goals. 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

11 NBCTs know how to assess the progress of individual students as well as the class as a whole. They use multiple methods for measuring student growth and understanding, and they can clearly explain student performance to parents. 5, 6, 12, 13 5, 6, 12, 13 Proposition 4: Teachers Think Systematically about Their Practice and Learn from Experience. NBCTs model what it means to be an educated person they read, they question, they create and they are willing to try new things. They are familiar with learning theories and instructional strategies and stay abreast of current issues in American education. They critically examine their practice on a regular basis to deepen knowledge, expand their repertoire of skills, and incorporate new findings into their practice. 13, 15, 16 1, 2, 3, 9, 15, 16 13, 15, 16 Proposition 5: Teachers are Members of Learning Communities. NBCTs collaborate with others to improve student learning. They are leaders and actively know how to seek and build partnerships with community groups and businesses. They work with other professionals on instructional policy, curriculum development and staff development. They can evaluate school progress and the allocation of resources in order to meet state and local education objectives. They know how to work collaboratively with parents to engage them productively in the work of the school. 15, 16 15, 16 5, 15, 16 12, 13, 15, Reprinted with permission from the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, All rights reserved. Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May

12 Bibliography Albright, A., & Gonzalez-Major, J. (n.d.). Hitchhiker s guide to course development. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from Anandakrishnan, M. (n.d.). E-learning: Substitute or supplement? Retrieved June 10, 2012, from Anglin, G. (1991). Instructional technology: Past, present, future. A hypertext history of instructional design. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from cuin6373/idhistory/credits.html Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, S. P. (2007, May 4). Learning independence: New approaches for educating the net generation. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from oaches_for.htm Berger, C., & Kam, R. (1996). Definitions of instructional design. Retrieved June 15, 2012, from Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1, cognitive domain. New York: McKay. Brown, A., & Green, T. (2011). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Burke, L. A. (2005). Transitioning to online course offerings: Tactical and strategic considerations. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2). Retrieved June 10, 2012, from Cantu, T. (2005). Teaching in action: Structuring online discussions. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from module2/online_disc.html CARP. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2012, from Center for Academic Computing. (1998, Spring). Instructional design: An expanding field in the information age. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from Penn State, Academic Computing Newsletter Web site: Center for Applied Special Technology. (n.d.). Teaching every student. Retrieved June 21, 2012, from Center for Applied Special Technology. (n.d.). Universal design for learning. Retrieved June 21, 2012, from Center for Instructional Technology. (2007). Using PowerPoint in online courses. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from the University of California, San Francisco Web site: Center for the Study of Higher Education. (2002). On-line assessment. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Chism, N. (n.d.). Handbook for instructors on the use of electronic class discussions. Retrieved June 15, 2012, from Ohio State University, Office of Faculty and TA Development Web site: Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice [Electronic version]. Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

13 Clark, D. R. (2010). Bloom s taxonomy of learning domains. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from: Clark, D. R. (2012). Robert Gagné s nine steps of instruction. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from: Culatta, R. (2011). Storyboarding. Retrieved August 29, 2012, from: Deakin Studies Online. (2003). Contemporary online teaching cases. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from Deakin University Web site: Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Fair use. (n.d.). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved January 5, 2012, from Fair-use issues. (2006). Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Indiana University-Purdue University, Copyright Management Center Web site: Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom s taxonomy. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Gardner, J. C. (Producer). (2011). The ADDIE analysis phase. [Web Video]. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from Gardner, J. C. (Producer). (2011). The ADDIE design phase. [Web Video]. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from Gardner, J. C. (Producer). (2011). The ADDIE development phase. [Web Video]. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from Gardner, J. C. (Producer). (2011). The ADDIE evaluation phase. [Web Video]. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from Gardner, J. C. (Producer). (2011). The ADDIE implementation phase. [Web Video]. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from Gonzales-Major, J. (2006, November 18). 50 interesting things you can do in your online course. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from interesting-things-you-can-do-in-your-online-courses/ Hanley, M. (2009, June 9). Discovering instructional design 10: The Dick and Carey model. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from the-dick-and-carey-model/ Kineo Group. (2012). Rapid e-learning authoring tools. Retrieved August 30, 2012 from Kruse, K. (n.d.). Gagne s nine events of instruction: An introduction. Retrieved May 1, 2012, from Leigh, D. (n.d.). A brief history of instructional design. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May

14 Mabrito, M. (2004). Guidelines for establishing interactivity in online courses. Innovate, 1(2). Retrieved April 15, 2012, from ty_in_online_courses.pdf Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon. Mason, C. L. (2002). Working with subject matter experts: Strategies to gain cooperation and win respect. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction. New York: John Wiley & Sons. National Center on Low-Incidence Disabilities. (2001). Creating accessible web sites tutorial. Retrieved June 21, 2012, from National Education Association. (n.d.). Guide to online high school courses. Retrieved July 22, 2012, from Nielsen, J. (1997, October). Why web users scan instead of reading. Retrieved August 16, 2012, from Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders. Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-xers, & millennials: Understanding the new students [Electronic version]. Educause Review, July/August, Retrieved July 14, 2012, from Phipps, R., Merisotis, J., & Harvey, M. (2000, April). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance learning. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books. Principals of online design. (2006). Retrieved July 22, 2012, from Florida Gulf Coast University Web site: Prometheus Training. (2011). The ADDIE model. Retrieved September 5, 2012, from Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), Retrieved June 22, 2012, from Roberts, S. (n.d). Instructional design and accessibility: Cognitive curb cuts. Retrieved June 21, 2012, from Robinson, L., & Howell, K. (2005). Behavioral objectives. In G. Sugai & R. Horner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavior modification and cognitive behavior therapy, volume III: Educational applications (pp ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Schneider, D. K. (2012, August 10). Rapid prototyping. Retrieved August 16, 2012, from Scriven, M. (1991). Beyond formative and summative evaluation. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. D. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education: At the quarter century (29 64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 14 Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May 2013

15 Smith, C. K. (1996, May). Convenience vs. connection: Commuter students views on distance learning. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Albuquerque, New Mexico. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED ) Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Jossey-Bass Education. Solberg, J. (2003). CARP: Contrast, alignment, repetition, proximity. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from Starr, L. (2004). The educator s guide to copyright and fair use. Retrieved May 14, 2012, from Thompson, N. (2001). Why ID? The benefits of instructional design models. Teaching with Technology Today, 7(6). Retrieved June 27, 2012, from Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38(1), Usability.gov. (n.d.). Content organization. In Research-based web design & usability guidelines (chap. 16). Retrieved July 15, 2012, from Usability.gov. (n.d.). Headings, titles, and labels. In Research-based web design & usability guidelines (chap. 9). Retrieved July 15, 2012, from Usability.gov. (n.d.). Lists. In Research-based web design & usability guidelines (chap. 12). Retrieved July 15, 2012, from Usability.gov. (n.d.). Page layout. In Research-based web design & usability guidelines (chap. 6). Retrieved July 15, 2012, from Williams, R., & Tollett, J. (2005). The non-designer s web book. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press. Instructional Design for Online Educators Online Updated May